The present invention concerns a method of fabricating a magnetic tunnel junction suitable for a magnetic random access memory (MRAM) cell having low defectivity and higher breakdown voltage.
The tunnel barrier layer 22 is often made from a magnesium oxide (MgO) layer. Indeed, large tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) for example of up to 200% can be obtained for the magnetic tunnel junction 2 comprising a crystalline MgO-based tunnel barrier layer 22. Such tunnel barrier layer 22 made of MgO can be obtained by using an RF magnetron sputtering method. However, the MgO formation method by the RF magnetron sputtering can give rise to dispersion in normalized tunnel resistive value (RA) and possible deterioration of the yield factor at the time of device fabrication.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,841,395, the MgO barrier layer is formed by a method comprising the steps film formation of a metal Mg layer, forming oxygen-doped metal Mg layers, and bringing the laminated layers into an oxidation process. However, during the step of oxidizing the Mg layer, defects such as pinholes can be formed on the MgO layer surface. Defects formation can arise due to the fact that the MgO oxide has a larger volume than metallic Mg. As a result, current leakage may occur yielding to a lower resistance and a lower breakdown voltage of the MgO tunnel barrier 22, especially for low RA values, below 50 ohm□m2. Such current leakage can occurs when a current is passed in the magnetic tunnel junction 2 for heating the magnetic tunnel junction 2 during the TA write operation of the MRAM cell 1, or for reading the junction resistance during a read operation of the MRAM cell 1. The presence of defects can thus decrease the resistance of the MgO tunnel barrier 22, and the tunnel magnetoresistance TMR of the magnetic tunnel junction 2 comprising such MgO tunnel barrier 22 is also lowered. Moreover, a lower breakdown voltage of the barrier layer 22 can be observed.
Reducing the effect of pinholes requires having a relatively thick Mg layer and/or growing relatively thick oxide layers. Increasing the thickness of the MgO tunnel barrier layer may 22 can yield a RA that is too large so that the voltage for driving the magnetic tunnel junction device becomes too high. Also, if the initial Mg layer is too thick a single step oxidation is not oxidize completely this Mg layer. The Mg layer will then be under oxidized, with lower RA, lower TMR and lower breakdown voltage.
The present disclosure concerns a method of fabricating a magnetic tunnel junction suitable for a magnetic random access memory (MRAM) cell and comprising a first ferromagnetic layer, a tunnel barrier layer, and a second ferromagnetic layer, comprising: forming the first ferromagnetic layer; forming the tunnel barrier layer; and forming the second ferromagnetic layer; wherein said forming the tunnel barrier layer comprises depositing a layer of metallic Mg; and oxidizing the deposited layer of metallic Mg such as to transform the metallic Mg into MgO; the step of forming the tunnel barrier layer being performed at least twice such that the tunnel barrier layer comprises at least two layers of MgO.
The method disclosed herein allows for forming the tunnel barrier having low defectivity and higher breakdown voltage compared to conventional tunnel barrier.
The invention will be better understood with the aid of the description of an embodiment given by way of example and illustrated by the figures, in which:
The ferromagnetic material of the first and second ferromagnetic layers 21, 23 can comprise elements from the group consisting of cobalt Co, iron Fe, boron B, nickel Ni, e.g., nickel iron boron NiFeB, and preferably cobalt iron boron CoFeB, which provides excellent magnetoresistance (TMR) response. Preferably, the first and second ferromagnetic layers 21, 23 are made from a CoFeB-based alloy. The tunnel barrier layer 22 can be an insulating layer, for example, made from an oxide selected in the group including among others aluminum oxides Al2O3. Preferably, the tunnel barrier layer 22 is made of an MgO-based oxide. The use of a MgO-based oxide in the magnetic tunnel junction makes it possible to achieve an increase in the available magnetoresistive signal up to about 200% resistance change at room temperature (Parkin et. al., 2004, Nat. Mater. 3, 862).
According to an embodiment, a method of fabricating the magnetic tunnel junction 2 comprises:
forming the first ferromagnetic layer 21;
forming the tunnel barrier layer 22; and
forming the second ferromagnetic layer 23;
wherein said forming the tunnel barrier layer 22 comprises depositing a layer of metallic Mg; and oxidizing the deposited layer of metallic Mg such as to transform the metallic Mg into MgO and obtain a layer of MgO 22a. The step of forming the tunnel barrier layer 22 is performed at least twice such that the tunnel barrier layer 22 comprises at least two MgO layers 22a.
In an embodiment, forming the first and second ferromagnetic layers 21, 23 and depositing the layer of metallic Mg are performed by using a sputtering deposition method. The several deposition steps can be performed in the same sputtering chamber or in different sputtering chambers. Alternatively, several deposition steps are performed by using any other vacuum film deposition technique such as ion beam deposition or pulsed laser deposition. The layer of metallic Mg is preferably deposited with a thickness comprised between 0 and 1.5 nm, and preferably between 0.3 nm and 1.2 nm.
Oxidizing the deposited layer of metallic Mg such as to transform the metallic Mg into an MgO oxide can comprise oxidation by exposure to a plasma or to an oxygen flow (natural oxidation). There is an optimum thickness that can be oxidized with given oxidation conditions. For example, if the Mg layer is thicker than this optimum it will be under oxidized for those particular oxidation conditions (lower RA and lower TMR). If it is thinner, it will be over oxidized (higher RA and lower TMR). Here, a plasma which contains oxygen ions is applied to the layer of metallic Mg. Plasma oxidation can be performed with or without accelerating oxygen ions in a direction normal to the surface of the exposed layer of metallic Mg to implant the oxygen ions therein. The plasma oxidation can also be performed whether or not accompanied by directional acceleration for implantation. The plasma oxidation can be performed at or below room temperature. For more rapid and more thorough conversion of the metallic Mg into the MgO oxide, plasma oxidation can also be performed at elevated temperatures, as high as the integrity of the tunnel junction will allow (approximately 300-400° C.). In the plasma oxidation process the settings that govern oxidation are the ion energy (power applied with the plasma source), process time and the amount of oxygen injected in the chamber, typically, 500 sccm. This method is faster than natural oxidation process described below but may result in inserting some defects in the MgO layer. A possible way to limit the formation of defects in the MgO layer can comprise using a natural oxidation process. In the natural oxidation process, an amount of oxygen gas is introduced in the presence of Mg metallic layer and in that case, “time” and “pressure” are the only settings of the oxidation process. Typical process time range from 100 to 500 s and typical process pressure range from 0.1 to 50 Torr. The oxygen atoms migrate into the Mg layer and the MgO is formed until the passivation layer thickness is reached. An annealing process will reorganize or crystallize this MgO layer. Alternatively, oxidizing the deposited layer of metallic Mg can be performed by oxidizing the metal by a radical oxidation (ROX). The step of oxidizing the deposited layer of metallic Mg is typically performed in a different chamber than the sputtering chambers.
In an embodiment, depositing the layer of metallic Mg further comprises using an inert gas such as N during the deposition operation. The inert gas is advantageously used for leveling, or flattening, the layer of metallic Mg, and in avoiding a compression of the MgO molecules during the oxidizing step.
In another embodiment, the method further comprises the step of depositing an additional layer of metallic Mg 27 prior and after to forming the tunnel barrier layer 22. The additional layers of metallic Mg 27 are not oxidized such that, after fabricating the magnetic tunnel junction 2, the latter comprises the additional layer of metallic Mg 27 between the tunnel barrier layer 22 and the first ferromagnetic layer 21 and between the tunnel barrier layer 22 and the second ferromagnetic layer 23, the additional layers of metallic Mg 27 being adjacent to the tunnel barrier layer 22. The additional layers of metallic Mg 27 are advantageous in preventing migration of oxygen from the MgO tunnel barrier layer 22 into the first and/or second ferromagnetic layer 21, 23. The additional layers of metallic Mg 27 are preferably deposited with a thickness below about 0.5 nm.
In yet another embodiment, the method further comprises the step of depositing a CoxFe1-x layer 26 after forming the first ferromagnetic layer 21 and prior to forming the second ferromagnetic layer 23. The magnetic tunnel junction 2 thus formed comprises the CoFe layers 26 between the first ferromagnetic layer 21 and the tunnel barrier layer 22 and between the multilayer barrier layer 22, and the second ferromagnetic layer 23. The CoFe layers 26 are typically deposited with a thickness of up to about 1 nm and preferably up to about 0.5 nm. The thin CoFe layers 26 are useful in preventing migration of B from the first and second ferromagnetic layer 21, 23 into the barrier layer 22.
During the step of oxidizing the layer of metallic Mg, pinholes 29 (see
Due to the MgO growth mechanisms during the oxidation process, the pinhole distribution is likely to vary from one MgO layer 22a to another. Consequently, when forming the multilayer barrier layer 22, very few or none of the pinholes 29 formed in the previously deposited MgO layer 22a′ are aligned with the pinholes formed in the subsequently deposited MgO layer 22a″. This is schematically illustrated in
The larger the number of deposited MgO layer 22a′, 22a″ forming the multilayered barrier layer 22, the lower the probability of the barrier layer 22 to comprise pinholes 29 being aligned through all MgO layers 22a and thus, the barrier layer 22 to comprise traversing pores.
This, in turn, can result in a lower breakdown voltage of the barrier layer 22. Reducing the effect of pinholes requires having a relatively thick Mg layer and/or growing relatively thick oxide layers.
Another advantage of the barrier layer 22 and the method of forming such barrier layer 22 is a leveling effect due to the plurality of MgO layers 22a. In
Increasing the number of deposited MgO layers 22a′, 22a″ diminishes the influence of the pinholes and allows for resistance of the multilayered barrier layer 22 and TMR of the magnetic tunnel junction 2 comprising the multilayered barrier layer 22 to be substantially similar to the ones obtained for a barrier layer 22 of same thickness without pinhole.
In an embodiment, the multilayered barrier layer 22 can be formed using the method disclosed herein having a higher breakdown voltage (more than 1V) than a conventional barrier layer 22 having a single MgO layer, for the same value of RA.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11290402 | Sep 2011 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6841395 | Linn et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
20020097534 | Sun | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040180237 | Drewes | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050078418 | Saito et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060003185 | Parkin | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060227465 | Inokuchi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080299679 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090268351 | Zeltser | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110081732 | Choi | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120288963 | Nishimura | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10309243 | Sep 2004 | DE |
1801895 | Jun 2007 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 2, 2012 for application EP11290402. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130234266 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |