The present disclosure generally relates to semiconductor devices and, more particularly, to methods for making enhanced semiconductor structures.
Structures and techniques have been proposed to enhance the performance of semiconductor devices, such as by enhancing the mobility of the charge carriers. For example, U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0057416 to Currie et al. discloses strained material layers of silicon, silicon-germanium, and relaxed silicon and also including impurity-free zones that would otherwise cause performance degradation. The resulting biaxial strain in the upper silicon layer alters the carrier mobilities enabling higher speed and/or lower power devices. Published U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0034529 to Fitzgerald et al. discloses a CMOS inverter also based upon similar strained silicon technology.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,685 B2 to Takagi discloses a semiconductor device including a silicon and carbon layer sandwiched between silicon layers so that the conduction band and valence band of the second silicon layer receive a tensile strain. Electrons having a smaller effective mass, and which have been induced by an electric field applied to the gate electrode, are confined in the second silicon layer, thus, an re-channel MOSFET is asserted to have a higher mobility.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,204 to Ishibashi et al. discloses a superlattice in which a plurality of layers, less than eight monolayers, and containing a fractional or binary or a binary compound semiconductor layer, are alternately and epitaxially grown. The direction of main current flow is perpendicular to the layers of the superlattice.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,357,119 to Wang et al. discloses a Si—Ge short period superlattice with higher mobility achieved by reducing alloy scattering in the superlattice. Along these lines, U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,934 to Candelaria discloses an enhanced mobility MOSFET including a channel layer comprising an alloy of silicon and a second material substitutionally present in the silicon lattice at a percentage that places the channel layer under tensile stress.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,216,262 to Tsu discloses a quantum well structure comprising two barrier regions and a thin epitaxially grown semiconductor layer sandwiched between the barriers. Each barrier region consists of alternate layers of SiO2/Si with a thickness generally in a range of two to six monolayers. A much thicker section of silicon is sandwiched between the barriers.
An article entitled “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure devices” also to Tsu and published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402 discloses a semiconductor-atomic superlattice (SAS) of silicon and oxygen. The Si/O superlattice is disclosed as useful in a silicon quantum and light-emitting devices. In particular, a green electroluminescence diode structure was constructed and tested. Current flow in the diode structure is vertical, that is, perpendicular to the layers of the SAS. The disclosed SAS may include semiconductor layers separated by adsorbed species such as oxygen atoms, and CO molecules. The silicon growth beyond the adsorbed monolayer of oxygen is described as epitaxial with a fairly low defect density. One SAS structure included a 1.1 nm thick silicon portion that is about eight atomic layers of silicon, and another structure had twice this thickness of silicon. An article to Luo et al. entitled “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 2002) further discusses the light emitting SAS structures of Tsu.
Published International Application WO 02/103,767 A1 to Wang, Tsu and Lofgren, discloses a barrier building block of thin silicon and oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, antimony, arsenic or hydrogen to thereby reduce current flowing vertically through the lattice more than four orders of magnitude. The insulating layer/barrier layer allows for low defect epitaxial silicon to be deposited next to the insulating layer.
Published Great Britain Patent Application 2,347,520 to Mears et al. discloses that principles of Aperiodic Photonic Band-Gap (APBG) structures may be adapted for electronic bandgap engineering. In particular, the application discloses that material parameters, for example, the location of band minima, effective mass, etc., can be tailored to yield new aperiodic materials with desirable band-structure characteristics. Other parameters, such as electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity and dielectric permittivity or magnetic permeability are disclosed as also possible to be designed into the material.
Despite the advantages provided by such structures, further developments may be desirable for integrating advanced semiconductor materials in various semiconductor devices and for different semiconductor processing configurations.
A method for processing a semiconductor wafer in a single wafer processing chamber may include heating the single wafer processing chamber to a temperature in a range of 650-700° C., and forming at least one superlattice on the semiconductor wafer within the heated single wafer processing chamber by depositing silicon and oxygen to form a plurality of stacked groups of layers. Each group of layers may include a plurality of stacked base silicon monolayers defining a base silicon portion and at least one oxygen monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base silicon portions. Depositing the oxygen may include depositing the oxygen using an N2O gas flow.
More particularly, the N2O gas flow may comprise 0.1% to 10% N2O in a gas comprising at least one of He and Ar, for example. Also by way of example, depositing the oxygen may include depositing the oxygen with an exposure time in a range of 1 to 100 seconds. In one example embodiment, the N2O gas flow may be in a range of 10 to 5000 standard cubic centimeters per minute (SCCM). Furthermore, the oxygen may be deposited at a pressure in a range of 10 to 100 Torr, for example. Also by way of example, a total dose of N2O may be in a range of 1×1014 to 7×1014 atoms/cm2 during the oxygen monolayer formation.
In accordance with one example implementation, the semiconductor wafer may include a plurality of spaced apart shallow trench isolation (STI) regions, and forming the at least one superlattice may include selectively forming a respective superlattice between adjacent pairs of STI regions. In accordance with another example, forming the at least one superlattice may comprise a blanket superlattice formation on the semiconductor wafer. Furthermore, at least some silicon atoms from opposing base silicon portions may be chemically bound together through the at least one oxygen monolayer therebetween.
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime notation is used to indicate similar elements in different embodiments.
Generally speaking, the present disclosure relates to enhanced semiconductor devices, particularly those incorporating advanced semiconductor materials such as the superlattice 25 described further below, and associated fabrication techniques. Applicant has established by atomistic simulation and experimental verification (SIMS) that electrical dopants such as boron and arsenic have an energetic minimum close to (e.g., typically one silicon bond removed from) an oxygen (or CO or N, etc.) atomic layer(s) in the superlattice 25, and preferentially accumulate in this position under thermal diffusion. Following the description of example superlattice structures below, techniques for enhanced deterministic doping of the superlattice 25 are also provided. However, it should be noted that the techniques set forth herein may also be used for other semiconductor layers and structures as well in addition to the noted superlattices, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Applicants theorize, without wishing to be bound thereto, that certain superlattices as described herein reduce the effective mass of charge carriers and that this thereby leads to higher charge carrier mobility. Effective mass is described with various definitions in the literature. As a measure of the improvement in effective mass Applicants use a “conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor”, Me−1 and Mh−1 for electrons and holes respectively, defined as:
for electrons and:
for holes, where f is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, EF is the Fermi energy, T is the temperature, E(k,n) is the energy of an electron in the state corresponding to wave vector k and the nth energy band, the indices i and j refer to Cartesian coordinates x, y and z, the integrals are taken over the Brillouin zone (B.Z.), and the summations are taken over bands with energies above and below the Fermi energy for electrons and holes respectively.
Applicants' definition of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor is such that a tensorial component of the conductivity of the material is greater for greater values of the corresponding component of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor. Again Applicants theorize without wishing to be bound thereto that the superlattices described herein set the values of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor so as to enhance the conductive properties of the material, such as typically for a preferred direction of charge carrier transport. The inverse of the appropriate tensor element is referred to as the conductivity effective mass. In other words, to characterize semiconductor material structures, the conductivity effective mass for electrons/holes as described above and calculated in the direction of intended carrier transport is used to distinguish improved materials.
Applicants have identified improved materials or structures for use in semiconductor devices. More specifically, the Applicants have identified materials or structures having energy band structures for which the appropriate conductivity effective masses for electrons and/or holes are substantially less than the corresponding values for silicon. In addition to the enhanced mobility characteristics of these structures, they may also be formed or used in such a manner that they provide piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and/or ferroelectric properties that are advantageous for use in a variety of different types of devices, as will be discussed further below.
Referring now to
Each group of layers 45a-45n of the superlattice 25 illustratively includes a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers 46 defining a respective base semiconductor portion 46a-46n and an energy band-modifying layer 50 thereon. The energy band-modifying layers 50 are indicated by stippling in
The energy band-modifying layer 50 illustratively includes one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. By “constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions” it is meant that at least some semiconductor atoms from opposing base semiconductor portions 46a-46n are chemically bound together through the non-semiconductor monolayer 50 therebetween, as seen in
In other embodiments, more than one such non-semiconductor monolayer may be possible. It should be noted that reference herein to a non-semiconductor or semiconductor monolayer means that the material used for the monolayer would be a non-semiconductor or semiconductor if formed in bulk. That is, a single monolayer of a material, such as silicon, may not necessarily exhibit the same properties that it would if formed in bulk or in a relatively thick layer, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Applicants theorize without wishing to be bound thereto that energy band-modifying layers 50 and adjacent base semiconductor portions 46a-46n cause the superlattice 25 to have a lower appropriate conductivity effective mass for the charge carriers in the parallel layer direction than would otherwise be present. Considered another way, this parallel direction is orthogonal to the stacking direction. The band modifying layers 50 may also cause the superlattice 25 to have a common energy band structure, while also advantageously functioning as an insulator between layers or regions vertically above and below the superlattice.
