Physically realistic computer simulation of medical procedures

Abstract
An apparatus for interfacing the movement of a shaft with a computer includes a support, a gimbal mechanism having two degrees of freedom, and three electromechanical transducers. When a shaft is engaged with the gimbal mechanism, it can move with three degrees of freedom in a spherical coordinate space, where each degree of freedom is sensed by one of the three transducers. A fourth transducer can be used to sense rotation of the shaft around an axis.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to human/computer interface devices, and more particularly to computer input devices such as mice, trackballs, etc.


Virtual reality computer systems provide users with the illusion that they are part of a “virtual” environment. A virtual reality system will typically include a personal computer or workstation, specialized virtual reality software, and virtual reality I/O devices such as head mounted displays, pointer gloves, 3D pointers, etc.


For example, a virtual reality computer system can allow a doctor-trainee or other human operator or user to “manipulate” a scalpel or probe within a computer-simulated “body”, and thereby perform medical procedures on a virtual patient. In this instance, the I/O device is typically a 3D pointer, stylus, or the like. As the “scalpel” or “probe” moves within the body image displayed on the screen of the computer system, results of such movement are updated and displayed so that the operator can gain the experience of such a procedure without practicing on an actual human being or a cadaver.


For virtual reality systems to provide a realistic (and therefore effective) experience for the user, sensory feedback and manual interaction should be as natural as possible. As virtual reality systems become more powerful and as the number of potential applications increases, there is a growing need for specific human/computer interface devices which allow users to interface with computer simulations with tools that realistically emulate the activities being represented within the virtual simulation. Such procedures as laparoscopic surgery, catheter insertion, and epidural analgesia should be realistically simulated with suitable human/computer interface devices if the doctor is to be properly trained.


While the state of the art in virtual simulation and medical imaging provides a rich and realistic visual feedback, there is a great need for new human/computer interface tools which allow users to perform natural manual interactions with the computer simulation. For medical simulation, there is a strong need to provide doctors with a realistic mechanism for performing the manual activities associated with medical procedures while allowing a computer to accurately keep track of their actions.


There are number of devices that are commercially available for interfacing a human with a computer for virtual reality simulations. There are, for example, such 2-dimensional input devices such as mice, trackballs, and digitizing tablets. However, 2-dimensional input devices tend to be awkward and inadequate to the task of interfacing with 3-dimensional virtual reality simulations. In contrast, a 3-dimensional human/computer interface tool sold under the trademark Immersion PROBE™ is marketed by Immersion Human Interface Corporation of Palo Alto, Calif., and allows manual control in 3-dimensional virtual reality computer environments. A pen-like stylus allows for dexterous 3-dimensional manipulation, and the position and orientation of the stylus is communicated to a host computer. The Immersion PROBE has six degrees of freedom which convey spatial coordinates (x, y, z) and orientation (role, pitch, yaw) of the stylus to the host computer.


While the Immersion PROBE is an excellent 3-dimensional interface tool, it may be inappropriate for certain virtual reality simulation applications. For example, in some of the aforementioned medical simulations three or four degrees of freedom of a 3-dimensional human/computer interface tool is sufficient and, often, more desirable than five or six degrees of freedom because it more accurately mimics the real-life constraints of the actual medical procedure. Therefore, a less complex, more compact, lighter weight, lower inertia and less expensive alternative to six degree of freedom human/computer interface tool is desirable for certain applications.


SUMMARY

The present invention provides a 3-dimensional human/computer interface tool which is particularly well adapted to virtual reality simulation systems that require fewer degrees of freedom, e.g. two, three, or four degrees of freedom. The present invention therefore tends to be less complex, more compact, lighter weight, less expensive, more reliable and have less inertia than 3-dimensional human/computer interface tools of the prior art having more degrees of freedom.


The present invention is directed to a method and apparatus for providing an interface between a human and a computer. The human end of the interface is preferably a substantially cylindrical object such as a shaft of a surgeon's tool, a catheter, a wire, etc. Alternatively, it can comprise a pool cue, a screw driver shaft, or any other elongated object that is manipulated in 3-dimensional space by a human operator. In certain embodiments of the present invention, the computer develops signals to provide force feedback to the object. For example, a twisting or resisting force can be imparted on the object to provide haptic or force feedback of a medical procedure being performed in a virtual reality simulation.


An apparatus for interfacing with a electrical system includes a support, a gimbal mechanism coupled to the support, and preferably three electromechanical transducers, although certain embodiments (e.g. for use with catheters) may require only two electromechanical transducers. The gimbal mechanism has a base portion which is rotatably coupled to the support to provide a first degree of freedom, and an object receiving portion rotatably coupled to the base portion to provide a second degree of freedom. A first electromechanical transducer is coupled between the support and the base portion, a second electromechanical transducer is coupled between the base portion and the object receiving portion, and a third electromechanical transducer is coupled between the object receiving portion and an intermediate portion of an elongated object that is at least partially disposed within the object receiving portion. The third electromechanical transducer is associated with a third degree of freedom. Therefore, each of the three transducers are associated with a degree of freedom of movement of the object when it is engaged with the object receiving portion of the gimbal mechanism.


More specifically, an apparatus for interfacing an operator manipulable shaft with a computer includes a support, a gimbal mechanism, and four sensors. The gimbal mechanism preferably includes a U shaped base portion having a base and a pair of substantially parallel legs extending therefrom, where the base of the U shaped base portion is rotatably coupled to the support, and a shaft receiving portion pivotally coupled between the legs of the base portion. The shaft receiving portion includes a translation interface and a rotation interface that engage the shaft when it is engaged with an aperture of the shaft receiving portion. The base portion rotates around a first axis and the shaft receiving portion rotates around a second axis substantially perpendicular to the first axis, such that an axis of the shaft defines a radius in a spherical coordinate system having an origin at an intersection of the first axis and the second axis. A first sensor is coupled between the support and the U shaped base portion to provide a first output signal, a second sensor is coupled between the U shaped base portion and the shaft receiving portion to produce a second output signal, a third sensor is coupled to the translation interface to produce a third output signal, and a fourth sensor is coupled between the rotation interface and the object to produce a fourth output signal. The output signals are preferably coupled to an input of a computer by an electronic interface.


In an alternative embodiment of the present invention a first actuator is coupled between the support and the U shaped base portion to produce a movement therebetween in response to a first input electrical signal, a second actuator is coupled between the U shaped base portion and the shaft receiving portion to produce a movement therebetween in response to a second input electrical signal, a third actuator is coupled to the translation interface to produce a mechanical movement of the elongated cylindrical object relative to the shaft receiving portion in response to a third input electrical signal, and a fourth actuator is coupled to the rotation interface to produce a mechanical movement of the elongated cylindrical object relative to the shaft receiving portion in response to a fourth input electrical signal.


A method for providing a human/computer interface includes the steps of: (a) defining an origin in a 3-dimensional space; (b) physically constraining a shaft that can be grasped by an operator such that a portion of the object always intersects the origin and such that the portion of the object extending past the origin defines a radius in a spherical coordinate system; (c) transducing a first electrical signal related to a first angular coordinate of the radius in the spherical coordinate system with a first transducer; (d) transducing a second electrical signal related to a second angular coordinate of the radius in the spherical coordinate system with a second transducer; (e) transducing a third electrical signal related to the length of the radius with a third transducer; and (f) electrically coupling the transducers to a computer system to provide a human/computer interface. The method can further include the step of transducing a fourth electrical signal related to a rotation of the shaft around an axis with a fourth transducer. The transducers are either sensors, actuators, or bi-directional transducers which can serve as either input or sensors.


It will therefore be appreciated that a human/computer interface of the present invention includes a support, a gimbal mechanism coupled to the support, and an elongated shaft engaged with the gimbal mechanism and having a grip area that can be grasped by a hand of an operator. The gimbal mechanism has a base portion rotatably coupled to the support, and a shaft receiving portion rotatably coupled to the base. A first sensor is coupled between the support and the base portion, a second sensor is coupled between the base portion and the shaft receiving portion, and a third sensor is coupled between the shaft receiving portion and an intermediate portion of the shaft. The three sensors are coupled to an input of a computer to provide the human/computer interface. Preferably, the interface further includes a fourth sensor coupled between the shaft receiving portion and an intermediate portion of the shaft, where the third sensor is a translation sensor and the fourth sensor is a rotation sensor.


The advantage of the present invention is that a 3-dimensional human/computer interface tool is provided which has the three or four degrees of freedom available that are desirable for many virtual reality simulation applications. The mechanism of the present invention is relatively straight-forward allowing for low cost production and high reliability. Furthermore, since the human/computer interface tool of the present invention is constrained from movement along at certain degrees of freedom, it can more accurately simulate the use of tools and other elongated mechanical objects which are similarly constrained. Importantly, the present interface is of low inertia since the primary mass of the interface is located at the pivot point. This, along with the light weight of the interface, makes the interface less fatiguing to use.


In another embodiment of the present invention a human/computer interface tool is provided which is provided with only two degrees of freedom. This is particularly advantageous when the shaft is flexible, such as with very thin shafts, wires, catheters, and the like. With, for example, catheters, it is only necessary to provide two degrees of freedom (i.e. in-and-out, and rotation) and, therefore, sensors and/or actuators for the other degrees of freedom do not need to be provided.


These and other advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the following descriptions of the invention and a study of the several figures of the drawing.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a virtual reality system which employs an apparatus of the present invention to interface a laparoscopic tool handle with a computer system;



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an apparatus for mechanically interfacing an elongated mechanical object with an electrical system in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 2
a is a perspective view of an alternative translation interface used for wires, catheters, and the like;



FIG. 3 is front elevation view of the apparatus of FIG. 2 illustrating a laparoscopic tool engaged with an object receiving portion of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a side elevation similarly showing a laparoscopic tool engaged with the object receiving portion of the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a top plan view also illustrating the engagement of a laparoscopic tool with the object receiving portion of the present invention;



FIG. 6 is a pictorial view illustrating the four degrees of freedom enjoyed with the mechanism of the present invention;



FIG. 7 illustrates a first embodiment of an input sensor;



FIG. 8 illustrates a modified laparoscopic tool handle for the use of the present invention;



FIG. 8
a is a cross-section taken along line 8a-8a of FIG. 8;



FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a sensor in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 9
a is a sectional view taken along line 9a-9a of FIG. 9.;



FIG. 9
b is a perspective view of an alternative sensing wheel used for wires, catheters, and the like;



FIG. 10 is a perspective view of and alternative sensor mechanism of the present invention;



FIG. 10
a is a cross sectional view taken along line 10a-10a of FIG. 10;



FIG. 11 is a perspective view of another alternative sensor of the present invention; and



FIG. 11
a is a sectional view taken along line 11a-11a of FIG. 11.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In FIG. 1, a virtual reality system 10 includes a human/computer interface apparatus 12, a electronic interface 14, and a computer 16. The illustrated virtual reality system 10 is directed to a virtual reality simulation of a laparoscopic surgery procedure. The software of the simulation is not a part of this invention and thus will not be discussed in any detail. However, such software is commercially available as, for example, Teleos™ from High Techsplanations of Rockville, Md. Suitable software drivers which interface such simulation software with computer input/output (I/O) devices are available from Immersion Human Interface Corporation of Palo Alto, Calif.


A laparoscopic tool 18 used in conjunction with the present invention is manipulated by an operator and virtual reality images are displayed on a screen 20 of the digital processing system in response to such manipulations. Preferably, the digital processing system is a personal computer or workstation, such as an IBM-PC AT or Macintosh personal computer, or a SUN or Silicon Graphics workstation. Most commonly, the digital processing system is a personal computer which operates under the MS-DOS operating system in conformance with an IBM PC AT standard.


The human/interface apparatus 12 as illustrated herein is used to simulate a laparoscopic medical procedure. In addition to a standard laparoscopic tool 18, the human/interface apparatus 12 includes a barrier 22 and a standard laparoscopic trocar 24. The barrier 22 is used to represent portion of the skin covering the body of a patient. Trocar 24 is inserted into the body of the patient to provide an entry and removal point from the body of the patient for the laparoscopic tool 18, and to allow the manipulation of the laparoscopic tool 18 within the body of the patient while minimizing tissue damage. Laparoscopic tools 18 and trocars 24 are commercially available from sources such as U.S. Surgical of Connecticut. Preferably, the laparoscopic tool 18 is modified such that the end of the tool (such as any cutting edges) are removed, leaving only the handle and the shaft. The end of the laparoscopic tool 18 is not required for the virtual reality simulation, and is removed to prevent any potential damage to persons or property. A gimbal apparatus 25 is shown within the “body” of the patient in phantom lines.


The laparoscopic tool 18 includes a handle or “grip” portion 26 and a shaft portion 28. The shaft portion is an elongated mechanical object and, in particular, is an elongated cylindrical object. The present invention is concerned with tracking the movement of the shaft portion 28 in three-dimensional space, where the movement has been constrained such that the shaft portion 28 has only three or four free degrees of motion. This is a good simulation of the real use of a laparoscopic tool 18 in that once it is inserted into a trocar 24 and through the gimbal apparatus 25, it is limited to about four degrees of freedom. More particularly, the shaft 28 is constrained at some point of along its length such that it can move with four degrees of freedom within the patient's body.


While the present invention will be discussed with reference to the shaft portion 28 of laparoscopic tool 18, it will be appreciated that a great number of other types of objects can be used with the method and apparatus of the present invention. In fact, the present invention can be used with any elongated mechanical object where is desirable to provide a human/computer interface with three or four degrees of freedom. Such objects may include catheters, hypodermic needles, wires, fiber optic bundles, screw drivers, pool cues, etc. Furthermore, although the described preferred embodiment of the present invention contemplates the use of a elongated cylindrical mechanical object, other embodiments of the present invention provide a similar human/computer interface for an elongated mechanical objects which are not cylindrical in shape.


The electronic interface 14 is a part of the human/computer interface apparatus 12 and coupled the apparatus 12 to the computer 16. An electronic interface 14 that is particularly well adopted for the present is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/092,974, filed Jul. 16, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,576,727, assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The electronic interface described therein was designed for the Immersion PROBE™ 3-D mechanical mouse and has six channels corresponding to the six degrees of freedom of the Immersion PROBE. However, in the context of the present invention, the electronic interface 14 requires the use of only four of the six channels, since the present invention is preferably constrained to no more than four degrees of freedom.


The electronic interface 14 is coupled to a gimbal apparatus 25 of the apparatus 12 by a cable 30 and is coupled to the computer 16 by a cable 32. In some embodiments of the present invention, interface 14 serves solely as an input device for the computer 16. In other embodiments of the present invention, interface 14 serves solely as an output device for the computer 16. In yet other embodiments of the present invention, the interface 14 serves as an input/output (I/O) device for the computer 16.


In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, interface 14 has a local microprocessor 33 preferably coupled with any transducers present in the interface 14 and with a transceiver 35. In such an embodiment, the computer 16 is coupled to the transceiver 35 and, typically, not coupled directly with any transducers present in the interface 14. As will be appreciated, the transceiver 35 may be any suitable transceiver capable of bidirectional communication through serial or parallel communication strategies. The local microprocessor 33 will be programmed to execute computer instructions locally such that a computing burden is removed from the computer 16. For example, positional information generated by the transducers may be processed locally by the local microprocessor 33, which in turn can send absolute position and velocity information to the computer 16. Still further, the local microprocessor 33 is capable of receiving incoming force commands from the computer 16, decoding such commands, and controlling the interface 14 accordingly. For more details, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,576,727 of Rosenberg et al.”


In the perspective view of FIG. 2, the gimbal apparatus 25 of the present invention is illustrated in some detail. The gimbal apparatus 25 includes a support 34 and a gimbal mechanism 36 rotatably coupled to the support. The gimbal mechanism 36 preferably includes a U shaped base portion 38 including a base 40 and a pair of substantially parallel legs 42a and 42b extending upwardly therefrom. As used herein, “substantially parallel” will mean that two objects or axis are exactly or almost parallel, i.e. are at least within five or ten degrees of parallel, and are preferably within less than one degree of parallel. Similarly, the term “substantially perpendicular” will mean that two objects or axis are exactly or almost perpendicular, i.e. at least within five degrees or ten degrees of perpendicular, or more preferably within less than one degree of perpendicular.


The gimbal mechanism 36 also includes an elongated object (shaft) receiving portion 44 provided with an aperture 46 which extends entirely through the object receiving portion. The aperture 46 defines an object axis A0 for an elongated cylindrical object, such that the shaft portion 28 of the laparoscopic tool 18 of FIG. 1. The object receiving portion 44 is at least partially disposed between the legs 42a and 42b of the U shaped base portion, and is pivotally coupled thereto such as by a pair of pivots, one of which is shown as pivot 48a in leg 42a. Another pivot 48b (not shown) is provided in leg 42b.


The object receiving portion 44 also includes a translation interface 50 and a rotation interface 52. The object receiving portion 44 includes a bearing section 54, a translation sensor section 56, and a rotation sensor section 58. The bearing section 54 includes a mass of material provided with a cylindrical bore 60 forming a portion of the aperture 46. The translation sensor section 56 includes a pair of opposing wall surfaces 62a and 62b, each of which is provided with a cylindrical bore receptive to the cylindrical object and forming a part of the aperture 46 which extends through the object receiving portion. The translation sensor section 56 includes a pair of opposing wall surfaces 64a and 64b of a wall 63 and which are provided with cylindrical bores receptive to the cylindrical object and therefore also forming a part of the aperture 46. In consequence, when an elongated cylindrical object is inserted into the object receiving portion 44 along axis A0 it engages the bore 60 of the bearing section 54, and extends through bores provided in the surfaces 62a, 62b, 64a, and 64b to extend completely through the object receiving portion 44 along aperture 46. In another embodiment of the present invention, wall 63 (and therefore wall surfaces 64a and 64b) is eliminated as being superfluous.


Referring briefly to FIG. 2a, an alternative construction for the translation interface 50 of FIG. 2 is shown at 50′. This alternative translation interface 50′ is well adapted for very thin shafts, wires, catheters, and the like. The problem encountered with the translation interface 50 is that, for example, wires and catheters are flexible and therefore do not engage well with a single friction wheel. Therefore, the translation interface 50′ includes a drive wheel 65a that is coupled to a sensor and/or actuator, and an idler wheel 65b. The wire or catheter 67 is pinched between the drive wheel 65a and the idler wheel 65b so that there is good frictional engagement between the catheter 67 and the drive wheel 65a.


The object receiving portion 44 is preferably a unitary mass of material made from aluminum or some other lightweight material such as a plastic. The object receiving portion 44 is preferably cast, molded, and/or machined as a monoblock member having the aforementioned bearing section, translation sensory section, and rotation sensory section. The materials and construction of U shaped base portion 38 preferably match the materials and construction techniques used for the production of object receiving portion 44.


The gimbal apparatus 25 illustrated in FIG. 2 constrains an object that is engaged with the object receiving portion 44 to four degrees of freedom. This is accomplished by allowing the U shaped base portion 38 to rotate around an axis A1 relative to the support 34, by allowing the object receiving portion 44 to rotate around an axis A2 relative to the U shaped base portion 38, by allowing the object to translate as illustrated by the arrow t along axis A0 of aperture 46, and by allowing the object to rotate as indicated by arrow r around the axis A0 of aperture 46.


Four electromechanical transducers are used in association with these four degrees of freedom. More particularly, a first degree of freedom electromechanical transducer 66 is arranged to transduce motion and/or force between the U shaped base portion 38 and the support 34, a second degree of freedom electromechanical transducer 68 is arranged to transduce motion and/or force between the U shaped base portion 38 and the object receiving portion 44, a third degree of freedom electromechanical transducer 70 is arranged to transduce motion and/or force between the object receiving portion 44 and an object engaged with the object receiving portion 44, and a fourth degree of freedom transducer 72 is arranged to transduce motion and/or force between the object receiving portion 44 and an object engaged with the object receiving portion 44.


By “associated with”, “related to”, or the like, it is meant that the electromechanical transducer is influenced by or influences one of the four degrees of freedom. The electromechanical transducers can be input transducers, in which case they sense motion along a respective degree of freedom and produce an electrical signal corresponding thereto for input into computer 16. Alternatively, the electromechanical transducers can be output transducers which receive electrical signals from computer 16 that cause the transducers to impart a force on the object in accordance with their respective degrees of freedom. The electromechanical transducers can also be hybrid or bi-directional transducers which operate both as sensors and as actuator devices.


A variety of transducers, readily available in the commercial market are suitable for use in the present invention. For example, if the transducers are input transducers (“sensors”), such sensors can include encoded wheel transducers, potentiometers, etc. Output transducers (“actuators”) include stepper motors, servo motors, magnetic particle brakes, friction brakes, pneumatic actuators, etc. Hybrid or bidirectional transducers often pair input and output transducers together, but may also include a purely bi-directional transducer such as a permanent magnet electric motor/generator.


It should be noted that the present invention can utilize both absolute and relative sensors. An absolute sensor is one which the angle of the sensor is known in absolute terms, such as with an analog potentiometer. Relative sensors only provide relative angle information, and thus require some form of calibration step which provide a reference position for the relative angle information. The sensors described herein are primarily relative sensors. In consequence, there is an implied calibration step after system power-up wherein the shaft is placed in a known position within the gimbal mechanism and a calibration signal is provided to the system to provide the reference position mentioned above. All angles provided by the sensors are thereafter relative to that reference position. Such calibration methods are well known to those skilled in the art and, therefore, will not be discussed in any great detail herein.


A preferred input transducer for use of the present invention is an optical encoder model SI marketed by U.S. Digital of Vancouver, Wash. This transducer is an encoded wheel type input transducer. A preferred output transducer for use of the present invention is a d.c. motor model 2434.970-50 produced by Maxon of Fall River, Mass. This type of transducer is a servo motor type output transducer.


There are a number of ways of attaching the transducers to the various members of the gimbal apparatus 25. In this preferred embodiment, a housing of transducer 66 is attached to the U shaped base portion 38, and a shaft of the transducer extends through an oversize bore (not shown) in base 40 to engage a press-fit bore (also not shown) in support 34. Therefore, rotation of the us shaped base portion 38 around axis A1 will cause a rotation of a shaft of transducer 66. A housing of transducer 68 is attached to leg 42a of the U shaped base portion 38 such that its shaft forms pivot 48a. Therefore rotation of the object receiving portion 44 around axis A2 will cause a rotation of the shaft of a second transducer 68. The transducer 70 is attached to object receiving portion 44 and extends through a bore (not shown) in a wall 74 of the translation sensor section 56. The shaft 76 provides an axis about which the translation interface 50 can rotate. The fourth transducer 74 is attached to a wall 78 of rotation sensor section 58 and extends through a bore 80 in that wall 78. The shaft 82 of the transducer 72 engages a circumferential surface of rotation interface 52 and rotates therewith.


Axes A1 and A2 are substantially mutually perpendicular and intersect at an origin point O within object receiving portion 44. Axis A0 also intersects this origin O. Shaft 76 rotates around an axis A3 which is substantially perpendicular to the axis A0. Shaft 58 of transducer 72 rotates around an axis A4 which is substantially parallel to the axis A0.


In FIG. 3, a front view of the gimbal apparatus 25 is used to illustrate one of the degrees of motion of the laparoscopic tool 18. The illustrated degree of freedom is the fourth degree of freedom, i.e. rotation around axis A0 as illustrated by the arrow r in FIG. 2. This degree of freedom is detected by transducer 72. In this fourth degree of motion, the handle portion 26 of the laparoscopic tool 18 can rotate in a clockwise direction as indicated at 26′ and in a counter clockwise direction as indicated at 26″. Of course, the handle 26 can rotate a full 360° although this would require the release and re-grasping of the handle 26.


In FIG. 4, a second degree of freedom is illustrated. With this degree of freedom, the laparoscopic tool 18 can pivot upwardly as illustrated at 18′ or downwardly (not shown). This rotation around A2 is detected by transducer 68. It should be noted in the present embodiment, the laparoscopic tool 18 cannot rotate 360° around the axis A2 because it is physically constrained by the support 34, portions of the gimbal mechanism 36, etc. However, in the present embodiment, the laparoscopic tool can achieve approximately 170 degrees of rotation around axis A2.



FIG. 5 is top view of the gimbal apparatus 25 and illustrates the first and third degrees of freedom. The first degree of freedom is detected by transducer 66 as the laparoscopic tool 18 is pivoted or rotated around axis A1 as illustrated at 18a and 18b. The third degree of freedom is detected by transducer 70 as the shaft portion 28 of laparoscopic tool 18 is moved back and fourth as illustrated by the arrow “t.” This causes a rotation of translation interface 50 and the shaft 76 of the third transducer 70.


The four degrees of freedom are illustrated graphically in FIG. 6. The cylinder 66′ represents the first transducer 66 and allows a first degree of freedom labeled “1st” around axis A1. Cylinder 68′ represents the sensor 68 and allows a second degree of freedom labeled “2nd” around axis A2. Telescoping members 70a′ and 70b′ represent the third sensor 70 can sense movement along a third degree of freedom labeled “3rd” along axis A0. Finally, a cylinder 72′ attached to member 70b′ represents the fourth transducer 72 and senses a fourth degree of freedom labeled “4th” around axis A0. A member 84 is provided to indicate position and rotational direction relative to axis A0.


In FIG. 7, a preferred input transducer (sensor) of the present invention is disclosed. Again, an input transducer of this type can be purchased as sensor model SI from U.S. Digital of Vancouver, Wash. The input transducer 86 includes a bearing block 88 having a bearing 89, a rotary shaft 90 supported by the bearing 89, and a sensing wheel 92 supported for rotation by shaft 90. The sensing wheel is preferably made from a clear, plastic material and is provided with a number of dark radial bands 94 near its circumference, such as by printing or silk screening. A first photodetector pair 96a including a light source 98a and a detector 100a are positioned on opposing sides of the sensing wheel 92 in alignment with the bands 94. Similarly, a second photodetector pair 96b including a light source 98b and a detector 100b are positioned on opposing sides of the sensing wheel 92 in alignment with the bands 94. As the sensing wheel 92 rotates as illustrated at 102 around an axis A, the bands 94 alternatively allow light emanating from light sources 98a and 98b to impinge or not impinge upon the detectors 100a and 100b, respectively. The electronic interface 14, coupled to the photodetector pairs 96a and 96b by cable 30, counts the bands 94 as they pass the photodetector pairs 96a and 96b to provide a signal on cable 32 to the computer 16 indicating the rotational position of the shaft 90 around axis A. The two pairs 96a and 96b are provided to determine the direction of rotation, as is well known to those skilled in the art of sensor design.



FIGS. 8 and 8
a illustrate a modified laparoscopic tool 104. More particularly, a sensor 106 has been added to determine when the handle 108 has been squeezed, and the shaft 110 has been grooved or slotted for a purpose to be discussed subsequently. The sensor 106 can be coupled to the computer 16 through electronic interface 14 to provide additional input to the virtual reality system.


With reference to FIG. 8a, the shaft 110 is preferably hollow, having an axial bore 112 which aligns with axis A0, and is provided with an elongated groove 114 which is parallel to an axis AL of the shaft 110. This elongated groove 114 can be produced by any process including extruding the shaft 110 in the appropriate shape, or cutting the groove 114 with a machine tool, etc.



FIGS. 9 and 9
a illustrate an alternate embodiment for transducer 72 which utilizes the shaft 110 and a detector mechanism similar to the one illustrated in FIG. 7. More particularly, the transducer 72′ includes a sleeve 114 which is slidingly engaged with shaft 110. As seen in the cross sectional view of FIG. 9a, the sleeve 115 is a substantially cylindrical object having a central bore 116 which engages the circumference 118 of the shaft 110. The sleeve 115 has a key 120 which engages the groove 114 of the shaft 110. Therefore, while the sleeve can slide back and forth along the axis AL as indicated at 122, but the sleeve 115 rotates with the shaft 110 as indicated at 124 due to the engagement of the key 120 with the groove 114. A sensing wheel 92′ is affixed to a circumferential portion of sleeve 115 so that it rotates coaxially with the sleeve 115. A photodetector pair 96′ senses the motion of bands 94′ and produces an electrical signal on cable 30. The advantage of the embodiment shown in FIG. 9 and 9a is that rotation of the shaft around axis AL is detected without the possibility of slippage. Another advantage of this embodiment is that it is more compact in design.


In FIG. 9b an alternate embodiment for a rotation interface 52′ is shown. This alternate embodiment is well adapted for flexible shafts, wires, catheters and the like, such as the aforementioned catheter 67. The rotation interface 52′ includes a transducer 72″″ that is provided with a resilient grommet 73 having a hole that engages a circumferential portion of the catheter 67. The grommet 73 is preferably a rubber or plastic grommet that causes the catheter 67 to rotate coaxially as the catheter spins or rotates. Preferably, the mass of the transducer 72″″ is kept very small so that it only takes a small amount of friction to ensure coaxial rotation of the catheter and transducer without slippage. Because the level of friction is so small, it does not substantially impede translational motion (i.e. in-out motion) of the catheter.



FIGS. 10 and 10
a illustrate another embodiment 72″ for the transducer 72 of FIG. 2 This embodiment has a number of points of similarity with the embodiment discussed with reference to FIGS. 9 and 9a, and it will be appreciated that elements with like reference numerals operate in a similar fashion. However, the embodiment of FIGS. 10 and 10a include a sheave 126 affixed to the circumference of sleeve 115 in the place of the sensing wheel 92′ of FIG. 9 and FIG. 9a. A position sensor 128 has a shaft 130 which is coupled to the sheave 126 by a belt 132. The belt 132 can be any continuous loop structure including a resilient, rubber-type belt, a drive-chain type belt, etc. The shaft 130 of position sensor 128 therefore rotates with the sheave 126. The advantage of using a belt 132 or the like is that a substantial amount of force may be applied to the belt to, again, minimize slippage.


Another embodiment 72″′ for the fourth transducer is illustrated in FIGS. 11 and 11a. Again, there are a number of points of similarity between the embodiments of FIGS. 11 and 11a and the previously described embodiments of FIGS. 9 and 9a and FIGS. 10 and 10a. Therefore like reference numerals will again refer to like elements. In this embodiment, a sensor 134 haws a shaft 136 which serves as the axle of a friction wheel 138 which, in turn, engages a circumferential surface of sleeve 115. Therefore, a rotation of the shaft 110 will cause a rotation of the sleeve 115, which will cause a rotation of the wheel 138 and the shaft 136 to create an electrical signal on cable 30.


With reference to all of the figures, and with particular reference to FIGS. 1 and 2, the shaft 28 of a laparoscopic tool 18 is inserted into aperture 46 along axis A0, causing the shaft 28 to frictionally engage the translation interface (wheel) 50. In this instance, the translational interface 50 is a friction wheel made out of a rubber-like material. The shaft 28 is also in engagement with the rotational interface 52 which, in the embodiment of FIG. 2, is also a frictional wheel made out of a rubber-like material. Rotation of the shaft 28 around the axis A0 is illustrated by the arrow r will cause a rotation of the friction wheel 50 and therefore the shaft 82 of the sensor 72. A translation of the shaft 28 along with axis A0 will cause a rotation of the friction wheel 50 which rotates the shaft 76 of the transducer 70. A movement up or down of the laparoscopic tool 18 will cause a rotation of the shaft (pivot) 48a of transducer 68, and a side-to-side pivoting of the laparoscopic tool 18 will cause a rotational around axis A1 which is detected by transducer 66.


To this point, the majority of the discussion has been under the assumption that the transducers are input transducers, i.e. the human/computer interface device is used an input device to the computer 16. However, it is also been mentioned that the interface device 12 can serve as an output device for the computer 16. When used as an output device, output transducers (“actuators”) are used to respond to electrical signals developed by the computer 16 to impart a force upon the shaft 28 of the laparoscopic tool 18. This can provide useful movement and force (haptic) feedback to the doctor/trainee or other user. For example, if the laparoscopic tool encounters dense mass of tissue or a bone in the “virtual” patient, a force can be generated by transducer 70 making it harder for the doctor/trainee to push the shaft 28 further into the gimbal apparatus 25. Likewise, twisting motions can be imparted on the shaft 28 when the shaft encounters an obstacle within the virtual patient.


It should be noted that force applied to the shaft may not result in any movement of the shaft. This is because the shaft may be inhibited from movement by the hand of the operator who is grasping a handle or grip portion of the shaft. However, the force applied to the shaft may be sensed by the operator as haptic feedback.


With reference to FIG. 2, a method for mechanically interfacing an elongated mechanical object with an electrical system in accordance with the present invention includes first step of defining an origin in 3-dimensional space. This corresponds to the origin O at the intersection of axis A1 and A2. A second step is to physically constrain an elongated object in the 3-dimensional space such that a portion of the object always intersects the origin O and such that a portion of the object extending from the origin O defines a radius in a spherical coordinate system. The elongated object (such as shaft 28 of laparoscopic tool 18) is physically constrained in a 3-dimensional space by the aperture 46 of the object receiving portion 44. The portion of the shaft 28 extending from origin O defines the radius. A third step includes transducing a first electrical signal related to a first angular coordinate of the radius with a first transducer. This corresponds to the operation of transducer 66 which transduces a first electrical signal related to a first angular coordinate of the radius. A fourth step is transducing a second electrical signal related to a second angular coordinate of the radius. This corresponds to the operation of transducer 68 which transduces a second electrical signal. A fifth step is to transduce a third electrical signal related to the length of the radius, which corresponds to the operation of transducer 70. A sixth and final step is to electrically couple the transducers to an electrical system which, in this instance, is preferably a computer 16. An additional, optional step transduces a fourth electrical signal related to a rotation of the object around an object axis which intersects the origin O. This step corresponds to the operation of transducer 72. The transducers can be input transducers, output transducers, or bidirectional transducers.


It will be noted that the electrical system most frequently described in the present invention is a digital processing system or a computer. However, other digital systems, analog systems, and simple electric or electromechanical system can also be utilized with the apparatus and method of the present invention.


It will also be noted that while specific examples of “elongated objects” and “shafts” have been given, that these examples are not meant to be limiting. In general, equivalents of “elongated objects”, “elongated cylindrical objects”, “shafts”, etc. include any object which can be grasped by a human operator to provide an interface between the operator and a computer system. By “grasp”, it is meant that operators may releasably engage a grip portion of the object in some fashion, such as by hand, with their fingertips, or even orally in the case of handicapped persons. The “grip” can be a functional grip or handle attached to an elongated portion of the object, or can be a portion of the object itself, such as a portion of the length of a shaft that can be gripped and/or manipulated by the operator.


