1. Field
This disclosure is generally related to deposition systems. More specifically, this disclosure is related to a multi-channel gas-delivery system used in a deposition reactor.
2. Related Art
The negative environmental impact caused by the use of fossil fuels and their rising cost have resulted in a dire need for cleaner, cheaper alternative energy sources. Among different forms of alternative energy sources, solar power has been favored for its cleanness and wide availability.
A solar cell converts light into electricity using the photoelectric effect. There are several basic solar cell structures, including a single p-n junction, p-i-n/n-i-p, and multi-junction. A typical single p-n junction structure includes a p-type doped layer and an n-type doped layer of similar material. A heterojunction structure includes at least two layers of materials of different bandgaps. A p-i-n/n-i-p structure includes a p-type doped layer, an n-type doped layer, and an optional intrinsic (undoped) semiconductor layer (the i-layer) sandwiched between the p-layer and the n-layer. A multi junction structure includes multiple semiconductor layers of different bandgaps stacked on top of one another.
In a solar cell, light is absorbed near the p-n junction generating carriers. The carriers diffuse into the p-n junction and are separated by the built-in electric field, thus producing an electrical current across the device and external circuitry. An important metric in determining a solar cell's quality is its energy-conversion efficiency, which is defined as the ratio between power converted (from absorbed light to electrical energy) and power collected when the solar cell is connected to an electrical circuit.
Materials that can be used to construct solar cells include amorphous silicon (a-Si), polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si), crystalline silicon (c-Si), cadmium telluride (CdTe), etc.
Based on industrial surveys, c-Si wafer-based solar cells dominate nearly 90% of the market. However, the cost of producing c-Si wafer-based solar cells is high, and the waste of Si material during the ingot-cutting process and the wafer-polishing process has caused a bottleneck in the supply of crystalline-Si wafers. Due to the soaring price and the supply shortage of Si material, there has been a great interest in alternative ways to manufacture solar cells. Recently, photovoltaic thin-film technology has been drawing vast interest because it can significantly reduce the amount of material used, thus lowering the cost of solar cells. Among various competing technologies, single-crystal Si thin-film solar cells have drawn great interest for their low cost and high efficiency.
Single-crystal Si thin-film solar cells can be created using conventional semiconductor epitaxy technologies which not only reduce manufacturing costs but also enable flexible doping levels in the emitter, absorber and back surface field of the solar cell, thus enhancing its efficiency. Single-crystal Si thin-film solar cells with an efficiency as high as 17% have been demonstrated in research labs (see M. Reutuer et al., “17% Efficient 50 μm Thick Solar Cells,” Technical Digest, 17th International Photovoltaic Science and Engineering Conference, Fukuoka, Japan, p. 424).
A high-quality single-crystal Si thin film can be produced using Si epitaxy, which has been widely used in the semiconductor industry to create a high-quality single-crystal Si layer for CMOS integrated circuits, power devices and high-voltage discrete devices. Among possible Si epitaxial deposition techniques, trichlorosilane (TCS) based chemical vapor deposition (CVD) can provide a deposition rate of up to 10 μm/min. Therefore, it is possible to achieve a high-throughput and low-cost epitaxial process for solar cell application.
However, there is a lack of suitable Si epitaxy tools that can meet the demand for high throughput and low deposition cost for Si film layers with thicknesses up to tens of microns, as required by the solar cell industry. Existing Si epitaxy tools, such as AMC7810™and Centura 5200™by Applied Materials, Inc., of Santa Clara, Calif., US; MT7700™by Moore Epitaxial, Inc., of Tracy, Calif., US; PE2061™by LPE Epitaxial Technology of Italy; and Epsilon 3200™by ASM International of the Netherlands, are optimized for the needs of semiconductor device manufacturing. Although these epitaxial tools can deliver Si films with the highest quality, these tools are not compatible, in terms of throughput and gas conversion efficiency, with the economics of the solar cell industry.
One embodiment of the present invention provides a gas-delivery system for delivering reaction gas to a reactor chamber. The gas-delivery system includes a main gas-inlet port for receiving reaction gases and a gas-delivery plate that includes a plurality of gas channels. A gas channel includes a plurality of gas holes for allowing the reaction gases to enter the reactor chamber from the gas channel. The gas-delivery system further includes a plurality of sub-gas lines coupling together the main gas-inlet port and the gas-delivery plate, and a respective sub-gas line is configured to deliver a portion of the received reaction gases to a corresponding gas channel.
In a variation on the embodiment, the gas-delivery system further includes a main gas line configured to deliver the reaction gases to the main-gas-inlet port.