Moreover, this superlattice structure may also advantageously act as a barrier to dopant and/or material diffusion between layers vertically above and below the superlattice 25. These properties may thus advantageously allow the superlattice 25 to provide an interface for high-K dielectrics which not only reduces diffusion of the high-K material into the channel region, but which may also advantageously reduce unwanted scattering effects and improve device mobility, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
It is also theorized that semiconductor devices including the superlattice 25 may enjoy a higher charge carrier mobility based upon the lower conductivity effective mass than would otherwise be present. In some embodiments, and as a result of the band engineering achieved by the present invention, the superlattice 25 may further have a substantially direct energy bandgap that may be particularly advantageous for opto-electronic devices, for example.
The superlattice 25 also illustratively includes a cap layer 52 on an upper layer group 45n. The cap layer 52 may comprise a plurality of base semiconductor monolayers 46. The cap layer 52 may have between 2 to 100 monolayers of the base semiconductor, and, more preferably between 10 to 50 monolayers.
Each base semiconductor portion 46a-46n may comprise a base semiconductor selected from the group consisting of Group IV semiconductors, Group III-V semiconductors, and Group II-VI semiconductors. Of course, the term Group IV semiconductors also includes Group IV-IV semiconductors, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example.
Each energy band-modifying layer 50 may comprise a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen, for example. The non-semiconductor is also desirably thermally stable through deposition of a next layer to thereby facilitate manufacturing. In other embodiments, the non-semiconductor may be another inorganic or organic element or compound that is compatible with the given semiconductor processing as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example
It should be noted that the term monolayer is meant to include a single atomic layer and also a single molecular layer. It is also noted that the energy band-modifying layer 50 provided by a single monolayer is also meant to include a monolayer wherein not all of the possible sites are occupied (i.e., there is less than full or 100% coverage). For example, with particular reference to the atomic diagram of
In other embodiments and/or with different materials this one-half occupation would not necessarily be the case as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. Indeed it can be seen even in this schematic diagram, that individual atoms of oxygen in a given monolayer are not precisely aligned along a flat plane as will also be appreciated by those of skill in the art of atomic deposition. By way of example, a preferred occupation range is from about one-eighth to one-half of the possible oxygen sites being full, although other numbers may be used in certain embodiments.
Silicon and oxygen are currently widely used in conventional semiconductor processing, and, hence, manufacturers will be readily able to use these materials as described herein. Atomic or monolayer deposition is also now widely used. Accordingly, semiconductor devices incorporating the superlattice 25 in accordance with the invention may be readily adopted and implemented, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
It is theorized without Applicants wishing to be bound thereto that for a superlattice, such as the Si/O superlattice, for example, that the number of silicon monolayers should desirably be seven or less so that the energy band of the superlattice is common or relatively uniform throughout to achieve the desired advantages. The 4/1 repeating structure shown in
While such a directionally preferential feature may be desired in certain semiconductor devices, other devices may benefit from a more uniform increase in mobility in any direction parallel to the groups of layers. It may also be beneficial to have an increased mobility for both electrons and holes, or just one of these types of charge carriers as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
The lower conductivity effective mass for the 4/1 Si/O embodiment of the superlattice 25 may be less than two-thirds the conductivity effective mass than would otherwise occur, and this applies for both electrons and holes. Of course, the superlattice 25 may further comprise at least one type of conductivity dopant therein, as will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Indeed, referring now additionally to
In some device embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions of a superlattice may be a same number of monolayers thick. In other embodiments, at least some of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick. In still other embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick.
In
It can be seen that the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure is located at the gamma point in contrast to bulk silicon (Si), whereas the valence band minimum occurs at the edge of the Brillouin zone in the (001) direction which we refer to as the Z point. One may also note the greater curvature of the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure compared to the curvature of the conduction band minimum for Si owing to the band splitting due to the perturbation introduced by the additional oxygen layer.
Although increased curvature is an indication of reduced effective mass, the appropriate comparison and discrimination may be made via the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor calculation. This leads Applicants to further theorize that the 5/1/3/1 superlattice 25′ should be substantially direct bandgap. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the appropriate matrix element for optical transition is another indicator of the distinction between direct and indirect bandgap behavior.
Turning to
One example single wafer chamber 61 is a single wafer Advanced Semiconductor Materials (ASM) chamber in which operation at a reduced pressure (RP) may be achieved, e.g., in a range of 10 T to 100 T, and more particularly about 19 T-40 T. By way of comparison, in a typical approach for making an Si/O superlattice 25, a 1% O2 gas flow in a He gas source may be used in the ASM processing chamber. In an example embodiment, an N2O oxygen source in used instead of O2. More particularly, the controller 63 may provide for a N2O gas flow in a range of 0.1% to 10%, and more particularly around 1%, in a He or Ar gas source as a replacement to the above-noted O2 gas flow. Generally speaking, N2O is less reactive than O2, and accordingly may be advantageous in some applications to help control the fabrication process, as will be discussed further below.
Example processing parameters will now be described for using the above-noted N2O gas flow in the single wafer chamber 61. The chamber may be heated to a temperature in a range of 650 to 700° C., for example. Applicants have determined that below 650° C., little or no oxygen will be incorporated into an Si/O superlattice film 25 with the N2O gas flow. Moreover, above 700° C., oxygen may be incorporated but silicon growth post oxygen deposition may be reduced, presumably because a different state of incorporation is starting to dominate. In the selective deposition approach, for example, SiO2 may be formed on the surface, which results in the lower Si growth rate.
Furthermore, the N2O gas flows may range from 10 to 5000 SCCM, and more particularly about 80 to 195 SCCM, and dose times may be in a range from 10 to 100 seconds, and more particularly about 12 to 24 seconds, for example. This may correspond to a total dose of about 1×1014 to 7×1014 atoms/cm2, as shown in the plot line 81 of the graph 80 of
In the example of
By way of example, such batch processing of semiconductor devices or wafers including the above-described structures may be performed using the Batch Epitaxial System (BES) from Hitachi Kokusai Electric (HKE), Inc. of Tokyo, Japan. The BES operates in the mTorr regime, and is a large furnace design. By way of example, an example batch may include 50 to 125 semiconductor wafers, although other numbers of wafers may be processed in different embodiments. Moreover, different processing chambers may be used in addition to the example chambers referenced herein.
While N2O is advantageously less reactive than O2 and may therefore help with controlling the batch fabrication process (to get better uniformity), various processing parameters may be selected to allow the N2O to be sufficiently reactive to allow formation of the above-described superlattice films. For example, temperature may be increased to get an oxygen source to react, yet without making it so high that the oxygen either desorbs before the next silicon layer is put down, or the oxygen bonds in a different configuration (SiO2) and prevents the restart of silicon epitaxial growth altogether. Generally speaking, batch processing at lower pressure makes the gases more reactive, and thus the above-noted parameters provided for the single wafer processing may be used for batch processing, but with temperatures translated down to 550-600° C. to provide comparable reactivity in a mTorr regime. Both the single wafer and batch processing may be selective or non-selective using dichlorosilane (DCS), for example. The DCS may be used at the higher temperatures and is selective with the addition of HCl. However, other temperature ranges may be used in different configurations.
In the graph 85 of
In the graph 90 of
Referring additionally to
Another similar example is provided in the graph 110 of
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented herein. Therefore, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific exemplary embodiments disclosed herein.
This application claims the benefit of provisional application No. 62/169,885 filed Jun. 2, 2015, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4485128 | Dalal et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4590399 | Roxlo et al. | May 1986 | A |
4594603 | Holonyak, Jr. | Jun 1986 | A |
4882609 | Schubert et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4908678 | Yamazaki | Mar 1990 | A |
4937204 | Ishibashi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4969031 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5055887 | Yamazaki | Oct 1991 | A |
5081513 | Jackson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5216262 | Tsu | Jun 1993 | A |
5357119 | Wang et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5577061 | Hasenberg et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5594567 | Akiyama et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606177 | Wallace et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5616515 | Okuno | Apr 1997 | A |
5627386 | Harvey et al. | May 1997 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5684817 | Houdre et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5994164 | Fonash et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6058127 | Joannopoulos et al. | May 2000 | A |
6255150 | Wilk et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274007 | Smirnov et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281518 | Sato | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281532 | Doyle et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6326311 | Euda et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344271 | Yadav et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350993 | Chu et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6376337 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6436784 | Allam | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6472685 | Takagi | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6498359 | Schmidt et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501092 | Nikonov et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6521549 | Kamath et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6566679 | Nikonov et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6608327 | Davis et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6621097 | Nikonov et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638838 | Eisenbeiser et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6646293 | Emrick et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673646 | Droopad | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690699 | Capasso et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6711191 | Kozaki et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6741624 | Mears et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6748002 | Shveykin | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6816530 | Capasso et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830964 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6833294 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6878576 | Mears et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6891188 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6897472 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6927413 | Mears et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6952018 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958486 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6993222 | Mears et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7018900 | Krepps | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033437 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034329 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7045377 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045813 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7071119 | Mears et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7109052 | Mears et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123792 | Mears et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7153763 | Hytha et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7202494 | Blanchard et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227174 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229902 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7265002 | Mears et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7279699 | Mears et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279701 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7288457 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7303948 | Mears et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7432524 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435988 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436026 | Kreps | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446002 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7446334 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7491587 | Rao | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7514328 | Rao | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7517702 | Halilov et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531828 | Mears et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7531829 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7531850 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7535041 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7586116 | Kreps et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7586165 | Blanchard | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598515 | Mears et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612366 | Mears et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625767 | Huang et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7659539 | Kreps et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7700447 | Dukovski et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7718996 | Dukovski et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7781827 | Rao | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7812339 | Mears et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7863066 | Mears et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880161 | Mears et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7928425 | Rao | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8389974 | Mears et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8497171 | Wu et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
9275996 | Mears et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
20020094003 | Bour et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030034529 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057416 | Currie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030089899 | Lieber et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030162335 | Yuki et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030215990 | Fitzgerald et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040084781 | Ahn et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040227165 | Wang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040262594 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262597 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040266045 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040266046 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040266116 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050029510 | Mears et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032247 | Mears et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050163692 | Atanackovic | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050208715 | Seo et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050279991 | Mears et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282330 | Mears et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011905 | Mears et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060220118 | Stephenson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060223215 | Blanchard | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060226502 | Blanchard | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060231857 | Blanchard | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060243964 | Kreps et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263980 | Kreps et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267130 | Rao | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273299 | Stephenson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060289049 | Rao | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060292765 | Blanchard et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010040 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070012910 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070015344 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020833 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020860 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070063185 | Rao | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070063186 | Rao | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070158640 | Halilov et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070166928 | Halilov et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070187667 | Halilov et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197006 | Dukovski et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080012004 | Huang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080197340 | Mears et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090072276 | Inaba | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090267155 | Izumida et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100270535 | Halilov et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110074498 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110215299 | Rao | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120261716 | Yanagihara | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130026486 | Miyoshi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130240836 | Lee et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20150144877 | Mears | May 2015 | A1 |
20150144878 | Mears et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150357414 | Mears et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160099317 | Mears et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160149023 | Mears et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 843 361 | May 1998 | EP |
2 347 520 | Jun 2000 | GB |
61027681 | Feb 1986 | JP |
61145820 | Jul 1986 | JP |
61220339 | Sep 1986 | JP |
62219665 | Sep 1987 | JP |
9629728 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9963580 | Dec 1999 | WO |
02103767 | Dec 2002 | WO |
2005034245 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2007011790 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2008130899 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2015077580 | May 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Keim et al., Adsorption of atomic oxygen (N20) on a clean Si(100) surface and its influence on the surface state density; A comparision with O2″, Surface Science, vol. 180, No. 203, Feb. 1987, pp. 565-598. |
Lau et al., “Evidence that N2O is a stronger oxidizing agent than O2 for both Ta205 and bare Si below 1000,o.C and temperature for minimum low-K interfacial oxide for high-K dielectric on Si”, Microelectronics and Reliability, Elsevier Science Ltd., vol. 47, No. 203, Feb. 2007, pp. 429-433. |
Lucovsky et al, “Low temperature plasma-assisted oxidation and thin-film deposition processes for forming levice-quality SiO″2/Si and composite dielectric-SiO″2/Si heterostructures”, Thin Solid Films, Elsevier-Sequoia S.A., vol. 220, No. 1-2, Nov. 1992, pp. 38-44. |
Uno et al, “XPS study of the oxidation process of Si(111) via photochemical decomposition of N″2O by an UV excimer laser”, Surface Science, vol. 193, No. 3, Jan. 1998, pp. 321-335. |
Luo et al., “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon”, published in Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 2002) 4 pgs. |
Raphael Tsu “Si Based Green ELD: Si-Oxygen Superlattice” wysiwyg://l/http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/72512946/start: published online Jul. 21, 2000; 2 pgs. Abstract Only. |
Yu et al., GaAs MOSFET with Oxide Gate Dielectric Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition, Agere Systems, Mar. 2003; 7 pgs. |
Novikov et al., Silicon-based Optoelectronics, 1999-2003, pp. 1-6. |
Fan et al., N- and P-Type SiGe/Si Superlattice Coolers, the Seventeenth Intersociety Conference on Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm 2000), vol. 1, pp. 304-307, Las Vegas, NV, May 2000; 4 pgs. |
Shah et al., Experimental Analysis and Theoretical Model for Anomalously High Ideality Factors (n>2.0) in AlGaN/GaN P—N. Junction Diodes, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 94, No. 4, Aug. 15, 2003; 4 pgs. |
Ball, Striped Nanowires Shrink Electronics, news@nature.com, Feb. 7, 2002; 2 pgs. |
Fiory et al., Light Emission from Silicon: Some Perspectives and Applications, Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 32, No. 10, 2003; pp. 1043-1051. |
Lecture 6: Light Emitting and Detecting Devices, MSE 6001, Semiconductor Materials Lectures, Fall 2004; 4 pgs. |
Harvard University Professor and Nanosys Co-Founder, Charlie Lieber, Raises the Stakes in the Development of Nanoscale Superlattice Structures and Nanodevices, Feb. 8, 2002, Nanosys, Inc.; 2 pgs. |
Bu, “FINFET Technology, a substrate prospective”, IBM Research, PreT0 Alliance, SOI Conference, 2011, pp. 1-28. |
Xu et al., “MOSFET performance and scalability enhancement by insertion of oxygen layers”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 1-4. |
R. Tsu “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure devices” published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402. |
Shinada et al., Nature 437, 1128 (2005)) Retrieved from internet Jun. 19, 2015; 3 pgs. |
Xu et al. “Effectiveness of Quasi-confinement technology for improving P-chanel Si an Ge MOSSFET performance” Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 2. mearstech.net; retrieved from internet Jan. 18, 2016. |
Xu et al. “Extension of planar bulk n-channel MOSFET scaling with oxygen insertion technology” IEEE Transactions on Electron devices, vol. 61, No. 9; Sep. 2014. pp. 3345-3349. |
Liu et al. Threshold Voltage Model for Deep-Submicrometer MOSFET's IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 40, No. I, Jan. 1993: pp. 86-95. |
Brews et al. “Generalized guide for MOSFET miniaturization” IEEE Electron Device Letters 1(1):2-4 • Jan. 1980. |
Damrongplasit et al. “Comparative study of uniform versus supersteep retrograde MOSFET channel doping and Implication for 6-T SRAM yield” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 60, No. 5, May 2013: pp. 1790-1793. |
Mears et al. “Simultaneous Carrier Transport Enhancement and variability reduction in Si MOSFETs by insertion of partial Monolayers of oxygen” IEEE silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop (2012): (Date of conference Jun. 10-11 2012). |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,276, filed May 13, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,296, filed May 13, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/966,312, filed Jan. 15, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160358773 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62169885 | Jun 2015 | US |