Embodiments of the invention relate to methods of fabricating thin films of self-assembling block copolymers, and devices resulting from those methods.
As the development of nanoscale mechanical, electrical, chemical and biological devices and systems increases, new processes and materials are needed to fabricate nanoscale devices and components. Making electrical contacts to conductive lines has become a significant challenge as the dimensions of semiconductor features shrink to sizes that are not easily accessible by conventional lithography. Optical lithographic processing methods have difficulty fabricating structures and features at the sub-60 nanometer level. The use of self-assembling diblock copolymers presents another route to patterning at nanoscale dimensions. Diblock copolymer films spontaneously assemble into periodic structures by microphase separation of the constituent polymer blocks after annealing, for example, by thermal annealing above the glass transition temperature of the polymer or by solvent annealing, forming ordered domains at nanometer-scale dimensions.
The film morphology, including the size and shape of the microphase-separated domains, can be controlled by the molecular weight and volume fraction of the AB blocks of a diblock copolymer to produce lamellar, cylindrical, or spherical morphologies, among others. For example, for volume fractions at ratios greater than about 80:20 of the two blocks (AB) of a diblock polymer, a block copolymer film will microphase separate and self-assemble into periodic spherical domains with spheres of polymer B surrounded by a matrix of polymer A. For ratios of the two blocks between about 60:40 and 80:20, the diblock copolymer assembles into periodic hexagonal close-packed or honeycomb array of cylinders of polymer B within a matrix of polymer A. For ratios between about 50:50 and 60:40, lamellar domains or alternating stripes of the blocks are formed. Domain size typically ranges from 5 to 50 nm.
A lamellar-phase block copolymer material has been used for making line features on a substrate. However, cylinders self-assemble more rapidly and correct defects faster than lamellae. Researchers have reported producing lines of upward-facing, half-cylinders of a minority block of a block copolymer in a matrix of the majority block through self-assembly of a cylindrical-phase morphology block copolymer on a chemically neutral surface. After removal of the matrix material, the half-cylinders form a masking structure over the underlying substrate. However, subsequent etching tends to undercut and isotropically etch the matrix material that remains under the half-cylinder lines, which will negatively affect etch resolution of the substrate. Applications for forming structures in an underlying substrate for semiconductor systems require a complex layout of elements for forming contacts, conductive lines and/or other elements, such as DRAM (dynamic random-access memory) capacitors.
It would be useful to provide methods of fabricating films of line arrays of ordered nanostructures that overcome these problems.
Embodiments of the invention are described below with reference to the following accompanying drawings, which are for illustrative purposes only. Throughout the following views, reference numerals are used in the drawings, and the same reference numerals are used throughout the several views and in the description to indicate same or like parts.
The following description with reference to the drawings provides illustrative examples of devices and methods according to embodiments of the invention. Such description is for illustrative purposes only and not for purposes of limiting the same.
In the context of the current application, the terms “semiconductor substrate,” “semiconductive substrate,” “semiconductive wafer fragment,” “wafer fragment,” or “wafer” mean any construction comprising semiconductor material including, but not limited to, bulk semiconductive materials such as a semiconductor wafer (either alone or in assemblies comprising other materials thereon), and semiconductive material layers (either alone or in assemblies comprising other materials). The term “substrate” refers to any supporting structure including, but not limited to, the semiconductive substrates, wafer fragments or wafers described above.
“Lo” as used herein is the inherent periodicity or pitch value (bulk period or repeat unit) of structures that self-assemble upon annealing from a self-assembling (SA) block copolymer. “LB” as used herein is the periodicity or pitch value of a blend of a block copolymer with one or more of its constituent homopolymers. “L” is used herein to indicate the center-to-center cylinder pitch or spacing of cylinders of the block copolymer or blend, and is equivalent to “Lo” for a pure block copolymer and “LB” for a copolymer blend.
In embodiments of the invention, a polymer material (e.g., film, layer) is prepared by guided self-assembly of block copolymers, with both polymer domains wetting the interface with the trench floor. Block copolymer materials spontaneously assemble into periodic structures by microphase separation of the constituent polymer blocks after annealing, forming ordered domains at nanometer-scale dimensions. In embodiments of the invention, one or more rows or lines of parallel-oriented half-cylinders are formed within a trench, with the face of the half-cylinder lines wetting a chemically neutral trench floor. Following self-assembly, the parallel-oriented line(s) formed on the substrate can then be used, for example, as an etch mask for patterning nanometer-scale line openings into the underlying substrate through selective removal of one block of the self-assembled block copolymer. Since the domain sizes and periods (L) involved in this method are determined by the chain length of a block copolymer (MW), resolution can exceed other techniques such as conventional photolithography. Processing costs using the technique are significantly less than extreme ultraviolet (EUV) photolithography, which has comparable resolution.
A method for fabricating a self-assembled block copolymer material that defines an array of nanometer-scale, parallel-oriented, downward facing half-cylinder lines according to an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
The described embodiment involves an anneal of a cylindrical-phase block copolymer in combination with a graphoepitaxy technique that utilizes a lithographically defined trench as a guide with a floor composed of a material that is neutral wetting to both polymer blocks and sidewalls and ends that are preferential wetting to one polymer block and function as constraints to induce self-assembly of the block copolymer material. In some embodiments, an overlying material layer that is preferential wetting is placed over the block copolymer material in the trench. In other embodiments, an air interface can selectively wet the desired block. Upon annealing, the block copolymer material will self-assemble into one or more rows or lines of half-cylinders in a polymer matrix and registered to the trench sidewalls, with the face of the half-cylinders oriented downward and wetting the trench floor. In some embodiments, an ordered array of two or more rows of half-cylinders can be formed in each trench.
As depicted in
In the illustrated embodiment, a neutral wetting material 12 (e.g., random copolymer, blend of functionalized homopolymers, etc.) has been formed over the substrate 10. A material layer 14 (or one or more material layers) can then be formed over the neutral wetting material and etched to form trenches 16, 16a, as shown in
In another embodiment illustrated in
Single or multiple trenches 16, 16a (as shown) can be formed using a lithographic tool having an exposure system capable of patterning at the scale of L (10 to 100 nm). Such exposure systems include, for example, extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography, proximity X-rays and electron beam (e-beam) lithography, as known and used in the art. Conventional photolithography can attain (at smallest) about 58 nm features.
A method called “pitch doubling” or “pitch multiplication” can also be used for extending the capabilities of photolithographic techniques beyond their minimum pitch, as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,328,810 (Lowrey et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 7,115,525 (Abatchev et al.), U.S. Patent Publication No. 2006/0281266 (Wells) and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0023805 (Wells). Briefly, a pattern of lines is photolithographically formed in a photoresist material overlying a layer of an expendable material, which in turn overlies a substrate, the expendable material layer is etched to form placeholders or mandrels, the photoresist is stripped, spacers are formed on the sides of the mandrels, and the mandrels are then removed leaving behind the spacers as a mask for patterning the substrate. Thus, where the initial photolithography formed a pattern defining one feature and one space, the same width now defines two features and two spaces, with the spaces defined by the spacers. As a result, the smallest feature size possible with a photolithographic technique is effectively decreased down to about 30 nm or less.
Factors in forming a single line or multiple lines of parallel-oriented half-cylinders within the trenches include the width (wt) of the trench, the formulation of the block copolymer or blend to achieve the desired pitch (L), and the thickness (t) of the block copolymer material.
There is a shift from two lines to one line of the half-cylinder lines as the width of the trench is decreased (e.g., from width wt2 to width wt) and/or the periodicity (L value) of the block copolymer is increased, for example, by forming a ternary blend by the addition of both constituent homopolymers. The boundary conditions of the trench sidewalls 20 in both the x- and y-axis impose a structure wherein each trench contains “n” number of features (e.g., n lines of half-cylinders).
In the illustrated embodiment shown in
For example, in using a cylindrical-phase block copolymer with an about 50 nm pitch value or L, in trenches 16 with a width (wt) of about 1.5 to 2 times 50 nm or about 75 nm to 100 nm, the block copolymer material will form a single downward-facing half-cylinder having a line width of about 25 nm. In trench 16a with a width (wt2), for example, of about 3 times L or about 3 times 50 nm (or about 150 nm), the block copolymer material will form two rows of the half-cylinder structures (line width of about 2 5nm) at a center-to-center pitch distance (p) of adjacent half-cylinder lines of about the L value (about 50 nm).
In another example, with a cylindrical-phase block copolymer or blend having a pitch or L value of 35 nm, a single line of about 17.5 nm wide (about 0.5 times L) of a downward facing half-cylinder will form in trench 16 having a width (wt) of about 1.5 to 2 times L or about 52.5 nm to 70 nm wide, and two parallel lines of half-cylinders (each about 17.5 nm wide) at a center-to-center pitch distance (p) of about 35 nm will form in trench 16a having a width (w12) of about 3 times L or about 3 times 35 nm (or about 105 nm).
The length (lt) of the trenches 16, 16a is according to the desired length of the half-cylinder line(s).
The depth (Dt) of the trenches 16, 16a is effective to direct lateral ordering of the block copolymer material during the anneal. In embodiments of the invention, the trench depth can be at or less than the final thickness (t2) of the block copolymer material (Dt≦t2), which minimizes the formation of a meniscus and variability in the thickness of the block copolymer material across the trench width. In some embodiments, the trench depth is at about two-thirds (⅔) to about three-fourths (¾), or about 67% to 75% less than the final thickness (t2) of the block copolymer material within the trench.
In some embodiments, the dimensions of the trenches 16, 16a are a width of about 20 nm to 100 nm (trench 16, wt) and about 20 nm to 3200 nm (trench 16a, wt2), a length (lt) of about 100 μm to 25,000 μm, and a depth (Dt) of about 10 nm to 100 nm.
As depicted in
The block copolymer material 26 or blend is constructed such that all of the polymer blocks will have equal preference for a neutral wetting material on the trench floor 24. In some embodiments of the invention, the block copolymer or blend is constructed such that the major domain can be selectively removed. In other embodiments, the minor domain polymer block can be selectively doped or structured to incorporate an inorganic component or species (e.g., a filler component) during annealing into microphase domains, which will remain on the substrate 10 as an etch resistant material (e.g., mask) upon selective removal of the majority polymer domain or, in some embodiments, both the majority and minority polymer domains. Suitable inorganic precursors are thermally stable and do not volatilize at the anneal temperature.
Block copolymers that incorporate an inorganic species can be prepared by techniques known in the art, for example, by a direct synthesis technique, or by incorporating atoms of an inorganic species by complexation or coordination with a reactive group of one of the polymer blocks.
For example, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,565,763 (Asakawa et al.), the block copolymer can be blended with an inorganic heat resistant material or precursor thereof, which will segregate to one polymer phase, for example, a metal salt, a metal oxide gel, metal alkoxide polymers, metal oxide precursor, metal nitride precursor, and metal fine particles. Examples of the metal include silicon (Si), chromium (Cr), titanium (Ti), aluminum (Al), molybdenum (Mo), gold (Au), platinum (Pt), ruthenium (Ru), zirconium (Zr), tungsten (W), vanadium (V), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn), among others.
Examples of metal alkoxides include alkoxysilanes such as tetramethoxysilane, tetraethoxysilane, tetraisopropoxysilane, tetraisopropoxyaluminum and tetraisopropoxytitanium, and alkylalkoxysilanes such as butyltriethoxysilane and propyltriethoxyaluminum. An example of the metal alkoxide polymer is polydiethoxysiloxane.
Examples of a metal oxide precursor or metal nitride precursor include polysilsesquioxane (e.g., polymethylsilsesquioxane, polymethylhydroxyl silsesquioxane, polyphenylsilsesquioxane, etc.), polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS), and polysilazane.
In some embodiments, a solution of a block copolymer can be combined with an additive such as an organic metal salt that has a high affinity to one of the polymer chains of the block copolymer and will segregate during an anneal to one of the polymer phases. For example, the block copolymer can be mixed with a metal salt combined with an organic compound. Examples of such organic metal salts include lithium 2,4-pentanedionate, lithium tetramethylpentanedionate, ruthenium 2,4-pentanedionate, magnesium 2,4-pentanedionate, magnesium hexafluoropentanedionate, magnesium trifluoropentanedionate, manganese(II) 2,4-pentanedionate, molybdenum(V) ethoxide, molybdenum(VI) oxide bis(2,4-pentanedionate), neodymium 6,6,7,7,8,8,8-heptafluoro-2,2-dimethyl-3,5-octanedionate, neodymium hexafluoropentanedionate, neodymium(III) 2,4-pentanedionate, nickel(II) 2,4-pentanedionate, niobium(V) n-butoxide, niobium(V) n-ethoxide, palladium hexafluoropentanedionate, palladium 2,4-pentanedionate, platinum hexafluoropentanedionate, platinum 2,4-pentanedionate, rhodium trifluoropentanedionate, ruthenium(III) 2,4-pentanedionate, tetrabutylammonium hexachloroplatinate(IV), tetrabromoaurate(III) cetylpyridinium salt, among others.
As described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0222995 and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0289943 (Lu; Agilent Technologies Inc.), atoms of an inorganic species such as a metal (e.g., iron, cobalt, molybdenum, etc.) can be incorporated into one block of a diblock copolymer by complexation of the atoms of the inorganic species with the pyridine units of poly(styrene)-b-poly(vinylpyridine) (PS-b-PVP), where the pyridine group forms a coordination bond with the inorganic species, e.g., iron (Fe), etc., or forms as an acid-base conjugate. As an example of an acid-base conjugate, a solution of the PS-b-PVP block copolymer can be combined with dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate (H2PtCl6) wherein a single Pt atom can be complexed with each pyridine group (at maximum loading).
As also described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0222995, block copolymers that incorporate an inorganic species can also be prepared by a direct synthesis technique. For example, a sequential living polymerization of a nonmetal-containing monomer (e.g., styrene monomer) followed by an inorganic species-containing monomer (e.g., ferrocenylethylmethylsilane monomer) can be used to synthesize an inorganic species-containing block copolymer (e.g., poly(styrene)-b-poly(ferrocenylmethylethylsilane) (PS-b-PFEMS).
Examples of diblock copolymers include, for example, poly(styrene)-b-poly(vinylpyridine) (PS-b-PVP), poly(styrene)-b-poly(methylmethacrylate) (PS-b-PMMA) or other PS-b-poly(acrylate) or PS-b-poly(methacrylate), poly(styrene)-b-poly(lactide) (PS-b-PLA), poly(styrene)-b-poly(tert-butyl acrylate) (PS-b-PtBA), and poly(styrene)-b-poly(ethylene-co-butylene (PS-b-(PS-co-PB)), and poly(styrene)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) (PS-b-PEO), polybutadiene-b-poly(vinylpyridine) (PB-b-PVP), poly(ethylene-alt-propylene)-b-poly(vinylpyridine) (PEP-b-PVP), among others, with PS-b-PVP diblock copolymers used in the illustrated embodiment. Other types of block copolymers (i.e., triblock or multiblock copolymers) can be used. Examples of triblock copolymers include ABC copolymers such as poly(styrene-b-methylmethacrylate-b-ethylene oxide) (PS-b-PMMA-b-PEO), and ABA copolymers such as PS-PMMA-PS, PMMA-PS-PMMA, and PS-b-PI-b-PS, among others.
Examples of diblock copolymers that incorporate an inorganic species include poly(styrene)-b-poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PS-b-PDMS), poly(isoprene)-b-poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PI-b-PDMS), PS-b-PFEMS, poly(isoprene)-b-poly(ferrocenylmethylethylsilane) (PI-b-PFEMS), poly(styrene)-b-poly(vinylmethylsiloxane) (PS-b-PVMS), poly(styrene)-b-poly(butadiene) (PS-b-PB) where the polybutadiene (PB) is stained by osmium tetroxide (OSO4), and poly(styrene)-b-poly(vinylpyridine) (PS-b-PVP) where the pyridine group forms a coordination bond with an inorganic species, among others. After annealing and self-assembly of the polymer blocks into the half-cylinders and matrix, an oxidation process (e.g., ultraviolet (UV)-ozonation or oxygen plasma etching) can be performed to remove the organic components of the block copolymer domains and convert the inorganic species to form a non-volatile inorganic oxide, which remains on the substrate and can be used as a mask in a subsequent etch process. For example, the inorganic species of the PDMS and PFEM block copolymers are silicon and iron, which, upon oxidation, will form non-volatile oxides, e.g., silicon oxide (SiOx) and iron oxide (FexOy).
The L value of the block copolymer can be modified, for example, by adjusting the molecular weight of the block copolymer. The block copolymer material can also be formulated as a binary or ternary blend comprising a block copolymer and one or more homopolymers (HPs) of the same type of polymers as the polymer blocks in the block copolymer, to produce a blend that will swell the size of the polymer domains and increase the L value. The concentration of homopolymers in a blend can range from 0 wt% to about 60 wt%. Generally, when added to a polymer material, both homopolymers are added to the blend in about the same ratio or amount. An example of a ternary diblock copolymer blend is a PS-b-PVP/PS/PVP blend, for example, 60 wt% of 32.5 K/12 K PS-b-PVP, 20 wt% of 10K PS, and 20 wt% of 10K PVP. Another example of a ternary diblock copolymer blend is a PS-b-PMMA/PS/PMMA blend, for example, 60 wt% of 46K/21K PS-b-PMMA, 20 wt% of 20K polystyrene and 20 wt% of 20K poly(methylmethacrylate). Yet another example is a blend of 60:20:20 (wt%) of PS-b-PEO/PS/PEO, or a blend of about 85 to 90 wt% PS-b-PEO and up to 10 to 15 wt% PEO homopolymer.
The film morphology, including the domain sizes and periods (Lo) of the microphase-separated domains, can be controlled by chain length of a block copolymer (molecular weight, MW) and volume fraction of the AB blocks of a diblock copolymer to produce cylindrical morphologies (among others). For example, for volume fractions at ratios of the two blocks generally between about 60:40 and 80:20, the diblock copolymer will microphase separate and self-assemble into periodic half-cylindrical domains of polymer B within a matrix of polymer A. An example of a cylinder-forming PS-b-PVP copolymer material (Lo˜35 nm) to form about 20 nm wide half-cylindrical PVP domains in a matrix of PS is composed of about 70 wt% PS and 30 wt% PVP with a total molecular weight (Mn) of 44.5 kg/mol.
Referring to
The block copolymer material 26 can be deposited by spin-casting (spin-coating) from a dilute solution (e.g., about 0.25 wt% to 2 wt % solution) of the copolymer in an organic solvent such as dichloroethane (CH2Cl2) or toluene, for example. Capillary forces pull excess block copolymer material 26 (e.g., greater than a monolayer) into the trenches 16, 16a. As shown, a thin layer or film 26a of the block copolymer material 26 can be deposited onto the material layer 14 outside the trenches 16, 16a, e.g., on the spacers 18. Upon annealing, the thin film 26a will flow into the trenches 16, 16a leaving a structureless brush layer on the material layer 14 from a top-down perspective.
In the present embodiment shown in
A chemically neutral wetting trench floor 24 allows both blocks of the copolymer material to wet the floor 24 of the trenches 16, 16a and provides for the formation of the half-cylinder line layout of the disclosure. The use of a neutral wetting trench floor in embodiments of the invention expands the number of block copolymer materials that can be utilized to produce self-assembled films having a series of parallel lines formed on a substrate surface that can be readily used as a mask for etching the underlying substrate to form a multiple line layout on a nanoscale level.
A neutral wetting material 12 can be provided, for example, by applying a neutral wetting polymer (e.g., a neutral wetting random copolymer) onto the substrate 10, then forming an overlying material layer 14 and etching the trenches 16, 16a to expose the underlying neutral wetting material, as illustrated in
In another embodiment illustrated in
Neutral wetting surfaces can be specifically prepared by the application of random copolymers composed of monomers identical to those in the block copolymer and tailored such that the mole fraction of each monomer is appropriate to form a neutral wetting surface. For example, in the use of a PS-b-PVP block copolymer, a neutral wetting material 12 can be formed from a thin film of a photo-crosslinkable random PS-r-PVP copolymer that exhibits non-preferential or neutral wetting toward PS and PVP, which can be cast onto the substrate 10 (e.g., by spin coating). The random copolymer material can be fixed in place by chemical grafting (on an oxide substrate) or by thermally or photolytically crosslinking (any surface) to form a mat that is neutral wetting to PS and PVP and insoluble when the block copolymer material is cast onto it, due to the crosslinking.
In another embodiment, a blend of hydroxyl-terminated homopolymers and a corresponding low molecular weight block copolymer can be grafted (covalently bonded) to the substrate to form a neutral wetting interface layer (e.g., about 4 nm to 5 nm) for PS-b-PMMA and PS-b-P2VP, among other block copolymers. The block copolymer can function to emulsify the homopolymer blend before grafting. For example, an about 1 wt% solution (e.g., in toluene) of a blend of about 20 wt% to 50 wt% (or about 30 wt% to 40 wt%) OH-terminated homopolymers (e.g., Mn=6K) and an about 80 wt% to 50 wt% (or about 70 wt% to 60 wt%) of a low molecular weight block copolymer (e.g., 5K-5K) can be spin-coated onto a substrate 10 (e.g., SiO2), heated (baked) (e.g., at 160° C.), and the non-grafted (unbonded) polymer material may be removed, for example, by a solvent rinse (e.g., toluene). For example, the neutral wetting material can be prepared from a blend of about 30 wt% PS-OH (Mn=6K) and PMMA-OH (Mn=6K) (weight ratio of 4:6) and about 70 wt% PS-b-PMMA (5K-5K), or a ternary blend of PS-OH (6K), P2VP-OH (6K) and PS-b-2PVP (8K-8K), etc.
In embodiments in which the substrate 10 is silicon (with native oxide), a neutral wetting surface for PS-b-PMMA can be provided by hydrogen-terminated silicon. The floors 24 of the trenches 16, 16a can be etched, for example, with a hydrogen plasma, to remove the oxide material and form hydrogen-terminated silicon, which is neutral wetting with equal affinity for both blocks of a block copolymer material. H-terminated silicon can be prepared by a conventional process, for example, by a fluoride ion etch of a silicon substrate (with native oxide present, about 12 Å to 15 Å) by exposure to an aqueous solution of hydrogen fluoride (HF) and buffered HF or ammonium fluoride (NH4F), by HF vapor treatment, or by a hydrogen plasma treatment (e.g., atomic hydrogen).
An H-terminated silicon substrate can be further processed by grafting a random copolymer such as PS-r-PVP, PS-r-PMMA, etc., selectively onto the substrate 10, resulting in a neutral wetting surface for the corresponding block copolymer (e.g., PS-b-PVP, PS-b-PMMA, etc.). For example, a neutral wetting layer of a PS-r-PMMA random copolymer can be provided by an in situ free radical polymerization of styrene and methylmethacrylate using a di-olefinic linker such as divinyl benzene, which links the copolymer to an H-terminated silicon surface to produce about a 10-nm to 15-nm thick film.
Referring again to
In yet another embodiment, a neutral wetting surface (e.g., for PS-b-PMMA and PS-b-PEO) can be provided by grafting a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) of a trichlorosilane-base SAM such as 3-(para-methoxyphenyl)propyltrichorosilane grafted to oxide (e.g., SiO2) as described, for example, by D. H. Park, Nanotechnology 18 (2007), p. 355304.
A surface that is neutral wetting to PS-b-PMMA can also be prepared by spin-coating a blanket layer of a photo- or thermally crosslinkable random copolymer such as a benzocyclobutene- or azidomethylstyrene-functionalized random copolymer of styrene and methylmethacrylate (e.g., poly(styrene-r-benzocyclobutene-r-methylmethacrylate (PS-r-PMMA-r-BCB)). For example, such a random copolymer can comprise about 42 wt% PMMA, about (58-x) wt% PS and x wt% (e.g., about 2 wt% to 3 wt%) of either polybenzocyclobutene or poly(para-azidomethylstyrene)). An azidomethylstyrene-functionalized random copolymer can be UV photo-crosslinked (e.g., 1 MW/cm2 to 5 MW/cm2 exposure for about 15 seconds to about 30 minutes) or thermally crosslinked (e.g., at about 170° C. for about four hours) to form a crosslinked polymer mat as a neutral wetting layer. A benzocyclobutene-functionalized random copolymer can be thermally crosslinked (e.g., at about 200° C. for about four hours or at about 250° C. for about ten minutes).
In another embodiment, a neutral wetting random copolymer of polystyrene (PS), polymethacrylate (PMMA) with hydroxyl group(s) (e.g., 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (P(S-r-MMA-r-HEMA)) (e.g., about 58 wt% PS) can be can be selectively grafted to a substrate 10 (e.g., an oxide) as a neutral wetting layer about 5 nm to 10 nm thick by heating at about 160° C. for about 48 hours. See, for example, In et al., Langmuir, 2006, 22, 7855-7860.
To provide preferential wetting trench sidewalls 20, for example, in the use of a PS-b-PVP block copolymer, the material layer 14 can be composed of silicon (with native oxide), oxide (e.g., silicon oxide, SiOx), silicon nitride, silicon oxycarbide, indium tin oxide (ITO), silicon oxynitride, and resist materials such as methacrylate-based resists and polydimethyl glutarimide resists, among other materials, which exhibit preferential wetting toward the preferred block (e.g., the minority block), which is the PVP block in the illustrated embodiment. Upon annealing and self-assembly of the block copolymer material 26, the preferred block (e.g., the PVP block) will form a thin interface layer along the preferential wetting sidewalls 20 and ends 22 of the trenches 16, 16a.
In other embodiments utilizing PS-b-PMMA, a preferential wetting material such as a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) polymer modified with an —OH containing moiety (e.g., hydroxyethylmethacrylate) can be selectively applied onto the sidewalls of the trenches in embodiments where a neutral wetting material 12, 12′, is in place on the trench floor 24, 24′ (as in
Referring to
In an embodiment of the invention, the preferential wetting material 30 is composed of a solid material that is placed onto the surface of the block copolymer material 26. For example, the preferential wetting material 30 can be composed of a soft, flexible or rubbery solid material such as a crosslinked poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) elastomer (e.g., Sylgard 184 by Dow Corning Corp., Midland, Mich.) or other elastomeric polymer material (e.g., silicones, polyurethanes, etc.).
A crosslinked, solid PDMS material 30 provides an external surface that is hydrophobic, which can be altered, for example, by a plasma oxidation to add silanol (SiOH) groups to the surface to render the PDMS surface hydrophilic. For example, in using a PS-b-PVP (70:30) block copolymer, a PDMS material 30 having a hydrophobic surface placed into contact with the PS-b-PVP block copolymer material 26 will be preferentially wetted by the PS block, while a PDMS material 30 modified with a hydrophilic surface will be preferentially wetted by the PVP block. After annealing, a PDMS material 30 can be removed, for example, by lifting or peeling the material 30 from the surface 28 of the block copolymer material 26, which can include applying a solvent such as water, alcohols, etc. (e.g., by soaking), to permeate and swell the PDMS material 30 to enhance physical removal, and which is compatible with and does not dissolve the block copolymer. A dilute fluoride solution (e.g., NH4F, HF, NaF, etc.) can also be applied to etch and dissolve away a PDMS material.
In another embodiment, the preferential wetting material 30 can be formed as an inorganic film on the surface 28 of the block copolymer material 26. For example, a layer of a spin-on dielectric (SOD) material can be formed by applying, for example, a spin-on liquid silicon-containing polymer, removing the solvent (e.g., by heating), and then oxidizing the polymer layer (e.g., oxygen atmosphere, steam-oxidation process, wet chemical oxidation, etc.) to form a hard silicon dioxide (SiO2) layer, a hydrophilic surface that will be preferentially wetted by the PVP (minority) block. In embodiments of the method, the oxidation can be conducted simultaneously with a thermal anneal of the block copolymer material 26. Examples of silicon-containing polymers include silicates, siloxanes (e.g., hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ), hexamethyldisiloxane, octamethyltrisiloxane, etc.), silazanes (e.g., polysilazanes such as hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), tetramethyldisilazane, octamethylcyclotetrasilazine, hexamethylcyclotrisilazine, diethylaminotrimethylsilane, dimethylaminotrimethylsilane, etc.) and silisesquioxanes (e.g., hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ). The spin-on polymer material can be applied, for example, by casting, spin applying, flow coating or a spray coating technique. The solvent of the spin-on polymer material is compatible with and does not dissolve the block copolymer, for example, water or an alcohol. After annealing, a layer of dielectric preferential wetting material 30 can be removed using a controlled etch back process, for example, by applying a fluoride-based etchant whereby the dielectric material is etched at a low etch rate (e.g., less than about 200 Å/minute).
With the preferential wetting material 30 in contact with the surface 28 of the block copolymer material 26, an annealing process is conducted (arrows ↓,
Thermal annealing can be conducted at above the glass transition temperature of the component blocks of the copolymer material 26 (see
The block copolymer material 26 can be globally heated or, in other embodiments, a zone or localized thermal anneal can be applied to portions or sections of the block copolymer material 26. For example, the substrate 10 can be moved across a hot-to-cold temperature gradient 34 (
Upon annealing, the cylindrical-phase block copolymer material 26 will self-assemble into a polymer material 32 (e.g., a film), as depicted in
In addition, the minority (preferred) block (e.g., PVP) will segregate to and wet the preferential wetting sidewalls 20 and ends 22 of the trenches 16, 16a to form a thin interface or wetting (brush) layer 36a, and will segregate to and wet the overlying preferential wetting material layer 30 to form an overlying thin wetting layer 36as. The thickness of the wetting layers 36a, 36as (both blocks considered) is generally about 0.5 times L, which includes ≦0.25 times L of the minority block and about 0.25 times L of the majority block. For example, a ≦0.25 times L thick layer of the PVP block will wet oxide interfaces with attached PS domains (about 0.25 times L thick) directed outward from the oxide material.
In embodiments of the invention, the self-assembled polymer material 32 has a post-anneal thickness (t2) at or below the L value, or t2=b+(0.5*L) (where b is the thickness of the overlying wetting layer 36as, both blocks considered), or t2=[(≦0.5*L)+(0.5*L)], or t2≦L.
In embodiments in which the block copolymer material 26 includes an inorganic species such as a metal (e.g., Si, Fe, etc.), the inorganic species will segregate to one polymer phase upon annealing. For example, with a PS-b-PVP copolymer combined with a silicon- and/or iron-containing additive where the pyridine group selectively solvates the Si and Fe species, during the anneal, the Si and Fe species will segregate to the PVP half-cylinders 36 (and wetting layers 36a). Suitable inorganic precursors are thermally stable and will not volatilize at the anneal temperature.
In the illustrated embodiment, the width (w1) of trenches 16 are about 1.5 to 2 times L (or 1.5 to 2× the pitch value) of the block copolymer 26, resulting in the formation of a single half-cylinder down the center of the trench 16 from a block copolymer having a pitch value of about L. As depicted in
After the block copolymer material is annealed and ordered, the preferential wetting material 30 can be removed from contact with the assembled block copolymer material 32, as shown in
For example, in the use of a solid, elastomeric material 30 such as PDMS, the material can be lifted or peeled from the surface of the block copolymer material 32. To facilitate removal, a solvent that is compatible with and does not dissolve or etch the assembled polymer domains such as water, alcohol, etc. can be applied (e.g., by spraying, soaking the material) to permeate and swell the material and enhance removal without altering or damaging the assembled polymer structure. A dilute fluoride solution (e.g., NH4F, HF, NaF, etc.) can also be applied to mediate the removal and decomposition of a PDMS material.
In embodiments of the invention in which the preferential wetting material 30 is composed of an inorganic material such as a spin-on dielectric (SOD), the material 30 can be removed by a controlled etch back process, for example, by applying a fluoride-based etchant whereby the dielectric material is etched at a low etch rate (e.g., less than about 200 Å/minute) without altering or damaging the assembled polymer structure.
In embodiments in which an elastomeric material 30 is used with a block copolymer material that includes an inorganic species (e.g., Si, Fe, etc.), a process that dissolves or etches the polymer components but not the inorganic species can be used to selectively remove the organic components of the block copolymer domains, leaving the inorganic species on the substrate to form a mask material. For example, an oxygen plasma etch will remove the carbonaceous major domains, leaving inorganic material (e.g., Si, Fe, etc.) as lines on the substrate surface.
Generally, a block copolymer thin film 26a outside the trenches (e.g., on spacers 18) will not be not thick enough to result in self-assembly. Optionally, the unstructured thin film 26a can be removed, for example, by an etch technique or a planarization process to provide an about uniformly flat surface.
Optionally, the copolymer material can be treated to crosslink one of the polymer domains (e.g., the PVP half-cylinders) to fix and enhance the strength of the polymer blocks. For example, one of the polymer blocks can be structured to inherently crosslink (e.g., upon exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation, including deep ultraviolet (DUV) radiation), or the polymer block can be formulated to contain a crosslinking agent. For example, the trench regions can be selectively exposed through a reticle (not shown) to crosslink only the self-assembled polymer material 32 within the trenches 16, 16a and a wash can then be applied with an appropriate solvent (e.g., toluene) to remove the non-crosslinked portions of the block copolymer material 26a, leaving the registered self-assembled polymer material 32 within the trench and exposing the surface of the material layer 14 above/outside the trenches. In another embodiment, the annealed polymer material 32 can be crosslinked globally, a photoresist material can be applied to pattern and expose the areas of the polymer material 26a outside the trench regions, and the exposed portions of the polymer material 26a can be removed, for example by an oxygen (O2) plasma treatment.
An embodiment of the application of the self-assembled polymer material 30 is as an etch mask to form openings in the substrate 10. After annealing and self-assembly of the polymer blocks into the half-cylinders 36 and matrix 38, and removal of the preferential wetting material 30, the assembled polymer material 32 can be processed to form a structure that can be used as an etch mask to form openings in the substrate 10.
In some embodiments of the invention, the surface wetting layer 36as (
In embodiments of the invention in which one of the polymer domains includes an inorganic species (e.g., Si, Fe, etc.), an oxidation process such as a UV-ozonation or oxygen plasma etching, can be performed to remove the organic material (i.e., the polymer domains) and convert the inorganic species to a non-volatile inorganic oxide, e.g., silicon oxide (SiOx), iron oxide (FexOy), etc., which remains on the substrate and can be used as a mask in a subsequent etch process.
For example, as depicted in
In other embodiments, the matrix domain 38 of the self-assembled polymer material 32 can be selectively removed relative to the half-cylinder lines 36, which can be used as a mask to etch the exposed substrate 10 at the trench floor 24. For example, in using a PS-b-PMMA block copolymer, PMMA domains can be selectively removed by UV exposure/acetic acid development or by selective reactive ion etching (RIE), and the remaining PS domains can then be used as a mask to etch the substrate 10.
The oxide lines 40 can then be used as a mask to etch line openings 42 (e.g., trenches) in the substrate 10, as depicted in
Further processing can then be performed as desired. For example, as depicted in
Referring now to
In some embodiments, a preferentially wetting atmosphere can be composed of clean, dry air to preferentially wet the polymer block having the lower surface tension. For example, in the use of PS-b-PVP and PS-b-PEO, the PS block has a relatively lower surface tension and will preferentially wet a clean dry air atmosphere. In the use of PS-b-PDMS, the PDMS block has a lower surface tension and will preferentially wet a clean dry air atmosphere. In other embodiments, a humid atmosphere (air) can be applied to preferentially wet PEO over PS (e.g., using PS-b-PEO), or a near-saturated solvent atmosphere (e.g., ethanol, dimethylformamide (DMF), and the like) can be applied as a vapor phase to preferentially wet PVP over the PS block (e.g., using PS-b-PVP).
An anneal of the block copolymer material 26′ in the presence of the preferentially wetting atmosphere 46′ can then be conducted such that the polymer blocks phase separate in response to the preferential and neutral wetting of the trench surfaces and the preferential wetting of the overlying atmosphere 46′ at the air-interface to form a self-assembled polymer material 32′ as illustrated in
Following the anneal, the polymer material 32′ can be optionally crosslinked as previously described. In some embodiments, the surface wetting layer 36a′s at the air interface (e.g., the minority block, PVP) can be selectively removed to expose the underlying matrix 38′, e.g., by an RIE process. The self-assembled polymer material can then be processed as desired, for example, to form a masking material to etch the underlying substrate 10′.
Embodiments of the invention provide methods of forming structures of parallel lines that assemble via graphoepitaxy rapidly and defect-free over large areas in wide trenches. The structures formed from cylinder-forming block copolymers can be produced considerably faster than for lamellar-forming block copolymers, and have improved pattern transfer to an underlying substrate when used as an etch mask compared to arrays of minority block cylinders fully suspended in a majority block matrix due to undercutting of the matrix underneath the cylinders during etching. The methods also provide ordered and registered elements on a nanometer scale that can be prepared more inexpensively than by electron beam lithography, EUV photolithography or conventional photolithography. The feature sizes produced and accessible by this invention cannot be easily prepared by conventional photolithography. The described methods and systems can be readily employed and incorporated into existing semiconductor manufacturing process flows and provide a low cost, high-throughput technique for fabricating small structures.
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations that operate according to the principles of the invention as described. Therefore, it is intended that this invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof. The disclosures of patents, references and publications cited in the application are incorporated by reference herein.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/114,173, filed May 2, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,301, issued Feb. 14, 2012.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4623674 | Bailey et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4877647 | Klabunde | Oct 1989 | A |
5328810 | Lowrey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5374367 | Edamura et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5382373 | Carlson | Jan 1995 | A |
5482656 | Hiraoka et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5512131 | Kumar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5538655 | Fauteux | Jul 1996 | A |
5622668 | Thomas | Apr 1997 | A |
5834583 | Hancock et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849810 | Muller | Dec 1998 | A |
5879582 | Havelka et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891356 | Inoue et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904824 | Oh | May 1999 | A |
5925259 | Biebuyck et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5948470 | Harrison et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6111323 | Carter et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6143647 | Pan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6270946 | Miller | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6310138 | Yonezawa et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312971 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6368871 | Christel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6403382 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423465 | Hawker et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6503841 | Criscuolo | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506660 | Holmes et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6548830 | Noguchi et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565763 | Asakawa | May 2003 | B1 |
6566248 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569528 | Nam et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6573030 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6682660 | Sucholeiki et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689473 | Guire et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699797 | Morris et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713238 | Chou et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6746825 | Nealey et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6780492 | Hawker et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781166 | Lieber et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6797202 | Endo et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6809210 | Chandross et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6884842 | Soane et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890624 | Kambe et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6890703 | Hawker et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908861 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913697 | Lopez et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924341 | Mays | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6926953 | Nealey et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6946332 | Loo et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949456 | Kumar | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957608 | Hubert et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6962823 | Empedocles et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6989426 | Hu et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992115 | Hawker et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6998152 | Uhlenbrock | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7030495 | Colburn et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037744 | Colburn et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045851 | Black et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056455 | Matyjaszewski et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7056849 | Wan et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7077992 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7090784 | Asakawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7115525 | Abatchev et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7115995 | Wong | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7118784 | Xie | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7132370 | Paraschiv et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135144 | Christel et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135388 | Ryu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135523 | Ho et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7163712 | Chilkoti et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166304 | Harris et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172953 | Lieber et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186613 | Kirner | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7189430 | Ajayan et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7189435 | Tuominen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190049 | Tuominen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202308 | Boussand et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7252791 | Wasserscheid et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259101 | Zurcher et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7282240 | Jackman et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7291284 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7326514 | Dai et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7332627 | Chandross et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338275 | Choi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347953 | Black et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7407887 | Guo | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7408186 | Merkulov et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7470954 | Lee et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7514339 | Yang et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7521090 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7553760 | Yang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7592247 | Yang et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7605081 | Yang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7632544 | Ho et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7767099 | Li et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8083953 | Millward et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8101261 | Millward et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8114300 | Millward | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20020055239 | Tuominen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020084429 | Craighead et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020158342 | Tuominen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158432 | Wain | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030077452 | Guire et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030091752 | Nealey et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100822 | Lew et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030143375 | Noguchi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030178707 | Abbott | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030180522 | DeSimone et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030180966 | Abbott et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185741 | Matyjaszewski | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030235930 | Bao et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040028875 | Van Rijn et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040084298 | Yao et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040124092 | Black et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040125266 | Miyauchi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127001 | Colburn | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142578 | Wiesner et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040159633 | Whitesides et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175628 | Nealey et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192013 | Ryu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040222415 | Chou | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040242688 | Chandross et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254317 | Hu | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256615 | Sirringhaus et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256662 | Black et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265548 | Ho et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008828 | Libera et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050062165 | Saenger et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074706 | Bristol | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100830 | Xu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124135 | Ayazi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147841 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167651 | Merkulov et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050208752 | Colburn et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050238889 | Iwamoto | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250053 | Marsh et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271805 | Kambe et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050272341 | Colburn et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013956 | Angelescu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060014001 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024590 | Sandhu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030495 | Gregg | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038182 | Rogers et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046079 | Lee | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046480 | Guo | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060863 | Lu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062867 | Choi | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078681 | Hieda et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105562 | Yi | May 2006 | A1 |
20060124467 | Ho et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060134556 | Nealey et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154466 | Lee et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163646 | Black | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060192283 | Benson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205875 | Cha et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060211871 | Dai | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217285 | Destarac | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228635 | Suleski | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060231525 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249784 | Black et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060249796 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060254440 | Choi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060255505 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060257633 | Inoue et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258159 | Colburn et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060278158 | Tolbert et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281266 | Wells | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286305 | Thies et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286490 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060292777 | Dunbar | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070020749 | Nealey et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070023247 | Ulicny et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070023805 | Wells | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045562 | Parekh | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071881 | Chua et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072403 | Sakata | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070122932 | Kodas et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138131 | Burdinski | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161237 | Lieber et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175859 | Black et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070181870 | Libertino et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200477 | Tuominen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208159 | McCloskey et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070218202 | Ajayan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222995 | Lu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070224819 | Sandhu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070224823 | Sandhu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070227383 | Decre et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249117 | Kang et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070272951 | Lieber et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281220 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070289943 | Lu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293041 | Yang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080032238 | Lu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080083991 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080085601 | Park et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080093743 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103256 | Kim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080164558 | Yang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080176767 | Millward | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080193658 | Millward | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080217292 | Millward et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233323 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080257187 | Millward | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260941 | Jin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080274413 | Millward | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080286659 | Millward | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080311347 | Millward et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080315270 | Marsh et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080318005 | Millward | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090062470 | Millward et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090155579 | Greco et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090200646 | Millward et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090206489 | Li et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090236309 | Millward et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240001 | Regner | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090263628 | Millward | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274887 | Millward et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100092873 | Sills et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100102415 | Millward et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100124826 | Millward et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137496 | Millward et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163180 | Millward | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100204402 | Millward et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100279062 | Millward | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100316849 | Millward et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100323096 | Sills et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1562730 | Jan 2005 | CN |
0784543 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1416303 | May 2004 | EP |
1593164 | Jun 2010 | EP |
11080414 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2003155365 | May 2003 | JP |
2004335962 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2006036923 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2006055982 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2005008882 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2008036491 | Feb 2008 | JP |
100771886 | Nov 2007 | KR |
200400990 | Jan 2004 | TW |
200419017 | Oct 2004 | TW |
200511364 | Mar 2005 | TW |
I253456 | Apr 2006 | TW |
256110 | Jun 2006 | TW |
9007575 | Jul 1990 | WO |
9706013 | Feb 1997 | WO |
9839645 | Sep 1998 | WO |
9947570 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0031183 | Jun 2000 | WO |
02081372 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2005122285 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006076016 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006078952 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007001294 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007013889 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007019439 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007024241 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007024323 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007055041 | May 2007 | WO |
2008091741 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008096335 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008097736 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008118635 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008124219 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008130847 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008145268 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2008156977 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009099924 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009102551 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009117238 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009117243 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009134635 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Berry, B. C., et al., “Effects of Zone Annealing on Thin Films of Block Copolymers”, National Institute of Standard and Technology, Polymers Division, Maryland, USA, 2007, 2 pages. |
Helmbold, A., et al., “Optical Absorption of Amorphous Hydrogenated Carbon Thin Films,” Thin Solid Films 283 (1996) pp. 196-203. |
Lutolf, M., et al., “Cell-Responsive Synthetic Hydrogels,” Adv. Mater., vol. 15, No. 11, Jun. 2003, pp. 888-892. |
Wu, C.Y., et al., “Self-Assembled Two-Dimensional Block Copolymers on Pre-patterned Templates with Laser Interference Lithography,” IEEE, 2007, pp. 153-154. |
Zhu, X. Y., et al., “Molecular Assemblies on Silicon Surfaces via Si-O Linkages,” Langmuir, vol. 16, 2000, American Chemical Society, pp. 6766-6772. [Published on Web Jul. 29, 2000]. |
Ali, H.A., et al., Solid-State Electronics 46 (2002), 1639-1642. |
Arshady et al., Makromol. Chem., 1976, vol. 177, p. 2911-2918. |
Bae, Joonwon, Surface Modification Using Photo-Crosslinkable Random Copolymers , Abstract submitted for the Mar. 2006 meeting of The American Physical Society, submitted Nov. 30, 2005. |
Balsara et al, CPIMA, IRG Technical Programs, Synthesis and application of Nanostructured Materials, Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 2006, http://www.stanford.edu/group/cpima/irg/irg—1.htm, printed Jul. 1, 2009. |
Bang, J., Abstract submitted for the Mar. 6 meeting of the American Physical Society, submitted Nov. 2005 (online), accessed via the Internet (retrieved on Apr. 5, 2010), URL: <http://absimage.aps.org/image/MWS—MAR06-2005-003641.pdf>. |
Bang, Joona, The Effect of Humidity on the Ordering of Tri-block Copolymer Thin Films, Abstract submitted for the Mar. 2007 meeting of The American Physical Society, submitted Nov. 20, 2006. |
Bass, Robert B., et al., Microcontact Printing with Octadecanethiol , Applied Surface Science, 226(4), pp. 335-340, Apr. 2004, http://www.ece.virginia.edu/UVML/sis/Papers/rbbpapers/assoct.pdf. |
Bearinger, J.P., et al., Nature Materials 2, 259-264, 2003. |
Berry, B.C., et al., Effects of Zone Annealing on Thin Films of Block Copolymers , National Institute of Standard and Technology, Polymers Division, Gaithersburg, MD., 2007. |
Black, C.T., IEEE 2005 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 87-91. |
Black, C.T., Applied Physics Letters 87, 163116-1 to 1163116-3, 2005. |
Black, C.T., et al., IBM J. Res. & Dev., vol. 51, No. 5, Sep. 2007, pp. 605-633. |
Black, C.T., Proc. of SPIE, vol. 6153, 615302 (2006). |
Black, Charles T., IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, vol. 3, No. 3, Sep. 2004, pp. 412-415. |
Black, Charles T., ACSNano, vol. 1, No. 3, 2007, American Chemical Society, pp. 147-150. |
Black, Charles T., et al., IEEE Electronon Device Letters, vol. 25, No. 9, Sep. 2004, pp. 622-624. |
Botelho do Rego, A.M., et al., Surface Science, 482-485 (2001), pp. 1228-1234. |
Brydson, Rik M., et al. (chapter authors), Generic Methodologies for Nanotechnology: Classification and Fabrication , Nanoscale Science and Technology, edited by R.W. Kelsall, et al., 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (published online: Dec. 20, 2005) (http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/summary/112217550/SUMMARY). |
Bulpitt, Paul et al, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 152-169, Abstract only. |
Canaria, Christi A., et al., Formation and Removal of Alkylthiolate Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold in Aqueous Solutions , Lab Chip 6, 289-295 (2006), http://www.rsc.org/publishing/journals/LC/article.asp?doi=b51066c] (Abstract). |
Candau et al., Polymer, 1977, vol. 18, p. 1253-1257. |
Cavicchi, Kevin A., et al., Macromolecules 2007, vol. 40, 2007, pp. 1181-1186. |
Chandekar, Amol, et al., Template-Directed Adsorption of block Copolymers on Alkanethiol-Patterned Gold Surfaces, (circa 2006), http://www.nano.neu.edu/industry/industry—showcase/industry—day/documents/Chandekar.pdf) (Powerpoint template for scientific posters (Swarthmore College)). |
Cheng, Joy T., et al., Nano Letters, vol. 0, No. 0, A-E, published on Web Aug. 16, 2006. |
Cheng, Joy Y., et al., Nano Letters, vol. 6, No. 9, 2006, pp. 2009-2103. |
Cheng, Joy Y., et al., Adv. Mater. 2003, vol. 15, No. 19, pp. 1599-1602. |
Cheng, Joy Y., et al., Applied Physics Letters, 91, 143106-143106-3 (2007). |
Daoulas Kostas Ch., et al., Physical Review Letters 96, week ending Jan. 27, 2006, pp. 036104-1-3. |
Darling, S.B., Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 32, No. 10, Sep. 28, 2007, pp. 1152-1204. |
Desai, Dr. Trejal A., et al., Business Briefing: Medical Device Manufacturing & Technology, 2002. |
Edwards, Erik W., et al., Journal of Polymer Science: Part B Polymer Physics, vol. 43, 3444-3459, 2005. |
Edwards, Erik W., et al., Advanced Mater, 16, No. 15, Aug. 4, 2004, pp. 1315-1319. |
Elisseeff J., et al., Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 51(2): 164-171, Aug. 2000, Abstract only. |
Fasolka, Michael J. et al., Macromolecules 2000, vol. 33, No. 15, pp. 5702-5712. |
Gates, Byron D., et al., Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2004, 34:339-72. |
Ge, Zhenbin, et al., PRL 96, 186101-1 186101-4, The American Physical Society, week ending May 12, 2006. |
Gelest Inc., Silane Coupling Agents: Connecting Across Boundaries, pp. 1-56, 2006. |
Genua, A., et al., Nanotechnology, 18 (2007), pp. 1-7. |
Gillmor, S.D., et al., Langmuir 2000, vol. 16, No. 18, 2000, pp. 7223-7228. |
Gudipati, Chakravarthy S., et al., Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 42, pp. 6193-6208. |
Guo, Kai, et al., Abstract of Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Biodegradable Unsaturated Poly(ester amide)/ Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate Hydrogels , Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 43, Issue 17, pp. 3932-3944, 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
Hamley, I. W., Introduction to Block Copolymers , Developments in Block Copolymers Science and Technology, 2004, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 1-29. |
Harrison, Christopher et al., Polymer, vol. 39, No. 13, pp. 2733-2744, 1998. |
Hawker, et al., Facile Synthesis of Block Copolymers for Nanolithographic Applications; Polymer Reprints, 2005. |
He, Yiyong et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2745-2750. |
Hermans, Thomas M., et al., Application of Solvent-Directed Assembly of Block Copolymers to the Synthesis of Nanostructured Materials with Low Dielectric Constants , Angewandte Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, pp. 6648-6652. |
Hutchison, J. Brian, et al., Chem. Mater., vol. 17, No. 19, 2005, pp. 4789-4797. |
In, Insik, et al., Langmuir, vol. 22, No. 18, 2006, pp. 7855-7860. |
Ji, Shengxiang, et al., Preparation of Neutral Wetting Brushes for Block Copolymer Films from Homopolymer Blends, submitted to Advanced Materials, 20[16]: 3054-3060; published online Jul. 7, 2008. |
Ji, Shengxiang, et al., Macromolecules, 2008, 41(23): 9098-9103. |
Search Report of Taiwanese Patent Application No. 097121922, dated Oct. 16, 2011, 1 page. |
Search Report of Taiwanese Patent Application No. 098108789, dated Dec. 18, 2012, 1 page. |
Search Report of Taiwanese Patent Application No. 098109253, dated Aug. 22, 2012, 1 page. |
Search Report of Taiwanese Patent Application No. 097110156, dated Mar. 22, 2012, 1 page. |
Choi, H. J., et al., “Magnetorheology of Synthesized Core—Shell Structured Nanoparticle,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 41, No. 10, Oct. 2005, pp. 3448-3450. |
Hawker, C. J., et al., Abstract for “Improving the Manufacturability and Structural Control of Block Copolymer Lithography,” Abstracts of Papers, 232nd ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA, Sep. 10-14, 2006. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2009/041125, dated Sep. 10, 2010, 15 pages. |
Search Report of the Taiwanese Application No. 098114513, issued Aug. 9, 2012, 3 pages. |
Jun, et al., Langmuir, 2002, 18(9), pp. 3415-3417, Abstract only. |
Karim, Alamgir et al., Control of Ordering Kinetics and Morphology Using Zone Annealing of Thin Block Copolymer Filmes , Abstract submitted for the Mar. 2007 Meeting of The American Physical Society, Nov. 20, 2006. |
Kim, IS, et al., Int J Pharm., Sep. 15, 2000; 205(1-2): 109-16, Abstract only. |
Kim, Sang Ouk, et al., Nature, vol. 424, Jul. 24, 2003, pp. 411-414. |
Kim, Sang Ouk, et al., Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, pp. 3271-3275. |
Kim, Seung Hyun, et al., Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, No. 3, Feb. 3, pp. 226-231. |
Kim, Seung Hyun, et al., Macromolecules 2006, vol. 39, No. 24, 2006, pp. 8473-8479. |
Kim, Seung Hyun, et al., Advanced Mater., vol. 16, No. 23-24, pp. 2119-2123, Dec. 17, 2004. |
Kim, SH, J Biomater Appl., Jul. 2000; 15(1): 23-46 Abstract only. |
Kim, SH, J Biomater Res., Mar. 15, 2000; 49(4): 517-27 Abstract only. |
Kim, Su-Jin, et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B26(1), Jan./Feb. 2008, 189-194. |
Krishnamoorthy, Sivashankar, et al., MaterialsToday, vol. 9, No. 9, Sep. 2006, pp. 40-47. |
La, Young-Hye, et al., Chem. Mater, 2007, vol. 19, No. 18, pp. 4538-4544. |
La, Young-Hye, et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 25[6], Nov./Dec. 2007, pp. 2508-2513. |
Laracuente, A.R., et al., Surface Science 545, 2003, pp. 70-84. |
Lentz, David, et al., Whole Wafer Imprint Patterning Using Step and Flash Imprint Lithography: A Manufacturing Solution for Sub 100 nm Patterning , SPIE Advanced Lithography Paper, http://molecularimprints. com/ NewsEvents/tech—articles/new—articles/SPIE—07—MII—WW—Paper.pdf], Feb. 2007, pp. 1-10. |
Li, Mingqi, et al., MaterialsToday, vol. 9, No. 9, Sep. 2006, pp. 30-39. |
Li, Wai-kin, et al, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 25[6], Nov./Dec. 2007, pp. 1982-1984. |
Li, Xue, et al., ScienceDirect, Polymer 48 [2007], pp. 2434-2443. |
Lin, Zhiqun, et al., Adv. Mater. 2002, 14 No. 19, Oct. 2, pp. 1373-1376. |
Lin-Gibson, Sheng, et al., Macromolecules 2005, 38, pp. 2897-2902. |
Lutolf, M.P., et al, Nature Biotechnology, 23, 47-55 (2005), Abstract only. |
Malkoch, Michael, et al., Chem. Commun., 2006, pp. 2774-2776. |
Mansky, P., et al., Science, vol. 275, Mar. 7, 1997, pp. 1458-1460. |
Martens, P., et al., Polymer, vol. 41, Issue 21, Oct. 2000, pp. 7715-7722, Abstract only. |
Matsuda, T., et al., ASAIO J, Jul.-Sep. 1992; 38(3): M154-7, Abstract only. |
Maye, Mathew A., et al., Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 79, No. 2, Feb. 2002, pp. 207-210. |
Metiers, Andrew, et al., Biomacromolecules 2005, 6, pp. 290-301, 2005. |
Meyer, Evelyn, et al., Macromollecular Mater. Eng., 276/277, 2000, pp. 44-50. |
Mezzenga, Raffaele, et al., Langmuir 2003, vol. 19, No. 20, 2003, pp. 8144-8147. |
Mindel, Joseph., et.al., A Study of Bredig Platinum Sols , The Chemical Laboratories of New York University, vol. 65 pp. 2112. |
Nealey, Paul F., et al., Self-Assembling Resists for Nanolithography , IEEE 2005. |
Naito, et al., IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 38, No. 5, Sep. 2002, pp. 1949-1951. |
Nguyen, Kytai, et al., Biomaterials 23, 2002, pp. 4307-4314. |
Nishikubo, T., American Chemical Society Symposium Series, 1997, p. 214-230. |
Niu, Sanjun, et al., Macromolecules, 36(7), 2428-2440, 2003 (web release date: Mar. 13, 2003) http://digitalcommons.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article+1005&contect=chemeng—nanotechnology). |
Olayo-Valles, Roberto et al., J. Mater. Chem, 2004, 14, 2729-2731. |
Parejo, Pilar Garcia, et al., J. Mater. Chem., 2006, 16, pp. 2165-2169. |
Park, Cheolmin, et al., Polymer 44, 2003, 6725-6760. |
Park, Dae-Ho, Nanotechnology 18, 2007, 355304, pp. 1-7. |
Park, Miri, et al., Science, v. 276, No. 5317, p. 1401-1404, May 30, 1997. |
Park, Sang-Min, et al., Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, pp. 607-611. |
Park, Sung Chan, et al., Macromolecules 2007, vol. 40, No. 22, pp. 8119-8124. |
Peng, Juan et al., Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 1422-1428. |
Peters, Richard D., et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 18, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2000, pp. 3530-3532. |
Peters, Richard D., et al., Macromolecules, vol. 35, No. 5, 2002, pp. 1822-1834. |
Potemkin, Igor I., et al., Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2007, 28, pp. 579-584. |
Resnick, Douglas, J., et al., J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst., vol. 3, No. 2, Apr. 2004, pp. 316-321. |
Rogers, John A., ACS Nano, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 151-153, 2007. |
Rozkiewicz, Dorota I., et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2006, 45, pp. 5292-5296. |
Ruiz, Ricardo, et al., Adv. Mater, 2007, 19, pp. 587-591. |
Ruiz, Ricardo et al., Science, vol. 321, Aug. 15, 2008, pp. 936-939. |
Ryu, Du Yeol, et al., Macromolecules, vol. 40, No. 12, 2007, pp. 4296-4300. |
Saraf, Ravi R., et al., Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, No. 23, Jun. 10, 2002, pp. 4425-4427. |
Sawhney, Amarpreet S., et al., Macromolecules 1993, 26, 581-587, Abstract only. |
Segalman, Rachel A., Materials Science and Engineering R 48 (2005), pp. 191-226. |
Shahrjerdi, Davood, et al., IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 28, No. 9, Sep. 2007, pp. 793-796. |
Sharma, Sadhana, et al., Applied Surface Science, 206 [2003], pp. 218-229. |
Sivaniah, E., et al., Macromolecules 2003, 36, pp. 5894-5896. |
Sivaniah, et al., Macromolecules 2005, 38, 1837-1849. |
Solak, Harun H., Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2006, pp. R171-188. |
Srinvivasan, Charan, et al., ACS Nano, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 191-201, 2007. |
Stoykovich, Mark P., et al., Science, vol. 308, Jun. 3, 2005, pp. 1442-1446. |
Stoykovich, Mark P., et al., ACS Nano, vol. 1, No. 3, 2007, pp. 168-175. |
Sundrani, Deepak, et al., Nano Lett., vol. 4, No. 2, 2004, pp. 273-276. |
Sundrani, Deepak, et al., Langmuir 2004, vol. 20, No. 12, 2004, pp. 5091-5099. |
Truskett, Van N., et al., TRENDS in Biotechnology, vol. 24, No. 7, Jul. 2006, pp. 312-315. |
Sigma-Aldrich, Tutorial regarding Materials for Lithography/Nanopatterning, http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/Area—of—Interest/Chemistry/Materials—Science/Micro—and—Nanoelectronic website, retrieved Aug. 27, 2007. |
Van Poll, Maaike L., et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, pp. 6634-6637. |
Wang, C., et al., Electrochimica Acta 52 (2006), pp. 704-709. |
Wathier, Michel, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126 (40), pp. 12744-12745, Abstract only. |
Winesett, D.A., et al., Langmuir 2003, 19, pp. 8526-8535. |
Xiao, Shuaigang et al., Nanotechnology 16 (2005) S324-S329. |
Xu, Ting et al., Polymer 42, [2001] 9091-9095. |
Wu, C.Y., et al., IEEE, 2007, pp. 153-154. |
Yamaguchi, Toru, et al., Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, vol. 19, No. 3, 2006, pp. 385-388. |
Yan, Xiaohu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 126, No. 32, 2004, pp. 10059-10066. |
Yang, Xiao M., et al., Macromolecules 2000, vol. 33, No. 26, 2000, pp. 9575-9582. |
Yang, XiaoMin, et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 22[6], Nov./Dec. 2004, 3331-3334. |
Yurt, Serkan, et al., Macromolecules 2006, vol. 39, No. 5, 2006. |
Zhang, Mingfu, et al., Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, pp. 1571-1576. |
Berry et al., Nano Letters vol. 7, No. 9, Aug. 2007, p. 2789-2794. |
Fukunaga et al., Macromolecules vol. 39, Aug. 2006, p. 6171-6179. |
Hammond et al., Macromoleculars vol. 38, Jul. 2005, p. 6575-6585. |
Knoll et al., “Phase Behavior in Thin Films of Cylinder-Forming Block Copolymers”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, No. 3, Jul. 2002. |
Zehner, et al., Langmuir, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 241-244, Jan. 20, 1998. |
Cha, Jennifer N., et al., Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 839-843. |
Chang, Li-Wen, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 6156, 2006, 615611-1 to 615611-6. |
Chang, Li-Wen, IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), paper 33.2, Dec. 6-8, San Francisco, 2010, pp. 33.2.1-33.2.4. |
Ikeda, Susumu et al., NanotechJapan Bulletin—vol. 3, No. 3, Dec. 17, 2010/Focus 26-06. |
Ji, Shengxiang et al., ACS Nano, vol. 4, No. 2, 2010, pp. 599-609. |
Metters, Andrew, et al., Biomacromolecules 2005, 6, pp. 290-301, 2005. |
Park, Seung Hak, et al., Soft Matter, 2010, 6, 2010, 120-125. |
Wipf, “Handbook of Reagents for Organic Synthesis”, 2005, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., p. 320. |
Yamaguchi, Toru, et al., Microprocesses and Nanotechnology, 2007, Conference date Nov. 5-8, 2007, pp. 434-435. |
Zhang, Yuan et al., Applied Physics Letter, 91, 013104, 2007, pp. 013104 to 013104-3. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120138570 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12114173 | May 2008 | US |
Child | 13396039 | US |