This invention relates to the field of supercritical processing. More particularly, this invention relates to the field of supercritical processing where multiple workpieces are processed simultaneously.
Semiconductor fabrication uses photoresist in ion implantation, etching, and other processing steps. In the ion implantation steps, the photoresist masks areas of a semiconductor substrate that are not implanted with a dopant. In the etching steps, the photoresist masks areas of the semiconductor substrate that are not etched. Examples of the other processing steps include using the photoresist as a blanket protective coating of a processed wafer or the blanket protective coating of a MEMS (micro electro-mechanical system) device. Following the ion implantation steps, the photoresist exhibits a hard outer crust covering a jelly-like core. The hard outer crust leads to difficulties in a photoresist removal. Following the etching steps, remaining photoresist exhibits a hardened character that leads to difficulties in the photoresist removal. Following the etching steps, residue (photoresist residue mixed with etch residue) coats sidewalls of etch features. Depending on a type of etching step and material etched, the photoresist residue mixed with the etch residue presents a challenging removal problem since the photoresist residue mixed with the etch residue often strongly bond to the sidewalls of the etch features.
Typically, in the prior art, the photoresist and the residue are removed by plasma ashing in an O2 plasma followed by cleaning in a wet-clean bath. A semiconductor etching and metallization process of the prior art is illustrated in block diagram format in FIG. 1. The semiconductor etching and metallization process 10 includes a photoresist application step 12, a photoresist exposure step 14, a photoresist development step 16, a dielectric etch step 18, an ashing step 20, a wet cleaning step 22, and a metal deposition step 24. In the photoresist application step 12, the photoresist is applied to a wafer having an exposed oxide layer. In the photoresist exposure step 14, the photoresist is exposed to light which is partially blocked by a mask.
Depending upon whether the photoresist is a positive or negative photoresist, either exposed photoresist or non-exposed photoresist, respectively, is removed in the photoresist development step 16 leaving a exposed pattern on the oxide layer. In the dielectric etch step 18, the exposed pattern on the oxide layer is etched in an RIE (reactive ion etch) process which etches the exposed pattern into the oxide layer, forming an etched pattern, while also partially etching the photoresist. This produces the residue which coats the sidewalls of the etch features while also hardening the photoresist. In the ashing step 20, the O2 plasma oxidizes and partially removes the photoresist and the residue. In the wet cleaning step 22, remaining photoresist and residue is cleaned in the wet-clean bath.
In the metal deposition step 24, a metal layer is deposited on the wafer filling the etched pattern and also covering non-etched regions. In subsequent processing, at least part of the metal covering the non-etched regions is removed in order to form a circuit.
Nishikawa et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 4,944,837, issued on Jul. 31, 1990, recite a prior art method of removing a resist using liquidized or supercritical gas. A substrate with the resist is placed into a pressure vessel, which also contains the liquidized or supercritical gas. After a predetermined time lapse, the liquidized or supercritical gas is rapidly expanded, which removes the resist.
Nishikawa et al. teach that supercritical CO2 can be used as a developer for photoresist. A substrate with a photoresist layer is exposed in a pattern to light, thus forming a latent image. The substrate with the photoresist and the latent image is placed in a supercritical CO2 bath for 30 minutes. The supercritical CO2 is then condensed leaving the pattern of the photoresist. Nishikawa et al. further teach that 0.5% by weight of methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) can be added to the supercritical CO2, which increases an effectiveness of the supercritical CO2 and, thus, reduces a development time from the 30 minutes to 5 minutes. Nishikawa et al. also teach that a photoresist can be removed using the supercritical CO2 and 7% by weight of the MIBK. The substrate with the photoresist is placed in the supercritical CO2 and the MIBK for 30-45 minutes. Upon condensing the supercritical CO2, the photoresist has been removed.
The methods taught by Nishikawa et al. are inappropriate for a semiconductor fabrication line for a number of reasons. Rapidly expanding a liquidized or supercritical gas to remove a photoresist from a substrate creates a potential for breakage of the substrate. A photoresist development process which takes 30 minutes is too inefficient. A photoresist development or removal process which uses MIBK is not preferred because MIBK is toxic and because MIBK is used only when a more suitable choice is unavailable.
Smith, Jr. et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,377,705, issued on Jan. 3, 1995, teach a system for cleaning contaminants from a workpiece. The contaminants include organic, particulate, and ionic contaminants. The system includes a pressurizable cleaning vessel, a liquid CO2 storage container, a pump, a solvent delivery system, a separator, a condenser, and various valves. The pump transfers CO2 gas and solvent to the cleaning vessel and pressurizes the CO2 gas to supercritical CO2. The supercritical CO2 and the solvent remove the contaminants from the workpiece. A valve allows some of the supercritical CO2 and the solvent to bleed from the cleaning vessel while the pump replenishes the supercritical CO2 and the solvent. The separator separates the solvent from the supercritical CO2. The condenser condenses the CO2 to liquid CO2 so that the liquid CO2 storage container can be replenished.
Employing a system such as taught by Smith, Jr. et al. for removing photoresist and residue presents a number of difficulties. The pressurizable cleaning vessel is not configured appropriately for semiconductor substrate handling. It is inefficient to bleed the supercritical CO2 and the solvent during cleaning. Such a system is not readily adaptable to throughput requirements of a semiconductor fabrication line. Such a system is not conducive to safe semiconductor substrate handling, which is crucial in a semiconductor fabrication line. Such a system is not economical for semiconductor substrate processing.
What is needed is a method of developing photoresist using supercritical carbon dioxide appropriate for a semiconductor fabrication line.
What is needed is a method of removing photoresist using supercritical carbon dioxide appropriate for a semiconductor fabrication line.
What is needed is a supercritical processing system which is configured for handling semiconductor substrates.
What is needed is a supercritical processing system in which supercritical CO2 and solvent are not necessarily bled from a processing chamber in order to create a fluid flow within the processing chamber.
What is needed is a supercritical processing system which meets throughput requirements of a semiconductor fabrication line.
What is needed is a supercritical processing system which provides safe semiconductor substrate handling.
What is needed is a supercritical processing system which provides economical semiconductor substrate processing.
The present invention is an apparatus for supercritical processing of multiple workpieces. The apparatus includes a transfer module, first and second supercritical processing modules, and a robot. The transfer module includes an entrance. The first and second supercritical processing modules are coupled to the transfer module. The robot is preferably located within the transfer module. In operation, the robot transfers a first workpiece from the entrance of the transfer module to the first supercritical processing module. The robot then transfers a second workpiece from the entrance to the second supercritical processing module. After the workpieces have been processed, the robot returns the first and second workpieces to the entrance of the transfer module. Alternatively, the apparatus includes additional supercritical processing modules coupled to the transfer module.
A semiconductor etch and metallization process of the present invention is illustrated, as a block diagram, in FIG. 2. The semiconductor etch and metallization process 30 includes a photoresist application step 32, a photoresist exposure step 34, a photoresist development step 36, a dielectric etch step 38, a supercritical removal process 40, and a metal deposition step 42. In the photoresist application step 32, the photoresist is applied to a wafer having an exposed oxide layer. In the photoresist exposure step 34, the photoresist is exposed to light which is partially blocked by a mask.
Depending upon whether the photoresist is a positive or negative photoresist, either exposed photoresist or non-exposed photoresist, respectively, is removed in the photoresist development step 36 leaving a exposed pattern on the oxide layer. In the dielectric etch step 38, the exposed pattern on the oxide layer is preferably etched in an RIE (reactive ion etch) process which etches the exposed pattern into the oxide layer while also partially etching the photoresist. This produces the residue which coats the sidewalls of the etch features while also hardening the photoresist.
In the supercritical removal process 40, supercritical carbon dioxide and a solvent are used to remove the photoresist and the residue. In the metal deposition step 42, a metal layer is deposited on the wafer filling the etched pattern and also covering non-etched regions. In subsequent processing, at least part of the metal covering the non-etched regions is removed in order to form a circuit.
The supercritical removal process 40 of the present invention is illustrated, as a block diagram, in FIG. 3. The supercritical removal process 40 begins by placing the wafer, with the photoresist and the residue on the wafer, within a pressure chamber and sealing the pressure chamber in a first process step 52. In a second process step 54, the pressure chamber is pressurized with carbon dioxide until the carbon dioxide becomes the supercritical carbon dioxide (SCCO2). In a third process step 56, the supercritical carbon dioxide carries a solvent into the process chamber. In a fourth process step 58, the supercritical carbon dioxide and the solvent are maintained in contact with the wafer until the photoresist and the residue are removed from the wafer. In the fourth process step 58, the solvent at least partially dissolves the photoresist and the residue. In a fifth process step 60, the pressure chamber is partially exhausted. In a sixth process step 62, the wafer is rinsed. In a seventh process step 64, the supercritical removal process 40 ends by depressurizing the pressure chamber and removing the wafer.
The supercritical removal process 40 is preferably implemented in a semiconductor fabrication line by the preferred supercritical processing system of the present invention, which is illustrated in FIG. 4. The preferred supercritical processing system 70 includes a transfer module 72, first through fifth supercritical processing modules, 74-78, a robot 80, and control electronics 82. The transfer module includes first through fifth process ports, 84-88, and a transfer module entrance 90. The transfer module entrance 90 includes first and second hand-off stations, 92 and 94, and first and second entrance ports, 96 and 98.
The first through fifth supercritical processing modules, 74-78, are coupled to the transfer module 72 via the first through fifth process ports, 84-88, respectively. Preferably, the robot 80 is coupled to the transfer module 72 at a center of the transfer module 72. The first and second hand-off stations, 92 and 94, are coupled to the transfer module via the first and second entrance ports, 96 and 98, respectively. The control electronics 82 are coupled to the transfer module 72.
Preferably, the transfer module 72 operates at atmospheric pressure. Alternatively, the transfer module 72 operates at a slight positive pressure relative to a surrounding environment where the slight positive pressure is produced by an inert gas injection arrangement. The inert gas injection arrangement injects an inert gas, such as Ar, CO2, or N2, into the transfer module 72. This assures a cleaner processing environment within the transfer module 72.
The robot 80 preferably includes a robot base 100, a robot arm 102, and an end effector 104. The robot base is coupled to the transfer module 72. The robot arm 102 is preferably a two piece robot arm, which couples the end effector 104 to the robot base 100. The end effector 104 is configured to pick and place workpieces. Preferably, the end effector 104 is configured to pick and place the wafer. Alternatively, the end effector 104 is configured to pick and place a puck or other substrate. Alternatively, a dual arm robot replaces the robot 80, where the dual arm robot includes two arms and two end effectors.
The first through fifth supercritical processing modules, 74-78, preferably include first through fifth gate valves, 106-110, respectively. The first through fifth gate valves, 106-110, couple first through fifth workpiece cavities, 112-116, of the first through fifth supercritical processing modules, 74-78, respectively, to the first through fifth process ports, 84-88.
Preferably, in operation, the robot 80 transfers a first workpiece 118 from the first hand-off station 92 to the first supercritical processing module 74, where the supercritical removal process 40 is performed. Subsequently, the robot 80 transfers a second workpiece 120 from the first hand-off station 92 to the second supercritical processing module 75, where the supercritical removal process 40 is performed. Further, the robot 80 transfers third through fifth workpieces (not shown) from the first hand-off station 92 to the third through fifth supercritical processing modules, 76-78, respectively, where the supercritical removal process 40 is performed.
In subsequent operation, the robot 80 transfers the first workpiece from the first supercritical processing module 74 to the second hand-off station 94. Further, the robot 80 transfers the second workpiece from the second supercritical processing module 75 to the second hand-off station 94. Moreover, the robot 80 transfers the third through fifth workpieces from the third through fifth supercritical processing modules, 76-78, respectively, to the second hand-off station 94.
Preferably, the first workpiece 118, the second wafer 120, and the third through fifth workpieces are wafers. Preferably, the wafers are in a first cassette at the first handoff station 92 prior to supercritical processing. Preferably, the wafers are placed by the robot 80 in a second cassette at the second hand-off station 94 following the supercritical processing. Alternatively, the wafers begin and end in the first cassette at the first handoff station 92 along while a second group of wafers begins and ends in the second cassette at the second hand-off station 94.
It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that the second hand-off station 94 can be eliminated or that additional hand-off stations can be added to the preferred supercritical processing system 70. Further, it will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that the preferred supercritical processing system 70 can be configured with less than the first through fifth supercritical processing modules, 74-78, or more than the first through fifth supercritical processing modules, 74-78. Moreover, it will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that the robot 80 can be replaced by a transfer mechanism which is configured to transfer the first workpiece 118, the second workpiece 120, and the third through fifth workpieces. Additionally, it will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that the first and second cassettes can be front opening unified pods which employ a standard mechanical interface concept so that the wafers can be maintained in a clean environment separate from the surrounding environment.
The first supercritical processing module 74 of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 5. The first supercritical processing module 74 includes a carbon dioxide supply vessel 132, a carbon dioxide pump 134, the pressure chamber 136, a chemical supply vessel 138, a circulation pump 140, and an exhaust gas collection vessel 144. The carbon dioxide supply vessel 132 is coupled to the pressure chamber 136 via the carbon dioxide pump 134 and carbon dioxide piping 146. The carbon dioxide piping 146 includes a carbon dioxide heater 148 located between the carbon dioxide pump 134 and the pressure chamber 136. The pressure chamber 136 includes a pressure chamber heater 150. The circulation pump 140 is located on a circulation line 152, which couples to the pressure chamber 136 at a circulation inlet 154 and at a circulation outlet 156. The chemical supply vessel 138 is coupled to the circulation line 152 via a chemical supply line 158, which includes a first injection pump 159. A rinse agent supply vessel 160 is coupled to the circulation line 152 via a rinse supply line 162, which includes a second injection pump 163. The exhaust gas collection vessel 144 is coupled to the pressure chamber 136 via exhaust gas piping 164.
The carbon dioxide supply vessel 132, the carbon dioxide pump 134, and the carbon dioxide heater 148 form a carbon dioxide supply arrangement 149. The chemical supply vessel 138, the first injection pump 159, the rinse agent supply vessel 160, and the second injection pump 163 form a chemical and rinse agent supply arrangement 165. Preferably, the carbon dioxide supply arrangement 149, the chemical and rinse agent supply arrangement 165, and the exhaust gas collection vessel 144 service the second through fifth supercritical processing modules, 75-78, (
It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that one or more additional carbon dioxide supply arrangements, one or more additional chemical and rinse agent supply arrangements, or one or more additional exhaust gas collection vessels can be provided to service the second through fifth supercritical processing modules, 75-78. Further, it will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that the first supercritical processing module 74 includes valving, control electronics, filters, and utility hookups which are typical of supercritical fluid processing systems. Moreover, it will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that additional chemical supply vessels could be coupled to the first injection pump 159 or that the additional chemical supply vessels and additional injection pumps could be coupled to the circulation line 152.
Referring to
Upon reaching initial supercritical conditions, the first injection pump 159 pumps the solvent from the chemical supply vessel 138 into the pressure chamber 136 via the circulation line 152 while the carbon dioxide pump further pressurizes the supercritical carbon dioxide in the third process step 56. At a beginning of a solvent injection, the pressure in the pressure chamber 136 is about 1,100-1,200 psi. Once a desired amount of the solvent has been pumped into the pressure chamber 136 and desired supercritical conditions are reached, the carbon dioxide pump 134 stops pressurizing the pressure chamber 136, the first injection pump 159 stops pumping the solvent into the pressure chamber 136, and the circulation pump 140 begins circulating the supercritical carbon dioxide and the solvent in the fourth process step 58. Preferably, the pressure at this point is about 2,700-2,800 psi. By circulating the supercritical carbon dioxide and the solvent, the supercritical carbon dioxide maintains the solvent in contact with the wafer. Additionally, by circulating the supercritical carbon dioxide and the solvent, a fluid flow enhances removal of the photoresist and the residue from the wafer.
Preferably, the wafer is held stationary in the pressure chamber 136 during the fourth process step 58. Alternatively, the wafer is spun within the pressure chamber 136 during the fourth process step 58.
After the photoresist and the residue has been removed from the wafer, the pressure chamber 136 is partially depressurized by exhausting some of the supercritical carbon dioxide, the solvent, removed photoresist, and removed residue to the exhaust gas collection vessel 144 in order to return conditions in the pressure chamber 136 to near the initial supercritical conditions in the fifth process step 60. Preferably, the pressure within the pressure chamber 136 is cycled at least once at this point by raising the pressure and then again partially exhausting the pressure chamber 136. This enhances a cleanliness within the pressure chamber 136. In the fifth process step 60, the pressure chamber is preferably maintained above the critical temperature and above a critical pressure. The critical pressure for carbon dioxide is 1,070 psi.
In the sixth process step 62, the second injection pump 163 pumps a rinse agent from the rinse agent supply vessel 160 into the pressure chamber 136 via the circulation line while the carbon dioxide pump 134 pressurizes the pressure chamber 136 to near the desired supercritical conditions and, then, the circulation pump 140 circulates the supercritical carbon dioxide and the rinse agent in order to rinse the wafer. Preferably, the rinse agent is selected from the group consisting of water, alcohol, acetone, and a mixture thereof. More preferably, the rinse agent is the mixture of the alcohol and the water. Preferably, the alcohol is selected from the group consisting of isopropyl alcohol, ethanol, and other low molecular weight alcohols. More preferably, the alcohol is selected from the group consisting of the isopropyl alcohol and the ethanol. Most preferably, the alcohol is the ethanol.
Preferably, the wafer is held stationary in the pressure chamber 136 during the sixth process step 62. Alternatively, the wafer is spun within the pressure chamber 136 during the sixth process step 62.
In the seventh process step 64, the pressure chamber 136 is depressurized, by exhausting the pressure chamber 136 to the exhaust gas collection vessel 144, the gate valve 106 is opened, and the wafer is removed from the pressure chamber 136 by the robot 80.
Alternative supercritical removal processes of the present invention are taught in the following patent applications, all of which are incorporated in their entirety by reference: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/697,227, filed on Oct. 25, 2000; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/389,788, filed on Sep. 3, 1999; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/085,391, filed on May 27, 1998; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/047,739, filed May 27, 1997.
A first alternative supercritical processing system of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 6. The first alternative supercritical processing system 170 adds first through fifth ante-chambers, 172-176, and first through fifth ante-chamber robots, 178-182, to the preferred supercritical processing system 70. In operation, the first through fifth ante-chambers, 172-176, operate from about atmospheric pressure to some elevated pressure. This allows the first through fifth wafer cavities, 112-16, to operate between the elevated pressure and supercritical pressure and, thus, enhancing throughput. Alternatively, in the first alternative supercritical processing system 170, the first through fifth ante-chamber robots, 178-182, are replaced with first through fifth magnetically coupled mechanisms, or first through fifth hydraulically driven mechanisms, or first through fifth pneumatically driven mechanisms.
A second alternative supercritical processing system of the present invention of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 7. The second alternative supercritical processing system 190 replaces the first and second hand-off stations, 92 and 94, of the preferred supercritical processing system 70 with first and second loadlocks, 192 and 194. In operation, the transfer module operates at a second elevated pressure and, thus, also enhances the throughput.
A third alternative supercritical processing system of the present invention of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 8. The third alternative supercritical processing system 200 comprises an alternative transfer module 202 and a robot track 204.
A fourth alternative supercritical processing system of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 9. The fourth alternative supercritical processing system 210 preferably replaces the third supercritical processing module 76 of the preferred supercritical processing system 70 with a third hand-off station 212 and adds a second transfer module 214, a second robot 216, and additional supercritical processing modules 218. In the fourth alternative supercritical processing system 210, the third hand-off station 212 couples the transfer module 72 to the second transfer module 214. The second robot 216 preferably resides in the second transfer module 214. The additional supercritical processing modules 218 are coupled to the second transfer module 214. Thus, the fourth alternative supercritical processing system 210 allows for more supercritical processing modules than the preferred supercritical processing system 70.
A fifth alternative supercritical processing system of the present invention eliminates the transfer module 72 of the preferred supercritical processing system 70. In the fifth alternative supercritical processing system, the robot 80 is configured to move workpieces between the first and second hand-off stations, 92 and 94, and the first through fifth supercritical processing modules, 74-78, without benefitting from a covering effect provided by the transfer module 72.
A sixth alternative supercritical processing system of the present invention adds an inspection station to the preferred supercritical processing system 70. In the sixth alternative supercritical processing system, the first workpiece 118, the second workpiece 120, and the third through fifth workpieces are transferred to the inspection station prior to being transferred to the second hand-off station 94. At the inspection station, an inspection of the workpieces ensures that the photoresist and the residue have been removed from the workpieces. Preferably, the inspection station uses spectroscopy to inspect the workpieces.
A seventh alternative supercritical processing system of the present invention adds a front-end robot to the preferred supercritical processing system 70. In the seventh alternative supercritical processing system, the front-end robot resides outside of the entrance to the transfer module 72 and the first and second cassettes are located away from the first and second hand-off stations, 92 and 94. The front-end robot is preferably configured to move the wafers from the first cassette to the first hand-off station 92 and is also preferably configured to move the wafers from the second hand-off station 94 to the second cassette.
An eighth alternative supercritical processing system of the present invention adds a wafer orientation mechanism to the preferred supercritical processing system 70. The wafer orientation mechanism orients the wafer according to a flat, a notch, or an other orientation indicator. Preferably, the wafer is oriented at the first hand-off station 92. Alternatively, the wafer is oriented at the second hand-off station 94.
