Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.
Making electrical connections at bonding interfaces has become paramount in microelectronics, as the transistor density that can be arrayed in a given 2-dimensional area has doubled every 18-24 months, for decades. Conventional flip chip connectors between semiconductor die and circuit board provide 45 contact bump connections per square millimeter (sq. mm), with each connection averaging 180 microns (μm) in bonding pitch. Conventional micropillar connectors improve upon conventional flip chip connectors, providing 625 pillar connections per sq. mm, with each connection averaging 40 μm in pitch. Bond pad width may be considered the size of the conductive pads to be bonded, while pitch refers to the distance between connections. Making 1,000,000 connections per sq. mm requires a bond pitch of 1 μm, for example, with a pad size that is likely around 0.5 μm. For wafer-to-wafer or die-to-wafer bonding that includes electrical interconnects, direct bonding techniques that include direct metal-to-metal bonding, such as “direct bond interconnect” (DBI® brand) direct hybrid bonding, can provide 100,000-1,000,000 connections per sq. mm, with each connection averaging from <1 μm-40 μm in pitch (Invensas Inc., a subsidiary of Xperi Corp., San Jose, CA). Even greater connection density is feasible with connections that are less than 1 μm in pitch.
Direct hybrid bonding processes, such as DBI® direct hybrid bonding, presuppose ultra-flat bonding surfaces, and so high density connections to be made by such direct bonding rely on varieties of chemical-mechanical planarization (CMP) processes to make the surfaces to be bonded flat to within a few ten-thousandths of a micron (within a few tenths of a nanometer) over a large surface. Various CMP processes can achieve a depth-of-field flatness sufficient for photolithography, or sufficient for 22 nanometer node technology, for example.
To achieve such exceptionally fine-pitch 3D electrical interconnects at ultra-high density, the alignment and bonding processes must also be finely tuned. The alignment and dielectric (nonmetal) bonding parts of the direct hybrid bonding process can be performed at room temperature. The dielectric portions of the bonding surfaces (for example, silicon oxide) forms oxide-to-oxide bonding spontaneously when the prepared surfaces are bought together. The metal pads or vias that are confined in the dielectric material, however, are slightly recessed from the dielectric surface that makes up the horizontal bonding interface, such that the metal pads do not impede bonding of the dielectric surfaces upon contact of the dielectric surfaces with each other.
Conventional annealing stages of direct hybrid bonding processes are at a raised temperature. At these higher annealing temperatures, the metal pads or vias expand vertically more than the surrounding dielectric material, due to the difference in coefficients of thermal expansion (CTEs) between metals and dielectrics. If the recess is sufficiently shallow, the metal vias or pads on each side of the surface being bonded will expand to bridge the small gap between the two metal surfaces and form a physical contact with each other at a certain self-expansion. The oxide-to-oxide bonding of the dielectrics around the metal pads further strengthens at these higher annealing temperatures to allow the metal pads to expand into each other and permanently bond. Bonding between metal pads initiates when copper atoms (for example, for copper pads) at each surface begin to make mutual metallic bonds with other copper atoms on the other side of the interface. No solder or other adhesives are used in the direct hybrid bonding process of electrical interconnects in this manner.
But the temperatures used in conventional annealing steps for direct hybrid bonding can place thermal stress on ever-smaller semiconductor components used in microelectronics. This annealing temperature could be lowered, but thermal expansion at lower temperatures is limited and requires very precise control of copper pad placement with respect to the recess distance of the metal pads from the bonding interface at room temperature, a precise control that is difficult to achieve in high volume manufacturing. This recess distance results from the CMP step, resulting in a very narrow manufacturing window that is impractical: any slight protrusion of the metal pad above the horizontal plane of the bonding interface composed of the dielectric surface can impede the spontaneous dielectric bonding phase of the direct hybrid bonding process that occurs at room temperature, and this causes overall bonding failure. Structures and processes that could otherwise lower the annealing temperature for direct metal-to-metal bonding of interconnects are desirable for further progress in 3D semiconductor packaging.
Layer structures for making direct metal-to-metal bonds at low temperatures and shorter annealing duration in microelectronics are provided. Example bonding interface structures enable direct metal-to-metal bonding of interconnects at low annealing temperatures of 150° C. or below, and at a lower energy budget due to shorter annealing times. The example structures provide a precise metal recess distance for conductive pads and vias being bonded that can be achieved in high volume manufacturing. The example structures provide a vertical stack of conductive layers confined by a surrounding dielectric with geometries and thermal expansion features designed to vertically expand the stack over the precise recess distance at lower temperatures to make the direct metal-to-metal bonds at the bonding interface without solders or adhesives. Further enhancements, such as surface nanotexture and copper crystal plane selection, can further actuate the direct metal-to-metal bonding at lowered annealing temperatures and shorter annealing durations.
This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Certain embodiments of the disclosure will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements. It should be understood, however, that the accompanying figures illustrate the various implementations described herein and are not meant to limit the scope of various technologies described herein.
Overview
This disclosure describes layer structures for making direct metal-to-metal bonds at low temperatures and short annealing durations in microelectronics. Example bonding interface structures enable direct metal-to-metal bonding of interconnects at low annealing temperatures of 150° C. or below. The example structures provide a precise metal recess specification of 4-6 nanometers, for example, that can be achieved in high volume manufacturing. In direct hybrid bonding, direct bonding of dielectric surfaces occurs first across a bonding interface. Then, in an anneal stage, the recessed vias or pads at the precise recess distance can expand at a low annealing temperature and shorter annealing duration to bridge the gap and form direct metal-to-metal bonds.
Reducing the energy budget or “thermal budget” for creating direct hybrid bonds, including metal-to-metal bonding of conductive interconnects, includes not only lowering annealing temperatures but also lowering the duration of the annealing phase of hybrid bonding. Example techniques are also described herein for shortening the annealing duration.
Significantly, example structures enabling direct hybrid bonds to be formed at a reduced energy budget allow hundreds-of-thousands or even over one-million electrical interconnects per square millimeter to be completed at lower temperatures and lower energy budget than temperatures conventionally applied in direct hybrid bonding of metal interconnects. Direct bonding can be accomplished either through thermal compression bonding or hybrid bonding. Hybrid bonding is described herein as an example. The example low-temperature processes are safer for semiconductor components and fabrication apparatuses, and also less expensive to implement. The example low-temperature processes also enable application of direct hybrid bonding to components and products that cannot be annealed at conventional annealing temperatures of 250° C. and above.
Example Bonding Interface Structures
Low-temperature direct metal-to-metal bonding is attractive for some applications. But the vertical thermal expansion needed to bond metals together in direct hybrid bonding processes is limited at lower temperatures compared with the vertical thermal expansion achievable at those annealing temperatures used conventionally, triggering a need for precise control of the structure of the bonding interface before the bonding can occur at the lower temperatures.
Specifically, as shown in
In an implementation, to enable direct bonding of metal interconnects at low temperatures, the maximum recess distance 104 between the metal pads 100 that are to be bonded and the horizontal plane of the larger bonding interface 102 is designed to be only a few nanometers (per side), and the metal pads 100 and structures 106 underlying the metal pads 100 are designed to expand with a calculated thermal expansion sufficient to raise each metal pad 100 into an opposing metal pad 100′ belonging to the other surface being joined, in order to direct-bond the metal pads 100 & 100′ into a single metal interconnect 110 after the bond. The maximum recess distance 104 between each metal pad 100 and its respective larger bonding interface 102 or 102′ is critical for achieving low-temperature direct bonding. If the specification for recess distance 104 is too small, for example, then control of the CMP process control is difficult and the risk of having the metal pad 100 protrude above the dielectric surface 102 increases. If the metal pads 100 are slightly higher than the larger bonding interface 102, then no dielectric bonding in layer 108 occurs around the protruded pads. If a sufficient number of the protruded pads disrupt bonding of the surrounding larger dielectric surface 102, bonding failure occurs.
On the other hand, if the recess distance 104 is too large, then the metal pads 100 & 100′ do not expand enough at the lower annealing temperature to make contact at the bonding interface 102, once thermal expansion of the metal pads 100 and the underlying structures 106 is spent. This results in oxide-to-oxide bonding of the nonmetal parts 108 of the bonding interface 102, but no bonding of the metal pads 100 & 100,′ since the metal pads 100 & 100′ never make contact with each other across the bonding interface 102. The dielectric surfaces bond, but with no electrical interconnects across the joined surfaces.
When copper is the metal being direct-bonded, higher temperatures of an annealing step can actuate changes in grain-size for the copper metal on each side of the metal-to-metal bond. This too can be reckoned favorably into low-temperature direct bonding. Likewise, the metal surfaces 100 to be bonded can be intentionally modified to favor bonding at lower temperatures. Conventionally, the CMP process presents surfaces of pure materials, at which metal areas of the flattened surface are free of oxides and impurities. The bonding surface can be activated with plasma, to decrease activation energy for forming bonds and to create some disruption in charge balances at the surface that favors bond formation. In an implementation herein, metal pads 100 to be direct-bonded as interconnects may also be topped by creating nanoparticles of the metal on the bonding surface, to increase the bonding surface area exponentially and physically catalyze or seed metallic direct-bonding. In another implementation, selection of a copper crystal plane increases the rate that copper atoms diffuse across the bonding interface to form permanent metal-to-metal bonds, thereby enabling a reduced annealing temperature and shorter annealing durations.
From the horizontal surface of the bonding interface 102, the recess distance 104 of the top surface 210 of the first conductive layer 206 in the vertical stack 204 varies by temperature, because the conductive layers 206 & 208 expand or contract in relation to the temperature. For a given layer structure 200, the recess distance 104 at room temperature has a specific range for a given annealing temperature for direct metal-to-metal bonding. The recess is dependent on the volume and geometry of the two conductors 206 & 208 in the vertical stack 204, and their respective coefficients of thermal expansion α1 & α2.
In an implementation, at an annealing temperature below conventional annealing temperatures around 250° C., the vertical stack 204 thermally expands so that at least part of the top surface 210 of the first conductive layer 206 expands or bulges over the recess distance 104 to the horizontal surface of the bonding interface 102, putting the top surface 210 in position for making a direct metal-to-metal bond at the bonding interface 102 with another instance of a vertical stack 204 on the other side of the bonding interface. The actual annealing temperature may be between 150-200° C., or may be around 150° C., or may even be below 150° C. These approximate temperatures are much lower than conventional temperatures around 250° C. needed for the anneal step in direct hybrid bonding.
In this implementation, the second conductive layer 208 of the vertical stack 204 resides below the first conductive layer 206 and is conductively connected to the first conductive layer 206. The second conductive layer 208 may have a second coefficient of thermal expansion α2.
At least one bottom layer 212 beneath the vertical stack 204 consists of the material of a semiconductor die or wafer, or a substrate material, such as glass, dielectric, conductor, etc.
The dielectric confinement layer 108, such as silicon dioxide, provides a confinement matrix around the vertical conductive stack 204, and has substantially lower CTE than the metal stack 204 in order to provide substantial confinement of horizontal expansion forces of the metal stack 204 and thereby generate substantial vertical expansion in the buried conductive layer 208. The dielectric layer 108 is rigid enough to substantially constrain most expansion of the vertical stack 204 to within the vertical stack 204 itself. Thus, by confining expansion forces, the dielectric layer 108 transforms horizontal thermal expansions of the first conductive layer 206 and the second conductive layer 208 into vertical expansion within the vertical stack 204. Example processes for building the dielectric layer(s) 108 and example vertical conductive stacks 204 are described below, with respect to
As shown in
Referring again to
In an implementation, the maximum recess distance 104 is determined as in Equation (1), by:
δ=α*×h×ΔT (1)
wherein δ is the recess distance 104, α* is an effective CTE of the vertical stack 204 of conductive layers 206 & 208, h is a thickness of the vertical stack 204 of conductive layers 206 & 208, which consist of three components: α*1, α*2, and α*3, and ΔT is the temperature change between the room temperature and the annealing temperature.
α*=α*1+α*2+α*3. (2)
The first component (α*1) of the effective CTE α* of the entire vertical stack 204 of conductive layers 206 & 208 represent the vertical component of thermal expansion of the stack 204 and can be approximated by a composite CTE of the vertical stack 204 of the layers 206 & 208. The composite CTE of the vertical stack 204 can be determined in Equation (2), by:
α*1=α1×h1/(h1+h2)+α2×h2/(h1+h2) (3)
where α1 is the CTE of the first conductive layer 206 of the vertical stack 204, α2 is the CTE of the second conductive layer 208 of the vertical stack 204, h1 is the thickness 214 of the first conductive layer 206, and h2 is the thickness 216 of the second conductive layer 208. The total thickness of metal in the stack 204, consisting of the first conductive layer 206 and the second conductive layer 208 and any optional additional layers, increases the thermal expansion beyond what can be achieved without a stacked structure, such as having only the first conductive layer 206. The combined thickness h=h1+h2 of the metal stack 204 is greater than thickness h1 of the first conductive layer 206 alone, and therefore lowers the annealing temperature for a given value of the metal recess distance 104.
The second component (α*2) of the effective CTE α* of the entire vertical stack 204 is the contribution (α*2) of the horizontal expansion of the second buried metal layer 208, which is converted to vertical expansion because of confinement by the dielectric 108. When the horizontal footprint of the buried metal layer 208 is larger than that of the first buried conductive layer 206 above it, the α*2 contribution is even more significant.
The third component of the effective CTE α* of the vertical stack 204 (α*3) is related to the surface area φ1 of the top surface 210 of the first conductive layer 206, this surface 210 can be the metal “pad” to be bonded. The movement of the outer edge of conductive layer 206 is constrained by the dielectric confinement matrix 108, since the two are adjacent. During design, increasing the surface area of the top surface 210 of the first conductive layer 206 provides less constraint to thermal expansion in the volume of metal within the first conductive layer 206 that is further away from the interface between the first conductive layer 206 and the constraining dielectric matrix 108. Consequently, at a given annealing temperature, the center portion of the top surface 210 on a large metal pad or conductive layer 206 expands further compared to a small pad with a small top surface 210. This contribution to the effective CTE α* of the entire vertical stack 204 is captured with α*3 as in Equation (2).
Structural designs, for example direct metal-to-metal bonding, that incorporate the following features and parameters can substantially reduce the annealing temperature of conductive vias 206 with example recesses 104 greater than 1-2 nm, to below 200° C., and even below 150° C. An example structure has a thick upper metal via 206, with h1 thicker than 0.5 μm for example, in an example range of 0.6-2.0 μm. The upper metal via 206 is conductively conducted to one or more buried metal layers 208, such as one or more trace layers of the BEOL stack layer, to increase effective total stack thickness h 204. When the buried metal layer 208 consists of part of a trace, the buried metal layer 208 can be intentionally thicker than usual trace layers, for example, in the range of 0.5-1.5 μm. The example buried metal layer 208 has a larger footprint (horizontal cross-section) than the via layer 206 above it. The larger than usual top surface area 210 of the upper via 206 also enables a lower annealing temperature for forming metal-to-metal bonds. For example, a conventional circular upper via 206 has a 3 μm diameter top surface 210, while an example enlarged upper via 206 as described herein for lowering the annealing temperature may have an upper circular pad surface 210 with a 5 μm, 10 μm, or 15 μm diameter.
For a given annealing temperature, the larger the metal recess distance 104, the higher the annealing temperature that is required. The smaller the recess distance 104, the lower the required annealing temperature that is required for a metal-to-metal bond to occur. However, for CMP process control and high-volume manufacturing, a very small recess specification is not desirable. By increasing the total metal thickness h1214 below the via surface 210, the slope of the line gets smaller in the plot, and then for a given recess 104, the calculated annealing temperature is lower with the greater total thickness 214 of the upper metal via 206.
The impact of the metal thickness 214 and other dimensions is demonstrated with the following example. For a 3 μm diameter via 206 with a 6 nm recess distance 104, if the upper metal via 206 has a vertical thickness (h1) 214 of 0.8 μm and the buried trace 208 that the upper metal via 206 is connected to has a vertical thickness (h2) 216 of 0.2 μm for a total metal h thickness 204 of 1.0 μm, then the calculated annealing temperature is close to 300° C. But when the buried metal trace 208 (which can be more than one layer) is increased to 0.8 μm to give a total metal stack thickness (h) 204 of 1.6 μm, then the calculated annealing temperature is reduced to 180° C. When the upper via layer 206 is increase to 1.3 μm for a total metal stack thickness (h) 204 of 2.1 μm, then the calculated annealing temperature is reduced to 130 C. Further increases in the metal stack thickness (h) 204 can further decrease the calculated annealing temperature.
As above, changing the metal recess distance parameter 104 lowers the annealing temperature. Given a total metal stack thickness (h) 204 of 1.6 μm, reducing the Cu recess distance 104 from 6 nm to 4 nm reduces the calculated annealing temperature from a nominal 180° C. to 121° C.
