The present invention relates to a thermal management assembly including but not limited to a heat spreader, which can be used for transferring heat away from a heat source, e.g., to a heat sink; an assembly having the heat spreader in contact with the heat source, e.g., between the heat source and the heat sink; a heat sink for dissipating the heat. The invention also relates to methods of manufacturing a thermal management assembly.
Advances in microelectronics technology have resulted in electronic devices which process signals and data at unprecedented high speeds. Electronic and/or integrated circuit (“IC”) devices, e.g., microprocessors, memory devices, etc, become smaller while heat dissipation requirements get larger. Thermal energy generated within electronic devices such as personal computers can be compared to that of a stovetop burner, with today's generation of Pentium and Power PC chips dissipating more than 100 watts of power. In simple terms, one could fry an egg on top of any of these chips.
The heat must be efficiently removed, to prevent the system from becoming unstable or being damaged. Heat spreaders and/or heat sinks are frequently used to dissipate heat from the surface of electronic components to a cooler environment, usually ambient air. The heat transfer rate from heat source surfaces directly to the surrounding air is typically poor.
A heat sink is a thermal dissipation device comprised of a mass of material that is thermally coupled to a heat source to conduct thermal energy away from the heat source. Heat sinks are typically designed to transport the heat from the heat spreader on the IC to ambient air. The heat sink may be in the form of fins or an integrated heat spreader. The heat sink conducts the thermal energy away from a high-temperature region (i.e., the processor) to a low-temperature region (i.e., the heat sink). The thermal energy is then dissipated by convection and radiation from a surface of the heat sink into the atmosphere surrounding the heat sink. Heat sinks are typically designed to increase the heat transfer efficiency primarily by increasing the surface area that is in direct contact with the air. This allows more heat to be dissipated and thereby lowers the device operating temperature.
Heat sinks used for cooling electronic components typically include a thermally conductive base plate that interfaces directly with the device to be cooled and a set of plate or pin fins extending from the base plate. The fins increase the surface area that is in direct contact with the air, and thereby increase the heat transfer efficiency between the heat source and ambient air.
In conventional heat sinks of the prior art, the fins are either integral with the base of the heat sink or assembled to the base using various conventional fastening techniques. In heat sinks where the base and the fins are assembled together, the base is typically either copper or aluminum, and the fins are either copper or aluminum. Copper has superior thermal conductivity as compared to aluminum (390 vs. 101 W/m·K), but is more expensive. Copper is also denser, adding weight to the heat sink and making the heat sink, and the electronic device more vulnerable to damage from shock and/or vibration. Therefore, heat sinks that have copper are heavy and costly while aluminum fins do not provide enough thermal performance. U.S. Pat. No. 6,862,183 discloses a heat sink having composite fins, i.e., each fin including a first portion made from copper that is thermally coupled to a base to conduct thermal energy away from the base, and a second portion made from aluminum.
To overcome the weight problems of conventional heat sinks employing copper and/or aluminum, heat sinks employing graphite have been proposed. U.S. Pat. No. 6,538,892 discloses a radial finned heat sink assembly having planar fins with graphite layers aligned with plane of fin, such that thermal conductivity in direction parallel to plane is greater than that in perpendicular direction. Each fin comprises a graphite “sheet” that has been compressed or compacted with the density and thickness of each graphite sheet varied by controlling the degree of compression, for a thickness of about 0.075 mm to 3.75 mm. U.S. Pat. No. 6,749,010 discloses a heat sink system having a metal base and a plurality of fins attached to the base, the fins constructed of a resin impregnated laminate of “sheets” of compressed particles of exfoliated graphite, with each graphite sheet having thickness of about 0.075 mm to 3.75 mm.
Using graphite is one way to overcome the weight problems of the aluminum/copper heat sinks of the prior art. However, the prior art graphite heat spreaders are directed at graphite “sheets” comprising plurality of graphite layers or cleavings at the micrometer level. There exists a need for advanced thermal management systems with ultra-thin heat sinks for a maximized ratio of thermal conductivity to weight.
The invention provides a thermal management assembly for dissipating thermal energy from an electronic device or a similar system requires heat removal. The assembly comprises a base adapted to be thermally coupled to the electronic device; and at least a heat sink thermally coupled to the base. The heat sink comprises at least a graphite layer exhibiting a thermal conductivity which is anisotropic in nature and is greater than 500 W/m° C. in at least one plane, the graphite layer has a first surface, a second surface, and a thickness comprising at least a graphene layer. The graphite layer is structurally supported by a later comprising at least one of a metal, a polymeric resin, a ceramic, and a mixture thereof disposed on at least one surface of the graphite layer.
The invention further relates to a method for constructing a fin for use in a heat sink, by cleaving at least a graphite layer having a thickness of less than 0.1 from a sheet of graphite exhibiting a thermal conductivity which is anisotropic in nature and is greater than 500 W/m° C. in at least one plane to obtain a graphite layer comprising at least a graphene layer.
As used herein, approximating language may be applied to modify any quantitative representation that may vary without resulting in a change in the basic function to which it is related. Accordingly, a value modified by a term or terms, such as “about” and “substantially,” may not to be limited to the precise value specified, in some cases.
The term “heat sink” may be used interchangeably with “heat dissipator” and that the term may be in the singular or plural form, indicating one or multiple items may be present, referring to an element which not only collects the heat, but also performs the dissipating function.
As used herein, the term “base plate,” “base plate” or “mounting frame” may be used interchangeably, referring to the thermally conductive structure or element that interfaces directly with a heat spreader, the device to be cooled or for the heat to be removed from. As used herein the term “heat spreader” refers to a device typically in the form of a sheath, that is in contact with the source of heat and the heat sink. A heat spreader sometimes also functions as an isolator to protect fragile IC components during shock and vibration,
Also as used herein, the term “thermal pyrolytic graphite” (“TPG”) may be used interchangeably with “highly oriented pyrolytic graphite” (“HOPG”), or compression annealed pyrolytic graphite (“CAPG”), referring to graphite materials consisting of crystallites of considerable size, the crystallites being highly aligned or oriented with respect to each other and having well ordered carbon layers or a high degree of preferred crystallite orientation, with an in-plane (a-b direction) thermal conductivity greater than 1000 W/m-K. In one embodiment, the TPG has an in-plane thermal conductivity greater than 1,500 W/m-K
As used herein, the term “graphene” or “graphene film” denotes the atom-thick carbon sheets or layers (as illustrate in
The invention relates to an advanced thermal management system, i.e., an ultra-thin heat sink, comprising at least a single layer or a single cleaving of graphite for a maximized ratio of thermal conductivity to weight.
Graphites possess anisotropic structures and thus exhibit or possess many properties that are highly directional e.g. thermal and electrical conductivity and fluid diffusion. Graphites are made up of layer planes of hexagonal arrays or networks of carbon atoms. As illustrated in
As graphite is made up of a plurality layers or planes, and because of its layered structure, graphite cleaves almost like mica along the basal planes. Using a simplistic process such as taking a piece of tape and pressing it onto the flat graphite surface and then pull it off, and the tape takes with is a thin cleaving 1 of graphite. As shown in
Thermal resistance is the critical parameter of heat sink design. Thermal resistance is directly proportional to thickness of the material and inversely proportional to thermal conductivity of the material and surface area of heat flow. The invention relates to an advanced thermal management system with optimized thermal resistance, i.e., an ultra-thin heat sink comprising a conductive material such a graphite, with thermal conductivity as high as 1000 W/m-K or more, with a thickness as low as one atomic layer of carbon.
Process for Manufacturing Advanced Thermal Spreader of Ultra-thin Thickness In one embodiment, a pyrolytic graphite (“PG”) sheet is used as the feedstock source for the ultra-thin cleavings of graphite for use in the advanced thermal spreader of the invention. PG is generally is made by passing a carbonaceous gas at low pressure over a substrate held at a high temperature, wherein pyrolysis occurs and the graphite is vapor-deposited on the exposed mandrel surface. The pyrolytic graphite sheet is separated from the base substrate, and further subjected to a thermal annealing process. In the annealing step, the PG is heated at a temperature of above 2900° C. for a sufficient period of time, depending on the thickness and bulk of the product being annealed, forming thermal pyrolytic graphite (“TPG”). In one embodiment, this sufficient amount of time is a minute or less. In a second embodiment, 45 seconds. In a third embodiment, 30 seconds. In a fourth embodiment, 10 seconds. In the annealing process, crystallographic changes take place resulting in an improvement in layer plane orientation, a decrease in thickness normal to the layer planes (decrease in the c direction), and an increase in length and width dimensions (increase in the a direction). The improved orientation along with an increase in crystallization size results in an excellent thermal conductivity of least 1000 watts/m-K in the finished material in certain directions. In one embodiment, the PG layers are hot pressed while undergoing annealing, for TPG sheets of excellent thermal conductivity and parallelism of the graphite layers or cleavings. The hot pressing may be done using processes and apparatuses known in the art, e.g., using dies, rollers, and the like.
As used herein, the term “graphite layer” refers to a single cleaving of PG comprising least one graphene layer of nanometer thickness. Also as used herein, the term “cleave” or “cleaving” refers to the process of peeling, removing, or extracting from, or separating a sheet of graphite to obtain at least an ultra-thin layer of graphite, comprising at least one single graphene layer of nanometer thickness. The “sheet” of graphite comprises at least two cleavings or layers of graphite, each in turns comprises a plurality of graphene layers.
Although the generic term “graphite” may be used herein, the ultra-thin heat sink of the invention depending on the application employs either pyrolytic graphite (PG) with a typical in-plane (a-b direction) thermal conductivity of less than 500 W/m-K, or thermal pyrolytic graphite (TPG) with an in-plane (a-b direction) thermal conductivity greater than 600 W/m-K. In one embodiment, the starting feedstock is a graphite sheet commercially available from sources including Panasonic, General Electric Company, etc., with thickness of 0.1±0.05 mm.
Preparing an Ultra-thin Graphite Layer Comprising Graphene Layers: In one embodiment, the graphite sheet is first treated with an intercalating agent known in the art to facilitates the exfoliation or separation of the layers to obtain cleavings of graphitized pyrolytic graphite in the c axis. After intercalation, i.e., being treated with the intercalating agent, the treated pyrolytic graphite may be washed or purged free of excess intercalating agent. Examples of intercalating agent include organic and inorganic acids such as nitric acid, sulfuric acid, perhalo acid and mixtures thereof, 7,7,8-8-tetracyanoquinomethane (TCNQ), tegracyanoethylene (TCNE), 1,2,4,5-tetracyanobenzene (TCBN), and the like; bromine and ferric chloride; nitric acid and chlorate of potash.
In yet another embodiment, a chemical source such as particles, fluids, gases, or liquids is first introduced to increase stress in the region between the graphene layers, for weakened interlayer interactions, inducing the graphene layers to exfoliate from the graphite surface. In one embodiment, the particles from the chemical source are introduced into the cleaving layer in a selected dosage to facilitate cleaving in a controlled manner. In one embodiment, an agent such as acetone, benzene, naphthalene is used to cause the graphene layers to exfoliate from the graphite surface by weakening their interlayer interactions.
In one embodiment, the separate graphene layers are obtained using ultrasonic, wherein a selectivity property of ultrasonic is employed for concentrating energies at interconnected interfaces between the graphene layers. As the interlayer interfaces between the graphene becomes weakened through the use of a chemical source such as acetone, benzene, etc., the energies of ultrasonic are absorbed to part and break away the graphene layers, thereby effectively and rapidly separating the graphene layers. The ultrasonic condition, i.e., frequency, power, time, etc., varies depending on the chemical source used to weaken the interlayer interactions of the graphene.
In yet another embodiment, the graphene layers are cleaved using micromechanical manipulations as described by Zhang et al. in APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 86, 073104 2005, May 6, 2005, to obtain graphite crystallites having thickness d ranging from 10 to 100 nm. The article is herein incorporated by reference. In this method a graphite sheet or block is transferred to a micro-machined silicon cantilever and glued down by using an adhesive. Thin microscopic cleaving can be obtained/controlled by tuning the normal force between the cantilever and the substrate.
In one embodiment, a separate cleaving comprising at least a graphene layer is obtained by pressing a sheet of PG against a layer of photoresist spread over glass substrate, for the top cleaving of PG comprising at least one graphene layer to attached to the photoresist layer. The photoresist layer can be dissolved away in solvents such as acetone, leaving behind the single cleaving layer of PG with at least one graphene layer of nanometer thickness.
In yet another embodiment, copper, aluminum, or tinned copper foil tapes backed with a highly conductive pressure-sensitive adhesive are pressed against a pyrolytic graphite substrate and peeled of, for a cleaving of pyrolytic graphite comprising at least one graphene film or layer. In one embodiment, the metal foil has a thickness of 5.0-25 μm thick, backed with carbon or Parylene, then a layer of highly conductive pressure sensitive adhesives. Metal foil tapes are commercially available from sources including Chomerics and Lebow Company.
Micro-finishing/Etching Step: Etched, micro-finished, or patterned surface shows an increase in adhesion to a laminating/coating layer that is needed to provide the structural support/integrity needed for the ultra-thin graphite layer. In one embodiment, the surface is patterned, mirofinished, or etched using techniques known in the art, including dry vacuum/plasma-assisted processes including ion etching, plasma etching, reactive ion etching or chemical etching, creating cracks, gaps, or pits on the graphene surface.
In one embodiment, etching is done via a physical process such as ion etching. In a second embodiment, the etching is via a chemical reaction such as plasma etching or oxidation. In a third embodiment, a combination of both physical and chemical effects such as reactive ion etching is used to microfinish the surface of the graphene. In one embodiment, the dry etching is done using a gas species such as oxygen, argon and a fluorine gas (such as Freon, SF6 and CF4). In one embodiment, the oxidative etching is done using an oxygen radical, so that carbon can be oxidized (burnt out) and converts to carbon dioxide, creating patterns on the graphene films. In one embodiment of oxidative etching, an oxygen molecule is irradiated with an ultraviolet ray to generate an oxygen radical for use in etching the surface of the graphene layer. In yet another embodiment, the graphene layer is etched by oxidizing at a temperature of 500 to 800° C., wherein it is noted that the density of the pits and the pit diameter on the graphene surface increases with the oxidation temperature.
Providing Structural Integrity to Graphene Layer(s): As the heat sink of the invention is fabricated from graphene layers of atomic layer thick, i.e., nanometer scale, the ultra-thin graphite layer is provided with structural integrity/support in the form of a coating layer (on one or both sides of the graphite layer), or laminated with a support layer (on one or both sides if needed). In one embodiment as illustrated in
In one embodiment and prior to coating, holes or vias with sizes between 0.1 to 5 mm in diameter and spacing between 2 to 25 mm apart are drilled through the ultra-thin graphite layer using methods known in the art including Electro Discharge Machining (EDM), Electro Discharge Grinding (EDG), laser, and plasma. In another embodiment, slits are fabricated in the ultra-thin graphite strip prior to treatments.
In one embodiment, the ultra-thin graphite strip having at least one graphene layer is coated or treated with a resin, a metal, a ceramic, or mixtures thereof Examples include parylene; silicon nitride, silicon oxide; nano particles of aluminum oxide, silicium oxide, zirconium oxide, titanium oxide, antimony oxide, zinc oxide, tin oxide, indium oxide, and cerium oxide, metal (e.g. aluminum or tungsten); cynoacrylate; a carbon film; a self-assembled monolayered material; perfluoropolyether; hexamethyldisilazane; perfluorodecanoic carboxylic acid; silicon dioxide; silicate glass; acrylic; epoxy; silicone; urethane; phenolic-based resin systems; or combinations thereof The coating provides moisture resistance, structural integrity, and handling strength, i.e. stiffness for the graphite layer, as well as “fixing” the morphology of the graphite layer.
The amount of coating used as well as the coating thickness should be sufficient so that the final ultra-thin graphite layer has sufficient structural integrity to be used as a heat sink, while the anisotropic thermal conductivity of the graphite is not adversely impacted. In one embodiment, the coating has a thickness between 50 nanometers and 1000 nanometers. In a second embodiment, the coating has a thickness of less than 500 nm. In a third embodiment, a sufficient amount of coating is applied so that the surface layer is sufficiently crack free, meaning that no cracks can be observed by optical microscopy or SEM with 10 k magnification. Cracks also include holes, perforations, pores, or lines.
The coating layer can be applied using processes known in the art, with the type of coating material used sometimes dictating the method of application. Examples of coating methods include but not limited to expanding thermal plasma (ETP), ion plating, plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) (also called Organometallic Chemical Vapor Deposition (OMCVD)), metal organic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE), physical vapor deposition processes such as sputtering, reactive electron beam (e-beam) deposition, plasma spray, manual brushing, dipping, spraying, and flow coating.
For small/low volume heat sink applications, brushing can be used as this method is excellent for small volumes, but it can result in an inconsistency in coating thickness and that coating materials are generally “air dryable” solvent-based or moisture curable. Spraying can also be used, which can be done via a hand-held spray gun in a spray booth or an automated application system, with possible variations in the coating thickness uniformity and surface coverage. In another embodiment, flow coating is used for one side coating, wherein the graphite layer is passed over a “wave” of coating material at a specific angle, with the thickness of coating being controlled by the viscosity of the material and the speed with which it passes over the wave.
In one embodiment, Parylene C is used as the coating material for the ultra-thin heat sink, for a coating of a thin, inert and highly conformal film. The Parylene C can be applied on one or both sides of the graphite layer by a physical coating method such as brushing, dipping, or spraying. In a second embodiment, both sides of the ultra-thin heat sink are coated with Parylene C using a chemical vapor deposition process.
In yet another embodiment, due to the nano-structured and ultra-thin nature of the graphite layer, a flame spraying or a plasma deposition technique is employed for a coating thickness of less than 500 nanometer. In one embodiment, the coating comprises a metal, and wherein the ultra-thin graphite layer is exposed to an evaporated metal in a plasma coating process. In yet another embodiment, a layer of aluminum oxide is used as a coating layer, wherein aluminum metal is evaporated in an inductively coupled oxygen plasma, thus forming a layer on the exposed graphene surface.
In one embodiment, the resin used for treating or coating the graphite layer can act as an adhesive to further laminate the resin-treated graphite layer with another layer, e.g., a metal foil or another ultra-thin graphite layer. In one embodiment, epoxy is used as a coating layer, which layer, upon curing, adhesively bond the graphite layer to another layer for structural support, e.g., a metal foil. In yet another embodiment, a material like a ceramet (ceramic/metal) precursor is used in a flame spraying (plasma spraying) to form a coating layer/a support layer on one or both sides of the ultra-thin graphite layer, forming ultra-thin reinforced graphite strip, which can be further processed to form an ultra-thin fin or ultra-thin heat sink.
The ultra-thin fin/coated graphite layer in one embodiment can be subsequently brazed to other materials or parts, i.e., mounting frame, water-cooled system, etc., using brazing materials which by themselves may not wet the graphite layer.
Cutting/Forming Fins Having Desired Shapes: In one embodiment, the ultra-thin reinforced graphite strip is cut into a desired size by any of EDM, EDG, laser, plasma, or other methods known in the art. In one embodiment, after cutting, the strip can be formed or bent into desired shapes depending on the final thermal management application. In one embodiment, the strip is rolled into a tube, forming “pin fins.”
In one embodiment, the cutting/forming step is carried out after the graphite layer is reinforced with a laminate or a coating layer. In a second embodiment, the cutting/forming step is carried out prior to the laminating/coating process.
In yet another embodiment, louvers, slits or vias are formed or perforated in the graphite layer by any of EDM, EDG, laser, plasma, or other methods known in the art. In one embodiment, vias are formed in the graphite layer so that a diffusion bond can be formed via the plurality of via with a resin coating on both sides of the graphite layer. The vias may be anywhere from 1-5 mm in diameter and placed between 3-25 mm apart to optimize thermal and mechanical performance.
In a further embodiment, the graphite layer is specifically designed with a number of holes or vias to form a weak mechanical structure, with the filled or coated vias acting to support the structure while minimizing the stress that can be transmitted across the heat sink or thermal spreader. By adjusting the number and location of vias, the thermal conductivity through the TPG and the mechanical integrity of the TPG can be optimized for a particular application, as coating materials (e.g., parylene, metal, etc.) flow into and diffuse across the holes, this creates mechanical vias that cross-link the opposing faces together for improved section modulus. In another embodiment, engineered size and spacing of the vias help mitigate the low z-direction conductivity of TPG, providing enhanced through-the-thickness conductivity in the final product.
In yet another embodiment, the surface of the high thermal conductivity graphite layer is textured or roughened so that the layer can effectively bond and/or adhere to brazing materials, encapsulants or laminating materials.
Assembling the Ultra-Thin Heat Sink: The ultra-thin graphite layer in the form of a fin 14 is assembled for intimate contact with a mounting frame or base plate for heat to be effectively transferred through the fin 14, in the a-b direction (the height or length of the fin depending on the configuration). In one embodiment, the mounting frame (or base plate) comprises a plastic material to eliminate all machining and drilling. In a second embodiment, the plastic is molded of metal filled material for EMI shielding, or of a highly heat resistant so that the heat sink can be soldered to the base plate in assembly. In another embodiment, the mounting frame is stamped and formed of metal, which would not only eliminate machining and drilling, but would also aid in heat dissipation.
The ultra-thin heat sink can be affixed to the mounting frame by known methods, including but not limited to using adhesives, soldering, crimping, swaging, staking, brazing, bonding, welding and spot welding. In one embodiment as illustrated in
Since partially deform TPG still conducts heat with excellent thermal conductivity, in the embodiment as illustrated in
In one embodiment, an adhesive is used to affix the ultra-thin graphite heat sink to the mounting frame. Adhesives, as used here, refer to any organic or inorganic/organic composite system which can be used to bond the heat sink. In one embodiment, the adhesive is a filled system, e.g., metal loaded polymers including silver loaded adhesives, composites of boron nitride (“BN”), Al2O3, silica or mixtures of these in a polymeric matrix such as BN filled epoxies, etc., which maintains a high degree of structural integrity at the use temperature and with adequate thermal conductivity. In yet another embodiment, a double sided thermally adhesive tape is used to securely attach each fin of the heat sink to the mounting frame.
In one embodiment, a braze that will wet the ultra-thin graphite layer is used to affix the ultra-thin graphite heat sink to the mounting frame. Examples of active brazes include “Ti—Cu-Sil” (titanium, copper, silver), brazes based on titanium and titanium hydride in combination of silicon and indium; and low temperature braze materials. In one embodiment, the brazes are applied in hard vacuum environment, e.g. around 10E-6 Torr and lower, allowing the braze to wet the graphene layers in the process of bonding the fin to the mounting frame.
Embodiments of the Ultra-Thin Heat Sink: The ultra-thin graphite heat sink of the invention can be bent, folded into same, shaped, encapsulated or laminated as fins for use in various different thermal management applications, including but not limited to cooling systems, heat sinks, heat spreaders and thermally conductive components. The number of fins, their dimensions and spacing vary depending on cooling requirements of the application.
Due to its ultra-thin and lightweight properties, the heat sink can provide optimized, thus performing better than the prior art thick thermal management solutions to remove heat from heat generating devices or installations. Exemplary applications range from commercial applications such as fuel cells, nuclear reactor, automotive, lap top computers, laser diodes, evaporators, etc. to defense-related and spacecraft applications including spacecrafts, jet fighters, etc, taking many shapes and forms, including but not limited to the embodiments described herein.
As illustrated in
Compared to the heat sink of the prior art, the ultra-thin heat sink is ultra light, i.e., TPG has a density of 2.18 to 2.24 g/cm3. This compares to a density of 8.9-g/cm3 for copper and 2.702-g/cm3 for aluminum. The use of graphite layers or cleavings from graphite sheet as the fins in the heat sink of the invention further allows the fin to be ultra-thin, for fin thickness ranging from a nanometer level, e.g, 5 nm or more, to less 50 mil (0.0254 mm), as compared to the prior art fins having thickness typically ranging from 0.25 mm to 0.75 mm. In one embodiment, the fin has a thickness ranging from 10 nm to 30 mil. In a second embodiment, from 50 nm to 20 mil. There is no upper limit to the thickness of the fins made from the ultra-thin graphite layer, however, it is desirable to have heat sinks that are as light as possible (and thus with fins as thin as possible down to several nanometer thick) for maximum heat removal capacity.
Due to the ultra-thin and ultra light property, the heat sink of the invention optimizes the amount of heat removal per surface area or weight of the heat sink (thermal conductivity of TPG of at least 1000 W/mK vs. 400 W/mK for copper, and 200 W/mK for aluminum). In one embodiment, the heat sink comprises a plurality of low profile heat sink having height of less than 10 mm and total weight of less than 1 gm, for use inside most telecommunications enclosures where space is limited. In one embodiment, the heat sink comprises between 20 to 100 fins each with a height of at least 10 mm and a width of at least 10 mm (total of at least 100 mm2 area), and for a weight less than 5 gm.
In one embodiment, the ultra-thin heat sink comprises a plurality of fins having rectangular shape as shown in
In yet another embodiment as illustrated in
In one embodiment as illustrated in
In a second embodiment of a thermal management system as illustrated in
In another embodiment as illustrated in
In one embodiment as illustrated in
In one embodiment as illustrated in
In yet embodiment as illustrated in
It should be further noted that in all embodiments, the fin 14 can be optionally provided with a plurality of vias, slits or slots, to further facility the heat convection and air flow. The size of the vias and/or slits, their spacing can be varied according to the final application. In one embodiment as illustrated in
Also, for all embodiments, pressure clips or brackets (not shown) can be optionally used to provide compressive force downward, further holding the folded fin 14 firmly seated in place/affixed to the base plate 12. In one embodiment of a radial finned or a honeycomb-style heat sink, a wire mesh, or net in the form of a perforated sheet is placed on top of the fins or honeycomb for holding the heat sink firmly seated in place.
Examples are provided herein to illustrate the invention but are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
A thermal pyrolytic graphite (TPG) sheet commercially available from General Electric Company is secured against a fat surface. A metal foil backed with a highly conductive adhesive tape, die cut to slightly overlap the TPG sheet, is pressed against the TPG Sheet. Metal foil tapes are commercially available from sources including Chomerics as CHO-FOIL® or CHO-FOIL® EMI shielding tapes. The metal foil sheet is peeled off, inducing the cleaving of the top graphene layer(s) from the pyrolytic graphite surface, and for the cleaving to be affixed to the adhesive backing of the metal foil tape. After the top cleaving is cleaved off, the process is repeated to obtain the next graphite cleaving.
The bare (not laminated) graphite layer surfaces of the metal-foil backed graphite strips in Example 1 are brushed with Parylene C using a small paint brush for thickness of 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00 mil (thousandth of an inch). The results show that as the thickness of Parylene increases, the mechanical robustness of the ultra-thin heat sink of the invention increases with the gain in robustness falling off at about 0.50 mil.
A two part, silver load, B-staged adhesive system is applied onto the bare graphite layer surface of the metal-foil backed strips obtained in Example. The resulting thermal conductivity of the heat sink is at least 75% of an uncoated TPG product.
While the invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment, those skilled in the art will understand that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. It is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims. All citations referred herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
This application claims the benefits of U.S. Patent Appl. No. 60/743998 filed Mar. 30, 2006, which patent application is fully incorporated herein by reference. This application is also a continuation-in-part (CIP) of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/761,567, with a filing date of Jan. 21, 2004.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60743998 | Mar 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10761567 | Jan 2004 | US |
Child | 11555681 | Nov 2006 | US |