The present invention pertains to methods of resputtering layers of material on a partially fabricated integrated circuit. The methods are particularly useful for resputtering diffusion barrier layers and copper seed layers. The methods can also be applied for resputter etch back of other wafer materials, such as conductive lines.
Miniaturization of integrated circuit (IC) devices demands superior electrical properties from both dielectric and conductive materials used in the manufacturing of an integrated circuit. Traditionally used materials, such as aluminum as a conductor and silicon dioxide as an insulator no longer provide adequate electrical characteristics at the modern level of miniaturization. Therefore, the manufacturers of IC devices are now employing new dielectric materials with lower dielectric constant than silicon dioxide and are increasingly turning to copper as a conductor, due to its low resistivity. The low-k dielectric materials used in the IC device processing include carbon doped silicon dioxide, hydrogenated silicon oxycarbides (SiCOH), fluorine doped silicon dioxide, and organic-containing low-k dielectrics. These materials, due to their low dielectric constants, provide low parasitic capacitance and minimize the “crosstalk” between the interconnects in an integrated circuit. At the same time, they are often porous foam-like materials and are generally more easily damaged during the processing steps than silicon dioxide. The impact of high-energy ions during such processing steps as PVD often results in undesired etching and microtrenching in the low-k dielectric layer. This problem is usually less pronounced when silicon dioxide is used.
The use of copper as a conductor, in addition to an obvious benefit of better conductive properties, also gives rise to several problems which are obviated by using a different processing technique than one traditionally employed with aluminum. One of these problems is a facile diffusion of copper into the adjacent dielectric layer. This diffusion results in a degradation of the insulating properties of a dielectric even at very low concentrations. This problem is solved by using a diffusion barrier layer between copper lines and a dielectric. Another problem in processing copper-containing ICs is that copper is not amenable to patterning by plasma etching. This can be obviated by using Damascene processing, a method which requires fewer processing steps than other methods and offers a higher yield.
Damascene processing is a method for forming interconnections on integrated circuits. It involves formation of inlaid metal lines in trenches and vias formed in a dielectric layer (inter-metal dielectric). In order to frame the context of this invention, a brief description of a copper dual Damascene process for forming a partially fabricated integrated circuit is described below. Note that the invention applies to other fabrication processes including single Damascene processes.
Presented in
As depicted in
The process follows, as depicted in
The dual Damascene process continues, as depicted in
Next, as depicted in
After diffusion barrier 123 is deposited, a seed layer of copper is applied (typically a PVD process) to enable subsequent electrofilling of the features with copper inlay.
Copper routes 125 and 107 are now in electrical contact and form conductive pathways, as they are separated only by diffusion barrier 123, which is also somewhat conductive. Traditionally these diffusion barriers are deposited using PVD methods because of the high quality resultant films. However, when depositing in features with higher aspect ratios such as the narrow vias within modern technologies, PVD methods tend to produce films with poor sidewall coverage and thick bottom coverage.
Therefore there is a need for a method that would remove some of the barrier layer from the via bottom and would increase the coverage of the via sidewalls. It is also sometimes desirable to remove all of the barrier layer from the via bottom, and even etch out some of the underlying copper layer, while maintaining the sidewall coverage. Ideally, this method should be selective for the via bottom region, and should not affect the trenches. However, good selectivity cannot be achieved in currently available methods. Therefore it is preferable, that any such method employed should cause the least possible damage in the trenches, while removing the material from the via bottom.
The present invention pertains to iPVD-based methods of resputtering material from the wafer surface. It significantly improves several characteristics of the resputter process used for removal and redistribution of diffusion barrier layers or conductive layers of the wafer. The invention provides process conditions which minimize the damage to the dielectric layer during resputtering. The invention allows considerable etching of the diffusion barrier material at the via bottom, while not damaging exposed dielectric elsewhere on the wafer. Specifically, it provides a solution for the dielectric microtrenching problem occurring during conventional resputter process. Furthermore, the invention increases the etch rate to deposition rate (E/D) ratio, which is desirable during resputter because it improves the effectiveness of the etch back. Still further, the etch back nonuniformity (EBNU) is greatly improved by the methods of this invention. Improvement of EBNU results in better overall reliability of the IC device. In general, this invention provides IC devices with higher reliability and decreases wafer manufacturing costs.
The present invention pertains to various methods for resputtering layers of material on the semiconductor wafer surface having recessed features, such as vias and trenches. In one embodiment the method of this invention comprises at least a step of resputtering the material at a pressure of at least 10 mTorr. This method may be performed in an apparatus that does not include inductively coupled plasma source. Such apparatus may include a process chamber having a planar or hollow target.
In certain embodiments the method of this invention involves at least two operations. The first operation deposits material, such as diffusion barrier material or copper seed layer, on a wafer surface. The second operation resputters the deposited material at a pressure of at least 10 mTorr. In this embodiment the resputter step is performed in an apparatus without using an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) source. The deposition process may be performed by sputtering the material using iPVD. Other deposition techniques, such as ALD or CVD may also be used. The deposited layer usually has low uniformity, with over-accumulation of material in the bottom of the vias and insufficient coverage of via sidewalls. This presents a particular problem for diffusion barrier layer formation, since continuous thin layers of barrier material are universally preferred in the industry. The barrier layer materials, such as Ta, TaNx, Ti, TiNX, W, WNx, Co and Ru have only moderate conductivity, and accumulation of these materials in the via bottom decreases conductivity of the via pathway. Insufficient coverage of sidewalls causes reliability problems due to increased diffusion of copper into the adjacent dielectric layer. The uniformity of the coverage is ameliorated by the resputtering step in which material is resputtered from the via bottom onto the via sidewalls. Resputtering may also be used for resputter etching of the copper lines underlying the via (sometimes referred to as “anchoring”).
The deposition and/or resputter steps may be performed in a suitable iPVD apparatus such as hollow cathode magnetron (HCM) or a planar magnetron. In a separate embodiment, the methods of this invention can be practiced in a planar or hollow magnetron employing an ICP source. In this case the deposited material is resputtered under pressure of about 50 to 100 mTorr, and preferably of about 60 to 90 mTorr.
In a preferred embodiment of this invention both deposition and resputter steps are performed in the same process chamber. The deposition and resputter steps can be repeated as many times as necessary to achieve the desired uniformity of the barrier layer coverage.
In one embodiment of this invention the recessed features are formed in a low-k dielectric layer. Low-k dielectrics are particularly prone to microtrenching during resputter. The method of present invention provides resputter conditions which practically eliminate microtrenching in a dielectric. Resputtering the barrier layer at a pressure of about 30-100 mTorr and more preferably 50-70 mTorr results in the IC structures essentially free of microtrenches. These pressure ranges also increase etch rate to deposition rate ratio (E/D) and decrease etch back nonuniformity (EBNU).
The present invention also encompasses an apparatus which can be used for deposition and resputtering steps. In one embodiment this apparatus does not make use of inductively coupled plasma (ICP). Such an apparatus, in addition to a process chamber having a target for sputtering the material onto the semiconductor wafer and a wafer support for holding the wafer in position during deposition of the material, has a controller with program instructions for the deposition step and for the resputter step. The instructions specify a pressure of at least 10 mTorr for the resputter step and may also include other pressure ranges such as a range from about 30 to 100 mTorr, and from about 50 to 70 mTorr. The instructions can also be used for generating a plasma comprising ionized material sputtered from the target. The target is usually composed of the metal to be deposited, which may be a metal used in formation of a diffusion barrier layer or a seed layer metal. The instructions can also specify that the deposition and resputter steps may be repeated as many times as requested by the operator. Examples of such an apparatus include an HCM and a planar magnetron.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be described in more detail below with reference to the associated drawings.
The etch-back of the barrier layer can be accomplished by a technique known as the resputter process. As explained below, resputtering may take place in the same chamber as the iPVD process and employ similar process conditions, but without significant deposition. In this process ionic species are directed towards the wafer and upon collision with the wafer surface, resputtering of the wafer material occurs. The ions are usually formed by ionization of the process gas in the iPVD magnetron chamber. However, the plasma conditions are controlled so that the gas ions do not significantly contact the target. Nevertheless, in some embodiments of this invention there may be a component of ionized metal in addition to ionized gas resputtering wafer material. Commonly employed process gases are inert gases such as argon and krypton and their mixtures with nitrogen. The resputtering process is typically carried out at temperatures of up to 500° C. The traditionally used pressure for resputtering is less than 10 mTorr, preferably from 2 to 5 mTorr.
The resputtering process is most often used for resputtering of the diffusion barrier layer, but can also be employed in the etch-back or redistribution of other wafer materials such as conductive metal layers; e.g., copper seed layers. Diffusion barrier materials commonly subjected to resputtering include but are not limited to tantalum, titanium, tungsten, ruthenium, cobalt, solid solutions of these metals and nitrogen and binary nitrides (e.g. TaNx, TiNx, WNx). Copper is also a commonly resputtered material.
In high aspect ratio recesses resputter leads to removal of some or all of the barrier layer at the bottom of the recess, while covering the sidewalls of the recess with the resputtered material. This can be advantageous because sidewalls are sometimes insufficiently covered during the basic PVD or iPVD process.
The effect of resputter in the field and in the trenches is less pronounced than in the via bottom. The usual result of resputtering in the field and in the trenches is the etch-back of the field and trench material which is normally less than the etch-back occurring in the via bottom. It is of course possible to achieve considerable etching of material in the trenches and in the field during resputter when the via bottom is etched by resputter to an even greater degree. While the term “resputtering” includes a wide range of possible deposition conditions, it is generally understood to imply that a net etching or removal of material occurs at the bottom of a recess being resputtered (e.g. a via and/or trench). Whether or not there is a net etch or deposition at other regions of the workpiece does not change the fact that resputtering is taking place.
Redistribution of the barrier material from the via bottom to the via sidewalls serves two purposes. First, it decreases the resistance at the via bottom by removing the excess of the barrier layer which is usually composed of only moderately conductive material. Ideally, resistance at the via bottom should be minimized to allow flow of the current from the underlying copper lines into the via after it is filled with copper or other conductive material. Secondly, it provides sufficiently thick coverage of the via sidewalls with the barrier layer, thus addressing reliability issues such as stress migration and electromigration resistance. In general, the resputtering process is not limited to barrier layer redistribution or etch back and can be applied to other wafer materials.
An important characteristic of iPVD processes is the etch rate to deposition rate ratio (E/D). It should be understood, that both etching and depositing processes are occurring simultaneously during iPVD and resputter. Etching is the result of inert gas ions bombarding the wafer, while deposition is the result of inert gas ions bombarding the target, and sputtering target material (neutral or ionic) onto the wafer surface. In some embodiments of this invention, ionized metal may be used together with ionized gas for resputtering of wafer materials. The etch and deposition processes can be controlled by modulating the power at the target and at the wafer pedestal. For example, to achieve high E/D ratio needed for resputter, the power at the target is decreased while the power at the wafer pedestal (bias) is increased. This results in inert gas ions being directed not to the target but to the wafer, leading to etching of the wafer layer (resputter). Commonly employed DC target power for the resputter process is 1-8 kW, preferably 1-6 kW. The bias power for resputtering can range from about 100 to about 3000 W, preferably from about 600 to about 1500 W, and even more preferably from about 900 to about 1200 W. Conversely, if the power at the target is increased and the bias at the wafer is decreased or turned off, the inert gas ions are directed towards the target, leading to deposition of the target material on the wafer. The DC target power used for deposition step ranges from 10 to 60 kW, preferably 20-35 kW, and more preferably 20-30 kW. The bias power during deposition can range from about 0 to about 3000 W, more preferably from about 500 to about 1200 W.
At the E/D ratio of 1 no net deposition or etching is occurring. At the E/D ratio of 0, the process is entirely depositing. At E/D ratios of more than 1 etching predominates, this being characteristic of resputter. The E/D ratio is not necessarily the same in different features of the wafer. For example, the E/D ratio in the field, in the trench, and in the via may have different values. These values usually correlate with the aspect ratio of the feature, being the largest in the highest aspect ratio recesses and decreasing as the aspect ratio decreases. Therefore, it is possible to have net deposition in the field region (E/D<1) and net etch at the via bottom (E/D>1). The resputter process can be defined as an iPVD-based method which provides an E/D>1 in the bottom of the feature or features where resputtering is desired, e.g. the lowest lying feature on the wafer or in some cases the feature having the highest aspect ratio. Commonly, E/D ratio during resputter can reach values of up to about 1.5. This E/D ratio can be increased by modulation of process parameters such as magnetic field to about 4.
As the etching and depositing rates can be easily modulated by adjusting the power of the target and the bias, it is natural that both the deposition and resputter steps can be carried out in the same process chamber. Moreover, since it is often desirable to increase the conformity of barrier layer coverage on the wafer by applying several cycles of deposition and resputter steps, some or all of these cycles can be accomplished in the same chamber.
One example of a sequence of depositing and resputtering steps is illustrated in
Resputtering process is now used for redistribution of barrier material and for etching of the conductive lines. The present invention improves several important characteristics of the resputter process—an etch rate to deposition rate ratio (E/D) and etch-back nonuniformity (EBNU). It also addresses the microtrenching problem, which is discussed below.
It is often desirable to use resputter for etching through the via into the underlying copper line. The sequence of wafer processing steps resulting in such punch-through etching is depicted in
The exposed top dielectric layer is then subjected to a diffusion barrier deposition step resulting in the structure shown in
When resputtering is performed further, it etches material of the copper line residing below the via leading to formation of a cavity in the conductive line, known as an anchor. The structure with an anchor 513 is shown in
Microtrenches are viewed as undesired features in IC devices since they may contribute to level-to-level current leakage and decrease the reliability of the integrated circuit. Referring to
In a preferred embodiment of the invention the resputter step is performed at a pressure of at least 10 mTorr or higher (“high pressure resputter”). It is preferably performed in the pressure range of about 30-100 mTorr and more preferably in the range of about 50-70 mTorr. When wafer layers undergo resputtering at these pressure ranges, the damage to dielectric layer is minimal and microtrenching is reduced or eliminated. This is illustrated in
Performing resputter process at higher pressure also results in an increased E/D ratio. This is a valuable characteristic, since deposition of neutral target material is usually not desired during resputter. At conventionally used pressures of less than 10 mTorr, the E/D ratio reaches the values of up to 1.5, which can be further increased to about 4 by modulation of magnetic field during low-pressure resputtering. High pressure resputter allows achieving E/D ratio of between 4 and 5 without large changes to magnetic field or other parameters of the process. The effect of high pressure on E/D ratio is due to a decrease in the deposition rate. This decrease is believed to occur because neutral material from the target is increasingly sputtered onto the apparatus shields rather than on the wafer due to increased amount of collisions with the argon gas. This leads to an overall decrease in deposition of neutral material on the wafer.
At the pressure ranges noted, there is wide latitude in tailoring other process conditions for the device application and the deposition chamber. In certain embodiments, the wafer is maintained at a temperature of between about −50 and 600° C., or more preferably between about −40 and −20° C. The temperature of the wafer can be controlled, for example, by setting the wafer chuck, such as electrostatic bipolar chuck, to maintain an appropriate temperature at the wafer. The flow rate of process gases will depend on the chamber design and configuration. In a typical case, argon and/or krypton is provided to an HCM chamber at a flow rate of between about 10 and 300 sccm, more preferably between about 100 and 200 sccm. In certain embodiments, particularly those involving deposition of nitride barrier layers, nitrogen may be provided to the chamber during the deposition step. During deposition, argon and nitrogen can be provided to the reactor at different ratios. The argon to nitrogen ratios may range from about 0.5:1 to about 20:1, preferably from about 0.8:1 to about 10:1. In specific examples, 1:1 and 10:1 ratios have been used. Ranges of appropriate bias power and power applied to the target are identified above.
Finally, it should be understood that there may be embodiments where the pressure is intentionally varied over a defined range during the resputtering and/or deposition operations. Also, in some embodiments, one pressure is used during deposition and a different pressure is used during resputter.
While the present invention can be practiced in many different types of apparatus, two main types of iPVD apparatus, hollow cathode magnetron (HCM) and planar magnetron, will now be briefly described. Hollow cathode magnetron is an apparatus carrying a three-dimensional sputter target. The present invention is not limited to a specific cup-like geometry of an HCM target and can be used in conjunction with three-dimensional targets of a plurality of shapes.
An inert gas, such as argon, is introduced through a gas inlet 613 into the hollow region of the cathode target 607 powered by a DC source to form a plasma. The pump 615 is positioned to evacuate or partially evacuate the process chamber. The control of pressure in the process chamber can be achieved by using a combination of gas flow rate adjustments and pumping speed adjustments, making use of, for example, a throttle valve or a baffle plate. Alternatively, pressure above the wafer can be controlled by varying the height of the wafer pedestal 603. At an increased pedestal height, slower gas flow results in a higher pressure above the wafer. An intense magnetic field is produced by electromagnets 605a-605b within the cathode target region. Additional electromagnets 605c are arranged downstream of the cathode target so that different currents can be applied to each electromagnet, thereby producing an ion flux and a controlled deposition and/or etch rate and uniformity. A floating shield 609, existing in equilibrium with the floating plasma potential, is used, in conjunction with the source electromagnets to shape the plasma distribution at the target mouth. A stream of ions is directed to the surface of the wafer, as shown by arrows on
In certain embodiments, a system controller 611 is employed to control process conditions during deposition and resputter, insert and remove wafers, etc. The controller will typically include one or more memory devices and one or more processors. The processor may include a CPU or computer, analog and/or digital input/output connections, stepper motor controller boards, etc.
In certain embodiments, the controller controls all of the activities of the deposition apparatus. The system controller executes system control software including sets of instructions for controlling the timing, mixture of gases, chamber pressure, chamber temperature, wafer temperature, RF power levels, wafer chuck or susceptor position, and other parameters of a particular process. Other computer programs stored on memory devices associated with the controller may be employed in some embodiments.
Typically there will be a user interface associated with controller 611. The user interface may include a display screen, graphical software displays of the apparatus and/or process conditions, and user input devices such as pointing devices, keyboards, touch screens, microphones, etc.
The computer program code for controlling the deposition and resputtering processes can be written in any conventional computer readable programming language: for example, assembly language, C, C++, Pascal, Fortran or others. Compiled object code or script is executed by the processor to perform the tasks identified in the program.
The controller parameters relate to process conditions such as, for example, process gas composition and flow rates, temperature, pressure, plasma conditions such as RF power levels and the low frequency RF frequency, cooling gas pressure, and chamber wall temperature. These parameters are provided to the user in the form of a recipe, and may be entered utilizing the user interface.
Signals for monitoring the process may be provided by analog and/or digital input connections of the system controller. The signals for controlling the process are output on the analog and digital output connections of the deposition apparatus.
The system software may be designed or configured in many different ways. For example, various chamber component subroutines or control objects may be written to control operation of the chamber components necessary to carry out the inventive deposition processes. Examples of programs or sections of programs for this purpose include substrate positioning code, process gas control code, pressure control code, heater control code, and plasma control code.
A substrate positioning program may include program code for controlling chamber components that are used to load the substrate onto a pedestal or chuck and to control the spacing between the substrate and other parts of the chamber such as a gas inlet and/or target. A process gas control program may include code for controlling gas composition and flow rates and optionally for flowing gas into the chamber prior to deposition in order to stabilize the pressure in the chamber. A pressure control program may include code for controlling the pressure in the chamber by regulating, e.g., a throttle valve in the exhaust system of the chamber. A heater control program may include code for controlling the current to a heating unit that is used to heat the substrate. Alternatively, the heater control program may control delivery of a heat transfer gas such as helium to the wafer chuck. A plasma control program may include code for setting RF power levels applied to the process electrodes at the target and the wafer chuck.
Examples of chamber sensors that may be monitored during deposition and/or resputtering include mass flow controllers, pressure sensors such as manometers, and thermocouples located in pedestal or chuck. Appropriately programmed feedback and control algorithms may be used with data from these sensors to maintain desired process conditions.
The methods of present invention have been evaluated experimentally.
The third important advantage of high pressure resputter is the improvement of etch-back nonuniformity (EBNU) as illustrated in
In a specific example, a tantalum barrier layer is deposited on a wafer, and is then resputtered with argon ions at a pressure of 65 mTorr. Argon gas is introduced into the process chamber at a flow rate of 700 sccm. A 6 kW DC current is applied to the tantalum target, and a 1.2 kW RF bias is applied to the wafer ESC chuck. The temperature of the ESC chuck is set to −10° C. These conditions are presented as an example of a high-pressure resputter process suitable for reducing microtrenching and etch-back non-uniformity.
