Method for making enhanced semiconductor structures in single wafer processing chamber with desired uniformity control

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9721790
  • Patent Number
    9,721,790
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 1, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 1, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
A method for processing a semiconductor wafer in a single wafer processing chamber may include heating the single wafer processing chamber to a temperature in a range of 650-700° C., and forming at least one superlattice on the semiconductor wafer within the heated single wafer processing chamber by depositing silicon and oxygen to form a plurality of stacked groups of layers. Each group of layers may include a plurality of stacked base silicon monolayers defining a base silicon portion and at least one oxygen monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base silicon portions. Depositing the oxygen may include depositing the oxygen using an N2O gas flow.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure generally relates to semiconductor devices and, more particularly, to methods for making enhanced semiconductor structures.


BACKGROUND

Structures and techniques have been proposed to enhance the performance of semiconductor devices, such as by enhancing the mobility of the charge carriers. For example, U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0057416 to Currie et al. discloses strained material layers of silicon, silicon-germanium, and relaxed silicon and also including impurity-free zones that would otherwise cause performance degradation. The resulting biaxial strain in the upper silicon layer alters the carrier mobilities enabling higher speed and/or lower power devices. Published U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0034529 to Fitzgerald et al. discloses a CMOS inverter also based upon similar strained silicon technology.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,685 B2 to Takagi discloses a semiconductor device including a silicon and carbon layer sandwiched between silicon layers so that the conduction band and valence band of the second silicon layer receive a tensile strain. Electrons having a smaller effective mass, and which have been induced by an electric field applied to the gate electrode, are confined in the second silicon layer, thus, an re-channel MOSFET is asserted to have a higher mobility.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,204 to Ishibashi et al. discloses a superlattice in which a plurality of layers, less than eight monolayers, and containing a fractional or binary or a binary compound semiconductor layer, are alternately and epitaxially grown. The direction of main current flow is perpendicular to the layers of the superlattice.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,357,119 to Wang et al. discloses a Si—Ge short period superlattice with higher mobility achieved by reducing alloy scattering in the superlattice. Along these lines, U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,934 to Candelaria discloses an enhanced mobility MOSFET including a channel layer comprising an alloy of silicon and a second material substitutionally present in the silicon lattice at a percentage that places the channel layer under tensile stress.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,216,262 to Tsu discloses a quantum well structure comprising two barrier regions and a thin epitaxially grown semiconductor layer sandwiched between the barriers. Each barrier region consists of alternate layers of SiO2/Si with a thickness generally in a range of two to six monolayers. A much thicker section of silicon is sandwiched between the barriers.


An article entitled “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure devices” also to Tsu and published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402 discloses a semiconductor-atomic superlattice (SAS) of silicon and oxygen. The Si/O superlattice is disclosed as useful in a silicon quantum and light-emitting devices. In particular, a green electroluminescence diode structure was constructed and tested. Current flow in the diode structure is vertical, that is, perpendicular to the layers of the SAS. The disclosed SAS may include semiconductor layers separated by adsorbed species such as oxygen atoms, and CO molecules. The silicon growth beyond the adsorbed monolayer of oxygen is described as epitaxial with a fairly low defect density. One SAS structure included a 1.1 nm thick silicon portion that is about eight atomic layers of silicon, and another structure had twice this thickness of silicon. An article to Luo et al. entitled “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 2002) further discusses the light emitting SAS structures of Tsu.


Published International Application WO 02/103,767 A1 to Wang, Tsu and Lofgren, discloses a barrier building block of thin silicon and oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, antimony, arsenic or hydrogen to thereby reduce current flowing vertically through the lattice more than four orders of magnitude. The insulating layer/barrier layer allows for low defect epitaxial silicon to be deposited next to the insulating layer.


Published Great Britain Patent Application 2,347,520 to Mears et al. discloses that principles of Aperiodic Photonic Band-Gap (APBG) structures may be adapted for electronic bandgap engineering. In particular, the application discloses that material parameters, for example, the location of band minima, effective mass, etc., can be tailored to yield new aperiodic materials with desirable band-structure characteristics. Other parameters, such as electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity and dielectric permittivity or magnetic permeability are disclosed as also possible to be designed into the material.


Despite the advantages provided by such structures, further developments may be desirable for integrating advanced semiconductor materials in various semiconductor devices and for different semiconductor processing configurations.


SUMMARY

A method for processing a semiconductor wafer in a single wafer processing chamber may include heating the single wafer processing chamber to a temperature in a range of 650-700° C., and forming at least one superlattice on the semiconductor wafer within the heated single wafer processing chamber by depositing silicon and oxygen to form a plurality of stacked groups of layers. Each group of layers may include a plurality of stacked base silicon monolayers defining a base silicon portion and at least one oxygen monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base silicon portions. Depositing the oxygen may include depositing the oxygen using an N2O gas flow.


More particularly, the N2O gas flow may comprise 0.1% to 10% N2O in a gas comprising at least one of He and Ar, for example. Also by way of example, depositing the oxygen may include depositing the oxygen with an exposure time in a range of 1 to 100 seconds. In one example embodiment, the N2O gas flow may be in a range of 10 to 5000 standard cubic centimeters per minute (SCCM). Furthermore, the oxygen may be deposited at a pressure in a range of 10 to 100 Torr, for example. Also by way of example, a total dose of N2O may be in a range of 1×1014 to 7×1014 atoms/cm2 during the oxygen monolayer formation.


In accordance with one example implementation, the semiconductor wafer may include a plurality of spaced apart shallow trench isolation (STI) regions, and forming the at least one superlattice may include selectively forming a respective superlattice between adjacent pairs of STI regions. In accordance with another example, forming the at least one superlattice may comprise a blanket superlattice formation on the semiconductor wafer. Furthermore, at least some silicon atoms from opposing base silicon portions may be chemically bound together through the at least one oxygen monolayer therebetween.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a greatly enlarged schematic cross-sectional view of a superlattice for use in a semiconductor device in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a perspective schematic atomic diagram of a portion of the superlattice shown in FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a greatly enlarged schematic cross-sectional view of another embodiment of a superlattice in accordance with the invention.



FIG. 4A is a graph of the calculated band structure from the gamma point (G) for both bulk silicon as in the prior art, and for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice as shown in FIGS. 1-2.



FIG. 4B is a graph of the calculated band structure from the Z point for both bulk silicon as in the prior art, and for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice as shown in FIGS. 1-2.



FIG. 4C is a graph of the calculated band structure from both the gamma and Z points for both bulk silicon as in the prior art, and for the 5/1/3/1 Si/O superlattice as shown in FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 is a schematic block diagram of a single wafer processing chamber for superlattice formation using an N2O gas flow in accordance with an example embodiment.



FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram of a batch wafer processing chamber for superlattice formation using an N2O gas flow in accordance with another example embodiment.



FIG. 7 is a graph of total dose vs. flow for an O2 oxygen deposition approach and for an N2O oxygen deposition approach in accordance with an example embodiment in a single wafer processing chamber.



FIG. 8 is a graph of total dose vs. time for an N2O oxygen deposition approach in accordance with an example embodiment in a single wafer processing chamber.



FIG. 9 is graph of total dose vs. temperature for an N2O oxygen deposition approach in accordance with an example embodiment in a single wafer processing chamber.



FIGS. 10 and 11 are graphs illustrating concentrations vs. depth for selective superlattice depositions in a single wafer processing chamber in accordance with example embodiments for different STI spacings.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime notation is used to indicate similar elements in different embodiments.


Generally speaking, the present disclosure relates to enhanced semiconductor devices, particularly those incorporating advanced semiconductor materials such as the superlattice 25 described further below, and associated fabrication techniques. Applicant has established by atomistic simulation and experimental verification (SIMS) that electrical dopants such as boron and arsenic have an energetic minimum close to (e.g., typically one silicon bond removed from) an oxygen (or CO or N, etc.) atomic layer(s) in the superlattice 25, and preferentially accumulate in this position under thermal diffusion. Following the description of example superlattice structures below, techniques for enhanced deterministic doping of the superlattice 25 are also provided. However, it should be noted that the techniques set forth herein may also be used for other semiconductor layers and structures as well in addition to the noted superlattices, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


Applicants theorize, without wishing to be bound thereto, that certain superlattices as described herein reduce the effective mass of charge carriers and that this thereby leads to higher charge carrier mobility. Effective mass is described with various definitions in the literature. As a measure of the improvement in effective mass Applicants use a “conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor”, Me−1 and Mh−1 for electrons and holes respectively, defined as:








M

e
,
i
,
j


-
1




(


E
F

,
T

)


=





E
>

E
F








B
.
Z
.






(



k



E


(

k
,
n

)



)

i








(



k



E


(

k
,
n

)



)

j










f


(


E


(

k
,
n

)


,

E
F

,
T

)





E








d
3


k







E
>

E
F








B
.
Z
.





f


(


E


(

k
,
n

)


,





E
F

,
T

)




d
3


k









for electrons and:








M

h
,
i
,
j


-
1




(


E
F

,
T

)


=


-




E
>

E
F








B
.
Z
.






(



k



E


(

k
,
n

)



)

i








(



k



E


(

k
,
n

)



)

j










f


(


E


(

k
,
n

)


,

E
F

,
T

)





E








d
3


k








E
>

E
F








B
.
Z
.





(

1
-

f


(


E


(

k
,
n

)


,





E
F

,
T

)



)







d
3


k









for holes, where f is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, EF is the Fermi energy, T is the temperature, E(k,n) is the energy of an electron in the state corresponding to wave vector k and the nth energy band, the indices i and j refer to Cartesian coordinates x, y and z, the integrals are taken over the Brillouin zone (B.Z.), and the summations are taken over bands with energies above and below the Fermi energy for electrons and holes respectively.


Applicants' definition of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor is such that a tensorial component of the conductivity of the material is greater for greater values of the corresponding component of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor. Again Applicants theorize without wishing to be bound thereto that the superlattices described herein set the values of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor so as to enhance the conductive properties of the material, such as typically for a preferred direction of charge carrier transport. The inverse of the appropriate tensor element is referred to as the conductivity effective mass. In other words, to characterize semiconductor material structures, the conductivity effective mass for electrons/holes as described above and calculated in the direction of intended carrier transport is used to distinguish improved materials.


Applicants have identified improved materials or structures for use in semiconductor devices. More specifically, the Applicants have identified materials or structures having energy band structures for which the appropriate conductivity effective masses for electrons and/or holes are substantially less than the corresponding values for silicon. In addition to the enhanced mobility characteristics of these structures, they may also be formed or used in such a manner that they provide piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and/or ferroelectric properties that are advantageous for use in a variety of different types of devices, as will be discussed further below.


Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 2, the materials or structures are in the form of a superlattice 25 whose structure is controlled at the atomic or molecular level and may be formed using known techniques of atomic or molecular layer deposition. The superlattice 25 includes a plurality of layer groups 45a-45n arranged in stacked relation, as perhaps best understood with specific reference to the schematic cross-sectional view of FIG. 1.


Each group of layers 45a-45n of the superlattice 25 illustratively includes a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers 46 defining a respective base semiconductor portion 46a-46n and an energy band-modifying layer 50 thereon. The energy band-modifying layers 50 are indicated by stippling in FIG. 1 for clarity of illustration.


The energy band-modifying layer 50 illustratively includes one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. By “constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions” it is meant that at least some semiconductor atoms from opposing base semiconductor portions 46a-46n are chemically bound together through the non-semiconductor monolayer 50 therebetween, as seen in FIG. 2. Generally speaking, this configuration is made possible by controlling the amount of non-semiconductor material that is deposited on semiconductor portions 46a-46n through atomic layer deposition techniques so that not all (i.e., less than full or 100% coverage) of the available semiconductor bonding sites are populated with bonds to non-semiconductor atoms, as will be discussed further below. Thus, as further monolayers 46 of semiconductor material are deposited on or over a non-semiconductor monolayer 50, the newly deposited semiconductor atoms will populate the remaining vacant bonding sites of the semiconductor atoms below the non-semiconductor monolayer.


In other embodiments, more than one such non-semiconductor monolayer may be possible. It should be noted that reference herein to a non-semiconductor or semiconductor monolayer means that the material used for the monolayer would be a non-semiconductor or semiconductor if formed in bulk. That is, a single monolayer of a material, such as silicon, may not necessarily exhibit the same properties that it would if formed in bulk or in a relatively thick layer, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


Applicants theorize without wishing to be bound thereto that energy band-modifying layers 50 and adjacent base semiconductor portions 46a-46n cause the superlattice 25 to have a lower appropriate conductivity effective mass for the charge carriers in the parallel layer direction than would otherwise be present. Considered another way, this parallel direction is orthogonal to the stacking direction. The band modifying layers 50 may also cause the superlattice 25 to have a common energy band structure, while also advantageously functioning as an insulator between layers or regions vertically above and below the superlattice.


Moreover, this superlattice structure may also advantageously act as a barrier to dopant and/or material diffusion between layers vertically above and below the superlattice 25. These properties may thus advantageously allow the superlattice 25 to provide an interface for high-K dielectrics which not only reduces diffusion of the high-K material into the channel region, but which may also advantageously reduce unwanted scattering effects and improve device mobility, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


It is also theorized that semiconductor devices including the superlattice 25 may enjoy a higher charge carrier mobility based upon the lower conductivity effective mass than would otherwise be present. In some embodiments, and as a result of the band engineering achieved by the present invention, the superlattice 25 may further have a substantially direct energy bandgap that may be particularly advantageous for opto-electronic devices, for example.


The superlattice 25 also illustratively includes a cap layer 52 on an upper layer group 45n. The cap layer 52 may comprise a plurality of base semiconductor monolayers 46. The cap layer 52 may have between 2 to 100 monolayers of the base semiconductor, and, more preferably between 10 to 50 monolayers.


Each base semiconductor portion 46a-46n may comprise a base semiconductor selected from the group consisting of Group IV semiconductors, Group III-V semiconductors, and Group II-VI semiconductors. Of course, the term Group IV semiconductors also includes Group IV-IV semiconductors, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example.


Each energy band-modifying layer 50 may comprise a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen, for example. The non-semiconductor is also desirably thermally stable through deposition of a next layer to thereby facilitate manufacturing. In other embodiments, the non-semiconductor may be another inorganic or organic element or compound that is compatible with the given semiconductor processing as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example


It should be noted that the term monolayer is meant to include a single atomic layer and also a single molecular layer. It is also noted that the energy band-modifying layer 50 provided by a single monolayer is also meant to include a monolayer wherein not all of the possible sites are occupied (i.e., there is less than full or 100% coverage). For example, with particular reference to the atomic diagram of FIG. 2, a 4/1 repeating structure is illustrated for silicon as the base semiconductor material, and oxygen as the energy band-modifying material. Only half of the possible sites for oxygen are occupied in the illustrated example.


In other embodiments and/or with different materials this one-half occupation would not necessarily be the case as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. Indeed it can be seen even in this schematic diagram, that individual atoms of oxygen in a given monolayer are not precisely aligned along a flat plane as will also be appreciated by those of skill in the art of atomic deposition. By way of example, a preferred occupation range is from about one-eighth to one-half of the possible oxygen sites being full, although other numbers may be used in certain embodiments.


Silicon and oxygen are currently widely used in conventional semiconductor processing, and, hence, manufacturers will be readily able to use these materials as described herein. Atomic or monolayer deposition is also now widely used. Accordingly, semiconductor devices incorporating the superlattice 25 in accordance with the invention may be readily adopted and implemented, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


It is theorized without Applicants wishing to be bound thereto that for a superlattice, such as the Si/O superlattice, for example, that the number of silicon monolayers should desirably be seven or less so that the energy band of the superlattice is common or relatively uniform throughout to achieve the desired advantages. The 4/1 repeating structure shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, for Si/O has been modeled to indicate an enhanced mobility for electrons and holes in the X direction. For example, the calculated conductivity effective mass for electrons (isotropic for bulk silicon) is 0.26 and for the 4/1 SiO superlattice in the X direction it is 0.12 resulting in a ratio of 0.46. Similarly, the calculation for holes yields values of 0.36 for bulk silicon and 0.16 for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice resulting in a ratio of 0.44.


While such a directionally preferential feature may be desired in certain semiconductor devices, other devices may benefit from a more uniform increase in mobility in any direction parallel to the groups of layers. It may also be beneficial to have an increased mobility for both electrons and holes, or just one of these types of charge carriers as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


The lower conductivity effective mass for the 4/1 Si/O embodiment of the superlattice 25 may be less than two-thirds the conductivity effective mass than would otherwise occur, and this applies for both electrons and holes. Of course, the superlattice 25 may further comprise at least one type of conductivity dopant therein, as will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


Indeed, referring now additionally to FIG. 3, another embodiment of a superlattice 25′ in accordance with the invention having different properties is now described. In this embodiment, a repeating pattern of 3/1/5/1 is illustrated. More particularly, the lowest base semiconductor portion 46a′ has three monolayers, and the second lowest base semiconductor portion 46b′ has five monolayers. This pattern repeats throughout the superlattice 25′. The energy band-modifying layers 50′ may each include a single monolayer. For such a superlattice 25′ including Si/O, the enhancement of charge carrier mobility is independent of orientation in the plane of the layers. Those other elements of FIG. 3 not specifically mentioned are similar to those discussed above with reference to FIG. 1 and need no further discussion herein.


In some device embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions of a superlattice may be a same number of monolayers thick. In other embodiments, at least some of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick. In still other embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick.


In FIGS. 4A-4C, band structures calculated using Density Functional Theory (DFT) are presented. It is well known in the art that DFT underestimates the absolute value of the bandgap. Hence all bands above the gap may be shifted by an appropriate “scissors correction.” However the shape of the band is known to be much more reliable. The vertical energy axes should be interpreted in this light.



FIG. 4A shows the calculated band structure from the gamma point (G) for both bulk silicon (represented by continuous lines) and for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice 25 shown in FIG. 1 (represented by dotted lines). The directions refer to the unit cell of the 4/1 Si/O structure and not to the conventional unit cell of Si, although the (001) direction in the figure does correspond to the (001) direction of the conventional unit cell of Si, and, hence, shows the expected location of the Si conduction band minimum. The (100) and (010) directions in the figure correspond to the (110) and (−110) directions of the conventional Si unit cell. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the bands of Si on the figure are folded to represent them on the appropriate reciprocal lattice directions for the 4/1 Si/O structure.


It can be seen that the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure is located at the gamma point in contrast to bulk silicon (Si), whereas the valence band minimum occurs at the edge of the Brillouin zone in the (001) direction which we refer to as the Z point. One may also note the greater curvature of the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure compared to the curvature of the conduction band minimum for Si owing to the band splitting due to the perturbation introduced by the additional oxygen layer.



FIG. 4B shows the calculated band structure from the Z point for both bulk silicon (continuous lines) and for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice 25 (dotted lines). This figure illustrates the enhanced curvature of the valence band in the (100) direction.



FIG. 4C shows the calculated band structure from both the gamma and Z point for both bulk silicon (continuous lines) and for the 5/1/3/1 Si/O structure of the superlattice 25′ of FIG. 3 (dotted lines). Due to the symmetry of the 5/1/3/1 Si/O structure, the calculated band structures in the (100) and (010) directions are equivalent. Thus the conductivity effective mass and mobility are expected to be isotropic in the plane parallel to the layers, i.e. perpendicular to the (001) stacking direction. Note that in the 5/1/3/1 Si/O example the conduction band minimum and the valence band maximum are both at or close to the Z point.


Although increased curvature is an indication of reduced effective mass, the appropriate comparison and discrimination may be made via the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor calculation. This leads Applicants to further theorize that the 5/1/3/1 superlattice 25′ should be substantially direct bandgap. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the appropriate matrix element for optical transition is another indicator of the distinction between direct and indirect bandgap behavior.


Turning to FIGS. 5-11, example approaches for fabricating band-engineered structures or films such as those described above using an N2O oxygen delivery system in both single wafer (FIG. 5) and batch (FIG. 6) processing chambers to enhance yield are now described. In the single wafer approach, a semiconductor (e.g., silicon) wafer 60 may be inserted in a single wafer chamber 61 which illustratively includes a heater or heating element(s) 62. Moreover, a controller 63 may control the heater 62, gas flow, and other operations within the chamber 61 during processing to perform a blanket superlattice 25 deposition on the wafer 60. That is, the superlattice 25 is formed across the entire upper surface of the wafer 60. However, in some embodiments a selective deposition approach may be used, in which superlattice 25 layers or films are selectively formed on active areas of the wafer 60 after shallow trench isolation (STI) region formation, as will be discussed further below with respect to FIG. 6. Either blanket or selective superlattice deposition may be performed in the single wafer chamber 61 using the techniques described herein.


One example single wafer chamber 61 is a single wafer Advanced Semiconductor Materials (ASM) chamber in which operation at a reduced pressure (RP) may be achieved, e.g., in a range of 10 T to 100 T, and more particularly about 19 T-40 T. By way of comparison, in a typical approach for making an Si/O superlattice 25, a 1% O2 gas flow in a He gas source may be used in the ASM processing chamber. In an example embodiment, an N2O oxygen source in used instead of O2. More particularly, the controller 63 may provide for a N2O gas flow in a range of 0.1% to 10%, and more particularly around 1%, in a He or Ar gas source as a replacement to the above-noted O2 gas flow. Generally speaking, N2O is less reactive than O2, and accordingly may be advantageous in some applications to help control the fabrication process, as will be discussed further below.


Example processing parameters will now be described for using the above-noted N2O gas flow in the single wafer chamber 61. The chamber may be heated to a temperature in a range of 650 to 700° C., for example. Applicants have determined that below 650° C., little or no oxygen will be incorporated into an Si/O superlattice film 25 with the N2O gas flow. Moreover, above 700° C., oxygen may be incorporated but silicon growth post oxygen deposition may be reduced, presumably because a different state of incorporation is starting to dominate. In the selective deposition approach, for example, SiO2 may be formed on the surface, which results in the lower Si growth rate.


Furthermore, the N2O gas flows may range from 10 to 5000 SCCM, and more particularly about 80 to 195 SCCM, and dose times may be in a range from 10 to 100 seconds, and more particularly about 12 to 24 seconds, for example. This may correspond to a total dose of about 1×1014 to 7×1014 atoms/cm2, as shown in the plot line 81 of the graph 80 of FIG. 7, which is for a 680° C. single wafer process. By way of comparison, the plot line 82 corresponds to an O2 gas flow, which only requires a three second exposure time due to the greater reactivity than N2O. It may be seen that the twelve second N2O exposure is 4× longer, and the tuning curve is flatter. In this comparison, adjustments were made to the overall process pressure to get one point 83 (while keeping temperature, time, and flow rates the same as the point below it) for N2O that centered the process around 1×1015 atoms/cm2. Applicant theorizes, without wishing to be bound thereto, that dose retention and pile up results may be similar for superlattice films having oxygen monolayers deposited using N2O to those with oxygen layers deposited using O2 gas flows.


In the example of FIG. 6, a plurality of wafers 70 are processed in a batch reactor 71 with a heater 72. Here again, a controller 73 illustratively controls the heater 72, the gas flow, etc., during batch processing to form superlattices 25 on the wafers 70. In the illustrated example, a selective process is performed in which respective superlattices are formed between adjacent STI regions 74 in the wafers 70, as noted above, although a blanket film deposition may also be performed in different embodiments.


By way of example, such batch processing of semiconductor devices or wafers including the above-described structures may be performed using the Batch Epitaxial System (BES) from Hitachi Kokusai Electric (HKE), Inc. of Tokyo, Japan. The BES operates in the mTorr regime, and is a large furnace design. By way of example, an example batch may include 50 to 125 semiconductor wafers, although other numbers of wafers may be processed in different embodiments. Moreover, different processing chambers may be used in addition to the example chambers referenced herein.


While N2O is advantageously less reactive than O2 and may therefore help with controlling the batch fabrication process (to get better uniformity), various processing parameters may be selected to allow the N2O to be sufficiently reactive to allow formation of the above-described superlattice films. For example, temperature may be increased to get an oxygen source to react, yet without making it so high that the oxygen either desorbs before the next silicon layer is put down, or the oxygen bonds in a different configuration (SiO2) and prevents the restart of silicon epitaxial growth altogether. Generally speaking, batch processing at lower pressure makes the gases more reactive, and thus the above-noted parameters provided for the single wafer processing may be used for batch processing, but with temperatures translated down to 550-600° C. to provide comparable reactivity in a mTorr regime. Both the single wafer and batch processing may be selective or non-selective using dichlorosilane (DCS), for example. The DCS may be used at the higher temperatures and is selective with the addition of HCl. However, other temperature ranges may be used in different configurations.


In the graph 85 of FIG. 8, total dose vs. time for a 1% N2O gas flow in an ASM single wafer chamber is represented by the plot 86 for a 650° C. deposition and 83 SCCM. From the reference plot 87 may be seen that the total dose is essentially linear. By way of comparison, on this scale oxygen would be at 1×1015 atoms/cm2 for an exposure down at 3 seconds.


In the graph 90 of FIG. 9, total dose vs. temperature is illustrated by the plot 91 for the 1% N2O gas flow in a single wafer chamber. As noted above, oxygen incorporation is not repeatable near (and below) 650° C. (i.e., no N2O decomposition), and is unstable above 700° C. (i.e., there is a change in oxygen bonding to silicon) for the ASM single wafer platform.


Referring additionally to FIG. 10, the graph 100 illustrates concentrations vs. depth for a selective superlattice deposition (i.e., between adjacent STI regions) with a relatively wide spacing using 30 Å spacers and grown using N2O in the single wafer ASM chamber. In the illustrated example, oxygen concentration is represented by the plot 101, SiN concentration is represented by the plot 102, and carbon-12 is represented by the plot line 103. For this example, an N2O exposure for 12 seconds at 680° C. and 170 SCCM was used.


Another similar example is provided in the graph 110 of FIG. 11. Here, everything is the same as in the example of FIG. 10, except that smaller spacers (i.e., 16 Å) were used. Here, the oxygen concentration is represented by the plot 111, SiN concentration is represented by the plot 112, and carbon-12 is represented by the plot line 113.


Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented herein. Therefore, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific exemplary embodiments disclosed herein.

Claims
  • 1. A method for processing a semiconductor wafer in a single wafer processing chamber, the method comprising: heating the single wafer processing chamber to a temperature in a range of 650-700° C.; andforming at least one superlattice on the semiconductor wafer within the heated single wafer processing chamber by depositing silicon and oxygen to form a plurality of stacked groups of layers with each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base silicon monolayers defining a base silicon portion and at least one oxygen monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base silicon portions;wherein depositing the oxygen comprises depositing the oxygen using an N2O gas flow, wherein the N2O gas flow comprises 0.1% to 10% N2O in a gas comprising He.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein depositing the oxygen comprises depositing the oxygen with an exposure time in a range of 1 to 100 seconds.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the N2O gas flow is in a range of 10 to 5000 standard cubic centimeters per minute (SCCM).
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein depositing the oxygen comprises depositing the oxygen at a pressure in a range of 10 to 100 Torr.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein a total dose of N2O is in a range of 1×1014 to 7×1014 atoms/cm2 during the oxygen monolayer formation.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the semiconductor wafer comprises a plurality of spaced apart shallow trench isolation (STI) regions, and wherein forming the at least one superlattice comprises selectively forming a respective superlattice between adjacent pairs of STI regions.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein forming the at least one superlattice comprises a blanket superlattice formation on the semiconductor wafer.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein at least some silicon atoms from opposing base silicon portions are chemically bound together through the at least one oxygen monolayer therebetween.
  • 9. A method for processing a semiconductor wafer in a single wafer processing chamber, the semiconductor wafer comprising a plurality of spaced apart shallow trench isolation (STI) regions, the method comprising: heating the single wafer processing chamber to a temperature in a range of 650-700° C.; andselectively forming a respective superlattice between adjacent pairs of STI regions on the semiconductor wafer within the heated single wafer processing chamber by depositing silicon and oxygen to form a plurality of stacked groups of layers with each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base silicon monolayers defining a base silicon portion and at least one oxygen monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base silicon portions;wherein depositing the oxygen comprises depositing the oxygen using an N2O gas flow and at a pressure in a range of 10 to 100 Torr, and wherein the N2O gas flow comprises 0.1% to 10% N2O in a gas comprising He.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 wherein depositing the oxygen comprises depositing the oxygen with an exposure time in a range of 1 to 100 seconds.
  • 11. The method of claim 9 wherein the N2O gas flow is in a range of 10 to 5000 standard cubic centimeters per minute (SCCM).
  • 12. The method of claim 9 wherein a total dose of N2O is in a range of 1×1014 to 7×1014 atoms/cm2 during the oxygen monolayer formation.
  • 13. The method of claim 9 wherein at least some silicon atoms from opposing base silicon portions are chemically bound together through the at least one oxygen monolayer therebetween.
  • 14. A method for processing a semiconductor wafer in a single wafer processing chamber, the method comprising: heating the single wafer processing chamber to a temperature in a range of 650-700° C.; andforming a blanket superlattice on the semiconductor wafer within the heated single wafer processing chamber by depositing silicon and oxygen to form a plurality of stacked groups of layers with each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base silicon monolayers defining a base silicon portion and at least one oxygen monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base silicon portions;wherein depositing the oxygen comprises depositing the oxygen using an N2O gas flow and at a pressure in a range of 10 to 100 Torr, and wherein the N2O gas flow comprises 0.1% to 10% N2O in a gas comprising He.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 wherein depositing the oxygen comprises depositing the oxygen with an exposure time in a range of 1 to 100 seconds.
  • 16. The method of claim 14 wherein the N2O gas flow is in a range of 10 to 5000 standard cubic centimeters per minute (SCCM).
  • 17. The method of claim 14 wherein a total dose of N2O is in a range of 1×1014 to 7×1014 atoms/cm2 during the oxygen monolayer formation.
  • 18. The method of claim 14 wherein at least some silicon atoms from opposing base silicon portions are chemically bound together through the at least one oxygen monolayer therebetween.
  • 19. A method for processing a semiconductor wafer in a single wafer processing chamber, the method comprising: heating the single wafer processing chamber to a temperature in a range of 650-700° C.; andforming at least one superlattice on the semiconductor wafer within the heated single wafer processing chamber by depositing silicon and oxygen to form a plurality of stacked groups of layers with each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base silicon monolayers defining a base silicon portion and at least one oxygen monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base silicon portions;wherein depositing the oxygen comprises depositing the oxygen using an N2O gas flow, and wherein the N2O gas flow comprises 0.1% to 10% N2O in a gas comprising Ar.
  • 20. The method of claim 19 wherein depositing the oxygen comprises depositing the oxygen with an exposure time in a range of 1 to 100 seconds.
  • 21. The method of claim 19 wherein the N2O gas flow is in a range of 10 to 5000 standard cubic centimeters per minute (SCCM).
  • 22. The method of claim 19 wherein depositing the oxygen comprises depositing the oxygen at a pressure in a range of 10 to 100 Torr.
  • 23. The method of claim 19 wherein a total dose of N2O is in a range of 1×1014 to 7×1014 atoms/cm2 during the oxygen monolayer formation.
  • 24. The method of claim 19 wherein the semiconductor wafer comprises a plurality of spaced apart shallow trench isolation (STI) regions, and wherein forming the at least one superlattice comprises selectively forming a respective superlattice between adjacent pairs of STI regions.
  • 25. The method of claim 19 wherein forming the at least one superlattice comprises a blanket superlattice formation on the semiconductor wafer.
  • 26. The method of claim 19 wherein at least some silicon atoms from opposing base silicon portions are chemically bound together through the at least one oxygen monolayer therebetween.
  • 27. A method for processing a semiconductor wafer in a single wafer processing chamber, the method comprising: heating the single wafer processing chamber to a temperature in a range of 650-700° C.; andforming at least one superlattice on the semiconductor wafer within the heated single wafer processing chamber by depositing silicon and oxygen to form a plurality of stacked groups of layers with each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base silicon monolayers defining a base silicon portion and at least one oxygen monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base silicon portions;wherein depositing the oxygen comprises depositing the oxygen using an N2O gas flow, and wherein a total dose of N2O is in a range of 1×1014 to 7×1014 atoms/cm2 during the oxygen monolayer formation.
  • 28. The method of claim 27 wherein depositing the oxygen comprises depositing the oxygen with an exposure time in a range of 1 to 100 seconds.
  • 29. The method of claim 27 wherein the N2O gas flow is in a range of 10 to 5000 standard cubic centimeters per minute (SCCM).
  • 30. The method of claim 27 wherein depositing the oxygen comprises depositing the oxygen at a pressure in a range of 10 to 100 Torr.
  • 31. The method of claim 27 wherein the semiconductor wafer comprises a plurality of spaced apart shallow trench isolation (STI) regions, and wherein forming the at least one superlattice comprises selectively forming a respective superlattice between adjacent pairs of STI regions.
  • 32. The method of claim 27 wherein forming the at least one superlattice comprises a blanket superlattice formation on the semiconductor wafer.
  • 33. The method of claim 27 wherein at least some silicon atoms from opposing base silicon portions are chemically bound together through the at least one oxygen monolayer therebetween.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of provisional application No. 62/169,885 filed Jun. 2, 2015, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (154)
Number Name Date Kind
4485128 Dalal et al. Nov 1984 A
4590399 Roxlo et al. May 1986 A
4594603 Holonyak, Jr. Jun 1986 A
4882609 Schubert et al. Nov 1989 A
4908678 Yamazaki Mar 1990 A
4937204 Ishibashi et al. Jun 1990 A
4969031 Kobayashi et al. Nov 1990 A
5055887 Yamazaki Oct 1991 A
5081513 Jackson et al. Jan 1992 A
5216262 Tsu Jun 1993 A
5357119 Wang et al. Oct 1994 A
5577061 Hasenberg et al. Nov 1996 A
5594567 Akiyama et al. Jan 1997 A
5606177 Wallace et al. Feb 1997 A
5616515 Okuno Apr 1997 A
5627386 Harvey et al. May 1997 A
5683934 Candelaria Nov 1997 A
5684817 Houdre et al. Nov 1997 A
5994164 Fonash et al. Nov 1999 A
6058127 Joannopoulos et al. May 2000 A
6255150 Wilk et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274007 Smirnov et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281518 Sato Aug 2001 B1
6281532 Doyle et al. Aug 2001 B1
6326311 Euda et al. Dec 2001 B1
6344271 Yadav et al. Feb 2002 B1
6350993 Chu et al. Feb 2002 B1
6376337 Wang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6436784 Allam Aug 2002 B1
6472685 Takagi Oct 2002 B2
6498359 Schmidt et al. Dec 2002 B2
6501092 Nikonov et al. Dec 2002 B1
6521549 Kamath et al. Feb 2003 B1
6566679 Nikonov et al. May 2003 B2
6608327 Davis et al. Aug 2003 B1
6621097 Nikonov et al. Sep 2003 B2
6638838 Eisenbeiser et al. Oct 2003 B1
6646293 Emrick et al. Nov 2003 B2
6673646 Droopad Jan 2004 B2
6690699 Capasso et al. Feb 2004 B2
6711191 Kozaki et al. Mar 2004 B1
6741624 Mears et al. May 2004 B2
6748002 Shveykin Jun 2004 B2
6816530 Capasso et al. Nov 2004 B2
6830964 Mears et al. Dec 2004 B1
6833294 Mears et al. Dec 2004 B1
6878576 Mears et al. Apr 2005 B1
6891188 Mears et al. May 2005 B2
6897472 Mears et al. May 2005 B2
6927413 Mears et al. Aug 2005 B2
6952018 Mears et al. Oct 2005 B2
6958486 Mears et al. Oct 2005 B2
6993222 Mears et al. Jan 2006 B2
7018900 Krepps Mar 2006 B2
7033437 Mears et al. Apr 2006 B2
7034329 Mears et al. Apr 2006 B2
7045377 Mears et al. May 2006 B2
7045813 Mears et al. May 2006 B2
7071119 Mears et al. Jul 2006 B2
7109052 Mears et al. Sep 2006 B2
7123792 Mears et al. Oct 2006 B1
7153763 Hytha et al. Dec 2006 B2
7202494 Blanchard et al. Apr 2007 B2
7227174 Mears et al. Jun 2007 B2
7229902 Mears et al. Jun 2007 B2
7265002 Mears et al. Sep 2007 B2
7279699 Mears et al. Oct 2007 B2
7279701 Kreps Oct 2007 B2
7288457 Kreps Oct 2007 B2
7303948 Mears et al. Dec 2007 B2
7432524 Mears et al. Oct 2008 B2
7435988 Mears et al. Oct 2008 B2
7436026 Kreps Oct 2008 B2
7446002 Mears et al. Nov 2008 B2
7446334 Mears et al. Nov 2008 B2
7491587 Rao Feb 2009 B2
7514328 Rao Apr 2009 B2
7517702 Halilov et al. Apr 2009 B2
7531828 Mears et al. May 2009 B2
7531829 Blanchard May 2009 B2
7531850 Blanchard May 2009 B2
7535041 Blanchard May 2009 B2
7586116 Kreps et al. Sep 2009 B2
7586165 Blanchard Sep 2009 B2
7598515 Mears et al. Oct 2009 B2
7612366 Mears et al. Nov 2009 B2
7625767 Huang et al. Dec 2009 B2
7659539 Kreps et al. Feb 2010 B2
7700447 Dukovski et al. Apr 2010 B2
7718996 Dukovski et al. May 2010 B2
7781827 Rao Aug 2010 B2
7812339 Mears et al. Oct 2010 B2
7863066 Mears et al. Jan 2011 B2
7880161 Mears et al. Feb 2011 B2
7928425 Rao Apr 2011 B2
8389974 Mears et al. Mar 2013 B2
8497171 Wu et al. Jul 2013 B1
9275996 Mears et al. Mar 2016 B2
20020094003 Bour et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030034529 Fitzgerald et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030057416 Currie et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030089899 Lieber et al. May 2003 A1
20030162335 Yuki et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030215990 Fitzgerald et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040084781 Ahn et al. May 2004 A1
20040227165 Wang et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040262594 Mears et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040262597 Mears et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040266045 Mears et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040266046 Mears et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040266116 Mears et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050029510 Mears et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050032247 Mears et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050163692 Atanackovic Jul 2005 A1
20050208715 Seo et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050279991 Mears et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050282330 Mears et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060011905 Mears et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060220118 Stephenson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060223215 Blanchard Oct 2006 A1
20060226502 Blanchard Oct 2006 A1
20060231857 Blanchard Oct 2006 A1
20060243964 Kreps et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060263980 Kreps et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060267130 Rao Nov 2006 A1
20060273299 Stephenson et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060289049 Rao Dec 2006 A1
20060292765 Blanchard et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070010040 Mears et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070012910 Mears et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070015344 Mears et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070020833 Mears et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070020860 Mears et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070063185 Rao Mar 2007 A1
20070063186 Rao Mar 2007 A1
20070158640 Halilov et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070166928 Halilov et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070187667 Halilov et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070197006 Dukovski et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080012004 Huang et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080197340 Mears et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090072276 Inaba Mar 2009 A1
20090267155 Izumida et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100270535 Halilov et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110074498 Thompson et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110215299 Rao Sep 2011 A1
20120261716 Yanagihara Oct 2012 A1
20130026486 Miyoshi et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130240836 Lee et al. Sep 2013 A1
20150144877 Mears May 2015 A1
20150144878 Mears et al. May 2015 A1
20150357414 Mears et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160099317 Mears et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160149023 Mears et al. May 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
0 843 361 May 1998 EP
2 347 520 Jun 2000 GB
61027681 Feb 1986 JP
61145820 Jul 1986 JP
61220339 Sep 1986 JP
62219665 Sep 1987 JP
9629728 Sep 1996 WO
9963580 Dec 1999 WO
02103767 Dec 2002 WO
2005034245 Apr 2005 WO
2007011790 Jan 2007 WO
2008130899 Oct 2008 WO
2015077580 May 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (27)
Entry
Keim et al., Adsorption of atomic oxygen (N20) on a clean Si(100) surface and its influence on the surface state density; A comparision with O2″, Surface Science, vol. 180, No. 203, Feb. 1987, pp. 565-598.
Lau et al., “Evidence that N2O is a stronger oxidizing agent than O2 for both Ta205 and bare Si below 1000,o.C and temperature for minimum low-K interfacial oxide for high-K dielectric on Si”, Microelectronics and Reliability, Elsevier Science Ltd., vol. 47, No. 203, Feb. 2007, pp. 429-433.
Lucovsky et al, “Low temperature plasma-assisted oxidation and thin-film deposition processes for forming levice-quality SiO″2/Si and composite dielectric-SiO″2/Si heterostructures”, Thin Solid Films, Elsevier-Sequoia S.A., vol. 220, No. 1-2, Nov. 1992, pp. 38-44.
Uno et al, “XPS study of the oxidation process of Si(111) via photochemical decomposition of N″2O by an UV excimer laser”, Surface Science, vol. 193, No. 3, Jan. 1998, pp. 321-335.
Luo et al., “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon”, published in Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 2002) 4 pgs.
Raphael Tsu “Si Based Green ELD: Si-Oxygen Superlattice” wysiwyg://l/http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/72512946/start: published online Jul. 21, 2000; 2 pgs. Abstract Only.
Yu et al., GaAs MOSFET with Oxide Gate Dielectric Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition, Agere Systems, Mar. 2003; 7 pgs.
Novikov et al., Silicon-based Optoelectronics, 1999-2003, pp. 1-6.
Fan et al., N- and P-Type SiGe/Si Superlattice Coolers, the Seventeenth Intersociety Conference on Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm 2000), vol. 1, pp. 304-307, Las Vegas, NV, May 2000; 4 pgs.
Shah et al., Experimental Analysis and Theoretical Model for Anomalously High Ideality Factors (n>2.0) in AlGaN/GaN P—N. Junction Diodes, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 94, No. 4, Aug. 15, 2003; 4 pgs.
Ball, Striped Nanowires Shrink Electronics, news@nature.com, Feb. 7, 2002; 2 pgs.
Fiory et al., Light Emission from Silicon: Some Perspectives and Applications, Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 32, No. 10, 2003; pp. 1043-1051.
Lecture 6: Light Emitting and Detecting Devices, MSE 6001, Semiconductor Materials Lectures, Fall 2004; 4 pgs.
Harvard University Professor and Nanosys Co-Founder, Charlie Lieber, Raises the Stakes in the Development of Nanoscale Superlattice Structures and Nanodevices, Feb. 8, 2002, Nanosys, Inc.; 2 pgs.
Bu, “FINFET Technology, a substrate prospective”, IBM Research, PreT0 Alliance, SOI Conference, 2011, pp. 1-28.
Xu et al., “MOSFET performance and scalability enhancement by insertion of oxygen layers”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 1-4.
R. Tsu “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure devices” published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402.
Shinada et al., Nature 437, 1128 (2005)) Retrieved from internet Jun. 19, 2015; 3 pgs.
Xu et al. “Effectiveness of Quasi-confinement technology for improving P-chanel Si an Ge MOSSFET performance” Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 2. mearstech.net; retrieved from internet Jan. 18, 2016.
Xu et al. “Extension of planar bulk n-channel MOSFET scaling with oxygen insertion technology” IEEE Transactions on Electron devices, vol. 61, No. 9; Sep. 2014. pp. 3345-3349.
Liu et al. Threshold Voltage Model for Deep-Submicrometer MOSFET's IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 40, No. I, Jan. 1993: pp. 86-95.
Brews et al. “Generalized guide for MOSFET miniaturization” IEEE Electron Device Letters 1(1):2-4 • Jan. 1980.
Damrongplasit et al. “Comparative study of uniform versus supersteep retrograde MOSFET channel doping and Implication for 6-T SRAM yield” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 60, No. 5, May 2013: pp. 1790-1793.
Mears et al. “Simultaneous Carrier Transport Enhancement and variability reduction in Si MOSFETs by insertion of partial Monolayers of oxygen” IEEE silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop (2012): (Date of conference Jun. 10-11 2012).
U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,276, filed May 13, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,296, filed May 13, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/966,312, filed Jan. 15, 2016.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160358773 A1 Dec 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62169885 Jun 2015 US