Semiconductor structure with reduced junction leakage and method of fabrication thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9105711
  • Patent Number
    9,105,711
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 19, 2013
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 11, 2015
    8 years ago
Abstract
A semiconductor structure is formed with a NFET device and a PFET device. The NFET device is formed by masking the PFET device regions of a substrate, forming a screen layer through epitaxial growth and in-situ doping, and forming an undoped channel layer on the screen layer through epitaxial growth. The PFET device is similarly formed by masking the NFET regions of a substrate, forming a screen layer through epitaxial growth and in-situ doping, and forming an undoped channel layer on the screen layer through epitaxial growth. An isolation region is formed between the NFET and the PFET device areas to remove any facets occurring during the separate epitaxial growth phases. By forming the screen layer through in-situ doped epitaxial growth, a reduction in junction leakage is achieved versus forming the screen layer using ion implantation.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates in general to semiconductor devices and processing and more particularly to a semiconductor structure with reduced junction leakage and method of fabrication thereof.


BACKGROUND

Cost effective electronic manufacturing requires transistor structures and manufacturing processes that are reliable at nanometer scales and that do not require expensive or unavailable tools or process control conditions. While it is difficult to balance the many variables that control transistor electrical performance, finding suitable transistor dopant structures and manufacturing techniques that result in acceptable electrical characteristics such as junction leakage and threshold voltage levels are a key aspect of such commercially useful transistors.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts, in which;



FIGS. 1A-1H illustrate a process flow for fabricating a semiconductor structure with reduced junction leakage;



FIGS. 2A and 2B compare the band to band generation rate at the channel to the drain junction between an implanted screen layer embodiment versus an in-situ grown screen layer embodiment;



FIG. 3 illustrates a dopant concentration level comparison between an implanted screen layer and an in-situ grown screen layer;



FIG. 4 illustrates differences in junction leakage between implanted and in-situ grown screen layers.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIGS. 1A-1H show a process flow for fabricating a semiconductor structure 100 with reduced junction leakage. The process will fabricate two field effect transistor (FET) devices, a NFET 102 and a PFET 104. The process begins in FIG. 1A where a substrate 106 is provided. Usually, substrate 106 is of a <100> or <111> silicon crystalline orientation. A mask 108 is formed on substrate 106 on the PFET 104 side of semiconductor structure 100. Mask 108 may be made of nitride, oxide, oxi-nitride, or other materials as desired to effectively block off the PFET 104 side of semiconductor structure 100. On the NFET 102 side of semiconductor structure 100, an optional P-well 110 may be implanted into substrate 106 using process conditions such as Boron implanted at an energy of about 60 keV to 120 keV and a dosage of about 1×1013 to 3×1013 atoms/cm2.


In FIG. 1B, a first layer at a preselected dopant concentration, preferably a screen layer 112 of the opposite dopant concentration type as to be used for the source and drain regions, is formed on substrate 106. Screen layer 112 may be formed by growing an epitaxial layer on substrate 106 and performing in-situ doping during the epitaxial layer growth so that the resulting concentration of dopants for screen layer 112 as grown is preferably within a range of about 5×1018 to 5×1019 atoms per cm3 with a thickness of about 5 nm to 10 nm. Screen layer 112 establishes the depletion depth for NFET 102.


Example in-situ screen layer growth conditions include a 10 A dilute HF etch to reduce native oxide, an in-situ hydrogen bake at 700° C. to 850° C. for 45 to 75 sec and about 20 T, and a selective epitaxial growth process. Exemplary gases for the selective epitaxial growth process include H2/SiH12Cl2/HCl at about a 30/0.1/0.5 ratio, with dilute B2H6 and/or CH3SiH3 additive at about a 0.001 ratio sufficient to achieve the desired dopant concentration. The selective epitaxial growth may be performed at 700° C. to 850° C. and approximately 20 T.


For NFET 102, boron may be used as the dopant material in screen layer 112 to screen the well from activity in a second layer, preferably a channel layer 114. Maintaining a relatively abrupt or sharp dopant profile of the screen dopant helps control against junction leakage. Carbon is also preferably included as a non-electrically active additive to prevent unwanted diffusion of boron out of screen layer 112 during subsequent process steps. An example method to add the carbon is to turn on a dopant source 113 to introduce the carbon and boron dopant materials during epitaxial growth of screen layer 112.


In FIG. 1B, a second layer of a preselected dopant concentration, preferably channel layer 114 is formed on screen layer 112, preferably by epitaxial growth of an undoped intrinsic semiconductor material having a dopant concentration of no more than 5×1017 atoms per cm3 (that is, a silicon or other semiconductor material wherein electrically active species are not added to modify the conductivity characteristics; some impurities may be incidentally and unintentionally introduced into the crystalline lattice due to contamination from the process chamber; fabrication conditions are established such that channel layer 114 is maintained as essentially undoped at least beneath a later formed gate dielectric). Channel layer 114 may be formed by inserting substrate 106 into a separate epitaxial process chamber from that used for screen layer 112, or may remain in the same process chamber used for forming the doped screen layer 112 and grown by turning off dopant source 113 and using a gas mixture that does not include the dopants. Screen layer 112 and channel layer 114 are grown to preselected thicknesses based upon a target threshold voltage for NFET 102. In the epitaxial growth process, it may be desirable to delay turning on the in-situ doping and initially form an undoped epitaxial layer on substrate 106 and beneath screen layer 112 to allow for further adjustment of a location for screen layer 112 and to set up for a thinner channel layer 114. By being able to independently set a thickness for screen layer 112 and channel layer 114 along with the dopant concentration in screen layer 112, multiple threshold voltages that feature different depletion depths may be achieved with a similar device structure on a single semiconductor wafer. Though individually setting thicknesses for screen layer 112 and channel layer 114 may be desirable, a planar surface for semiconductor structure 100 may still be obtained as desired by maintaining the overall thickness for the channel layer and screen layer combination at a constant across all devices on substrate 106. In an alternative embodiment, channel layer 114 may be formed as a blanket epitaxial channel layer with the channel layer of PFET 104 later in the fabrication process.


An optional threshold voltage control layer (not shown) for NFET 102 may be formed between screen layer 112 and channel layer 114. The threshold voltage control layer may be formed by further epitaxial growth on screen layer 112 using the same dopant type but with different doping conditions so that the resulting dopant concentration is about 1/10th that of screen layer 112 or is about 1/10th higher than that of channel layer 114. Epi thickness for the threshold voltage control layer may be 5 nm to 10 nm in thickness. The in-situ doping conditions may be adjusted from the conditions for screen layer 112 to the conditions for the threshold voltage control layer during epitaxial growth by reducing the concentration of the dopant species gas to result in the desired dopant concentration in the layer. Epitaxial growth of screen layer 112 and the threshold voltage control layer may be continuously performed so as to avoid removing substrate 106 from the epitaxial growth process chamber. Alternatively, the threshold voltage control layer can be formed using ion implantation either directly into screen layer 112 so that the threshold voltage control layer is formed effectively at a top surface of screen layer 112, by ion implantation into an epitaxially grown layer, or, a threshold voltage control layer can be formed using ion implantation after channel layer 114 is formed preferably by using a high enough implant energy to target a location of dopants to be at or just above the top surface of screen layer 112. The threshold voltage control layer for NFET 102 is preferably added if screen layer 112 is not sufficient by itself to set the targeted threshold voltage for the device.


In FIG. 1C, mask 108 is removed to open the PFET 104 side of semiconductor structure 100 and a mask 118 is formed on substrate 106 on the NFET 102 side of semiconductor structure 100. Mask 118 may also be made of nitride, oxide, oxi-nitride, or other materials as desired to effectively block off the NFET 102 side of semiconductor structure 100. On the PFET 104 side of semiconductor structure 100, an optional N-well 120 may be implanted into substrate 106 using Arsenic or Phosphorus at an energy of about 100 keV to 200 keV with a dosage of 1×1013 to 3×1013 atoms/cm2.


In FIG. 1D, a first layer of a preselected dopant concentration for the second FET, preferably a screen layer 122 of an opposite dopant concentration type as that used for source and drain regions, is formed on substrate 106. Screen layer 122 may be formed by growing an epitaxial layer on substrate 106 and performing in-situ doping during the epitaxial layer growth so that the resulting concentration of dopants for screen layer 122 is preferably within a range of about 5×1018 to 5×1019 atoms per cm3 with a thickness of about 5 nm to 10 nm. Screen layer 122 establishes a depletion depth for PFET 104.


Example in-situ screen layer growth conditions include a 10 A dilute HF etch to reduce native oxide, an in-situ hydrogen bake at 700° C. to 850° C. for 45 to 60 sec and about 20 T, and a selective epitaxial growth process. Exemplary gases for the selective epitaxial growth process include H2/SiH2Cl2/HCl at about a 30/0.1/0.5 ratio, with dilute AsH3 sufficient to achieve the desired dopant concentration. The selective epitaxial growth may be performed at 700° C. to 850° C. and approximately 20 T.


For PFET 104, phosphorous or arsenic may be used as the in-situ dopant material in screen layer 122 to screen the well from activity in a second layer, preferably a channel layer 124. Maintaining a relatively abrupt or sharp dopant profile of the screen dopant helps to control against junction leakage.


In FIG. 1D, a second layer of a preselected dopant concentration for the second FET, preferably channel layer 124 is formed on screen layer 122 preferably by epitaxial growth of an undoped intrinsic semiconductor material having a dopant concentration of no more than 5×1017 atoms per cm3 (that is a silicon or other semiconductor material wherein electrically active species are not added to modify the conductivity characteristics; some impurities may be incidentally and unintentionally introduced into the crystalline lattice due to contamination from the process chamber; fabrication conditions are established such that channel layer 124 is maintained as essentially undoped at least beneath a later formed gate dielectric). Channel layer 124 may be formed by inserting substrate 106 into a separate epitaxial process chamber from that used for screen layer 122, or may remain in the same process chamber used for forming the doped screen layer 122 and grown by turning off dopant source 113 and using a gas mixture that does not include the dopants. Screen layer 122 and channel layer 124 are grown to preselected thicknesses based upon a target threshold voltage for PFET 104. In the epitaxial growth process, it may be desirable to delay turning on the in-situ doping and initially form an undoped epitaxial layer on substrate 106 and beneath screen layer 122 to allow for further adjustment of a location for screen layer 122 and to set up for a thinner channel layer 124. By being able to independently set a thickness for screen layer 122 and channel layer 124 along with the dopant concentration in screen layer 122, variations in threshold voltages and depletion depth from one PFET device to another may be achieved on a single semiconductor wafer. Though individually setting thicknesses for screen layer 122 and channel layer 124 may be desirable, a planar surface for semiconductor structure 100 may still be achieved by maintaining the overall thickness for the channel layer and screen layer combination at a constant across all devices on substrate 106. In an alternative embodiment, channel layer 124 may be formed as a blanket channel layer with channel layer 114 of NFET 104 later in the fabrication process.


An optional threshold voltage control layer (not shown) may be formed between screen layer 122 and channel layer 124. Similar to NFET 102, the threshold voltage control layer for PFET 104 may be formed by further epitaxial growth on screen layer 122 using the same dopant type but with different doping conditions so that a resulting dopant concentration is about 1/10th that of screen layer 122 or is about 1/10th higher than that of channel layer 124 for a thickness of about 3 nm to 6 nm. Different doping materials may be used between screen layer 122 and the threshold voltage control layer. For example, arsenic may be used for screen layer 122 and phosphorous may be used for the threshold voltage control layer. The in-situ doping conditions may be adjusted from the conditions for screen layer 122 to the conditions for the threshold voltage control layer during epitaxial growth by reducing the concentration of the dopant species gas. Epitaxial growth of screen layer 122 and the threshold voltage control layer may be continuously performed so as to avoid removing substrate 106 from the epitaxial growth process chamber. Alternatively, the threshold voltage control layer can be formed using ion implantation either directly into screen layer 122 so that the threshold voltage control layer is formed effectively at the top surface of screen layer 122, by ion implantation into an epitaxially grown layer, or the threshold voltage control layer may be formed using ion implantation after channel 124 is formed preferably by using a high enough implant energy to target a location of dopants to be at or just above the top surface of screen layer 122. The threshold voltage control layer for PFET 104 is preferably added if screen layer 122 is not sufficient to set the targeted threshold voltage for the device.


In FIG. 1E, mask 118 is removed. Due to the positioning of masks 108 and 118 and the epitaxial growth conditions, facets 130 are usually formed in each layer of each device. Facets 130 form at the boundary of growth areas and masking dielectric areas such as the NFET 102 and PFET 104 areas where the growth area is adjacent to mask areas 118 and 108. Facet 130 formation can vary from one epitaxial growth process to another through selection of temperature, pressure, chemistry/partial pressure, and starting substrate orientation. Facets are undesirable as they may introduce additional unwanted variations to the device that adversely affect device operation. These facets can be eliminated by performing a shallow trench isolation process after the selective epitaxial growth. It is noted that, prior to shallow trench isolation, in an alternative embodiment if channel layers 114 and 124 have not been previously formed, an undoped blanket channel layer may be epitaxially grown on substrate 106 and screen layers 112 and 122 in order to establish channel layers 114 and 124 by way of an epitaxial layer that extends between the FETs.



FIG. 1F shows the formation of a trench 132 between NFET 102 and PFET 104. Trench 132 is aligned with the boundary between NFET 102 and PFET 104, and is formed by applying masks to protect NFET 102 and PFET 104 and etching into substrate 106. Then an etch process is performed to remove material that is wider than the interface where the faceted structures come together, resulting in a trench structure that slices through and eliminates the facets. As shown in FIG. 1G, trench 132 is then filled using dielectric material, usually silicon oxide deposited by chemical vapor deposition, to establish a physical and electrical isolation region 134 between NFET 102 and PFET 104. Gate stack 144 and 154 and source/drain formations 146 and 156 are then established to complete the transistor devices as shown in FIG. 1H. In this manner, a device is established with a screen layer setting a depletion depth underneath the gate stack 144 and 154 and a channel layer overlying the screen layer is maintained undoped in contact with the gate dielectric 148 and 158 with an optional threshold voltage control layer between the screen layer and the channel layer.


Advantages are obtained by forming screen layer 112 for NFET 102 by way of in-situ doped epitaxial growth as compared to ion implantation into substrate 106. FIG. 2A shows the band to band generation rate at the channel to drain junction for a dopant profile using an implanted screen layer. FIG. 2B shows the band to band generation rate at the channel to drain junction for a dopant profile using an in-situ doped epitaxially grown screen layer 112. The junction leakage, being a strong function of screen doping level and screen peak width, is reduced for the in-situ doped epitaxially grown screen layer 112 compared to the implanted screen layer. In FIG. 2A, a larger area of band to band tunneling generation rate is shown for an implanted screen layer in comparison of the smaller area of band to band tunneling process generation in FIG. 2B for the in-situ doped epitaxially grown screen layer 112. The more band to band tunneling generation rate there is, the more junction leakage is seen in a device.


The higher band to band tunneling process generation for the implanted screen layer is caused by a wider spread of the dopant peak as compared to an in-situ doped epitaxially grown screen layer. FIG. 3 shows a graph 300 with a dopant concentration level comparison between the implanted screen layer and the in-situ doped epitaxially grown screen layer 112. As shown in graph 300, the in-situ doped epitaxially grown screen layer 112 shows a narrower and lower doping peak as compared to the implanted screen layer, leading to the reduction in junction leakage. The concentration level of the in-situ doped epitaxially grown screen layer 112 is higher and closer to the silicon surface of the semiconductor structure than that of the implanted screen layer for the same threshold voltage setting. The higher dopant concentration nearer the substrate surface for the in-situ doped epitaxially grown screen layer 112 is disadvantageous in one respect in that there may be a slight increase in random dopant fluctuation (RDF) induced threshold voltage mismatch (AVT) as compared to the implanted screen layer. However, the tighter dopant distribution having the shorter tail improves junction leakage control drastically.



FIG. 4 shows a graph 400 with differences in junction leakage between the implanted screen layer and the in-situ epitaxially grown screen layer 112. Graph lines 402 and 404 show the plots for the implanted screen layer. Graph lines 408 and 408 show the plots for an in-situ grown screen layer. Graph line 402 shows how the threshold voltage can be tuned by changing the dose for the screen implant while keeping the channel layer thickness constant. Graph line 404 shows how the threshold voltage can be tuned by changing the thickness of the channel layer while keeping the dose for the screen implant constant. Similarly, graph line 406 shows how the threshold voltage for NFET 102 can be tuned by changing the in-situ boron concentration at a first thickness for the channel layer. Graph line 408 shows how the threshold voltage for NFET 102 can be tuned by changing the in-situ boron concentration at a second thickness for the channel layer. There are two advantages provided by the in-situ epitaxially grown screen layer 112 over the implanted screen layer. First, the in-situ epitaxially grown screen layer 112 allows for a more flexible threshold voltage targeting range than the implanted screen layer. Second, the in-situ epitaxially grown screen layer 112 provides a greater than ten times reduction in junction, leakage as compared to the implanted screen layer. In addition, a thicker epitaxial channel layer may be used with an in-situ epitaxially grown screen layer 112 due to elimination of the implantation depth, relaxing the process constraints to grow a very thin epitaxial channel layer.


A reduction in junction leakage is achievable in a deeply depleted channel device by epitaxially growing a screen layer and in-situ doping of the screen layer during epitaxial growth. Any facets produced during epitaxial growth may be eliminated by forming an isolation region at a boundary of a NFET 102 and a PFET 104, preferably by cutting into substrate 106 and through a facet region by etching and filling a shallow trench. Threshold voltage control can be achieved by selecting a dopant concentration for the screen layer, including a threshold control layer on the screen layer, and setting a thickness for the channel layer and the screen layer.


From the foregoing, it may be appreciated by those of skill in the art that a need has arisen for a technique to fabricate a semiconductor structure with reduced junction leakage, threshold voltage controllability, and facetless physical properties in order to provide improved and consistent transistor operational performance. The above description discloses features that substantially eliminate or greatly reduce disadvantages and problems associated with previous transistor device fabrication and design. The present disclosure describes various technical advantages and features not present in previous transistor fabrication and design. Embodiments of the present disclosure may enjoy some, all, or none of these advantages. Other technical advantages may be readily apparent to one skilled in the art from the figures, description, and claims.


Although the present disclosure has been described in detail with reference to one or more particular embodiments, it should be understood that various other changes, substitutions, and alterations may be made hereto without departing from the scope of the appended claims. Although the present disclosure includes a description with reference to a specific ordering of processes, other process sequencing may be followed and other incidental process steps may be performed to achieve the end result discussed herein.


Numerous other changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications may be ascertained by those skilled in the art and it is intended that the present disclosure encompass all such changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications as falling within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Moreover, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited in any way by any statement in the specification that is not otherwise reflected in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for forming a facet free field effect transistor structure using selective epitaxial deposition, comprising: providing a substrate;epitaxially growing, over distinct areas of the substrate, a plurality of first epitaxial screen layers for a plurality of field effect transistors, the respective first epitaxial screen layers having defined dopant concentrations and grown to preselected thicknesses;epitaxially growing, over distinct areas of the first epitaxial screen layers, a plurality of second epitaxial channel layers, the respective second epitaxial channel layers being undoped and grown to preselected thicknesses;wherein at least some of the epitaxially grown layers form facets that are eliminated during processing.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein epitaxially growing the first epitaxial screen layers for the field effect transistors further introduces dopant species into the selective epitaxial deposition process.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising: forming a blanket epitaxial layer on the substrate.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: etching through a portion of the second epitaxial channel layers and the first epitaxial screen layers through to the substrate to eliminate the facets formed by the epitaxial growth of the second epitaxial channel layers.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: turning on a dopant source during epitaxial growth of the first epitaxial screen layer of at least one of a first field effect transistor and a second field effect transistor;turning off a dopant source during epitaxial growth of the second epitaxial channel layer of the at least one of the first and second field effect transistors.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein epitaxial growth is continuously performed for the first epitaxial screen layer and the second epitaxial channel layer of the first and second field effect transistors.
  • 7. The method of claim 5, wherein a thickness of the first epitaxial screen layer and the second epitaxial channel layer of the first and second field effect transistors is determined by when the dopant source is turned off.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the thickness for the second epitaxial screen layer of the first field effect transistor is different than the thickness for the second epitaxial screen layer of the second field effect transistor.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising: forming by epitaxial growth a threshold voltage control layer between the first epitaxial screen layer and the second epitaxial channel layer for at least one of a first field effect transistor and a second field effect transistor, the threshold voltage control layer having a dopant concentration less than a dopant concentration of the first epitaxial screen layer.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, further comprising: using a first doping condition during epitaxial growth of the first epitaxial screen layer for the at least one of the first and second field effect transistors;using a second doping condition during epitaxial growth of the threshold voltage control layer for the at least one of the first and second field effect transistors.
  • 11. The method of claim 9, wherein epitaxial growth is continuously performed for the first epitaxial screen layer, the threshold voltage control layer, and the second epitaxial channel layer for the at least one of the first and second field effect transistors.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising: forming a threshold voltage control layer for at least one of a first field effect transistor and a second field effect transistor, the threshold voltage control layer having a dopant concentration that is less than a dopant concentration of the first epitaxial screen layer for the at least one of the first and second field effect transistors, the threshold voltage control layer being formed by ion implantation.
  • 13. An intermediate die structure for a field effect transistor, comprising: a substrate;a plurality of areas temporarily protecting portions of the substrate from having deposited thereon a single crystal silicon material;a plurality of first epitaxial screen layers deposited on the substrate and defined between the plurality of areas, the respective first epitaxial screen layers having defined dopant concentrations and preselected thickness;a plurality of second epitaxial channel layers, the respective second epitaxial channel layers having no facets, configured to be undoped, and to have preselected thicknesses, the plurality of second epitaxial channel layers being disposed on the plurality of first epitaxial screen layers;a blanket epitaxial layer positioned above the substrate.
  • 14. The structure of claim 13, wherein the first epitaxial screen layers have no implanted dopants.
  • 15. The structure of claim 13, wherein the respective second epitaxial channel layers have the same thickness.
  • 16. A facet free channel structure for a field effect transistor, comprising: a substrate;a plurality of first screen layers deposited on the substrate, the respective first screen layers having defined dopant concentrations and preselected thicknesses; anda plurality of second epitaxial channel layers, the respective second epitaxial channel layers having no facets, being substantially undoped, and having preselected thicknesses, the plurality of second epitaxial channel layers being selectively deposited on the plurality of first screen layers;wherein the first screen layers are part of a blanket epitaxial layer positioned above the substrate.
  • 17. The structure of claim 16, wherein the first screen layers have no implanted dopants.
  • 18. The structure of claim 16, wherein the respective second epitaxial channel layers have the same thickness.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/600,647 and now U.S. Pat. No. 8,637,955, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (501)
