The present application is claiming priority of German Patent Application Serial No. 101 00 265.3, which was filed on Jan. 8, 2001.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention concerns an illumination system, particularly one that is used for lithography, for example, VUV and EUV-lithography with wavelengths of less than or equal to 193 nm, which illuminates a field, wherein the illumination system comprises at least one light source as well as optical elements, which are divided into raster elements.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In order to be able to even further reduce the structural widths for electronic components, particularly in the submicron range, it is necessary to reduce the wavelength of the light utilized for microlithography.
For example, lithography with soft x-rays is conceivable at wavelengths of smaller than 193 mn. A double-facetted illumination system for such wavelengths has become known, for example, from DE 199 03 807. The disclosure content of DE 199 03 807 is incorporated herein by reference.
In the case of the illumination system known from DE 199 03 807, first raster elements, which are also denoted field raster elements, are illuminated via collecting optics. When arranged in reflection, illumination is produced at a specific angle of incidence. Therefore, the illuminated field on the field raster elements is preferably elliptical. The field raster elements are configured rectangularly, however, corresponding to the desired field in the object plane, which coincides with the reticle plane.
Each field raster element is imaged in a field in an object plane, in which the reticle is positioned. Since each field raster element contributes to the uniformity of the illuminated field, field raster elements that are only partially illuminated adversely affect the uniformity in the object plane. Thus, only completely illuminated field raster elements should be used.
In systems, such as are known from DE 199 03 807, the first raster elements or facets have a typical aspect ratio of approximately 1:16. In such systems, field raster elements cover only about 80% of the area illuminated by the light source, i.e. approximately 20% of the power is lost. Since the number of field raster elements is limited by the optical elements arranged in the light path from the light source to the reticle plane behind the optical element with first raster elements and for reasons of geometry and capability of construction, a better efficiency for an illumination system as is known from DE 199 03 807 cannot be achieved simply by increasing the number of field raster elements.
An object of the invention is thus to provide a imaging system that overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art, and particularly has a high utilization of the irradiated light power.
The object is solved according to the present invention by an illumination system, particularly for lithography with wavelengths of ≦193 nm, comprising a first optical element, which is divided into first raster elements and lies in a first plane, whereby the plane defines an x-direction and a y-direction, whereby the images of the first raster elements superimpose in an object plane of the illumination system and the first raster elements each have an x-direction and a y-direction with an aspect ratio, characterized in that at least two raster elements each have an aspect ratio of different magnitudes.
According to the invention, in order to minimize the light losses, the first raster elements, which are also denoted field raster elements, have different shapes. For example, they can be of different sizes or the aspect ratio of the individual field raster elements may vary over the field raster element mirror, so that a better covering of the illuminated area in the plane where the field raster elements are situated by the plurality of field raster elements and thus a higher efficiency of the illumination system is achieved.
In order to compensate for the different sizes or aspect ratios of the first raster elements or field raster elements, the second raster elements or pupil raster elements are anamorphotic. The anamorphism or astigmatic action of each pupil raster element is adapted for this purpose to the aspect ratio of each field raster element.
The essential characteristic of the invention is thus that pupil raster elements of different anamorphotic effect combined with field raster elements of different aspect ratios lead to a higher energy utilization of the light source by the illumination system. This is achieved in that the second raster elements have different anamorphotic effects, so that the aspect ratio of the images of the first raster elements in the object plane of the illumination system, in which, for example, a reticle is positioned, essentially corresponds to the field aspect ratio, independently of the aspect ratio of the first raster elements. The field raster elements may have, but need not have, an anamorphotic effect.
An anamorphotic effect can be realized in the simplest case by a toric surface shape, i.e., the radii of curvature of a mirror in the x- and y-directions differ at the vertex of the mirror in x- and y-directions, i.e., Ry is not equal to Rx.
Other advantageous embodiments of the invention are the subject of the subclaims.
The invention will be described below, for example, on the basis of the drawings.
Here:
The field raster elements 3 have a typical aspect ratio of approximately 1:16. Approximately 200 field raster elements 3 are arranged on a slightly elliptical illuminated surface. Approximately 80% of the illuminated surface is covered by field raster elements, i.e., approximately 20% of the power is lost.
In order to minimize this loss, according to the invention, the field raster elements, as shown in
A field raster element plate 1 configured in this way is shown in
For a better arrangement, all field raster elements of a row 5 in the embodiment according to
The following derivation based on
The case of a light channel between a field raster element 3 and a pupil raster element 7 will be considered first, wherein the field raster element 3 is isotropic, as is also pupil raster element 7. For this case of an isotropic field raster element 3 and exact Köhler illumination, the size of field raster element 3 with aperture NA1 behind pupil raster element 7, respectively, for the double-facetted system is coupled via:
wherein
Further, a light-source image 9, which field raster element 3 produces, lies in plane of the pupil raster element 7, i.e., the point of intersection of the aperture beam and the optical axis HA lies in the plane of pupil raster element 7. For the refractive power of the field raster element in this case, it follows that
wherein
If one assumes values that are typical for an EUV illumination system:
size of the field raster element,
then the following design values result for isotropic field raster elements or pupil raster elements:
focal distance of the field raster element:
If all field raster elements 3 are made equal in the x-direction, as shown in
If the refractive power of pupil raster element 7 is changed, then the magnification is also changed. Therefore, the distance between the vertex of the pupil raster elements and the image of the field raster elements S1 is also changed to S′1, while the distance between field raster elements and pupil raster elements on the object side remains the same: S0=−Z.
The image plane with distance S1 to the pupil raster elements is imaged by the imaging optics of the illumination system in the object plane to be illuminated. If the image of a field raster element is formed in another plane than the image plane with distance S1 to the vertex of the pupil raster elements, the image in the object plane that is to be illuminated, which coincides with the reticle plane, is blurred. This must be taken into account in the design of the pupil raster element with a specific lateral magnification, in order to prevent unnecessary large light losses. As shown in
Δy′=(S1−S′1)·tan(arc sin(p1))=dz·tan(arc sin(p1)) ≈dz·p1 (3)
wherein
In addition, the illumination is broadened in case of a source with a finite size by the aperture of the secondary light source in the object plane. Usually, this aperture and the additional broadening that it produces, however, are negligibly small. This small amount of broadening by the finite source size will be disregarded in the following derivation.
βy0≈β′y′0+dz′·p1 (4)
If the well-known imaging equation of the first order is inserted for p1:
wherein
p′0 must now still be selected, i.e., the collecting or convergent power of field raster elements 3 must be determined.
For this purpose, one uses generalized Equations (1) and (2) and obtains from
wherein
If the following parameters are selected, which are taken from the typical design example above, wherein the following is also valid:
In a first embodiment according to
here p′0>−0.034. With p′0=−0.033, the following values are obtained from Equation (6) and Equation (7) for the focal distances:
Focal distance in the y-direction of the field raster element with height of 26 mm:
Focal distance in the y-direction of the assigned pupil raster element:
Focal distance in the x-direction of the field raster element with height of 1.4 mm:
Focal distance in the x-direction of the assigned pupil raster element:
fxpw=700 mm.
In a second form of embodiment according to
Thus the beam bundle behind field raster element 3 is not vignetted by pupil raster element 7 of finite extent, so that the following must now be applied:
here p′0<−0.0233. With p′0=−0.024, the following values for the focal distances are obtained from Equation (6) and Equation (7):
Focal distance in the y-direction of the field raster elements with height of 26 mm:
Focal distance in the y-direction of the assigned pupil raster elements:
Focal distance in the x-direction of the field raster elements with height of 1.4 mm:
Focal distance in the x-direction of the assigned pupil raster elements:
For manufacturing reasons, it is preferred to curve the field facets 3 isotropic, i.e., spheric, and to have only pupil raster elements 7 with an anamorphotic effect, in order to compensate for the different aspect ratios of the field raster elements. Field raster elements 3 with different aspect ratios may be designed, for example as follows:
Focal distance of the field raster element with dimensions of 2.8 mm×46 mm:
Focal distance in the y-direction of the assigned pupil raster element:
Focal distance in the x-direction of the assigned pupil raster element:
For another field raster element with a height y0″=20 mm, which is thus narrower and has a smaller aspect ratio, for example, the following results:
Focal distance of the field raster element with dimensions of 2.8 mm×40 mm:
Focal distance in the y-direction of the assigned pupil raster element:
Focal distance in the x-direction of the assigned pupil honeycomb:
And, of course, for the original field raster element with the height of 23 mm:
Focal distance of the field raster element:
Focal distance of the pupil raster element:
A schematic diagram of an illumination system, in which the invention can be used, is shown in
Exit pupil 112 of the illumination system is illuminated for the most part homogeneously by means of the illumination system shown in
The optical part of a projection exposure system beginning at the position of a physical light source 122 up to an object 124 to be exposed is shown in
For the first time an EUV Illumination system, with which the thermal load on the second facetted mirror element can be reduced is provided.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
101 00 265 | Jan 2001 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4682885 | Torigoe | Jul 1987 | A |
5098184 | Van den Brandt et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5251067 | Kamon | Oct 1993 | A |
5315629 | Jewell et al. | May 1994 | A |
5339346 | White | Aug 1994 | A |
5361292 | Sweatt | Nov 1994 | A |
5439781 | MacDowell et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5512759 | Sweatt | Apr 1996 | A |
5581605 | Murakami et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594526 | Mori et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5636003 | Tanitsu et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5662401 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669708 | Mashima et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5677939 | Oshino | Oct 1997 | A |
5719709 | Kodaka | Feb 1998 | A |
5737137 | Cohen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754278 | Kurtz | May 1998 | A |
5805365 | Sweatt | Sep 1998 | A |
5896438 | Miyake et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5912725 | Tanitsu | Jun 1999 | A |
5963305 | Mizouchi | Oct 1999 | A |
6002467 | Nishi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6057899 | Tanaka et al. | May 2000 | A |
6181482 | Grafton | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195201 | Koch et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198793 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219111 | Fukuda et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6260972 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6337759 | Yamamoto | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6400794 | Schultz et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402325 | Yamamoto | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6438199 | Schultz et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6504896 | Miyake et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6507440 | Schultz | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6594334 | Ota | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6637892 | Okuyama et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6704095 | Schultz | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6741394 | Tanitsu et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6833904 | Komatsuda | Dec 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19903807 | Nov 1999 | DE |
WO9949505 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020131181 A1 | Sep 2002 | US |