This application claims priority to German patent application 10 2007 018 867.8, filed Apr. 19, 2007, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The disclosure concerns a projection exposure apparatus for microlithography.
Projection exposure apparatuses are known.
A central aspect of the implementation of a projection exposure apparatus is the provision of efficient illumination of the object field. It is typically desirable for the largest possible proportion of the illumination radiation which is generated in the radiation emitter of the radiation source should reach the object field. In particular, it is generally the case that short wave illumination radiation, e.g. in the EUV (extreme ultraviolet) range between 10 nm and 30 nm, can be guided efficiently and with low loss only via reflection mirrors. In this case, it can be desirable to use as small a number of mirrors as possible because losses can occur at every reflection. For EUV radiation and small angles of incidence, typical maximum reflection rates of 65% are achieved. This means that about a third of the incident EUV radiation is lost at every reflection. Also, particularly in the case of EUV illumination radiation, it can be advantageous for mirrors to be operated either at close to perpendicular incidence, i.e. with angles of incidence which are less than 25°, in particular less than 20°, or with angles of incidence which are close to grazing incidence, i.e. with angles of incidence which are greater than 70°. The nearer the angle of incidence is to 0° on the one hand or 90° on the other, the higher is the achievable reflection rate. In the case of known projection exposure apparatuses, these conditions, “small number of mirrors” and “angle of incidence close to perpendicular or grazing incidence” generally cannot be combined. Since the radiation sources are sometimes of considerable size, in the case of known projection exposure apparatuses illumination radiation is usually emitted by the radiation source in an approximately horizontal direction, whereas the direction of the illumination radiation immediately before the reticle is almost vertical. This means that the main beam of the illumination radiation in the illumination optics should be deflected by about 90°, which on the one hand involves a minimum number of mirrors resulting in unavoidable reflection losses, and on the other hand involves angles of incidence which are relatively far from perpendicular or grazing incidence.
In some embodiments, the disclosure provides a projection exposure apparatus capable of guiding illumination radiation with low loss.
In certain embodiments, the arrangement of all main components of the projection exposure apparatus are not in the same chamber. For example, by arranging the radiation source and projection optics in different chambers or rooms (e.g., one above the other), a sufficiently large optical distance between the radiation source and the illumination optics can be made available, without guiding the illumination radiation source in a main beam direction which is basically perpendicular to the direction of the illumination radiation before the reticle. It is therefore possible to avoid a relatively large adjustment of the main beam direction of the illumination radiation within the illumination optics. This can simplify the design of the illumination optics with high illumination radiation throughput. Because of the possibility of providing a large optical distance between the radiation source and the illumination optics, efficient screening of the downstream components of the projection exposure apparatus from unwanted particles or debris which the radiation source generates can take place there. Appropriate screening is known from US 2004/0108465 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,989,629 B1 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,867,843 B2. By housing the radiation source and projection optics in different chambers (e.g., one above the other), it is also possible to separate the supply of the radiation source spatially from those of the other components of the projection exposure apparatus, which is particularly advantageous for oscillation decoupling.
By arranging the illumination optics and/or the projection optics in a chamber different from (e.g., above) the radiation source, supplying the radiation source can be simplified, because shorter paths for whatever cooling water and heavy current feeds are involved can be achieved.
In some embodiments, it is possible to avoid an additional reflection mirror, since the illumination radiation from the radiation source can be sent through the leadthrough directly into the illumination optics, and passed on from there. In particular, two, four, six or eight reflection mirrors with correspondingly small angles of incidence can be provided. Optionally, separate illumination optics can even be omitted completely. In such embodiments, for example, after passing through the illumination radiation leadthrough, the illumination radiation, which the collector forms after the radiation source, hits the reticle directly without further bundle formation.
In certain embodiments, three or five reflection mirrors with correspondingly small angles of incidence can be provided. In principle, even illumination optics with precisely one reflection mirror with a correspondingly small angle of incidence are possible.
The advantages of the projection exposure apparatus can be particularly effective with certain radiation sources. In particular, a plasma generator, the EUV emission of which can be collected with a collector with a collection angle in the range from 40° to 75°, can be used as an EUV radiation source.
In certain embodiments, a vacuum leadthrough can give the possibility of obtaining a vacuum in one chamber, while the other chamber is ventilated (e.g., for assembly or maintenance work).
In some embodiments, a main beam angle can ensure the smallest possible effective deflection angle within the illumination optics. The main beam angle of the illumination radiation between the radiation source and the illumination optics can be practically the same as that between the illumination optics and the reticle. In this case, practically no effective deflection of the main beam of the illumination radiation is desired in the illumination optics, so that reflections can only occur near the perpendicular or near the grazing incidence. The angle between the main beam of the illumination radiation in the region of the leadthrough and the plane of the wall can be greater than 70° (e.g., greater than 80°, such as 90°).
Intermediate focus formation can allow for using an illumination radiation leadthrough with a relatively small width. This can simplify the construction of a vacuum leadthrough which is implemented there. A collector with long focal length is possible. Optionally, the numerical aperture at the intermediate focus is in the range from 0.075 to 0.12.
Depending on the design of the collector, its focal length and thus the position of the intermediate focus can be specified. In some embodiments, it is possible to use an illumination radiation leadthrough with a particularly small width. If the wall includes multiple layers, it can be advantageous to position the intermediate focus within the layer at which the leadthrough has a small opening or a small width. This can be a layer the processing of which is complex, or a layer in which the vacuum leadthrough is to be implemented.
In some embodiments, the radiation source is arranged in a chamber that is below the illumination and/or projection optics.
In certain embodiments, the radiation source is arranged in a chamber that is above the illumination and/or projection optics.
Embodiments are explained in more detail below with reference to the drawings, in which:
The illumination radiation 3 is used to expose an object field in an object plane 4 of the projection exposure apparatus 1. The illumination radiation 3 is guided between the radiation source 2 and the object plane 4 by illumination optics 5. Projection optics 6 are used to image the object field into an image field in an image plane 7 of the projection exposure apparatus 1.
In the object plane 4, a reticle 8 is arranged, and its pattern surface to be imaged is in the object field. The reticle 8 is held by a reticle holder 9, a portion of which is shown in
The projection exposure apparatus 1 can be implemented like a stepper or like a scanner.
In
The radiation source 2 is in chamber 14, and the other main components of the projection exposure apparatus 1 are arranged in chambers 15. As shown in
The main beam of the illumination radiation 3 in the region of the leadthrough 17 makes an angle α, which in the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment according to
In
The illumination optics 5 has a field facet mirror 23 and a pupil facet mirror 24. These two mirrors 23, 24 ensure defined illumination of the object field. Appropriate arrangements of the field facet mirror 23 and pupil facet mirror 24 are known to the person skilled in the art. The facet mirrors 23, 24 are reflection mirrors. The main beam angles of incidence of the illumination radiation 3 on the facet mirrors 23, 24 are less than 20°. In the embodiment according to
Downstream from the pupil facet mirror 24 is a grazing incidence mirror 25 of the illumination optics 5. The mirror 25 deflects the illumination radiation 3 coming from the pupil facet mirror 24 onto the object field. The main beam angle of incidence of the illumination radiation 3 on the grazing incidence mirror 25 is significantly greater than 45°. In total, therefore, the illumination optics 5 according to
The main beam of the illumination radiation 3 in the region of the leadthrough 17 has an angle α to the plane 19 of the wall 16 of about 60°.
The illumination optics 26 has, in addition to the facet mirrors 23, 24, two further, down-stream reflection mirrors 27, 28 before the grazing incidence mirror 25. The main beam angle of incidence of the illumination radiation 3 on the facet mirror 23 is about 16° in the embodiment according to
As shown in
The radiation source 2 is supported by a floor 34 of the lower chamber 14.
The collimating effect of the collector 30 is such that the intermediate focus 20 is central in the supporting layer 31 in the embodiment according to
An angle α between the main beam of the illumination beam 3 in the region of the leadthrough 17 and the plane 19 is about 75° in the embodiment according to
The embodiment according to
An angle α between the main beam of the illumination beam 3 in the region of the leadthrough 17 and the plane 19 is about 75° in the embodiment according to
The embodiment according to
An angle α between the main beam of the illumination beam 3 in the region of the leadthrough 17 and the plane 19 is about 75° in the embodiment according to
In the embodiment according to
An angle α between the main beam of the illumination beam 3 in the region of the leadthrough 17 and the plane 19 is about 75° in the embodiment according to
The embodiment according to
An angle α between the main beam of the illumination beam 3 in the region of the leadthrough 17 and the plane 19 is about 75° in the embodiment according to
In the case of the projection exposure apparatus 35, the radiation source 2 is arranged in the upper chamber 15, and the other main components of the projection exposure apparatus 35, in particular the illumination optics 5 and the projection optics 6, are arranged in the chamber 14 therebelow. Correspondingly, an illumination radiation leadthrough 36, which corresponds in function to the illumination radiation leadthrough 17, is in turn arranged in the wall 16 which separates the two chambers 14, 15 from each other. In the embodiment according to
The angle α between the main beam of the illumination radiation 3 in the region of the leadthrough 36 and the plane 19 is 90° in the embodiment according to
In the embodiment according to
The angle of incidence of the illumination radiation 3 on the field facet mirror 23 is about 24°. The angle of incidence of the illumination radiation 3 on the pupil facet mirror 24 is about 14°. The angle of incidence of the illumination radiation 3 on the reflection mirror 40 is about 1°. The angle of incidence of the illumination radiation 3 on the grazing incidence mirror 25, also in the embodiment according to
Also in the embodiments according to
In the embodiments according to
Corresponding devices are known to the person skilled in the art, and described, for instance, in publications US 2004/0108465 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,989,629 B1 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,867,843 B2.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2007 018 867.8 | Apr 2007 | DE | national |