The present invention relates to electrical probes for use with charged particle beams systems.
Using small conductors on the nanometer scale to probe electrical circuits is referred to as nanoprobing. Nanoprobing is widely used in the semiconductor market for failure analyses and device characterization. Some probes can be positioned with a resolution of better than 10 nm to measure or apply a voltage or current to electrically test a circuit.
Before probing, the sample needs to be prepared, for example, by exposing buried conductors to electrically access a circuit. A dual beam system, that is, a charged particle beam system including an ion beam column and an electron beam column, is a powerful tool for sample analysis. In a dual beam system, the ion beam can be used, for example, to expose buried layers of a circuit, and the electron beam can be used to form a highly magnified image of the exposed layers of the circuit. An advantage of some dual beam systems is that the stage can tilt and rotate to expose the work piece to the electron beam and ion beam from different angles for milling different structures and for imaging. Another advantage of some system is that a voltage can be applied to a portion of the stage to reduce the energy of the beam after the beam passes the final focusing lens and before the beam impacts the circuit, thereby reducing sample damage while maintaining high resolution.
Nanoprobe assemblies for positioning within an electron microscope are available for example from Kleindiek Nanotechnik GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany. A probe assembly can have any number of electrical probes, sometime, 4, 6, or 8, that can apply or sense a voltage from a circuit under test. Each probe includes a manipulator that can raise or lower the probe tip to contact the circuit. The probe tip is typically electrically isolated from the manipulator. When a probe assembly is mounted in the dual beam system, however, much of the flexibility of the dual beam is lost. The cabling to the probe assembly restricts the stage movement so it can be impossible to rotate and tilt the sample in a manner required for charged particle beam processing. The electronics of the probe assembly may prevent the application of a retarding voltage to the stage or sample, so that the electron beam energy cannot be reduced after passing the focusing lens.
Because the presence of the probe assembly in the dual beam system reduces the flexibility of the system, prevents rotation and beam deceleration, it is necessary to remove the work piece from the system having the probe assembly and insert it into another dual beam system to process the work piece. The work piece can then be moved back into the first system that includes the probe assembly.
An object of the invention is to provide the flexibility of a dual beam system in combination with a probe assembly.
Some embodiments of the invention provide a mechanism to connect and disconnect a probe assembly from its electrical harness within a vacuum chamber so that the probe assembly with the work piece mounted can be rotated and tilted without interference from a cable, and can then be reconnected without opening the vacuum chamber. Some embodiments of the invention provide a means of grounding a sample and probes when the probe assembly is disconnected from its electrical harness. Some embodiments of the invention provide a means of preventing damage to the probe mechanism and the probe itself by ensuring that the probes are not sticking up too far during operations, such as passing through an air lock or tiling the stage, in which the probes are positioned near an object that could damage them.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiments disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
For a more thorough understanding of the present invention, and advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
It is desirable to be able to switch back and forth between electrically testing a sample using a nanoprobe and processing the sample using charged particle beam processing without removing the sample from the vacuum chamber.
During processing, applicants have recognized that, in some sample preparation processes, it is desirable that:
The wiring harness that carries electrical signals to and from the probe assembly must be disconnected before tilting or rotating, and disconnecting will eliminate the ground connection from the sample and the needles. Also, the wiring harness must be disconnected before biasing the stage to a high voltage, which reducing the beam energy, to avoid damaging the probe electronics and creating unsafe conditions.
The probe assembly is preferably positioned on a five-axis stage, that is, the stage can move in the X, Y, and Z direction and can tilt and rotate. Only the Y-axis movement mechanism is shown in
After the sample is processed, for example, by milling on a focused ion beam or imaging using the electron beam, the UHR Y carriage is moved in the direct opposite arrow 110, the lever 102 contacts actuator pin 122, which forces the connector back into the connector on the probe assembly so that the sample can be probed. This process can be repeated, for example, as different layers are removed from the sample using the ion beam, and exposed layers are electrically probed in sequence. Embodiments of the invention allow the electrical connections to the probe assembly to be connected and disconnected within the vacuum chamber, without venting the vacuum chamber to the atmosphere.
As shown in
When the wiring harness is disconnected from the probe assembly, the sample and the probes are electrically floating, that is, they are not grounded. When the charged particle beam is directed at the sample, the sample becomes charged if it is not grounded.
The embodiments of
The mezzanine is used not only to ground the probes, but it can also be used to prevent the probe from elevated to a point where it would be damages when the probe is tilted upward during physical motion, for example, while the probe assembly is being inserted into an airlock of a vacuum system or when the probe assembly with the sample is being tilted for charged particle beam processing.
One aspect of the invention provides a system for electrical probing of a work piece in a vacuum chamber, comprising:
a vacuum chamber;
a movable and rotatable stage;
a probe assembly adapted to be supported on the rotatable stage, the probe assembly including:
one or more electrical probes for contacting the work piece and providing or sensing electrical signal; and
an electrical connector for providing or receiving electrical signals to or from the probe;
the electrical connector configured so that motion of the stage can selectively connect or disconnect the electrical connector to allow the stage to move freely when the electrical connector is disconnected.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises one or more first elements mounted on a first portion of the stage and one or more second elements mounted on the a second portion of the stage that is moveable with respect to the first portion, one of the first element contacting the one of the second elements to physically disconnect or reconnect the electrical connector.
In some embodiments, the one or more of the first elements comprises an actuator pin and one or more of the second elements comprise a lever that is moved by the actuator pins.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a conductor for grounding the sample when the electrical connector is disconnected.
In some embodiments, the conductor is a post that is contacted by the sample by moving the stage.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a conductor for grounding the probe needles when the electrical connector is disconnected.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a mechanical barrier external to the probes that limits the extension of the probes.
Some aspects of the invention include a method of operating a charged particle beam system, comprising:
inserting a probe assembly through a load lock of a vacuum chamber, the probe assembly including:
multiple probes; and
a sample position for supporting a sample during probing by the multiple probes;
processing the sample in the vacuum chamber using a charged particle beam;
without opening the vacuum chamber, mating a first electrical connector on the probe assembly with a second electrical connector in the vacuum chamber; and
contacting one or more of the multiple probes to the sample to perform electrical testing on the sample.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises after processing the sample using the charged particle beam and contacting one or more of the multiple probes to the sample to perform electrical testing on the sample:
disconnecting the first electrical connector and the second electrical connector;
processing the sample a second time using the charged particle beam;
mating the first electrical connector with the second electrical connector a second time; and
contacting one or more of the multiple probes to the sample to perform electrical testing on the sample a second time.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises before processing the sample the first time or the second time using focused ion beam, grounding the sample.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises during processing of the sample the first time or the second time using the charged particle beam, electrically biasing the sample to reduce the energy of the charged particles impinging on the sample while the probe assembly connector is not connected.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises grounding the probes while processing the sample in the vacuum chamber using the charged particle beam.
In some embodiments, grounding the sample comprises moving the sample horizontally or vertically into contact with a grounding conductor.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises providing a physical restraint, external to the probes themselves, on the maximum elevation of the probe to prevent damage to the probe.
In some embodiments, the invention includes a method and apparatus for grounding a sample in a probe assembly mounted in a vacuum chamber, the method comprising moving the sample or sample stage horizontally or vertically to contact a ground post.
In some embodiments, the invention includes a method and apparatus for grounding a probe in a probe assembly mounted in a vacuum chamber, the method comprising moving the probe to contact a grounded conductor above or below the probe.
In some embodiments, the invention includes a method and apparatus for protecting a probe in a probe assembly mounted in a vacuum chamber, the method comprising providing an external restriction that restricts motion of the probe to prevent the probe from extending far enough above the probe assembly to collide with an airlock or lens or other structure.
A preferred method or apparatus of the present invention has many novel aspects, and because the invention can be embodied in different methods or apparatuses for different purposes, not every aspect need be present in every embodiment. Moreover, many of the aspects of the described embodiments may be separately patentable. For example, the method and apparatus for grounding the sample is thought to be patentable distinct from the method and apparatus for electrically connecting and disconnecting the probe assembly. Also, the method and apparatus for grounding the probes and the method and apparatus for protecting the probes by limiting their range of motion and separately patentable. These inventions can be used independently and are not required to be used together. The invention has broad applicability and can provide many benefits as described and shown in the examples above. The embodiments will vary greatly depending upon the specific application, and not every embodiment will provide all of the benefits and meet all of the objectives that are achievable by the invention.
Although much of the previous description is directed at mineral samples from drill cuttings, the invention could be used to prepare samples of any suitable material. The terms “work piece,” “sample,” “substrate,” and “specimen” are used interchangeably in this application unless otherwise indicated. Further, whenever the terms “automatic,” “automated,” or similar terms are used herein, those terms will be understood to include manual initiation of the automatic or automated process or step.
In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . ” To the extent that any term is not specially defined in this specification, the intent is that the term is to be given its plain and ordinary meaning. The accompanying drawings are intended to aid in understanding the present invention and, unless otherwise indicated, are not drawn to scale. Particle beam systems suitable for carrying out the present invention are commercially available, for example, from FEI Company, the assignee of the present application.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made to the embodiments described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application 61/866,003 filed Aug. 14, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3939414 | Roch | Feb 1976 | A |
4480223 | Aigo | Oct 1984 | A |
4623839 | Garretson et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4633176 | Reimer | Dec 1986 | A |
4777716 | Folk et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4827127 | Todokoro | May 1989 | A |
4875005 | Terada et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4893914 | Hancock et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5729150 | Schwindt | Mar 1998 | A |
6031383 | Streib et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6060892 | Yamagata | May 2000 | A |
6137302 | Schwindt | Oct 2000 | A |
6191598 | Hollman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198299 | Hollman | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6380751 | Harwood et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6424141 | Hollman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6541989 | Norris et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6605955 | Costello et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6621282 | Hollman | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6636059 | Harwood et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6649919 | Chao et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6683320 | Gerlach et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6700397 | Hollman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6744268 | Hollman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6801047 | Harwood et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6803756 | Hollman et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6838895 | Hollman | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6873176 | Yeh et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6891170 | Yu et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6909273 | Lau | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6917195 | Hollman | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6960765 | Tomimatsu et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967335 | Dyer et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6973406 | Zemer et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6995579 | Schwindt | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009383 | Harwood et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023225 | Blackwood | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7061256 | Hasegawa | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071713 | Furukawa et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7071718 | Schwindt | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7106049 | Lau | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7180317 | Hollman | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7220973 | Yu et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221177 | Komatsu et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7248067 | Poechmueller | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250779 | Dunklee et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7253646 | Lou et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262613 | Komatsu et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7285778 | Baur et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295023 | Lou et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297945 | Hazaki et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301146 | Tomimatsu et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304486 | Petersen et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7348787 | Harwood et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7372283 | Furukawa et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7535247 | Andrews et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7553334 | Hazaki et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7576553 | Lou et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579854 | Kiesewetter et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7595632 | Harwood et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598755 | Furukawa et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7616018 | Lou et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7626406 | Ishii | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7659742 | Jacobson et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7675300 | Baur et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7683645 | Ku et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7688088 | Komatsu et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7764079 | Daoudi et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7795860 | Sullivan | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7847575 | Potok et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7888655 | van Gaasbeek et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7898281 | Andrews et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918669 | Tiengtum | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8074293 | Hazaki et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8159245 | Komatsu et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8816712 | Nakamura et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20030042921 | Hollman | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030098702 | Tatematsu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030184332 | Tomimatsu et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040119492 | Schneidewind et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040189336 | Fink | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050140379 | Furukawa et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050269511 | Tomimatsu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060114012 | Reitinger | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060145716 | Komatsu et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070063725 | Komatsu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070290703 | Hollman | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080218185 | Furukawa et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20120161804 | Root et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130099134 | Sun et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20150378267 | Shibazaki | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
H09326425 | Jan 1997 | JP |
H0926436 | Dec 1997 | JP |
2000147070 | May 2000 | JP |
2002181898 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2003309153 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2005210067 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005251745 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2009224788 | Oct 2009 | JP |
20110137389 | Dec 2011 | KR |
Entry |
---|
McAuley, C.N., et al., “3D Failure Analysis in Depth Profiles of Sequentially Made FIB Cuts”, Microelectronics and Reliability, 2007, pp. 1595-1598, vol. 47. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150048815 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61866003 | Aug 2013 | US |