Improvements in semiconductor processing technology have resulted in integrated circuit chips which are more densely populated with microelectronic elements and which provide more functionality than ever before. Furthermore, the aggressive development of semiconductor technology and the accompanying need for higher device integration has enabled current state-of-the-art chips to integrate entire systems on a single small semiconductor die. The need to provide all the possible interconnections to these feature laden chips remains a challenge in the packaging industry, as all the required pads compete for the small peripheral space around the die. The interconnection issue has become even more challenging as these chips are utilizing newer technology nodes to achieve smaller die sizes that are pad limited.
It is conventional to test semiconductor integrated circuits during manufacture to ensure the integrity of the integrated circuits. In one testing technique integrated circuits or dies are tested by establishing electrical current between test equipment such as a tester and each integrated circuit or die. The ability to test the dies in an efficient manner is constantly being reviewed for improvements. It is desirable to be able to increase the throughput of the testing as the die size is shrinking and the pad density is increasing, both of which tend to cause constraints for the testing throughput.
It is within this context that the embodiments described below arise.
The embodiments described herein provide an integrated circuit having a surface with a probe pad distribution pattern that enables efficient testing of the integrated circuit. It should be appreciated that the present invention can be implemented in numerous ways, such as a process, an apparatus, a system, a device or a method on a computer readable medium. Several inventive embodiments of the present invention are described below.
In one aspect of the invention, an integrated circuit (IC) is provided. The integrated circuit includes a plurality of bond pads disposed on a surface of the IC and a plurality of probe pads disposed on the surface of the IC. Each of the plurality of probe pads is in electrical communication with corresponding bond pads. The plurality of probe pads are linearly configured across the surface of the die. In one embodiment, the probe pads are disposed along a diagonal of the surface of the die defined between opposing vertices of the die surface. In another embodiment, multiple rows of linearly disposed probe pads are provided on the surface. The die may be tested through automated test equipment where the tester includes a probe card that has probe pins which align with the probe pads diagonally disposed along the surface of the die or dies being tested.
In another aspect of the invention, a method of testing a semiconductor device is provided. The method initiates with orienting a plurality of devices under test so that probe pads disposed along diagonally opposing vertices of successive devices under test are substantially linear. The method includes contacting the probe pads with probe pins of a probe card and transmitting electrical signals to the probe pads through the probe pins. Responses initiated by the electrical signals are captured to verify the integrity of the device. In one embodiment, the probe card is a cantilevered probe card.
Other aspects of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the invention.
The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and like reference numerals designate like structural elements.
The embodiments described herein provide a pad layout for probe pads and wire bonding pads of an integrated circuit. It will be obvious, however, to one skilled in the art, that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
The embodiments described herein provide a diagonal redistribution pattern for probe pads in a die to be packaged through wire bonding. The diagonal redistribution pattern enables low-cost schemes for multi-die probing to be performed. As explained in more detail below the redistributed probe pads are arranged in a diagonal across a surface of the die. Under this arrangement, multiple die can be probed with a linear arrangement of probe pins, by aligning the wafer diagonally. The embodiments enable the use of linear probe cards, which are less expensive and produce more reliable measurements. In one embodiment, cantilever probe technology may be utilized for the probe cards performing the testing. One skilled in the art will appreciate that cantilever probe technology has a fixed dimension in one planar direction, but is capable of moving in an orthogonal direction to the plane of the fixed dimension.
In summary, the embodiments provide for a distribution pattern for probe pads disposed on a surface of an integrated circuit. The integrated circuit may be a processor or a programmable logic device in one embodiment. The distribution pattern provides for a linear arrangement of the probe pads along a diagonal extending between opposing vertices of the surface of the integrated circuit.
The embodiments may be utilized for any integrated circuit and are not limited to programmable logic devices. However, where the embodiments are applied to a programmable logic device, the programmable logic device may be part of a data processing system that includes one or more of the following components; a processor; memory; I/O circuitry; and peripheral devices. The data processing system can be used in a wide variety of applications, such as computer networking, data networking, instrumentation, video processing, digital signal processing, or any suitable other application where the advantage of using programmable or re-programmable logic is desirable. The programmable logic device can be used to perform a variety of different logic functions. For example, the programmable logic device can be configured as a processor or controller that works in cooperation with a system processor. The programmable logic device may also be used as an arbiter for arbitrating access to a shared resource in the data processing system. In yet another example, the programmable logic device can be configured as an interface between a processor and one of the other components in the system.
Any of the operations described herein that form part of the invention are useful machine operations. The invention also relates to a device or an apparatus for performing these operations. The apparatus can be specially constructed for the required purpose, or the apparatus can be a general-purpose computer selectively activated or configured by a computer program stored in the computer. In particular, various general-purpose machines can be used with computer programs written in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may be more convenient to construct a more specialized apparatus to perform the required operations.
As used herein programmable logic devices refer to any integrated circuit that may be programmed to perform a desired function and include programmable logic arrays (PLAs), programmable array logic (PAL), field programmable gate arrays (FPGA), complex programmable logic devices (CPLDs), and a wide variety of other logic and memory devices that may be programmed. Often, such PLDs are designed and programmed by a design engineer using an electronic design automation tool that takes the form of a software package.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications can be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims. In the claims, elements and/or steps do not imply any particular order of operation, unless explicitly stated in the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5398696 | Wiley | Mar 1995 | A |
5399983 | Nagasawa | Mar 1995 | A |
5616931 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5904639 | Smyser et al. | May 1999 | A |
6437364 | Wu | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445001 | Yoshida | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6605951 | Cowan | Aug 2003 | B1 |
7595557 | Watase et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20020132655 | Mercer et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135055 | Cho et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20070241330 | Nishimura et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090174051 | Osaka et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1077026 | Oct 1993 | CN |
1910750 | Feb 2007 | CN |
101419111 | Apr 2009 | CN |
2005209882 | Aug 2005 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority and International Search Report, PCT/US2010/043137, mailed Feb. 18, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110025359 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |