A proximity sensor detects the presence of a nearby person or object in a region or area. A proximity sensor may employ an electromagnetic or electrostatic field, or a beam of electromagnetic radiation, e.g., infrared, or acoustic energy and detect changes in the field or return signal. Proximity sensing can utilize different sensor types for different types of target objects. For example a photoelectric sensor might be suitable for a plastic target; an inductive proximity sensor might be used to detect a metal target.
Different types of proximity sensors have different maximum distances within which the sensors can detect an object. Some sensors have adjustments of the nominal distance range or means to report a graduated detection distance. Proximity sensors can have a high reliability and long functional life because of the absence of mechanical parts and lack of physical contact between sensor and the sensed object.
The following disclosure describes examples of proximity detection and proximity sensors. Capacitance of a sensing element to ground is measured as an object moves into or out of proximity to the sensing element.
The drawing figures depict one or more implementations in accordance with the present teachings, by way of example only, not by way of limitation. In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same or similar elements.
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth by way of examples in order to illustrate the relevant teachings. In order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring aspects of the present teachings, those methods, procedures, components, and/or circuitry that are well-known to one of ordinary skill in the art have been described at a relatively high-level.
The examples shown and described implement a form of proximity detection utilizing detection of capacitance of a sensing element, relative to ground, as objects move into or out of proximity to the sensing element. For example, the proximity detection may occur over significant distances from a proximity sensor, compared to the dimensions of the sensor, or when the proximity sensor is touched by a person or other target object.
Reference now is made in detail to the examples illustrated in the accompanying figures and discussed below.
The circuit diagram of
As a person or other object approaches or moves away from the antenna 120, changes in the capacitance Cx of the antenna 120 will occur. For example, as a person approaches antenna 120, Cx will increase, and as the person moves away from the antenna 120, Cx will decrease. The change in Cx produces a measurable effect, which can be utilized by the sensor 100 for proximity detection.
In the circuit depicted in
For measuring capacitance on Cs as affected by Cx, the output of the comparator 112 can be provided to a clock input of a pulse width modulator (PWM) circuit 140. The PWM circuit 140 can be used to gate a counter 150 that is clocked at a suitable frequency to count the number of pulses during a specified time. The control circuitry 110 may also include a processor 160 and storage functionality 170, e.g., suitable ROM and/or RAM, for holding software instructions and buffered data. The processor 160 can receive the counter output and correlate the counter output to Cs, Cx, and the proximity of a person or object to the sensor 100. The output of the counter 150 as received by the processor 160 may be suitably filtered for reducing noise effects. The processor 160 can process the output of the counter 150 for detecting proximity of an object relative to the antenna 120. The control circuitry 110 can provide an output signal, e.g., as shown by the DETECT signal of
For some applications, a dynamic reference voltage may be used to alter the sensing functionality of sensor 100. Raising the reference voltage may lower the nominal range of the sensor, for example from one foot (30 cm) maximum sensing distance from the antenna down to a few millimeters maximum sensing distance for proximity detection of a touch. For example, a sensor such as sensor 100 may be placed in a child's toy bear. If a child were to approach within a specified distance, e.g., six inches or so, the bear could respond with a verbal response such as “pick me up,” encouraging the child to hold the toy. The proximity detection of the sensor may then be changed, by simply altering the reference voltage of the sensor, to close proximity-based touch sensing, allowing the bear to subsequently respond to the child's actual touches. Dynamically changing the nominal detection range of a proximity sensor in such a way may add commercial value to the related good(s) or components.
The control circuitry 110 can be implemented, for example, by a suitable microcontroller, a field programmable gate array (FPGA), or other standard logic devices. For example, an ATtiny48 microcontroller, as made commercially available by ATMEL Corporation, and/or a suitable timer/counter may be used for implementation of the control circuitry 110. In an example, the sample capacitor 114 may have a nominal capacitance of 4.7 nF and be 10 percent X7R ceramic.
For some proximity sensor applications, antennas may be configured for proximity detection in one general direction. In other applications, antennas may be configured for proximity detection in multiple directions. For antennas suitable for exemplary proximity sensors, plane charges such as produced by rectangular plates, e.g., as shown by the patch antenna (E), may offer good distance characteristics because the greatest field strength is expressed perpendicular to the surface of the plane. Such configurations, however, may allow limited space for related components of a proximity sensor or a device incorporating such a sensor, e.g., control circuitry, key pads, etc.
For some applications, electric field lines from a sensor antenna can be oriented to form a directional antenna and still offer available space within or adjacent to the antenna, e.g., within the perimeter of the antenna. In some applications, a square loop or dipole antenna may be used. Examples are shown in
Sensors or antennas configured as points, spheres and lines, because of their radial field spreading with distance, may be well suited for proximity detection in applications where the direction of approach is unknown or variable. As described previously, some applications may, however, require proximity detection from one general direction.
The exemplary proximity sensors can utilize other types of measurement of an antenna's capacitance to ground for proximity detection.
The circuit diagram of
For sensor 500, as an object or person approaches or comes into proximity with the sensing element 530, the capacitance Cx increases. As an object or person moves away and out of proximity to the sensing element 530, the capacitance Cx decreases. Because Cx is in parallel with Cs, the new Cx changes the capacitance of the oscillator 520, changing the resonant frequency, f, where f is given by:
The control circuitry 510 can measure the change in the resonant frequency f, which can be correlated to capacitance Cx and corresponding proximity of an object or person within range of the sensor 500.
In addition to proximity sensors utilizing oscillators according to
The circuit diagram of
As indicated in
With continued reference to
Some implementations of proximity detection may involve programming. For example, a microcontroller may include firmware facilitating the control of the switching functionality for charging and discharging a sample capacitor and antenna of a proximity sensor as shown in the table of
Various modifications may be made to the examples and embodiments described m the foregoing description, and any related teachings may be applied in numerous applications, only some of which have been described herein. It is intended by the following claims to claim any and all applications, modifications and variations that fall within the true scope of the present teachings.
This nonprovisional application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/846,458 filed Mar. 18, 2013, entitled “Proximity Detection,” which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/910,484, filed Oct. 22, 2010, patented as U.S. Pat. No. 8,400,209 and entitled “Proximity Detection.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4345167 | Calvin | Aug 1982 | A |
5315884 | Kronberg | May 1994 | A |
6081185 | Portet | Jun 2000 | A |
6466036 | Philipp | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6911829 | Hilliard et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7663607 | Hotelling | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7864503 | Chang | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875814 | Chen | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7920129 | Hotelling | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8031094 | Hotelling | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8031174 | Hamblin | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8040326 | Hotelling | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8049732 | Hotelling | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8179381 | Frey | May 2012 | B2 |
8217902 | Chang | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8400209 | Ujvari | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8723824 | Myers | May 2014 | B2 |
20020149376 | Haffner et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167439 | Bloch et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030071639 | Haag et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050052429 | Philipp | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050093638 | Lin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050277198 | Shortes et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060071734 | McCorquodale et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070089513 | Rosenau et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070291016 | Philipp | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080297175 | Wu | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080309635 | Matsuo | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090219039 | Fasshauer | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090315854 | Matsuo | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100148799 | Hardie | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156629 | Sexton et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100181980 | Richardson | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110308320 | Rocznik | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120043976 | Bokma | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120098588 | Ujvari | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120242588 | Myers et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120242592 | Rothkopf | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120243151 | Lynch | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120243719 | Franklin | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120313892 | Philipp | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130076612 | Myers | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140009171 | Ujvari | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2012129247 | Sep 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 61/454,936, filed Mar. 21, 2011, Myers. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/454,950, filed Mar. 21, 2011, Lynch. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/454,894, filed Mar. 21, 2011, Rothkopf. |
D. A. Ujvari, U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,484, Election Restriction Requirement, dated Apr. 2, 2012. |
D. A. Ujvari, U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,484, Response to Election Restriction Requirement, dated May 2, 2012. |
D. A. Ujvari, U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,484, Non-final Rejection, dated Jun. 22, 2012. |
D. A. Ujvari, U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,484, Response to non-final Rejection, dated Oct. 22, 2012. |
D. A. Ujvari, U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,484, Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 21, 2012. |
D. A. Ujvari, U.S. Appl. No. 13/846,458, Preliminary Amendment, dated Mar. 18, 2013. |
D. A. Ujvari, U.S. Appl. No. 13/846,458, Non-final Rejection, dated May 22, 2015. |
D. A. Ujvari, U.S. Appl. No. 13/846,458, Response to non-final Rejection, dated Sep. 22, 2015. |
D. A. Ujvari, U.S. Appl. No. 13/846,458, Final Office Action, dated Dec. 22, 2015. |
D. A. Ujvari, U.S. Appl. No. 13/846,458, RCE and Amendment, dated May 23, 2016. |
D. A. Ujvari, U.S. Appl. No. 13/846,458, Non-final Rejection, dated Jun. 27, 2016. |
D. A. Ujvari, U.S. Appl. No. 13/846,458, Response to non-final Rejection, dated Sep. 27, 2016. |
D. A. Ujvari, U.S. Appl. No. 13/846,458, Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 12, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180031361 A1 | Feb 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13846458 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 15595471 | US | |
Parent | 12910484 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 13846458 | US |