Rapid response mass spectrometer system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6326615
  • Patent Number
    6,326,615
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 30, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 4, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A high speed mass spectrometer system capable of detecting in real-time multiple compounds in complex environments. This system includes a continuous ionization source coupled to a quadrupole ion trap to store ions, to filter ions for detection, to resonantly excite the ion trajectories to cause them to dissociate for more detailed analysis. This system includes a dual ionization configuration to cover broad and disparate classes of compounds. A glow discharge source is used to attach electrons to molecules with high electrons affinity. A photoionization source is used to detach electrons from molecules with low ionization potentials.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to a mass spectrometer which has a glow discharge ionizer and a photoionizer that are coupled to a mass detector(s) by quadrupole ion traps.




2. Background Information




Terrorists have been known to use explosives to hijack commercial aircraft. For this reason, there has been a desire to provide an explosive detection system that can be operated “on-site” at an airport terminal. An on-site detection system must be capable of detecting extremely low concentrations of an explosive(s) material in a relatively fast time frame to minimize the time delays in air travel for the passengers.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,854,431 issued to Linker et al. and assigned to Sandia Corporation (“Sandia”) discloses a preconcentrator system that generates a flow of air to dislodge explosive material from a passenger. The dislodged explosive material is captured by a screen of the system. The air flow across the passenger is temporarily terminated to allow the captured explosive material to be removed from the screen by a secondary flow of air. The explosive material removed from the screen is directed into a particle detector. The preconcentrator disclosed in the Sandia patent increases the concentration of explosive material provided to the detector.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,849,628 issued to McLuckey et al. (“McLuckey”) discloses a mass detection system that can detect relatively low concentrations of a trace molecule(s). McLuckey utilizes a glow discharge ionizer which ionizes an “atmospheric” sample. Providing an air sample at atmospheric pressures increases the density of the sample and the number of ionized molecules. Increasing the number of ions improves the sensitivity of the detector.




The glow discharge ionizer includes a pair of electrodes separated by a chamber. A voltage potential is created between the electrodes to induce a glow discharge which ionizes a gas sample within the chamber. The glow discharge ionizer of McLuckey is coupled to a quadrupole mass spectrometer that can detect a trace molecule such as an explosive material.




The quadrupole mass spectrometer includes a scanning circuit which provides a continuously varying voltage field across the poles of the spectrometer. The continuously varying voltage field sequentially ejects ionized molecules from the quadrupole to a detector. The excitation circuit and detector can be coupled to a computer which correlates detected molecules with the excitation voltage. Explosive materials will provide detection at a predetermined voltage(s). The computer can correlate detection with an explosive material and inform an operator that an explosive has been detected.




Quadrupole mass spectrometers are relatively slow because of the time required to vary the excitation voltage to sequentially eject the ionized trace molecules. The prior art does include time of flight mass spectrometers, which simultaneously accelerate all of the ionized molecules toward a detector and then detect the different times when the molecules arrive. The mass of the molecules varies with the different arrival times. Time of flight mass spectrometers are not effective when used with a continuous ionization source such as a glow discharge ionizer. It would be desirable to provide a monitor that can quickly detect trace molecules in relatively low concentrations.




Glow discharge ionizers are efficient in ionizing molecules with high electron affinity but are not generally effective for molecules with low ionization potentials, which generally have low electron affinity. It would also be desirable to provide a monitor that can quickly detect a variety of different trace molecules in relatively low concentrations. For example, it would be desirable to provide an on-site airport terminal detector that can detect explosives as well as other threats and contraband such as chemical weapons and drugs.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention includes an embodiment of a monitor for detecting a trace molecule from a gas sample. The monitor may include a glow discharge ionizer and a threshold photoionizer, which can ionize a trace molecule from the gas sample. The ionized trace molecule is trapped within a quadrupole ion trap. The quadrupole ion trap is coupled to a mass detector which can detect the ionized trace molecule.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic representation of an embodiment of a monitor of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a schematic representation of an alternate embodiment of the monitor;





FIG. 3

is a schematic showing the complementary function of photoionization and discharge ionization





FIG. 4

is a schematic representation of an alternate embodiment of the monitor;





FIG. 5

is a schematic representation showing fluid flow through the monitor;





FIG. 6

is a graph which shows signal levels as a function of residence time to show the potential to achieve high dynamic range;





FIG. 7

is a graph which shows reduced ion-molecule association in a quadrupole ion trap using air sampling as measured by ion trap residence time;





FIG. 8

is a diagram showing the ion collection and ion scan periods for operation by a QIT/TOFMS and an ITMS.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Referring to the drawings more particularly by reference numbers,

FIG. 1

shows an embodiment of a monitor


100


of the present invention. The monitor


100


is typically used to measure trace molecular constituents from a direct air sample, a sample collector, a preconcentrator, a process line, or from other sources. For purposes of discussion, trace molecular constituents could include small quantities of explosives or chemical agents or other threat compounds, or any other molecules that are to be monitored. The monitor


100


is contained in a vacuum housing that has a pumping device and other standard vacuum components.




The monitor


100


may include a glow discharge ionizer


102


that can receive a gas sample. The glow discharge ionizer


102


may include a first electrode


104


and a second electrode


106


that are separated by a chamber


108


. The gas sample may enter the chamber


108


through an aperture


110


in the first electrode


104


and exit the chamber


108


through an aperture


112


in the second electrode


106


. The electrodes


104


and


106


may be connected to an electrical circuit(s) (not shown). The electrical circuit may generate a voltage potential between the electrodes


104


and


106


which creates a glow discharge that ionizes trace molecules within the chamber


108


.




By way of example, the space between the electrodes


104


and


106


may be approximately about 2 cm, but can be other dimensions. Typically the voltages of electrodes


104


and


106


are about −350 V and 0 V, respectively. The glow discharge ionizer


102


may be similar to the ionizer disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,849,628 issued to McLuckey et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference.




The ionizer


102


may include a port


114


that is in fluid communication with a pump


116


. The pump


116


may be used to pump out the ionization chamber in order to keep the residence time of the sample to a minimum, which improves detection time response, and to handle relatively large sample volumes. The ionizer


102


can also operate with the port


114


sealed, in which case, the residence time in the ionization volume is dictated by the flow through aperture


112


. Ions may exit the aperture


112


along with the neutral gas. The ions can be drawn through the aperture


112


by the potential field across the electrodes


104


and


106


. This invention also allows for focusing elements in the ionizer


102


to increase the yield of ions that exit aperture


112


.




The ions that exit the aperture


112


may be steered into a quadrupole ion trap


118


by electrostatic focusing elements


120


. The quadrupole ion trap


118


may trap ions created within the ionizer


102


. The quadrupole ion trap


118


may include a ring electrode


122


that is separated from a pair of endcap electrodes


124


and


126


by dielectric material


127


. The elements


120


and endcap


124


may function as an einsel lens. Typically, the first and last element of the einsel lens (the first element of


120


and electrode


124


) can be biased at the same voltage, such as ground potential, and the middle element (the second element of


120


) is biased at a different potential. Alternatively, the lenses can have progressively decreasing potential to accelerate the ions. Other focusing elements have been tested and may include multipole ion guides, such as quadrupole, hexapole, or octapole ion guides. The device can also operate without focusing elements, by relying on the ion velocities through the aperture


112


to carry them to the ion trap


118


or by applying a potential difference from electrodes


106


and


124


to accelerate the ions toward the ion trap


118


. The elements


120


and electrodes


122


,


124


and


126


may be connected to an electrical circuit(s)


128


.




The ions enter the quadrupole ion trap


118


through an aperture


129


in the entrance electrode


122


and are stabilized and stored within the trap


118


by the application of an alternating current to the ring electrode


126


in a manner known in the art. The endcaps


122


and


124


are usually held at a constant voltage, such as ground potential, however, auxiliary oscillating current may be applied. The range of ion masses that are stored efficiently depends on the frequency and amplitude of the current applied to the ring electrode, it is typically of radio frequency (such as 1 MHz) and a few hundred to a few thousand volts peak to peak, but can have other values. The ions may continuously accumulate within the trap


118


. Waveforms can be applied to one or both endcap electrodes


122


and


124


and/or to the ring electrode


126


to excite specific ion masses in the trap


118


in order to eject them from stable orbits, to prevent them from accumulating, or to excite them to more energetic orbits to cause them to dissociate with background gas in order to produce fragment ions of the selected ions. Each ion mass has a distinct resonance condition. Many different ion masses may be excited simultaneously by applying a superposition of many frequencies. The frequency spectrum may be generated by a variety of prior art methods. In this embodiment, the arbitrary waveform is formed by superimposing the sum of individual periodic waveforms corresponding to the frequency and amplitude most suited for exciting each ion mass to the desired effect. In one embodiment this waveform may be applied to the exit endcap


126


, although it is to be understood that effective excitation may be achieved by application of the waveform to other electrodes in the ion trap as noted above.




