The present invention relates to a lithographic apparatus and a device manufacturing method.
A lithographic apparatus is a machine that applies a desired pattern onto a target portion of a substrate. Lithographic apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs). In that circumstance, a patterning device, such as a mask, may be used to generate a circuit pattern corresponding to an individual layer of the IC, and this pattern can be imaged onto a target portion (e.g. comprising part of, one or several dies) on a substrate (e.g. a silicon wafer) that has a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist). In general, a single substrate will contain a network of adjacent target portions that are successively exposed. Known lithographic apparatus include so-called steppers, in which each target portion is irradiated by exposing an entire pattern onto the target portion at one time, and so-called scanners, in which each target portion is irradiated by scanning the pattern through the projection beam in a given direction (the “scanning”-direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate parallel or anti-parallel to this direction.
It has been proposed to immerse the substrate in the lithographic projection apparatus in a liquid having a relatively high refractive index, e.g. water, so as to fill a space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate. The point of this is to enable imaging of smaller features since the exposure radiation will have a shorter wavelength in the liquid. (The effect of the liquid may also be regarded as increasing the effective NA of the system and also increasing the depth of focus.) Other immersion liquids have been proposed, including water with solid particles (e.g. quartz) suspended therein.
However, submersing the substrate or substrate and substrate table in a bath of liquid (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 4,509,852, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference) means that there is a large body of liquid that must be accelerated during a scanning exposure. This requires additional or more powerful motors and turbulence in the liquid may lead to undesirable and unpredictable effects.
One of the solutions proposed is for a liquid supply system to provide liquid on only a localized area of the substrate and in between the final element of the projection system and the substrate using a liquid confinement system (the substrate generally has a larger surface area than the final element of the projection system). One way which has been proposed to arrange for this is disclosed in WO 99/49504, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. As illustrated in
Unexpected disadvantages emerge from this new technology when compared with systems that do not have liquid in the exposure radiation path. In particular, despite the improved imaging resolution, the liquid tends to degrade the image quality in other respects. Accordingly, it would be advantageous, for example, to improve the imaging performance of an apparatus having a liquid filling a space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic projection apparatus comprising:
an illumination system arranged to condition a radiation beam;
a support structure configured to support a patterning device, the patterning device being capable of imparting the radiation beam with a pattern in its cross-section;
a substrate table configured to hold a substrate;
a projection system arranged to project the patterned radiation beam onto a target portion of the substrate;
a liquid supply system configured to at least partly fill a space between the projection system and the substrate with a liquid; and
a bubble reduction device configured to reduce a size, a concentration, or both of bubbles in the liquid, the bubble reduction device comprising a bubble detector configured to detect bubbles in the liquid.
An important source of image degradation in liquid immersion lithography may be due to the scattering of imaging radiation from bubbles in the liquid. By reducing the size and concentration of these bubbles it may be possible to reduce this scattering and the associated distortion of the image reaching the substrate, thereby reducing the frequency and magnitude of defects in the printed pattern on the substrate. Bubbles typically form when dissolved gases from the atmosphere come out of solution due to a disturbance of some kind, or from out-gassing elements of the lithographic apparatus, such as a photosensitive layer on the substrate. Bubbles thus formed may vary greatly in number density and size distribution depending on the liquid, gases and disturbances involved. Very fine bubbles tend to cause particular problems as they are both difficult to detect and hard to remove using standard methods and yet still influence the image formed on the substrate. For use in the context of a typical lithographic apparatus, for example, bubbles continue to degrade performance down to around 10 nm in diameter. The bubble reduction device may comprise a bubble detector. The inclusion of a bubble detector provides the possibility of feedback to the bubble reduction device, allowing adjustment and/or optimization of bubble reduction processes.
In an implementation, the bubble detector may comprise one or more ultrasonic transducers. These transducers may emit ultrasonic waves and receive ultrasonic waves that are influenced by the presence of bubbles in the liquid within which they propagate. The information yielded by the ultrasonic transducers may include information about the distribution of bubble sizes as well as their number density.
The ultrasonic transducers may also measure the ultrasonic attenuation as a function of frequency. The advantage of this approach is that it is possible to detect bubbles with dimensions very much smaller than the wavelength of the ultrasonic waves. Using only the amplitude of the signal would restrict this measurement method to bubbles of the same size or greater than the wavelength of the ultrasonic waves.
In an embodiment, the bubble reduction device may comprise a bubble removal device.
The bubble removal device may comprise a degassing device, the degassing device comprising an isolation chamber, wherein a space above liquid in the isolation chamber is maintained at a pressure below atmospheric pressure encouraging previously dissolved gases to come out of solution and be pumped away. A degassing process may dramatically reduce the occurrence of bubbles due to dissolved atmospheric gases coming out of solution. Following the degassing process, the liquid is, in an embodiment, kept as isolated as possible from the normal atmosphere.
In an embodiment, the bubble removal device provides a continuous flow of liquid over the projection system and the substrate in order to transport bubbles out of the imaging field. This step is particularly effective for removing gases originating from out-gassing elements of the lithographic apparatus.
The bubble reduction device may pressurize the liquid above atmospheric pressure to minimize the size of bubbles and encourage bubble-forming gases to dissolve into the liquid.
The composition of the liquid may also be chosen to have a lower surface tension than water. This may reduce the tendency of bubbles to stick to the substrate where they may be particularly damaging to the image and where they tend to be resistant to removal measures. The tendency of bubbles to stick to the substrate and other components may be reduced by controlling the surface finish in contact with the immersion liquid. In particular, the surface finish may be polished or arranged to have a minimal surface roughness, for example with a characteristic length scale of less than 0.5 μm.
The bubble reduction device may treat the liquid before it is introduced into the space between the projection system and the substrate. An advantage of this approach is improved space considerations and liberty of design. These factors make it easier to treat liquid in bulk for use in a plurality of lithographic apparatuses or for use in a circulatory system or where the liquid is to be replaced on a frequent basis. After treatment, the liquid may be protected from atmospheric gases by being kept under vacuum or by being exposed only to a gas, such as nitrogen, argon or helium, which does not easily dissolve into the liquid.
The ultrasonic transducers of the bubble detector may be arranged in a pulse-echo arrangement wherein the same transducer emits waves and, after reflection from a boundary, receives waves attenuated by propagation through the liquid. An advantage of this arrangement is that fewer transducers are used and it may be easier to arrange a relatively long signal path through the liquid.
The bubble detector may comprise two spatially separated ultrasonic transducers, the first arranged to transmit, and the second to receive waves. An advantage of this arrangement is that the signal received at the receiving transducer may be easier to interpret and may suffer less from anomalous signal loss caused, for example, by non-specular reflection from the boundary.
The bubble removal device may include two spatially separated ultrasonic transducers, arranged to produce ultrasonic standing-wave patterns within the liquid that trap bubbles within nodal regions. The bubble removal device is arranged to displace the bubbles through the use of a phase adjusting device linked with the transducers, the phase adjusting device causing spatial shift of the nodal regions and of bubbles trapped within them. This process may be used to transport bubbles completely to one side of a liquid reservoir where they may be isolated and removed from the system.
In an embodiment, the ultrasonic transducers may operate at megasonic frequencies (in the region of 1 MHz). Megasonic waves avoid some of the disadvantages of conventional (lower frequency) ultrasonic waves such as cavitation and bubble collision with solid surfaces, which results in small particles being dislodged and contaminating the liquid.
The bubble removal device may comprise an electric field generator configured to apply an electric field to the liquid, the electric field being capable of dislodging bubbles attached to interfaces within the liquid. This feature may be particularly useful where an interface in question is the substrate, as bubbles attached here are at the focus of the lithographic projection apparatus and may therefore distort the image more severely. The electric field lines are distorted in the vicinity of the bubble, which has a dielectric constant different from that of the surrounding liquid. This embodiment works on the basis that when the bubble is close to, or in contact with, an interface, the electric field distribution may be such as to force the bubble away from the surface and into the bulk of the liquid. Once in the bulk of the liquid, the bubble has a less detrimental effect on image quality, and may also be more easily removed. This method is applicable even where the surface to which the bubble has attached is liquid-phobic and reduces the need to apply special liquid-philic coatings to the substrate.
The bubble removal device may comprise a heater configured to selectively control the temperature and therefore the size of bubbles according to their composition. By selecting to heat only the bubbles and not the surrounding liquid, it may be possible to minimize unnecessary variations in the liquid temperature. Increasing the temperature of the bubbles causes them to expand in size and therefore become easier to remove. The heater may comprise a microwave source, operating at frequencies that correspond to the resonant frequencies of the gas molecules forming the bubbles (commonly nitrogen and oxygen). Given the temperature sensitivity of the lithographic apparatus in the region of the substrate, this method allows more extensive heating of the gas within the bubbles than would be the case if the liquid and bubbles had to be heated simultaneously. The result may be a more energy and time efficient method for removing bubbles from the liquid.
The bubble removal device may comprise a particle input device configured to introducing particles into the liquid, and a particle removal device configured to remove the particles from the liquid. This mechanism operates on the principle that, where the particles are chosen so that it is energetically or otherwise favorable, gas bubbles tend to attach to the surface of particles present in the liquid. Cumulatively, the particles present a large surface area to the liquid, which increases the chances of contact between particle and bubble. The surface in question may comprise the outer surface of the particles, and, where the particles are porous, the internal surface associated with the pores of the particles. Porous particles therefore provide a larger particle surface in contact with the liquid than non-porous particles. This embodiment may be particularly effective when the particles are arranged to have a surface that repels the liquid (i.e. a surface that has a high interface energy with the liquid). In the case of a liquid comprising water, such a surface may be described as hydrophobic. This arrangement favors attachment of the bubbles as they act to reduce the particle surface area in contact with the liquid, thus minimizing the surface energy. There may also be an electrostatic attraction between the bubble and particle, or other surface characteristics of the particle that favor attachment of bubbles. Gas bubbles that become attached to the particles are removed from the liquid when the particles are removed from the liquid by the particle removal device. The particle removal device may comprise a particle filter. In general, the dimensions of the particle are chosen to make them easy to remove, and this mechanism may provide efficient removal of very fine bubbles.
The bubble detector may comprise a light source, a light detector and a light comparator. The light source and the light detector may be configured so that light emitted by the source propagates between the source and the detector through a portion of the liquid, the comparator being arranged to detect changes in the proportion of the emitted light that arrives at the detector after propagation through a portion of the liquid. The presence of bubbles in the liquid causes the light to be scattered. Depending on the arrangement of the source and the detector, this scattering may cause an increase or a decrease in the signal detected at the detector and may be analyzed to provide information about the population of bubbles. An advantage of this arrangement is that it may be operated continuously, even when the projection apparatus is in normal operation. When bubbles occur, they may be detected at an early stage and exposure may be suspended until the liquid is clear again. This feature therefore may minimize lost time, and reduce the quantity of poorly exposed substrates that are produced.
According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic projection apparatus comprising:
an illumination system arranged to condition a radiation beam;
a support structure configured to support a patterning device, the patterning device being capable of imparting the radiation beam with a pattern in its cross-section;
a substrate table configured to hold a substrate;
a projection system arranged to project the patterned radiation beam onto a target portion of the substrate;
a liquid supply system configured to at least partly fill a space between the projection system and the substrate with a liquid; and
a detection system configured to detect impurities in the liquid, including a light source, a light detector and a light comparator, the light source and the light detector being arranged so that light emitted by the source propagates between the source and the detector through a portion of the liquid, the comparator being arranged to detect changes in the proportion of the emitted light that arrives at the detector after propagation through a portion of the liquid.
A detection system may be arranged to detect particles in the liquid between the projection system and the substrate. Particles may be introduced deliberately in order to control optical properties of the liquid and enhance the performance of the lithographic apparatus. This may be achieved, for example, by a fine suspension of quartz particles. In this case, the detection system may be used to verify that the particles are present in the desired proportions. Alternatively or additionally, damaging particles may enter the system by accident, such as those that break away from surfaces in contact with the immersion liquid. In this case, the detection system may be used to detect these particles and initiate an alarm procedure when the particle concentration and/or size distribution exceeds predetermined thresholds. Early detection of problems (whether a lack of desired particles or an excess of undesirable particles) allows corrective action to be taken promptly and may help to minimize loss of time and materials associated with substandard imaging.
According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a device manufacturing method comprising:
providing a liquid to a space between a projection system of a lithographic apparatus and a substrate;
projecting a patterned radiation beam using the projection system, through the liquid, onto a target portion of a substrate; and
detecting and reducing bubbles in the liquid.
According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic projection apparatus comprising:
an illumination system arranged to condition a radiation beam;
a support structure configured to support a patterning device, the patterning device being capable of imparting the radiation beam with a pattern in its cross-section;
a substrate table configured to hold a substrate;
a projection system arranged to project the patterned radiation beam onto a target portion of the substrate;
a liquid supply system configured to at least partly fill a space between the projection system and the substrate with a liquid; and
a liquid quality monitor capable of switching the operational state of the projection apparatus between an active state and a suspended state, the active state being selected when the liquid quality is determined to be above a predefined threshold and the suspended state being selected when the liquid quality is determined to be below a predefined threshold state.
A liquid quality monitor may allow early detection of faults, and avoid unnecessary loss of time and material due to faulty exposure of the substrates. The predefined thresholds may be based on parameters such as limits on the size and/or number distribution of bubbles as detected by a bubble detector. Alternatively, the predefined thresholds may relate to limits on the size and/or number distribution of other particles in the liquid.
Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of lithographic apparatus in the manufacture of ICs, it should be understood that the lithographic apparatus described herein may have other applications, such as the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, liquid-crystal displays (LCDs), thin-film magnetic heads, etc. The skilled artisan will appreciate that, in the context of such alternative applications, any use of the terms “wafer” or “die” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general terms “substrate” or “target portion”, respectively. The substrate referred to herein may be processed, before or after exposure, in for example a track (a tool that typically applies a layer of resist to a substrate and develops the exposed resist) or a metrology or inspection tool. Where applicable, the disclosure herein may be applied to such and other substrate processing tools. Further, the substrate may be processed more than once, for example in order to create a multi-layer IC, so that the term substrate used herein may also refer to a substrate that already contains multiple processed layers.
Where reference is made to “ultrasonic” or “ultrasound”, unless stated otherwise, this is to be interpreted as relating to sound waves at any frequency greater than the upper limit of human perception, namely, greater than 20 kHz.
The terms “radiation” and “beam” used herein encompass all types of electromagnetic radiation, including ultraviolet (UV) radiation (e.g. having a wavelength of 365, 248, 193, 157 or 126 nm).
The term “patterning device” used herein should be broadly interpreted as referring to any device that can be used to impart a projection beam with a pattern in its cross-section such as to create a pattern in a target portion of the substrate. It should be noted that the pattern imparted to the projection beam may not exactly correspond to the desired pattern in the target portion of the substrate. Generally, the pattern imparted to the projection beam will correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion, such as an integrated circuit.
A patterning device may be transmissive or reflective. Examples of a patterning device include masks, programmable mirror arrays, and programmable LCD panels. Masks are well known in lithography, and include mask types such as binary, alternating phase-shift, and attenuated phase-shift, as well as various hybrid mask types. An example of a programmable mirror array employs a matrix arrangement of small mirrors, each of which can be individually tilted so as to reflect an incoming radiation beam in different directions; in this manner, the reflected beam is patterned. In each example of a patterning device, the support structure may be a frame or table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required and which may ensure that the patterning device is at a desired position, for example with respect to the projection system. Any use of the terms “reticle” or “mask” herein may be considered synonymous with the more general term “patterning device”.
The term “projection system” used herein should be broadly interpreted as encompassing various types of projection system, including refractive optical systems, reflective optical systems, and catadioptric optical systems, as appropriate for example for the exposure radiation being used, or for other factors such as the use of an immersion liquid or the use of a vacuum. Any use of the term “projection lens” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general term “projection system”.
The illumination system may also encompass various types of optical components, including refractive, reflective, and catadioptric optical components for directing, shaping, or controlling the projection beam of radiation, and such components may be referred to below, collectively or singularly, as a “lens”.
The lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two (dual stage) or more substrate tables (and/or two or more mask tables). In such “multiple stage” machines the additional tables may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables while one or more other tables are being used for exposure.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which:
a depicts the arrangement of inlets and outlets of the liquid supply system of
b depicts a liquid supply system according to an embodiment of the invention;
a and 11b depict an embodiment of the bubble removal device arranged to selectively heat bubbles via a microwave radiation source;
In the Figures, corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts.
an illumination system (illuminator) IL for providing a projection beam PB of radiation (e.g. UV radiation or DUV radiation);
a first support structure (e.g. a mask table) MT for supporting a patterning device (e.g. a mask) MA and connected to a first positioning device PM for accurately positioning the patterning device with respect to item PL;
a substrate table (e.g. a wafer table) WT for holding a substrate (e.g. a resist-coated wafer) W and connected to a second positioning device PW for accurately positioning the substrate with respect to item PL; and
a projection system (e.g. a refractive projection lens) PL for imaging a pattern imparted to the projection beam PB by the patterning device MA onto a target portion C (e.g. comprising one or more dies) of the substrate W.
As here depicted, the apparatus is of a transmissive type (e.g. employing a transmissive mask). Alternatively, the apparatus may be of a reflective type (e.g. employing a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above).
The illuminator IL receives a beam of radiation from a radiation source SO. The source and the lithographic apparatus may be separate entities, for example when the source is an excimer laser. In such cases, the source is not considered to form part of the lithographic apparatus and the radiation beam is passed from the source SO to the illuminator IL with the aid of a beam delivery system BD comprising for example suitable directing mirrors and/or a beam expander. In other cases the source may be integral part of the apparatus, for example when the source is a mercury lamp. The source SO and the illuminator IL, together with the beam delivery system BD if required, may be referred to as a radiation system.
The illuminator IL may comprise an adjusting device AM for adjusting the angular intensity distribution of the beam. Generally, at least the outer and/or inner radial extent (commonly referred to as σ-outer and σ-inner, respectively) of the intensity distribution in a pupil plane of the illuminator can be adjusted. In addition, the illuminator IL generally comprises various other components, such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO. The illuminator provides a conditioned beam of radiation, referred to as the projection beam PB, having a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross-section.
The projection beam PB is incident on the mask MA, which is held on the mask table MT. Having traversed the mask MA, the projection beam PB passes through the projection system PL, which focuses the beam onto a target portion C of the substrate W. With the aid of the second positioning device PW and position sensor IF (e.g. an interferometric device), the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g. so as to position different target portions C in the path of the beam PB. Similarly, the first positioning device PM and another position sensor (which is not explicitly depicted in
The depicted apparatus can be used in the following modes:
1. In step mode, the mask table MT and the substrate table WT are kept essentially stationary, while an entire pattern imparted to the projection beam is projected onto a target portion C at one time (i.e. a single static exposure). The substrate table WT is then shifted in the X and/or Y direction so that a different target portion C can be exposed. In step mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the size of the target portion C imaged in a single static exposure.
2. In scan mode, the mask table MT and the substrate table WT are scanned synchronously while a pattern imparted to the projection beam is projected onto a target portion C (i.e. a single dynamic exposure). The velocity and direction of the substrate table WT relative to the mask table MT is determined by the (de-)magnification and image reversal characteristics of the projection system PL. In scan mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the width (in the non-scanning direction) of the target portion in a single dynamic exposure, whereas the length of the scanning motion determines the height (in the scanning direction) of the target portion.
3. In another mode, the mask table MT is kept essentially stationary holding a programmable patterning device, and the substrate table WT is moved or scanned while a pattern imparted to the projection beam is projected onto a target portion C. In this mode, generally a pulsed radiation source is employed and the programmable patterning device is updated as required after each movement of the substrate table WT or in between successive radiation pulses during a scan. This mode of operation can be readily applied to maskless lithography that utilizes a programmable patterning device, such as a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above.
Combinations and/or variations on the above described modes of use or entirely different modes of use may also be employed.
a and
If the liquid has been exposed to the atmosphere, some atmospheric gases may be dissolved in the liquid. Disturbances of the fluid (in any way) may give rise to the formation of bubbles, which, depending on the liquid, gases and disturbances involved, may be very fine. Fine bubbles, down to around 10 nm in diameter, are very difficult to detect using standard methods but still interfere with the imaging performance of the exposure radiation, distorting the image and leading to printing defects on the substrate. Bubbles may also enter the reservoir 13 via out-gassing from elements within the lithographic apparatus such as the photosensitive layer on the substrate W when it is exposed.
The reservoir is bounded at least in part by a seal member 17 positioned below and surrounding the final element of the projection system PL. The seal member 17 extends a little above the final element of the projection system PL and the liquid level rises above the bottom end of the final element of the projection system PL. The seal member 17 has an inner periphery that at the upper end closely conforms to the step of the projection system or the final element thereof and may, e.g., be round. At the bottom, the inner periphery closely conforms to the shape of the image field, e.g. rectangular but may be any shape.
Between the seal member 17 and the substrate W, the liquid may be confined to the reservoir by a contact-less seal 16, such as a gas seal formed by gas, e.g. nitrogen, argon, helium or similar that do not readily dissolve into the liquid, provided under pressure to the gap between the seal member 17 and the substrate W. Between the seal member 17 and the projection system PL, the liquid is confined by sealing members 14, optionally to keep the liquid pressurized. Alternatively, the sealing members 14 may be omitted and the liquid confined by gravity.
The bubble reduction device 3 may comprise a bubble removal device.
The bubble reduction device 3 may comprise a bubble detection device 4.
The attenuation is measured as a function of frequency in order to detect bubbles that are much smaller than the wavelength of the ultrasonic signals. This may be done using broadband transducers and excitations. Measuring attenuation at only a single frequency restricts detection to bubbles with diameters of the same order of size as or larger than the wavelength of the ultrasonic signals.
The bubble removal device may work using ultrasonic waves as described in European patent application no. EP 03253694.8 hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference, or on similar principles using higher frequency waves known as megasonic waves (about 1 MHz) which avoid some of the disadvantages of conventional ultrasonic waves (which may lead to cavitation and bubble collision with walls resulting in small particles breaking off the walls and contaminating the liquid). As an alternative, the ultrasonic energy may be controlled, even with lower frequency ultrasound, to reduce the likelihood or extent of bubble cavitation. Additionally, ultrasound may be used to cause coalescence of smaller bubbles into larger bubbles which rise more quickly and may be more easily removed.
Other bubble reduction devices are also possible, for example those described in the above mentioned European patent application as well as the use of membranes perhaps in combination with a vacuum or by purging the liquid with a low solubility gas, such as helium. Membranes are already used for removal of gases from liquids in fields such as microelectronics, pharmaceutical and power applications. The liquid is pumped through a bundle of semi-porous membrane tubing. The pores of the membrane are sized and the material chosen so that the liquid cannot pass through them but the gases to be removed can. Thus the liquid is degassed. The process may be accelerated by applying to the outside of the tubing a low pressure. Liqui-Cel™ membrane contactors available from Membrana-Charlotte, a division of Celgard Inc. of Charlotte, N.C., USA may be suitable for this purpose.
Purging with a low solubility gas is a known technique applied in high performance chromatography to prevent gas bubble trapping in a reciprocating pump head. When the low solubility gas is purged through the liquid, it drives out other gases, such as carbon dioxide and oxygen.
The bubble reduction device 3 may comprise elements both within the reservoir 13, as shown in
A bubble reduction device 3 located within the reservoir 13 is particularly effective for dealing with bubbles that unavoidably originate within the reservoir 13, such as from out-gassing.
The composition of the liquid may be chosen to have a lower surface tension than water. This reduces the tendency of bubbles to stick to the substrate (particularly acute for small bubbles) where they may be particularly damaging to the image and where they tend to be resistant to removal measures. This may be achieved by choosing a pure liquid with a lower surface tension or by adding a component to the liquid that reduces its surface tension, such as a surfactant.
Bubbles attached to the surface of the substrate W are particularly damaging because they are near the focus of the projection apparatus. The image is thus liable to be seriously distorted due to diffraction. An embodiment of the present invention provides a means for removing such bubbles and, more generally, bubbles attached to any interfaces within the immersion liquid.
A number of design considerations should be taken into account. The conductivity of the liquid should be carefully controlled. In particular, it should not be too high, because this will make it difficult to create the electric field. Water with a resistivity of roughly 0.8 to 18.2 MOhm*cm may be used for example. Also, the electrodes 27a and 27b may be protected, in an implementation, from breakdown by isolating material 29 to prevent electrolysis and subsequent material breakdown. The conductivity and/or dielectric permittivity of the electrodes themselves should be high in comparison to the immersion liquid. One consequence of this will be to ensure that there is no appreciable fall in potential within the conductor material, which may help produce a uniform field between the electrodes.
Electrical forces may also cause adhesion between bubbles and solid particles dispersed in liquid. Bubbles in a liquid have, on their surface, an electrokinetic (or zeta) potential which results in a potential difference between the surface of the bubble and the fully disassociated ionic concentration in the body of the liquid. This also applies to small particles.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, a power source or voltage supply V (or charge, voltage, electrical field or potential difference generator or supply) may be used to apply an electrical potential to one or more objects of the immersion apparatus. The principle of operation is that if repulsion is needed a potential difference between the fully disassociated ionic concentration of the liquid and the object is generated, which is of the same polarity as the potential difference between the fully disassociated ionic concentration in the body of the liquid and the surface of the bubble. If attraction between the object and the bubble is needed, the potential differences should have the same polarity. In this way forces may be generated on the bubbles towards or away from the objects (electrodes) which are in contact with the immersion liquid.
In
In pure water, which is the most promising candidate for use as an immersion liquid at 193 nm projection beam wavelength, it has been found that the surface potential of μm bubbles is about −50 mV. This potential will vary with bubble size and also with type of immersion liquid. However, the same principles as described here may be used for other immersion liquids and bubble sizes and the embodiments of the invention are fully applicable to those. Additives may be added to the immersion liquid to change the effect of the potential. CaCl2 or NaCl are suitable candidate additions for this purpose.
In
Alternatively or additionally, an object to be charged or have a voltage applied to it could be attached to a surface of the seal member 17. In
Another place to use this embodiment is upstream of the space 36 between the final element of the projection system PL and the substrate W in the liquid supply system. In this case, as the immersion liquid passes along conduits 56 and through a housing 58, oppositely charged and opposing plates 62, 64 produce a force on the bubbles which is effective to move the bubbles, when the immersion liquid is in the space 36, further away from the substrate W than they would be without the application of the electrical field upstream of the space 36. The immersion liquid with a high concentration of bubbles i.e. near to the electrode 64, could even be removed and not supplied to the space 36. The removed liquid could be subjected to a bubble removal process before being recycled in the liquid supply system.
In all of the above examples, the higher the voltage applied by the voltage generator V the greater the force on the bubbles. The potential on the object(s) should not be so high as to cause disassociation of the immersion liquid but should be high enough to provide an effective force on the bubbles. For an immersion liquid comprised mainly of water, typical potential differences applied to the object(s) according to this embodiment are 5 mV to 5 V, optionally 10 mV to 500 mV. In an embodiment, an electrical field of 5 mV/mm to 500 mV/mm due to the application of the potential could be provided.
In an embodiment, the particles are arranged to have surface characteristics that encourage bubbles to attach to the surface, for example in order to lower their surface energy. In addition, the particles may be arranged to have as large a surface area as possible. This may be achieved by using porous particles such that bubbles may attach on surfaces within the interior of the particles. Generally this parameter may be varied by controlling the size and number distribution, and porosity of the particles. A balance may need to be achieved in pore size because although finer pores may provide the greatest additional surface area, they will exclude bubbles that are of a similar order of size or that are large in comparison with the pores (the pores may also be blocked by such bubbles). Many different particle compositions may be used, for example silica, zeolites, alumina, activated carbon, or a carbon molecular sieve. Certain polymer compositions may also be used. The particle size is a less critical factor (compared with the surface area) and a typical size range may be 5 to 1000 μm diameter.
In
Another method for bringing the particles into the liquid is the occasional use of ultrasonic agitation in combination with non-degassed liquid. Due to cavitation of the bubbles, particles will be released from solid surfaces exposed to the liquid.
The arrangement illustrated in
The light comparator 44 may interact with a liquid quality monitor 45, which may be realized by a suitably programmed computer. The liquid quality monitor 45 may be arranged to ensure that the liquid is always at a suitable level of cleanliness to ensure that the quality of the image being written to the substrate W does not fall below a minimum threshold level. The liquid quality monitor 45 may take into account, in addition to the concentration of bubbles and/or particles, other factors such as the chemical composition of the liquid. The liquid quality monitor 45 may in turn be coupled to an alarm system 46 that causes the system to be shut down from an active state to a suspended state, or other appropriate action to be taken, when the state of the immersion liquid falls outside predefined parameters. This early reaction to problems in the liquid allows corrective action to be taken promptly, and may also minimize the loss of materials and time associated with substandard exposures caused by low quality immersion liquid.
