Patent Grant
8863063
It is known that optical lithography has reached the end of its capability at the 193 nm light wavelength and 1.35 numerical aperture (NA) immersion system. The minimum straight line resolution capability of this equipment is approximately 40 nm with an approximate 80 nm feature-to-feature pitch. A feature-to-feature pitch requirement lower than about 80 nm would require multiple patterning steps for a given structure type within a given chip level. Also, line end resolution becomes more challenging as lithography is pushed toward its resolution limits. In semiconductor device layout, a typical metal line pitch at the 32 nm critical dimension is approximately 100 nm. In order to achieve the cost benefit of feature scaling, a scaling factor of 0.7 to 0.75 is desirable. The scaling factor of about 0.75 to reach the 22 nm critical dimension would require a metal line pitch of about 75 nm, which is below the capability of current single exposure lithography systems and technology. It is within this context that the present invention arises.
In one embodiment, an integrated circuit is disclosed. The circuit includes a first finfet transistor of a first transistor type. The circuit includes a first finfet transistor of a second transistor type. The circuit includes a second finfet transistor of the first transistor type. The circuit includes a second finfet transistor of the second transistor type. Each of the first and second finfet transistors of the first transistor type and each of the first and second finfet transistors of the second transistor type has a respective gate electrode extending lengthwise in a parallel direction. The gate electrodes of the first finfet transistor of the first transistor type and the first finfet transistor of the second transistor type have their lengthwise centerlines substantially aligned to a common gate electrode track extending in the parallel direction. The gate electrodes of the second finfet transistor of the first transistor type and the second finfet transistor of the second transistor type are positioned on opposite sides of the common gate electrode track. Each of the first and second finfet transistors of the first transistor type is formed in part by a respective diffusion fin of a first diffusion type electrically connected to a common node. Each of the first and second finfet transistors of the second transistor type is formed in part by a respective diffusion fin of a second diffusion type electrically connected to the common node. The diffusion fins of the first diffusion type are collectively separated from the diffusion fins of the second diffusion type in the parallel direction by an inner non-diffusion region. The gate electrodes of both the first finfet transistor of the first transistor type and the first finfet transistor of the second transistor type are formed by a first conductive structure so as to be electrically connected to each other through the first conductive structure. The gate electrode of the second finfet transistor of the first transistor type is formed by a second conductive structure. The gate electrode of the second finfet transistor of the second transistor type is formed by a third conductive structure. Each of the first, second, and third conductive structures includes portions extending over the inner non-diffusion region. A first conductive contacting structure is connected to the portion of the second conductive structure that extends over the inner non-diffusion region. A second conductive contacting structure is connected to the portion of the third conductive structure that extends over the inner non-diffusion region. Each of the first and second conductive contacting structures is respectively defined as either a gate contact or a local interconnect structure.
In one embodiment, a method is disclosed for creating a layout of an integrated circuit. The method includes operating a computer to define a layout of a first finfet transistor of a first transistor type. The method includes operating the computer to define a layout of a first finfet transistor of a second transistor type. The method includes operating the computer to define a layout of a second finfet transistor of the first transistor type. The method includes operating the computer to define a layout of a second finfet transistor of the second transistor type. Each layout of the first and second finfet transistors of the first transistor type and each layout of the first and second finfet transistors of the second transistor type has a respective gate electrode layout feature extending lengthwise in a parallel direction. The gate electrode layout features of the first finfet transistor of the first transistor type and the first finfet transistor of the second transistor type have their lengthwise centerlines substantially aligned to a common gate electrode track extending in the parallel direction. The gate electrode layout features of the second finfet transistor of the first transistor type and the second finfet transistor of the second transistor type are positioned on opposite sides of the common gate electrode track. Each layout of the first and second finfet transistors of the first transistor type includes a respective diffusion fin layout of a first diffusion type to be electrically connected to a common node. Each layout of the first and second finfet transistors of the second transistor type includes a respective diffusion fin layout of a second diffusion type to be electrically connected to the common node. The diffusion fin layouts of the first diffusion type are collectively separated from the diffusion fin layouts of the second diffusion type in the parallel direction by an inner non-diffusion layout region. The gate electrode layout features of both the first finfet transistor of the first transistor type and the first finfet transistor of the second transistor type are formed as parts of a first conductive structure layout feature so as to be electrically connected to each other through a conductive structure corresponding to the first conductive structure layout feature. The gate electrode layout feature of the second finfet transistor of the first transistor type is formed as part of a second conductive structure layout feature. The gate electrode layout feature of the second finfet transistor of the second transistor type is formed as part of a third conductive structure layout feature. Each of the first, second, and third conductive structure layout features includes portions extending over the inner non-diffusion layout region. The method includes operating the computer to define a layout of a first conductive contacting structure defined to connect to a portion of a conductive structure corresponding to the portion of the second conductive structure layout feature that extends over the inner non-diffusion region. The method includes operating the computer to define a layout of a second conductive contacting structure defined to connect to a portion of a conductive structure corresponding to the portion of the third conductive structure layout feature that extends over the inner non-diffusion region. Each of the first and second conductive contacting structures is respectively defined as either a gate contact or a local interconnect structure.
In one embodiment, a data storage device having program instructions stored thereon for generating a layout of an integrated circuit is disclosed. The data storage device includes program instructions for defining a layout of a first finfet transistor of a first transistor type. The data storage device includes program instructions for defining a layout of a first finfet transistor of a second transistor type. The data storage device includes program instructions for defining a layout of a second finfet transistor of the first transistor type. The data storage device includes program instructions for defining a layout of a second finfet transistor of the second transistor type. Each layout of the first and second finfet transistors of the first transistor type and each layout of the first and second finfet transistors of the second transistor type has a respective gate electrode layout feature extending lengthwise in a parallel direction. The gate electrode layout features of the first finfet transistor of the first transistor type and the first finfet transistor of the second transistor type have their lengthwise centerlines substantially aligned to a common gate electrode track extending in the parallel direction. The gate electrode layout features of the second finfet transistor of the first transistor type and the second finfet transistor of the second transistor type are positioned on opposite sides of the common gate electrode track. Each layout of the first and second finfet transistors of the first transistor type include a respective diffusion fin layout of a first diffusion type to be electrically connected to a common node. Each layout of the first and second finfet transistors of the second transistor type include a respective diffusion fin layout of a second diffusion type to be electrically connected to the common node. The diffusion fin layouts of the first diffusion type are collectively separated from the diffusion fin layouts of the second diffusion type in the parallel direction by an inner non-diffusion layout region. The gate electrode layout features of both the first finfet transistor of the first transistor type and the first finfet transistor of the second transistor type are formed as parts of a first conductive structure layout feature so as to be electrically connected to each other through a conductive structure corresponding to the first conductive structure layout feature. The gate electrode layout feature of the second finfet transistor of the first transistor type is formed as part of a second conductive structure layout feature. The gate electrode layout feature of the second finfet transistor of the second transistor type is formed as part of a third conductive structure layout feature. Each of the first, second, and third conductive structure layout features includes portions extending over the inner non-diffusion layout region. The data storage device includes program instructions for defining a layout of a first conductive contacting structure defined to connect to a portion of a conductive structure corresponding to the portion of the second conductive structure layout feature that extends over the inner non-diffusion region. The data storage device includes program instructions for defining a layout of a second conductive contacting structure defined to connect to a portion of a conductive structure corresponding to the portion of the third conductive structure layout feature that extends over the inner non-diffusion region. Each of the first and second conductive contacting structures is respectively defined as either a gate contact or a local interconnect structure.
In one embodiment, a semiconductor device includes a substrate, a first transistor, and a second transistor. The first transistor has a source region and a drain region within a first diffusion fin. The first diffusion fin is structured to project from a surface of the substrate. The first diffusion fin is structured to extend lengthwise in a first direction from a first end of the first diffusion fin to a second end of the first diffusion fin. The second transistor has a source region and a drain region within a second diffusion fin. The second diffusion fin is structured to project from the surface of the substrate. The second diffusion fin is structured to extend lengthwise in the first direction from a first end of the second diffusion fin to a second end of the second diffusion fin. The second diffusion fin is positioned next to and spaced apart from the first diffusion fin. Also, either the first end or the second end of the second diffusion fin is positioned in the first direction between the first end and the second end of the first diffusion fin.
In one embodiment, a method of fabricating a semiconductor device is disclosed. The method includes providing a substrate. The method also includes forming a first transistor on the substrate, such that the first transistor has a source region and a drain region within a first diffusion fin, and such that the first diffusion fin is formed to project from a surface of the substrate, and such that the first diffusion fin is formed to extend lengthwise in a first direction from a first end of the first diffusion fin to a second end of the first diffusion fin. The method also includes forming a second transistor on the substrate, such that the second transistor has a source region and a drain region within a second diffusion fin, and such that the second diffusion fin is formed to project from the surface of the substrate, and such that the second diffusion fin is formed to extend lengthwise in the first direction from a first end of the second diffusion fin to a second end of the second diffusion fin, and such that the second diffusion fin is formed at a position next to and spaced apart from the first diffusion fin. Also, the first and second transistors are formed such that either the first end or the second end of the second diffusion fin is formed at a position in the first direction between the first end and the second end of the first diffusion fin.
In one embodiment, a data storage device has computer executable program instructions stored thereon for rendering a layout of a semiconductor device. The data storage device includes computer program instructions for defining a first transistor to be formed on a substrate, such that the first transistor is defined to have a source region and a drain region within a first diffusion fin, and such that the first diffusion fin is defined to project from a surface of the substrate, and such that the first diffusion fin is defined to extend lengthwise in a first direction from a first end of the first diffusion fin to a second end of the first diffusion fin. The data storage device also includes computer program instructions for defining a second transistor to be formed on the substrate, such that the second transistor is defined to have a source region and a drain region within a second diffusion fin, and such that the second diffusion fin is defined to project from the surface of the substrate, and such that the second diffusion fin is defined to extend lengthwise in the first direction from a first end of the second diffusion fin to a second end of the second diffusion fin, and such that the second diffusion fin is defined to be positioned next to and spaced apart from the first diffusion fin, and such that the second diffusion fin is defined to have either its first end or its second end positioned in the first direction between the first end and the second end of the first diffusion fin.
FIGS. 12A/B show a variation of the layout of
FIGS. 13A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 12A/B that does not have contacts from each of local interconnect and gate electrode structures to met1, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 14A/B show a variation of the layout of
FIGS. 15A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 14A/B having met1 routing structures populated so each (y) location has a met1 structure, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 16A/B show a variation of the layout of
FIGS. 17A/B show an example cell layout implementing diffusion fins, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 18A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 17A/B in which the contacts connect to the horizontal local interconnect, and in which the horizontal local interconnect connects directly to the vertical local interconnect, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 19A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 17A/B in which the power rail contact to local interconnect are not shared, and in which there is no shared local interconnect under the power rails, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 20A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 19A/B in which the diffusion fins are offset by a diffusion fin half-pitch with respect to the cell boundary, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 21A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 20A/B having minimum width power rails and negative vertical local interconnect overlap of the diffusion fins, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 22A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 17A/B having minimum width power rails, no shared local interconnect or diffusion fins under the power rails, and a larger space between p-find and n-fins, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 23A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 17A/B, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 24A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 23A/B, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 25A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 23A/B, in which the cell is doubled in height, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 26A/B show an example cell layout implementing diffusion fins, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 27A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 26A/B, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 28A/B show an example cell layout implementing diffusion fins, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 29A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 28A/B in which there are no local interconnect structures present between two gate electrode structures of n-type transistors, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 30A/B show an example cell layout implementing diffusion fins, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 35A/B through 47A/B show cross-couple transistor configurations having transmission gate in both logic paths, requiring all the internal nodes to have a connection between p-type and n-type, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 48A/B through 57A/B show cross-couple transistor configurations having transmission gate in the logic path with larger transistors, and tristate gate in other paths, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 58A/B through 59A/B show cross-couple transistor configurations having transmission gate in the logic path with smaller transistors, and tristate gate in other paths, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 60A/B through 62A/B show cross-couple transistor configurations having tristate gate in both logic paths, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 63A/B through 67A/B show cross-couple transistor configurations having transmission gate in both logic paths, requiring all the internal nodes to have a connection between p-type and n-type, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 68A/B through 69A/B show cross-couple transistor configurations having tristate gate in both logic paths, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 71A/B through 77A/B show a number of example SDFF circuit layouts that utilize both tri-state and transmission gate based cross-coupled circuit structures, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention. Additionally, it should be understood that the various circuit and/or layout features depicted in a given figure presented herein can be utilized in combination with other circuit and/or layout features depicted in other figures presented herein.
A “finfet” is a transistor constructed from a vertical silicon island, i.e., fin. The finfet transistor can also be referred to as a tri-gate transistor. The term “finfet” transistor as used herein refers to any transistor configuration that includes a diffusion structure that projects upward from an underlying substrate.
It should be understood that the example finfet transistor 100 depicted in
Also, while the example diffusion fin 102 of
Additionally, in some embodiments, a vertical projection distance of the diffusion fins 102 above the substrate 105 will be substantially equal across a region of the semiconductor chip. However, in other embodiments, some diffusion fins 102 may be designed and fabricated to have multiple different vertical projection distances above the substrate 105 across one or more regions of the semiconductor chip. Because the channel area of the finfet transistor 100 is a function of the diffusion fin 102 vertical projection distance above the substrate 105, such a variation in diffusion fin 102 vertical projection distance above the substrate 105 can be used to adjust a drive strength of selected finfet transistors 100 relative to others on the semiconductor chip. In one example, selective variation in diffusion fin 102 height can be provided through selective etching/overetching of the diffusion fin 102 structures during fabrication.
As discussed above,
Transistor scaling has slowed below the 45 nanometers (nm) critical dimension due to gate oxide limitations and/or source/drain leakage scaling issues. The finfet transistor mitigates these issues by controlling the channel of the finfet transistor from three sides. The increased electrical fields in the channel of the finfet transistor improve the relationship between I-on (on drive current) and I-off (sub-threshold leakage current). Finfet transistors can be employed at the 22 nm critical dimension and below. However, due to their vertical projection, finfet transistors can have restricted placement in various circuit layouts. For instance, there can be a required finfet-to-finfet minimum spacing and/or a required finfet-to-finfet minimum pitch, among other restrictions. Embodiments are disclosed herein for cell layouts that utilize finfet transistors in a manner which complements layout scaling.
A cell, as referenced herein, represents an abstraction of a logic function, and encapsulates lower-level integrated circuit layouts for implementing the logic function. It should be understood that a given logic function can be represented by multiple cell variations, wherein the cell variations may be differentiated by feature size, performance, and process compensation technique (PCT) processing. For example, multiple cell variations for a given logic function may be differentiated by power consumption, signal timing, current leakage, chip area, OPC (optical proximity correction), RET (reticle enhancement technology), etc. It should also be understood that each cell description includes the layouts for the cell in each level (or layer) of a chip within the associated vertical column of the chip, as required to implement the logic function of the cell. More specifically, a cell description includes layouts for the cell in each level of the chip extending from the substrate level up through a particular interconnect level.
In some embodiments, such as shown in
It should be understood that other embodiments may utilize multiple diffusion fin pitches within a given cell or among a collection of cells. For example,
In each Figure presented herein, each diffusion fin, e.g., diffusion fins 201A/201B in
The cell layout also includes a number of linear-shaped gate electrode structures 207. The linear-shaped gate electrode structures 207 extend in a substantially perpendicular direction to the diffusion fins 201A/201B, i.e., in the second direction (y). When fabricated, the linear-shaped gate electrode structures 207 wrap over the diffusion fins 201A/201B to form gate electrodes of finfet transistors. It should be understood that an appropriate gate oxide material is disposed, i.e., positioned/deposited, between the diffusion fins 201A/201B and the gate electrode structures 207 formed thereover.
In some embodiments, the linear-shaped gate electrode structures 207 are placed in accordance with a fixed gate pitch 209 as measured in the first direction (x) between lengthwise centerlines of adjacently positioned gate electrode structures 207. In some embodiments, the gate pitch 209 is related to the cell width as measured in the first direction (x), such that the gate pitch can be continued across cell boundaries. Therefore, in some embodiments, the gate electrode structures 207 for multiple neighboring cells can be placed in accordance with a common global gate pitch, thereby facilitating chip level manufacturing of the linear-shaped gate electrode structures 207 in multiple cells.
It should be understood that some of the gate pitch locations in a given cell may be occupied by gate electrode structures 207, while other gate pitch locations in the given cell are left vacant. Also, it should be understood that multiple gate electrode structures 207 can be placed in a spaced apart, end-to-end manner along any of the gate electrode pitch locations within a given cell. It should be further understood that in some embodiments, the gate electrode structures 207 can be placed in accordance with one or more gate pitches, or can be placed in an unrestricted manner with regard to gate pitch.
The cell layout can also include a number of horizontal linear-shaped local interconnect structures (lih) 211, and/or a number of vertical linear-shaped local interconnect structures (liv) 213. The vertical local interconnect structures 213 are oriented parallel to the gate electrode structures 207. The horizontal local interconnect structures 211 are oriented parallel to the diffusion fins 201A/201B. In some embodiments, placement of the vertical local interconnect structures 213 is defined to be out of phase from placement of the gate electrode structures 207 by one-half of the gate pitch. Thus, in this embodiment, each vertical local interconnect structure 213 is centered between its neighboring gate electrode structures 207, when the neighboring gate electrode structures 207 are positioned on the gate pitch. Therefore, in this embodiment, adjacently placed vertical local interconnect structures 213 will have a center-to-center spacing equal to a local gate pitch or a global gate pitch, where the local gate pitch is applied within a given cell, and the global gate pitch is applied across multiple cells.
In some embodiments, placement of the horizontal local interconnect structures 211 is defined to be out of phase from placement of the diffusion fins 201A/201B by one-half of the diffusion fin pitch. Thus, in this embodiment, the horizontal local interconnect structures 211 can be centered between its neighboring diffusion fins 201A/201B, when the neighboring diffusion fins 201A/201B are positioned on the diffusion fin pitch. Therefore, in this embodiment, adjacently placed horizontal local interconnect structures 211 will have a center-to-center spacing equal to a local diffusion fin pitch or a global diffusion fin pitch, where the local diffusion fin pitch is applied within a given cell, and the global diffusion fin pitch is applied across multiple cells.
In some embodiments, the cell layout also includes a number of linear-shaped metal 1 (met 1) interconnect structures 215. The met1 interconnect structures 215 are oriented parallel to the diffusion fins 201A/201B and perpendicular to the gate electrode structures 207. In some embodiments, placement of the met1 interconnect structures 215 is defined to be out of phase from placement of the diffusion fins 201A/201B by one-half of the diffusion fin pitch. Thus, in this embodiment, each met1 interconnect structure 215 is centered between its neighboring diffusion fins, when its neighboring diffusion fins are positioned on the diffusion fin pitch, albeit within a higher chip level. Therefore, in this embodiment, adjacently placed met1 interconnect structures 215 will have a center-to-center spacing equal to a local diffusion fin pitch or a global diffusion fin pitch, where the local diffusion fin pitch is applied within a given cell, and the global diffusion fin pitch is applied across multiple cells. In some embodiments, the met1 interconnect structure 215 pitch, and hence the diffusion track pitch, is set at the single exposure lithographic limit, e.g., 80 nm for 193 nm wavelength light and 1.35 NA. In this embodiment, no double exposure lithography, i.e., multiple patterning, is required to manufacture the met1 interconnect structures 215. It should be understood that other embodiments can utilize met1 interconnect structures 215 that are oriented perpendicular to the diffusion fins 201A/201B and parallel to the gate electrode structures 207.
The cell layout also includes a number of contacts 217 defined to connect various met1 interconnect structures 215 to various local interconnect structures 211/213 and gate electrode structures 207, thereby providing electrical connectivity between the various finfet transistors as necessary to implement the logic function of the cell. In some embodiments, the contacts 217 are defined to satisfy single exposure lithographic limits. For example, in some embodiments, layout features to which the contacts 217 are to connect are sufficiently separated to enable single exposure manufacture of the contacts 217. For instance, the men interconnect structures 215 are defined such that their line ends which are to receive contacts 217 are sufficiently separated from neighboring men interconnect structure 215 line ends which are also to receive contacts 217, such that a spatial proximity between the contacts 217 is sufficiently large to enable single exposure lithography of the contacts 217. In some embodiments, neighboring contacts 217 are separated from each other by at least 1.5 times the gate pitch. It should be appreciated that line end cutting and the associated increased expense of double exposure lithography can be eliminated by sufficiently separating opposing line ends of the men interconnect structures 215. It should be understood that contact separation and line end separation on metal layers can be independent of each other in some embodiments, depending on choices made in the manufacturing process.
In some embodiments, the cell layout also includes a number of linear-shaped metal 2 (met2) interconnect structures 219. The met2 interconnect structures 219 are oriented parallel to the gate electrodes 207 and perpendicular to the diffusion fins 201A/201B. The met2 interconnect structures 219 can be physically connected to the men interconnect structures 215 by via 1 structures (v1) 221, as necessary to implement the logic function of the cell. Although the example cell of
The cell of
Based on the foregoing, it should be appreciated that the logic function of a given cell layout can be changed by swapping the material types of the diffusion fins. Therefore, for each cell layout present herein, it should be understood that multiple logic functions can be represented depending on the assignment of n-type and p-type materials to the diffusion fins.
It should be appreciated that each of the layouts in
As previously mentioned,
It should be understood that the diffusion fins and horizontal local interconnect structures under the power rails at the top and bottom of the cells in the various layouts depicted herein extend continuously in the horizontal direction (x) so as to service multiple cells that are positioned in a row, and possibly in adjacent rows. To illustrate this point,
Additionally, conductive structures in different layers (a.k.a. levels) of the semiconductor device, or portion thereof, can be positioned on respective pitch arrangements where a defined relationship exists between the conductive structure pitch arrangements of the different layers. For example, in some embodiments, diffusion fins in the diffusion fin layer are positioned in accordance with a diffusion fin pitch arrangement that can include one or more diffusion fin pitches, and metal 1 (met1) interconnect structures in the met1 layer are positioned in accordance with a met1 pitch arrangement that can include one or more met1 pitches, where one or more of the diffusion fin pitches are related to one or more of the met1 pitches by a rational number (x/y), where x and y are integer values. In some embodiments, a relationship between a diffusion fin pitch and a men pitch is defined by a rational number within a range extending from (1/4) to (4/1).
Also, in some embodiments, vertical local interconnect structures (liv) can be positioned in accordance with a vertical local interconnect pitch that is substantially equal to the gate electrode pitch. In some embodiments, the gate electrode pitch is less than 100 nanometers. Also, in a manner similar to that discussed above with regard to the diffusion fin pitch-to-met1 pitch relationship, in some embodiments the diffusion fin pitch arrangement can be related to the horizontal local interconnect pitch arrangement by a rational number (x/y), where x and y are integer values. That is, one or more diffusion fin pitches can be related to one or more horizontal local interconnect pitches by a rational number (x/y).
For instance, finfet transistors identified on the left side of the cell include the transistors ft12 and ft11, where ft12 is a finfet transistor 1 of the second type, and so on. Also shown is the 1st (first) common node electrical connection of the cell, i.e., the electrical connection of diffusion fins to a first common diffusion node. At the bottom of the standard cell additional finfet transistors of a 1st (first) type are identified using the marking arrows. Also shown in the cell is the 2nd (second) common node electrical connection, i.e., the electrical connection of diffusion fins to a second common diffusion node. A guide is also provided at the lower most part of the drawing, identifying the characteristics of the various components in the cell, and the associated hatching used to identify the various components, features, geometries, lines, connections, interconnections, positioning, placement, relative positioning, interconnections with relative positioning, and the like.
It should be understood that a given finfet transistor can be defined using multiple diffusion fins. For example,
Further illustrated is a 1st (first) direction, which may be the X axis, and a 2nd (second) direction which may be the Y axis. The 1st (first) and 2nd (second) directions point to the right of the cell, and to the top of the cell, respectively. However, it should be understood that the Y axis can traverse up and down across the cell, and the X axis can traverse left and right across the cell. In still another way of characterizing, the direction can be to associate the Y axis as a vertical direction, and the x-axis as a horizontal direction. Also shown for sake of completeness is a dashed line “ - - - ” to identify the cell abutment edge.
When various cells are placed together in a layout, such as to define an integrated circuit, the various cells are lined up to the abutment edges. The alignment to the abutment edges may, in one embodiment, allow cells to each include their own abutment edges, and each cell's abutment edge will overlap the abutment edge of an adjacent cell, depending on the placement of the cells for the circuit, as defined by the integrated circuit being designed, and ultimately formed into an electronic chip.
Additionally shown is an electrical connection 1 with type 2 FIN, as denoted by the heavy dashed line. Electrical connection 2 with type 2 FIN is also identified near the top part of the cell, as denoted by the heavy dashed line. Electrical connection with type 1 FIN is illustrated near the bottom portion of the cell, as denoted by the heavy dashed line. Also shown are the various centerlines of the FINs. For example, centerlines associated with the 1st (first) FIN up to the 10th (tenth) FIN are shown near the right portion of the cell, as identifiers illustrating the horizontal positioning of the centerlines across the horizontal direction of the cell. As noted above, the horizontal direction of the cell may be referred to as an X direction. The gate electrodes, that define the finfet transistors are oriented vertically along the Y direction, or vertically in different portions of the cell relative to the horizontal direction. Further shown in
The centerline segments are, in this example generalized for purposes of understanding the nature of their positioning, orientation, interconnection, and relationship to other features in the cell provided as an example in
In the example layout of
In the example layout of
In the example layout of
FIGS. 12A/B show a variation of the layout of
FIGS. 13A/13 show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 12A/B that does not have contacts from each of local interconnect and gate electrode structures to met1, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 14A/B show a variation of the layout of
FIGS. 15A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 14A/B having met1 routing structures populated so each (y) location has a men structure, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
The finfet transistors of the various types are shown, and identified by the notations described above, such as ft12, ft22, ft11, ft21, etc. Also shown are identification of centerlines along the rightmost side of the example standard cell. The centerline spacings, relative to each of the centerlines, are also shown using identifying arrows. The cell abutment edge is also identified in the cell, for purposes of clarity. As described above, the cell abutment edge defines the location where an adjacent cell will be placed, in an overlapping configuration, such that cell abutment edges overlap each other.
Further noted is that the cells, which are illustrated herein are utilized to make integrated circuits. The integrated circuits are made using the standard cell libraries, where tools are used to select specific cells to match the functionality desired for the integrated circuit. The standard cells, however, will include their defined construction and orientation for the transistors, which in one embodiment follow the methodology defined herein.
In this example, additional arrows have provided to identify spacings between the cell abutment edge and the FIN centerlines. Also shown are the type 1 FIN widths and the type 2 FIN widths. Further illustrated and pointed out by appropriate arrows are gate level feature (GLF) conductive contacting structure (CCS) features. Also illustrated is, on the left side of the figure, a centerline spacing between the type 1 and type 2 FIN. Further shown, using the guides for the hatching and shading, are the different types of diffusions used in the cell, the gate electrode, the metal, the contacts, the local interconnects vertical (LIV), and other identifying structures. For completeness, illustration of arrows showing the centerline spacing between type 1 FINs and centerline spacing between type 2 FINs are also provided.
Again, the spacings, illustrations, relative positioning, and orientations of the features are provided simply as an example of a cell, which may be a cell that is part of a standard cell library used to make integrated circuits. A resulting circuit can therefore be made into a physical structure, known as a chip. The chip can then be integrated into an integrated circuit, or an electronic device, etc. The electronic device can be in the form of a computing device, a portable device, a mobile device, a computer, a telephone, a digital assistant, a tablet, or any other form of device that can utilize a chip that processes functions or instructions.
FIGS. 16A/13 show a variation of the layout of
FIGS. 17A/B show an example cell layout implementing diffusion fins, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
In the example layout of FIGS. 17A/B, the diffusion fins include the following features:
In the example layout of FIGS. 17A/B, the local interconnect include the following features:
In the example layout of FIGS. 17A/B, the higher level men interconnect layer includes the following features:
FIGS. 18A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 17A/B in which the contacts connect to the horizontal local interconnect, and in which the horizontal local interconnect connects directly to the vertical local interconnect, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 19A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 17A/B in which the power rail contact to local interconnect are not shared, and in which there is no shared local interconnect under the power rails, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 20A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 19A/B in which the diffusion fins are offset by a diffusion fin half-pitch with respect to the cell boundary, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 21A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 20A/B having minimum width power rails and negative vertical local interconnect overlap of the diffusion fins, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 22A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 17A/B having minimum width power rails, no shared local interconnect or diffusion fins under the power rails, and a larger space between p-find and n-fins, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 23A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 17A/B, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
Also, FIGS. 23A/B show the diffusion fins before they are cut on the left and right edges.
FIGS. 24A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 23A/B, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 25A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 23A/B, in which the cell is doubled in height, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 26A/B show an example cell layout implementing diffusion fins, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
In the example layout of FIGS. 26A/B, the diffusion fins include the following features:
In the example layout of FIGS. 26A/B, the local interconnect include the following features:
In the example layout of FIGS. 26A/B, the higher level met1 interconnect layer includes the following features:
FIGS. 27A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 26A/B, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 28A/B show an example cell layout implementing diffusion fins, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
It should be understood that any of the figures presented herein, including the example layout of FIGS. 28A/B, can have the type 1 diffusion fins defined as p-type diffusion fins and the type 2 diffusion fins defined as n-type diffusion fins, or can have the type 1 diffusion fins defined as n-type diffusion fins and the type 2 diffusion fins defined as p-type diffusion fins, depending on the particular implementation embodiment. In the example layout of FIGS. 28A/B, the diffusion fins include the following features:
In the example layout of FIGS. 28A/B, the local interconnect include the following features:
In the example layout of FIGS. 28A/B, the higher level met1 interconnect layer includes the following features:
FIGS. 29A/B show a variation of the layout of FIGS. 28A/B in which there are no local interconnect structures present between two gate electrode structures of n-type transistors, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 30A/B show an example cell layout implementing diffusion fins, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
In the example layout of FIGS. 30A/B, the diffusion fins include the following features:
In the example layout of FIGS. 30A/B, the local interconnect include the following features:
In the example layout of FIGS. 30A/B, the higher level met1 interconnect layer includes the following features:
FIGS. 35A/B through 47A/B and 63A/B through 67A/B show cross-couple transistor configurations having transmission gate in both logic paths, requiring all the internal nodes to have a connection between p-type and n-type. FIGS. 48A/B through 57A/B show cross-couple transistor configurations having transmission gate in the logic path with larger transistors, and tristate gate in other paths. Tristate gate does not require a connection between p-type diffusion and n-type diffusion on the internal node.
FIGS. 58A/B through 59A/B show cross-couple transistor configurations having transmission gate in the logic path with smaller transistors, and tristate gate in other paths. Tristate gate does not require a connection between p-type diffusion and n-type diffusion on the internal node.
FIGS. 60A/B through 62A/B and 68A/B through 69A/B show cross-couple transistor configurations having tristate gate in both logic paths.
FIGS. 63A/B through 69A/B show cell layouts that have a number of p-type diffusion fins equal to a number of n-type diffusion fins. Some of the other FIGS. 35A/B through 62A/B show cell layouts that a number of p-type diffusion fins not equal to a number of n-type diffusion fins.
FIGS. 40A/B shows a cell layout that utilizes tighter spacing between horizontal/vertical local interconnect structures. FIGS. 37A/B, 45A/B, and 49A/B show cell layout examples that utilize a larger spacing between diffusion fins. FIGS. 63A/B through 69A/B show cell layout examples that utilize tighter spacing between diffusion fins. FIGS. 43A/B and 44A/B show cell layout examples that utilize a diffusion fin as a wire.
FIGS. 35A/B through 41A/B, 48A/B through 65A/B, and 68A/B through 69A/B shows cell layout examples that utilize a dense gate electrode structure implementation without split gates. FIGS. 42A/B through 47A/B and 66A/B through 67A/B show cell layout examples that utilize a split gate implementation with less wiring and larger transistor sizes.
FIGS. 35A/B through 69A/B show cell layout examples that demonstrate a number of different wiring examples for various cell layouts. FIGS. 35A/B through 69A/B show cell layout examples that demonstrate use of a fully populated gate electrode layer, including extension of gate electrode end caps and use of dummy structures where possible within the gate electrode layer. Some of the cell layouts shown in FIGS. 35A/B through 69A/B show examples of dummy gate electrode layer structures without the cuts at the top and bottom of the cell, i.e., prior to cut mask operation during the fabrication process. Some of the cell layouts, e.g., FIGS. 53A/B through 55A/B and 66A/B shows example cell layouts where power buses are omitted.
These cross-coupled transistor configuration of FIGS. 35A/B through 69A/B include structures formed on each layer as well as on a combination of layers, and many of the cell layout features mentioned above can be applied independent of each other. It should be understood that the cell layouts of FIGS. 35A/B through 69A/B show examples of what can be done with the finfet-based cross-coupled transistor configuration, and in no way represent an all inclusive set of possible cell layout configurations. Any of the features demonstrated in the various cell layout examples of FIGS. 35A/B through 69A/B can be combined to generate additional cell layouts.
Technologies for which the optical resolution is not sufficient to resolve line patterns directly will use some form of pitch division. The pitch division can be self-aligned, using spacers, or through multiple exposure steps at an achievable resolution. For example, for an ArF excimer laser scanner using water immersion of the final lens and a portion of the wafer to be exposed, the optical resolution is limited to ˜40 nm. This corresponds to a k1 value of 0.28 for a wavelength of 193 nm and an effective numerical aperture of 1.35. For diffusion fin layers and gate electrode layers and other layers formed with pitch division (for example, spacer double patterning, spacer quadruple patterning, multiple exposure Litho-Etch-Litho-Etch, etc. . . . ), even though the layout is done with uniform pitches (lengthwise centerline-to-lengthwise centerline pitches) for the conductive structures, i.e., for the lines, the as-fabricated conductive structures can end up slightly off target due to processing variations, such that multiple (e.g., two, four, etc. . . . ) pitches end up on the wafer.
Pitch division can be applied multiple times, for example pitch-division-by-2, pitch-division-by-4, with either the self-aligned spacer approach or multiple lithographic exposures. Pitch-division-by-4 has been reported to achieve lines/spaces of about 11 nm. One limitation of pitch division is that the resultant line patterns can have slightly different pitches within a pattern. For pitch-division-by-2, this means that groups of two lines will have one pitch, the next group of two lines can have a slightly different pitch, the next group of two lines will have the same pitch as the first group, etc. The result on a finished wafer will be lines which were intended to be on a uniform, fixed pitch but will end up on two or four or other multiple pitches. For self-aligned spacers, the original core line pattern will be drawn on a fixed, uniform pitch. For multiple exposures, each of the exposures will have lines drawn on a uniform fixed pitch. The non-uniform pitch introduced by the pitch division process may be on the order of 10% or less of the final pitch. For example, for a final target pitch of 50 nm, the pitches of each group of two lines may differ by less than 5 nm.
Restricted Gate Level Layout Architecture
The various circuit layouts incorporating finfet transistors, as discussed above, can be implemented within a restricted gate level layout architecture. For the gate level, a number of parallel virtual lines are defined to extend across the layout. These parallel virtual lines are referred to as gate electrode tracks, as they are used to index placement of gate electrodes of various transistors within the layout. In some embodiments, the parallel virtual lines which form the gate electrode tracks are defined by a perpendicular spacing therebetween equal to a specified gate electrode pitch. Therefore, placement of gate electrode segments on the gate electrode tracks corresponds to the specified gate electrode pitch. In another embodiment, the gate electrode tracks can be spaced at variable pitches greater than or equal to a specified gate electrode pitch.
Within the restricted gate level layout architecture, a gate level feature layout channel is defined about a given gate electrode track so as to extend between gate electrode tracks adjacent to the given gate electrode track. For example, gate level feature layout channels 70-5A through 70-5E are defined about gate electrode tracks 70-1A through 70-1E, respectively. It should be understood that each gate electrode track has a corresponding gate level feature layout channel. Also, for gate electrode tracks positioned adjacent to an edge of a prescribed layout space, e.g., adjacent to a cell boundary, the corresponding gate level feature layout channel extends as if there were a virtual gate electrode track outside the prescribed layout space, as illustrated by gate level feature layout channels 70-5A and 70-5E. It should be further understood that each gate level feature layout channel is defined to extend along an entire length of its corresponding gate electrode track. Thus, each gate level feature layout channel is defined to extend across the gate level layout within the portion of the chip to which the gate level layout is associated.
Within the restricted gate level layout architecture, gate level features associated with a given gate electrode track are defined within the gate level feature layout channel associated with the given gate electrode track. A contiguous gate level feature can include both a portion which defines a gate electrode of a transistor, i.e., of a finfet transistor as disclosed herein, and a portion that does not define a gate electrode of a transistor. Thus, a contiguous gate level feature can extend over both a diffusion region, i.e., diffusion fin, and a dielectric region of an underlying chip level.
In some embodiments, each portion of a gate level feature that forms a gate electrode of a transistor is positioned to be substantially centered upon a given gate electrode track. Furthermore, in this embodiment, portions of the gate level feature that do not form a gate electrode of a transistor can be positioned within the gate level feature layout channel associated with the given gate electrode track. Therefore, a given gate level feature can be defined essentially anywhere within a given gate level feature layout channel, so long as gate electrode portions of the given gate level feature are centered upon the gate electrode track corresponding to the given gate level feature layout channel, and so long as the given gate level feature complies with design rule spacing requirements relative to other gate level features in adjacent gate level layout channels. Additionally, physical contact is prohibited between gate level features defined in gate level feature layout channels that are associated with adjacent gate electrode tracks.
A gate electrode corresponds to a portion of a respective gate level feature that extends over a diffusion structure, i.e., over a diffusion fin, wherein the respective gate level feature is defined in its entirety within a gate level feature layout channel. Each gate level feature is defined within its gate level feature layout channel without physically contacting another gate level feature defined within an adjoining gate level feature layout channel. As illustrated by the example gate level feature layout channels 70-5A through 70-5E of
Some gate level features may have one or more contact head portions defined at any number of locations along their length. A contact head portion of a given gate level feature is defined as a segment of the gate level feature having a height and a width of sufficient size to receive a gate contact structure. In this instance, “width” is defined across the substrate in a direction perpendicular to the gate electrode track of the given gate level feature, and “height” is defined across the substrate in a direction parallel to the gate electrode track of the given gate level feature. The gate level feature width and height may or may not correspond to the cell width W and cell height H, depending on the orientation of the gate level features within the cell. It should be appreciated that a contact head of a gate level feature, when viewed from above, can be defined by essentially any layout shape, including a square or a rectangle. Also, depending on layout requirements and circuit design, a given contact head portion of a gate level feature may or may not have a gate contact defined thereabove.
A gate level of the some embodiments disclosed herein is defined as a restricted gate level, as discussed above. Some of the gate level features form gate electrodes of transistor devices. Others of the gate level features can form conductive segments extending between two points within the gate level. Also, others of the gate level features may be non-functional with respect to integrated circuit operation. It should be understood that the each of the gate level features, regardless of function, is defined to extend across the gate level within their respective gate level feature layout channels without physically contacting other gate level features defined with adjacent gate level feature layout channels.
In some embodiments, the gate level features are defined to provide a finite number of controlled layout shape-to-shape lithographic interactions which can be accurately predicted and optimized for in manufacturing and design processes. In this embodiment, the gate level features are defined to avoid layout shape-to-shape spatial relationships which would introduce adverse lithographic interaction within the layout that cannot be accurately predicted and mitigated with high probability. However, it should be understood that changes in direction of gate level features within their gate level layout channels are acceptable when corresponding lithographic interactions are predictable and manageable.
It should be understood that each of the gate level features, regardless of function, is defined such that no gate level feature along a given gate electrode track is configured to connect directly within the gate level to another gate level feature defined along a different gate electrode track without utilizing a non-gate level feature. Moreover, each connection between gate level features that are placed within different gate level layout channels associated with different gate electrode tracks is made through one or more non-gate level features, which may be defined in higher interconnect levels, i.e., through one or more interconnect levels above the gate level, or by way of local interconnect features at or below the gate level.
FIGS. 71A/B through 77A/B show a number of example SDFF circuit layouts that utilize both tri-state and transmission gate based cross-coupled circuit structures, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
1. Gate conductors:
2. Diffusion fins:
3. Local interconnect:
4. Contacts:
The example SDFF circuit layout of FIGS. 71A/B shows the following features, among others:
The example SDFF circuit layout of FIGS. 72A/B shows the following features, among others:
The example SDFF circuit layout of FIGS. 73A/B shows a version of the SDFF circuit that uses both the gate conductor and metal 2 layers for vertical (y-direction) wiring. The example SDFF circuit layout of FIGS. 74A/B shows a version of the SDFF circuit that uses horizontally oriented, i.e., in the x-direction, metal 2 structures for internal wiring. The example SDFF circuit layout of FIGS. 75A/B shows an alternate version of the SDFF circuit that again uses horizontally oriented, i.e., in the x-direction, metal 2 structures for internal wiring. The example SDFF circuit layout of FIGS. 76A/B shows a variation of the layout of FIG. 72A/B with horizontal local interconnect and vertical local interconnect used as separate conductors to allow for removal of the internal metal 2 conductors. The example SDFF circuit layout of FIGS. 77A/B shows a partial SDFF layout illustrating an alternate way to define circuit structures so as to minimize use of metal 2 and maximize transistor density.
It should be understood based on the circuit layouts and description provided herein that in some embodiments one or more of the following features can be utilized:
In an example embodiment, a semiconductor device includes a substrate, a first transistor, and a second transistor. The first transistor has a source region and a drain region within a first diffusion fin. The first diffusion fin is structured to project from a surface of the substrate. The first diffusion fin is structured to extend lengthwise in a first direction from a first end of the first diffusion fin to a second end of the first diffusion fin. The second transistor has a source region and a drain region within a second diffusion fin. The second diffusion fin is structured to project from the surface of the substrate. The second diffusion fin is structured to extend lengthwise in the first direction from a first end of the second diffusion fin to a second end of the second diffusion fin. The second diffusion fin is positioned next to and spaced apart from the first diffusion fin. Also, either the first end or the second end of the second diffusion fin is positioned in the first direction between the first end and the second end of the first diffusion fin.
The above-mentioned first and second transistors can be located at different positions in the second direction. Also, each of the first and second transistors can be a three-dimensionally gated transistor.
The above-mentioned first transistor includes a first linear-shaped gate electrode structure that extends lengthwise in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction as viewed from above the substrate. The above-mentioned second transistor includes a second linear-shaped gate electrode structure that extends lengthwise in the second direction perpendicular to the first direction as viewed from above the substrate. At least one of the first and second ends of the first diffusion fin can be positioned in the first direction between the first and second linear-shaped gate electrode structures. And, at least one of the first and second ends of the second diffusion fin can be positioned in the first direction between the first and second linear-shaped gate electrode structures. The first linear-shaped gate electrode structure is positioned next to and spaced apart from the second linear-shaped gate electrode structure.
The semiconductor device can also include a linear-shaped local interconnect structure that extends in the second direction and that is positioned between the first and second linear-shaped gate electrode structures. The linear-shaped local interconnect structure can be substantially centered in the first direction between the first and second linear-shaped gate electrode structures. The linear-shaped local interconnect structure can connect to one or more of the first and second diffusion fins.
The semiconductor device can also include a linear-shaped local interconnect structure that extends in the first direction and that is positioned between the first and second diffusion fins. This linear-shaped local interconnect structure can be substantially centered in the second direction between the first and second diffusion fins. Also, this linear-shaped local interconnect structure can connect to one or more of the first and second gate electrode structures.
The above-mentioned linear-shaped local interconnect structure that extends in the first direction can be referred to as a first linear-shaped local interconnect structure. The semiconductor device can also include a second linear-shaped local interconnect structure that extends in the second direction and that is positioned between the first and second linear-shaped gate electrode structures. The second linear-shaped local interconnect structure can be substantially centered in the first direction between the first and second linear-shaped gate electrode structures. Also, the second linear-shaped local interconnect structure can connect to one or more of the first diffusion fin, the second diffusion fin. Additionally, in some embodiments, the first linear-shaped local interconnect structure can be a first linear segment of a two-dimensionally varying non-linear local interconnect structure, and the second linear-shaped local interconnect structure can be a second linear segment of the two-dimensionally varying non-linear local interconnect structure. And, in some instances, the first and second linear-shaped local interconnect structures can be connected to each other.
The semiconductor device can also include a contact structure positioned between the first and second diffusion fins. In some embodiments, the contact structure can be substantially centered between the first and second diffusion fins. In some embodiments, the contact structure can connect to either the first gate electrode structure or the second gate electrode structure.
The semiconductor device can also include a contact structure positioned between the first and second gate electrode structures. In some embodiments, the contact structure can be substantially centered between the first and second gate electrode structures. Also, in some embodiments, the semiconductor device can include a conductive interconnect structure positioned in the second direction between first and second diffusion fins, where the contact structure connects to the conductive interconnect structure. In some embodiments, the conductive interconnect structure is a lowest level interconnect structure extending in the first direction that is not a diffusion fin.
The semiconductor device can also include a conductive interconnect structure positioned in the first direction between first and second diffusion fins, where the contact structure connects to a conductive interconnect structure. In some embodiments, the conductive interconnect structure is higher-level interconnect structure.
The semiconductor device can also include one or more interconnect structures, where some of the one or more interconnect structures include one or more interconnect segments that extend in the first direction. In some embodiments, some of the one or more interconnect segments that extend in the first direction are positioned between the first and second diffusion fins. Also, in some embodiments, some of the one or more interconnect segments that extend in the first direction are positioned over either the first diffusion fin or the second diffusion fin. In some embodiments, the one or more interconnect segments that extend in the first direction are positioned in accordance with a second direction interconnect pitch as measured in the second direction between respective first direction oriented centerlines of the one or more interconnect segments.
In some embodiments, the first and second diffusion fins can be positioned in accordance with a diffusion fin pitch as measured in the second direction between respective first direction oriented centerlines of the first and second diffusion fins, where the second direction interconnect pitch is a rational multiple of the diffusion fin pitch, with the rational multiple defined as a ratio of integer values.
In some embodiments, each of the first and second diffusion fins is centerline positioned in accordance with either a first diffusion fin pitch as measured in the second direction or a second diffusion fin pitch as measured in the second direction, where the first and second diffusion pitches successively alternate in the second direction, and where an average diffusion fin pitch is an average of the first and second diffusion fin pitches, and
where the second direction interconnect pitch is a rational multiple of the average diffusion fin pitch, with the rational multiple defined as a ratio of integer values. In some embodiments, the first diffusion fin pitch is equal to the second diffusion fin pitch. In some embodiments, the first diffusion fin pitch is different than the second diffusion fin pitch.
The above-mentioned one or more interconnect structures can include either a local interconnect structure, a higher-level interconnect structure, or a combination thereof, where the local interconnect structure is a lowest level interconnect structure that is not a diffusion fin, and where the higher-level interconnect structure is an interconnect structure formed at a level above the local interconnect structure relative to the substrate.
In some embodiments, each of the first and second diffusion fins is centerline positioned in accordance with either a first diffusion fin pitch as measured in the second direction or a second diffusion fin pitch as measured in the second direction, where the first and second diffusion pitches successively alternate in the second direction, and where an average diffusion fin pitch is an average of the first and second diffusion fin pitches. Also, the one or more interconnect segments that extend in the first direction can be centerline positioned in accordance with either a first interconnect pitch as measured in the second direction or a second interconnect pitch as measured in the second direction, where the first and second interconnect pitches successively alternate in the second direction, and where an average interconnect pitch is an average of the first and second interconnect pitches. Also, the average interconnect pitch is a rational multiple of the average diffusion fin pitch, with the rational multiple defined as a ratio of integer values.
In some embodiments, the first diffusion fin pitch is equal to the second diffusion fin pitch, and the first interconnect pitch is equal to the second interconnect pitch. In some embodiments, the first diffusion fin pitch is different than the second diffusion fin pitch, and the first interconnect pitch is different than the second interconnect pitch. In some embodiments, the first diffusion fin pitch is equal to the first interconnect pitch, and the second diffusion fin pitch is equal to the second interconnect pitch.
The semiconductor device can also include one or more interconnect structures, where some of the one or more interconnect structures include one or more interconnect segments that extend in the second direction. In some embodiments, some of the one or more interconnect segments that extend in the second direction are positioned between the first and second gate electrode structures. In some embodiments, some of the one or more interconnect segments that extend in the second direction are positioned over either the first gate electrode structure or the second gate electrode structure.
In some embodiments, the one or more interconnect segments that extend in the second direction are positioned in accordance with a first direction interconnect pitch as measured in the first direction between respective second direction oriented centerlines of the one or more interconnect segments. Also, the first and second gate electrode structures can be positioned in accordance with a gate electrode pitch as measured in the first direction between respective second direction oriented centerlines of the first and second gate electrode structures. The first direction interconnect pitch can be a rational multiple of the gate electrode pitch, with the rational multiple defined as a ratio of integer values.
The above-mentioned one or more interconnect structures can include either a local interconnect structure, a higher-level interconnect structure, or a combination thereof, where the local interconnect structure is a lowest level interconnect structure that is not a diffusion fin, and where the higher-level interconnect structure is an interconnect structure formed at a level above the local interconnect structure relative to the substrate.
In some embodiments, the semiconductor device can also include a first plurality of transistors each having a respective source region and a respective drain region formed by a respective diffusion fin. Each diffusion fin of the first plurality of transistors is structured to project from the surface of the substrate. Each diffusion fin of the first plurality of transistors is structured to extend lengthwise in the first direction from a first end to a second end of the respective diffusion fin. The first ends of the diffusion fins of the first plurality of transistors are substantially aligned with each other in the first direction.
Also, the semiconductor device can include a second plurality of transistors each having a respective source region and a respective drain region formed by a respective diffusion fin. Each diffusion fin of the second plurality of transistors is structured to project from the surface of the substrate. Each diffusion fin of the second plurality of transistors is structured to extend lengthwise in the first direction from a first end to a second end of the respective diffusion fin. The first ends of the diffusion fins of the second plurality of transistors are substantially aligned with each other in the first direction. And, one or more of the first ends of the diffusion fins of the second plurality of transistors are positioned in the first direction between the first and second ends of one or more of the diffusion fins of the first plurality of transistors.
In some embodiments, each of the first ends of the diffusion fins of the second plurality of transistors is positioned in the first direction between the first and second ends of one or more of the diffusion fins of the first plurality of transistors. In some embodiments, at least one of the diffusion fins of the second plurality of transistors is positioned next to and spaced apart from at least one diffusion fin of the first plurality of transistors. Also, in some embodiments, the first plurality of transistors can include either n-type transistors, p-type transistors, or a combination of n-type and p-type transistors, and the second plurality of transistors can include either n-type transistors, p-type transistors, or a combination of n-type and p-type transistors. In some embodiments, the first plurality of transistors are n-type transistors and the second plurality of transistors are p-type transistors.
In some embodiments, the first and second pluralities of diffusion fins are positioned to have their respective first direction oriented centerlines substantially aligned to a diffusion fin alignment grating defined by a first diffusion fin pitch as measured in the second direction and a second diffusion fin pitch as measured in the second direction. The first and second diffusion fin pitches occur in an alternating sequence in the second direction. Also, in some embodiments, the diffusion fins of the first and second pluralities of transistors collectively occupy portions at least eight consecutive alignment positions of the diffusion fin alignment grating.
In an example embodiment, a method of fabricating a semiconductor device is disclosed. The method includes providing a substrate. The method also includes forming a first transistor on the substrate, such that the first transistor has a source region and a drain region within a first diffusion fin, and such that the first diffusion fin is formed to project from a surface of the substrate, and such that the first diffusion fin is formed to extend lengthwise in a first direction from a first end of the first diffusion fin to a second end of the first diffusion fin. The method also includes forming a second transistor on the substrate, such that the second transistor has a source region and a drain region within a second diffusion fin, and such that the second diffusion fin is formed to project from the surface of the substrate, and such that the second diffusion fin is formed to extend lengthwise in the first direction from a first end of the second diffusion fin to a second end of the second diffusion fin, and such that the second diffusion fin is formed at a position next to and spaced apart from the first diffusion fin. Also, the first and second transistors are formed such that either the first end or the second end of the second diffusion fin is formed at a position in the first direction between the first end and the second end of the first diffusion fin.
It should be understood that any circuit layout incorporating finfet transistors as disclosed herein can be stored in a tangible form, such as in a digital format on a computer readable medium. For example, a given circuit layout can be stored in a layout data file, and can be selectable from one or more libraries of cells. The layout data file can be formatted as a GDS II (Graphic Data System) database file, an OASIS (Open Artwork System Interchange Standard) database file, or any other type of data file format suitable for storing and communicating semiconductor device layouts. Also, multi-level layouts of a cell incorporating finfet transistors as disclosed herein can be included within a multi-level layout of a larger semiconductor device. The multi-level layout of the larger semiconductor device can also be stored in the form of a layout data file, such as those identified above.
Also, the invention described herein can be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable medium. For example, the computer readable code can include a layout data file within which a layout of a cell incorporating finfet transistors as disclosed herein is stored. The computer readable code can also include program instructions for selecting one or more layout libraries and/or cells that include finfet transistors as disclosed herein. The layout libraries and/or cells can also be stored in a digital format on a computer readable medium.
The computer readable medium mentioned herein is any data storage device that can store data which can thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computer readable medium include hard drives, network attached storage (NAS), read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, CD-Rs, CD-RWs, magnetic tapes, and other optical and non-optical data storage devices. Multiple computer readable media distributed within a network of coupled computer systems can also be used to store respective portions of the computer readable code such that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion within the network.
In an example embodiment, a data storage device has computer executable program instructions stored thereon for rendering a layout of a semiconductor device. The data storage device includes computer program instructions for defining a first transistor to be formed on a substrate, such that the first transistor is defined to have a source region and a drain region within a first diffusion fin, and such that the first diffusion fin is defined to project from a surface of the substrate, and such that the first diffusion fin is defined to extend lengthwise in a first direction from a first end of the first diffusion fin to a second end of the first diffusion fin. The data storage device also includes computer program instructions for defining a second transistor to be formed on the substrate, such that the second transistor is defined to have a source region and a drain region within a second diffusion fin, and such that the second diffusion fin is defined to project from the surface of the substrate, and such that the second diffusion fin is defined to extend lengthwise in the first direction from a first end of the second diffusion fin to a second end of the second diffusion fin, and such that the second diffusion fin is defined to be positioned next to and spaced apart from the first diffusion fin, and such that the second diffusion fin is defined to have either its first end or its second end positioned in the first direction between the first end and the second end of the first diffusion fin.
It should be further understood that any circuit layout incorporating finfet transistors as disclosed herein can be manufactured as part of a semiconductor device or chip. In the fabrication of semiconductor devices such as integrated circuits, memory cells, and the like, a series of manufacturing operations are performed to define features on a semiconductor wafer. The wafer includes integrated circuit devices in the form of multi-level structures defined on a silicon substrate. At a substrate level, transistor devices with diffusion regions and/or diffusion fins are formed. In subsequent levels, interconnect metallization lines are patterned and electrically connected to the transistor devices to define a desired integrated circuit device. Also, patterned conductive layers are insulated from other conductive layers by dielectric materials.
While this invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art upon reading the preceding specifications and studying the drawings will realize various alterations, additions, permutations and equivalents thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention includes all such alterations, additions, permutations, and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is also a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 13/740,191, filed Jan. 12, 2013, which: 1. claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/586,387, filed Jan. 13, 2012, and 2. claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/589,224, filed Jan. 20, 2012, and 3. is a continuation-in-part application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 12/775,429, filed May 6, 2010, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/176,058, filed May 6, 2009. Each of the above-identified applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/572,225, filed Oct. 1, 2009, which is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 12/212,562, filed Sep. 17, 2008, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,842,975, which is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 11/683,402, filed Mar. 7, 2007, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,446,352, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/781,288, filed Mar. 9, 2006. Each of the above-identified applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/073,994, filed Mar. 28, 2011, which is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 12/013,342, filed Jan. 11, 2008, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,917,879, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to each of 1) U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/963,364, filed Aug. 2, 2007, and 2) U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/972,394, filed Sep. 14, 2007. Each of the above-identified applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/753,793, filed Apr. 2, 2010, which is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 12/402,465, filed Mar. 11, 2009, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,956,421, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to each of 1) U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/036,460, filed Mar. 13, 2008, and 2) U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/042,709, filed Apr. 4, 2008, and 3) U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/045,953, filed Apr. 17, 2008, and 4) U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/050,136, filed May 2, 2008. Each of the above-identified applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/189,433, filed Jul. 22, 2011, which is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 12/814,411, filed Jun. 11, 2010, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,994,545, which is a divisional application under 35 U.S.C. 121 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 11/969,854, filed Jan. 4, 2008, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,763,534, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/983,091, filed Oct. 26, 2007. Each of the above-identified applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/956,305, filed Dec. 13, 2007, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/540,529, filed Jul. 2, 2012, which is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 12/497,052, filed Jul. 2, 2009, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,214,778, which claims priority: 1) under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/081,370, filed Jul. 16, 2008, and 2) as a continuation-in-part application under 35 U.S.C. 120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/013,342, filed Jan. 11, 2008, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,917,879, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) both U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/963,364, filed Aug. 2, 2007, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/972,394, filed Sep. 14, 2007. Each of the above-identified applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4197555 | Uehara et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4417161 | Uya | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4424460 | Best | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4613940 | Shenton et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4657628 | Holloway et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4682202 | Tanizawa | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4745084 | Rowson et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4780753 | Ohkura et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4801986 | Chang et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4804636 | Groover, III | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4812688 | Chu et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4884115 | Michel et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4928160 | Crafts | May 1990 | A |
| 4975756 | Haken et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5068603 | Mahoney | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5079614 | Khatakhotan | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5097422 | Corbin et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5117277 | Yuyama et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5121186 | Wong et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5208765 | Turnbull | May 1993 | A |
| 5224057 | Igarashi | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5242770 | Chen et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5268319 | Harari | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5298774 | Ueda et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5313426 | Sakuma et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5351197 | Upton et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5359226 | DeJong | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5365454 | Nakagawa et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367187 | Yuen | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5378649 | Huang | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5396128 | Dunning et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5420447 | Waggoner | May 1995 | A |
| 5461577 | Shaw et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5471403 | Fujimaga | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5497334 | Russell et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5497337 | Ponnapalli et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5526307 | Yiu et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5536955 | Ali | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5545904 | Orbach | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5581098 | Chang | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5581202 | Yano et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5612893 | Hao et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5636002 | Garofalo | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5656861 | Godinho et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5682323 | Pasch et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5684311 | Shaw | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5684733 | Wu et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5698873 | Colwell et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5705301 | Garza et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5723883 | Gheewalla | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5723908 | Fuchida et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5740068 | Liebmann et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745374 | Matsumoto | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5764533 | deDood | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774367 | Reyes et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5780909 | Hayashi | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5789776 | Lancaster et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5790417 | Chao et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5796128 | Tran et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5796624 | Sridhar et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5814844 | Nagata et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5825203 | Kusunoki et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5834851 | Ikeda et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5838594 | Kojima | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841663 | Sharma et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5847421 | Yamaguchi | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850362 | Sakuma et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5852562 | Shinomiya et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5858580 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5898194 | Gheewala | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5900340 | Reich et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5908827 | Sirna | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5915199 | Hsu | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917207 | Colwell et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5920486 | Beahm et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5923059 | Gheewala | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5923060 | Gheewala | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5929469 | Mimoto et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930163 | Hara et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5935763 | Caterer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5949101 | Aritome | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5973507 | Yamazaki | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5977305 | Wigler et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5977574 | Schmitt et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5998879 | Iwaki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009251 | Ho et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6026223 | Scepanovic et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6037613 | Mariyama | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6037617 | Kumagai | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044007 | Capodieci | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6054872 | Fudanuki et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6063132 | DeCamp et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6077310 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080206 | Tadokoro et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084437 | Sako | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091845 | Pierrat et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6099584 | Arnold et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6100025 | Wigler et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6114071 | Chen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6144227 | Sato | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6166415 | Sakemi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6166560 | Ogura et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6174742 | Sudhindranath et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182272 | Andreev et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6194104 | Hsu | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6194252 | Yamaguchi | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6194912 | Or-Bach | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6209123 | Maziasz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6230299 | McSherry et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6232173 | Hsu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6240542 | Kapur | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6249902 | Igusa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6255600 | Schaper | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6255845 | Wong et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6262487 | Igarashi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269472 | Garza et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6275973 | Wein | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282696 | Garza et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6291276 | Gonzalez | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6297668 | Schober | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6297674 | Kono et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6303252 | Lin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6331733 | Or-Bach et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6331791 | Huang | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6335250 | Egi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6338972 | Sudhindranath et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6347062 | Nii et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
| 6356112 | Tran et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6359804 | Kuriyama et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
| 6370679 | Chang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6378110 | Ho | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6380592 | Tooher et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6388296 | Hsu | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6393601 | Tanaka et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6399972 | Masuda et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6400183 | Yamashita et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6415421 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6416907 | Winder et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6417549 | Oh | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6421820 | Mansfield et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425112 | Bula et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425117 | Pasch et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6426269 | Haffner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6436805 | Trivedi | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445049 | Iranmanesh | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6445065 | Gheewala et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6467072 | Yang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6469328 | Yanai et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6470489 | Chang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6476493 | Or-Bach et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6477695 | Gandhi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480032 | Aksamit | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480989 | Chan et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6492066 | Capodieci et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6496965 | van Ginneken et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6504186 | Kanamoto et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6505327 | Lin | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6505328 | van Ginneken et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6507941 | Leung et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6509952 | Govil et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6514849 | Hui et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6516459 | Sahouria | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6523156 | Cirit | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6525350 | Kinoshita et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6536028 | Katsioulas et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6543039 | Watanabe | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553544 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6553559 | Liebmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6553562 | Capodieci et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6566720 | Aldrich | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6570234 | Gardner | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6571140 | Wewalaarachchi et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6571379 | Takayama | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6578190 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6583041 | Capodieci | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6588005 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6590289 | Shively | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6591207 | Naya et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6609235 | Ramaswamy et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6610607 | Armbrust et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6617621 | Gheewala et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6620561 | Winder et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6632741 | Clevenger et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6633182 | Pileggi et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6635935 | Makino | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6642744 | Or-Bach et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6643831 | Chang et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6650014 | Kariyazaki | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6661041 | Keeth | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6662350 | Fried et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6664587 | Guterman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6673638 | Bendik et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6677649 | Osada et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6687895 | Zhang | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6690206 | Rikino et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6691297 | Misaka et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6700405 | Hirairi | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6703170 | Pindo | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6709880 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6714903 | Chu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6732338 | Crouse et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6732344 | Sakamoto et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6737199 | Hsieh | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6737318 | Murata et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6737347 | Houston et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6745372 | Cote et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6745380 | Bodendorf et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6749972 | Yu | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6750555 | Satomi et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6760269 | Nakase et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6765245 | Bansal | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6777138 | Pierrat et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6777146 | Samuels | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6787823 | Shibutani | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6789244 | Dasasathyan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6789246 | Mohan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6792591 | Shi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6792593 | Takashima et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6794677 | Tamaki et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6794914 | Sani et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6795332 | Yamaoka et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6795358 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6795952 | Stine et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6795953 | Bakarian et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6800883 | Furuya et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6807663 | Cote et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6809399 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6812574 | Tomita et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6818389 | Fritze et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6818929 | Tsutsumi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6819136 | Or-Bach | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6826738 | Cadouri | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6834375 | Stine et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6841880 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6850854 | Naya et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6854096 | Eaton et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6854100 | Chuang et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6871338 | Yamauchi | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6872990 | Kang | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6877144 | Rittman et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6881523 | Smith | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6884712 | Yelehanka et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6885045 | Hidaka | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6889370 | Kerzman et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6897517 | Houdt et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6897536 | Nomura et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6898770 | Boluki et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6904582 | Rittman et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6918104 | Pierrat et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6920079 | Shibayama | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6921982 | Joshi et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6922354 | Ishikura et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6924560 | Wang et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6928635 | Pramanik et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6931617 | Sanie et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6953956 | Or-Bach et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6954918 | Houston | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6957402 | Templeton et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6968527 | Pierrat | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6974978 | Possley | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6977856 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6978436 | Cote et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6978437 | Rittman et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6980211 | Lin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6992394 | Park | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6992925 | Peng | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6993741 | Liebmann et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6994939 | Ghandehari et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7003068 | Kushner et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7009862 | Higeta et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7016214 | Kawamata et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7022559 | Barnak et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7028285 | Cote et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7041568 | Goldbach et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7052972 | Sandhu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7053424 | Ono | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7063920 | Baba-Ali | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7064068 | Chou et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7065731 | Jacques et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7079989 | Wimer | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7093208 | Williams et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7093228 | Andreev et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7103870 | Misaka et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7105871 | Or-Bach et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7107551 | de Dood et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7115343 | Gordon et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7115920 | Bernstein et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7120882 | Kotani et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7124386 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7126837 | Banachowicz et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7132203 | Pierrat | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7137092 | Maeda | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7141853 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143380 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7149999 | Kahng et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152215 | Smith et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155685 | Mori et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155689 | Pierrat et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7159197 | Falbo et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7174520 | White et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7175940 | Laidig et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7176508 | Joshi et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7177215 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7185294 | Zhang | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7188322 | Cohn et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7194712 | Wu | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7200835 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7202517 | Dixit et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7208794 | Hofmann et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7214579 | Widdershoven et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7219326 | Reed et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7221031 | Ryoo et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7225423 | Bhattacharya et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7227183 | Donze et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7228510 | Ono | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7231628 | Pack et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7235424 | Chen et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7243316 | White et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7252909 | Shin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7264990 | Rueckes et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7269803 | Khakzadi et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7278118 | Pileggi et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7279727 | Ikoma et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7287320 | Wang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7294534 | Iwaki | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7302651 | Allen et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7308669 | Buehler et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7312003 | Cote et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7315994 | Aller et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7327591 | Sadra et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7329938 | Kinoshita | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7335966 | Ihme et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7337421 | Kamat | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7338896 | Vanhaelemeersch et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7345909 | Chang et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7346885 | Semmler | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7350183 | Cui et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7353492 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7360179 | Smith et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7360198 | Rana et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366997 | Rahmat et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7367008 | White et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7376931 | Kokubun | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7383521 | Smith et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7397260 | Chanda et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7400627 | Wu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7402848 | Chang et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7404154 | Venkatraman et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7404173 | Wu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7411252 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7421678 | Barnes et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7423298 | Mariyama et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7424694 | Ikeda | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7424695 | Tamura et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7426710 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7432562 | Bhattacharyya | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7434185 | Dooling et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7441211 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7442630 | Kelberlau et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7444609 | Charlebois et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7446352 | Becker et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7449371 | Kemerling et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7458045 | Cote et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7459792 | Chen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7465973 | Chang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7466607 | Hollis et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7469396 | Hayashi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7480880 | Visweswariah et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7480891 | Sezginer | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7484197 | Allen et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7485934 | Liaw | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7487475 | Kriplani et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7500211 | Komaki | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7502275 | Nii et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7503026 | Ichiryu et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7504184 | Hung et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7506300 | Sezginer et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7508238 | Yamagami | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7509621 | Melvin, III | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7509622 | Sinha et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7512017 | Chang | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7512921 | Shibuya | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7514959 | Or-Bach et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7523429 | Kroyan et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7527900 | Zhou et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7538368 | Yano | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7543262 | Wang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7563701 | Chang et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7564134 | Yang et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7568174 | Sezginer et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7569309 | Blatchford et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7569310 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7569894 | Suzuki | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7575973 | Mokhlesi et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7598541 | Okamoto et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7598558 | Hashimoto et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7614030 | Hsu | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7625790 | Yang | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7632610 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7640522 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7646651 | Lee et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7653884 | Furnish et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7665051 | Ludwig et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7700466 | Booth et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7712056 | White et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7739627 | Chew et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7749662 | Matthew et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7755110 | Gliese et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7770144 | Dellinger | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7791109 | Wann et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7802219 | Tomar et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7825437 | Pillarisetty et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7842975 | Becker et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7873929 | Kahng et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7882456 | Zach | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7888705 | Becker et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7898040 | Nawaz | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7906801 | Becker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7908578 | Becker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7910958 | Becker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7910959 | Becker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7917877 | Singh et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7917879 | Becker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7923266 | Thijs et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7923337 | Chang et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7923757 | Becker et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7932544 | Becker et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7932545 | Becker et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7934184 | Zhang | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7943966 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7943967 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7948012 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7948013 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7952119 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7956421 | Becker | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7958465 | Lu et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7962867 | White et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7962879 | Tang et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7964267 | Lyons et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 7971160 | Osawa et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7989847 | Becker et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7989848 | Becker et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7992122 | Burstein et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 7994583 | Inaba | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8004042 | Yang et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8022441 | Becker et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8030689 | Becker et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8035133 | Becker et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8044437 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8058671 | Becker et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8058690 | Chang | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8072003 | Becker et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8072053 | Li | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8088679 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8088680 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8088681 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8088682 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089098 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089099 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089100 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089101 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089102 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089103 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089104 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8101975 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8110854 | Becker et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8129750 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129751 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129752 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129754 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129755 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129756 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129757 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129819 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8130529 | Tanaka | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8134183 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8134184 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8134185 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8134186 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8138525 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8161427 | Morgenshtein et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8178905 | Toubou | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8178909 | Venkatraman et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8198656 | Becker et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8207053 | Becker et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8214778 | Quandt et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8217428 | Becker et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8225239 | Reed et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8225261 | Hong et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8245180 | Smayling et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8247846 | Becker | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8253172 | Becker et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8253173 | Becker et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8258547 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8258548 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8258549 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8258550 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8258551 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8258552 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8264007 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8264008 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8264009 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8283701 | Becker et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8316327 | Herold | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8356268 | Becker et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8378407 | Audzeyeu et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8395224 | Becker et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8402397 | Robles et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8405163 | Becker et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8422274 | Tomita et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8436400 | Becker et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8453094 | Kornachuk et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 20020003270 | Makino | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020015899 | Chen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020030510 | Kono et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020079927 | Katoh et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020149392 | Cho | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020166107 | Capodieci et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194575 | Allen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030042930 | Pileggi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046653 | Liu | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061592 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088839 | Watanabe | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088842 | Cirit | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030106037 | Moniwa et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030117168 | Uneme et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030124847 | Houston et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125917 | Rich et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126569 | Rich et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030145288 | Wang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030145299 | Fried et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177465 | MacLean et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030185076 | Worley | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229868 | White et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229875 | Smith et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040049754 | Liao et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040063038 | Shin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040115539 | Broeke et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139412 | Ito et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145028 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153979 | Chang | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040161878 | Or-Bach et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040169201 | Hidaka | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040194050 | Hwang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196705 | Ishikura et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229135 | Wang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040232444 | Shimizu | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243966 | Dellinger | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040262640 | Suga | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050009312 | Butt et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050009344 | Hwang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050012157 | Ryoo et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055828 | Wang et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050076320 | Maeda | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050087806 | Hokazono | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050093147 | Tu | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101112 | Rueckes et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050110130 | Kitabayashi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050135134 | Yen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050136340 | Baselmans et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050138598 | Kokubun | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050156200 | Kinoshita | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050185325 | Hur | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050189604 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050189614 | Ihme et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050196685 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050205894 | Sumikawa et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050212018 | Schoellkopf et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050224982 | Kemerling et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050229130 | Wu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251771 | Robles | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050264320 | Chan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050264324 | Nakazato | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050266621 | Kim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050268256 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050280031 | Yano | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060038234 | Liaw | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060063334 | Donze et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060070018 | Semmler | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084261 | Iwaki | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060091550 | Shimazaki et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095872 | McElvain et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060101370 | Cui et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060112355 | Pileggi et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060113567 | Ohmori et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060120143 | Liaw | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121715 | Chang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060123376 | Vogel et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060125024 | Ishigaki | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060131609 | Kinoshita et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136848 | Ichiryu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060146638 | Chang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060151810 | Ohshige | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060158270 | Gibet et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177744 | Bodendorf et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060181310 | Rhee | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195809 | Cohn et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060197557 | Chung | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206854 | Barnes et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060223302 | Chang et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248495 | Sezginer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070001304 | Liaw | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070002617 | Houston | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070007574 | Ohsawa | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038973 | Li et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070074145 | Tanaka | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094634 | Seizginer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070101305 | Smith et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105023 | Zhou et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070106971 | Lien et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070113216 | Zhang | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172770 | Witters et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070196958 | Bhattacharya et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209029 | Ivonin et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070210391 | Becker et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070234252 | Visweswariah et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070251771 | Huang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070256039 | White | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070257277 | Takeda et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070274140 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070277129 | Allen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288882 | Kniffin et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070290361 | Chen | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070294652 | Bowen | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070297249 | Chang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005712 | Charlebois et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046846 | Chew et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082952 | O'Brien | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080086712 | Fujimoto | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097641 | Miyashita et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098334 | Pileggi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080099795 | Bernstein et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080127000 | Majumder et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080127029 | Graur et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080134128 | Blatchford et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080144361 | Wong | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080148216 | Chan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080163141 | Scheffer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080168406 | Rahmat et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080211028 | Suzuki | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080216207 | Tsai | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080244494 | McCullen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080251779 | Kakoschke et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080265290 | Nielsen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080276105 | Hoberman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080283910 | Dreeskornfeld et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080285331 | Torok et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080308848 | Inaba | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080315258 | Masuda et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090014811 | Becker et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090024974 | Yamada | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090031261 | Smith et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090032898 | Becker et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090032967 | Becker et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090037864 | Becker et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090057780 | Wong et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090075485 | Ban et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090077524 | Nagamura et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090085067 | Hayashi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090087991 | Yatsuda et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090101940 | Barrows et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106714 | Culp et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090155990 | Yanagidaira et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090181314 | Shyu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187871 | Cork | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090206443 | Juengling | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090224408 | Fox | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228853 | Hong et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228857 | Kornachuk et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090273100 | Aton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090280582 | Thijs et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090302372 | Chang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319977 | Saxena et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100001321 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006897 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006898 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006899 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006900 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006901 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006902 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006903 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006947 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006948 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006950 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006951 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006986 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011327 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011328 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011329 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011330 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011331 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011332 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011333 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012981 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012982 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012983 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012984 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012985 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012986 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017766 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017767 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017768 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017769 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017770 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017771 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017772 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019280 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019281 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019282 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019283 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019284 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019285 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019286 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019287 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019288 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019308 | Chan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023906 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023907 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023908 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023911 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025731 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025732 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025733 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025734 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025735 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025736 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100032722 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100032723 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100032724 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100032726 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100037194 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100037195 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100096671 | Becker et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100203689 | Bernstein et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100224943 | Kawasaki | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100229140 | Strolenberg et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100232212 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100264468 | Xu | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100270681 | Bird et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100287518 | Becker | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110016909 | Mirza et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110108890 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110108891 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110154281 | Zach | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110207298 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110260253 | Inaba | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110298025 | Haensch et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120012932 | Perng et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120273841 | Quandt et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130097574 | Balabanov et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200465 | Becker et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200469 | Becker et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130207198 | Becker et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130207199 | Becker et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130254732 | Kornachuk et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0102644 | Jul 1989 | EP |
| 0788166 | Aug 1997 | EP |
| 1394858 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1670062 | Jun 2006 | EP |
| 1833091 | Aug 2007 | EP |
| 1730777 | Sep 2007 | EP |
| 2251901 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| 2860920 | Apr 2005 | FR |
| 58-182242 | Oct 1983 | JP |
| 61-182244 | Aug 1986 | JP |
| 63-310136 | Dec 1988 | JP |
| 03-165061 | Jul 1991 | JP |
| 07-153927 | Jun 1995 | JP |
| 2684980 | Jul 1995 | JP |
| 1995-302706 | Nov 1995 | JP |
| 1997-09289251 | Nov 1997 | JP |
| 10-116911 | May 1998 | JP |
| 1999-045948 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| 2001-068558 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2002-026125 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2002-026296 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2002-184870 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2001-056463 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002-258463 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002-289703 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2001-272228 | Mar 2003 | JP |
| 2003-264231 | Sep 2003 | JP |
| 2004-013920 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2004-200300 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2004-241529 | Aug 2004 | JP |
| 2004-342757 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2005-020008 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2003-359375 | May 2005 | JP |
| 2005-135971 | May 2005 | JP |
| 2005-149265 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005-183793 | Jul 2005 | JP |
| 2005-203447 | Jul 2005 | JP |
| 2005-114752 | Oct 2006 | JP |
| 2006-303022 | Nov 2006 | JP |
| 10-0417093 | Jun 1997 | KR |
| 10-1998-087485 | Dec 1998 | KR |
| 1998-0084215 | Dec 1998 | KR |
| 10-1999-0057943 | Jul 1999 | KR |
| 10-2000-0028830 | May 2000 | KR |
| 10-2002-0034313 | May 2002 | KR |
| 10-2002-0070777 | Sep 2002 | KR |
| 2003-0022006 | Mar 2003 | KR |
| 10-2005-0030347 | Mar 2005 | KR |
| 2005-0037965 | Apr 2005 | KR |
| 2006-0108233 | Oct 2006 | KR |
| 386288 | Apr 2000 | TW |
| WO 2005104356 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006014849 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006052738 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007014053 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007103587 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/021345. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/625,342, filed May 25, 2006, Pileggi et al. |
| Acar, et al., “A Linear-Centric Simulation Framework for Parametric Fluctuations”, 2002, IEEE, Carnegie Mellon University USA, pgs. 1-8, Jan. 28, 2002. |
| Amazawa, et al., “Fully Planarized Four-Level Interconnection with Stacked VLAS Using CMP of Selective CVD-A1 and Insulator and its Application to Quarter Micron Gate Array LSIs”, 1995, IEEE, Japan, pgs. 473-476, Dec. 10, 1995. |
| Axelrad et al. “Efficient Full-Chip Yield Analysis Methodology for OPC-Corrected VLSI Design”, 2000, International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), Mar. 20, 2000. |
| Balasinski et al. “Impact of Subwavelength CD Tolerance on Device Performance”, 2002, SPIE vol. 4692, Jul. 11, 2002. |
| Burkhardt, et al., “Dark Field Double Dipole Lithography (DDL) for Back-End-Of-Line Processes”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Mar. 26, 2007. |
| Capetti, et al., “Sub k1 = 0.25 Lithography with Double Patterning Technique for 45nm Technology Node Flash Memory Devices at λ = 193nm”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Mar. 27, 2007. |
| Capodieci, L., et al., “Toward a Methodology for Manufacturability-Driven Design Rule Exploration,” DAC 2004, Jun. 7, 2004, San Diego, CA. |
| Chandra, et al., “An Interconnect Channel Design Methodology for High Performance Integrated Circuits”, 2004, IEEE, Carnegie Mellon University, pgs. 1-6, Feb. 16, 2004. |
| Cheng, et al., “Feasibility Study of Splitting Pitch Technology on 45nm Contact Patterning with 0.93 NA”, 2007, SPIE, Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Chow, et al., “The Design of a SRAM-Based Field-Programmable Gate Array--Part II: Circuit Design and Layout”, 1999, IEEE, vol. 7 # 3 pgs. 321-330, Sep. 1, 1999. |
| Clark et al. “Managing Standby and Active Mode Leakage Power in Deep Sub-Micron Design”, Aug. 9, 2004, ACM. |
| Cobb et al. “Using OPC to Optimize for Image Slope and Improve Process Window”, 2003, SPIE vol. 5130, Apr. 16, 2003. |
| Devgan “Leakage Issues in IC Design: Part 3”, 2003, ICCAD, Nov. 9, 2003. |
| DeVOR, et al., “Statistical Quality Design and Control”, 1992, Macmillan Publishing Company, pp. 264-267, Jan. 3, 1992. |
| Dictionary.com, “channel,” in Collins English Dictionary—Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition. Source location: HarperCollins Publishers. Sep. 3, 2009. |
| Dusa, et al. “Pitch Doubling Through Dual Patterning Lithography Challenges in Integration and Litho Budgets”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| El-Gamal, “Fast, Cheap and Under Control: The Next Implementation Fabric”, Jun. 2, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 354-355. |
| Firedberg, et al., “Modeling Within-Field Gate Length Spatial Variation for Process-Design Co-Optimization,” 2005 Proc. of SPIE vol. 5756, pp. 178-188, Feb. 27, 2005. |
| Frankel, “Quantum State Control Interference Lithography and Trim Double Patterning for 32-16nm Lithography”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 27, 2007. |
| Garg, et al. “Lithography Driven Layout Design”, 2005, IEEE VLSI Design 2005, Jan. 3, 2005. |
| Grobman et al. “Reticle Enhancement Technology Trends: Resource and Manufacturability Implications for the Implementation of Physical Designs” Apr. 1, 2001, ACM. |
| Grobman et al. “Reticle Enhancement Technology: Implications and Challenges for Physical Design” Jun. 18, 2001, ACM. |
| Gupta et al. “Enhanced Resist and Etch CD Control by Design Perturbation”, Oct. 4, 2006, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. |
| Gupta et al. “A Practical Transistor-Level Dual Threshold Voltage Assignment Methodology”, 2005, Sixth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), Mar. 21, 2005. |
| Gupta et al. “Detailed Placement for Improved Depth of Focus and CD Control”, 2005, ACM, Jan. 18, 2005. |
| Gupta et al. “Joining the Design and Mask Flows for Better and Cheaper Masks”, Oct. 14, 2004, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. |
| Gupta et al. “Manufacturing-Aware Physical Design”, ICCAD 2003, Nov. 9, 2003. |
| Gupta et al. “Selective Gate-Length Biasing for Cost-Effective Runtime Leakage Control”, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM. |
| Gupta et al. “Wafer Topography-Aware Optical Proximity Correction for Better DOF Margin and CD Control”, Apr. 13, 2005, SPIE. |
| Gupta, Puneet, et al., “Manufacturing-aware Design Methodology for Assist Feature Correctness,” SPIE vol. 5756, May 13, 2005. |
| Ha et al., “Reduction in the Mask Error Factor by Optimizing the Diffraction Order of a Scattering Bar in Lithography,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 46, No. 5, May 5, 2005, pp. 1213-1217. |
| Hakko, et al., “Extension of the 2D-TCC Technique to Optimize Mask Pattern Layouts,” 2008 Proc. of SPIE vol. 7028, 11 pages, Apr. 16, 2008. |
| Halpin et al., “Detailed Placement with Net Length Constraints,” Publication Year 2003, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on System-on-Chip for Real-Time Applications, pp. 22-27, Jun. 30, 2003. |
| Hayashida, et al., “Manufacturable Local Interconnect technology Fully Compatible with Titanium Salicide Process”, Jun. 11, 1991, VMIC Conference. |
| Heng, et al., “A VLSI Artwork Legalization Technique Base on a New Criterion of Minimum Layout Perturbation”, Proceedings of 1997 International Symposium on Physical Design, pp. 116-121, Apr. 14, 1997. |
| Heng, et al., “Toward Through-Process Layout Quality Metrics”, Mar. 3, 2005, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. |
| Hu, et al., “Synthesis and Placement Flow for Gain-Based Programmable Regular Fabrics”, Apr. 6, 2003, ACM Press, pgs. 197-203. |
| Hur et al., “Mongrel: Hybrid Techniques for Standard Cell Placement,” Publication Year 2000, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design, ICCAD-2000, pp. 165-170, Nov. 5, 2000. |
| Hutton, et al., “A Methodology for FPGA to Structured-ASIC Synthesis and Verification”, 2006, EDAA, pp. 64-69, Mar. 6, 2006. |
| Intel Core Microarchitecture White Paper “Introducing the 45 nm Next-Generation Intel Core Microarchitecture,” Intel Corporation, 2007 (best available publication date). |
| Jayakumar, et al., “A Metal and VIA Maskset Programmable VLSI Design Methodology using PLAs”, 2004, IEEE, pgs. 590-594, Nov. 7, 2004. |
| Jhaveri, T. et al., Maximization of Layout Printability/Manufacturability by Extreme Layout Regularity, Proc. of the SPIE vol. 6156, Feb. 19, 2006. |
| Kang, S.M., Metal-Metal Matrix (M3) for High-Speed MOS VLSI Layout, IEEE Trans. On CAD, vol. CAD-6, No. 5, Sep. 1, 1987. |
| Kawashima, et al., “Mask Optimization for Arbitrary Patterns with 2D-TCC Resolution Enhancement Technique,” 2008 Proc. of SPIE vol. 6924, 12 pages, Feb. 24, 2008. |
| Kheterpal, et al., “Design Methodology for IC Manufacturability Based on Regular Logic-Bricks”, DAC, Jun. 13, 2005, IEEE/AMC, vol. 6520. |
| Kheterpal, et al., “Routing Architecture Exploration for Regular Fabrics”, DAC, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 204-207. |
| Kim, et al., “Double Exposure Using 193nm Negative Tone Photoresist”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Kim, et al., “Issues and Challenges of Double Patterning Lithography in DRAM”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Koorapaty, et al., “Exploring Logic Block Granularity for Regular Fabrics”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 1-6, Feb. 16, 2004. |
| Koorapaty, et al., “Heterogeneous Logic Block Architectures for Via-Patterned Programmable Fabric”, 13th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL) 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Sep. 1, 2003, Springer-Verlag, vol. 2778, pp. 426-436. |
| Koorapaty, et al., “Modular, Fabric-Specific Synthesis for Programmable Architectures”, 12th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL—2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)), Sep. 2, 2002, Springer-Verlag, vol. 2438 pp. 132-141. |
| Kuh et al., “Recent Advances in VLSI Layout,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 78, Issue 2, pp. 237-263, Feb. 1, 1990. |
| Lavin et al. “Backend DAC Flows for ”Restrictive Design Rules“”, 2004, IEEE, Nov. 7, 2004. |
| Li, et al., “A Linear-Centric Modeling Approach to Harmonic Balance Analysis”, 2002, IEEE, pp. 1-6, Mar. 4, 2002. |
| Li, et al., “Nonlinear Distortion Analysis Via Linear-Centric Models”, 2003, IEEE, pp. 897-903, Jan. 21, 2003. |
| Liebmann et al., “Integrating DfM Components into a Cohesive Design-to-Silicon Solution,” Proc. SPIE 5756, Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing III, Feb. 27, 2005. |
| Liebmann et al., “Optimizing Style Options for Sub-Resolution Assist Features,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4346, Feb. 25, 2001, pp. 141-152. |
| Liebmann, et al., “High-Performance Circuit Design for the RET-Enabled 65nm Technology Node”, Feb. 26, 2004, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 5379 pp. 20-29. |
| Liebmann, L. W., Layout Impact of Resolution Enhancement Techniques: Impediment or Opportunity?, International Symposium on Physical Design, Apr. 6, 2003. |
| Liu et al., “Double Patterning with Multilayer Hard Mask Shrinkage for Sub 0.25 k1 Lithography,” Proc. SPIE 6520, Optical Microlithography XX, Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Mansfield et al., “Lithographic Comparison of Assist Feature Design Strategies,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4000, Feb. 27, 2000, pp. 63-76. |
| Miller, “Manufacturing-Aware Design Helps Boost IC Yield”, Sep. 9, 2004, http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=47102054. |
| Mishra, P., et al., “FinFET Circuit Design,” Nanoelectronic Circuit Design, pp. 23-54, Dec. 21, 2010. |
| Mo, et al., “Checkerboard: A Regular Structure and its Synthesis, International Workshop on Logic and Synthesis”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, UC Berkeley, California, pp. 1-7, Jun. 1, 2003. |
| Mo, et al., “PLA-Based Regular Structures and Their Synthesis”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, IEEE, pp. 723-729, Jun. 1, 2003. |
| Mo, et al., “Regular Fabrics in Deep Sub-Micron Integrated-Circuit Design”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Entire Book, Jun. 1, 2002. |
| Moore, Samuel K., “Intel 45-nanometer Penryn Processors Arrive,” Nov. 13, 2007, IEEE Spectrum, http://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/design/intel-45nanometer-penryn-processors-arrive. |
| Mutoh et al. “1-V Power Supply High-Speed Digital Circuit Technology with Multithreshold-Voltage CMOS”, 1995, IEEE, Aug. 1, 1995. |
| Op de Beek, et al., “Manufacturability issues with Double Patterning for 50nm half pitch damascene applications, using RELACS® shrink and corresponding OPC”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Or-Bach, “Programmable Circuit Fabrics”, Sep. 18, 2001, e-ASIC, pp. 1-36. |
| Otten, et al., “Planning for Performance”, DAC 1998, ACM Inc., pp. 122-127, Jun. 15, 1998. |
| Pack et al. “Physical & Timing Verification of Subwavelength-Scale Designs-Part I: Lithography Impact on MOSFETs”, 2003, SPIE vol. 5042, Feb. 23, 2003. |
| Pandini, et al., “Congestion-Aware Logic Synthesis”, 2002, IEEE, pp. 1-8, Mar. 4, 2002. |
| Pandini, et al., “Understanding and Addressing the Impact of Wiring Congestion During Technology Mapping”, ISPD Apr. 7, 2002, ACM Press, pp. 131-136. |
| Patel, et al., “An Architectural Exploration of Via Patterned Gate Arrays, ISPD 2003”, Apr. 6, 2003, pp. 184-189. |
| Pham, D., et al., “FINFET Device Junction Formation Challenges,” 2006 International Workshop on Junction Technology, pp. 73-77, Aug. 1, 2006. |
| Pileggi, et al., “Exploring Regular Fabrics to Optimize the Performance-Cost Trade-Offs, Proceedings of the 40th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2003”, Jun. 2, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 782-787. |
| Poonawala, et al., “ILT for Double Exposure Lithography with Conventional and Novel Materials”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Qian et al. “Advanced Physical Models for Mask Data Verification and Impacts on Physical Layout Synthesis” 2003 IEEE, Mar. 24, 2003. |
| Ran, et al., “An Integrated Design Flow for a Via-Configurable Gate Array”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 582-589, Nov. 7, 2004. |
| Ran, et al., “Designing a Via-Configurable Regular Fabric”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC). Proceedings of the IEEE, Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 423-426. |
| Ran, et al., “On Designing Via-Configurable Cell Blocks for Regular Fabrics” Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2004, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, s 198-203. |
| Ran, et al., “The Magic of a Via-Configurable Regular Fabric”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD) Oct. 11, 2004. |
| Ran, et al., “Via-Configurable Routing Architectures and Fast Design Mappability Estimation for Regular Fabrics”, 2005, IEEE, pgs. 25-32, Sep. 1, 2006. |
| Reis, et al., “Physical Design Methodologies for Performance Predictability and Manufacturability”, Apr. 14, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 390-397. |
| Robertson, et al., “The Modeling of Double Patterning Lithographic Processes”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Rosenbluth, et al., “Optimum Mask and Source Patterns to Print a Given Shape,” 2001 Proc. of SPIE vol. 4346, pp. 486-502, Feb. 25, 2001. |
| Rovner, “Design for Manufacturability in Via Programmable Gate Arrays”, May 1, 2003, Graduate School of Carnegie Mellon University. |
| Sengupta, “An Integrated CAD Framework Linking VLSI Layout Editors and Process Simulators”, 1998, Thesis for Rice University, pp. 1-101, Nov. 1, 1998. |
| Sengupta, et al., “An Integrated CAD Framework Linking VLSI Layout Editors and Process Simulators”, 1996, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 2726; pp. 244-252, Mar. 10, 1996. |
| Sherlekar, “Design Considerations for Regular Fabrics”, Apr. 18, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 97-102. |
| Shi et al., “Understanding the Forbidden Pitch and Assist Feature Placement,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4562, pp. 968-979, Mar. 11, 2002. |
| Smayling et al., “APF Pitch Halving for 22 nm Logic Cells Using Gridded Design Rules,” Proceedings of SPIE, USA, vol. 6925, Jan. 1, 2008, pp. 69251E-1-69251E-7. |
| Socha, et al., “Simultaneous Source Mask Optimization (SMO),” 2005 Proc. of SPIE vol. 5853, pp. 180-193, Apr. 13, 2005. |
| Sreedhar et al. “Statistical Yield Modeling for Sub-Wavelength Lithography”, 2008 IEEE, Oct. 28, 2008. |
| Stapper, “Modeling of Defects in Integrated Circuit Photolithographic Patterns”, Jul. 1, 1984, IBM, vol. 28 # 4, pp. 461-475. |
| Taylor, et al., “Enabling Energy Efficiency in Via-Patterned Gate Array Devices”, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 874-877. |
| Tian et al. “Model-Based Dummy Feature Placement for Oxide Chemical—Mechanical Polishing Manufacturability” IEEE, vol. 20, Issue 7, Jul. 1, 2001. |
| Tong, et al., “Regular Logic Fabrics for a Via Patterned Gate Array (VPGA), Custom Integrated Circuits Conference”, Sep. 21, 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 53-56. |
| Vanleenhove, et al., “A Litho-Only Approach to Double Patterning”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Wang, et al., “Performance Optimization for Gridded-Layout Standard Cells”, vol. 5567 SPIE, Sep. 13, 2004. |
| Wang, J. et al., Standard Cell Layout with Regular Contact Placement, IEEE Trans. on Semicon. Mfg., vol. 17, No. 3, Aug. 9, 2004. |
| Webb, Clair, “45nm Design for Manufacturing,” Intel Technology Journal, vol. 12, Issue 02, Jun. 17, 2008, ISSN 1535-864X, pp. 121-130. |
| Webb, Clair, “Layout Rule Trends and Affect upon CPU Design”, vol. 6156 SPIE, Feb. 19, 2006. |
| Wenren, et al., “The Improvement of Photolithographic Fidelity of Two-dimensional Structures Though Double Exposure Method”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Wilcox, et al., “Design for Manufacturability: A Key to Semiconductor Manufacturing Excellence”, 1998 IEEE, pp. 308-313, Sep. 23, 1998. |
| Wong, et al., “Resolution Enhancement Techniques and Design for Manufacturability: Containing and Accounting for Variabilities in Integrated Circuit Creation,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, Sep. 27, 2007, vol. 6(3), 2 pages. |
| Wu, et al., “A Study of Process Window Capabilities for Two-dimensional Structures under Double Exposure Condition”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Xiong, et al., “The Constrained Via Minimization Problem for PCB and VLSI Design”, 1988 ACM Press/IEEE, pp. 573-578, Jun. 12, 1998. |
| Yamamaoto, et al., “New Double Exposure Technique without Alternating Phase Shift Mask”, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Yamazoe, et al., “Resolution Enhancement by Aerial Image Approximation with 2D-TCC,” 2007 Proc. of SPIE vol. 6730, 12 pages, Sep. 17, 2007. |
| Yang, et al., “Interconnection Driven VLSI Module Placement Based on Quadratic Programming and Considering Congestion Using LFF Principles”, 2004 IEEE, pp. 1243-1247, Jun. 27, 2004. |
| Yao, et al., “Multilevel Routing With Redundant Via Insertion”, Oct. 23, 2006, IEEE, pp. 1148-1152. |
| Yu, et al., “True Process Variation Aware Optical Proximity Correction with Variational Lithography Modeling and Model Calibration,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MAMS MOEMS, Sep. 11, 2007, vol. 6(3), 16 pages. |
| Zheng, et al.“Modeling and Analysis of Regular Symmetrically Structured Power/Ground Distribution Networks”, DAC, Jun. 10, 2002, ACM Press, pp. 395-398. |
| Zhu, et al., “A Stochastic Integral Equation Method for Modeling the Rough Surface Effect on Interconnect Capacitance”, 2004 IEEE, Nov. 7, 2004. |
| Zhu, et al., “A Study of Double Exposure Process Design with Balanced Performance Parameters for Line/Space Applications”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Zuchowski, et al., “A Hybrid ASIC and FPGA Architecture”, 2003 IEEE, pp. 187-194, Nov. 10, 2002. |
| Alam, Syed M. et al., “A Comprehensive Layout Methodology and Layout-Specific Circuit Analyses for Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits,” Mar. 21, 2002. |
| Alam, Syed M. et al., “Layout-Specific Circuit Evaluation in 3-D Integrated Circuits,” May 1, 2003. |
| Aubusson, Russel, “Wafer-Scale Integration of Semiconductor Memory,” Apr. 1, 1979. |
| Bachtold, “Logic Circuits with Carbon,” Nov. 9, 2001. |
| Baker, R. Jacob, “CMOS: Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation (2nd Edition),” Nov. 1, 2004. |
| Baldi et al., “A Scalable Single Poly EEPROM Cell for Embedded Memory Applications,” pp. 1-4, Fig. 1, Sep. 1, 1997. |
| Cao, Ke, “Design for Manufacturing (DFM) in Submicron VLSI Design,” Aug. 1, 2007. |
| Capodieci, Luigi, “From Optical Proximity Correction to Lithography-Driven Physical Design (1996-2006): 10 years of Resolution Enhancement Technology and the roadmap enablers for the next decade,” Proc. SPIE 6154, Optical Microlithography XIX, 615401, Mar. 20, 2006. |
| Chang, Leland et al., “Stable SRAM Cell Design for the 32 nm Node and Beyond,” Jun. 16, 2005. |
| Cheung, Peter, “Layout Design,” Apr. 4, 2004. |
| Chinnery, David, “Closing the Gap Between ASIC & Custom: Tools and Techniques for High-Performance ASIC Design,” Jun. 30, 2002. |
| Chou, Dyiann et al., “Line End Optimization through Optical Proximity Correction (OPC): A Case Study,” Feb. 19, 2006. |
| Clein, Dan, “CMOS IC Layout: Concepts, Methodologies, and Tools,” Dec. 22, 1999. |
| Cowell, “Exploiting Non-Uniform Access Time,” Jul. 1, 2003. |
| Das, Shamik, “Design Automation and Analysis of Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits,” May 1, 2004. |
| Dehaene, W. et al., “Technology-Aware Design of SRAM Memory Circuits,” Mar. 1, 2007. |
| Deng, Liang et al., “Coupling-aware Dummy Metal Insertion for Lithography,” p. 1, col. 2, Jan. 23, 2007. |
| Devoivre et al., “Validated 90nm CMOS Technology Platform with Low-k Copper Interconnects for Advanced System-on-Chip (SoC),” Jul. 12, 2002. |
| Enbody, R. J., “Near-Optimal n-Layer Channel Routing,” Jun. 29, 1986. |
| Ferretti, Marcos et al., “High Performance Asynchronous ASIC Back-End Design Flow Using Single-Track Full-Buffer Standard Cells,” Apr. 23, 2004. |
| Garg, Manish et al., “Litho-driven Layouts for Reducing Performance Variability,” p. 2, Figs. 2b-2c, May 23, 2005. |
| Greenway, Robert et al., “32nm 1-D Regular Pitch SRAM Bitcell Design for Interference-Assisted Lithography,” Oct. 6, 2008. |
| Gupta et al., “Modeling Edge Placement Error Distribution in Standard Cell Library,” Feb. 23, 2006. |
| Grad, Johannes et al., “A standard cell library for student projects,” Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education, Jun. 2, 2003. |
| Hartono, Roy et al., “Active Device Generation for Automatic Analog Layout Retargeting Tool,” May 13, 2004. |
| Hartono, Roy et al., “IPRAIL— Intellectual Property Reuse-based Analog IC Layout Automation,” Mar. 17, 2003. |
| Hastings, Alan, “The Art of Analog Layout (2nd Edition),” Jul. 4, 2005. |
| Hurat et al., “A Genuine Design Manufacturability Check for Designers,” Feb. 19, 2006. |
| Institute of Microelectronic Systems, “Digital Subsystem Design,” Oct. 13, 2006. |
| Ishida, M. et al., “A Novel 6T-SRAM Cell Technology Designed with Rectangular Patterns Scalable beyond 0.18 pm Generation and Desirable for Ultra High Speed Operation,” IEDM 1998, Dec. 6, 1998. |
| Jakusovszky, “Linear IC Parasitic Element Simulation Methodology,” Oct. 1, 1993. |
| Jangkrajarng, Nuttorn et al., “Template-Based Parasitic-Aware Optimization and Retargeting of Analog and RF Integrated Circuit Layouts,” Nov. 5, 2006. |
| Kahng, Andrew B., “Design Optimizations DAC-2006 DFM Tutorial, part V),” Jul. 24, 2006. |
| Kang, Sung-Mo et al., “CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits Analysis & Design,” Oct. 29, 2002. |
| Kottoor, Mathew Francis, “Development of a Standard Cell Library based on Deep Sub-Micron SCMOS Design Rules using Open Source Software (MS Thesis),” Aug. 1, 2005. |
| Kubicki, “Intel 65nm and Beyond (or Below): IDF Day 2 Coverage (available at http://www.anandtech.com/show/1468/4),” Sep. 9, 2004. |
| Kuhn, Kelin J., “Reducing Variation in Advanced Logic Technologies: Approaches to Process and Design for Manufacturability of Nanoscale CMOS,” p. 27, Dec. 12, 2007. |
| Kurokawa, Atsushi et al., “Dummy Filling Methods for Reducing Interconnect Capacitance and No. Of Fills, Proc. of ISQED,” pp. 586-591, Mar. 21, 2005. |
| Lavin, Mark, “Open Access Requirements from RDR Design Flows,” Nov. 11, 2004. |
| Liebmann, Lars et al., “Layout Methodology Impact of Resolution Enhancement Techniques,” pp. 5-6, Apr. 6, 2003. |
| Liebmann, Lars et al., “TCAD development for lithography resolution enhancement,” Sep. 1, 2001. |
| Lin, Chung-Wei et al., “Recent Research and Emerging Challenges in Physical Design for Manufacturability/Reliability,” Jan. 26, 2007. |
| McCullen, Kevin W., “Layout Techniques for Phase Correct and Gridded Wiring,” pp. 13, 17, Fig. 5, Dec. 1, 2006. |
| Mosis, “Design Rules MOSIS Scalable CMOS (SCMOS) (Revision 8.00),” Oct. 4, 2004. |
| Mosis, “MOSIS Scalable CMOS (SCMOS) Design Rules (Revision 7.2),” Jan. 1, 1995. |
| Muta et al., “Manufacturability-Aware Design of Standard Cells,” pp. 2686-2690, Figs. 3, 12, Dec. 1, 2007. |
| Na, Kee-Yeol et al., “A Novel Single Polysilicon EEPROM Cell With a Polyfinger Capacitor,” Nov. 30, 2007. |
| Pan et al., “Redundant Via Enhanced Maze Routing for Yield Improvement,” DAC 2005, Jan. 18, 2005. |
| Park, Tae Hong, “Characterization and Modeling of Pattern Dependencies in Copper Interconnects for Integrated Circuits,” Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, May 24, 2002. |
| Patel, Chetan, “An Architectural Exploration of Via Patterned Gate Arrays (CMU Master's Project),” May 1, 2003. |
| Pease, R. Fabian et al., “Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future Electronics,” IEEE 2008, vol. 96, Issue 2, Jan. 16, 2008. |
| Serrano, Diego Emilio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Facultad De Ingenieria, Departamento De Electronica, “Diseño De Multiplicador 4 X 8 en VLSI, Introduccion al VLSI,” 2006 (best available publication date). |
| Pramanik, “Impact of layout on variability of devices for sub 90nm technologies,” 2004 (best available publication date). |
| Pramanik, Dipankar et al., “Lithography-driven layout of logic cells for 65-nm node (SPIE Proceedings vol. 5042),” Jul. 10, 2003. |
| Roy et al., “Extending Aggressive Low-K1 Design Rule Requirements for 90 and 65 Nm Nodes Via Simultaneous Optimization of Numerical Aperture, Illumination and Optical Proximity Correction,” J.Micro/Nanolith, MEMS MOEMS, 4(2), 023003, Apr. 26, 2005. |
| Saint, Christopher et al., “IC Layout Basics: A Practical Guide,” Chapter 3, Nov. 5, 2001. |
| Saint, Christopher et al., “IC Mask Design: Essential Layout Techniques,” May 24, 2002. |
| Scheffer, “Physical CAD Changes to Incorporate Design for Lithography and Manufacturability,” Feb. 4, 2004. |
| Smayling, Michael C., “Part 3: Test Structures, Test Chips, In-Line Metrology & Inspection,” Jul. 24, 2006. |
| Spence, Chris, “Full-Chip Lithography Simulation and Design Analysis: How OPC is changing IC Design, Emerging Lithographic Technologies IX,” May 6, 2005. |
| Subramaniam, Anupama R., “Design Rule Optimization of Regular layout for Leakage Reduction in Nanoscale Design,” pp. 474-478, Mar. 24, 2008. |
| Tang, C. W. et al., “A compact large signal model of LDMOS,” Solid-State Electronics 46(2002) 2111-2115, May 17, 2002. |
| Taylor, Brian et al., “Exact Combinatorial Optimization Methods for Physical Design of Regular Logic Bricks,” Jun. 8, 2007. |
| Tian, Ruiqi et al., “Dummy Feature Placement for Chemical-Mechanical Uniformity in a Shallow Trench Isolation Process,” IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 63-71, Jan. 1, 2002. |
| Tian, Ruiqi et al., “Proximity Dummy Feature Placement and Selective Via Sizing for Process Uniformity in a Trench-First-Via-Last Dual-Inlaid Metal Process,” Proc. of IITC, pp. 48-50, Jun. 6, 2001. |
| Torres, J. A. et al., “RET Compliant Cell Generation for sub-130nm Processes,” SPIE vol. 4692, Mar. 6, 2002. |
| Uyemura, John P., “Introduction to VLSI Circuits and Systems,” Chapters 2, 3, 5, and Part 3, Jul. 30, 2001. |
| Uyemura, John, “Chip Design for Submicron VLSI: CMOS Layout and Simulation,” Chapters 2-5, 7-9, Feb. 8, 2005. |
| Verhaegen et al., “Litho Enhancements for 45nm-nod MuGFETs,” Aug. 1, 2005. |
| Won{}, Ban P., “Bridging the Gap between Dreams and Nano-Scale Reality (DAC-2006 DFM Tutorial),” Jul. 28, 2006. |
| Wang, Dunwei et al., “Complementary Symmetry Silicon Nanowire Logic: Power-Efficient Inverters with Gain,” Aug. 17, 2006. |
| Wang, Jun et al., “Effects of grid-placed contacts on circuit performance,” pp. 135-139, Figs. 2, 4-8, Feb. 28, 2003. |
| Wang, Jun et al., “Standard cell design with regularly placed contacts and gates (SPIE vol. 5379),” Feb. 22, 2004. |
| Wang, Jun et al., “Standard cell design with resolution-enhancement-technique-driven regularly placed contacts and gates,” J. Micro/Nanolith, MEMS MOEMS, 4(1), 013001, Mar. 16, 2005. |
| Watson, Bruce, “Challenges and Automata Applications in Chip-Design Software,” pp. 38-40, Jul. 16, 2007. |
| Weste, Neil et al., “CMOS VLSI Design: A Circuits and Systems Perspective, 3rd Edition,” May 21, 2004. |
| Wingerden, Johannes van, “Experimental verification of improved printability for litho-driven designs,” Mar. 14, 2005. |
| Wong, Alfred K., “Microlithography: Trends, Challenges, Solutions and Their Impact on Design,” Micro IEEE vol. 23, Issue 2, Apr. 29, 2003. |
| Xu, Gang, “Redundant-Via Enhanced Maze Routing for Yield Improvement,” Proceedings of ASP-DAC 2005, Jan. 18, 2005. |
| Yang, Jie, “Manufacturability Aware Design,” pp. 93, 102, Fig. 5.2, Jan. 16, 2008. |
| Yongshun, Wang et al., “Static Induction Devices with Planar Type Buried Gate,” Chinese Journal of Semiconductors, vol. 25, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2004. |
| Zobrist, George (editor), “Progress in Computer Aided VLSI Design: Implementations (Ch. 5),” Ablex Publishing Corporation, Feb. 1, 1990. |
| Petley, Graham, “VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Library Design,” from website www.vlsitechnology.org, Jan. 11, 2005. |
| Liebmann, Lars, et al., “Layout Optimization at the Pinnacle of Optical Lithography,” Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing II, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5042, Jul. 8, 2003. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130207199 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61586387 | Jan 2012 | US | |
| 61589224 | Jan 2012 | US | |
| 61176058 | May 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13740191 | Jan 2013 | US |
| Child | 13841951 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12775429 | May 2010 | US |
| Child | 13740191 | US |