A first alternative supercritical processing module of the present invention replaces the pressure chamber 136 and gate valve 106 with an alternative pressure chamber. The alternative pressure chamber comprises a chamber housing and a hydraulicly driven wafer platen. The chamber housing comprises a cylindrical cavity which is open at its bottom. The hydraulicly driven wafer platen is configured to seal against the chamber housing outside of the cylindrical cavity. In operation, the wafer is placed on the hydraulicly driven wafer platen. Then, the hydraulicly driven wafer platen moves upward and seals with the chamber housing. Once the wafer has been processed. the hydraulicly driven wafer platen is lowered and the wafer is taken away.
A second alternative supercritical processing module of the present invention places alternative inlets for the circulation line 152 to enter the wafer cavity 112 at a circumference of the wafer cavity 112 and places an alternative outlet at a top center of the wafer cavity 112. The alternative inlets are preferably configured to inject the supercritical carbon dioxide in a plane defined by the wafer cavity 112. Preferably, the alternative inlets are angled with respect to a radius of the wafer cavity 112 so that in operation the alternative inlets and the alternative outlet create a vortex within the wafer cavity 112.
It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that other various modifications may be made to the preferred embodiment without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This patent application is a divisional application of the U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/704,642, filed Nov. 1, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,748,960, and titled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPERCRITICAL PROCESSING OF MULTIPLE WORKPIECES,” which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/163,121, filed Nov. 2, 1999, and titled “A HIGH THROUGHPUT CLUSTER TOOL FOR CLEANING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES USING SUPERCRITICAL CO2.” The U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/704,642, filed Nov. 1, 2000, and titled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPERCRITICAL PROCESSING OF A WORKPIECE,” is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2617719 | Stewart | Nov 1952 | A |
2625886 | Browne | Jan 1953 | A |
3744660 | Gaines et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3890176 | Bolon | Jun 1975 | A |
3900551 | Bardoncelli et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3968885 | Hassan et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4029517 | Rand | Jun 1977 | A |
4091643 | Zucchini | May 1978 | A |
4219333 | Harris | Aug 1980 | A |
4245154 | Uehara et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4341592 | Shortes et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4355937 | Mack et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4367140 | Wilson | Jan 1983 | A |
4406596 | Budde | Sep 1983 | A |
4422651 | Platts | Dec 1983 | A |
4474199 | Blaudszun | Oct 1984 | A |
4475993 | Blander et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4522788 | Sitek et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4549467 | Wilden et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4592306 | Gallego | Jun 1986 | A |
4601181 | Privat | Jul 1986 | A |
4626509 | Lyman | Dec 1986 | A |
4670126 | Messer et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4682937 | Credle, Jr. | Jul 1987 | A |
4693777 | Hazano et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4749440 | Blackwood et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4778356 | Hicks | Oct 1988 | A |
4788043 | Kagiyama et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4789077 | Noe | Dec 1988 | A |
4823976 | White, III et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4825808 | Takahashi et al. | May 1989 | A |
4827867 | Takei et al. | May 1989 | A |
4838476 | Rahn | Jun 1989 | A |
4865061 | Fowler et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4877530 | Moses | Oct 1989 | A |
4879004 | Oesch et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4879431 | Bertoncini | Nov 1989 | A |
4917556 | Stark et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4923828 | Gluck et al. | May 1990 | A |
4924892 | Kiba et al. | May 1990 | A |
4933404 | Beckman et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4944837 | Nishikawa et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4951601 | Maydan et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4960140 | Ishijima et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4983223 | Gessner | Jan 1991 | A |
5011542 | Weil | Apr 1991 | A |
5013366 | Jackson et al. | May 1991 | A |
5044871 | Davis et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5062770 | Story et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5068040 | Jackson | Nov 1991 | A |
5071485 | Matthews et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5105556 | Kurokawa et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5143103 | Basso et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5158704 | Fulton et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5167716 | Boitnott et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5169296 | Wilden | Dec 1992 | A |
5169408 | Biggerstaff et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5174917 | Monzyk | Dec 1992 | A |
5185058 | Cathey, Jr. | Feb 1993 | A |
5185296 | Morita et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186594 | Toshima et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186718 | Tepman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5188515 | Horn | Feb 1993 | A |
5190373 | Dickson et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5191993 | Wanger et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5193560 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195878 | Sahiavo et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201960 | Starov | Apr 1993 | A |
5213485 | Wilden | May 1993 | A |
5213619 | Jackson et al. | May 1993 | A |
5215592 | Jackson | Jun 1993 | A |
5217043 | Novakovi | Jun 1993 | A |
5221019 | Pechacek | Jun 1993 | A |
5222876 | Budde | Jun 1993 | A |
5224504 | Thompson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5225173 | Wai | Jul 1993 | A |
5236602 | Jackson | Aug 1993 | A |
5236669 | Simmons et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237824 | Pawliszyn | Aug 1993 | A |
5238671 | Matson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240390 | Kvinge et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5243821 | Schuck et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5246500 | Samata et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5250078 | Saus et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5251776 | Morgan, Jr. et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5261965 | Moslehi | Nov 1993 | A |
5266205 | Fulton et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267455 | Dewees et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5269815 | Schlenker et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5274129 | Natale et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5280693 | Heudecker | Jan 1994 | A |