Although various details have been omitted for clarity's sake, various design alternatives may be implemented. Therefore, the present examples are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part claiming priority under 35 USC 120 from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/804,353 filed Mar. 18, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,186,648), titled “Barrier First Method For Single Damascene Trench Applications,” naming Rozbicki et al. as inventors, which is a continuation-in-part claiming priority under 35 USC 120 from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/412,562 filed Apr. 11, 2003 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,764,940), which is a continuation-in-part claiming priority under 35 USC 120 from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/965,472 filed Sep. 26, 2001 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,607,977), which claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/275,803 filed Mar. 13, 2001. U.S. Pat. No. 6,764,940 also claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/379,874 filed May 10, 2002. Each of these references is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3763031 | Scow et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3767551 | Lang et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
4058430 | Suntola et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4492620 | Matsuo et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4588490 | Cuomo et al. | May 1986 | A |
4604180 | Hirukawa et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4609903 | Toyokura et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4622121 | Wegmann et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4737384 | Murthy et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4874493 | Pan | Oct 1989 | A |
4963524 | Yamazaki | Oct 1990 | A |
4999096 | Nihei et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5009963 | Ohmi et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5084412 | Nakasaki | Jan 1992 | A |
5126028 | Hurwitt et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5139825 | Gordon et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5178739 | Barnes et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5194398 | Miyachi et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5221449 | Colgan et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5281485 | Colgan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5298091 | Edwards, III et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5378506 | Imai et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5482611 | Helmer et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5622608 | Lanford et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629221 | Chao et al. | May 1997 | A |
5654233 | Yu | Aug 1997 | A |
5656860 | Lee | Aug 1997 | A |
5766379 | Lanford et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5789027 | Watkins et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801089 | Kenney | Sep 1998 | A |
5904565 | Nguyen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5948215 | Lantsman | Sep 1999 | A |
5962923 | Xu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969422 | Ting et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5985762 | Geffken et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6037257 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046108 | Liu et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6074544 | Reid et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077403 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077780 | Dubin | Jun 2000 | A |
6080285 | Liu et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093966 | Venkatraman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099702 | Reid et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100200 | Van Buskirk et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110346 | Reid et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114238 | Liao | Sep 2000 | A |
6120641 | Stevens et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124203 | Joo et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126798 | Reid et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139712 | Patton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147000 | You et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156167 | Patton et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159354 | Contolini et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159857 | Liu et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162344 | Reid et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179973 | Lai et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179983 | Reid et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193854 | Lai et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200893 | Sneh | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203613 | Gates et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217716 | Fai Lai | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221757 | Schmidbauer et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228754 | Iacoponi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235163 | Angelo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249055 | Dubin | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251242 | Fu et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6271591 | Dubin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6274008 | Gopalraja et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277249 | Gopalraja et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280597 | Kashiwada et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287977 | Hashim et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6333547 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6340435 | Bjorkman et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342133 | D'Couto et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6342448 | Lin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6350353 | Gopalraja et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6358376 | Wang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6387805 | Ding et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6391785 | Satta et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395642 | Liu et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402907 | Rich | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417094 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440854 | Rozbicki | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448176 | Grill et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451177 | Gopalraja et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6492262 | Uzoh | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6498091 | Chen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500762 | Hashim et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6509267 | Woo et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6538324 | Tagami et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6541374 | de Felipe et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554914 | Rozbicki et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559061 | Hashim et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6562715 | Chen et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6566246 | de Felipe et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6589887 | Dalton et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605534 | Chung et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607977 | Rozbicki et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607982 | Powell et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613199 | Tobin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624066 | Lu et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6642146 | Rozbicki et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652718 | D'Couto et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656841 | Kim | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6660622 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673716 | D'Couto et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6706155 | Morimoto et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709557 | Kailasam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709987 | Hashim et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6755945 | Yasar et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758947 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764940 | Rozbicki et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6784096 | Chen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790776 | Ding et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6841044 | Ruzic | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6893541 | Chiang et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6905965 | Subrahmanyan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6919275 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6943111 | Lin et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949457 | Fiordalice et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6969448 | Lau | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6992012 | Haskim et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7030031 | Wille et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037830 | Rumer et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7048837 | Somekh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7074714 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7135402 | Lin et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7186648 | Rozbicki et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7253109 | Ding et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7294574 | Ding et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7365001 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20010039113 | Blalock et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020000382 | Morrissey et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020041028 | Choi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020110999 | Lu et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030034244 | Yasar et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030116427 | Ding et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030129828 | Cohen | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040048461 | Chen | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040171250 | Chiang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188239 | Robison et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040211661 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224507 | Marieb et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050006222 | Ding et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020080 | Chiang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050032382 | Rossman | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050085068 | Chiang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085070 | Park | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050103620 | Chistyakov | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110147 | Wu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050173239 | Somekh et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186793 | Omoto et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050211545 | Cerio, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050252765 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255690 | Chen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255691 | Ding et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255700 | Gopalraja et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050266682 | Chen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050272254 | Ding et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060014378 | Aggrawal et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024953 | Rao et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030151 | Ding et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060057843 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060207873 | Fu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070020922 | Chiang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070178682 | Chiang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070193982 | Brown et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080190760 | Tang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080310005 | Tonar et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 692 551 | Jan 1996 | EP |
11-186273 | Sep 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60275803 | Mar 2001 | US | |
60379874 | May 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10804353 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 11588586 | US | |
Parent | 10412562 | Apr 2003 | US |
Child | 10804353 | US | |
Parent | 09965472 | Sep 2001 | US |
Child | 10412562 | US |