The present invention relates to a charged-particle source which is suitable for use in, or as part of charged-particle nano-pattering or inspection tools, in particular of the multi-beam type. More specifically, the invention relates to a source for emission of electrically charged particles, in particular electrons, as a charged-particle beam along a direction of emission, with the charged-particle source comprising
Charged particle sources are used, for instance, as sources to generate a particle beam in a charged-particle multi-beam tool for nano-pattering or inspecting semiconductor substrates.
The illumination system 3 comprises, for instance, the electron source as the one subject of this invention 7, an extraction system 8 as well as a condenser lens system 9. It should, however, be noted that in place of electrons, in general, other electrically charged particles can be used as well. Apart from electrons these can be, for instance, hydrogen ions or heavier ions, charged atom clusters, or charged molecules.
The extraction system 8 accelerates the particles to a defined energy of typically several keV, e.g. 5 keV. By means of a condenser lens system 9, the particles emitted from the source 7 are generally, but not exclusively, formed into a wide particle beam serving as lithography beam 50. The lithography beam 50 then irradiates a PD system 4 which comprises a number of plates with a plurality of openings or apertures 24 (
Referring to
The pattern as represented by the patterned beam 50b is then projected by means of an electro-magneto-optical projection system 5 onto the substrate 16 where it forms an image of the “switched-on” apertures and/or openings. The projection system 5 comprises a number of consecutive electro-magneto-optical lens components 10a, 10b, 10c and implements a demagnification of, for instance, 200:1 with two crossovers c1 and c2. Furthermore, deflection means 12a, 12b and 12c may be provided in the condenser 3 and/or projection system 5 for lateral shifting the image. The target or “substrate” 16 is, for instance, a 6″ mask blank or a silicon wafer covered with a particle sensitive resist layer 17. The substrate is held by a chuck 15 and positioned by a substrate stage 14 of the target station 6.
The operation of lithography apparatus such as the apparatus 1 and related processing and writing methods are discussed, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 9,053,906 of the applicant as well as the mentioned documents U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,768,125, 8,222,621 and 8,378,320 of the applicant; the disclosure of these documents is herewith included by reference.
The dose rate of each beamlet reaching the resist layer 17 is ultimately linked to the local current density of the lithography beam generated by the charged particle source, which is basically a radial function of the distance from the optical axis; but in general, the current density may also exhibit position-dependent components which arise from source emission inhomogeneity. The latter is determined by factors such as: contaminations on the cathode surface, residual gasses present in the housing 2 and many others. It will be clear to the skilled person that removal of contaminants from the source cathode surface is of crucial importance for efficiency and long term reliability of the apparatus.
It is common practice to remove contaminants from a surface by a cleaning process which employs slightly eroding the surface by means of sputtering or etching (including, in particular, chemical plasma etching). However, in case of a cathode to be installed in an particle-beam processing apparatus (such as eMET), the cathode will be available to be cleaned/sputtered only before being mounted into the apparatus. Thus, the cleaning procedure as known from the state of the art would not be effective against contamination factors accumulated during mounting or during operation.
In view of the above, it is one object of this invention to provide a particle source and a method for cleaning a particle source which enables cleaning of the particle source directly in the source environment, thus providing ‘in situ’ cleaning of the cathode (emitter electrode) of the source without disassembling the optical system. That is, without physically removing the source body from the rest of the eMET apparatus. The cleaning mechanism is mainly envisaged to employ sputtering or etching. It is a further objective of the invention to provide a particle source and cleaning method that enables controlling the trajectories of charged particles present in the source environment.
The above-mentioned objectives are met by a charged-particle source which, in addition to the components mentioned in the beginning, comprises
In other words, a cleaning method which corresponds to said first cleaning mode comprises
This solution offers an efficient implementation of cleaning in a charged-particle source. It also provides an efficient tool for generating, extracting and/or controlling the trajectory of the charged particles present in the source environment. The ionized gas particles are directed onto the emitter surface for removing material from the surface, for instance by sputtering (back-sputtering) and/or etching effects. In a cleaning mode, the ionization of the gas species in the source space is partially or entirely decoupled from the primary beam radiation as produced by the emitter surface. In the mentioned first cleaning mode (also referred to as ‘soft cleaning mode’), the ionization is enhanced by secondary electrons emitted at the counter electrodes and possibly other components surrounding the source space (such as the adjustment electrodes discussed further below) as a consequence of being hit by the particles of the primary beam radiation.
Thus, the invention offers a larger degree of freedom concerning the parameters of operation of the source during a cleaning process, and allows to better adjust the energy of the ionizing radiation so as to achieve a desired cleaning result, the preferential location within the source space where the ionization takes place and ultimately the ionization rate of the gas species present in the source space to operating parameters suitable to achieve efficient cleaning of the emitter surface. Thus, controlling the sputtering rate at the emitter surface is improved. The ionization rate can be adjusted based on, e.g., the binary-encounter dipole model presented in the article “Binary-encounter-dipole model for electron-impact ionization” of Y.-K. Kim & M. E. Rudd, Phys. Rev. A 50, 3954 (1994). The source setup of the invention allows an improved control of trajectories of the charged particle present in the source space, including those species which are unintentionally present, such as residual gas from the environment.
According to a preferred development of the invention, the charged-particle source further comprises a gas ionizer device, said gas ionizer device being configured to irradiate energetic radiation into the source space, which energetic radiation is capable of ionizing particles of said gas, which is present in and/or fed into the source space, to obtain a plasma (wherein a weakly ionized plasma, i.e. having a degree of ionization of e.g. at least 1%, is sufficient), the particle source being operable in a second cleaning mode wherein a voltage is applied between selected ones of the adjustment electrodes while operating the gas ionizer device to generate a plasma in the gas within the source space and direct such plasma onto the emitter surface.
In other words, a cleaning method which corresponds to this second cleaning mode comprises
With the second cleaning mode another very efficient cleaning process in a charged-particle source is provided. The plasma is directed onto the emitter surface for removing material from the surface, for instance by sputtering and/or etching effects. Also in this cleaning mode the ionization of the gas species in the source space is decoupled from the primary beam radiation as produced by the emitter surface.
In particular, the energetic radiation may comprise electrons, and the gas ionizer device is an electron gun configured to inject said electrons into the source space, for instance in a direction transversal to the direction of emission. In a specific advantageous embodiment, the gas ionizer device may be realized as a hollow-cathode electron gun, configured to irradiate the energetic radiation (such as electrons) into the source space along a direction transversal to the direction of emission.
Furthermore, in many advantageous embodiments of the invention the pressure regulator device itself may feed the gas into the source space. Thus, the pressure regulator device may be able to feed, into the source space, one or more gas species destined to be ionized during an operation in the first cleaning mode (and, if applicable, the second cleaning mode as well), preferably and in particular while a voltage between the emitter and counter electrodes is applied during a cleaning mode operation. Alternatively or in combination, the pressure regulator device may be configured to supply at least one gas species into the source space at a pre-defined pressure of the gas species thus injected.
The number of adjustment electrodes which can be applied different electrostatic potentials with respect to the emitter electrode may be chosen suitably; i.e. typically this number lies between two and five, preferably four.
In order to further improve the cleaning processes and enable a better control of the locations to be cleaned, it may be advantageous when at least two of the adjustment electrodes are realized as split electrodes, each of said split electrodes being composed of at least two, preferably four, sectorial electrodes, which sectorial electrodes are configured to be applied different electrostatic potentials. In addition, these split electrodes may be used during a cleaning mode for directing ionized particles to specific regions on the emitter surface. Alternatively or in combination, the split electrodes may be configured to tune the intensity of ionized particles impinging on the emitter surface by means of the electrostatic potentials of the counter electrode and the adjustment electrodes including the split electrodes.
In order to achieve another improvement of the cleaning process, in particular a raised homogeneity, it may be useful to vary the voltages of the adjustment electrodes involved over time. This may be done in a step-wise manner, wherein for at each step a voltage of the adjustment electrodes is maintained for a respective duration. The voltage levels and pertinent durations are chosen suitably so as to achieve a desired profile of cleaning action.
The charged-particle source of the invention may further comprise a control electrode of Wehnelt type; this Wehnelt electrode would be located between the emitter electrode and the adjustment electrodes, preferably closer to the emitter electrode, said control electrode configured to being applied a control voltage with regard to the emitter electrode opposite to that of the counter electrode with regard to the emitter electrode, and having a control aperture at a location downstream of the emitter electrode along said direction of emission.
The charged-particle source of the invention is of particular benefit for use in a charged-particle multi-beam apparatus for processing or inspection of a target by means of exposure with a beam of electrically charged particles, comprising an illumination system including the charged-particle source according to the invention, a pattern definition device and a projection optics system.
In the following, in order to further demonstrate the present invention, a discussion of illustrative and non-restrictive embodiments, as shown in the drawings, is presented. The drawings show:
The detailed discussion of exemplary embodiments of the invention given below discloses the basic concepts and further advantageous developments of the invention. The embodiments refer to an electron source, but also elucidate methods using this source to generate charged particle beams with uniform current density and to condition the cathode surface by means of physical sputtering and/or chemical etching during a maintenance procedure. It will be evident to the person skilled in the art to freely combine several or all of the embodiments discussed here as deemed suitable for a specific application of the invention. Throughout this disclosure, terms like “for instance”, “advantageous”, “exemplary” or “preferred” indicate elements or dimensions which are particularly suitable (but not essential) to the invention or an embodiment thereof, and may be modified wherever deemed suitable by the skilled person, except where expressly required. It will be appreciated that the invention is not restricted to the embodiments discussed in the following, which are given for exemplary, illustrative purpose and merely present suitable implementations of the invention.
The applicant has realized charged-particle multi-beam tools and developed corresponding charged-particle optics, pattern definition (PD) device, and multi-beam writing method, in particular a 50 keV electron multi-beam writer to realize leading-edge complex photomasks for 193 nm immersion lithography, of masks for EUV lithography and of templates (1× masks) for nanoimprint lithography. The system is called eMET (electron Mask Exposure Tool) or MBMW (multi-beam mask writer) for exposing 6″ mask blank substrates. The multi-beam system has been called PML2 (Projection Mask-Less Lithography) for electron beam direct writer (EBDW) applications on Silicon wafer substrates. The multi-beam column and writing method can also be used for multi-beam inspection applications.
The electron source 100 comprises a cathode 101 having an emitter surface 111 which is configured for the emission of electrons along the mentioned direction of emission e, as well as a Wehnelt cylinder 102 and an anode 103 serving as counter electrode with an aperture 113 at the location where the direction of emission e passes through the anode. Suitable layouts of the cathode 101, Wehnelt 102 and aperture anode 103 are well-known to the skilled person. The source is located in a housing 120, which enables the source to be connected to the housing 2 of the apparatus 1, and which is connected to a vacuum pumping system 121 of its own, and/or is held at vacuum through the vacuum system of the apparatus 1. The electric potentials applied to the electrodes of the source 100 are provided by a voltage supply unit 157; the electric lines of the electrodes are generally understood and not shown for better clarity of the drawings.
Furthermore, in order to enable the in-situ cleaning according to the invention, the electron source 100 is provided with a pressure regulator device 104, also referred to as atmosphere regulator (AR), and several adjustment electrodes 106, 107, 108, 109; in addition, a device 105 for ionizing the gas, referred to as gas ionizer (GI) may be provided.
In the embodiment shown, the AR 104 includes a gas supply 140 for one or more gas species, one or more mass flow controllers (MFCs) 141, 142, a vacuum pumping system 143 (which preferably is separate from the vacuum pumping system 121), and a gas pressure sensor 144, and feeds the gases into the source chamber through a gas feed line 145 and the GI 105. The aperture 148 of the gas pressure sensor 144 in the source housing 120 (which is preferably well separated from the pumping connection of the vacuum pumping system 143 to the housing 120) is advantageously located such that it allows adequate measurement of the pressure in the source space 110, preferably in the region close to the emitter surface 111; for instance, the aperture 148 may be positioned just outside the source space 110 between the cathode 101 and next electrode in the source space, such as the first adjustment electrode 106. The MFCs 141, 142 control the amount of gases provided from the gas supply 140 to the source space. The AR 104 serves to regulate the pressure in the source space and inject, in a controlled manner, one or more gas species into the source chamber. Thus, the AR 104 enables introducing and regulating an atmosphere into the space of the charge-particle source between the anode and cathode. The gas supply 140 may provide specific gases supplied from resources such as gas bottles, and/or gases obtained from the surrounding, such as atmospheric gases (air). In other embodiments (not shown), the AR may not have a gas supply of its own, in which case the AR operates with atmospheric gases or residual gases from a preceding operation of the source, which gases are controlled at a desired pressure, for instance by means of the mentioned vacuum pumping system.
Referring to
Some or all of the MFCs 142 of the AR 104 (in particular in the case where the GI 105 is omitted) may be connected to the interior of the source bypassing the GI, for instance through an outlet 147. The one or more MFCs 142 of this “second” type may be used to supply gas in order to offer an additional adjustable flow of gas into the source space. The outlet 147 may be arranged at location convenient to ensure a suitable gas configuration in the source space 110, such as between two of the adjustment electrodes 106-109. In the embodiment shown, the outlet 147 is located before the electrodes where the GI 105 is positioned, more particularly between electrodes 107 and 108.
As mentioned, the charged-particle source 100 comprises a number of (in particular, at least two) adjustment electrodes 106, 107, 108, 109. The adjustment electrodes are, for instance, realized as conductive plates, separated by dielectric gaps. The electrodes of the source 100 are electrically connected to a voltage supply unit 112 which provides the electrostatic potentials needed for the individual electrodes; for the sake of clarity of the drawings the electric connecting lines from the voltage supply unit 112 to the plurality of electrodes in the source 100 are not shown.
Furthermore, in order to modify and/or control the trajectories of the different types of charged particles, some of the electrodes 106-109 are realized as split electrodes, which are composed of two or more sectorial sub-electrodes separated by dielectric gaps.
In the embodiment shown, the electrodes are substantially ring-shaped; in other realizations, the shape of the electrodes may be more complex. Examples of suitable dimensions are as follows: The inner radius of the adjustment electrodes may be within a range from 0.5 mm up to 1.0 mm. The physical dimensions of each electrode along the axis e is chosen within a range from 0.5 mm to 3 mm. The spacing between electrodes is set at a value between 1 mm up to 2 mm. The dimensions may be the same for all electrodes or vary for each electrode. Depending on the number of electrodes and dimension of the electrodes, the length of the overall source space may range from 4 mm to 37 mm. The sub-electrodes are preferentially composed by a conductive material such as titanium, molybdenum or 316L stainless steel, whereas the dielectrics gaps are in a range from 0.1 mm to 0.5 mm; the dielectrics gaps may be realized as (“empty”) spaces or be filled with machined Macor, Al2O3 or other ceramics.
In the following various operating conditions (also referred to as ‘operation modes’) of the electron source 100 are described. An operation mode is generally specified by parameters including: the average pressure and atmosphere composition in the source, the electrical potential applied to individual components of the source. Unless explicitly specified otherwise, voltage values of electrodes are understood as potential differences with respect to the potential of the anode 103 serving as counter electrode; this potential is also referred to as ground potential. The term “bias” of a component is understood in this sense as referring to an electric potential applied to the respective component relative to the anode.
It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the width and the position of the main ionization area relative to the split electrode plates can be adjusted by varying the biases applied to the split electrodes themselves. Here the cathode, biased as described in the emission mode, will radiate electrons 168 which partially ionize the gas mixture introduced in the source chamber in a region around the axis e, referred to as ionization area and indicated in the drawings as a dot-hatched area 160. Nevertheless, the ionization rate of the gas mixture molecules—as caused by the electrons 168, which are travelling substantially along the direction of emission e,—is rather low due to the high energy of the electrons (e.g. 5 keV) (for an explanation, see e.g. Kim & Rudd op.cit.). Thus, the gas mixture ionization rate in the ionization area 160 can be enhanced via secondary electrons 169 emitted from the source components (e.g. electrodes and other metal parts) if the latter are hit by the beam of primary electrons 168 coming from the cathode. Thus, the remaining split electrodes can operate in multipole mode, e.g. forming a basic quadrupole electrostatic lens or electrostatic dipoles in order to shape and direct the electron radiation so that it hits in a predefined position the inner wall of the source chamber generating secondary electrons and enhancing the ionization rate. The ionization area and the secondary electrons source position are defined so that ionized gas mixture molecules 161 will be accelerated back to the emitter surface 111 of the cathode 101 along the axis e. Advantageously, one or several of the split electrodes 106-109 can be electrostatically biased in monopole mode to act as additional focusing elements for the ions travelling towards the source and as such modify the ion landing distribution.
An example of a soft cleaning mode is as follows: The cathode 101 is set to −5 kV with respect to the counter electrode 103, and the electrodes 108 and 109 are set to ground potential and +2.5 kV, respectively, in order to define the main gas ionization area 160 in the space between the positions of electrodes 108 and 109. Then, the electrode 106 is set to ground potential, and the electrode 107 can be used as focusing/defocusing electrode for the charged particles 161 moving towards the emitter surface 111 along the axis e.
By means of sputtering and or chemical etching, the impinging ions clean the surface of the cathode. The soft cleaning mode is advantageous in applications where the source is part of, for example, an electron multi-beam processing apparatus, and may be used as a conditioning procedure or during maintenance of the latter. The overall low ion density in the chamber leads to a slow sputtering rate of less than 1 A/s. Such slow sputter rate is advantageously adopted, e.g., in a case where a regeneration of the cathode is needed, but a large erosion of the latter is not desired, thus necessitating fine control of the sputtering procedure.
In a further variant, and with reference to
While the ions are the only charged particles moving along the direction of emission e in this mode as mentioned, the split electrodes 106-109 may be used to act as lensing apparatus, with the individual electrostatic potentials being chosen in suitable way which allows to direct the ions towards specific desired locations on the emitter surface. This is depicted in
It will be evident to the skilled person that the voltage configurations of the electrodes and their sub-electrodes can be varied to achieve further suitable configurations of cleaning operations at the emitter surface 111.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/623,952, entitled “Charged-Particle Source and Method For Cleaning a Charged-Particle Source Using Back-Sputtering” to Platzgummer et al., filed Jan. 30, 2018, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1033741 | Sims | Jul 1912 | A |
1420104 | Howe et al. | Jun 1922 | A |
1903005 | McCuen | Mar 1933 | A |
2187427 | Middleton | Jan 1940 | A |
2820109 | Dewitz | Jan 1958 | A |
2920104 | Brooks et al. | Jan 1960 | A |
3949265 | Holl | Apr 1976 | A |
4467211 | Smith | Aug 1984 | A |
4735881 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4899060 | Lischke | Feb 1990 | A |
5103101 | Neil et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5189306 | Frei | Feb 1993 | A |
5260579 | Yasuda et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5369282 | Arai et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5393987 | Abboud et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5399872 | Yasuda et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5533170 | Teitzel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5814423 | Maruyama et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5841145 | Satoh et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5847959 | Veneklasen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857815 | Bailey et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866300 | Satoh et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876902 | Veneklasen | Mar 1999 | A |
5933211 | Nakasugi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6014200 | Sogard et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6043496 | Tennant | Mar 2000 | A |
6049085 | Ema | Apr 2000 | A |
6107636 | Muraki | Aug 2000 | A |
6111932 | Dinsmore | Aug 2000 | A |
6137113 | Muraki | Oct 2000 | A |
6225637 | Terashima et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229595 | McKinley et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6252339 | Kendall | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258511 | Okino et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280798 | Ring et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6333138 | Higashikawa et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6472673 | Chalupka et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473237 | Mei | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6552353 | Muraki et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6617587 | Parker | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6768123 | Giering | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768125 | Platzgummer et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6829054 | Stanke et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835937 | Muraki et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6858118 | Platzgummer et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6897454 | Sasaki et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6965153 | Ono et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7084411 | Lammer-Pachlinger et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7124660 | Chiang | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129024 | Ki | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7199373 | Stengl et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201213 | Leeson | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214951 | Stengl et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7276714 | Platzgummer et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7368738 | Platzgummer et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7446601 | LeChevalier | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7459247 | Bijnen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7671687 | LeChevalier | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7683551 | Miyamoto et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7687783 | Platzgummer et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7710634 | Sandstrom | May 2010 | B2 |
7714298 | Platzgummer et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7741620 | Doering et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7772574 | Stengl et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7777201 | Fragner et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7781748 | Platzgummer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7823081 | Sato et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8057972 | Heinrich et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8115183 | Platzgummer et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8178856 | Nakayamada et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8183543 | Platzgummer et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8198601 | Platzgummer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8222621 | Fragner et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8227768 | Smick et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8257888 | Sczyrba et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8258488 | Platzgummer et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8294117 | Kruit et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8304749 | Platzgummer et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8378320 | Platzgummer | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8502174 | Wieland | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8531648 | Jager et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8546767 | Platzgummer et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8563942 | Platzgummer | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8598544 | Van De Peut et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8736170 | Liu et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8859983 | Wieland | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9053906 | Platzgummer | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9093201 | Platzgummer et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9099277 | Platzgummer | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9184026 | Wieland | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9188874 | Johnson | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9269543 | Reiter et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9335638 | Jager et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9373482 | Platzgummer | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9443699 | Platzgummer et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9495499 | Platzgummer et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9520268 | Platzgummer | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9568907 | Platzgummer et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9653263 | Platzgummer et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9691589 | Van De Peut et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9799487 | Platzgummer | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9978562 | Van De Peut et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10325756 | Platzgummer | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10325757 | Platzgummer et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10410831 | Platzgummer | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10522329 | Platzgummer et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
20010028038 | Hamaguchi et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020021426 | Mei et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020036264 | Nakasuji | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020148978 | Innes et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030085360 | Parker et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030106230 | Hennessey | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030155534 | Platzgummer et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030160980 | Olsson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040056207 | Petrov | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040058536 | Ki | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040119021 | Parker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040157407 | Qin-Yi et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169147 | Haruhito et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050001178 | Parker et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050063510 | Hieronimi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050072941 | Tanimoto et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050104013 | Stengl et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050242302 | Platzgummer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050242303 | Platzgummer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060060775 | Sakakibara et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076509 | Okino et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060169925 | Miyajima et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070138374 | Nishibashi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070178407 | Hatakeyama et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070279768 | Shibazaki et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080024745 | Baselmans et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080080782 | Olsson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080099693 | Platzgummer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080105827 | Tamamushi | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128638 | Doering et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080142728 | Smick et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080198352 | Kugler et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080203317 | Platzgummer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212052 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080237460 | Fragner et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080257096 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260283 | Ivansen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080283767 | Platzgummer | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080299490 | Takekoshi | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090032700 | Park et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090101816 | Noji et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090168043 | Lee | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090200495 | Platzgummer et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090249266 | Pierrat et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090256075 | Kemen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090321631 | Smick et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100124722 | Fragner et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127185 | Fragner et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127431 | Sandstrom | May 2010 | A1 |
20100178602 | Seto et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100187434 | Platzgummer et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100288938 | Platzgummer | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110053087 | Nielsen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073782 | Wieland | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110084219 | Adamec | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110121208 | Nakayamada et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110204253 | Platzgummer et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110226968 | Platzgummer | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120001097 | Yashima et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120007002 | Nakayamada et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120076269 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120085940 | Matsumoto | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120151428 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120211674 | Kato | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120286169 | Van de Peut et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286170 | Van de Peut et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288787 | Choi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120329289 | Fujimura et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130070222 | Fujimura | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130120724 | Wieland et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128247 | Khuat et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130157198 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130161511 | Karimata | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130164684 | Yamanaka | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130198697 | Hotzel et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130201468 | Manakli | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130252145 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253688 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140042334 | Wieland | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140158916 | Fujimura | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140197327 | Platzgummer | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140240732 | Tinnemans et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140264066 | Van De Peut et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264086 | Van De Peut et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140322927 | Morita | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140346369 | Matsumoto | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150021493 | Platzgummer | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028230 | Platzgummer | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150069260 | Platzgummer | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150243480 | Yamada | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150248993 | Reiter et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150311030 | Platzgummer et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150311031 | Platzgummer et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150347660 | Platzgummer et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160012170 | Platzgummer | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160013019 | Platzgummer | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160071684 | Platzgummer et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160276131 | Platzgummer | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160276132 | Platzgummer et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160284509 | Matsumoto | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160336147 | Platzgummer | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160349626 | Matsumoto | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170032926 | Miyamoto | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170154750 | Sato | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170357153 | Platzgummer | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180019094 | Iwata | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180218879 | Platzgummer et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190066976 | Platzgummer et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190088448 | Platzgummer et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190214226 | Platzgummer et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202204836 | Apr 2012 | CN |
0178156 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0928012 | Jul 1999 | EP |
1033741 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1993118 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2019415 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2187427 | May 2010 | EP |
2190003 | May 2010 | EP |
2214194 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2312609 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2317535 | May 2011 | EP |
2363875 | Sep 2011 | EP |
2950325 | Dec 2015 | EP |
2993684 | Mar 2016 | EP |
3037878 | Jun 2016 | EP |
2349737 | Nov 2000 | GB |
08213301 | Aug 1996 | JP |
2006019436 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006332289 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007172862 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2010098275 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2006084298 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2008053140 | May 2008 | WO |
2009147202 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2012172913 | Dec 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for Application 08450077.6, report dated Jan. 29, 2010, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 09450211.9-1226; report dated Sep. 14, 2010; 4 pgs. |
European Search Report for application 09450212.7; dated Sep. 28, 2010, 9 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 141501197.7, report dated Jun. 6, 2014, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 14165967, report dated Oct. 30, 2014, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 14165970, report dated Jun. 18, 2014, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 14170611, report dated Nov. 4, 2014, 3 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 14176563, report dated Jan. 14, 2015, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 14177851; report dated Oct. 16, 2014; 1 page. |
European Search Report for Application 14199183, report dated Jun. 19, 2015, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 15159397.7, report dated Sep. 28, 2015, 7 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 15159617.8, report dated Oct. 19, 2015, 3 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 15164770, report dated Sep. 18, 2015; 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 15164772, report dated Sep. 11, 2015, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 15169632, report dated Oct. 20, 2015, 3 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 15171348, report dated Oct. 30, 2015, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for EP 14176645, completed Dec. 1, 2014, 1 pg. |
European Search Report for EP Application No. 16174185, Search Completed Dec. 6, 2016, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for European Application 10450070.7 dated May 7, 2012, 13 pgs. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 16160622, Search completed Jul. 21, 2016, dated Jul. 21, 2016, 3 pgs. |
European Search Report for European Patent Application 16160621, Report Completed Oct. 5, 2016, 3 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 16169216.5, Search completed Sep. 21, 2016, dated Sep. 29, 2016, 12 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17153506, Search completed Oct. 5, 2017, dated Oct. 16, 2017, 2 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17187922.4, Search completed Feb. 21, 2018, dated Mar. 6, 2018, 7 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17191553.1, Search completed Mar. 22, 2018, dated Apr. 9, 2018, 5 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18150797.1, Search completed Jun. 29, 2018, dated Jul. 9, 2018, 8 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18154140.0, Search completed Aug. 16, 2018, dated Sep. 4, 2018, 5 pgs. |
“Dither”, Wikipedia, Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dither&oldid=762118152 on Oct. 5, 2017. |
“Ordered dithering”, Wikipedia, Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ordered_dithering&oldid=759840417 on Oct. 5, 2017. |
Berry et al., “Programmable aperture plate for maskless high-throughput nanolithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Nov./Dec. 1997, vol. B15, No. 6, pp. 2382-2386. |
Borodovsky, “EUV, EBDW—ARF Replacement or Extension?”, KLA-Tencor Lithography User Forum, Feb. 21, 2010, San Jose, CA, USA, 21 pgs. |
Borodovsky, “MPProcessing for MPProcessors”, SEMATECH Maskless Lithography and Multibeam Mask Writer Workshop, May 10, 2010, New York, NY, USA, 35 pgs. |
Disclosed Anonymously, “Multi-tone rasterization, dual pass scan, data path and cell based vector format”, IPCOM000183472D, printed from ip.com PriorArtDatabase, published May 22, 2009, 108 pages. |
Hinterberger, “Ion optics with electrostatic lenses”, University of Bonn, Germany, 2006, 18 pgs. |
Huber et al., “Computing Straight Skeletons and Motorcycle Graphs: Theory and Practice”, Thesis, Univ. of Salzburg (Austria) Jun. 2011, 134 pgs. |
Kapl et al., “Characterization of CMOS programmable multi-beam blanking arrays as used for programmable multi-beam projection lithography and resistless nanopatterning”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 21, Mar. 24, 2011, pp. 1-8. |
Kim et al., “Binary-encounter-dipole model for electron-impact ionization”, Physical Review A, Nov. 1994, vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 3954-3967. |
Li et al., “Through-Silicon Interposer Technology for Heterogeneous Integration”, Future Fab Intl., Issue 45 (Apr. 25, 2013), 6 pgs. |
Palfrader et al., “Computing Mitered Offset Curves Based on Straight Skeletons”, Computer-Aided Design & Applications, vol. 12, No. 4, Feb. 11, 2015, pp. 414-424. |
Paraskevopoulos et al., “Scalable (24-140 Gbps) optical data link, well adapted for future maskless lithography applications”, Proc. SPIE vol. 7271, 72711 I (2009), 11 pgs. |
Platzgummer et al., “eMET—50keV electron Mask Exposure Tool Development based on proven multi-beam projection technology”, Proc. of SPIE, 2010, vol. 7823, pp. 782308-1-782308-12. |
Platzgummer et al., “eMET POC: Realization of a proof-of-concept 50 keV electron multibeam Mask Exposure Tool”, Proc. of SPIE, 2011, vol. 8166, pp. 816622-1-816622-7. |
Shih, “Image processing and mathematical morphology: fundamentals and applications”, CRC Press, 2009, pp. 26-32. |
Vink et al., “Materials with a high secondary-electron yield for use in plasma displays”, Applied Physics Letters, Mar. 25, 2002, vol. 80, No. 12, pp. 2216-2218. |
Wheeler et al., “Use of Electron Beams in VLSI”, G.E.C. Journal of Science and Technology, General Electric Company. Wembley, Middlesex, GB, vol. 48, No. 2, Jan. 1, 1982, pp. 103-107, XP000820522. |
Zhang et al., “Integrated Multi-Electron-Beam Blanker Array for Sub-10-nm Electron Beam Induced Deposition”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Nov./Dec. 2006, vol. B24, No. 6, pp. 2857-2860. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190237288 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62623952 | Jan 2018 | US |