This application is a national phase filing claiming the benefit of and priority to International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/051320, filed on May 16, 2018, which claims priority from and the benefit of United Kingdom patent application No. 1708430.2 filed on May 26, 2017. The contents of these applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates generally to mass spectrometers and in particular to time of flight mass analysers with improved spatial focusing.
Originally, time-of-flight (TOF) mass analysers were simulated and designed effectively as one-dimensional systems, only really concerned with the dimension in which the ions are reflected (X-dimension). The motion of the ions orthogonal to this dimension was left unrestricted, with no forces applied to the ions in these orthogonal dimensions. Conventionally, an ion mirror comprises a plurality of flat plate electrodes, each of which has an aperture through it for allowing the ions to pass into and through the mirror. Fine wire meshes are arranged in each aperture so as to maintain a flat electric field profile, i.e. not having components of the electric field orthogonal to the dimension of ion reflection (X-dimension). This configuration of mirror electrodes helps avoid the initial velocity components of the ions and their positions in the dimensions orthogonal to the dimension of reflection (X-dimension) from influencing the motion of the ions in the dimension of reflection (X-dimension). This avoids the initial orthogonal spread of the ion cloud from causing (cross-) aberrations, enabling the time of flight mass spectrometer to achieve fine spatial focusing in the dimension of reflection (X-dimension) despite the ion packets starting with relatively large sizes in the dimensions orthogonal to this dimension of reflection.
There has been an increasing demand to increase the resolving power of TOF mass spectrometers, which has unavoidably led to instruments having an increased flight path length between the orthogonal accelerator and the ion detector. If the motion of the ions in such instruments remains unrestricted in the dimensions orthogonal to the dimension of reflection, then in order to accommodate this the vacuum chamber and detector must be unacceptably large. The main approach in solving this issue has been to use ion optic focusing elements such as ion lenses. However, ion lenses are disadvantageous in that they mix orthogonal parameters and unavoidably introduce orthogonal aberrations. It is known to minimize orthogonal aberrations by using immersion lenses in gridless ion reflectors, e.g. as in WO 2010/008386. However, even in the best cases where such aberrations are minimized, the initial size of the ion packet in the dimensions orthogonal to the dimension of reflection must be severely restricted.
It is desired to focus ions in the dimensions orthogonal to the dimension of reflection without influencing the motion of the ions in the dimension of reflection and increasing the cross-aberrations.
From a first aspect the present invention provides a Time of Flight mass analyser comprising:
Embodiments of the present invention focus (or prevent excessive divergence of) the ion packet in the first dimension (i.e. in the direction of the ion detector) as it travels to the detector. This enables the detector to be relatively small in the first dimension. This also enable the ion packet at the first ion accelerator to be relatively large in the first dimension, allowing a reduced space-charge effect, increased mass analyser duty cycle, and increased sensitivity. Embodiments disclosed herein also enable the mass analyser to have a relatively high mass resolving power since cross-aberrations in the first and second dimensions are avoided. In the multi-reflecting TOF embodiments disclosed herein, the technique may be used to prevent ions dispersing in the first dimension and to prevent ions performing different numbers of ion mirror reflections before reaching the detector.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,020,586 discloses a TOF mass analyser that pulses ions out of the orthogonal accelerator in a manner so that they become time-space focused at the detector, i.e. in the dimension of mass separation. However, U.S. Pat. No. 6,020,586 does not disclose causing the ion packet to converge in a dimension orthogonal to the direction of mass separation as the ion packet travels towards the detector.
The first and second dimension are substantially orthogonal to each other.
The at least one ion mirror may be arranged and configured to reflect the ions in the second dimension (X-dimension).
The orthogonal accelerator may be configured to receive ions in a direction along the first dimension (Y-dimension) and comprises a voltage supply for applying a voltage pulse that accelerates the ions out in the second dimension (X-dimension).
The first ion accelerator is configured to pulse the ion packet out having a first length in the first dimension (Y-dimension), the orthogonal accelerator is configured to pulse the ion packet out having a second length in the first dimension (Y-dimension), and the detector is arranged such that the ion packet has a third length in the first dimension (Y-dimension) when it impacts the detector, wherein the third length may be shorter than or substantially the same as the first length and/or second length.
The ion packet may decrease in length in the first dimension (Y-dimension) substantially monotonously as the ion packet travels towards the detector.
The first ion accelerator may comprise a voltage supply for applying a voltage pulse that accelerates the ion packet in the first dimension (Y-dimension) such that the ion packet is spatially focused in the first dimension to a spatial focal point that is downstream of the first ion accelerator, and wherein the detector is arranged in the first dimension at the spatial focal point.
Alternatively, the detector may be arranged in the first dimension (Y-dimension) upstream or downstream of the spatial focal point, but at a location in the first dimension such that the ion packet is narrower (or substantially the same) in the first dimension than when it is pulsed out of the first ion accelerator and/or orthogonal accelerator.
The mass analyser may comprise electrodes defining a further ion acceleration region downstream of the first ion accelerator and a voltage supply for applying a potential difference across the further ion acceleration region so as to accelerate ions that have been pulsed out of the first ion accelerator in the first dimension (Y-dimension).
The potential difference across the further ion acceleration region may be an electrostatic potential difference for accelerating the ions passing therethrough.
The further ion acceleration region may be directly adjacent the first ion accelerator.
The voltage supply may be configured to generate an electric field within the further ion acceleration region that has a magnitude in the first dimension (Y-dimension) that is greater than the magnitude of the pulsed electric field in the first dimension within the first ion accelerator.
The at least one ion mirror may comprise a first ion mirror spaced apart from a second ion mirror, wherein the ion mirrors and detector are arranged and configured such that ions pulsed out of the orthogonal accelerator pass into the first ion mirror and are reflected between the ion mirrors and then onto the detector.
The first ion accelerator may be configured to pulse the ion packet in the first dimension (Y-dimension) so that the ions have sufficient energy in this dimension that they do not impact upon the orthogonal accelerator after they have been reflected from the first ion mirror.
The mass analyser may be configured to reflect the ion packet a total of n times in the ion mirrors; wherein a first distance, in the first dimension (Y-dimension), is provided between the centre of the ion extraction region of the orthogonal accelerator and the centre of the detector; and wherein the length of the extraction region of the orthogonal accelerator, in the first dimension (Y-dimension), is at least n times shorter than said first distance.
The mass analyser may comprise a mesh electrode at the exit of the ion accelerator and/or between the first ion accelerator and orthogonal accelerator.
The mass analyser may comprise a first voltage supply for applying a voltage to the first ion accelerator to pulse out the ion packet in the first dimension, a second voltage supply for applying a voltage to the orthogonal accelerator to pulse out the ion packet in the second dimension, and a controller for delaying the start time of the second pulse relative to the first pulse and/or the duration of the second pulse so that at least some of the ions pulsed out of the first ion accelerator are pulsed out of the orthogonal accelerator to the detector.
The controller may be configured to delay the timing of the second pulse relative to the first pulse based on a pre-set or selected upper and/or lower threshold mass to charge ratio desired to be analysed so that the ions reaching the detector have masses below the upper threshold mass to charge ratio and/or above the lower threshold mass to charge ratio.
The mass analyser may comprise an input interface for inputting into the mass analyser the upper and/or lower threshold mass to charge ratio desired to be analysed.
The at least one ion mirror may be configured to reflect ions in a reflection dimension and either: (i) the first dimension is orthogonal to the reflection dimension; or (ii) the reflection dimension is at an acute or obtuse angle to the second dimension in the plane defined by the first and second dimensions. In embodiments according to option (ii), the ion packet is pulsed along the first dimension (Y-dimension) by the first ion accelerator so that the ion packet begins to converge along the first dimension. The ions are also orthogonally accelerated in the second dimension (X-dimension). The ion packet may subsequently be deflected such that the primary direction in which said convergence occurs is orthogonal to the dimension in which the ions are reflected by the ion mirror(s).
The ion detector may have a substantially planar ion detecting surface arranged either substantially parallel to the first dimension (Y-dimension) or at an acute or obtuse angle to the first dimension in a plane defined by the first and second dimensions (X-Y plane).
The mass analyser may be configured such that the ion flight path length between the orthogonal accelerator and the detector is greater in the second dimension than in the first dimension.
The mass analyser may comprise one or more vacuum pump and vacuum chamber for maintaining the first ion accelerator and/or orthogonal accelerator at a pressure of either: ≤10−3 mbar; ≤0.5×10−4 mbar; ≤10−4 mbar; ≤0.5×10−5 mbar; ≤10−5 mbar; ≤0.5×10−6 mbar; ≤10−6 mbar; ≤0.5×10−7 mbar; or ≤10−7 mbar.
The present invention also provides a mass spectrometer comprising the mass analyser described herein and an ion source for supplying ions to the mass analyser.
The ion source may be a continuous ion source.
The mass spectrometer may be configured to supply ions to the first ion accelerator in the first dimension (Y-dimension).
The mass spectrometer may comprise either: an ionisation source inside the first ion accelerator; or an ionisation source configured to emit photons, charged particles or molecules into the first ion accelerator for ionising analyte therein.
The present invention also provides a method of Time of Flight mass analysis comprising:
The ions may be pulsed in the first dimension by the first ion accelerator prior to being pulsed in the second dimension by the orthogonal accelerator, or vice versa.
The mass to charge ratio of any given ion may be determined from the flight path length between the orthogonal accelerator and the detector (which is substantially the same for all ions), and the duration of time between pulsing the ion from the orthogonal accelerator to the ion being detected at the detector.
The present invention also provides a method of mass spectrometry comprising a method of mass analysis as described herein.
The spectrometers disclosed herein may comprise an ion source selected from the group consisting of: (i) an Electrospray ionisation (“ESI”) ion source; (ii) an Atmospheric Pressure Photo Ionisation (“APPI”) ion source; (iii) an Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionisation (“APCI”) ion source; (iv) a Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation (“MALDI”) ion source; (v) a Laser Desorption Ionisation (“LDI”) ion source; (vi) an Atmospheric Pressure Ionisation (“API”) ion source; (vii) a Desorption Ionisation on Silicon (“DIOS”) ion source; (viii) an Electron Impact (“EI”) ion source; (ix) a Chemical Ionisation (“CI”) ion source; (x) a Field Ionisation (“FI”) ion source; (xi) a Field Desorption (“FD”) ion source; (xii) an Inductively Coupled Plasma (“ICP”) ion source; (xiii) a Fast Atom Bombardment (“FAB”) ion source; (xiv) a Liquid Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (“LSIMS”) ion source; (xv) a Desorption Electrospray Ionisation (“DESI”) ion source; (xvi) a Nickel-63 radioactive ion source; (xvii) an Atmospheric Pressure Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation ion source; (xviii) a Thermospray ion source; (xix) an Atmospheric Sampling Glow Discharge Ionisation (“ASGDI”) ion source; (xx) a Glow Discharge (“GD”) ion source; (xxi) an Impactor ion source; (xxii) a Direct Analysis in Real Time (“DART”) ion source; (xxiii) a Laserspray Ionisation (“LSI”) ion source; (xxiv) a Sonicspray Ionisation (“SSI”) ion source; (xxv) a Matrix Assisted Inlet Ionisation (“MAII”) ion source; (xxvi) a Solvent Assisted Inlet Ionisation (“SAII”) ion source; (xxvii) a Desorption Electrospray Ionisation (“DESI”) ion source; (xxviii) a Laser Ablation Electrospray Ionisation (“LAESI”) ion source; and (xxix) a Surface Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation (“SALDI”) ion source.
The spectrometer may comprise one or more continuous or pulsed ion sources.
The spectrometer may comprise one or more ion guides.
The spectrometer may comprise one or more ion mobility separation devices and/or one or more Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometer devices.
The spectrometer may comprise one or more ion traps or one or more ion trapping regions.
The spectrometer may comprise one or more collision, fragmentation or reaction cells selected from the group consisting of: (i) a Collisional Induced Dissociation (“CID”) fragmentation device; (ii) a Surface Induced Dissociation (“SID”) fragmentation device; (iii) an Electron Transfer Dissociation (“ETD”) fragmentation device; (iv) an Electron Capture Dissociation (“ECD”) fragmentation device; (v) an Electron Collision or Impact Dissociation fragmentation device; (vi) a Photo Induced Dissociation (“PID”) fragmentation device; (vii) a Laser Induced Dissociation fragmentation device; (viii) an infrared radiation induced dissociation device; (ix) an ultraviolet radiation induced dissociation device; (x) a nozzle-skimmer interface fragmentation device; (xi) an in-source fragmentation device; (xii) an in-source Collision Induced Dissociation fragmentation device; (xiii) a thermal or temperature source fragmentation device; (xiv) an electric field induced fragmentation device; (xv) a magnetic field induced fragmentation device; (xvi) an enzyme digestion or enzyme degradation fragmentation device; (xvii) an ion-ion reaction fragmentation device; (xviii) an ion-molecule reaction fragmentation device; (xix) an ion-atom reaction fragmentation device; (xx) an ion-metastable ion reaction fragmentation device; (xxi) an ion-metastable molecule reaction fragmentation device; (xxii) an ion-metastable atom reaction fragmentation device; (xxiii) an ion-ion reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions; (xxiv) an ion-molecule reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions; (xxv) an ion-atom reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions; (xxvi) an ion-metastable ion reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions; (xxvii) an ion-metastable molecule reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions; (xxviii) an ion-metastable atom reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions; and (xxix) an Electron Ionisation Dissociation (“EID”) fragmentation device.
The ion-molecule reaction device may be configured to perform ozonlysis for the location of olefinic (double) bonds in lipids.
The spectrometer may comprise one or more energy analysers or electrostatic energy analysers.
The spectrometer may comprise one or more mass filters selected from the group consisting of: (i) a quadrupole mass filter; (ii) a 2D or linear quadrupole ion trap; (iii) a Paul or 3D quadrupole ion trap; (iv) a Penning ion trap; (v) an ion trap; (vi) a magnetic sector mass filter; (vii) a Time of Flight mass filter; and (viii) a Wien filter.
The spectrometer may comprise a device or ion gate for pulsing ions; and/or a device for converting a substantially continuous ion beam into a pulsed ion beam.
The spectrometer may comprise a C-trap and a mass analyser comprising an outer barrel-like electrode and a coaxial inner spindle-like electrode that form an electrostatic field with a quadro-logarithmic potential distribution, wherein in a first mode of operation ions are transmitted to the C-trap and are then injected into the mass analyser and wherein in a second mode of operation ions are transmitted to the C-trap and then to a collision cell or Electron Transfer Dissociation device wherein at least some ions are fragmented into fragment ions, and wherein the fragment ions are then transmitted to the C-trap before being injected into the mass analyser.
The spectrometer may comprise a stacked ring ion guide comprising a plurality of electrodes each having an aperture through which ions are transmitted in use and wherein the spacing of the electrodes increases along the length of the ion path, and wherein the apertures in the electrodes in an upstream section of the ion guide have a first diameter and wherein the apertures in the electrodes in a downstream section of the ion guide have a second diameter which is smaller than the first diameter, and wherein opposite phases of an AC or RF voltage are applied, in use, to successive electrodes.
The spectrometer may comprise a device arranged and adapted to supply an AC or RF voltage to the electrodes. The AC or RF voltage optionally has an amplitude selected from the group consisting of: (i) about <50 V peak to peak; (ii) about 50-100 V peak to peak; (iii) about 100-150 V peak to peak; (iv) about 150-200 V peak to peak; (v) about 200-250 V peak to peak; (vi) about 250-300 V peak to peak; (vii) about 300-350 V peak to peak; (viii) about 350-400 V peak to peak; (ix) about 400-450 V peak to peak; (x) about 450-500 V peak to peak; and (xi) >about 500 V peak to peak.
The AC or RF voltage may have a frequency selected from the group consisting of: (i) <about 100 kHz; (ii) about 100-200 kHz; (iii) about 200-300 kHz; (iv) about 300-400 kHz; (v) about 400-500 kHz; (vi) about 0.5-1.0 MHz; (vii) about 1.0-1.5 MHz; (viii) about 1.5-2.0 MHz; (ix) about 2.0-2.5 MHz; (x) about 2.5-3.0 MHz; (xi) about 3.0-3.5 MHz; (xii) about 3.5-4.0 MHz; (xiii) about 4.0-4.5 MHz; (xiv) about 4.5-5.0 MHz; (xv) about 5.0-5.5 MHz; (xvi) about 5.5-6.0 MHz; (xvii) about 6.0-6.5 MHz; (xviii) about 6.5-7.0 MHz; (xix) about 7.0-7.5 MHz; (xx) about 7.5-8.0 MHz; (xxi) about 8.0-8.5 MHz; (xxii) about 8.5-9.0 MHz; (xxiii) about 9.0-9.5 MHz; (xxiv) about 9.5-10.0 MHz; and (xxv) >about 10.0 MHz.
The spectrometer may comprise a chromatography or other separation device upstream of an ion source. The chromatography separation device may comprise a liquid chromatography or gas chromatography device. Alternatively, the separation device may comprise: (i) a Capillary Electrophoresis (“CE”) separation device; (ii) a Capillary Electrochromatography (“CEC”) separation device; (iii) a substantially rigid ceramic-based multilayer microfluidic substrate (“ceramic tile”) separation device; or (iv) a supercritical fluid chromatography separation device.
The ion guide may be maintained at a pressure selected from the group consisting of: (i) <about 0.0001 mbar; (ii) about 0.0001-0.001 mbar; (iii) about 0.001-0.01 mbar; (iv) about 0.01-0.1 mbar; (v) about 0.1-1 mbar; (vi) about 1-10 mbar; (vii) about 10-100 mbar;
(viii) about 100-1000 mbar; and (ix) >about 1000 mbar.
Analyte ions may be subjected to Electron Transfer Dissociation (“ETD”) fragmentation in an Electron Transfer Dissociation fragmentation device. Analyte ions may be caused to interact with ETD reagent ions within an ion guide or fragmentation device.
The spectrometer may be operated in various modes of operation including a mass spectrometry (“MS”) mode of operation; a tandem mass spectrometry (“MS/MS”) mode of operation; a mode of operation in which parent or precursor ions are alternatively fragmented or reacted so as to produce fragment or product ions, and not fragmented or reacted or fragmented or reacted to a lesser degree; a Multiple Reaction Monitoring (“MRM”) mode of operation; a Data Dependent Analysis (“DDA”) mode of operation; a Data Independent Analysis (“DIA”) mode of operation a Quantification mode of operation or an Ion Mobility Spectrometry (“IMS”) mode of operation.
Various embodiments will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
In operation, ions 8 are transmitted along an ion entrance axis (Y-dimension) into the orthogonal accelerator 2 to the space between the pusher and mesh electrodes. Voltage pulses are applied between the pusher and mesh electrodes so as to orthogonally accelerate the ions (in the X-dimension). The ions therefore maintain their component of velocity along the ion entrance axis (Y-dimension) but also gain an orthogonal component of velocity (in the X-dimension). The ions pass through the mesh electrode 2b and travel into an electric-field free region 10 between the orthogonal accelerator 2 and the ion mirror 4. The ions begin to separate (in the X-dimension) according to their mass to charge ratios as they travel towards the ion mirror 4. Voltages are applied to the electrodes of the ion mirror 4 so as to generate an electric field in the ion mirror that causes the ions to be reflected (in the X-dimension) and to be spatially focused (in the X-dimension) when they reach the detector 6. The reflected ions then leave the ion mirror 4 and pass back into the field-free region 10 and travel onwards to the ion detector 6. As described above, the ions separate in the dimension of orthogonal acceleration (X-dimension) as they pass from the orthogonal accelerator 2 to the ion detector 6. As such, for any given ion, the duration of time between the ion being pulsed by the orthogonal accelerator 2 to the time that it is detected at the ion detector 6 can be used to determine its mass to charge ratio.
However, the ions have a spread of speeds along the dimension of the entrance axis (Y-dimension) at the orthogonal accelerator 2. As such, each packet of ions that is pulsed out of the orthogonal accelerator 2 becomes longer in this dimension by the time it reaches the ion detector 6, thus requiring a relatively large ion detector 6 in order to detect a significant proportion of the ions in the ion packet.
It is desired to focus the ions in the dimension of the ion entrance axis so as to minimise, prevent or reduce the spreading of the ion packet in this dimension between the orthogonal accelerator 2 and the ion detector 6. Embodiments of the present invention provide spatial focusing of the ions in the direction from the orthogonal accelerator to the ion detector (Y-dimension) that is independent of the time of flight focusing (in the X-dimension), without mixing ion motion in the two dimensions (i.e. X and Y dimensions).
The inventors have recognised that such spatial focusing techniques may be used in TOF mass analysers in order to spatially focus the ions in a dimension orthogonal to the dimension in which the ions are reflected by the ion mirror(s), i.e. in a dimension orthogonal to the X-dimension. Embodiments described herein enable such spatial focusing to be independent of the parameters in the other dimension(s), i.e. independent of the X-dimension and/or Z-dimension.
In operation, ions 38 are transmitted along an ion entrance axis (Y-dimension) into the first ion accelerator 30. A voltage pulse is then applied to one or more electrodes of the first ion accelerator 30 so as to generate a first electric field that accelerates ions in a direction towards the detector 36 (i.e. in the Y-dimension). In a corresponding manner to that described in relation to
The ions ejected from the first ion accelerator 30 are received in the orthogonal accelerator 32. At least one voltage pulse is then applied to at least one of the electrodes in the orthogonal accelerator 30 so as to orthogonally accelerate the ions towards the ion mirror 34 (in the X-dimension). It will be appreciated that a delay is provided between pulsing the ions out of the first ion accelerator 30 and pulsing the ions out of the orthogonal ion accelerator 32 such that the same ions may be pulsed by both devices, i.e. the first ion accelerator and orthogonal accelerator are synchronised. The ions maintain their component of velocity along the direction that they were ejected from the first ion accelerator 30 (Y-dimension) but also gain an orthogonal component of velocity (in the X-dimension). The ions travel from the orthogonal accelerator 32 into an electric-field free region 40 between the orthogonal accelerator 32 and the ion mirror 34. The ions begin to separate according to their mass to charge ratios as they travel towards the ion mirror 34. Voltages are applied to the electrodes of the ion mirror 34 so as to generate an electric field in the ion mirror that causes the ions to be reflected and spatially focused at the position of detector (in the X-dimension). The reflected ions then leave the ion mirror 34 and pass back into the field-free region 40 and travel onwards to the ion detector 36. As described above, the ions separate in the dimension of orthogonal acceleration (X-dimension) as they pass from the orthogonal accelerator 32 to the ion detector 36. As such, for any given ion, the duration of time between the ion being pulsed by the orthogonal accelerator 32 to the time that it is detected at the ion detector 36 can be used to determine its mass to charge ratio.
As the first ion accelerator 30 pulses the ions in the direction towards the ion detector 36 (Y-dimension), the packet of ions pulsed out of the first ion accelerator 30 (and subsequently pulsed out of the orthogonal accelerator 32) will become progressively spatially focused in the direction of pulsing out from the first ion accelerator 30 (Y-dimension) up until a focal point, after which the ions may spatially diverge (in the Y-dimension). The ion detector 36 may be arranged at this focal point. This is illustrated in
The embodiments described above enable the ion detector 36 to be relatively small in the dimension of ejection from the first ion accelerator 30 (Y-dimension), whilst still receiving a significant proportion or substantially all of the ions in each ion packet. Similarly, the embodiments also enable a relatively large packet of ions (in the dimension of ejection from the first ion accelerator, i.e. Y-dimension) to be ejected from the orthogonal accelerator 32 and received at the ion detector 36.
The embodiments enable the mass analyser to have a relatively high duty cycle. More specifically, the duty cycle is related to the ratio of length of the ion packet in the Y-dimension, when it is accelerated by the orthogonal accelerator 32, to the distance from the centre of the orthogonal accelerator 32 to the centre of the ion detector 36. For any given ion detector 36, the embodiments enable a relatively long ion packet (in the Y-dimension) to be ejected from the orthogonal accelerator 32 and hence enable a relatively high duty cycle.
It will be appreciated that multiple ion packets may be sequentially pulsed from the first ion accelerator to the detector.
The spectrometer may comprise an ion source for supplying ions to the first ion accelerator 30, wherein the ion source is arranged such that said first ion accelerator 30 receives ions from the ion source travelling in the Y-dimension. This enables the beam to pulsed out of the first ion accelerator to be elongated in the Y-dimension (e.g. for increased duty cycle) whilst being small in the X-dimension and Z-dimension.
Although a single reflection TOF mass analyser has been described above, the invention may be applied to other TOF mass analysers, such as a multi-reflecting TOF mass analyser (also known as a folded flight path mass analyser).
The mass analyser may be configured such that all ions that reach the detector 36 have performed the same number of reflections between the mirrors 34,35, so that the ions have the same flight path length. The first ion accelerator 30 may be controlled so as to eject the ions with velocities that achieve this.
It is also necessary, in this embodiment, for the first ion accelerator 30 to provide the ions with sufficient energy in the Y-dimension such that after they are first reflected by an ion mirror 34, the reflected ions have travelled a sufficient distance in the Y-dimension such that they do not strike the orthogonal accelerator 32 as they travel towards the next ion mirror 35. In order to achieve this for n reflections between the ion mirrors, the length in the in Y-direction of the push-out region of the orthogonal accelerator 32 is configured to be at least n times shorter than the distance in the Y-direction between the push-out region of the orthogonal accelerator 32 and the detector 36.
It is desired that the first ion accelerator 30 accelerates ions in the Y-dimension (with the ion mirror and ion detector planes in the Y-Z plane) and the longitudinal axis of the orthogonal accelerator is aligned in the Y-dimension. This avoids cross-aberrations caused by mixing of X and Y dimension parameters. However, other arrangements such as that in
The first ion accelerator 30 described herein may receive the ions in the same direction that it pulses ions out. This enables the ion beam to be maintained relatively small in one or both of the dimensions (e.g. X-dimension) perpendicular to the dimension along which ions are pulsed out of the first ion accelerator 30. For example, the ion beam may be maintained relatively small in the dimension that they are pulsed out of the orthogonal accelerator (X-dimension) and as parallel as possible. The ions may be received, for example, as a substantially continuous ion beam, e.g. from a continuous ion source.
The ion acceleration region in the first ion accelerator 30 may be relatively long in the direction of ion acceleration, so as to provide the mass analyser with a relatively high duty cycle. The electric field for accelerating the ions is desired to be strongly homogeneous, so as to avoid introducing orthogonal (X and Z dimension) ion beam deviations. This acceleration region may therefore be relatively large in the dimensions (e.g. X and Z dimensions) orthogonal to the dimension in which ions are accelerated and/or a plurality of electrodes and voltage supplies may be provided to support a homogenous ion acceleration field.
In the MRTOF embodiments, it is desired to provide a relatively high number n of ion mirror reflections and so the spatial focal distance provided by the first ion accelerator 30 is desired to be relatively long. The kinetic energy of the ions after being accelerated by the first ion accelerator is desired to be much higher (e.g. ˜n/2 times higher) than the additional energy acquired during the pulse of the accelerating field in the ion acceleration region of the first ion accelerator.
Two different techniques are contemplated for accelerating ions in the first ion accelerator 30. In a first technique, the ions have a relatively high energy when they arrive in the first ion accelerator (e.g. 50 eV) and the first ion accelerator applies a voltage pulse to the ions to accelerate them (e.g. 10 V). In a second technique the ions have a relatively low energy when they arrive in the first ion accelerator (e.g. 5 eV), the first ion accelerator applies a voltage pulse to the ions to accelerate them (e.g. 18 V) and the ions then pass through a further ion acceleration region across which a potential difference is maintained (e.g. of 37 V). The exemplary energies and voltages described in the first and second techniques provide the ions with about the same energy distribution. In both techniques the spatial focal distance in the dimension of ion acceleration (Y-dimension) is about 11 times longer than the length (in the Y-dimension) of the pulsed ion acceleration region of the first ion accelerator. Accordingly, if an orthogonal accelerator having an orthogonal acceleration region of the same length (in the Y-dimension) is arranged adjacent the first ion accelerator (in the Y-dimension), then there will be a further ten such lengths downstream before the ions are spatially focused in the Y-dimension. This allows ten reflections between the ion mirrors before the spatial focusing occurs, e.g. before the ions hit the detector.
The first technique enables the ion beam to be maintained smaller in the X-dimension, whereas the second technique may be used to provide the mass analyser with a relatively high duty cycle.
Specific examples of the first and second techniques will now be described, for illustrative purposes only, for analysing ions having a maximum m/z of 1000 Th and a pulsed ion acceleration region in the first ion accelerator having a length in the Y-dimension of 62 mm.
In an example according to the first technique, the ions are received in the first ion accelerator having a kinetic energy of 50 eV and a velocity of 3.1 mm/μs (m/z=1000 Th), so as to fill the 62 mm ion acceleration region in 20 μs. A voltage pulse of 10 V is then applied across the 62 mm ion acceleration region such that the ions become spatially focused in the Y-dimension at about 700 mm (after a flight time of ˜225 μs). After about 20 μs from being pulsed out of the first ion accelerator, the ions fill the adjacent orthogonal accelerator and a voltage pulse is applied in the X-dimension so as to orthogonally accelerate these ions into a first ion mirror. The ion packet is then reflected 10 times in the X-dimension by the ion mirrors (without impacting on the orthogonal accelerator between the first and second reflections) before arriving at the ion detector. It is required to wait about 20 μs for an ion of m/z 1000 to leave the first ion accelerator (keeping the voltage pulse applied), and then another 20 μs for the ions to fill the orthogonal accelerator. Whilst the ions are filling the orthogonal accelerator, a second packet of ions (e.g. having an upper m/z of 1000) may fill the first ion accelerator. The second packet of ions can therefore be accelerated out of the first ion accelerator at a time of 40 μs. However, if each ion packet includes a range of mass to charge ratios, then ions from different pulses may arrive at the detector at times which overlap, since the heaviest and slowest ions in one pulse may reach the detector after the lightest and fastest ions from a subsequent pulse. For any given pulse, the lowest mass registered at the ion detector will be the one moving twice as fast as the highest mass desired to be analysed (1000 Th), i.e. a mass of 250 Th, and will arrive at the detector in 112 μs. The duty cycle of the mass analyser depends on the period of the push-out pulses. For the example wherein the upper limit of the mass range detected is m/z=1000 Th, and taking into account the absence of masses below 250 Th, a cycle time of 112 μs can be provided and the duty cycle is then approximately 20/112, i.e. 18%.
In an example according to the second technique, the ions are received in the first ion accelerator having a kinetic energy of 5 eV and a velocity 0.98 mm/μs (m/z=1000 Th), so as to fill the 62 mm ion acceleration region in 63 μs. A voltage pulse of about 18 V is then applied across the 62 mm ion acceleration region so as to accelerate ions into a further (short) ion acceleration region across which a potential difference of 37 V is maintained. As with the first technique, this provides the ions with the same maximum energy (60 eV) and causes the ions to become spatially focused in the Y-dimension at about 700 mm. The 18 V pulse increases the energy of the last ions up to 23 eV and a velocity 2.1 mm/μs. These ions therefore leave the pulsed acceleration region after 30 μs and are then accelerated to 60 eV in the downstream further acceleration region. The orthogonal acceleration is delayed by 30 μs. In contrast to the first technique, in the second technique the ion packet stretches to 93 mm at the orthogonal acceleration region, instead of 62 mm. If it is still desired to have the same number of reflections as in the first technique (i.e. n=10), then it is required to sacrifice ⅓ of the ions and still use an orthogonal acceleration region having a length of 62 mm. As such, it is still possible to use a 20 μs delay before pulsing the orthogonal accelerator (i.e. the moment that the first ions reach the far end of the orthogonal acceleration region). In this case, the low-mass cut-off will again be 250 Th and so a cycle time of 112 μs can again be used to analyse ions having a mass range of 250-1000. The duty cycle of the mass analyser in this case is about 0.67×63 μs/112, i.e. 37%.
Longer cycle times may be used to analyse ions of higher mass to charge ratios, although this has a corresponding lower efficiency of using the incoming ion beam (i.e. a lower duty-cycle). Also, if a gap is provided between the first ion acceleration region and the orthogonal accelerator then the high mass cut-off of the mass range able to be analysed will be defined by the distance of this gap.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the accompanying claims.
For example, although embodiments have been described in which the ions are received in the first acceleration region 30 as a continuous ion beam, the ions may be received as a non-continuous or pulsed ion beam. The mass spectrometer may therefore comprise either a pulsed ion source or other types of ion sources. For example, the ion source may be an electron ionisation ion source or a laser ablation ionisation source (either as vacuum ion sources or ion sources at ambient gas pressure).
The ionisation source may be arranged inside the first acceleration region. Alternatively, or additionally, the ionisation source may be configured to emit photons, charged particles (such as electrons or reagent ions) or molecules that interact with analyte so as to ionise it, wherein these photons, particles or molecules are directed into the first ion accelerator 30 for ionising analyte therein. The photons, particles or molecules may be directed along the axis of the first accelerator (Y-dimension). This may increase the sensitivity of the analyser.
The analyser may be configured such that the final ion energy in the Y-dimension is related to the ion energy provided in the X-dimension such that the ion speeds in these dimensions are proportional to their respective effective flight path lengths along these dimensions. For example, the flight path of the ions from the first ion accelerator 30 to the ion detector 36 in the Y-dimension may be significantly smaller than the flight path of the ions in the X-dimension.
Although the ions have only been described as being reflected by the ion mirror(s) in the X-dimension, it is contemplated that the ions may also be reflected in the Y-dimension so as to extend the length of the ion flight path. For example, the ions may be pulsed in the Y-dimension by the first ion accelerator, reflected in the X-dimension between two ion mirrors, reflected in the Y-dimension back towards the first ion accelerator, reflected between the ion mirrors in the X-dimension and then onto the detector.
The voltage pulses applied to the first ion accelerator 30 and/or the orthogonal acceleration region 32 are desirably maintained until all ions of interest have exited the first ion accelerator 30 and/or the orthogonal acceleration region 32, respectively. This provides the all masses of interest with the same energy. In contrast, a shorter pulse would provide the same momentum to all masses, which would spatially focus different masses at different distances in the Y-dimension.
A wire mesh may be provided between the first ion accelerator 30 and the orthogonal accelerator 32 so as to prevent the pulsed electric field from either device entering the other device.
Embodiments are also contemplated in which the ions may also be accelerated in the Z-dimension in a corresponding manner to that in which the ions are accelerated in the Y-dimension by the first ion accelerator 30. This enables the ions to be spatially focused in the Z-dimension as well as the Y-dimension. This may be useful for embodiments in which the detector 36 is displaced from the orthogonal accelerator 32 in both the Y-dimension and the Z-dimension.
Although planar ion mirror geometries in which ions are reflected in a single plane have been described, other geometries are also contemplated.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1708430 | May 2017 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2018/051320 | 5/16/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/215737 | 11/29/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3898452 | Hertel | Aug 1975 | A |
4390784 | Browning et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4691160 | Ino | Sep 1987 | A |
4731532 | Frey et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4855595 | Blanchard | Aug 1989 | A |
5017780 | Kutscher et al. | May 1991 | A |
5107109 | Stafford, Jr. et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5128543 | Reed et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5202563 | Cotter et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5331158 | Dowell | Jul 1994 | A |
5367162 | Holland et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5396065 | Myerholtz et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5435309 | Thomas et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5464985 | Cornish et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5619034 | Reed et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5654544 | Dresch | Aug 1997 | A |
5689111 | Dresch et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696375 | Park et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719392 | Franzen | Feb 1998 | A |
5763878 | Franzen | Jun 1998 | A |
5777326 | Rockwood et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5834771 | Yoon et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5847385 | Dresch | Dec 1998 | A |
5869829 | Dresch | Feb 1999 | A |
5955730 | Kerley et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5994695 | Young | Nov 1999 | A |
6002122 | Wolf | Dec 1999 | A |
6013913 | Hanson | Jan 2000 | A |
6020586 | Dresch et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6080985 | Welkie et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6107625 | Park | Aug 2000 | A |
6160256 | Ishihara | Dec 2000 | A |
6198096 | Le Cocq | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229142 | Bateman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6271917 | Hagler | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6300626 | Brock et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316768 | Rockwood et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6337482 | Francke | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6384410 | Kawato | May 2002 | B1 |
6393367 | Tang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6437325 | Reilly et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6455845 | Li et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6469295 | Park | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6489610 | Barofsky et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504148 | Hager | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6504150 | Verentchikov et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6534764 | Verentchikov et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6545268 | Verentchikov et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570152 | Hoyes | May 2003 | B1 |
6576895 | Park | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6580070 | Cornish et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6591121 | Madarasz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614020 | Cornish | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627877 | Davis et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6646252 | Gonin | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647347 | Roushall et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6664545 | Kimmel et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683299 | Fuhrer et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6694284 | Nikoonahad et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6717132 | Franzen | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734968 | Wang et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6737642 | Syage et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744040 | Park | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6744042 | Zajfman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6747271 | Gonin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6770870 | Vestal | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6782342 | LeGore et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787760 | Belov et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794643 | Russ, IV et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6804003 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6815673 | Plomley et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6833544 | Campbell | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836742 | Brekenfeld | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6841936 | Keller et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6861645 | Franzen | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6864479 | Davis et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6870156 | Rather | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870157 | Zare | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6872938 | Makarov et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6888130 | Gonin | May 2005 | B1 |
6900431 | Belov et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6906320 | Sachs et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6940066 | Makarov et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949736 | Ishihara | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7034292 | Whitehouse et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7071464 | Reinhold | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084393 | Fuhrer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091479 | Hayek | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7126114 | Chernushevich | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7196324 | Verentchikov | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7217919 | Boyle et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221251 | Menegoli et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7326925 | Verentchikov et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351958 | Vestal | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365313 | Fuhrer et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7385187 | Verentchikov et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7388197 | McLean et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7399957 | Parker et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7423259 | Hidalgo et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7498569 | Ding | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7501621 | Willis et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7504620 | Sato et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7521671 | Kirihara et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7541576 | Belov et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7582864 | Verentchikov | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7608817 | Flory | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7663100 | Vestal | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7675031 | Konicek et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7709789 | Vestal et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7728289 | Naya et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7745780 | McLean et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7755036 | Satoh | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7772547 | Verentchikov | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7800054 | Fuhrer et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7825373 | Willis et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7863557 | Brown | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7884319 | Willis et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7932491 | Vestal | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7982184 | Sudakov | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7985950 | Makarov et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7989759 | Holle | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7999223 | Makarov et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8017907 | Willis et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8017909 | Makarov et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8063360 | Willis et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8080782 | Hidalgo et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8093554 | Makarov | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8237111 | Golikov et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8354634 | Green et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8373120 | Verentchikov | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8395115 | Makarov et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8492710 | Fuhrer et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8513594 | Makarov | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8633436 | Ugarov | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8637815 | Makarov et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8642948 | Makarov et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8642951 | Li | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8648294 | Prather et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8653446 | Mordehai et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8658984 | Makarov et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8680481 | Giannakopulos et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8723108 | Ugarov | May 2014 | B1 |
8735818 | Kovtoun et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8772708 | Kinugawa et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8785845 | Loboda | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8847155 | Vestal | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8853623 | Verenchikov | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8884220 | Hoyes et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8921772 | Verenchikov | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8952325 | Giles et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8957369 | Makarov | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8975592 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9048080 | Verenchikov et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9082597 | Willis et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9082604 | Verenchikov | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9099287 | Giannakopulos | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9136101 | Grinfeld et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9147563 | Makarov | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9196469 | Makarov | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9207206 | Makarov | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9214322 | Kholomeev et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9214328 | Hoyes et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9281175 | Haufler et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9312119 | Verenchikov | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9324544 | Rather | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9373490 | Nishiguchi et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9396922 | Verenchikov et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9417211 | Verenchikov | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9425034 | Verentchikov et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9472390 | Verenchikov et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9514922 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9576778 | Wang | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9595431 | Verenchikov | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9673033 | Grinfeld et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9679758 | Grinfeld et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9683963 | Verenchikov | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9728384 | Verenchikov | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9779923 | Verenchikov | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9786484 | Willis et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9786485 | Ding et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9865441 | Damoc et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9865445 | Verenchikov et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9870903 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9870906 | Quarmby et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9881780 | Verenchikov et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9899201 | Park | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9922812 | Makarov | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9941107 | Verenchikov | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9972483 | Makarov | May 2018 | B2 |
10006892 | Verenchikov | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10037873 | Wang et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10141175 | Verentchikov et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10141176 | Stewart et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10163616 | Verenchikov et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10186411 | Makarov | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10192723 | Verenchikov et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10290480 | Crowell et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10373815 | Crowell et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10388503 | Brown et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10593525 | Hock et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10593533 | Hoyes et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10622203 | Veryovkin | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10629425 | Hoyes et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10636646 | Hoyes et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
20010011703 | Franzen | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010030284 | Dresch | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020030159 | Chernushevich et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020107660 | Nikoonahad et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020190199 | Li | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030010907 | Hayek et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030111597 | Gonin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030232445 | Fulghum | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040026613 | Bateman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040084613 | Bateman et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040108453 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119012 | Vestal | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040144918 | Zare et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155187 | Axelsson | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040159782 | Park | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183007 | Belov | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050006577 | Fuhrer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050040326 | Enke | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050103992 | Yamaguchi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050133712 | Belov et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050151075 | Brown et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050194528 | Yamaguchi et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050242279 | Verentchikov | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050258364 | Whitehouse et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060169882 | Pau et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060214100 | Verentchikov et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060289746 | Raznikov et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070023645 | Chernushevich | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070029473 | Verentchikov | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070176090 | Verentchikov | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070187614 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194223 | Sato et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080049402 | Han et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080197276 | Nishiguchi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080203288 | Makarov et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080290269 | Saito et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090090861 | Willis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090114808 | Bateman et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090121130 | Satoh | May 2009 | A1 |
20090206250 | Wollnik | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090250607 | Staats et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272890 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090294658 | Vestal et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090314934 | Brown | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100001180 | Bateman et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100044558 | Sudakov | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100072363 | Giles et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100078551 | Loboda | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100140469 | Nishiguchi | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100193682 | Golikov et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100207023 | Loboda | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100301202 | Vestal | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110133073 | Sato et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168880 | Ristroph | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110180702 | Flory et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110180705 | Yamaguchi | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110186729 | Verentchikov et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120168618 | Vestal | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120261570 | Shvartsburg et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120298853 | Kurulugama et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130048852 | Verenchikov | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130056627 | Verenchikov | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130068942 | Verenchikov | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130187044 | Ding et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130240725 | Makarov | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130248702 | Makarov | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130256524 | Brown et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130313424 | Makarov et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130327935 | Wiedenbeck | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140054454 | Hoyes et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140054456 | Kinugawa et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140084156 | Ristroph et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140117226 | Giannakopulos | May 2014 | A1 |
20140138538 | Hieftje et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140183354 | Moon et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140191123 | Wildgoose et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140217275 | Ding et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140239172 | Makarov | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140246575 | Langridge et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140291503 | Shchepunov et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140312221 | Verenchikov et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140361162 | Murray et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150028197 | Grinfeld et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028198 | Grinfeld | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150034814 | Brown et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150048245 | Vestal et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150060656 | Ugarov | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150122986 | Haase | May 2015 | A1 |
20150194296 | Verenchikov et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150228467 | Grinfeld et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150279650 | Verenchikov | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150294849 | Makarov et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150318156 | Loyd et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150364309 | Welkie | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150380233 | Verenchikov | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160005587 | Verenchikov | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160035552 | Verenchikov | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160035558 | Verenchikov et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160079052 | Makarov | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160225598 | Ristroph | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160225602 | Ristroph et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160240363 | Verenchikov | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170016863 | Verenchikov | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170025265 | Verenchikov et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032952 | Verenchikov | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170098533 | Stewart et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170168031 | Verenchikov | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170229297 | Green et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170338094 | Verenchikov et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180144921 | Hoyes et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180229297 | Funakoshi et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180315589 | Oshiro | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180366312 | Hamish et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190180998 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190206669 | Verenchikov et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190237318 | Brown | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190360981 | Verenchikov | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200083034 | Hoyes et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200090919 | Artaev et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200126781 | Kovtoun | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200152440 | Hoyes et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200168447 | Verenchikov | May 2020 | A1 |
20200168448 | Verenchikov et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200243322 | Stewart et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200373142 | Verenchikov | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200373143 | Verenchikov et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200373145 | Verenchikov et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2412657 | May 2003 | CA |
101369510 | Feb 2009 | CN |
102131563 | Jul 2011 | CN |
201946564 | Aug 2011 | CN |
4310106 | Oct 1994 | DE |
10116536 | Oct 2002 | DE |
102015121830 | Jun 2017 | DE |
102019129108 | Jun 2020 | DE |
112015001542 | Jul 2020 | DE |
0237259 | Sep 1987 | EP |
1137044 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1566828 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1901332 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2068346 | Jun 2009 | EP |
1665326 | Apr 2010 | EP |
1789987 | Sep 2010 | EP |
1522087 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2599104 | Jun 2013 | EP |
1743354 | Aug 2019 | EP |
3662501 | Jun 2020 | EP |
3662502 | Jun 2020 | EP |
3662503 | Jun 2020 | EP |
2080021 | Jan 1982 | GB |
2217907 | Nov 1989 | GB |
2300296 | Oct 1996 | GB |
2390935 | Jan 2004 | GB |
2396742 | Jun 2004 | GB |
2403063 | Dec 2004 | GB |
2455977 | Jul 2009 | GB |
2476964 | Jul 2011 | GB |
2478300 | Sep 2011 | GB |
2484361 | Apr 2012 | GB |
2484429 | Apr 2012 | GB |
2485825 | May 2012 | GB |
2489094 | Sep 2012 | GB |
2490571 | Nov 2012 | GB |
2495127 | Apr 2013 | GB |
2495221 | Apr 2013 | GB |
2496991 | May 2013 | GB |
2496994 | May 2013 | GB |
2500743 | Oct 2013 | GB |
2501332 | Oct 2013 | GB |
2506362 | Apr 2014 | GB |
2528875 | Feb 2016 | GB |
2555609 | May 2018 | GB |
2556451 | May 2018 | GB |
2556830 | Jun 2018 | GB |
2562990 | Dec 2018 | GB |
2575157 | Jan 2020 | GB |
2575339 | Jan 2020 | GB |
S6229049 | Feb 1987 | JP |
2000036285 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000048764 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2003031178 | Jan 2003 | JP |
3571546 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005538346 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006049273 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2007227042 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2010062152 | Mar 2010 | JP |
4649234 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011119279 | Jun 2011 | JP |
4806214 | Nov 2011 | JP |
2013539590 | Oct 2013 | JP |
5555582 | Jul 2014 | JP |
2015506567 | Mar 2015 | JP |
2015185306 | Oct 2015 | JP |
2564443 | Oct 2015 | RU |
2015148627 | May 2017 | RU |
2660655 | Jul 2018 | RU |
198034 | Sep 1991 | SU |
1681340 | Sep 1991 | SU |
1725289 | Apr 1992 | SU |
9103071 | Mar 1991 | WO |
9801218 | Jan 1998 | WO |
9808244 | Feb 1998 | WO |
0077823 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2005001878 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005043575 | May 2005 | WO |
2006049623 | May 2006 | WO |
2006102430 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2006103448 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007044696 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007104992 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007136373 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008046594 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008087389 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2010008386 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010034630 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010138781 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011086430 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011107836 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011135477 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2012010894 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012023031 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012024468 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012024570 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012116765 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2013045428 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013063587 | May 2013 | WO |
2013067366 | May 2013 | WO |
2013093587 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013098612 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013110587 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013110588 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013124207 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014021960 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014074822 | May 2014 | WO |
2014110697 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014142897 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014152902 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015142897 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2015152968 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015153622 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015153630 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015153644 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015175988 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015189544 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016064398 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016174462 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2016178029 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2017042665 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2018073589 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018109920 | Jun 2018 | WO |
2018124861 | Jul 2018 | WO |
2018183201 | Oct 2018 | WO |
2019030475 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019030476 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019030477 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019058226 | Mar 2019 | WO |
2019162687 | Aug 2019 | WO |
2019202338 | Oct 2019 | WO |
2019229599 | Dec 2019 | WO |
2020002940 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020021255 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020121167 | Jun 2020 | WO |
2020121168 | Jun 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/062174 dated Mar. 6, 2017, 8 pages. |
IPRP PCT/US2016/062174 issued May 22, 2018, 6 pages. |
Search Report for GB Application No. GB1520130.4 dated May 25, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/062203 dated Mar. 6, 2017, 8 pages. |
Search Report for GB Application No. GB1520134.6 dated May 26, 2016. |
IPRP PCT/US2016/062203, issued May 22, 2018, 6 pages. |
Search Report Under Section 17(5) for Application No. GB1507363.8 dated Nov. 9, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for Application No. PCT/GB2016/051238 dated Jul. 12, 2016, 16 pages. |
IPRP for application PCT/GB2016/051238 dated Oct. 31, 2017, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/063076 dated Mar. 30, 2017, 9 pages. |
Search Report for GB Application No. 1520540.4 dated May 24, 2016. |
IPRP for application PCT/US2016/063076, dated May 29, 2018, 7 pages. |
IPRP PCT/GB17/51981 dated Jan. 8, 2019, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2018/051206, dated Jul. 12, 2018, 9 pages. |
Author unknown, “Electrostatic lens,” Wikipedia, Mar. 31, 2017 (Mar. 31, 2017), XP055518392, Retrieved from the Internet URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electrostatic_lens&oldid=773161674 [retrieved on Oct. 24, 2018]. |
Hussein, O.A. et al., “Study the most favorable shapes of electrostatic quadrupole doublet lenses”, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1815, Feb. 17, 2017 (Feb. 17, 2017), p. 110003. |
Guan S., et al., “Stacked-ring electrostatic ion guide”, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Elsevier Science Inc, 7(1):101-106 (1996). |
Scherer, S., et al., “A novel principle for an ion mirror design in time-of-flight mass spectrometry”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 251, No. 1, Mar. 15, 2006. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052104, dated Oct. 31, 2018, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052105, dated Oct. 15, 2018, 18 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application PCT/GB2018/052105, dated Oct. 19, 2018, 19 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application PCT/GB2018/052102 dated Oct. 25, 2018, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052099, dated Oct. 10, 2018, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052101, dated Oct. 19, 2018, 15 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) for application GB1807605.9, dated Oct. 29, 2018, 5 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) for application GB1807626.5, dated Oct. 29, 2018, 7 pages. |
Yavor, M.I., et al., “High performance gridless ion mirrors for multi-reflection time-of-flight and electrostatic trap mass analyzers”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, vol. 426, Mar. 2018, pp. 1-11. |
Search Report under Section 17(5) for application GB1707208.3, dated Oct. 12, 2017, 5 pages. |
Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search for International Application No. PCT/GB2019/01118, dated Jul. 19, 2019, 25 pages. |
Doroshenko, V.M., and Cotter, R.J., “Ideal velocity focusing in a reflectron time-of-flight mass spectrometer”, American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 10(10):992-999 (1999). |
Kozlov, B. et al. “Enhanced Mass Accuracy in Multi-reflecting TOF MS” www.waters.com/posters, ASMS Conference (2017). |
Kozlov, B. et al. “Multiplexed Operation of an Orthogonal Multi-Reflecting TOF Instrument to Increase Duty Cycle by Two Orders” ASMS Conference, San Diego, CA, Jun. 6, 2018. |
Kozlov, B. et al. “High accuracy self-calibration method for high resolution mass spectra” ASMS Conference Abstract, 2019. |
Kozlov, B. et al., “Fast Ion Mobility Spectrometry and High Resolution TOF MS” ASMS Conference Poster (2014). |
Verenchicov, A. N. “Parallel MS-MS Analysis in a Time-Flight Tandem. Problem Statement, Method, and Instrumental Schemes” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004) Abstract. |
Yavor, M. I. “Planar Multireflection Time-Of-Flight Mass Analyzer with Unlimited Mass Range” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004). Abstract. |
Khasin, Y. I. et al., “Initial Experimental Studies of a Planar Multireflection Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometer” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004). Abstract. |
Verenchicov, A. N. et al. “Stability of Ion Motion in Periodic Electrostatic Fields” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004). Abstract. |
Verenchicov, A. N. “The Concept of Multireflecting Mass Spectrometer for Continuous Ion Sources” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006). Abstract. |
Verenchicov, A. N., et al. “Accurate Mass Measurements for Interpreting Spectra of atmospheric Pressure Ionization” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006). Abstract. |
Kozlov, B. N. et al., “Experimental Studies of Space Charge Effects in Multireflecting Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometes” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006). Abstract. |
Kozlov, B. N. et al., “Multireflecting Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometer With an Ion Trap Source” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006). Abstract. |
Hasin, Y. I., et al., “Planar Time-Of-Flight Multireflecting Mass Spectrometer with an Orthogonal Ion Injection Out of Continuous Ion Sources” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006). Abstract. |
Lutvinsky, Y. I., et al., “Estimation of Capacity of High Resolution Mass Spectra for Analysis of Complex Mixtures” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006). Abstract. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/GB2020/050209, dated Apr. 28, 2020, 12 pages. |
Verenchicov, A. N. et al. “Multiplexing in Multi-Reflecting TOF MS” Journal of Applied Solution Chemistry and Modeling, 6:1-22 (2017). |
Supplementary Partial EP Search Report for EP Application No. 16869126.9, dated Jun. 13, 2019. |
Supplementary Partial EP Search Report for EP Application No. 16866997.6, dated Jun. 7, 2019. |
Wikipedia “Reflectron”, Oct. 9, 2015, Retrieved from the Internet URL https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reflectron&oldid=684843442 [retrieved on May 29, 2019]. |
Sakurai, T., et al., “A new multi-passage time-of-flight mass spectrometer at JAIST” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 427(1-2):182-186 (1999) abstract. |
Extended European Search Report for EP Patent Application No. 16866997.6 dated Oct. 16, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2019/051234 dated Jul. 29, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2019/051839 dated Sep. 18, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2018/0051320 dated Aug. 1, 2018. |
Stresau, D., et al., “Ion Counting Beyond 10ghz Using a New Detector and Conventional Electronics”, European Winter Conference on Plasma Spectrochemistry, Feb. 4-8, 2001, Lillehammer, Norway, Retrieved from the Internet URL htps://www.etp-ms.com/file-repository/21 [retrieved on Jul. 31, 2019]. |
Kaufmann, R., et. al., “Sequencing of peptides in a time-of-flight mass spectrometer: evaluation of postsource decay following matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation (MALDI)”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co. Amsterdam, NL, 131:355-385, Feb. 24, 1994. |
Shaulis, Barry, et al., “Signal linearity of an extended range pulse counting detector: Applications to accurate and precise U—Pb dating of zircon by laser ablation quadrupole ICP-MS”, G3: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 11(11):1-12, Nov. 20, 2010. |
Search Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1708430.2 dated Nov. 28, 2017. |
Toyoda, M. et al., “Multi-turn time-of-flight mass spectrometers with electrostatic sectors”, Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 38:1125-1142 (2003). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2017/070508 dated Oct. 16, 2017, 17 pages. |
Search Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1613988.3 dated Jan. 5, 2017, 4 pages. |
Search Report under Section 17(5) for GB1916445.8, dated Jun. 15, 2020. |
IPRP for International application No. PCT/GB2018/051206, issued on Nov. 5, 2019, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application PCT/GB2018/052100, dated Oct. 19, 2018, 19 pages. |
Wouters et al., “Optical Design of the TOFI (Time-of-Flight Isochronous) Spectrometer for Mass Measurements of Exotic Nuclei”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A, 240(1): 77-90, Oct. 1, 1985. |
Combined Search and Examination Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1901411.7 dated Jul. 31, 2019. |
Examination Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1618980.5 dated Jul. 25, 2019. |
Combined Search and Examination Report for GB 1906258.7, dated Oct. 25, 2019. |
Combined Search and Examination Report for GB1906253.8, dated Oct. 30, 2019, 5 pages. |
Author unknown, “Einzel Lens”, Wikipedia [online] Nov. 2020 [retrieved on Nov. 3, 2020]. Retrieved from Internet URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einzel_lens, 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/GB2019/051235, dated Sep. 25, 2019, 22 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/GB2019/051416, dated Oct. 10, 2019, 22 pages. |
Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) for Application No. GB1906258.7, dated Dec. 11, 2020, 7 pages. |
Examination Report under Section 18(3) for Application No. GB1906258.7, dated May 5, 2021, 4 pages. |
O'Halloran, G.J., et al., “Determination of Chemical Species Prevalent in a Plasma Jet”, Bendix Corp Report ASD-TDR-62-644, U.S. Air Force (1964). Abstract. |
Carey, D.C., “Why a second-order magnetic optical achromat works”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 189(203):365-367 (1981). Abstract. |
Sakurai, T. et al., “Ion optics for time-of-flight mass spectrometers with multiple symmetry”, Int J Mass Spectrom Ion Proc 63(2-3):273-287 (1985). Abstract. |
Wollnik, H., and Casares, A., “An energy-isochronous multi-pass time-of-flight mass spectrometer consisting of two coaxial electrostatic mirrors”, Int J Mass Spectrom 227:217-222 (2003). Abstract. |
Collision Frequency, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collision_frequency accessed Aug. 17, 2021. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2020/050471, dated May 13, 2020, 9 pages. |
Search Report for GB Application No. GB2002768.6 dated Jul. 7, 2020. |
Search Report for GB Application No. GB 1903779.5, dated Sep. 20, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200152440 A1 | May 2020 | US |