1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the invention generally relate to systems for immersing a substrate in an electrolyte solution, and more particularly, to apparatuses and methods for controlling electrical power applied to a substrate during an immersion process.
2. Description of the Related Art
Metallization of sub-quarter micron sized features is a foundational technology for present and future generations of integrated circuit manufacturing processes. More particularly, in devices such as ultra large scale integration-type devices, i.e., devices having integrated circuits with more than a million logic gates, the multilevel interconnects that lie at the heart of these devices are generally formed by filling high aspect ratio interconnect features with a conductive material, such as copper or aluminum, for example. Conventionally, deposition techniques such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD), for example, have been used to fill these interconnect features. However, as interconnect sizes decrease and aspect ratios increase, void-free interconnect feature fill via conventional metallization techniques becomes increasingly difficult. As a result thereof, plating techniques, such as electrochemical plating (ECP) and electroless plating, for example, have emerged as viable processes for void free filling of sub-quarter micron sized high aspect ratio interconnect features in integrated circuit manufacturing processes.
In an ECP process, for example, sub-quarter micron sized high aspect ratio features formed into the surface of a substrate may be efficiently filled with a conductive material, such as copper, for example. ECP plating processes are generally two stage processes, wherein a seed layer is first formed over the surface features of the substrate, and then the surface features of the substrate are exposed to an electrolyte solution, while an electrical bias is simultaneously applied between the substrate and an anode positioned within the electrolyte solution. The electrolyte solution is generally rich in ions to be plated onto the surface of the substrate, and therefore, the application of the electrical bias causes these ions to be urged out of the electrolyte solution and to be plated onto the seed layer.
However, one challenge associated with ECP processes is that the plating solutions, which are generally acidic, may chemically etch the seed layer during the process of immersing the substrate in the plating solution. Inasmuch as seed layers are generally relatively thin conductive layers, the chemical etching that may take place during the immersion process may result in conductive discontinuities in the seed layer, which may cause plating irregularities in the subsequent plating processes. Therefore, in order to prevent chemical etching during the immersion process, conventional ECP plating systems apply an electrical loading bias to the substrate seed layer during the immersion process. The loading bias is generally configured to apply a cathodic bias to the substrate in order to prevent the chemical etching process and to cause at least some forward plating to occur. A conventional loading bias generally includes a constant voltage or current being applied to the substrate as the substrate is immersed in the plating solution in a tilt-type motion, i.e., one edge of the substrate is first immersed, and then a tilting motion is used to immerse the remaining portion of the substrate. This generally operates to urge bubbles that may form on the surface of the substrate toward the upper end of the substrate being tilted into the plating solution, and therefore, remove the bubbles from the surface, so that plating irregularities that may result from bubbles are minimized. However, as the surface of the substrate is immersed in the tilting motion under the constant load bias, the conductive area of the substrate being immersed is changing (increasing), and therefore, the resistance of the conductive path is also changing (decreasing). As a result of the changes in the current path during the immersion process, the current density applied across the surface of the substrate varies through the immersion process. Although the immersion process may only take a few seconds, the uniformity of the thin conductive seed layer may be affected by the varying current density applied across the surface of the seed layer, and therefore, the uniformity of layers subsequently plated over the seed layer may also be affected.
Therefore, there is a need for an apparatus and method for applying a loading bias to a substrate being immersed in a plating solution, wherein the method and apparatus provide a uniform current density across the surface of the substrate throughout the immersion process.
Embodiments of the invention generally provide a method and apparatus for providing a uniform current density across an immersed surface of a substrate during an immersion process. An embodiment of the method includes the steps of determining a time varying area of an immersed portion of the substrate during the immersion process, and supplying a time varying current to the substrate during the immersion process, wherein the time varying current is proportional to the time varying area and is configured to provide a constant current density to the immersed portion of the substrate.
Embodiments of the invention further provide a method for maintaining a loading bias having a constant current density during an immersion process. Embodiments generally include sensing a pivotal position of a lid member supporting a substrate during an immersion process, and determining a present total immersed area from the sensed pivotal position. The method can further include determining a load bias current that will generate the constant current density, and adjusting a current supplied to the substrate to correspond with the load bias current. Additionally, the steps of sensing, determining the current, determining the load bias, and adjusting can be at predetermined time intervals during the immersion process.
Embodiments of the invention further provide a method for maintaining a target current density across an immersed portion of a substrate surface. The methods generally include applying an initial current to the substrate surface as an immersion process initiates, the initial current being calculated to generate the target current density across the substrate surface, and pivotally immersing the substrate surface during an immersion duration. The method may further include determining a time varying immersed surface area of the substrate, and applying a time varying current to the immersed surface area of the substrate, wherein the time varying current is proportional to the time varying change in the immersed surface area and is calculated to maintain the target current density across the immersed portion of the substrate surface.
Embodiments of the invention may further provide an apparatus for plating metal onto substrates. The apparatuses generally include an electrolyte container, a lid member pivotally mounted proximate the electrolyte container, the lid member being configured to selectively support a substrate in fluid contact with electrolyte in the electrolyte container, and a power supply in electrical communication with the lid member and configured to supply an electrical bias to the substrate. The apparatus may further include a controller in electrical communication with the power supply, wherein the controller is configured to determine a time varying area of an immersed portion of the substrate during an immersion process, and supply a time varying current to the substrate during the immersion process, the time varying current being proportional to the time varying area and so that constant current density is maintained across the immersed portion of the substrate.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention are attained and can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
The present invention generally provides an apparatus and method for controlling the voltage or current applied to a substrate being immersed in an electrolyte solution. The voltage or current may be controlled in a manner that provides a constant current density across the surface of the substrate as the area of the substrate contacting the electrolyte increases during the immersion process. The application of a constant current density to the substrate surface operates to prevent seed layer irregularities and/or discontinuities that may facilitate plating uniformity problems in subsequent processing steps.
In operation, plating cell 102, such as an electrochemical plating (ECP) cell, for example, is configured to plate metal, such as copper or aluminum, onto a substrate. With lid 101 in an open position, a substrate to be plated is positioned on the lower side of lid 101. Once the substrate is positioned, a loading bias is applied to the substrate by power supply 104 and lid 101 is pivoted so that the substrate becomes immersed in the electrolyte solution 103. However, during the immersion process, the loading bias is controlled by controller 108 to maintain a constant current density across the surface of the substrate throughout the immersion process. More particularly, controller 108 operates to provide a time varying control of the output of power supply 104 so that the current supplied to the substrate can be varied as the substrate becomes immersed in the electrolyte solution. The variance in the current provided by power supply 104 is configured to provide a constant current density over the area of the substrate being immersed in the electrolyte solution, even though the area of the substrate being immersed in the electrolyte solution is continually increasing as lid 101 pivots into contact with the electrolyte solution. The load bias can be applied to the substrate surface immediately before the immersion process initiates and terminates immediately before the plating bias is applied to the substrate.
The calculation of the time varying area of the substrate immersed in the electrolyte solution generally includes incrementally calculating the area of minute sections of the immersed portion of the substrate and summing the sections together to obtain the total area immersed for a particular time. The size of the minute sections may be determined by the user. If greater accuracy is desired, then the size of the individual sections should be smaller, and conversely, if larger sized sections are used, then the measurement will be less accurate. Therefore, as the immersed area increases, additional incremental sections of area may be added to the previous total area calculated to obtain the current total area immersed. Referring to
wherein R/n represents the width of the sectional area to be calculated, 2n represents the total number of sections to be calculated in the immersion process, j represents the previous section, j+1 represents the current section being calculated, and R represents the radius of the substrate being immersed, as illustrated in FIG. 2. The calculation of equation (1) may be conducted for each j that is less than the total number of sections 2n. Therefore, using simple algebraic manipulations, the area of the previous section may be represented by the equation:
and therefore, the area of the current section may be represented by the equation:
Therefore, for example, the current supplied to the substrate during the initial stage of the immersion process, i.e., during the stage where the area immersed in the electrolyte solution corresponds to Rj, may be calculated by multiplying the area of section Rj by the desired current density. As the immersion process continues, the area increases, and therefore, the area used to calculate the current to be supplied to the immersed area in order to generate the desired current density also increases. However, the calculation process generally remains the same, except for the fact that the area used to calculate the current supplied to generate the desired current density changes in accordance with the area calculations. As such, the process for providing a uniform current density across the surface of the substrate during the immersion process generally becomes a process of increasing the current supplied to the substrate proportionally to the increase in the immersed area of the substrate, so that the current per unit of immersed area of the substrate remains constant.
Therefore, for example, assuming that the desired current density during the immersion process is represented by J0, then the current supplied to the substrate may be represented by the equation:
Ij=J0·Aj (4),
wherein, Ij represents the current supplied to the substrate at time j and Aj represents the area immersed at time j. Using equation (4), when j is less than or equal to the total time, i.e., when the substrate is in the immersion process, then the area Aj may be calculated by the equation:
When j is greater than n, which represents the situation where over half of the substrate is immersed, as illustrated in
where at the initial step, ie., where n=1, I1 will equal a small initial current. The total time it takes from the substrate initially touching the plating solution until the time when the substrate surface is fully immersed in the plating solution is represented by t0. Inasmuch when j=1 corresponds to the point where the substrate is initially immersed in the solution, it corresponds that the current supplied to the substrate will be the initial current. However, as the immersion process continues, the immersed area increases, and therefore, the current supplied to the substrate must also increase if the current density across the surface of the substrate is to remain constant. For example, at step 2, which generally corresponds to j=2, the current supplied to the immersed area may be represented by the equation:
Similarly, at step j=3, the current supplied to the immersed area may be represented by the equation:
When the step increment reaches j, then the current supplied to the immersed portion of the substrate is equal to the total current density (J0). Additionally, as illustrated in
In one embodiment of the invention, the current supplied to the substrate is increased as the immersion surface area increases in accordance with a time calculation. For example, the total time for an immersion process can be determined through experimentation. Thereafter, a correlation between the elapsed time in the immersion process and the immersed surface area can be determined through calculation. As such, with the correlation between the elapsed time and immersion area determined, the current and supply to the substrate can then be determined in accordance with the increase in the immersion time, as the time is proportional to the immersion area. Therefore, knowing the correlation between the immersion time and the immersion surface area, processing recipes can be modified to include a proportional change in the current supplied to the substrate during the immersion process so that a uniform current density across the immersed surface area can be maintained throughout the immersion process.
In another embodiment of the invention, sensor 109 is used to determine the exact radial or tilting position of lid 101 during the immersion process. As such, a position of lid 101 is transmitted to controller 108, which may then calculate the immersed area in a real-time manner. The calculated, immersed area may then be used to determine the current to be supplied to the substrate in order to maintain a uniform current density across the immersed substrate area. The granularity/incremental section sampling of the measurement process may be increased simply by taking more measurements per unit time, and therefore, adjusting the current supplied to the immersed surface area more per unit time. Although the end result of the present embodiment is to provide a uniform current density across the immersed surface area of the substrate, the present embodiment also provides for a uniform current density across the immersed area of the substrate during nonuniform immersion processes. For example, if the immersion speed of lid 101 is not constant or is not repeatable between respective immersion processes, the present embodiment may be utilized to maintain a uniform current density across the immersed area of the substrate regardless of the immersion speed, as the current calculation is independent of the elapsed immersion time. Therefore, the feedback loop type system of the present embodiment may provide advantages over other embodiments of the invention in specific configurations wherein the elapsed time of the immersion process is not constant across several substrate immersions.
In another embodiment of the invention, the method for maintaining a uniform current density across the surface of the substrate is utilized during the process of removing a substrate from a plating cell. For example, once a plating process for a substrate is complete, the substrate is removed from the plating chamber be reversing the steps of the immersion process. In the reverse immersion process, it may be desirable to maintain a constant current density across the immersed surface of the substrate in order to avoid variances in uniformity, in similar fashion to the constant current density maintained during the immersion process. Therefore, in the reverse immersion process, the current supplied to the substrate may be decreased as the immersed area of the substrate decreases, so that a uniform current density across the immersed area of the substrate may be maintained. The process of controlling the current to the substrate during the reverse immersion process is, for example, conducted to a feedback loop type system or a time varying current control type system, as discussed in the previous embodiments. Regardless of the type of current control system implemented, the current supplied to the substrate during the reverse immersion process will generally be proportional to the surface area of the substrate remaining immersed in the plating solution.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2742413 | Cransberg et al. | Apr 1956 | A |
2882209 | Brown | Apr 1959 | A |
3627661 | Gordon et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3649509 | Morawetz et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3727620 | Orr | Apr 1973 | A |
3770598 | Creutz | Nov 1973 | A |
4027686 | Shortes et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4065374 | Asami et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4092176 | Kozai et al. | May 1978 | A |
4110176 | Creutz et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4113492 | Sato et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4120759 | Asami et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4129480 | Robert | Dec 1978 | A |
4315059 | Raistrick et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4326940 | Eckles et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4336114 | Mayer et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4376685 | Watson | Mar 1983 | A |
4396467 | Anthony | Aug 1983 | A |
4405416 | Raistrick et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4428815 | Powell et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4435266 | Johnston | Mar 1984 | A |
4489740 | Rattan et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4496436 | Inoue | Jan 1985 | A |
4510176 | Cuthbert et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4518678 | Allen | May 1985 | A |
4519846 | Aigo | May 1985 | A |
4693805 | Quazi | Sep 1987 | A |
4732785 | Brewer | Mar 1988 | A |
4789445 | Goffman et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4869971 | Nee et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4891106 | Domnikov | Jan 1990 | A |
4898647 | Luce et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5039381 | Mullarkey | Aug 1991 | A |
5055425 | Leibovitz et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5092975 | Yamamura et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5155336 | Gronet et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5162260 | Leibovitz et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5178813 | Akatsu et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5222310 | Thompson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5224504 | Thompson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5230743 | Thompson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5252807 | Chizinsky | Oct 1993 | A |
5256274 | Poris | Oct 1993 | A |
5259407 | Tuchida et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5290361 | Hayashida et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5302256 | Miura et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5316974 | Crank | May 1994 | A |
5328589 | Martin | Jul 1994 | A |
5349978 | Sago et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5368711 | Poris | Nov 1994 | A |
5377708 | Bergman et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5384640 | Wong | Jan 1995 | A |
5415890 | Kloiber et al. | May 1995 | A |
5429733 | Ishida | Jul 1995 | A |
5447615 | Ishida | Sep 1995 | A |
5454930 | Miura et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5516412 | Andricacos et al. | May 1996 | A |
5516414 | Glafenhein et al. | May 1996 | A |
5528118 | Lee | Jun 1996 | A |
5608943 | Konishi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5625170 | Poris | Apr 1997 | A |
5651865 | Sellers | Jul 1997 | A |
5670034 | Lowery | Sep 1997 | A |
5705223 | Bunkofske | Jan 1998 | A |
5723028 | Poris | Mar 1998 | A |
5730890 | Bickford et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5838121 | Fairbairn et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5885469 | Kholodenko et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6024856 | Haydu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6071388 | Uzoh | Jun 2000 | A |
6074544 | Reid et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093291 | Izumi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6113771 | Landau et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133061 | Sonoda | Oct 2000 | A |
6162344 | Reid et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174425 | Simpson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197181 | Chen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203582 | Berner et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203684 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210555 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224737 | Tsai et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6251236 | Stevens | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254760 | Shen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258220 | Dordi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261433 | Landau | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261733 | Coppens et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267853 | Dordi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277263 | Chen | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290833 | Chen | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303014 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319384 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6340633 | Lopatin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344419 | Forster et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350366 | Landau et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6391166 | Wang | May 2002 | B1 |
6395101 | Scranton et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6399479 | Chen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409903 | Chung et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423636 | Dordi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432821 | Dubin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432832 | Miller et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440291 | Henri et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6551484 | Hey et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551488 | Chen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565729 | Chen | May 2003 | B2 |
6632345 | Chen et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638410 | Chen et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
20010015321 | Reid et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 160 846 | Dec 2001 | EP |
520 563 69 | Sep 1977 | JP |
58182823 | Oct 1983 | JP |
63118093 | May 1988 | JP |
04280993 | Oct 1992 | JP |
06-17291 | Jan 1994 | JP |
04-141395 | May 1994 | JP |
53086580 | Jul 1998 | JP |
9712079 | Apr 1997 | WO |
9925902 | May 1999 | WO |
9925903 | May 1999 | WO |
9925904 | May 1999 | WO |
9925905 | May 1999 | WO |
9926275 | May 1999 | WO |
9947731 | Sep 1999 | WO |
9954527 | Oct 1999 | WO |
0190446 | Nov 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030201166 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |