The invention relates to a particle-optical apparatus comprising a sample holder arranged for receiving a sample, a particle source arranged for producing a primary beam of first electrically charged particles along an optical axis for irradiating said sample, first detection means arranged for detecting electrons such as secondary electrons emanating from the sample due to said irradiation, a detection space formed by at least said sample holder and said first detection means, and an immersion lens arranged for providing a magnetic field for focusing the primary beam in the vicinity of the sample holder, wherein said first detection means are arranged for providing an electric field in the detection space, and wherein the detection space is arranged for comprising a gas,
A device as described above is known from abstract number 5-174768(A) of Japanese patent application number 3-53811, which abstract was published on Jul. 7, 1993.
Such devices are better known by the name Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopes (ESEM), and are based on the principle of Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEM). In a SEM, a region of a sample that is to be investigated is probed by a primary beam of electrically charged particles (generally electrons) that move along an optical axis of the device. As a result of the energy released in collision, the charged particles incident on the sample causes the liberation of other charged particles in the sample, which emanate from the sample with a certain kinetic energy. The energy of these secondary particles, which is substantially lower than the energy of the particles in the primary beam, provides information on the nature, structure and composition of the sample. For this reason, a SEM is often provided with a secondary electron detection apparatus, which can detect these liberated particles. If, for example, the secondary electron detection apparatus is provided with an electrode that is maintained at a positive voltage, and if it is presumed that the secondary particles liberated from the sample are (negatively charged) secondary electrons, then these secondary electrons will move toward the electrode. The secondary electrons captured by the electrode produce a current in the detector, which current can be amplified and can yield the necessary information about the sample. Because the primary beam from the particle source probes a region of the sample, it is possible to obtain an image of the sample by compiling the information obtained with the aid of the detector. It will be apparent that, in connection with the quality of the image thus obtained, particularly the speed with which the image is recorded and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), it is useful to have the detected current as large as possible.
In an ESEM, the sample that is to be investigated is placed in an atmosphere of a gas having a pressure between 0.1 Torr (13 Pa) and 50 Torr (6575 Pa), whereas in a conventional SEM the sample is located in vacuum. The advantage of an ESEM as compared to a conventional SEM is that the ESEM offers the possibility to form electron-optical images of moist or non-conducting samples (for example: biological samples, moist samples, plastics, ceramic materials or glass fibers) which, under the usual vacuum conditions in the conventional SEM, would be difficult to image. The ESEM provides the possibility of maintaining the sample in its natural state, without having to be subjected to the disadvantageous effects of drying, freezing or vacuum coating, which are normally necessary in studies using conventional SEMs.
Another advantage of the employed gaseous atmosphere is the dissipation of the surface charge accumulating on the sample as a result of irradiation (assuming the sample to be a non-conducting sample), as a result of which the resolving power of the microscope is increased.
The use of a gaseous atmosphere in an ESEM also makes improved detection means possible. In an ESEM, the liberated secondary electrons that move in the direction of the secondary electron detector will collide en route with gas molecules present in their path. This collision will result in the liberation of new electrons (so called daughter electrons) from the gas molecules, which will also move in the direction of the secondary electron detector. In their turn, these newly liberated daughter electrons will again collide with other gas molecules, etc., so that, as a result of using the gas atmosphere, an amplification of the secondary electron signal occurs. It will be apparent that, the greater the distance that the secondary electrons have to travel to the secondary electron detector, the greater the number of collisions that will occur between secondary electrons and gas molecules. In this scenario, one should make allowances for the fact that the dimensions of the sample chamber or detection space of the electron microscope are preferably such that the length of the path that the primary beam must traverse through the pressurized sample chamber is as small as possible. This is because the gas molecules present also cause scattering of the primary beam, seeing as electrons from the primary beam can collide with the gas molecules.
In the cited abstract number 5-174768, an ESEM is disclosed wherein the primary beam from the particle source is focused on the sample by means of an immersion lens. The immersion lens consists of a magnetic dipole whose poles are located on opposite sides of the sample chamber formed by the sample holder and primary beam source. In this manner, a magnetic field is present in the sample chamber. The secondary electrons liberated from the sample will be influenced by the magnetic field while on their way to the detector, as a result of which they will follow a helical path. It is claimed that in this way, the distance traversed by the secondary electrons is greatly increased, so that the collision probability proportionately increases and the amplification factor of the detection apparatus increases. A disadvantage of the disclosed device described here above is that, in the given configuration, the electrons follow a helical path around an axis that extends parallel to a magnetic field. The distance traversed by the electron from the sample to the detector is directly dependent upon the distance between the detector and the sample in the direction of the magnetic field. In the illustrated case, this means that the detector electrode should be located as high as possible above the sample, so as to achieve as large an amplification factor as possible. Attendant upon this is the fact that the distance traversed by the primary beam through the sample chamber (and thus through the gaseous atmosphere) shall also be large. As a result of this, scattering of the primary beam will increase. An increased amplification factor for the detection apparatus is thus achieved at the expense of the resolving power of the illustrated device.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a particle-optical device in which the working distance (the distance traversed by the primary beam through the detection space) is as small as possible, but the amplification factor of the detection means is as large as possible. It is to be understood that detection includes direct collection of charged particles and induction of signal in an external circuit caused by the movement of charged particles.
These and other objects have been achieved in the present invention in that said first detection means and said immersion lens are arranged for providing the electric field and the magnetic field such that the detection space comprises a first portion in which the electric field is oriented transverse to the magnetic field. It can be shown that the motion of the low energy electrons in this field structure can create a large amplification factor, provided that certain values of electric field and magnetic field are present. It can further be shown that this large amplification can take place even with a low pressure of gas, which further reduces the scattering of the primary beam.
The invention makes use of the principle that the resultant force {overscore (F)} (by {overscore (F)} the vector F is meant here) on an electrically charged particle, such as an electron, moving through a magnetic field and an electric field is comprised of the electrical force {overscore (F)}E and the magnetic force {overscore (F)} on the particle. The electrical force {overscore (F)}E is, dependent on the charge of the particle, parallel or anti-parallel to the electric field Ē, and the magnetic force is oriented perpendicular to the velocity {overscore (v)} of the particle and the magnetic flux {overscore (B)}. The direction of the magnetic force {overscore (F)} is further determined by the polarity of the charge of the particle (positive/negative).
The electrical force and magnetic force are given by:
{overscore (F)}E=qĒ (1)
{overscore (F)}B=q({overscore (v)}×{overscore (B)}) (2)
where q is the charge of the particle (which can be positive or negative).
The resultant force F is given by the following vector relationship:
{overscore (F)}={overscore (F)}E+{overscore (F)}B=q.(Ē+{overscore (v)}×{overscore (B)})
The present invention makes use of the motion followed by an electron that starts from rest (or low energy) in a magnetic field that is orthogonal to an electric field. The electrons will follow a so called cycloidal path and the kinetic energy of the electron will cycle repeatedly from the starting energy to a higher energy and then back to the original energy. This cycle will repeat indefinitely in high vacuum. However, in a gaseous environment the electron may collide with a gas molecule. If the kinetic energy of the electrons exceeds the ionization energy of the gas present in the detection space, then the electron is capable of liberating another electron (called a daughter electron) in a collision with a gas molecule. When these collisions occur, the original electron, and the daughter electron will also follow a cycloidal path and a chain reaction may result in a large number of electrons for each secondary electron. Thus, there is a large amplification of the secondary electron signal. This amplified signal is collected at the electrodes that provide the electric field.
In a further embodiment of the present invention the electric field may have radial symmetry, and the electron will follow a generally circular path, combined with the cycloidal motion. The same large amplification may occur. This radial electric field can be conveniently provided by an annular electrode, which may also serve as the signal detector. It can further be shown that this large amplification factor can occur at low pressures of the gas.
It will be understood that, because the electric field and the magnetic field are, in principle, to be oriented perpendicular to one another, the distance traversed by the particle between the sample and the detector is not dependent upon the working distance traversed by the primary beam of primary electrons through the detection space. The distance traversed by the particle is dependent upon the distance between the optical axis and the most closely located point of the detector electrode. Performing the detection technique described will not be at the expense of the resolving power of the particle-optical apparatus. Of importance to the above is that, in at least a portion of the detection space, the electric field must have a component Ē that is perpendicular to the magnetic field {overscore (B)} of sufficient magnitude to bring electrons in the cycloidal motion to a kinetic energy that is higher than the ionization energy of the gas molecule. From this, an average person skilled in the art will be able to calculate those parameters that are of importance with regard to the electric field and magnetic field.
In an embodiment of the present invention, a particle-optical device is disclosed in which the first detection means and the immersion lens are further arranged for providing the electric field and the magnetic field such that the detection space comprises a second portion in which the electric field and the magnetic field are parallel.
If, in a second portion of the detection space, the electric field has a component Ē that is parallel to the magnetic field {overscore (B)} then a particle that has a random velocity that is not completely parallel to the magnetic flux {overscore (B)} will follow a helical path. An explanation for this is that as a result of the electrical force {overscore (F)}E the particle will be accelerated uniformly in the direction of the electric field {overscore (F)}E. However, the component of the velocity V″ of the particle that is perpendicular to the magnetic flux {overscore (B)} will experience a force {overscore (F)}B that is perpendicular to the velocity and the magnetic field. This component of the velocity V″ of the particle perpendicular to the magnetic flux {overscore (B)} will consequently vary continually in direction. The particle will accordingly describe a helical motion around an axis that is oriented in the direction of the electric field Ē.
If the electric field Ē can be made to change from positive to negative then the secondary electrons will oscillate backwards and forwards while also describing the helical motion due to the magnetic field. The combination of these two motions will greatly increase the path of the electrons in the gas, and thereby increase the amplification of the signal. As a result of this, the detector of the particle-optical device of the present invention will become more sensitive.
In another embodiment of the particle-optical device of the present invention, the first detection means comprise a first electrode that is arranged for providing the electric field and for detecting the secondary and daughter electrons, whereby the first electrode comprises a central opening which is symmetrically arranged around the optical axis. This embodiment provides a simple set-up for generating a radially symmetric electric field around the optical axis. The set-up, wherein the sample holder in which the sample is located during operation is disposed in extension of the optical axis, will, when the dimensions of the central opening are suitably chosen, generate an electric field that, in the vicinity of the detector, comprises a large component perpendicular to the optical axis, and, furthermore, in the vicinity of the sample holder, will comprise a large component parallel to the optical axis. By generating a magnetic field that is principally parallel to the optical axis, using techniques known to the skilled artisan, the aforementioned embodiments are obtained, whereby the detection space comprises regions in which the electric and magnetic field are parallel as well as regions in which the electric and magnetic field are directed perpendicular or transverse to one another. In this manner, the invention can be applied in an easy manner in a particle-optical device.
In yet another embodiment, a particle-optical device further comprises second detection means that are arranged for detecting second charged particles, such as ions, that are formed in the gas due to interactions between the gas and the electrons. Because, for example, the secondary electrons collide with the gas molecules in the detection space, not only will daughter electrons be formed when the kinetic energy of the secondary electrons exceeds the ionization energy of the gas molecules, but also electrically charged gas ions (second charged particles). By detecting these gas ions with second detection means, it is possible to receive an additional signal that provides information on the composition and nature of the sample. Since the polarity of the gas ions is opposite to that of the secondary electrons, the detection thereof will, at the outset, yield a signal that can be regarded as the negative of the signal from the first detection means.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the detection means comprise a second electrode that is located between the sample and the first detection means, whereby the second electrode comprises a central opening that is symmetrically disposed around the optical axis.
Such an electrode offers the advantage that it does not asymmetrically disturb the radial electric field of the first electrode. Since electrons are usually more mobile than ions, in view of their mass, the placement of the second electrode between the first electrode and the sample will yield the advantage that ions will be more easily captured by the second electrode. The positive ions will thus collide with the second electrode, whereby they will be neutralized by recombination and will thus cause a signal which may be measured from the second electrode.
In another embodiment of the invention, the sample holder comprises a third electrode, and the third detection means are at least comprised by the sample holder.
In such an embodiment, some of the positively charged ions from the gas are collected by the sample holder. In this manner, a current can be generated in the third detector, which provides the desired signal.
Another embodiment of the invention further comprises fourth detection means arranged for detecting photons that have been liberated as a result of interactions between the gas and the electrons. As a consequence of the collisions between, for example, secondary electrons from the sample and gas molecules, photons may be generated that can be detected by fourth detection means. The number of detected photons, i.e. the intensity of the detected light, is proportional to of the number of collisions that have taken place between secondary electrons and gas molecules. Consequently, the detected light intensity is directly related to the secondary electron signal from the sample and the signal from the first detector. The detection of these photons provides information on the sample, which information may be used in signal processing and image formation.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention further comprises means for the provision of a signal based on a combination of at least two signals provided by the first, second, third and fourth detection means.
By combining signals from the different detection means, the signal-to-noise ratio may be increased. The signals obtained with the detectors will comprise a certain quantity of noise. If one compares the signal from the first detector with a signal from one of the other detectors, some of the noise present in the signals from the various detectors will be correlated, and some uncorrelated. This enables a number of techniques, known to an average person skilled in the art, to remove the noise.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, a particle-optical device comprises means that are embodied to electrically bias the sample with a negative bias. In such a scenario the electric field between the sample and the first detector will increase, which will increase the amplification in the gas.
In a second aspect of the invention, the present invention relates to detection means comprising a ring-shaped electrode and amplification means arranged for use as first detector means in a particle-optical apparatus according to a first aspect of the invention.
In a third aspect the present invention relates to a method of detecting electrons in a particle-optical apparatus wherein a sample is irradiated by a primary beam of charged particles and secondary electrons are liberated from said sample by said irradiation, wherein said secondary electrons are accelerated towards detection means and a detection space is at least formed by said detection means and said sample, said detection space comprising a gas, and wherein an immersion lens provides a magnetic field in said detection space, wherein said electric field and said magnetic field are provided such that the detection space comprises at least a portion wherein the electric field is oriented transverse to the magnetic field.
The invention shall be further elucidated with the aid of a number of embodiments thereof, with reference to the attached drawings and the reference numbers contained therein, whereby it is to be noted that the described embodiments do not have an exclusive effect on the scope of protection as set forth in the claims of the application, read in the light of the description and drawings, wherein:
a renders a schematic depiction of path of an electron propagating through a magnetic and an electric field, whereby the electric field is transverse to the magnetic field in a vacuum.
a shows the field from a magnetron where the electric field is transverse to the magnetic field and the electric field is radially symmetric.
a depicts an electric potential that increases and then decreases again along a z axis.
a is a schematic depiction of the motion of an electron 1 that starts with zero velocity at k and moves under the influence of electric field E (which is parallel to the Y axis) and magnetic field B (which is perpendicular to the page, and directed into the page). Initially the electron accelerates in Y due to the electric field E. The electron experiences a force in the X direction due to the influence of the magnetic field and the electron velocity. This causes the electron to follow the path depicted as 2. At the point designated m, the electron achieves maximum velocity and maximum energy. During the passage from m to n the electron decelerates until it comes to rest again at n. This motion is known as a cycloidal motion. If the field E is constant along all points in the X axis, then the cycloidal motion will be repeated indefinitely provided that the electron is in a vacuum. This motion of an electron is well known to those expert in the art, and is known as the planar magnetron.
b depicts the situation where the electron is in a gaseous environment. As the electron follows the cycloidal path it will eventually collide with a gas molecule, depicted as point q. If the electron energy at q exceeds the ionization energy of the gas molecule then the gas molecule will be ionized and another electron is liberated. This second electron is designated a daughter electron 3.
The original electron 1 and the daughter electron 3 will both start from q and will undergo the cycloidal motion shown as 4. These two electrons may each ionize further gas molecules, thereby causing a cascade multiplication. This mechanism is exploited in the primary claim of the present invention.
a shows a cylindrical magnetron field configuration. There are two cylindrical elements, the inner electrode 5 and outer electrode 6 with a potential applied between the electrodes. The Figure depicts the situation where the outer electrode is at a more positive voltage than the inner electrode, creating the electric field E which is radially symmetric. Again, there is a magnetic field B (which is perpendicular to the page). It can be shown that an electron starting from rest in a vacuum between the electrodes will accelerate towards the outer electrode and may undergo a motion similar to the cycloid shown in
If the space between the two electrodes is filled with a gas then ionization may occur and daughter electrons may be generated (as described above for the planar magnetron). At each collision, the electron and the daughter electron will be closer to the outer electrode. This is depicted in
The generation of daughter electrons and the subsequent cascade amplification will occur provided that certain values of E and B are present. The maximum energy of the electron in the cycloidal motion is given by 2*m*(E/B)^2/q, where m is the mass of an electron and q is the charge of an electron. If this maximum energy is greater than the ionization energy of the gas, then an ionizing event can occur and a daughter electron can be generated. Hence, for a given value of B, there is a Critical value of E that is required. In a circular symmetric electric field the value of E varies with radius, and in order to obtain a large amplification the Critical value must be provided over a large part of the detection space.
It is well known to those expert in the art that a radial electric field may be provided by various different structures. For example it is known that a ring electrode or a plate electrode with a circular hole will both provide a radially symmetric electric field. Further it can be shown that the electric field produced by a ring or a plate electrode will produce the preferential amplification described. Hence, the ring or plate may be placed symmetrically about the charged particle beam which minimizes the effect of the electric field on the charged particle beam. It is also well known to those expert in the art that the required axial magnetic field may be provided by various different structures. A suitable magnetic field can be provided by a so called immersion lens of a charged particle beam apparatus, or within the polepiece of a so called pinhole lens of a charged particle beam apparatus, or provided by the so called single pole lens of a charged particle beam apparatus.
The electric field 18 will, at the outset, uniformly accelerate the electron 15 in a direction opposite to that of the electric field 18. The component 16″ of the velocity that is perpendicular to both fields 17 and 18 will ensure that an interaction arises with the magnetic field, giving rise to a magnetic force on the electron that is continually perpendicular to the velocity component 16″. In this manner, in part because of the acceleration in the direction opposite to that of the electric field 18, the particle will traverse a helical or screw-thread-like path. The radius of this path will be determined by the so-called Larmor radius, with which the average skilled artisan is familiar.
a depicts a situation where an electric potential 9 increases along the Z axis to a maximum value V and then decreases. An electron 10, subject to this potential, will at first be accelerated by the electric field created by the potential, then will decelerates again, and then reverse direction. That is, the electron 10 will, if unobstructed, oscillate around the point or plane of highest potential.
The path followed by the electron in a gaseous environment is depicted by 12 in
In a practical situation the electrons generated in this cascade will drift towards the electrodes that provide the electric field and the cascade will be prematurely terminated. It is very beneficial to provide a magnetic field that is parallel to the electric field creating the potential of
Anode 32 is typically biased at a positive potential between 10 V and 2000V. The primary beam opening 33 and the base structure 31 are typically biased at ground potential. These conditions typically provide an electric field that is schematically depicted by the electric field lines 34. It can be shown that the potential distribution along the Z axis has the desired form depicted in
The detection space 20 further comprises a subspace in which the electric and magnetic field lines are oriented principally parallel to one another. This subspace is at least bordered by the base structure 31. In the depicted example, such a subspace is present in the vicinity of the extremity 30 of the electron source. It will be understood that the schematic depiction given in
It can be shown that the motion of the low energy electrons in this field structure can create a large amplification factor, provided that certain combinations of values are present for the electric field and magnetic field. The anode hole size is a factor in determining the strengths of the parallel and transverse components of the electric field. If the hole in the anode is too small, then the amplification will be enhanced by the magnetic Penning mechanism, but the magnetron mechanism will be degraded or absent because the electric field will not achieve the critical value described above with respect to
Hence, the detection space 20 depicted in
A set of conditions that provides conditions for both the magnetic Penning mechanism and for the magnetron mechanism includes an anode hole size about 3 mm, a magnetic field of up to about 0.3 Tesla, an anode potential greater than about 400 V, and a gas pressure of about 0.3 Torr. These conditions are known to produce an amplification that is much greater than any previous ESEM detector at 400V. Typical operational pressures are between 0.1 Torr and 0.7 Torr.
The detection space 20 depicted in
The (non-depicted) electric field generated by the ring-shaped anode 32, and the (non-depicted) magnetic field generated by the magnetic dipole formed by the wall of the electron source 30 and the base structure 31, will ensure that, in analogy to
In some embodiments, ions generated in the gas may be used may be used to counteract charging of the sample due to the charged particle beam.
The generation of daughter electrons using the magnetic Penning mechanism and magnetron mechanism will also generate positively charged gas ions. Some of these ions will migrate to the separation diaphragm 37 and some will migrate towards the sample 41. Some of the ions that migrate to the sample are required to dissipate the charge induced in the sample due to the charged particle beam. However, the high amplification factor of this detection volume may generate a surplus of ions. These surplus gas ions may be collected by an electrode between the sample and the anode. Such an electrode could take the form of a grid, a wire, a set of wires, or a plate such as the ion plate 36. The electrode may be electrically biased, or at ground potential.
In another embodiment, the distance between the base structure 31 and the wall of the electron source 30 can be chosen to be so small that the subspace in which the electric and magnetic field are principally parallel to one another is very small, or even absent. The detection space is therefore very “flat”, and the electric and magnetic field will be principally transverse to one another. The secondary electrons liberated from the sample 41 shall thus immediately be subjected to circumstances under which the electric field and the magnetic field are principally perpendicular to one another. The amplification using the magnetic Penning mechanism may be absent but the detector combination 32, 38, 39 can still achieve a large amplification factor due to the magnetron, which is sufficiently large to produce the desired signal at the output of the detector 39, while the working distance -being the distance that the electron primary beam must traverse through the detection space 20 from the primary beam opening 33 to the sample 41—can be kept as small as possible. Scattering of the electron primary beam off gas molecules present in the detection space will be kept to a minimum in this embodiment.
The quality of the detected signal can be improved by detecting other signals that are produced during irradiation of the sample and detection of the secondary electrons.
The signals at the outputs 39 and 46 can now be combined with one another such that the signal-to-noise ratio of the resultant signal is improved. It is noted that some of the noise present in the signals from the detectors is correlated, enabling a number of filtering techniques that are known to an average person skilled in the art.
A further possibility to obtain information on the sample from the particle-optical device is offered by photon detector 49, which is connected to amplifier 50, producing at output 51 a signal that is proportional to the light intensity present in the detection space. As a consequence of the collisions between, for example, secondary electrons from the sample and gas molecules, photons may be generated that can be detected by 49. The number of detected photons, i.e. the intensity of the detected light, is proportional to the number of collisions that have taken place between secondary electrons and gas molecules. Consequently, the detected light intensity is directly related to the secondary electron signal from the sample.
In another embodiment of the invention the sample mount 42 may be biased at a potential. A negative potential will enhance the strength of the magnetic Penning mechanism by increasing the field strength. It is also advantageous to apply a bias potential to the separation diaphragm 37 to achieve the same objective.
While the disclosure above includes a description of a theoretical mechanism thought by applicants to account for the unexpected large amplification of embodiments of the present invention, the invention has been shown to work in practice, and the validity of the invention does not depend upon the correctness of the theoretical premises.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Pat. Appl. No. 60/411,699, filed Sep. 18, 2002, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/330,691, filed Dec. 27, 2002, now ABN.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4249077 | Crawford | Feb 1981 | A |
5502306 | Meisburger et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5578821 | Meisberger et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
6172363 | Shinada et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184525 | Van Der Mast | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6329826 | Shinada et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6365896 | Van der Mast | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6525317 | Yang | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6538254 | Tomimatsu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
05-174768 | Jul 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040124356 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60411699 | Sep 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10330691 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 10664796 | US |