Following accumulation of ions and the optional manipulation of ions consisting of selective ion ejection and selective collision-induced ion dissociation, the remaining ions in the quadrupole ion trap


118


are mass analyzed by ejecting all the ions into a mass detector


130


. The mass detector


130


may be a time of flight mass spectrometer. Ion ejection to the mass detector


130


may be accomplished by applying a high voltage pulse to the ion trap exit endcap


126


. Alternatively, a high voltage pulse may be applied to the entrance endcap


124


to “push” the ions into the detector


130


, or two oppositely-phased pulses may be applied to both endcaps


124


and


126


in a “push-pull” manner to extract ions into the detector


130


.




The extracted ions can be accelerated to a higher energy by an acceleration grid


132


. The accelerated ion pulse may be focused and collimated by a electrostatic lens assembly


134


. This is shown as a three-element einsel lens, however other configurations may be used, such as a two-element assembly. The third element in the einsel lens configuration can make use of the back plate of a detector


136


.




The accelerated and collimated ion packet passes through a hole


138


in the coaxial detector


136


. A cylinder


139


may be provided in the detector hole


138


to keep a uniform voltage potential for the traversing ions and is electrically isolated from the detector plates themselves (described below). The ions travel through a drift tube


140


under field-free conditions where ions of different mass travel at different speeds and spread out in space. The ions may then reach a reflectron section


142


of the mass detector where they are reversed in direction. This operation acts to focus ions of different initial energies in the usual manner. The ions then travel back toward the front of the detector


136


where they impact and are recorded as a signal in the normal manner. The resulting signal from the detector is measured with electronics that can distinguish the different arrival times of different ion masses as is known in the art. Although a reflectron


142


is shown with a coaxial detector in monitor


100


, it is to be understood that the reflectron


142


may also be of an off-axis design, or the mass detector


130


may be of a linear design with the detector plate


136


at the end of the drift tube


140


.





FIG. 2

shows an alternate embodiment of a monitor


200


that incorporates a glow discharge ionizier


202


and a photoionizer


204


. The glow discharge ionizer


202


may ionize molecules which have a high electron affinity. The photoionizer


204


may be used to detach electrons from molecules which have low ionization potentials.




As shown in

FIG. 3

drugs and chemical weapons tend to have a low ionization potential while explosive materials tend to have a high electron affinity. The inclusion of both the photoionizer


204


and the glow discharge ionizer


202


provides a single monitor which can effectively ionize a number of different trace molecules to detect a plurality of substances. Such a monitor would be particularly useful when used to detect both explosives, chemical weapons, and drugs at an airport terminal. Photoionization and glow discharge electron attachment are complementary ionization methods that significantly increase the range of compounds that can be detected in one device.




Referring again to

FIG. 2

, each ionizer


202


and


204


is connected to a corresponding quadrupole ion trap


206


and


208


, respectively, and mass detectors


210


. Each detector


210


may include a coaxial detector and focusing lens assembly


214


, a reflectron section


216


, and other components. The operation of the combined glow discharge ionizer


202


, ion trap


206


and mass detector


210


may be similar to the system shown in FIG.


1


.




The photoionizer


204


, ion trap


208


and detector


210


may function in a manner similar to the glow discharge section of the monitor


200


. The photoionizer


204


typically operates in positive ion mode compared to the glow discharge ionizer


202


, which typically operates in a negative ion mode. The monitor


200


may include partitions


218


that separates the ion source vacuum region from the mass detector vacuum region and allows each region to be separately pumped and to have different operating pressures.