In a further variation, the main gas line includes a stainless steel tube with an outer diameter of 0.5 inch
In a variation on the embodiment, at least one of the sub-gas lines is coupled to a flow control valve configured to individually control a gas flow rate within the sub-gas lines, thereby facilitating a uniform gas flow into the reactor chamber.
In a further variation, the flow control valve is a bellow metering valve (BMV).
In a variation on the embodiment, at least one of the sub-gas lines include a stainless steel tube with an outer diameter of 0.25 inch.
In a variation on the embodiment, the gas holes have a diameter of 1 mm.
In a variation on the embodiment, the gas-delivery system further includes a gas diffuser situated between a sub-gas line and a corresponding gas channel.
The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same figure elements.
The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
Overview
Embodiments of the present invention provide a multi-channel gas-delivery system used in a material deposition reactor. The gas-delivery system includes a main gas-inlet port and a multi-channel gas-delivery plate. During operation, process gas enters the multi-channel gas-delivery plate via the main gas-inlet port. The multi-channel gas-delivery plate includes a plurality of equally spaced channels, each leading to a flow control valve, which controls the gas flow in a respective channel. The processing gas enters the reaction chamber through the multiple channels located on the gas-delivery plate. By individually controlling the flow rate of each channel, the multi-channel gas-delivery system can ensure a uniform gas flow over each wafer surface.
Chamber and Susceptors
The front side of susceptor 402 includes a set of pockets, such as pocket 404, for supporting substrates to be deposited. The shape of the bottom of the pockets is carefully designed to ensure a good thermal contact between the susceptor and the substrates. In one embodiment, the bottom of pocket 404 has a contour shape. Depending on the size of susceptor 402, various numbers of substrates can fit onto susceptor 402. In one embodiment, susceptor 402 includes 12 pockets for supporting 12 125×125 mm2 substrates.
Detailed descriptions of the deposition reactor, including the reactor chamber and the susceptors, can be found in U. S. patent application Ser. No. 12/355,463 (Attorney Docket No. SSP08-1003US), entitled “Scalable, High-Throughput, Multi-Chamber Epitaxial Reactor for Silicon Deposition,” by inventors Steve Poppe, Yan Rozenzon, Davis Z. Chen, Xiaole Yan, Peijun Ding, and Zheng Xu, filed 16 Jan. 2009, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
Gas-Delivery System
In a solar cell, film uniformity greatly impacts the solar cell's efficiency. In a traditional epitaxial system, it has been difficult to achieve good deposition uniformity and a high reaction-gas-utilization rate at the same time. Substrate rotation can be used to improve uniformity. However, it becomes increasingly difficult to rotate substrates in a large batch reactor. To achieve better deposition uniformity, the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/355,463 has proposed to inject precursor gases, such as TCS and H2, into the narrow channel formed by the two interlocked susceptors from the top and bottom of the reactor chamber, alternately. It is important to address the uniformity issue across the horizontal direction, where the gas flow rate over each wafer varies depending on the location of the wafer. For example, a wafer placed directly underneath the precursor gas inlet may experience a higher gas flow rate compared with another wafer placed on the edge. The different gas flow rates over the different wafers may result in non-uniform deposition result.
To address the non-uniformity problem, embodiments of the present invention implements a multi-channel gas-delivery plate.
During deposition, precursor gas first enters gas-delivery system 600 through main gas-inlet port 602. Main gas-outlet port 602 can have various dimensions and can be made of different materials. In one embodiment, main gas-inlet port 602 includes a stainless steel tube with an outer diameter (OD) of 0.5 inch. Subsequently, the precursor gas enters multi-channel gas-delivery plate 606 through the sub-gas lines, such as sub-gas line 604. Each sub-gas line is coupled to a flow control valve (not shown), which can individually control the flow rate of the coupling sub-gas line. The sub-gas line can have various dimensions and can be made of different materials. In one embodiment, the sub-gas lines are stainless steel tubes with an OD of 0.25 inch. In addition, various types of flow control valves can be used to control the flow rate in the sub-gas lines. In one embodiment, each sub-gas line is coupled to a bellow metering valve (BMV), which can be individually adjusted.
Multi-channel gas-delivery plate 606 includes a plurality of channels, such as channel 608, each coupled to an individual sub-gas line. For example, channel 608 is coupled to sub-gas line 604. In addition, each channel couples to the reactor chamber though a plurality of gas holes, such as gas hole 610. The number of gas holes per channel and the dimensions of the gas holes can vary. In one embodiment, the gas holes are uniformly sized with an OD of 1 mm. During deposition, precursor gas fills each channel through the coupling sub-gas line before entering the reactor chamber via the gas holes. The relative locations of the sub-gas lines and the channels can be arbitrary. In one embodiment, the sub-gas lines are equally spaced, and each sub-gas line is approximately coupled to the center of each gas channel. To match the gas pressure within the sub-gas lines and the channels, in one embodiment, a gas diffuser (not shown) is inserted between each sub-gas line and each channel.
Because the flow rate within each gas-sub-line can be individually adjusted, the amount of gas flow into the reactor chamber via each channel can also be individually adjusted. Consequently, a uniform gas flow across the horizontal intersection of the narrow channel formed by the two interlocking susceptors can be achieved. For example, by slightly increasing the flow rate in the edge sub-gas lines, the system can match the flow rate between the gas channels located at the edge and the gas channels located in the center. Such adjustment can result in the same amount of precursor gas flow over the surface of wafers at different locations during the deposition process.
During deposition, precursor gas enters the deposition reactor via main gas line 802, which couples to gas-delivery plate 806 though the sub-gas lines. Gas-delivery plate 806 includes a number of gas channels, such as channel 812. Once the precursor gas fills the gas channel, it enters gas nozzle 808, which then leads the gas to the narrow channel formed by two interlocking suceptors, such as susceptor 810, located within chamber 820. A number of wafers, such as wafer 814, are attached to the surface of susceptor 810. Note that deposition reactor 800 may also include other gas nozzles for exhaust or for injecting purging gas into chamber 820. In addition, it is optional to implement the multi-channel gas-delivery system for those nozzles since they don't require uniform gas input.
By individually controlling the flow rate of each sub-gas line, a uniform gas flow (indicated by the arrows in
Note that, although this disclosure gives an example of a gas-delivery system incorporating 1 main gas line, 6 sub-gas lines, and 6 gas channels, other configurations with fewer or more main gas lines, sub-gas lines, or channels are also possible. In addition, the numbers of gas holes per channel can be different. Also note that, although in the example shown in
The foregoing descriptions of various embodiments have been presented only for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/334,987, entitled “Uniform Gas Flow over Multiple Wafers in a High Volume EPI Reactor” by inventors Yan Rozenzon, Robert T. Trujillo, and Steven C. Beese, filed 14 May 2010. The subject matter of this application is related to the subject matter of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/355,463, entitled “Scalable, High-Throughput, Multi-Chamber Epitaxial Reactor for Silicon Deposition,” by inventors Steve Poppe, Yan Rozenzon, David Z. Chen, Xiaole Yan, Peijun Ding, and Zheng Xu, filed 16 Jan. 2009, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
This invention was made with government support under DE-EE0000589 awarded by Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3603284 | Garnache | Sep 1971 | A |
3637434 | Nakanuma | Jan 1972 | A |
3658585 | Folkmann | Apr 1972 | A |
3675619 | Burd | Jul 1972 | A |
3699298 | Briody | Oct 1972 | A |
3796182 | Rosler | Mar 1974 | A |
3806360 | Briody | Apr 1974 | A |
4168998 | Hasegawa | Sep 1979 | A |
4193756 | Leon | Mar 1980 | A |
4268374 | Lepselter | May 1981 | A |
4298443 | Maydan | Nov 1981 | A |
4325778 | Lepselter | Apr 1982 | A |
4496828 | Kusmierz | Jan 1985 | A |
4522149 | Garbis | Jun 1985 | A |
4558660 | Nishizawa | Dec 1985 | A |
4565157 | Brors | Jan 1986 | A |
4579080 | Martin | Apr 1986 | A |
4612207 | Jansen | Sep 1986 | A |
4661199 | Looney | Apr 1987 | A |
4747367 | Posa | May 1988 | A |
4761269 | Conger | Aug 1988 | A |
4786352 | Benzing | Nov 1988 | A |
4794220 | Sekiya | Dec 1988 | A |
4807562 | Sandys | Feb 1989 | A |
4823736 | Post | Apr 1989 | A |
4838983 | Schumaker | Jun 1989 | A |
4839145 | Gale | Jun 1989 | A |
4858558 | Ohmura | Aug 1989 | A |
4928626 | Carlson | May 1990 | A |
5038711 | Dan | Aug 1991 | A |
5053247 | Moore | Oct 1991 | A |
5074245 | Ota | Dec 1991 | A |
5119540 | Kong | Jun 1992 | A |
5121531 | Severns | Jun 1992 | A |
5151133 | Ohmine | Sep 1992 | A |
5207835 | Moore | May 1993 | A |
5269847 | Anderson | Dec 1993 | A |
5288364 | Burt | Feb 1994 | A |
5350455 | Mahler | Sep 1994 | A |
5373806 | Logar | Dec 1994 | A |
5374159 | Severns | Dec 1994 | A |
5427824 | Inushima | Jun 1995 | A |
5441571 | Ohta | Aug 1995 | A |
5453124 | Moslehi | Sep 1995 | A |
5458918 | Hawkins | Oct 1995 | A |
5476359 | Severns | Dec 1995 | A |
5505778 | Ono | Apr 1996 | A |
5518549 | Hellwig | May 1996 | A |
5532190 | Goodyear | Jul 1996 | A |
5614447 | Yamaga | Mar 1997 | A |
5629245 | Inushima | May 1997 | A |
5700422 | Usui | Dec 1997 | A |
5871586 | Crawley | Feb 1999 | A |
5916369 | Anderson | Jun 1999 | A |
5950925 | Fukunaga | Sep 1999 | A |
5964948 | Dietze | Oct 1999 | A |
5993555 | Hamilton | Nov 1999 | A |
5994675 | Bethune | Nov 1999 | A |
6013338 | Inushima | Jan 2000 | A |
6110289 | Moore | Aug 2000 | A |
6113984 | MacLeish | Sep 2000 | A |
6120605 | Sato | Sep 2000 | A |
6129048 | Sullivan | Oct 2000 | A |
6193804 | Chang | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6214116 | Shin | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217662 | Kong | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6262393 | Imai | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6338756 | Dietze | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6348397 | Ide | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6399510 | Riley | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6435428 | Kim | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6472639 | Nishitani | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475284 | Moore | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478923 | Igarashi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500734 | Anderson | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6506256 | Ide | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6530990 | Kong | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6544333 | Keck | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562128 | Dietze | May 2003 | B1 |
6747249 | Robinson | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6814811 | Ose | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6916399 | Rozenzon | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6934145 | Hsieh | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7153368 | Preti | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159537 | Wickramanayaka | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7270713 | Blonigan | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7273526 | Shinriki | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7314526 | Preti | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7354622 | Shinriki | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7462246 | Hellwig | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7628863 | Sen | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7918938 | Provencher | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8080107 | Kennedy | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8133323 | Kakegawa | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8183132 | Nijhawan | May 2012 | B2 |
8231799 | Bera | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8257547 | Pei | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8268078 | Suzuki | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8288645 | Lee | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8388753 | Pei | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8404049 | Hellwig | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8430962 | Masuda | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8448598 | Pei | May 2013 | B2 |
8539908 | Takagi | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8562745 | Rozenzon | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8608854 | Pei | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8764902 | Suzuki | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8778079 | Begarney | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8808454 | Lee | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8877000 | Strang | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8967081 | Borean | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8980005 | Carlson | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9117670 | Abedijaberi | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20010040100 | Wang | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020004309 | Collins | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020102859 | Yoo | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030012885 | Gramarossa | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030019428 | Ku | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030145791 | Shinya | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040135979 | Hazelton | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050016956 | Liu | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050208217 | Shinriki | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229848 | Shinriki | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060016559 | Kobayashi | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060060791 | Hazelton | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060124169 | Mizusawa | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060191118 | Lee | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060191637 | Zajac | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060201414 | Brabant | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231035 | Hellwig | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070131173 | Halpin | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070175391 | Mizusawa | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070181181 | Mizusawa | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070247075 | Kim | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249173 | Kim | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251642 | Bera | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070254483 | Bera | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070254486 | Bera | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090081878 | Dhindsa | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090117746 | Masuda | May 2009 | A1 |
20090139570 | Kinoshita | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090194235 | Kobayashi | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090311869 | Okesaku | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100092697 | Poppe | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100092698 | Poppe | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100183825 | Becker | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100263587 | Sivaramakrishnan | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100313877 | Bellman | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110048325 | Choi | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110067632 | Poppe | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110277688 | Trujillo | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277690 | Rozenzon | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283941 | Rozenzon | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120111271 | Begarney | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
H11288890 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2003158054 | May 2003 | JP |
2003277936 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2006080098 | Mar 2006 | JP |
20060117134 | Nov 2006 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Beaucarne, G et al., “Epitaxial thin-film Si solar cells”, pp. 533-542, Science Direct, www.sciencedirect.com, Thin Solid Films 511-512 (2006) 533-542. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110277690 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61334987 | May 2010 | US |