It should also be noted that flexible shafts, such as wires or catheters, do not always require three or four degrees of freedom. For example, if a human/computer interface for a catheter insertion virtual reality system is desired, only a translation interface (e.g. translation interface 50′ of FIG. 2a) and rotation interface (such as rotation interface 52′ of FIG. 9c) may be required. This is because a catheter can be moved in and out of a virtual patient (as sensed by translation interface 50′) and can be twisted or rotated (as sensed by rotation interface 50′), but cannot be, in any practical manner, moved up or down or from side-to-side due to the flexibility of the catheter. In such applications, therefore, it is desirable to have a human/computer interface with only two degrees of freedom.


While this invention has been described in terms of several preferred embodiments, it is contemplated that alternatives, modifications, permutations and equivalents thereof will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the specification and study of the drawings. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims include all such alternatives, modifications, permutations and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A system comprising: a user manipulatable object comprising a laparoscopic tool handle and an elongated member extending from the laparoscopic tool handle;a gimbal mechanism coupled to the user manipulatable object, the gimbal mechanism configured to receive the elongated member of the user manipulatable object and to allow the user manipulatable object to move in at least three rotational degrees of freedom and a translational degree of freedom;a trocar coupled to the gimbal mechanism, the trocar configured to receive the elongated member of the user manipulatable object;a first sensor configured to determine a first movement of the user manipulatable object in a first rotational degree of freedom and to transmit a first sensor signal based on the first movement;a second sensor configured to determine a second movement of the user manipulatable object in a second rotational degree of freedom and to transmit a second sensor signal based on the second movement;a third sensor configured to determine a third movement of the user manipulatable object in a third rotational degree of freedom and to transmit a third sensor signal based on the third movement;a fourth sensor configured to determine a fourth movement of the user manipulatable object in the translational degree of freedom and to transmit a fourth sensor signal based on the fourth movement; anda local processor in communication with the first, second, third, and fourth sensors and configured to: receive the first, second, third, and fourth sensor signals, andtransmit a local processing signal to a host processor, the local processing signal based on at least one of the first, second, third, or fourth sensor signals.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, further comprising: a first actuator configured to output a first force in the first rotational degree of freedom;a second actuator configured to output a second force in the second rotational degree of freedom;a third actuator configured to output a third force in the third rotational degree of freedom; anda fourth actuator configured to output a fourth force in the translational degree of freedom.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the local processor is configured to output actuator signals to the first, second, third, and fourth actuators configured to cause the actuators to output the first, second, third, and fourth forces.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the elongated member comprises a catheter.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the laparoscopic handle comprises a grip configured to open and close about a pivot point, and wherein the system further comprises a fifth sensor to sense an open and close movement of the grip about the pivot point, the fifth sensor configured to transmit a fifth sensor signal based on the open and close movement.
  • 6. The system of claim 5, further comprising an actuator configured to output a force about the pivot point.
  • 7. The system of claim 5, wherein the local processing signal is based on at least one of the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth sensor signals, and further comprising the host processor in communication with the local processor, the host processor configured to: receive the local processing signal;execute a laparoscopic simulation; anddisplay a simulated object in a simulated environment based on the local processing signal.
  • 8. The system of claim 2, wherein the laparoscopic handle comprises a grip configured to open and close about a pivot point, and wherein the system further comprises a sensor to sense an open and close movement of the grip about the pivot point.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, further comprising a fifth actuator configured to output a fifth force about the pivot point.
  • 10. The system of claim 8 further comprising the host processor in communication with the local processor, the host processor configured to: receive the local processing signal;execute a laparoscopic simulation; anddisplay a simulated object in a simulated environment based on the local processing signal.
  • 11. A system comprising: a user manipulatable object comprising a tool handle and an elongated member extending from the tool handle;a gimbal mechanism coupled to the user manipulatable object, the gimbal mechanism configured to receive the elongated member of the user manipulatable object and to allow the user manipulatable object to move in at least three rotational degrees of freedom and a translational degree of freedom;a trocar coupled to the gimbal mechanism, the trocar configured to receive the elongated member of the user manipulatable object;a first sensor configured to determine a first movement of the user manipulatable object in a first rotational degree of freedom and to transmit a first sensor signal based on the first movement;a second sensor configured to determine a second movement of the user manipulatable object in a second rotational degree of freedom and to transmit a second sensor signal based on the second movement;a third sensor configured to determine a third movement of the user manipulatable object in a third rotational degree of freedom and to transmit a third sensor signal based on the third movement;a fourth sensor configured to determine a fourth movement of the user manipulatable object in the translational degree of freedom and to transmit a fourth sensor signal based on the fourth movement; anda local processor in communication with the first, second, third, and fourth sensors and configured to: receive the first, second, third, and fourth sensor signals, andtransmit a local processing signal to a host processor, the local processing signal based on at least one of the first, second, third, or fourth sensor signals.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, further comprising: a first actuator configured to output a first force in the first rotational degree of freedom;a second actuator configured to output a second force in the second rotational degree of freedom;a third actuator configured to output a third force in the third rotational degree of freedom; anda fourth actuator configured to output a fourth force in the translational degree of freedom.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the local processor is configured to output actuator signals to the first, second, third, and fourth actuators configured to cause the actuators to output the first, second, third, and fourth forces.
  • 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the elongated member comprises a catheter.
  • 15. The system of claim 11, wherein the laparoscopic handle comprises a grip configured to open and close about a pivot point, and wherein the system further comprises a fifth sensor to sense an open and close movement of the grip about the pivot point, the fifth sensor configured to transmit a fifth sensor signal based on the open and close movement.
  • 16. The system of claim 15, further comprising an actuator configured to output a force about the pivot point.
  • 17. The system of claim 15, wherein the local processing signal is based on at least one of the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth sensor signals, and further comprising the host processor in communication with the local processor, the host processor configured to: receive the local processing signal;execute a laparoscopic simulation; anddisplay a simulated object in a simulated environment based on the local processing signal.
  • 18. The system of claim 12, wherein the laparoscopic handle comprises a grip configured to open and close about a pivot point, and wherein the system further comprises a sensor to sense an open and close movement of the grip about the pivot point.
  • 19. The system of claim 18, further comprising a fifth actuator configured to output a fifth force about the pivot point.
  • 20. The system of claim 18 further comprising the host processor in communication with the local processor, the host processor configured to: receive the local processing signal;execute a laparoscopic simulation; anddisplay a simulated object in a simulated environment based on the local processing signal.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/725,958, filed Mar. 19, 2007, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/674,423, filed Oct. 1, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,215,326, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/996,487, filed Nov. 27, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,654,000, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/276,012, filed Mar. 25, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,323,837, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/833,502, filed Apr. 7, 1997 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,037,927, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/275,120, filed Jul. 14, 1994, now Pat. No. 5,623,582, the entirety of all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (283)
Number Name Date Kind
2906179 Bower Sep 1959 A
2972140 Hirsch Feb 1961 A
3157853 Hirsch Nov 1964 A
3220121 Cutler Nov 1965 A
3226846 Wood Jan 1966 A
3497668 Hirsch Feb 1970 A
3517446 Codvon et al. Jun 1970 A
3520060 Crabtree et al. Jul 1970 A
3531868 Stevenson Oct 1970 A
3623064 Kagan Nov 1971 A
3662076 Gordon et al. May 1972 A
3775865 Rowan Dec 1973 A
3863098 Mehr Jan 1975 A
3890958 Fister et al. Jun 1975 A
3902687 Hightower Sep 1975 A
3903614 Diamond et al. Sep 1975 A
3911416 Feder Oct 1975 A
3919691 Noll Nov 1975 A
3944798 Eaton Mar 1976 A
4052981 Bachmann Oct 1977 A
4127752 Lowthorp Nov 1978 A
4148014 Burson Apr 1979 A
4160508 Salisbury, Jr. Jul 1979 A
4216467 Colston Aug 1980 A
4227319 Guy et al. Oct 1980 A
4236325 Hall et al. Dec 1980 A
4262549 Schwellenbach Apr 1981 A
4321047 Landis Mar 1982 A
4333070 Barnes Jun 1982 A
4360345 Hon Nov 1982 A
4391282 Ando et al. Jul 1983 A
4398889 Lam et al. Aug 1983 A
4439162 Blaine Mar 1984 A
4444205 Jackson Apr 1984 A
4459113 Boscaro Gatti et al. Jul 1984 A
4464117 Foerst Aug 1984 A
4477043 Repperger Oct 1984 A
4477973 Davies Oct 1984 A
4484191 Vavra Nov 1984 A
4513235 Acklam et al. Apr 1985 A
4571834 Fraser et al. Feb 1986 A
4575297 Richter Mar 1986 A
4581491 Boothroyd Apr 1986 A
4593470 Davies Jun 1986 A
4599070 Hladky et al. Jul 1986 A
4632341 Repperger et al. Dec 1986 A
4638798 Shelden et al. Jan 1987 A
4642055 Saliterman Feb 1987 A
4653011 Iwano Mar 1987 A
4654648 Herrington et al. Mar 1987 A
4664130 Gracovetsky May 1987 A
4676002 Slocum Jun 1987 A
4679331 Koontz Jul 1987 A
4680519 Chand et al. Jul 1987 A
4685464 Goldberger et al. Aug 1987 A
4703443 Moriyasu Oct 1987 A
4708656 de Vries et al. Nov 1987 A
4713007 Alban Dec 1987 A
4726772 Amplatz Feb 1988 A
4750487 Zanetti Jun 1988 A
4769763 Trieb et al. Sep 1988 A
4771344 Fallcaro et al. Sep 1988 A
4773865 Baldwin Sep 1988 A
4787051 Olson Nov 1988 A
4789340 Zikria Dec 1988 A
4791934 Brunnett Dec 1988 A
4794392 Selinko Dec 1988 A
4800721 Cemenska et al. Jan 1989 A
4811608 Hilton Mar 1989 A
4819195 Bell et al. Apr 1989 A
4825872 Tan et al. May 1989 A
4839838 LaBiche et al. Jun 1989 A
4849692 Blood Jul 1989 A
4868549 Affinito et al. Sep 1989 A
4879556 Duimel Nov 1989 A
4879668 Cline et al. Nov 1989 A
4885565 Embach Dec 1989 A
4888877 Enderle et al. Dec 1989 A
4891764 McIntosh Jan 1990 A
4891889 Tomelleri Jan 1990 A
4896554 Culver Jan 1990 A
4907970 Meenen, Jr. Mar 1990 A
4907973 Hon Mar 1990 A
4930770 Baker Jun 1990 A
4934694 McIntosh Jun 1990 A
4942545 Sapia Jul 1990 A
4945305 Blood Jul 1990 A
4945501 Bell et al. Jul 1990 A
4961138 Gorniak Oct 1990 A
4962591 Zeller et al. Oct 1990 A
4982504 Soderberg et al. Jan 1991 A
4986280 Marcus et al. Jan 1991 A
5007085 Greanias et al. Apr 1991 A
5007300 Siva Apr 1991 A
5019761 Kraft May 1991 A
5022384 Freels Jun 1991 A
5022407 Horch et al. Jun 1991 A
5035242 Franklin et al. Jul 1991 A
5038089 Szakaly Aug 1991 A
5040306 McMurtry et al. Aug 1991 A
5044956 Behensky et al. Sep 1991 A
5047942 Middleton et al. Sep 1991 A
5047952 Kramer et al. Sep 1991 A
5050608 Watanabe et al. Sep 1991 A
5067072 Talati et al. Nov 1991 A
5072361 Davis et al. Dec 1991 A
5078152 Bond et al. Jan 1992 A
5086401 Glassman et al. Feb 1992 A
5088046 McMurtry et al. Feb 1992 A
5088055 Oyama Feb 1992 A
5095303 Clark et al. Mar 1992 A
5103404 McIntosh Apr 1992 A
5107080 Rosen Apr 1992 A
5112228 Zouras May 1992 A
5116051 Moncrief et al. May 1992 A
5121747 Andrews Jun 1992 A
5128671 Thomas, Jr. Jul 1992 A
5131844 Marinaccio et al. Jul 1992 A
5132672 Clark Jul 1992 A
5137458 Ungs et al. Aug 1992 A
5139261 Openiano Aug 1992 A
5142506 Edwards Aug 1992 A
5142931 Menahem Sep 1992 A
5143505 Burdea et al. Sep 1992 A
5146566 Hollis, Jr. et al. Sep 1992 A
5148377 McDonald Sep 1992 A
5149270 McKeown Sep 1992 A
5149487 McKeown Sep 1992 A
5162713 Mohri et al. Nov 1992 A
5165897 Johnson Nov 1992 A
5175459 Danial et al. Dec 1992 A
5181181 Glynn Jan 1993 A
5182557 Lang Jan 1993 A
5184319 Kramer Feb 1993 A
5185561 Good et al. Feb 1993 A
5186629 Rohen Feb 1993 A
5186695 Mangseth et al. Feb 1993 A
5187874 Takahashi et al. Feb 1993 A
5189806 McMurtry et al. Mar 1993 A
5193963 McAffee et al. Mar 1993 A
5204824 Fujimaki Apr 1993 A
5205289 Hardy et al. Apr 1993 A
5212473 Louis May 1993 A
5217003 Wilk Jun 1993 A
5220260 Schuler Jun 1993 A
5223776 Radke et al. Jun 1993 A
5228356 Chuang Jul 1993 A
5230623 Guthrie et al. Jul 1993 A
5240417 Smithson et al. Aug 1993 A
5251127 Raab Oct 1993 A
5251156 Heier et al. Oct 1993 A
5259120 Chapman et al. Nov 1993 A
5271290 Fischer Dec 1993 A
5273038 Beaven Dec 1993 A
5275174 Cook Jan 1994 A
5275565 Moncrief Jan 1994 A
5280265 Kramer et al. Jan 1994 A
5283970 Aigner Feb 1994 A
5290276 Sewell, Jr. Mar 1994 A
5295694 Levin Mar 1994 A
5296846 Ledley Mar 1994 A
5299810 Pierce et al. Apr 1994 A
5309140 Everett, Jr. et al. May 1994 A
5317336 Hall May 1994 A
5320537 Watson Jun 1994 A
5333106 Lanpher et al. Jul 1994 A
5334017 Lang et al. Aug 1994 A
5334027 Wherlock Aug 1994 A
5337412 Baker et al. Aug 1994 A
5338198 Wu et al. Aug 1994 A
5339723 Huitema Aug 1994 A
5351692 Dow et al. Oct 1994 A
5354162 Burdea et al. Oct 1994 A
5368487 Medina Nov 1994 A
5376007 Zirm Dec 1994 A
5379663 Hara Jan 1995 A
5384460 Tseng Jan 1995 A
5385474 Brindle Jan 1995 A
5389849 Asano et al. Feb 1995 A
5389865 Jacobus et al. Feb 1995 A
5391081 Lampotang et al. Feb 1995 A
5396266 Brimhall Mar 1995 A
5396895 Takashima et al. Mar 1995 A
5397323 Taylor Mar 1995 A
5402582 Raab Apr 1995 A
5403191 Tuason Apr 1995 A
5405152 Katanics et al. Apr 1995 A
5414337 Schuler May 1995 A
5417210 Funda et al. May 1995 A
5417696 Kashuba et al. May 1995 A
5428748 Davidson et al. Jun 1995 A
5429140 Burdea et al. Jul 1995 A
5435729 Hildreth et al. Jul 1995 A
5436542 Petelin et al. Jul 1995 A
5436622 Gutman et al. Jul 1995 A
5436638 Bolas et al. Jul 1995 A
5437607 Taylor Aug 1995 A
5438529 Rosenberg et al. Aug 1995 A
5445166 Taylor Aug 1995 A
5451924 Massimino et al. Sep 1995 A
5454722 Holland et al. Oct 1995 A
5459382 Jacobus et al. Oct 1995 A
5461711 Wang et al. Oct 1995 A
5466213 Hogan et al. Nov 1995 A
5467763 McMahon et al. Nov 1995 A
5482051 Reddy et al. Jan 1996 A
5482472 Garoni et al. Jan 1996 A
5483961 Kelly et al. Jan 1996 A
5509810 Schertz et al. Apr 1996 A
5510832 Garcia Apr 1996 A
5512919 Araki Apr 1996 A
5513100 Parker et al. Apr 1996 A
5513992 Refait May 1996 A
5518406 Waters May 1996 A
5547382 Yamasaki et al. Aug 1996 A
5575761 Hajianpour Nov 1996 A
5576727 Rosenberg et al. Nov 1996 A
5577981 Jarvik Nov 1996 A
5587937 Massie et al. Dec 1996 A
5589828 Armstrong Dec 1996 A
5598269 Kitaevich et al. Jan 1997 A
5609485 Bergman et al. Mar 1997 A
5609560 Ichikawa et al. Mar 1997 A
5623582 Rosenberg Apr 1997 A
5629594 Jacobus et al. May 1997 A
5643087 Marcus et al. Jul 1997 A
5667517 Hooven Sep 1997 A
5676157 Kramer Oct 1997 A
5690582 Ulrich et al. Nov 1997 A
5701140 Rosenberg et al. Dec 1997 A
5704791 Gillio Jan 1998 A
5709219 Chen et al. Jan 1998 A
5721566 Rosenberg Feb 1998 A
5724264 Rosenberg et al. Mar 1998 A
5731804 Rosenberg Mar 1998 A
5734373 Rosenberg et al. Mar 1998 A
5739811 Rosenberg et al. Apr 1998 A
5742278 Chen et al. Apr 1998 A
5755577 Gillio May 1998 A
5766016 Sinclair et al. Jun 1998 A
5767839 Rosenberg Jun 1998 A
5769640 Jacobus et al. Jun 1998 A
5785630 Bobick et al. Jul 1998 A
5790108 Salcudean et al. Aug 1998 A
5805140 Rosenberg et al. Sep 1998 A
5808665 Green Sep 1998 A
5821920 Rosenberg et al. Oct 1998 A
5841423 Carroll, Jr. et al. Nov 1998 A
5880714 Rosenberg et al. Mar 1999 A
5882207 Lampotang et al. Mar 1999 A
5889670 Schuler et al. Mar 1999 A
5889672 Schuler et al. Mar 1999 A
5909380 Dubois et al. Jun 1999 A
5920319 Vining et al. Jul 1999 A
5929846 Rosenberg et al. Jul 1999 A
5941710 Lampotang et al. Aug 1999 A
5944151 Jakobs et al. Aug 1999 A
5950629 Taylor et al. Sep 1999 A
5976156 Taylor et al. Nov 1999 A
6004134 Marcus et al. Dec 1999 A
6024576 Bevirt et al. Feb 2000 A
6037927 Rosenberg Mar 2000 A
6046727 Rosenberg et al. Apr 2000 A
6057828 Rosenberg et al. May 2000 A
6059506 Kramer May 2000 A
6104158 Jacobus et al. Aug 2000 A
6111577 Zilles et al. Aug 2000 A
6125337 Rosenberg et al. Sep 2000 A
6131097 Peurach et al. Oct 2000 A
6154198 Rosenberg Nov 2000 A
6160489 Perry et al. Dec 2000 A
6162190 Kramer Dec 2000 A
6195592 Schuler et al. Feb 2001 B1
6223100 Green Apr 2001 B1
6246390 Rosenberg Jun 2001 B1
6300937 Rosenberg Oct 2001 B1
6323837 Rosenberg Nov 2001 B1
6422941 Thorner et al. Jul 2002 B1
6437771 Rosenberg et al. Aug 2002 B1
6758843 Jensen Jul 2004 B2
6876891 Schuler et al. Apr 2005 B1
7091950 Rosenberg et al. Aug 2006 B2
7215326 Rosenberg May 2007 B2
Foreign Referenced Citations (22)
Number Date Country
0 349 086 Jan 1990 EP
0571827 Dec 1993 EP
0571827 Dec 1993 EP
2254911 Oct 1992 GB
H2-185278 Jul 1990 JP
H4-8381 Jan 1992 JP
434610 Feb 1992 JP
H5-192449 Aug 1993 JP
H7-24147 Jan 1995 JP
1124372 Nov 1984 SU
9106935 May 1991 WO
WO 9106935 May 1991 WO
WO 9400052 Jan 1994 WO
WO 9426167 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9502233 Jan 1995 WO
WO 9502801 Jan 1995 WO
9520787 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9520787 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9520788 Sep 1995 WO
WO 9616397 May 1996 WO
WO 9622591 Jul 1996 WO
WO 9639944 Dec 1996 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090299711 A1 Dec 2009 US
Continuations (6)
Number Date Country
Parent 11725958 Mar 2007 US
Child 12537967 US
Parent 10674423 Oct 2003 US
Child 11725958 US
Parent 09996487 Nov 2001 US
Child 10674423 US
Parent 09276012 Mar 1999 US
Child 09996487 US
Parent 08833502 Apr 1997 US
Child 09276012 US
Parent 08275120 Jul 1994 US
Child 08833502 US