This application claims the priority benefit of Italian Application for Patent No. 102023000011235, filed on Jun. 1, 2023, the contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety to the maximum extent allowable by law.
Embodiments herein relate to a microelectromechanical gyroscope having improved vibration rejection. In particular, reference is made to a gyroscope of a triaxial type, i.e., capable of detecting angular velocities along three orthogonal axes (typically denoted as the roll, pitch and yaw axes).
As is known, current micromachining techniques allow to obtain microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) starting from layers of semiconductor material, which have been deposited (for example, a layer of polycrystalline silicon) or grown (for example, an epitaxial layer) on sacrificial layers, which are removed via chemical etching. Inertial sensors, accelerometers, and gyroscopes obtained with this technology are witnessing a growing success, for example in the automotive field, in inertial navigation, or in the field of portable devices for consumer electronics.
In particular, microelectromechanical gyroscopes are known which are made with MEMS semiconductor technology (in what follows referred to simply as MEMS gyroscopes). Such MEMS gyroscopes operate on the basis of the theorem of relative accelerations, exploiting Coriolis acceleration. When a rotation at a certain angular velocity (the value of which is to be detected) is applied to a mobile mass that is driven with a linear velocity, the same mobile mass is subjected an apparent force, referred to as Coriolis force, which causes a displacement thereof in a direction perpendicular to the direction of the linear driving velocity and further perpendicular to the axis about which the rotation occurs. The mobile mass is supported via elastic elements that enable both the driving displacement and a detection displacement of the mass in the direction of the apparent force. According to Hooke's law, the displacement is proportional to the apparent force so that, from the detection displacement of the mobile mass, it is possible to detect the Coriolis force and the value of the angular velocity of the rotation that has generated it.
The detection displacement of the mobile mass may, for example, be detected in a capacitive way by determining, in a resonance condition, the variations of capacitance caused by the movement of mobile detection electrodes, which are fixed with respect to the mobile mass (or constituted by parts of the same mobile mass) and are coupled (for example, in a so-called parallel-plate configuration, or else in a combfingered configuration) to fixed detection electrodes.
There is a need in the art to provide a MEMS gyroscope, in particular, of a triaxial type, having a reduced occupation of area and reduced power consumption levels and also enabling improved rejection of vibrations, which represent a disturbance with respect to detection of the angular velocities. Applications that have recently witnessed development and diffusion, for example in the field of virtual reality (VR) or augmented reality (AR), require in fact more demanding specifications as regards elimination of vibrations and at the same time maintenance of overall dimensions and performance comparable to those of known sensors so as to maintain full compatibility with current consumer products.
However, angular-velocity sensors commonly used, in particular, in the so-called consumer-electronics market, do not have performance characteristics specifically aimed at rejection of vibrations (in particular vibrations of an angular, nonlinear, nature, as will be discussed hereinafter).
In this regard,
The detection structure, designated as a whole by 1, is symmetrical with respect to a central axis of symmetry S and comprises a pair of detection masses, formed by a first detection mass and a second detection mass, denoted, respectively, by M1, M2, arranged on opposite sides with respect to the aforesaid central axis of symmetry S, suspended elastically over a substrate 2.
On the same substrate 2, a first and a second fixed or stator electrode S1, S2 are arranged in positions facing and underlying (along a vertical axis z, orthogonal to the aforesaid horizontal plane) the aforesaid first and second detection masses M1, M2; these first and second fixed electrodes S1, S2 are fixed with respect to the substrate 2 and are capacitively coupled to the detection masses M1, M2, in a differential configuration (the stator electrodes S1, S2 thus being also arranged symmetrically with respect to the central axis of symmetry S and constituting a positive electrode ‘+’ and a negative electrode ‘−’, respectively, for the differential detection scheme).
The detection masses M1, M2 are driven in opposite directions (in phase opposition) with a driving movement “Drive” along a second axis (axis x) of the horizontal plane xy, orthogonal to the aforesaid first axis, with a linear oscillation movement (which thus causes them to approach to, or alternatively moving away from, the aforesaid central axis of symmetry S).
In the presence of an angular velocity, designated by Q, acting about the aforesaid axis of symmetry, a Coriolis force is generated on the detection masses M1, M2, which causes their displacement in opposite directions along the vertical axis z (as indicated by the arrows “Co”) and consequently, for example, the approach to, and respectively moving away from, the respective stator electrode S1, S2. A differential capacitive variation is thus generated, which may provide (after appropriate processing by an electronic circuit, for example of Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) type associated to the detection structure 1) an indication of the value of the aforesaid angular velocity Q.
The above detection architecture enables rejection of linear accelerations of disturbance (for example, due to impact or vibrations) that act on the detection structure 1 along the aforesaid vertical axis z (as indicated by the arrow VL in the aforesaid
Instead, it is evident that angular accelerations of disturbance (for example, once again due to vibrations or impact), denoted by VA, producing an effect of rotation about the aforesaid central axis of symmetry S and thus a movement, in phase opposition, of the detection masses M1, M2 along the vertical axis z (like the movement induced by the aforesaid Coriolis force), will not be rejected in the detection structure 1.
The above angular vibrations may therefore affect detection of the angular velocity of interest, in particular, in the case where the frequency of said vibrations is close to the driving frequency of the gyroscope or to the natural frequency of spurious modes of the corresponding detection structure.
In order to solve the above problem, it has, for example, been proposed to adopt a reduced value of the gyroscope quality factor Q in order to limit detection and amplification of the spurious external vibrations. Alternatively, it has been proposed to shift all the (operating and spurious) modes of the gyroscope beyond a given frequency band where vibrations may occur during operation of the same gyroscope.
Both solutions, however, have drawbacks.
In particular, the value of the Q factor is important for determining the performance of the gyroscope and it is not possible to reduce it without adversely affecting such performance (for example, as regards a driving capacity).
Furthermore, the use of higher operating frequencies entails a greater stiffness of the elements of the detection structure, with consequent reduction of the sensitivity and increase in the driving voltages required to keep the masses in oscillation. Furthermore, a redesign of the electronic circuit associated with the detection structure may be required on account of the change of the system clock (connected to the operating frequency of the gyroscope).
There is therefore a need to provide a new architecture for a detection structure of a MEMS gyroscope that will have improved rejection of disturbance, in particular, linked to angular vibrations, without being affected by the above discussed drawbacks.
In an embodiment, a microelectromechanical gyroscope is provided in a die of semiconductor material and comprises a substrate and a detection structure suspended over said substrate. The detection structure has a main extension in a horizontal plane, is symmetrical with respect to a central axis of symmetry and comprises, for each detection axis of said microelectromechanical gyroscope: a first pair of detection masses arranged on a first side of the central axis of symmetry; and a second pair of detection masses arranged on a second side of the central axis of symmetry, opposite to the aforesaid first side in the horizontal plane. The detection masses of each pair are capacitively coupled to respective stator electrodes according to a differential detection scheme, where the stator electrodes are arranged symmetrically with respect to one another on opposite sides of the central axis of symmetry.
The detection masses are configured so that an angular velocity about the respective detection axis causes a detectable variation of a detection capacitance resulting from the capacitive coupling with said stator electrodes so as to determine a variation of an output signal associated with said differential detection scheme. For example, the detection masses of each pair are configured to perform movements in phase opposition as a result of a Coriolis force associated with an angular velocity about the respective detection axis.
The detection masses are also configured so that linear vibrations or angular vibrations acting about said central axis of symmetry do not cause substantially any variation of said detection capacitance. For example, the detection masses of each pair are configured to perform in-phase movements as a result of linear vibrations or angular vibrations acting about said central axis of symmetry.
For a better understanding of the present invention, a preferred embodiment thereof is now described, purely by way of non-limiting example and with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
As illustrated schematically in
The detection structure, designated by 10, thus comprises in this case: a first pair of detection masses, denoted by M1, M2, arranged on a first side of the central axis of symmetry S; and a second pair of detection masses, denoted by M1′, M2′, arranged on a second side of the central axis of symmetry S, opposite to the aforesaid first side (in the horizontal plane xy).
The detection masses of each pair M1, M2, M1′, M2′ are capacitively coupled to a respective stator electrode S1, S2, S1′, S2′ according to a differential detection scheme (designed to generate, after an appropriate processing of the resulting capacitive variation, an electrical output signal Sout), the stator electrodes being thus arranged with central symmetry, arranged in pairs symmetrically on opposite sides of the central axis of symmetry S and constituting a positive electrode ‘+’ (the stator electrodes S1, S1′ being arranged, in the example, in a position further away from the central axis of symmetry S, electrically connected together) and, respectively, a negative electrode ‘−’ (the stator electrodes S2, S2′ being arranged, in the example, in a position closer to the central axis of symmetry S, electrically connected together), so as to implement the differential detection scheme.
Basically, the stator electrodes defining the aforesaid positive electrode and the stator electrodes defining the aforesaid negative electrode are arranged in pairs in a symmetrical way.
This configuration of the detection masses enables rejection, thanks to the differential detection scheme, not only of linear accelerations of disturbance (indicated once again by the arrow VL in the aforesaid
As indicated in the same
The detection masses M1, M1′, arranged in positions further away from the central axis of symmetry S, have, at the instant represented, a detection movement (once again indicated by the arrow Co) in a first direction along the vertical axis z (in the example, a movement of approach to the respective stator electrodes S1, S1′), whereas the detection masses M2, M2′ arranged, in the example, in a position closer to the central axis of symmetry S have a detection movement in a second direction along the vertical axis z, opposite to the first direction (in the example, moving away from the respective stator electrodes S2, S2′).
Consequently, the arrangement of the detection masses and of the respective stator electrodes and the differential configuration of the capacitive coupling with the same stator electrodes advantageously enables generation of an output signal Sout, that is indicative of the angular velocity of interest about a respective detection axis and is insensitive to linear or angular vibrational disturbance.
With reference first to
The detection structure 10 is provided in a die 101 of semiconductor material, for example silicon, comprising a substrate 11, is suspended above the substrate 11, and has a complete symmetry with respect to a first central axis, which coincides with a first horizontal axis x of a horizontal plane xy of main extension of the detection structure 10. In particular, the first horizontal axis x coincides with a pitch detection axis of the detection structure 10, about which a pitch angular velocity Ωp may be detected.
The detection structure 10 is further completely symmetrical with respect to a second horizontal axis y, which forms, with the first horizontal axis x, the aforesaid horizontal plane xy and coincides with a roll-detection axis of the detection structure 10, about which a roll angular velocity Ωr may be detected.
The detection structure 10 has an extension (thickness) smaller than the aforesaid main extension along a vertical axis z, orthogonal to the aforesaid horizontal plane xy and coinciding with a yaw-detection axis, about which a yaw angular velocity Ωy may be detected.
The detection structure 10 comprises a first pair of roll-detection masses R1, R2 and a second pair of roll-detection masses R1′, R2′, arranged symmetrically and on opposite sides with respect to the first horizontal axis x and suspended above the substrate 11, at a certain separation distance along the vertical axis z.
In this embodiment, the roll-detection masses R1, R2, R1′, R2′ of each pair are fixedly coupled together to form a single body (so as to jointly define a first roll detection mass R1, R2, formed by the first pair of roll-detection masses, and a second roll detection mass R1′, R2′, formed by the second pair of roll detection masses, these first and second roll detection masses being arranged on opposite sides of the first horizontal axis x). The above-defined single body has a substantially rectangular extension along the second horizontal axis y and centrally define a window 13, arranged within which is a respective roll anchorage 14, fixedly connected to the substrate 11 (this roll anchorage 14 having, for example, a substantially column-like conformation that extends as far as the substrate 11, being coupled integrally to the same substrate 11).
Elastic anchorage elements 15, of a torsional type, connect the roll-detection masses R1, R2, R1′, R2′ of each pair to the respective anchorage 14 within the window 13. In particular, these elastic anchorage elements 15 have a longitudinal extension along the first horizontal axis x and are arranged on opposite sides of the roll anchorage 14 with respect to the second horizontal axis y.
The pairs of roll-detection masses R1, R2, R1′, R2′ are elastically coupled together by an elastic coupling element 15′, arranged in a position corresponding to the first horizontal axis x and having a stiffness such as to allow motion of the two masses both along the first horizontal axis x and along the vertical axis z and, at the same time, such as to keep them constrained to one another.
Respective roll stator electrodes SR1, SR2, SR1′, SR2′ (illustrated schematically) are arranged underneath the roll-detection masses R1, R2, R1′, R2′ of each pair, capacitively coupled to the respective roll-detection masses R1, R2, R1′, R2′ and positioned on the substrate 11 (so as to provide a differential detection scheme, as discussed previously with reference to
The detection structure 10 further comprises a first pair and a second pair of driving masses D1, D2 and D1′, D2′, which are arranged alongside and on the outside of the roll-detection masses R1, R2, R1′, R2′ of the first pair and the second pair, respectively, on opposite sides with respect to the first horizontal axis x, and are also suspended above the substrate 11 at a certain separation distance along the vertical axis z.
The above driving masses D1, D2, D1′, D2′ have, for example, a substantially rectangular-frame conformation along the second horizontal axis y, internally defining windows 16 for mobile driving electrodes 17, which are fixed with respect to the frames and are combfingered with corresponding fixed driving electrodes (not illustrated, for reasons of clarity of representation), which are also arranged within the same windows 16.
In a way not illustrated in detail, in the frames of the driving masses D1, D2, D1′, D2′ electrodes for detecting the driving movement may further be provided, being designed to provide a feedback indication of the driving movement.
Each driving mass D1, D2 of the first pair is coupled to a respective driving mass D2′, D1′ of the second pair (arranged symmetrically with respect to the first horizontal axis x) through a respective elastic coupling element 18, of a folded type, having an extension along the second horizontal axis y.
The driving masses D1, D2, D1′, D2′ are coupled to respective driving anchorages 19, which are fixed with respect to the substrate 11 and are arranged on opposite sides with respect to the respective elastic coupling element 18, i.e., at a distance from the first horizontal axis x, through a respective elastic anchorage element 20, which is also of a folded type.
Each of the driving masses D1, D2, D1′, D2′ is further coupled centrally to a respective one of the roll-detection masses R1, R2, R1′, R2′ through a respective elastic driving element 21, of a torsional type, having a linear extension directed longitudinally along the first horizontal axis x.
The detection structure 10 moreover comprises a first pair and a second pair of pitch-detection masses P1, P2 and P1′, P2′, which are arranged alongside and on the outside of the driving masses D1, D2, D1′, D2′ of the first pair and, respectively, of the second pair, on opposite sides with respect to the first horizontal axis x, and are also suspended above the substrate 11 at a certain separation distance along the vertical axis z.
The above pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ are, for example, substantially L-shaped, with the long side extending along the second horizontal axis y and the short side extending along the first horizontal axis x.
Arranged underneath the pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ of each pair, as discussed for the roll-detection masses, are respective pitch stator electrodes SP1, SP2, SP1′, SP2′ (illustrated schematically), capacitively coupled to the respective pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ and positioned on the substrate 11 (so as to provide a differential detection scheme, as discussed previously with reference to
Each pitch-detection mass P1, P2, P1′, P2′ is coupled to a respective driving mass D1, D2, D1′, D2′ through respective driving elastic-coupling elements 22, which have an extension along the second horizontal axis y, folded end portions, and a central portion with linear extension. In detail, in the embodiment illustrated in the aforesaid
Furthermore, the pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ are coupled together two by two by respective elastic-coupling structures 25, which extend centrally, crossing the first horizontal axis x or the second horizontal axis y, between respective end portions of long sides, or short sides, of the pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′. Basically, as on the other hand is evident from an examination of the aforesaid
In detail, each elastic-coupling structure 25 defines an elastic lever element 26, of a central-fulcrum type, hinged to the substrate 11 through a central anchorage 27 and coupled at its ends to the respective pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ by means of respective folded elastic elements 28.
The detection structure 10 further comprises, in this embodiment, a first pair and a second pair of yaw-detection masses Y1,Y2, Y1′,Y2′, which are arranged externally to the pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ of the first pair and, respectively, the second pair, on opposite sides with respect to the first horizontal axis x, and are suspended over the substrate 11 at a certain separation distance along the vertical axis z.
Each yaw-detection mass Y1,Y2, Y1′,Y2′ is elastically coupled to a respective pitch-detection mass P1, P2, P1′, P2′ by a respective yaw elastic-coupling element 29, with an extension along the first horizontal axis x (in a position arranged between the same pitch-detection and yaw-detection masses), having folded end portions and a central portion with linear extension.
The aforesaid yaw-detection masses Y1,Y2, Y1′,Y2′ have a substantially rectangular-frame conformation along the first horizontal axis x, internally defining windows 31 for mobile yaw-detection electrodes 32, which are fixed with respect to the frames and alternate with corresponding fixed detection electrodes or yaw stator electrodes SY1, SY2, SY1′, SY2′ (not illustrated herein, for reasons of clarity of representation), which are also arranged within the windows 31.
The same yaw-detection masses Y1,Y2, Y1′,Y2′ are further elastically coupled to a yaw anchorage 35, which is arranged centrally to the corresponding frame. Furthermore, the yaw-detection masses Y1,Y2, Y1′,Y2′ of each pair are elastically coupled together by an elastic coupling element 36, with linear extension along the first horizontal axis x and arranged between the corresponding frames.
It is thus emphasized that, in the solution described, for each detection axis a first set of the aforesaid stator electrodes (S1, S1′) are electrically connected together to form a positive detection electrode for the differential detection scheme, and a second set of the aforesaid stator electrodes (S2, S2′) are electrically connected together to form a negative detection electrode for the same differential detection scheme, the electrodes of the first set being arranged with respect to the electrodes of the second set with central symmetry (in the case of the pitch- and roll-detection axes) or axial symmetry (in the case of the yaw-detection axis, the axis of symmetry coinciding with the aforesaid second horizontal axis y).
Operation of the detection structure 10 is now described, for detection of the aforesaid roll, pitch, and yaw angular velocities ΩR, ΩP, ΩY.
As illustrated schematically in
As indicated by the arrows in the above
Furthermore, the pitch masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ are driven (or dragged) by the driving masses D1, D2, D1′, D2′ into a corresponding movement of translation in phase opposition along the second horizontal axis y. This movement in turn entails rotation in the horizontal plane xy about the respective central anchorage 27 of the elastic lever elements 26 of the elastic-coupling structures 25 that couple together the pitch-detection masses P1 and P2, P1′ and P2′ of a same pair (the remaining elastic-coupling structures 25 remain stationary). The yaw-detection masses Y1, Y2, Y1′, Y2′ are further fixedly coupled to the respective pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ during the corresponding driving movement.
The aforesaid driving movements thus take place entirely in the horizontal plane xy and do not involve further elements of the detection structure 10.
As illustrated schematically in
Basically, as is on the other hand represented schematically in
It is evident how the linear acceleration causes an in-phase movement of all the roll-detection masses R1, R2, R1′, R2′, which is thus rejected by the differential detection scheme. Likewise, the angular acceleration VA of disturbance causes an in-phase movement of the roll-detection masses R1 and R2, R1′ and R2′ of each pair (for example, at the operating instant represented, both of the roll-detection masses R1, R2 of the first pair move away from and the roll-detection masses R1′, R2′ of the second pair move towards the substrate 11 and to the corresponding roll stator electrodes).
It is consequently evident that, also in this case, the differential detection scheme enables elimination of the effects due to the angular acceleration of disturbance, which thus do not affect the output signal Sout, unlike the roll angular velocity ΩR that is to be detected.
As illustrated schematically in
This movement of the pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ is allowed by rotation of the elastic lever elements 26 of all the elastic-coupling structures 25 about the central anchorage 27, out of the horizontal plane xy along the vertical axis z (as illustrated schematically in the aforesaid
Basically, the pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ carry out, as a result of the Coriolis force, a movement, along the vertical axis z, moving away from/approaching to the respective pitch stator electrodes SP1, SP2, SP1′, SP2′, causing, as a whole, a capacitive variation that may be detected by the aforementioned differential detection scheme.
As illustrated schematically in
It is thus evident that also in this case, the differential detection scheme enables elimination of the effects linked both to the linear vibrations and to the angular vibrations of disturbance.
As illustrated schematically in
The movement described further entails rotation in the horizontal plane xy about the respective central anchorage 27 of the elastic lever elements 26 of the elastic-coupling structures 25 that couple together the pitch-detection masses P1, P2′, P2, P1′ that are mutually symmetrical with respect to the first horizontal axis x.
A movement of the yaw mobile electrodes 32 (not illustrated herein) thus occurs along the second horizontal axis y, with respect to the alternating yaw stator electrodes, and a consequent capacitive variation that may be detected by the differential scheme.
As highlighted in
It is thus evident that also in this case, the differential detection scheme enables elimination of the effects linked both to the linear accelerations of disturbance and to the angular vibrations of disturbance.
With reference to
As illustrated schematically in the above
In this embodiment, the driving masses D1, D2, D1′, D2′ are arranged, in the horizontal plane xy, externally with respect to the aforesaid pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′, which are thus arranged between a respective driving mass D1, D2, D1′, D2′ and a respective roll-detection mass R1, R2, R1′, R2′.
Each pitch-detection mass P1, P2, P1′, P2′ is also in this case coupled to a respective driving mass D1, D2, D1′, D2′ by respective driving elastic-coupling elements 22, which have an extension along the second horizontal axis y.
The driving masses D1 and D2, D1′ and D2′ of each pair are in this case elastically coupled together by a respective elastic-coupling structure, designated by 37, which defines an elastic central-fulcrum lever element, hinged to the substrate 11 by a central anchorage 38.
In this second embodiment, the roll-detection masses R1 and R2, R1′ and R2′ of each pair (fixed with respect to one another, as in the first embodiment) are surrounded in the horizontal plane xy by a respective rigid ring structure 40; an elastic central element 42, of a torsional type and with a rectangular-frame conformation, arranged in a position corresponding to the first horizontal axis x, elastically couples the ring structures 40 associated to the two pairs of roll-detection masses R1, R2, R1′, R2′.
The pitch-detection masses P1 and P2, P1′ and P2′ of each pair are in this case coupled together by the aforesaid ring structure 40; in particular, the pitch-detection masses P1 and P2, P1′ and P2′ of each pair are coupled to a respective ring structure 40 through respective elastic elements 41, of the folded type, at a central portion of the same ring structure 40 (aligned to the elastic anchorage elements 15 along the first horizontal axis x).
Furthermore, the pitch-detection masses P1, P2′, P2, P1′ that are mutually symmetrical with respect to the first horizontal axis x are once again coupled by the central-fulcrum elastic-coupling structures 25, which are hinged to the substrate 11 by the respective central anchorage 27.
As illustrated schematically in
The driving masses D1, D2, D1′, D2′ are in fact driven (by appropriate biasing of the mobile driving electrodes and of the alternating fixed driving electrodes, not illustrated) so as to carry out a movement of translation in phase opposition along the second horizontal axis y, which carries, in a similar movement of translation, the pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ and further entails rotation in the horizontal plane xy, about the respective central anchorage 38, of the elastic lever elements of the elastic-coupling structures 37 that couple together the driving masses D1, D2, D1′, D2′ of each pair.
Furthermore, the movement of the driving masses D1, D2′ and D2, D1′ (that are mutually symmetrical with respect to the first horizontal axis x) causes, as a result of the elastic couplings, a rotation in phase opposition of the roll-detection masses R1, R2, R1′, R2′ of the two pairs in the horizontal plane xy, about an axis parallel to the vertical axis z and passing through the center of the respective roll anchorage 14.
Once again in a way similar to what has been described for the first embodiment, and as illustrated schematically in
As illustrated in
As described for the first embodiment, this movement of the pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ is enabled by rotation of the respective elastic lever elements of the elastic-coupling structures 25 that couple the pitch-detection masses P1, P2′, P2, P1′ that are mutually symmetrical with respect to the first horizontal axis x, a movement that occurs about the corresponding central anchorage 27, out of the horizontal plane xy (along the vertical axis z). In this second embodiment, coupling between the pitch-detection masses P1, P2′, P2, P1′ is further provided by the corresponding ring structures 40, which rotate about the second horizontal axis y, out of the horizontal plane xy.
As illustrated in
In a way that will be clear from what has been described, considerations altogether similar to those mentioned for the first embodiment also apply to this second embodiment as regards rejection of the linear and angular accelerations of disturbance (such considerations will thus not in general be repeated).
With reference to
In this detection mode, a linear acceleration VL causes an in-phase movement of all the pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ along the first horizontal axis x and a consequent concordant movement of the mobile yaw-detection electrodes, thus entailing a capacitive variation with respect to the fixed yaw-detection electrodes SY1 and SY2, SY1′ and SY2′, which is rejected by the differential detection scheme (the electrodes are once again illustrated schematically and with different designation for the positive electrodes ‘+’ and negative electrode ‘−’ for the differential detection scheme).
Likewise, an angular acceleration of disturbance (acting in this case about the center of the detection structure 10′ and about the vertical axis z, in the horizontal plane xy) causes an in-phase movement of the pitch-detection masses P1, P2, P1′, P2′ of each pair (the movements of the pairs being in mutually opposite directions) and, thus, corresponding opposite movements of recession or approach between the mobile and fixed yaw-detection electrodes, which alternate with one another.
It is thus evident that, also in this case, the differential detection scheme enables elimination of the effects linked both to the linear accelerations and to the angular accelerations of disturbance.
The advantages of the solution proposed emerge clearly from the foregoing description.
In any case, it is emphasized that the solution described allows to obtain an improved vibration rejection (in particular, of angular vibrations, in addition to linear vibrations), without entailing any substantial increase in the area occupied by the detection structure and without entailing any increase of electrical consumption as compared to known solutions.
In addition, it is emphasized that the second embodiment described has the advantage of having a simpler architecture (without the presence of the four additional yaw-detection masses), with the disadvantage, however, of a possible presence of spurious modes as regards the movement of yaw.
Finally, it is clear that modifications and variations may be made to what has been described and illustrated herein, without thereby departing from the scope of the present invention, as defined in the annexed claims.
In particular, it is emphasized that the position of the various detection masses in the detection structure and the configuration of the associated elastic couplings and anchorages may differ from what has been illustrated in detail herein for the first and second embodiments.
For instance, the roll-detection masses R1, R2, R1′, R2′ of each pair might not be fixedly coupled together, but be distinct and coupled together in a suitable manner.
Further, it is pointed out that the solution described could advantageously be applied also for detection structures of biaxial or also uniaxial gyroscopes, maintaining the advantageous characteristics of improved insensitivity to vibrational disturbance of a linear or angular nature.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102023000011235 | Jun 2023 | IT | national |