The imaging performance of the lithography system may also be affected negatively (causing stray light, for example) by contamination on the bottom part of the projection system PL. Such contamination may include, for example, the formation of salts arising primarily from the resist chemicals or oxides such as SiO2. The contamination may be reduced by mechanical or chemical cleaning, but such procedures involve expensive stoppages and service man hours, are not always completely effective and risk damage to the projection system. According to an embodiment of the present invention described above, one or more ultrasonic transducers are provided to detect or remove bubbles from the immersion liquid. These devices may also be oriented and configured to remove contamination from the final element of the projection system PL and the substrate W or substrate table WT.
Another immersion lithography solution which has been proposed is to provide the liquid supply system with a seal member which extends along at least a part of a boundary of the space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate table. The seal member is substantially stationary relative to the projection system in the XY plane though there may be some relative movement in the Z direction (in the direction of the optical axis). A seal is formed between the seal member and the surface of the substrate. In an embodiment, the seal is a contactless seal such as a gas seal. Such a system is disclosed in, for example, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/705,783, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference.
A further immersion lithography solution with a localized liquid supply system is shown in
In European patent application no. 03257072.3, the idea of a twin or dual stage immersion lithography apparatus is disclosed. Such an apparatus is provided with two substrate tables for supporting the substrate. Leveling measurements are carried out with a substrate table at a first position, without immersion liquid, and exposure is carried out with a substrate table at a second position, where immersion liquid is present. Alternatively, the apparatus can have only one substrate table moving between the first and second positions.
Embodiments of the present invention may be applied to any immersion lithography apparatus and any liquid supply system (including relevant parts thereof), in particular, but not exclusively, to any of those liquid supply systems mentioned above and the bath of liquid as described above.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described. The description is not intended to limit the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
03253694 | Jun 2003 | EP | regional |
This application claims priority from European patent application EP 03253694.8, filed Jun. 11, 2003 and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/820,227, filed Apr. 8, 2004, each of which is herein incorporated in its entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573975 | Dhaka et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3648587 | Stevens | Mar 1972 | A |
4346164 | Tabarelli et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4390273 | Loebach et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4396705 | Akeyama et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4468120 | Tanimoto et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4480910 | Takanashi et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4509852 | Tabarelli et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
5040020 | Rauschenbach et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5061070 | Batchelder et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5121256 | Corle et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5229872 | Mumola | Jul 1993 | A |
5257128 | Diller et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5296891 | Vogt et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5523193 | Nelson | Jun 1996 | A |
5587794 | Mizutani et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5610683 | Takahashi | Mar 1997 | A |
5715039 | Fukuda et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5825043 | Suwa | Oct 1998 | A |
5900354 | Batchelder | May 1999 | A |
5969441 | Loopstra et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6046792 | Van Der Werf et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6191429 | Suwa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6236634 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6301055 | Legrand et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6466365 | Maier et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496257 | Taniguchi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6560032 | Hatano | May 2003 | B2 |
6600547 | Watson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603130 | Bisschops et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6633365 | Suenaga | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6781670 | Krautschik | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788477 | Lin | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7061578 | Levinson | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7091502 | Gau et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7145641 | Kroon et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7224427 | Chang et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224434 | Tokita | May 2007 | B2 |
7307263 | Bakker et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315033 | Pawloski et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7385670 | Compen et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7405417 | Stevens et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7462850 | Banine et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20020020821 | Van Santen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020159070 | Maeda et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163629 | Switkes et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030030916 | Suenaga | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030123040 | Almogy | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157538 | Krull et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174408 | Rostalski et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040000627 | Schuster | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021844 | Suenaga | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040075895 | Lin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040109237 | Epple et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114117 | Bleeker | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118184 | Violette | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119954 | Kawashima et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125351 | Krautschik | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136494 | Lof et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160582 | Lof et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165159 | Lof et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169834 | Richter et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040169924 | Flagello et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180294 | Baba-Ali et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180299 | Rolland et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207824 | Lof et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211920 | Derksen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224265 | Endo et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040224525 | Endo et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040227923 | Flagello et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239954 | Bischoff | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253547 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253548 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257544 | Vogel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259008 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259040 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263808 | Sewell | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263809 | Nakano | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007569 | Streefkerk et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018155 | Cox et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024609 | De Smit et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030497 | Nakamura | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030506 | Schuster | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036121 | Hoogendam et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036183 | Yeo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036184 | Yeo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036213 | Mann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050037269 | Levinson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042554 | Dierichs et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046813 | Streefkerk et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050046934 | Ho et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050048223 | Pawloski et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050052632 | Miyajima | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068639 | Pierrat et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073670 | Carroll | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084794 | Meagley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050094116 | Flagello et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050094125 | Arai | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100745 | Lin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110973 | Streefkerk et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117224 | Shafer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122497 | Lyons et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122505 | Miyajima | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134817 | Nakamura | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050140948 | Tokita | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141098 | Schuster | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145803 | Hakey et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050146693 | Ohsaki | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050146694 | Tokita | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050146695 | Kawakami | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050147920 | Lin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050151942 | Kawashima | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050153424 | Coon | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050158673 | Hakey et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164502 | Deng et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174549 | Duineveld et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050175776 | Streefkerk et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185269 | Epple et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190435 | Shafer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050190455 | Rostalski et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050200815 | Akamatsu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205108 | Chang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213061 | Hakey et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213065 | Kitaoka | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213066 | Sumiyoshi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213072 | Schenker et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050217135 | O'Donnell et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050217137 | Smith et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050217703 | O'Donnell | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219481 | Cox et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219482 | Baselmans et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219489 | Nei et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219499 | Maria Zaal et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050225737 | Weissenrieder et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231694 | Kolesynchenko et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233081 | Tokita | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237501 | Furukawa et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243292 | Baselmans et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050245005 | Benson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050253090 | Gau et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259232 | Streefkerk et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259233 | Streefkerk et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264774 | Mizutani et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050264778 | Lof et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050270505 | Smith | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050274898 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060023185 | Hazelton et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060028628 | Lin et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050351 | Higashiki | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060103818 | Holmes et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060126043 | Mizutani et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132731 | Jansen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060209278 | Kiuchi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060232757 | Tani et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060256316 | Tanno et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070064215 | Dirksen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070127001 | Van Der Hoeven | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146657 | Van Mierlo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146658 | Van Mierlo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159610 | Shiraishi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171390 | Hazelton et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070206279 | Brueck et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070247600 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251543 | Singh | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070253710 | Kaneyama et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258072 | Nagasaka et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070285631 | Stavenga et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002162 | Jansen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080049201 | Stavenga et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080218712 | Compen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080273181 | De Jong et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080284990 | De Jong et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090025753 | De Jong et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027635 | De Jong et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027636 | Leenders et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
206 607 | Feb 1984 | DE |
221 563 | Apr 1985 | DE |
224448 | Jul 1985 | DE |
242880 | Feb 1987 | DE |
0023231 | Feb 1981 | EP |
0418427 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0 834 773 | Apr 1998 | EP |
1039511 | Sep 2000 | EP |
2474708 | Jul 1981 | FR |
A 57-153433 | Sep 1982 | JP |
58-202448 | Nov 1983 | JP |
A 59-19912 | Feb 1984 | JP |
62-065326 | Mar 1987 | JP |
62-121417 | Jun 1987 | JP |
63-157419 | Jun 1988 | JP |
2-87045 | Mar 1990 | JP |
04-190873 | Jul 1992 | JP |
04-305915 | Oct 1992 | JP |
04-305917 | Oct 1992 | JP |
A 05-62877 | Mar 1993 | JP |
A 05-304072 | Nov 1993 | JP |
06-124873 | May 1994 | JP |
6-124873 | May 1994 | JP |
A 06-168866 | Jun 1994 | JP |
06-254304 | Sep 1994 | JP |
06-262005 | Sep 1994 | JP |
07-132262 | May 1995 | JP |
07-220990 | Aug 1995 | JP |
A 07-220990 | Aug 1995 | JP |
A 8-316125 | Nov 1996 | JP |
A 10-154659 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-228661 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-255319 | Sep 1998 | JP |
A 10-255319 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10-303114 | Nov 1998 | JP |
10-340846 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-176727 | Jul 1999 | JP |
A 11-176727 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-290752 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000-058436 | Feb 2000 | JP |
A 2000-58436 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-323396 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-091849 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-121063 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-175005 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2002-236111 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2004-193252 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-207696 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2005-072404 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-079222 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006-134999 | May 2006 | JP |
WO9833096 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO9838597 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO9840791 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9949504 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO9949504 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 02091078 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03077036 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03077037 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO2004019128 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053596 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053950 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053951 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053952 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053953 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053954 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053955 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053956 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053957 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053958 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053959 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004055803 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057589 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057590 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004077154 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004081666 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090577 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090633 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090634 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004092830 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004092833 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093130 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093159 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093160 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004095135 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005001432 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005003864 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005006026 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005008339 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005010611 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005013008 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005015283 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005017625 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005019935 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005022266 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024325 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024517 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005034174 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005050324 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005054953 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005054955 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059617 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059618 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059645 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059654 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005062128 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005064400 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005064405 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069055 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069078 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069081 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005071491 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005074606 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005076084 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005081030 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005081067 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005122218 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006041086 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006062065 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2007136089 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050024609 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10820227 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 10860662 | US |