Methods and apparatus for physical vapor deposition

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6168690
  • Patent Number
    6,168,690
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 29, 1997
    27 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 2, 2001
    24 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates to an improved sputter target that is a combination sputter target and induction antenna. In one embodiment, when the sputter target is energized sputter material particles are sputtered away from the sputter target and a plasma is induced.In another embodiment, the sputter target is energized by an energy source. In yet another embodiment, the energy source includes a bias power supply and an induction power supply. The bias power supply applies a potential to the sputter target relative to an object. The induction power supply applies a current to the sputter target. The potential and the current promote the sputtering away of the sputter target, the formation of the plasma and the anisotropic distribution of the sputtered material particles.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to physical vapor deposition. More particularly, the present invention relates to improved methods and apparatuses for ionized physical vapor deposition.




Generally physical vapor deposition, commonly referred to as sputtering, is a method of transferring a material from a sputtering target to an object. Sputtering is normally carried out by applying a voltage differential between the sputtering target and the object to promote the migration of the material from the sputtering target to the object.





FIG. 1

depicts a prior art physical vapor deposition (PVD) apparatus


10


. Physical vapor deposition apparatus


10


includes a sputter target


15


, a chuck


20


and a direct current bias power supply


25


. The PVD apparatus


10


has an internal chamber


12


within which the sputter target


15


and chuck


20


are placed. An object


30


is typically placed on chuck


20


. Internal chamber


12


is typically kept at a very low pressure and argon gas is introduced into internal chamber


12


at low pressure. The gas in the plasma state is suitable for sputtering material off of a target.




The D.C. bias power supply


25


negatively biases sputtering target


15


relative to ground. The electric potential created between sputtering target


15


and ground promotes the ionization of the argon gas particles. The ions are bombarded against sputter target


15


, sputtering off metal particles


40


. Metal particles


40


bombard the entire chamber


12


and some of the metal particles


40


are typically deposited on to object


30


.




In order to promote a greater rate of sputtering an externally generated magnetic field


50


is typically induced near sputter target


15


. Magnetic field


50


promotes the formation of a plasma


45


having a higher density of ions closer to sputter target


15


. The presence of a greater number of ions near sputter target


15


creates a greater number of interactions between the ions and the sputter target, thus allowing a higher rate of sputtering.




One drawback of prior art PVD apparatuses has been the large amounts of power required to sputter at acceptable rates. Sometimes power supply


25


is required to generate 20 kilowatts of power in order to obtain acceptable deposition rates.




Another disadvantage of the prior art PVD apparatus


10


is that the metal particles


40


sputtered away from sputtering target


15


are isotropically distributed. That is, sputter particles


40


travel in individually random directions. For some applications of sputtering an isotropic distribution of metal particles


40


is undesirable.




FIGS.


2


A-C depict the filling of a trench


31


in object


30


that is a semiconductor substrate


30


′. In many applications of sputtering the trench


31


in a semiconductor substrate


30


′ is required to be filled with the metal sputter material. An isotropic distribution of the metal particles


40


leads to the deposition of a layer of metal


41


, as depicted in FIG.


2


B. The metallic layer


41


forms not only at the bottom of trench


31


, but also along the walls of the trench. Eventually, as seen in

FIG. 2C

, trench


31


is filled by the metallic layer


41


, but often times a void


43


is left within the trench. Voids


43


within the trenches often times lead to failures of the finished semiconductor device.




FIGS.


3


A-B depict the filling of the trench


31


by anisotropically distributed metal particles. Anisotropically distributed metal particles travel in the same general direction. Thus, anisotropically directed metal particles


40


aimed orthogonally towards the semiconductor substrate


30


′ will deposit a more uniform metallic layer


41


′. As seen in

FIGS. 3A and 3B

, metallic layer


41


′ fills trench


31


uniformly from the bottom up, and prevents the formation of voids


43


.




Prior art methods of anisotropically depositing metal particles have several disadvantages.

FIG. 4

, for example, depicts a prior art PVD apparatus


10


′ utilizing a collimator


60


. Collimator


60


screens out metal particles


40


to only allow those metal particles orthogonally directed towards object


30


to pass through. In order to ensure that metal particles


40


do not collide with other particles between the collimator


60


and object


30


(and hence become isotropically distributed), a greater vacuum is required within chamber


12


.




Screening out a large portion of the sputtered metal population lowers the rate of deposition. Therefore, higher power must be used to obtain similar rates to PVD devices without collimators.





FIG. 5

depicts another prior art PVD apparatus


10


″ utilizing induction coils


70


shown in a cross-sectional view. Induction coils


70


are connected to a radio frequency power supply


72


. The radio frequency power supply


72


provides an alternating current through induction coils


70


inducing a plasma


45


′ within the circumference of coils


70


.




Sputter target


15


may be independently biased by power supply


25


. Bias power supply


25


regulates the rate of sputtering while radio frequency power supply


72


regulates the generation of ions. Ions diffusing to the edge of the plasma fall down the potential between the plasma and the boundaries, and obtain a velocity component normal to the boundary. This process is commonly referred to as ionized physical vapor deposition.




PVD apparatus


10


″, however, has several limitations. First, it typically still requires a large amount of power to generate the bias potential and energize induction coils


70


. Next, induction coils


70


and sputter target


15


must be made of the same type and quality of material in order to prevent contamination. Third, induction coils


70


, themselves, may also be consumed in the deposition process, requiring replacement of induction coils


70


in addition to sputter target


15


.




Finally, sputter target


15


is typically not uniformly consumed. Normally, a sputter target


15


utilized in a ionized PVD system is a circular disc. The disc is typically consumed quickest in an ring pattern within the outer diameter of the disc. The non-uniformity is generally caused by externally generated magnetic field's


50


irregular attraction of ions towards sputter target


15


. This non-uniform consumption of the sputter target requires more frequent replacement of sputter target


15


.




The need, therefore, exists for a method and an apparatus of anisotropically depositing a sputter material onto an object with a lower rate of energy consumption. Additionally, it is preferred to minimize the number of elements utilized and consumed during the deposition process. Finally, an increase in the throughput of the deposition process is desired.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The invention relates to an improved sputter target that is a combination sputter target and induction antenna. The improved sputter target reduces the amount of power necessary to successfully perform physical vapor deposition operations. Additionally, the improved sputter simplifies the design of a physical vapor deposition apparatus.




In one embodiment, the improved sputter target is comprised of a sputter material. When the sputter target is energized sputter material particles are sputtered away and a plasma is induced such that the sputter material particles are anisotropically directed.




In another embodiment, the sputter target is energized by an energy source. In another embodiment, the energy source includes a bias power supply and an induction power supply. The bias power supply applies a potential to the sputter target relative to an object or ground. The induction power supply applies a current to the sputter target. The potential and the current promote the sputtering away of the sputter material, the formation of the plasma and the anisotropic distribution of the sputtered material particles.




In alternative embodiments, the sputter target may be any suitable size, shape and composition. In another embodiment, the sputter target may be attached to a chamber surface. In yet another embodiment, the sputter target is shielded.




A physical vapor deposition apparatus including an improved sputter target is also disclosed. In one embodiment, the physical vapor deposition apparatus also includes an energy source. The energy source includes a bias power supply, an induction power supply and a matching filter. The matching filter combines the power outputs of the power supplies to provide a combined power output to the sputter target.




A method of physical vapor deposition is further disclosed. These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and studying the various drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:





FIG. 1

depicts a prior art physical vapor deposition (PVD) apparatus.




FIGS.


2


A-C depict the filling of a trench in a semiconductor substrate.




FIGS.


3


A-B depict the filling of a trench by anisotropically distributed metal sputter particles.





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view of a prior art PVD apparatus utilizing a collimator.





FIG. 5

is a cross-sectional view of another prior art PVD apparatus utilizing ionization induction coils shown in a cross-sectional view.





FIG. 6

depicts a schematic diagram of an improved physical vapor deposition apparatus, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 7

is a schematic block diagram of a power source for powering the improved physical vapor deposition apparatus of

FIG. 6

, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 8A and 8B

are schematic diagrams of alternative embodiments of a matching network, in accordance with alternate embodiments of the present invention.





FIGS. 9A and 9B

illustrate exemplary shapes of a sputter antenna, in accordance with alternate embodiments of the present invention.




FIGS.


10


A-


10


E illustrate exemplary cross-section shapes of a sputter antenna, in accordance with alternate embodiments of the present invention.





FIG. 11

is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of a sputter antenna, in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 12

is a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of a sputter antenna, in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 13

is a cross-sectional view of yet another embodiment of a sputter antenna, in accordance with the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




The present invention will now be described in detail with reference to a few preferred embodiments and associated drawings. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art, that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process steps have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.




In one embodiment of the present invention, a combination sputter target and induction antenna, or a sputter antenna, is disclosed. By combining the functions of a sputter target and the induction antenna into a single element, many factors of a physical vapor deposition process may be dramatically improved. First, the amount of power necessary to create a bias potential on the sputter antenna and generate an induction current through the sputter antenna may be dramatically reduced. Next, since the sputter target and the induction antenna are combined in a single element, only one element is typically necessary. The sputter antenna may also be substantially uniformly consumed, thus leading to a longer life span. Additionally, the sputter antenna may be used in a higher pressure environment, helping to increase throughput.




The features and advantages of the present invention may be better understood with reference to the figures and discussion below.

FIG. 6

depicts a schematic diagram of an improved physical vapor deposition apparatus


100


, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The improved physical vapor deposition apparatus


100


includes a chamber


110


, a combined sputter target and induction antenna or sputter antenna


112


, a chuck


115


and a power source


120


. Sputter antenna


112


is mounted within chamber


110


, typically opposite chuck


115


. An object


122


to be deposited with the sputter material is placed on chuck


115


. Power source


120


is electrically coupled to object


122


and sputter antenna


112


.




A vacuum is created within chamber


110


and a gas is introduced into the chamber. The gas can be any gas suitable for use in a physical vapor deposition process. By way of example, noble gases, such as argon and xenon have been found to exhibit preferable results in the physical vapor deposition process. Additionally, other suitable gases such as nitrogen and copper gas may be utilized in the PVD process.




Power source


120


creates a bias voltage potential between object


122


and sputter antenna


112


. In another embodiment, sputter antenna


112


is biased relative to ground. Additionally, power source


120


passes a radio frequency inductive current through sputter antenna


112


. The inductive current passing through sputter antenna


112


creates a plasma


130


. The bias voltage potential and the inductive current can be varied to vary the size and density of plasma


130


. The bias potential can also be adjusted to vary the rate of sputtering.




Further, no externally generated magnetic field


50


(referring back to

FIGS. 1

,


4


and


5


) is typically required to generate plasma


130


. Even without an externally generated magnetic field


50


, PVD apparatus


100


is capable of generating plasmas of similar or greater charged particle densities as prior art systems utilizing an externally generated magnetic field.




However, in another embodiment, an externally generated magnetic field


50


may be applied near sputter antenna


112


to increase the residency of ions near sputter antenna


112


, and further increase the efficiency of the present invention. While the use of externally generated magnetic field


50


may possibly promote non-uniform consumption of sputter antenna


112


, the increase in throughput may be desirable. Regardless, the increased efficiency of either embodiment is still an improvement over prior art PVD apparatuses.




Gas ions generated by the energization of sputter antenna


112


impact upon the sputter antenna. Sputter material particles


140


may then be sputtered away from sputter antenna


112


.





FIG. 7

is a schematic block diagram of a power source


120


for powering the improved physical vapor deposition apparatus


100


of FIG.


6


. Power source


120


includes induction power supply


150


, bias power supply


151


, and matching network


153


. In one embodiment, induction power supply


150


provides a radio frequency current that is passed through sputter antenna


112


. However, any type of suitable power supply that will energize sputter antenna


112


sufficiently to form a plasma may be used. The current output of induction power supply


150


can be adjusted to control plasma parameters.




In another embodiment, bias power supply


151


is a direct current voltage supply. The voltage is applied between sputter antenna


112


and object


122


. The voltage level on bias power supply


151


can be adjusted to control the sputter rate. In alternative embodiments, any suitable power supply that can produce a voltage potential between sputter antenna


112


and object


122


may be used. By way of example, bias power supply


151


may be an alternating current power supply, or an alternating current power supply with a voltage offset. Again, sputter antenna


112


may also be biased relative to ground rather than object


122


.




The outputs of induction power supply


150


and bias power supply


151


are coupled to matching network


153


. Matching network


153


matches the outputs of the power supplies


150


and


151


to match the appropriate impedances of sputter antenna


112


for efficient power transfer to the plasma.




Matching network


153


is electrically coupled to sputter antenna


112


by conductors


121


and


131


. Conductors


121


and


131


close a circuit with sputter antenna


112


and provide the induction current generated by induction power supply


150


. Conductors


121


and


131


also provide the bias voltage generated by bias power supply


151


relative to object


122


, which is electrically coupled to bias power supply


151


by conductor


133


. In an alternative embodiment, object


122


may be separately biased with respect to ground.





FIGS. 8A and 8B

are schematic diagrams of alternative embodiments of matching network


153


. In one embodiment, as depicted in

FIG. 8A

, matching network


153


includes capacitors


201


and


220


, a variable transformer


202


, variable capacitors


204


and


206


and inductors


208


and


210


. Capacitor


201


, variable transformer


202


and variable capacitor


204


provide a matching circuit which combines the outputs of power supplies


150


and


151


. Inductor


208


and variable capacitor


206


provide impedance matching between the power supplies


150


and


151


. Inductor


210


and capacitor


220


form a low pass filter for the output of bias power supply


151


.




In another embodiment, as depicted in

FIG. 8B

, matching network


153


includes capacitors


230


-


233


. Capacitors


230


-


233


form a matching circuit rather than the transformer embodiment depicted in FIG.


8


A. In either embodiment of the present invention, a node


250


may be located between the low pass filter and the impedance matching circuit. An object that may be desired to be biased in addition to sputter antenna


112


may be coupled to node


250


, as discussed further below.




Matching network


153


is coupled to sputter antenna


112


by conductors


121


and


131


. In one embodiment, bias power supply


151


is also coupled to object


122


by conductor


133


in order to provide the necessary reference for the bias voltage. Additionally, any suitable matching circuitry may be utilized to combine the outputs of power supplies


150


and


151


.




A distinct advantage of the present invention is the additive effects of the bias potential and the inductive current applied to a single element. The bias potential need not be as high as in prior art devices since the bias potential alone is not needed to create the plasma.




Unlike the prior art devices, the density of plasma


130


created by sputter antenna


112


may be significantly greater than the plasmas of prior art devices utilizing only bias power. Densities as high as 5×10


11


charged particles per cubic centimeter may be generated utilizing sputter antenna


112


.




Accordingly, the bias voltage potential may be as low as about 200 volts. A bias voltage of 250 volts has been shown to provide a useful sputter rate. The alternating induction current may also be varied in magnitude and frequency to adjust the characteristics of plasma


130


. By way of example, induction current power magnitudes of about 500 to about 5,000 watts at 13.56 MHz have produced desirable results. Typically, the magnitude of the induction current is more significant than the frequency. However, the present invention may be utilized at any suitable induction current frequency.




A sufficiently ionized plasma


130


generated by sputter antenna


112


ensures an anisotropic distribution of ionized particles traversing the sheath at any boundary. Thus, the improved ionized PVD apparatus


100


can be operated at higher pressures of gas. By way of example, pressures of about 0.1 to about 50 millitorr of argon have shown to produce desirable results. In one embodiment, a pressure of about 10 millitorr of argon has produced satisfactory results.




Table 1 provides the approximate values used in one embodiment shown to produce desirable results.















TABLE 1













Pressure




10 millitorr of argon







Gas Flow




50 standard cm


3


of argon







Bias Voltage




250 volts







Induction Power




750 Watts @ 13.56 Mhz















In general, sputter antenna


112


may be any suitable shape or size capable of inducing a plasma which allows uniform deposition on object


122


. By way of example, sputter antenna


112


may be shaped as a flat spiral coil, a hemispherical coil, a conical coil, a plate, a disc, a linear element, a slotted plate, or a slotted disc.




While sputter antenna


112


may be any suitable shape, in another embodiment, a linearly elongated shape may be utilized. A linearly elongated sputter antenna discourages the non-uniform energization of sputter antenna


112


, causing non-uniform consumption. Thus, a linearly elongated sputter antenna promotes uniform consumption. Any linearly elongated shape may be utilized. By way of example,

FIGS. 9A and 9B

illustrate a linearly elongated sputter antenna shaped into a substantially flat coil


112




a


and a zig zag configuration


112




b


, respectively.




Similarly, the cross-section of the linearly elongated sputter antenna may also be any suitable shape. FIGS.


10


A-


10


D illustrate exemplary cross-section shapes of sputter antenna


112


. FIGS.


10


A-


10


D depict flattened ovular


180




a


, circular


180




b


, semi-circular


180




c


cross-sections and cut-out cross-section


180




d


, respectively. However, the cross-section of sputter antenna


112


may be any suitable shape.




In a further embodiment, the cross-sectional shape of sputter antenna


112


may be varied to control the directional sputtering of the sputter material according to the current density distribution of the shapes when current is passed through it. By creating a greater surface area on one side of sputter antenna


112


than the other side more sputter particles may be generated on one side. By way of example, the semi-circular cross-section


180




c


of

FIG. 10C

will generate more sputter particles on the circular side of sputter antenna


112


than the flat side. In this manner the cross-sectional shape of sputter antenna


112


can aid in directing the sputter particles. Any suitable cross-sectional shape with a surface area greater on one side than the other may be utilized. By way of example, the cut-out cross-section


180




d


depicted in

FIG. 10D

may be used.




The composition of sputter antenna


112


may be any suitable sputter material. Typically, metals are used as sputter materials since metals are capable of carrying the inductive current supplied by induction power supply


150


. However, any material capable of carrying a current may be used as the sputter material. By way of example, aluminum, copper, aluminum alloys, zinc, tin, tungsten, gallium, titanium, and tantalum may be used.





FIG. 10E

illustrates a cross-section of a hybrid sputter antenna


112


′ in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The hybrid sputter antenna includes a core


181


and an outer sheath


182


.




Typically, high resistivity materials are not good candidates as a sputter material in PVD devices because large amounts of power are lost via resistive losses. In one embodiment of the present invention, resistive materials may be used as the sputter material, or the outer sheath


182


. The core


181


may be a conductive material and the outer sheath


182


may be a resistive material. Core


181


is appropriately energized by power source


120


, but rather than core


181


being sputtered away, the resistive material of the outer sheath


182


is sputtered away and deposited on object


122


.




Any resistive material suitable for sputtering may be used as the outer sheath


182


. By way of example, titanium nitride, aluminum nitride, and tantalum nitride may be used. Accordingly, any two suitable materials may be used as long as the material used for core


181


is less resistive than the material used for outer sheath


182


.





FIG. 11

depicts an alternative embodiment of the sputter antenna of FIG.


6


. In the embodiment depicted in

FIG. 6

, sputter antenna


112


is mounted within chamber


110


but detached from the chamber surface. One potential disadvantage is that the sputter material may sputter away from both sides of sputter antenna


112


. Sputter material sputtered away from the side of sputter antenna


112


facing the chamber wall may be more likely to deposit on the chamber wall or some other part of the chamber rather than on object


122


. It is desirable that the side of sputter antenna


112


facing object


122


be sputtered away while the other side is not.




In the alternative embodiment, a shield


190


may be placed between sputter antenna


112


and the wall of the chamber facing the sputter antenna. Shield


190


may be coupled to power source


120


and may be biased by the power source with the same bias potential as sputter antenna


112


. Since shield


190


and sputter antenna


112


are similarly biased, the portions of sputter antenna


112


facing shield


190


may be less likely to be sputtered away compared to the portions of sputter antenna


112


facing object


122


. Shield


190


may, for example, be coupled to node


250


of the illustrated embodiments of power source


120


in

FIGS. 8A and 8B

.





FIG. 12

illustrates another embodiment of the sputter antenna of FIG.


6


. As another method of allowing the sputter material to be sputtered away from sputter antenna


112


asymmetrically, sputter antenna


112


may be mounted to the wall of chamber


110


. An insulator


192


and a conductor


191


may be placed between sputter antenna


112


and the wall of the chamber. Insulator


192


provides insulation between conductor


191


and sputter antenna


112


. Conductor


191


is coupled to power source


120


and may be biased similarly to sputter antenna


112


.




Biasing of conductor


191


prevents the depositing of sputter particles


140


on exposed portions


195


of insulator


192


. Insulator


192


may also be a dielectric.





FIG. 13

illustrates yet another embodiment of the sputter antenna of FIG.


6


. Sputter antenna


112


may be mounted on a wall of chamber


110


, again to promote uniform consumption of sputter antenna


112


on only one side of the sputter antenna. Rather than using a powered conductor as illustrated in

FIG. 112

, different geometries of the cross-section of sputter antenna


112


may be employed. Insulator


192


is placed between sputter antenna


112


and the chamber wall. To avoid deposition of sputter material particles


140


on the exposed portions


195


of insulator


192


the cross-section of sputter antenna


112


is a jagged shape. The jagged shape helps to screen out any sputter particles


140


from depositing on the exposed portions


195


.




While the illustrated embodiment depicts smooth angled walls surrounding exposed portions


195


, sputter antenna


112


may have any suitable shape. By way of example, the walls could be a stair step configuration or the walls may contain more turns. Practically any configuration of sputter antenna


12


that will discourage ions from reaching exposed portions


195


may be suitable.




The combination of a sputter target and an induction antenna in a physical vapor deposition process is a new and non-obvious advance in the field. As discussed, prior art PVD devices have utilized collimators or separate induction coils in order to anisotropically deposit material onto an object. Up until the present invention, there has been no suggestion of combining a sputter target with an induction antenna in a PVD process to promote anisotropically distributed sputter material particles.




A combined sputter target and induction antenna provides a variety of benefits. The PVD process may be performed at lower power. The pressure of the PVD process may also be increased, decreasing the cumbersome task of creating a greater vacuum, and thereby increasing the throughput. At the same time, plasmas of greater density and size may be generated than those generated by prior art devices consuming the same amount of power.




Sputter antenna


112


being a single element, additional elements are typically not required, thus removing the need to match the materials used for different elements. Also, sputter antenna


112


is typically uniformly and substantially consumed before requiring replacement. Further, alternative embodiments in accordance with the present invention provide for methods for promoting uniform and substantially complete consumption of sputter antenna


112


.




It can be appreciated that the versatility of the present invention allows it to be used in other applications than those particularly described above. In another embodiment, the present invention may be used in isotropic applications. By varying the bias power supply and the induction power supply to produce isotropically distributed sputter material particles are produced. Further, isotropic deposition may also be performed with lower power consumption than prior art PVD devices. The ability of the present invention to isotropically and anisotropically deposit materials on to an object is another advantageous feature.




As evidence of the versatility of the present invention, another embodiment may be used in chemical vapor deposition. A combination of gases may be introduced into chamber


110


. Sputter antenna


112


may be composed of a material that is capable of reacting with the gas mixture. Reactions between sputter material particles


140


and the introduced gas or gases occur either inside or outside plasma


130


.




By way of example, argon and nitrogen may be introduced into chamber


112


. Sputter antenna


112


may be composed of tantalum. Again argon promotes sputtering and does not react with the sputtered tantalum particles, while the nitrogen reacts with the tantalum. Tantalum nitride particles are formed, which are then deposited on object


122


. Any suitable combinations of gases and sputter materials may be utilized to allow the deposition of a desired material. Again, any suitable combination of gases and sputter material may be utilized in accordance with the present invention.




While the present invention has been described in terms of several preferred embodiments, there are alterations, permutations, and equivalents which fall within the scope of this invention. By way of example, the present invention can be used for doping objects rather than deposition. It should also be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing the methods and compositions of the present invention. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims be interpreted as including all such alterations, permutations, and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.



Claims
  • 1. A sputter target for use in depositing a layer of material on an object in a plasma physical vapor deposition apparatus, said plasma vapor deposition apparatus comprising a layer of insulator, an energy source, and a gas source, said sputter target being configured to be sputtered away to produce sputter material particles for said depositing, said sputter target being further configured as a sputter antenna on the layer of insulator, the sputter antenna having a linearly elongated shape, wherein a portion of the insulator is exposed between adjacent portions of the sputter antenna, and wherein a first end of the linearly elongated shape is electrically connected to the energy source; and a second end of the linearly elongated shape is electrically connected to the energy source so that the linearly elongated shape and the energy source form a closed circuit, and wherein the energy source and the elongated shape are formed to inductively excite a gas from the gas source into a plasma, and wherein the sputter antenna is electrically connected to the object through the energy source.
  • 2. A sputter target as recited in claim 1, wherein said energy source is a variable energy source, which controls a rate at which the sputter material particles are sputtered from the sputter target according to a setting of said variable energy source.
  • 3. A sputter target as recited in claim 1, wherein the sputter material particles are directed towards said object in a substantially anisotropic manner when the sputter target is energized in said plasma physical vapor deposition apparatus.
  • 4. A sputter target as recited in claim 1, wherein a shape of the sputter target is a coil.
  • 5. A sputter target as recited in claim 4, wherein said coil is substantially planar.
  • 6. A sputter target as recited in claim 1, wherein said energy source provides a bias between said sputter target and said object.
  • 7. A sputter target as recited in claim 1, wherein the sputter target is comprised of a metal.
  • 8. A sputter target as recited in claim 1, wherein the sputter target is comprised of a sputter material selected from the group consisting of aluminum, copper, aluminum alloys, tungsten, titanium and tantalum.
  • 9. A sputter target as recited in claim 1, wherein the sputter material comprises a conductive core, said conductive core being sheathed within a outer covering, said outer covering configured to sputter away the sputter material particles when the sputter target is energized.
  • 10. A sputter target as in claim 9 wherein said outer covering is formed of an outer covering material having a higher resistivity than said conductive core.
  • 11. A sputter target as recited in claim 9, wherein the outer covering material is selected from the group consisting of titanium nitride, aluminum nitride and tantalum nitride.
  • 12. A plasma-enhanced physical vapor deposition apparatus for use in depositing a layer of material on an object, comprising:a chamber configured to surround the object during said depositing; an energy source, wherein an object is placed within the chamber and is electrically coupled to the energy source; and a sputter target disposed within the chamber and electrically coupled to the energy source, the sputter target being configured to be sputtered away to produce sputter material particles during said depositing, the sputter target being further configured as a sputter antenna on a layer of insulator, the sputter antenna having a linearly elongated shape with a portion of the insulator being exposed between adjacent portions of the sputter antenna.
  • 13. A plasma-enhanced physical vapor deposition apparatus as recited in claim 12, the energy source including a bias power supply, wherein said bias power supply is configured to apply bias potential to the sputter target relative to the object when the energy source energizes the sputter target, wherein the potential promotes the sputtering away of the sputter material particles from the sputter target and the sputter material particles are directed toward the object.
  • 14. A plasma-enhanced physical vapor deposition apparatus as recited in claim 13, wherein the bias power supply is configured to apply an alternating current voltage potential and a direct current voltage potential to the sputter target, relative to the object.
  • 15. A plasma-enhanced physical vapor deposition apparatus as recited in claim 13, wherein the bias power supply is variable, such that a rate at which the sputter material particles are sputtered away from the sputter target varies, responsive to a setting of the variable bias power supply.
  • 16. A plasma-enhanced physical vapor deposition apparatus as recited in claim 13, further comprising:a conductor adjacent to the insulator and coupled to the energy source, wherein the bias power supply is configured to apply the bias potential to the sputter antenna and the conductor, whereby the sputter material particles are discouraged from depositing on the exposed portion of the insulator.
  • 17. A plasma-enhanced physical vapor deposition apparatus as recited in claim 13, wherein the walls of the adjacent portions of the sputter antenna have a shape that discourages the sputter material particles from depositing on the exposed portion of the insulator.
  • 18. A plasma-enhanced physical vapor deposition apparatus as recited in claim 12, the energy source including an induction power supply, wherein the induction power supply is configured to apply an RF current to the sputter target when the energy source energizes the sputter target, wherein said RF current promotes the striking of the plasma within the chamber when said RF current is applied to the sputter target, whereby the sputter material particles are directed towards the object in a substantially anisotropic manner.
  • 19. A plasma-enhanced physical vapor deposition apparatus as recited in claim 18, wherein the induction power supply is variable, such that a size and a density of the plasma varies, responsive to a setting of the induction power supply, whereby the movement of the sputter material particles towards the object is controlled.
  • 20. A plasma-enhanced physical vapor deposition apparatus as recited in claim 12, wherein the energy source includes,an induction power supply producing an induction power output; a bias power supply producing a bias power output; and a matching circuit electrically coupled to the induction power supply and the bias power supply, wherein the matching circuit combines the induction power output with the bias power output and provides a matched output to the sputter target.
  • 21. In a plasma processing chamber, a method for depositing a layer of material on a semiconductor substrate, comprising:positioning said semiconductor substrate in said plasma processing chamber; and energizing a sputter target within the plasma processing chamber, the sputter target being configured to be sputtered away to produce sputter material particles for said depositing, the sputter target being further configured as a sputter antenna on a layer of insulator, the sputter antenna having a linearly elongated shape with a portion of the insulator being exposed between adjacent portions of the sputter antenna; wherein the energizing comprises: generating a bias potential between the sputter target and the semiconductor substrate; generating an induction current; and combining the bias potential with the induction current producing a combined power output, wherein the combined power output is applied to the sputter target, so that the bias potential is applied during the generating of the induction current.
US Referenced Citations (15)
Number Name Date Kind
2069835 Keller Feb 1937
3501393 Wehner et al. Mar 1970
3595773 Wurm et al. Jul 1971
3619402 Wurm Nov 1971
3985635 Adam et al. Oct 1976
5069770 Glocker Dec 1991
5135634 Clarke Aug 1992
5178739 Barnes et al. Jan 1993
5401350 Patrick et al. Mar 1995
5512155 Fukasawa Apr 1996
5580428 Krivokapic et al. Dec 1996
5693197 Lal et al. Dec 1997
5707498 Ngan Jan 1998
5798029 Morita Sep 1998
5800688 Lantsmann et al. Sep 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
1905058 Jan 1969 DE
0 807 954 A1 Nov 1997 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
PCT International Preliminary Examination Report, EPO (Oct. 11, 1999).
S. M. Rossnagel et al., “Metal Ion deposition from ionized mangetron sputtering discharge,” Jan./Feb. 1994, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology.
Peter F. Cheng et al., “Directional deposition of Cu into semiconductor trench structures using ionized magnetron sputtering,” Mar./Apr. 1995, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology.