The invention relates to a design structure, and more particularly, to a design structure for a heavy ion tolerant device, method of manufacturing the same and a structure thereof.
Commercial microelectronics have higher performance, function, and density compared with microelectronics designed for space and military applications. However, designs for such commercial microelectronics result in failure caused by Single Event Upset (SEU) in space applications. For example, ionizing radiation in space (and ground) based applications directly upset storage circuits, such as SRAMs, register files and flip-flops. Moreover, radiation events in combinational logic create voltage glitches that can be latched. Also, SEUs may cause the circuit to perform incorrect or illegal operations; whereas, an accumulation of radiation over a long period of time may additionally lead to complete device failure.
More specifically, in space applications, the major radiation sources are high-energy protons and high-energy heavy ions (from helium up to about any heavy stable isotope). The high-energy cosmic protons and ions are known to produce secondary fragments which cause SEUs and single event latchups (SELs), as well as total failure resulting from total dose (long accumulation of radiation) in semiconductor ICs. Fluxes of cosmic protons and heavy ions can be estimated by models like Cosmic Ray Effects on Microelectronics (CREME) software packages.
For applications on the ground, a major source of radiation is from neutrons. These terrestrial neutrons interact with the devices and the packaging materials to produce secondary (spallation) ions that cause upsets (mainly single event upsets SEUs). The spectra of the secondary ions depend on the device back end of the line (BEOL) materials. The terrestrial neutron flux has been measured and modeled very accurately. In modern nuclear physics and high-energy physics experiments, man-made radiation environments are often generated near the microelectronics that control the detector systems, because the primary beam produces secondary particles (e.g., protons, heavy ions, pions and other particles) which can cause SEUs and SELs. The designs in this invention will also cover these situations.
These upsets, e.g., SEUs, SELs and total failure, occur in many types of commercial device configurations. In one known device configuration, an SOI series device consists of two FETs laid out side by side, where each FET has its own source and drain diffusion regions and each FET is completely surrounded by oxide regions (STI) (
Alternatively, in another commercial device configuration (see,
The n+ regions for source and drain have a typical doping concentration of 1E20 cm−3. The corresponding hole diffusion length is about 300 nm, which is quite large compared with the minimum lithography dimensions of modern integrated circuit technology. For example, the most advanced CMOS technology in production has a minimum lithographic dimension of only 45 nm. The net is that the series-connected device configuration shown in
Minimizing the occurrence of such upsets with minimal change to design and process would allow the use of close derivatives of commercial components with close to commercial performance, function, and density with a minimal schedule delay. This is crucial for maintaining strategic differentiation for US defense systems against potential adversaries. However current methods to prevent SEUs and total dose include adding spatial and/or temporal redundancy, so that a single radiation event cannot cause an SEU. The series-connected devices shown in
Accordingly, there exists a need in the art to overcome the deficiencies and limitations described hereinabove.
In a first aspect of the invention, a structure includes a first device having a diffusion comprising a drain region and source region and a second device having a diffusion comprising a drain region and source region. The first and second device are aligned in an end-to-end layout along a width of the diffusion of the first device and the second device. A first isolation region separating the diffusion of the first device and the second device.
In another aspect of the invention, a structure includes a first device having a diffusion area and a second device having a diffusion area and aligned in an end-to-end layout along a width of the diffusion area of the first device and the second device. A first isolation region isolates the first device from the second device and extends in the width direction between the diffusion area of the first device and the second device. A common gate is associated with the first device and the second device, and extends in the width direction of the diffusion area of the first device and the second device.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a method of forming a structure comprises: forming a first device with a diffusion comprising a drain region and source region; forming a second device with a diffusion comprising a drain region and source region and aligned in an end-to-end layout along a width of the diffusion of the first device and the second device; and forming an isolation region separating the diffusion of the first device and the second device.
In a further aspect of the invention, a design structure for a rad hard device is embodied in a machine readable medium for designing, manufacturing, or testing an integrated circuit. The design structure comprises: a first device having a diffusion comprising a drain region and source region; a second device having a diffusion comprising a drain region and source region, the first and second device being aligned in an end-to-end layout along a width of the diffusion of the first device and the second device; and a first isolation region separating the diffusion of the first device and the second device.
The present invention is described in the detailed description which follows, in reference to the noted plurality of drawings by way of non-limiting examples of exemplary embodiments of the present invention.
The invention relates to a design structure, and more particularly, to a design structure for a heavy ion tolerant device, method of manufacturing the same and a structure thereof. More specifically, the invention is directed to physical arrangements or layouts of component FETs in an SOI series device to reduce its sensitivity to radiation effects. In the layouts of the invention, a minimum adjustable isolation region may be provided between the diffusions of each of the FETs. In embodiments, the isolation region may be 1× to 2× that of the gate length of the device, e.g., 45 nm to 90 nm (or more) for CMOS at 45 nm node. In further embodiments, the P and N devices can be inter-digitated (interleaved) so that stacked, i.e. series-connected, NFET's are not physically next to each other. As a result, the embodiments of the invention are superior to known device layouts in terms of reduced sensitivity to radiation effects, e.g., the arrangement of the component FETs significantly reduces the chance of one radiation particle hitting more than one component FET.
In 45 nm technology, the width of the diffusion regions (n+ regions) of the FET 10 and FET 20, as represented by distance “X” in
An isolation region 40 is provided between the diffusion regions of the FET 10 and FET 20. In embodiments, the isolation region 40 is adjustable and can range, in embodiments, between about 1× to 2× of the channel length (e.g., 45 nm to 90nm in 45 nm technology). Those of skill in the art should realize, though, that other distances of the isolation region 40 are also contemplated by the invention.
In the layout of the first aspect of the invention, a high energy particle hitting either of the devices (FETs) 10, 20 in the direction of arrow “A”, will not result in a SEU. This is due to the fact that the devices (FETs) 10, 20 are not aligned, side-by-side (along the gate length) and, as such, any high energy particle passing through the gate length (diffusion region) of one FET will not pass through or hit-the other FET.
There is also a very low probability that a high energy particle hitting the structure of
For example, a high energy particle travelling in the direction of arrow “B” has a very low probability of causing a SEU. This is due to the fact that the high energy particle hitting the body of one device (FET) would have to travel a large distance, e.g., upwards in some structures of more than 490 nm, and at a very narrow angle of attack before approaching the body region of the other device (FET). That is, the high energy particle would have to pass through the entire or substantially the entire width of the body region of one device (FET) as well as the isolation region 40 at a specific range of angles in order to hit the body region of the other device to cause such an SEU. A further explanation of several possible scenarios is discussed in more detail with reference to
In
In
Similar to the aspect of the invention shown in
Similar to that of
The interleave design includes interleaved NFET devices 300 and PFET devices 400. The NFET devices 300 and PFET devices 400 have a non-shared drain, which offers better protection from SEU than conventional devices. The interleaved structure of
As shown in
In
In
In
The methods as described above are used in the fabrication of integrated circuit chips. The resulting integrated circuit chips can be distributed by the fabricator in raw wafer form (that is, as a single wafer that has multiple unpackaged chips), as a bare die, or in a packaged form. In the latter case the chip is mounted in a single chip package (such as a plastic carrier, with leads that are affixed to a motherboard or other higher level carrier) or in a multichip package (such as a ceramic carrier that has either or both surface interconnections or buried interconnections). In any case the chip is then integrated with other chips, discrete circuit elements, and/or other signal processing devices as part of either (a) an intermediate product, such as a motherboard, or (b) an end product. The end product can be any product that includes integrated circuit chips.
By way of background, linear energy transfer (LET) is the energy loss per unit path length of a radiation particle in a target medium. Here, a radiation particle can be any charged particle, which includes a proton (hydrogen ion), an alpha particle (He-4 ion), or any heavier (charged) ion, that bombards the medium of the integrated circuit.
LET is proportional to Z**2/(E/amu). For example, LET is proportional to the square of the electric charge of the radiation particle, but inversely proportional to its kinetic energy/amu. By way of illustration, a proton has amu=1, and an alpha particle has amu=4, etc. A proton with 1 MeV and a 4 MeV alpha particle would both be associated with 1 MeV/amu, and as such, the 1 MeV proton and the 4 MeV alpha would move with the same velocity. But the LET of 4 MeV alpha particle would be four times the LET of the 1 MeV proton.
When a radiation particle goes through a (thin) target, such as a device or a circuit, the charge generated by this particle in the target can be computed as:
dQ=a conversion factor*LET*path length of the particle in the target.
Here, the conversion factor depends on the target material. For example, if dQ is expressed in unit of fC (femto-Coulomb), LET in units of MeV/micron and the path length in microns, then for Si, the conversion factor is 44.5. Also, because of the Z**2 dependence of LET, heavy ions are associated with larger LET than protons or alphas. This is a major reason why in space programs heavy ion-induced SEUs are a major issue, because heavy ions are an important radiation source. On ground, SEU can be caused by terrestrial neutrons, but neutrons themselves do not carry electric charge. However, when the neutrons hit devices/circuits, they can interact with the materials via nuclear reactions to produce (secondary) protons, alphas, or some heavy recoil nuclei, all of which can cause SEUs.
For each of
The following are exemplary values used in
Table 1, below, shows several examples using the layout of the first or second aspect of the invention. In Table 1, the first column provides a ratio of device separation to device thickness and the second column provides the critical angle. For advanced SOI technologies, this critical angle would be approximately 70-75 degrees. The third column of Table 1 provides the ratio of particle path length in Si to BEOL thickness.
In one example, a typical BEOL thickness is approximately 10 μm. For δ/t=2.5, α needs to travel about 26.9 μm which already exceeds the maximum range of a 5.3 MeV α emitted from a Polonium-210 source in the packaging materials. In a typical dimension of the present invention of δ/t>>2.5, there is a very small probability for α from BEOL to hit two neighboring FETs.
Also, the solid angle shown in
δΩ=(π/4)[L/(W1+W2+δ)]2+O(x4), where x=L/(W1+W2+δ).
For advanced SOI technologies, this solid angle would be less than 0.01 radians, using typical values of L/(W1+W2+δ)<0.1
In
˜(t/tNC)(δΩ/4π)˜(t/16tNC)[L/(W1+W2+δ)]2˜1.6×10−6,
where the estimates are based on typical values of parameters: t=50 nm; tNC=20 μm and L/(W1+W2+δ)=0.1
Designing sufficiently large isolation separation of neighboring FETs (δ) is very effective in reducing sensitivity to the scenario in
The designs discussed in the background section, though, are not immune to HI track structure problem, and that the layouts of the present invention are superior to such known devices. Also, in the designs discussed in the background, high-Z HI hitting the middle n+ region can easily deposit charge in both FETs, because the length of middle n+ region<diffusion length, something that will not occur in the invention. Additionally, in the designs discussed in the background, high-Z HI hitting middle isolation region can deposit charge in both FETs, because the e-h plasma column can overlap on the wide sides of n+ regions of both FETs, something that will not occur in the invention.
Design process 910 preferably employs and incorporates hardware and/or software modules for synthesizing, translating, or otherwise processing a design/simulation functional equivalent of the components, circuits, devices, or logic structures shown in
Design process 910 may include hardware and software modules for processing a variety of input data structure types including netlist 980. Such data structure types may reside, for example, within library elements 930 and include a set of commonly used elements, circuits, and devices, including models, layouts, and symbolic representations, for a given manufacturing technology (e.g., different technology nodes, 32 nm, 45 nm, 90 nm, etc.). The data structure types may further include design specifications 940, characterization data 950, verification data 960, design rules 970, and test data files 985 which may include input test patterns, output test results, and other testing information. Design process 910 may further include, for example, standard mechanical design processes such as stress analysis, thermal analysis, mechanical event simulation, process simulation for operations such as casting, molding, and die press forming, etc. One of ordinary skill in the art of mechanical design can appreciate the extent of possible mechanical design tools and applications used in design process 910 without deviating from the scope and spirit of the invention. Design process 910 may also include modules for performing standard circuit design processes such as timing analysis, verification, design rule checking, place and route operations, etc.
Design process 910 employs and incorporates logic and physical design tools such as HDL compilers and simulation model build tools to process design structure 920 together with some or all of the depicted supporting data structures along with any additional mechanical design or data (if applicable), to generate a second design structure 990. Design structure 990 resides on a storage medium or programmable gate array in a data format used for the exchange of data of mechanical devices and structures (e.g. information stored in a IGES, DXF, Parasolid XT, JT, DRG, or any other suitable format for storing or rendering such mechanical design structures). Similar to design structure 920, design structure 990 preferably comprises one or more files, data structures, or other computer-encoded data or instructions that reside on transmission or data storage media and that when processed by an ECAD system generate a logically or otherwise functionally equivalent form of one or more of the embodiments of the invention shown in
Design structure 990 may also employ a data format used for the exchange of layout data of integrated circuits and/or symbolic data format (e.g. information stored in a GDSII (GDS2), GL1, OASIS, map files, or any other suitable format for storing such design data structures). Design structure 990 may comprise information such as, for example, symbolic data, map files, test data files, design content files, manufacturing data, layout parameters, wires, levels of metal, vias, shapes, data for routing through the manufacturing line, and any other data required by a manufacturer or other designer/developer to produce a device or structure as described above and shown in
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims, if applicable, are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principals of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. Accordingly, while the invention has been described in terms of embodiments, those of skill in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modifications and in the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4714840 | Proebsting | Dec 1987 | A |
5151759 | Vinal | Sep 1992 | A |
5528056 | Shimada et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5703381 | Iwasa et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5987086 | Raman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6184559 | Hayakawa et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6268630 | Schwank et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6794908 | Erstad | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6804502 | Burgener et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7067366 | Gehres | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7298010 | Ma | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7304354 | Morris | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7332780 | Matsuda et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7888959 | Cannon et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8541879 | Smayling | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20020182884 | Bernkopf et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030214773 | Kitagawa | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040007743 | Matsuda et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040140483 | Yonemaru | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050179093 | Morris | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060001045 | Sidhu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20090072313 | Cai et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10093023 | Apr 1998 | JP |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,596. |
Makihara et al., “SEE in a 0.15 μm Fully Depleted CMOS/SOI Commercial Process”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 51, No. 6, Dec. 2004, pp. 3621-3625. |
Makihara et al., “Hardness-by-Design Approach for 0.15 μm Fully Depleted CMOS/SOI Digital Logic Devices with Enhanced SUE/SET Immunity”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 52, No. 6, Dec. 2006, pp. 2524-2530. |
Makihara et al., “Optimization for SEU/SET Immunity on 0.15 μm Fully Depleted CMOS/SOI Digital Logic Devices”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 53, No. 6, Dec. 2006, pp. 3422-3427. |
Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,569, 17 pages. |
Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,569, 21 pages. |
Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,569, 27 pages. |
Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,569, 7 pages. |
Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,569, 12 pages. |
Tang, “Nuclear Processes and Soft Fails in Microelectronics”, Nuclear Physics A, vol. 752, Apr. 2005, Abstract, 2 pages. |
Gordon et al., “Measurement of the Flux and Energy Spectrum of Cosmic-Ray Induced Neutrons on the Ground”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 51, No. 6, Dec. 2004, pp. 3427-3434. |
Makihara et al., “Optimization for SEU/SET Immunity on 0.15 μm Fully Depleted CMOS/SOI Digital Logic Devices”, The 7th Annual Workshop on Radiation Effects on Semiconductor Devices for Space Application, Oct. 16-18, 2006; 16 pages. |
Final Office Action dated May 16, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,569; 24 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100237389 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |