The present invention relates in general to metallization or thin film coating of optical surfaces in micro-optical bench devices, and in particular to the fabrication of a shadow mask providing selective step coverage of optical surfaces of micro-fabricated structures within micro-optical bench devices.
Deeply etched micro-optical benches are typically formed using a Deep Reactive Ion Etching (DRIE) process on Silicon On Insulator (SOI) wafers in order to produce micro-optical and Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) components that are able to process free-space optical beams propagating parallel to the SOI substrate. Conventionally, a one-level shadow mask is used to provide step coverage and selective metallization or thin film coating of optical surfaces within deeply etched micro-optical benches.
However, protection of nearby optical surfaces from thin film coating requires separating the coated and non-coated surfaces by a sufficient distance to avoid inadvertent coating of non-coated surfaces. Therefore, the optical propagation distance within micro-optical bench devices is limited to the design rules of the shadow mask.
Lm=M+(h+D2)tan θm (Equation 1)
where M, h and D2 are the misalignment margin, the SOI device layer height and the shadow mask thickness, respectively.
To protect an opposite micro-optical surface (e.g., surface 160) from being metallized, a protection distance Lp from the metallization opening is required. The protection distance is directly proportional to the metallization opening width and device layer height, and is given by:
Where D1 is the thickness of the shadow mask excluding recessed part above the SOI wafer. Thus, the total distance between a metallized surface 150 and a protected surface 160 is given by:
From the above equations, it can be deduced that increasing the device layer height, which may be required for better optical coupling efficiency, directly affects the minimum optical propagation distance that can be achieved using a one-level shadow mask for metallization or thin film coating of vertical micro-optical surfaces. On the other hand, increasing the thickness of the one-level shadow mask increases the required metallization opening, while at the same time reduces the protection distance.
Therefore, what is needed is a shadow mask designed to provide selective step coverage of micro-fabricated structures within a micro-optical bench device with minimal protection distance between optical surfaces.
Various aspects of the present disclosure provide a shadow mask for use in selectively coating micro-fabricated structures within a micro-optical bench device. The shadow mask includes a first opening within a top surface of the shadow mask and a second opening within a bottom surface of the shadow mask. The second opening is aligned with the first opening and has a second width less than a first width of the first opening. An overlap between the first opening and the second opening forms a hole within the shadow mask through which selective coating of micro-fabricated structures within the micro-optical bench device may occur.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be obtained by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
In accordance with aspects of the present disclosure, selective metallization or thin film coating of optical surfaces of micro-fabricated structures within micro-optical bench devices is performed using two or more levels of openings in a shadow mask, placed above the micro-optical bench device. The multi-level shadow mask enables forming optical mirrors in Silicon-On-Insulator SOI wafers with smaller bench foot print (i.e., reduced optical propagation distance) and controlled thin film coating of the micro-optical components inside the micro-optical bench device. The size and shape of the top level shadow mask openings are used to control the profile and thickness of the deposited thin film. The second level shadow mask openings are used to control the spread of the deposition and to protect the surfaces that are not to be coated. The multi-level shadow mask may further improve the uniformity of coating from one optical surface to another inside a single micro-optical bench device and across a wafer containing multiple micro-optical bench devices before singulation of the wafer.
The shadow mask 200 may be, for example, formed of a silicon (Si) substrate or other type of substrate (e.g., plastic, glass, etc.) that has a top surface 202 and a bottom surface 206. The multiple levels of the shadow mask 200 are formed using two or more openings therein. For example, as shown in
A recessed portion 206 of the shadow mask 200 provides a gap between the shadow mask 200 and the moving/fragile micro-fabricated structures 282 and 292 within the micro-optical bench device 270. By having different widths for the first and second opening 205 and 210, a protection lip 220 may be formed within the shadow mask 200, in which the width of the protection lip 220 corresponds to a difference between the first width Lm of the first opening 205 and the second width Lmb of the second opening 210. The protection lip 220 enables protection of a surface 290 during deposition of the coating material (i.e., metal layer) on an opposing surface 280.
As can be seen in
The different levels are designed to expose some optical surfaces (e.g., surface 280), while at the same time protect other optical surfaces (e.g, surface 290) within the micro-optical bench device 270. Thus, these levels represent the control parameters for selective metallization or thin film coating of the micro-optical bench device 270. By optimizing these levels, smaller micro-fabricated structures 282 and 292 with shorter optical propagation distances therebetween can be achieved. In addition, optimization of the levels may further control the optical quality of the micro-mirrors and optical interfaces within the micro-optical bench device 170. Consequently, the multi-level shadow mask 200 enhances the optical efficiency of the micro-optical bench device 170.
In an aspect of the disclosure, the distance between a surface to be metallized/coated (e.g., surface 280) and a surface to be protected from metallization/thin film coating (e.g., surface 390) may be minimized by controlling the shadow mask levels. For example, the width of the top level opening 205 may be the same as that shown in
In addition, the total distance Lt between the metallized surface 280 and the protected surface 290 may be given by:
Using a shadow mask thickness twice as large as the conventional shadow mask thickness D0, such that D2=2D0, and using D3=D0/2, the total optical propagation distance (Lt) may be reduced to half of the value when using the conventional shadow mask. Further reduction may also be achieved by further increases in D2 and/or decreases in D3.
The thickness and profile of the coating material 285 (i.e., metal layer) deposited on the optical surface 280 may be controlled by the sputtering time and the top opening width Lm, while the spread of the metal on the substrate (≈Lt) may be controlled by the bottom opening width Lmb, which is given by:
Lmb=M+(h+D3+D2−D1)tan θm (Equation 6)
Thus, the sputtered metal thickness profile and maximum thickness value may be controlled by the shadow mask opening shape and profile, respectively, as shown in
Referring now to
The widths of the bottom level openings 210a and 210b may be the same or different. For example, the widths of the bottom level openings 210a and 210b may be selected to provide protection to other surfaces 290a and 290b within the micro-optical bench device 270 during deposition of the coating material 285 on coated surfaces 280a and 280b.
Referring now to
Referring now to
For example, one sub-opening (e.g., sub-opening 210a) may be designed to minimize the opening size in the direction connecting the micro-mirror surface 280 to be metallized and the interface surface 290 to be protected. Another sub-opening (e.g., sub-opening 210b) may be designed to maximize the opening in a tilted direction with respect to the line connecting the micro-mirror surface 280 and the interface surface 290. Thus, as can be seen in
An example of a spectrometer including an interferometer that may be fabricated as a micro-optical bench device is shown in
In one example, the MEMS actuator 1150 is formed of a comb drive and spring. By applying a voltage to the comb drive, a potential difference results across the actuator 1150, which induces a capacitance therein, causing a driving force to be generated as well as a restoring force from the spring, thereby causing a displacement of moveable mirror 1140 to the desired position for reflection of the beam L2. An optical path length difference (OPD) is then created between the reflected beams that is substantially equal to twice the mirror 1140 displacement.
The reflected beams interfere at the beam splitter 1120, allowing the temporal coherence of the light to be measured at each different Optical Path Difference (OPD) offered by the moving mirror. The signal, called the interferogram, is measured by a detector 1160 at many discrete positions of the moving mirror. The spectrum may then be retrieved, for example, using a Fourier transform carried out by a processor 1170.
The processor 1170 may be a single processing device or a plurality of processing devices. Such a processing device may be a microprocessor, micro-controller, digital signal processor, microcomputer, central processing unit, field programmable gate array, programmable logic device, logic circuitry, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or any device that manipulates signals (analog and/or digital) based on hard coding of the circuitry and/or operational instructions. The processor 1170 may have an associated memory and/or memory element, which may be a single memory device, a plurality of memory devices, and/or embedded circuitry of the processor. Such a memory device may be a read-only memory, random access memory, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, static memory, dynamic memory, flash memory, cache memory, and/or any device that stores digital information.
At block 1230, the shadow mask is placed on the substrate in a position to enable a surface of a micro-fabricated structure to be coated through the hole. In particular, the bottom surface of the shadow mask is placed adjacent to a top surface of the substrate and the micro-fabricated structure surface to be coated is aligned with the hole. At block 1240, a coating material, such as a metal layer, is deposited on the surface of the micro-fabricated structure through the hole.
In
As will be recognized by those skilled in the art, the innovative concepts described in the present application can be modified and varied over a wide range of applications. Accordingly, the scope of patents subject matter should not be limited to any of the specific exemplary teachings discussed, but is instead defined by the following claims.
The present Application for Patent is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/047,032 filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Feb. 18, 2016, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth below in its entirety and for all applicable purposes. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/047,032 claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/119,065, entitled “Selective Step Coverage for Micro-Fabricated Structures,”, filed Feb. 20, 2015, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth below in its entirety and for all applicable purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5853805 | Mizuguchi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6884327 | Pan et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7268406 | Yotsuya et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7796267 | Saadany et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
9365923 | Ochi et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
20060021869 | Brody | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070042527 | Tuckeerman et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20130100424 | Sabry et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130299345 | Abarra et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140020628 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140220715 | Kang | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150068455 | Lee et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150259779 | Ma et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150361546 | Ochi et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1713342 | Dec 2005 | CN |
1834282 | Sep 2006 | CN |
203999787 | Dec 2014 | CN |
57076842 | May 1982 | JP |
201439352 | Oct 2014 | TW |
WO-2008132777 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
TW 480572 A (Derwent Abstract) (Year: 2002). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US16/18802 dated May 4, 2016; 10 pages. |
Second Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201680011162.2 dated Apr. 23, 2020, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200130006 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62119065 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15047032 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 16730947 | US |