This invention relates to semiconductor processing and, more particularly to an oxide-nitride-oxide stack having an improved oxide-nitride or oxynitride layer and methods of forming the same.
Non-volatile semiconductor memories, such as a split gate flash memory, typically use a stacked floating gate type field effect transistors, in which electrons are induced into a floating gate of a memory cell to be programmed by biasing a control gate and grounding a body region of a substrate on which the memory cell is formed.
An oxide-nitride-oxide (ONO) stack is used as either a charge storing layer, as in silicon-oxide-nitride-oxide-silicon (SONOS) transistor, or as an isolation layer between the floating gate and control gate, as in a split gate flash memory.
One problem with conventional SONOS structures 102 and methods of forming the same is the poor data retention of the nitride or oxynitride layer 118 that limits the device 100 lifetime and/or its use in several applications due to leakage current through the layer.
Another problem with conventional SONOS structures 102 and methods of forming the same is the stochiometry of the oxynitride layer 118 is neither uniform nor optimized across the thickness of the layer. In particular, the oxynitride layer 118 is conventionally formed or deposited in a single step using a single process gas mixture and fixed or constant processing conditions in an attempt to provide a homogeneous layer having a high nitrogen and high oxygen concentration across the thickness of the relatively thick layer. However, due to top and bottom effects this results in nitrogen, oxygen and silicon concentrations, which can vary throughout the conventional oxynitride layer 118. The top effect is caused by the order in which process gases are shut off following deposition. In particular, the silicon containing process gas, such as silane, is typically shut off first resulting in a top portion of the oxynitride layer 118 that is high in oxygen and/or nitride and low in silicon. Similarly, the bottom effect is caused by the order in which process gases are introduced to initiate deposition. In particular, the deposition of the oxynitride layer 118 typically follows an annealing step, resulting in a peak or relatively high concentration of ammonia (NH3) at the beginning of the deposition process and producing in a bottom portion of the oxynitride layer that is low in oxygen and silicon and high in nitrogen. The bottom effect is also due to surface nucleation phenomena in which that oxygen and silicon that is available in the initial process gas mixture preferentially reacts with silicon at the surface of the substrate and does not contribute to the formation of the oxynitride layer. Consequently, the charge storage characteristics, and in particular programming and erase speed and data retention of a memory device 100 made with the ONO stack 104, are adversely effected.
Accordingly, there is a need for a memory device having an ONO stack with an oxynitride layer as a memory layer that exhibits improved programming and erase speed and data retention. There is a further need for a method or process of forming an ONO stack having an oxynitride layer that exhibits improved oxynitride stochiometry.
A semiconductor device including a silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon structure and methods of forming the same are provided. In one embodiment, the structure comprises: a tunnel oxide layer on a surface of a substrate including silicon; a multi-layer charge storing layer including an oxygen-rich, first oxynitride layer on the tunnel oxide layer in which the stoichiometric composition of the first oxynitride layer results in it being substantially trap free, and an oxygen-lean, second oxynitride layer on the first oxynitride layer in which the stoichiometric composition of the second oxynitride layer results in it being trap dense; a blocking oxide layer on the second oxynitride layer; and a silicon containing gate layer on the blocking oxide layer.
In one embodiment, the method includes: (i) forming a tunnel oxide layer on a silicon containing layer of a substrate; (ii) forming a multi-layer charge storing layer by depositing on the tunnel oxide layer an oxygen-rich first oxynitride layer in which the stoichiometric composition of the first oxynitride layer results in it being substantially trap free; and depositing on the first oxynitride layer an oxygen-lean second oxynitride layer in which the stoichiometric composition of the second oxynitride layer results in it being trap dense; (iii) forming a blocking oxide layer on the second oxynitride layer; and (iv) forming a silicon containing gate layer on the blocking oxide layer.
These and various other features and advantages of the present structure and method will be apparent upon reading of the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and the appended claims provided below, where:
The present invention is directed generally to a device comprising a silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon gate structure including a multi-layer charge storing layer and methods for making the same. The gate structure and method are particularly useful for forming a memory layer in a memory device, such as a memory transistor.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present disclosure. It will be evident, however, to one skilled in the art that the present structure and method may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures, and techniques are not shown in detail or are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring an understanding of this description.
Reference in the description to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification do not necessarily all refer to the same embodiment. The term “to couple” as used herein may include both to directly connect and to indirectly connect through one or more intervening components.
Briefly, the method involves forming a multi-layer charge storing layer including multiple oxynitride layers, such as silicon oxynitride (Si2N2O) layers, having differing concentrations of Oxygen, Nitrogen and/or Silicon. The oxynitride layers are formed at higher temperatures than nitride or oxynitride layers in conventional ONO structures, and each of the layers are formed using differing process gases mixtures and/or at differing flow rates. Generally, the oxynitride layers include at least a top oxynitride layer and a bottom oxynitride layer. In certain embodiments, the stoichiometric compositions of the layers is tailored or selected such that the lower or bottom oxynitride has a high oxygen and silicon content, and the top oxynitride layer has high silicon and a high nitrogen concentration with a low oxygen concentration to produce an oxygen-lean, silicon-rich nitride or oxynitride. The silicon-rich and oxygen-rich bottom oxynitride layer reduces stored charge loss without compromising device speed or an initial (beginning of life) difference between program and erase voltages. The silicon-rich, oxygen-lean top oxynitride layer increases a difference between programming and erase voltages of memory devices, thereby improving device speed, increasing data retention, and extending the operating life of the device. In some embodiments, the silicon-rich, oxygen-lean top oxynitride layer can further include a concentration of carbon selected to increase the number of traps therein.
Optionally, the ratio of thicknesses between the top oxynitride layer and the bottom oxynitride layer can be selected to facilitate forming of the oxynitride layers over a tunneling or first oxide layer of a silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon gate structure following the forming of the first oxide layer using a dry or wet oxidation.
A silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon structure and methods for fabricating the same according to various embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described in greater detail with reference to
The substrate 208 may include any known silicon-based semiconductor material including silicon, silicon-germanium, silicon-on-insulator, or silicon-on-sapphire substrate. Alternatively, the substrate 208 may include a silicon layer formed on a non-silicon-based semiconductor material, such as gallium-arsenide, germanium, gallium-nitride, or aluminum-phosphide. In certain embodiments, the substrate 208 is a doped or undoped silicon substrate.
The lower oxide layer or tunneling oxide layer 216 of the silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon structure generally includes a relatively thin layer of silicon dioxide (SiO2) of from about 15 angstrom (Å) to about 22 Å, and in some embodiments about 18 Å. The tunneling oxide layer 216 can be formed or deposited by any suitable means including, for example, being thermally grown or deposited using chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Generally, the tunnel oxide layer is formed or grown using a thermal oxidation in oxygen ambient. In one embodiment, the process involves a dry oxidation method in which the substrate 208 is placed in a in a deposition or processing chamber, heated to a temperature from about 700° C. to about 850° C., and exposed to oxygen for a predetermined period of time selected based on a desired thickness of the finished tunneling oxide layer 216. In another embodiment, the tunnel oxide layer is grown in an ISSG (In-Situ Steam Generation) chamber with a radical oxidation using a reaction between oxygen (O2) and hydrogen (H2) on the substrate at temperatures of at least 1000° C. Exemplary process times are from about 10 to about 100 minutes. The oxidation can be performed at atmospheric or at low pressure.
As noted above, the multi-layer charge storing layer generally includes at least two oxynitride layers having differing compositions of silicon, oxygen and nitrogen, and can have an overall thickness of from about 70 Å to about 150 Å, and in certain embodiments about 100 Å. In one embodiment, the oxynitride layers are formed or deposited in a low pressure CVD process using a silicon source, such as silane (SiH4), chlorosilane (SiH3Cl), dichlorosilane or DCS (SiH2Cl2), tetrachlorosilane (SiCl4) or Bis-TertiaryButylAmino Silane (BTBAS), a nitrogen source, such as nitrogen (N2), ammonia (NH3), nitrogen trioxide (NO3) or nitrous oxide (N2O), and an oxygen-containing gas, such as oxygen (O2) or N2O. Alternatively, gases in which hydrogen has been replaced by deuterium can be used, including, for example, the substitution of deuterated-ammonia (ND3) for NH3. The substitution of deuterium for hydrogen advantageously passivates Si dangling bonds at the silicon-oxide interface, thereby increasing an NBTI (Negative Bias Temperature Instability) lifetime of the devices.
For example, the lower or bottom oxynitride layer 220B can be deposited over the tunneling oxide layer 216 by placing the substrate 208 in a deposition chamber and introducing a process gas including N2O, NH3 and DCS, while maintaining the chamber at a pressure of from about 5 millitorr (mT) to about 500 mT, and maintaining the substrate at a temperature of from about 700° C. to about 850° C. and in certain embodiments at least about 760° C., for a period of from about 2.5 minutes to about 20 minutes. In particular, the process gas can include a first gas mixture of N2O and NH3 mixed in a ratio of from about 8:1 to about 1:8 and a second gas mixture of DCS and NH3 mixed in a ratio of from about 1:7 to about 7:1, and can be introduced at a flow rate of from about 5 to about 200 standard cubic centimeters per minute (sccm). It has been found that an oxynitride layer produced or deposited under these condition yields a silicon-rich, oxygen-rich, bottom oxynitride layer 220B, that decrease the charge loss rate after programming and after erase, which is manifested in a small voltage shift in the retention mode.
The top oxynitride layer 220A can be deposited over the bottom oxynitride layer 220B in a CVD process using a process gas including N2O, NH3 and DCS, at a chamber pressure of from about 5 mT to about 500 mT, and at a substrate temperature of from about 700° C. to about 850° C. and in certain embodiments at least about 760° C., for a period of from about 2.5 minutes to about 20 minutes. In particular, the process gas can include a first gas mixture of N2O and NH3 mixed in a ratio of from about 8:1 to about 1:8 and a second gas mixture of DCS and NH 3 mixed in a ratio of from about 1:7 to about 7:1, and can be introduced at a flow rate of from about 5 to about 20 sccm. It has been found that an oxynitride layer produced or deposited under these condition yields a silicon-rich, nitrogen-rich, and oxygen-lean top oxynitride layer 220A, which improves the speed and increases of the initial difference between program and erase voltage without compromising a charge loss rate of memory devices made using an embodiment of the silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon structure, thereby extending the operating life of the device.
In some embodiments, the silicon-rich, nitrogen-rich, and oxygen-lean top oxynitride layer 220A can be deposited over the bottom oxynitride layer 220B in a CVD process using a process gas including BTBAS and ammonia (NH3) mixed at a ratio of from about 7:1 to about 1:7 to further include a concentration of carbon selected to increase the number of traps therein. The selected concentration of carbon in the second oxynitride layer can include a carbon concentration of from about 5% to about 15%.
In certain embodiments, the top oxynitride layer 220A is deposited sequentially in the same tool used to form the bottom oxynitride layer 220B, substantially without breaking vacuum on the deposition chamber. In certain embodiments, the top oxynitride layer 220A is deposited substantially without altering the temperature to which the substrate 208 was heated during deposition of the bottom oxynitride layer 220B. In one embodiment, the top oxynitride layer 220A is deposited sequentially and immediately following the deposition of the bottom oxynitride layer 220B by decreasing the flow rate of the N2O/NH3 gas mixture relative to the DCS/NH3 gas mixture to provide the desired ratio of the gas mixtures to yield the silicon-rich, nitrogen-rich, and oxygen-lean top oxynitride layer 220A.
In certain embodiments, another oxide or oxide layer (not shown in these figures) is formed after the formation of the gate stack 202 in a different area on the substrate 208 or in the device using a steam oxidation. In this embodiment, the top oxynitride layer 220A and top or blocking oxide layer 218 of the silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon structure are beneficially steam annealed during the steam oxidation process. In particular, steam annealing improves the quality of the top or blocking oxide layer 218 reducing the number of traps formed near a top surface of the blocking oxide layer and near a top surface of the underlying top oxynitride layer 220A, thereby reducing or substantially eliminating an electric field that could otherwise form across the blocking oxide layer, which could result in back streaming of charge carriers therethrough and adversely affecting data or charge retention in the charge storing layer.
A suitable thickness for the bottom oxynitride layer 220B has been found to be from about 10 Å to about 80 Å, and a ratio of thicknesses between the bottom layer and the top oxynitride layer has been found to be from about 1:6 to about 6:1, and in certain embodiments at least about 1:4.
The top or blocking oxide layer 218 of the silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon structure includes a relatively thick layer of SiO2 of from about 30 Å to about 70 Å, and in certain embodiments about 45 Å. The top or blocking oxide layer 218 can be formed or deposited by any suitable means including, for example, being thermally grown or deposited using CVD. In one embodiment, the top or blocking oxide layer 218 is a high-temperature-oxide (HTO) deposited using CVD process. Generally, the deposition process involves exposing the substrate 208 to a silicon source, such as silane, chlorosilane, or dichlorosilane, and an oxygen-containing gas, such as O2 or N2O in a deposition chamber at a pressure of from about 50 mT to about 1000 mT, for a period of from about 10 minutes to about 120 minutes while maintaining the substrate at a temperature of from about 650° C. to about 850° C.
In certain embodiments, the top or blocking oxide layer 218 is deposited sequentially in the same tool used to form the oxynitride layers 220A, 220B. In certain embodiments, the oxynitride layers 220A, 220B, and the top or blocking oxide layer 218 are formed or deposited in the same tool used to grow the tunneling oxide layer 216. Suitable tools include, for example, an ONO AVP, commercially available from AVIZA technology of Scotts Valley, Calif.
A method or forming or fabricating a silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon stack according to one embodiment will now be described with reference to the flowchart of
Referring to
Optionally, the method may further include forming or depositing a silicon containing layer on a surface of the top or blocking oxide layer 218 to form a silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon stack or structure (308). The silicon containing layer can be, for example, a polysilicon layer deposited by a CVD process to form a control or poly gate layer 214 of the transistor or device 200.
A comparison of data retention for a memory device using a memory layer formed according to an embodiment of the present disclosure as compared to a memory device using a conventional memory layer will now be made with reference to
Referring to
In contrast, the change in VTP and VTE over time for an EEPROM made using a silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon structure having a multi-layer oxynitride layer, illustrated by lines 406 and 408 respectively, shows a difference between VTE and VTP of at least about 1.96V at the specified EOL. Thus, an EEPROM made using a silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon structure according to an embodiment of the present disclosure will meet and exceed the specified operating life of 20 years. In particular, graph or line 406 illustrates the change over time of VTP for an EEPROM using a silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon structure according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. Actual data points on line 406 are shown by unfilled squares, the remainder of the line showing an extrapolation of VTP to the specified EOL. Graph or line 408 illustrates the change over time of VTE for the EEPROM, and actual data points on line 408 are shown by filled squares, the remainder of the line showing an extrapolation of VTE to EOL.
A method or forming or fabricating a semiconductor device according to another embodiment is now described with reference to the flowchart of
Referring to
An oxygen-lean, second or top oxynitride layer 220A is then formed on a surface of the first or bottom oxynitride layer 220B (504). The second or top oxynitride layer 220A has a stoichiometric composition of oxygen, nitrogen and/or silicon different from that of the first layer. In particular, and as noted above, the second or top oxynitride layer 220A can be formed or deposited by a CVD process using a process gas using a process gas comprising a N2O/NH3 mixture at a ratio in the range of about 1:6 to 1:8 and a SiH2Cl2/NH3 mixture at a ratio in the range of about 1.5:1 to 3:1 to provide a trap dense oxynitride layer having an oxygen concentration of about 5% or less. Thus, the second or top oxynitride layer 220A comprises a charge trap density at least 1000 times greater than the first or bottom oxynitride layer 220B.
Finally, a top or blocking oxide layer 218 is formed over the second or top oxynitride layer 220A of the multi-layer charge storing layer 204 (506). As noted above, this top or blocking oxide layer 218 can be formed or deposited by any suitable means. In one embodiment the second or blocking oxide layer 218 is formed a manner that results in thinning of the second or top oxynitride layer 220A to a predetermined thickness through oxidization of a portion of the second oxynitride layer. Finally, as noted above with respect to
In another aspect, the multi-layer charge storing layer of the present disclosure has bandgap energy engineered to generate an electrical field opposing that built-up due to charge storage in the charge storing layer in a programmed state, thereby increasing data retention, without impacting programming voltages and/or device speed. An energy band diagram of a programmed conventional device including a channel in silicon substrate 602, a tunneling oxide layer 604, a homogeneous nitride or oxynitride charge storing layer 606, oxide blocking layer 608 and a polysilicon control gate 610 is illustrated in
In contrast, in a memory device including the multi-layer charge storing layer of the present disclosure engineering the bandgap energy multi-layer charge storing layer results in a build-up of an electrical field pointing inward (from the charge storing layer toward the tunnel oxide), which opposes the build-up of the electric field due to the stored charge increasing charge retention. An unprogrammed memory device including a multi-layer charge storing layer 706 is shown in
Although shown and described above as having only two oxynitride layer, i.e., a top and a bottom layer, the present disclosure is not so limited, and the multi-layer charge storing layer can include any number, n, of oxynitride layers, any or all of which may have differing stoichiometric compositions of oxygen, nitrogen and/or silicon. In particular, multi-layer charge storing layers having up to five oxynitride layers each with differing stoichiometric compositions have been produced and tested. However, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art it is generally desirable to utilize as few layers as possible to accomplish a desired result, reducing the process steps necessary to produce the device, and thereby providing a much simpler and more robust manufacturing process. Moreover, utilizing as few layers as possible also results in higher yields as it is simpler to control the stoichiometric composition and dimensions of the fewer layers.
It will further be appreciated that although shown and described as part of a silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon stack in a memory device, the structure and method of the present disclosure is not so limited, and the silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon structure can be used in or with any semiconductor technology or in any device requiring a charge storing or dielectric layer or stack including, for example, in a split gate flash memory, a TaNOS stack, in a 1T (transistor) SONOS-type cell, a 2T SONOS-type cell, a 3T SONOS-type cell, a localized 2-bit cell, a multilevel programming or cell, and/or a 9T or 12T non-volatile semiconductor memory (NVSM) cells without departing from the scope of the disclosure.
The advantages of the structures and methods of forming the same according to an embodiment of the present disclosure over previous or conventional approaches include: (i) the ability to enhance data retention in memory devices using the structure by dividing the oxynitride layer into a plurality of films or layers and tailoring the oxygen, nitrogen and silicon profile across each layer; (ii) the ability to enhance speed of a memory device without compromising data retention; (iii) the ability to meet or exceed data retention and speed specifications for memory devices using a silicon-oxide-oxynitride-oxide-silicon structure of an embodiment of the present disclosure at a temperature of at least about 125° C.; and (iv) provide heavy duty program erase cycles of 100,000 cycles or more.
Although the present disclosure has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.72(b), requiring an abstract that will allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.
In the forgoing description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details have been set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the multi-layer charge storing layer and method of the present disclosure. It will be evident however to one skilled in the art that the present interface device and method may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures, and techniques are not shown in detail or are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring an understanding of this description.
Reference in the description to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the hot de-latch system or method. The appearances of the phrase “one embodiment” in various places in the specification do not necessarily all refer to the same embodiment. The term “to couple” as used herein may include both to directly electrically connect two or more components or elements and to indirectly connect through one or more intervening components.
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 11/811,958, filed Jun. 13, 2007, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/931,947, filed May 25, 2007, both of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4395438 | Chiang | Jul 1983 | A |
4490900 | Chiu | Jan 1985 | A |
4543707 | Ito et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4843023 | Chiu et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4870470 | Bass et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5404791 | Ahmad et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408115 | Chang | Apr 1995 | A |
5464783 | Kim et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5573963 | Sung | Nov 1996 | A |
5793089 | Fulford et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5817170 | Desu et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5861347 | Maiti et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5937323 | Orczyk et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5939333 | Hurley et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5972765 | Clark et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972804 | Tobin et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6015739 | Gardner et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020606 | Liao | Feb 2000 | A |
6023093 | Gregor et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025267 | Pey et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6074915 | Chen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6114734 | Eklund | Sep 2000 | A |
6127227 | Lin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140187 | DeBusk et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147014 | Lyding et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6150286 | Sun et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157426 | Gu | Dec 2000 | A |
6162700 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174774 | Lee | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6214689 | Lim et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217658 | Orczyk et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218700 | Papadas | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6268299 | Jammy et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277683 | Pradeep et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6297096 | Boaz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6297173 | Tobin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321134 | Henley et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6335288 | Kwan et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348380 | Weimer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6365518 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6399484 | Yamasaki et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406960 | Hopper et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6429081 | Doong et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433383 | Ramsbey et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440797 | Wu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444521 | Chang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6445030 | Wu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468927 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6518113 | Buynoski | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6559026 | Rossman et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6586343 | Ho et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6586349 | Jeon et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599795 | Ogata | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602771 | Inoue et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610614 | Niimi et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6661065 | Kunikiyo | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670241 | Kamal et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6677213 | Ramkumar et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6709928 | Jenne et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713127 | Subramony et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6730566 | Niimi et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746968 | Tseng et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6768160 | Li et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768856 | Akwani et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774433 | Lee et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787419 | Chen et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6818558 | Rathor et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6833582 | Mine et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835621 | Yoo et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6884681 | Kamal et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6903422 | Goda et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6906390 | Nomoto et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913961 | Hwang | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6946349 | Lee et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6958511 | Halliyal et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7012299 | Mahajani et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015100 | Lee et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7018868 | Yang et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7033890 | Shone | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033957 | Shiraiwa et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7042054 | Ramkumar et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7045424 | Kim et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7098154 | Yoneda | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112486 | Cho et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115469 | Halliyal et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7172940 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7238990 | Burnett et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250654 | Chen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7253046 | Higashi et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262457 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7315474 | Lue | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7365389 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7372113 | Tanaka et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7390718 | Roizin et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7410857 | Higashi et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7450423 | Lai et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7463530 | Lue et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7479425 | Ang et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482236 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7544565 | Kwak et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7576386 | Lue et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7588986 | Jung | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7612403 | Bhattacharyya | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7636257 | Lue | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7646637 | Liao | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7670963 | Ramkumar et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7714379 | Lee | May 2010 | B2 |
7723789 | Lin et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7879738 | Wang | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7910429 | Dong et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7999295 | Lai et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8008713 | Dobuzinsky et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8063434 | Polishchuk et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8067284 | Levy | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8093128 | Koutny, Jr. et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8143129 | Ramkumar et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8222688 | Jenne et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8318608 | Ramkumar et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20010052615 | Fujiwara | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020020890 | Willer | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020154878 | Akwani et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030122204 | Nomoto et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030123307 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030124873 | Xing et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030183869 | Crivelli et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227049 | Sakakibara | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040067619 | Niimi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040071030 | Goda et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040094793 | Noguchi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104424 | Yamazaki | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040129986 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040173918 | Kamal et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040183122 | Mine et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207002 | Ryu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040227196 | Yoneda | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040251489 | Jeon et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050026637 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070126 | Senzaki | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050093054 | Jung | May 2005 | A1 |
20050098839 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050141168 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050186741 | Roizin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050205920 | Jeon et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050224866 | Higashi et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050236679 | Hori et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245034 | Fukuda et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050266637 | Wang | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050275010 | Chen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050275012 | Nara et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060017092 | Dong et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060051880 | Doczy et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060065919 | Fujiwara | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060111805 | Yokoyama et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060113586 | Wang | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060113627 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060160303 | Ang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060192248 | Wang | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060202263 | Lee | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060220106 | Choi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060226490 | Burnett et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060228899 | Nansei et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060261401 | Bhattacharyya | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281331 | Wang | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070029625 | Lue et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070031999 | Ho et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070048916 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049048 | Rauf et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070051306 | Ivanov et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066087 | Jung | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070121380 | Thomas | May 2007 | A1 |
20070210371 | Hisamoto et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070272971 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080029399 | Tomita et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048237 | Iwata | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080057644 | Kwak et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080087942 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080146042 | Kostamo et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150003 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080237694 | Specht et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258203 | Happ et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272424 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080286927 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080290398 | Polishchuk et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080290399 | Levy et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080290400 | Jenne et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080293207 | Koutny, Jr. et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080293255 | Ramkumar | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080296664 | Ramkumar et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090011609 | Ramkumar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090039414 | Lue et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090179253 | Levy | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090302365 | Bhattacharyya | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100252877 | Nakanishi et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110237060 | Lee et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110248332 | Levy et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011162725 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated Oct. 7, 2010; 12 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated Apr. 20, 2010; 6 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated Mar. 16, 2010; 3 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated Jan. 6, 2010; 17 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated May 13, 2009; 14 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/185,470 dated Jul. 16, 2004; 4 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 10/185,470 dated Feb. 24, 2004; 6 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 10/185,470 dated Oct. 16, 2003; 7 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/920,378 dated Nov. 10, 2003; 5 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/920,378 dated Sep. 5, 2003; 3 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/920,378 dated Jun. 25, 2003; 3 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 09/920,378 dated Mar. 28, 2003; 6 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 09/920,378 dated Oct. 21, 2002; 10 pages. |