Number Name Date Kind
3958266 Athanas May 1976 A
4000504 Berger Dec 1976 A
4021835 Etoh et al. May 1977 A
4242691 Kotani et al. Dec 1980 A
4276095 Beilstein, Jr. et al. Jun 1981 A
4315781 Henderson Feb 1982 A
4518926 Swanson May 1985 A
4559091 Allen et al. Dec 1985 A
4578128 Mundt et al. Mar 1986 A
4617066 Vasudev Oct 1986 A
4662061 Malhi May 1987 A
4761384 Neppl et al. Aug 1988 A
4780748 Cunningham et al. Oct 1988 A
4819043 Yazawa et al. Apr 1989 A
4885477 Bird et al. Dec 1989 A
4908681 Nishida et al. Mar 1990 A
4945254 Robbins Jul 1990 A
4956311 Liou et al. Sep 1990 A
5034337 Mosher et al. Jul 1991 A
5144378 Hikosaka Sep 1992 A
5156989 Williams et al. Oct 1992 A
5156990 Mitchell Oct 1992 A
5166765 Lee et al. Nov 1992 A
5208473 Komori et al. May 1993 A
5294821 Iwamatsu Mar 1994 A
5298763 Shen et al. Mar 1994 A
5369288 Usuki Nov 1994 A
5373186 Schubert et al. Dec 1994 A
5384476 Nishizawa et al. Jan 1995 A
5426328 Yilmaz et al. Jun 1995 A
5444008 Han et al. Aug 1995 A
5552332 Tseng et al. Sep 1996 A
5559368 Hu et al. Sep 1996 A
5608253 Liu et al. Mar 1997 A
5622880 Burr et al. Apr 1997 A
5624863 Helm et al. Apr 1997 A
5625568 Edwards et al. Apr 1997 A
5641980 Yamaguchi et al. Jun 1997 A
5663583 Matloubian et al. Sep 1997 A
5712501 Davies et al. Jan 1998 A
5719422 Burr et al. Feb 1998 A
5726488 Watanabe et al. Mar 1998 A
5726562 Mizuno Mar 1998 A
5731626 Eaglesham et al. Mar 1998 A
5736419 Naem Apr 1998 A
5753555 Hada May 1998 A
5754826 Gamal et al. May 1998 A
5756365 Kakumu May 1998 A
5763921 Okumura et al. Jun 1998 A
5780899 Hu et al. Jul 1998 A
5847419 Imai et al. Dec 1998 A
5856003 Chiu Jan 1999 A
5861334 Rho Jan 1999 A
5877049 Liu et al. Mar 1999 A
5885876 Dennen Mar 1999 A
5889315 Farrenkopf et al. Mar 1999 A
5895954 Yasumura et al. Apr 1999 A
5899714 Farremkopf et al. May 1999 A
5918129 Fulford, Jr. et al. Jun 1999 A
5923067 Voldman Jul 1999 A
5923987 Burr Jul 1999 A
5936868 Hall Aug 1999 A
5946214 Heavlin et al. Aug 1999 A
5985705 Seliskar Nov 1999 A
5989963 Luning et al. Nov 1999 A
6001695 Wu Dec 1999 A
6020227 Bulucea Feb 2000 A
6043139 Eaglesham et al. Mar 2000 A
6060345 Hause et al. May 2000 A
6060364 Maszara et al. May 2000 A
6066533 Yu May 2000 A
6072217 Burr Jun 2000 A
6087210 Sohn Jul 2000 A
6087691 Hamamoto Jul 2000 A
6088518 Hsu Jul 2000 A
6091286 Blauschild Jul 2000 A
6096611 Wu Aug 2000 A
6103562 Son et al. Aug 2000 A
6121153 Kikkawa Sep 2000 A
6147383 Kuroda Nov 2000 A
6153920 Gossmann et al. Nov 2000 A
6157073 Lehongres Dec 2000 A
6175582 Naito et al. Jan 2001 B1
6184112 Maszara et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190979 Radens et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194259 Nayak et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198157 Ishida et al. Mar 2001 B1
6218892 Soumyanath et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218895 De et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221724 Yu et al. Apr 2001 B1
6229188 Aoki et al. May 2001 B1
6232164 Tsai et al. May 2001 B1
6235597 Miles May 2001 B1
6245618 An et al. Jun 2001 B1
6268640 Park et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271070 Kotani et al. Aug 2001 B2
6271551 Schmitz et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288429 Iwata et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297132 Zhang et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300177 Sundaresan et al. Oct 2001 B1
6313489 Letavic et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319799 Ouyang et al. Nov 2001 B1
6320222 Forbes et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323525 Noguchi et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326666 Bernstein et al. Dec 2001 B1
6335233 Cho et al. Jan 2002 B1
6358806 Puchner Mar 2002 B1
6380019 Yu et al. Apr 2002 B1
6391752 Colinge et al. May 2002 B1
6426260 Hshieh Jul 2002 B1
6426279 Huster et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432754 Assaderaghi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6444550 Hao et al. Sep 2002 B1
6444551 Ku et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449749 Stine Sep 2002 B1
6461920 Shirahata Oct 2002 B1
6461928 Rodder Oct 2002 B2
6472278 Marshall et al. Oct 2002 B1
6482714 Hieda et al. Nov 2002 B1
6489224 Burr Dec 2002 B1
6492232 Tang et al. Dec 2002 B1
6500739 Wang et al. Dec 2002 B1
6503801 Rouse et al. Jan 2003 B1
6503805 Wang et al. Jan 2003 B2
6506640 Ishida et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518623 Oda et al. Feb 2003 B1
6521470 Lin et al. Feb 2003 B1
6534373 Yu Mar 2003 B1
6541328 Whang et al. Apr 2003 B2
6541829 Nishinohara et al. Apr 2003 B2
6548842 Bulucea et al. Apr 2003 B1
6551885 Yu Apr 2003 B1
6552377 Yu Apr 2003 B1
6573129 Hoke et al. Jun 2003 B2
6576535 Drobny et al. Jun 2003 B2
6600200 Lustig et al. Jul 2003 B1
6620671 Wang et al. Sep 2003 B1
6624488 Kim Sep 2003 B1
6627473 Oikawa et al. Sep 2003 B1
6630710 Augusto Oct 2003 B1
6660605 Liu Dec 2003 B1
6662350 Fried et al. Dec 2003 B2
6667200 Sohn et al. Dec 2003 B2
6670260 Yu et al. Dec 2003 B1
6691333 Krist Feb 2004 B1
6730568 Sohn May 2004 B2
6737724 Hieda et al. May 2004 B2
6743291 Ang et al. Jun 2004 B2
6743684 Liu Jun 2004 B2
6751519 Satya et al. Jun 2004 B1
6753230 Sohn et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760900 Rategh et al. Jul 2004 B2
6770944 Nishinohara et al. Aug 2004 B2
6787424 Yu Sep 2004 B1
6797553 Adkisson et al. Sep 2004 B2
6797602 Kluth et al. Sep 2004 B1
6797994 Hoke et al. Sep 2004 B1
6808004 Kamm et al. Oct 2004 B2
6808994 Wang Oct 2004 B1
6813750 Usami et al. Nov 2004 B2
6821825 Todd et al. Nov 2004 B2
6821852 Rhodes Nov 2004 B2
6822297 Nandakumar et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831292 Currie et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835639 Rotondaro et al. Dec 2004 B2
6852602 Kanzawa et al. Feb 2005 B2
6852603 Chakravarthi et al. Feb 2005 B2
6881641 Wieczorek et al. Apr 2005 B2
6881987 Sohn Apr 2005 B2
6891439 Jachne et al. May 2005 B2
6893947 Martinez et al. May 2005 B2
6900519 Cantell et al. May 2005 B2
6901564 Stine et al. May 2005 B2
6916698 Mocuta et al. Jul 2005 B2
6917237 Tschanz et al. Jul 2005 B1
6927463 Iwata et al. Aug 2005 B2
6928128 Sidiropoulos Aug 2005 B1
6930007 Bu et al. Aug 2005 B2
6930360 Yamauchi et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936509 Coolbaugh et al. Aug 2005 B2
6957163 Ando Oct 2005 B2
6963090 Passlack et al. Nov 2005 B2
6995397 Yamashita et al. Feb 2006 B2