5285352 | Pastore et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5288333 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5290361 | Hayashida et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5294261 | McDermott et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5298032 | Schlenker et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5304515 | Morita et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306350 | Hoy et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312882 | DeSimone et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313965 | Palen | May 1994 | A |
5314574 | Takahashi | May 1994 | A |
5316591 | Chao et al. | May 1994 | A |
5328722 | Ghanayem et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5334332 | Lee | Aug 1994 | A |
5334493 | Fujita et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5337446 | Smith et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339844 | Stanford, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5352327 | Witowski | Oct 1994 | A |
5355901 | Mielnik et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5356538 | Wai et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364497 | Chau et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368171 | Jackson | Nov 1994 | A |
5370740 | Chao et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5370741 | Bergman | Dec 1994 | A |
5370742 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5377705 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5401322 | Marshall | Mar 1995 | A |
5403621 | Jackson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5403665 | Alley et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5404894 | Shiraiwa | Apr 1995 | A |
5412958 | Iliff et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417768 | Smith, Jr. et al. | May 1995 | A |
5433334 | Reneau | Jul 1995 | A |
5447294 | Sakata et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5456759 | Stanford, Jr. et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5470393 | Fukazawa | Nov 1995 | A |
5474812 | Truckenmuller et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5482564 | Douglas et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5486212 | Mitchell et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5494526 | Paranjpe | Feb 1996 | A |
5500081 | Bergman | Mar 1996 | A |
5501761 | Evans et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5503176 | Dunmire et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5505219 | Lansberry et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5509431 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514220 | Wetmore et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522938 | O'Brien | Jun 1996 | A |
5526834 | Mielnik et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533538 | Marshall | Jul 1996 | A |
5547774 | Gimzewski et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550211 | DeCrosta et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5571330 | Kyogoku | Nov 1996 | A |
5580846 | Hayashida et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589082 | Lin et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589105 | DeSimone et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589224 | Tepman et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5621982 | Yamashita et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629918 | Ho et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632847 | Ohno et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635463 | Muraoka | Jun 1997 | A |
5637151 | Schulz | Jun 1997 | A |
5641887 | Beckman et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644855 | McDermott et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649809 | Stapelfeldt | Jul 1997 | A |
5656097 | Olesen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665527 | Allen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669251 | Townsend et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672204 | Habuka | Sep 1997 | A |
5676705 | Jureller et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679169 | Gonzales et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679171 | Saga et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683473 | Jureller et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683977 | Jureller et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5688879 | DeSimone | Nov 1997 | A |
5700379 | Biebl | Dec 1997 | A |
5702228 | Tamai et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706319 | Holtz | Jan 1998 | A |
5726211 | Hedrick et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5730874 | Wai et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5739223 | DeSimone | Apr 1998 | A |
5746008 | Yamashita et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769588 | Toshima et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783082 | DeSimone et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797719 | James et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798126 | Fujikawa et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798438 | Sawan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5804607 | Hedrick et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817178 | Mita et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5866005 | DeSimone et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868856 | Douglas et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868862 | Douglas et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872257 | Beckman et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873948 | Kim | Feb 1999 | A |
5881577 | Sauer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882165 | Maydan et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888050 | Fitzgerald et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5898727 | Fujikawa et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5900107 | Murphy et al. | May 1999 | A |
5900354 | Batchelder | May 1999 | A |
5904737 | Preston et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906866 | Webb | May 1999 | A |
5908510 | McCullough et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5928389 | Jevtic | Jul 1999 | A |
5932100 | Yager et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5934856 | Asakawa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5934991 | Rush | Aug 1999 | A |
5944996 | DeSimone et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955140 | Smith et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965025 | Wai et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975492 | Brenes | Nov 1999 | A |
5976264 | McCullough et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979306 | Fujikawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980648 | Adler | Nov 1999 | A |
5981399 | Kawamura et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989342 | Ikeda et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005226 | Aschner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017820 | Ting et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6024801 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029371 | Kamikawa et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035871 | Eui-Yeol | Mar 2000 | A |
6037277 | Masakara et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6053348 | Morch | Apr 2000 | A |
6056008 | Adams et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067728 | Farmer et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077053 | Fujikawa et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077321 | Adachi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6082150 | Stucker | Jul 2000 | A |
6085935 | Malchow et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097015 | McCullough et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110232 | Chen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114044 | Houston et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122566 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128830 | Bettcher et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145519 | Konishi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149828 | Vaartstra | Nov 2000 | A |
6159295 | Maskara et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6164297 | Kamikawa | Dec 2000 | A |
6186722 | Shirai | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200943 | Romack et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203582 | Berner et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216364 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224774 | DeSimone et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228563 | Starov et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228826 | DeYoung et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235634 | White et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239038 | Wen | May 2001 | B1 |
6241825 | Wytman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6242165 | Vaartstra | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244121 | Hunter | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251250 | Keigler | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6277753 | Mullee et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286231 | Bergman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6305677 | Lenz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306564 | Mullee | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6334266 | Moritz et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344174 | Miller et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355072 | Racette et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6388317 | Reese | May 2002 | B1 |
6389677 | Lenz | May 2002 | B1 |
6418956 | Bloom | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436824 | Chooi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454519 | Toshima et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454945 | Weigl et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464790 | Shertinsky et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6508259 | Tseronis et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6509141 | Mullee | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6521466 | Castrucci | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6541278 | Morita et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6546946 | Dunmire | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6550484 | Gopinath et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558475 | Jur et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6561213 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6561220 | McCullough et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6561481 | Filonczuk | May 2003 | B1 |
6561767 | Biberger et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6564826 | Shen | May 2003 | B2 |
20020001929 | Biberger et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
251213 | Aug 1948 | CH |
1399790 | Feb 2003 | CN |
36 08 783 | Sep 1987 | DE |
39 04 514 | Aug 1990 | DE |
40 04 111 | Aug 1990 | DE |
39 06 724 | Sep 1990 | DE |
39 06 735 | Sep 1990 | DE |
39 06 737 | Sep 1990 | DE |
44 29 470 | Mar 1995 | DE |
43 44 021 | Jun 1995 | DE |
198 60 084 | Jul 2000 | DE |
0 244 951 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0 272 141 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0 283 740 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0 302 345 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0 370 233 | May 1990 | EP |
0 391 035 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0 453 867 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0 518 653 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0 536 752 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0 572 913 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0 587 168 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0 620 270 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 679 753 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0 711 864 | May 1996 | EP |
0 726 099 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0 822 583 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0 829 312 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 836 895 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0 903 775 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1499491 | Sep 1967 | FR |
2 003 975 | Mar 1979 | GB |
2 193 482 | Nov 1987 | GB |
56-142629 | Nov 1981 | JP |
60-192333 | Sep 1985 | JP |
60-238479 | Nov 1985 | JP |
60-246635 | Dec 1985 | JP |
61-017151 | Jan 1986 | JP |
61-231166 | Oct 1986 | JP |
62-125619 | Jun 1987 | JP |
63-303059 | Dec 1988 | JP |
1045131 | Feb 1989 | JP |
2-148841 | Jun 1990 | JP |
2-209729 | Aug 1990 | JP |
2-304941 | Dec 1990 | JP |
7142333 | Jun 1995 | JP |
727711 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8-186140 | Jul 1996 | JP |
8-206485 | Aug 1996 | JP |
8222508 | Aug 1996 | JP |
10-144757 | May 1998 | JP |
10-335408 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-200035 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-106358 | Apr 2000 | JP |
WO 8707309 | Dec 1987 | WO |
WO 9006189 | Jun 1990 | WO |
WO 9013675 | Nov 1990 | WO |
WO 9112629 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO 9314255 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9314259 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9320116 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO 9627704 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9918603 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9949998 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0036635 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0110733 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0133615 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0155628 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0168279 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0174538 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0178911 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0185391 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0194782 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0216051 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 03030219 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030121535 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60163121 | Nov 1999 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09704642 | Nov 2000 | US |
Child | 10327397 | US |