Isolation of incompatible processes in a multi-station processing chamber

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6319553
  • Patent Number
    6,319,553
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 28, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 20, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
A multi-station processing chamber in which incompatible processes are performed includes multiple pedestals positioned in wells with annular gaps around the pedestals. Showerheads located above the pedestals flow reactive gases over substrates located on the pedestals. The reactive gases are drawn through the annular gaps by a pressure gradient. The reactive gases are then pumped out of the wells through an exhaust port. The narrow annular gap permits little recirculation of the reactive gases one they are drawn into the wells. Moreover, the showerheads are flush with ceiling of the chamber and the wells contain smooth contours to minimize dead space in the chamber thereby reducing residence time of the reactive gases. An indexing plate is used to lift the substrates off the pedestals and to accurately position the substrates at the next processing station. In one embodiment a purge plate located on the ceiling of the chamber between the showerheads flows an inert gas, such as argon, to further assist in maintaining a separation between the reactive gases. Thus, while one process, such as a silane initiation is performed at one station, other stations may contemporaneously perform an incompatible process, such as a tungsten hexafluoride-silane nucleation process and hydrogen reduction, thereby increasing throughput.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to processing chambers and in particular the present invention relates to a multi-station processing chamber.




BACKGROUND




Multi-station processing chambers are used to process several substrates, such as semiconductor wafers, within the same chamber. By processing several wafers at once, the throughput of the system is increased. An example of a multi-station processing chamber is the batch chemical vapor deposition (“CVD”) chamber, Concept 2 Altus model, manufactured by Novellus Systems, Inc. located in San Jose, Calif.




While the throughput of multi-station processing chambers is typically greater than single wafer processing chambers, the throughput of a multi-station processing chamber is generally limited by the inability to simultaneously perform incompatible processes. For example, in a CVD tungsten chamber, incompatible reactive gases, such as silane (SiH


4


) and tungsten hexafluoride (WF


6


) are used within the same chamber. If these reactive gases are permitted to mix at critical SiH


4


to WF


6


ratios, particles may be formed in the gas phase, which then may contaminate the wafers being processed. In conventional CVD tungsten chambers, each wafer introduced to the chamber must be brought up to temperature and exposed to silane gas in an initiation step. If the silane gas is exposed to any tungsten hexafluoride during the initiation step, unwanted particles will form. Thus, the tungsten deposition at other stations can occur only after the newly introduced wafer has completed its heating and silane initiation step.




In addition, where reactive gases, e.g., tungsten hexafluoride, migrate from one area in the chamber to other areas in an uncontrolled fashion prior to the completion of other processing steps, such as the silane initiation, the reactive gases may attack the Ti seed/barrier layers causing damage to the devices on the wafers. This mechanism can be independent of the gas phase particle producing phenomena. Thus, during the heating and silane initiation of the wafer, the other stations in the multi-station chamber must remain idle to avoid the uncontrolled migration of reactive gases or the undesirable combination of reactive gases. Consequently, the throughput of a multi-station processing chamber is limited by the idle period of the different stations while incompatible processes are performed in neighboring stations. Alternatively, a multi-station processing chamber must perform certain incompatible processing steps, such as the silane initiation, in a separate reactor, which adds cost and complexity to the system, and may reduce throughput.




SUMMARY




A multi-station processing chamber, in which incompatible processes can be performed simultaneously, includes a base with a plurality of wells in which pedestals are located. The outside edge of the wells and the pedestals define annular gaps. The chamber also includes a top portion with showerheads that are aligned above each of the plurality of pedestals. The showerheads flow reactive gases over substrates, such as semiconductor wafers, that are located on the pedestals. The reactive gases are drawn through the annular gap by a pressure gradient created by a vacuum pump connected to the wells via exhaust ports. The reactive gases are thus drawn through the annular gaps into the wells and out the exhaust port. The narrow annular gaps permit little or no recirculation of the reactive gases once the gases are drawn into the wells. Consequently, the reactive gases are not permitted to mix in an uncontrolled manner at an elevated temperature and pressure sufficient to cause a gas phase reaction, thereby avoiding unintentional creation of gas phase particles. Further, the undesirable migration of reactive gases throughout the chamber is avoided.




The showerheads are flush with the ceiling of the chamber, while the wells contain smooth contours to limit the dead space in the chamber, thereby minimizing residence time of the reactive gases.




The chamber also includes an indexing plate to move the substrates from one station to the next. The substrates are loaded and unloaded via a load/unload port adjacent to one station.




In one embodiment, a purge plate that flows an inert gas, such-as argon, is located between the showerheads on the ceiling of the chamber. The flow of an inert gas between the flow of reactive gases assists in maintaining the desired separation of reactive gases.




Using the chamber in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, incompatible processes may be contemporaneously performed. Thus, a substrate positioned on one pedestal at one station may receive a silane initiation, while another substrate positioned on another pedestal can simultaneously receive a tungsten hexafluoride-silane nucleation or hydrogen reduction. Because each process step may be performed at the same time, there is little or no idle period, thereby increasing throughput.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The above and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying figures, where:





FIG. 1

is an exploded perspective view of a multi-station processing chamber, in which incompatible processes can be simultaneously performed on multiple substrates;





FIG. 2

shows a plan view of the chamber including the chamber base and the wafer indexing plate;





FIG. 3

is a cross-sectional view of the chamber showing a side view of two stations, including the chamber base, wafer indexing plate, and chamber top;





FIG. 4

shows a perspective view of a pedestal in a well;





FIG. 5

is a bottom perspective view of MOER ring that may be used in conjunction with the present invention;





FIG. 6

is an exploded perspective view of a MOER ring, a wafer indexing plate, and a pedestal;





FIG. 7

is a perspective view of four MOER rings raised by a wafer indexing plate;





FIGS. 8A and 8B

are side views of a pedestal and a well, illustrating the operation of the wafer indexing plate;





FIG. 9

shows a side view of station A, including a pedestal, a wafer indexing plate, and a load/unload port, illustrating the loading and unloading of a wafer from the chamber;





FIG. 10

is an exploded perspective view of another embodiment of the chamber in which a purge plate that delivers a uniform flow of an inert gas is located on the chamber top between stations A, B, C, and D; and





FIG. 11

is a cross-sectional view of the chamber with the purge plate producing a flow of an inert gas.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION





FIG. 1

is an exploded perspective view of a multi-station processing chamber


100


, in which incompatible processes can be simultaneously performed on multiple substrates, such as semiconductor wafers, flat panel displays, glass plates or disks or any other device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The present disclosure will refer to the substrates as semiconductor wafers. Chamber


100


includes a chamber base


102


, a wafer indexing plate


104


and a chamber top


106


.





FIG. 2

shows a plan view of chamber base


102


with wafer indexing plate


104


. Chamber top


106


is not shown in

FIG. 2

for clarity.




One example of an embodiment of chamber


100


is the Concept 3 Altus processing chamber manufactured by Novellus Systems, Inc., located in San Jose, Calif. It will be understood that although four pedestals and stations are shown in chamber


100


in

FIGS. 1 and 2

, this number is illustrative. Thus, there is no limitation as to the specific number of pedestals used, only that a plurality of pedestals and stations are used.




As shown in

FIG. 1

, chamber base


102


includes four pedestals


112


,


114


,


116


, and


118


each positioned within a corresponding well


122


,


124


,


126


,


128


. Chamber top


106


includes four showerheads


132


,


134


,


136


, and


138


that are aligned with respective pedestals


112


,


114


,


116


,


118


. It should be understood that showerheads


132




134


,


136


, and


138


are on the interior wall of chamber top


106


, i.e., on the ceiling of chamber


100


, but are explicitly shown on chamber top


106


for the sake of clarity. Each combination of pedestal, well, and showerhead forms an individual processing station within chamber


100


. Thus, the combination of pedestal


112


, well


122


, and showerhead


132


forms station A, the combination of pedestal


114


, well


124


, and showerhead


134


forms station B, the combination of pedestal


116


, well


126


, and showerhead


136


forms station C, and the combination of pedestal


118


, well


128


, and showerhead


138


forms station D. Each station is isolated from the other stations in chamber


100


through the efficient use of gas flow in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Chamber base


102


also includes a wafer load/unload port


110


adjacent to station A, which is used to load and unload wafers into processing chamber


100


.




Where chamber


100


is configured to process 300 mm semiconductor wafers, the inside diameter D


chamber


of chamber


100


, as shown in

FIG. 2

, is approximately 41 inches. The diameter D


ped


of each pedestal is approximately 14 inches.




Showerheads


132


,


134


,


136


, and


138


are used to distribute the reactive gases uniformly over the wafer bearing surfaces of respective pedestals


112


,


114


,


116


, and


118


, where wafers are positioned during processing. The showerheads are, for example, plates of aluminum or other similarly rigid, non-corrosive material, having small holes through which the reactive gases flow. For example, each of showerheads


132


,


134


,


136


, and


138


is 14 inches in diameter and contains approximately 3355 uniformly distributed holes, where each hole is approximately 0.04 inches in diameter. Of course, the particular type of material used for the showerheads, as well as the other parts of chamber


100


, is dependent upon the specific type of processing for which chamber


100


is intended, as will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. Each showerhead is connected to a gas supply (shown in

FIG. 3

) of the particular gases that is distributed by that showerhead. The supply of gas to each showerhead is strictly controlled by a single or multiple mass flow controllers (electro-mechanical devices used to precisely meter gas flow), which in turn are controlled by a microprocessor, digital signal processor or any other appropriate manner (also shown FIG.


3


).




During processing, semiconductor wafers are moved from one pedestal to the next by wafer indexing plate


104


, such that each wafer is sequentially moved through and processed in each station of chamber


100


. Wafer indexing plate


104


may be manufactured from any rigid, non-corrosive material such as aluminum. The outside diameter D


index


of wafer indexing plate


104


, shown in

FIG. 2

, is approximately 40 inches. Wafer indexing plate


104


is shown cross hatched in

FIG. 2

for the sake of clarity.




Wafer indexing plate


104


rests on the top surface


108


of chamber base


102


, when wafers are being processed. A spindle


109


projects from top surface


108


of chamber base


102


and is used to lift wafer indexing plate


104


and rotate wafer indexing plate


104


in a clockwise direction when the wafers in chamber


100


are to be moved to the next processing station. Wafer indexing plate


104


, the rim of top surface


108


around each well, and each pedestal define an annular gap that serves as an opening into each well. Thus, each well


122


,


124


,


126


, and


128


includes a respective annular gap


122




a


,


124




a


,


126




a


, and


128




a


. Wafer indexing plate


104


includes a plurality of notches


162


, which are used to lift a minimum overlap exclusion ring (“MOER” ring) (shown in

FIGS. 5

,


6


, and


7


) and the wafer during indexing.




Each pedestal


112


,


114


,


116


, and


118


includes a plurality of mounting blocks


113


,


115


,


117


, and


119


with small grooves, to assist in aligning wafer indexing plate


104


and lifting the wafers off the pedestals, as will be discussed below in reference to

FIGS. 8A and 8B

. The diameter D


gap


of the annular gaps, is approximately 15 inches, which is the same as the diameter of the holes in wafer indexing plate


104


.





FIG. 3

is a cross-sectional view of chamber


100


along line I—I, as shown in

FIG. 2

, including chamber base


102


, wafer indexing plate


104


, and chamber top


106


.

FIG. 3

shows a side view of pedestals


118


and


116


along with wells


128


,


126


, and showerheads


138


,


136


, all of which form respective stations D and C. Also shown in

FIG. 3

are annular gaps


128




a


and


126




a


defined by wafer indexing plate


104


, the rim


108




a


of top surface


108


and respective pedestals


118


and


116


. As shown in

FIG. 3

, the base of wells


126


and


128


is wider than the width of annular gaps


126




a


and


128




a


. The diameter of the wells at their base is approximately 17 inches. Showerheads


136


and


138


are approximately 1 inch above the wafer bearing surfaces of pedestals


116


and


118


. The extensions


113


,


115


,


117


, and


119


of pedestals


112


,


114


,


116


, and


118


are not shown in

FIG. 3

for the sake of clarity.





FIG. 3

also shows an exhaust port


140


located at the bottom of and is fluidically coupled to well


126


and well


128


. Exhaust port


140


is connected to a vacuum pump


142


. Each well in chamber


100


is connected to the wells on either side by an exhaust port, which is then connected to vacuum pump


142


. Thus, for example, well


128


is also connected to well


122


by an exhaust port, not shown in

FIG. 3

, and well


116


is connected to well


124


by an exhaust port, also not shown in FIG.


3


. Of course, if desired, each well may have a separate exhaust port that is independently connected to vacuum pump


142


or to separate vacuum pumps.




In addition, as shown in

FIG. 3

, showerheads


136


and


138


are connected to separate gas supplies


146


and


148


via respective valves


147


and


149


. The supply of gas to showerheads


136


and


138


is controlled by a controller


150


, such as a mass flow controller which is controlled by a microprocessor, a digital signal processor or the like, that is programmed with the flow rates, duration of the flow, and the sequencing of the processes. Wafer indexing plate


104


is controlled by a system controller that schedules timing throughout the system, and which may be a separate or the same microprocessor, digital signal processor, or the like used in controller


150


. Showerheads


136


and


138


may be connected to the same gas supply, independent gas supplies and/or multiple gas supplies if desired. Thus, several different gases can be independently controlled to flow through each showerhead. It should be understood that the other showerheads in chamber


100


, i.e., showerheads


132


and


134


are similarly connected to gas supplies and controller


150


.




During processing, semiconductor wafers


156


and


158


, shown in

FIG. 3

, are positioned on the wafer bearing surfaces of respective pedestals


116


and


118


. Controller


150


opens valves


147


and


149


permitting gas to flow through showerheads


136


and


138


, as indicated by the dotted lines, while vacuum pump


142


pumps gas out of wells


126


and


128


. A pressure gradient is formed within chamber


100


, with the highest pressure existing below showerheads


136


and


138


and above pedestals


116


and


118


and the lowest pressure at exhaust port


140


and in wells


126


and


128


. Because the gas flows from highest to lowest pressure, the gas is directed through annular gaps


126




a


and


128




a


and into wells


126


and


128


. The presence of annular gaps


126




a


and


128




a


assures a gas flow geometry that isolates each station, i.e., station C from station D and prevents recirculation of the gases within chamber


100


.




Thus, reactive gases from showerheads


136


and


138


react on the surfaces of respective wafers


156


and


158


and then are drawn down into respective wells


126


and


128


, via annular gaps


126




a


and


128




a


, and have little opportunity to migrate toward another pedestal. Any gas that does migrate toward another pedestal will become entrained in the gas flow surrounding that pedestal and will be drawn down into that pedestal's well rather than reaching the pedestal. Once gas is drawn into a well, the gas will be pumped out through exhaust port


140


and will not recirculate back up through annular gaps


126




a


and


128




a


. To aid in the uniform flow of gas through wells


126


and


128


(without any recirculation zones), the walls of chamber


100


, including the wells, should have no sharp angles. Additionally, showerheads should be flush with the bottom surface of chamber top


106


, i.e., the ceiling of chamber


100


, to minimize dead space in chamber


100


, which will limit the residence time of reactive gases and thus further inhibit opportunities for flow stagnation/recirculation to form.




It should be understood that the other stations of chamber


100


, i.e., stations A and B, have similar cross sections to stations C and D shown in FIG.


3


. Thus, the flow of gas in the other stations in chamber


100


has a flow geometry similar to that explained in FIG.


3


.





FIG. 4

shows a detailed perspective view of pedestal


116


in well


126


. Also shown in

FIG. 4

is exhaust port


140


along with a second exhaust port


141


, which connects well


126


with well


124


. Rim


108




a


of top surface


108


is also shown. As shown in

FIG. 4

, pedestal


116


includes three mounting blocks


117




a


,


117




b


, and


117




c


, each with a groove


117




d


,


117




e


, and


117




f


, respectively. Grooves,


117




d


,


117




e


, and


117




f


are used to accurately position the wafers during indexing, as explained below. Each pedestal in chamber


100


has a similar configuration of mounting blocks and grooves as that shown in FIG.


4


.




Wafer


156


may be positioned on pedestal


116


by itself or in conjunction with MOER ring


157


. Each wafer is inserted into a MOER ring as the wafer is loaded into chamber


100


. MOER rings are rings of a non-corrosive material, such as ceramic or aluminum with an inside diameter that is approximately the same as the wafer being inserted. Thus, exposure of the outside diameters of the wafers inserted into an MOER rings is minimized during processing.





FIG. 5

is a bottom perspective view of MOER ring


157


. As can be seen in

FIG. 5

, MOER ring


157


includes a plurality of tongues


170


,


172


, and


174


, each having a respective holder assembly


171


,


173


, and


175


. Holder assemblies


171


,


173


, and


175


are used to lift the wafer when MOER ring


157


is lifted by wafer indexing plate


104


. Bearings within the holder assemblies may be used to assist in aligning the wafer relative to the holder assemblies when the wafer is lifted. Holder assemblies


171


,


173


, and


175


are configured to fit into grooves


117




d


,


117




e


, and


117




f


. The grooves may have sloping side walls and/or bearings to assist in precisely positioning the holder assemblies as wafer indexing plate


104


is lowered to its resting position. Bearings used in conjunction with MOER ring


157


should be manufactured from a non-corrosive material such as sapphire. MOER ring


157


includes an exclusion lip


176


around the inside diameter that rests on or close to the top surface of wafer


156


during processing to prevent the reactive gases from contacting the outer diameter of wafer


156


. For additional information on MOER rings as well as indexing wafers from one location within a chamber to another location see U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/980,125, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Aligning Substrate to Chuck in Processing Chamber,” filed on Nov. 6, 1997, and having the same assignee, which is incorporated herein by reference.





FIG. 6

is an exploded perspective view of MOER ring


157


, wafer indexing plate


104


, and pedestal


116


. The tongues


170


,


172


, and


174


extend over mounting blocks


117




a


,


117




b


, and


117




c


, and fit into notches


162


on wafer indexing plate


104


. As can be seen in

FIG. 6

, if desired, notches


162


may be configured to fit around mounting blocks


117




a


,


117




b


, and


117




c


. In addition, it can be seen in

FIG. 6

that there are a plurality of MOER rings used. Thus, as shown in perspective view in

FIG. 7

, there is a separate MOER ring for each pedestal in chamber


100


.

FIG. 7

shows four MOER rings


157


raised by wafer indexing plate


104


.





FIGS. 8A and 8B

are side views of pedestal


116


, with mounting blocks


117




a


and


117




b


with grooves


117




d


and


117




e


, and well


126


, illustrating the operation of wafer indexing plate


104


.

FIGS. 8A and 8B

also show exhaust port


140


along with exhaust port


141


. Wafer


156


is vacuum clamped to pedestal


116


. Alternatively, wafer


156


may be clamped to pedestal using an electrostatic charge, a mechanical clamp, or gravity. Vacuum chucks, electrostatic chucks, mechanical chucks, and other such type of chucks are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. While wafer


156


is positioned on pedestal


116


, wafer indexing plate


104


is resting on the top surface


108


of chamber base


102


.




As shown in

FIGS. 8A and 8B

, MOER ring


157


includes tongues


170


and


172


with respective holder assemblies


171


and


173


. Holder assemblies


171


and


173


are inserted into grooves


117




d


and


117




e


on pedestal


116


when wafer indexing plate


104


is resting on top surface


108


. It should be understood that there is an additional tongue


174


and holder assembly


175


that is not shown in

FIG. 8A

for the sake of clarity. In addition, wafer indexing plate


104


includes a corresponding set of notches


162


for each tongue on MOER ring


157


.




As illustrated in

FIG. 8B

, when wafer indexing plate


104


is lifted from its resting position by spindle


109


(shown in FIG.


1


), tongues


170


,


172


and


174


(shown in

FIG. 6

) of MOER ring


157


fit into notches


162


of wafer indexing plate


104


. Thus, as wafer indexing plate


104


raises, MOER ring


157


is raised until holder assemblies


171


,


173


, and


175


(shown in

FIG. 6

) are lifted out of grooves


117




d


,


117




e


, and


117




f


(shown in FIG.


6


). Thus, holder assemblies


171


,


173


, and


175


lift wafer


156


off the wafer bearing surface of pedestal


116


. Wafer indexing plate


104


is then rotated until wafer


156


and MOER ring


157


are located over the next pedestal, i.e., pedestal


118


shown in FIG.


3


. Wafer indexing plate


104


is then lowered so that holder assemblies


171


,


173


, and


175


are inserted into corresponding grooves in pedestal


118


. The grooves in pedestal


118


aid in aligning holder assemblies


171


,


173


, and


175


such that wafer


156


and MOER ring


157


are precisely positioned on pedestal


118


.




It should be understood that the use of wafer index plate


104


, along with MOER rings with holder assemblies and grooves in the pedestal into which the holder assemblies are inserted is an example of one indexing system for the wafers in chamber


100


. The present invention is not limited to one particular manner of moving the wafers from one position in chamber


100


to another position, nor is the present invention limited to the use of MOER rings. Thus, other indexing methods exist and may be used in conjunction with chamber


100


as will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, where MOER ring


157


is not used, wafer


156


may be lifted by finger like extensions extending directly from wafer indexing plate


104


. The finger-like extensions from wafer indexing plate


104


rest in grooves


117




d


,


117




e


,


117




f


in pedestal


116


when wafer indexing plate


104


is in its lowered position.





FIG. 9

shows a side view of station A, including pedestal


112


, well


122


, wafer indexing plate


104


, showerhead


132


, and load/unload port


110


.

FIG. 9

also shows pedestal


112


with mounting blocks


113




a


and


113




b


with respective grooves


113




d


and


113




e


. It should be understood that pedestal


112


includes an additional mounting block


113




c


and groove


113




f


that are not shown in FIG.


9


. Exhaust port


143


is positioned between well


122


and well


128


(not shown).





FIG. 9

illustrates the loading and unloading of a wafer


152


. As shown in

FIG. 9

, pedestal


112


includes a set of lift pins


182


and


184


that rise out of grooves


113




d


and


113




e


in pedestal


112


to lift MOER ring


153


via holder assemblies


186


and


188


. Holder assembly


186


is shown as shorter than holder assembly


188


in

FIG. 9

because of foreshortening. An additional lift pin (not shown) rises out of groove


113




f


(not shown) in pedestal


112


to lift a third holder assembly. Lift pins are used to lift MOER ring


153


in a controlled and stable manner. The use of lift pins may be controlled by controller


150


, shown in FIG.


3


. By lifting MOER ring


153


, the wafer


152


is lifted by the holder assemblies of MOER ring


153


.




To load a wafer, e.g., wafer


152


, into chamber


100


, wafer


152


is inserted through load/unload port


110


by a conventional mechanized robot arm


190


, as illustrated by the arrow. Wafer


152


is inserted under MOER ring


153


, but over the holder assemblies of MOER ring


153


. Thus, the holder assemblies of the MOER rings used in conjunction with chamber


100


should be placed sufficiently apart that wafer


152


can pass between them. Robot arm


190


then lowers wafer


152


onto the extensions of the holder assemblies. Once wafer


152


is positioned on the holder assemblies of MOER ring


153


, robot arm


190


is retracted through load/unload port


110


and chamber


100


is sealed. Lift pins


182


and


184


(as well as the lift pin not shown in

FIG. 9

) then lower MOER ring


153


. Wafer indexing plate


104


is in a lowered position during this process.




Where preheating of wafer


152


is desired, the lift pins


182


and


184


are partially lowered and wafer


152


is supported above the wafer bearing surface of pedestal


112


by small springs


192


or a similar type of spacing mechanism, such as a second set of lift pins, to prevent contact between pedestal


112


and wafer


152


. The separation between wafer


152


and pedestal


112


during preheating is approximately 0.014 inches. Once wafer


152


is preheated, wafer


152


may be lowered onto the wafer bearing surface of pedestal


112


by vacuum clamping wafer


152


downward to overcome the spring resistance of springs


192


or by lowering the second set lift pins. If desired, wafer


152


may be momentarily lifted via MOER ring


153


and lift pins


182


and


184


(as well as the lift pin not shown in

FIG. 9

) a second time to realign wafer


152


with respect to MOER ring


153


prior to clamping wafer


152


onto pedestal


112


. Lift pins


182


and


184


are then completely lowered.




To unload a wafer, e.g., wafer


152


, from chamber


100


, wafer indexing plate


104


is rotated and then lowers wafer


152


onto pedestal


112


. Lift pins are raised to lift holder assemblies out of the grooves in pedestal


112


, thereby lifting wafer


152


off the wafer bearing surface of pedestal


112


. Mechanized robot arm


190


is inserted through load/unload port


110


until it is positioned under wafer


152


. Robot arm


190


lifts wafer


152


off the holder assemblies and retracts wafer


152


through load/unload port


110


. Another wafer may then be loaded into chamber


100


as described above.





FIG. 10

is an exploded perspective view of chamber


200


, which is similar to chamber


100


, like designated elements being the same. However, chamber top


206


includes a purge plate


210


that delivers a uniform flow of an inert gas, such as argon, between stations A, B, C, and D. The flow of inert gas is used to assist in maintaining separation of the reactive gases flowing at each station to isolate each station. Purge plate


210


has a diameter of 41 inches, i.e., the diameter of the interior of chamber


200


, and has approximately 7344 holes each with a diameter of 0.063 inches.





FIG. 11

is a cross-sectional view of chamber


200


including chamber base


102


, wafer indexing plate


104


and chamber top


206


with purge plate


210


.

FIG. 11

is similar to

FIG. 3

, like designated elements being the same. However, as shown in

FIG. 11

, chamber top


206


includes purge plate


210


, which is connected to a gas supply


212


via a valve


214


. Controller


150


controls the flow of gas from gas supply


212


to purge plate


210


. Gas supply


212


contains an inert gas, for example argon. During processing, the inert gas flows through purge plate


210


between station C and D, as well as between the other stations of chamber


200


, while the reactive gases flow through the showerheads above the pedestals. Vacuum pump


142


pumps the gas out of the wells, such that a pressure gradient is formed with the highest pressure being above the wafer bearing surfaces of the pedestals and the lowest pressure being in the wells. Thus, as shown in

FIG. 11

, the gases, including the reactive gases and the inert gas, are drawn into wells


126


and


128


through respective annular gaps


126




a


and


128


and out through exhaust port


140


. The flow of reactive gases as well as inert gas is illustrated in

FIG. 11

as broken lines.




To minimize dead space and to aid in the smooth flow of the gases, purge plate


210


should be flush with the showerheads of chamber


200


, which will assist in reducing the residence time of the reactive gases.




By way of an example, the performance of chamber


100


will be described in terms of a tungsten deposition process. The deposition of tungsten is well understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. It will be understood that the described tungsten deposition process may be varied according to desired results and that other alternative processes may be used in accordance with other embodiments of the present invention. Further, the described process is intended to illustrate the isolation of incompatible processes within a multi-station chamber, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, and is not intended as an explanation of the tungsten deposition processes itself.




A process cycle in chamber


100


begins with wafers positioned in stations B, C, and D, and a wafer, i.e., wafer


152


, being loaded into station A. As described above in reference to

FIG. 9

, wafer


152


is loaded into MOER ring


153


at station A above pedestal


112


. Prior to clamping wafer


152


to pedestal


112


, wafer


152


and MOER ring


153


are lowered such that wafer


152


is held slightly above the wafer bearing surface of pedestal


112


, e.g., by springs


192


shown in

FIG. 9

, and wafer


152


is preheated for approximately ten seconds to 445° C. as described above in reference to FIG.


9


. Wafer


152


is then vacuum clamped to pedestal


112


(MOER ring


153


is not clamped, but rests on the surface of pedestal


112


only by the force of gravity). If desired, lift pins can momentarily raise MOER ring


153


and wafer


152


so as to realign wafer


152


with MOER ring


153


prior to vacuum clamping wafer


152


to pedestal


112


.




During the loading and unloading processes, as well as all the other processing steps, chamber


100


remains at same desired pressure, e.g., 40 torr. Because wafer indexing plate


104


is in a lowered position during the loading and preheating of wafer


152


, the wafers at stations B, C, and D may be clamped and processing at stations B, C, and D may occur, prior to the wafer at station A being clamped. The combination of wafer


152


and MOER ring


153


will be described as wafer


152


, unless otherwise indicated.




A silane (SiH


4


) initiation is performed by feeding silane gas from showerhead


132


at 95 sccm (standard cubic centimeters per minute) over wafer


152


clamped to pedestal


112


. Showerhead


132


also provides a flow of hydrogen (H


2


) at 6400 sccm and argon at 5400 sccm with the silane gas flow. If desired, the silane initiation may occur while preheating wafer


152


.




The wafers positioned at stations B, C, and D are clamped to respective pedestals


114


,


116


, and


118


and are simultaneously processed while wafer


152


is being pre-heated and clamped on pedestal


112


at station A and receives the silane initiation. of course, each of the wafers at stations B, C, and D have already received processing at each of the previous stations.




Once the silane initiation of wafer


152


at station A is complete or the process steps at stations B, C, or D are complete, whichever is longer, the reactive gases at each station are turned off. The reactive gases are permitted to drain out of chamber


100


via the exhaust ports. The non-reactive gases, e.g., the hydrogen and argon at stations A, B, C, and D, continue to flow while the reactive gases are drained out of chamber


100


, thereby maintaining the desired isolating gas flow pattern, e.g., as shown in FIG.


3


. If the wafers on pedestals


112


,


114


,


116


, and


118


are indexed to the next stations prior to the reactive gases draining out of chamber


100


, the reactive gases may combine in an undesirable manner resulting in contamination of the wafers. The amount of time necessary to permit the reactive gases to drain out of chamber


100


is dependent on the residence time of the reactive gases, but is typically five to ten seconds. Once the reactive gases have drained out, the vacuum clamps holding the wafers to the pedestals are turned off and wafer indexing plate


104


raises off top surface


108


lifting the MOER rings, which consequently lift the wafers off the pedestals. Wafer indexing plate


104


rotates to position the wafers in the next processing stations. Thus, wafer


152


is located in station B above pedestal


114


.




After lowering wafer indexing plate


104


to position the wafers on the pedestals, the wafer that is now located at station A and which has finished the tungsten deposition process is raised via the lift pins and unloaded via load/unload port


110


. A new unprocessed wafer is then loaded into station A, the lift pins are partially lowered and the new wafer is preheated. When the new wafer is preheated, the lift pins can be completely lowered thereby positioning the newly loaded wafer on pedestal


112


. The new wafer at station A is then vacuum clamped.




Wafer


152


, which is now clamped to pedestal


114


in station B receives silane and tungsten hexafluoride (WF


6


) nucleation. Showerhead


134


feeds tungsten hexafluoride gas at 250 sccm and silane at 95 sccm along with a flow of hydrogen (H


2


) at 5000 sccm and argon at 6400 sccm. The duration of the tungsten hexafluoride gas flow is dependent on the desired film thickness.




In some embodiments, for example, where a thin film is to be deposited on the wafers, the silane initiation process from station A is continued at station B. For the continued silane initiation process, showerhead


134


flows silane gas at 95 sccm along with hydrogen at 5000 sccm and argon at 6400 sccm. Using the continued silane initiation process at station B reduces the amount of time that wafer


152


must spend at station A. Consequently the amount of time a wafer spends at any one station is reduced, which produces a thinner film. After the silane initiation process at station B is complete, the tungsten hexafluoride-silane nucleation step is performed.




With the tungsten hexafluoride-silane nucleation step complete, as well as the respective process steps at the other stations, the showerheads in chamber


100


again shut off the reactive gases so that the reactive gases can drain out of chamber


100


. The vacuum clamps are released, wafer indexing plate


104


raises and rotates to place the wafers in the next processing station. The wafers are then vacuum clamped. Thus, wafer


152


is now at station C vacuum clamped to pedestal


116


. Again, the wafer at station A is unloaded and a new wafer is loaded and preheated.




A hydrogen (H


2


) reduction of the tungsten hexafluoride occurs at station C. Showerhead


136


flows tungsten hexafluoride at 250 sccm along with a flow of hydrogen at 5000 sccm and argon at 4400 sccm. When the process steps at each of the respective stations have been completed, wafer


152


is moved to pedestal


118


at station D via wafer indexing plate


104


according to the same indexing process, including draining the reactive gases, lifting the wafers, rotating, and lowering the wafers. The process step at station D is the same as station C. Thus, showerhead


138


flows tungsten hexafluoride at 250 sccm along with a flow of hydrogen at 5000 sccm and argon at 4400 sccm. Wafer


152


completes the tungsten deposition process at station D.




Again at the appropriate time, the wafers are rotated to the next processing stations via wafer indexing plate


104


. Thus, wafer


152


, which has completed the tungsten deposition process, is located in station A. Wafer


152


is then unloaded via load/unload port


110


, as described in reference to

FIG. 9

, thereby completing the process cycle.




It should be understood that with use of chamber


100


, the deposition processes are divided into four equal time periods. The deposition process, however, includes several steps, such as preheating, silane initiation, tungsten hexafluoride-silane nucleation, and hydrogen reduction of tungsten hexafluoride, that do not have the same time requirements. Each process step is dependent on process parameters, such as desired temperature, flow rates, and desired film thickness. Thus, some stations in chamber


100


may perform only a portion of a process step while other stations perform multiple steps. However, because incompatible processes may occur simultaneously within chamber


100


, the location and duration of each process step may be optimized, without concern to incompatible processes. Consequently, the throughput of multi-station processing chamber


100


is greater than conventional processing chambers. Of course, where a number of stations other than four is used in a multi-station processing chamber in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the processing steps must be proportionally divided into that number of stations.




In a conventional multi-station chamber system, the process steps at stations B, C, and D cannot occur simultaneously with the processing that occurs at station A. If the reactive gases of the tungsten deposition stations, e.g. tungsten hexafluoride, were to flow while silane is flowing, a commingling of the gases would lead to the detrimental formation of particles in the chamber. In addition, migration of the tungsten hexafluoride to station A prior to the silane initiation step can attack devices that are on the wafer. Consequently, in a conventional multi-station chamber, the incompatible gases must flow one at a time and therefore there is a period where the wafers must remain idle at their individual stations. Alternatively, the silane initiation step could be done in a separate reactor, but this adds cost and complexity to the system.




In chamber


100


, however, the incompatible processes may be performed simultaneously because stations A, B, C, and D are isolated by the flow patterns of the gases. As shown in

FIG. 3

, the flow patterns of the reactive gases are directed through the annular gaps and into the wells where the gas is drained out the exhaust ports. Thus, chamber


100


limits the amount of crossover or commingling of the gases.




In another embodiment, shown in

FIGS. 10 and 11

, purge plate


210


is used to flow argon between the stations of chamber


100


. During processing, purge plate


210


flows argon gas at 50 slm (standard liters per minute). Of course, other types of gases may also be used, such as hydrogen, although hydrogen is not truly inert. Hydrogen will reduce WF


6


to W+HF, but in the absence of SiH


4


+WF


6


, the hydrogen will not react and thus can be used. Purge plate


210


continues to flow argon throughout the deposition process, including during the rotation of wafer indexing plate


104


with the wafers. The use of an argon gas flow from purge plate


210


assists in directing the flow of the reactive gases down into the wells where the reactive gases are drained out. The reactive gases are thus directed away from neighboring stations and into the wells and exhaust ports, thereby preventing the tungsten hexafluoride at stations B, C, and D from crossing over to station A as well as preventing the silane gas at station A from crossing over to stations B, C, or D.




Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain versions thereof, other versions are possible. For example, the number of pedestals and stations used in the multi-station processing chamber may be varied according to the desired process. Further, the type of processing performed within the chamber is not limited to tungsten deposition, but may be any other process. The particular inert gas used to isolate the stations of the chamber is not limited to one particular gas, but may be any inert gas or combination of inert gases. Moreover, the specific configuration of chamber


100


may be varied to accommodate any desired number of isolated stations, pedestals, and/or processes. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the versions depicted in the figures.



Claims
  • 1. A method of processing multiple substrates within a single chamber, said method comprising:flowing a first gas supply over a second substrate at a first station within said chamber; and flowing a second gas supply over a first substrate at a second station within said chamber; providing a separation between said first gas supply and said second gas supply by flowing said first gas supply over said second substrate and into a first annular gap around said second substrate and out an exhaust port, and by flowing said second gas supply over said first substrate into a second annular gap around said first substrate and out said exhaust port.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said first substrate is loaded into said chamber at said first station and moved to said second station prior to said second substrate being loaded into said chamber at said first station.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 further comprising:moving said second substrate and said first substrate, whereby said second substrate is positioned at said second station; and flowing said second gas supply over said second substrate at said second station.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:waiting for said first gas supply and said second gas supply to drain out of said chamber prior to moving said second substrate and said first substrate.
  • 5. The method of claim 3 wherein moving said second substrate and said first substrate positions said first substrate at a third station within said chamber, said method further comprising:flowing a third gas supply over said first substrate at said third station; and providing a separation between said third gas supply and said first gas supply and said second gas supply by flowing said third gas supply over said first substrate and into a third annular gap around said first substrate and out said exhaust port.
  • 6. The method of claim 3 further comprising:loading a third substrate into said chamber at said first station after moving said second substrate and said first substrate; heating said third substrate; flowing said first gas supply over said third substrate at said first station; and providing a separation between said first gas supply and said second gas supply by flowing said first gas supply over said third substrate and into said first annular gap around said third substrate and out said exhaust port, and by flowing said second gas supply over said second substrate into said second annular gap around said second substrate and out said exhaust port.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein said flow of a first gas supply at said first station is at least one of silane initiation, tungsten hexafluoride-silane nucleation and hydrogen reduction of tungsten hexafluoride.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein said flow of a second gas supply at said second station is at least one of silane initiation, tungsten hexafluoride-silane nucleation and hydrogen reduction of tungsten hexafluoride.
  • 9. The method of claim 6, wherein said flow of a third gas supply at said third station is at least one of silane initiation, tungsten hexafluoride-silane nucleation and hydrogen reduction of tungsten hexafluoride.
  • 10. The method of claim 6, said processing is tungsten deposition processing, and wherein said flow of a first gas supply at said first station is at least silane initiation, said flow of a second gas supply at said second station is at least a tungsten hexafluoride-silane nucleation, and said flow of a third gas supply at least said third station is a hydrogen reduction of tungsten hexafluoride.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, further comprising a flow of said first gas supply at said second station as a continued silane initiation prior to flowing said second gas supply for tungsten hexafluoride-silane nucleation.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising:flowing a purging gas supply between said first station and said second station; providing a separation between said first gas supply and said second gas supply by flowing said purging gas supply into said first annular gap and said second annular gap and out said exhaust port, said purging gas supply impedes said first gas supply and said second gas supply from combining.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein said first gas supply comprises a silane gas, said second gas supply comprises a tungsten hexafluoride gas, and said purging gas supply comprises an argon gas.
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional of application No. 09/168,624filed Oct. 8, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,143,082, issued Nov. 7, 2000, intitled “Isolation Of Incompatible Processes In A Multi-Station Processing Chamber”.

US Referenced Citations (7)
Number Name Date Kind
5133284 Thomas et al. Jul 1992
5230741 van de Ven et al. Jul 1993
5238499 van de Ven et al. Aug 1993
5302209 Maeda et al. Apr 1994
5338362 Imahashi Aug 1994
5779803 Kurono et al. Jul 1998
6143082 McInerney et al. Nov 2000
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
E.J. McInerney, “Study of station flow dynamics in a sequential multiwafer chemical vapor deposition batch reactor using reactor modeling”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14(3), May/Jun. 1996, 1996 American Vacuum Society, pp. 1152-1155.