7002214 Boyd et al. Feb 2006 B1
7008836 Algotsson et al. Mar 2006 B2
7013359 Li Mar 2006 B1
7015546 Herr et al. Mar 2006 B2
7015741 Tschanz et al. Mar 2006 B2
7022559 Barnak et al. Apr 2006 B2
7036098 Eleyan et al. Apr 2006 B2
7038258 Liu et al. May 2006 B2
7039881 Regan May 2006 B2
7045456 Murto et al. May 2006 B2
7057216 Ouyang et al. Jun 2006 B2
7061058 Chakravarthi et al. Jun 2006 B2
7064039 Liu Jun 2006 B2
7064399 Babcock et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071103 Chan et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078325 Curello et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078776 Nishinohara et al. Jul 2006 B2
7089513 Bard et al. Aug 2006 B2
7089515 Hanafi et al. Aug 2006 B2
7091093 Noda et al. Aug 2006 B1
7105399 Dakshina-Murthy et al. Sep 2006 B1
7109099 Tan et al. Sep 2006 B2
7119381 Passlack Oct 2006 B2
7122411 Mouli Oct 2006 B2
7127687 Signore Oct 2006 B1
7132323 Haensch et al. Nov 2006 B2
7169675 Tan et al. Jan 2007 B2
7170120 Datta et al. Jan 2007 B2
7176137 Perng et al. Feb 2007 B2
7186598 Yamauchi et al. Mar 2007 B2
7189627 Wu et al. Mar 2007 B2
7199430 Babcock et al. Apr 2007 B2
7202517 Dixit et al. Apr 2007 B2
7208354 Bauer Apr 2007 B2
7211871 Cho May 2007 B2
7221021 Wu et al. May 2007 B2
7223646 Miyashita et al. May 2007 B2
7226833 White et al. Jun 2007 B2
7226843 Weber et al. Jun 2007 B2
7230680 Fujisawa et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235822 Li Jun 2007 B2
7256639 Koniaris et al. Aug 2007 B1
7259428 Inaba Aug 2007 B2
7260562 Czajkowski et al. Aug 2007 B2
7294877 Rueckes et al. Nov 2007 B2
7297994 Wieczorek et al. Nov 2007 B2
7301208 Handa et al. Nov 2007 B2
7304350 Misaki Dec 2007 B2
7307471 Gammie et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312500 Miyashita et al. Dec 2007 B2
7323754 Ema et al. Jan 2008 B2
7332439 Lindert et al. Feb 2008 B2
7332790 Gonzalez et al. Feb 2008 B2
7348629 Chu et al. Mar 2008 B2
7354833 Liaw Apr 2008 B2
7380225 Joshi et al. May 2008 B2
7398497 Sato et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402207 Besser et al. Jul 2008 B1
7402872 Murthy et al. Jul 2008 B2
7416605 Zollner et al. Aug 2008 B2
7427788 Li et al. Sep 2008 B2
7439164 Langdo et al. Oct 2008 B2
7442971 Wirbeleit et al. Oct 2008 B2
7449733 Inaba et al. Nov 2008 B2
7462908 Bol et al. Dec 2008 B2
7469164 Du-Nour Dec 2008 B2
7470593 Rouh et al. Dec 2008 B2
7485536 Jin et al. Feb 2009 B2
7487474 Ciplickas et al. Feb 2009 B2
7491988 Tolchinsky et al. Feb 2009 B2
7494861 Chu et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496862 Chang et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496867 Turner et al. Feb 2009 B2
7498637 Yamaoka et al. Mar 2009 B2
7501324 Babcock et al. Mar 2009 B2
7503020 Allen et al. Mar 2009 B2
7507999 Kusumoto et al. Mar 2009 B2
7514766 Yoshida Apr 2009 B2
7521323 Surdeanu et al. Apr 2009 B2
7531393 Doyle et al. May 2009 B2
7531836 Liu et al. May 2009 B2
7538364 Twynam May 2009 B2
7538412 Schulze et al. May 2009 B2
7562233 Sheng et al. Jul 2009 B1
7564105 Chi et al. Jul 2009 B2
7566600 Mouli Jul 2009 B2
7569456 Ko et al. Aug 2009 B2
7586322 Xu et al. Sep 2009 B1
7592241 Takao Sep 2009 B2
7595243 Bulucea et al. Sep 2009 B1
7598142 Ranade et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605041 Ema et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605060 Meunier-Beillard et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605429 Bernstein et al. Oct 2009 B2
7608496 Chu Oct 2009 B2
7615802 Elpelt et al. Nov 2009 B2
7622341 Chudzik et al. Nov 2009 B2
7638380 Pearce Dec 2009 B2
7642140 Bae et al. Jan 2010 B2
7644377 Saxe et al. Jan 2010 B1
7645665 Kubo et al. Jan 2010 B2
7651920 Siprak Jan 2010 B2
7655523 Babcock et al. Feb 2010 B2
7673273 Madurawe et al. Mar 2010 B2
7675126 Cho Mar 2010 B2
7675317 Perisetty Mar 2010 B2
7678638 Chu et al. Mar 2010 B2
7681628 Joshi et al. Mar 2010 B2
7682887 Dokumaci et al. Mar 2010 B2
7683442 Burr et al. Mar 2010 B1
7696000 Liu et al. Apr 2010 B2
7704822 Jeong Apr 2010 B2
7704844 Zhu et al. Apr 2010 B2
7709828 Braithwaite et al. May 2010 B2
7723750 Zhu et al. May 2010 B2
7737472 Kondo et al. Jun 2010 B2
7741138 Cho Jun 2010 B2
7741200 Cho et al. Jun 2010 B2
7745270 Shah et al. Jun 2010 B2
7750374 Capasso et al. Jul 2010 B2
7750381 Hokazono et al. Jul 2010 B2
7750405 Nowak Jul 2010 B2
7750682 Bernstein et al. Jul 2010 B2
7755144 Li et al. Jul 2010 B2
7755146 Helm et al. Jul 2010 B2
7759206 Luo et al. Jul 2010 B2
7759714 Itoh et al. Jul 2010 B2
7761820 Berger et al. Jul 2010 B2
7795677 Bangsaruntip et al. Sep 2010 B2
7808045 Kawahara et al. Oct 2010 B2
7808082 Yang et al. Oct 2010 B2
7808410 Kim et al. Oct 2010 B2
7811873 Mochizuki Oct 2010 B2
7811881 Cheng et al. Oct 2010 B2
7818702 Mandelman et al. Oct 2010 B2
7821066 Lebby et al. Oct 2010 B2
7829402 Matocha et al. Nov 2010 B2
7831873 Trimberger et al. Nov 2010 B1
7846822 Seebauer et al. Dec 2010 B2
7855118 Hoentschel et al. Dec 2010 B2
7859013 Chen et al. Dec 2010 B2
7863163 Bauer Jan 2011 B2
7867835 Lee et al. Jan 2011 B2
7883977 Babcock et al. Feb 2011 B2
7888205 Herner et al. Feb 2011 B2
7888747 Hokazono Feb 2011 B2
7895546 Lahner et al. Feb 2011 B2
7897495 Ye et al. Mar 2011 B2
7906413 Cardone et al. Mar 2011 B2
7906813 Kato Mar 2011 B2
7910419 Fenouillet-Beranger et al. Mar 2011 B2
7919791 Flynn et al. Apr 2011 B2
7926018 Moroz et al. Apr 2011 B2
7935984 Nakano May 2011 B2
7941776 Majumder et al. May 2011 B2
7945800 Gomm et al. May 2011 B2
7948008 Liu et al. May 2011 B2
7952147 Ueno et al. May 2011 B2
7960232 King et al. Jun 2011 B2
7960238 Kohli et al. Jun 2011 B2
7968385 Cai Jun 2011 B2
7968411 Williford Jun 2011 B2
7968440 Seebauer Jun 2011 B2
7968459 Bedell et al. Jun 2011 B2
7989900 Haensch et al. Aug 2011 B2
7994573 Pan Aug 2011 B2
8004024 Furukawa et al. Aug 2011 B2
8012827 Yu et al. Sep 2011 B2
8029620 Kim et al. Oct 2011 B2
8039332 Bernard et al. Oct 2011 B2
8046598 Lee Oct 2011 B2
8048791 Hargrove et al. Nov 2011 B2
8048810 Tsai et al. Nov 2011 B2
8051340 Cranford, Jr. et al. Nov 2011 B2
8053340 Colombeau et al. Nov 2011 B2
8063466 Kurita Nov 2011 B2
8067279 Sadra et al. Nov 2011 B2
8067280 Wang et al. Nov 2011 B2
8067302 Li Nov 2011 B2
8076719 Zeng et al. Dec 2011 B2
8097529 Krull et al. Jan 2012 B2
8103983 Agarwal et al. Jan 2012 B2
8105891 Yeh et al. Jan 2012 B2
8106424 Schruefer Jan 2012 B2
8106481 Rao Jan 2012 B2
8110487 Griebenow et al. Feb 2012 B2
8114761 Mandrekar et al. Feb 2012 B2
8119482 Bhalla et al. Feb 2012 B2
8120069 Hynecek Feb 2012 B2
8129246 Babcock et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129797 Chen et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134159 Hokazono Mar 2012 B2
8143120 Kerr et al. Mar 2012 B2
8143124 Challa et al. Mar 2012 B2
8143678 Kim et al. Mar 2012 B2
8148774 Mori et al. Apr 2012 B2
8163619 Yang et al. Apr 2012 B2
8169002 Chang et al. May 2012 B2
8170857 Joshi et al. May 2012 B2
8173499 Chung et al. May 2012 B2
8173502 Yan et al. May 2012 B2
8176461 Trimberger May 2012 B1
8178430 Kim et al. May 2012 B2
8179530 Levy et al. May 2012 B2
8183096 Wirbeleit May 2012 B2
8183107 Mathur et al. May 2012 B2
8185865 Gupta et al. May 2012 B2
8187959 Pawlak et al. May 2012 B2
8188542 Yoo et al. May 2012 B2
8196545 Kurosawa Jun 2012 B2
8201122 Dewey, III et al. Jun 2012 B2
8214190 Joshi et al. Jul 2012 B2
8216906 Tsai et al. Jul 2012 B2
8217423 Liu et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225255 Ouyang et al. Jul 2012 B2
8227307 Chen et al. Jul 2012 B2
8236661 Dennard et al. Aug 2012 B2
8239803 Kobayashi Aug 2012 B2
8247300 Babcock et al. Aug 2012 B2
8255843 Chen et al. Aug 2012 B2
8258026 Bulucea Sep 2012 B2
8266567 El Yahyaoui et al. Sep 2012 B2
8286180 Foo Oct 2012 B2
8288798 Passlack Oct 2012 B2
8299562 Li et al. Oct 2012 B2
8324059 Guo et al. Dec 2012 B2
8637955 Wang et al. Jan 2014 B1
20010014495 Yu Aug 2001 A1
20020042184 Nandakumar et al. Apr 2002 A1
20030006415 Yokogawa et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030047763 Hieda et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030122203 Nishinohara et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030173626 Burr Sep 2003 A1
20030183856 Wieczorek et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030215992 Sohn et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040075118 Heinemann et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040075143 Bae et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040084731 Matsuda et al. May 2004 A1
20040087090 Grudowski et al. May 2004 A1
20040126947 Sohn Jul 2004 A1
20040175893 Vatus et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040180488 Lee Sep 2004 A1
20050106824 Alberto et al. May 2005 A1
20050116282 Pattanayak et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050250289 Babcock et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050280075 Ema et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060022270 Boyd et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060049464 Rao Mar 2006 A1
20060068555 Huilong et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068586 Pain Mar 2006 A1
20060071278 Takao Apr 2006 A1
20060154428 Dokumaci Jul 2006 A1
20060197158 Babcock et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060203581 Joshi et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060220114 Miyashita et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060223248 Venugopal et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070040222 Van Camp et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070117326 Tan et al. May 2007 A1
20070158790 Rao Jul 2007 A1
20070212861 Chidambarrao et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070238253 Tucker Oct 2007 A1
20080067589 Ito et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080108208 Arevalo et al. May 2008 A1
20080169493 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080169516 Chung Jul 2008 A1
20080169535 Butt et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080197439 Goerlach et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080227250 Ranade et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080237661 Ranade et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080258198 Bojarczuk et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080272409 Sonkusale et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090057746 Sugll et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090108350 Cai et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090134468 Tsuchiya et al. May 2009 A1
20090224319 Kohli Sep 2009 A1
20090302388 Cai et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090309140 Khamankar et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090311837 Kapoor Dec 2009 A1
20090321849 Miyamura et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100012988 Yang et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100038724 Anderson et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100100856 Mittal Apr 2010 A1
20100148153 Hudait et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100149854 Vora Jun 2010 A1
20100187641 Zhu et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100207182 Paschal Aug 2010 A1
20100270600 Inukai et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110059588 Kang Mar 2011 A1
20110073961 Dennard et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110074498 Thompson et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110079860 Verhulst Apr 2011 A1
20110079861 Shifren et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110095811 Chi et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110147828 Murthy et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110169082 Zhu et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110175170 Wang et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110180880 Chudzik et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110193164 Zhu Aug 2011 A1
20110212590 Wu et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110215376 Holt et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110230039 Mowry et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110242921 Tran et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110248352 Shifren Oct 2011 A1
20110294278 Eguchi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110309447 Arghavani et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120021594 Gurtej et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120034745 Colombeau et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120056275 Cai et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120065920 Nagumo et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120108050 Chen et al. May 2012 A1
20120132998 Kwon et al. May 2012 A1
20120138953 Cai et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120146155 Hoentschel et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120167025 Gillespie et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120187491 Zhu et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120190177 Kim et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120223363 Kronholz et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120228716 Harley et al. Sep 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
0274278 Jul 1988 EP
0312237 Apr 1989 EP
0531621 Mar 1993 EP
0889502 Jan 1999 EP
1450394 Aug 2004 EP
59193066 Nov 1984 JP
4186774 Jul 1992 JP
0683515 Nov 1995 JP
8153873 Jun 1996 JP
8288508 Nov 1996 JP
2004087671 Mar 2004 JP
794094 Jan 2008 KR
WO2011062788 May 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (33)
Entry
Abiko, H et al., “A Channel Engineering Combined with Channel Epitaxy Optimization and Channel Epitaxy Optimization and TED Suppression for 0.15μm n-n Gate CMOS Technology”, 1995 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 23-24, 1995.
Chau, R et al., “A 50nm Depleted-Substrate CMOS Transistor (DST)”, Electron Device Meeting 2001, IEDM Technical Digest, IEEE International, pp. 29.1.1-29.1.4, 2001.
Ducroquet, F et al. “Fully Depleted Silicon—On—Insulator nMOSFETs with Tensile Strained High Carbon Conent Si1-yCx Channel”, ECS 210th Meeting, Abstract 1033, 2006.
Ernst, T et al., “Nanoscaled MOSFET Transistors on Strained Si, SiGe, Ge Layers: Some Integration and Electrical Properties Features”, ECS Trans. 2006, vol. 3, Issue 7, pp. 947-961, 2006.
Goesele, U et al., Diffusion Engineering by Carbon in Silicon, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. vol. 610, 2000.
Hokazono, A et al., “Steep Channel & Halo Profiles Utilizing Boron-Diffusion-Barrier Layers (Si:C) for 32 nm Node and Beyond”, 2008 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 112-113, 2008.
Hokazono, A et al., “Steep Channel Profiles in n/pMOS Controlled by Boron-Doped Si:C Layers for Continual Bulk-CMOS Sealing”, IEDM09-676 Symposium, pp. 29.1.1-29.1.4, 2009.
Holland, Ow and Thomas, DK “A Method to Improve Activation of Implanted Dopants in SiC”, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 2001.
Kotaki, H., et al., “Novel Bulk Dynamic Threshold Voltage MOSFET (B-DTMOS) with Advanced Isolation (SITOS) and Gate to Shallow-Well Contact (SSS-C) Processes for Ultra Low Power Dual Gate CMOS”, IEDM 96, pp. 459-462, 1996.
Lavéant, P. “Incorporation, Diffusion and Agglomeration of Carbon in Silicon”, Solid State Phenomena, vols. 82-84, pp. 189-194, 2002.
Noda, K et al., “A 0.1-μm Delta-Doped MOSFET Fabricated with Post-Low-Energy Implanting Selective Epitaxy” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 809-814, Apr. 1998.
Ouguro, T et al., “An 0.18-μm CMOS for Mixed Digital and Analog Aplications with Zero-Volt-Vth Epitaxial-Channel MOSFET's”, IEEE Transaction on Electron Devices, vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 1378-1383, Jul. 1999.
Pinacho, R et al., “Carbon in Silicon: Modeling of Diffusion and Clustering Mechanisms”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 92, No. 3, pp. 1582-1588, Aug. 2002.
Robertson, LS et al., “The Effect of Impurities on Diffusion and Activation of Ion Implanted Boron in Silicon”, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. vol. 610, 2000.
Scholz, R et al., “Carbon-Induced Undersaturation of Silicon Self-Interstitials”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72(2), pp. 200-202, Jan. 1998.
Scholz, RF et al., “The Contribution of Vacancies to Carbon Out-Diffusion in Silicon”, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 392-394. Jan. 1999.
Stolk, PA et al., “Physical Mechanisms of Transient Enhanced Dopant Diffusion in Ion-Implanted Silicon”, J. Appl. Phys. 81(9), pp. 6031-6050, May 1997.
Thompson, S et al., “MOS Sealing: Transistor Challenges for the 21st Century”, Intel Technology Journal Q3′ 1998, pp. 1-19, 1998.
Wann, C. et al., “Channel Profile Optimization and Device Design for Low-Power High-Performance Dynamic-Threshold MOSFET”, IEDM 96, pp. 113-116, 1996.
Werner, P et al., “Carbon Diffusion in Silicon”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, No. 17, pp. 2465-2467, Oct. 1998.
Yan, Ran-Hong et al., “Scaling the Si MOSFET: From Bulk to SOi to Bulk”, IEEE Transaction on Electron Devices, vol. 39, No. 7, Jul. 1992.
Komaragiri, R. et al., “Depletion-Free Poly Gate Electrode Architecture for Sub 100 Nanometer CMOS Devices with High-K Gate Dielectrics”, IEEE IEDM Tech Dig., San Francisco CA, 833-836, Dec. 13-15, (2004).
Samsudin, K et al., “Integrating Intrinsic Parameter Fluctuation Description into BSIMSOI to Forecast sub-15nm UTB SOI based 6T SRAM Operation”, Solid-State Electronics (50), pp. 86-93, 2006.
Wong, H et al., “Nanoscale CMOS”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vo. 87, No. 4, pp. 537-570, Apr. 1999.
Banerjee, et al. “Compensating Non-Optical Effects using Electrically-Driven Optical Proximity Correction”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 7275 7275OE, 2009.
Cheng, et al. “Extremely Thin SOI (ETSOI) CMOS with Record Low Variability for Low Power System-on-Chip Applications”, Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Dec. 2009.
Cheng, et al. “Fully Depleted Extremely Thin SOI Technology Fabricated by a Novel Intergration Scheme Feturing Implant-Free, Zero-Silicon-Loss, and Faceted Raised Source/Drain”, Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 212-213, 2009.
Drennan, et al. “Implications of Proximity Effects for Analog Design”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 169-176, Sep. 2006.
Hook, et al. “Lateral Ion Implant Straggle and Mask Proximity Effect”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 1946-1951, Sep. 2003.
Hori, et al., “A 0.1 μm CMOS, with a Step Channel Profile Formed by Ultra High Vacuum CVD and In-Situ Doped Ions”, Proceedings of the International Electron Devices Meeting, New York, IEEE, US, pp. 909-911, Dec. 5, 1993.
Matshuashi, et al. “High-Performance Double-Layer Epitaxial-Channel PMOSFET Compatible with a Single Gate CMOSFET”, Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 36-37, 1996.
Shao, et al., “Boron Diffusion in Silicon: The Anomalies and Control by Point Defect Engineering”, Materials Science and Engineering R: Reports, vol. 42, No. 3-4, pp. 65-114, Nov. 1, 2003.
Sheu, et al. “Modeling the Well-Edge Proximity Effect in Highly Scaled MOSFETs”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53, No. 11, pp. 2792-2798, Nov. 2006.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140103406 A1 Apr 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13600647 Aug 2012 US
Child 14133743 US