Patent Grant
11430656
The present disclosure relates generally to the field of vapor phase deposition, particularly cyclical vapor deposition of oxide materials.
Integrated circuits are currently manufactured by an elaborate process in which various layers of materials are sequentially constructed in a predetermined arrangement on a semiconductor substrate.
The predetermined arrangement of materials on a semiconductor substrate is often accomplished by deposition of a material over the entire substrate surface, followed by removal of the material from predetermined areas of the substrate, such as by deposition of a mask layer and subsequent selective etching process.
In certain cases, the number of steps involved in manufacturing an integrated surface on a substrate may be reduced by utilizing a selective deposition process, wherein a material is selectively deposited on a first surface relative to a second surface without the need, or with reduced need for subsequent processing. In various contexts, selectivity can be useful to differentiate amounts of deposition on different surfaces of the same part, or to differentiate deposition on different parts.
Oxide materials, whether selectively formed or blanket deposited, are useful in a variety of contexts, including semiconductor fabrication. In many contexts, it is useful to form uniform, thin layers of oxide.
According to some aspects, methods for selectively depositing thin films on a first surface of a substrate relative to a second surface are disclosed. In some embodiments a method can comprise contacting the substrate with a first vapor phase precursor, exposing the substrate to a purge gas or vacuum after contacting the substrate with the first vapor phase precursor, and contacting the substrate with a second vapor phase precursor comprising molecular oxygen (O2) after exposing the substrate to the purge gas or vacuum. In some embodiments the thin film may comprise an insulating metal oxide. In some embodiments the second surface may comprise organic species.
In some embodiments the first surface is a substantially different material from the second surface. In some embodiments a method may further comprise exposing the substrate to a purge gas or vacuum after contacting the substrate with a second vapor phase precursor comprising molecular oxygen. In some embodiments the second surface may comprise a self-assembled monolayer (SAM). In some embodiments a thickness or amount of the thin film deposited on the second surface is less than about 50% of a thickness or amount of the thin film selectively deposited on the first surface of the substrate.
In some embodiments the first vapor phase precursor may comprise an organometallic compound. In some embodiments the first vapor phase precursor may comprise magnesium, lanthanum, hafnium, zirconium, aluminum, yttrium, scandium, a lanthanide, or a transition metal. In some embodiments the first vapor phase precursor may comprise bis(cyclopentadienyl)magnesium (Mg(Cp)2). In some embodiments the first vapor phase precursor may comprise lanthanum formamidinate (La(FAMD)3). In some embodiments the first vapor phase precursor may comprise tetramethylethyl alkylamide hafnium (TEMAH). In some embodiments the second vapor phase precursor does not comprise an additional compound comprising oxygen.
In some embodiments contacting the substrate with the second vapor phase precursor comprising molecular oxygen does not degrade or oxidize the second surface of the substrate. In some embodiments the thin film is deposited at a temperature of from about 100° C. to about 500° C.
According to some aspects methods for depositing a magnesium oxide, lanthanum oxide, or hafnium oxide thin film on a surface of a substrate are disclosed. In some embodiments a method can comprise contacting the substrate with a first vapor phase precursor comprising magnesium, lanthanum, or hafnium, exposing the substrate to a purge gas or vacuum, and contacting the substrate with a second vapor phase precursor comprising molecular oxygen (O2) after exposing the substrate to the purge gas or vacuum. In some embodiments a method may further comprise exposing the substrate to a purge gas or vacuum after contacting the substrate with the second vapor phase precursor.
In some embodiments the substrate may comprise a first surface and a second, substantially different surface and magnesium oxide, lanthanum oxide, or hafnium oxide may be selectively deposited on the first surface of the substrate relative to the second, substantially different surface. In some embodiments the second surface of the substrate comprises organic species. In some embodiments the first vapor phase precursor comprising magnesium, lanthanum, or hafnium comprises at least one cyclopentadienyl (Cp) ligand. In some embodiments the second vapor phase precursor comprising molecular oxygen does not comprise any other compounds comprising oxygen. In some embodiments the magnesium oxide, lanthanum oxide, or hafnium oxide thin film is selectively deposited on a first surface of the substrate relative to a second surface of the substrate, wherein the second surface is organic.
The invention will be better understood from the Detailed Description and from the appended drawings, which are meant to illustrate and not to limit the invention, and wherein:
In the case of oxide thin films, vapor deposition process such as atomic layer deposition (ALD) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) can be used to achieve deposition. Typically these processes include an oxygen-containing reactant such as ozone (O3), oxygen containing plasma, or water (H2O), however in a selective deposition process the concentration of an O3 or H2O reactant may be difficult to control and an O3 or H2O reactant may be difficult to remove from the reaction chamber. Further, O3, or oxygen plasma, for example, may destroy or oxidize a second surface or passivation layer on which deposition is not desired.
According to some aspects of the present disclosure, selective deposition can be used to deposit an oxide material on a first surface of a substrate relative to a second surface. In some embodiments the selective deposition process may be a vapor deposition process, for example a deposition process utilizing chemical reactions between a substrate surface and one or more precursors or reactants, for example an atomic layer deposition type process. In some embodiments, the vapor deposition process can be a thermal deposition process. In some embodiments the selective deposition process may be a cyclical deposition process, for example an ALD process or cyclical CVD process. In some embodiments the selective deposition process may include an oxygen-containing reactant comprising molecular O2. In some embodiments the selectively deposited oxide material may comprise an oxide thin film. In some embodiments the selectively deposited oxide material may comprise a metal oxide, for example a dielectric or an insulating metal oxide such as lanthanum oxide, hafnium oxide, zirconium oxide, magnesium oxide, a transition metal oxide, or aluminum oxide. In some embodiments the deposited metal oxide material does not comprise a substantial amount, if any, of a noble metal, such as Ru. In some embodiments the deposited metal oxide material is not substantially conductive. In some embodiments the deposited metal oxide material has a resistivity of greater than about 10,000 μΩ·cm, or greater than about 1,000,000 μΩ·cm.
In some embodiments the first surface may comprise a metal or semimetal material. In some embodiments the first surface may comprise a metallic material. In some embodiments the first surface may comprise an oxidized metal or metallic material. For example, the first surface may comprise a metal or metallic material, including, but not limited to, materials such as metal nitride, metal silicide, metal carbide, or mixtures of the same, that has been oxidized on its surface. In some embodiments the first surface comprises one or more transition metals. In some embodiments the first surface comprises one or more of Al, Cu, Co, Ni, W, Nb, Fe. In some embodiments the first surface may comprise one or more noble metals, such as Ru. In some embodiments the first surface may comprise Zn, Fe, Mn, or Mo. In some embodiments the first surface may comprise a dielectric material. In some embodiments the first surface may comprise a semiconductor or metallic oxide, nitride, carbide, boride, silicate, or combination thereof. For example, the first surface may comprise one or more of RuOx, NbCx, NbBx, NiOx, CoOx, NbOx, WNCx, TaN, or TiN.
In some embodiments the first surface may comprise a semiconductor material. In some embodiments the first surface may comprise silicon and/or germanium. For example, the first surface may comprise silicon nitride, silicon oxide, silicon carbide, or germanium oxide. In some embodiments the first surface may comprise a silicon dioxide surface. In some embodiments the first surface may comprise a mixture of two or more of the materials recited above.
In some embodiments an oxide material is selectively deposited on a first surface of a substrate relative to a second, different surface of the substrate. In some embodiments the second surface may comprise an organic surface. In some embodiments the second surface may comprise a polymer surface. For example, in some embodiments the second surface may comprise a polyimide, polyamide, polystyrene, polyuria, or other such polymer. In some embodiments the polymers may include dimers, trimers, polyurethanes, polythioureas, polyesters, or polyimines. In some embodiments the organic surface may comprise other polymeric forms or mixtures of the above materials. In some embodiments the second organic surface comprises graphene or another form of carbon. In some embodiments the organic material may comprise amorphous carbon. In some embodiments the amorphous carbon may contain hydrogen. In some embodiments the second organic surface comprises photoresist material. In some embodiments there is no hydrocarbon contamination of the surface, for example from the atmosphere.
In some embodiments the second surface may comprise a directed self-assembled layer (DSA), such as a block co-polymer layer. In some embodiments the second surface may comprise a self-assembled monolayer (SAM). For example, in some embodiments the second surface may comprise a tricholoro(octadecyl)silane SAM. In some embodiments the second surface may serve as a passivation layer during selective deposition. In some embodiments the second surface may comprise an organic passivation material, for example the second surface may comprise benzotriazole (BTA). In some embodiments the second surface may comprise organic species which can serve to passivate the second surface during selective deposition. In some embodiments the second surface may not be a continuous or closed layer. In some embodiments, the second surface may comprise a resist, such as photoresist. That is, in some embodiments the second surface may comprise a light sensitive material capable of being used in, for example, photolithography or photoengraving processes. For example, in some embodiments the second surface may comprise a photoresist capable of being used in an extreme ultraviolet lithography process, otherwise referred to as an EUV resist. In some embodiments the second surface may comprise a photoresist capable of being used in an immersion lithography process, for example a photoresist capable of being used in an immersion lithography process using light at a wavelength of 193 nm, otherwise referred to as a 193i resist.
In some embodiments a second material, such as a passivation layer, organic species or material, and/or SAM may be deposited on a portion of a first surface of a substrate in order to form a second, different surface. In some embodiments the second surface may comprise an organic material or organic species and the first surface may not comprise an organic material or organic species.
In some embodiments where the second surface comprises an organic surface, such as a passivation layer, a selective deposition process may remove or degrade less than about 40%, less than about 30%, less than about 20%, less than about 10%, less than about 5%, or less than about 1% of the organic surface as measured by the thickness of the organic surface. In some embodiments a selective deposition process may not remove or degrade substantially any material from the organic surface. In some embodiments an organic second surface, such as a passivation layer, may not be substantially removed or degraded by a selective deposition process including O2 as an oxygen-containing reactant, as compared to a similar deposition process including O3, oxygen-containing plasma, and/or H2O as an oxygen-containing reactant.
Selectivity
Selectivity can be given as a percentage calculated by [(deposition on first surface)−(deposition on second surface)]/(deposition on the first surface). Deposition can be measured in any of a variety of ways. In some embodiments deposition may be given as the measured thickness of the deposited material. In some embodiments deposition may be given as the measured amount of material deposited.
In some embodiments where deposition is measured as the thickness of material deposited and selectivity is a ratio of thicknesses on the different surfaces, selectivity is greater than about 10%, greater than about 50%, greater than about 75%, greater than about 85%, greater than about 90%, greater than about 93%, greater than about 95%, greater than about 98%, greater than about 99% or even greater than about 99.5%. In embodiments described herein, the selectivity can change over the duration or thickness of a deposition.
In some embodiments where deposition is measured as the amount of material deposited and selectivity is a ratio of the amount of material deposited on the different surfaces, selectivity is greater than about 10%, greater than about 50%, greater than about 75%, greater than about 85%, greater than about 90%, greater than about 93%, greater than about 95%, greater than about 98%, greater than about 99% or even greater than about 99.5%. In embodiments described herein, the selectivity can change over the duration or amount of material deposited over the course of a deposition.
In some embodiments deposition only occurs on the first surface and does not occur on the second surface. In some embodiments deposition on the first surface of the substrate relative to the second surface of the substrate is at least about 80% selective, which may be selective enough for some particular applications. In some embodiments the deposition on the first surface of the substrate relative to the second surface of the substrate is at least about 50% selective, which may be selective enough for some particular applications. In some embodiments the deposition on the first surface of the substrate relative to the second surface of the substrate is at least about 10% selective, which may be selective enough for some particular applications. It will be understood by the skilled artisan that even partial selectivity in deposition can easily provide full selectivity in the resultant layers. For example, if 20 nm of a material is deposited on a first surface, and only 1 nm is deposited on the second surface, a subsequent brief etch (e.g., an isotropic wet etch) can remove all of the material from over the second surface with only slight percentage removal of the material from over the first surface. Additionally or alternatively, when the second surface comprises a passivation layer to minimize deposition thereover, removal of the passivation layer can undercut and remove any of the deposited material thereover.
In some embodiments the oxide film selectively deposited on the first surface of the substrate may have a thickness less than about 50 nm, less than about 20 nm, less than about 10 nm, less than about 5 nm, less than about 3 nm, less than about 2 nm, or less than about 1 nm, while a ratio of material deposited on the first surface of the substrate relative to the second surface of the substrate may be greater than or equal to about 2:1, greater than or equal to about 20:1, greater than or equal to about 15:1, greater than or equal to about 10:1, greater than or equal to about 5:1, greater than or equal to about 3:1, or greater than or equal to about 2:1.
In some embodiments a cyclical selective deposition process including O2 as an oxygen-containing reactant may have an initial selectivity above a desired level, for example above 50% selectivity for a first deposition cycle. In some embodiments a cyclical selective deposition process including O2 as an oxygen-containing reactant may maintain selectivity above the desired level, for example above 50% selectivity, for more subsequent deposition cycles as compared to a similar deposition process including O3, oxygen-containing plasma, and/or H2O as an oxygen-containing reactant. In some embodiments a cyclical selective deposition process including O2 as an oxygen-containing reactant may maintain selectivity above a desired level for 25% more cycles, 50% more cycles, 75% more cycles, or 100% more cycles or more cycles than a similar deposition process including O3, oxygen-containing plasma, and/or H2O as an oxygen-containing reactant.
In some embodiments a cyclical selective deposition process including O2 as an oxygen-containing reactant may be able to achieve a higher level of selectivity for one or more deposition cycles as compared to a similar selective deposition process including O3, oxygen-containing plasma, and/or H2O as an oxygen-containing reactant. In some embodiments a selective deposition process including O2 as an oxygen-containing reactant may have a selectivity 25% greater, 50% greater, 75%, 100% greater, or more than a similar selective deposition process including O3, oxygen-containing plasma, and/or H2O as an oxygen-containing reactant.
Atomic Layer Deposition Type Processes
Atomic layer deposition (ALD) type processes are based on controlled, self-limiting surface reactions of precursor chemicals, or reactants. Gas phase reactions are avoided by alternately and sequentially contacting the substrate with the precursors. Vapor phase reactants are separated from each other on the substrate surface, for example, by removing excess reactants and/or reactant byproducts from substrate surface of interest between reactant pulses. In some embodiments one or more substrate surfaces are alternately and sequentially contacted with two or more vapor phase precursors, or reactants. Contacting a substrate surface with a vapor-phase reactant means that the reactant vapor is in contact with the substrate surface for a limited period of time. In other words, it can be understood that the substrate surface is exposed to each vapor phase reactant for a limited period of time.
Briefly, a substrate comprising at least a first surface and second, different surface is heated to a suitable deposition temperature, generally at lowered pressure. Deposition temperatures are generally maintained below the thermal decomposition temperature of the reactants but at a high enough level to avoid condensation of reactants and to provide the activation energy for the desired surface reactions. Of course, the appropriate temperature window for any given ALD reaction will depend upon the surface termination and reactant species involved. Here, the temperature varies depending on the precursors being used and is generally at or below about 700° C., in some embodiments the deposition temperature is generally at or above about 100° C. for thermal ALD, in some embodiments the deposition temperature is between about 150° C. and about 350° C., and in some embodiments the deposition temperature is between about 175° C. and about 300° C.
The surface of the substrate is contacted with a vapor phase first reactant or precursor. In some embodiments a pulse of vapor phase first reactant is provided to a reaction space containing the substrate (for example, time divided ALD). In some embodiments the substrate is moved to a reaction space containing vapor phase first reactant (for example, space divided ALD). Conditions can be selected such that no more than about one monolayer of the first reactant is adsorbed on the first surface of the substrate in a self-limiting manner. However, in some arrangements hybrid CVD/ALD, or cyclical CVD, processes can allow overlap of the different mutually reactive reactants over the substrate and thus can produce more than a monolayer per cycle. The appropriate contacting times can be readily determined by the skilled artisan based on the particular circumstances. Excess first reactant and reaction byproducts, if any, are removed from the substrate surface, such as by purging with an inert gas or by removing the substrate from the presence of the first reactant.
For ALD processes, in which overlap between the reactants is minimized or avoided, vapor phase precursors and/or vapor phase byproducts are removed from the substrate surface, such as by evacuating a chamber with a vacuum pump and/or by purging (for example, replacing the gas inside a reactor with an inert gas such as argon or nitrogen). Supply of the reactant to the substrate surface is typically stopped during the removal periods, and may be shunted to a different chamber or to a vacuum pump during the removal periods. Typical removal times are from about 0.05 to 20 seconds, from about 1 to 10 seconds, or from about 1 to 2 seconds. However, other removal times can be utilized if necessary, such as where highly conformal step coverage over extremely high aspect ratio structures or other structures with complex surface morphology is needed.
The surface of the substrate is contacted with a vapor phase second gaseous reactant or precursor. In some embodiments a pulse of a second gaseous reactant is provided to a reaction space containing the substrate. In some embodiments the substrate is moved to a reaction space containing the vapor phase second reactant. Excess second reactant and gaseous byproducts of the surface reaction, if any, are removed from the substrate surface. Contacting and removing are repeated until a thin film of the desired thickness has been selectively formed on the first surface of substrate, with each cycle leaving no more than about a molecular monolayer. Additional phases comprising alternately and sequentially contacting the surface of a substrate with other reactants can be included to form more complicated materials, such as ternary materials.
As mentioned above, each phase of each cycle can be self-limiting for ALD processes. An excess of reactant precursors is supplied in each phase to saturate the susceptible structure surfaces, for example the first surface of the substrate. Surface saturation ensures reactant occupation of all available reactive sites (subject, for example, to physical size or “steric hindrance” restraints) and thus ensures excellent step coverage. Typically, less than one molecular layer of material is deposited with each cycle, however, in some embodiments more than one molecular layer is deposited during the cycle.
Removing excess reactants can include evacuating some of the contents of a reaction space and/or purging a reaction space with helium, nitrogen, argon or another inert gas. In some embodiments purging can comprise turning off the flow of the reactive gas while continuing to flow an inert carrier gas to the reaction space.
The substrate can comprise various types of materials. When manufacturing integrated circuits, the substrate typically comprises a number of thin films with varying chemical and physical properties. For example and without limitation, the substrate may comprise a first layer and at least a second, different layer. In some embodiments the second, different layer may be a passivation or blocking layer. In some embodiments the second, different layer may be an organic layer.
The precursors employed in ALD type processes may be solid, liquid or gaseous materials under standard conditions (room temperature and atmospheric pressure), provided that the precursors are in vapor phase before they are contacted with the substrate surface. Contacting a substrate surface with a vaporized precursor means that the precursor vapor is in contact with the substrate surface for a limited period of time. Typically, the contacting time is from about 0.05 to 10 seconds. However, depending on the substrate type, its surface area, and/or the size of the chamber the contacting time may be even higher than 10 seconds. Contacting times can be on the order of minutes in some cases, particularly for batch deposition processes on multiple substrates. The optimum contacting time can be determined by the skilled artisan based on the particular circumstances.
The mass flow rate of the precursors can also be determined by the skilled artisan. In some embodiments the flow rate of metal precursors is between about 1 and 1000 sccm without limitation, more particularly between about 100 and 500 sccm for a single wafer deposition reactor.
The pressure in a reaction chamber is typically from about 0.01 to about 20 mbar, or from about 1 to about 10 mbar. However, in some cases the pressure will be higher or lower than this range, as can be determined by the skilled artisan given the particular circumstances.
Before starting the deposition of the film, the substrate is typically heated to a suitable growth temperature. The growth temperature varies depending on the type of thin film formed, physical properties of the precursors, etc. The growth temperature can be less than the crystallization temperature for the deposited materials such that an amorphous thin film is formed or it can be above the crystallization temperature such that a crystalline thin film is formed. The deposition temperature may vary depending on a number of factors such as, and without limitation, the reactant precursors, the pressure, flow rate, the arrangement of the reactor, crystallization temperature of the deposited thin film, and the composition of the substrate including the nature of the material to be deposited on. The specific growth temperature may be selected by the skilled artisan.
In some embodiments, the substrate temperature is high enough to support thermal ALD for the reactants of interest, but low enough to avoid burning off an organic passivation layer to aid selectivity. For example, the growth temperature may be generally be greater than about 100° C. In some embodiments the growth temperature may be at or below about 700° C., at or below about 500° C., or at or below about 400° C. In some embodiments the growth temperature is between about 150° C. and about 500° C., in some embodiments the growth temperature is between about 150° C. and about 350° C., and in some embodiments the growth temperature is between about 175° C. and about 300° C.
Reactors capable of being used to grow thin films can be used for the deposition. Such reactors include ALD reactors, as well as CVD reactors equipped with appropriate equipment and means for providing the precursors. According to some embodiments, a showerhead reactor may be used.
Examples of suitable reactors that may be used include commercially available single substrate (or single wafer) deposition equipment such as Pulsar® reactors (such as the Pulsar® 2000 and the Pulsar® 3000), and the EmerALD® reactor, available from ASM America, Inc. of Phoenix, Ariz. and ASM Europe B.V., Almere, Netherlands. Other commercially available reactors include those from ASM Japan K.K (Tokyo, Japan) under the tradename Eagle® XP and XP8.
In some embodiments a batch reactor may be used. Suitable batch reactors include, but are not limited to, Advance® 400 Series reactors commercially available from and ASM Europe B.V (Almere, Netherlands) under the trade names ALDA400™ and A412™. In some embodiments a vertical batch reactor is utilized in which the boat rotates during processing, such as the A412™. Thus, in some embodiments the wafers rotate during processing. In other embodiments, the batch reactor comprises a minibatch reactor configured to accommodate 10 or fewer wafers, 8 or fewer wafers, 6 or fewer wafers, 4 or fewer wafers, or 2 wafers. In some embodiments in which a batch reactor is used, wafer-to-wafer uniformity is less than 3% (1sigma), less than 2%, less than 1% or even less than 0.5%.
The deposition processes described herein can optionally be carried out in a reactor or reaction space connected to a cluster tool. In a cluster tool, because each reaction space is dedicated to one type of process, the temperature of the reaction space in each module can be kept constant, which improves the throughput compared to a reactor in which the substrate is heated up to the process temperature before each run. Additionally, in a cluster tool it is possible to reduce the time to pump the reaction space to the desired process pressure levels between substrates.
A stand-alone reactor can be equipped with a load-lock. In that case, it is not necessary to cool down the reaction space between each run. In some embodiments a selective deposition process for depositing an oxide material, for example a metal oxide thin film may comprise a plurality of deposition cycles, for example ALD cycles. In some embodiments each ALD cycle comprises at least two distinct phases. Contacting the substrate with a first precursor and thereafter removing excess first precursor and reaction byproducts from the substrate surface may be considered a phase and may be referred to as a first phase, first precursor phase, metal phase, metal precursor phase, first metal phase, first metal precursor phase, etc. For a deposition cycle, in a first phase, the substrate is contacted with a first precursor which forms no more than about one monolayer on the substrate surface. The first phase can include the contacting period, also referred to as a supply period, and a removal (e.g., purging) period. In a second phase, the substrate is contacted with a second precursor comprising oxygen and may convert adsorbed first precursor to an oxide material, for example an insulating metal oxide such as lanthanum oxide or magnesium oxide. Contacting the substrate with a second precursor and thereafter removing excess second precursor and reaction byproducts from the substrate surface may be considered a phase and may be referred to as a second phase, second precursor phase, oxidation phase, oxygen phase, oxygen precursor phase, second oxygen phase, and/or second oxygen precursor phase. One or more of the precursors may be provided with the aid of a carrier gas, such as N2, Ar, or He. Additional phases may be added and phases may be removed as desired to adjust the composition of the final film.
Referring to
In some embodiments the above described cyclical deposition may be an ALD type process. In some embodiments, the deposition may selectively form the oxide material on a first surface relative to a second surface. In one embodiment the first and second surfaces are on the same substrate. In another embodiment the first surface is on a substrate and the second surface is not on the same substrate than the first surface.
In some embodiments one or more surfaces of the substrate may be subjected to a pretreatment process prior to beginning the deposition process 100. In some embodiments a pretreatment process may enhance the selectivity of the selective deposition process 100. In some embodiments a pretreatment process may enhance deposition of an oxide material on one surface relative to one or more different surfaces prior to beginning the deposition process 100. In some embodiments a pretreatment process may inhibit deposition of an oxide material on one surface relative to one or more different surfaces prior to beginning the deposition process 100.
In some embodiments a pretreatment process may comprise forming a passivation or blocking layer on a portion of the substrate to thereby form a second surface on the substrate. In some embodiments the pretreatment process may comprise forming a DSA layer or a SAM layer on a portion of the substrate. In some embodiments the pretreatment may comprise forming a layer comprising an organic material, for example a polymer on a portion of the substrate.
In some embodiments a pretreatment process may be used to enhance the selectivity of the subsequent selective deposition process. In some embodiments a pretreatment process may enhance selective deposition of an oxide material on a first surface relative to a second different surface. In some embodiments a pretreatment process may enhance the selectivity of a subsequent selective deposition process by a factor of more than about 2, more than about 5, or more than about 10.
In some embodiments a pretreatment process may be performed in the same reaction chamber or reactor as the subsequent deposition process 100. In some embodiments a pretreatment process may be performed in a different reaction chamber or reactor than the subsequent deposition process 100.
Referring again to
The first precursor pulse can be supplied in vapor form. The first precursor gas is considered “volatile” for purposes of the present description if the species exhibits sufficient vapor pressure under the process conditions to transport the species to the workpiece in sufficient concentration to saturate exposed surfaces.
In some embodiments the first precursor contacts the substrate for about 0.01 seconds to about 60 seconds, for about 0.02 seconds to about 30 seconds, for about 0.025 seconds to about 20 seconds, for about 0.05 seconds to about 5.0 seconds, about 0.05 seconds to about 2.0 seconds or about 0.1 seconds to about 1.0 second.
The first precursor employed in the cyclical deposition processes may be solid, liquid, or gaseous material under standard conditions (room temperature and atmospheric pressure), but the first precursor is in vapor phase before it is conducted into the reaction chamber and contacted with the substrate surface. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise a metal, such as magnesium, lanthanum, hafnium, zirconium, aluminum, or a transition metal.
At block 130 excess first precursor and reaction byproducts, if any, are removed from the substrate surface, for example exposing the substrate to a purge gas or vacuum. In some embodiments removal of excess first precursor and any reaction byproducts can be accomplished by purging with a pulse of inert gas such as nitrogen or argon. During removal periods such as block 130, any vapor phase precursors and/or any vapor phase byproducts can be removed from the substrate surface by evacuating the reactor chamber with a vacuum pump and/or by purging the gas inside the reactor with an inert gas such as argon or nitrogen and/or by moving the substrate away from the supply of precursor. Typical removal times are from about 0.05 to 20 seconds, such as between about 1 and 10 seconds, and more particularly between about 1 and 2 seconds. However, other removal times can be utilized if desired, such as when depositing layers over extremely high aspect ratio structures or other structures with complex surface morphology is needed. The appropriate removal times can be readily determined by the skilled artisan based on the particular circumstances.
As noted above, in some embodiments, removing excess first precursor and reaction byproducts, if any, may comprise moving the substrate so that the first precursor no longer contacts the substrate. In some embodiments no precursor may be removed from the various parts of a chamber. In some embodiments the substrate is moved from a part of the chamber containing a first precursor to another part of the chamber containing a second precursor or no precursor at all. In some embodiments the substrate is moved from a first reaction chamber to a second, different reaction chamber. In some embodiments the substrate is exposed to first and second precursors in the same reaction chamber.
At block 140 molecular O2 is supplied to the substrate surface in order to contact the substrate with a second vapor phase precursor comprising molecular oxygen. In some embodiments the second vapor phase precursor comprises molecular oxygen and is not excited prior to contacting the substrate. Thus, in some embodiments block 140 can comprise flowing molecular O2 into the reaction chamber without passing through any in situ or ex situ excitation. In some embodiments block 140 can comprise supplying a flow of molecular O2 to the substrate surface.
In some embodiments the second precursor is supplied to the substrate where it reacts with the first precursor bound to the surface of the substrate. In an ALD sequence, the reaction can form up to about a monolayer of an oxide material on the surface of the substrate. In some embodiments, however, more than one molecular layer of an oxide material is formed on the substrate, but in some instances CVD gas phase reactions causing loss of selectivity are to be avoided.
In some embodiments the second precursor contacts the substrate for about 0.01 seconds to about 60 seconds, for about 0.02 seconds to about 30 seconds, for about 0.025 seconds to about 20 seconds, for about 0.05 seconds to about 5.0 seconds, about 0.05 seconds to about 2.0 seconds or about 0.1 seconds to about 1.0 second. However, depending on the reactor type, substrate type and its surface area, the second precursor contacting time may be even higher than 10 seconds, particularly for batch reactors or other processes in which very large surface areas are to be coated. In some embodiments, contacting times can be on the order of minutes. The optimum contacting time can be readily determined by the skilled artisan based on the particular circumstances.
The concentration of the second precursor in the reaction chamber may be from about 0.01% by volume to about 99.0% by volume. And the second precursor may flow through the reaction chamber at a rate of between about 1 standard cm3/min and about 4000 standard cm3/min.
At block 150, excess second precursor and gaseous by-products of the surface reaction, if any, are removed from the substrate, as described above for block 130. In some embodiments excess precursor and reaction byproducts are removed with the aid of an inert gas. In some embodiments excess second precursor and any byproducts are removed by exposing the substrate to a purge gas or vacuum.
The acts of contacting and removing may be optionally repeated at block 160 until an oxide material of a desired thickness has been formed on the surface of the substrate, with each cycle leaving no more than about a molecular monolayer. In some cases, it might be desirable to achieve at least partial decomposition of at least one the various precursors. Thus, in some embodiments conditions may be selected such that more than one molecular layer of an oxide material is formed on the substrate in each deposition cycle but in some instances CVD gas phase reactions that cause a loss of selectivity are to be avoided. In some instances partial decomposition of at least one the various precursors may occur, which in some instances, without being bound to any one theory, may increase the reactivity of an at least partially decomposed precursor towards O2.
The oxide material selective deposition processes of the present disclosure may comprise one or more cycles. Some embodiments involve the repetition of at least about 5 cycles, at least about 10 cycles, at least about 50 cycles, at least about 100 cycles, at least about 200 cycles, or at least about 300 cycles or more.
According to some embodiments, deposited thin films deposited using O2 may exhibit step coverage and pattern loading effects of greater than about 50%, greater than about 80%, greater than about 90%, or greater than about 95%. In some cases step coverage and pattern loading effects can be greater than about 98% and in some case about 100% (within the accuracy of the measurement tool or method. These values can be achieved in features with aspect ratios of 2 or greater, in some embodiments in aspect ratios of about 3 or greater, in some embodiments in aspect ratios of about 5 or greater and in some embodiments in aspect ratios of about 8 or greater.
Although the illustrated oxide material deposition cycle begins with contacting the surface of the substrate with the first vapor phase precursor, in other embodiments the deposition cycle begins with contacting the surface of the substrate with the second vapor phase precursor comprising molecular oxygen. It will be understood by the skilled artisan that contacting the substrate surface with the first vapor phase precursor and second vapor phase precursor comprising molecular oxygen are interchangeable in the deposition cycle. Additionally, some cycles can include multiple sequential repetitions of the same phase.
In some embodiments the substrate is moved such that different reactants alternately and sequentially contact the surface of the substrate in a desired sequence for a desired time. In some embodiments the removing blocks, 130 and 150 are not performed. In some embodiments no reactant may be removed from the various parts of a chamber. In some embodiments the substrate is moved from a part of the chamber containing a first precursor to another part of the chamber containing the second reactant. In some embodiments the substrate is moved from a first reaction chamber to a second, different reaction chamber. In some embodiments the substrate is exposed to first and second precursors in the same reaction chamber.
The skilled artisan can determine the optimal reactant evaporation temperatures based on the properties of the selected precursors. The skilled artisan can determine the optimal reactant contact times through routine experimentation based on the properties of the selected precursors and the desired properties of the deposited oxide material.
The growth rate of the deposited oxide material will vary depending on the reaction conditions. As described below, in initial experiments, the growth rate varied between about 0.01 and about 1.5 Å/cycle. In some embodiments the growth rate may be from about 0.01 Å/cycle to about 10.0 Å/cycle, from about 0.1 Å/cycle to about 2.5 Å/cycle, or from 0.3 Å/cycle to about 1.5 Å/cycle. In some embodiments, if decomposition of the precursor occurs, the growth rate can be more than 2.5 Å/cycle or more than 5 Å/cycle.
In some embodiments the deposited oxide material comprises a thin film. In some embodiments the deposited oxide material comprises a metal oxide, and in some embodiments the deposited oxide material comprises an insulating metal oxide such as lanthanum oxide, hafnium oxide, zirconium oxide, magnesium oxide, a transition metal oxide, or aluminum oxide. In some embodiments the deposited oxide material is lanthanum oxide, hafnium oxide, zirconium oxide, magnesium oxide, a transition metal oxide, or aluminum oxide. As used herein, magnesium oxide refers to materials having the general chemical formula MgO or MgOx, wherein x is from about 0.8 to about 1.2, but it will be understood that magnesium oxide need not be stoichiometric. As used herein, lanthanum oxide refers to materials having the general chemical formula La2O3 or LaOx, but it will be understood that lanthanum oxide need not be stoichiometric. As used herein, hafnium oxide refers to materials having the general formula HfO2 or HfOx, but it will be understood that hafnium oxide need not be stoichiometric. As used herein, zirconium oxide refers to materials having the general formula ZrO2 or ZrOx, but it will be understood that zirconium oxide need not be stoichiometric. As used herein, aluminum oxide refers to materials having the general formula Al2O3 or AlOx, but it will be understood that aluminum oxide need not be stoichiometric.
In some embodiments, metal oxide materials comprise other constituents (e.g., metal silicates or metal oxynitrides). In some embodiments, metal oxide materials are formed that consist essentially of a metal or metals and oxygen. In some embodiments, contaminants other than metal or metals and oxygen represent no more than about 30 at %, no more than about 20 at %, no more than about 10 at %, no more than about 5 at %, no more than about 3 at %, no more than about 1.5 at %, or no more than about 0.5 at % of the thin film when excluding hydrogen. In some embodiments contaminants other than metal or metals and oxygen represent no more than about 45%, no more than about 30 at %, no more than about 20 at %, no more than about 10 at %, no more than about 5 at %, no more than about 3 at %, no more than about 1.5 at %, or no more than about 0.5 at % when including hydrogen. In some embodiments an additional phase, such as an additional metal phase may be provided after the final deposition cycle, or intermittently in the deposition process.
In some embodiments an oxide material is selectively deposited on a substrate by a cyclical vapor deposition process comprising one or more cycles, each cycle comprising:
Referring now to
In some embodiments the above described cyclical deposition may be an ALD type process. In some embodiments, the deposition may selectively form the magnesium oxide material on a first surface relative to a second surface. In one embodiment the first and second surfaces are on the same substrate. In another embodiment the first surface is on a substrate and the second surface is on another part, such as a reactor surface.
Although the illustrated magnesium oxide deposition cycle begins with contacting the substrate with the first precursor comprising magnesium, in other embodiments the deposition cycle begins with contacting the substrate with the second precursor comprising molecular oxygen. It will be understood by the skilled artisan that contacting the substrate surface with first precursor comprising magnesium and second precursor comprising molecular oxygen are interchangeable in the deposition cycle.
In some embodiments the above describe deposition process may be a selective deposition process. That is, in some embodiments a substrate comprising a first surface and a second, different surface is provided and magnesium oxide is selectively deposited on the first surface of the substrate relative to the second, different surface by a cyclical deposition process comprising at least one cycle comprising alternately and sequentially contacting the substrate with a vapor phase first precursor comprising magnesium and a vapor phase second precursor comprising molecular oxygen.
In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise an organometallic compound comprising magnesium and the second precursor may comprise O2. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise Mg(Cp)2 and the second precursor may comprise O2.
In some embodiments a magnesium oxide film may be deposited with a growth rate from about 0.01 Å/cycle to about 2.0 Å/cycle. In some embodiments the growth rate of a magnesium oxide thin film may be greater than about 0.1 Å/cycle, greater than about 0.5 Å/cycle, greater than about 0.75 Å/cycle, or greater than about 1.0 Å/cycle.
In some embodiments a standard deviation (STD) uniformity of a deposited magnesium oxide thin film may be less than about 10%, less than about 7.5%, less than about 5%, or even less than about 1%. In some embodiments a deposited magnesium oxide thin film may have a step coverage greater than about 50%, greater than about 80%, greater than about 90%, greater than about 95%, greater than about 98%, greater than about 99% or greater. These values can be achieved in features with aspect ratios of 2 or greater, in some embodiments in aspect ratios of about 3 or greater, in some embodiments in aspect ratios of about 5 or greater and in some embodiments in aspect ratios of about 8 or greater.
In some embodiments the deposition temperature for a magnesium oxide selective deposition process may be about 150° C. to about 500° C., about 200° C. to about 450° C., or about 225° C. to about 400° C. In some embodiments the pressure in the reaction chamber may be from about 0.001 Torr to about 100 Torr, or from about 0.1 Torr to about 20 Torr.
Referring now to
In some embodiments the above described cyclical deposition may be an ALD type process. In some embodiments, the deposition may selectively form the lanthanum oxide material on a first surface relative to a second surface. In one embodiment the first and second surfaces are on the same substrate. In another embodiment the first surface is on a substrate and the second surface is on another part, such as a reactor surface.
Although the illustrated lanthanum oxide deposition cycle begins with contacting the substrate with the first precursor comprising lanthanum, in other embodiments the deposition cycle begins with contacting the substrate with the second precursor comprising molecular oxygen. It will be understood by the skilled artisan that contacting the substrate surface with first precursor comprising lanthanum and second precursor comprising molecular oxygen are interchangeable in the deposition cycle.
In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise an organometallic compound comprising lanthanum and the second precursor may comprise O2. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise lanthanum formamidinate (La(FAMD)3) and the second precursor may comprise O2.
Referring now to
In some embodiments the above described cyclical deposition may be an ALD type process. In some embodiments, the deposition may selectively form the hafnium oxide material on a first surface relative to a second surface. In one embodiment the first and second surfaces are on the same substrate. In another embodiment the first surface is on a substrate and the second surface is on another part, such as a reactor surface.
Although the illustrated hafnium oxide deposition cycle begins with contacting the substrate with the first precursor comprising hafnium, in other embodiments the deposition cycle begins with contacting the substrate with the second precursor comprising molecular oxygen. It will be understood by the skilled artisan that contacting the substrate surface with first precursor comprising hafnium and second precursor comprising molecular oxygen are interchangeable in the deposition cycle.
In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise an organometallic compound comprising hafnium and the second precursor may comprise O2. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise tetramethylethyl alkylamide Hafnium (TEMAH) and the second precursor may comprise O2.
It should be noted that
With reference to
An operating procedure for the reactor 600 will now be described using the example of time divided ALD for a stationary substrate, though the skilled artisan will readily appreciate how to adopt the teachings herein for space divided ALD or hybrid systems. In a first stage, the first metal precursor is supplied to the deposition chamber 610. Specifically, the first metal precursor source 630 is accessed such that the first metal precursor can flow through, for example, a first supply conduit into the deposition chamber 610 while the oxygen source 640 does not flow to the deposition chamber 610. The second reactant flow can be prevented from flowing to the deposition chamber 610, for example, a pulsing valve or by an arrangement of inert gas valving, such as, the arrangement described at page 8 of International Publication No. WO 02/08488, published Jan. 21, 2002, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference herein. In some embodiments the purging gas flows through both the first supply conduit connecting the first metal precursor source 630 to the deposition chamber 610 and the second supply conduit connecting the oxygen source 640 to the deposition chamber 610. During this stage, the first metal precursor can be adsorbed on active sites of the substrate to form an adsorbed monolayer as described herein. During a second stage, any excess first metal precursor and any gaseous by-products are removed from the deposition chamber 610, or at least from the vicinity of the substrate surface. In some embodiments this can be accomplished by shutting off the first metal precursor flow while continuing the flow of a purge gas through the supply conduits. In some embodiments, purge gas can additionally or instead be supplied through a third supply conduit that is independently connected to the deposition chamber 610. In a third stage, the second reactant is supplied to the deposition chamber 610. Specifically, while the first metal precursor source 630 does not flow to the deposition chamber 610, the oxygen source 640 is accessed to flow to the deposition chamber 610. In some embodiments purging gas is still supplied through both the first and second conduits. The first metal precursor and second reactant are mutually reactive. As such, the adsorbed species (typically a monolayer or less for pure ALD) of the first metal precursor reacts with the second reactant that has been introduced into the deposition chamber 610. This reaction leaves the desired metal oxide thin film on the substrate. The reaction is generally self-limiting and terminates once the entire amount of the adsorbed species of the first metal precursor has been consumed. It should be noted that the reaction may leave an element in the thin layer or may simply strip ligands from the adsorbed layer. In a fourth stage, any excess second reactant and any gaseous by-product is removed from the deposition chamber 610, or at least from the vicinity of the substrate surface. This can be accomplished by shutting off the oxygen source while the purging gas flows to both the first and second supply conduits remain on. The cycle described above can be repeated as necessary to deposit the metal oxide thin film to a desired thickness. Of course, in some embodiments, purge phases can be replaced with pump down phases or with phases that include moving the substrate to a separate deposition chamber or area of the deposition chamber that does not include a given reactant.
First Precursors
A number of different first precursors can be used in the selective deposition processes described herein. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise a metal. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise at least one alkyl ligand, such as a C1-C4 alkyl ligand. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise an organometallic or metalorganic compound. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise at least one cyclopentadienyl (Cp) ligand. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise a formamidinate or a amidinate compound. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise a beta-diketonate compound. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise an alkylamino compound, such as a dialkylamino compound. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise an alkylamino ligand, such as —NMe2, —NEt2 or —NEtMe.
In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise magnesium. In some embodiments the first precursor may be an organometallic or an metalorganic compound comprising magnesium. For example, in some embodiments the first precursor may comprise Mg(Cp)2 or a derivative thereof.
In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise lanthanum. In some embodiments the first precursor may be an organometallic compound comprising lanthanum. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise lanthanum formamidinate (La(FAMD)3).
In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise hafnium. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise an organometallic compound comprising hafnium. For example, in some embodiments the first precursor may comprise alkylamino hafnium compound, such as tetramethylethyl alkylamino Hafnium (TEMAH, Hf(NEtMe)4) or a derivative thereof.
In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise zirconium. In some embodiments the first precursor may comprise aluminum. In some embodiments the first precursor comprises a transition metal. In some embodiments the first precursor does not comprise a noble metal, such as Ru.
In some embodiments, the first precursor has the following formula:
MgL2 (I)
wherein Mg is magnesium, and wherein each L can be independently selected to be a hydrocarbon group. In some embodiments each L can be linear, branched, cyclic alkyl or unsaturated hydrocarbon group, such as alkenyl, alkynyl, aromatic, cyclopentadienyl, phenyl, cyclooctadienyl, or cycloheptatrienyl group. In some embodiments one or both L can be a cyclopentadienyl group. In some embodiments, one or both L can be a bidentate ligand, such as betadiketonate, guanidinate or amidinate. In some embodiments, the betadiketonate ligand can be acetylacetonate or 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato (thd).
In some embodiments, the first precursor is a cyclopentadienyl compound or derivate thereof, such as alkylsubstituted cyclopentadienyl compound and have the following formula:
Mg(R1R2R3R4R5Cp)2 (II)
wherein each of the R1 groups, each of the R2 groups, each of the R3 groups, each of the R4 groups, and each of the R5 groups can be independently selected to be hydrogen or a substituted or unsubstituted alkyl group. In some embodiments each of the R1 groups, each of the R2 groups, each of the R3 groups, each of the R4 groups, and each of the R5 groups can be independently selected to be hydrogen or a linear or branched C1-C5 alkyl group. In some embodiments each of the R1 groups, each of the R2 groups, each of the R3 groups, each of the R4 groups, and each of the R5 groups can be independently selected to be hydrogen or a C1-C3 alkyl group, such as methyl, ethyl, n-propyl or i-propyl group. In some embodiments the first precursor is Mg(Cp)2.
In some embodiments, the first precursor comprises one or more ligands, such as cyclopentadienyl (“Cp”) ligands. These first precursor compounds can be selected from a group consisting of the following compounds:
(Cp)xLa (III);
(Cp)xLyLa (IV);
(Cp)xWnLa (V);
(CP)xLyWnLa (VI);
In the chemical equations I-IV, the cyclopentadienyl and/or cyclooctadienyl groups can be in the same molecule, so that there is a bridge between two Cp-groups consisting of a substituted or unsubstituted C1-C6 chain that may contain a heteroatom selected from Si, N, P, Se, S or B.
In some embodiments L is an independently selected:
In some embodiments L is and independently selected:
(d) ether or thioether.
Cyclopentadienyl or cyclooctadienyl groups, Cp in chemical formulas I-IV have the form:
Cp′RmHa-m (VII)
In some embodiments each R ligand can be the same as each other R ligand, or each R ligand may different from one another. That is, each R ligand can be independently selected. In some embodiments R can be a substituted or unsubstituted, cyclic, linear or branched, alkyl alkenyl, aryl, alkylaryl, arylalkyl, alkoxy, thio, amino, cyano or silyl group. The cyclic or aromatic ring of the substituent may contain a heteroatom. Examples of the substituents are methyl, ethyl, propyl and isopropyl groups.
Neutral adduct ligands L shown in chemical equations II and IV can be independently selected ethers, amines or solvent molecules such as tetrahydrofurane that form a bond to the metal with one atom. Examples of suitable neutral adduct ligands that form a bond to a metal with several atoms are polyethers and polyamines.
In some embodiments a first precursor may comprise at least one cyclopentadienyl ligand and can be written according to Formula VIII:
(R1R2R3R4R5Cp)x-MR0z—(R6)y (VIII)
wherein M is a metal selected from the group consisting of Mg, Sr, Ba, Sc, Y and lanthanides;
wherein each of the R0 groups, each of the R1 groups, each of the R2 groups, each of the R3 groups, each of the R4 groups, and each of the R5 groups can be independently selected from:
wherein R6 is independently selected from:
wherein both x and y are ≥1 and z≥0.
In some embodiments, the first precursor comprising a cyclopentadienyl compound comprises at least one ligand that is bonded to a metal via nitrogen as depicted by Formula IX:
(R1R2R3R4R5Cp)x-MR0z—(NR1R2)y (IX)
wherein M is a metal selected from the group consisting of Mg, Sr, Ba, Sc, Y or lanthanides;
wherein each of the R0 groups, each of the R1 groups, each of the R2 groups, each of the R3 groups, each of the R4 groups, and each of the R5 groups is independently selected from:
wherein both x and y are ≥1 and z≥0.
In Formula IX, the alkyl, alkenyl and alkynyl groups can be selected from any linear or branched alkyl, alkenyl and alkynyl groups which have 1 to 6 carbon atoms. Examples of such alkyl groups include methyl; ethyl; n- and i-propyl-; n-, i- and t-butyl-; n- and isoamyl; n- and isopentyl; n- and isohexyl; and 2,3-dimethyl-2-butyl. In some embodiments, alkyl groups are used. In other embodiments the C1-6, alkenyl and alkynyl groups include the corresponding groups having a corresponding degree of unsaturation can be used.
In some embodiments the first precursor is a compound having at least one cyclopentadienyl ligand and at least one chelating ligand, for example, a bidentate ligand. In some embodiments, this compound is depicted by Formula X, (R1R2R3R4R5Cp)x-MR0z—(NR1NR2R)y, as follows:
wherein M is a metal selected from the group consisting of Mg, Sr, Ba, Sc, Y or lanthanides;
wherein R can be any linear and branched C1-C6 alkyl, alkenyl or alkynyl groups,
which are independently substituted or unsubstituted and R can be bonded to two bridging nitrogen atoms any point of alkyl, alkenyl and alkynyl groups;
wherein each of the R0 groups, each of the R1 groups, each of the R2 groups, each of the R3 groups, each of the R4 groups, and each of the R5 groups can be independently selected from:
wherein both x and y are ≥1 and z≥0.
In some other embodiments, the first precursor can be depicted by Formula XI, (R1R2R3R4R5Cp)x-MR0z—[(NR1NR2)CNR3]y, as follows:
In further embodiments, the first precursor is depicted by Formula XII, (R1R2R3R4R5Cp)x-MR0z—[(NR1NR2)CNR3R4]y, as follows:
In some embodiments, the first precursor as described in Formulae VIII-XII may comprise R0, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6 wherein each each of the R0 groups, each of the R1 groups, each of the R2 groups, each of the R3 groups, each of the R4 groups, and each of the R5 groups, and each of the R6 groups can be independently selected from
Optionally, a first precursor as described may comprise modified cyclopentadienyl groups. In some embodiments, the modified cyclopentadienyl groups are selected from the group consisting of Me5Cp, MeCp, EtCp, and Me3SiCp. In further embodiments, the first precursor may comprise an anionic or dianionic guanidinate ligand such as a triisopropylguandinate ligand.
Second Precursors
In some embodiments the second precursor comprises oxygen and may be referred to herein as the oxygen precursor, oxygen reactant, oxygen-containing precursor, or oxygen-containing reactant. In some embodiments the second precursor comprises molecular oxygen (O2). In some embodiments the second precursor does not comprise a compound comprising oxygen other than O2. In some embodiments the second precursor does not comprise O3 or H2O. In some embodiments the second precursor does not comprise a plasma, for example an oxygen plasma. In some embodiments the second precursor is supplied with or mixed with inert gas such as N2, He or Ar.
In some embodiments the second precursor comprises molecular oxygen and less than about 50%, 25%, 15%, 10%, 5%, 1%, or 0.1% of impurities other than inert gases.
In some embodiments wherein the second precursor is molecular oxygen, such a second precursor may advantageously allow for improved purging from the substrate surface as compared with O3 or H2O. In some embodiments improved purging may allow for faster cycle times and may also allow for improved retention or minimal damage to the second surface, for example a second surface comprising an organic passivation layer such as a SAM or polymer.
In some embodiments the second precursor does not substantially oxidize or degrade the second surface of the substrate. For example, in some embodiments molecular oxygen does not oxidize or degrade a second surface comprising an organic passivation layer such as a SAM or polymer layer under the deposition conditions. That is, in some embodiments the selective deposition process may have a deposition temperature lower than the temperature at which an organic passivation layer may degrade or burn. In some embodiments the deposition temperature may be less than about 450° C., less than about 400° C., less than about 350° C., less than about 300° C. or lower.
Deposition of magnesium oxide (MgO) thin films by ALD type processes according to some embodiments was carried out on various substrates using bis(cyclopentadienyl)magnesium (Mg(Cp)2) as a first precursor comprising magnesium and molecular oxygen (O2) as a second precursor. The deposition temperature was about 250° C. and the number of deposition cycles was varied for each sample.
Referring now to
Deposition of magnesium oxide (MgO) was carried out on two coupon substrates, a reference silicon coupon substrate having a native silicon oxide surface, and two SAM silicon coupon substrates, each having a surface comprising a SAM layer formed over a portion of the native silicon oxide surface.
The water contact angle for the surfaces of the coupon substrates was measured before and after deposition of an MgO layer. The water contact angle of a surface indicates the hydrophobic or hydrophilic nature of that surface. This water contact angle measurement was used to study the passivation capability of the SAM layer on the SAM coupon substrates.
As depicted in
The SAM coupon substrates were then subjected to MgO deposition processes. A first SAM coupon substrate was subjected to an MgO deposition process according to some embodiments and described herein, including MgCp2 as a first precursor and O2 as a second precursor. The second SAM coupon substrate was subjected to a typical MgO deposition process as known in the art, including MgCp2 as a first precursor and H2O as a second precursor.
As depicted in
The first SAM coupon substrate was also analyzed with XPS, which detected a small amount of Mg on the first SAM coupon; however the amount of Mg detected did not significantly increase as a function of MgO deposition cycles including O2 as a second precursor up to a nominal thickness of 25 nm.
Deposition of hafnium oxide (HfO2) was carried out on a first silicon coupon substrate having a native silicon oxide surface, and a second silicon coupon substrate having a surface comprising a SAM layer formed over a portion of the native silicon oxide surface. The coupon substrates were subjected to an ALD hafnium oxide deposition process including TEMAH as a first precursor and O2 as a second precursor according to some embodiments and as described herein. The deposition temperature was 285°.
The water contact angle for the surfaces of the coupon substrates was measured before and after the HfO2 deposition process As depicted in
As can be further seen in
A similar experiment was carried out on the second SAM coupon substrate; however that substrate was subjected to a typical HfO2 deposition process as known in the art including TEMAH as a first precursor and H2O as a second precursor. The water contact angle for the SAM layer was reduced to 94° after being subjected to an HfO2 deposition process with a target thickness of 6 nm. This HfO2 deposition process had a deposition temperature of 285° C. and included 85 deposition cycles. Prior to the deposition process the SAM layer, formed from a liquid phase on the native silicon oxide surface of the coupon substrate had a water contact angle of 107, indicating that it was high quality.
As shown in
As used herein, the term “about” may refer to a value that is within 15%, within 10%, within 5%, or within 1% of a given value.
The terms “film” and “thin film” are used herein for simplicity. “Film” and “thin film” are meant to mean any continuous or non-continuous structures and material deposited by the methods disclosed herein. For example, “film” and “thin film” could include 2D materials, nanorods, nanotubes or nanoparticles or even single partial or full molecular layers or partial or full atomic layers or clusters of atoms and/or molecules. “Film” and “thin film” may comprise material or layer with pinholes, but still be at least partially continuous.
It will be understood by those of skill in the art that numerous and various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the present invention. The described features, structures, characteristics and precursors can be combined in any suitable manner. Therefore, it should be clearly understood that the forms of the present invention are illustrative only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. All modifications and changes are intended to fall within the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.
Although certain embodiments and examples have been discussed, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the scope of the claims extend beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4804640 | Kaganowicz | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4863879 | Kwok | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4948755 | Mo | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5288697 | Schrepp et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5447887 | Filipiak et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5604153 | Tsubouchi et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5633036 | Seebauer et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5869135 | Vaeth et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5925494 | Horn | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6046108 | Liu et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6416577 | Suntoloa et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6426015 | Xia et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6455414 | Hillman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6482740 | Soininen et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6586330 | Ludviksson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6679951 | Soininen et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6759325 | Raaijmakers et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6811448 | Paton | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6844258 | Fair et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6852635 | Satta et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6858533 | Chu et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6878628 | Sophie et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6887795 | Soininen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6921712 | Soininen et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6958174 | Klaus et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 7041609 | Vaartstra | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7067407 | Kostamo et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7084060 | Furukawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7118779 | Verghese et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7220669 | Hujanen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7241677 | Soininen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7323411 | Blosse | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7405143 | Leinikka et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7425350 | Todd | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7476618 | Kilpela et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7494927 | Kostamo et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7595271 | White | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7611751 | Elers | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7695567 | Fu | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7754621 | Putkonen | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7790631 | Sharma et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7799135 | Verghese et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7910177 | Li | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7914847 | Verghese et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7927942 | Raaijmakers | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7951637 | Weidman et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7955979 | Kostamo et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7964505 | Khandelwal et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8030212 | Yang et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8084087 | Bent et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8173554 | Lee et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8293597 | Raaijmakers | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8293658 | Shero et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8425739 | Wieting | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8466052 | Baek et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8536058 | Kostamo et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8623468 | Lin et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8778815 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8890264 | Dewey et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8956971 | Haukka et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8962482 | Albertson et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8980418 | Darling et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8993404 | Korbrinsky et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9067958 | Romero | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9112003 | Haukka et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9129897 | Pore et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9136110 | Rathsack | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9159558 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9236292 | Romero et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9257303 | Haukka et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9312131 | Bauer et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9349687 | Gates et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
| 9353139 | Sundermeyer et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9455138 | Fukazawa et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
| 9490145 | Niskanen et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9502289 | Haukka et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9552979 | Knaepen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9679808 | Haukka et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9754779 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
| 9786491 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9786492 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9803277 | Longrie et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
| 9805974 | Chen et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
| 9816180 | Haukka et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9895715 | Haukka et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9911595 | Smith et al. | Mar 2018 | B1 |
| 10014212 | Chen et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10041166 | Longrie et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10047435 | Haukka et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10049924 | Haukka et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10115603 | Niskanen et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10121699 | Wang et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10157786 | Haukka et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10186420 | Fukazawa | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10204782 | Maes et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10343186 | Pore et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10373820 | Tois et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10428421 | Haukka et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10443123 | Haukka et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10453701 | Tois et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10480064 | Longrie et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10508337 | Iwaji | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10546741 | Muramaki et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10553482 | Wang et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10566185 | Wang et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10695794 | Pore et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10741411 | Niskanen et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10793946 | Longrie et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
| 10847361 | Wang et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10847363 | Tapily | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10872765 | Tois et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10900120 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10903113 | Wang et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 20010019803 | Mirkanimi | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010021414 | Morishima et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010025205 | Chern et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020027261 | Blesser et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020047144 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020068458 | Chiang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020090777 | Forbes et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107316 | Bice et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030027431 | Sneh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030066487 | Suzuki | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030143839 | Raaijmakers et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030176559 | Bice et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030181035 | Yoon et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030185997 | Hsieh | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030192090 | Meilland | Oct 2003 | P1 |
| 20030193090 | Otani et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040092073 | Cabral | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040129558 | Liu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040219746 | Vaartstra et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20050012975 | George et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050136604 | Al-Bayati et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050160575 | Gambino et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050223989 | Lee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060019493 | Li | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047132 | Shenai-Khatkhate et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121271 | Frey et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121677 | Parekh et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121733 | Kilpela et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060128150 | Gandikota et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060141155 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060156979 | Thakur et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060176559 | Takatoshi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199399 | Muscat | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060226409 | Burr et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060292845 | Chiang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070014919 | Hamalainen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070026654 | Huotari et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070036892 | Haukka et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070063317 | Kim et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070098894 | Verghese et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070099422 | Wijekoon et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070232082 | Balseanu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070241390 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070251444 | Gros-Jean et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292604 | Dordi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080066680 | Sherman | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080072819 | Rahtu | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080124932 | Tateishi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080179741 | Streck et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080241575 | Lavoie et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080282970 | Heys et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090035949 | Niinisto et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090071505 | Miya et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081385 | Heys et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081827 | Yang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090203222 | Dussarrat et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090269507 | Yu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090274887 | Millward et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090275163 | Lacey et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090311879 | Blasco et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100015756 | Weidman et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100102417 | Ganguli et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100147396 | Yamagishi et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100178468 | Jiang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100248473 | Ishizaka et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100270626 | Raisanen | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100297474 | Dameron | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100314765 | Liang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110039420 | Nakao | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110053800 | Jung et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110120542 | Levy | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110124192 | Ganguli et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110146568 | Haukka et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110146703 | Chen et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110198756 | Thenappan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110221061 | Prakash | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110244680 | Tohnoe et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110311726 | Liu | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120032311 | Gates | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120046421 | Darling et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120052681 | Marsh | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120088369 | Weidman et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120091541 | Suchomel et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120189868 | Borovik et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120219824 | Prolier et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120241411 | Darling et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120264291 | Ganguli et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120269970 | Ido et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130005133 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130078793 | Sun et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130084700 | Swerts et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130089983 | Sugita et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130095664 | Matero et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130115763 | Takamure et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130115768 | Pore et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130126815 | Kim et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130143401 | Yu et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130146881 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130157409 | Vaidya et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130189790 | Li et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130189837 | Haukka et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130196502 | Haukka et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130203267 | Pomarede et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130280919 | Yuasa et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130284094 | Pavol et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130309457 | Rathsack et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130316080 | Yamaguchi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130319290 | Xiao et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130323930 | Chattopadhyay et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140001572 | Bohr et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140024200 | Kato et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140091308 | Dasgupta et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140120738 | Jung et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140152383 | Nikonov et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140190409 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140193598 | Traser et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140205766 | Lyon et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140209022 | Inoue et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140227461 | Darwish et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140252487 | Stephens et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140272194 | Xiao et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140273290 | Somervell | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140273477 | Niskanen et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140273514 | Somervell et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140273523 | Rathsack | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140273527 | Niskanen et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150004317 | Dussarrat et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150004319 | Mizue | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150004806 | Ndiege et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150011032 | Kunimatsu et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150011093 | Singh et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150037972 | Danek et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150064931 | Kumagi et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150083415 | Monroe et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150087158 | Sugita et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150093890 | Blackwell et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150097292 | He et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150118863 | Rathod et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150162214 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150170961 | Romero et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150179798 | Clendenning et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150217330 | Haukka | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150240121 | Sugita et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150270140 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150275355 | Mallikarjunan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150299848 | Haukka et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150371866 | Chen et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150372205 | Kimura et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150376211 | Girard et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160075884 | Chen | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160079524 | Do et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160086850 | Romero et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160152640 | Kuchenbeiser et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160172189 | Tapily | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160186004 | Hustad et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160190060 | Bristol et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160222504 | Haukka et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160247695 | Niskanen et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160276208 | Haukka et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160284568 | Morris et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160293384 | Yan et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160293398 | Danek et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160315191 | Tsai et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160346838 | Fujita et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160365280 | Brink et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170037513 | Haukka et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170040164 | Wang et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170051405 | Fukazawa et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170058401 | Blackwell et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170069527 | Haukka et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170100742 | Pore et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170100743 | Pore et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170107413 | Wang et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170154806 | Wang et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170298503 | Maes et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170301542 | Maes et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170323776 | Färm et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170332179 | Bright et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170352533 | Tois et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170352550 | Tois et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170358482 | Chen et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180010247 | Niskanen et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180040708 | Narayanan et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180073136 | Haukka et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180080121 | Longrie et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180096888 | Naik et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180142348 | Yu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180151345 | Haukka et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180151355 | Fukazawa | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180182618 | Blanquart et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180222933 | Romero | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180233350 | Tois et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180243787 | Haukka et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20190017170 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190057858 | Hausmann et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190074441 | Kikuchi et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190100837 | Haukka et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190155159 | Knaepen et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190283077 | Pore et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190333761 | Tois et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190341245 | Tois et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20200010953 | Haukka et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200051829 | Tois et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200066512 | Tois et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200105515 | Maes et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200181766 | Haukka et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200365416 | Niskanen et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20210118669 | Tois et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0469456 | Feb 1992 | EP |
| 0880168 | Nov 1998 | EP |
| 1340269 | Feb 2009 | EP |
| 3026055 | Jun 2016 | EP |
| 2001-127068 | May 2001 | JP |
| 2004-281479 | Oct 2004 | JP |
| 2008-311603 | Dec 2008 | JP |
| 4333900 | Sep 2009 | JP |
| 2010-232316 | Oct 2010 | JP |
| 2011-018742 | Jan 2011 | JP |
| 2011-187583 | Sep 2011 | JP |
| 2014-093331 | May 2014 | JP |
| 2014-93331 | May 2014 | JP |
| 102001001072 | Feb 2001 | KR |
| 10-2002-0010821 | Feb 2002 | KR |
| 20030027392 | Apr 2003 | KR |
| 1020040056026 | Jun 2004 | KR |
| 10-2005-0103811 | Nov 2005 | KR |
| 10-0869326 | Nov 2008 | KR |
| 10-0920033 | Oct 2009 | KR |
| 10-2010-0093859 | Aug 2010 | KR |
| 10-2012-0120902 | Nov 2012 | KR |
| 175767 | Aug 2003 | TW |
| 2005-39321 | Dec 2005 | TW |
| 2010-05827 | Feb 2010 | TW |
| 2010-27766 | Jul 2010 | TW |
| 2014-39365 | Oct 2014 | TW |
| WO 2002045167 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO 2011156705 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| WO 2013161772 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014156782 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014209390 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2015047345 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015094305 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015147843 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015147858 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2016178978 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2017184357 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017184358 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2018204709 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018213018 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Farm et al. Selective-Area Atomic Layer Deposition Using Poly(methyl methacrylate) Films as Mask Layers, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, pp. 15791-15795. (Year: 2008). |
| Schuisky et al. Atomic Layer Deposition ofThin Films Using O2 as Oxygen Source, Langmuir, 2001, 17, pp. 5508-5512. (Year: 2001). |
| Mackus et al. The use of atomic layer deposition in advanced nanopatterning, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, pp. 10941-10960. (Year: 2014). |
| Farm et al. Self-Assembled Octadecyltrimethoxysilane Monolayers Enabling Selective-Area Atomic Layer Deposition of Iridium, Chem. Vap. Deposition, 12, 2006, pp. 415-417. (Year: 2006). |
| Kukli et al. Properties of hafnium oxide films grown by atomic layer deposition from hafnium tetraiodide and oxygen, J. App. Phys., 92(10), 2002, pp. 5698-5703. (Year: 2002). |
| Coclite, et al.; 25th Anniversary Article: CVD Polymers: A New Paradigm for Surface Modification and Device Fabrication; Advanced Materials; Oct. 2013; 25; pp. 5392-5423. |
| Farr, Isaac Vincent; Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Polyimide Gas Separation Membrane Material Systems, Chapter 2; Virginia Tech Chemistry PhD Dissertation; URN # etd-080999-123034; Jul. 26, 1999. |
| George, Steven M.; Atomic Layer Deposition: An Overview; Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, pp. 111-131; Feb. 12, 2009. |
| Norrman, et al.; 6 Studies of Spin-Coated Polymer Films; Annu. Rep. Prog. Chem.; Sect. C; 2005; 101; pp. 174-201. |
| Toirov, et al.; Thermal Cyclodehydration of Polyamic Acid Initiated by UV-Irradiation; Iranian Polymer Journal; vol. 5, No. 1; pp. 16-22; 1996; Iran. |
| Au et al., “Selective Chemical Vapor Deposition of Manganese Self-Aligned Capping Layer for Cu Interconnections in Microelectronics”, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 157, No. 6, 2010, pp. D341-D345. |
| Bouteville et al., “Selective R.T.L.P.C.V.D. of Tungsten by Silane Reduction on Patterned PPQ/Si Wafers” Journal De Physique IV, Colloque C2, suppl. au Journal de Physique II, vol. 1, Sep. 1991, pp. C2-857-C2-864. |
| Burton, B.B. et al., “Atomic Layer Deposition of MgO Using Bis(ethylcyclopentadienyl)magnesium and H20”. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 1939-1946. |
| Burton, B.B., et al., “Si02 Atomic Layer Deposition Using Tris(dimethylamino)silane and Hydrogen Peroxide Studied by in Situ Transmission FTIR Spectroscopy”. J. Phys. Chern. C, 2009, 113, 8249-8257. |
| Carlsson, J., “Precursor Design for Chemical Vapour Deposition”, Acta Chemica Scandinavica, vol. 45, 1991, pp. 864-869. |
| Chang et al., “Influences of damage and contamination from reactive ion etching on selective tungsten deposition in a low-pressure chemical-vapor-deposition reactor”, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 80, No. 5, Sep. 1, 1996, pp. 3056-3061. |
| Chen et al., Highly Stable Monolayer Resists for Atomic Layer Deposition on Germanium and Silicon, Chem. Matter, vol. 18, No. 16, pp. 3733-3741, 2006. |
| Elam et al., “Kinetics ofthe WF6 and Si2H6 surface reactions during tungsten atomic layer deposition”, Surface Science, vol. 479, 2001, pp. 121-135. |
| Elam et al., “Nucleation and growth during tungsten atomic layer deposition on SiO2 surfaces”, Thin Solid Films, vol. 386, 2001 pp. 41-52. |
| Fabreguette et al., Quartz crystal microbalance study of tungsten atomic layer deposition using WF6 and Si2H6, Thin Solid Films, vol. 488, 2005, pp. 103-110. |
| Ghosal et al., Controlling Atomic Layer Deposition of Ti02 in Aerogels through Surface Functionalization, Chem. Matter, vol. 21, pp. 1989-1992, 2009. |
| Grubbs et al., “Nucleation and growth during the atomic layer deposition of W on Al2O3 and Al2O3 on W”, Thin Solid Films, vol. 467, 2004, pp. 16-27. |
| Hymes et al., “Surface cleaning of copper by thermal and plasma treatment in reducing and inert ambients”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 16, No. 3, May/Jun. 1998, pp. 1107-1109. |
| Klaus et al., “Atomic layer deposition of tungsten using sequential surface chemistry with a sacrificial stripping reaction”, Thin Solid Films, vol. 360, 2000, pp. 145-153. |
| Klaus et al., “Atomically controlled growth of tungsten and tungsten nitride using sequential surface reactions”, Applied Surface Science 162-163, 2000, pp. 479-491. |
| King, Dielectric Barrier, Etch Stop, and Metal Capping Materials for State of the Art and beyond Metal Interconnects, ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. N3029-N3047, 2015. |
| Lee et al., Area-Selective Atomic Layor Deposition Using Self-Assembled Monolayer and Scanning Probe Lithography, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 156, Issue 9, pp. G125-G128, 2009. |
| Lei et al., “Real-time observation and opitimization of tungsten atomic layer deposition process cycle”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 24, No. 2, Mar./Apr. 2006, pp. 780-789. |
| Lemonds, Andrew Michael, “Atomic Layer Deposition and Properties of Refractory Transition Metal-Based Copper-Diffusion Barriers for ULSI Interconnect”, The University of Texas at Austin, 2003, pp. 1-197. |
| Leusink et al., “Growth kinetics and inhibition of growth of chemical vapor deposited thin tungsten films on silicon from tungsten hexafluoride”, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 7 2, No. 2, Jul. 15, 1992, pp. 490-498. |
| Liang, Xuehai, et al., “Growth of Ge Nanofilms Using Electrochemical Atomic Layer Deposition, with a “Bait and Switch” Surface-Limited Reaction”. Journal ofthe American Chemical Society, 2011, 133, 8199-8024. |
| Lohokare et al., “Reactions of Disilane on Cu(111): Direct Observation of Competitive Dissociation, Disproportionation, and Thin Film Growth Processes”, Langmuir 1995, vol. 11, pp. 3902-3912. |
| Low et al., Selective deposition of CVD iron on silicon dioxide and tungsten, Microelectronic Engineering 83, pp. 2229-2233, 2006. |
| Mackus et al., Influence of Oxygen Exposure on the Nucleation of Platinum Atomic Layer Deposition: Consequences for Film Growth, Nanopatterning, and Nanoparticle Synthesis, Chem. Matter, vol. 25, pp. 1905-1911, 2013. |
| Mackus et al., Local deposition of high-purity Pt nanostructures by combining electron beam induced deposition and atomic layer deposition, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 107, pp. 116102-1-116102-3, 2010. |
| Maluf et al., “Selective tungsten filling of sub-0.25 μm trenches for the fabrication of scaled contacts and x-ray masks”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 8, No. 3, May/Jun. 1990, pp. 568-569. |
| Overhage et al., Selective Atomic Layer Deposition (SALD) of Titanium Dioxide on Silicon and Copper Patterned Substrates, Journal of Undergraduate Research 4, 29, Mar. 2011 in 4 pages. |
| Parulekar et al., Atomic Layer Deposition of Zirconium Oxide on Copper Patterned Silicon Substrate, Journal of Undergraduate Research, vol. 7, pp. 15-17, 2014. |
| Parulekar et al., Selective atomic layer deposition of zirconium oxide on copper patterned silicon substrate, pp. 1-6, 2013. |
| Proslier et al., “Atomic Layer Deposition and Superconducting Properties of NbSi Films”, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2011, vol. 115, No. 50, pp. 1-26. |
| Roberts et al., “Selective Mn deposition on Cu lines”, poster presentation, 12th International Conference on Atomic Layer Deposition, Jun. 19, 2012, Dresden, Germany. |
| Schmeißer, Decomposition of formic acid, Chemnitz University of Technology, pp. 1-13, Aug. 31, 2011. |
| Schmeißer, Reduction of Copper Oxide by Formic Acid an ab-initio study, Chemnitz University of Technology, pp. 1-42, Sep. 2011. |
| Selvaraj et al., Selective atomic layer deposition of zirconia on copper patterned silicon substrates using ethanol as oxygen source as well as copper reductant, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 010601-1-010601-4, Jan. 2014. |
| Senesky et al., “Aluminum nitride as a masking material for the plasma etching of silicon carbide structures,” 2010, IEEE, pp. 352-355. |
| “Tungsten and Tungsten Silicide Chemical Vapor Deposition”, TimeDomain CVD, Inc., retrieved from link: http://www.timedomaincvd.com/CVD_Fundamentals/films/W_WSi.html, Last modified Jul. 11, 2008. |
| Yu et al., “Gas/surface reactions in the chemical vapor deposition of tungsten using WF6/SiH4 mixtures”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, vol. 7, No. 3, May/Jun. 1989, pp. 625-629. |
| Vallat et al., Selective deposition of Ta205 by adding plasma etching super-cycles in plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition steps, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 01B104-1-01B104-7, Jan. 2017. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 17, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/039970, filed Jun. 10, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 5, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,195. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13,702,992. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,863. |
| Ellinger et al., “Selective Area Spatial Atomic Layer Deposition of ZnO, Al2O3, and Aluminum-Doped ZnO Using Poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)”, Chern. Mater. 2014, 26, pp. 1514-1522. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,195, filed Jun. 8, 2016. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,863, filed Dec. 7, 2012. |
| Vervuurt et al., “Area-selective atomic layer deposition of platinum using photosensitive polyimide”, Nanotechnology 27, 2016, in 6 pages. |
| Benzotriazole, Wikipedia via https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzotriazole; pp. 1-5, no date available. |
| Bernal-Ramos, et al., “Atomic Layer Deposition of Cobalt Silicide Thin Films Studied by in Situ Infrared Spectroscopy”, Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, pp. 4943-4949. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,784, filed Feb. 3, 2015. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 15/877,632, filed Jan. 23, 2018. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/687,833, filed Apr. 15, 2015. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 16/100,855, filed Aug. 10, 2018. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,799, filed Feb. 23, 2015. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 15/331,366, filed Oct. 21, 2016. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 16/143,888, filed Sep. 27, 2018. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/817,161, filed Aug. 3, 2015. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,274, filed Aug. 5, 2015. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 15/432,263, filed Feb. 14, 2017. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 16/158,780, filed Oct. 12, 2018. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 15/221,453, filed Jul. 27, 2016. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 15/795,768, filed Oct. 27, 2017. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 16/040,844, filed Jul. 20, 2018. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 15/581,726, filed Apr. 28, 2017. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 15/892,728, filed Feb. 9, 2018. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 15/356,306, filed Nov. 18, 2016. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 16/213,479, filed Dec. 7, 2018. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,992, filed Mar. 26, 2013. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/613,183, filed Feb. 3, 2015. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/988,374, filed Jan. 5, 2016. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 15/609,497, filed May 31, 2017. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 16/100,581, filed Aug. 10, 2018. |
| Formic Acid, Wikipedia via https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formic_acid; pp. 1-5, no date available. |
| Hashemi et al., “A New Resist for Area Selective Atomic and Molecular Layer Deposition on Metal-Dielectric Patterns”, J. Phys. Chem. C2014, 118, pp. 10957-10962. |
| Hashemi et al., “Selective Deposition of Dieletrics: Limits and Advantages of Alkanethiol Blocking Agents on Metal-Dielectric Patterns”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, pp. 33264-33272. |
| Lecordier et al., “Vapor-deposited octadecanethlol masking layer on copper to enable area selective Hf3N4 atomic layer deposition on dielectrics studied by in situ spectroscopic ellipsometry”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A36(3), May/Jun. 2018, pp. 031605-1-031605-8. |
| Lemonds, A.M., “Atomic layer deposition of TaSix thin films on SiO2 using TaF5 and Si2H6”, Thin Solid Films 488, 2005 pp. 9-14. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2017 in Korean Application No. 2013-7000596. |
| Suntola, Tuomo, “Thin Films and Epitaxy Part B: Grown mechanism and Dynamics”, Handbook of Crystal Growth vol. 3, Elsevier, 1994, 33 pages. |
| Ting, et al., “Selective Electroless Metal Deposition for Integrated Circuit Fabrication”, J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 136, No. 2, Feb. 1989, pp. 456-462. |
| Aaltonen et al. (2004) Atomic layer deposition of iridium thin films. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 151(8):G489-G492. |
| Cho et al., “Atomic layer deposition of Al2O3 thin films using dimethylaluminum isopropoxide and water”, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 21, (2003), doi: 10.1116/1.1562184, pp. 1366-1370. |
| Hu et al. “Coating strategies for atomic layer deposition”, Nanotechnol. Rev. 2017; 6(6): pp. 527-547. |
| Lin et al., “Selective Deposition of Multiple Sensing Materials on Si Nanobelt Devices through Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition and Device-Localized Joule Heating”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 39935-39939, DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b13896. |
| Prasittichai et al., “Area Selective Molecular Layer Deposition of Polyurea Film”, Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, vol. 5, pp. 13391-13396. |
| Putkonen, et al.; Atomic Layer Deposition of Polyimide Thin Films; Journal of Materials Chemistry; 2007, 17, pp. 664-669. |
| Ratta, Varun; Crystallization, Morphology, Thermal Stability and Adhesive Properties of Novel High Performance Semicrystalline Polyimides, Chapter 1; Virginia Tech Chemistry PhD Dissertation; URN # etd-051799-162256; Apr. 26, 1999. |
| Sapp, et al.; Thermo-Mechanical and Electrical Characterization of Through-Silicon Vias with a Vapor Deposited Polyimide Dielectric Liner; IEEE; 2012. |
| Sundberg, et al.; Organic and Inorganic-Organic Thin Film Structures by Molecular Layer Deposition: A Review; Beilstein J. Nanotechnol; 2014, 5, pp. 1104-1136. |
| Toirov, et al.; Thermal Cyclodehydration of Polyamic Acid Initiated by UV-Irradiation; Iranian Polymer Journal; vol. 5, No. 1; pp. 1A323:C3286-22; 1996; Iran. |
| Wang et al., “Low-temperature plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition of tin oxide electron selective layers for highly efficient planar perovskite solar cells”, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016, 4, pp. 12080-12087. |
| Zhou, et al.; Fabrication of Organic Interfacial Layers by Molecular Layer Deposition: Present Status and Future Opportunities; Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology; A 31 (4), 040801-1 to 040801-18; 2013. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 8, 2018 in Application No. PCT/US2018/030974, filed May 3, 2018. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 24, 2018 in Application No. PCT/US2018/030979, filed May 3, 2018. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180151345 A1 | May 2018 | US |
