The present invention relates to a lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method.
A lithographic apparatus is a machine that applies a desired pattern onto a substrate, usually onto a target portion of the substrate. A lithographic apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs). In that instance, a patterning device, which is alternatively referred to as a mask or a reticle, may be used to generate a circuit pattern to be formed on an individual layer of the IC. This pattern can be transferred onto a target portion (e.g. comprising part of, one, or several dies) on a substrate (e.g. a silicon wafer). Transfer of the pattern is typically via imaging onto a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist) provided on the substrate. In general, a single substrate will contain a network of adjacent target portions that are successively patterned. Known lithographic apparatus include so-called steppers, in which each target portion is irradiated by exposing an entire pattern onto the target portion at one time, and so-called scanners, in which each target portion is irradiated by scanning the pattern through a radiation beam in a given direction (the “scanning”-direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate parallel or anti-parallel to this direction. It is also possible to transfer the pattern from the patterning device to the substrate by imprinting the pattern onto the substrate.
It has been proposed to immerse the substrate in the lithographic projection apparatus in a liquid having a relatively high refractive index, e.g. water, so as to fill a space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate. The point of this is to enable imaging of smaller features since the exposure radiation will have a shorter wavelength in the liquid. (The effect of the liquid may also be regarded as increasing the effective NA of the system and also increasing the depth of focus.) Other immersion liquids have been proposed, including water with solid particles (e.g. quartz) suspended therein.
However, submersing the substrate or substrate and substrate table in a bath of liquid (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,509,852, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference) means that there is a large body of liquid that must be accelerated during a scanning exposure. This requires additional or more powerful motors and turbulence in the liquid may lead to undesirable and unpredictable effects.
One of the solutions proposed is for a liquid supply system to provide liquid on only a localized area of the substrate and in between the final element of the projection system and the substrate (the substrate generally has a larger surface area than the final element of the projection system). One way which has been proposed to arrange for this is disclosed in PCT patent application WO 99/49504, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. As illustrated in
Accordingly, it would be advantageous, for example, to increase a production yield of a lithographic apparatus and a device manufacturing method.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a substrate handling system for a lithographic apparatus, comprising
a substrate table constructed to hold a substrate;
a surrounding structure surrounding the substrate table;
a sensor configured to determine a level parameter of the substrate;
an actuator configured to move the substrate table with respect to the surrounding structure at least in a direction perpendicular to a surface of the surrounding structure; and
a controller configured to drive the actuator to move the substrate table, making use of the level parameter, with respect to the surface of the surrounding structure to a position so that the surface of the substrate, when held on the substrate table, is substantially level with the surface of the surrounding structure.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a device manufacturing method, comprising:
positioning a substrate table with respect to a surface of a surrounding structure, that surrounds the substrate table, to a position where a surface of a substrate held on the substrate table is substantially level with a surface of the surrounding structure; and
projecting a patterned beam of radiation onto the substrate. According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a computer program comprising program instructions configured to cause an apparatus to execute a method comprising positioning a substrate table with respect to a surface of a surrounding structure, that surrounds the substrate table, to a position where a surface of a substrate held on the substrate table is substantially level with a surface of the surrounding structure.
According to an aspect of the invention, these is provided an optical exposure apparatus, comprising
a substrate table constructed to hold a substrate;
a surrounding structure surrounding the substrate table;
a fluid reservoir configured to confine a liquid adjacent the substrate, the substrate table, the surrounding structure, or any combination of the foregoing;
a sensor configured to determine a level parameter of the substrate;
an actuator configured to move the substrate table with respect to the surrounding structure at least in a direction perpendicular to a surface of the surrounding structure; and
a controller configured to drive the actuator to move the substrate table, making use of the level parameter, with respect to the surface of the surrounding structure to a position so that the surface of the substrate, when held on the substrate table, is substantially level with the surface of the surrounding structure.
According to an aspect, there is provided a A lithographic apparatus, comprising:
an illuminator configured to condition a radiation beam;
a support constructed to hold a patterning device, the patterning device configured to impart the radiation beam with a pattern in its cross-section to form a patterned radiation beam;
a substrate table constructed to hold a substrate;
a surrounding structure surrounding the substrate table;
a projection system configured to project the patterned radiation beam onto a target portion of the substrate;
a liquid supply system configured to at least partly fill a space between the projection system and the substrate with a liquid, the liquid supply system comprising a liquid confinement structure configured to at least partly confine the liquid within the space;
a sensor configured to determine a level parameter of the substrate;
an actuator configured to move the substrate table with respect to the surrounding structure at least in a direction perpendicular to a surface of the surrounding structure; and
a controller configured to drive the actuator to move the substrate table, making use of the level parameter, with respect to the surface of the surrounding structure to a position so that the surface of the substrate, when held on the substrate table, is substantially level with the surface of the surrounding structure.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts, and in which:
The illumination system may include various types of optical components, such as refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic, electrostatic or other types of optical components, or any combination thereof, for directing, shaping, or controlling radiation.
The support structure supports, i.e. bears the weight of, the patterning device. It holds the patterning device in a manner that depends on the orientation of the patterning device, the design of the lithographic apparatus, and other conditions, such as for example whether or not the patterning device is held in a vacuum environment. The support structure can use mechanical, vacuum, electrostatic or other clamping techniques to hold the patterning device. The support structure may be a frame or a table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required. The support structure may ensure that the patterning device is at a desired position, for example with respect to the projection system. Any use of the terms “reticle” or “mask” herein may be considered synonymous with the more general term “patterning device.”
The term “patterning device” used herein should be broadly interpreted as referring to any device that can be used to impart a radiation beam with a pattern in its cross-section such as to create a pattern in a target portion of the substrate. It should be noted that the pattern imparted to the radiation beam may not exactly correspond to the desired pattern in the target portion of the substrate, for example if the pattern includes phase-shifting features or so called assist features. Generally, the pattern imparted to the radiation beam will correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion, such as an integrated circuit.
The patterning device may be transmissive or reflective. Examples of patterning devices include masks, programmable mirror arrays, and programmable LCD panels. Masks are well known in lithography, and include mask types such as binary, alternating phase-shift, and attenuated phase-shift, as well as various hybrid mask types. An example of a programmable mirror array employs a matrix arrangement of small mirrors, each of which can be individually tilted so as to reflect an incoming radiation beam in different directions. The tilted mirrors impart a pattern in a radiation beam which is reflected by the mirror matrix.
The term “projection system” used herein should be broadly interpreted as encompassing any type of projection system, including refractive, reflective, catadioptric, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical systems, or any combination thereof, as appropriate for the exposure radiation being used, or for other factors such as the use of an immersion liquid or the use of a vacuum. Any use of the term “projection lens” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general term “projection system”.
As here depicted, the apparatus is of a transmissive type (e.g. employing a transmissive mask). Alternatively, the apparatus may be of a reflective type (e.g. employing a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above, or employing a reflective mask).
The lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two (dual stage) or more substrate tables (and/or two or more mask tables). In such “multiple stage” machines the additional tables may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables while one or more other tables are being used for exposure.
Referring to
The illuminator IL may comprise an adjuster AM for adjusting the angular intensity distribution of the radiation beam. Generally, at least the outer and/or inner radial extent (commonly referred to as σ-outer and σ-inner, respectively) of the intensity distribution in a pupil plane of the illuminator can be adjusted. In addition, the illuminator IL may comprise various other components, such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO. The illuminator may be used to condition the radiation beam, to have a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross-section.
The radiation beam PB is incident on the patterning device (e.g., mask MA), which is held on the support structure (e.g., mask table MT), and is patterned by the patterning device. Having traversed the mask MA, the radiation beam PB passes through the projection system PL, which focuses the beam onto a target portion C of the substrate W. With the aid of the second positioner PW and position sensor IF (e.g. an interferometric device, linear encoder or capacitive sensor), the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g. so as to position different target portions C in the path of the radiation beam PB. Similarly, the first positioner PM and another position sensor (which is not explicitly depicted in
The depicted apparatus could be used in at least one of the following modes:
Combinations and/or variations on the above described modes of use or entirely different modes of use may also be employed.
A further immersion lithography solution with a localized liquid supply system is shown in
Another immersion lithography solution with a localized liquid supply system solution which has been proposed is to provide the liquid supply system with a liquid confinement structure which extends along at least a part of a boundary of the space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate table. Such a system is shown in
The liquid is confined in the reservoir by a gas seal 16 between the bottom of the liquid confinement structure 12 and the surface of the substrate W. The gas seal is formed by gas, e.g. air, synthetic air, N2 or an inert gas, provided under pressure via inlet 15 to the gap between liquid confinement structure 12 and substrate and extracted via first outlet 14. The overpressure on the gas inlet 15, vacuum level on the first outlet 14 and geometry of the gap are arranged so that there is a high-velocity gas flow inwards that confines the liquid. It will be understood by the person skilled in the art that other types of seal could be used to contain the liquid.
In the arrangement according to
An issue associated with a localized liquid supply system, such as the arrangement as described with reference to
Where a surrounding structure is provided, the difference in level the gas seal/bearing 16 is able to cross is relatively small, in an implementation around 30 to 40 micrometers. This difference is to a large extent determined by the dimensions of the gap between the substrate W and the liquid confinement structure 12. In general, however, a tolerance of thickness of the substrate W is larger than the level difference the gas seal/bearing is able to cope with. Currently, a thickness tolerance of substrates is in the range of about +/−25 micrometers, and in addition thereto a number of layers might have been established on the substrate W during a production process, such as an integrated circuit manufacturing process. The thickness of such layers will probably be between about 0 to 20 micrometers. As a result thereof, a total tolerance band of the thickness of a substrate will in a current implementation amount to approximately a range of about −25 micrometers to +45 micrometers, thus resulting in a total tolerance band of about 70 micrometers. This total tolerance exceeds the level difference which the gas seal/bearing 16 is able to cope with.
As a result of this discrepancy, illumination of the substrate W may take place in a center zone of the substrate only, thus not illuminating the substrate surface near its edge, with a downside that a significant part of the substrate W may not effectively be used during production. Alternatively, a selection of appropriate substrates may be implemented, i.e., only substrates having a thickness within a tolerance acceptable for the lithographic apparatus, and in particular acceptable for the gas seal/bearing, are provided to be processed by the lithographic apparatus. A downside of this selection process is that it may reduce production yield of the lithographic apparatus, as substrates having a thickness outside the acceptable tolerance are not allowed to be processed and thus have to be taken out of the production process in which the lithographic apparatus is used. This may result in a waste of material, a waste of time of apparatuses processing a substrate that will be disqualified because of its thickness, etc.
In an embodiment, the optical element comprises an immersion liquid reservoir, e.g. the reservoir 10 as depicted in
A level sensor is provided to determine a level parameter of the substrate W to enable a controller CON to drive the actuators A1, A2, and A3 to position the substrate table WT with respect to the surrounding structure M such that the surface of the substrate, when being held by the substrate table, is substantially on a same level as the surface of the surrounding structure. The level parameter may comprise a thickness (as is the case in the embodiment described with reference to
Alternatively, the level sensor may comprise a level difference sensor constructed to measure a level difference between the surface of the substrate and the surface of the surrounding structure and the level parameter comprises the level difference. An advantage of this arrangement is that measurement of the level difference can be performed as a single action, thus obviating a need to measure the level of the substrate and the surrounding structure separately. Further, the level difference may be measured with existing level sensors used for focus control during exposure of the substrate.
In another embodiment, the level sensor comprises a level measurement sensor constructed to measure a level of the surface of the substrate when held by the substrate table and the level parameter comprises the level of the surface of the substrate. In this case, the controller is further provided with a level of the surrounding structure to position the substrate table with respect to the surrounding structure. An advantage of this configuration is that this provides for a simple solution, advantageous in an embodiment wherein only the substrate table is moved by the actuators and the surrounding structure is stationary.
In this document, the wording ‘substantially level with’ is to be understood as being on substantially a same level, i.e., being on a same level or showing a level difference which is insubstantial for the movement of the optical element with respect to the surfaces of the substrate and of the surrounding structure. In an embodiment, such a level difference amounts to less than about 30 to 40 micrometers (being a thickness of a gap as created by the gas seal 16 in
The optical element OE can comprise any part of the projection system, such as a lens, a diaphragm, an optical window, a radiation source, or any other optical element. In an embodiment as described with reference to
The actuators may comprise any type of positioning actuator, such as a piezo-electric actuator, a pneumatic actuator, a linear motor, a Lorentz actuator, a cam disk or a spindle. An advantage of piezo-electric actuator and a cam disk is their high stiffness, thus increasing the eigen frequencies of the substrate table and increasing the position accuracy thereof. While multiple actuators have been described, a single actuator may be used.
Alternatively or additionally to the arrangement shown in
As noted, the actuators may be a single actuator configured to compensate for a thickness of the substrate, thus providing for a compensation in a single dimension. Where two or more actuators are provided, it is also possible that the actuators may be configured to compensate for an unflatness of or variation in thickness of the substrate in 2 or more dimensions. In an embodiment, three actuators are provided, preferably located substantially 120° from each other on an imaginary circle substantially concentric with the substrate W held by the substrate table WT. The actuators may be driven individually by the controller to enable an adjustment of the position of the substrate table at each of the actuators individually. In this manner, an error caused by an unflatness of the substrate, e.g. a cross section of the substrate comprising a wedge shape, may be compensated for as the substrate table can be set at a different position at each of the actuators. This may be advantageous in combination with a thickness sensor which is able to determine a thickness of the substrate at two or more distinct locations of the substrate. An example of such thickness sensor is the first stage in a dual stage lithographic apparatus on which leveling measurements are performed. In an embodiment, the locations at the substrate at which the thickness thereof is determined correspond or substantially correspond to the point(s) of application of force by the actuator(s). In this manner, the actuator(s) can be driven so as to position the substrate table as to level the surface of the substrate at the point(s) of application, with the surface of the surrounding structure. In other words, in an embodiment, each actuator is driven by the controller to position the substrate table with respect to the surface of the surrounding structure at a position wherein at two or more distinct locations a distance between the surface of the substrate table and the surface of the surrounding structure, in the direction perpendicular to the surface of the surrounding structure, substantially equals the thickness of the substrate at each of the two or more locations. Thus, making use of two or more actuators, an unflatness resulting in a level difference between a surface of the substrate held by the substrate table and a surface of the surrounding structure, may be compensated for in two or more dimensions.
The actuator is constructed to move the substrate table at least in a direction perpendicular to the surface of the substrate when held by the substrate table. In a typical embodiment, the actuator is constructed to move the substrate table in a vertical direction, however other types of movement of the substrate table are also possible, the movements at least comprising a movement in a direction perpendicular to the surface of the substrate when held by the substrate table or in a direction perpendicular to the surface of the substrate table itself.
Where in this document the term surface is used, in particular in the context of a surface of the substrate, this is to be understood as including a substantially flat surface, however the surface of the substrate may also contain irregularities, level differences, etc, which may be due to, for example, the provisioning of patterns, layers, or other structures on the substrate. Thus, the same remarks as made with regard to the term surface in respect of the substrate may also hold in the context of the surface of the surrounding structure. The surface of the surrounding structure includes a substantially flat or smooth surface, however it is also imaginable that the surface of the surrounding structure comprises irregularities, steps, discontinuities, etc. caused by, for example, the presence of different parts of the surrounding structure, such as the various sensors (TIS, ILIAS, etc) and other elements comprised in the surrounding structure, as described above. In an embodiment, a level difference in the surface of the substrate and/or the surrounding structure amounts to less than 20 micrometers or less than 10 micrometers. In other words, the surface of the substrate and/or the surrounding structure is substantially flat within 20 micrometers or within 10 micrometers, hence providing a surface which is sufficiently smooth, i.e., sufficiently flat not to impede the optical element, in particular the immersion liquid reservoir 10, over the substrate and the surrounding structure.
The bearing discussed herein may comprise a gas bearing and/or a liquid bearing. Applicable gasses may comprise air, synthetic air, nitrogen or any other suitable gas. Applicable liquids may comprise a polarized or non-polarized liquid, comprising, e.g., water, etc. The gas or liquid may be pure or may be a mixture of substances.
The surrounding structure may be comprised in a constructive element of the lithographic apparatus, such as a frame carrying the substrate table WT, however it is also possible that the surrounding structure has no other function in the lithographic apparatus than the provisioning of a surface around the surface of the substrate when positioned on the substrate table. Also, it is possible that the surrounding structure forms part of an optical element of the lithographic apparatus, the optical element, e.g., comprising a mirror block.
The level sensor can comprise any type of level sensor, e.g. an optical distance sensor operating with visible, infrared or ultra-violet radiation, or a mechanical distance sensor. The level sensor may be a separate device in the lithographic apparatus, however it is also possible that an existing measurement device in the lithographic apparatus fulfills the function of the thickness sensor or level sensor, e.g. in other words the thickness sensor or level sensor is comprised in an existing measurement device of the lithographic apparatus. In an embodiment, such an existing measurement device may comprise the leveling measurement stage as described above and in European Patent application 03257072.3, incorporated herein its entirety by reference. For example, leveling measurements may be carried out with a stage at a first position, without immersion liquid (or in more generic terms: immersion fluid), and exposure is carried out with the stage at a second position, where immersion liquid (or in more generic terms: immersion fluid) is present, the thickness of the substrate or the level parameter is advantageously determined at the first position, as leveling measurements are carried out at that stage already. In such a dual stage lithographic apparatus, the leveling measurements can advantageously be carried out along an edge of the substrate, e.g. in a form of a circle in case of a substantially circular substrate. During normal operation, in the dual stage lithographic apparatus, a substrate, e.g. a wafer, is first processed with the substrate table at the first position, e.g. leveling measurements are performed on that particular substrate, and then with the substrate table at the second position, illumination of the substrate takes place. As during the leveling measurements at the first stage the thickness of the substrate may be determined, a positioning of the substrate table WT by the actuators can take place under control of the controller making use of the thickness as determined with regard to that particular substrate when on the first stage. As a result thereof, no or only very limited additional time is required to determining a thickness of the substrate and thus the thickness determination not or substantially not affecting a throughput of the lithographic apparatus. Also, settling time for the positioning of the substrate table should have a negligible influence on a throughput of the lithographic apparatus, as the thickness has been measured when the substrate table with the substrate was e.g. at the first position, thus the thickness is known before positioning the substrate and substrate table at the second position, enabling sufficient time for positioning thereof. Also, it is possible that the level sensor or thickness is a level sensor of a lithographic apparatus having a single stage. In that case, results of a leveling measurement by an existing level sensor of the lithographic apparatus may be used to control a positioning of the substrate table in a manner similarly as described above.
In an embodiment, the thickness sensor may be positioned near a substrate supply, i.e. a substrate input of the lithographic apparatus. In that case, the thickness of the substrate is detected at or near the substrate supply input of the lithographic apparatus. This has an advantage that a substrate having a thickness outside a certain predetermined thickness range may be taken out manually or automatically before being processed further by the lithographic apparatus. This way it can be avoid that the stage or stages of the lithographic apparatus are loaded with a substrate which appears to be outside the level parameter range, e.g. the thickness range.
The controller can comprise any type of controller such as an electronic controller, analog, digital, or a combination thereof, comprising, e.g., a microprocessor, microcontroller, other type of programming device, application specific integrated circuitry, or any other type of programmable device. The actuator can be connected to the controller via any suitable connection, such as an analog line, a digital line, a multiplexed digital line, or any other communication channel.
The arrangement as described with reference to
An embodiment of the method according to the invention is depicted in
In European Patent Application No. 03257072.3, the idea of a twin or dual stage immersion lithography apparatus is disclosed. Such an apparatus is provided with two tables for supporting a substrate. Leveling measurements are carried out with a table at a first position, without immersion liquid, and exposure is carried out with a table at a second position, where immersion liquid is present. Alternatively, the apparatus has only one table
Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of lithographic apparatus in the manufacture of ICs, it should be understood that the lithographic apparatus described herein may have other applications, such as the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, flat-panel displays, liquid-crystal displays (LCDs), thin-film magnetic heads, etc. The skilled artisan will appreciate that, in the context of such alternative applications, any use of the terms “wafer” or “die” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general terms “substrate” or “target portion”, respectively. The substrate referred to herein may be processed, before or after exposure, in for example a track (a tool that typically applies a layer of resist to a substrate and develops the exposed resist), a metrology tool and/or an inspection tool. Where applicable, the disclosure herein may be applied to such and other substrate processing tools. Further, the substrate may be processed more than once, for example in order to create a multi-layer IC, so that the term substrate used herein may also refer to a substrate that already contains multiple processed layers.
The terms “radiation” and “beam” used herein encompass all types of electromagnetic radiation, including ultraviolet (UV) radiation (e.g. having a wavelength of or about 365, 248, 193, 157 or 126 nm).
The term “lens”, where the context allows, may refer to any one or combination of various types of optical components, including refractive and reflective optical components.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described. For example, the invention may take the form of a computer program containing one or more sequences of machine-readable instructions describing a method as disclosed above, or a data storage medium (e.g. semiconductor memory, magnetic or optical disk) having such a computer program stored therein.
One or more embodiments of the present invention may be applied to any immersion lithography apparatus, in particular, but not exclusively, to those types mentioned above. A liquid supply system is any mechanism that provides a liquid to a space between the projection system and the substrate and/or substrate table. It may comprise any combination of one or more structures, one or more liquid inlets, one or more gas inlets, one or more gas outlets, and/or one or more liquid outlets, the combination providing and confining the liquid to the space. In an embodiment, a surface of the space may be limited to a portion of the substrate and/or substrate table, a surface of the space may completely cover a surface of the substrate and/or substrate table, or the space may envelop the substrate and/or substrate table.
The descriptions above are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Thus, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the invention as described without departing from the scope of the claims set out below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573975 | Dhaka et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3648587 | Stevens | Mar 1972 | A |
4346164 | Tabarelli et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4390273 | Loebach et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4396705 | Akeyama et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4480910 | Takanashi et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4509852 | Tabarelli et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4999669 | Sakamoto et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5040020 | Rauschenbach et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5121256 | Corle et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5610683 | Takahashi | Mar 1997 | A |
5711646 | Ueda et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5825043 | Suwa | Oct 1998 | A |
5900354 | Batchelder | May 1999 | A |
6031597 | Knirck et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6191429 | Suwa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6236634 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6529266 | Sandstrom | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6600547 | Watson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603130 | Bisschops et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
7129485 | Nakasuji et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20020020821 | Van Santen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020163629 | Switkes et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030011771 | Moriyama | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030123040 | Almogy | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030128348 | Nishi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040000627 | Schuster | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040075895 | Lin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080734 | Taniguchi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040114117 | Bleeker | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136494 | Lof et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160582 | Lof et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165159 | Lof et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040189964 | Nijmeijer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207824 | Lof et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211920 | Derksen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224265 | Endo et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239954 | Bischoff | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263809 | Nakano | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007569 | Streefkerk et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018155 | Cox et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024609 | De Smit et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030497 | Nakamura | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046813 | Streefkerk et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050046934 | Ho et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050052632 | Miyajima | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050094116 | Flagello et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050094125 | Arai | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122505 | Miyajima | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132914 | Mulkens et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134817 | Nakamura | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050140948 | Tokita | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050146693 | Ohsaki | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050146694 | Tokita | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050151942 | Kawashima | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050200815 | Akamatsu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213065 | Kitaoka | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213066 | Sumiyoshi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219489 | Nei et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233081 | Tokita | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
206 607 | Feb 1984 | DE |
221 563 | Apr 1985 | DE |
224 448 | Jul 1985 | DE |
242 880 | Feb 1987 | DE |
0023231 | Feb 1981 | EP |
0418427 | Mar 1991 | EP |
1039511 | Sep 2000 | EP |
2474708 | Jul 1981 | FR |
58-202448 | Nov 1983 | JP |
62-065326 | Mar 1987 | JP |
62-121417 | Jun 1987 | JP |
63-157419 | Jun 1988 | JP |
04-305915 | Oct 1992 | JP |
04-305917 | Oct 1992 | JP |
06-124873 | May 1994 | JP |
07-132262 | May 1995 | JP |
07-220990 | Aug 1995 | JP |
10-228661 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-255319 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10-303114 | Nov 1998 | JP |
10-340846 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-176727 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-058436 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001-091849 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2004-193252 | Jul 2004 | JP |
WO 9949504 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 2004053596 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053950 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053951 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053952 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053953 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053954 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053955 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053956 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053957 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053958 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053959 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004055803 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057589 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057590 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090577 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090633 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090634 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004092830 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004092833 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093130 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093159 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093160 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004095135 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005010611 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024517 | Mar 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060103831 A1 | May 2006 | US |