Many designs are possible for the photoionizer


204


. In the embodiment shown, atmospheric air or other gaseous mixture may be allowed to enter the ionizer through a valve, or aperture, and/or a thin tube. The pressure in the photoionizer


204


may be sub-atmosphere, typically being about 1 torr, but can operate from 10


−3


torr to greater than 10 torr, even up to atmosphere. Ions that are formed in the photoionizer


204


are extracted through an aperture that leads to the ion trap


208


. The ions are steered and accumulated and ejected from the trap


208


and into the detector


212


in a manner similar to the description given for monitor


100


shown in FIG.


1


.




The photoionizer may include a light source which emits a light beam which has a wavelength so that photo-energy between 8.0 and 12.0 electron volts (eV) is delivered to the gas sample. Photo-energy between 8.0 and 12.0 is high enough to ionize most trace molecules of interest without creating much molecular fragmentation within the sample. By way of example the light source may be a Nd:YAG laser which emits light at a wavelength of 355 nanometers (nm). The 355 nm light may travel through a frequency tripling cell that generates light at 118 nms. 118 nm light has an energy of 10.5 eV. Such a light source is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,299 issued to Syage, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Alternatively, the light source may include continuous or pulsed discharge lamps which are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,933,432 issued to Driscoll; U.S. Pat. No. 5,393,979 issued to Hsi; U.S. Pat. No. 5,338,931 issued to Spangler et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,206,594 issued to Zipf, which are hereby incorporated by reference.





FIG. 4

shows an embodiment of a monitor


300


which has a glow discharge ionizer


302


and a photoionizer


304


coupled to the same mass detector


306


. Each ionizer


302


and


304


can be coupled to the mass detector


306


by a quadrupole ion trap


308


and


310


, respectively. The ion traps


308


and


310


can be connected to the ionizers


302


and


304


so that the ions exiting the ionization source directly enter the traps without requiring ion focusing elements. In this and other embodiments, the spacers that seal the ion traps


308


and


310


from the surrounding vacuum chamber,


312


in

FIG. 4 and 127

in

FIG. 1

may be removed so that the traps


308


and


310


can be pumped out. This may be used very effectively for the directly coupled ionizer/trap configuration to allow increased sample throughput into the traps. The quadrupole ion traps


308


and


310


may have ports


314


or open area that are coupled to a pump (not shown). The ports can be used to pump out the ion traps, or introduce a gas other than the sample gas, such as helium, which has been shown in previous work to effectively cool ions in the traps.




The monitor


300


in

FIG. 4

shows an embodiment whereby the ions that exit each trap


308


and


310


enter the same mass detector


306


. The mass detector


306


may be a time of flight mass spectrometer which includes a drift tube


316


, reflectron


318


and detector plate


320


. In order to separate the recorded mass spectrum from each ion source, the ions from each ion trap


308


and


310


can be pulsed into the mass detector


306


at different times. The monitor


300


may have electrostatic steering optics such as a simple deflector


322


for this purpose to steer the ions from the traps


308


and


310


in a direction that will insure detection by plate


320


.




If ions of the same charge are detected from each quadrupole ion trap


308


and


310


, then the detection follows the prescription described earlier and the operation of the mass detector


306


may operate in a conventional manner. If ions of different charge exit each trap


308


and


310


, such as is the case for the glow discharge ionizer


302


in electron attachment, negative ion mode, and the photoionizer


304


in positive ion mode, then the voltages on the drift tube


316


, the reflectron segment


318


and the detector


320


must be switched according to the conditions that are appropriate for the charge being detected. Standard electronic methods may be used to achieve switching in the time period after the recording of one mass spectrum and before the extraction of the ions from the other trap


308


or


310


.




The monitor


300


may have separate sample inlet ports


324


and


326


for the glow discharge ionizer


302


and photoionizer


304


, respectively. In one embodiment, these sample inlets


324


and


326


are connected so that the same sample is split and enters both ionizers


302


and


304


. It is also possible to use each ionizer and mass analyzer for separate samples.




The embodiments in

FIG. 4

represent a variety of options that may be applied separately or in combination to achieve a variety of configurations tailored for specific applications.





FIG. 5

shows an embodiment of sample gas flow partitioning systems for a photoionizer


402


and a glow discharge ionizer


404


that achieve high sample throughput while minimizing the gas load on the vacuum systems. A sample consisting of trace compounds in air or other gases can be delivered to the inlet system of the glow discharge ionizer


404


or the photoionizer


402


. A sample may be introduced through tubes


406


which have inlets


408


that are coupled to a pump (not shown) which draws in a sample. Alternatively, the sample may be delivered by exposure to ambient air without a sampling tube, a preconcentrator device such as a momentum impactor device for particles, a mesh, an electrostatic precipitator for particles and vapor, or by other means.




A portion of the air sample flow, constituting the first stage of partitioning enters the ionizers


402


and


404


through an aperture


410


for glow discharge ionizer


402


and through either an aperture or a jet separator


412


for the photoionizer


404


. If a jet separator is used then the usual skimmed flow is pumped away along an airstream


414


. For the glow discharge ionizier


402


, the air entering the ionizer chamber is pumped away along airstream


416


. This bypass pumping and the resultant advantages were described earlier when referring to number


114


in FIG.


1


. The glow discharge partitioning


414


and the optional photoionizer jet separator partitioning


416


constitute the second stage of flow partitioning.




The third stage of flow partitioning occurs in the regions between the ionizer exit apertures and the quadrupole ion trap entrance apertures of the ion traps


418


and


420


, along flow streams


422


and


424


, respectively. The traps


418


and


420


may be coupled to mass detectors


426


and


428


, respectively. The mass detectors


426


and


428


can be evacuated by flow streams


430


and


432


, respectively. Only a small fraction of the neutral background air or gas enters the traps


418


and


420


and hence the final gas load on the mass detectors


426


and


428


is minimized. The requirements for vacuum partitioning denoted by


422


and


430


for the photoionizer section, and


424


and


432


for the glow discharge section can be met by available split-flow or multi-ported turbo-molecular pumps, although other pumps and separate pumping may also be used. An example of operating pressures in the source and mass detector regions is about 10


−3


torr and about 10


−5


torr, respectively, although these regions can operate at higher or lower pressures. For the embodiment


400


described by

FIG. 5

, the source and mass detector vacuum sections can be connected, such that a single multi-ported pump


433


and corresponding manifold


434


can be used for the glow discharge source and the dual photoionizer configuration.




The intent for each stage of flow partitioning is to achieve enrichment of the target compounds and ions in the background air or gas. In the sample delivery stage, this may be effected by using a preconcentrator or other device as noted above. In the second stage, a jet separator achieves mass focusing whereby higher molecular weight compounds are enriched along the centerline, which is the portion that enters into the photoionizer


404


. A similar effect occurs for the glow discharge ionizer


402


in which higher molecular weight ions may be enriched along the centerline, which is aligned with the exit aperture. The third stage achieves very effective enrichment because the ions exiting the ionizers


402


and


404


can be focused into the traps


418


and


420


, whereas the exiting neutral gas disperses and is mostly pumped along


422


and


424


.





FIGS. 6 and 7

show results which demonstrate the benefits of the combined quadrupole ion trap/time of flight mass spectrometer (“QIT/TOFMS”) vs. an ion trap mass spectrometer (“ITMS”)for use with continuous ionization sources such as glow discharge and photoionization. To achieve the highest levels of sensitivity and dynamic range, it is advantageous to use a method of mass analysis that has a high duty cycle for ion collection. The use of a quadrupole ion trap as an interface between a continuous ionization source such as glow discharge and a pulsed mass analyzer such as time of flight mass spectrometer has significant advantages over the use of an ITMS, or an orthogonal extraction time of flight mass spectrometer.




The advantage of ion trap over orthogonal extraction TOFMS is (1) higher ion collection efficiency, and (2) capability to perform specific ion rejection and specific collision-induced dissociation (CID). The QIT/TOFMS mass analyzer and ITMS operate similarly with regard to ion collection, ion rejection and CID. However as noted above, the principal difference is in the method of mass analysis. The ITMS uses mass-selective instability to sequentially scan out ions of increasing mass from the trap, whereas QIT/TOFMS uses a high voltage pulse to inject all the ions into a TOFMS for mass analysis. There are three main advantages of QIT/TOFMS compared to ITMS:




(1) The ion ejection time is significantly less for QIT/TOFMS vs ITMS (about 5-10 microsecond vs 1-100 millisecond, respectively). Because ion collection must be turned off during the mass analysis period, the longer mass analysis period for ITMS limits how the high repetition rate may be set before the duty cycle for ion collection becomes small. Referring to

FIG. 8

the detection duty for an ITMS is 1−(t/T) where t is the mass scan out time and T is the time between collection periods. By way of example a 50% duty cycle corresponds to a repetition rate of 10 Hz for a 50 ms mass analysis time and to 50 Hz for a 10 ms analysis time. QIT/TOFMS achieves nearly a 100% ion collection duty cycle up to repetition rates as high as and greater than 1 kHz. Excellent signal linearity is observed in

FIG. 6

for collection periods (inverse repetition rate) ranging from 3 ms to 60 ms. If MS/MS is employed, then the duty cycle for ion collection will decrease due to the finite time required to effect CID in the trap. By using air as a carrier gas and operating the trap at relatively high pressures (a few m-torr), we anticipate time periods for sufficient CID to be about 10 ms, based on some preliminary observations. An alternative method to avoid the ion collection “down time” is to use notch filtering whereby a selected set of parent and daughter ion masses is stabilized and the remaining masses destabilized using the appropriate RF waveform. In this case, the parent ions would be excited to induce CID, without fully ejecting them from the trap. Other multiplexed MS/MS routines may be incorporated and benefit from the high repetition rates achievable by QIT/TOFMS.




(2) Mass resolution and mass analysis ejection efficiency is less sensitive to space charge repulsion for QIT/TOFMS than for ITMS allowing a higher ion storage capacity. The ITMS method requires that the Mathieu parameter q for each ion mass be constant for high mass resolution in the RF scan out. Space charge repulsion can broaden the apparent q value and consequently the mass resolution. For QIT/TOFMS a HV pulse out is less sensitive to space charge repulsion for the following reasons: (i) The broadening effects of the energy spread of the ions due to space charge repulsion can be minimized by increasing the drift length and TOF voltage. (ii) Broadening due to the ion energy spread can be refocused using a reflectron TOFMS. Significantly greater QIT ion capacities have been measured by us for QIT/TOFMS than reported by commercial instrument manufacturers for ITMS. A possible limitation on trap capacity may occur when using the selective ion rejection mode for ion collection because severe space charge may broaden the resonance spectrum of each ion mass. However, to the extent that unit mass resolution is not needed for resonance ejection, a higher ion capacity may be used compared to the limit value for ITMS instruments.




(3) Ion mass signals appear within significantly narrower time window for QIT/TOFMS vs ITMS (typically 50-100 nanoseconds vs about 100 microseconds, respectively), leading to potentially better signal-to-noise ratios for the former technique. A given number of ions will produce a larger peak current (or voltage) if they are detected in a shorter period of time. Narrower time bins per unit mass also lead to proportionately better noise immunity since less instrument noise is collected. However, note that chemical noise, defined as signal from ions of the same mass as the analyte, is not reduced by using narrower time bins.




The potential for operating at higher repetition rates by QIT/TOFMS vs. ITMS also offers the potential for higher detection dynamic range by the former method. The repetition rate enables control over the maximum number of ions that accumulate in the trap. Too many ions in the QIT can lead to spectral broadening and other known undesirable effects. By increasing the maximum repetition rate, the range of detectable ions per unit time is increased proportionately. This feature in addition to the greater number of ions that may be stored in the QIT using TOFMS analysis vs. mass-selective instability scanning as described earlier, leads to a potential improvement in dynamic range of about 1-2 orders of magnitude for QIT/TOFMS vs ITMS.





FIG. 7

shows QIT/TOFMS mass spectral intensities recorded for repetition rates ranging from 17 Hz to 304 Hz (residence time of 59 and 3 ms, respectively) for a sample of 5 ppm DIMP (180 molecular weight) and 9 ppm DMMP (124 molecular weight) in room air. Excellent linearity is observed over this range for all signals (97 and 139 amu are fragments of DIMP parent ion at 180 amu; DMMP is observed as a protonated ion at 125 amu, and ion clustering is observed at 249 and 263 amu). Ion molecule reactions, such as clustering and dissociation can occur in the QIT, which may be undesirable for certain applications. The extent of reaction can be tested by varying the residence or reaction time in the QIT.

FIG. 7

shows the ratio of the DIMP fragment ions at 97 and 139 amu relative to the parent ion at 180 amu. These ratios show a slight dependence, however for the typical condition of 40 Hz (25 ms residence time), the extent of reaction is not significant. The effect of ion-molecule association (clustering) is also not significant in the QIT as measured by the ratio of DMMP dimer ion to monomer ion (protonated signal 249 amu/125 amu) and to the DIMP 139 amu fragment and DMMP parent cluster (263 amu/125 amu). The ion clusters have been shown to occur in the PI source and can be minimized by reducing the PI source pressure.




While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on the broad invention, and that this invention not be limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other modifications may occur to those ordinarily skilled in the art.



Claims
  • 1. A monitor that can detect at least one trace molecule within a gas sample, comprising:a glow discharge ionizer which can ionize the trace molecule, said glow discharge ionizer operating at a pressure significantly less than atmospheric pressure; an ion trap which traps the ionized trace molecule; and, a time of flight analyzer that is coupled to said ion trap and which can detect the ionized trace molecule.
  • 2. The monitor of claim 1, wherein said ion trap applies a voltage that has a frequency to the ionized trace molecule, wherein the voltage frequency can be varied to selectively eject the ionized trace molecule into the time of flight analyzer.
  • 3. The monitor of claim 1, further comprising a pump system that pulls air from a location upstream from said glow discharge ionizer, a location upstream from said ion trap and a location upstream from said time of flight analyzer.
  • 4. The monitor of claim 1, further comprising a photoionizer that can ionize a trace molecule.
  • 5. The monitor of claim 4, further comprising an ion trap which traps the trace molecule ionized by said photoionizer.
  • 6. The monitor of claim 5, wherein said ion trap applies a voltage to the ionized trace molecule, wherein the voltage can be varied to selectively eject the ionized trace molecule into said time of flight analyzer.
  • 7. A monitor that can detect a first trace molecule and a second trace molecule within a gas sample, comprising:a glow discharge ionizer which can ionize the first trace molecule; a glow discharge mass detector that is coupled to said glow discharge ionizer and which can detect the ionized first trace molecule; a photoionizer which can ionize the second trace molecule; and a photoionizer mass detector that is coupled to said photoionizer and which can detect the ionized second trace molecule.
  • 8. The monitor of claim 7, further comprising a glow discharge ion trap that traps the ionized first trace molecule, and a photoionizer ion trap that traps the ionized second trace molecule.
  • 9. The monitor of claim 8, wherein said glow discharge ion trap and said photoionizer ion trap each apply a voltage to the ionized first and second trace molecules, respectively, wherein the voltage can be varied to selectively eject the ionized first and second trace molecules into said mass detectors.
  • 10. The monitor of claim 8, wherein said time of flight analyzer includes a coaxial detector.
  • 11. The monitor of claim 7, wherein said glow discharge mass detector and said photoionizer mass detector each include a time of flight mass analyzer.
  • 12. The monitor of claim 7, further comprising a pump that pumps out a non-ionized trace molecule.
  • 13. A monitor that can detect a first trace molecule and a second trace molecule within a gas sample, comprising:a glow discharge ionizer which can ionize the first trace molecule; a photoionizer which can ionize the second trace molecule; and a mass detector that is coupled to said glow discharge ionizer and said photoionizer and which can detect the ionized first and second trace molecules.
  • 14. The monitor of claim 13, further comprising a glow discharge ion trap that traps the ionized first trace molecule, and a photoionizer ion trap that traps the ionized second trace molecule.
  • 15. The monitor of claim 14, wherein said glow discharge ion trap and said photoionizer ion trap each apply a voltage to the ionized first and second trace molecules, respectively, wherein the voltage can be varied to selectively eject the first and second ionized trace molecules into said mass detector.
  • 16. The monitor of claim 13, wherein said mass detector includes a time of flight mass analyzer.
  • 17. The monitor of claim 13, further comprising a pump that pumps out a non-ionized trace molecule.
US Referenced Citations (22)
Number Name Date Kind
4365157 Unsold et al. Dec 1982
4540884 Stafford et al. Sep 1985
4733073 Becker et al. Mar 1988
4780608 Cross et al. Oct 1988
4849628 McLuckey et al. Jul 1989
4861988 Henion et al. Aug 1989
4931640 Marshall et al. Jun 1990
5070240 Lee et al. Dec 1991
5206594 Zipf Apr 1993
5283436 Wang Feb 1994
5393979 Hsi Feb 1995
5397895 Leone et al. Mar 1995
5504328 Bonser Apr 1996
5554846 Regiee et al. Sep 1996
5569917 Buttrill, Jr. et al. Oct 1996
5631462 Reents, Jr. May 1997
5808299 Syage Sep 1998
5854431 Linker et al. Dec 1998
5869832 Kang et al. May 1999
6011259 Whitehouse et al. Jan 2000
6040575 Whitehouse et al. Mar 2000
6140638 Tanner et al. Oct 2000
Non-Patent Literature Citations (16)
Entry
Mahon, McIlrath, Myerscough, Koopman, Third-Harmonic Generation in Argon, Krypton, and Xenon: Bandwidth Limitations in the Vicinity of Lyman-α, 1979, Eight (8) pages, vol. QE-15, IEEE.
R. Wallenstein, Generation of Narrowband Tunable VUV Radiation at the Lyman -α Wavelength, Apr. 1980, Four (4) pages, vol. 33 No. 1, Optics Communication, West Germany.
R. Hilbig and R. Wallenstein, Tunable VUV Radiation Generated by Two-Photon Resonant Frequency Mixing in Xenon, Feb. 1983, vol. QE-19, IEEE.
C. Rettner, E. Marinero, R. Zare, A. Kung, Pulsed Free Jets: Novel Nonlinear Media for Generation of Vacuum Ultrviolet and Extreme Ultrviolet Radiation, 1984, Seven (7) pages, American Chemical Society.
Roger Tembreull and David M. Lubman, Pulsed Laser Desorption of Biological Molecules in Supersonic Beam Mass Spectrometry with Resonant Two-Photon Ionization Detection, Apr. 15, 1987, Seven (7) pages, Analytical Chemistry, vol. 59, No. 8, Michigan.
E.R. Rohwer, R.C. Beavis, C. Koster, J. Lindner, J. Grotemeyer and E.W. Schlag, Fast Pulsed Laser Induced Electron Generation for Electron Impact Mass Spectrometry, Nov. 23, 1988.
Russell G. Tonkyn and Michael G. White, Compact Vacuum Ultrviolet Source for Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Mar. 20, 1989, Seven (7) pages, American Institute of Physics.
J.G. Boyle, L.D. Pfefferle, E.E. Gulcicek, S.D. Colson, Laser-driven Electron Ionization for a VUV Photoionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer, Oct. 1990, Eleven (11) pages, American Institute of Physics.
David M. Lubman, Lasers and Mass Spectrometry, 1990, Twelve (12) pages, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.
Jack A. Syage, Real-Time Detection of Chemical Ageuis Using Molecular Beam Laser Mass Spectrometry, 1990, Five (5) pages, American Chemical Society.
R. Frey, A. Holle, H. Betzold, W. Ulke, U. Boest, Real-Time Vehicle Exhaust Analysis Using a Laser TOF Mass Spectrometer, 1992, Two (2) pages.
Steven M. Michael, Mingta Chien and David M. Lubman, An Ion Trap Storage/Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer, Jun. 17, 1992, Four (4) pages, American Institute of Physiscs, Michigan.
P.Y.Cheng and H.L. Dai, A Photoemitted Electron-Impact Ionization Method for Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometers, May 12, 1993, Four (4) pages, American Institute of Physics.
U. Boesl, R. Weinkauf, C. Weickhardt, E.W. Schlag, Laser Ion Sources for Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry, Thirty-Eight (38) pages, Sep. 14, 1993.
Dale R. Nesselrodt and Tomas Baer, Cyclic Ketone Mixture Analysis Using 2+1 Resonance-Enhanced Multiphoton Ionization Mass Spectrometry, Aug. 1, 1994, Eight (8) pages, vol. 66, No. 15, Analytical Chemistry.
Mark G. Qian and David M. Lubman, A Marriage made in MS, Apr. 1, 1995, Four (4) pages, vol. 67, No. 7, Analytical Chemistry.