Synthetic pattern exchange configuration for side reading reduction

Abstract

A patterned, synthetic, longitudinally exchange biased GMR sensor is provided which has a narrow effective trackwidth and reduced side reading. The advantageous properties of the sensor are obtained by satisfying a novel relationship between the magnetizations (M) of the ferromagnetic free layer (F1) and the ferromagnetic biasing layer (F2) which enables the optimal thicknesses of those layers to be determined for a wide range of ferromagnetic materials and exchange coupling materials. The relationship to be satisfied is MF2/MF1=(Js+Jex)/Js, where Js is the synthetic coupling energy between F1 and F2 and Jex is the exchange energy between F2 and an overlaying antiferromagnetic pinning layer. An alternative embodiment omits the overlaying antiferromagnetic pinning layer which causes the relationship to become MF2/MF1=1.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally to the fabrication of a giant magnetoresistive (GMR) magnetic field sensor for a magnetic read head, more specifically to the use of synthetic exchange biasing to reduce the magnetic track width (MRW) of such a sensor.

2. Description of the Related Art

Magnetic read heads whose sensors make use of the giant magnetoresistive effect (GMR) in the spin-valve configuration (SVMR) base their operation on the fact that magnetic fields produced by data stored in the medium being read cause the direction of the magnetization of one layer in the sensor (the free magnetic layer) to move relative to a fixed magnetization direction of another layer of the sensor (the fixed or pinned magnetic layer). Because the resistance of the sensor element is proportional to the cosine of the (varying) angle between these two magnetizations, a constant current (the sensing current) passing through the sensor produces a varying voltage across the sensor which is interpreted by associated electronic circuitry. The accuracy, linearity and stability required of a GMR sensor places stringent requirements on the magnetization of its fixed and free magnetic layers. The fixed layer, for example, has its magnetization “pinned” in a direction normal to the air bearing surface of the sensor (the transverse direction) by an adjacent magnetic layer called the pinning layer. The free layer is magnetized in a direction along the width of the sensor and parallel to the air bearing surface (the longitudinal direction). Layers of hard magnetic material (permanent magnetic layers) or laminates of antiferromagnetic and soft magnetic materials are typically formed on each side of the sensor and oriented so that their magnetic field extends in the same direction as that of the free layer. These layers, called longitudinal bias layers, maintain the free layer as a single magnetic domain and also assist in linearizing the sensor response by keeping the free layer magnetization direction normal to that of the fixed layer when quiescent. Maintaining the free layer in a single domain state significantly reduces noise (Barkhausen noise) in the signal produced by thermodynamic variations in domain configurations. A magnetically stable spin-valve sensor using either hard magnetic biasing layers or ferromagnetic biasing layers is disclosed by Zhu et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,324,037 B1) and by Huai et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,222,707 B1).

The importance of longitudinal bias has led to various inventions designed to improve the material composition, structure, positioning and method of forming the magnetic layers that produce it. One form of the present art provides for sensor structures in which the longitudinal bias layers are layers of hard magnetic material (permanent magnets) that abut the etched back ends of the active region of the sensor to produce what is called an abutted junction configuration. This arrangement fixes the domain structure of the free magnetic layer by magnetostatic coupling through direct edge-to-edge contact at the etched junction between the biasing layer and the exposed end of the layer being biased (the free layer). Another form of the present art, patterned exchange bias, appears in two versions: 1) direct exchange and 2) synthetic exchange. Unlike the magnetostatic coupling resulting from direct contact with a hard magnetic material that is used in the abutted junction, in exchange coupling the biasing layer is a layer of ferromagnetic material which overlays the layer being biased, but is separated from it by a thin coupling layer of non-magnetic material. This non-magnetic gap separating the two layers produces exchange coupling between them, a situation in which it is energetically favorable for the biasing layer and the biased layer assume a certain relative direction of magnetization. In direct exchange coupling, the material used to form the gap (eg. Cu or Ru) and its thickness are chosen to allow a ferromagnetic form of exchange coupling wherein the biasing and biased layers have the same directions of magnetization. In synthetic exchange coupling, the non-magnetic material of the coupling layer (eg. Cu, Ru or Rh) and its thickness are chosen to allow antiferromagnetic coupling, wherein the magnetization of the biasing and biased layers are antiparallel. Xiao et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,322,640 B1) disclose a method for forming a double, antiferromagnetically biased GMR sensor, using as the biasing material a magnetic material having two crystalline phases, one of which couples antiferromagnetically and the other of which does not.

As the area density of magnetization in magnetic recording media (eg. disks) continues to increase, significant reduction in the width of the active sensing region (trackwidth) of read-sensors becomes necessary. For trackwidths less than 0.2 microns (μm), the traditional abutted junction hard bias structure discussed above becomes unsuitable because the strong magnetostatic coupling at the junction surface actually pins the magnetization of the (very narrow) biased layer (the free layer), making it less responsive to the signal being read and, thereby, significantly reducing the sensor sensitivity. This adverse pinning effect is discussed by Fukuzawa et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,118,624) who provide a mechanism for alleviating it by use of a hard magnetic biasing film which has a higher saturation magnetism than the free layer being biased.

Under very narrow trackwidth conditions, the exchange bias method becomes increasingly attractive, since the free layer is not reduced in size by the formation of an abutted junction, but extends continuously across the entire width of the sensor element. FIG. 1 is a schematic depiction of an abutted junction arrangement and FIG. 2 is an equally schematic depiction of a direct exchange coupled configuration. As can be seen, the trackwidth in the abutted junction is made narrow by physically etching away both ends of the sensor, whereas in the exchange coupled sensor, the trackwidth is defined by placement of the conductive leads and bias layers while the sensor element retains its full width.

The direct exchange biasing also has its shortcomings when used in a very narrow trackwidth configuration because of the weakness of the pinning field, provided to the free and biasing layers by the antiferromagnetic layer, which pinning field is found to be, typically, approximately 250 Oe.

A stronger pinning field, typically exceeding 700 Oe, can be obtained using the synthetic exchange biasing method. Such a pinning field can be obtained, for example, using a GMR configuration (numerals referring to angstroms) with a CoFe (10)/NiFe(20) ferromagnetic free bilayer, a Ru (7.5) non-magnetic coupling layer and a CoFe (15) biasing layer antiferromagnetically pinned by an antiferromagnetic IrMn (40) layer. According to micromagnetic simulation, a magnetic trackwidth of 0.15 μm can be obtained with a physical track width of 0.1 μm by using such a configuration. Unfortunately, even with its higher degree of exchange coupling this configuration produces an undesirable level of side reading (sensor response generated by signals originating outside of the magnetic trackwidth region) which is produced by the portion of the free layer that is beneath the biasing layer and conduction leads.

The present invention, therefore, addresses this significant problem of reducing the undesirable side reading of a synthetic exchange biased sensor, while retaining the strong coupling between the biasing layer and the free layer which is responsible for the generally excellent performance of the sensor configuration.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is a first object of the present invention to provide a magnetically stable synthetic exchange (longitudinally) biased GMR sensor capable of reading high area density magnetic recordings of densities exceeding 60 Gb/in² (gigabits per square inch).

It is a second object of the present invention to provide such a synthetic exchange biased GMR sensor which has a very narrow trackwidth, typically in a range between 0.05 and 0.20 microns.

It is a third object of the present invention to provide such a synthetic exchange biased GMR sensor having a very narrow trackwidth and in which undesirable side reading is eliminated.

It is a fourth object of the present invention to provide such a synthetic exchange biased GMR sensor having an improved topography.

It is a fifth object of the present invention to provide such a synthetic exchange biased GMR sensor having negative magnetostriction.

It is a sixth object of the present invention to provide such a synthetic exchange biased GMR sensor that is easily fabricated.

It is a seventh object of the present invention to provide such a synthetic exchange biased GMR sensor that can be manufactured within an advantageous process range.

The objects of this invention will be achieved in two embodiments. In the first embodiment, a synthetic exchange (longitudinally) biased GMR sensor will be designed through coherent rotation simulation wherein the biased ferromagnetic free layer (F1) and the ferromagnetic biasing layer (F2) are formed with an optimal ratio of thicknesses. For a given synthetic coupling energy (J_s) between F1 and F2 resulting from a non-magnetic spacer layer of given material and thickness and an a given exchange energy (J_ex) between F2 and an overlaying antiferromagnetic layer of given material and thickness which pins the magnetization direction of F2, this optimum ratio is found to satisfy the relationship between their respective magnetizations (M): M_F2/M_F1=(J_s+J_ex)/J_s. When formed in accord with this novel, optimized configuration given by this relationship, the sensor is magnetically stable, has an improved overall response, is characterized by significantly reduced undesirable side reading characteristics, has an effectively decreased (by ˜30%) trackwidth and can be manufactured within an advantageous process range. Furthermore, the use of the relationship above allows a straightforward calculation of optimal F1 and F2 thicknesses for a wide variety of F1 and F2 materials, a wide variety of antiferromagnetic pinning materials and a wide variety of non-magnetic spacer layers and their thicknesses.

The existence of an optimum thickness ratio is established by means of coherent rotation simulations which study the relationship between the angular displacement of the magnetization of F1 relative to F2 in the conducting lead region as a function of the strength of an applied external magnetic field that is perpendicular to the pinning field. In addition, there is also shown the variation of the magnetoresistance (MR) of the configuration as a function of the same applied field.

In a second embodiment, a novel configuration of a synthetic exchange biased sensor is provided wherein the ferromagnetic biasing layer (F2) is not itself antiferromagnetically pinned by an overlaying antiferromagnetic layer. This novel configuration simplifies the fabrication process of the sensor, improves its topography and, in equal measure to the first embodiment, provides a sensor with highly improved (negative) magnetostriction characteristics.

The method by which the sensors described above are fabricated and to which the optimizations also described above can be readily and easily applied is fully disclosed in patent application HT01-036/038, Ser. No. 10/104,802, filing date Mar. 22, 2002, which is incorporated fully herein by reference.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The objects, features and advantages of the present invention are understood within the context of the Description of the Preferred Embodiment, as set forth below. The Description of the Preferred Embodiment is understood within the context of the accompanying figures, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a highly schematic diagram of a prior-art abutted junction GMR sensor stack having a hard magnetic bias layer and conductive lead overlayer in contact with the junction. The diagram is a cross-sectional view of the air bearing surface (ABS) of the sensor. The sensor stack shows only the free layer.

FIG. 2 is a schematic, ABS view, cross-sectional diagram of a prior-art direct exchange biased GMR sensor stack, showing the patterned biasing layers as well as other layers of the sensor.

FIG. 3 is a schematic, ABS view, cross-sectional diagram of a synthetic exchange biased GMR sensor stack otherwise identical to the stack in FIG. 2 but which can be optimized in a manner consistent with the objects of the present invention. The general form of this stack, when optimized, will be in accord with the objects of a first embodiment the present invention and possess novel and improved side reading characteristics.

FIG. 4 is a schematic, ABS view, cross-sectional diagram of a synthetic exchange biased GMR sensor stack formed in accord with a second embodiment of the present invention. This stack is structurally different from the stack in FIG. 3 and it can be similarly optimized.

FIGS. 5A–H is two sets of graphs, showing (A–D) simulated dependencies of the angle between the magnetizations of F1 (free layer) and F2 (biasing layer) on an external field and (E–H) the relationship between the magnetoresistance of the configuaration and the external field. The graphs are for four different values of the thickness of F2.

FIG. 6 is a graph showing the simulated response of the F1 signal at the region of the conductive leads as a function of F2 thickness.

FIG. 7 is a graph showing the results of simulating the response of F1 along its length as a function of F2 thickness.

FIG. 8 is the sensor of FIG. 3 now formed in accord with the method of the present invention, i.e., wherein the F1 and F2 layers have the thicknesses prescribed by the optimization procedure.

All the simulation results depicted in FIGS. 5–8 were done on the following simulation structure: FM/Cu/F1(CoFe10/NiFe20)/Ru 7.5/F2(CoFe X)/IrMn, where the numerals represent thicknesses in angstroms and X represents the variable thickness of the F2 layer.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring first to FIG. 1 there is shown a schematic cross-sectional view of the ABS surface of a typical abutted junction GMR sensor designed in accord with the prior art. As can be seen, the narrow trackwidth is obtained at the price of reducing the physical width of the ferromagnetic free layer (10). As a result, the biasing layer (20) pins the magnetization of the free layer and reduces the sensitivity of the sensor.

Referring next to FIG. 2, there is shown a schematic cross-sectional view of the ABS surface of a patterned direct exchange longitudinally biased GMR sensor of the prior art. The physical trackwidth (10) of this configuration is defined by the width of the region between the leads (20), typically a Ta/Au bilayer, and the patterned biasing (25) layers (F2), typically layers of CoFe, which are laterally (ie. in the longitudinal direction) separated along the top of the sensor. The ferromagnetic free layer (F1) (27), typically a CoFe/NiFe bilayer, extends the entire width of the sensor so it is not adversely affected by the strength of the biasing layer, which is a disadvantage of the hard biased abutted junction of FIG. 1. The diagram also shows the antiferromagnetic layer (29), typically a layer of IrMn, which pins the patterned F2 biasing layer (25). The free layer (27) is separated from the biasing layer (25) by a non-magnetic coupling layer (28) which is typically a layer of Cu or Ru and which directly exchange couples the ferromagnetic free layer (27) to the ferromagnetic biasing layer (25) by ferromagnetic coupling to produce parallel magnetizations (11). The remainder of the configuration comprises an antiferromagnetically coupled pinned layer (30), which is comprised of two ferromagnetic layers (AP2 (32) and AP1 (34)) antiferromagnetically exchange coupled across a non-magnetic coupling layer (36) and which is separated from (27) by a non magnetic spacer layer (31). Beneath (30) there is an antiferromagnetic pinning layer (40), typically a layer of MnPt, which pins the antiferromagnetically coupled pinned layer. Since the strength of the ferromagnetic coupling (the pinning field) is weak and is typically less than 250 Oe, it is difficult to achieve a narrow effective trackwidth of less than 0.2 microns. Note that thicknesses are not given for this figure since the configuration is shown for comparison purposes only.

Referring next to FIG. 3, there is shown a schematic cross-sectional view of the ABS surface of a patterned synthetic exchange longitudinally biased GMR sensor whose structure and method of fabrication are fully described in related patent application HT01-0361038 and which is fully incorporated herein by reference. This structure is similar in many respects to the direct exchange configuration of FIG. 2. except for the antiparallel directions of the F2 and F1 magnetic moments M2 (12), M1 (13). It is this configuration of FIG. 3 which, when properly designed and optimized in accord with the simulations of the present invention, constitutes the first embodiment of the present invention. The following dimensions, however, are those disclosed in HT01-036/038 and are not in accord with the present invention. The physical trackwidth (10) of this configuration is approximately 0.1 microns and is defined by the width of the region between the leads (20) and patterned biasing (25) layers (F2). Typically, F2 is a layer of CoFe whose thickness is approximately 15 angstroms. Because the ferromagnetic free layer (F1) (27) extends the entire width of the sensor, it is not adversely affected by the strength of the biasing layer as in the case of the hard biased abutted junction of FIG. 1. Typically F1 is a CoFe/NiFe bilayer, wherein the thickness of the CoFe is approximately 10 angstroms and the thickness of the NiFe layer is approximately 20 angstroms. The diagram also shows the antiferromagnetic layer (29), typically a layer of IrMn, of thickness approximately approximately 40 angstroms, which pins the F2 biasing layer (25). Unlike the configuration of FIG. 2, the free layer F1 (27) is separated from the biasing layer F2 (25) by a non-magnetic coupling layer (28) which is typically a layer of Cu, Rh or Ru and which has the correct thickness to exchange couple the ferromagnetic free layer (27) to the ferromagnetic biasing layer (25) by antiferromagnetic coupling. A layer of Ru of approximately 7.5 angstroms thickness, for example, is preferable. The remainder of this configuration is the same as in FIG. 2. The strength of the antiferromagnetic coupling (the pinning field) is stronger than the ferromagnetic coupling in FIG. 2 and is typically over 700 Oe. According to our simulations a physical trackwidth of 0.1 microns in the above configuration will produce an effective trackwidth of 0.15 microns because of the undesirable side reading. It is to be noted that the layer thicknesses given above refer to a prior art configuration as does the 0.15 micron effective trackwidth for a 0.1 micron physical trackwidth. Only with the use of the method of the present invention will the significant reduction in effective trackwidth and reduced side reading be obtained. The present invention will provide a novel mechanism for optimizing the thicknesses of F1 and F2 so as to appreciably narrow the effective trackwidth for a given physical trackwidth.

The first embodiment of the present invention will consist of the application to the configuration of FIG. 3 (to which the label numbers below refer), of the novel results of a coherent rotation simulation (FIGS. 5–8 below). These results indicate the existence of an optimal relationship between the thicknesses of F1 (27) and F2 (25), which, when used to form the configuration described in FIG. 3, significantly reduce the side reading propensity of that configuration, thereby effectively narrowing its trackwidth while simultaneously retaining all of the original advantageous properties provided by such a patterned, synthetic exchange biased sensor. This reduced trackwidth is sufficient for reading magnetic recordings with area densities exceeding 60 Gb/in². The results of the simulation indicate that the thicknesses of F1 and F2 should be chosen so that the relationship between their respective magnetizations M_F1, M_F2 satisfy the following equation:M_F2/M_F1=(J_s+J_ex)/J_sinvolving the coupling energy (J_s) between F1 and F2 and the exchange energy (J_ex) between F2 and the overlaying antiferromagnetic layer (29).

Referring next to FIG. 4, there is shown a schematic cross-sectional view of the ABS surface of a patterned synthetic exchange biased GMR sensor, whose novel configuration provides the second preferred embodiment of this invention. Although the general configuration is similar in some respects to the patterned synthetic exchange configuration of FIG. 3, there is an important difference in that the biasing layer F2 is not pinned by an antiferromagnetic layer (layer (29) in FIG. 3). The omission of antiferromagnetic layer simplifies the fabrication process of the sensor, improves its topography and, most significantly, makes the magnetostriction characteristics negative. In the absence of the antiferromagnetic pinning layer the exchange energy term, J_ex, is zero and the optimization formula becomes:M_F2/M_F1=(J_s+J_ex)/J_s=(J_s+0)/J_s=1,which leads to an optimized thickness ratio, F₂/F₁, which is also 1. The F2 biasing layer (25) can be a layer of ferromagnetic material such as CoFe.

Like the configuration of FIG. 3, the ferromagnetic free layer (27), which is typically a layer of CoFe or a bilayer of CoFe and NiFe is separated from the biasing layer (25) by a non-magnetic antiferromagnetically coupling layer (28) which is typically a layer of Cu, Rh or Ru and which exchange couples the ferromagnetic free layer (27) to the ferromagnetic biasing layer (25) by antiferromagnetic coupling. The remainder of this configuration is the same as in FIG. 3 and the various layers are numbered as in FIG. 3.

Referring next to FIGS. 5A–H, there is shown, two groups of four graphs, generated by micromagnetic simulation. The A–D graphs indicate the variation of the angle between the magnetization (magnetic moment) of F1 and F2 as a function of an externally applied field. The four separate graphs in this figure correspond to four different thicknesses of the biasing layer, F2. The E–H graphs indicate the variation of the magnetoresistance (MR) of the configuration as a function of the same externally applied field. The configuration of layers that is the basis for this simulation is a realistic representation of an actual sensor structure of the type described in FIG. 3, namely:

• • FM/Cu/F1(CoFe(10)/NiFe(20))/Ru(7.5)/F2(CoFe(X))/IrMnThe numbers are thicknesses in angstroms, the “X” in CoFe represents the variable simulation thickness of the F2 layer that is used to distinguish the four graphs, X=15 angstroms, 25 angstroms, 28 angstroms and 35 angstroms. FM, representing a ferromagnetic layer, is used to simplify the simulation. Referring to the figure, it can be seen that with the increase in F2 thickness from 15 to 35 angstroms, the F1 rotation angle under low field first decreases with F2 thickness and reaches a minimum for F2=28 angstroms, then increases again with F2 thickness. For each fixed value of F1, as well as values of J_ex and J_s, there is an optimum thickness of F2, so different configurations will generally require different optimizations. In the simulated structure above, J_s=0.25 erg/cm² and J_ex=0.1 erg/cm². It is to be noted that the IrMn layer would be absent in the second embodiment of FIG. 4

Referring next to FIG. 6, there is shown a graph relating F2 thickness to the relative sensor signal produced by only the lead region of the free layer, the portion of F1 that is beneath the lead layer and, therefore, outside of the physical trackwidth. Since the reduction of effective trackwidth is a result of eliminating, to as great a degree as possible, undesirable signals emanating from that portion of the free layer, it is critical to demonstrate that such signal reduction is possible and can be optimized. As seen in the graph, there is a distinct minimum at around 28 angstroms thickness of F2. The simulation producing the graph assumed a 400 Oe field in the lead region of F1. An observation of the graph also shows that if F2 is in the thickness range of 22 to 34 angstroms, the signal contribution of the lead region can be reduced by more than a factor of three. The results compiled in Table 1 (below) also indicate that the 25 angstrom and 28 angstrom F2 thicknesses have very similar effective trackwidths. This indicates that there is a window of thicknesses (an F2/F1 ratio of between 1.1 and 1.7) about the optimal thickness which are equally advantageous for sensor formation.

Referring finally to FIG. 7, there is shown the superposition of three graphs that plot normalized sensor output as a function of position along the physical trackwidth of the sensor (0.1 micron). For the purposes of this simulation, the configuration was the following.

In the lead region:

• MnPt/CoFe15/Ru7.5/CoFe20/Cu18/CoFe10/NiFe20/Ru7.5/CoFeX/IrMn/Ta/Au/TaIn the sensor region:
• MnPt/CoFe15/Ru7.5/CoFe20/Cu18/CoFe10/NiFe20/Ru7.5/CoFeOThe three graphs correspond to different F2 thickness: X=15, 25 and 28 angstroms. As can be seen in the figure, the trackwidth becomes narrower with increasing F2 thickness and the graph for X=28 angstroms is both narrowest and smoothest.

The results of the modeling are summarized in Table 1 below.

	TABLE 1
	Js	Jex	Effective
Configuration (angstroms)	erg/cm2	Trackwidth (μm)
CoFe10/NiFe20/Ru7.5/CoFe15/IrMn40	0.25	0.1	0.15
CoFe10/NiFe20/Ru7.5/CoFe25/IrMn40	0.25	0.1	0.12
CoFe10/NiFe20/Ru7.5/CoFe25/IrMn40	0.25	0.1	0.11

With a different nonmagnetic spacer layer and/or a different antiferromagnetic pinning layer J_s and J_ex would change and the thickness of F2 would have to be recalculated for optimality. It is found that for a given configuration with fixed J_s and J_ex the minimum F1 rotation can be obtained when the ratio of F1/F2 magnetic moments is given by:M_F2/M_F1=(J_s+J_ex)/J_sAn example of the variation of F2 thickness required to obtain minimum effective trackwidth for two different non-magnetic spacer layers and F1 having a magnetization equivalent to 20 angstroms of CoFe is given in Table 2.

TABLE 2
	Js(erg/	Js(erg/	F2	Hpin
Structure	cm2)	cm2)	thickness	(Oe)
CoFe10/NiFe20/Ru7.5/F2/IrMn40	0.25	0.1	28	900
CoFe10/NiFe20/Rh5/F2/IrMn40	0.75	0.1	22.6	2500

The synthetic bias scheme of this embodiment can be a variety of combinations of materials for the antiferromagnetic layer that pins F2 (eg. NiMn, PtMn, PdPtMn, FeMn, IrMn), the non-magnetic spacer layer that couples F1 to F2 (eg. Cu, Rh, Ru, Ir, Cr) and the ferromagnetic free layer F1 (eg. CoFe, CoFe/NiFe, CoFeNi, NiFe). Knowledge of J_s and J_ex, which would be obtained from experiment, and the use of the relationship M_F2/M_F1=(J_s+J_ex)/J_s (or, M_F2/M_F1=1, for the second embodiment) allows a straightforward determination of optimal thicknesses for F1 and F2.

Referring now to FIG. 8 there is shown the first preferred embodiment of this invention, which is the formation of the structure in FIG. 3, using fabrications methods from related patent application HT01-036/038 fully incorporated herein by reference and, in addition, applying the results of the simulations described in FIGS. 5–7, Tables 1 and 2 and the formula M_F2/M_F1=(J_s+J_ex)/J_s. In FIG. 8 there is shown, therefore, the structure of FIG. 3, wherein the dimensions of the F1 and F2 layers and their material composition are as follows. It is further understood that if the objects and advantages of the present invention are to be obtained, the determination of F2 and F1 dimensions must be calculated anew for each choice of their material composition and the values of J_s and J_ex resulting from the various possible coupling layers and pinning layers. In the present figure, however, the free layer (27) is a bilayer of CoFe/NiFe, wherein the CoFe (21) has a thickness between approximately 3 and 20 angstroms, with 10 angstroms being the preferred value and the NiFe (22) has a thickness between 40 and 10 angstroms, with 20 angstroms being the preferred value. Within this range of values, the biasing layer, F2, (27) is a layer of CoFe of thickness range between approximately 22 angstroms and 34 angstroms, with 28 angstroms being the preferred value and the non-magnetic coupling layer (28) is a layer of Ru of thickness between approximately 2 angstroms and 9 angstroms, with 7.5 angstroms being preferable. Alternatively, if the non-magnetic coupling layer (28) is a layer of Rh of thickness between approximately 3 and 6 angstroms, with 5 angstroms being preferable, the F2 layer (27) would be a layer of CoFe of thickness between approximately 18.6 angstroms and 26.6 angstroms, with 22.6 angstroms being preferable. The pinning layer of IrMn (29) is in the thickness range between approximately 25 angstroms and 100 angstroms. In the second embodiment, which would be the application to the structure of FIG. 4 the relationship M_F2/M_F1=1, the optimization the dimensional ranges of layer F1 remain approximately the same as in the first embodiment, while the thickness of the F2 layer, which is a layer of CoFe, is between approximately 10 angstroms and 20 angstroms with 15 angstroms being preferred. All other layers and dimensions would be the same as those of FIG. 3.

As is understood by a person skilled in the art, the preferred embodiment of the present invention is illustrative of the present invention rather than limiting of the present invention. Revisions and modifications may be made to methods, materials, structures and dimensions employed in fabricating a synthetic, patterned, longitudinally exchange biased GMR sensor with narrow effective trackwidth and reduced side reading, while still providing a method for fabricating such a synthetic, patterned, longitudinally exchange biased GMR sensor with narrow effective trackwidth and reduced side reading, in accord with the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A synthetic, patterned, longitudinally exchange biased GMR sensor with narrow effective trackwidth and reduced side reading comprising: a substrate;a first layer of antiferromagnetic material formed on the substrate, said layer being a pinning layer;a synthetic antiferromagnetic pinned layer formed on said antiferromagnetic pinning layer;a non-magnetic spacer layer formed on said pinned layer;a ferromagnetic free layer formed on said non-magnetic spacer layer, said free layer having a free layer thickness and a free layer magnetic moment M1;a non-magnetic antiferromagnetically coupling layer formed on said ferromagnetic free layer;a patterned, ferromagnetic, longitudinal biasing layer formed on said coupling layer, said biasing layer being formed as two discrete, disconnected and laterally separated segments, laterally and symmetrically disposed to either side of the antiferromagnetically coupling layer and wherein the separation of said segments defines a physical trackwidth and wherein said biasing layer has a biasing layer thickness, a biasing layer magnetic moment M2 and wherein there is a synthetic coupling energy Js between said biasing layer and said free layer and wherein said longitudinal biasing layer is antiferromagnetically coupled to said free layer through said antiferromagnetically coupling layer;a second antiferromagnetic layer formed on said patterned, longitudinal biasing layer and coexstensive with it, said second antiferromagnetic layer being exchange coupled to said longitudinal biasing layer and there being an exchange energy, Jex, between said second antiferromagnetic layer and said biasing layer;a conductive lead layer formed on said antiferromagnetic layer; and

2. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the first antiferromagnetic layer is a layer chosen from the group of antiferromagnetic materials consisting of PtMn, IrMn, NiMn, PdPtMn and Fe Mn.

3. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the first antiferromagnetic layer is a layer of PtMn and is formed to a thickness of between approximately 50 and 200 angstroms, but is preferably 100 angstroms.

4. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the synthetic antiferromagnetic pinned layer is a trilayer comprising a first and second ferromagnetic layer separated by a non-magnetic antiferromagnetically coupling layer.

5. The sensor of claim 4 wherein the first and second ferromagnetic layers are layers of ferromagnetic material chosen from the group consisting of CoFe, NiFe and CoFeNi.

6. The sensor of claim 4 wherein the non-magnetic antiferromagnetically coupling layer is a layer of non-magnetic material chosen from the group consisting of Cu, Ru and Rh.

7. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the synthetic antiferromagnetic pinned layer is a trilayer comprising a first layer of CoFe, formed to a thickness of between approximately 10 and 30 angstroms with approximately 15 angstroms being preferred and a second layer of CoFe formed to a thickness of between approximately 10 and 40 angstroms with approximately 20 angstroms being preferred, with a layer of Ru between them of thickness between approximately 2 and 9 angstroms with approximately 7.5 angstroms being preferred.

8. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the non-magnetic spacer layer is a layer of non-magnetic material chosen from the group consisting of Cu, Ru and Rh.

9. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the non-magnetic spacer layer is a layer of Cu formed to a thickness of between approximately 5 and 30 angstroms, with approximately 18 angstroms being preferred.

10. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the ferromagnetic free layer is a layer of ferromagnetic material chosen from the group consisting of CoFe, NiFe and CoFeNi.

11. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the ferromagnetic free layer is a bilayer comprising a first ferromagnetic layer on which is formed a second ferromagnetic layer wherein said first ferromagnetic layer is a layer of ferromagnetic material chosen from the group consisting of CoFe, NiFe and CoFeNi and wherein said second ferromagnetic layer is a layer of ferromagnetic material chosen from the group consisting of CoFe, NiFe and CoFeNi.

12. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the ferromagnetic free layer is a bilayer comprising a layer of CoFe of thickness between approximately 3 and 15 angstroms, where approximately 10 angstroms is preferred, on which is formed a layer of NiFe of thickness between approximately 10 and 40 angstroms, where approximately 20 angstroms is preferred.

13. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the non-magnetic antiferromagnetically coupling layer is a layer of non-magnetic material chosen from the group consisting of Cu, Ru and Rh.

14. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the non-magnetic antiferromagnetically coupling layer is a layer of Ru formed to a thickness of between approximately 2 and 9 angstroms, where approximately 7.5 angstroms is preferred.

15. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the non-magnetic antiferromagnetically coupling layer is a layer of Rh formed to a thickness of between approximately 3 and 6 angstroms, where approximately 5 angstroms is preferred.

16. The sensor of claim 14 wherein the ferromagnetic biasing layer is a layer of CoFe formed to a thickness between approximately 22 angstroms and 34 angstroms with approximately 28 angstroms being preferred.

17. The sensor of claim 15 wherein the ferromagnetic biasing layer is a layer of CoFe formed to a thickness between approximately 18.6 angstroms and 26.6 angstroms with approximately 22.6 angstroms being preferred.

18. The sensor of claim 16 wherein the second antiferromagnetic layer is a layer of IrMn formed to a thickness between approximately 25 and 100 angstroms, where approximately 40 angstroms is preferred.

19. The sensor of claim 17 wherein the second antiferromagnetic layer is a layer of IrMn formed to a thickness between approximately 25 and 100 angstroms, where approximately 40 angstroms is preferred.

20. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the values of MF1, MF2, Js and Jex are determined by coherent rotation simulation.

21. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the values of MF1, MF2, Js and Jex are determined by experiment.

22. A synthetic, patterned, longitudinally exchange biased GMR sensor with narrow effective trackwidth and reduced side reading comprising: a substrate;a first layer of antiferromagnetic material formed on the substrate, said layer being a pinning layer;a synthetic antiferromagnetic pinned layer formed on said antiferromagnetic pinning layer;a non-magnetic spacer layer formed on said pinned layer;a ferromagnetic free layer formed on said non-magnetic spacer layer, said free layer having a free layer thickness and a free layer magnetic moment M1;a non-magnetic antiferromagnetically coupling layer formed on said ferromagnetic free layer;a patterned, ferromagnetic, longitudinal biasing layer formed on said coupling layer, said biasing layer being formed as two discrete, disconnected and laterally separated segments, laterally and symmetrically disposed to either side of the antiferromagnetically coupling layer and wherein the separation of said segments defines a physical trackwidth and wherein said biasing layer has a biasing layer thickness, a biasing layer magnetic moment M2 and wherein there is a synthetic coupling energy Js between said biasing layer and said free layer and wherein said longitudinal biasing layer is antiferromagnetically coupled to said free layer through said antiferromagnetically coupling layer;a conductive lead layer formed on said ferromagnetic biasing layer; and

23. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the antiferromagnetic layer is a layer chosen from the group of antiferromagnetic materials consisting of PtMn, IrMn, NiMn, PdPtMn and Fe Mn.

24. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the antiferromagnetic layer is a layer of PtMn and is formed to a thickness of between approximately 50 and 200 angstroms, but is preferably approximately 100 angstroms.

25. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the synthetic antiferromagnetic pinned layer is a trilayer comprising a first and second ferromagnetic layer separated by a non-magnetic antiferromagnetically coupling layer.

26. The sensor of claim 25 wherein the first and second ferromagnetic layers are layers of ferromagnetic material chosen from the group consisting of CoFe, NiFe and CoFeNi.

27. The sensor of claim 25 wherein the non-magnetic antiferromagnetically coupling layer is a layer of non-magnetic material chosen from the group consisting of Cu, Ru and Rh.

28. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the synthetic antiferromagnetic pinned layer is a trilayer comprising a first layer of CoFe, formed to a thickness of between approximately 10 and 30 angstroms with approximately 15 angstroms being preferred and a second layer of CoFe formed to a thickness of between approximately 10 and 40 angstroms with 20 angstroms being preferred, with a layer of Ru between them of thickness between approximately 2 and 9 angstroms with 7.5 angstroms being preferred.

29. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the non-magnetic spacer layer is a layer of non-magnetic material chosen from the group consisting of Cu, Ru and Rh.

30. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the non-magnetic spacer layer is a layer of Cu formed to a thickness of between approximately 5 and 30 angstroms, with approximately 18 angstroms being preferred.

31. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the ferromagnetic free layer is a layer of ferromagnetic material chosen from the group consisting of CoFe, NiFe and CoFeNi.

32. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the ferromagnetic free layer is a bilayer comprising a first ferromagnetic layer on which is formed a second ferromagnetic layer wherein said first ferromagnetic layer is a layer of ferromagnetic material chosen from the group consisting of CoFe, NiFe and CoFeNi and wherein said second ferromagnetic layer is a layer of ferromagnetic material chosen from the group consisting of CoFe, NiFe and CoFeNi.

33. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the ferromagnetic free layer is a bilayer comprising a layer of CoFe of thickness between approximately a and 15 angstroms, where approximately 10 angstroms is preferred, on which is formed a layer of NiFe of thickness between approximately 10 and 40 angstroms, where approximately 20 angstroms is preferred.

34. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the non-magnetic antiferromagnetically coupling layer is a layer of non-magnetic material chosen from the group consisting of Cu, Ru and Rh.

35. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the non-magnetic antiferromagnetically coupling layer is a layer of Ru formed to a thickness of between approximately 2 and 9 angstroms, where approximately 7.5 angstroms is preferred.

36. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the non-magnetic antiferromagnetically coupling layer is a layer of Rh formed to a thickness of between approximately 3 and 6 angstroms, where approximately 5 angstroms is preferred.

37. The sensor of claim 35 wherein the ferromagnetic biasing layer is a layer of CoFe formed to a thickness between approximately 22 angstroms and 34 angstroms with 28 angstroms being preferred.

38. The sensor of claim 36 wherein the ferromagnetic biasing layer is a layer of CoFe formed to a thickness between approximately 18.6 angstroms and 26.6 angstroms with 22.6 angstroms being preferred.

39. The sensor of claim 34 wherein the biasing layer is a synthetic structure comprising a first ferromagnetic layer and a second ferromagnetic layer between which is a non-magnetic coupling layer.

40. The sensor of claim 39 wherein the first ferromagnetic layer is a layer of CoFe formed to a thickness of between approximately 10 and 40 angstroms, where approximately 20 angstroms is preferred, the second ferromagnetic layer is a layer of CoFe formed to a thickness of between approximately 10 and 40 angstroms, where approximately 20 angstroms is preferred and where the coupling layer is a layer of Ru formed to a thickness of between approximately 2 and 9 angstroms with approximately 7.5 angstroms being preferred.

41. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the values of MF1, MF2 and Js are determined by coherent rotation simulation.

42. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the values of MF1, MF2 and Js are determined by experiment.

43. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the physical trackwidth is less than approximately 0.2 microns.

44. The sensor of claim 22 wherein the physical trackwidth is less than approximately 0.2 microns.