Embodiments of the invention relate to methods of fabricating nanostructures by use of thin films of self-assembling block copolymers, and devices resulting from those methods.
As the development of nanoscale mechanical, electrical, chemical and biological devices and systems increases, new processes and materials are needed to fabricate nanoscale devices and components. Optical lithographic processing methods are not able to accommodate fabrication of structures and features at the nanometer level. The use of self-assembling diblock copolymers presents another route to patterning at nanometer dimensions. Diblock copolymer films spontaneously assembly into periodic structures by microphase separation of the constituent polymer blocks after annealing, for example, by thermal annealing above the glass transition temperature of the polymer or by solvent annealing, forming ordered domains at nanometer-scale dimensions. Following self-assembly, one block of the copolymer can be selectively removed and the remaining patterned film used, for example, as an etch mask for patterning nanosized features into the underlying substrate. Since the domain sizes and periods (Lo) involved in this method are determined by the chain length of a block copolymer (MW), resolution can exceed other techniques such as conventional photolithography, while the cost of the technique is far less than electron beam (E-beam) lithography or EUV photolithography, which have comparable resolution.
The film morphology, including the size and shape of the microphase-separated domains, can be controlled by the molecular weight and volume fraction of the AB blocks of a diblock copolymer to produce lamellar, cylindrical, or spherical morphologies, among others. For example, for volume fractions at ratios greater than about 80:20 of the two blocks (AB) of a diblock polymer, a block copolymer film will microphase separate and self-assemble into a periodic spherical domains with spheres of polymer B surrounded by a matrix of polymer A. For ratios of the two blocks between about 60:40 and 80:20, the diblock copolymer assembles into periodic cylindrical domains of polymer B within a matrix of polymer A. For ratios between about 50:50 and 60:40, lamellar domains or alternating stripes of the blocks are formed. Domain size typically ranges from 5-50 nm.
Researchers have demonstrated the ability to chemically differentiate a surface such that some areas are preferentially wetting to one domain of a block copolymer and other areas are neutral wetting to both blocks. Periodic cylindrical structures have been grown in parallel and perpendicular orientations to substrates within trenches by thermal annealing cylindrical-phase block copolymers. A primary requirement for producing perpendicular cylinders is that the trench floor must be non-preferential or neutral wetting to both blocks of the copolymer. For producing parallel-oriented half-cylinders, the trench floor must by preferentially wetting by the minor copolymer block.
A film composed of periodic hexagonal close-packed cylinders, for example, can be useful in forming an etch mask to make structures in an underlying substrate for specific applications such as magnetic storage devices. However, many applications require a more complex layout of elements for forming contacts, conductive lines and/or other elements such as DRAM capacitors.
Embodiments of the invention are described below with reference to the following accompanying drawings, which are for illustrative purposes only. Throughout the following views, the reference numerals will be used in the drawings, and the same reference numerals will be used throughout the several views and in the description to indicate same or like parts.
The following description with reference to the drawings provides illustrative examples of devices and methods according to embodiments of the invention. Such description is for illustrative purposes only and not for purposes of limiting the same.
In the context of the current application, the term “semiconductor substrate” or “semiconductive substrate” or “semiconductive wafer fragment” or “wafer fragment” or “wafer” will be understood to mean any construction comprising semiconductor material, including but not limited to bulk semiconductive materials such as a semiconductor wafer (either alone or in assemblies comprising other materials thereon), and semiconductive material layers (either alone or in assemblies comprising other materials). The term “substrate” refers to any supporting structure including, but not limited to, the semiconductive substrates, wafer fragments or wafers described above.
“Lo” is the inherent pitch (bulk period or repeat unit) of structures that self-assemble upon annealing from a self-assembling (SA) block copolymer or a blend of a block copolymer with one or more of its constituent homopolymers.
In embodiments of the invention, processing conditions utilize graphoepitaxy techniques that use topographical features, e.g., the sidewalls and ends of trenches, as constraints to induce the formation and registration of polymer domains of cylindrical-phase diblock copolymers in one dimension (e.g., hexagonal close-packed (honeycomb) array or single row of perpendicular cylinders) and chemically or structurally (topographically) differentiated trench floors to provide a wetting pattern to control orientation of the microphase separated and self-assembling cylindrical domains in a second dimension (e.g., parallel lines of half-cylinders or perpendicular-oriented cylinders). The trench floors are structured or composed of surface materials to provide a neutral wetting surface or preferential wetting surface to impose ordering on a block copolymer film that is then cast on top of the substrate and annealed to produce desired arrays of nanoscale cylinders.
Embodiments of the invention provide a means of generating self-assembled diblock copolymer structures wherein perpendicular cylinders are formed in some trenches and parallel-oriented half-cylinders are formed in other trenches. Control of the orientation of the cylinders is provided by the nature of the trench floor surface. Graphoepitaxy is used to provide parallel lines of half-cylinders, hexagonal close-packed arrays of perpendicular cylinders, or a single row of perpendicular cylinders within lithographically defined trenches. A desired pattern of cylinders on a substrate, e.g., a wafer, can be prepared by providing trenches having walls that are selective to one polymer block of a block copolymer and a floor composed either of a material that is block-sensitive or preferentially wetting to one of the blocks of the block copolymer in trenches where lines of parallel half-cylinders are desired, or a material that is neutral wetting to both blocks in trenches where an array of perpendicular cylinders are desired. Embodiments of the invention can be used to pattern lines and openings (holes) in the same patterning step at predetermined locations on a substrate.
Embodiments of the invention of methods for fabricating arrays of cylinders from thin films of cylindrical-phase self-assembling (SA) block copolymers are described with reference to the figures. As shown in
The trenches can be formed using a lithographic tool having an exposure system capable of patterning at the scale of Lo (10-100 nm). Such exposure systems include, for example, extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography, dry lithography (e.g., 248 nm, 193 nm), immersion lithography (e.g., 193 nm), and electron beam lithography, as known and used in the art. Conventional photolithography can attain about 58 nm features. A method called “pitch doubling” or “pitch multiplication” can also be used for extending the capabilities of photolithographic techniques beyond their minimum pitch, as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,328,810 (Lowrey et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 7,115,525 (Abatchev, et al.), U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0281266 (Wells) and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0023805 (Wells), the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein. Briefly, a pattern of lines is photolithographically formed in a photoresist layer overlying a layer of an expendable material, which in turn overlies a substrate, the expendable material layer is etched to form placeholders or mandrels, the photoresist is stripped, spacers are formed on the sides of the mandrels, and the mandrels are then removed leaving behind the spacers as a mask for patterning the substrate. Thus, where the initial photolithography formed a pattern defining one feature and one space, the same width now defines two features and two spaces, with the spaces defined by the spacers. As a result, the smallest feature size possible with a photolithographic technique is effectively decreased down to about 30 nm or more.
The trenches 14a-14c are structured with opposing sidewalls 16, opposing ends 18, a floor 20, a width (wt), a length (lt) and a depth (Dt). Trench 14c is also structured with the trench ends 18 angled to the sidewalls 16, for example, at an about 60° angle, and in some embodiments, the trench ends are slightly rounded. Portions of the material layer 12 form a spacer 12a between the trenches.
The trench sidewalls, edges and floors influence the self-assembly of the polymer blocks and the structuring of the array of nanostructures within the trenches. The boundary conditions of the trench sidewalls 16 impose order in the x-direction (x-axis) and the ends 18 impose order in the y-direction (y-axis) to impose a structure wherein each trench contains n number of features (i.e., cylinders). Other factors that influence the formation and alignment of elements within the trench include the width (wt) of the trench, the formulation of the block copolymer to achieve the desired pitch (Lo), the thickness (t) of the block copolymer film, and the wetting nature of the trench surfaces.
Entropic forces drive the wetting of a neutral wetting surface by both blocks, and enthalpic forces drive the wetting of a preferential-wetting surface by the preferred block (e.g., the minority block). The trench sidewalls 16 and ends 18 are structured to be preferential wetting such that upon annealing, the preferred block of the block copolymer will segregate to the sidewalls and edges of the trench to assemble into a thin (e.g., ¼ pitch) interface (wetting) layer, and will self-assemble to form cylinders in the center of a polymer matrix within each trench, the cylinders being in a perpendicular orientation on neutral wetting floor surfaces and half-cylinders in a parallel orientation in relation to preferential wetting floor surfaces.
As illustrated in
As shown in
For example, a block copolymer having a 35-nm pitch (Lo value) deposited into a 75-nm wide trench having a neutral wetting floor will, upon annealing, result in a zigzag pattern of 35-nm diameter perpendicular cylinders that are offset by a half distance for the length (lb) of the trench, rather than a single line of perpendicular cylinders aligned with the sidewalls down the center of the trench. As the Lo value of the copolymer is increased, for example, by forming a ternary blend by the addition of both constituent homopolymers, there is a shift from two rows to one row of the perpendicular cylinders within the center of the trench.
In some embodiments, the substrate 10 can be a material that is inherently preferential wetting to one of the blocks, and a neutral wetting surface layer 22 can be provided by applying a neutral wetting polymer (e.g., a neutral wetting random copolymer) onto the substrate 10 and then selectively removing the layer 22 to expose portions of the preferential wetting surface of the substrate 10. For example, in the use of a poly(styrene-block-methyl methacrylate) block copolymer (PS-b-PMMA), a random PS:PMMA copolymer (PS-r-PMMA) which exhibits non-preferential or neutral wetting toward PS and PMMA can be applied. The polymer layer can be affixed by grafting (on an oxide substrate) or by cross-linking (any surface) using UV radiation or thermal processing.
As shown in
In another embodiment depicted in
For example, a neutral wetting polymer (NWP) such as a random copolymer of polystyrene (PS), polymethacrylate (PMMA) with hydroxyl group(s) (e.g., 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (P(S-r-MMA-r-HEMA)) (e.g., about 58% PS) can be can be selectively grafted to a material layer (e.g., an oxide floor) as a layer 22″ of about 5-10 nm thick by heating at about 160° C. for about 48 hours (
A surface that is neutral wetting to PS-b-PMMA can also be prepared by spin coating a blanket layer of a photo- or thermally cross-linkable random copolymer such as a benzocyclobutene- or azidomethylstyrene-functionalized random copolymer of styrene and methyl methacrylate (e.g., poly(styrene-r-benzocyclobutene-r-methyl methacrylate (PS-r-PMMA-r-BCB)). For example, such a random copolymer can comprise about 42% PMMA, about (58-x) % PS and x % (e.g., about 2-3%) of either polybenzocyclobutene or poly(para-azidomethylstyrene)). An azidomethylstyrene-functionalized random copolymer can be UV photo-cross-linked (e.g., 1-5 MW/cm^2 exposure for about 15 seconds to about 30 minutes) or thermally cross-linked (e.g., at about 170° C. for about 4 hours) to form a cross-linked polymer mat as a neutral wetting layer 22″. A benzocyclobutene-functionalized random copolymer can be thermally cross-linked (e.g., at about 200° C. for about 4 hours or at about 250° C. for about 10 minutes). The layer 22″ can be globally photo- or thermal-cross-linked (
In other embodiments, as illustrated in
Referring now to
In other embodiments, a neutral wetting layer (22) can be provided by grafting a random copolymer such as PS-r-PMMA selectively onto an H-terminated silicon substrate (e.g., 20′″ floor) in
In other embodiments, a layer of a preferential wetting material can be applied onto the surface of the substrate exposed as the floors of trenches 14b″. For example, a layer of oxide or silicon nitride, etc., can be deposited as a blanket layer into the trenches 14b″(e.g., as shown in
In yet another embodiment, the floors of the trenches can be made neutral or preferential wetting by varying the roughness of the surface of the floors of the trenches, as described, for example, in Sivaniah et al., Macromolecules 2005, 38, 1837-1849, and Sivaniah et al., Macromolecules 2003, 36, 5894-5896, the disclosure of which are incorporated by reference herein. A grooved, or periodic, grating-like substrate topography having a lateral periodicity and structure at or above a critical roughness value (e.g., qsR where qs=2π/λs, R is the (root-mean-square) vertical displacement of the surface topography about a mean horizontal plane, and λs is the lateral periodicity in the surface topography) can be provided to form a neutral wetting surface (e.g., trenches 14a, 14c) for formation of perpendicular cylinders (under conditions of a neutral wetting air surface). The floors of trenches 14b can be provided with a low surface roughness below the critical qsR, value for formation of parallel-oriented half-cylinders in those trenches. The critical roughness of the floor surface topography can also be adjusted according to the molecular weight of the block copolymer to achieve a perpendicular orientation of cylinders. The roughness of the substrate surface can be characterized using atomic force microscopy (AFM).
For example, as shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
The copolymer material layer 28 is deposited into the trenches 14a-14c to a thickness (t) such that during an anneal, the capillary forces pull excess material (e.g., greater than a monolayer) into the trenches 14a-14c. The resulting thickness of layer 28 in the trench is at about the Lo value of the copolymer material such that the copolymer film layer will self-assemble upon annealing to form an array of cylindrical elements, for example, perpendicular cylindrical domains having a diameter at or about 0.5 Lo (e.g., about 20 nm) over the neutral wetting surface 22 of trenches 14a, 14c, and a single layer of lines of parallel-oriented half-cylinders with a diameter at or about 0.5 Lo over the preferential wetting floor 20 of trenches 14b. The film thickness can be measured, for example, by ellipsometry. Depending on the depth (Dt) of the trenches, the cast block copolymer material 28 can fill the trenches where the trench depth is about equal to Lo (Dt˜L0), or form a thinner film over the trench floor where the trench depth (Dt) is greater than Lo (Dt>L0) as depicted. A thin film of the copolymer material 28 generally less than Lo can be deposited on the spacers 12a, this material will not self-assemble, as it is not thick enough to form structures.
Although diblock copolymers are used in the illustrative embodiment, other types of block copolymers (i.e., triblock or multiblock copolymers) can be used. Examples of diblock copolymers include poly(styrene-block-methyl methacrylate) (PS-b-PMMA), polyethyleneoxide-polyisoprene, polyethyleneoxide-polybutadiene, polyethyleleoxide-polystyrene, polyetheleneoxide-polymethylmethacrylate, polystyrene-polyvinylpyridine, polystyrene-polyisoprene (PS-b-PI), polystyrene-polybutadiene, polybutadiene-polyvinylpyridine, and polyisoprene-polymethylmethacrylate, among others. Examples of triblock copolymers include poly(styrene-block methylmethacrylate-block-ethylene oxide). An example of a PS-b-PMMA copolymer material (Lo=35 nm) is composed of about 70% PS and 30% PMMA with a total molecular weight (Me) of 67 kg/mol, to form 20 nm diameter cylindrical PMMA domains in a matrix of PS.
The block copolymer material can also be formulated as a binary or ternary blend comprising a SA block copolymer and one or more homopolymers of the same type of polymers as the polymer blocks in the block copolymer, to produce blends that swell the size of the polymer domains and increase the Lo value of the polymer. The volume fraction of the homopolymers can range from 0 to about 40%. An example of a ternary diblock copolymer blend is a PS-b-PMMA/PS/PMMA blend, for example, 46K/21K PS-b-PMMA containing 40% 20K polystyrene and 20K poly(methylmethacrylate). The Lo value of the polymer can also be modified by adjusting the molecular weight of the block copolymer.
Optionally, ellipticity (“bulging”) can be induced in the structures by creating a slight mismatch between the trench and the spacer widths and the inherent pitch (Lo) of the block copolymer or ternary blend, as described, for example, by Cheng et al., “Self-assembled One-Dimensional Nanostructure Arrays,” Nano Lett., 6 (9), 2099-2103 (2006), which then reduces the stresses that result from such mismatches.
Referring now to
The copolymer film can be thermally annealed to above the glass transition temperature of the component blocks of the copolymer material. For example, a PS-b-PMMA copolymer film can be annealed at a temperature of about 180-285° C. in a vacuum oven for about 1-24 hours to achieve the self-assembled morphology. The resulting morphologies of the block copolymer (i.e., perpendicular and parallel orientation of cylinders) can be examined, for example, using atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
The diameter of the perpendicular cylinders 30 and width of the half-cylinders 32 is generally about 0.5 Lo (e.g., about 20 nm). The center-to-center distance (pitch distance, p) between adjacent cylindrical domains within a trench is generally at or about Lo (e.g., about 40 nm for a 46/21 PS/PMMA block copolymer).
The hexagonal array of perpendicular cylinders 30 in trench 14c contains n rows of cylinders according to the width (wt) of the trench with the cylinders in each row being offset by about Lo (pitch distance (p) or center-to-center distance) from the cylinders in the adjacent rows. Each row contains “in” number of cylinders according to the length (lt) of the trench and the shape of the trench ends 18 (e.g., rounded, angled, etc.), with some rows having greater or less than m cylinders. The perpendicular cylinders 30 are spaced apart at a pitch distance (p) at or about Lo between cylinders in the same row and an adjacent row, and at a pitch distance (p) at or about Lo*cos(π/6) or about 0.866*Lo distance between two parallel lines where one line bisects the cylinders in a given row and the other line bisects the cylinders in an adjacent row.
The annealed and ordered film may then be treated to cross-link the polymer segments (e.g., the PS matrix 34) to fix and enhance the strength of the self-assembled polymer blocks within the trenches. The polymers can be structured to inherently cross-link (e.g., upon exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation, including deep ultraviolet (DUV) radiation), or one or both of the polymer blocks of the copolymer material can be formulated to contain a cross-linking agent. Non-ordered material outside the trenches (e.g., on spacers 12a) may then be removed.
For example, in one embodiment, the trench regions can be selectively exposed through a reticle (not shown) to cross-link only the self-assembled films within the trenches, and optionally, a wash can then be applied with an appropriate solvent (e.g., toluene) to remove non-cross-linked portions of the film 28 (e.g., on the spacers 12a). In another embodiment, the annealed films can be cross-linked globally, a photoresist layer can be applied to pattern and expose the areas of the film outside the trench regions (e.g., over the spacers 12a), and the exposed portions of the film can be removed, for example by an oxygen (O2) plasma treatment. In other embodiments, the spacers 12a are narrow in width, for example, a width (ws) of one of the copolymer domains (e.g., about Lo) such that the non-cross-linked block copolymer material 28 on the spacers is minimal and no removal is required. Material on the spacers 12a that is generally featureless need not be removed.
After annealing and the copolymer material is ordered, the minority polymer domains can be selectively removed from the films to produce a template for use in patterning the substrate 10. For example, as shown in
As shown in
Methods of the disclosure provide a means of generating self-assembled diblock copolymer structures where perpendicular cylinders preferentially form on some regions on a substrate and parallel cylinders form on other regions. In some embodiments, the desired orientation is controlled by the structure of the substrate (e.g., wafer) and/or the nature of the surface material. The methods provide ordered and registered elements on a nanometer scale that can be prepared more inexpensively than by electron beam lithography or EUV photolithography. The feature sizes produced and accessible by this invention cannot be prepared by conventional photolithography. Embodiments of the invention can be used to pattern lines and openings (holes) on a substrate in the same patterning step, thus eliminating processing steps compared to conventional process flows. The described methods can be readily employed and incorporated into existing semiconductor manufacturing process flows.
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement which is calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations that operate according to the principles of the invention as described. Therefore, it is intended that this invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof. The disclosures of patents, references and publications cited in the application are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4623674 | Bailey, Jr. | Nov 1986 | A |
4877647 | Klabunde | Oct 1989 | A |
5328810 | Lowrey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5374367 | Edamura et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5382373 | Carlson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5482656 | Hiraoka et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5512131 | Kumar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5538655 | Fauteux et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5622668 | Thomas | Apr 1997 | A |
5834583 | Hancock et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849810 | Muller | Dec 1998 | A |
5879582 | Havelka et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891356 | Inoue et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904824 | Oh | May 1999 | A |
5925259 | Biebuyck et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5948470 | Harrison et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6111323 | Carter et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6143647 | Pan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6270946 | Miller | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6310138 | Yonezawa et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312971 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6368871 | Christel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6403382 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423465 | Hawker et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6503841 | Criscuolo | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506660 | Holmes et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6548830 | Noguchi et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565763 | Asakawa | May 2003 | B1 |
6566248 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569528 | Nam et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6573030 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6682660 | Sucholeiki et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689473 | Guire et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699797 | Morris et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713238 | Chou et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6746825 | Nealey et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6780492 | Hawker et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781166 | Lieber et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6797202 | Endo et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6809210 | Chandross et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6884842 | Soane et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890624 | Kambe et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6890703 | Hawker et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908861 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913697 | Lopez et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924341 | Mays | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6926953 | Nealey et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6946332 | Loo et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949456 | Kumar | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957608 | Hubert et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6962823 | Empedocles et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6989426 | Hu et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992115 | Hawker et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6998152 | Uhlenbrock | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7030495 | Colburn et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037744 | Colburn et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045851 | Black et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056455 | Matyjasewski et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7056849 | Wan et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7077992 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7090784 | Asakawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7115525 | Abatchev et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7115995 | Wong | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7118784 | Xie | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7132370 | Paraschiv | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135144 | Christel et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135388 | Ryu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135523 | Ho et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7163712 | Chilkoti et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166304 | Harris et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172953 | Lieber et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186613 | Kirner | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7189430 | Ajayan et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7189435 | Tuominen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190049 | Tuominen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202308 | Boussand et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7252791 | Wasserscheid et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259101 | Zurcher et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7282240 | Jackman et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7291284 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7326514 | Dai et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7332627 | Chandross et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347953 | Black et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7407887 | Guo | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7408186 | Merkulov et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7514339 | Yang et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7521090 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7553760 | Yang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7592247 | Yang et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7605081 | Yang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7767099 | Li et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20020055239 | Tuominen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020158342 | Tuominen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030077452 | Guire et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030091752 | Nealey et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100822 | Lew et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030143375 | Noguchi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030178707 | Abbott | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030180522 | DeSimone et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030180966 | Abbott et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185741 | Matyjaszewski | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030235930 | Bao et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040028875 | Van Rijn et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040084298 | Yao et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040124092 | Black et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040125266 | Miyauchi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127001 | Colburn | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142578 | Wiesner et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040159633 | Whitesides et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175628 | Nealey et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192013 | Ryu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040222415 | Chou | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040242688 | Chandross et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254317 | Hu | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256615 | Sirringhaus et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256662 | Black et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265548 | Ho et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008828 | Libera et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050062165 | Saenger et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074706 | Bristol | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100830 | Xu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124135 | Ayazi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147841 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167651 | Merkulov et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050208752 | Colburn et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050238889 | Iwamoto | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250053 | Marsh et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271805 | Kambe et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050272341 | Colburn et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013956 | Angelescu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060014001 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024590 | Sandhu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030495 | Gregg | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038182 | Rogers et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046079 | Lee | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046480 | Guo | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060863 | Lu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062867 | Choi | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078681 | Hieda et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105562 | Yi | May 2006 | A1 |
20060124467 | Ho et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060134556 | Nealey et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060163646 | Black | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060192283 | Benson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205875 | Cha et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060211871 | Dai | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217285 | Destarac | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228635 | Suleski | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060231525 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249784 | Black et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060249796 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060254440 | Choi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060255505 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060257633 | Inoue et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258159 | Colburn et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060278158 | Tolbert et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281266 | Wells | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286305 | Thies et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286490 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060292777 | Dunbar | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070020749 | Nealey et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070023247 | Ulicny et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070023805 | Wells | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045562 | Parekh | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071881 | Chua et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072403 | Sakata | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070122932 | Kodas et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138131 | Burdinski | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161237 | Lieber et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175859 | Black et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070181870 | Libertino et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200477 | Tuominen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208159 | McCloskey et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070218202 | Ajayan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222995 | Lu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070224819 | Sandhu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070227383 | Decre et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249117 | Kang et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070281220 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070289943 | Lu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293041 | Yang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080083991 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080093743 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103256 | Kim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080164558 | Yang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080176767 | Millward | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080193658 | Millward | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080217292 | Millward et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233323 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080257187 | Millward | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260941 | Jin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080274413 | Millward | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080286659 | Millward | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080315270 | Marsh et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080318005 | Millward | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090062470 | Millward et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090200646 | Millward et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090206489 | Li et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090236309 | Millward et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240001 | Regner | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090263628 | Millward | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274887 | Millward et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100092873 | Sills et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100102415 | Millward et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100124826 | Millward et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137496 | Millward et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163180 | Millward | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100204402 | Millward et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100279062 | Millward | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100316849 | Millward et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100323096 | Sills et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1562730 | Jan 2005 | CN |
0784543 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1416303 | May 2004 | EP |
1593164 | Jun 2010 | EP |
11080414 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2005008882 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2006036923 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2006055982 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2008-036491 | Feb 2008 | JP |
200400990 | Jan 2004 | TW |
200419017 | Oct 2004 | TW |
200511364 | Mar 2005 | TW |
I253456 | Apr 2006 | TW |
256110 | Jun 2006 | TW |
9007575 | Jul 1990 | WO |
9706013 | Feb 1997 | WO |
9839645 | Sep 1998 | WO |
9947570 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0031183 | Jun 2000 | WO |
02081372 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2005122285 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006076016 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006078952 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007001294 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007019439 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007013889 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007024241 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007024323 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007055041 | May 2007 | WO |
2008091741 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008097736 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008096335 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008124219 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008118635 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008130847 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008145268 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2008156977 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009099924 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009102551 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009117238 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009117243 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009134635 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bae, Joonwon, “Surface Modification Using Photo-Crosslinkable Random Copolymers”, Abstract submitted for the Mar. 2006 meeting of the American Physical Society, submitted Nov. 30, 2005. |
Bang, Joona, “The Effect of Humidity on the Ordering of Tri-block Copolymer Thin Films,” Abstract submitted for the Mar. 2007 meeting of the American Physical Society, submitted Nov. 20, 2006. |
Bass, Robert B., et al., “Microcontact Printing with Octadecanethiol”, Applied Surface Science, 226(4), pp. 335-340, Apr. 2004, http://www.ece.virginia.edu/UVML/sis/Papers/rbbpapers/assoct.pdf. |
Bearinger, J.P., et al., Nature Materials 2, 259-264, 2003, published online Mar. 23, 2003. |
Black, C.T., IEEE 2005 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 87-91. |
Black, C.T., et al., IBM J. Res. & Dev., vol. 51, No. 5, Sep. 2007, pp. 605-633. |
Black, Charles T., ACSNano, vol. 1, No. 3, 2007, American Chemical Society, pp. 147-150, published online Oct. 31, 2007. |
Black, Charles T., et al., IEEE Electronon Device Letters, vol. 25, No. 9, Sep. 2004, pp. 622-624. |
Botelho do Rego, A.M., et al., Surface Science, 482-485 (2001), pp. 1228-1234. |
Brydson, Rik M., et al. (chapter authors), “Generic Methodologies for Nanotechnology: Classification and Fabrication”, Nanoscale Science and Technology, edited by R.W. Kelsall, et al., 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (published online: Dec. 20, 2005) (http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/summary/112217550/Summary). |
Canaria, Christi A., et al., “Formation and Removal of Alkylthiolate Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold in Aqueous Solutions”, Lab Chip 6, 289-295 (2006), http://www.rsc.org/publishing/journals/LC/article.asp?doi=b51066c) (Abstract). |
Chandekar, Amol, et al., “Template-Directed Adsorption of block Copolymers on Alkanethiol-Patterned Gold Surfaces,” (circa 2006), http://www.nano.neu.edu/industry/industry—showcase/industry—day/documents/Chandekar.pdf) (Powerpoint template for scientific posters (Swarthmore College)). |
Cheng, Joy T., et al., Nano Letters, vol. 0, No. 0, A-E, published on Web Aug. 16, 2006. |
Daoulas Kostas Ch., et al., Physical Review Letters 96, week ending Jan. 27, 2006, pp. 036104-1-3. |
Desai, Dr. Trejal A., et al., Business Briefing: Medical Device Manufacturing & Technology, 2002. |
Edwards, Erik W., et al., Journal of Polymer Science: Part B Polymer Physics, vol. 43, 3444-3459, 2005. |
Edwards, Erik W., et al., Advanced Mater, 16, No. 15, Aug. 4, 2004, pp. 1315-1319. |
Fasolka, Michael J. et al., Macromolecules 2000, vol. 33, No. 15, pp. 5702-5712, published on the web Jun. 29, 2000. |
Gates, Byron D., et al., Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2004, 34:339-72, published online Mar. 26, 2004. |
Ge, Zhenbin, et al., PRL 96, 186101-1-186101-4, The American Physical Society, week ending May 12, 2006. |
Genua, A., et al., Nanotechnology, 18 (2007), pp. 1-7, published Apr. 27, 2007. |
Gillmor, S.D., et al., Langmuir 2000, vol. 16, No. 18, 2000, pp. 7223-7228, published on Web Aug. 5, 2000. |
Hamley, I. W., “Introduction to Block Copolymers”, Developments in Block Copolymers Science and Technology, 2004, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 1-29. |
Hermans, Thomas M., et al., “Application of Solvent-Directed Assembly of Block Copolymers to the Synthesis of Nanostructured Materials with Low Dielectric Constants”, Angewandte Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, pp. 6648-6652. |
Hutchison, J. Brian, et al., Chem. Mater., vol. 17, No. 19, 2005, pp. 4789-4797, published on Web Aug. 25, 2005. |
In, Insik, et al., Langmuir, vol. 22, No. 18, 2006, pp. 7855-7860, published on Web Aug. 1, 2006. |
Kim, Sang Ouk, et al., Nature, vol. 424, Jul. 24, 2003, pp. 411-414. |
Kim, Sang Ouk, et al., Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, pp. 3271-3275. |
Kim, Seung Hyun, et al., Macromolecules 2006, vol. 39, No. 24, 2006, pp. 8473-8479, published on Web Oct. 25, 2006. |
Kim, Seung Hyun, et al., Advanced Mater., vol. 16, No. 23-24, pp. 2119-2123, Dec. 17, 2004. |
Krishnamoorthy, Sivashankar, et al., MaterialsToday, vol. 9, No. 9, Sep. 2006, pp. 40-47. |
La, Young-Hye, et al., Chem. Mater, 2007, vol. 19, No. 18, pp. 4538-4544, published on Web Jul. 28, 2007. |
Laracuente, A.R., et al., Surface Science 545, 2003, pp. 70-84. |
Lentz, David, et al., “Whole Wafer Imprint Patterning Using Step and Flash Imprint Lithography: A Manufacturing Solution for Sub 100 nm Patterning”, SPIE Advanced Lithography Paper, http://molecularimprints.com/NewsEvents/tech—articles/new—articles/SPIE —07—MII—WW—Paper.pdf), Feb. 2007, pp. 1-10. |
Li, Mingqi, et al., MaterialsToday, vol. 9, No. 9, Sep. 2006, pp. 30-39. |
Li, Xue, et al., Polymer 48 (2007), pp. 2434-2443, available online Feb. 25, 2007. |
Lin, Zhiqun, et al., Adv. Mater. 2002, 14 No. 19, Oct. 2, pp. 1373-1376. |
Lin-Gibson, Sheng, et al., Macromolecules 2005, 38, pp. 2897-2902, published on Web Mar. 8, 2005. |
Malkoch, Michael, et al., Chem. Commun., 2006, pp. 2774-2776, published on the web Jun. 1, 2006. |
Mansky, P., et al., Science, vol. 275, Mar. 7, 1997, pp. 1458-1460. |
Maye, Mathew A., et al., Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 79, No. 2, Feb. 2002, pp. 207-210. |
Meyer, Evelyn, et al., Macromollecular Mater. Eng., 276/277, 2000, pp. 44-50. |
Mezzenga, Raffaele, et al., Langmuir 2003, vol. 19, No. 20, 2003, pp. 8144-8147, published on Web Aug. 29, 2003. |
Mindel, Joseph., et.al., “A Study of Bredig Platinum Sols”, The Chemical Laboratories of New York University, vol. 65 pp. 2112. |
Naito, et al., IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 38, No. 5, Sep. 2002, pp. 1949-1951. |
Nealey, Paul F., et al., “Self-Assembling Resists for Nanolithography”, IEEE 2005. |
Nguyen, Kytai, et al., Biomaterials 23, 2002, pp. 4307-4314. |
Wang, C., et al., Electrochimica Acta 52 (2006), pp. 704-709, available online Jul. 12, 2006. |
Black, C.T., Proc. of SPIE, vol. 6153, 615302 (2006). |
Darling, S.B., Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 32, No. 10, Sep. 28, 2007, pp. 1152-1204. |
Harrison, Christopher et al., Polymer, vol. 39, No. 13, pp. 2733-2744, 1998. |
Kim, Su-Jin, et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B26(1), Jan./Feb. 2008, 189-194. |
La, Young-Hye, et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 25(6), Nov./Dec. 2007, pp. 2508-2513. |
Olayo-Valles, Roberto et al., J. Mater. Chem, 2004, 14, 2729-2731, published on web Aug. 18, 2004. |
Yang, XiaoMin, et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 22(6), Nov./Dec. 2004, 3331-3334. |
Berry, B.C., et al., “Effects of Zone Annealing on Thin Films of Block Copolymers”, National Institute of Standard and Technology, Polymers Division, Gaithersburg, MD., 2007. |
Black, C.T., Applied Physics Letters 87, 163116-1 to 1163116-3, 2005, published online Oct. 13, 2005. |
Black, Charles T., IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, vol. 3, No. 3, Sep. 2004, pp. 412-415. |
Cavicchi, Kevin A., et al., Macromolecules 2007, vol. 40, 2007, pp. 1181-1186, published on the web Jan. 24, 2007. |
Gudipati, Chakravarthy S., et al., Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 42, pp. 6193-6208. |
Guo, Kai, et al., Abstract of “Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Biodegradable Unsaturated Poly(ester amide)/Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate Hydrogels”, Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 43, Issue 17, pp. 3932-3944, 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
Karim, Alamgir et al., “Control of Ordering Kinetics and Morphology Using Zone Annealing of Thin Block Copolymer Filmes”, Abstract submitted for the Mar. 2007 Meeting of The American Physical Society, Nov. 20, 2006. |
Kim, Seung Hyun, et al., Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, No. 3, Feb. 3, pp. 226-231. |
Park, Dae-Ho, Nanotechnology 18, 2007, 355304, pp. 1-7, Aug. 8, 2007. |
Peng, Juan et al., Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 1422-1428. |
Rogers, John A., ACS Nano, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 151-153, 2007. |
Rozkiewicz, Dorota I., et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2006, 45, pp. 5292-5296. |
Ruiz, Ricardo et al., Science, vol. 321, Aug. 15, 2008, pp. 936-939. |
Segalman, Rachel A., Materials Science and Engineering R 48 (2005), pp. 191-226. |
Srinvivasan, Charan, et al., ACS Nano, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 191-201, 2007, published online Oct. 17, 2007. |
Xiao, Shuaigang et al., Nanotechnology 16 (2005) S324-S329, Apr. 15, 2005. |
Jun, et al., Langmuir, 2002, 18(9), pp. 3415-3417, Abstract only, Web publication date Apr. 3, 2002. |
Balsara et al, CPIMA, IRG Technical Programs, Synthesis and application of Nanostructured Materials, Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 2006, http://www.stanford.edu/group/cpima/irg/irg—1.htm, printed Jul. 1, 2009. |
Bulpitt, Paul et al, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 152-169, Abstract only, published online Aug. 13, 1999. |
Elisseeff J., et al., Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 51(2): 164-171, Aug. 2000, Abstract only. |
Gelest Inc., Silane Coupling Agents: Connecting Across Boundaries, pp. 1-56, 2006. |
Ji, Shengxiang, et al., Preparation of Neutral Wetting Brushes for Block Copolymer Films from Homopolymer Blends, submitted to Advanced Materials, 20(16): 3054-3060; published online Jul. 7, 2008. |
Ji, Shengxiang, et al., Macromolecules, 2008, 41(23): 9098-9103. |
Kim, SH, J Biomater Appl., Jul. 2000; 15(1): 23-46 Abstract only. |
Kim, SH, J Biomater Res., Mar. 15, 2000; 49(4): 517-27 Abstract only. |
Kim, IS, et al., Int J Pharm., Sep. 15, 2000; 205(1-2): 109-16, Abstract only. |
Li, Wai-kin, et al, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 25(6), Nov./Dec. 2007, pp. 1982-1984, published Dec. 6, 2007. |
Lutolf, M.P., et al, Nature Biotechnology, 23, 47-55 (2005), Abstract only, published online Jan. 6, 2005. |
Martens, P., et al., Polymer, vol. 41, Issue 21, Oct. 2000, pp. 7715-7722, Abstract only. |
Matsuda, T., et al., ASAIO J, Jul.-Sep. 1992; 38(3): M154-7, Abstract only. |
Sawhney, Amarpreet S., et al., Macromolecules 1993, 26, 581-587, Abstract only. |
Walthier, Michel, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126 (40), pp. 12744-12745, Abstract only, web publication date Sep. 21, 2004. |
Truskett, Van N., et al., Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 24, No. 7, Jul. 2006, pp. 312-315. |
Cheng, Joy Y., et al., Nano Letters, vol. 6, No. 9, 2006, pp. 2099-2103, publ on Web Aug. 16, 2006. |
Cheng, Joy Y., et al., Adv. Mater. 2003, vol. 15, No. 19, pp. 1599-1602, Oct. 2, 2003. |
Cheng, Joy Y., et al., Applied Physics Letters, 91, 143106-143106-3 (2007), publ online Oct. 1, 2007. |
Niu, Sanjun, et al., Macromolecules, 36(7), 2428-2440, 2003 (web release date: Mar. 13, 2003) http:// digitalcommons.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article+1005&contect=chemeng—nanotechnology). |
Parejo, Pilar Garcia, et al., J. Mater. Chem., 2006, 16, pp. 2165-2169. |
Park, Cheolmin, et al., Polymer 44, 2003, 6725-6760. |
Park, Miri, et al., Science, v. 276, No. 5317, p. 1401-1404, May 30, 1997. |
Park, Sang-Min, et al., Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, pp. 607-611. |
Park, Sung Chan, et al., Macromolecules 2007, vol. 40, No. 22, pp. 8119-8124, published on Web Oct. 4, 2007. |
Peters, Richard D., et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 18, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2000, pp. 3530-3532. |
Peters, Richard D., et al., Macromolecules, vol. 35, No. 5, 2002, pp. 1822-1834, published on Web Jan. 26, 2002. |
Potemkin, Igor I., et al., Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2007, 28, pp. 579-584. |
Resnick, Douglas, J., et al., J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst., vol. 3, No. 2, Apr. 2004, pp. 316-321. |
Ruiz, Ricardo, et al., Adv. Mater, 2007, 19, pp. 587-591. |
Ryu, Du Yeol, et al., Macromolecules, vol. 40, No. 12, 2007, pp. 4296-4300, published on Web May 19, 2007. |
Saraf, Ravi R., et al., Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, No. 23, Jun. 10, 2002, pp. 4425-4427. |
Shahrjerdi, Davood, et al., IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 28, No. 9, Sep. 2007, pp. 793-796. |
Sharma, Sadhana, et al., Applied Surface Science, 206 (2003), pp. 218-229. |
Sivaniah, E., et al., Macromolecules 2003, 36, pp. 5894-5896, publ on Web Jul. 15, 2003. |
Sivaniah, et al., Macromolecules 2005, 38, 1837-1849, publ on Web Feb. 2, 2005. |
Solak, Harun H., Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2006, pp. R171-188, published May 5, 2006. |
Stoykovich, Mark P., et al., Science, vol. 308, Jun. 3, 2005, pp. 1442-1446. |
Stoykovich, Mark P., et al., ACS Nano, vol. 1, No. 3, 2007, pp. 168-175, published online Oct. 6, 2007. |
Sundrani, Deepak, et al., Nano Lett., vol. 4, No. 2, 2004, pp. 273-276, published on Web Dec. 25, 2003. |
Sundrani, Deepak, et al., Langmuir 2004, vol. 20, No. 12, 2004, pp. 5091-5099, published on Web Mar. 11, 2004. |
Sigma-Aldrich, Tutorial regarding Materials for Lithography/Nanopatterning, http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/Area—of—Interest/Chemistry/Materials—Science/Micro—and—Nanoelectronic website, retrieved Aug. 27, 2007. |
Van Poll, Maaike L., et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, pp. 6634-6637. |
Winesett, D.A., et al., Langmuir 2003, 19, pp. 8526-8535, published on Web Aug. 22, 2003. |
Xu, Ting et al., Polymer 42, (2001) 9091-9095. |
Wu, C.Y., et al., IEEE, 2007, pp. 153-154. |
Yamaguchi, Toru, et al., Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, vol. 19, No. 3, 2006, pp. 385-388. |
Yan, Xiaohu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 126, No. 32, 2004, pp. 10059-10066. |
Yang, Xiao M., et al., Macromolecules 2000, vol. 33, No. 26, 2000, pp. 9575-9582, published on Web Dec. 26, 2000. |
Yurt, Serkan, et al., Macromolecules 2006, vol. 39, No. 5, 2006, published on Web Feb. 2, 2006. |
Zhang, Mingfu, et al., Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, pp. 1571-1576, published online May 15, 2007. |
Arshady et al., Makromol. Chem., 1976, vol. 177, p. 2911-2918. |
Bang, J. Abstract submitted for the Mar. 2006 meeting of the American Physical Society, submitted Nov. 2005 [online], accessed via the Internet [retrieved on Apr. 5, 2010], URL: <http://absimage.aps.org/image/MWS—MAR06-2005-003641.pdf>. |
Candau et al., Polymer, 1977, vol. 18, p. 1253-1257. |
Hawker et al., Facile Synthesis of Block Copolymers for Nanolithographic Applications; Polymer Reprints, 2005. |
Nishikubo, T., American Chemical Society Symposium Series, 1997, p. 214-230. |
He, Yiyong et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, pp. 2745-2750, web publication Feb. 2, 2006. |
Ali, H.A., et al., Solid-State Electronics 46 (2002), 1639-1642. |
Berry et al., Orientational Order in Block Copolymer Films Zone Annealed below the Order-Disorder Transition Temperature , Nano Letters vol. 7, No. 9 Aug. 2007, p. 2789-2794. |
Hammond et al., Temperature Dependence of Order, Disorder, and Defects in Laterally Confined Diblock Copolymer Cylinder Monolayers, Macromolecules vol. 38, Jul. 2005; p. 6575-6585. |
Knoll et al., Phase Behavior in Thin Films of Cylinder-Forming Block Copolymers, Physical Review Letters vol. 89, No. 3 Jul. 2002. |
Zehner, Robert W. et al., Langmuir, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 241-244, Jan. 20, 1998. |
Berry et al., Orientational Order in Bloack Copolymer Films Zone Annealed below the Order-Disorder Transition Temperature, Nano Letters vol. 7, No. 9 Aug. 2007, p. 2789-2794. |
Fukunaga et al., Self-Assembly of Block Copolymer Thin Films Having a Half-Domain-Spacing Thickness: Nonequilibrium Pathways to Achieve Equilibrium Brush Layers Parallel to Substrate, Macromolecules vol. 39, Aug. 2006, p. 6171-6179. |
Hammond et al., Temperature Dependence of Order, Disorder, and Defects in Laterally Confined Diblock Copolymer Cylinder Monolayers, Macromoleculars vol. 38, Jul. 2005; p. 6575-6585. |
Knoll et al., Phase Behavoir in Thin Films of Cylinder-Forming Block Copolymers, Physical Review Letters vol. 89, No. 3, Jul. 2002. |
Wipf, Handbook of Reagents for Organic Synthesis, 2005, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., p. 320. |
Cha, Jennifer N., et al., Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 839-843, published on web Jan. 20, 2007. |
Chang, Li-Wen, Proc. Of SPIE, vol. 6156, 2006, 615611-1 to 615611-6. |
Chang, Li-Wen, IEEE Internation Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), paper 33.2, Dec. 6-8, San Francisco, 2010, pp. 33.2.1-33.2.4. |
Ji, Shengxiang et al., ACS Nano, vol. 4, No. 2, 2010, pp. 599-609, published online Dec. 30, 2009. |
Metters, Andrew, et al., Biomacromolecules 2005, 6, pp. 290-301, 2005, published on web Nov. 13, 2004. |
Park, Scung Hak, et al., Soft Matter, 2010, 6, 2010, 120-125, published on web Sep. 17, 2009. |
Yamaguchi, Toru, et al., Microprocesses and Nanotechnology, 2007, Conference date Nov. 5-8, 2007, pp. 434-435. |
Zhang, Yuan et al., Applied Physics Letter, 91, 013104, 2007, pp. 013104 to 013104-3, published online Jul. 2, 2007. |
Ikeda, Susumu et al., NanotechJapan Bulletin—vol. 3, No. 3, Dec. 17, 2010/Focus 26-06. |
Choi, et al., IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 41(10):3448-3450 (2005), Oct. 2005. |
Hawker et al., “Improving the manufacturability and structural control of block copolymer lithography,” Abstracts of Papers, 232nd ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA, Sep. 10-14, 2006. |
A. Helmbold, D. Meissner, Thin Solid Films, 1996, 283:196-203. |
Lutolf et al., Adv. Mater., 2003, 15(11), 888-892, Jun. 5, 2003. |
Search Report of the IPO, Taiwanese Application No. 097110156, issued Apr. 10, 2012, two pages. |
Zhu et al., Langmuir, 1b, 6766-6722, published on web Jul. 29, 2000. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080311347 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |