High voltage field effect transistor finger terminations

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9136341
  • Patent Number
    9,136,341
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, March 12, 2013
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 15, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A field effect transistor having at least one structure configured to redistribute and/or reduce an electric field from gate finger ends is disclosed. Embodiments of the field effect transistor include a substrate, an active region disposed on the substrate, at least one source finger in contact with the active region, at least one drain finger in contact with the active region, and at least one gate finger in rectifying contact with the active region. One embodiment has at least one end of the at least one gate finger extending outside of the active region. Another embodiment includes at least one source field plate integral with the at least one source finger. The at least one source field plate extends over the at least one gate finger that includes a portion outside of the active region. Either embodiment can also include a sloped gate foot to further improve high voltage operation.
Description
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to field effect transistors having structures for protecting other structures such as gate fingers from damage resulting from high operational voltages.


BACKGROUND

Gallium Nitride (GaN) technology has widely been identified as a preferred high voltage (>600 V) power electronics technology due to its inherent high Johnson limit, which is a relationship between cutoff frequency (fT) and breakdown voltage. Quantitatively, the Johnson limit is a product of fT and breakdown voltage for a particular semiconductor technology such as GaN technology. The Johnson limit for GaN technology is significantly improved over the Johnson limit for silicon technology. As a result, GaN technology is being developed to realize relatively very compact and efficient switching regulators that require small passive filter elements in comparison to silicon technologies. However, challenges remain in utilizing GaN technology for compact and efficient switching regulators as well as other commercial applications. Some of the challenges include achieving low cost, normally off operation, low leakage of drain-to-source current (Ids) and low gate leakage current (Igate), as well as low channel on-resistance (R-on).


Moreover, greater than 600 V power electronic GaN switching transistor devices require low Ids leakage current under a high drain-to-source voltage (Vds) condition. A typical power electronic GaN switch requires less than 10-20 μA/mm of Ids leakage current under 1200 V Vds operation in an off-state in order to minimize the off-power dissipation and maximize switching efficiency. In addition, the same GaN switch requires a very low on-resistance of <200 milli-Ohms in the on-state in order to minimize on-power dissipation and maximize switching efficiency. The on-resistance may be reduced by increasing the overall size of the device by increasing the gate width. However, this will increase cost and the absolute value of Igate leakage current, which is proportional to the gate width.


Excessive leakage current is a common problem with lateral high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) devices. In a lateral HEMT device, a channel surface typically needs to be passivated to reduce surface states that contribute to electron leakage transport in a lateral direction. The leakage current that results from the surface states increases with higher voltage operation and the resulting electric fields. In particular, the leakage currents and breakdown voltages are strongly influenced by peak electric fields between the gate and drain regions of a device. Excessive leakage current is often mitigated with field distribution techniques such as employing sloped gate metal, gate field plates, and source field plates over the gate-drain regions of an active device.


SUMMARY

A field effect transistor having at least one structure configured to redistribute and/or reduce an electric field away from gate fingers is disclosed. In the exemplary embodiments, a field effect transistor includes a substrate, an active region disposed on the substrate, at least one source finger in contact with the active region, at least one drain finger in contact with the active region, and at least one gate finger in rectifying contact with the active region. In one of the exemplary embodiments, at least one end of at least one gate finger extends outside of the active region. In another exemplary embodiment, at least one source finger includes at least one source field plate integral with at least one source finger such that at least one source field plate extends over at least one gate finger with a portion of the source field plate extending outside of the active region. Either of the exemplary embodiments can also include a sloped gate foot and/or an extended gate field plate (in the longitudinal direction of the gate finger protruding outside the active region) to further mitigate potentially damaging effects of high voltage operation.


Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description in association with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.



FIG. 1 is a structural diagram depicting a top view, end view, and side view of structural elements making up a field effect transistor of the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 is a left-side perspective view of the field effect transistor of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a right-side perspective view of the field effect transistor of FIG. 1.



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of yet another embodiment of a field effect transistor in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 5 is a process diagram of a method for making a field effect transistor of the present disclosure.



FIG. 6 is process diagram of another method for making a field effect transistor according to the present disclosure.



FIG. 7 is a top view of a field effect transistor of a chamfered metal and multi-finger type that is in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIG. 8 is a top view of a field effect transistor of a rounded metal and multi-finger type according to another embodiment of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the disclosure and illustrate the best mode of practicing the disclosure. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawings, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.


It will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region, or substrate is referred to as being “over,” “on,” “in,” or extending “onto” another element, it can be directly over, directly on, directly in, or extend directly onto the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly over,” “directly on,” “directly in,” or extending “directly onto” another element, there are no intervening elements present. It will also be understood that when an element is referred to as being “connected” or “coupled” to another element, it can be directly connected or coupled to the other element or intervening elements may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly connected” or “directly coupled” to another element, there are no intervening elements present.


Relative terms such as “below” or “above” or “upper” or “lower” or “horizontal” or “vertical” may be used herein to describe a relationship of one element, layer, or region to another element, layer, or region as illustrated in the Figures. It will be understood that these terms and those discussed above are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in addition to the orientation depicted in the Figures.


For relatively extremely high voltages 600 V and higher, the leakage current typically becomes more challenging and new leakage paths need to be addressed, such as the path between gate finger ends and associated drain regions of a device. Surface leakage currents associated with the gate finger ends become more important for 1200 V applications and above, and the field termination at the end of individual gate fingers needs to be designed to limit surface leakage currents. What is needed are structures and methods that reduce drain and gate leakage current for voltage operation that is greater than a few hundred volts for lateral field effect transistors such as GaN high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) type transistors.



FIG. 1 is a structural diagram depicting a top view, end view, and side view of structural elements making up a field effect transistor 10 of the present disclosure. The field effect transistor 10 includes a substrate 12 and an active region 14 disposed on the substrate 12. At least one source finger 16 is in ohmic contact with the active region 14 while at least one gate finger 18 is in rectifying contact with the active region 14. Moreover, at least one drain finger 20 is in ohmic contact with the active region 14. In the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 1, at least one source field plate 22 is integral with the at least one source finger 16 such that the at least one source field plate 22 extends over the at least one gate finger 18 with a portion 24 of the at least one source field plate 22 extending outside of the active region 14. Dashed lines define a boundary between the active region 14 and an inactive region 26.


Referring to the top view, the at least one drain finger 20 typically extends to one side to combine multiple drain fingers together, which typically corresponds to an area that is commonly known as the drain finger side of the device. This structural positioning is predetermined to keep the source and drain areas away from each other in the high current draw areas. The structural positioning also has the added benefit of layout compactness. The proximity of the gate finger end portion 24 to the at least one drain finger 20 outside the active region 14 is similar to that just inside the active region 14. At high voltages, the high electric field continues to present a problem even with no active channel present within the active region 14. If the breakdown and leakage mechanisms in this region is dominated by the breakdown in a dielectric GaN epitaxial (EPI) surface interface, then the gate field termination at the end of the at least one gate finger 18 may be just as critical as inside the active region 14, especially at voltages that approach 1200 V. The typical spacing between gate edge and drain is ˜10-25 μm. Thus, the electric field ˜V/d does not change significantly in the proximity of an active channel/isolation region border.


As best seen in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 of this exemplary embodiment, the at least one source field plate 22 also includes at least one side 28 that extends downwardly towards the substrate 12 between the at least one gate finger 18 and the at least one drain finger 20. Another feature for redistributing and/or reducing an electric field's influence on the at least one gate finger 18 is a gate field plate 30 integrated with the at least one gate finger 18. The gate field plate 30 integrated with the at least one gate finger 18 appears as a T shape or a F shape when viewed from an end of the at least one gate finger 18. Another electric field mitigating feature is a sloped gate foot 32 on at least one end of the at least one gate finger 18. The sloped gate foot 32 has an end that inclines downwardly towards the substrate 12. The sloped foot 32 also has a longitudinal base 34 with upwardly and outwardly inclining sides 36A and 36B.


Returning briefly to FIG. 1, a passivation dielectric layer 38 covers the at least one source finger 16, the at least one gate finger 18, and the at least one drain finger 20. The passivation dielectric layer 38 is typically required for surface passivation and voltage breakdown improvement and may consist of a multi-layer dielectric formed in multiple steps. The thickness and material of the dielectric is typically predetermined for high voltage breakdown device performance and compatibility with backside metallization processing needed to fabricate the field effect transistor 10. The passivation dielectric layer 38 that passivates the surface of the active region 14 is typically made of silicon nitride (Si3N4), but other materials with higher breakdown voltage (BV) characteristics may be substituted. These higher BV materials may become necessary as a required device operating voltage is increased to over 200 V to approach 600 V and higher, since at those potentials current leakage paths can occur at the end of the at least one gate finger 18 extending outside the active region 14.


An additional feature depicted in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 is a device periphery 40 shown bounded between a dotted and dashed line and the lateral extents of the substrate 12. The device periphery 40 reduces opportunities for leakage current between adjacent lateral devices (not shown).



FIG. 4 is a left-side perspective view of a modified version of the field effect transistor 10. In this exemplary case, a field effect transistor 42 retains most of the features of the field effect transistor 10 (FIGS. 1, 2 and 3), except in this case, at least one gate finger 44 has an end 46 that does not extend outside of the active region 14. In addition, a gate field plate 48, integral with the at least one gate finger 44, appears as gamma (Γ) shaped when viewed from an end of the at least one gate finger 44.



FIG. 5 is a process diagram for an exemplary first method for fabricating a sloped gate channel for the sloped gate foot 32 (FIGS. 1 through 3) and for isolating the device periphery 40 (FIGS. 2 through 4). The first method begins with providing a field effect transistor structure 50 making up a portion of the field effect transistor 10 (FIGS. 1 through 3) (step 200). The provided field effect transistor structure 50 comprises the substrate 12. A buffer layer 52 is disposed on the substrate 12 to accommodate differences in crystallographic structures between the active region 14 (FIGS. 1 through 4) and the substrate 12. The active region 14 provided in the exemplary first method includes a device layer 54 and a cap layer 56. The passivation dielectric layer 38 covers the at least one source finger 16, the at least one drain finger 20, and the active region 14.


A gate channel having inwardly sloping side walls 58 is etched into the passivation dielectric layer 38 (step 202). A slope angle Θ is predetermined to mitigate relatively high potential electric fields at a gate edge (not shown). Next, the device isolation is achieved by ion implantation 60 of the device periphery 40 (step 204). It is to be understood that device isolation by implantation can be performed either before or after the gate channel is etched into the passivation dielectric layer 38.



FIG. 6 is a process diagram for an exemplary second method for fabricating a sloped gate channel or via and for isolating the device periphery 40. The second method begins with providing the field effect transistor structure 50 (step 300). In this case, device isolation is achieved with mesa isolation via a mesa etch of the device periphery 40 (step 302). Next, a gate channel is fabricated by etching inwardly sloping side walls 58 (step 304). Like the previous process, the slope angle Θ is predetermined to mitigate relatively high potential electric fields at a gate edge (not shown). Selection of surface passivation material such as Si3N4 or other dielectric material is predetermined for high-voltage applications. Other characteristics such as dielectric thickness, hydrogen content, and porosity are also predetermined to mitigate high potential electric fields. Moreover, the sloped gate vias will allow for more conformal gate metal deposition thus reducing the potential for voids in metal coverage within the vias. Devices can be isolated by a mesa etch. Mesa etching may present challenges of additional topography and the need for proper surface passivation to mitigate any potential surface leakage. Mesa isolation has the potential to be more robust than implant isolation for high voltage applications.



FIG. 7 is a top view of a field effect transistor 62 of a chamfered metal and multi-finger type that is structured in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure. The field effect transistor 62 has a plurality of fingers 64 made up of alternating source and drain fingers. Gate fingers are also present between each of the source and drain fingers making up the plurality of fingers 64. However, in this top view of the field effect transistor 62, the gate fingers are not visible. A drain bus 66 is coupled to each of the drain fingers within the plurality of fingers 64. A source bus 68 is coupled to each of the source fingers within the plurality of fingers 64. A gate bus 70A and a gate bus 70B couple to the gate fingers within the plurality of fingers 64.


A magnified top view of exemplary finger ends for the plurality of fingers 64 is shown in the box to the right in FIG. 7. In particular, a portion of a source finger 72 has a chamfered metal end 74 and a chamfered metal source field plate 76 that is integral with the source finger 72. The chamfered metal source field plate 76 extends from the source finger 72 to cover a gate finger 78. A chamfered gate field plate 80 integral with the gate finger 78 extends from an active region 82 into a non-active region 84. An isolation (ISO) line depicted by a dotted and dashed line separates the active region 82 and the non-active region 84. To the left of the ISO line is the active area 82 of the field effect transistor 62. All other areas are fully isolated. Extending the gate finger 78 and gate field plate 80 into the isolated region or non-active region 84 provides for a complete blocking of any potential leakage paths at the edge of the field effect transistor 62. The extension of the gate field plate 80 further reduces any fields in the isolated regions between the plurality of gate fingers 64. Completely rounded contact/metal corners offers an improvement over chamfered corners further reducing high fields at the edges of contact/metal traces. An end portion of the chamfered metal source field plate 76 also extends into the non-active region 84. A portion of a drain finger 86 has a chamfered metal end 88 that is located within the active region 82.



FIG. 8 is a top view of a field effect transistor 90 of a rounded metal and multi-finger type according to another embodiment of the present disclosure. The field effect transistor 90 has a plurality of fingers 92 made up of alternating source and drain fingers. Gate fingers are also present between each of the source and drain fingers making up the plurality of fingers 92. However, in this top view of the field effect transistor 90, the gate fingers are not visible. A drain bus 94 is coupled to each of the drain fingers within the plurality of fingers 92. A source bus 96 is coupled to each of the source fingers within the plurality of fingers 92. A gate bus 98A and a gate bus 98B couple to the gate fingers within the plurality of fingers 92.


A magnified top view of exemplary finger ends for the plurality of fingers 92 is shown in the box to the right in FIG. 8. In particular, a portion of a source finger 100 has a rounded metal end 102 and a rounded metal source field plate 104 that is integral with the source finger 100. The rounded metal source field plate 104 extends from the source finger 100 to cover a gate finger 106. A rounded gate field plate 108 is integral with the gate finger 106 and extends from an active region 110 into a non-active region 112. An isolation (ISO) line depicted by a dotted and dashed line separates the active region 110 and the non-active region 112. To the left of the ISO line is the active region 110 of the field effect transistor 90. All other areas are fully isolated. Extending the gate finger 106 and gate field plate 108 into the isolated region or non-active region 112 provides for a complete blocking of any potential leakage paths at the edge of the field effect transistor 90. The extension of the gate field plate 108 further reduces any fields in the isolated regions between the plurality of fingers 92. Completely rounded contact/metal corners offers an improvement over chamfered corners further reducing high fields at the edges of contacts/metal traces. An end portion of the rounded metal source field plate 104 also extends into the non-active region 112. A portion of a drain finger 114 has a rounded metal end 116 that is located within the active region 110.


Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. A field effect transistor comprising: a substrate;an active region disposed on the substrate;at least one source finger in contact with the active region;at least one gate finger in rectifying contact with the active region;at least one drain finger in contact with the active region; andat least one source field plate integral with the at least one source finger such that the at least one source field plate extends over the at least one gate finger with a portion of the source field plate extending outside of the active region such that a gate leakage current is less than around about 10 μA/mm for a drain-to-source voltage that ranges from around about 500 V to around about 1200 V.
  • 2. The field effect transistor of claim 1 wherein the at least one source field plate includes at least one side that extends downwardly towards the active region between the at least one gate finger and the at least one drain finger.
  • 3. The field effect transistor of claim 1 wherein the at least one gate finger includes a gate field plate integrated with the at least one gate finger.
  • 4. The field effect transistor of claim 3 wherein the gate field plate integrated with the at least one gate finger appears as a T shape or alternatively as a F shape when viewed from an end of the at least one gate finger.
  • 5. The field effect transistor of claim 1 wherein the at least one gate finger has chamfered ends.
  • 6. The field effect transistor of claim 1 wherein the at least one gate finger has rounded ends.
  • 7. The field effect transistor of claim 1 wherein the at least one gate finger has an end with a sloped foot.
  • 8. The field effect transistor of claim 7 wherein the sloped foot inclines downwardly towards the substrate.
  • 9. The field effect transistor of claim 7 wherein the sloped foot has a longitudinal base with upwardly and outwardly inclining sides.
  • 10. The field effect transistor of claim 1 wherein at least one end of the at least one gate finger extends outside of the active region.
  • 11. The field effect transistor of claim 1 wherein the at least one gate finger is confined within the active region.
  • 12. The field effect transistor of claim 1 wherein a gate leakage current is less than around about 10 μA/mm for a drain-to-source voltage of around about 1200 V.
  • 13. The field effect transistor of claim 1 wherein the substrate, the active region disposed on the substrate, the at least one source finger in ohmic contact with the active region, the at least one gate finger in Schottky contact with the active region, and the at least one drain finger in ohmic contact with the active region comprise a lateral structure.
  • 14. The field effect transistor of claim 1 wherein the substrate is made of silicon carbide (SiC).
  • 15. The field effect transistor of claim 1 wherein the active region comprises: a GaN buffer layer disposed on the substrate;a device layer disposed on the GaN buffer layer; anda GaN cap layer disposed on the device layer.
  • 16. The field effect transistor of claim 15 further including a passivation dielectric layer disposed over the active region.
  • 17. The field effect transistor of claim 16 wherein the device layer is made of aluminum gallium nitride/GaN (AlGaN/GaN).
  • 18. The field effect transistor of claim 16 wherein the passivation dielectric layer is made of silicon nitride (SiN).
  • 19. The field effect transistor of claim 1 further including a device isolation periphery.
  • 20. The field effect transistor of claim 19 wherein the device isolation periphery is fabricated using ion implantation.
  • 21. The field effect transistor of claim 19 wherein the device isolation periphery is fabricated via mesa isolation.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/625,929, filed Apr. 18, 2012. The present application is related to concurrently filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/795,986 entitled “METHODS FOR FABRICATING HIGH VOLTAGE FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR FINGER TERMINATIONS.” All of the applications listed above are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (191)
Number Name Date Kind
4317055 Yoshida et al. Feb 1982 A
4540954 Apel Sep 1985 A
4543535 Ayasli Sep 1985 A
4620207 Calviello Oct 1986 A
4788511 Schindler Nov 1988 A
5028879 Kim Jul 1991 A
5046155 Beyer et al. Sep 1991 A
5047355 Huber et al. Sep 1991 A
5107323 Knolle et al. Apr 1992 A
5118993 Yang Jun 1992 A
5208547 Schindler May 1993 A
5227734 Schindler et al. Jul 1993 A
5306656 Williams et al. Apr 1994 A
5361038 Allen et al. Nov 1994 A
5365197 Ikalainen Nov 1994 A
5389571 Takeuchi et al. Feb 1995 A
5414387 Nakahara et al. May 1995 A
5485118 Chick Jan 1996 A
5608353 Pratt Mar 1997 A
5629648 Pratt May 1997 A
5698870 Nakano et al. Dec 1997 A
5742205 Cowen et al. Apr 1998 A
5764673 Kawazu et al. Jun 1998 A
5834326 Miyachi et al. Nov 1998 A
5843590 Miura et al. Dec 1998 A
5864156 Juengling Jan 1999 A
5874747 Redwing et al. Feb 1999 A
5880640 Dueme Mar 1999 A
5914501 Antle et al. Jun 1999 A
5949140 Nishi et al. Sep 1999 A
6049250 Kintis et al. Apr 2000 A
6064082 Kawai et al. May 2000 A
6110757 Udagawa et al. Aug 2000 A
6130579 Iyer et al. Oct 2000 A
6133589 Krames et al. Oct 2000 A
6177685 Teraguchi et al. Jan 2001 B1
6191656 Nadler Feb 2001 B1
6229395 Kay May 2001 B1
6265943 Dening et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271727 Schmukler Aug 2001 B1
6285239 Iyer et al. Sep 2001 B1
6306709 Miyagi et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307364 Augustine Oct 2001 B1
6313705 Dening et al. Nov 2001 B1
6329809 Dening et al. Dec 2001 B1
6333677 Dening Dec 2001 B1
6342815 Kobayashi Jan 2002 B1
6356150 Spears et al. Mar 2002 B1
6369656 Dening et al. Apr 2002 B2
6369657 Dening et al. Apr 2002 B2
6373318 Dohnke et al. Apr 2002 B1
6376864 Wang Apr 2002 B1
6377125 Pavio et al. Apr 2002 B1
6384433 Barratt et al. May 2002 B1
6387733 Holyoak et al. May 2002 B1
6392487 Alexanian May 2002 B1
6400226 Sato Jun 2002 B2
6404287 Dening et al. Jun 2002 B2
6448793 Barratt et al. Sep 2002 B1
6455877 Ogawa et al. Sep 2002 B1
6475916 Lee et al. Nov 2002 B1
6477682 Cypher Nov 2002 B2
6521998 Teraguchi et al. Feb 2003 B1
6525611 Dening et al. Feb 2003 B1
6528983 Augustine Mar 2003 B1
6560452 Shealy May 2003 B1
6566963 Yan et al. May 2003 B1
6589877 Thakur Jul 2003 B1
6593597 Sheu Jul 2003 B2
6608367 Gibson et al. Aug 2003 B1
6614281 Baudelot et al. Sep 2003 B1
6621140 Gibson et al. Sep 2003 B1
6624452 Yu et al. Sep 2003 B2
6627552 Nishio et al. Sep 2003 B1
6633073 Rezvani et al. Oct 2003 B2
6633195 Baudelot et al. Oct 2003 B2
6639470 Andrys et al. Oct 2003 B1
6656271 Yonehara et al. Dec 2003 B2
6657592 Dening et al. Dec 2003 B2
6660606 Miyabayashi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6701134 Epperson Mar 2004 B1
6701138 Epperson et al. Mar 2004 B2
6706576 Ngo et al. Mar 2004 B1
6720831 Dening et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723587 Cho et al. Apr 2004 B2
6724252 Ngo et al. Apr 2004 B2
6727762 Kobayashi Apr 2004 B1
6748204 Razavi et al. Jun 2004 B1
6750158 Ogawa et al. Jun 2004 B2
6750482 Seaford et al. Jun 2004 B2
6759907 Orr et al. Jul 2004 B2
6802902 Beaumont et al. Oct 2004 B2
6815722 Lai et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815730 Yamada Nov 2004 B2
6822842 Friedrichs et al. Nov 2004 B2
6861677 Chen Mar 2005 B2
6943631 Scherrer et al. Sep 2005 B2
7015512 Park et al. Mar 2006 B2
7026665 Smart et al. Apr 2006 B1
7033961 Smart et al. Apr 2006 B1
7042150 Yasuda May 2006 B2
7052942 Smart et al. May 2006 B1
7211822 Nagahama et al. May 2007 B2
7408182 Smart et al. Aug 2008 B1
7449762 Singh Nov 2008 B1
7459356 Smart et al. Dec 2008 B1
7557421 Shealy et al. Jul 2009 B1
7719055 McNutt et al. May 2010 B1
7768758 Maier et al. Aug 2010 B2
7804262 Schuster et al. Sep 2010 B2
7935983 Saito et al. May 2011 B2
7968391 Smart et al. Jun 2011 B1
7974322 Ueda et al. Jul 2011 B2
8017981 Sankin et al. Sep 2011 B2
8405068 O'Keefe Mar 2013 B2
8502258 O'Keefe Aug 2013 B2
8633518 Suh et al. Jan 2014 B2
8692294 Chu et al. Apr 2014 B2
8785976 Nakajima et al. Jul 2014 B2
20010040246 Ishii Nov 2001 A1
20010054848 Baudelot et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020031851 Linthicum et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020048302 Kimura Apr 2002 A1
20020079508 Yoshida Jun 2002 A1
20030003630 Iimura et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030122139 Meng et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030160307 Gibson et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030160317 Sakamoto et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030206440 Wong Nov 2003 A1
20030209730 Gibson et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030218183 Micovic et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040070003 Gaska et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040130037 Mishra et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040241916 Chau et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050139868 Anda Jun 2005 A1
20050189559 Saito et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050189562 Kinzer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050194612 Beach Sep 2005 A1
20050212049 Onodera Sep 2005 A1
20050225912 Pant et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050271107 Murakami et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060043385 Wang et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068601 Lee et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060124960 Hirose et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060243988 Narukawa et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070093009 Baptist et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070295985 Weeks, Jr. et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080023706 Saito et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080073752 Asai et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080112448 Ueda et al. May 2008 A1
20080121875 Kim May 2008 A1
20080142837 Sato et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080179737 Haga et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080190355 Chen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080272382 Kim et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080272422 Min Nov 2008 A1
20080283821 Park et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080308813 Suh et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090072269 Suh et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090090984 Khan et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090146185 Suh et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090166677 Shibata et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090278137 Sheridan et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100025657 Nagahama et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100133567 Son Jun 2010 A1
20100187575 Baumgartner et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100207164 Shibata et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100230656 O'Keefe Sep 2010 A1
20100230717 Saito Sep 2010 A1
20100258898 Lahreche Oct 2010 A1
20110017972 O'Keefe Jan 2011 A1
20110025422 Marra et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110095337 Sato Apr 2011 A1
20110101300 O'Keefe May 2011 A1
20110115025 Okamoto May 2011 A1
20110127586 Bobde et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110163342 Kim et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110175142 Tsurumi et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110199148 Iwamura Aug 2011 A1
20110211289 Kosowsky et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110242921 Tran et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110290174 Leonard et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120018735 Ishii Jan 2012 A1
20120086497 Vorhaus Apr 2012 A1
20120126240 Won May 2012 A1
20120199875 Bhalla et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120211802 Tamari Aug 2012 A1
20120218783 Imada Aug 2012 A1
20120262220 Springett Oct 2012 A1
20130277687 Kobayashi et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130280877 Kobayashi et al. Oct 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
1187229 Mar 2002 EP
1826041 Aug 2007 EP
10242584 Sep 1998 JP
2000031535 Jan 2000 JP
2003332618 Nov 2003 JP
2008148511 Jun 2008 JP
2008258419 Oct 2008 JP
20070066051 Jun 2007 KR
2004051707 Jun 2004 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (89)
Entry
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,182, mailed May 1, 2014, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,482, mailed May 23, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,986, mailed Apr. 24, 2014, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed Sep. 25, 2014, 9 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,182, mailed Sep. 17, 2014, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,488, mailed Oct. 28, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/966,400, mailed Sep. 3, 2014, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,698, mailed Nov. 5, 2014, 11 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,482, mailed Nov. 5, 2014, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056105, mailed Feb. 12, 2014, 15 pages.
Chang, S.J. et al, “Improved ESD protection by combining InGaN—GaN MQW LEDs with GaN Schottky diodes,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Mar. 2003, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 129-131.
Chao, C-H., et al., “Theoretical demonstration of enhancement of light extraction of flip-chip GaN light-emitting diodes with photonic crystals,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, 2006, 4 pages.
Fath, P. et al., “Mechanical wafer engineering for high efficiency solar cells: An investigation of the induced surface damage,” Conference Record of the Twenty-Fourth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Dec. 5-9, 1994, vol. 2, pp. 1347-1350.
Han, D.S. et al., “Improvement of Light Extraction Efficiency of Flip-Chip Light-Emitting Diode by Texturing the Bottom Side Surface of Sapphire Substrate,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Jul. 1, 2006, vol. 18, No. 13, pp. 1406-1408.
Hibbard, D.L. et al., “Low Resistance High Reflectance Contacts to p-GaN Using Oxidized Ni/Au and Al or Ag,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83 No. 2, Jul. 14, 2003, pp. 311-313.
Lee, S.J., “Study of photon extraction efficiency in InGaN light-emitting diodes depending on chip structures and chip-mount schemes,” Optical Engineering, SPIE, Jan. 2006, vol. 45, No. 1, 14 pages.
Shchekin, O.B. et al., “High performance thin-film flip-chip InGaN—GaN light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, 071109, Aug. 2006, 4 pages.
Wierer, J. et al., “High-power AlGaInN flip-chip light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 78 No. 22, May 28, 2001, pp. 3379-3381.
Windisch, R. et al., “40% Efficient Thin-Film Surface-Textured Light-Emitting Diodes by Optimization of Natural Lithography,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Jul. 2000, vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 1492-1498.
Windisch, R. et al., “Impact of texture-enhanced transmission on high-efficiency surface-textured light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, Oct. 8, 2001, vol. 79, No. 15, pp. 2315-2317.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Feb. 15, 2005, 2 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Dec. 16, 2004, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Jul. 23, 2004, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed May 3, 2005, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Dec. 8, 2005, 4 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,980, mailed Jan. 26, 2005, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,980, mailed May 12, 2005, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225 mailed Dec. 22, 2011, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,279, mailed Oct. 31, 2007, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,279, mailed Apr. 17, 2008, 7 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,979, mailed Jun. 29, 2005, 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,979, mailed Jan. 11, 2005, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,979, mailed Oct. 26, 2005, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225, mailed Nov. 9, 2012, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,734, mailed Jan. 18, 2008, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,734, mailed Aug. 7, 2008, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,257 mailed Jan. 5, 2012, 13 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Feb. 2, 2010, 2 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Nov. 19, 2009, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Mar. 18, 2010, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed May 29, 2009, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Feb. 28, 2011, 8 pages.
Quayle Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Nov. 24, 2010, 4 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/458,833, mailed Dec. 15, 2008, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/458,833, mailed Apr. 1, 2008, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/458,833, mailed Mar. 9, 2009, 7 pages.
Invitation to Pay Fees for PCT/US2013/056105, mailed Nov. 5, 2013, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056126, mailed Oct. 25, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056132, mailed Oct. 10, 2013, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056187, mailed Oct. 10, 2013, 11 pages.
International Search Report for GB0902558.6, issued Jun. 15, 2010, by the UK Intellectual Property Office, 2 pages.
Examination Report for British Patent Application No. 0902558.6, mailed Nov. 16, 2012, 5 pages.
Examination Report for British Patent Application No. GB0902558.6, issued Feb. 28, 2013, 2 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,869, mailed Feb. 9, 2012, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,869, mailed Apr. 4, 2013, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,869, mailed Jul. 19, 2012, 8 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225, mailed Apr. 16, 2012, 3 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225 mailed Feb. 1, 2012, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225, mailed May 2, 2012, 10 pages.
Boutros, K.S., et al., “5W GaN MMIC for Millimeter-Wave Applications,” 2006 Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium, Nov. 2006, pp. 93-95.
Cho, H., et al., “High Density Plasma Via Hole Etching in SiC,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Surfaces, and Films, vol. 19, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2001, pp. 1878-1881.
Darwish, A.M., et al., “Dependence of GaN HEMT Millimeter-Wave Performance on Temperature,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 57, No. 12, Dec. 2009, pp. 3205-3211.
Krüger, Olaf, et al., “Laser-Assisted Processing of VIAs for AlGaN/GaN HEMTs on SiC Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 27, No. 6, Jun. 2006, pp. 425-427.
Sheppard, S.T., et al., “High Power Demonstration at 10 GHz with GaN/AlGaN HEMT Hybrid Amplifiers,” 2000 Device Research Conference, Conference Digest, Jun. 2000, pp. 37-38.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/942,998, mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,526, mailed Dec. 16, 2014, 17 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed Jan. 20, 2015, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/914,060, mailed Nov. 13, 2014, 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/966,400, mailed Dec. 3, 2014, 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,986, mailed Dec. 5, 2014, 16 pages.
Author Unknown, “CGHV1J006D: 6 W, 18.0 GHz, GaN HEMT Die,” Cree, Inc., 2014, 9 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/056105, mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 12 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/056126, mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 7 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/056132, mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 9 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/056187, mailed Mar. 12, 2015, 9 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed Apr. 6, 2015, 3 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,488, mailed Feb. 20, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/966,400, mailed Feb. 20, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,698, mailed Mar. 30, 2015, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,986, mailed Mar. 6, 2015, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,019, mailed Mar. 25, 2015, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/942,998, mailed Apr. 27, 2015, 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,526, mailed Jun. 17, 2015, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed May 14, 2015, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,488, mailed May 29, 2015, 9 pages.
Corrected/Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,689, mailed May 20, 2015, 3 pages.
Corrected/Supplement Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,689, mailed Jun. 9, 2015, 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,482, mailed May 4, 2015, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,698, mailed Jul. 20, 2015, 7 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130277687 A1 Oct 2013 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61625929 Apr 2012 US