Examples of imaging optical systems are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,750,948 B2, US 2006/0232867 A1, EP 0 267 766 A2, U.S. Pat. No. 7,209,286 B2 and WO 2006/069 725 A1.
In particular for use within a projection exposure system for microlithography, in particular for the production of microstructured or nano-structured semiconductor components, there is a need for improved imaging properties of imaging optical systems. For example, in imaging optical systems composed of mirrors, it can be desirable to provide a greater numerical aperture or a better correction of imaging errors. Alternatively or additionally, there is a need for simpler manufacture of mirrors at pre-specified dimensions, or for a mirror arrangement that relaxes the requirements on the production of the mirror support in particular, at least for individual mirrors. For example, the number of optical elements required for the imaging and for the correction of imaging errors should be kept as low as possible.
It has been found that imaging optical systems having a mirror that determines, with the outer edge thereof and not with an opening, a pupil obscuration of an obscured optical system, can provide high-aperture objectives with well-corrected imaging errors. The outer edge of the mirror (e.g., which can be a fourth-last mirror in the light path of the imaging optical system) which surrounds the optically effective reflection surface thereof, is either the outer edge of the optically effective reflection surface itself, or the outer edge of a substrate on which the reflection surface is provided, or the outer edge of a mechanical holding structure supporting the reflection surface or the substrate.
A convex fourth-last mirror in the light path of the imaging optical system can allow the imaging optical system to be constructed with relatively low pupil obscuration.
In some embodiments, it is possible to apply an aperture stop to the fourth-last mirror in the light path.
In some embodiments, an advantageously large space is present between the fourth-last and last mirrors. Such embodiments can advantageously avoid problems associated with other imaging optical systems having obscured mirrors and a high numerical aperture in which the region between the fourth-last and the last mirror was a problematically small meaning that either only very thin mirrors or a mirror which was very expensive to produce, comprising reflective coatings on both sides, could be used there.
In certain embodiments, moving the intermediate image plane in the direction of an image plane of the imaging optical system leads, by comparison with other constructions, to reduced requirements on the optical effect of the last two mirrors of the imaging optical system. In contrast, in certain known obscured systems, the intermediate image plane is often spatially arranged at approximately the height of the last mirror in the light path. It has been found that this is not a compulsory requirement because the last mirror in the light path is mostly not decisive as regards the pupil obscuration, in such a way that a relatively large central opening, and thus an intermediate plane separated from the reflection surface of the penultimate mirror, can be tolerated there.
In some embodiments, a distance between an intermediate image and the image plane, along the optical axis, is at most 0.95 times the distance, from the image plane, of the last mirror in the light path. A distance from the image plane of the last mirror in the light path is defined as the distance from the image plane of the piercing point of an optical axis of the imaging optical system through the reflection surface of this mirror. In the case where the optical axis does not pass through the reflection surface of the mirror, i.e., in the case, for example, of an off-axis mirror, the piercing point of the optical axis through a surface which carries on continuously in accordance with the optical design input is selected instead of the piercing point of the optical axis through the reflection surface. If the mirror is rotationally symmetric about the optical axis, this piercing point coincides with the centre of the reflection surface of the mirror. In the case where this last mirror is obscured, the centre of the reflection surface may also lie in the obscuration opening, in which case it is assumed that the reflection surface carries on continuously within the obscuration opening in accordance with the optical design input. The distance of the intermediate image plane from the image plane may for example, be 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 times the distance of the last mirror in the light path from the image plane.
In some embodiments, imaging optical systems have a numerical aperture of at least 0.4 (e.g., at least 0.5, at least 0.6, at least 0.9).
In certain embodiments, imaging optical systems include fewer than 10 mirrors and have a numerical aperture of ≧0.7.
In some embodiments, imaging optical systems include exactly eight mirrors and have a numerical aperture of 0.9.
Imaging optical systems can have a maximum root mean square (rms) wavefront error of less than 10 nm (e.g., less than 5 nm, less than 2 nm, less than 1 nm, less than 0.5 nm).
Such imaging properties can be advantageous for achieving a high local resolution over the whole field. These imaging properties can be independent of the wavelength of the imaging light. The wavelength of the imaging light can range from the EUV range to the visible spectrum. Wavefront errors are preferred which lead to a diffraction limited resolution and which are therefore, in particular, less than one fourteenth of the imaging light wavelength. For EUV wavelengths, a wavefront error which has a root mean square (rms) of less than 1 nm leads to a resolution which is, in practice, diffraction limited.
In some embodiments, the imaging optical system has a maximum distortion of less than 10 nm (e.g., less than 2 nm, less than 0.5 nm).
In certain embodiments, the imaging optical system has a pupil obscuration of less than 20% (e.g., less thank 15%, less than 10%).
A low pupil obscuration, i.e., the proportion of the pupil surface which cannot be used because of the central pupil obscuration, can lead to an advantageously high light throughput for the imaging optical system. Additionally, an imaging optical system with a low pupil obscuration can be more widely used, because the lower the pupil obscuration, the greater the bandwidth of the available illumination means. Imaging optical systems with low pupil obscurations therefore provide high-contrast imaging substantially independently of the type of object structure to be imaged.
Field planes arranged parallel to one another can facilitate the integration of the imaging optical system into structural surroundings. This advantage may be particularly significant when the imaging optical system is used in a scanning projection exposure system, since the scan directions can then be guided parallel to one another.
In certain embodiments, imaging optical systems can have an image field larger than 1 mm2 (e.g., having side lengths of 1 mm and 13 mm). Such image field sizes can lead to a good throughput when the imaging optical system is used in a projection exposure system. Other dimensions of the long and short image field sides are also possible. The short image field sides may also be less than 1 mm or greater than 1 mm. The long image field sides may, for example, also be 5 mm, 10 mm or 15 mm.
Imaging optical systems can have a reduction image scale of eight. Such an imaging scale can allow a low angle of incidence on a reflection mask when using the imaging optical system in a projection exposure system. In this type of application, the use of an imaging scale of this type does not lead to the requirement of unnecessarily large masks.
In some embodiments, an odd number of obscured mirrors are used. For example, three mirrors could be obscured.
Imaging optical systems can include at least one intermediate image, e.g., positioned at a plane folded in the vicinity of a pupil plane (e.g., coinciding with the pupil plane). Such an arrangement can lead to the possibility, in a spatially restricted arrangement, of exerting influences both in a field plane and in a pupil plane of the imaging optical system. This can be particularly expedient for correction purposes.
Principal rays of imaging optical systems can extend divergently to neighbouring field points in the light path from an object plane of the imaging optical system to the first mirror in the light path. Such embodiments can lead to the possibility of supplying on the imaging optical system, directly and without the interposition of additional imaging elements, from a preceding illumination optical system via a pupil component which is the last element before the imaging optical system, it then being possible for this pupil component to be arranged in the pupil plane of the imaging optical system, which plane is disposed so as to precede said imaging optical system.
In certain embodiments, imaging optical systems include exactly six mirrors and form two intermediate images. Such embodiments can be used on the one hand for compact beam guidance and also, on the other hand, for correction purposes.
Projection exposure systems can include an imaging optical system, a light source, and an illumination optical system for guiding light from the light source to the imaging optical system. The light source of the projection exposure system may be in the form of a broadband light source and may have, for example, a bandwidth greater than 1 nm, greater than 10 nm or greater than 100 nm. In addition, the projection exposure system may be constructed in such a way that it can be operated with light sources of different wavelengths. Light sources for other wavelengths, in particular wavelengths used for microlithography, can be used in conjunction with the imaging optical system, for example light sources with wavelengths of 365 nm, 248 nm, 193 nm, 157 nm, 126 nm and 109 nm, and in particular also with wavelengths which are less than 100 nm.
In certain aspects, the invention features methods for producing a microstructured component that include providing a reticle and a wafer, projecting a structure on the reticle onto a light sensitive layer of the a wafer by using a projection exposure system, and producing a microstructure on the wafer.
Embodiments will be described in the following in greater detail with reference to the drawings, in which:
is a view of an embodiment of an imaging optical system, in meridional section.
A projection exposure system 1 for microlithography has a light source 2 for illumination light. The light source 2 is an EUV light source which produces light in a wavelength range in particular of between 10 nm and 30 nm. Other EUV wavelengths are also possible. In general, any desired wavelengths, for example visible wavelengths or any other wavelengths which are used, for example, in microlithography and are available for the appropriate laser light sources and/or LED light sources (for example 365 nm, 248 nm, 193 nm, 157 nm, 129 nm or 109 nm), are possible for the illumination light guided in the projection exposure system 1. A light path of the illumination light 3 is shown extremely schematically in
An illumination optical system 6 guides the illumination light 3 from the light source 2 to an object field 4 (cf.
The image field 8 is bent in an arc shape, the distance between the two arcs which delimit the image field 8 being 1 mm. 1 mm is also the side length of the straight side edges which delimit the image field 8 between the two arcs and which extend parallel to one another. These two straight side edges of the image field 8 are at a distance of 13 mm from one another. The surface of this curved image field corresponds to a rectangular image field with side lengths of 1 mm×13 mm. A square image field 8 of this type is also possible.
Imaging takes place on the surface of a substrate 11 in the form of a wafer which is supported by a substrate holder 12. In
The image field-side numerical aperture of the projection optical system 7 shown in
In order to aid the description of the projection exposure system 1 and the various embodiments of the projection optical system 7, an xyz Cartesian coordinate system is provided in the drawings and shows the respective locations of the components represented in the figures. In
The projection exposure system 1 is a scanner-type device. Both the reticle 10 and the substrate 11 are scanned in the y direction during operation of the projection exposure system 1.
The projection optical system 7 shown in
The optical data for the projection optical system 7 shown in
The second table describes the precise surface form of the reflection surfaces of the mirrors M1 to M8, where the constants K and A to J are to be put into the following equation for the sagittal height:
In this case, h represents the distance from the optical axis 19. Therefore: h2=x2+y2. The reciprocal of “radius” is used for c.
The mirrors M1, M2 and M4 of a first mirror group 18, which includes the mirrors M1 to M4, are shaped as ring segments and are used off-axis with respect to the optical axis 19—completely in the case of the mirrors M1 and M2 and for the most part in the case of the mirror M4. The employed optical reflection surface of the mirrors M, M2 and—for the most part—M4 thus lies at a distance from the optical axis 19. The reflection surfaces of all the mirrors M1 to M8 are rotationally symmetric about the optical axis 19.
The employed reflection surface of the mirror M3 is approximately centred on the optical axis 19 (on-axis).
The mirrors M1, M4, M6, M7 and M8 are concave mirrors. The mirrors M2, M3 and M5 are convex mirrors.
An intermediate image plane 20 of the projection optical system 7 lies between the mirrors M4 and M5. As their course continues, the individual rays 15 pass through an opening 21 in the mirror M6. The mirror M6 is used around opening 21. The mirror M6 is thus an obscured mirror. As well as the mirror M6, the mirrors M7 and M8 are also obscured and both likewise include a opening 21.
The mirror M5, i.e. the fourth-last mirror in the light path before the image field 8, is not obscured and thus has no opening for imaging light. An outer edge 22 of the optically effective reflection surface of the mirror M5 provides a central shadowing of the projection optical system 7, i.e., of the imaging optical system, in the pupil plane 17. The mirror M5 therefore shadows the light path between the mirrors M6 and M7.
The mirror M5 is arranged on the optical axis 19 and lies approximately centrally on said optical axis 19.
In the embodiment shown in
A further intermediate plane 23 lies between the mirror M6 and the mirror M7 in the light path. This is the intermediate image plane which is closest to the image plane 9. This intermediate image plane 23 lies spatially between the last mirror M8 in the light path and the image plane 9. The distance of the intermediate image plane 23 from the image plane 9 is approximately 0.7 times the distance of the last mirror M6 in the light path from the image plane 9.
The projection optical system 7 shown in
The optical data for the projection optical system 7 shown in
The embodiment shown in
The projection optical system 7 shown in
The first intermediate image plane 20 is arranged in the region of the mirror M4 in the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In the projection optical system 7 shown in
The maximum (rms) wavefront error of the projection optical system 7 shown in
The optical data for the projection optical system 7 shown in
The projection optical system 7 shown in
In the projection optical system 7 of
In the embodiment shown in
In the projection optical system 7 shown in
The maximum (rms) wavefront error of the projection optical system 7 shown in
The optical data for the projection optical system 7 shown in
The projection optical system 7 shown in
In the projection optical system 7 shown in
The projection optical system 7 shown in
The projection optical system 7 according to
The mirror M1 is arranged in the opening 21 of the mirror M4. The opening 21 of the mirror M4 is again passed through thrice, similarly to the mirror M6 in the embodiment shown in
The fourth-last mirror M3, the outer edge 22 of which again provides the pupil obscuration of the projection optical system 7 shown in
The distance between the fourth-last mirror M3 and the last mirror M6 is equal to approximately 21.0% of the distance between the object plane 5 and the image plane 9 in the embodiment shown in
The projection optical system 7 shown in
The optical data for the projection optical system 7 shown in
The projection optical system 7 shown in
The mirror M1 is arranged adjacent to the opening 21 of the mirror M4. This arrangement is such that the opening 21 of the mirror M4 is only passed through once for the ray between the mirrors M2 and M3.
The projection optical system 7 shown in
In the embodiment shown in
The projection optical system 7 shown in
The distance between the fourth-last mirror M3 and the last mirror M6 is equal to approximately 22% of the distance of the object plane 5 from the image plane 9 in the embodiment of the projection optical system 7 shown in
The projection optical system 7 shown in
The optical data for the projection optical system 7 shown in
Like the embodiments shown in
The projection optical system 7 shown in
The distance between the fourth-last mirror M3 and the last mirror M6 is equal to approximately 25% of the distance of the object plane 5 from the image plane 9 in the embodiment of the projection optical system 7 shown in
The maximum (rms) wavefront error of the projection optical system 7 shown in
To produce a microstructured or nanostructured component, the projection exposure system 1 is used as follows: Initially, the reflection mask 10, or the reticle and the substrate, or the wafer 11 is prepared. Subsequently, a structure on the reticle 10 is projected onto a light-sensitive layer of the wafer 11 by means of the projection exposure system 1. By developing the light-sensitive layer, a microstructure on the wafer 11, and thus the microstructured component, are then produced.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 051 670 | Oct 2007 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation of PCT/EP2008/008381, filed on Oct. 2, 2008, which claims benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/982,785, filed on Oct. 26, 2007, and to German Application No. 10 2007 051 670.5, filed Oct. 26, 2007. The entire contents of each of the above-referenced applications is incorporated herein by reference. The disclosure relates to imaging optical systems, to projection exposure systems including an imaging optical system, methods for producing microstructured components, and microstructured components produced with these methods.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4804258 | Kebo | Feb 1989 | A |
6750948 | Omura | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6894834 | Mann et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7050152 | Terashima et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7209286 | Mann et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7626770 | Singer et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7682031 | Mann et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20020056815 | Mann et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020154395 | Mann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030021026 | Allan et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040057134 | Dinger | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070743 | Hudyma et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040114217 | Mann et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050122498 | Jasper | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050173653 | Yamada | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060232867 | Mann et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070236784 | Singer et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080118849 | Chandhok et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080170310 | Mann | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080316451 | Mann et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090244696 | Geyl et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100231886 | Mann | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265481 | Mann | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120236282 | Mann | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 612 052 | May 2005 | CN |
10 2005 042 005 | Jul 2006 | DE |
10 2006 017 336 | Oct 2007 | DE |
0 267 766 | May 1988 | EP |
0 689 075 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0 799 528 | Jun 1997 | EP |
1 093 021 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1 093 031 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1 434 093 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1 825 315 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1 930 771 | Jun 2008 | EP |
09 213618 | Aug 1997 | JP |
2001-185480 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2005-500566 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2007-514192 | May 2007 | JP |
2008-176326 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-525831 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2009-532891 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2010-510666 | Apr 2010 | JP |
WO 9619871 | Jun 1996 | WO |
2005059617 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005098506 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2006063605 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006069725 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006119977 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2008063825 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2009052962 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009053023 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English translation of Chinese Office Action corresponding to CN Application No. 2008 8011 3375.1, dated Jun. 24, 2011. |
Hudyma, “An Overview of Optical Systems for 30 nm Resolution Lithography at EUV Wavelengths,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4832, Dec. 1, 2002, pp. 137-148. |
D.A. Tichenor et al., “EUV Engineering Test Stand”, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Feb. 14, 2000, Figs. 6 (preprint UCRL-JC-137668). |
Japanese Office Action, with English translation, for corresponding JP Appl No. 2010-530298, dated Nov. 29, 2012. |
Code V Reference Manual, pp. 2A-114 and 2A-415 (1999). |
Code V Reference Manual, pp. 173 and 237-239 (2012). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100231885 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60982785 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2008/008381 | Oct 2008 | US |
Child | 12767521 | US |