USPTO Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 09/920,378 dated Jul. 22, 2002; 4 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,205 dated Jun. 15, 2005; 6 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,205 dated Mar. 22, 2005; 8 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,205 dated Jun. 29, 2004; 5 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/094,108 dated Aug. 22, 2003; 5 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 10/094,108 dated Mar. 31, 2003; 8 pages. |
USPTO Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 10/094,108 dated Dec. 3, 2002; 4 pages. |
Ohring, M., Materials Science of Thin Films, 2nd ed. Academic, 2002, 4 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S Appl. No. 11/904,475 dated Nov. 24, 2010; 3 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S Appl. No. 12/197,466 dated Jan. 31, 2012; 3 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S Appl. No. 13/114,889 dated Aug. 29, 2012; 3 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S Appl. No. 11/904,475 dated Sep. 28, 2010; 14 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S Appl. No. 12/124,855 dated Jan. 31, 2012; 7 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S Appl. No. 12/124,855 dated May 10, 2010; 11 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S Appl. No. 12/125,864 dated Jul. 1, 2010; 18 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S Appl. No. 12/185,747 dated Feb. 25, 2010; 12 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S Appl. No. 12/197,466 dated Nov. 17, 2011; 13 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final for U.S Appl. No. 11/904,475 dated Apr. 12, 2011; 14 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated Oct. 1, 2012; 17 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,475 dated Apr. 27, 2010; 12 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,855 dated Jan. 18, 2011; 5 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,855 dated Aug. 16, 2011; 9 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,855 dated Oct. 29, 2009; 9 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/125,864 dated Apr. 27, 2009; 17 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/125,864 dated Nov. 13, 2009; 19 pages. |
USPTO Requirement Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,466 dated Mar. 11, 2011; 5 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,747 dated Jul. 1, 2010; 12 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,747 dated Aug. 6, 2009; 15 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,751 dated Aug. 4, 2009; 19 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,466 dated Jun. 1, 2011; 11 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,855 dated May 1, 2012; 7 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,855 dated May 3, 2011; 7 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,855 dated Jul. 28, 2010; 6 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,855 dated Aug. 1, 2012; 7 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/125,864 dated Apr. 19, 2011; 11 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/125,864 dated Oct. 31, 2011; 6 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,747 dated Feb. 13, 2012; 6 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,747 dated Jul. 11, 2011; 6 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,747 dated Nov. 17, 2010; 8 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,751 dated Jan. 31, 2011; 5 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,751 dated Feb. 24, 2010; 7 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,751 dated Apr. 6, 2012; 7 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,751 dated Aug. 11, 2010; 7 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,751 dated Oct. 20, 2011; 6 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,751 dated Nov. 2, 2012; 7 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,466 dated Jun. 15, 2012; 4 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,466 dated Sep. 24, 2012; 8 pages. |
USPTO Requirement for Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,475 dated Jan. 8, 2010; 8 pages. |
USPTO Requirement for Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,751 dated Apr. 20, 2009; 7 pages. |
USPTO Requirement for Restriction/Election for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,747 dated Apr. 20, 2009; 7 pages. |
Application No. 096136630.0: “SONOS ONO Stack Scaling,” filed on Sep. 29, 2007; entire document. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,506: “SONOS ONO stack scaling,” Fredrick B. Jenne, filed on Sep.26, 2007; 46 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/125,864 “Integration of Non-Volatile Charge Trap Memory Devices and Logic Cmos Devices” William W.C. Koutny Jr et al., Filed on May 22, 2008; 65 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,747 “Integration of Non-Volatile Charge Trap Memory Devices and Logic Cmos Devices,” Krishnaswamy Ramkumar et al., Filed on Aug. 4, 2008; 66 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,751 “Integration of Non-Volatile Charge Trap Memory Devices and Logic Cmos Devices,” Krishnaswamy Ramkumar et al., Filed on Aug. 4, 2008; 66 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,466: “Radical Oxidation Process for Fabricating a Nonvolatile Charge Trap Memory Device,” Ramkumar et al., filed on Aug. 25, 2008; 68 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,201: “Method of Integrating a Charge-Trapping Gate Stack Into a CMOS Flow” Krishnaswamy Ramkumar et al., filed on Mar. 23, 2012; 38 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/431,069: “SONOS Stack With Split Nitride Memory Layer” Fredrick Jenne et al., filed on Mar. 27, 2012; 59 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/436,872: “Oxide-Nitride-Oxide Stack Having Multiple Oxynitride Layers” Sagy Levy, Zichron-Yoakev et al., filed on Mar. 31, 2012; 53 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/436,875: “Nonvolatile Charge Trap Memory Device Having a High Dielectric Constant Blocking Region” Igor Polishchuk et al., filed on Mar. 31, 2012; 70 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/436,878: “Integration of Non-Volatile Charge Trap Memory Devices and Logic CMOS Devices” Krishnaswamy Ramkumar et al., filed on Mar. 31, 2012; 90 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/539,461: “Sonos Ono Stack Scaling,” Fredrick Jenne, filed on Jul. 1, 2012; 91 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/551,237: “SONOS Stack With Split Nitride Memory Layer” Fredrick Jenne et al., filed on Jul. 17, 2012; 37 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,071: “Method of Fabricating a Nonvolatile Charge Trap Memory Device” Krishnaswamy Ramkumar et al., filled on Sep. 14, 2012; 69 pages. |
Application No. 200880000919.3 William W.C. Koutny Jr. et al., Filed on May 23, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/931,947: “Oxide-nitride- Oxide Stack Having Multiple Oxynitride Layers” Sagy Levy et al., filed on May 25, 2007; 27 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/931,948: “SONOS stack with oxynitride bilayer made of BTBAS and NH3” Sagy Levy et al., filed on May 25, 2007; 11 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/940,128: “Single Wafer Process for ONO Stack” Krishnaswamy Ramkumar et al., filed on May 25, 2007; 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/940,384: “SONOS ONO Stack Scaling” Frederick Jenne et al., filed on May 25, 2007; 33 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/007,566: “Nonvolatile Charge Trap Memory Device Having A High Dielectric Constant Blocking Region” Igor Polishchuk et al., filed on Dec. 12, 2007; 37 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/172,320: “SONOS stack With Superior Reliability” Fredrick Jenne et al., filed on Apr. 24, 2009; 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/599,258 “New Integration of SONOS Stack” Krishnaswamy Ramkumar et al., filed on Feb. 15, 2012: 4 pages. |
Application No. PCT/US08/06597 “Integration of Non-Volatile Charge Trap Memory Devices and Logic Cmos Devices,” Filed on May 23, 2008; 50 pages. |
Application No. PCT/US08/06627 “Radical Oxidation Process for Fabricating a Nonvolatile Charge Trap Memory Device,” Filed on May 23, 2008; 53 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US07/20966 dated Apr. 21, 2008; 2 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US07/20988 dated Mar. 14, 2008; 2 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US12/021583 dated Jul. 19, 2012; 2 pages. |
SIPO Office Action for Application No. 200780035963.3 dated Feb. 29, 2012; 4 pages. |
Uspto Advisory Action for Application No. 11/904,506 dated Aug. 30, 2011; 4 pages. |
Uspto Final Rejection for Application No. 11/811,958 dated Mar. 13, 2013; 22 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904506 dated Jun. 7, 2011; 15 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/005,813 dated Mar. 6, 2012; 5 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,644 dated Jan. 24, 2011; 22 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/114,889 dated Apr. 2, 2013; 12 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/114,889 dated Jun. 4, 2012; 12 pages. |
USPTO Miscellaneous Internal Document for U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,644 dated May 28, 2010; 6 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated Dec. 7, 2011; 13 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904505 dated Feb. 3, 2011; 13 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904506 dated Aug. 31, 2010; 17 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/005,813 dated Sep. 23, 2011; 12 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,644 dated May 28, 2010; 19 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,105 dated Apr. 21, 2011; 7 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,105 dated Oct. 18, 2011; 7 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/007,533 dated Apr. 12, 2012; 9 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/539,458 dated Mar. 13, 2013; 5 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated Oct. 1, 2012; 17 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,105 dated Apr. 4, 2012; 8 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,105 dated May 7, 2012; 7 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/007,533 dated Mar. 7, 2013; 8 pages. |
USPTO Requirement for Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,506 dated Apr. 13, 2010; 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/080,166: “Sequential Deposition and Anneal of A Dielectic Layer In A Charge Trapping Memory Device” Krishnaswamy Ramkumar et al., filed Mar. 31, 2008; 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/080,175: “Plasma Oxidation of A Memory Layer to Form A Blocking Layer In Non Volatile Charge Trap Memory Devices” Krishnaswamy Ramkumar et al., filed on Mar. 31, 2008; 37 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US13/32339 dated May 30, 2013; 2 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated May 14, 2013; 4 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated Jun. 2, 2011; 5 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated Mar. 15, 2011; 13 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,513 dated Jun. 24, 2009; 12 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated Oct. 7, 2010; 12 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,513 dated Dec. 10, 2008; 11 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/006,961 dated Jun. 24, 2010; 8 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/080,166 dated Jun. 30, 2010; 11 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/125,864 dated Nov. 17, 2010; 19 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,513 dated Oct. 9, 2009; 7 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/006,961 dated Jul. 26, 2011; 8 pages. |
USPTO Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/080,166 dated Sep. 1, 2011; 9 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/080,175 dated May 14, 2010; 10 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/185,751 dated May 15, 2013; 9 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,466 dated Sep. 24, 2012; 3 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/539,458 dated May 24, 2013; 8 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/539,466 dated Nov. 27, 2012; 8 pages. |
USPTO Requirement for Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,513 dated Oct. 7, 2008; 8 pages. |
USPTO Requirement for Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,644 dated Oct. 7, 2009; 11 pages. |
USPTO Requirement for Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 12/080,166 dated Mar.19, 2010; 6 pages. |
USPTO Requirement for Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 12/080,175 dated Feb. 3, 2010; 6 pages. |
USPTO Requirement for Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 13/551,237 dated Jun. 17, 2013; 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT1US13132339 mailed May 30, 2013; 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,644: “NonVolatile Charge Trap Memory Device Having A High Dielectric Constant Blocking Region” Igor Polishchuk et al., filed on Feb. 13, 2008; 37 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US13/29784 dated May 20, 2013; 2 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US13/32777 dated Jun. 20, 2013; 2 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US13/48876 dated Jul. 26, 2013; 5 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated Mar. 16, 2010; 4 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/114,889 dated Aug. 2, 2013; 2 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated Nov. 6, 2010; 17 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,958 dated May 13, 2009; 14 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/114,889 dated Sep. 5, 2013; 11 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/431,069 dated Aug. 16, 2013; 7 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/436,878 dated Jul. 24, 2013; 12 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/551,237 dated Jul. 18, 2013; 6 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,506 dated Feb. 3, 2011; 13 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/006,961 dated Mar. 15, 2011; 8 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/006,961 dated Oct. 14, 2010; 4 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,201 dated Aug. 5, 2013; 12 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/13US/32777 dated Jun. 20, 2013; 7 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US13/29784 mailed May 20, 2013; 6 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for the International Application No. PCT/US 12/21583 dated May 8, 2012; 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110248332 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60931947 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11811958 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 13007533 | US |