In an implementation, with proper design and combination of materials to optimize confinement by the dielectric 108, the contribution of components α*2 (horizontal thermal expansion converted to vertical) and α*3 (surface area of the metal-to-metal bonding surface) of the overall effective CTE reduces the annealing temperature to below even the calculated value. As shown above, with a metal stack thickness (h) of 1.6 um, the calculated minimum annealing temperature using the example parameter for the α*1 component alone is 180° C., a great improvement over conventional annealing temperatures in direct hybrid bonding. Successful metal-to-metal bonding at lower annealing temperatures have been demonstrated with a total Cu stack thickness (h) 204 of 1.6 μm at 150° C. versus a 180° C. calculated value from using an improved α*1 (vertical thermal expansion) component alone, due to additional contributions from α*2 (horizontal thermal expansion converted to vertical) and α*3 (surface area of the top of metal via or pad being bonded).
In an implementation, a copper first conductive layer 206 has a vertical thickness (h1) 214 of 1.6 μm, and a CTE al that is in a range of 16.7-17.0×10−6/° C. The second conductive layer 208 is also copper with a vertical thickness (h2) 216 which may also be around 0.5-1.0 μm, and a CTE α2 that is also in the range of 16.7-17.0×10−6/° C. In this scenario, the maximum recess distance δ is approximately 6 nanometers (nm), and the annealing temperature is lowered down to between 150-200° C.
The second “buried metal” conductive layer 208 of the vertical stack 204 may be at least in part, a part of a redistribution layer (RDL) or an electrical trace of the microelectronic component being fabricated. In an implementation, the RDL or electrical trace making up the second conductive buried metal layer 208 has a horizontal footprint with at least one dimension greater than a corresponding horizontal dimension of the footprint of the first conductive layer 206. The greater footprint of the underlying second conductive layer 208 compared to the first conductive layer 206 provides more thermal expansion through a greater volume of metal, including its horizontal thermal expansion converted to vertical expansion of the vertical stack 204 because of the confinement of horizontal expansion provided by the dielectric confinement matrix 108. This increase in the volume of metal buried deeper beneath the bonding interface 102 and below the first metal via 206 is significant, since only a few nanometers in recess distance 104 lowers the temperature needed for annealing that results in direct metal-to-metal bonds.
Besides pure copper, in a wide variety of implementations, the first conductive layer 206 or the second conductive layer 208 of the vertical stack 204 may be another material, such as a brass alloy with a CTE in a range of 18-19×10−6/° C., a manganese bronze alloy with a CTE of 21.2×10−6/° C., an aluminum metal or aluminum alloy with a CTE in a range of 21-24×10−6/° C., a zinc metal or zinc alloy with a CTE in a range of 30-35×10−6/° C., nickel in copper, for example, or another suitable conductor.
The third conductive layer 504 increases the total stack thickness (h) 502 and may increase the effective CTE α* by providing a conductor in the vertical stack 502 with a higher CTE than copper metal, for example, thereby providing greater vertical thermal expansion of the entire vertical stack 502, which lowers the annealing temperature needed to form direct metal-to-metal bonds in direct hybrid bonding. The geometry of the third conductive layer 504 may also increase both vertical expansion and effective CTE α* when the horizontal footprint is relatively large, as in structure 500′. Then the horizontal thermal expansion of the third conductive layer 504 at the annealing temperature tends to be converted to additional vertical expansion of the vertical stack 502 because of the constraining dielectric matrix 108. The third conductive layer 504 may be, for example, a brass alloy with a CTE in a range of 18-19×10−6/° C., a manganese bronze alloy with a CTE of 21.2×10−6/° C., an aluminum metal or aluminum alloy with a CTE in a range of 21-24×10−6/° C., a zinc metal or zinc alloy with a CTE in a range of 30-35×10−6/° C., or other suitable conductor.
The example vertical stacks 502 in
In an example implementation, the first conductive layer 206, which is the direct bonding layer, has a top surface 210 with dimensions of a circular via 5 μm in diameter. The diameter may also be 2 μm, 3 μm, 5 μm, 10 μm and 15 μm, and other sizes, for example. The vertical thickness (h2) of the first conductive layer 206 can be approximately 1.5 μm, and the second conductive layer 208, which may be an RDL layer, has dimensions of 20 μm×20 μm×0.5 μm, for example. In this example, the metal volume of the first conductive layer 206 is 2.5 μm×2.5 μm×3.14×1.5 μm=29 μm3, for example. The volume of the second conductive layer 208 is 200 μm3, for example. The buried metal volume of the second conductive layer 208 is approximately 7 times that of the first conductive layer 206. Even if only a fraction of horizontal thermal expansion of the second conductive layer 208 is deformed to vertical expansion of the first conductive layer 206, this additional expansion significantly increases the effective CTE α* and substantially reduces annealing temperature for the metal-to-metal bonding.
In another example, the volume of the first conductive layer 206 is 265 μm3, for example, and the volume of the “buried” second conductive layer 208 is 327 μm3, for example. In this case, the contribution of thermal expansion from the layer 206 and layer 208 is approximately same magnitude assuming that the two layers have the same CTE.
The embedded bump 604 or inlay 606 can also be a dielectric material, such as an organic material (nonmetal) with a very high CTE, as long as the bump 604 or inlay 606 does not block an electrical conduction path, for example between an electrical trace and the via 206 with the top surface 210 forming the direct metal-to-metal bond. The organic material with high CTE can also be a buried layer, such as layer 504 in structure 500 of
Referring to
In another implementation, the example structure 702 in
At block 802, a dielectric material 804 is formed or deposited on a semiconductor or other substrate 806, and trenches 808 are formed in the dielectric material 804 for confining one or more metal layers. The trenches may be etched trenches and/or damascene cavities, for example.
At block 810, a barrier layer and/or adhesion layer and metal seed layer are applied at least in the trenches 808 for metal deposition. The trenches 808 are then filled with one or more metals 812 & 814, in one or more layers, or can be filled with any other multiple layer composition. The top surface 816 of the metal or metals is flattened with a CMP process to remove excess deposition.
At block 818, another layer of dielectric material 820 is deposited, and trenches 822 formed or etched for confining a bonding layer metal 824 (“conductive via”) to be added next. The trenches 822 are filled with the bonding layer metal 824, and planarized with CMP to remove the excess deposition. The finished surface 826 after CMP meets the dielectric surface roughness and metal recess 104 specification for an example direct hybrid bonding process.
In
At block 828, two instances of the bonding interface structure are bonded together in a first phase of a direct hybrid bonding process. The first phase direct-bonds the oxide surfaces 830 of the inorganic dielectrics together. The joining of surfaces may be in a wafer to wafer (W2W) process, a die-to-wafer (D2W) process, or a die-to-die (D2D) process.
At block 832, the bonded structure is annealed, in a second phase of the direct hybrid bonding process. The raised temperature of the annealing process vertically expands the buried metals 812 & 814 and the bonding layer metal 824, all of these confined by the surrounding dielectric layers 804 & 820 to convert horizontal thermal expansion into vertical expansion. The vertical expansion of the metals 812 & 814 & 824 cause at least part of the top surfaces 816 to bridge the gap of the combined recesses 104 at the lower annealing temperature. The respective top surfaces 834 of the bonding layer metals 824 contact each other and metal atoms diffuse across the interface to form an irreversible metal-to-metal bond between the respective bonding layer metals 824.
Lower annealing temperature is one consideration of low temperature bonding, the second consideration is the annealing duration, which in turn affects the thermal budget for annealing. Lower thermal (energy) budget is desired. There are two components involved in the formation of direct Cu-to-Cu bonds in an example direct hybrid bonding process: 1) the two recessed surfaces expand to bridge the gap and physically contact each other (thermal dynamic consideration); and 2) Cu atoms diffuse across the interface to form permanent bonds (bonding kinetics consideration). It is known that surface diffusion of atoms along the 111 crystal plane is 3-4 orders of magnitude faster than along the 100 or 110 crystal planes (see the reference below). Therefore it is advantageous to have mostly the 111 crystal plane on the surface 834 in order to shorten the annealing time for direct hybrid bonding, especially at lower temperatures because the Cu surface diffusion also slows down when the annealing temperature is reduced.
Table (1) shows calculated Cu surface diffusivity (cm2/sec) on (111), (100), and (110) planes at various temperatures, ranging from 150° C. to 300° C. (Agrawal, P. M. et al., “Predicting trends in rate parameters for self-diffusion on FCC metal surfaces.” Surf. Sci. 515, 21-35 (2003))
Low-temperature direct copper-to-copper bonding is enabled by creep on the (111) surfaces of nanotwinned copper of the nanotexture surface 1004. The grain size of copper metal at the grain boundary of the bonding surface 834 can also affect annealing conditions to lower the annealing temperature. The copper metal grain size is smaller at lower temperatures, so the lower temperatures also favor direct-bond formation in that respect, over higher annealing temperatures.
Steps of the example process flow are shown as individual blocks and corresponding diagrams. The example process uses the same initial fabrication steps as the process shown in
In
The bonding metal layer 834 itself may be formed with a process selected to plate copper metal (Cu) in the 111 crystal orientation (of copper). The copper metal may be deposited from a super-filling electroplating bath, for example, with plating chemistry selected to optimize the direct metal-to-metal bonding to occur during the example direct hybrid bonding. The microstructure of the deposited or coated bonding metal layer 824 may be stabilized, for example by an annealing step, separate from the annealing step of the example direct hybrid bonding that occurs later.
An example nanotexture surface 1004 may also be explicitly formed or retro-formed by applying a nanotexturing process to the top surface 834 of the bonding metal layer 824 to form a high index plane and/or a surface of lattice planes with 111 Miller indices, for example.
In an implementation, the nanotexture surface 1004 can be made several ways. For example, a very dilute acid rinse can be applied to the top surface 834, and the surface can be spun dry in an oxygen ambient, and rinsed with deionized water. Or, the top surface 834 can be rinsed in low acid copper sulfate solution and dried in an oxygen ambient, and then treated with a dilute acid rinse followed by a deionized rinse.
These treatments can create a hexagonal network of screw dislocations in the copper metal surface 834 to create the example nanosurface texture 1004, which can facilitate and accelerate the rate of diffusion of copper atoms across the bonding interface, the atomic process that creates the direct metal-to-metal bond. Facilitating and accelerating the direct metal-to-metal bonding process shortens the duration of the annealing step of the direct hybrid bonding process, even at lower annealing temperatures than are conventionally used. The duration of the example annealing may even be shorter than the duration of conventional annealing with microwave heating and bonding.
At block 1006, instances of the example bonding structures with nanotexture surfaces 1004 are joined for example direct hybrid bonding. The nanotexture surfaces 1004 facilitate faster diffusion of copper atoms across the bonding interface, resulting in a facilitated metal-to-metal bond that occurs faster, and at lower temperature, than in conventional direct bonding processes.
Example Method
At block 1102, a first confinement matrix layer is applied to a substrate. The confinement matrix can be silicon dioxide or another inorganic dielectric capable of forming direct bonds, such as oxide-to-oxide bonds for example, across a bonding interface.
At block 1104, a first trench is formed in the first confinement matrix. The first trench may be etched and/or formed with damascene processes, for example.
At block 1106, the first trench is filled with one or more metals. The first trench may be filled with 1-12 layers of metals, featuring high CTEs for providing relatively large thermal expansion. The fill may also be one or more metal alloys or compositions.
At block 1108, a second confinement matrix is applied onto the first confinement matrix and onto the one or more metals below. The second confinement matrix may be a different material than the first confinement matrix, or may be the same material, but is applied as a discrete layer.
At block 1110, a second trench is formed in the second confinement matrix. The second trench may be etched and/or formed with damascene processes, for example.
At block 1112, the second trench is at least partly filled with a conductive via in electrical communication with the one or more metals. The conductive via can be copper metal, but can also be other conductors. The metal material of the conductive via must be capable of direct bonding with a like conductive via of the same metal, during an example direct hybrid bonding process.
At block 1114, at least the second confinement matrix is planarized, for example with CMP, to create a bonding surface for direct hybrid bonding, with a top surface of the conductive via recessed 4-6 nanometers (nm) from the planarized bonding surface.
After fabrication of the above structure suitable for forming direct metal-to-metal bonds at low annealing temperatures, a further process includes joining a first instance of the bonding surface with a second instance of the bonding surface to create direct contact bonds between respective second confinement matrices of the first and second bonding surfaces. In other words, the flat and polished surfaces of two instances of the bonding structure are joined together, and the dielectric parts of the surface spontaneously bond together upon contact, in a first phase of an example direct hybrid bonding process.
In a second phase of the example direct hybrid bonding process, annealing the joined bonding surfaces at a temperature equal to or less than 150° C. thermally expands the respective metals in the first trenches and the respective conductive vias in the second trenches to create a direct metal-to-metal bond between the respective conductive vias, at this low temperature. The vertical expansion of the stack of metals causes the top surface of each conductive via to bridge the gap of the pre-designed recess distance that exists at room temperature between the top surface and the bonding surface.
The first trench may be formed with a larger cross-sectional area than the cross-sectional area of the second trench in order to bury more metal under the conductive via that will be undergoing direct metal-to-metal bonding. The large volume of the buried metals creates increased vertical thermal expansion under the conductive via at the annealing temperature that is equal to or less than 150° C. The first confinement matrix also converts horizontal expansion of the one or more buried metals to vertical expansion, to expand the top of the conductive via to the bonding plane, at the lower temperatures.
In an implementation, the method may include filling the first trench with one or more metals having an overall vertical thickness (or height) between approximately 0.5-1.5 μm. The example method also includes creating the second trench with dimensions suitable for forming a conductive via having a circular cross-section with a diameter of 5 μm or greater. The diameter can be much greater, for example 15 μm. The example method then includes filling the second trench with the conductive via, which may have a vertical thickness (or height) between approximately 0.6-2.0 μm.
In an implementation, a nanostructure surface is created on the top surface of the conductive via to lower the annealing temperature and to shorten a duration of the annealing. In an implementation, the nanotexture surface is a hexagonal network of screw dislocations in a copper metal.
In the foregoing description and in the accompanying drawings, specific terminology and drawing symbols have been set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosed embodiments. In some instances, the terminology and symbols may imply specific details that are not required to practice those embodiments. For example, any of the specific dimensions, quantities, material types, fabrication steps and the like can be different from those described above in alternative embodiments. The term “coupled” is used herein to express a direct connection as well as a connection through one or more intervening circuits or structures. The terms “example,” “embodiment,” and “implementation” are used to express an example, not a preference or requirement. Also, the terms “may” and “can” are used interchangeably to denote optional (permissible) subject matter. The absence of either term should not be construed as meaning that a given feature or technique is required.
Various modifications and changes can be made to the embodiments presented herein without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, features or aspects of any of the embodiments can be applied in combination with any other of the embodiments or in place of counterpart features or aspects thereof. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
While the present disclosure has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations possible given the description. It is intended that the appended claims cover such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4612083 | Yasumoto et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4818728 | Rai et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4904328 | Beecher et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4939568 | Kato et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4998665 | Hayashi | Mar 1991 | A |
5087585 | Hayashi | Feb 1992 | A |
5236118 | Bower et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5322593 | Hasegawa et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5413952 | Pages et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419806 | Huebner | May 1995 | A |
5442235 | Parrillo et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5489804 | Pasch | Feb 1996 | A |
5501003 | Bernstein | Mar 1996 | A |
5503704 | Bower et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5504376 | Sugahara et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5516727 | Broom | May 1996 | A |
5563084 | Ramm et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5610431 | Martin | Mar 1997 | A |
5696406 | Ueno | Dec 1997 | A |
5734199 | Kawakita et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5753536 | Sugiyama et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771555 | Eda et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5821692 | Rogers et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5866942 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5985739 | Plettner et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998808 | Matsushita | Dec 1999 | A |
6008126 | Leedy | Dec 1999 | A |
6034393 | Sakamoto et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6054363 | Sakaguchi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6063968 | Hubner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071761 | Jacobs | Jun 2000 | A |
6080640 | Gardner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097096 | Gardner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123825 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6147000 | You et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6183592 | Sylvester | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6218203 | Khoury et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232150 | Lin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6258625 | Brofman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259160 | Lopatin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265775 | Seyyedy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6297072 | Tilmans et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316786 | Mueller et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322600 | Brewer et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6333120 | DeHaven et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333206 | Ito et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348709 | Graettinger et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355153 | Uzoh et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359235 | Hayashi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374770 | Lee | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6409904 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423640 | Lee et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6465892 | Suga | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6515343 | Shroff et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6528894 | Akram et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6541382 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552436 | Burnette et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555917 | Heo | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6579744 | Jiang | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583515 | James et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589813 | Park | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6593645 | Shih et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600224 | Farquhar et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6624003 | Rice | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627814 | Stark | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632377 | Brusic et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6642081 | Patti | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656826 | Ishimaru | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660564 | Brady | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667225 | Hau-Riege et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6720212 | Robl et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6759738 | Fallon et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6828686 | Park | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837979 | Uzoh et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847527 | Sylvester et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6864585 | Enquist | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6867073 | Enquist | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6887769 | Kellar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902987 | Tong et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6908027 | Tolchinsky et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909194 | Farnworth et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6960492 | Miyamoto | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6962835 | Tong et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974769 | Basol et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7037755 | Enquist | May 2006 | B2 |
7045453 | Canaperi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7078811 | Suga | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7105980 | Abbott et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109063 | Jiang | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109092 | Tong | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126212 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7193239 | Leedy | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193423 | Dalton et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7247948 | Hedler et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7335572 | Tong et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7354798 | Pogge et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7387944 | Tong et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7485968 | Enquist et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7553744 | Tong et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7750488 | Patti et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7803693 | Trezza | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7807549 | Tong et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7998335 | Feeney et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8183127 | Patti et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8241961 | Kim et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8314007 | Vaufredaz | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8349635 | Gan et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8357931 | Schieck et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8377798 | Peng et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8435421 | Keleher et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8441131 | Ryan | May 2013 | B2 |
8476146 | Chen et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8476165 | Trickett et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8482132 | Yang et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8501537 | Sadaka et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8507979 | Huang et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8524533 | Tong et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8620164 | Heck et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8647987 | Yang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8697493 | Sadaka | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8716105 | Sadaka et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8802538 | Liu | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8809123 | Liu et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8841002 | Tong | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8846450 | Tong | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8916448 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8988299 | Kam et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9040385 | Chen et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9064937 | Edelstein et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9082627 | Tong et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9082644 | Ossimitz et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9093350 | Endo et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9142517 | Liu et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9171756 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9184125 | Enquist et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9224704 | Landru | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9230941 | Chen et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9257399 | Kuang et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9299736 | Chen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9312229 | Chen et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9331032 | Liu et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9331149 | Tong et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9337235 | Chen et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9343330 | Brusic et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9343369 | Du | May 2016 | B2 |
9368866 | Yu | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9385024 | Tong et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9394161 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9425155 | Liu et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9431368 | Enquist et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9437572 | Chen et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443796 | Chou et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9461007 | Chun et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9496239 | Edelstein et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9536848 | England et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9559081 | Lai et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9620481 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9656852 | Cheng et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9704827 | Huang | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9723716 | Meinhold | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9728521 | Tsai et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9741620 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9799587 | Fujii et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9852988 | Enquist et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9859254 | Yu et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9865581 | Jang | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9881882 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9893004 | Yazdani | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9899442 | Katkar | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9929050 | Lin | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9941241 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9941243 | Kim et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9953941 | Enquist | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9960129 | Liu et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9960142 | Chen et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10002844 | Wang et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10026605 | Doub et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10075657 | Fahim et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10090351 | Ashidate | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10103122 | Liu | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10147641 | Enquist et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10204893 | Uzoh et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10211166 | Matsuo | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10269708 | Enquist et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10269756 | Uzoh | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10269778 | Lin et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276619 | Kao et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276909 | Huang et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10312275 | Hynecek | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10418277 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10431614 | Gambino et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446456 | Shen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446487 | Huang et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446532 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10672654 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10707087 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10790262 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10796913 | Lin | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10840135 | Uzoh | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840205 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10854578 | Morein | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10879212 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10886177 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10892246 | Uzoh | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10923413 | DeLaCruz | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10937755 | Shah et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10950547 | Mohammed et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10964664 | Mandalapu et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10985133 | Uzoh | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10991804 | DeLaCruz et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10998292 | Lee et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11011494 | Gao et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11011503 | Wang et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11031285 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11037919 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11056348 | Theil | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11069734 | Katkar | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11088099 | Katkar et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11127738 | DeLaCruz et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11158606 | Gao et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11171117 | Gao et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11176450 | Teig et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11256004 | Haba et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11264357 | DeLaCruz et al. | Mar 2022 | B1 |
11276676 | Enquist et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11329034 | Tao et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11348898 | DeLaCruz et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11355443 | Huang et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11552041 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
20020000328 | Motomura et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020003307 | Suga | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020025665 | Juengling | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020074670 | Suga | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094661 | Enquist et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020113241 | Kubota et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030092220 | Akram | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109083 | Ahmad | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030129796 | Bruchhaus et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157748 | Kim et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040072423 | Jorne | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040084414 | Sakai et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040126990 | Ohta | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040157407 | Tong et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040217483 | Hedler et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040262772 | Ramanathan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050104224 | Huang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050181542 | Enquist | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060024950 | Choi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060057945 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060138368 | Lee | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070096294 | Ikeda et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070111386 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070212870 | Yang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222048 | Huang | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070257366 | Wang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070295456 | Gudeman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080122092 | Hong | May 2008 | A1 |
20090108469 | Kang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090197408 | Lehr et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090200668 | Yang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100164066 | Di Franco | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110074040 | Frank et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110290552 | Palmateer et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120211894 | Aoyagi | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120212384 | Kam et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120319280 | Suganuma et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130020704 | Sadaka | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130034948 | Huang et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130075900 | Shim et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130078783 | Nieh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130187287 | Park et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130221527 | Yang et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130256913 | Black et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130284885 | Chen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130320556 | Liu et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130328186 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140131869 | Pendse | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145338 | Fujii et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140175655 | Chen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140206109 | Ossimitz et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140217593 | Chen | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140225795 | Yu | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140252635 | Tran et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264948 | Chou et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140332980 | Sanders et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150064498 | Tong | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150096798 | Uzoh | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150097022 | Di Cioccio et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150108644 | Kuang et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150155263 | Farooq et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150200073 | Jen et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150206823 | Lin et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150214191 | Lee et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150228621 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150307819 | Ida et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150340269 | Rivoire et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150340371 | Lue | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150364434 | Chen et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160086923 | Best | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160148816 | Lee et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160163684 | Chou | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160181228 | Higuchi et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160190103 | Kabe | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160322414 | Chen et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160343682 | Kawasaki | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170053897 | Lai et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170179029 | Enquist et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170194271 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170250160 | Wu et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170278698 | Ikegawa et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170365487 | Shen et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180175012 | Wu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182639 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182665 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182666 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180190580 | Haba et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180190583 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180204798 | Enquist et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180219038 | Gambino et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180226371 | Enquist | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180226375 | Enquist et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180269325 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180273377 | Katkar et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180286805 | Huang et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180323177 | Yu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180323227 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180331066 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180350674 | Uzoh | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190035767 | Yu | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190057756 | Kim et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190088535 | Yan et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190096741 | Uzoh et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190096842 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190109042 | Katkar et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190115277 | Yu et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190131277 | Yang et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190157334 | Wei et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190189603 | Wang et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190198407 | Huang et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190198409 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190265411 | Huang et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190333550 | Fisch | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190348336 | Katkar et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190385935 | Gao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385966 | Gao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200013637 | Haba | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200013765 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200035630 | Kameshima | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200035641 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200075520 | Gao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075553 | DeLaCruz et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200126906 | Uzoh et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200194396 | Uzoh | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200227367 | Haba et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200243380 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200279821 | Haba et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200294908 | Haba et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200321307 | Uzoh | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328162 | Haba et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328164 | DeLaCruz et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328165 | DeLaCruz et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200335408 | Gao et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200365575 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200371154 | DeLaCruz et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200395321 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200411483 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210098412 | Haba et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210118864 | DeLaCruz et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210143125 | DeLaCruz et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210181510 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193603 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193624 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193625 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210242152 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210296282 | Gao et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210305202 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210366820 | Uzoh | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210407941 | Haba | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220077063 | Haba | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220077087 | Haba | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220139867 | Uzoh | May 2022 | A1 |
20220139869 | Gao et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220208650 | Gao et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220208702 | Uzoh | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220208723 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220246497 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220285303 | Mirkarimi et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220319901 | Suwito et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220320035 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220320036 | Gao et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20230005850 | Fountain, Jr. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230019869 | Mirkarimi et al. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230036441 | Haba et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230067677 | Lee et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230069183 | Haba | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230100032 | Haba et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230115122 | Uzoh et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230118156 | Gao et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230122531 | Uzoh | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230123423 | Gao et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230125395 | Gao et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230130259 | Haba et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230132632 | Katkar et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230140107 | Uzoh et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230142680 | Guevara et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230154816 | Haba et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230154828 | Haba et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230187264 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230187317 | Uzoh | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230187412 | Gao et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197453 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197496 | Theil | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197559 | Haba et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197560 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197655 | Theil et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207402 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207437 | Haba | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207474 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207514 | Gao et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230215836 | Haba et al. | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230245950 | Haba et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230268300 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230343734 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2023 | A1 |
20230360950 | Gao | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230361074 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230369136 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230375613 | Haba et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105140144 | Dec 2015 | CN |
106653720 | May 2017 | CN |
106920795 | Jul 2017 | CN |
107039380 | Aug 2017 | CN |
107731668 | Feb 2018 | CN |
107993927 | May 2018 | CN |
107993928 | May 2018 | CN |
109155301 | Jan 2019 | CN |
109417073 | Mar 2019 | CN |
109417075 | Mar 2019 | CN |
109417077 | Mar 2019 | CN |
109643643 | Apr 2019 | CN |
109844915 | Jun 2019 | CN |
0 465 227 | Jan 1992 | EP |
2 863 420 | Apr 2015 | EP |
61-030059 | Feb 1986 | JP |
01-168040 | Jul 1989 | JP |
4-259249 | Sep 1992 | JP |
05-029183 | Feb 1993 | JP |
5-198739 | Aug 1993 | JP |
6-13456 | Jan 1994 | JP |
6-260594 | Sep 1994 | JP |
H07-66093 | Mar 1995 | JP |
H7-249749 | Sep 1995 | JP |
7-283382 | Oct 1995 | JP |
8-78645 | Mar 1996 | JP |
8-125121 | May 1996 | JP |
8-186235 | Jul 1996 | JP |
9-120979 | May 1997 | JP |
10-135404 | May 1998 | JP |
10-223636 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-242383 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11-186120 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-100679 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-260934 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000-299379 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000-311982 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-102479 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-326326 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002-026123 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-516033 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-353416 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002-368159 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-023071 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2004-200547 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2005-086089 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-093486 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-135988 | May 2005 | JP |
2013-033786 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2013-033900 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2013-243333 | Dec 2013 | JP |
2018-160519 | Oct 2018 | JP |
2019-129199 | Aug 2019 | JP |
10-2012-0106366 | Sep 2012 | KR |
10-2015-0097798 | Aug 2015 | KR |
476145 | Feb 2002 | TW |
WO 0161743 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 03054954 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2005043584 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2006100444 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2012013162 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO 2016185883 | Nov 2016 | WO |
WO 2017151442 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO 2017155002 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO 2019146427 | Aug 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Derbyshire, Katherine, “The darker side of hybrid bonding,” Semiconductor Engineering, Dec. 17, 2020, https://semiengineering.com/author/katherine/, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 10, 2022, European Application No. 19853599.9, 18 pages. |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Teardown, posted Apr. 24, 2016, contributing authors: Jim Morrison, Ray Fontaine, Dick James and Daniel Yang, https://www.techinsights.com/blog/samsung-galaxy-s7-edge-teardown, last accessed on May 16, 2022, 6 pages. |
Gao, Guilian et al., “Scaling package interconnects below 20 m pitch with hybrid bonding,” 2018 IEEE 68th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), IEEE, May 29, 2018, pp. 314-322, XP033380016. |
Sart C., et al., “Cu/SiO2 hybrid bonding; Finite element modeling and experimental characterization,” 2016 6th Electronic System-Integration Technology Conference (ESTC), IEEE, Sep. 13, 2016, pp. 1-7, XP033015798. |
Amirfeiz et al., “Formation of silicon structures by plasma-activated wafer bonding,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2000, vol. 147, No. 7, pp. 2693-2698. |
Appeal Decision of Rejection issued on Apr. 12, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-526104, in 14 pages. |
Aspar, B. et al., “The smart-cut process: Status and developments,” Proc. Electrochem Soc., 1999, vol. 99-53, pp. 48-59. |
Bower, R. et al., “Low temperature Si3N4 direct bonding,” Appl. Phys. Lett., Jun. 28, 1993, vol. 62, No. 26, pp. 3485-3487. |
Canadian Office Action issued Aug. 1, 2013 in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,618,191, 4 pages. |
Canadian Office Action, mailed May 16, 2012 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,515,375, with international preliminary report, 2 pages. |
Ceramic Microstructures: Control at the Atomic Level, Recent Progress in Surface Activated Bonding, 1998, pp. 385-389. |
“Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Metrology with Advanced Surface Polisher,” Park Systems, 4 pages. |
Chung et al., “Room temperature GaAseu + Si and InPeu + Si wafer direct bonding by the surface activate bonding method,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Jan. 2, 1997, vol. 121, Issues 1-4, pp. 203-206. |
Chung et al., “Wafer direct bonding of compound semiconductors and silicon at room temperature by the surface activated bonding method,” Applied Surface Science, Jun. 2, 1997, vols. 117-118, pp. 808-812. |
D'Agostino, R., “Plasma etching of Si and SiO2 in SF6—O2 mixtures,” J. Appl. Phys., Jan. 1981, vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 162-167. |
Decision—Request for Trail Granted, Inter Partes Review, U.S. Pat. No. 7,485,968, Case IPR2013-00381, dated Dec. 18, 2013, in 27 pages. |
Declaration of Richard A. Blanchard in Support of Petition for inter partes review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,485,968, dated Jun. 13, 2013, pp. 1-18. |
Dysard, Jeffrey M. et al., “CMP solutions for the integration of high-k metal gate technologies,” ECS Transactions, 2010, vol. 33, Issue 10, pp. 77-89. |
Fan et al., “Copper water bonding,” Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., U.S.A., The Electrochemical Society, Aug. 6, 1999, vol. 2, No. 10, pp. 534-536. |
Fang, S.J. et al., “Advanced process control in dielectric chemical mechanical polishing (CMP),” Texas Instruments, Silicon Technology Development, 8 pages. |
Farrens et al., “Chemical free room temperature wafer to wafer direct bonding,” J. Electrochem. Soc., The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Nov. 1995, vol. 142, No. 11. pp. 3949-3955. |
Farrens et al., “Chemical free wafer bonding of silicon to glass and sapphire,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings vol. 95-7, 1995, pp. 72-77. |
Final Written Decision, Inter PartesReview, U.S. Pat. No. 7,485,968, Case IPR2013-00381, dated Feb. 27, 2014, in 3 pages. |
Gösele et al., “Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: A flexible approach to materials combinations in microelectronics; micromechanics and optoelectronics,” IEEE, 1997, pp. 23-32. |
Gösele et al., “Silicon layer transfer by wafer bonding,” Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: Science, Technology and Applications, The Electrochemical Society Proceedings, vol. 93-29 (1993), pp. 395-409. |
Handbook of Thin Film Technology, Maissel and Glang, 1983 Reissue, pp. 12-24. |
Harendt, C. et al., “Vertical polysilicon interconnects by aligned wafer bonding,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 1998, vol. 97-36, pp. 501-508. |
Hayashi, Y. et al., “Fabrication of three-dimensional IC using cumulatively bonded IC (CUBIC) technology,” VSLI Tech. Dog., 1990, pp. 95-96. |
Hizukuri, M. et al., “Dynamic strain and chip damage during ultrasonic flip chip bonding,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 2001, pp. 3044-3048. |
Hosoda et al., “Effect of the surface treatment on the room-temperature bonding of Al to Si and SiO2,” Journal of Materials Science, Jan. 1, 1998, vol. 33, Issue 1, pp. 253-258. |
Hosoda et al., “Room temperature GaAs—Si and InP—Si wafer direct bonding by the surface activated bonding method,” Nuclear Inst. And Methods in Physics Research B, 1997, vol. 121, Nos. 1-4, pp. 203-206. |
Howlader et al., “A novel method for bonding of ionic wafers,” Electronics Components and Technology Conference, 2006, IEEE, pp. 7. |
Howlader et al., “Bonding of p-Si/n-InP wafers through surface activated bonding method at room temperature,” Indium Phosphide and Related Materials, 2001, IEEE International Conference On, pp. 272-275. |
Howlader et al., “Characterization of the bonding strength and interface current of p-Si/ n-InP wafers bonded by surface activated bonding method at room temperature,” Journal of Applied Physics, Mar. 1, 2002, vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 3062-3066. |
Howlader et al., “Investigation of the bonding strength and interface current of p-SionGaAs wafers bonded by surface activated bonding at room temperature,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 19, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2114-2118. |
“Hybrid Bonding—Patent Landscape Analysis,” from Technologies to IP Business Intelligence, KnowMade Patent & Technology Intelligence, www.kmowmade.com, Nov. 2019, 81 pages. |
Hymes, S. et al., “Determination of the planarization distance for copper CMP process,” 6 pages. |
Iida, A. et al., “The study of initial mechanism for Al—Au solid phase diffusion flip-chip bonding,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 1997, pp. 3044-3661. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Apr. 22, 2019 in International Application No. PCT/US2018/064982, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 7, 2019, in International Application No. PCT/US2018/060044, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 10, 2019, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/051537, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Oct. 8, 2019, in International Application No. PCT/US2019/037072, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Dec. 6, 2019, in International Application No. PCT/US2019/047513, 12 pages. |
Itoh et al., “Characteristics of fritting contacts utilized for micromachined wafer probe cards,” 2000 American Institute of Physics, AIP Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 71, 2000, pp. 2224. |
Itoh et al., “Characteristics of low force contact process for MEMS probe cards,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Apr. 1, 2002, vols. 97-98, pp. 462-467. |
Itoh et al., “Development of MEMS IC probe card utilizing fritting contact,” Initiatives of Precision Engineering at the Beginning of a Millennium: 10th International Conference on Precision Engineering (ICPE) Jul. 18-20, 2001, Yokohama, Japan, 2002, Book Part 1, pp. 314-318. |
Itoh et al., “Room temperature vacuum sealing using surface activated bonding method,” The 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Boston, Jun. 8-12, 2003, 2003 IEEE, pp. 1828-1831. |
Juang, Jing-Ye et al., “Copper-to-copper direct bonding on highly (111)-oriented nanotwinned copper in no-vacuum ambient,” Scientific Reports, Sep. 17, 2018, vol. 8, 11 pages. |
Ker, Ming-Dou et al., “Fully process-compatible layout design on bond pad to improve wire bond reliability in CMOS Ics,” IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, Jun. 2002, vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 309-316. |
Kim et al., “Low temperature direct Cu—Cu bonding with low energy ion activation method,” Electronic Materials and Packaging, 2001, IEEE, pp. 193-195. |
Kim et al., “Room temperature Cu—Cu direct bonding using surface activated bonding method,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 2003 American Vacuum Society, Mar./Apr. 2003, vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 449-453. |
Kim et al., “Wafer-scale activated bonding of Cu—CU, Cu—Si, and Cu—SiO2 at low temperature,” Proceedings—Electrochemical Society, 2003, vol. 19, pp. 239-247. |
Kissinger, G. et al., “Void-free silicon-wafer-bond stregthening in the 200-400 C. range,” Sensors and Actuators A, 1993, vol. 36, pp. 149-156. |
Krauter, G. et al., “Low temperature silicon direct bonding for application in micromechanics: bonding energies for different combinations of oxides,” Sensors and Actuators A, 1998, vol. 70, pp. 271-275. |
Kunio, Takemitsu, “Three dimensional IC technology, using cubic method,” Journal of the JWS, Japan Welding Society, Apr. 5, 1994, vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 185-189. |
Lee, D. et al., “Slurry components in metal chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) process: A review,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Dec. 2016, vol. 17, No. 12, pp. 1751-1762. |
Li, Yuzhuo, “Key factors that influence step height reduction efficiency and defectivity during metal CMP,” Clarkson University, Levitronix CMP Users' Conference 2006, 2006, 32 pages. |
Li, Y.A. et al., “Low temperature copper to copper direct bonding,” Jpn. Appl. Phys. 37, 1998, pp. L1068-L1069. |
Li, Y.A. et al., “Systematic low temperature silicon bonding using pressure and temperature,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 37, 1998, pp. 737-741. |
Liu, Zi-Yu et al. “Detection and formation mechanism of micro-defects in ultrafine pitch Cu—Cu direct bonding,” Chin. Phys. B, 2016, vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 018103-1-018103-7. |
Liu, C. et al., “Low-temperature direct copper-to-copper bonding enabled by creep on (111) surfaces of nanotwinned Cu,” Scientific Reports, May 12, 2015, 5:09734, pp. 1-11. |
Lu, L. et al., “Grain growth and strain release in nanocrystalline copper,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 89, Issue 11, pp. 6408. |
Luo, Ying, “Slurry Chemistry Effects On Copper Chemical Mechanical Planarization,” University of Central Florida STARS, Electronic Theses and Disserations, 2004, Paper 36, 111 pages. |
Matsuzawa et al., “Room-temperature interconnection of electroplated Au microbump by means of surface activated bonding method,” Electornic Components and Technology Confererence, 2001, 51st Proceedings, IEEE, pp. 384-387. |
Monsma et al., “Development of the spin-valve transistor,” IEEE Tran. Magnet., vol. 33, No. 5, Sep. 1997, pp. 3495-3499. |
Moriceau, H. et al., “Overview of recent direct wafer bonding advances and applications,” Advances in Natural Sciences—Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2010, 11 pages. |
Mott, D. et al., “Synthesis of size-controlled and shaped copper nanoparticles,” Langmuir, 2007, vol. 23, No. 10, pp. 5740-5745. |
Nakanishi, H. et al., “Studies on SiO2—SiO2 bonding with hydrofluoric acid. Room temperature and low stress bonding technique for MEMS,” Sensors and Actuators, 2000, vol. 79, pp. 237-244. |
Oberhammer, J. et al., “Sealing of adhesive bonded devices on wafer level,” Sensors and Actuators A, 2004, vol. 110, No. 1-3, pp. 407-412, see pp. 407-412, and Figures 1 (a)-1 (l), 6 pages. |
Onodera et al., “The effect of prebonding heat treatment on the separability of Au wire from Ag-plated Cu alloy substrate,” Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions, Jan. 2002, vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 5-12. |
Ortleb, Thomas et al., “Controlling macro and micro surface topography for a 45nm copper CMP process using a high resolution profiler,” Proc. Of SPIE, 2008, vol. 6922, 11 pages. |
Paul, E. et al., “A model of copper CMP,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 2005, vol. 152, Issue 4, pp. G322-G328. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,485,968, IPR 2013-00381, filed Jun. 21, 2013, pp. 1-49. |
Plobi, A. et al., “Wafer direct bonding: tailoring adhesion between brittle materials,” Materials Science and Engineering Review Journal, 1999, R25, 88 pages. |
Reiche et al., “The effect of a plasma pretreatment on the Si/Si bonding behaviouir,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 1998, vol. 97-36, pp. 437-444. |
Rhoades, Robert L., “The Dark Art of CMP,” Future Fab International, Issue 24, 10 pages. |
Roberds et al., “Low temperature , in situ, plasma activated wafer bonding,” Electrochecmical Society Proceedings, 1997, vol. 97-36, pp. 598-606. |
Rosales-Yeomans, D. et al., “Evaluation of pad groove designs under reduced slurry flow rate conditions during copper CMP,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2008, vol. 155, No. 10, pp. H812-H818. |
Schmidt, Martin A., Wafer-To-Wafer Bonding for Microstructure Formation, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 86, No. 8, 1998, pp. 1575-1586. |
Shigetou et al., “Cu—Cu direct bonding for bump-less interconnect,” Research Center for Advanced Science and Technolog., University of Tokyo, Optoelectronic Packaging and Solder Bumps, (2002), pp. 628-639. |
Shigetou et al., “Room temperature bonding of ultra-fine pitch and low-profiled Cu electrodes for bump-less interconnect,” 2003 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, pp. 848-852. |
Shigetou et al., “Room-temperature direct bonding of CMP-Cu film for bumpless interconnection,” Electronic Components and Technology Confererence, 51st Proceedings, 2001, IEEE, pp. 755-760. |
Shimatsu, T. et al., “Metal bonding during sputter film deposition,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16(4), 1998, pp. 2125-2131. |
Shingo et al., “Design and fabrication of an electrostatically actuated MEMS probe card,” Tranducers, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 12th International Conference, Jun. 8-12, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 1522-1525. |
Steinkirchner, J. et al., “Silicon wafer bonding via designed monolayers,” Advanced Materials, 1995, vol. 7, No. 7, 7 pages. |
Suga et al., “A new approach to Cu—Cu direct bump bonding,” IEMT/IMC Symposium, 1997, Joint International Electronic Manufacturing Symposium and the International Microelectronics Conference, Apr. 16-18, 1997, IEEE, pp. 146-151. |
Suga et al., “A new bumping process using lead-free solder paste,” Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on (vol. 25, Issue 4), IEEE, Oct. 2002, pp. 253-256. |
Suga et al., “A new wafer-bonder of ultra-high precision using surface activated bonding (SAB) concept,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2001, IEEE, pp. 1013-1018. |
Suga et al., “Bump-less interconnect for next generation system packaging,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2001, IEEE, pp. 1003-1008. |
Suga et al., “Surface activated bonding—an approach to joining at room temperature,” Ceramic Transactions: Structural Ceramics Joining II, The American Ceramic Society, 1993, pp. 323-331. |
Suga et al., “Surface activated bonding for new flip chip and bumpless interconnect systems,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2002, IEEE, pp. 105-111. |
Suga, “UHV room temperature joining by the surface activated bonding method,” Advances in science and technology, Techna, Faenza, Italie, 1999, pp. C1079-C1089. |
Suga, T., “Feasibility of surface activated bonding for ultra-fine pitch interconnection—A new concept of bump-less direct bonding for system level packaging,” The University of Tokyo, Research Center for Science and Technology, 2000 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2000 IEEE, pp. 702-705. |
Suga, T., “Room-temperature bonding on metals and ceramics,” Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: Science, Technology and Applications, The Electrochemical Society Proceedings, vol. 93-29 (1993), pp. 71-80. |
Takagi et al, “Wafer-scale room-temperature bonding between silicon and ceramic wafers by means of argon-beam surface activation,” Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2001, MEMS 2001, The 14th IEEE International Conference, Jan. 25, 2001, IEEE, pp. 60-63. |
Takagi et al., “Effect of surface roughness on room-temperature wafer bonding by Ar beam surface activation,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 1998, vol. 37, Part 1, No. 1, pp. 4197. |
Takagi et al., “Low temperature direct bonding of silicon and silicon dioxide by the surface activation method,” Solid State Sensors and Actuators, 1997, Transducers '97 Chicago, 1997 International Conference, vol. 1, pp. 657-660. |
Takagi et al., “Room temperature silicon wafer direct bonding in vacuum by Ar beam irradiation,” Micro Electro Mehcanical Systems, MEMS '97 Proceedings, 1997, IEEE, pp. 191-196. |
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature bonding of lithium niobate and silicon wafers by argon-beam surface activation,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 1999. Vol. 74, pp. 2387. |
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature wafer bonding of Si to LiNbO3, LiTaO3 and Gd3Ga5O12 by Ar-beam surface activation,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2001, vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 348. |
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature wafer bonding of silicon and lithium niobate by means of arbon-beam surface activation,” Integrated Ferroelectrics: An International Journal, 2002, vol. 50, Issue 1, pp. 53-59. |
Takagi et al., “Surface activated bonding silicon wafers at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2222 (1996). |
Takagi et al., “Wafer-scale spontaneous bonding of silicon wafers by argon-beam surface activation at room temperature,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Jun. 15, 2003, vol. 105, Issue 1, pp. 98-102. |
Tong et al., “Low temperature wafer direct bonding,” Journal of Microelectomechanical systems, Mar. 1994, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 29-35. |
Tong et al., “Low temperature wafer direct bonding,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, vol. 3, No. 1, Mar. 1, 1994, pp. 29-35, XP-000885425, ISSN 1057-7157. |
Tong, Q.Y. et al., “Semiconductor wafer bonding,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, R25, 1999, 239 pages (exerpts). |
Tong, Q.Y. et al., “Semiconductor wafer bonding: recent developments,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 37, 1994, pp. 101-127. |
Tong, Q.Y. et al., “Semiconductor wafer bonding: science and technology,” 1999, 120 pages. |
Tong, Q.Y. et al., “Semiconductor wafer bonding: science and technology,” 1999, 159 pages. |
Tong, Q.Y. et al., “Wafer bonding and layer splitting for microsystems,” Advanced Materials, 1999, vol. 11, No. 17, pp. 1409-1425. |
Topol et al., “Enabling technologies for wafer-level bonding of 3D MEMS and integrated circuit structures,” 2004 Electronics Components and Technology Conference, 2004 IEEE, pp. 931-938. |
Tsau et al., “Fabrication process and plasticity of gold-gold thermocompression bonds,” Mater. Soc. Symp. Proc. 605, 171 (1999). |
Tsau, C.H. et al., “Characterization of low temperature wafer-level gold—gold thermocompression bonds,” Mater. Soc. Symp. Proc. 605, 1999, pp. 171-176. |
Vossen, J. et al., “Thin Film Processes II,” Academic Press, 1991, 62 pages. |
Vossen, J. et al., “Thin Film Processes,” Academic Press, 1978, 62 pages. |
Wang et al., “Reliability and microstructure of Au—Al and Au—Cu direct bonding fabricated by the Surface Activated Bonding,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2002, IEEE, pp. 915-919. |
Wang et al., “Reliability of Au bump—Cu direct interconnections fabricated by means of surface activated bonding method,” Microelectronics Reliability, May 2003, vol. 43, Issue 5, pp. 751-756. |
Warner, K. et al., “Low-temperature oxide-bonded three-dimensional integrated circuits,” IEEE International SOI Conference, Oct. 2012, pp. 123-125. |
Weldon et al., “Physics and chemistry of silicon wafer bonding investigated by infrared absorption spectroscopy,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Jul./Aug. 1996, vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 3095-3106. |
Wikipedia, “Chemical bond,” URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/chemical_bond, accessed on Mar. 31, 2010, 10 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Van der Waals force,” URL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_der_Waals_force, originally accessed on Mar. 31, 2010, 7 pages. |
Xu et al., “New Au—Al interconnect technology and its reliability by surface activated bonding,” Electronic Packaging Technology Proceedings, Oct. 28-30, 2003, Shanghai, China, pp. 479-483. |
Yablonovitch, E. et al., “Van der Waals bonding of GaAs on Pd leads to a permanent, solid-phase-topotaxial metallurgical bond,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 1991, pp. 3159-3161. |
Image showing a partial cross-section of Sony IMX260 BSI image sensor from Samsung Galaxy S7; product believed to be released Mar. 2016. |
Image showing a partial cross-section of Omnivision OV16B10 16MP BSI image sensor from Huawei P20 Lite Phone; product believed to be released May 2018. |
Bush, Steve, “Electronica: Automotive power modules from On Semi,” ElectronicsWeekly.com, indicating an ONSEMI AR0820 product was to be demonstrated at a Nov. 2018 trade show, https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/products/power-supplies/electronica-automotive-power-modules-semi-2018-11/ (published Nov. 8, 2018; downloaded Jul. 26, 2023). |
Morrison, Jim et al., “Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Teardown,” Tech Insights (posted Apr. 24, 2016), includes description of hybrid bonded Sony IMX260 dual-pixel sensor, https://www.techinsights.com/blog/samsung-galaxy-s7-edge-teardown, downloaded Jul. 11, 2023, 9 pages. |
ONSEMI AR0820 image, cross section of a CMOS image sensor product. The part in the image was shipped on Sep. 16, 2021. Applicant makes no representation that the part in the image is identical to the part identified in the separately submitted reference BUSH, Nov. 8, 2018, ElectronicsWeekly.com (“BUSH article”); however, the imaged part and the part shown in the BUSH article share the part number “ONSEMI AR0820.”. |
Sony IMX260 image, a first cross section of Sony product labeled IMX260, showing a hybrid bonded back side illuminated CMOS image sensor with a pad opening for a wire bond. The second image shows a second cross-section with peripheral probe and wire bond pads in the bonded structure. The part in the images was shipped in Apr. 2016. Applicant makes no representation that the part in the images is identical to the part identified in the separately submitted reference Morrison et al. (Tech Insights article dated Apr. 24, 2016), describing and showing a similar sensor product within the Samsung Galaxy S7; however the imaged part and the part shown in the Morrison et al. article share the part name “Sony IMX260 image.” |
Sony IMX260 images, showing various cross sections and materials analyses for a hybrid bonded back side illuminated CMOS image sensor. The part in the images was shipped in Apr. 2016. Applicant makes no representation that the part in the images is identical to the part identified in the separately submitted reference Morrison et al. (Tech Insights article dated Apr. 24, 2016), describing and showing a similar sensor product within the Samsung Galaxy S7; however the imaged part and the part shown in the Morrison et al. article share the part name “Sony IMX260 image.” (8 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220005784 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62725801 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16218769 | Dec 2018 | US |
Child | 17320767 | US |