Techniques to characterize iso-dense effects for microdevice manufacture

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6800403
  • Patent Number
    6,800,403
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 18, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 5, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A technique is provided to define a pattern (100) on a substrate (70) that includes a dense region with a number of features (101) and an isolated feature region comprised of at least a part of one of the features (101). The dense feature region has a greater feature density than the isolated feature region. A reference feature (103) is measured at a number of different points relative to the isolated feature region and the dense feature region with a measurement tool (75). An iso-dense effect is determined from these measurements.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to characterization of the iso-dense effect. More particularly, but not exclusively, the present invention relates to determining the iso-dense effect for microdevice manufacture.




To increase the speed of electronic devices, it is often desirable to decrease the critical dimension of various semiconductor components. Concomitantly, functionality of many integrated circuit devices may be increased by reducing the size of individual components so that the component density, and correspondingly the number and complexity of integrated circuits formed from the components may be increased. Unfortunately, as the critical dimension of semiconductor devices is deeply scaled down into the submicron range (<0.5 micron), various shortcomings of the processes used to make such devices can become of greater concern.




For lithographic processes aimed at forming devices with dimensions in the submicron range, the iso-dense effect can become more prominent. The iso-dense effect results in a difference in transfer dimension for dense features as compared to features that are more greatly spaced apart. This phenomenon is commonly encountered as a linewidth transfer difference between an isolated line of submicron width and a denser lines of comparable width with submicron spacing. Wilder and Singh et al.,


Sub


-0.35-


Micron Critical Dimension Metrology Using Atomic Force Microscopy


, SPIE Proceedings, volume 2725, pages 540-554 (published 1996) provides information concerning existing techniques to evaluate the iso-dense effect and is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.




Notably, characterizing the iso-dense effect can be complicated by the fact that measurement tools, such as a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), can be sensitive to the iso-dense condition. As a result, special tools are sometimes used, such as the Atomic Force Microscope (AFM), and/or electrical measurements are made; however, these approaches can be slow and expensive, and generally cannot be performed in real time with the desired manufacturing process. Other measurement schemes include application of a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM); however, such schemes are typically destructive and require long sample preparation times. Consequently, further contributions are needed in this area of technology.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




One embodiment of the present invention includes a unique technique to characterize the iso-dense effect. Other embodiments of the present invention include unique systems, methods, and apparatus to determine the iso-dense effect for microdevice manufacture.




A further embodiment of the present invention includes the definition of a pattern on a substrate for manufacture of a microdevice. This pattern includes a dense feature region and an isolated feature region. A portion of one or more features in the dense feature region are removed and one or more measurements are made corresponding to at least one of the remaining features after this removal. An iso-dense effect is determined from the measurements.




A further embodiment includes: defining a pattern on a substrate that includes a dense region of features and an isolated feature region comprised of at least a part of one of the features; measuring at least one of these features at a number of different points relative to the isolated and dense regions with a measurement tool; and determining an iso-dense effect for the measurement tool from these measurements.




Still another embodiment of the present invention includes a mask having a central portion to define a layer of one or more integrated circuits, a first end portion to define a first pattern including a dense region of features, and a second end portion opposite the first end portion to define a second pattern including one or more windows. During operation, the mask is arranged to overlap one or more of the features of the first pattern when making one field with one or more windows of the second pattern when making an adjacent field. From these overlapping patterns, a set of measurable marks are provided to determine an iso-dense effect.




Yet another embodiment includes a device having an iso-dense effect evaluation pattern comprised of a number of approximately parallel line segments, with at least one of the line segments being provided as a reference mark measurable at different points to determine one or more iso-dense effects. In one form, the reference mark extends from a dense region of the line segments to an isolated region to provide an isolated portion. This isolated portion is separated from the other line segments by a distance greater than the minimum spacing of the line segments in the dense region.




Accordingly, one object of the present invention is to provide a unique technique to characterize an iso-dense effect.




Another object of the present invention is to provide a unique method, system, or apparatus to determine an iso-dense effect for the manufacture of a microdevice.




Further objects, features, aspects, forms, embodiments, benefits, and advantages of the present invention shall become apparent from the description and figures contained herein.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a diagrammatic view of a photolithographic mask for manufacturing integrated circuitry.





FIG. 2

is a diagrammatic view of a wafer processing system that operates with the mask of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a partial, diagrammatic view of the mask shown in

FIG. 1

, illustrating a mask pattern in greater detail.





FIG. 4

is a partial, diagrammatic view of an iso-dense effect evaluation pattern provided with the system of

FIG. 2

using the mask of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 5

is a flowchart of a process for characterizing iso-dense effects during the manufacture of integrated circuitry with the mask of FIG.


1


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




For the purpose of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications in the described embodiments, and any further applications of the principles of the invention as described herein are contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.





FIG. 1

depicts mask


20


of one embodiment of the present invention. Mask


20


includes a pattern


21


to photolithographically define features for the manufacture of integrated circuitry. Referring additionally to wafer processing system


70


of

FIG. 2

, mask


20


is utilized with stepper equipment


50


to repetitively define pattern


21


on semiconductor wafer


60


. Wafer


60


is illustrated with kerfs (or scribe lines)


62


arranged in a grid. Kerfs


62


are schematically represented by lines of a square dot pattern, and only a cutaway portion of wafer


60


is schematically shown in

FIG. 2

to enhance clarity. Typically, a complete wafer has a generally circular profile and may include a flat for orientation purposes. Nonetheless, in other embodiments wafer


60


may be shaped differently.




Each rectangular or square area defined by the grid of kerfs


62


is used to form an integrated circuit device


64


(only a few of which are designated by reference numerals to preserve clarity). Devices


64


can be separated from one another along kerfs


62


to form corresponding die at a later stage of manufacture (not shown). Wafer


60


is alternatively designated substrate


66


, and may include one or more layers, and/or may be comprised of one or more different materials.




Mask


20


is arranged to provide a field shot with a central portion defining an integrated circuitry pattern corresponding to four central die pattern regions


22


at once. Central die pattern regions


22


are separated from one another at inner borders


24


by kerf or scribe line regions


26


positioned therebetween. Regions


26


also frame regions


22


at outer borders


28


. Regions


26


of mask


20


include side end portion


30


opposite side end portion


32


. End portion


30


includes mask pattern


80


and end portion


32


includes mask pattern


90


.




In

FIG. 2

, three representative field shots


42




a


,


42




b


, and


42




c


are illustrated on substrate


66


, which were shot with equipment


50


using mask


20


. Each field shot


42




a


,


42




b


, and


42




c


formed with mask


20


is represented by a square formed of solid lines that encloses four central die regions


22




a


defined with central die pattern regions


22


. It should be understood that additional field shots would typically be made along the useable area of wafer


60


. This arrangement reveals an overlap in the field shots


42




a


,


42




b


, and


42




c


that has been exaggerated in

FIG. 2

to enhance clarity. As depicted, upper end


44


of field shot


42




b


overlaps lower end


46


of field shot


42




a


and side


47


of field shot


42




c


overlaps side


48


of field shot


42




a


. This overlap corresponds to the overlay of end portion


32


on end portion


30


, such that pattern


90


of one field shot overlays pattern


80


of a subsequent field shot to selectively double expose a portion of the features defined with pattern


80


.




Turning to

FIG. 3

, mask pattern


80


is described in greater detail. Pattern


80


includes a number of features


81


in the form of approximately parallel line segments that are opaque to electromagnetic radiation used to perform lithographic processes with mask


20


. Features


81


are arranged to provide dense feature region


82


, in which features


81


are alternatively designated line segments


82




a


,


82




b


,


82




c


, and


82




d


; and reference feature


83


, which is alternatively designated line segment


83




a


. Pattern


80


also includes assist feature region


84


, including assist features


84




a


and


84




b


in the form of line segments. In other regions


85




a


,


85




b


, and


85




c


, feature


83


is spatially isolated relative to the remaining features. It should be understood that the number of features per unit area in dense feature region


82


is greater than features per unit area in regions


85




a


,


86


, and


85




c.






Referring back to

FIG. 1

, pattern


90


includes a blocking area


91


that is opaque to electromagnetic radiation used for lithographic processing with mask


20


. Blocking area


91


defines windows


92




a


,


92




b


,


92




c


, and


92




d


therethrough for selectively exposing portions of a field to such radiation. Windows


92




a


-


92




d


are arranged to remove certain parts of the features resulting on substrate


66


from exposure to pattern


80


. The lithographic processing performed to provide an iso-dense effect evaluation pattern on substrate


66


is next described in greater detail.





FIG. 5

depicts a flowchart of iso-dense effect evaluation process


120


. In operation


122


of process


120


, mask


20


, stepper equipment


50


, and wafer


60


are arranged in a standard manner, with substrate


66


including a positive photoresist film


68


(see FIG.


2


). The photoresist film


68


is selectively exposed to electromagnetic radiation of an appropriate type through portions of mask


20


transparent to such radiation, while being blocked by other portions such as features


81


of pattern


80


and area


91


of pattern


90


. These exposures are performed for each successive field that is shot with mask


20


, incrementing with stepper equipment


50


from one field to the next. As one field is shot, the side adjacent a previously shot field causes an overlap such that pattern


90


overlays features imparted to substrate


66


with pattern


80


for this previously shot field. In operation


124


, the photoresist film


68


is developed to provide a metrology pattern of marks corresponding to these features.




As shown in

FIG. 4

, this resulting iso-dense effect evaluation pattern of developed photoresist features is designated by reference numeral


100


. Pattern


100


includes features or marks


101


on wafer


60


which correspond generally to features


81


, except that parts of line segments


82




a


,


82




b


,


82




c


, and


82




d


have been removed by double exposure through windows


92




c


and


92




d


of pattern


90


; and parts of assist features


84




a


and


84




b


have been removed by double exposure through windows


92




a


and


92




b


of pattern


90


, respectively. Pattern


90


is overlaid in phantom in

FIG. 4

, and the removed portions of line segments


82




a


-


82




d


and features


84




a


,


84




b


are also shown in phantom to enhance clarity.




Marks


101


are arranged to provide dense region


102


with approximately parallel line segments


102




a


,


102




b


,


102




c


, and


102




d


. Pattern


100


also includes reference mark


103


in the form of line segment


103




a


. Pattern


100


also includes assist feature region


104




a


with assist features


104


. It should be understood that during the overlap of pattern


90


on an area previously exposed with pattern


80


, that reference feature


103


is blocked from direct exposure; however, a number of reference mark portions


105




a


-


105




h


can be differently impacted by various iso-dense effects. Portions


105




a


and


105




b


correspond to line segments of reference mark


103


in region


107




a


and dense region


102


, respectively. Portions


105




c


and


105




d


of reference mark


103


are positioned between windows


92




c


and


92




d


providing the potential for some difference in iso-dense effect due to photolithographic processing in connection with these windows as compared to portions


105




a


and


105




b


. Notably, portion


105




c


of reference mark


103


corresponds to region


102




e


where features were removed by double exposure, while portion


105




d


of reference mark


103


is in relative isolation in isolated region


107




b.






Portion


105




e


of reference mark


103


is located between assist features


104


in region


104




a


. Portion


105




f


and


105




g


of reference mark


103


are potentially subject to an iso-dense effect resulting from photolithography exposures through windows


92




a


and


92




b


. Portion


105




f


is in region


104




b


where adjacent assist features of pattern


80


were removed by exposure through windows


92




a


and


92




b


; however, portion


105




g


is in a relatively isolated region


107




c


. Portion


105




h


of reference mark


103


is in isolated region


107




c


having a lower feature density per unit area than regions


102


and


104




a


. It should be understood that reference mark


103


extends above and below dense feature regions


102


and


104




a


into different isolated regions


107




a


,


107




b


, and


107




c.






While not shown to preserve clarity, it should be understood that the iso-dense effect can cause the linewidth of reference mark


103


to vary from one region to the next. In operation


126


of process


120


, Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)


75


shown in

FIG. 2

is utilized to measure the linewidth of reference mark


103


at a point in region


107




a


(portion


105




a


) and at a point in region


102


(portion


105




b


). In operation


128


, the measurement in region


102


(portion


105




b


) is subtracted from the measurement in region


107




a


(portion


105




a


), as determined in operation


126


. This difference represents the collective iso-dense effect of both SEM


75


and the photolithographic processing to create pattern


100


. In operation


130


, linewidth measurements of reference mark


103


are made at a point in region


102




e


(portion


105




c


) and at a point in region


107




b


(portion


105




d


). In operation


132


, the measurement for region


102




e


(portion


105




c


) is subtracted from the measurement for region


107




b


(portion


105




d


), as determined in operation


130


. This difference represents the iso-dense effect of the photolithographic process alone. In operation


134


, the iso-dense effect of the SEM


75


alone is determined by subtracting the difference found in operation


132


from the difference found in operation


128


. Process


120


then halts.




It should be appreciated that an iso-dense effect for the assist features can be determined in a like manner. Specifically, a linewidth measurement in region


104




a


(portion


105




e


) and region


104




b


(portion


105




f


) can be determined and the difference taken to provide the photolithographic iso-dense effect peculiar to such assist features. This approach may be desirable where the assist features are of a sub-resolution type.




In one nonlimiting embodiment of the present invention, the dense line segments


102




a


,


102




b


,


102




c


and


102




d


are each about 0.2 micron in width with the spacing from the edge of one to the edge of the next being a minimum of about 0.3 micron in region


102


, and are each about 0.9 microns in length. As a result, there is a center-to-center separation distance of about 0.5 micron between lines


102




a


and


102




b


, and between lines


102




c


and


102




d


. For this arrangement, assist features are of a sub-resolution type, having a length of about 0.7 micron and a width significantly less than 0.1 micron. For this embodiment, line segment


103




a


of reference mark


103


has a nominal length of about 6.2 microns and a width of 0.2 micron, and is approximately centered between line segments


102




b


and


102




c


with approximately a 0.5 micron center-to-center separation distance, and lengths for portions


105




a


-


105




h


of about 1.0 micron, 0.9 micron, 0.8 micron, 0.7 micron, 0.7 micron, 0.7 micron, 0.8 micron, and 0.6 micron, respectively. In such an embodiment, windows


92




a


-


92




d


of pattern


90


can be dimensioned and positioned to expose features defined with pattern


80


arranged in rectangles of about 0.8 micron by 1.5 microns and 0.3 micron from either side of line segment


103




a


to double expose the upper 0.8 micron portion of photoresist features corresponding to line segments


82




a


-


82




d


and the upper 0.7 micron portion of photoresist features corresponding to assist features


84




a


and


84




b


, resulting in the removal of these upper portions.




In one form, mask


20


is prepared in this manner with chrome providing the features and areas opaque to electromagnetic radiation. In other embodiments, a photoresist film can be of a negative type as are known to those skilled in the art.




In another embodiment directed to an integrated circuit form of microdevice, a number of insulated gate field effect transistors are formed, and the iso-dense effect evaluation patterns are provided in the same layer that is used to define critical dimensions of such transistors. Additionally or alternatively, iso-dense effect evaluation patterns may be used in more than one layer, be composed of different materials, be used more or less frequently than one per field, be used in other overlapping arrangements (such as overlapping upper and lower field shot ends or field shot corners), or as would otherwise occur to those skilled in the art.




In one preferred form of the present invention, the densely spaced features in a dense feature region are separated from one another by a minimum spacing of less than about 0.5 micron. In contrast, at least a portion of one of the features in this arrangement is isolated from the features of the dense region by a distance greater than this minimum spacing. In a more preferred form, this minimum spacing is less than 0.35 micron. The principles of the present invention can be utilized to prepare any form of microdevice using techniques for which an iso-dense effect may be of concern, including but not limited to micromachines, microsensors, and/or microoptical devices, either with or without integrated circuitry.




In yet further embodiments, features of mask patterns and corresponding evaluation patterns for an iso-dense effect may not be continuous line segments. Instead, dashed line segments, or other shapes (such as circles, squares, etc.) that are continuous or discontinuous can be utilized to provide a feature. In still other embodiments, features of any given type may not follow a straight pathway, but instead may be curved or otherwise change direction, and/or the pathways of multiple features may not be approximately parallel to one another.




All publications, patents, and patent applications cited in this specification are herein incorporated by reference as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application were specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference and set forth in its entirety herein. While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only the preferred embodiments have been shown and described and that all changes, modifications and equivalents that come within the spirit of the inventions as defined herein or by the following claims are desired to be protected.



Claims
  • 1. A method, comprising:defining a pattern on a substrate, the pattern including a plurality of features with a dense feature region comprised of a number of the features and an isolated feature region comprised of at least a portion of one of the features; removing a portion of one or more of the features in the dense feature region; making one or more measurements corresponding to at least one of the features after said removing; and determining an iso-dense effect from the measurements.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the features are approximately parallel line segments and the one of the features extends from between two other of the features in the dense feature region to the isolated feature region.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the features have a separation distance of less than about 0.35 micron from one to another in the dense feature region.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the measurements number at least three and are each performed relative to at least three different points along a reference mark formed with the pattern.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the measurements are made with a scanning electron microscope to determine the iso-dense effect of at least one of the scanning electron microscope and a photolithographic process.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein said defining includes performing a first exposure of a photoresist on the substrate through a first mask portion and said removing includes performing a second exposure of the portion of the one or more of the features of the dense feature region through a second mask portion.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, which includes developing the photoresist between said removing and said making and wherein the pattern defines a layer of integrated circuitry corresponding to a critical dimension of one or more transistor gates.
  • 8. An apparatus, comprising:a mask to define a number of fields along a substrate, the mask including a ventral portion to define at least a portion of one or more integrated circuits, a first end portion to define a first pattern including a dense region of features each having a minimum spacing from another of less than 0.5 micron and at least one feature portion isolated from the dense region by an amount greater than the minimum spacing between members of the dense region, and a second end portion opposite the first end portion to define a second pattern including one or more windows; and wherein the mask is operable to overlap one or more of the features of the first pattern for one of the fields with the one or more windows of the second pattern for a different one of the fields to define at least one reference feature to determine an iso-dense effect.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 8, further comprising a wafer carrying the at least one reference feature comprised of a developed photoresist material.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 9, further comprising a scanning electron microscope operable to measure the at least one reference feature.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the first pattern defines the features as a group of approximately parallel line segments with the one feature portion being defined by one of the line segments extending from between two other of the line segments from the dense region of the features to an isolated region of the features.
  • 12. The apparatus claim 8, wherein the minimum spacing is less than 0.35 micron.
US Referenced Citations (35)
Number Name Date Kind
5214492 LoBianco et al. May 1993 A
5280437 Corliss Jan 1994 A
5392113 Sayka et al. Feb 1995 A
5407785 Leroux Apr 1995 A
5438413 Mazor et al. Aug 1995 A
5545593 Watkins et al. Aug 1996 A
5617340 Cresswell et al. Apr 1997 A
5629772 Ausschnitt May 1997 A
5655110 Krivokapic et al. Aug 1997 A
5699282 Allen et al. Dec 1997 A
5776645 Barr et al. Jul 1998 A
5780208 Ziger et al. Jul 1998 A
5790254 Ausschnitt Aug 1998 A
5830610 Leroux et al. Nov 1998 A
5835227 Grodnensky et al. Nov 1998 A
5856052 Leroux Jan 1999 A
5876883 Leroux Mar 1999 A
5902703 Leroux et al. May 1999 A
5962173 Leroux et al. Oct 1999 A
5982044 Lin et al. Nov 1999 A
6077756 Lin et al. Jun 2000 A
6079256 Bareket Jun 2000 A
6127071 Lu Oct 2000 A
6127075 Hsu Oct 2000 A
6128089 Ausschnitt et al. Oct 2000 A
6130750 Ausschnitt et al. Oct 2000 A
6137578 Ausschnitt Oct 2000 A
6185323 Archie et al. Feb 2001 B1
6218200 Chen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6225639 Adams et al. May 2001 B1
6280887 Lu Aug 2001 B1
6301008 Ziger et al. Oct 2001 B1
6303253 Lu Oct 2001 B1
6350548 Leidy et al. Feb 2002 B1
6596444 Buck Jul 2003 B2
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
“Minimising Optical Overlay Measurement Errors”, Smith et al., SPIE, vol. 1926, pp. 450-462 (Dated 1993).
“Sub-0.35-micron critical dimension metrology using atomic force microscopy”, Wilder et al., SPIE, vol. 2725, pp. 540-554 (Dated 1996).
“Combined level-to-level and within-level overlay control”, Ausschnitt et al., SPIE, vol. 4689, pp. 1-13 (Dated 2002).