The present invention relates to a method for electron beam induced etching of layers with implanted gallium.
Etching processes have an important roll in industry, in particular in the semiconductor technology. With the aid of etching processes fine structures are prepared down to the nanometre range. Further, etching processes have an important function at the repair of photolithography masks.
For the fabrication of fine structures by means of etching processes, as they are used in the semiconductor technology, etching under the impact of a focused ion beam is known in the prior art as FIB (focused ion beam). For example, the FIB technology is disclosed in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,639,301. The specific advantage of the FIB technology is that this method allows the manufacturing of flat and steep side walls, i.e. structure with a large aspect ratio at a high etching rate. The aspect ratio indicates the ratio of the depth or height, respectively, of a structure to its smallest lateral extension.
At the FIB technology, the ion beam consists regularly of gallium (Ga) ions. During the repairing of photolithography masks, the implantation of gallium in the quartz substrate results in an impairment of the transmission behaviour with respect to the ultraviolet (UV) radiation which is used for the exposition. The US 2004/0226814 A1 discloses a method with which the transmission behaviour of a quartz substrate can again be reconstructed to a large extent without changing significantly the thickness of the substrate layer. The quartz substrate has been blurred with respect to UV radiation by the bombardment with gallium ions. For this purpose, the areas of the quartz substrate on which gallium ions are implanted are cleared with the aid of an electron beam and the etching gas xenon difluoride (XeF2). The essential precondition in this process is that the substrate is not etched by the combined impact of an electron beam and of XeF2. A removal of substrate material would locally change the substrate thickness and would therefore generate phase errors at the exposition with UV radiation. This would result in image defects of the photolithography mask. Thus, at the end this would replace the defect of insufficient transmission by the defect of insufficient image quality of the photolithography mask.
The implementation of gallium in a layer below the layer to be processed is a general problem of the FIB technology and occurs in parallel to the above described mask repairing process also at the so-called circuit editing, i.e. the directed modification of microscopic structures in the semiconductor technology in which for example electrically conductive paths of a device are subsequently disconnected or connected with each other.
The implantation of gallium in a semiconductor layer, as it is for example occurring by the bombardment of gallium at the FIB technology, complicates the further processing of this layer significantly. In particular, the etching of this layer is extremely difficult. At the removal of larger volumes, in which gallium has been implanted, regularly stay inert residua, which are a problem at the further processing. As a consequence of the difficult removal of a layer contaminated with gallium, the etching of deep contacts holes or vias in a multi-layered system having a layer contaminated with gallium results in a bottleneck in the range of this layer (cf.
The present invention is therefore based on the problem to indicate a method for essentially residue-free etching of a layer contaminated with gallium and therefore to avoid at least partly the above-mentioned disadvantages.
According to an embodiment of the present invention this problem is solved by a method for electron beam induced etching of a layer contaminated with gallium, which comprises providing at least one first halogenated compound as an etching gas at a position at which an electron beam impacts on the layer and providing at least one second halogenated compound as a precursor gas at this position.
Applicant has surprisingly detected that a layer contaminated with gallium can be removed by electron beam induced etching using an appropriate precursor gas. By the addition of a precursor gas inert residua can to a large extent be avoided which are known from the prior art when larger volumes are removed which are contaminated with gallium. When etching a multi-layered system having at least a layer contaminated with gallium, the addition of an appropriate precursor gas avoids or reduces the adsorption of gallium residuals at the other layers. Thus, the inventive method allows an essentially residue-free etching of a layer contaminated with gallium. Moreover, the addition of a precursor gas when etching layers contaminated with gallium can reduce the selectivity of the etching process compared with layers having no gallium implanted. For this reason, the formation of bottlenecks can be avoided when etching vias.
In a preferred embodiment of the inventive method, xenon difluoride (XeF2) is used as a first halogenated compound. However, it is also conceivable to apply other halogenated compounds, as for example a halogen (bromine (Br2) and/or iodine (I2)), or other compounds as etching gases, as for example sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) or oxygen (O2)).
Preferably chlorine (Cl2) is used as a second halogenated compound. However, the inventive method is not restricted to the application of Cl2 as a precursor gas. It is conceivable to use other precursor gases, as for example a different halogen, halogenated compounds, or oxidizing compounds.
In a preferred embodiment of the inventive method good etching results are obtained when continuously providing the second halogenated compound during the etching. In a particularly preferred embodiment of the inventive method good etching results are obtained at a gas flow rate of the second halogenated compound of 0.1 sccm (standard cubic centimetres per minute).
Preferably the first halogenated compound is provided temporally varying during the etching process. In an embodiment the first halogenated compound is chopped with a duty cycle of 1:5 with a clock rate of 30 s (seconds).
In an embodiment of the inventive method when etching a via through a multi-layered system having a layer contaminated with gallium, the gas flow of the second halogenated compound is larger when etching the at least one layer contaminated with gallium than when etching layers which are not contaminated with gallium.
In a further preferred embodiment of the inventive method, a cold trap and/or an ultraviolet lamp reduces the water partial pressure in a vacuum chamber.
Preferably the electron beam of the electron beam apparatus is additionally or alternatively used to investigate the surface of the layer to be etched and/or of the layer which has been etched. In addition or parallel to the electron beam microscopy also other methods can be applied, as for example Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning tunnelling microscopy and/or scanning force microscopy. The combination of these techniques is also possible.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, an apparatus for electron beam induced etching having a layer with implanted gallium has an inlet for one first halogenated compound. The inlet is at a position at which the electron beam impacts on the layer. Furthermore, the apparatus has an inlet for at least one second halogenated compound as a precursor gas at this position.
Further embodiments of the inventive methods are defined in further dependent patent claims.
In the following detailed description presently preferred embodiments of the invention are described with reference to the drawings, wherein
In the following preferred embodiments of the inventive method and of the inventive apparatus will be explained in detail.
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention schematically shown in
In the embodiment represented in
XeF2 as well as Cl2 are brought up to the multi-layered systems 100, 200 to be etched via appropriate dosing valves (not shown in
The dosage of XeF2 and Cl2 can be temporally uniform. It is also possible to change the dosage of both gases and/or of one of the two gases during the etching process (“chopping”). At the etching of a semiconductor layer contaminated with gallium good results are obtained if the precursor gas is continuously provided with a gas flow rate of 0.1 sccm. At the same time, the etching gas XeF2 is preferably provided temporally varying at a temperature of 273 K. In this process, the duty cycle is 1:5 and the cycle length is 30 s (seconds). This means that for 5 seconds XeF2 is introduced in the vacuum chamber 10 via the inlet 40 and for the next 25 seconds a valve in the inlet 40 (not shown in
Electron beam induced etching using chlorine as precursor gas involves some challenges for the equipment. In an untreated vacuum chamber 10 of the electron beam device 30 the reactivity of chlorine releases so much residual gas in the vacuum chamber 10, for example hydrocarbons that the deposition of the released residual gases impedes the etching of the sample 90 to be etched. A further probable reaction path in the vacuum chamber 10 at the supply of chlorine, which additionally generates appropriate molecules for the deposition on the layer to be etched, is the spontaneous reaction of chlorine with water molecules, available in the vacuum chamber 10 as residual gas, to hydrogen chloride (HCl). HCl is a polar compound which significantly better adheres to the sample to be etched 90 than the less polar water molecules do. Therefore, water vapour desorbing methods are helpful in the vacuum chamber 10.
Different actions can be taken to prevent the contamination problems described in the preceding section when introducing chlorine via the inlet 50 in the vacuum chamber 10. As non-closing samples are mentioned here: heating of the vacuum chamber 10, cleaning of the vacuum chamber 10 by means of a plasma, the application of a cryogenic pump, or of a cold trap 60 to increase the pumping power for water as well as the support of the desorption of water from the surfaces of the vacuum chamber 10 and of the sample 90 by irradiation with ultraviolet light.
The parameters of the electron beam can be adjusted in dependence of the material composition of the layer contaminated with gallium. In an exemplary parameter set an electron beam is used with an electron energy of 1 keV, a strength of current of 50 pA, a dwell time of 50 ns and a refresh time of 2 ms.
For initializing the etching reaction preferably a focused electron beam is exclusively used. However, in addition or alternatively other energy transferring mechanisms can also be used (for example a focused laser beam and/or an un-focused ion beam).
As already mentioned, two different problems occur when etching layers contaminated with gallium. The removal of large volumes forms areas which persistently persist the removal by the etching process, which are the so-called inert residua when an electron beam induced etching according to a method of the prior art is used.
At an electron beam induced etching process, when etching the layer 120 contaminated with gallium according to the prior art, inert residuals 190 remain which can not be removed by the etching process. Moreover, at the removal of the layer 120 contaminated with gallium, gallium residuals 180 removed from the layer 120 deposit at the highest layer 110 which has been etched at first.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 037 951 | Aug 2008 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/005823 | 8/11/2009 | WO | 00 | 4/13/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/017963 | 2/18/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4226666 | Winters et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4639301 | Doherty et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4851097 | Hattori et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4874459 | Coldren et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
5055696 | Haraichi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5188705 | Swanson et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5273935 | Morimoto et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5501893 | Laermer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5683547 | Azuma et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
6042738 | Casey, Jr. et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6639226 | Morio et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6753538 | Musil et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6787783 | Marchman et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6897157 | Liang et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6991878 | Kanamitsu et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7095021 | Shichi et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7172839 | Sugiyama et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7368729 | Shichi et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7391039 | Kitamura et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7662524 | Stewart et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7670956 | Bret et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7692163 | Nagano | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7727681 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7927770 | Kanamitsu | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8076650 | Smith et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8110814 | Ward et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20030020176 | Nambu | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030047691 | Musil et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030215722 | Kanamitsu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224601 | Roy et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040048398 | Liang et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040113097 | Marchman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040131953 | Sugiyama et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151991 | Stewart et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040226814 | Stewart et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050014383 | Ji et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050108892 | Wu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060030064 | Roy et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037182 | Roy et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060115966 | Roy et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060134920 | Liang | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060147814 | Liang | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060228634 | Bret et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070010097 | Deering et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070087572 | Le Roy et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070158304 | Nasser-Ghodsi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070187622 | Nagano | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070267579 | Sugiyama et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090111036 | Stewart et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090309018 | Smith et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100186768 | Kanamitsu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100203431 | Bret et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100282596 | Auth et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110183444 | Auth et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120080407 | Smith et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102 61 035 | Oct 2003 | DE |
103 38 019 | Mar 2005 | DE |
11 2006 000 129 | Nov 2007 | DE |
1 664 924 | Jun 2006 | EP |
08250478 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2005159287 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006515937 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006319105 | Nov 2006 | JP |
WO 03003118 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2004066027 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004066027 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005017949 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2006074198 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007025039 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007100933 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2009080707 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2010017987 | Feb 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English translation of International Preliminary Report on Patentability for corresponding PCT Appl. No. PCT/EP2009/005823. |
Watanabe et al., “Low-Damage Electron-Beam-Assisted Dry Etching of Gaas and Aigaas Using Electron Using Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasma Electron Source,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B (11)6, Nov./Dec. 1993, pp. 2288-2293. |
Yoshida et al., “The effect of EB irradiation with and without hot-jet C12 on an ultra-thin GaN layer for selective etching,” Applied Surface Science, 100/101 (1996) 184-188. |
International Search Report for corresponding PCT Appl. No. PCT/EP2009/005823, mailed Nov. 10, 2009. |
Randolph et al., “Focused, nanoscale-electron-beam-induced deposition and etching,” Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, vol. 31, No. 3, Sep. 1, 2006, pp. 55-89. |
Lassiter et al., “Inhibiting spontaneous etching of nanoscale electron beam induced etching features: Solutions for nanoscale repair of extreme ultraviolet lithography masks,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., vol. 26, No. 3, May 2008, pp. 963-967. |
Matsui et al., “Direct writing onto Si by electron beam stimulated etching,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 51(19), 1498 (1987). |
H.F. Winters et al., “The etching of silicon with XeF2vapour”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 34(1), 70 (1979). |
J.W. Coburn et al., “Ion and electron-assisted gas-surface chemistry—An important effect in plasma etching”, J. Appl. Phys. 50(5), 3189 (1979). |
K. Tsujimoto et al., “A New Side Wall Protection Technique in Microwave Plasma Etching Using a Chopping Method”, Conf. on Solid State Devices and Materials, 229-233, Tokyo 1986. |
Leonhardt et al., “Etching with electron beam generated plasmas,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 22(6):2276-2283, Nov./Dec. 2004. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal, Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-522428, English Translation provided, 6 pages, Jun. 10, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110183523 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |