Patent Grant
10968453
The present application is being filed along with a Sequence Listing in electronic format. The Sequence Listing is provided as a file entitled BIOL0240WOSEQ_ST25.pdf created Mar. 30, 2015, which is 320 Kb in size. The information in the electronic format of the sequence listing is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Provided are compositions and methods for reducing expression of superoxide dismutase 1, soluble (SOD-1) mRNA and protein in an animal. Such methods are useful to treat, prevent, or ameliorate neurodegenerative diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by inhibiting expression of SOD-1 in an animal.
The soluble SOD-1 enzyme (also known as Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase) is one of the superoxide dismutases that provide defense against oxidative damage of biomolecules by catalyzing the dismutation of superoxide to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (Fridovich, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1995, 64, 97-112). The superoxide anion (02-) is a potentially harmful cellular by-product produced primarily by errors of oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria (Turrens, J. Physiol. 2003, 552, 335-344) Mutations in the SOD-1 gene are associated with a dominantly-inherited form of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease) a disorder characterized by a selective degeneration of upper and lower motor neurons (Rowland, N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 1688-1700). There is a tight genetic linkage between familial ALS and missense mutations in the SOD1 gene (Rosen, Nature, 1993, 362, 59-62). The toxicity of mutant SOD1 is believed to arise from an initial misfolding (gain of function) reducing nuclear protection from the active enzyme (loss of function in the nuclei), a process that may be involved in ALS pathogenesis (Sau, Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007, 16, 1604-1618).
ALS is a devastating progressive neurodegenerative disease affecting as many as 30,000 Americans at any given time. The progressive degeneration of the motor neurons in ALS eventually leads to their death. When the motor neurons die, the ability of the brain to initiate and control muscle movement is lost. With voluntary muscle action progressively affected, patients in the later stages of the disease may become totally paralyzed.
Currently lacking are acceptable options for treating such neurodegenerative diseases. It is therefore an object herein to provide methods for the treatment of such diseases.
Provided herein are methods, compounds, and compositions for modulating expression of superoxide dismutase 1, soluble (SOD-1) mRNA and protein. In certain embodiments, compounds useful for modulating expression of SOD-1 mRNA and protein are antisense compounds. In certain embodiments, the antisense compounds are modified oligonucleotides.
In certain embodiments, modulation can occur in a cell or tissue. In certain embodiments, the cell or tissue is in an animal. In certain embodiments, the animal is a human. In certain embodiments, SOD-1 mRNA levels are reduced. In certain embodiments, SOD-1 protein levels are reduced. Such reduction can occur in a time-dependent manner or in a dose-dependent manner.
Also provided are methods, compounds, and compositions useful for preventing, treating, and ameliorating diseases, disorders, and conditions. In certain embodiments, such SOD-1 related diseases, disorders, and conditions are neurodegenerative diseases. In certain embodiments, such neurodegenerative diseases, disorders, and conditions include amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
Such diseases, disorders, and conditions can have one or more risk factors, causes, or outcomes in common. Certain risk factors and causes for development of ALS include growing older, having a personal or family history, or genetic predisposition. However, the majority of ALS cases are sporadic and no known risk factors are known. Certain symptoms and outcomes associated with development of ALS include but are not limited to: fasciculations, cramps, tight and stiff muscles (spasticity), muscle weakness affecting an arm or a leg, slurred and nasal speech, difficulty walking, difficulty chewing or swallowing (dysphagia), difficulty speaking or forming words (dysarthria), weakness or atrophy, spasticity, exaggerated reflexes (hyperreflexia), and presence of Babinski's sign. As ALS progresses, symptoms and outcomes by include weakening of other limbs, perhaps accompanied by twitching, muscle cramping, and exaggerated, faster reflexes; problems with chewing, swallowing, and breathing; drooling may occur; eventual paralysis; and death.
In certain embodiments, methods of treatment include administering an SOD-1 antisense compound to an individual in need thereof. In certain embodiments, methods of treatment include administering an SOD-1 modified oligonucleotide to an individual in need thereof.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed. Herein, the use of the singular includes the plural unless specifically stated otherwise. As used herein, the use of “or” means “and/or” unless stated otherwise. Additionally, as used herein, the use of “and” means “and/or” unless stated otherwise. Furthermore, the use of the term “including” as well as other forms, such as “includes” and “included”, is not limiting. Also, terms such as “element” or “component” encompass both elements and components comprising one unit and elements and components that comprise more than one subunit, unless specifically stated otherwise. Also, all sequences described herein are listed 5′ to 3′, unless otherwise stated. The section headings used herein are for organizational purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the subject matter described. All documents, or portions of documents, cited in this disclosure, including, but not limited to, patents, patent applications, published patent applications, articles, books, treatises, and GENBANK Accession Numbers and associated sequence information obtainable through databases such as National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and other data referred to throughout in the disclosure herein are hereby expressly incorporated by reference for the portions of the document discussed herein, as well as in their entirety.
Unless specific definitions are provided, the nomenclature utilized in connection with, and the procedures and techniques of, analytical chemistry, synthetic organic chemistry, and medicinal and pharmaceutical chemistry described herein are those well known and commonly used in the art. Standard techniques may be used for chemical synthesis, and chemical analysis.
Unless otherwise indicated, the following terms have the following meanings:
“2′-deoxynucleoside” (also 2′-deoxyribonucleoside) means a nucleoside comprising 2′-H furanosyl sugar moiety, as found in naturally occurring deoxyribonucleosides (DNA). In certain embodiments, a 2′-deoxynucleoside may comprise a modified nucleobase or may comprise an RNA nucleobase (e.g., uracil).
“2′-deoxyribose sugar” means a 2′-H furanosyl sugar moiety, as found in naturally occurring deoxyribonucleic acids (DNA).
“2′-O-methoxyethyl” (also 2′-MOE and 2′-OCH2CH2—OCH3 and MOE and 2′-O-methoxyethylribose) refers to an O-methoxy-ethyl modification of the 2′ position of a furanose ring. A 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified sugar is a modified sugar.
“2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified nucleoside” (also 2′-MOE nucleoside) means a nucleoside comprising a 2′-MOE modified sugar moiety.
“2′-substituted nucleoside” means a nucleoside comprising a substituent at the 2′-position of the furanose ring other than H or OH. In certain embodiments, 2′ substituted nucleosides include nucleosides with bicyclic sugar modifications.
“5-methylcytosine” means a cytosine modified with a methyl group attached to the 5 position. A 5-methylcytosine is a modified nucleobase.
“About” means within 10% of a value. For example, if it is stated, “the compounds affected at least about 50% inhibition of SOD-1”, it is implied that the SOD-1 levels are inhibited within a range of 45% and 55%. “Administered concomitantly” refers to the co-administration of two pharmaceutical agents in any manner in which the pharmacological effects of both are manifest in the patient at the same time. Concomitant administration does not require that both pharmaceutical agents be administered in a single pharmaceutical composition, in the same dosage form, or by the same route of administration. The effects of both pharmaceutical agents need not manifest themselves at the same time. The effects need only be overlapping for a period of time and need not be coextensive.
“Administering” means providing a pharmaceutical agent to an animal, and includes, but is not limited to administering by a medical professional and self-administering.
“Amelioration” refers to a lessening, slowing, stopping, or reversing of at least one indicator of the seventy of a condition or disease. The severity of indicators may be determined by subjective or objective measures, which are known to those skilled in the art.
“Animal” refers to a human or non-human animal, including, but not limited to, mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, cats, pigs, and non-human primates, including, but not limited to, monkeys and chimpanzees.
“Antibody” refers to a molecule characterized by reacting specifically with an antigen in some way, where the antibody and the antigen are each defined in terms of the other. Antibody may refer to a complete antibody molecule or any fragment or region thereof, such as the heavy chain, the light chain, Fab region, and Fc region.
“Antisense activity” means any detectable or measurable activity attributable to the hybridization of an antisense compound to its target nucleic acid. In certain embodiments, antisense activity is a decrease in the amount or expression of a target nucleic acid or protein encoded by such target nucleic acid.
“Antisense compound” means an oligomeric compound that is capable of undergoing hybridization to a target nucleic acid through hydrogen bonding. Examples of antisense compounds include single-stranded and double-stranded compounds, such as, antisense oligonucleotides, siRNAs, shRNAs, ssRNAs, and occupancy-based compounds.
“Antisense inhibition” means reduction of target nucleic acid levels in the presence of an antisense compound complementary to a target nucleic acid compared to target nucleic acid levels or in the absence of the antisense compound.
“Antisense mechanisms” are all those mechanisms involving hybridization of a compound with a target nucleic acid, wherein the outcome or effect of the hybridization is either target degradation or target occupancy with concomitant stalling of the cellular machinery involving, for example, transcription or splicing.
“Antisense oligonucleotide” means a single-stranded oligonucleotide having a nucleobase sequence that permits hybridization to a corresponding segment of a target nucleic acid.
“Base complementarity” refers to the capacity for the precise base pairing of nucleobases of an oligonucleotide with corresponding nucleobases in a target nucleic acid (i.e., hybridization), and is mediated by Watson-Crick, Hoogsteen or reversed Hoogsteen hydrogen binding between corresponding nucleobases.
“Bicyclic sugar” means a furanose ring modified by the bridging of two atoms. A bicyclic sugar is a modified sugar.
“Bicyclic nucleic acid” or “BNA” refers to a nucleoside or nucleotide wherein the furanose portion of the nucleoside or nucleotide includes a bridge connecting two carbon atoms on the furanose ring, thereby forming a bicyclic ring system.
“Cap structure” or “terminal cap moiety” means chemical modifications, which have been incorporated at either terminus of an antisense compound.
“cEt” or “constrained ethyl” or “cEt modified sugar” means a bicyclic nucleoside having a sugar moiety comprising a bridge connecting the 4′-carbon and the 2′-carbon, wherein the bridge has the formula: 4′-CH(CH3)—O-2′. A cEt modified sugar is a modified sugar.
“cEt modified nucleoside” means a bicyclic nucleoside having a sugar moiety comprising a bridge connecting the 4′-carbon and the 2′-carbon, wherein the bridge has the formula: 4′-CH(CH3)—O-2′. A cEt modified sugar is a modified sugar.
“Chemically distinct region” refers to a region of an antisense compound that is in some way chemically different than another region of the same antisense compound. For example, a region having 2′-O-methoxyethyl nucleosides is chemically distinct from a region having nucleosides without 2′-O-methoxyethyl modifications.
“Chimeric antisense compound” means an antisense compound that has at least two chemically distinct regions, each position having a plurality of subunits.
“Co-administration” means administration of two or more pharmaceutical agents to an individual.
The two or more pharmaceutical agents may be in a single pharmaceutical composition, or may be in separate pharmaceutical compositions. Each of the two or more pharmaceutical agents may be administered through the same or different routes of administration. Co-administration encompasses parallel or sequential administration.
“Complementarity” means the capacity for pairing between nucleobases of a first nucleic acid and a second nucleic acid.
“Comprise,” “comprises,” and “comprising” will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated step or element or group of steps or elements but not the exclusion of any other step or element or group of steps or elements.
“Contiguous nucleobases” means nucleobases immediately adjacent to each other.
“Designing” or “designed to” refer to the process of designing an oligomeric compound that specifically hybridizes with a selected nucleic acid molecule.
“Diluent” means an ingredient in a composition that lacks pharmacological activity, but is pharmaceutically necessary or desirable. For example, in drugs that are injected, the diluent may be a liquid, e.g. saline solution.
“Dose” means a specified quantity of a pharmaceutical agent provided in a single administration, or in a specified time period. In certain embodiments, a dose may be administered in one, two, or more boluses, tablets, or injections. For example, in certain embodiments where subcutaneous administration is desired, the desired dose requires a volume not easily accommodated by a single injection, therefore, two or more injections may be used to achieve the desired dose. In certain embodiments, the pharmaceutical agent is administered by infusion over an extended period of time or continuously. Doses may be stated as the amount of pharmaceutical agent per hour, day, week, or month.
“Effective amount” in the context of modulating an activity or of treating or preventing a condition means the administration of that amount of pharmaceutical agent to a subject in need of such modulation, treatment, or prophylaxis, either in a single dose or as part of a series, that is effective for modulation of that effect, or for treatment or prophylaxis or improvement of that condition. The effective amount may vary among individuals depending on the health and physical condition of the individual to be treated, the taxonomic group of the individuals to be treated, the formulation of the composition, assessment of the individual's medical condition, and other relevant factors.
“Efficacy” means the ability to produce a desired effect.
“Expression” includes all the functions by which a gene's coded information is converted into structures present and operating in a cell. Such structures include, but are not limited to the products of transcription and translation.
“Fully complementary” or “100% complementary” means each nucleobase of a first nucleic acid has a complementary nucleobase in a second nucleic acid. In certain embodiments, a first nucleic acid is an antisense compound and a target nucleic acid is a second nucleic acid.
“Gapmer” means a chimeric antisense compound in which an internal region having a plurality of nucleosides that support RNase H cleavage is positioned between external regions having one or more nucleosides, wherein the nucleosides comprising the internal region are chemically distinct from the nucleoside or nucleosides comprising the external regions. The internal region may be referred to as a “gap” and the external regions may be referred to as the “wings.”
“Gap-narrowed” means a chimeric antisense compound having a gap segment of 9 or fewer contiguous 2′-deoxyribonucleosides positioned between and immediately adjacent to 5′ and 3′ wing segments having from 1 to 6 nucleosides.
“Gap-widened” means a chimeric antisense compound having a gap segment of 12 or more contiguous 2′-deoxyribonucleosides positioned between and immediately adjacent to 5′ and 3′ wing segments having from 1 to 6 nucleosides.
“Hybridization” means the annealing of complementary nucleic acid molecules. In certain embodiments, complementary nucleic acid molecules include, but are not limited to, an antisense compound and a target nucleic acid. In certain embodiments, complementary nucleic acid molecules include, but are not limited to, an oligonucleotide and a nucleic acid target.
“Identifying an animal having a SOD-1 associated disease” means identifying an animal having been diagnosed with a SOD-1 associated disease or predisposed to develop a SOD-1 associated disease. Individuals predisposed to develop a SOD-1 associated disease include those having one or more risk factors for developing a SOD-1 associated disease, including, growing older, having a personal or family history, or genetic predisposition of one or more SOD-1 associated diseases. Such identification may be accomplished by any method including evaluating an individual's medical history and standard clinical tests or assessments, such as genetic testing.
“Immediately adjacent” means there are no intervening elements between the immediately adjacent elements.
“Individual” means a human or non-human animal selected for treatment or therapy.
“Inhibiting SOD-1” means reducing the level or expression of a SOD-1 mRNA and/or protein. In certain embodiments, SOD-1 mRNA and/or protein levels are inhibited in the presence of an antisense compound targeting SOD-1, including a modified oligonucleotide targeting SOD-1, as compared to expression of SOD-1 mRNA and/or protein levels in the absence of a SOD-1 antisense compound, such as a modified oligonucleotide.
“Inhibiting the expression or activity” refers to a reduction or blockade of the expression or activity and does not necessarily indicate a total elimination of expression or activity.
“Internucleoside linkage” refers to the chemical bond between nucleosides.
“Linked nucleosides” means adjacent nucleosides linked together by an internucleoside linkage.
“Mismatch” or “non-complementary nucleobase” refers to the case when a nucleobase of a first nucleic acid is not capable of pairing with the corresponding nucleobase of a second or target nucleic acid.
“Mixed backbone” means a pattern of internucleoside linkages including at least two different internucleoside linkages. For example, an oligonucleotide with a mixed backbone may include at least one phosphodiester linkage and at least one phosphorothioate linkage.
“Modified internucleoside linkage” refers to a substitution or any change from a naturally occurring internucleoside bond (i.e., a phosphodiester internucleoside bond).
“Modified nucleobase” means any nucleobase other than adenine, cytosine, guanine, thymidine, or uracil. An “unmodified nucleobase” means the purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G), and the pyrimidine bases thymine (T), cytosine (C), and uracil (U).
A “modified nucleoside” means a nucleoside having, independently, a modified sugar moiety and/or modified nucleobase.
“Modified nucleotide” means a nucleotide having, independently, a modified sugar moiety, modified internucleoside linkage, and/or modified nucleobase.
“Modified oligonucleotide” means an oligonucleotide comprising at least one modified internucleoside linkage, modified sugar, and/or modified nucleobase.
“Modified sugar” means substitution and/or any change from a natural sugar moiety.
“Monomer” means a single unit of an oligomer. Monomers include, but are not limited to, nucleosides and nucleotides, whether naturally occurring or modified.
“Motif” means the pattern of unmodified and modified nucleosides in an antisense compound.
“Natural sugar moiety” means a sugar moiety found in DNA (2′-H) or RNA (2′-OH).
“Naturally occurring internucleoside linkage” means a 3′ to 5′ phosphodiester linkage.
“Non-complementary nucleobase” refers to a pair of nucleobases that do not form hydrogen bonds with one another or otherwise support hybridization.
“Nucleic acid” refers to molecules composed of monomeric nucleotides. A nucleic acid includes, but is not limited to, ribonucleic acids (RNA), deoxyribonucleic acids (DNA), single-stranded nucleic acids, double-stranded nucleic acids, small interfering ribonucleic acids (siRNA), and microRNAs (miRNA).
“Nucleobase” means a heterocyclic moiety capable of pairing with a base of another nucleic acid.
“Nucleobase complementarity” refers to a nucleobase that is capable of base pairing with another nucleobase. For example, in DNA, adenine (A) is complementary to thymine (T). For example, in RNA, adenine (A) is complementary to uracil (U). In certain embodiments, complementary nucleobase refers to a nucleobase of an antisense compound that is capable of base pairing with a nucleobase of its target nucleic acid. For example, if a nucleobase at a certain position of an antisense compound is capable of hydrogen bonding with a nucleobase at a certain position of a target nucleic acid, then the position of hydrogen bonding between the oligonucleotide and the target nucleic acid is considered to be complementary at that nucleobase pair.
“Nucleobase sequence” means the order of contiguous nucleobases independent of any sugar, linkage, and/or nucleobase modification.
“Nucleoside” means a nucleobase linked to a sugar.
“Nucleoside mimetic” includes those structures used to replace the sugar or the sugar and the base and not necessarily the linkage at one or more positions of an oligomeric compound such as for example nucleoside mimetics having morpholino, cyclohexenyl, cyclohexyl, tetrahydropyranyl, bicyclo, or tricyclo sugar mimetics, e.g., non furanose sugar units. Nucleotide mimetic includes those structures used to replace the nucleoside and the linkage at one or more positions of an oligomeric compound such as for example peptide nucleic acids or morpholinos (morpholinos linked by —N(H)—C(═O)—O— or other non-phosphodiester linkage). Sugar surrogate overlaps with the slightly broader term nucleoside mimetic but is intended to indicate replacement of the sugar unit (furanose ring) only. The tetrahydropyranyl rings provided herein are illustrative of an example of a sugar surrogate wherein the furanose sugar group has been replaced with a tetrahydropyranyl ring system. “Mimetic” refers to groups that are substituted for a sugar, a nucleobase, and/or internucleoside linkage. Generally, a mimetic is used in place of the sugar or sugar-internucleoside linkage combination, and the nucleobase is maintained for hybridization to a selected target.
“Nucleotide” means a nucleoside having a phosphate group covalently linked to the sugar portion of the nucleoside.
“Off-target effect” refers to an unwanted or deleterious biological effect associated with modulation of RNA or protein expression of a gene other than the intended target nucleic acid.
“Oligomeric compound” or “oligomer” means a polymer of linked monomeric subunits which is capable of hybridizing to at least a region of a nucleic acid molecule.
“Oligonucleotide” means a polymer of linked nucleosides each of which can be modified or unmodified, independent one from another.
“Parenteral administration” means administration through injection (e.g., bolus injection) or infusion. Parenteral administration includes subcutaneous administration, intravenous administration, intramuscular administration, intraarterial administration, intraperitoneal administration, or intracranial administration, e.g., intrathecal or intracerebroventricular administration.
“Peptide” means a molecule formed by linking at least two amino acids by amide bonds. Without limitation, as used herein, peptide refers to polypeptides and proteins.
“Pharmaceutical agent” means a substance that provides a therapeutic benefit when administered to an individual. For example, in certain embodiments, a modified oligonucleotide targeted to SOD-1 is a pharmaceutical agent.
“Pharmaceutical composition” means a mixture of substances suitable for administering to a subject. For example, a pharmaceutical composition may comprise a modified oligonucleotide and a sterile aqueous solution.
“Pharmaceutically acceptable derivative” encompasses pharmaceutically acceptable salts, conjugates, prodrugs or isomers of the compounds described herein.
“Pharmaceutically acceptable salts” means physiologically and pharmaceutically acceptable salts of antisense compounds, i.e., salts that retain the desired biological activity of the parent oligonucleotide and do not impart undesired toxicological effects thereto.
“Phosphorothioate linkage” means a linkage between nucleosides where the phosphodiester bond is modified by replacing one of the non-bridging oxygen atoms with a sulfur atom. A phosphorothioate linkage is a modified internucleoside linkage.
“Portion” means a defined number of contiguous (i.e., linked) nucleobases of a nucleic acid. In certain embodiments, a portion is a defined number of contiguous nucleobases of a target nucleic acid. In certain embodiments, a portion is a defined number of contiguous nucleobases of an antisense compound.
“Prevent” or “preventing” refers to delaying or forestalling the onset or development of a disease, disorder, or condition for a period of time from minutes to days, weeks to months, or indefinitely.
“Prodrug” means a therapeutic agent that is prepared in an inactive form that is converted to an active form (i.e., drug) within the body or cells thereof by the action of endogenous enzymes or other chemicals and/or conditions.
“Prophylactically effective amount” refers to an amount of a pharmaceutical agent that provides a prophylactic or preventative benefit to an animal.
“Region” is defined as a portion of the target nucleic acid having at least one identifiable structure, function, or characteristic.
“Ribonucleotide” means a nucleotide having a hydroxy at the 2′ position of the sugar portion of the nucleotide. Ribonucleotides may be modified with any of a variety of substituents.
“Salts” mean a physiologically and pharmaceutically acceptable salts of antisense compounds, i.e., salts that retain the desired biological activity of the parent oligonucleotide and do not impart undesired toxicological effects thereto.
“Segments” are defined as smaller or sub-portions of regions within a target nucleic acid.
“Shortened” or “truncated” versions of oligonucleotides SOD-1ght herein have one, two or more nucleosides deleted.
“Side effects” means physiological responses attributable to a treatment other than desired effects. In certain embodiments, side effects include, without limitation, injection site reactions, liver function test abnormalities, renal function abnormalities, liver toxicity, renal toxicity, central nervous system abnormalities, and myopathies.
“Single-stranded oligonucleotide” means an oligonucleotide which is not hybridized to a complementary strand.
“Sites,” as used herein, are defined as unique nucleobase positions within a target nucleic acid.
“Slows progression” means decrease in the development of the disease.
“SOD-1” means the mammalian gene superoxide dismutase 1, soluble (SOD-1), including the human gene superoxide dismutase 1, soluble (SOD-1).
“SOD-1 associated disease” means any disease associated with any SOD-1 nucleic acid or expression product thereof. Such diseases may include a neurodegenerative disease. Such neurodegenerative diseases may include amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
“SOD-1 mRNA” means any messenger RNA expression product of a DNA sequence encoding SOD-1.
“SOD-1 nucleic acid” means any nucleic acid encoding SOD-1. For example, in certain embodiments, a SOD-1 nucleic acid includes a DNA sequence encoding SOD-1, an RNA sequence transcribed from DNA encoding SOD-1 (including genomic DNA comprising introns and exons), and a mRNA sequence encoding SOD-1. “SOD-1 mRNA” means a mRNA encoding a SOD-1 protein.
“SOD-1 protein” means the polypeptide expression product of a SOD-1 nucleic acid.
“Specifically hybridizable” refers to an antisense compound having a sufficient degree of complementarity between an oligonucleotide and a target nucleic acid to induce a desired effect, while exhibiting minimal or no effects on non-target nucleic acids under conditions in which specific binding is desired, i.e., under physiological conditions in the case of in vivo assays and therapeutic treatments.
“Stringent hybridization conditions” or “stringent conditions” refer to conditions under which an oligomeric compound will hybridize to its target sequence, but to a minimal number of other sequences.
“Subject” means a human or non-human animal selected for treatment or therapy.
“Sugar chemistry motif” means a pattern of sugar modifications including at least two different sugar modifications. For example, an oligonucleotide with a mixed backbone may include at least one 2′-O-methoxyethyl modified nucleoside, and/or one cEt modified nucleoside, and/or one 2′-deoxynucleoside.
“Target” refers to a protein, the modulation of which is desired.
“Target gene” refers to a gene encoding a target.
“Targeting” or “targeted” means the process of design and selection of an antisense compound that will specifically hybridize to a target nucleic acid and induce a desired effect.
“Target nucleic acid,” “target RNA,” and “target RNA transcript” and “nucleic acid target” all mean a nucleic acid capable of being targeted by antisense compounds.
“Target region” means a portion of a target nucleic acid to which one or more antisense compounds is targeted.
“Target segment” means the sequence of nucleotides of a target nucleic acid to which an antisense compound is targeted. “5′ target site” refers to the 5′-most nucleotide of a target segment. “3′ target site” refers to the 3′-most nucleotide of a target segment.
“Therapeutically effective amount” means an amount of a pharmaceutical agent that provides a therapeutic benefit to an individual.
“Treat” or “treating” or “treatment” refers administering a composition to effect an alteration or improvement of the disease or condition.
“Unmodified nucleobases” mean the purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G), and the pyrimidine bases thymine (T), cytosine (C) and uracil (U).
“Unmodified nucleotide” means a nucleotide composed of naturally occuring nucleobases, sugar moieties, and internucleoside linkages. In certain embodiments, an unmodified nucleotide is an RNA nucleotide (i.e. β-D-ribonucleosides) or a DNA nucleotide (i.e. β-D-deoxyribonucleoside).
“Wing segment” means a plurality of nucleosides modified to impart to an oligonucleotide properties such as enhanced inhibitory activity, increased binding affinity for a target nucleic acid, or resistance to degradation by in vivo nucleases.
Certain embodiments provide methods, compounds, and compositions for inhibiting SOD-1 mRNA and protein expression. Certain embodiments provide methods, compounds, and composition for decreasing SOD-1 mRNA and protein levels.
Certain embodiments provide antisense compounds targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid. In certain embodiments, the SOD-1 nucleic acid is the sequence set forth in GENBANK Accession No. NM_000454.4 (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1), GENBANK Accession No. NT_011512.10 truncated from nucleotides 18693000 to 18704000 (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 2), and the complement of GENBANK Accession No. NW_001114168.1 truncated from nucleotides 2258000 to U.S. Pat. No. 2,271,000 (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 3).
Certain embodiments provide methods for the treatment, prevention, or amelioration of diseases, disorders, and conditions associated with SOD-1 in an individual in need thereof. Also contemplated are methods for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment, prevention, or amelioration of a disease, disorder, or condition associated with SOD-1. SOD-1 associated diseases, disorders, and conditions include neurodegenerative diseases. In certain embodiments, SOD-1 associated diseases include amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
Oligomeric compounds include, but are not limited to, oligonucleotides, oligonucleosides, oligonucleotide analogs, oligonucleotide mimetics, antisense compounds, antisense oligonucleotides, modified oligonucleotides, and siRNAs. An oligomeric compound may be “antisense” to a target nucleic acid, meaning that is is capable of undergoing hybridization to a target nucleic acid through hydrogen bonding.
In certain embodiments, an antisense compound has a nucleobase sequence that, when written in the 5′ to 3′ direction, comprises the reverse complement of the target segment of a target nucleic acid to which it is targeted. In certain such embodiments, an oligonucleotide has a nucleobase sequence that, when written in the 5′ to 3′ direction, comprises the reverse complement of the target segment of a target nucleic acid to which it is targeted.
In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 12 to 30 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 12 to 25 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 12 to 22 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 14 to 20 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 15 to 25 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 18 to 22 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 19 to 21 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, the antisense compound is 8 to 80, 12 to 50, 13 to 30, 13 to 50, 14 to 30, 14 to 50, 15 to 30, 15 to 50, 16 to 30, 16 to 50, 17 to 30, 17 to 50, 18 to 30, 18 to 50, 19 to 30, 19 to 50, or 20 to 30 linked subunits in length.
In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 12 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 13 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 14 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 15 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 16 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 17 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 18 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 19 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 20 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 21 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 22 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 23 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 24 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 25 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 26 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 27 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 28 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 29 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 30 subunits in length. In certain embodiments, the antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, or 80 linked subunits in length, or a range defined by any two of the above values. In certain embodiments the antisense compound is a modified oligonucleotide, and the linked subunits are nucleosides.
In certain embodiments, oligonucleotides targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid may be shortened or truncated. For example, a single subunit may be deleted from the 5′ end (5′ truncation), or alternatively from the 3′ end (3′ truncation). A shortened or truncated antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid may have two subunits deleted from the 5′ end, or alternatively may have two subunits deleted from the 3′ end, of the antisense compound. Alternatively, the deleted nucleosides may be dispersed throughout the antisense compound, for example, in an antisense compound having one nucleoside deleted from the 5′ end and one nucleoside deleted from the 3′ end.
When a single additional subunit is present in a lengthened antisense compound, the additional subunit may be located at the 5′ or 3′ end of the antisense compound. When two or more additional subunits are present, the added subunits may be adjacent to each other, for example, in an antisense compound having two subunits added to the 5′ end (5′ addition), or alternatively to the 3′ end (3′ addition), of the antisense compound. Alternatively, the added subunits may be dispersed throughout the antisense compound, for example, in an antisense compound having one subunit added to the 5′ end and one subunit added to the 3′ end.
It is possible to increase or decrease the length of an antisense compound, such as a modified oligonucleotide, and/or introduce mismatch bases without eliminating activity. For example, in Woolf et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:7305-7309, 1992), a series of oligonucleotides 13-25 nucleobases in length were tested for their ability to induce cleavage of a target RNA in an oocyte injection model. Oligonucleotides 25 nucleobases in length with 8 or 11 mismatch bases near the ends of the oligonucleotides were able to direct specific cleavage of the target mRNA, albeit to a lesser extent than oligonucleotides that contained no mismatches. Similarly, target specific cleavage was achieved using 13 nucleobase oligonucleotides, including those with 1 or 3 mismatches.
Gautschi et al (J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 93:463-471, March 2001) demonstrated the ability of an oligonucleotide having 100% complementarity to the bcl-2 mRNA and having 3 mismatches to the bcl-xL mRNA to reduce the expression of both bcl-2 and bcl-xL in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, this oligonucleotide demonstrated potent anti-tumor activity in vivo.
Maher and Dolnick (Nuc. Acid. Res. 16:3341-3358, 1988) tested a series of tandem 14 nucleobase oligonucleotides, and a 28 and 42 nucleobase oligonucleotides comprised of the sequence of two or three of the tandem oligonucleotides, respectively, for their ability to arrest translation of human DHFR in a rabbit reticulocyte assay. Each of the three 14 nucleobase oligonucleotides alone was able to inhibit translation, albeit at a more modest level than the 28 or 42 nucleobase oligonucleotides.
Antisense Compound Motifs
In certain embodiments, antisense compounds targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid have chemically modified subunits arranged in patterns, or motifs, to confer to the antisense compounds properties such as enhanced inhibitory activity, increased binding affinity for a target nucleic acid, or resistance to degradation by in vivo nucleases.
Chimeric antisense compounds typically contain at least one region modified so as to confer increased resistance to nuclease degradation, increased cellular uptake, increased binding affinity for the target nucleic acid, and/or increased inhibitory activity. A second region of a chimeric antisense compound may optionally serve as a substrate for the cellular endonuclease RNase H, which cleaves the RNA strand of an RNA:DNA duplex.
Antisense compounds having a gapmer motif are considered chimeric antisense compounds. In a gapmer an internal region having a plurality of nucleotides that supports RNaseH cleavage is positioned between external regions having a plurality of nucleotides that are chemically distinct from the nucleosides of the internal region. In the case of an oligonucleotide having a gapmer motif, the gap segment generally serves as the substrate for endonuclease cleavage, while the wing segments comprise modified nucleosides. In certain embodiments, the regions of a gapmer are differentiated by the types of sugar moieties comprising each distinct region. The types of sugar moieties that are used to differentiate the regions of a gapmer may in some embodiments include β-D-ribonucleosides, β-D-deoxyribonucleosides, 2-modified nucleosides (such 2′-modified nucleosides may include 2′-MOE, and 2′-O—CH3, among others), and bicyclic sugar modified nucleosides (such bicyclic sugar modified nucleosides may include those having a 4′-(CH2)n—O-2′ bridge, where n=1 or n=2 and 4′-CH2—O—CH2-2′). In certain embodiments, wings may include several modified sugar moieties, including, for example 2′-MOE. In certain embodiments, wings may include several modified and unmodified sugar moieties. In certain embodiments, wings may include various combinations of 2′-MOE nucleosides and 2′-deoxynucleosides.
Each distinct region may comprise uniform sugar moieties, variant, or alternating sugar moieties. The wing-gap-wing motif is frequently described as “X—Y—Z”, where “X” represents the length of the 5′ wing, “Y” represents the length of the gap, and “Z” represents the length of the 3′ wing. “X” and “Z” may comprise uniform, variant, or alternating sugar moieties. In certain embodiments, “X” and “Y” may include one or more 2′-deoxynucleosides. “Y” may comprise 2′-deoxynucleosides. As used herein, a gapmer described as “X—Y—Z” has a configuration such that the gap is positioned immediately adjacent to each of the 5′ wing and the 3′ wing. Thus, no intervening nucleotides exist between the 5′ wing and gap, or the gap and the 3′ wing. Any of the antisense compounds described herein can have a gapmer motif. In certain embodiments, “X” and “Z” are the same; in other embodiments they are different.
In certain embodiments, gapmers provided herein include, for example 20-mers having a motif of 5-10-5.
In certain embodiments, gapmers provided herein include, for example 19-mers having a motif of 5-9-5.
In certain embodiments, gapmers provided herein include, for example 18-mers having a motif of 5-8-5.
In certain embodiments, gapmers provided herein include, for example 18-mers having a motif of 4-8-5.
In certain embodiments, gapmers provided herein include, for example 18-mers having a motif of 5-8-7.
In certain embodiments, gapmers provided herein include, for example 18-mers having a motif of 6-8-6.
In certain embodiments, gapmers provided herein include, for example 18-mers having a motif of 6-8-5.
In certain embodiments, the modified oligonucleotide contains at least one 2′-O-methoxyethyl modified nucleoside, at least one cEt modified nucleoside, and at least one 2′-deoxynucleoside. In certain embodiments, the modified oligonucleotide has a sugar chemistry motif of any of the following:
Nucleotide sequences that encode SOD-1 include, without limitation, the following: GENBANK Accession No. NM_000454.4 (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1), GENBANK Accession No. NT_011512.10 truncated from nucleotides 18693000 to 18704000 (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 2), and the complement of GENBANK Accession No. NW_001114168.1 truncated from nucleotides 2258000 to U.S. Pat. No. 2,271,000 (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 3).
It is understood that the sequence set forth in each SEQ ID NO in the Examples contained herein is independent of any modification to a sugar moiety, an internucleoside linkage, or a nucleobase. As such, antisense compounds defined by a SEQ ID NO may comprise, independently, one or more modifications to a sugar moiety, an internucleoside linkage, or a nucleobase. Antisense compounds described by Isis Number (Isis No) indicate a combination of nucleobase sequence and motif.
In certain embodiments, a target region is a structurally defined region of the target nucleic acid. For example, a target region may encompass a 3′ UTR, a 5′ UTR, an exon, an intron, an exon/intron junction, a coding region, a translation initiation region, translation termination region, or other defined nucleic acid region. The structurally defined regions for SOD-1 can be obtained by accession number from sequence databases such as NCBI and such information is incorporated herein by reference. In certain embodiments, a target region may encompass the sequence from a 5′ target site of one target segment within the target region to a 3′ target site of another target segment within the same target region.
Targeting includes determination of at least one target segment to which an antisense compound hybridizes, such that a desired effect occurs. In certain embodiments, the desired effect is a reduction in mRNA target nucleic acid levels. In certain embodiments, the desired effect is reduction of levels of protein encoded by the target nucleic acid or a phenotypic change associated with the target nucleic acid.
A target region may contain one or more target segments. Multiple target segments within a target region may be overlapping. Alternatively, they may be non-overlapping. In certain embodiments, target segments within a target region are separated by no more than about 300 nucleotides. In certain embodiments, target segments within a target region are separated by a number of nucleotides that is, is about, is no more than, is no more than about, 250, 200, 150, 100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, or 10 nucleotides on the target nucleic acid, or is a range defined by any two of the preceeding values. In certain embodiments, target segments within a target region are separated by no more than, or no more than about, 5 nucleotides on the target nucleic acid. In certain embodiments, target segments are contiguous. Contemplated are target regions defined by a range having a starting nucleic acid that is any of the 5′ target sites or 3′ target sites listed herein.
Suitable target segments may be found within a 5′ UTR, a coding region, a 3′ UTR, an intron, an exon, or an exon/intron junction. Target segments containing a start codon or a stop codon are also suitable target segments. A suitable target segment may specifically exclude a certain structurally defined region such as the start codon or stop codon.
The determination of suitable target segments may include a comparison of the sequence of a target nucleic acid to other sequences throughout the genome. For example, the BLAST algorithm may be used to identify regions of similarity amongst different nucleic acids. This comparison can prevent the selection of antisense compound sequences that may hybridize in a non-specific manner to sequences other than a selected target nucleic acid (i.e., non-target or off-target sequences).
There may be variation in activity (e.g., as defined by percent reduction of target nucleic acid levels) of the antisense compounds within an active target region. In certain embodiments, reductions in SOD-1 mRNA levels are indicative of inhibition of SOD-1 expression. Reductions in levels of a SOD-1 protein are also indicative of inhibition of target mRNA expression. Phenotypic changes are indicative of inhibition of SOD-1 expression. Improvement in neurological function is indicative of inhibition of SOD-1 expression. Improved motor function is indicative of inhibition of SOD-1 expression.
Hybridization
In some embodiments, hybridization occurs between an antisense compound disclosed herein and a SOD-1 nucleic acid. The most common mechanism of hybridization involves hydrogen bonding (e.g., Watson-Crick, Hoogsteen or reversed Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding) between complementary nucleobases of the nucleic acid molecules.
Hybridization can occur under varying conditions. Stringent conditions are sequence-dependent and are determined by the nature and composition of the nucleic acid molecules to be hybridized.
Methods of determining whether a sequence is specifically hybridizable to a target nucleic acid are well known in the art. In certain embodiments, the antisense compounds provided herein are specifically hybridizable with a SOD-1 nucleic acid.
Complementarity
An antisense compound and a target nucleic acid are complementary to each other when a sufficient number of nucleobases of the antisense compound can hydrogen bond with the corresponding nucleobases of the target nucleic acid, such that a desired effect will occur (e.g., antisense inhibition of a target nucleic acid, such as a SOD-1 nucleic acid).
Non-complementary nucleobases between an antisense compound and a SOD-1 nucleic acid may be tolerated provided that the antisense compound remains able to specifically hybridize to a target nucleic acid. Moreover, an antisense compound may hybridize over one or more segments of a SOD-1 nucleic acid such that intervening or adjacent segments are not involved in the hybridization event (e.g., a loop structure, mismatch or hairpin structure).
In certain embodiments, the antisense compounds provided herein, or a specified portion thereof, are, or are at least, 70%, 80%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100% complementary to a SOD-1 nucleic acid, a target region, target segment, or specified portion thereof. Percent complementarity of an antisense compound with a target nucleic acid can be determined using routine methods.
For example, an antisense compound in which 18 of 20 nucleobases of the antisense compound are complementary to a target region, and would therefore specifically hybridize, would represent 90 percent complementarity. In this example, the remaining noncomplementary nucleobases may be clustered or interspersed with complementary nucleobases and need not be contiguous to each other or to complementary nucleobases. As such, an antisense compound which is 18 nucleobases in length having 4 (four) noncomplementary nucleobases which are flanked by two regions of complete complementarity with the target nucleic acid would have 77.8% overall complementarity with the target nucleic acid and would thus fall within the scope of the present invention. Percent complementarity of an antisense compound with a region of a target nucleic acid can be determined routinely using BLAST programs (basic local alignment search tools) and PowerBLAST programs known in the art (Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol., 1990, 215, 403 410; Zhang and Madden, Genome Res., 1997, 7, 649 656). Percent homology, sequence identity or complementarity, can be determined by, for example, the Gap program (Wisconsin Sequence Analysis Package, Version 8 for Unix, Genetics Computer Group, University Research Park, Madison Wis.), using default settings, which uses the algorithm of Smith and Waterman (Adv. Appl. Math., 1981, 2, 482 489).
In certain embodiments, the antisense compounds provided herein, or specified portions thereof, are fully complementary (i.e., 100% complementary) to a target nucleic acid, or specified portion thereof. For example, an antisense compound may be fully complementary to a SOD-1 nucleic acid, or a target region, or a target segment or target sequence thereof. As used herein, “fully complementary” means each nucleobase of an antisense compound is capable of precise base pairing with the corresponding nucleobases of a target nucleic acid. For example, a 20 nucleobase antisense compound is fully complementary to a target sequence that is 400 nucleobases long, so long as there is a corresponding 20 nucleobase portion of the target nucleic acid that is fully complementary to the antisense compound. Fully complementary can also be used in reference to a specified portion of the first and/or the second nucleic acid. For example, a 20 nucleobase portion of a 30 nucleobase antisense compound can be “fully complementary” to a target sequence that is 400 nucleobases long. The 20 nucleobase portion of the 30 nucleobase oligonucleotide is fully complementary to the target sequence if the target sequence has a corresponding 20 nucleobase portion wherein each nucleobase is complementary to the 20 nucleobase portion of the antisense compound. At the same time, the entire 30 nucleobase antisense compound may or may not be fully complementary to the target sequence, depending on whether the remaining 10 nucleobases of the antisense compound are also complementary to the target sequence.
The location of a non-complementary nucleobase may be at the 5′ end or 3′ end of the antisense compound. Alternatively, the non-complementary nucleobase or nucleobases may be at an internal position of the antisense compound. When two or more non-complementary nucleobases are present, they may be contiguous (i.e., linked) or non-contiguous. In one embodiment, a non-complementary nucleobase is located in the wing segment of a gapmer oligonucleotide.
In certain embodiments, antisense compounds that are, or are up to 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 nucleobases in length comprise no more than 4, no more than 3, no more than 2, or no more than 1 non-complementary nucleobase(s) relative to a target nucleic acid, such as a SOD-1 nucleic acid, or specified portion thereof.
In certain embodiments, antisense compounds that are, or are up to 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, or 30 nucleobases in length comprise no more than 6, no more than 5, no more than 4, no more than 3, no more than 2, or no more than 1 non-complementary nucleobase(s) relative to a target nucleic acid, such as a SOD-1 nucleic acid, or specified portion thereof.
The antisense compounds provided herein also include those which are complementary to a portion of a target nucleic acid. As used herein, “portion” refers to a defined number of contiguous (i.e. linked) nucleobases within a region or segment of a target nucleic acid. A “portion” can also refer to a defined number of contiguous nucleobases of an antisense compound. In certain embodiments, the antisense compounds, are complementary to at least an 8 nucleobase portion of a target segment. In certain embodiments, the antisense compounds are complementary to at least a 9 nucleobase portion of a target segment. In certain embodiments, the antisense compounds are complementary to at least a 10 nucleobase portion of a target segment. In certain embodiments, the antisense compounds, are complementary to at least an 11 nucleobase portion of a target segment. In certain embodiments, the antisense compounds, are complementary to at least a 12 nucleobase portion of a target segment. In certain embodiments, the antisense compounds, are complementary to at least a 13 nucleobase portion of a target segment. In certain embodiments, the antisense compounds, are complementary to at least a 14 nucleobase portion of a target segment. In certain embodiments, the antisense compounds, are complementary to at least a 15 nucleobase portion of a target segment. Also contemplated are antisense compounds that are complementary to at least a 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, or more nucleobase portion of a target segment, or a range defined by any two of these values.
Identity
The antisense compounds provided herein may also have a defined percent identity to a particular nucleotide sequence, SEQ ID NO, or compound represented by a specific Isis number, or portion thereof. As used herein, an antisense compound is identical to the sequence disclosed herein if it has the same nucleobase pairing ability. For example, a RNA which contains uracil in place of thymidine in a disclosed DNA sequence would be considered identical to the DNA sequence since both uracil and thymidine pair with adenine. Shortened and lengthened versions of the antisense compounds described herein as well as compounds having non-identical bases relative to the antisense compounds provided herein also are contemplated. The non-identical bases may be adjacent to each other or dispersed throughout the antisense compound. Percent identity of an antisense compound is calculated according to the number of bases that have identical base pairing relative to the sequence to which it is being compared.
In certain embodiments, the antisense compounds, or portions thereof, are at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% identical to one or more of the antisense compounds or SEQ ID NOs, or a portion thereof, disclosed herein.
In certain embodiments, a portion of the antisense compound is compared to an equal length portion of the target nucleic acid. In certain embodiments, an 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, or 25 nucleobase portion is compared to an equal length portion of the target nucleic acid.
In certain embodiments, a portion of the oligonucleotide is compared to an equal length portion of the target nucleic acid. In certain embodiments, an 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, or 25 nucleobase portion is compared to an equal length portion of the target nucleic acid.
Modifications
A nucleoside is a base-sugar combination. The nucleobase (also known as base) portion of the nucleoside is normally a heterocyclic base moiety. Nucleotides are nucleosides that further include a phosphate group covalently linked to the sugar portion of the nucleoside. For those nucleosides that include a pentofuranosyl sugar, the phosphate group can be linked to the 2′, 3′ or 5′ hydroxyl moiety of the sugar. Oligonucleotides are formed through the covalent linkage of adjacent nucleosides to one another, to form a linear polymeric oligonucleotide. Within the oligonucleotide structure, the phosphate groups are commonly referred to as forming the internucleoside linkages of the oligonucleotide.
Modifications to antisense compounds encompass substitutions or changes to internucleoside linkages, sugar moieties, or nucleobases. Modified antisense compounds are often preferred over native forms because of desirable properties such as, for example, enhanced cellular uptake, enhanced affinity for nucleic acid target, increased stability in the presence of nucleases, or increased inhibitory activity.
Chemically modified nucleosides may also be employed to increase the binding affinity of a shortened or truncated oligonucleotide for its target nucleic acid. Consequently, comparable results can often be obtained with shorter antisense compounds that have such chemically modified nucleosides.
Modified Internucleoside Linkages
The naturally occurring internucleoside linkage of RNA and DNA is a 3′ to 5′ phosphodiester linkage. Antisense compounds having one or more modified, i.e. non-naturally occurring, internucleoside linkages are often selected over antisense compounds having naturally occurring internucleoside linkages because of desirable properties such as, for example, enhanced cellular uptake, enhanced affinity for target nucleic acids, and increased stability in the presence of nucleases.
Oligonucleotides having modified internucleoside linkages include internucleoside linkages that retain a phosphorus atom as well as internucleoside linkages that do not have a phosphorus atom. Representative phosphorus containing internucleoside linkages include, but are not limited to, phosphodiesters, phosphotriesters, methylphosphonates, phosphoramidate, and phosphorothioates. Methods of preparation of phosphorous-containing and non-phosphorous-containing linkages are well known.
In certain embodiments, modified oligonucleotides targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid comprise one or more modified internucleoside linkages. In certain embodiments, the modified internucleoside linkages are interspersed throughout the antisense compound. In certain embodiments, the modified internucleoside linkages are phosphorothioate linkages. In certain embodiments, each internucleoside linkage of a modified oligonucleotide is a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage.
In certain embodiments, the modified oligonucleotides targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid comprise one or more phosphodiester internucleoside linkages. In certain embodiments, modified oligonucleotides targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid comprise at least one phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage and at least one phosphodiester internucleoside linkage. In certain embodiments, the modified oligonucleotide has a mixed backbone motif of the following:
Antisense compounds of the invention can optionally contain one or more nucleosides wherein the sugar group has been modified. Such sugar modified nucleosides may impart enhanced nuclease stability, increased binding affinity, or some other beneficial biological property to the antisense compounds. In certain embodiments, nucleosides comprise chemically modified ribofuranose ring moieties. Examples of chemically modified ribofuranose rings include without limitation, addition of substitutent groups (including 5′ and 2′ substituent groups, bridging of non-geminal ring atoms to form bicyclic nucleic acids (BNA), replacement of the ribosyl ring oxygen atom with S, N(R), or C(R1)(R2) (R, R1 and R2 are each independently H, C1-C12 alkyl or a protecting group) and combinations thereof. Examples of chemically modified sugars include 2′-F-5′-methyl substituted nucleoside (see PCT International Application WO 2008/101157 Published on Aug. 21, 2008 for other disclosed 5′,2′-bis substituted nucleosides) or replacement of the ribosyl ring oxygen atom with S with further substitution at the 2′-position (see published U.S. Patent Application US2005-0130923, published on Jun. 16, 2005) or alternatively 5′-substitution of a BNA (see PCT International Application WO 2007/134181 Published on Nov. 22, 2007 wherein LNA is substituted with for example a 5′-methyl or a 5′-vinyl group).
Examples of nucleosides having modified sugar moieties include without limitation nucleosides comprising 5′-vinyl, 5′-methyl (R or S), 4′-S, 2′-F, 2′-OCH3, 2′-OCH2CH3, 2′-OCH2CH2F and 2′-O(CH2)2OCH3 substituent groups. The substituent at the 2′ position can also be selected from allyl, amino, azido, thio, O-allyl, O—C1-C10 alkyl, OCF3, OCH2F, O(CH2)2SCH3, O(CH2)2—O—N(Rm)(Rn), O—CH2—C(═O)—N(Rm)(Rn), and O—CH2—C(═O)—N(R1)—(CH2)2—N(Rm)(Rn), where each R1, Rm and Rn is, independently, H or substituted or unsubstituted C1-C10 alkyl.
As used herein, “bicyclic nucleosides” refer to modified nucleosides comprising a bicyclic sugar moiety. Examples of bicyclic nucleic acids (BNAs) include without limitation nucleosides comprising a bridge between the 4′ and the 2′ ribosyl ring atoms. In certain embodiments, antisense compounds provided herein include one or more BNA nucleosides wherein the bridge comprises one of the formulas: 4′-(CH2)—O-2′ (LNA); 4′-(CH2)—S-2′; 4′-(CH2)2—O-2′ (ENA); 4′-CH(CH3)—O-2′ and 4′-CH(CH2OCH3)—O-2′ (and analogs thereof see U.S. Pat. No. 7,399,845, issued on Jul. 15, 2008); 4′-C(CH3)(CH3)—O-2′ (and analogs thereof see PCT/US2008/068922 published as WO/2009/006478, published Jan. 8, 2009); 4′-CH2—N(OCH3)-2′ (and analogs thereof see PCT/US2008/064591 published as WO/2008/150729, published Dec. 11, 2008); 4′-CH2—O—N(CH3)-2′ (see published U.S. Patent Application US2004-0171570, published Sep. 2, 2004); 4′-CH2—N(R)—O-2′, wherein R is H, C1-C12 alkyl, or a protecting group (see U.S. Pat. No. 7,427,672, issued on Sep. 23, 2008); 4′-CH2—C(H)(CH3)-2′ (see Chattopadhyaya et al., J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 118-134); and 4′-CH2—C(═CH2)-2′ (and analogs thereof see PCT/US2008/066154 published as WO 2008/154401, published on Dec. 8, 2008).
Further bicyclic nucleosides have been reported in published literature (see for example: Srivastava et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129(26) 8362-8379; Frieden et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, 21, 6365-6372; Elayadi et al., Curr. Opinion Invens. Drugs, 2001, 2, 558-561; Braasch et al., Chem. Biol., 2001, 8, 1-7; Orum et al., Curr. Opinion Mol. Ther., 2001, 3, 239-243; Wahlestedt et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2000, 97, 5633-5638; Singh et al., Chem. Commun., 1998, 4, 455-456; Koshkin et al., Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 3607-3630; Kumar et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1998, 8, 2219-2222; Singh et al., J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 10035-10039; U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,399,845; 7,053,207; 7,034,133; 6,794,499; 6,770,748; 6,670,461; 6,525,191; 6,268,490; U.S. Patent Publication Nos.: US2008-0039618; US2007-0287831; US2004-0171570; U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/129,154; 61/099,844; 61/097,787; 61/086,231; 61/056,564; 61/026,998; 61/026,995; 60/989,574; International applications WO 2007/134181; WO 2005/021570; WO 2004/106356; WO 94/14226; and PCT International Applications Nos.: PCT/US2008/068922; PCT/US2008/066154; and PCT/US2008/064591). Each of the foregoing bicyclic nucleosides can be prepared having one or more stereochemical sugar configurations including for example α-L-ribofuranose and β-D-ribofuranose (see PCT international application PCT/DK98/00393, published on Mar. 25, 1999 as WO 99/14226).
As used herein, “monocylic nucleosides” refer to nucleosides comprising modified sugar moieties that are not bicyclic sugar moieties. In certain embodiments, the sugar moiety, or sugar moiety analogue, of a nucleoside may be modified or substituted at any position.
As used herein, “4′-2′ bicyclic nucleoside” or “4′ to 2′ bicyclic nucleoside” refers to a bicyclic nucleoside comprising a furanose ring comprising a bridge connecting two carbon atoms of the furanose ring connects the 2′ carbon atom and the 4′ carbon atom of the sugar ring.
In certain embodiments, bicyclic sugar moieties of BNA nucleosides include, but are not limited to, compounds having at least one bridge between the 4′ and the 2′ carbon atoms of the pentofuranosyl sugar moiety including without limitation, bridges comprising 1 or from 1 to 4 linked groups independently selected from —[C(Ra)(Rb)]n—, —C(Ra)═C(Rb)—, —C(Ra)═N—, —C(═NRa)—, —C(═O)—, —C(═S)—, —O—, —Si(Ra)2—, —S(═O)x—, and —N(Ra)—; wherein: x is 0, 1, or 2; n is 1, 2, 3, or 4; each Ra and Rb is, independently, H, a protecting group, hydroxyl, C1-C12 alkyl, substituted C1-C12 alkyl, C2-C12 alkenyl, substituted C2-C12 alkenyl, C2-C12 alkynyl, substituted C2-C12 alkynyl, C5-C20 aryl, substituted C5-C20 aryl, heterocycle radical, substituted heterocycle radical, heteroaryl, substituted heteroaryl, C5-C7 alicyclic radical, substituted C5-C7 alicyclic radical, halogen, OJ1, NJ1J2, SJ1, N3, COOJ1, acyl (C(═O)—H), substituted acyl, CN, sulfonyl (S(═O)2-J1), or sulfoxyl (S(═O)-J1); and each J1 and J2 is, independently, H, C1-C12 alkyl, substituted C1-C12 alkyl, C2-C12 alkenyl, substituted C2-C12 alkenyl, C2-C12 alkynyl, substituted C2-C12 alkynyl, C5-C20 aryl, substituted C5-C20 aryl, acyl (C(═O)—H), substituted acyl, a heterocycle radical, a substituted heterocycle radical, C1-C12 aminoalkyl, substituted C1-C12 aminoalkyl or a protecting group.
In certain embodiments, the bridge of a bicyclic sugar moiety is, —[C(Ra)(Rb)]n—, —[C(Ra)(Rb)]n—O—, —C(RaRb)—N(R)—O— or —C(RaRb)—O—N(R)—. In certain embodiments, the bridge is 4′-CH2-2′, 4′-(CH2)2-2′, 4′-(CH2)3-2′, 4′-CH2—O-2′, 4′-(CH2)2—O-2′, 4′-CH2—O—N(R)-2′ and 4′-CH2—N(R)—O-2′- wherein each R is, independently, H, a protecting group or C1-C12 alkyl.
In certain embodiments, bicyclic nucleosides are further defined by isomeric configuration. For example, a nucleoside comprising a 4′-(CH2)—O-2′ bridge, may be in the α-L configuration or in the β-D configuration. Previously, α-L-methyleneoxy (4′-CH2—O-2′) BNA's have been incorporated into antisense oligonucleotides that showed antisense activity (Frieden et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, 21, 6365-6372).
In certain embodiments, bicyclic nucleosides include those having a 4′ to 2′ bridge wherein such bridges include without limitation, α-L-4′-(CH2)—O-2′, β-D-4′-CH2—O-2′, 4′-(CH2)2—O-2′, 4′-CH2—O—N(R)-2′, 4′-CH2—N(R)—O-2′, 4′-CH(CH3)—O-2′, 4′-CH2—S-2′, 4′-CH2—N(R)-2′, 4′-CH2—CH(CH3)-2′, and 4′-(CH2)3-2′, wherein R is H, a protecting group or C1-C12 alkyl.
In certain embodiment, bicyclic nucleosides have the formula:
wherein:
Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;
-Qa-Qb-Qc- is —CH2—N(Rc)—CH2—, —C(═O)—N(Rc)—CH2—, —CH2—O—N(Rc)—, —CH2—N(Rc)—O— or —N(Rc)—O—CH2;
Rc is C1-C12 alkyl or an amino protecting group; and
Ta and Tb are each, independently H, a hydroxyl protecting group, a conjugate group, a reactive phosphorus group, a phosphorus moiety or a covalent attachment to a support medium.
In certain embodiments, bicyclic nucleosides have the formula:
wherein:
Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;
Ta and Tb are each, independently H, a hydroxyl protecting group, a conjugate group, a reactive phosphorus group, a phosphorus moiety or a covalent attachment to a support medium;
Za is C1-C6 alkyl, C2-C6 alkenyl, C2-C6 alkynyl, substituted C1-C6 alkyl, substituted C2-C6 alkenyl, substituted C2-C6 alkynyl, acyl, substituted acyl, substituted amide, thiol or substituted thiol.
In one embodiment, each of the substituted groups, is, independently, mono or poly substituted with substituent groups independently selected from halogen, oxo, hydroxyl, OJc, NJcJd, SJc, N3, OC(═X)Jc, and NJeC(═X)NJcJd, wherein each Jc, Jd and Je is, independently, H, C1-C6 alkyl, or substituted C1-C6 alkyl and X is O or NJc.
In certain embodiments, bicyclic nucleosides have the formula:
wherein:
Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;
Ta and Tb are each, independently H, a hydroxyl protecting group, a conjugate group, a reactive phosphorus group, a phosphorus moiety or a covalent attachment to a support medium;
Zb is C1-C6 alkyl, C2-C6 alkenyl, C2-C6 alkynyl, substituted C1-C6 alkyl, substituted C2-C6 alkenyl, substituted C2-C6 alkynyl or substituted acyl (C(═O)—).
In certain embodiments, bicyclic nucleosides have the formula:
wherein:
Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;
Ta and Tb are each, independently H, a hydroxyl protecting group, a conjugate group, a reactive phosphorus group, a phosphorus moiety or a covalent attachment to a support medium;
Rd is C1-C6 alkyl, substituted C1-C6 alkyl, C2-C6 alkenyl, substituted C2-C6 alkenyl, C2-C6 alkynyl or substituted C2-C6 alkynyl;
each qa, qb, qc and qd is, independently, H, halogen, C1-C6 alkyl, substituted C1-C6 alkyl, C2-C6 alkenyl, substituted C2-C6 alkenyl, C2-C6 alkynyl or substituted C2-C6 alkynyl, C1-C6 alkoxyl, substituted C1-C6 alkoxyl, acyl, substituted acyl, C1-C6 aminoalkyl or substituted C1-C6 aminoalkyl;
In certain embodiments, bicyclic nucleosides have the formula:
wherein:
Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;
Ta and Tb are each, independently H, a hydroxyl protecting group, a conjugate group, a reactive phosphorus group, a phosphorus moiety or a covalent attachment to a support medium;
qa, qb, qe and qf are each, independently, hydrogen, halogen, C1-C12 alkyl, substituted C1-C12 alkyl, C2-C12 alkenyl, substituted C2-C12 alkenyl, C2-C12 alkynyl, substituted C2-C12 alkynyl, C1-C12 alkoxy, substituted C1-C12 alkoxy, OJj, SJj, SOJj, SO2Jj, NJjJk, N3, CN, C(═O)OJj, C(═O)NJjJk, C(═O)Jj, O—C(═O)NJjJk, N(H)C(═NH)NJjJk, N(H)C(═O)NJjJk or N(H)C(═S)NJjJk;
or qe and qf together are ═C(qg)(qh);
qg and qh are each, independently, H, halogen, C1-C12 alkyl or substituted C1-C12 alkyl.
The synthesis and preparation of adenine, cytosine, guanine, 5-methyl-cytosine, thymine and uracil bicyclic nucleosides having a 4′-CH2—O-2′ bridge, along with their oligomerization, and nucleic acid recognition properties have been described (Koshkin et al., Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 3607-3630). The synthesis of bicyclic nucleosides has also been described in WO 98/39352 and WO 99/14226.
Analogs of various bicyclic nucleosides that have 4′ to 2′ bridging groups such as 4′-CH2—O-2′ and 4′-CH2—S-2′, have also been prepared (Kumar et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1998, 8, 2219-2222). Preparation of oligodeoxyribonucleotide duplexes comprising bicyclic nucleosides for use as substrates for nucleic acid polymerases has also been described (Wengel et al., WO 99/14226). Furthermore, synthesis of 2′-amino-BNA, a novel conformationally restricted high-affinity oligonucleotide analog has been described in the art (Singh et al., J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 10035-10039). In addition, 2′-amino- and 2′-methylamino-BNA's have been prepared and the thermal stability of their duplexes with complementary RNA and DNA strands has been previously reported.
In certain embodiments, bicyclic nucleosides have the formula:
wherein:
Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;
Ta and Tb are each, independently H, a hydroxyl protecting group, a conjugate group, a reactive phosphorus group, a phosphorus moiety or a covalent attachment to a support medium;
each qi, qj, qk and ql is, independently, H, halogen, C1-C12 alkyl, substituted C1-C12 alkyl, C2-C12 alkenyl, substituted C2-C12 alkenyl, C2-C12 alkynyl, substituted C2-C12 alkynyl, C1-C12 alkoxyl, substituted C1-C12 alkoxyl, OJj, SJj, SOJj, SO2Jj, NJjJk, N3, CN, C(═O)OJj, C(═O)NJjJk, C(═O)Jj, O—C(═O)NJjJk, N(H)C(═NH)NJjJk, N(H)C(═O)NJjJk or N(H)C(═S)NJjJk; and qi and qj or qi and qk together are ═C(qg)(qh), wherein qg and qh are each, independently, H, halogen, C1-C12 alkyl or substituted C1-C12 alkyl.
One carbocyclic bicyclic nucleoside having a 4′-(CH2)3-2′ bridge and the alkenyl analog bridge 4′-CH═CH—CH2-2′ have been described (Frier et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 1997, 25(22), 4429-4443 and Albaek et al., J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 7731-7740). The synthesis and preparation of carbocyclic bicyclic nucleosides along with their oligomerization and biochemical studies have also been described (Srivastava et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129(26), 8362-8379).
In certain embodiments, bicyclic nucleosides include, but are not limited to, (A) α-L-methyleneoxy (4′-CH2—O-2′) BNA, (B) β-D-methyleneoxy (4′-CH2—O-2′) BNA, (C) ethyleneoxy (4′-(CH2)2—O-2′) BNA, (D) aminooxy (4′-CH2—O—N(R)-2′) BNA, (E) oxyamino (4′-CH2—N(R)—O-2′) BNA, (F) methyl(methyleneoxy) (4′-CH(CH3)—O-2′) BNA (also referred to as constrained ethyl or cEt), (G) methylene-thio (4′-CH2—S-2′) BNA, (H) methylene-amino (4′-CH2—N(R)-2′) BNA, (I) methyl carbocyclic (4′-CH2—CH(CH3)-2′) BNA, (J) propylene carbocyclic (4′-(CH2)3-2′) BNA, and (K) vinyl BNA as depicted below.
wherein Bx is the base moiety and R is, independently, H, a protecting group, C1-C6 alkyl or C1-C6 alkoxy.
As used herein, the term “modified tetrahydropyran nucleoside” or “modified THP nucleoside” means a nucleoside having a six-membered tetrahydropyran “sugar” substituted for the pentofuranosyl residue in normal nucleosides and can be referred to as a sugar surrogate. Modified THP nucleosides include, but are not limited to, what is referred to in the art as hexitol nucleic acid (HNA), anitol nucleic acid (ANA), manitol nucleic acid (MNA) (see Leumann, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2002, 10, 841-854) or fluoro HNA (F-HNA) having a tetrahydropyranyl ring system as illustrated below.
In certain embodiment, sugar surrogates are selected having the formula:
wherein:
Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;
T3 and T4 are each, independently, an internucleoside linking group linking the tetrahydropyran nucleoside analog to the oligomeric compound or one of T3 and T4 is an internucleoside linking group linking the tetrahydropyran nucleoside analog to an oligomeric compound or oligonucleotide and the other of T3 and T4 is H, a hydroxyl protecting group, a linked conjugate group or a 5′ or 3-terminal group;
q1, q2, q3, q4, q5, q6 and q7 are each independently, H, C1-C6 alkyl, substituted C1-C6 alkyl, C2-C6 alkenyl, substituted C2-C6 alkenyl, C2-C6 alkynyl or substituted C2-C6 alkynyl; and
one of R1 and R2 is hydrogen and the other is selected from halogen, substituted or unsubstituted alkoxy, NJ1J2, SJ1, N3, OC(═X)J1, OC(═X)NJ1J2, NJ3C(═X)NJ1J2 and CN, wherein X is O, S or NJ1 and each J1, J2 and J3 is, independently, H or C1-C6 alkyl.
In certain embodiments, q1, q2, q3, q4, q5, q6 and q7 are each H. In certain embodiments, at least one of q1, q2, q3, q4, q5, q6 and q7 is other than H. In certain embodiments, at least one of q1, q2, q3, q4, q5, q6 and q7 is methyl. In certain embodiments, THP nucleosides are provided wherein one of R1 and R2 is F. In certain embodiments, R1 is fluoro and R2 is H; R1 is methoxy and R2 is H, and R1 is methoxyethoxy and R2 is H.
In certain embodiments, sugar surrogates comprise rings having more than 5 atoms and more than one heteroatom. For example nucleosides comprising morpholino sugar moieties and their use in oligomeric compounds has been reported (see for example: Braasch et al., Biochemistry, 2002, 41, 4503-4510; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,698,685; 5,166,315; 5,185,444; and 5,034,506). As used here, the term “morpholino” means a sugar surrogate having the following formula:
In certain embodiments, morpholinos may be modified, for example by adding or altering various substituent groups from the above morpholino structure. Such sugar surrogates are referred to herein as “modified morpholinos.”
Combinations of modifications are also provided without limitation, such as 2′-F-5′-methyl substituted nucleosides (see PCT International Application WO 2008/101157 published on Aug. 21, 2008 for other disclosed 5′, 2′-bis substituted nucleosides) and replacement of the ribosyl ring oxygen atom with S and further substitution at the 2′-position (see published U.S. Patent Application US2005-0130923, published on Jun. 16, 2005) or alternatively 5′-substitution of a bicyclic nucleic acid (see PCT International Application WO 2007/134181, published on Nov. 22, 2007 wherein a 4′-CH2—O-2′ bicyclic nucleoside is further substituted at the 5′ position with a 5′-methyl or a 5′-vinyl group). The synthesis and preparation of carbocyclic bicyclic nucleosides along with their oligomerization and biochemical studies have also been described (see, e.g., Srivastava et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129(26), 8362-8379).
In certain embodiments, antisense compounds comprise one or more modified cyclohexenyl nucleosides, which is a nucleoside having a six-membered cyclohexenyl in place of the pentofuranosyl residue in naturally occurring nucleosides. Modified cyclohexenyl nucleosides include, but are not limited to those described in the art (see for example commonly owned, published PCT Application WO 2010/036696, published on Apr. 10, 2010, Robeyns et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130(6), 1979-1984; Horvith et al., Tetrahedron Letters, 2007, 48, 3621-3623; Nauwelaerts et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129(30), 9340-9348; Gu et al., Nucleosides, Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids, 2005, 24(5-7), 993-998; Nauwelaerts et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 2005, 33(8), 2452-2463; Robeyns et al., Acta Crystallographica, Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications, 2005, F61(6), 585-586; Gu et al., Tetrahedron, 2004, 60(9), 2111-2123; Gu et al., Oligonucleotides, 2003, 13(6), 479-489; Wang et al., J. Org. Chem., 2003, 68, 4499-4505; Verbeure et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, 29(24), 4941-4947; Wang et al., J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 8478-82; Wang et al., Nucleosides, Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids, 2001, 20(4-7), 785-788; Wang et al., J. Am. Chem., 2000, 122, 8595-8602; Published PCT application, WO 06/047842; and Published PCT Application WO 01/049687; the text of each is incorporated by reference herein, in their entirety). Certain modified cyclohexenyl nucleosides have Formula X.
wherein independently for each of said at least one cyclohexenyl nucleoside analog of Formula X:
Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;
T3 and T4 are each, independently, an internucleoside linking group linking the cyclohexenyl nucleoside analog to an antisense compound or one of T3 and T4 is an internucleoside linking group linking the tetrahydropyran nucleoside analog to an antisense compound and the other of T3 and T4 is H, a hydroxyl protecting group, a linked conjugate group, or a 5′- or 3′-terminal group; and
q1, q2, q3, q4, q5, q6, q7, q8 and q9 are each, independently, H, C1-C6 alkyl, substituted C1-C6 alkyl, C2-C6 alkenyl, substituted C2-C6 alkenyl, C2-C6 alkynyl, substituted C2-C6 alkynyl or other sugar substituent group.
Many other monocyclic, bicyclic and tricyclic ring systems are known in the art and are suitable as sugar surrogates that can be used to modify nucleosides for incorporation into oligomeric compounds as provided herein (see for example review article: Leumann, Christian J. Bioorg. & Med. Chem., 2002, 10, 841-854). Such ring systems can undergo various additional substitutions to further enhance their activity.
As used herein, “2′-modified sugar” means a furanosyl sugar modified at the 2′ position. In certain embodiments, such modifications include substituents selected from: a halide, including, but not limited to substituted and unsubstituted alkoxy, substituted and unsubstituted thioalkyl, substituted and unsubstituted amino alkyl, substituted and unsubstituted alkyl, substituted and unsubstituted allyl, and substituted and unsubstituted alkynyl. In certain embodiments, 2′ modifications are selected from substituents including, but not limited to: O[(CH2)nO]mCH3, O(CH2)nNH2, O(CH2)nCH3, O(CH2)nF, O(CH2)nONH2, OCH2C(═O)N(H)CH3, and O(CH2)nON[(CH2)nCH3]2, where n and m are from 1 to about 10. Other 2′-substituent groups can also be selected from: C1-C12 alkyl, substituted alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, alkaryl, aralkyl, O-alkaryl or O-aralkyl, SH, SCH3, OCN, Cl, Br, CN, F, CF3, OCF3, SOCH3, SO2CH3, ONO2, NO2, N3, NH2, heterocycloalkyl, heterocycloalkaryl, aminoalkylamino, polyalkylamino, substituted silyl, an RNA cleaving group, a reporter group, an intercalator, a group for improving pharmacokinetic properties, or a group for improving the pharmacodynamic properties of an antisense compound, and other substituents having similar properties. In certain embodiments, modified nucleosides comprise a 2′-MOE side chain (Baker et al., J. Biol. Chem., 1997, 272, 11944-12000). Such 2′-MOE substitution have been described as having improved binding affinity compared to unmodified nucleosides and to other modified nucleosides, such as 2′-O-methyl, O-propyl, and O-aminopropyl. Oligonucleotides having the 2′-MOE substituent also have been shown to be antisense inhibitors of gene expression with promising features for in vivo use (Martin, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1995, 78, 486-504; Altmann et al., Chimia, 1996, 50, 168-176; Altmann et al., Biochem. Soc. Trans., 1996, 24, 630-637; and Altmann et al., Nucleosides Nucleotides, 1997, 16, 917-926).
As used herein, “2′-modified” or “2′-substituted” refers to a nucleoside comprising a sugar comprising a substituent at the 2′ position other than H or OH. 2′-modified nucleosides, include, but are not limited to, bicyclic nucleosides wherein the bridge connecting two carbon atoms of the sugar ring connects the 2′ carbon and another carbon of the sugar ring; and nucleosides with non-bridging 2′ substituents, such as allyl, amino, azido, thio, O-allyl, O—C1-C10 alkyl, —OCF3, O—(CH2)2—O—CH3, 2′-O(CH2)2SCH3, O—(CH2)2—O—N(Rm)(Rn), or O—CH2—C(═O)—N(Rm)(Rn), where each Rm and Rn is, independently, H or substituted or unsubstituted C1-C10 alkyl. 2′-modified nucleosides may further comprise other modifications, for example at other positions of the sugar and/or at the nucleobase.
As used herein, “2′-F” refers to a nucleoside comprising a sugar comprising a fluoro group at the 2′ position of the sugar ring.
As used herein, “2′-OMe” or “2′-OCH3”, “2′-O-methyl” or “2′-methoxy” each refers to a nucleoside comprising a sugar comprising an —OCH3 group at the 2′ position of the sugar ring.
As used herein, “MOE” or “2′-MOE” or “2′-OCH2CH2OCH3” or “2′-O-methoxyethyl” each refers to a nucleoside comprising a sugar comprising a —OCH2CH2OCH3 group at the 2′ position of the sugar ring.
Methods for the preparations of modified sugars are well known to those skilled in the art. Some representative U.S. patents that teach the preparation of such modified sugars include without limitation, U.S. Pat. Nos.: 4,981,957; 5,118,800; 5,319,080; 5,359,044; 5,393,878; 5,446,137; 5,466,786; 5,514,785; 5,519,134; 5,567,811; 5,576,427; 5,591,722; 5,597,909; 5,610,300; 5,627,053; 5,639,873; 5,646,265; 5,670,633; 5,700,920; 5,792,847 and 6,600,032 and International Application PCT/US2005/019219, filed Jun. 2, 2005 and published as WO 2005/121371 on Dec. 22, 2005, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
As used herein, “oligonucleotide” refers to a compound comprising a plurality of linked nucleosides. In certain embodiments, one or more of the plurality of nucleosides is modified. In certain embodiments, an oligonucleotide comprises one or more ribonucleosides (RNA) and/or deoxyribonucleosides (DNA).
In nucleotides having modified sugar moieties, the nucleobase moieties (natural, modified or a combination thereof) are maintained for hybridization with an appropriate nucleic acid target.
In certain embodiments, antisense compounds comprise one or more nucleosides having modified sugar moieties. In certain embodiments, the modified sugar moiety is 2′-MOE. In certain embodiments, the 2′-MOE modified nucleosides are arranged in a gapmer motif. In certain embodiments, the modified sugar moiety is a bicyclic nucleoside having a (4′-CH(CH3)—O-2′) bridging group. In certain embodiments, the (4′-CH(CH3)—O-2′) modified nucleosides are arranged throughout the wings of a gapmer motif.
Compositions and Methods for Formulating Pharmaceutical Compositions
Oligonucleotides may be admixed with pharmaceutically acceptable active or inert substances for the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions or formulations. Compositions and methods for the formulation of pharmaceutical compositions are dependent upon a number of criteria, including, but not limited to, route of administration, extent of disease, or dose to be administered.
An antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid can be utilized in pharmaceutical compositions by combining the antisense compound with a suitable pharmaceutically acceptable diluent or carrier. A pharmaceutically acceptable diluent includes phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). PBS is a diluent suitable for use in compositions to be delivered parenterally. Accordingly, in one embodiment, employed in the methods described herein is a pharmaceutical composition comprising an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid and a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent. In certain embodiments, the pharmaceutically acceptable diluent is PBS. In certain embodiments, the antisense compound is a modified oligonucleotide.
Pharmaceutical compositions comprising antisense compounds encompass any pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters, or salts of such esters, or any other oligonucleotide which, upon administration to an animal, including a human, is capable of providing (directly or indirectly) the biologically active metabolite or residue thereof. Accordingly, for example, the disclosure is also drawn to pharmaceutically acceptable salts of antisense compounds, prodrugs, pharmaceutically acceptable salts of such prodrugs, and other bioequivalents. Suitable pharmaceutically acceptable salts include, but are not limited to, sodium and potassium salts.
A prodrug can include the incorporation of additional nucleosides at one or both ends of an antisense compound which are cleaved by endogenous nucleases within the body, to form the active antisense compound.
Conjugated Antisense Compounds
Antisense compounds may be covalently linked to one or more moieties or conjugates which enhance the activity, cellular distribution or cellular uptake of the resulting oligonucleotides. Typical conjugate groups include cholesterol moieties and lipid moieties. Additional conjugate groups include carbohydrates, phospholipids, biotin, phenazine, folate, phenanthridine, anthraquinone, acridine, fluoresceins, rhodamines, coumarins, and dyes.
Antisense compounds can also be modified to have one or more stabilizing groups that are generally attached to one or both termini of antisense compounds to enhance properties such as, for example, nuclease stability. Included in stabilizing groups are cap structures. These terminal modifications protect the antisense compound having terminal nucleic acid from exonuclease degradation, and can help in delivery and/or localization within a cell. The cap can be present at the 5′-terminus (5′-cap), or at the 3′-terminus (3′-cap), or can be present on both termini. Cap structures are well known in the art and include, for example, inverted deoxy abasic caps. Further 3′ and 5′-stabilizing groups that can be used to cap one or both ends of an antisense compound to impart nuclease stability include those disclosed in WO 03/004602 published on Jan. 16, 2003.
Cell Culture and Antisense Compounds Treatment
The effects of antisense compounds on the level, activity or expression of SOD-1 nucleic acids can be tested in vitro in a variety of cell types. Cell types used for such analyses are available from commerical vendors (e.g. American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va.; Zen-Bio, Inc., Research Triangle Park, N.C.; Clonetics Corporation, Walkersville, Md.) and are cultured according to the vendor's instructions using commercially available reagents (e.g. Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif.). Illustrative cell types include, but are not limited to, HepG2 cells, Hep3B cells, primary hepatocytes, A431 cells, and SH-SY5Y cells.
In Vitro Testing of Oligonucleotides
Described herein are methods for treatment of cells with oligonucleotides, which can be modified appropriately for treatment with other antisense compounds.
Cells may be treated with oligonucleotides when the cells reach approximately 60-80% confluency in culture.
One reagent commonly used to introduce oligonucleotides into cultured cells includes the cationic lipid transfection reagent LIPOFECTIN (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). Oligonucleotides may be mixed with LIPOFECTIN in OPTI-MEM 1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) to achieve the desired final concentration of oligonucleotide and a LIPOFECTIN concentration that may range from 2 to 12 ug/mL per 100 nM oligonucleotide.
Another reagent used to introduce oligonucleotides into cultured cells includes LIPOFECTAMINE (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). Oligonucleotide is mixed with LIPOFECTAMINE in OPTI-MEM 1 reduced serum medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) to achieve the desired concentration of oligonucleotide and a LIPOFECTAMINE concentration that may range from 2 to 12 ug/mL per 100 nM oligonucleotide.
Another technique used to introduce oligonucleotides into cultured cells includes electroporation.
Cells are treated with oligonucleotides by routine methods. Cells may be harvested 16-24 hours after oligonucleotide treatment, at which time RNA or protein levels of target nucleic acids are measured by methods known in the art and described herein. In general, when treatments are performed in multiple replicates, the data are presented as the average of the replicate treatments.
The concentration of oligonucleotide used varies from cell line to cell line. Methods to determine the optimal oligonucleotide concentration for a particular cell line are well known in the art. Oligonucleotides are typically used at concentrations ranging from 1 nM to 300 nM when transfected with LIPOFECTAMINE. Oligonucleotides are used at higher concentrations ranging from 625 to 20,000 nM when transfected using electroporation.
RNA Isolation
RNA analysis can be performed on total cellular RNA or poly(A)+ mRNA. Methods of RNA isolation are well known in the art. RNA is prepared using methods well known in the art, for example, using the TRIZOL Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's recommended protocols.
Analysis of Inhibition of Target Levels or Expression
Inhibition of levels or expression of a SOD-1 nucleic acid can be assayed in a variety of ways known in the art. For example, target nucleic acid levels can be quantitated by, e.g., Northern blot analysis, competitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or quantitaive real-time PCR. RNA analysis can be performed on total cellular RNA or poly(A)+ mRNA. Methods of RNA isolation are well known in the art. Northern blot analysis is also routine in the art. Quantitative real-time PCR can be conveniently accomplished using the commercially available ABI PRISM 7600, 7700, or 7900 Sequence Detection System, available from PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif. and used according to manufacturer's instructions.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of Target RNA Levels
Quantitation of target RNA levels may be accomplished by quantitative real-time PCR using the ABI PRISM 7600, 7700, or 7900 Sequence Detection System (PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) according to manufacturer's instructions. Methods of quantitative real-time PCR are well known in the art.
Prior to real-time PCR, the isolated RNA is subjected to a reverse transcriptase (RT) reaction, which produces complementary DNA (cDNA) that is then used as the substrate for the real-time PCR amplification. The RT and real-time PCR reactions are performed sequentially in the same sample well. RT and real-time PCR reagents may be obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, Calif.). RT real-time-PCR reactions are carried out by methods well known to those skilled in the art.
Gene (or RNA) target quantities obtained by real time PCR are normalized using either the expression level of a gene whose expression is constant, such as cyclophilin A, or by quantifying total RNA using RIBOGREEN (Invitrogen, Inc. Carlsbad, Calif.). Cyclophilin A expression is quantified by real time PCR, by being run simultaneously with the target, multiplexing, or separately. Total RNA is quantified using RIBOGREEN RNA quantification reagent (Invetrogen, Inc. Eugene, Oreg.). Methods of RNA quantification by RIBOGREEN are SOD-1ght in Jones, L. J., et al, (Analytical Biochemistry, 1998, 265, 368-374). A CYTOFLUOR 4000 instrument (PE Applied Biosystems) is used to measure RIBOGREEN fluorescence.
Probes and primers are designed to hybridize to a SOD-1 nucleic acid. Methods for designing real-time PCR probes and primers are well known in the art, and may include the use of software such as PRIMER EXPRESS Software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.).
Analysis of Protein Levels
Antisense inhibition of SOD-1 nucleic acids can be assessed by measuring SOD-1 protein levels. Protein levels of SOD-1 can be evaluated or quantitated in a variety of ways well known in the art, such as immunoprecipitation, Western blot analysis (immunoblotting), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), quantitative protein assays, protein activity assays (for example, caspase activity assays), immunohistochemistry, immunocytochemistry or fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Antibodies directed to a target can be identified and obtained from a variety of sources, such as the MSRS catalog of antibodies (Aerie Corporation, Birmingham, Mich.), or can be prepared via conventional monoclonal or polyclonal antibody generation methods well known in the art. In certain embodiments, the compounds herein provide improved reduction in protein levels.
In Vivo Testing of Antisense Compounds
Antisense compounds, for example, modified oligonucleotides, are tested in animals to assess their ability to inhibit expression of SOD-1 and produce phenotypic changes, such as, improved motor function. In certain embodiments, motor function is measured by walking initiation analysis, rotarod, grip strength, pole climb, open field performance, balance beam, hindpaw footprint testing in the animal. Testing may be performed in normal animals, or in experimental disease models. For administration to animals, oligonucleotides are formulated in a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent, such as phosphate-buffered saline. Administration includes parenteral routes of administration, such as intraperitoneal, intravenous, and subcutaneous. Oligonucleotide dosage and dosing frequency depends upon multiple factors such as, but not limited to, route of administration and animal body weight. Following a period of treatment with oligonucleotides, RNA is isolated from CNS tissue or CSF and changes in SOD-1 nucleic acid expression are measured.
Certain Indications
In certain embodiments, provided herein are methods, compounds, and compositions of treating an individual comprising administering one or more pharmaceutical compositions described herein. In certain embodiments, the individual has a neurodegenerative disease. In certain embodiments, the individual is at risk for developing a neurodegenerative disease, including, but not limited to, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In certain embodiments, the individual has been identified as having a SOD-1 associated disease. In certain embodiments, provided herein are methods for prophylactically reducing SOD-1 expression in an individual. Certain embodiments include treating an individual in need thereof by administering to an individual a therapeutically effective amount of an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid.
In one embodiment, administration of a therapeutically effective amount of an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid is accompanied by monitoring of SOD-1 levels in an individual, to determine an individual's response to administration of the antisense compound. An individual's response to administration of the antisense compound may be used by a physician to determine the amount and duration of therapeutic intervention.
In certain embodiments, administration of an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid results in reduction of SOD-1 expression by at least 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, or 100%, or a range defined by any two of these values. In certain embodiments, administration of an antisense compound targeted to a SOD-1 nucleic acid results in improved motor function in an animal. In certain embodiments, administration of a SOD-1 antisense compound improves motor function by at least 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, or 100%, or a range defined by any two of these values.
In certain embodiments, pharmaceutical compositions comprising an antisense compound targeted to SOD-1 are used for the preparation of a medicament for treating a patient suffering or susceptible to a neurodegenerative disease including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
Certain Comparator Compositions
Antisense oligonucleotides targeting human SOD-1 were described in an earlier publication (see WO 2005/040180, incorporated by reference herein, in its entirety). Several oligonucleotides (ISIS 333611, ISIS 146144, ISIS 146145, ISIS 150437, ISIS 150441, ISIS 150443, ISIS 150444, ISIS 150445, ISIS 150446, ISIS 150447, ISIS 150448, ISIS 150449, ISIS 150452, ISIS 150454, ISIS 150458, ISIS 150460, ISIS 150462-150467, ISIS 150470, ISIS 150472, ISIS 150474, ISIS 150475, ISIS 150476, ISIS 150479-150483, ISIS 150488, ISIS 150489, ISIS 150490, ISIS 150491-150493, ISIS 150495-150498, ISIS 150511, ISIS 333605, ISIS 333606, ISIS 333609-333617, ISIS 333619, ISIS 333620-333636, ISIS 333638, and ISIS 333640) described therein, were used as comparator compounds throughout select screens for new antisense compounds described herein.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 333611, a 5-10-5 MOE gapmer, having a sequence of (from 5′ to 3′) CCGTCGCCCTTCAGCACGCA (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 21), wherein each internucleoside linkage is a phosphorothioate linkage, each cytosine is a 5-methylcytosine, and each of nucleosides 1-5 and 16-20 (from 5′ to 3′) comprise a 2′-O-methoxyethyl moiety was used as a comparator compound. ISIS 333611 was selected as a comparator compound because it exhibited high levels of dose-dependent inhibition in various studies as described in WO 2005/040180. Additionally, phase 1 human clinical trials were completed using ISIS 333611. See, MILLER et al., “An antisense oligonucleotide against SOD1 delivered intrathecally for patients with SOD1 familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a phase 1, randomised, first-in-man study” Lancet Neurol. (2013) 12(5): 435-442. Thus, ISIS 333611 was deemed a highly efficacious and potent compound with an acceptable safety profile (such that it was tested in human patients).
In certain embodiments, the compounds described herein benefit from one or more improved properties relative to the antisense compounds described in WO 2005/040180. Some of the improved properties are demonstrated in the examples provided herein. In certain embodiments, compounds described herein are more efficacious, potent, and/or tolerable in various in vitro and in vivo studies than comparator compounds described herein, including ISIS 333611. In certain embodiments, ISIS 666853, ISIS 666859, ISIS 666919, ISIS 666921, ISIS 666922, ISIS 666869, ISIS 666870, and ISIS 666867 are more efficacious and/or potent in various in vitro and in vivo studies than comparator compounds described herein, including ISIS 333611. In certain embodiments, ISIS 666853, ISIS 666859, ISIS 666919, ISIS 666921, ISIS 666922, ISIS 666869, ISIS 666870, and ISIS 666867 are more tolerable in one or more tolerability assays in animals than comparator compounds described herein, including ISIS 333611. This is despite 333611 being sufficiently well tolerated to progress to human clinical trials.
In certain embodiments, certain compounds described herein are more efficacious than comparator compounds by virtue of an in vitro IC50 of less than 2 μM, less than 1.9 μM, less than 1.8 μM, less than 1.7 μM, less than 1.6 μM, less than 1.5 μM, less than 1.4 μM, less than 1.3 μM, less than 1.2 μM, less than 1.1 μM, less than 1 μM, less than 0.9 μM, less than 0.8 μM, less than 0.7 μM, less than 0.6 μM, or less than 0.5 μM less than 0.4 μM, less than 0.3 μM, less than 0.2 μM, less than 0.1 μM, when tested in human cells, for example, in the HepG2 A431 or SH-SY5Y cell lines (For example, see Examples 6-11).
In certain embodiments, certain compounds described herein are more efficacious than comparator compounds by virtue of their ability to inhibit SOD-1 expression in vivo. In certain embodiments, the compounds inhibit SOD-1 in lumbar spinal cord and cervical spinal cord by at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90% or at least 95% in, for example, a transgenic animal model.
In certain embodiments, certain compounds described herein are more tolerable than comparator compounds on the basis of reduced microglial marker levels (e.g., IBA1), reduced astrocytic marker levels (e.g., GFAP), and/or FOB scores in rats, mice, and/or monkeys. See, for example, Examples 14, 15, 18, and 19.
ISIS 666853
For example, as provided in Example 12 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666853 achieved 81% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 74% in cervical spinal cord of an SOD-1 transgenic rat model when dosed with 30 μL of 16.67 mg/ml solution of oligonucleotide diluted in PBS (500 μg final dose), whereas ISIS 333611 achieved 51% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 47% inhibition in cervical spinal cord.
For example, as provided in Example 14 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666853 achieved a FOB score of 0 whereas ISIS 333611 achieved a FOB score of 4 in Sprague-Dawley rats after 3 hours when treated with 3 mg of oligonucleotide. Microglial marker (IBA1) levels and astrocytic marker (GFAP) levels were also reduced in ISIS 666853 treated rats as compared to ISIS 333611 treated rats.
For example, as provided in Example 15 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666853 achieved an ED50 of 81.3 and 242.6 in lumbar tissue and cervical tissue (respectively) in SOD-1 transgenic rats when treated intrathecally with 10, 30, 100, 300, or 3000 μg of oligonucleotide. ED50 in lumbar and cervical tissues could not be calculated in ISIS 333611 treated transgenic rats because the highest concentration tested (3000 μg) filed to inhibit human SOD-1 mRNA greater than 55-65%.
For example, as provided in Example 16 (hereinbelow), at doses of 1 mg and 3 mg ISIS 666853 achieved 3 hour FOB scores of 0.0 and 0.5 (respectively) whereas ISIS 333611 achieved FOB scores of 3.0 and 4.9 (respectively). At doses of 1 mg and 3 mg ISIS 666853 achieved 8 week FOB scores of 0.0 and 0.0 (respectively) whereas ISIS 333611 achieved FOB scores of 0.0 and 1.2 (respectively).
For example, as provided in Example 17 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666853 achieved an ED50 of 136 and 188 in lumbar tissue and cortex tissue (respectively) whereas ISIS 333611 achieved an ED50 of 401 and 786 in lumbar tissue and cortex tissue (respectively) in SOD-1 transgenic mice when treated with an intracerebral ventricular bolus of 10, 30, 100, 300, or 700 μg of oligonucleotide.
For example, as provided in Example 18 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666853 achieved a FOB score of 1.25 whereas ISIS 333611 achieved a FOB score of 6.5 in C57bl6 mice after 3 hours when treated with 700 μg of oligonucleotide. Microglial marker (IBA1) levels and astrocytic marker (GFAP) levels were also reduced in ISIS 666853 treated mice as compared to ISIS 333611 treated mice.
ISIS 666859
For example, as provided in Example 12 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666859 achieved 79% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 64% inhibition in cervical spinal cord of an SOD-1 transgenic rat model when dosed with 30 μL of 16.67 mg/ml solution of oligonucleotide diluted in PBS (500 μg final dose), whereas ISIS 333611 achieved 51% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 47% inhibition in cervical spinal cord.
For example, as provided in Example 14 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666859 achieved a FOB score of 1 whereas ISIS 333611 achieved a FOB score of 4 in Sprague-Dawley rats after 3 hours when treated with 3 mg of oligonucleotide. Microglial marker (IBA1) levels and astrocytic marker (GFAP) levels were also reduced in ISIS 666859 treated rats as compared to ISIS 333611 treated rats.
For example, as provided in Example 15 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666859 achieved an ED50 of 74.0 and 358.8 in lumbar tissue and cervical tissue (respectively) in SOD-1 transgenic rats when treated intrathecally with 10, 30, 100, 300, or 3000 μg of oligonucleotide. ED50 in lumbar and cervical tissues could not be calculated in ISIS 333611 treated transgenic rats because the highest concentration tested (3000 μg) filed to inhibit human SOD-1 mRNA greater than 55-65%.
For example, as provided in Example 16 (hereinbelow), at doses of 1 mg and 3 mg ISIS 666859 achieved 3 hour FOB scores of 0.0 and 2.1 (respectively) whereas ISIS 333611 achieved FOB scores of 3.0 and 4.9 (respectively). At doses of 1 mg and 3 mg ISIS 666859 achieved 8 week FOB scores of 0.0 and 0.3 (respectively) whereas ISIS 333611 achieved FOB scores of 0.0 and 1.2 (respectively).
For example, as provided in Example 17 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666859 achieved an ED50 of 106 and 206 in lumbar tissue and cortex tissue (respectively) whereas ISIS 333611 achieved an ED50 of 401 and 786 in lumbar tissue and cortex tissue (respectively) in SOD-1 transgenic mice when treated with an intracerebral ventricular bolus of 10, 30, 100, 300, or 700 μg of oligonucleotide.
For example, as provided in Example 18 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666859 achieved a FOB score of 1.75 whereas ISIS 333611 achieved a FOB score of 6.5 in C57bl6 mice after 3 hours when treated with 700 μg of oligonucleotide. Microglial marker (IBA1) levels and astrocytic marker (GFAP) levels were also reduced in ISIS 666859 treated mice as compared to ISIS 333611 treated mice.
ISIS 666919
For example, as provided in Example 12 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666919 achieved 76% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 68% in cervical spinal cord of an SOD-1 transgenic rat model when dosed with 30 μL of 16.67 mg/ml solution of oligonucleotide diluted in PBS (500 μg final dose), whereas ISIS 333611 achieved 51% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 47% inhibition in cervical spinal cord.
For example, as provided in Example 14 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666919 achieved a FOB score of 2 whereas ISIS 333611 achieved a FOB score of 4 in Sprague-Dawley rats after 3 hours when treated with 3 mg of oligonucleotide. Microglial marker (IBA1) levels and astrocytic marker (GFAP) levels were also reduced in ISIS 666919 treated rats as compared to ISIS 333611 treated rats.
For example, as provided in Example 15 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666919 achieved an ED50 of 104.1 and 613.5 in lumbar tissue and cervical tissue (respectively) in SOD-1 transgenic rats when treated intrathecally with 10, 30, 100, 300, or 3000 μg of oligonucleotide. ED50 in lumbar and cervical tissues could not be calculated in ISIS 333611 treated transgenic rats because the highest concentration tested (3000 μg) filed to inhibit human SOD-1 mRNA greater than 55-65%.
For example, as provided in Example 16 (hereinbelow), at doses of 1 mg and 3 mg ISIS 666919 achieved 3 hour FOB scores of 1.3 and 3.5 (respectively) whereas ISIS 333611 achieved FOB scores of 3.0 and 4.9 (respectively). At doses of 1 mg and 3 mg ISIS 666919 achieved 8 week FOB scores of 0.0 and 0.1 (respectively) whereas ISIS 333611 achieved FOB scores of 0.0 and 1.2 (respectively).
For example, as provided in Example 17 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666919 achieved an ED50 of 168 in lumbar tissue whereas ISIS 333611 achieved an ED50 of 401 in lumbar tissue in SOD-1 transgenic mice when treated with an intracerebral ventricular bolus of 10, 30, 100, 300, or 700 μg of oligonucleotide.
For example, as provided in Example 18 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666919 achieved a FOB score of 0.0 whereas ISIS 333611 achieved a FOB score of 6.5 in C57bl6 mice after 3 hours when treated with 700 μg of oligonucleotide. Microglial marker (IBA1) levels and astrocytic marker (GFAP) levels were also reduced in ISIS 666919 treated mice as compared to ISIS 333611 treated mice.
ISIS 666921
For example, as provided in Example 12 (hereinbelow), ISIS 66621 achieved 71% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 65% in cervical spinal cord of an SOD-1 transgenic rat model when dosed with 30 μL of 16.67 mg/ml solution of oligonucleotide diluted in PBS (500 μg final dose), whereas ISIS 333611 achieved 51% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 47% inhibition in cervical spinal cord.
For example, as provided in Example 14 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666921 achieved a FOB score of 2 whereas ISIS 333611 achieved a FOB score of 4 in Sprague-Dawley rats after 3 hours when treated with 3 mg of oligonucleotide. Microglial marker (IBA1) levels and astrocytic marker (GFAP) levels were also reduced in ISIS 666919 treated rats as compared to ISIS 333611 treated rats.
ISIS 666922
For example, as provided in Example 12 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666922 achieved 67% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 62% in cervical spinal cord of an SOD-1 transgenic rat model when dosed with 30 μL of 16.67 mg/ml solution of oligonucleotide diluted in PBS (500 μg final dose), whereas ISIS 333611 achieved 51% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 47% inhibition in cervical spinal cord.
For example, as provided in Example 14 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666922 achieved a FOB score of 3 whereas ISIS 333611 achieved a FOB score of 4 in Sprague-Dawley rats after 3 hours when treated with 3 mg of oligonucleotide. Microglial marker (IBA1) levels and astrocytic marker (GFAP) levels were also reduced in ISIS 666919 treated rats as compared to ISIS 333611 treated rats.
ISIS 666869
For example, as provided in Example 12 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666869 achieved 82% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 81% in cervical spinal cord of an SOD-1 transgenic rat model when dosed with 30 μL of 16.67 mg/ml solution of oligonucleotide diluted in PBS (500 μg final dose), whereas ISIS 333611 achieved 51% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 47% inhibition in cervical spinal cord.
ISIS 666870
For example, as provided in Example 12 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666870 achieved 76% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 68% in cervical spinal cord of an SOD-1 transgenic rat model when dosed with 30 μL of 16.67 mg/ml solution of oligonucleotide diluted in PBS (500 μg final dose), whereas ISIS 333611 achieved 51% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 47% inhibition in cervical spinal cord.
For example, as provided in Example 15 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666870 achieved an ED50 of 139.4 and 1111 in lumbar tissue and cervical tissue (respectively) in SOD-1 transgenic rats when treated intrathecally with 10, 30, 100, 300, or 3000 μg of oligonucleotide. ED50 in lumbar and cervical tissues could not be calculated in ISIS 333611 treated transgenic rats because the highest concentration tested (3000 μg) filed to inhibit human SOD-1 mRNA greater than 55-65%.
For example, as provided in Example 17 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666870 achieved an ED50 of 148 and 409 in lumbar tissue and cortex tissue (respectively) whereas ISIS 333611 achieved an ED50 of 401 and 786 in lumbar tissue and cortex tissue (respectively) in SOD-1 transgenic mice when treated with an intracerebral ventricular bolus of 10, 30, 100, 300, or 700 μg of oligonucleotide.
For example, as provided in Example 18 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666870 achieved a FOB score of 4.75 whereas ISIS 333611 achieved a FOB score of 6.5 in C57bl6 mice after 3 hours when treated with 700 μg of oligonucleotide.
ISIS 666867
For example, as provided in Example 12 (hereinbelow), ISIS 666867 achieved 59% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 48% in cervical spinal cord of an SOD-1 transgenic rat model when dosed with 30 μL of 16.67 mg/ml solution of oligonucleotide diluted in PBS (500 μg final dose), whereas ISIS 333611 achieved 51% inhibition in lumbar spinal cord and 47% inhibition in cervical spinal cord.
Certain Compositions
1. ISIS 666853
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666853 is characterized as a 5-10-5 MOE gapmer, having a sequence of (from 5′ to 3′) CAGGATACATTTCTACAGCT (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 725), wherein each of nucleosides 1-5 and 16-20 are 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified nucleosides, and each of nucleosides 6-15 are 2′-deoxynucleosides, wherein the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 2 to 3, 4 to 5, 16 to 17, and 18 to 19 are phosphodiester linkages and the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 1 to 2, 3 to 4, 5 to 6, 6 to 7, 7 to 8, 8 to 9, 9 to 10, 10 to 11, 11 to 12, 12 to 13, 13 to 14, 14 to 15, 15 to 16, 17 to 18, and 19 to 20 are phosphorothioate linkages, and wherein each cytosine is a 5′-methylcytosine.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666853 is described by the following chemical notation: mCes Aeo Ges Geo Aes Tds Ads mCds Ads Tds Tds Tds mCds Tds Ads mCeo Aes Geo mCes Te; wherein,
A=an adenine,
mC=a 5′-methylcytosine
G=a guanine,
T=a thymine,
e=a 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified sugar,
d=a 2′-deoxyribose sugar,
s=a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage, and
o=a phosphodiester internucleoside linkage.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666853 is described by the following chemical structure:
2. ISIS 666859
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666859 is characterized as a modified oligonucleotide having the nucleobase sequence (from 5′ to 3′) TTAATGTTTATCAGGAT (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1351), consisting of seventeen nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 1-4 and 15-17 are 2′-O-methoxyethylribose nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 13 and 14 are cEt modified nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 5-12 are 2′-deoxyribonucleosides, wherein the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 2 to 3, 3 to 4, 13 to 14, 14 to 15 are phosphodiester linkages and the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 1 to 2, 4 to 5, 5 to 6, 6 to 7, 7 to 8, 8 to 9, 9 to 10, 10 to 11, 11 to 12, 12 to 13, 15 to 16, and 16 to 17 are phosphorothioate linkages, and wherein each cytosine is a 5′-methylcytosine.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666859 is described by the following chemical notation: Tes Teo Aeo Aes Tds Gds Tds Tds Tds Ads Tds mCds Ako Gko Ges Aes Te; wherein,
A=an adenine,
mC=a 5′-methylcytosine
G=a guanine,
T=a thymine,
e=a 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified sugar,
k=a cEt modified sugar,
d=a 2′-deoxyribose sugar,
s=a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage, and
o=a phosphodiester internucleoside linkage.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666859 is described by the following chemical structure:
3. ISIS 666919
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666919 is characterized as a modified oligonucleotide having the nucleobase sequence (from 5′ to 3′) GGATACATTTCTACAGC (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1342), consisting of seventeen nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 1-4 and 16-17 are 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 14 and 15 are cEt modified nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 5-13 are 2′-deoxyribonucleosides, wherein the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 2 to 3, 3 to 4, 4 to 5, and 14 to 15 are phosphodiester linkages and the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 1 to 2, 5 to 6, 6 to 7, 7 to 8, 8 to 9, 9 to 10, 10 to 11, 11 to 12, 12 to 13, 13 to 14, 15 to 16, and 16 to 17 are phosphorothioate linkages, and wherein each cytosine is a 5′-methylcytosine.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666919 is described by the following chemical notation: Ges Geo Aeo Teo Ads mCds Ads Tds Tds Tds mCds Tds Ads mCko Aks Ges mCe; wherein,
A=an adenine,
mC=a 5′-methylcytosine
G=a guanine,
T=a thymine,
e=a 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified sugar,
k=a cEt modified sugar,
d=a 2′-deoxyribose sugar,
s=a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage, and
o=a phosphodiester internucleoside linkage.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666919 is described by the following chemical structure:
4. ISIS 666921
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666921 is characterized as a modified oligonucleotide having the nucleobase sequence (from 5′ to 3′) GGATACATTTCTACAGC (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1342), consisting of seventeen nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 1-5 and 16-17 are 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 14-15 are cEt modified nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 6-13 are 2′-deoxyribonucleosides, wherein the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 2 to 3, 3 to 4, 4 to 5, and 14 to 15 are phosphodiester linkages and the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 1 to 2, 5 to 6, 6 to 7, 7 to 8, 8 to 9, 9 to 10, 10 to 11, 11 to 12, 12 to 13, 13 to 14, 15 to 16, and 16 to 17 are phosphorothioate linkages, and wherein each cytosine is a 5′-methylcytosine.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666921 is described by the following chemical notation: Ges Geo Aeo Teo Aes mCds Ads Tds Tds Tds mCds Tds Ads mCko Aks Ges mCe; wherein,
A=an adenine,
mC=a 5′-methylcytosine
G=a guanine,
T=a thymine,
e=a 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified sugar,
k=a cEt modified sugar,
d=a 2′-deoxyribose sugar,
s=a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage, and
o=a phosphodiester internucleoside linkage.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666921 is described by the following chemical structure:
5. ISIS 666922
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666922 is characterized as a modified oligonucleotide having the nucleobase sequence (from 5′ to 3′) GGATACATTTCTACAGC (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1342), consisting of seventeen nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 1-4 and 15-17 are 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 5 and 14 are cEt modified nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 6-13 are 2′-deoxyribonucleosides, wherein the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 2 to 3, 3 to 4, 4 to 5, and 14 to 15 are phosphodiester linkages and the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 1 to 2, 5 to 6, 6 to 7, 7 to 8, 8 to 9, 9 to 10, 10 to 11, 11 to 12, 12 to 13, 13 to 14, 15 to 16, and 16 to 17 are phosphorothioate linkages, and wherein each cytosine is a 5′-methylcytosine.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666922 is described by the following chemical notation: Ges Geo Aeo Teo Aks mCds Ads Tds Tds Tds mCds Tds Ads mCko Aes Ges mCe; wherein,
A=an adenine,
mC=a 5′-methylcytosine
G=a guanine,
T=a thymine,
e=a 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified sugar,
k=a cEt modified sugar,
d=a 2′-deoxyribose sugar,
s=a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage, and
o=a phosphodiester internucleoside linkage.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666922 is described by the following chemical structure:
6. ISIS 666869
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666869 is characterized as modified oligonucleotide having the nucleobase sequence (from 5′ to 3′) AGTGTTTAATGTTTATC (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1173), consisting of seventeen nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 1, 3, 14, and 16-17 are 2′-methoxyethylribose modified nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 2, 4, 13, and 15 are cEt modified nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 5-12 are 2′-deoxyribonucleosides, wherein the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 2 to 3, 3 to 4, 13 to 14, and 14 to 15 are phosphodiester linkages and the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 1 to 2, 4 to 5, 5 to 6, 6 to 7, 7 to 8, 8 to 9, 9 to 10, 10 to 11, 11 to 12, 12 to 13, 15 to 16, and 16 to 17 are phosphorothioate linkages, and wherein each cytosine is a 5′-methylcytosine.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666869 is described by the following chemical notation: Aes Gko Teo Gks Tds Tds Tds Ads Ads Tds Gds Tds Tko Teo Aks Tes mCe; wherein,
A=an adenine,
mC=a 5′-methylcytosine
G=a guanine,
T=a thymine,
e=a 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified sugar,
k=a cEt modified sugar,
d=a 2′-deoxyribose sugar,
s=a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage, and
o=a phosphodiester internucleoside linkage.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666869 is described by the following chemical structure:
7. ISIS 666870
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666870 is characterized as a modified oligonucleotide having the nucleobase sequence (from 5′ to 3′) AGTGTTTAATGTTTATC (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1173), consisting of seventeen nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 1, 3, 13-17 are 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 2 and 4 are cEt modified nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 5-12 are 2′-deoxyribonucleosides, wherein the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 2 to 3, 3 to 4, 13 to 14, and 14 to 15 are phosphodiester linkages and the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 1 to 2, 4 to 5, 5 to 6, 6 to 7, 7 to 8, 8 to 9, 9 to 10, 10 to 11, 11 to 12, 12 to 13, 15 to 16, and 16 to 17 are phosphorothioate linkages, and wherein each cytosine is a 5′-methylcytosine.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666870 is described by the following chemical notation: Aes Gko Teo Gks Tds Tds Tds Ads Ads Tds Gds Tds Teo Teo Aes Tes mCe; wherein,
A=an adenine,
mC=a 5′-methylcytosine
G=a guanine,
T=a thymine,
e=a 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified sugar,
k=a cEt modified sugar,
d=a 2′-deoxyribose sugar,
s=a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage, and
o=a phosphodiester internucleoside linkage.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666870 is described by the following chemical structure:
8. ISIS 666867
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666867 is characterized as a modified oligonucleotide having the nucleobase sequence (from 5′ to 3′) AGTGTTTAATGTTTATC (incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1173), consisting of seventeen nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 1-2 and 13-17 are 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 3 and 4 are cEt modified nucleosides, wherein each of nucleosides 5-12 are 2′-deoxyribonucleosides, wherein the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 2 to 3, 3 to 4, 13 to 14, and 14 to 15 are phosphodiester linkages and the internucleoside linkages between nucleosides 1 to 2, 4 to 5, 5 to 6, 6 to 7, 7 to 8, 8 to 9, 9 to 10, 10 to 11, 11 to 12, 12 to 13, 15 to 16, and 16 to 17 are phosphorothioate linkages, and wherein each cytosine is a 5′-methylcytosine.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666867 is described by the following chemical notation: Aes Geo Tko Gks Tds Tds Tds Ads Ads Tds Gds Tds Teo Teo Aes Tes mCe; wherein,
A=an adenine,
mC=a 5′-methylcytosine
G=a guanine,
T=a thymine,
e=a 2′-O-methoxyethylribose modified sugar,
k=a cEt modified sugar,
d=a 2′-deoxyribose sugar,
s=a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage, and
o=a phosphodiester internucleoside linkage.
In certain embodiments, ISIS 666867 is described by the following chemical structure:
While certain compounds, compositions, and methods described herein have been described with specificity in accordance with certain embodiments, the following examples serve only to illustrate the compounds described herein and are not intended to limit the same. Each of the references recited in the present application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Modified oligonucleotides were designed targeting a superoxide dismutase 1, soluble (SOD-1) nucleic acid and were tested for their effects on SOD-1 mRNA in vitro. ISIS 146144, ISIS 146145, ISIS 150437, ISIS 150441, ISIS 150443, ISIS 150444, ISIS 150445, ISIS 150446, ISIS 150447, ISIS 150448, ISIS 150449, ISIS 150452, ISIS 150454, ISIS 150458, ISIS 150460, ISIS 150462-150467, ISIS 150470, ISIS 150472, ISIS 150474, ISIS 150475, ISIS 150476, ISIS 150479-150483, ISIS 150488, ISIS 150489, ISIS 150490, ISIS 150491-150493, ISIS 150495-150498, ISIS 150511, ISIS 333605, ISIS 333606, ISIS 333609-333617, ISIS 333619, ISIS 333620-333636, ISIS 333638, and ISIS 333640, previously disclosed in WO 2005/040180, were also included in this assay. ISIS 333611, previously disclosed in WO 2005/040180, was also designated as a benchmark or comparator oligonucleotide. ISIS 333611 was recently tested in human clinical trials. See, MILLER et al., “An antisense oligonucleotide against SOD1 delivered intrathecally for patients with SOD1 familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a phase 1, randomised, first-in-man study” Lancet Neurol. (2013) 12(5): 435-442.
The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar culture conditions. The results for each experiment are presented in separate tables shown below. Cultured HepG2 cells at a density of 20,000 cells per well were transfected using electroporation with 7,000 nM modified oligonucleotide. After a treatment period of approximately 24 hours, RNA was isolated from the cells and SOD-1 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR.
Human primer probe set RTS3898 (forward sequence CTCTCAGGAGACCATTGCATCA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 11; reverse sequence TCCTGTCTTTGTACTTTCTTCATTTCC; designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 12; probe sequence CCGCACACTGGTGGTCCATGAAAA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 13) was used to measure mRNA levels. In cases where the oligonucleotide overlapped the amplicon of the primer probe set, an alternative primer probe set, HTS90 (forward sequence CGTGGCCTAGCGAGTTATGG, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 14; reverse sequence GAAATTGATGATGCCCTGCA; designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 15; probe sequence ACGAAGGCCGTGTGCGTGCTGX, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 16), was used to measure mRNA levels. SOD-1 mRNA levels were adjusted according to total RNA content, as measured by RIBOGREEN®. Results are presented as percent inhibition of SOD-1, relative to untreated control cells. ‘n.d.’ indicates that inhibition levels were not measured using the particular primer probe set.
The newly designed modified oligonucleotides in the Tables below were designed as 5-10-5 MOE gapmers. The 5-10-5 MOE gapmers are 20 nucleosides in length, wherein the central gap segment is comprised of ten 2′-deoxyribonucleosides and is flanked by wing segments on the 5′ direction and the 3′ directions comprising five nucleosides each. Each nucleoside in the 5′ wing segment and each nucleoside in the 3′ wing segment has a 2′-MOE modification. The internucleoside linkages throughout each gapmer are phosphorothioate linkages. All cytosine residues throughout each gapmer are 5-methylcytosines. “Startsite” indicates the 5′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted in the human gene sequence. “Stopsite” indicates the 3′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted human gene sequence. Each gapmer listed in the Tables below is targeted to either the human SOD-1 mRNA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1 (GENBANK Accession No. NM_000454.4) or the human SOD-1 genomic sequence, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 2 (GENBANK Accession No. NT_011512.10 truncated from nucleotides 18693000 to 18704000). ‘n/a’ indicates that the modified oligonucleotide does not target that particular gene sequence with 100 complementarity.
Modified oligonucleotides were designed targeting asuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble (SOD-1) nucleic acid and were tested for their effects on SOD-1 mRNA in vitro. ISIS 146143, ISIS150438-150440, ISIS 150442, ISIS 150450, ISIS 150455-150457, ISIS 150459, ISIS 150461, ISIS 150469, ISIS 150473, ISIS 150478, ISIS 150484, ISIS 150486, ISIS 150494, ISIS 150508-150510, ISIS 333607, ISIS 333608, ISIS 333611, ISIS 333618, previously disclosed in WO 2005/040180, were also included in this assay. The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar culture conditions. The results for each experiment are presented in separate tables shown below. Cultured HepG2 cells at a density of 20,000 cells per well were transfected using electroporation with 5,000 nM modified oligonucleotide. After a treatment period of approximately 24 hours, RNA was isolated from the cells and SOD-1 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR.
Human primer probe set RTS3898 was used to measure mRNA levels. In cases where the oligonucleotide overlapped the amplicon of the primer probe set, an alternative primer probe set, HTS90, was used to measure mRNA levels. SOD-1 mRNA levels were adjusted according to total RNA content, as measured by RIBOGREEN. Results are presented as percent inhibition of SOD-1, relative to untreated control cells. ‘n.d.’ indicates that inhibition levels were not measured using the particular primer probe set.
The newly designed modified oligonucleotides in the Tables below were designed as 5-10-5 MOE gapmers. The 5-10-5 MOE gapmers are 20 nucleosides in length, wherein the central gap segment is comprised of ten 2′-deoxyribonucleosides and is flanked by wing segments on the 5′ direction and the 3′ directions comprising five nucleosides each. Each nucleoside in the 5′ wing segment and each nucleoside in the 3′ wing segment has a 2′-MOE modification. The internucleoside linkages throughout each gapmer are phosphorothioate linkages. All cytosine residues throughout each gapmer are 5-methylcytosines. “Start site” indicates the 5′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted in the human gene sequence. “Stop site” indicates the 3′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted human gene sequence. Each gapmer listed in the Tables below is targeted to either the human SOD-1 mRNA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1 (GENBANK Accession No. NM_000454.4) or the human SOD-1 genomic sequence, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 2 (GENBANK Accession No. NT_011512.10 truncated from nucleotides 18693000 to 18704000). ‘n/a’ indicates that the modified oligonucleotide does not target that particular gene sequence with 100% complementarity.
Modified oligonucleotides were designed targeting a superoxide dismutase 1, soluble (SOD-1) nucleic acid and were tested for their effects on SOD-1 mRNA in vitro. ISIS 333611, which was previously described in WO 2005/040180, was included as a benchmark. ISIS 590067, ISIS 590074, ISIS 590082, ISIS 590130, ISIS 590138, and ISIS 590146, which are 5-10-5 MOE gapmers as described above in Example 1, were also included in this assay. ISIS 590512, which has a similar sequence as ISIS 333611 but with deoxy, MOE, and cEt sugar modifications, was also included in this study.
The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar culture conditions. The results for each experiment are presented in separate tables shown below. Cultured HepG2 cells at a density of 20,000 cells per well were transfected using electroporation with 3,000 nM modified oligonucleotide. After a treatment period of approximately 24 hours, RNA was isolated from the cells and SOD-1 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR.
Human primer probe set RTS3898 was used to measure mRNA levels. SOD-1 mRNA levels were adjusted according to total RNA content, as measured by RIBOGREEN®. Results are presented as percent inhibition of SOD-1, relative to untreated control cells. ‘n.d.’ indicates that inhibition levels were not measured.
The newly designed modified oligonucleotides in the Tables below were designed as deoxy, MOE, and cEt gapmers. The gapmers are 17 nucleosides in length wherein each nucleoside has a MOE sugar modification, a cEt sugar modification, or a deoxy moiety. The sugar chemistry of each oligonucleotide is denoted as in the Chemistry column, where ‘k’ indicates a cEt modified sugar; ‘d’ indicates a 2′-deoxyribose; and ‘e’ indicates a 2′-MOE modified sugar. The internucleoside linkages throughout each gapmer are phosphorothioate linkages. All cytosine residues throughout each gapmer are 5-methylcytosines. “Start site” indicates the 5′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted in the human gene sequence. “Stop site” indicates the 3′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted human gene sequence. Each gapmer listed in the Tables below is targeted to either the human SOD-1 mRNA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1 (GENBANK Accession No. NM_000454.4) or the human SOD-1 genomic sequence, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: (GENBANK Accession No. NT_011512.10 truncated from nucleotides 18693000 to 18704000). ‘n/a’ indicates that the modified oligonucleotide does not target that particular gene sequence with S100 complementarity.
Modified oligonucleotides were designed targeting a superoxide dismutase 1, soluble (SOD-1) nucleic acid and were tested for their effects on SOD-1 mRNA in vitro. ISIS 333611, a5-10-5 MOE gapmer which was previously described in WO2005/040180, was included as a benchmark.
The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar culture conditions. The results for each experiment are presented in separate tables shown below. Cultured HepG2 cells at a density of 20,000 cells per well were transfected using electroporation with 4,000 nM modified oligonucleotide. After a treatment period of approximately 24 hours, RNA was isolated from the cells and SOD-1 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR.
Human primer probe set RTS3898 was used to measure mRNA levels. SOD-1 mRNA levels were adjusted according to total RNA content, as measured by RIBOGREEN®. Results are presented as percent inhibition of SOD-1, relative to untreated control cells. ‘n.d.’ indicates that inhibition levels were not measured.
The newly designed modified oligonucleotides in the Tables below were designed as deoxy, MOE, and cEt gapmers or 5-10-5 gapmers. The 5-10-5 MOE gapmers are 20 nucleosides in length, wherein the central gap segment is comprised of ten 2′-deoxyribonucleosides and is flanked by wing segments on the 5′ direction and the 3′ direction comprising five nucleosides each. Each nucleoside in the 5′ wing segment and each nucleoside in the 3′ wing segment has a2′-MOE modification. The deoxy, MOE and cEt oligonucleotides are 17 nucleosides in length wherein the nucleoside has a MOE sugar modification, a cEt sugar modification, or a deoxy moiety. The sugar chemistry of each oligonucleotide is denoted as in the Chemistry column, where ‘k’ indicates a cEt modified sugar; ‘d’ indicates a 2′-deoxyribose; and ‘e’ indicates a 2′-MOE modified sugar. The internucleoside linkages throughout each gapmer are phosphorothioate linkages. All cytosine residues throughout each gapmer are 5-methylcytosines. “Start site” indicates the 5′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted in the human gene sequence. Each gapmer listed in the Tables below is targeted to either the human SOD-1 mRNA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1 (GENBANK Accession No. NM_000454.4) or the human SOD-1 genomic sequence, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 2 (GENBANK Accession No. NT_011512.10 truncated from nucleotides 18693000 to 18704000). ‘n/a’ indicates that the modified oligonucleotide does not target that particular gene sequence with 100% complementarity.
Modified oligonucleotides were designed targeting an SOD-1 nucleic acid and were tested for their effects on SOD-1 mRNA in vitro. ISIS 333611, a5-10-5 MOE gapmer, which was previously described in WO 2005/040180, was included as a benchmark.
The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar culture conditions. The results for each experiment are presented in separate tables shown below. Cultured HepG2 cells at a density of 20,000 cells per well were transfected using electroporation with 5,000 nM modified oligonucleotide. After a treatment period of approximately 24 hours, RNA was isolated from the cells and SOD-1 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR.
Human primer probe set RTS3898 was used to measure mRNA levels. SOD-1 mRNA levels were adjusted according to total RNA content, as measured by RIBOGREEN®. Results are presented as percent inhibition of SOD-1, relative to untreated control cells. ‘n.d.’ indicates that inhibition levels were not measured.
The newly designed modified oligonucleotides in the Tables below were designed as deoxy, MOE, and cEt gapmers. The gapmers are 17 nucleosides in length wherein each nucleoside has a MOE sugar modification, cEt sugar modification, or a deoxy moiety. The sugar chemistry of each oligonucleotide is denoted as in the Chemistry column, where ‘k’ indicates a cEt modified sugar; ‘d’ indicates a 2′-deoxyribose; and ‘e’ indicates a 2′-MOE modified sugar. The internucleoside linkages throughout each gapmer are phosphorothioate linkages. All cytosine residues throughout each gapmer are 5-methylcytosines. “Start site” indicates the 5′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted in the human gene sequence. Each gapmer listed in the Tables below is targeted to either the human SOD-1 mRNA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1 (GENBANK Accession No. NM_000454.4) or the human SOD-1 genomic sequence, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 2 (GENBANK Accession No. NT_011512.10 truncated from nucleotides 18693000 to 18704000). ‘n/a’ indicates that the modified oligonucleotide does not target that particular gene sequence with 100% complementarity.
Gapmers from the studies described above exhibiting significant in vitro inhibition of SOD-1 mRNA were selected and tested at various doses in HepG2 cells. Benchmark compound ISIS 333611 and other compounds previously disclosed in WO 2005/040180, including ISIS 146144, 146145, 150445, 150446, 150447, 150454, 150463, 150465, 333606, 333609, and 333611 were also tested.
The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar culture conditions. The results for each experiment are presented in separate tables shown below. Cells were plated at a density of 20,000 cells per well and transfected using electroporation with 0.813 μM, 1.625 μM, 3.250 μM, 6.500 μM, and 13.000 μM concentrations of modified oligonucleotide, as specified in the Tables below. After a treatment period of approximately 16 hours, RNA was isolated from the cells and SOD-1 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Human primer probe set RTS3898 was used to measure mRNA levels. SOD-1 mRNA levels were adjusted according to total RNA content, as measured by RIBOGREEN®. Results are presented as percent inhibition of SOD-1, relative to untreated control cells.
The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of each oligonucleotide is also presented. SOD-1 mRNA levels were significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner in modified oligonucleotide treated cells.
Gapmers from the studies described above exhibiting significant in vitro inhibition of SOD-1 mRNA were selected and tested at various doses in HepG2 cells. Benchmark compound, ISIS 333611, and ISIS 333625, both of which were previously disclosed in WO 2005/040180 were also tested.
The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar culture conditions. The results for each experiment are presented in separate tables shown below. Cells were plated at a density of 20,000 cells per well and transfected using electroporation with 0.148 μM, 0.444 μM, 1.330 μM, 4.000 μM, and 12.000 μM concentrations of modified oligonucleotide, as specified in the Tables below. After a treatment period of approximately 16 hours, RNA was isolated from the cells and SOD-1 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Human primer probe sets RTS3898 or HTS90 was used to measure mRNA levels. SOD-1 mRNA levels were adjusted according to total RNA content, as measured by RIBOGREEN®. Results are presented as percent inhibition of SOD-1, relative to untreated control cells.
The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of each oligonucleotide is also presented. SOD-1 mRNA levels were significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner in modified oligonucleotide treated cells.
Gapmers from the studies described above exhibiting significant in vitro inhibition of SOD-1 mRNA were selected and tested at various doses in HepG2 cells. Benchmark compound, ISIS 333611, and additional compounds including, ISIS 146143, 150442, 195753, 333607, and 333608, were previously disclosed in WO 2005/040180 were also tested.
The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar culture conditions. The results for each experiment are presented in separate tables shown below. Cells were plated at a density of 20,000 cells per well and transfected using electroporation with 0.1875 μM, 0.7500 μM, 3.0000 μM, and 12.0000 μM concentrations of modified oligonucleotide, as specified in the Tables below. After a treatment period of approximately 16 hours, RNA was isolated from the cells and SOD-1 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Human primer probe sets RTS3898 was used to measure mRNA levels. SOD-1 mRNA levels were adjusted according to total RNA content, as measured by RIBOGREEN®. Results are presented as percent inhibition of SOD-1, relative to untreated control cells. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of each oligonucleotide is also presented. SOD-1 mRNA levels were significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner in modified oligonucleotide treated cells.
Additional gapmers were designed based on the sequences of the oligonucleotides disclosed in studies described above. The oligonucleotides were designed as 5-10-5 MOE, 5-8-5 MOE, and deoxy, MOE and cEt oligonucleotides. The 5-10-5 MOE gapmers are 20 nucleosides in length, wherein the central gap segment is comprised of ten 2′-deoxyribonucleosides and is flanked by wing segments on the 5′ direction and the 3′ direction comprising five nucleosides each. The 5-8-5 MOE gapmers are 18 nucleosides in length, wherein the central gap segment is comprised of eight 2′-deoxyribonucleosides and is flanked by wing segments on the 5′ direction and the 3′ direction comprising five nucleosides each. Each nucleoside in the 5′ wing segment and each nucleoside in the 3′ wing segment has a 2′-MOE modification. The deoxy, MOE and cEt oligonucleotides are 16 or 17 nucleosides in length wherein each nucleoside has a MOE sugar modification, a cEt sugar modification, or a deoxy moiety. The sugar chemistry of each oligonucleotide is denoted as in the Chemistry column, where ‘k’ indicates a cEt modified sugar; ‘d’ indicates a 2′-deoxyribose; and ‘e’ indicates a 2′-MOE modified sugar. The internucleoside linkages throughout each gapmer are either phosphodiester or phosphorothioate linkages. The internucleoside linkages of each oligonucleotide are denoted in the Backbone Chemistry column, where ‘o’ indicates a phosphodiester linkage and ‘s’ denotes a phosphorothioate linkage. All cytosine residues throughout each gapmer are 5-methylcytosines. “Start site” indicates the 5′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted in the human gene sequence. “Stop site” indicates the 3′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted human gene sequence. Each gapmer listed in the Tables below is targeted to either the human SOD-1 mRNA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1 (GENBANK Accession No. NM_000454.4) or the human SOD-1 genomic sequence, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 2 (GENBANK Accession No. NT_011512.10 truncated from nucleotides 18693000 to 18704000).
The newly designed oligonucleotides were tested at various doses in HepG2 cells. The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar culture conditions. The results for each experiment are presented in separate tables shown below. Cells were plated at a density of 20,000 cells per well and transfected using electroporation with 0.222 μM, 0.667 μM, 2.000 μM, and 6.000 μM concentrations of modified oligonucleotide, as specified in the Tables below. After a treatment period of approximately 16 hours, RNA was isolated from the cells and SOD-1 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Human primer probe sets RTS3898 was used to measure mRNA levels. SOD-1 mRNA levels were adjusted according to total RNA content, as measured by RIBOGREEN®. Results are presented as percent inhibition of SOD-1, relative to untreated control cells.
The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of each oligonucleotide is also presented. SOD-1 mRNA levels were significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner in modified oligonucleotide treated cells.
Additional gapmers were designed based on the sequences of the oligonucleotides disclosed in studies described above. The oligonucleotides were designed as deoxy, MOE and cEt oligonucleotides. The deoxy, MOE and cEt oligonucleotides are 16 or 17 nucleosides in length wherein each nucleoside has a MOE sugar modification, a cEt sugar modification, or a deoxy moiety. The sugar chemistry of each oligonucleotide is denoted as in the Chemistry column, where ‘k’ indicates a cEt modified sugar; ‘d’ indicates a 2′-deoxyribose; and ‘e’ indicates a 2′-MOE modified sugar. The internucleoside linkages throughout each gapmer are either phosphodiester or phosphorothioate linkages. The internucleoside linkages of each oligonucleotide are denoted in the Backbone Chemistry column, where ‘o’ indicates a phosphodiester linkage and ‘s’ indicates a phosphorothioate linkage. All cytosine residues throughout each gapmer are 5-methylcytosines. “Start site” indicates the 5′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted in the human gene sequence. “Stop site” indicates the 3′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted human gene sequence. Each gapmer listed in the Tables below is targeted to either the human SOD-1 mRNA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1 (GENBANK Accession No. NM_000454.4) or the human SOD-1 genomic sequence, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 2 (GENBANK Accession No. NT_011512.10 truncated from nucleotides 18693000 to 18704000).
The newly designed oligonucleotides were tested at various doses in A431 cells. The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar culture conditions. The results for each experiment are presented in separate tables shown below. Cells were plated at a density of 5,000 cells per well and modified oligonucleotides were added to the media at 0.12 μM, 0.60 μM, 3.00 μM, and 15.00 μM concentrations of modified oligonucleotide for free uptake by the cells, as specified in the Tables below. After a treatment period of approximately 16 hours, RNA was isolated from the cells and SOD-1 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Human primer probe sets RTS3898 was used to measure mRNA levels. SOD-1 mRNA levels were adjusted according to total RNA content, as measured by RIBOGREEN®. Results are presented as percent inhibition of SOD-1, relative to untreated control cells.
Additional gapmers were designed based on the sequences of the oligonucleotides disclosed in studies described above. The oligonucleotides were designed as 5-10-5 MOE gapmers, 4-8-5 MOE gapmers, 5-8-5 MOE gapmers, 5-8-7 MOE gapmers, 6-8-6 MOE gapmers, 6-9-5 MOE gapmers, or deoxy, MOE and cEt oligonucleotides.
The 5-10-5 MOE gapmers are 20 nucleosides in length, wherein the central gap segment is comprised of ten 2′-deoxynucleosides and is flanked by wing segments on the 5′ direction and the 3′ directions comprising five nucleosides each. The 4-8-5 MOE gapmers are 17 nucleosides in length, wherein the central gap segment is comprised of eight 2′-deoxyribonucleosides and is flanked by wing segments on the 5′ direction and the 3′ directions comprising four and five nucleosides respectively. The 5-8-5 MOE gapmers are 18 nucleosides in length, wherein the central gap segment is comprised of eight 2′-deoxynucleosides and is flanked by wing segments on the 5′ direction and the 3′ directions comprising five nucleosides each. The 5-8-7 MOE gapmers are 20 nucleosides in length, wherein the central gap segment is comprised of eight 2′-deoxynucleosides and is flanked by wing segments on the 5′ direction and the 3′ directions comprising five and seven nucleosides respectively. The 6-8-6 MOE gapmers are 20 nucleosides in length, wherein the central gap segment is comprised of eight 2′-deoxynucleosides and is flanked by wing segments on the 5′ direction and the 3′ directions comprising six nucleosides each. The 6-9-5 MOE gapmers are 20 nucleosides in length, wherein the central gap segment is comprised of nine 2′-deoxynucleosides and is flanked by wing segments on the 5′ direction and the 3′ directions comprising six and five nucleosides respectively. Each nucleoside in the 5′ wing segment and each nucleoside in the 3′ wing segment has a 2′-MOE modification.
The deoxy, MOE and cEt oligonucleotides are 17 nucleosides in length wherein each nucleoside has a MOE sugar modification, a cEt sugar modification, or a deoxy moiety. The sugar chemistry of each oligonucleotide is denoted as in the Chemistry column, where ‘k’ indicates a cEt modified sugar; ‘d’ indicates a 2′-deoxyribose; and ‘e’ indicates a 2′-MOE modified sugar.
The internucleoside linkages throughout each gapmer are either phosphodiester or phosphorothioate linkages. The internucleoside linkages of each oligonucleotide are denoted in the Backbone Chemistry column, where ‘o’ indicates a phosphodiester linkage and ‘s’ indicates a phosphorothioate linkage. All cytosine residues throughout each gapmer are 5-methylcytosines. “Start site” indicates the 5′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted in the human gene sequence. “Stop site” indicates the 3′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted human gene sequence. Each gapmer listed in the Tables below is targeted to either the human SOD-1 mRNA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1 (GENBANK Accession No. NM_000454.4) or the human SOD-1 genomic sequence, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 2 (GENBANK Accession No. NT_011512.10 truncated from nucleotides 18693000 to 18704000).
The newly designed oligonucleotides were tested at various doses in A431 cells. The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar culture conditions. The results for each experiment are presented in separate tables shown below. Cells were plated at a density of 5,000 cells per well and modified oligonucleotides were added to the media at 0.062 μM, 0.185 μM, 0.556 μM, 1.667 μM, 5.000 μM, and 15.000 μM concentrations of modified oligonucleotide for free uptake by the cells, as specified in the Tables below. After a treatment period of approximately 16 hours, RNA was isolated from the cells and SOD-1 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Human primer probe sets RTS3898 was used to measure mRNA levels. SOD-1 mRNA levels were adjusted according to total RNA content, as measured by RIBOGREEN®. Results are presented as percent inhibition of SOD-1, relative to untreated control cells.
The newly designed oligonucleotides were also tested at various doses in SH-SY5Y cells. The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar culture conditions. The results for each experiment are presented in separate tables shown below. Cells were plated at a density of 20,000 cells per well and modified oligonucleotides transfected using electroporation at 0.062 μM, 0.185 μM, 0.556 μM, 1.6676 μM, 5.000 μM, 1 and 15.000 μM concentrations of modified oligonucleotide, as specified in the Tables below. After a treatment period of approximately 16 hours, RNA was isolated from the cells and SOD-1 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Human primer probe set RTS3898 was used to measure mRNA levels. SOD-1 mRNA levels were adjusted according to total RNA content, as measured by RIBOGREEN®. Results are presented as percent inhibition of SOD-1, relative to untreated control cells.
Gapmers from the studies described above, including benchmark compound ISIS 333611, which was previously disclosed in WO 2005/040180, were tested in an SOD-1 transgenic rat model (Taconic, Cat #2148-F and 2148-M). These hemizygous rats express mutant human SOD-1 in the spinal cord.
Additional gapmers were designed based on the sequences of the oligonucleotides disclosed in studies described above. The oligonucleotides were designed as 5-9-5 MOE gapmers, 5-10-5 MOE gapmers or deoxy, MOE and cEt oligonucleotides. The 5-9-5 MOE gapmers are 19 nucleosides in length, wherein the central gap segment is comprised of nine 2′-deoxyribonucleosides and is flanked by wing segments on the 5′ direction and the 3′ directions comprising five nucleosides each. The 5-10-5 MOE gapmers are 20 nucleosides in length, wherein the central gap segment is comprised of ten 2′-deoxyribonucleosides and is flanked by wing segments on the 5′ direction and the 3′ directions comprising five nucleosides each. Each nucleoside in the 5′ wing segment and each nucleoside in the 3′ wing segment has a 2′-MOE modification. The deoxy, MOE and cEt oligonucleotides are 17 nucleosides in length wherein each nucleoside has a MOE sugar modification, a cEt sugar modification, or a deoxy moiety The sugar chemistry of each oligonucleotide is denoted as in the Chemistry column, where ‘k’ indicates a cEt modified sugar; ‘d’ indicates a 2′-deoxyribose; and ‘e’ indicates a 2′-MOE modified sugar. The internucleoside linkages throughout each gapmer are either phosphodiester or phosphorothioate linkages. The internucleoside linkages of each oligonucleotide is denoted in the Backbone Chemistry column, where ‘o’ indicates a phosphodiester linkage and ‘s’ indicates a phosphorothioate linkage. All cytosine residues throughout each oligonucleotide are 5-methylcytosines. “Start site” indicates the 5′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted in the human gene sequence. “Stop site” indicates the 3′-most nucleoside to which the gapmer is targeted human gene sequence. Each gapmer listed in the Table below is targeted to either the human SOD-1 mRNA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 1 (GENBANK Accession No. NM_000454.4) or the human SOD-1 genomic sequence, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 2 (GENBANK Accession No. NT_011512.10 truncated from nucleotides 18693000 to 18704000).
The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar conditions. The results for each experiment are presented in separate tables shown below. Rats were injected intrathecally with 30 μL of a 16.67 mg/ml solution of modified oligonucleotide diluted in PBS (500 μg final dose). A control group of rats was injected intrathecally with PBS. Inhibition levels of SOD-1 in the lumbar spinal cord, thoracic spinal cord and cervical spinal cord were assessed. The data is presented below and indicate that several modified oligonucleotides inhibited human SOD-1 levels in this model.
Gapmers from the studies described above, including benchmark compound ISIS 333611, exhibiting significant in vitro inhibition of SOD-1 mRNA were selected and tested at various doses in LLC-MK2 cells. The cross-reactivity of the human modified oligonucleotides tested in this study with the rhesus monkey genomic sequence (the complement of GENBANK Accession No. NW_001114168.1 truncated from nucleotides 2258000 to 2271000, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 3) is shown in the Table below.
Cells were plated at a density of 20,000 cells per well and transfected using electroporation with 0.078 μM, 0.156 μM, 0.313 μM, 0.625 μM, 1.25 μM, 2.50 μM, 5.00 μM, and 10.000 μM concentrations of modified oligonucleotide, as specified in the Tables below. After a treatment period of approximately 16 hours, RNA was isolated from the cells and SOD-1 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR Primer probe set RTS3121 (forward sequence TGGAGATAATACACAAGGCTGTACCA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 17; reverse sequence CAACATGCCTCTCTTCATCCTTT, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 18; probe sequence ATCCTCTATCCAGACAACACGGTGGGC, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 19) was used to measure mRNA levels. SOD-1 mRNA levels were adjusted according to total RNA content, as measured by RIBOGREEN®. Results are presented as percent inhibition of SOD-1, relative to untreated control cells. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of each oligonucleotide is also presented. As presented in the Table, several of the newly designed oligonucleotides were more potent than the benchmark, ISIS 336611.
Gapmers from the studies described above, including benchmark compound ISIS 333611, which was previously disclosed in WO 2005/040180, were tested for tolerability in Sprague-Dawley rats.
The modified oligonucleotides were tested in a series of experiments that had similar conditions. Rats were injected intrathecally with 3 mg of a single dose of ISIS oligonucleotide. A control group of rats was injected intrathecally with PBS. Acute tolerability was assessed 3 hours post-dose using a functional observational battery (FOB). This score is used to evaluate the acute tolerability of a compound with lower scores denoting better tolerated compounds. Control animals usually have a score of ‘0’ or ‘1’. At 3 hours post injection, the rats are observed by placing each rat on the cage top and evaluating certain functions, assigning a number of ‘0’ or ‘1’ depending on whether the rat exhibits normal function in the region of interest (0) or does not (1) for each function, and then adding the total scores. Seven regions are assessed, including tail, hind paws, hind legs, hind end, front posture, fore paws, and head. The results of the scoring are presented in the Table below. As presented in the Table, several newly designed oligonucleotides demonstrated more acute tolerability compared to the benchmark, ISIS 333611.
Tolerability was also assessed 8 weeks post-dose by measuring the levels of IBA1, a microglial marker, and GFAP, an astrocytic marker, in the lumbar spinal cord region. Both IBA1 and GFAP are markers of CNS inflammation (Frank, M G, Brain Behav. Immun. 2007, 21, 47-59), hence the higher the level of either marker, the less tolerable the antisense oligonucleotide is deemed to be in this rat model.
IBA1 mRNA levels were measured with primer probe set rAIF1_LTS00219 (forward sequence AGGAGAAAAACAAAGAACACCAGAA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 5; reverse sequence CAATTAGGGCAACTCAGAAATAGCT, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 6; probe sequence CCAACTGGTCCCCCAGCCAAGA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 7). GFAP mRNA levels were measured with primer probe set mGFAP_LTS00370 (forward sequence GAAACCAGCCTGGACACCAA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 8; reverse sequence TCCACAGTCTTTACCACGATGTTC, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 9; probe sequence TCCGTGTCAGAAGGCCACCTCAAGA, designated herein as SEQ ID NO: 10).
The results are presented in the Table below. As presented in the Table, several newly designed oligonucleotides were more tolerable compared to the benchmark, ISIS 333611.
Gapmers from the studies described above, including benchmark compound ISIS 333611, were tested in an SOD-1 transgenic rat model (Taconic, Cat #2148-F and 2148-M). These hemizygous rats express mutant human SOD-1 in the spinal cord, many brain regions, and peripheral organs. Rats were injected intrathecally with 10, 30, 100, 300, 1000, or 3000 μg of a gapmer listed in the table below or with only PBS. Two weeks later, the animals were sacrificed. Inhibition of SOD-1 mRNA in the lumbar spinal cord, cervical spinal cord, rostral cortex, and caudal cortex was assessed by RT-PCR using primer probe set RTS3898, described in Example 1. The data is presented below as ED50 values, and indicates that the oligonucleotides inhibited SOD1 mRNA in multiple CNS tissues more potently than Isis 333611. Indeed, ED50 values for Isis No. 333611 could not even be calculated, as indicated by an entry of “n/a,” because even the highest concentration tested (3000 μg) did not inhibit SOD-1 mRNA greater than 55-65%. “n.d.” indicates that there is no data available for the indicated sample.
Gapmers from the studies described above, including benchmark compound ISIS 333611, were tested for tolerability in Sprague-Dawley rats. Groups of 4 to 6 rats were injected intrathecally with 1 mg or 3 mg of a single dose of an ISIS oligonucleotide. A control group of rats was injected intrathecally with PBS. Acute tolerability was assessed 3 hours post-dose, as described in Example 14. The results for the 1 mg dose are the averages for each group following one experiment. The results for the 3 mg dose are the averages for each group across two replicate experiments. The results of the study, presented in the table below, indicate that several newly designed oligonucleotides were more tolerable than the benchmark, ISIS 333611.
In order to confirm the results obtained in transgenic rats in another species, gapmers from the studies described above were tested in an SOD-1 transgenic mouse model that expresses the same G93A human mutant SOD1 gene that the transgenic rat expresses (see Examples 12 and 15).
Mice received an intracerebral ventricular bolus (ICVB) of 10, 30, 100, 300, or 700 μg of a gapmer listed in the table below, or PBS. Two weeks later, the animals were sacrificed. Inhibition of SOD-1 mRNA in the lumbar spinal cord and cortex was assessed by RT-PCR using primer probe set RTS3898, described in Example 1. The data is presented below as ED50 values, and indicates that the oligonucleotides inhibited SOD1 mRNA more potently than Isis 333611 in both rats and mice.
Gapmers from the studies described above, including benchmark compound ISIS 333611, were tested for tolerability in C57bl6 mice. Mice were injected stereotaxically into the cerebral ventricles with 700 ug of a single dose of ISIS oligonucleotide. A control group of mice was injected into the cerebral ventricle with PBS. Acute tolerability was assessed at 3 hours post injection using a functional observation battery (FOB) different from that used for the rats. Each mouse was evaluated according to 7 different criteria. The 7 criteria are (1) the mouse was bright, alert, and responsive; (2) the mouse was standing or hunched without stimuli; (3) the mouse shows any movement without stimuli (4) the mouse demonstrates forward movement after its lifted; (5) the mouse demonstrates any movement after its lifted; (6) the mouse responds to a tail pinch; (7) regular breathing. For each of the 7 different criteria, each mouse was given a sub-score of 0 if it met the criteria or 1 if it did not. After all of the 7 criteria were evaluated, the sub-scores were summed for each mouse and then averaged for each group. For example, if a mouse was bright, alert, and responsive 3 hours after the 700 μg ICV dose, and met all other other criteria, it would get a summed score of 0. If another mouse was not bright, alert, and responsive 3 hours after the 700 μg ICV dose but met all other criteria, it would receive a score of 1. Saline treated mice generally receive a score of 0. A score at the top end of the range would be suggestive of acute toxicity.
Bodyweights were measured throughout the study and are reported below as percent change at 8 weeks relative to baseline. Long term tolerability was assessed 8 weeks post-dose by measuring the levels of IBA1 and GFAP, as described in Example 14. IBA1 and GFAP mRNA levels are reported relative to PBS treated animals. The results of the study, presented in the tables below, indicate that several newly designed oligonucleotides were more tolerable, in rats and mice, compared to the benchmark, ISIS 333611.
Isis No. 666853 was tested in cynomolgus monkey. There is one mismatch between Isis No. 666853 and cynomolgus monkey SOD-1, and there are 17 contiguous bases in Isis No. 666853 that are 100% complementary to cynomolgus monkey SOD-1.
Groups of 6-10 male and female monkeys received an intrathecal lumbar bolus of PBS or 4, 12, or 35 mg of Isis No. 666853 on days 1, 14, 28, 56, and 84 of the study. Each group received the same dose on all five dosing days. On day 91, the animals were sacrificed. Inhibition of SOD-1 mRNA in the lumbar, thoracic, and cervical spinal cord and frontal cortex, motor cortex, hippocampus, pons, and cerebellum was assessed by RT-PCR using primer probe set RTS3898. The data is presented below as the average percent inhibition for each treatment group, relative to the PBS treated group. The results indicate that Isis No. 666853 inhibited SOD-1 mRNA in multiple target tissues in cynomolgus monkey.
Treatment with 666853 was well tolerated for the duration of the 13 week study and there were no clinical observations of adverse reactions in monkeys.
This application is a continuation of and claims the benefit of priority of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/513,297, filed Jul. 16, 2019 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,669,546), which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/301,004 filed Sep. 30, 2016 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,385,341), which is U.S. national stage application of PCT/US2015/023934, filed Apr. 1, 2015, which in turn claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Appl. No. 61/973,803 filed Apr. 1, 2014. The contents of each of these applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3687808 | Merigan et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 4415732 | Caruthers et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4469863 | Ts'o et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4476301 | Imbach et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4500707 | Caruthers et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4725677 | Koster et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4845205 | Huynh Dinh et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4973679 | Caruthers et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4981957 | Lebleu et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5013830 | Ohutsuka et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5023243 | Tullis | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5034506 | Summerton et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5118800 | Smith et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5130302 | Spielvogel et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5132418 | Caruthers et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5134066 | Rogers et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| RE34036 | McGeehan | Aug 1992 | E |
| 5149797 | Pederson et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5166315 | Summerton et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5175273 | Bischofberger et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5177196 | Meyers, Jr. et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5177198 | Spielvogel et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5188897 | Suhadolnik et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5194599 | Froehler et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5214134 | Weis et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5216141 | Benner | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5220007 | Pederson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5223618 | Cook et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5235033 | Summerton et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5256775 | Froehler | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5264423 | Cohen et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264562 | Matteucci | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264564 | Matteucci | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5185444 | Summerton et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5276019 | Cohen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5286717 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5319080 | Leumann | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5321131 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5359044 | Cook et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5366878 | Pederson et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367066 | Urdea et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5378825 | Cook et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5386023 | Sanghvi et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5393878 | Leumann | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5399676 | Froehler | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5403711 | Walder et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5405938 | Summerton et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5405939 | Suhadolnik et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5432272 | Benner | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5434257 | Matteucci | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5446137 | Maag et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5453496 | Caruthers et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5455233 | Spielvogel et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5457187 | Gmelner et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5457191 | Cook et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5459255 | Cook et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5466677 | Baxter et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5466786 | Burh et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470967 | Huie et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5476925 | Letsinger et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5484908 | Froehler et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5489677 | Sanghvi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5491133 | Walder et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5502177 | Matteucci et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5508270 | Baxter et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5514785 | Van Ness et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5519126 | Hecht | May 1996 | A |
| 5519134 | Acevedo et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5525711 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527899 | Froehler | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5536638 | Rossau et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5536821 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541306 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541307 | Cook et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5550111 | Suhadolnik et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5552540 | Haralambidis | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5561225 | Maddry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5563253 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5565350 | Kmiec | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5565555 | Froehler et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5567811 | Mistura et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571799 | Tkachuk et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5576427 | Cook et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5587361 | Cook et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5587469 | Cook et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5587470 | Cook et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591722 | Montgomery et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5594121 | Froehler et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596086 | Matteucci | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596091 | Switzer | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5597909 | Urdea et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5602240 | De Mesmaeker et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5608046 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5610289 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5610300 | Altmann et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5614617 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618704 | Sanghvi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623065 | Cook et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623070 | Cook et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625050 | Beaton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5627053 | Usman et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5633360 | Bischofberger et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5639873 | Barascut et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5645985 | Froehler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5646265 | McGee | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5646269 | Matteucci | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5652355 | Metelev et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5652356 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5663312 | Chaturvedula | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5670633 | Cook et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672697 | Burh et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5677437 | Teng et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5677439 | Weis et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681941 | Cook et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5698685 | Summerton et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5700920 | Altmann et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5700922 | Cook | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5721218 | Froehler | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5750692 | Cook et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5763588 | Matteucci et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5792608 | Swaminathan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5792847 | Burh et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5801154 | Baracchini et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5808027 | Cook et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5830653 | Froehler et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5843641 | Brown et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5849290 | Brown et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5859221 | Cook et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5948903 | Cook et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5994076 | Chenchik et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5994517 | Ts'O et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5998148 | Bennett et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005087 | Cook et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005096 | Matteucci et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6077833 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6166199 | Cook et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6194150 | Stinchcomb et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6300319 | Manoharan | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6303374 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6352829 | Chenchik et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6426220 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6525191 | Ramasamy | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6531584 | Cook et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6582908 | Fodor et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6600032 | Manoharan et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6660720 | Manoharan | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6784290 | Monia et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 7015315 | Cook et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7053199 | Imanishi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7053207 | Wengel et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7060809 | Wengel et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7054125 | Wengel | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7101993 | Cook et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7132530 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7217805 | Imanishi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7262177 | Ts'o et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7314923 | Kaneko et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7399845 | Seth et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7427672 | Imanishi et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7491805 | Vargeese et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7547684 | Seth et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7569686 | Bhat et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7622455 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7632938 | Khvorova et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7655785 | Bentwich | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7666854 | Seth et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7678895 | Bennett et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7696345 | Allerson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7723509 | Manoharan et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7741457 | Swayze et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7750131 | Seth et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7875733 | Bhat et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7888497 | Bentwich et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7902163 | Bennett et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7939677 | Bhat et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8022193 | Swayze et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8030467 | Seth et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8039610 | Khvorova et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8080644 | Wengel et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8088746 | Seth et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8088904 | Swayze et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8106022 | Manoharan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8124745 | Allerson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8153365 | Wengel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8268980 | Seth et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8278283 | Seth et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8278425 | Prakash et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8278426 | Seth et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8440803 | Swayze et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8501805 | Seth et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8530640 | Seth et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8546556 | Seth et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8575123 | Manoharan et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| RE44779 | Imanishi et al. | Feb 2014 | E |
| 8828956 | Manoharan et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8921331 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8993529 | Bennett et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9005906 | Swayze et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9012421 | Migawa et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9102938 | Rajeev et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9127276 | Prakash et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9290760 | Rajeev et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9476051 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 10385341 | Swayze et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 20010053519 | Fodor et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020156040 | Oberley et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030158403 | Manoharan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030175906 | Manoharan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228597 | Cowsert et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040091919 | Bennett et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040171570 | Allerson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040192629 | Xu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040241651 | Olek et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050019915 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050118625 | Mounts | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050130923 | Bhat et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244851 | Blume et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261218 | Esau et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060148740 | Platenburg | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229268 | Benjamin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060293269 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070031844 | Khvorova et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070054869 | Bennett et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070117772 | Bennett et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080039618 | Allerson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20090130195 | Acevedo-Duncan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20100081705 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100190837 | Migawa et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100197762 | Swayze et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20110039914 | Pavco et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191912 | Alexandrov et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20120029049 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120214865 | Bennett et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20130130378 | Manoharan et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130053430 | Bell et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130323836 | Manoharan et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140107330 | Freier et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20150078540 | Prakash et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150167008 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150184153 | Freier et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150191727 | Migawa et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150267195 | Seth et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150275212 | Albaek et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20200040342 | Swayze et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2451643 | Nov 2012 | CA |
| 103582648 | Feb 2014 | CN |
| 2221376 | Nov 2012 | EP |
| 2270024 | Oct 2018 | EP |
| WO 199005181 | May 1990 | WO |
| WO 199419493 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| WO 199726270 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO 199731012 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| WO 200203979 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002044321 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002057414 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO 2003000707 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003004602 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 2005040180 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006066203 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007092182 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2009102427 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2013173637 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| WO 2015031392 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015153800 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2016016449 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016077687 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2017007813 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017007825 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2018204786 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/301,044, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,385,341, filed Sep. 30, 2016, Swayze. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,297, filed Jul. 16, 2019, Swayze. |
| Agrawal et al., “Antisense therapeutics: is it as simple as complementary base recognition,” Mol. Medicine Today, 2000, 6:72-81. |
| Al-Chalabi et al., “Recent Advances in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,” Curr Opin Neurol, 2000, 13(4):397-405. |
| Alisky et al., “Gene therapy for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other motor neuron diseases,” Hum Gene Ther, 2000, 11(17):2315-2329. |
| Amorfix Life Sciences Ltd., “Amorfix Life Sciences Discovers Common Link Between ALS and Alzheimer's Disease,” Press Release, Nov. 27, 2007. |
| Berger et al., “Crystal structures of B-DNA with incorporated 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-arabino-furanosyl thymines: implications of conformational preorganization for duplex stability,” Nucleic Acids Res, 1998, 26(10):2473-2480. |
| Berger et al., “Universal bases for hybridization, replication and chain termination,” Nucleic Acids Research, 2000, 28(15):2911-2914. |
| Bosco et al., “Wild-Type and Mutant SOD1 Share an Aberrant Conformation and a Common Pathogenic Pathway in ALS,” Nat. Neurosci., 2010, 13(11):1396-1403. |
| Braasch et al., “Novel Antisense and Peptide Nucleic Acid Strategies for Controlling Gene Expression,” Biochemistry, 2002, 41(14):4503-4510. |
| Branch, “A good antisense molecule is hard to find,” TIBS, 1998, 23″45-50. |
| Brooks et al., “El Escorial revisited: Revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,” ALS and Other Motor Neuron Disorders, 2000, 1:293-299. |
| Bruijin et al., “Aggregation and motor neuron toxicity of an ALS-linked SOD1 mutant independent from wild-type SOD1,” Science, 1998, 281(5384):1851-1854. |
| Burel et al., “Hepatotoxicity of high affinity gapmer antisense oligonucleotides is mediated by RNase H1 dependent promiscuous reduction of very long pre-mRNA transcripts,” Nucleic Acids Research, 2015, 44(5):2093-2109. |
| Chin, “On the Preparation and Utilization of Isolated and Purified Oligonucleotides,” Document purportedly located on a CD-ROM and contributed to the public collection of the Katherine R. Everett Law Library of the University of North Carolina on Mar. 14, 2002. |
| Cleveland et al., “Oxidation versus aggregation—how do SOD1 mutants cause ALS?” Nat Med., 2000, 6(12):1320-1321. |
| Condon et al., “Altered mRNA splicing and inhibitions of human E-selectin expression by an antisense oligonucleotide in human umbilical vein endothelial cells,” J. Nio. Chem., 1996, 271(48):30398-30403. |
| Crooke et al., “Antisense Drug Technology,” Second Edition, CRC Press. (2008). Chapters 1-28. |
| Crooke et al., “Basic Principles of Antisense Therapeutics,” (1998), Chapter 1, Springer-Verlag, New York. |
| Dean et al., “Antisense Oligonucleotide-based Therapeutics for Cancer,” Oncogene, 2003, 22:9087-9096. |
| Egli et al., “Synthesis, improved antisense activity and structural rationale for the divergent RNA affinities of 3′-fluoro hexitol nucleic acid (FHNA and Ara-FHNA) modified oligonucleotides,” J. Am. Chem., 2011, 133(41):16642-16649. |
| European Extended Search Report in European Application No. 15773965.7, dated Oct. 6, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Fridovich, “Superoxide radical and superoxide dismutases,” Annu, Rev. Biochem., 1995, 64:97-112. |
| Gautschi et al., “Activity of a novel bcl-2/bcl-xL-bispecific antisense oligonucleotide against tumors of diverse histologic origins,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2001, 93:463-471. |
| GenBank Accession No. X02312 (PRI Jan. 28, 1995), 2 pages. |
| Green et al., “Antisense Oligonucleotides: An Evolving Technology for the Modulation of Gene Expression in Human Disease,” J. Am. Coll. Surg., 2000, 191(1):93-105. |
| Grzanna et al., “Intrastriatal and intraventricular injections of oligodeoxynucleotides in the rat brain: tissue penetration, intracellular distribution and c-fos antisense effects,” Mol. Brain Res., 1998, 63(1):35-52. |
| Gulesserian et al., “Superoxide dismutase SOD1, encoded on chromosome 21, but not SOD2 is overexpressed in brains of patients with down syndrome,” J. Investig. Med., 2001, 49(1):41-46. |
| Haidet-Phillips et al., “Astrocytes from familial and sporadic ALS patients are toxic to motor neurons,” Nature Biotech, 2011, 29(9):824-830. |
| Hammond et al., “Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing by Double-Stranded RNA,” Nature, 2001, 2:110-119. |
| Hanze et al., “Monitoring of antisense effects of oligonucleotides targeted to the neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor gene,” Eur. J. Pharmacol., 1997, 330:(1):87-92. |
| Ho et al., “cDNA and deduced amino acid sequence of rat coper-zinc-containing superoxide dismutase,” Nucleic Acid Research, 1987, 15(16):6746. |
| Hottinger, “The copper chelator d-penicillamine delays onset of disease and extends survival in a transgenic mouse model of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 1997. 9(7):1548-1551. |
| Hoye et al., “MicroRNA profiling reveals marker of motor neuron disease in ALS models,” J. Neuroscience, 2017, 37(22):5574-5586 (online Apr. 17, 2017). |
| Huang et al., “Superoxide dismutase as a target for the selective killing of cancer cells,” Nature, 2000, 407(6802):390-395. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2015/023934, dated Oct. 4, 2016, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report in International Application No. PCT/US2002/19664, dated Jan. 14, 2003, 4 pages. |
| International Search Report in International Application No. PCT/US2004/031673, dated Aug. 22, 2005, 4 pages. |
| International Search Report in International Application No. PCT/US2015/23934, dated Sep. 30, 2015. |
| Jen et al., “Suppression of Gene Expression by Targeted Disruption of Messenger RNA: Available Options and Current Strategies,” Stem Cells, 2000, 18:307-319. |
| Kagiyama et al., “Antisense inhibition of angiotensinogen attenuates vasopressin release in the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus of spontaneously hypertensive rats,” Brain Research, 1999, 829:120-124. |
| Kawata et al., “Aberrant splicing of human Cu/Zn superoxide dimutase (SOD1) RNA transcripts,” Neuroport, 2000, 11(12):2649-2653. |
| Klivenyi et al., “Neuroprotective effects of creatine in a transgenic animal model of amyotrophic, lateral sclerosis,” Nat Med, 1999, 5(3):347-350. |
| Klug et al., “A selective antisense oligonucleotide against the G93A mutant of the Cu/Zn—SOD1 mRNA, applied to the mouse brain,” European Journal of Physiology, 2001, 441(6):R205 Abstract No. P20-7. |
| Lee et al., “Molecular Cloning and High-Level Expression of Human Cytoplasmic Superoxide Dismutase Gene in Escherichia coli,” Kor. Jour. Microbiol., 1990, 28(2):91-7. |
| Levanon et al., “Architecture and anatomy of the chromosomal locus in human chromosome 21 encoding the Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase,” EMBO, 1985, 4(1): 77-84. |
| Lima et al., “Defining the Factors that Contribute to On-Target Specificity of Antisense Oligonucleotides,” PLoS One, 2014, 9(7):e101752, 19 pages. |
| Maher et al., “Comparative hybrid arrest by tandem antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotides or oligodeoxyribonucleoside methylphosphonates in a cell-free system,” Nucl. Acid. Res., 1998, 16(8):3341-3358. |
| Miller et al., “An antisense oligonucleotide against SOD1 delivered intrathecally for patients with SOD1 familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a phase 1, randomised, first-in-man study,” Lancet Neurol, 2013, 12(5):435-442. |
| Milner et al., “Selecting effective antisense reagents on combinatorial oligonucleotide arrays,” Nature Biotechnology, 1997, 15:537-541. |
| Misra et al., “Drug delivery to the central nervous system: a review,” J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci, 2003, 6(2):252-273. |
| Miyagishi et al., “Comparison of the suppressive effects of antisense oligonucleotides and siRNAs directed against the same targets in mammalian cells,” Antisense and Nucleic Acid Drug Development, 2003, 13(1):1-7. |
| Miyagishi et al., “Strategies for generation of an siRNA expression library directed against the human genome”, Oligonucleotides, 2003, 13(5):325-33. |
| Muramatsu et al., “Superoxide Dismutase in SAS Human Tongue Carcinoma Cell Line is a Factor-Defining Invasiveness and Cell Motility,” Cancer Research, 1995, 55:6210-6214. |
| New England Biolabs, “Nucleic Acids, Linkers and Primers,” 1998-1999 Catalog (cover page and pp. 121 and 284). |
| Partial European Search Report in European Patent Application No. 02742241, dated Nov. 8, 2004, 6 pages. |
| Reynolds et al., “Rational siRNA design for RNA interference,” Nature Biotechnology, 2004, 22:326-330. |
| Rosen et al., “Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,” Nature, 1993, 362:59-62. |
| Rothstein et al., “Chronic inhibition of superoxide dismutase produces apoptotic death of spinal Neurons” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1994, 91(10)4155-4159. |
| Rowland et al., “Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,” N. Engl. J. Med., 2001, 334:1688-1700. |
| Rowland et al., “Six important themes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) research, 1999,” J. Neurol. Sci., 2000, 180:2-6. |
| Sanghvi, “Heterocyclic Base Modifications in Nucleic Acids and Their Applications in Antisense Oligonucleotides,” Antisense Research and Application, 1993, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 276-278. |
| Sau et al., “Mutation of SOD1 in ALS: a gain of a loss of function,” Hum. Mol. Genet., 2007, 16(13):1604-1618. |
| Scanlon, “Anti-Genes: SiRNA, Ribozymes and Antisense,” Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 2004, 5:415-420. |
| Seth et al., “Short Antisense Oligonucleotides with Novel 2′-4′ Conformationally Restricted Nucleoside Analogues Show Improved Potency Without Increased Toxicity in Animals,” J. Med. Chem., 2009, 52:10-13. |
| Sherman et al., “Nucleotide Sequence and Expression of Human Chromosome 21-encoded Superoxide Dismutase mRNA,” Pro. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1983, 80:5465-5496. |
| Sinnayah et al., “Effects of angiotensinogen antisense oligonucleotides on fluid intake in response to different dipsogenic stimuli in the rat,” Molecular Brain Research, 1997, 50:43-50. |
| Skerra, “Phosphorothioate primers improve the amplification of DNA sequence by DNA polymerases with proofreading activity,” Nucleic Acids Research, 1992, 20(14):3551-3554. |
| Smith et al., “Antisense oligonucleotide therapy for neurodegenerative disease,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2006, 116(8):2290-2296. |
| Tasheva et al., “Regulation of human RPS14 transcription by intronic antisense RNA'a and ribosomal protein S14,” Genes Dev., 1995, 9(3):304-316. |
| Trotti et al., “SOD1 mutants linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis selectivity inactivate a glial glutamate transporter,” Nat. Neurosci., 1999,2(5):427-433. |
| Troy et al., “Down-regulation of copper/zinc superoxide dismutase causes apoptotic death in PC12 neuronal cells,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 1994, 91(14):6384-6387. |
| Troy et al., “Down-regulation of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase leads to cell death via the nitric oxide-peroxynitrite pathway,” J. Neurosci., 1996, 16(1):253-261. |
| Turrens, “Mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species,” J. Physiol., 2003, 552:335-344. |
| Vickers et al., “Antisense oligonucleotides capable of promoting specific target mRNA reduction via competing RNase H1-dependent and independent mechanisms,” PLOS One, 2014, 9(10):1/12. |
| Vickers et al., “Efficient reduction of target RNAs by small interfering RNA and RNase H-dependent antisense agents A comparative analysis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2003, 278:7108-7118. |
| Vickers et al., “The rates of the major steps in the molecular mechanism of RNase H1-dependent antisense oligonucleotide induced degradation of RNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, 2015, 43(18):8955-8963. |
| Wang et al., “Delivery of antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotides against the human epidermal growth factor receptor into cultured KB cells with liposomes conjugated to folate via polyethylene glycol,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1995, 92(8):3318-3322. |
| Ward et al., “Nonsense-Mediated Decay as a Terminating Mechanism for Antisense Oligonucleotides,” Nucleic Acids Res., 2014, 42(9):5871-5879. |
| Winer et al., “SOD1 in cerebral spinal fluid as a pharmacodynamic marker for antisense oligonucleotide therapy,” Arch. Neurol., 2013, 70(2):201-207 (online Nov. 12, 2012). |
| Woolf et al., “Specificity of antisense oligonucleotides in vivo,” PNAS, 1992, 89:7305-7309. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200354723 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61973803 | Apr 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15301004 | US | |
| Child | 16513297 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16513297 | Jul 2019 | US |
| Child | 16849583 | US |
