Patent Grant
10596597
The disclosed technology relates to the fields of manufacture of electrical components such as ultrasound transducers.
In general, the disclosed technology provides methods for manufacturing electrical components, such as arrayed ultrasonic transducers.
As will be described in further detail below, the disclosed technology relates to making connections to between traces on a printed circuit and an array of transducer elements. In one embodiment, traces that carry signals to and receive signals from transducer elements are disposed on a printed flex circuit. Adjacent transducer elements to which the traces are to be connected are spaced closer together than the distance the minimum distance that can be achieved between the conductors on the printed flex circuit. Therefore, embodiments of the disclosed technology employ a multi-layer printed flex circuit having traces therein, whereby the distance between adjacent traces on any single layer of the multi-layer flex circuit are spaced farther apart than the distance between adjacent transducer elements in the transducer array. In one embodiment, a single multi-layer printed flex circuit is used to connect to one side of all of the ultrasound transducer elements. In another embodiment, two multi-layer printed flex circuits connect to opposite sides of the transducer elements so that one multi-layer printed flex circuit connects to the even numbered transducer elements while the other multi-layer printed flex circuit connects to the odd numbered transducer elements.
In one embodiment, a single four-layer printed flex circuit is used to connect to the transducer elements such that the traces on any given layer connect to every fourth transducer element on a side of an ultrasonic transducer. If two, four-layer printed flex circuits are used such that the traces on each printed flex circuit connect to only even or odd numbered transducer elements, then the traces on any given layer of a multi-layer printed flex circuit can be spaced by the distance between 8 transducer elements.
In one embodiment, the traces in each printed flex circuit are routed in a path that extends in a direction that is approximately parallel to the long length of the transducer array. In another embodiment, the traces in each printed flex circuit extend in a direction that is substantially aligned with the short length of the transducer array.
In one embodiment, the traces in the multi-layer printed flex circuits are connected to transducer elements by securing the multi-layer printed flex circuit to the ultrasound transducer with a particulate filled epoxy material. The epoxy material may be molded or machined to provide a smooth transition from the flex circuits to the transducer elements. Channels are then formed in the epoxy material between transducer elements and traces in the layers of the printed flex circuit. Once the channels have been created, the channels over the printed flex circuit and the ultrasound transducer are then coated with a metallic conductor and a resist. A laser is then used to remove the resist and expose the metallic conductor in areas where it is not wanted. An etch processes then removes most of the exposed metallic conductor and a laser can remove the remainder if necessary. The resist that is located over the areas where the metallic conductor is desired is then removed with a solvent. The remaining metallic conductor forms the electrical connections between the transducer elements and a corresponding traces in the multi-layer printed flex circuit.
Advantages of the disclosed technology will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the disclosed technology. The advantages of the disclosed technology will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the disclosed technology, as claimed.
The disclosed technology features methods for the manufacture of electrical components such as ultrasound transducers. In particular, the disclosed technology provides methods of depositing materials, such as metals, on surfaces; methods of patterning electrodes, e.g., in the connection of an ultrasound transducer to an electrical circuit; and methods of making integrated matching layer for an ultrasound transducer. The disclosed technology also features ultrasound transducers produced by the methods described herein.
Deposition of Materials
The disclosed technology provides improved methods for the adhesion of materials to a surface, e.g., a thin film of metal or an adhesive such as epoxy. The method involves use of a substrate of a composite material. The composite material includes a matrix material and a particulate material, and the matrix material ablates at a lower laser fluence than the particulate material. When this substrate is ablated at an appropriate fluence, the matrix material is removed, but the particulate material is retained unless all matrix material surrounding the particles is removed. The result of the process is a highly three-dimensional surface formed by a combination of the matrix and partially exposed particulate material. The surface area of the new morphology is greatly increased compared to the unablated surface. A material, such as a metal or adhesive, is then deposited onto the ablated surface, and adhesion is increased because of the morphology created by ablation. The improved adhesion preferably allows for later ablation of the material in selected areas without delamination of the material in unablated areas. An exemplary matrix material is a polymer such as epoxy, and exemplary particulate materials are silica and silicon carbide. An exemplary metal for deposition is gold. An adhesion layer, e.g., containing chromium, may also be deposited for certain metals, such as gold, as is known in the art. Examples of conditions and uses of the method are provided herein.
Patterning of Electrodes
The disclosed technology also provides a method for patterning electrodes. This process can be used to connect any electrical component that can withstand the metallization step (highest temp ˜60-70° C.) directly to a flex or other circuit board type component. This method can be used to create features smaller than 5 μm over mm scale distances in X, Y, and Z.
In general, the method involves providing an electrical component needing the patterning of electrodes. The component is coated with a material, such as the composite material described above. This coating is generally ablated and selectively removed in the desired pattern of the electrodes. A conductive metal layer is then deposited over the ablated surface. A resist is then applied over the metal layer. Because the coating was removed in the pattern of the electrodes, the metal applied where the coating is removed is deposited in a trough or trench. These troughs or trenches are filled with resist, resulting in a thicker layer of resist overtop of the pattern of the electrodes. The resist is then removed from areas not forming part of the electrode pattern, and the metal is etched. Any remaining metal and the coating in these areas are then ablated. Finally, the resist may be removed, resulting in the electrode pattern. As is described in more detail herein, a portion of the electrical component, e.g., filler material in a kerf slot of a transducer, may be ablated to create a depression relative to the patterned electrodes. Ablation at relatively high fluence in these depressions may then be employed to remove extraneous metal left behind by previous steps. The depression protects the patterned electrodes from the byproducts of ablation, which would otherwise likely result in delamination.
An exemplary use of the method is in making electrical connections to an arrayed ultrasound transducer. Each element of an array is typically connected to a coaxial cable. At high frequencies (e.g., 20 MHz and up), the elements making up the array are typically too small and fragile for conventional wire bonding (which usually needs at least about 75 μm). In addition, thermal budgets required for wire bonding may also be problematic. For high frequency transducers, wet etching may also be ineffective because of the inability to hard bake resist because of thermal budgets, as the resist may dissolver prior to removal of the metal. Laser ablation of the electrode may also be problematic, as thin films can be removed, but frequently crack, and thicker films (>about 6000 Angstroms) providing crack resistance are prone to shorting because of splattering of metal during laser ablation. Also, the ablation process may cause collateral damage of the electrode. The method of disclosed technology, however, may be employed to make electrical connections with elements of an array, e.g., with a pitch of 25 μm or less (e.g., less than 15 μm).
A laser that can be used for ablation in conjunction with the disclosed technology is a short wavelength laser such as a KrF Excimer laser system (having, for example, about a 248 nm wavelength or an argon fluoride laser (having, for example, about a 193 nm wavelength). In another aspect, the laser used to cut the piezoelectric layer is a short pulse length laser. For example, lasers modified to emit a short pulse length on the order of ps to fs can be used. A KrF excimer laser system (UV light with a wavelength of about 248 nm) with a fluence range of about and between 0-20 J/cm2 can be employed. Resist may be removed at a fluence below that required to remove the conductive material (e.g., less than 0.8 J/cm2). When it is desired to remove residual conductive metal, adhesion layers, and the composite material as described herein by ablation, the fluence may be between 0.8 to 1.0 J/cm2. Ablation at higher fluences, e.g., up to 5 J/cm2, may be employed to remove composite material (and underlying portions of an electrical component) located in depressions.
Further examples of conditions and uses of the method are provided herein.
Integrated Matching Layer
The disclosed technology also features a process for making an integrated matching layer. For high frequency applications, a lens for focusing an ultrasound array is often manufactured as a separate part, which must be attached to the transducer. At high frequencies, the use of adhesives to attached the lens is complicated by the need to reduce any bondline to less than approximately 1 μm for 20 MHz and thin for higher frequencies. Producing such bondlines presents challenges as follows: i) large voids are created, when a small generally spherical void in the adhesive is squeezed flat. Such voids can result from wetting issues on either surface or from small trapped voids in the adhesive. ii) Squeezing the bondline to such dimensions can interfere with the mobility of the molecules in the adhesive and compromise performance. iii) In order to press a bondline to the appropriate dimension, surplus adhesive must be squeezed out from in between the two parts being bonded. As the thickness of the bond decreases, the force required to overcome shear forces within the adhesive increases nonlinearly with the bond thickness and can quickly exceed acceptable force budgets for the stack and/or lens materials. In order to ensure that the bondline has no negative impact on the stack, the disclosed technology provides a method of making the bondline into a matching layer. This approach eliminates the need for an ultra thin layer and thus removes the concerns listed above.
The method employs spacers applied around the perimeter of the transducer, and then lapped to the desired final height of the integral matching layer. The matching layer is then made by curing the adhesive between the lens (and any matching layers attached to the lens) and the surface to which the spacers are attached. If particles are employed in the adhesive, e.g., to adjust the acoustical impedance, nano-particle dopants may be employed to ensure that the resulting uncured glue can be pressed down onto the spacers without more than a fraction of a micron error (due to particles being trapped between the top of the spacers, and the bottom of the lens). Spacers are desirably small to minimize trapping of powder, but large enough to be accurately lapped to height, e.g., about 0.25 to 0.75 mm in diameter. The clamping force required for this process is minimal, as the bondline is relatively thick, e.g., between 5 and 25 μm) in the desired frequency range. Examples of conditions and uses of the method are provided herein.
General Description of a Transducer
The disclosed technology will be further described with respect to ultrasound transducers that can be produce with the methods described herein. Components of the transducer stack, including piezoeletric layers, matching layers, lenses, and backing layers are known in the art and described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,230,368, U.S. Publication No. 2007/0222339, U.S. Publication No. 2007/0205698, and U.S. Publication No. 2007/0205697.
In one aspect, an ultrasonic transducer includes a stack having a first face, an opposed second face, and a longitudinal axis Ls extending between. The stack includes a plurality of layers, each layer having a top surface and an opposed bottom surface. In one aspect, the plurality of layers of the stack includes a piezoelectric layer and a dielectric layer (which may be deposited and patterned as described herein). In one aspect, the dielectric layer is connected to and underlies at least a portion of the piezoelectric layer.
The plurality of layers of the stack can further include a ground electrode layer, a signal electrode layer, a backing layer, and at least one matching layer. Additional layers cut can include, but are not limited to, temporary protective layers (not shown), an acoustic lens, photoresist layers (not shown), conductive epoxies (not shown), adhesive layers (not shown), polymer layers (not shown), metal layers (not shown), and the like.
The piezoelectric layer can be made of a variety of materials. For example, materials that form the piezoelectric layer include ceramic, single crystal, polymer and co-polymer materials, ceramic-polymer and ceramic-ceramic composites with 0-3, 2-2 and/or 1-3 connectivity, and the like. In one example, the piezoelectric layer includes lead zirconate titanate (PZT) ceramic.
The dielectric layer can define the active area of the piezoelectric layer. The dielectric layer can be applied to the bottom surface of the piezoelectric layer. In one aspect, the dielectric layer does not cover the entire bottom surface of the piezoelectric layer. In one aspect, the dielectric layer defines an opening or gap that extends a second predetermined length in a direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the stack. The opening in the dielectric layer is preferably aligned with a central region of the bottom surface of the piezoelectric layer. The opening defines the elevation dimension of the array. In one aspect, each element of the array has the same elevation dimension, and the width of the opening is constant within the area of the piezoelectric layer reserved for the active area of the device that has formed kerf slots. In one aspect, the length of the opening in the dielectric layer can vary in a predetermined manner in an axis substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the stack resulting in a variation in the elevation dimension of the array elements.
The relative thickness of the dielectric layer and the piezoelectric layer and the relative dielectric constants of the dielectric layer and the piezoelectric layer define the extent to which the applied voltage is divided across the two layers. In one example, the voltage can be split at 90% across the dielectric layer and 10% across the piezoelectric layer. It is contemplated that the ratio of the voltage divider across the dielectric layer and the piezoelectric layer can be varied. In the portion of the piezoelectric layer where there is no underlying dielectric layer, then the full magnitude of the applied voltage appears across the piezoelectric layer. This portion defines the active area of the array. In this aspect, the dielectric layer allows for the use of a piezoelectric layer that is wider than the active area and allows for kerf slots to be made in the active area and extend beyond this area in such a way that array elements and array sub-elements are defined in the active area, but a common ground is maintained on the top surface.
A plurality of first kerf slots are defined therein the stack. Each first kerf slot extends a predetermined depth therein the stack and a first predetermined length in a direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the stack. The “predetermined depth” of the first kerf slot may follow a predetermined depth profile that is a function of position along the respective length of the first kerf slot. The first predetermined length of each first kerf slot is at least as long as the second predetermined length of the opening defined by the dielectric layer and is shorter than the longitudinal distance between the first face and the opposed second face of the stack in a lengthwise direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the stack. In one aspect, the plurality of first kerf slots define a plurality of ultrasonic array elements.
The ultrasonic transducer can also comprise a plurality of second kerf slots. In this aspect, each second kerf slot extends a predetermined depth therein the stack and a third predetermined length in a direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the stack. The “predetermined depth” of the second kerf slot can follow a predetermined depth profile that is a function of position along the respective length of the second kerf slot. The length of each second kerf slot is at least as long as the second predetermined length of the opening defined by the dielectric layer and is shorter than the longitudinal distance between the first face and the opposed second face of the stack in a lengthwise direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the stack. In one aspect, each second kerf slot is positioned adjacent to at least one first kerf slot. In one aspect, the plurality of first kerf slots define a plurality of ultrasonic array elements and the plurality of second kerf slots define a plurality of ultrasonic array sub-elements. For example, an array with one second kerf slot between two respective first kerf slots has two array sub-elements per array element. For a 64-element array with two sub-diced elements per array element, 129 respective first and second kerf slots are made to produce 128 piezoelectric sub-elements that make up the 64 elements of the array. It is contemplated that this number can be increased for a larger array. For an array without sub-dicing, 65 and 257 first kerf slots can be used for array structures with 64 and 256 array elements respectively. In one aspect, the first and/or second kerf slots can be filled with air. In an alternative aspect, the first and/or second kerf slots can also be filled with a liquid or a solid, such as, for example, a polymer.
Because neither the first or second kerf slots extend to either of the respective first and second faces of the stack, i.e., the kerf slots have an intermediate length, the formed array elements are supported by the contiguous portion of the stack near the respective first and second faces of the stack.
The piezoelectric layer of the stack can resonate at frequencies that are considered high relative to current clinical imaging frequency standards. In one aspect, the piezoelectric layer resonates at a center frequency of about 30 MHz. In other aspects, the piezoelectric layer resonates at a center frequency of about and between 10-200 MHz, preferably about and between, 20-150 MHz, and more preferably about and between 25-100 MHz.
Each of the plurality of ultrasonic array sub-elements has an aspect ratio of width to height of about and between 0.2-1.0, preferably about and between 0.3-0.8, and more preferably about and between 0.3-0.7. In one aspect, an aspect ratio of width to height of less than about 0.6 for the piezoelectric elements can be used. This aspect ratio, and the geometry resulting from it, helps to separate lateral resonance modes of an array element from the thickness resonant mode used to create the acoustic energy. Thus, the noted width to height ratios are configured to prevent any lateral resonant modes within the piezoelectric bar from interfering with the dominant thickness mode resonance. Similar cross-sectional designs can be considered for arrays of other types as understood by one skilled in the art. Each array element can comprise at least one sub-dice kerf, such that each array element will effectively include two or more bars, in which the signal electrodes for all bars of each respective element are electrically shorted together.
The width to height aspect ratio of the piezoelectric bar can also impact the directivity of the array element, i.e., the more narrow the width, the lower the directivity and the larger the steering angle of the array. For arrays with a pitch greater than about 0.5 lambda, the amplitude of the grating lobes produced for an aperture of driven elements will increase. Without limitation, various exemplary width/height aspect ratios of PZT bars can include:
The first and/or second kerf slots can be filled with air or with a liquid or a solid, such as a polymer. The filler can be a low acoustic impedance material that minimizes mechanical coupling between adjacent piezoelectric bars within the array structure. If selected, the low acoustic impedance material can have an acoustic response that is outside of the bandwidth of the piezoelectric bars to avoid any unwanted coupling with the piezoelectric bars. It will be appreciated that the choice of filler can influence the effective width of an array element, i.e., the effective width of the array element will be equal to, or larger than, the actual width of the array element due to any mechanical coupling between elements. Further, as the effective width increases, the directivity of the array element will increase slightly. For example, and not meant to be limiting, Epotek 301 and/or 301-2 epoxies, and the like, can be used as kerf filler materials.
The formation of sub-elements by “sub-dicing,” using a plurality of first and second kerf slots is a technique in which two adjacent sub-elements are electrically shorted together, such that the pair of shorted sub-elements act as one element of the array. For a given element pitch, which is the center to center spacing of the array elements resulting from the first kerf slots, sub-dicing allows for an improved element width to height aspect ratio such that unwanted lateral resonances within the element are shifted to frequencies outside of the desired bandwidth of the operation of the device.
In one aspect, the piezoelectric layer of the stack has a pitch of about and between 7.5-300 microns, preferably about and between 10-150 microns, and more preferably about and between 15-100 microns. In one example and not meant to be limiting, for a 30 MHz array design, the resulting pitch for a 1.5 k is about 74 microns.
At high frequencies, when the width of the array elements and of the kerf slots scale down to the order of 1-10's of microns, it is desirable in array fabrication to make narrow kerf slots. Narrowing the kerf slots can minimize the pitch of the array such that the effects of grating lobes of energy can be minimized during normal operation of the array device. Further, by narrowing the kerf slots, the element strength and sensitivity are maximized for a given array pitch by removing as little of the piezoelectric layer as possible. Using laser machining, the piezoelectric layer may be patterned with a fine pitch and maintain mechanical integrity.
As noted above, the plurality of layers can further include a signal electrode layer and a ground electrode layer. The electrodes can be defined by the application of a metallization layer that covers the dielectric layer and the exposed area of the piezoelectric layer. The electrode layers can comprise any metalized surface as would be understood by one skilled in the art. A non-limiting example of electrode material that can be used is Nickel (Ni). A metalized layer of lower resistance (at 1-100 MHz) that does not oxidize can be deposited by thin film deposition techniques such as sputtering (evaporation, electroplating, etc.). A Cr/Au combination (300/3000 Angstroms respectively) is an example of such a lower resistance metalized layer, although thinner and thicker layers can also be used. The Cr is used as an interfacial adhesion layer for the Au. As would be clear to one skilled in the art, it is contemplated that other conventional interfacial adhesion layers well known in the semiconductor and microfabrication fields can be used. Signal electrodes can be patterned as described herein.
The plurality of layers of the stack can further include at least one matching layer having a top surface and an opposed bottom surface. In one aspect, the plurality of layers includes two such matching layers. At least a portion of the bottom surface of the first matching layer can be connected to at least a portion of the top surface of the piezoelectric layer. If a second matching layer is used, at least a portion of the bottom surface of the second matching layer is connected to at least a portion of the top surface of the first matching layer. The matching layer(s) can be at least as long as the second predetermined length of the opening defined by the dielectric layer in a lengthwise direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the stack. Methods for producing integrated matching layers are described herein.
The matching layer(s) can have a thickness that is usually equal to about or around ¼ of a wavelength of sound, at the center frequency of the device, within the matching layer material itself. The specific thickness range of the matching layers depends on the actual choice of layers, their specific material properties, and the intended center frequency of the device. In one example and not meant to be limiting, for polymer based matching layer materials, and at 30 MHz, this results in a preferred thickness value of about 15-25 μm.
In one aspect, the acoustic impedance of a matching layer can be between 8-9 Mrayl; in another aspect, the impedance can be between 3-10 Mrayl; and, in yet another aspect, the impedance can be between 1-33 Mrayl.
The plurality of layers of the stack can further include a backing layer having a top surface and an opposed bottom surface. In one aspect, the backing layer substantially fills the opening defined by the dielectric layer. In another aspect, at least a portion of the top surface of the backing layer is connected to at least a portion of the bottom surface of the dielectric layer. In a further aspect, substantially all of the bottom surface of the dielectric layer is connected to at least a portion of top surface of the backing layer. In yet another aspect, at least a portion of the top surface of the backing layer is connected to at least a portion of the bottom surface of the piezoelectric layer.
The matching and backing layers can be selected from materials with acoustic impedance between that of air and/or water and that of the piezoelectric layer. In addition, as one skilled in the art will appreciate, an epoxy or polymer can be mixed with metal and/or ceramic powder of various compositions and ratios to create a material of variable acoustic impedance and attenuation. Any such combinations of materials are contemplated in this disclosure. The choice of matching layer(s), ranging from 1-6 discrete layers to one gradually changing layer, and backing layer(s), ranging from 0-5 discrete layers to one gradually changing layer alters the thickness of the piezoelectric layer for a specific center frequency.
In one aspect, the backing layer of the transducer can be configured such that the acoustic energy that travels downwards towards the backing layer when the piezoelectric element is electrically excited, or operated in receive mode, is absorbed by the backing material to avoid any unnecessary acoustic reflections within the thickness of the ultrasonic transducer stack. In one aspect, to effect the desired absorption of the acoustic energy that enters the backing material, a single backing material that has a high acoustic attenuation is configured to be sufficiently thick such that the layer acts as an infinitely thick layer. If more than a single backing layer is contemplated, to adjust the bandwidth and/or the characteristic frequency response of the transducer in any way, then the acoustic impedances are to be chosen accordingly. In one exemplary aspect, the backing layer can comprise a powder-doped epoxy.
In one aspect, a lens can be positioned in substantial overlying registration with the top surface of the layer that is the uppermost layer of the stack. The lens can be used for focusing the acoustic energy. The lens can be made of a polymeric material as would be known to one skilled in the art. In one preferred aspect, the lens can be made of a material that is well matched to water and has a low acoustic loss. For example, a preformed or prefabricated piece of Rexolite which has three flat sides and one curved face can be used as a lens. The radius of curvature (R) is determined by the intended focal length of the acoustic lens. For example not meant to be limiting, the lens can be conventionally shaped using computerized numerical control equipment, laser machining, molding, and the like. In one aspect, the radius of curvature is large enough such that the width of the curvature (WC) is at least as wide as the opening defined by the dielectric layer. Exemplary lens materials are polymethylpentene (e.g., TPX®) and cross-linked polystyrene (e.g., Rexolite®).
The speed of sound of Rexolite is greater than the speed of sound in water; therefore, the lens is formed with a concave surface. The radius of curvature of the lens defines the elevation focal depth of the array. For a focal length of 10 mm, the radius of curvature (R)=3.65 mm. In a further aspect, the maximum depth of the curvature of the lens can be minimized to avoid trapping air pockets in the acoustic gel used during imaging. In an additional aspect, the thinnest cross-sectional portion of the lens can be made as thin as possible such that the internal acoustic reflection that forms at the front face of the lens will remain temporally close to the primary pulse. In a further aspect, the thinnest cross-sectional portion of the lens can be thick enough to pass IEC patient leakage current tests for BF and/or CF rating. In yet another aspect, the curvature of the lens can extend beyond the active area of the array in order to avoid any unwanted diffraction due to a lens boundary discontinuity. Exemplary focal depths and radius of curvature of an exemplary Rexolite lens are:
In one preferred aspect, the minimum thickness of the lens substantially overlies the center of the opening or gap defined by the dielectric layer. Further, the width of the curvature is greater than the opening or gap defined by the dielectric layer. In one aspect, the length of the lens can be wider than the length of a kerf slot allowing for all of the kerf slots to be protected and sealed once the lens is mounted on the top of the transducer device.
At least one first kerf slot can extend through or into at least one layer to reach its predetermined depth/depth profile in the stack. Some or all of the layers of the stack can be cut through or into substantially simultaneously. Thus, a plurality of the layers can be selectively cut through substantially at the same time. Moreover, several layers can be selectively cut through at one time, and other layers can be selectively cut through at subsequent times, as would be clear to one skilled in the art. In one aspect, at least a portion of at least one first and/or second kerf slot extends to a predetermined depth that is at least 60% of the distance from the top surface of the piezoelectric layer to the bottom surface of the piezoelectric layer, and at least a portion of at least one first and/or second kerf slot can extend to a predetermined depth that is 100% of the distance from the top surface of the piezoelectric layer to the bottom surface of the piezoelectric layer.
At least a portion of at least one first kerf slot can extend to a predetermined depth into the dielectric layer and at least a portion of one first kerf slot can also extend to a predetermined depth into the backing layer. As would be clear to one skilled in the art, the predetermined depth into the backing layer can vary from 0 microns to a depth that is equal to or greater than the thickness of the piezoelectric layer itself. Laser micromachining through the backing layer can provide a significant improvement in isolation between adjacent elements. In one aspect, at least a portion of one first kerf slot extends through at least one layer and extends to a predetermined depth into the backing layer. As described herein, the predetermined depth into the backing layer may vary. The predetermined depth of at least a portion of at least one first kerf slot can vary in comparison to the predetermined depth of another portion of that same respective kerf slot or to a predetermined depth of at least a portion of another kerf slot in a lengthwise direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the stack. In another aspect, the predetermined depth of at least one first kerf slot can be deeper than the predetermined depth of at least one other kerf slot.
As described above, at least one second kerf slot can extend through at least one layer to reach its predetermined depth in the stack as described above for the first kerf slots. The second kerf slots can extend into or through at least one layer of the stack as described above for the first kerf slots. If layers of the stack are cut independently, each kerf slot in a given layer of the stack, whether a first or second kerf slot can be in substantial overlying registration with its corresponding slot in an adjacent layer.
A transducer may also include a support member to provide mechanical support for the various components of the transducers and to aid in the fabrication process.
The disclosed technology will now be described with respect to the transducer configurations shown generally in
The plurality of layers of the stack can further include a ground electrode layer 810 that is disposed on the top surface of the piezoelectric layer, a signal electrode layer 812, and a backing layer 814.
As shown in
In the inactive area, the stack transducer includes the following layers (from top to bottom):
The piezoelectric layer 806 can be made of a variety of materials. For example and not meant to be limiting, materials that form the piezoelectric layer can include ceramic, single crystal, polymer and co-polymer materials, ceramic-polymer and ceramic-ceramic composites with 0-3, 2-2 and/or 3-1 connectivity, and the like. In one example, the piezoelectric layer includes lead zirconate titanate (PZT) ceramic.
As shown in
In a further aspect, the inner edges of the respective first and second ground electrodes are spaced from each other a distance sufficient for respective first and second matching layers to be mounted sequentially on the top surface of the piezoelectric layer between the inner edges of the respective first and second ground electrodes. In this aspect, the longitudinally extending edges of the first and second matching layers 816, 826 can be spaced from the inner edges of the respective first and second ground electrodes. Optionally, a plurality of spacers 900 can be provided that are positioned outside of the acoustic field as defined by the active area of the stack onto portions of the top surface of the respective first and second ground electrodes. Each spacer 900 extends upwardly a predetermined distance relative to the top surface of the piezoelectric layer such that the bottom surface of a fourth matching layer 846 can be positioned at a desired distance relative to the piezoelectric layer and the intervening first and second matching layers. In this aspect, one spacer can be positioned or formed on the inwardly extending portion of the saw-tooth inner edges of the respective first and second ground electrodes. In one aspect, upon completion of the assembly of the stack, the spacing generated by the spacers 900 is equal to the thickness of a third matching layer 836 of the stack. It is contemplated that the spacers can be made from any material that can be lapped down to, or built up to, the target thickness.
In one exemplary aspect, the dielectric material includes silica doped Epotek 301 epoxy, which has a low relative dielectric constant of about 4 and provides strong adhesion for sputtered gold when the dielectric surface is treated with low fluence UV light and/or plasma. In a further aspect, the thickness of the dielectric can be at least 10 μm, preferably at least 10 μm, and more preferably at least 20 μm. Optionally, the edge of the dielectric layer can be sloped, with respect to the cross-sectional plane, to provide some apodization and to help suppress side lobes in elevation. The exact shape of the slope will be selected by one skilled in art based on the desired effect on the ultrasound wave. In another aspect, the width of the gap in the doped epoxy dielectric layer, which defines the elevation dimension of the array, can preferably be between about 0.5 mm-3.5 mm, more preferably between about 0.75 mm-3.0 mm, and most particularly between about 1.0 mm-3.0 mm.
The plurality of layers of the stack can further include at least one matching layer having a top surface and an opposed bottom surface. In a further aspect, the acoustic impedance of each matching layer can be configured such that the acoustic impedance monotonically decreases from the first matching layer above the piezoelectric to the top matching layer just underneath the lens. In one exemplary aspect, at least one of the matching layers is polymer based. It is also contemplated that all of the matching layers can be polymer based. In a further aspect, the exemplary plurality of matching layers can result in a substantially smooth pulse response with no perceivable phase discontinuities. The smooth nature of the pulse response means that there is a predictable relationship between the time and frequency response of the transducer.
In one exemplary illustrated aspect, the plurality of matching layers comprises four such matching layers. In one exemplary aspect, at least a portion of the bottom surface of the first matching layer 816 can be connected to at least a portion of the top surface of the ground electrode layer, which is, as described above, mounted thereon the top surface of the piezoelectric layer. At least a portion of the bottom surface of the second matching layer 826 is connected to at least a portion of the top surface of the first matching layer. The first and second matching layers can be at least as long as the second predetermined length of the opening defined by the dielectric layer in a lengthwise direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the stack.
As shown in
In one aspect, a top surface of a fourth matching layer 846 is bonded to the bottom, flat face of the lens. In the embodiment in which the lens is formed from Rexolite, the fourth matching layer 846 can be made from cyanoacrylate (CA) adhesive, which is a low acoustic material that can be reliably bonded to the Rexolite lens, as described in U.S. Publication No. 2007/0205698. Of course, it is contemplated that any low impedance material that can be reliably bonded to the material of the desired lens can be used. In one further aspect, it is preferred that the bottom surface of the CA layer, i.e., the fourth matching layer, is adhesively coupled to the top surface of the second matching layer. In this aspect, of the bottom surface of the fourth matching layer are seated on the top surface of the plurality of spacers such that the lens can be positioned/spaced as the desired distance from the second matching layer. In this aspect, the adhesive layer provides for bonding the lens to the stack.
The applied adhesive layer can also act as the third matching layer 836 provided that the thickness of the adhesive layer applied to the bottom face of the lens is of an appropriate wavelength in thickness (such as, for example and not meant to be limiting, ¼ wavelength in thickness). In this example, it is contemplated that the choice of powder and concentration of powder is selected to adjust the acoustic impedance to match the desired acoustic profile. One skilled in the art will appreciate that Epotek 301 epoxy, Epotek 301-2 epoxy, and the like can be used as the adhesive layer to form the noted third matching layer. Epotek 301 epoxy has an acoustic impedance of 2.9 Mrayl in its pure state and can be doped with powders of different composition and size to create a 0-3 composite material that can be configured to have a desirable acoustic impedance by controlling the density and speed of sound. In this exemplary aspect, the layer of CA acts as one of the matching layers of the transducer. Thus, in one non-limiting example, the plurality of matching layers can comprise a layer of CA and three underlying matching layers can comprise powder loaded Epotek 301 epoxy, Epotek 301-2 epoxy, and the like.
In a further aspect, prior to mounting the lens onto the stack, the CA layer and the lens can be laser cut, which effectively extends the array kerfs (i.e., the first and/or second array kerf slots), and in one aspect, the sub-diced or second kerfs, through both matching layers (or if two matching layers are used) and into the lens. If the CA and lens are laser cut, a pick and place machine (or an alignment jig that is sized and shaped to the particular size and shape of the actual components being bonded together) can be used to align the lens in both X and Y on the uppermost surface of the top layer of the stack. To laser cut the CA and lens, laser fluence of approximately 0.5-5 J/cm2 can be used.
In various exemplary aspects, arrays have the following acoustic design characteristics:
A flex circuit is placed on a 45 degree inclined plane with respect to the plane of an ultrasound array, and each finger of the flex is lined up with a corresponding array element. Two pieces of flex, one on each side of the array, are staggered, so that each flex is twice the pitch of the array. The flex is permanently attached in this position. The whole assembly is filled with a silica particle filled epoxy that covers all of the flex fingers. The epoxy is shaped to form a smooth internal profile over the all of the array, so that there are no sudden transitions from one surface to another.
An excimer laser is then used (e.g., 248 nm) to selectively expose the active region of the array by removing the particle/epoxy from the surface of the piezoelectric, e.g., PZT along each element, using a fluence that does not ablate the piezoelectric, but does remove the epoxy mixture. A ridge of kerf width is left between each element in the active area. The epoxy mixture is then removed from over the flex fingers, exposing the copper of the flex. Trenches are then made from each element to its respective finger. The transducer is sputtered, covering the entire inner surface with 1 μm of gold. Any standard metal could be used. A chromium adhesion layer may be used in conjunction with gold deposition. The laser ablation of the epoxy mixture and laser activation of the piezoelectric improve the adhesion of the metal.
A standard positive photoresist is coated onto the gold. Because of the trenches and ridges, the resist pools thickly in the trenches and remains thin on the high areas. The resist is allowed to dry but is not hard baked. The laser set to a very low fluence (about 0.3 J/cm2) is used to remove the resist without damaging the gold underneath. This is important, since ablation of the gold directly will typically cause collateral damage to the electrode left behind. Having thus exposed the negative of the electrode pattern in the resist, the gold is etched using a standard wet gold etching process at slightly elevated temperatures of up to 50° C. for a few minutes. The result of this is to have removed almost all of the gold down to the Cr/Au alloy region that is only about 300 Angstroms thick.
The laser is used at a slightly higher fluence to remove the remaining metal, e.g., about 0.8 J/cm2. This fluence will remove the remaining metal and created a trench in the epoxy under the gold layer. In the active area where the kerfs are less than 5 μm, a third, high fluence pass (e.g., at about 3 J/cm2) may be used to remove shorts. The trench made with the 0.8 J/cm2 pass acts as a guide for the plasma caused by the laser pulses, thereby preventing collateral damage of the electrode that would be caused by using a high fluence initially. After the final laser pass, a short wet etch can be used to de-burr the laser cut edges. Finally the resist is removed by dissolving in a suitable solvent at room temperature.
The piezoelectric layer, with a metalized ground electrode layer (not shown) coupled to the top surface of the piezoelectric layer, is initially blocked and its bottom surface is lapped conventionally to a first desired thickness in a first step. In one aspect, the first desired thickness is typically not the final thickness, but is rather a thickness that allows the continued working of the piezoelectric layer. In a second step, the first matching layer 816 is applied to a portion of the top surface of the metalized ground electrode layer and, after curing, is lapped to a target thickness. In step, the second matching layer 826 is applied to a portion of the top surface of the first matching layer and is subsequently lapped to a target thickness after curing. In one aspect, both the first and second matching layers are positioned substantially in the center of the piezoelectric layer and extend on the top surface of the piezoelectric layer between the elongate edges of the piezoelectric layer. The longitudinally extending edges of the first and second matching layers 816, 826 can be spaced from the longitudinally extending edges of the piezoelectric layer.
Subsequently, a copper foil 910 is coupled, for example with a conductive adhesive, to a portion of the top surface of the metalized ground electrode layer. As shown in
In another aspect, to achieve a desired standoff from the top surface of the respective first and second ground electrodes, a plurality of spacers 900 are positioned on portions of the top surface of the respective first and second ground electrodes 850 and 860. The plurality of spacers 900 can be in the form of pillars or dots that are positioned about the full perimeter of the piezoelectric layer. In another aspect, the plurality of spacers 900 can be positioned on portions of the top surface of the respective first and second ground electrodes adjacent to the inner edges of the respective first and second ground electrodes. In yet another aspect, the plurality of spacers can be positioned outwardly from the active area of the stack, i.e., in the inactive area of the stack. The spacers can be made from any conventional material that can be lapped to the desired target thickness.
The fourth matching layer 846 is adhesively coupled to the lens 809 and is subsequently allowed to cure prior to being lapped to the desired target thickness. In one exemplary aspect, the lens can include Rexolite, and the fourth matching layer can include a CA adhesive. In a further aspect, the fourth matching layer can be applied to a Rexolite blank and can be lapped to the desired target thickness prior to machining the Rexolite blank into a lens.
Referring to
Referring now to
Further, in one aspect, a pin marker fiducial can be scribed on the bottom surface of the piezoelectric layer by, for example and not meant to be limiting, laser machining. The pin marker fiducial can be, for example, at least one marking, such as a plurality of crosses. The pin marker, if used, can be used to correctly orient the stack with respect to the flex circuit in a subsequent downstream fabrication process. In a further aspect, the pin marker fiducial should extend into the bottom surface of the piezoelectric layer a depth that is sufficient for the pin marker fiducial to remain visible as the bottom surface of the piezoelectric layer is lapped to its final target thickness. It is preferred that the etch pattern of the pin marker fiducial extend substantially straight down such that the width of the pin marker fiducial does not change when the bottom surface of the piezoelectric lapped.
As shown in
Optionally, the formed first and second kerf slots are filled as described above and the fill material is allowed to cure. Subsequently, the bottom surface of the piezoelectric layer is lapped to its final target thickness, which results in a cross sectional view of the stack that is illustrated in
Referring now to
In one exemplary aspect, a plurality of circuit alignment features 960, such as the exemplified score lines illustrated in
As shown in
The respective bottom surface of the distal ends of the circuit boards, such as the flex circuit 950 shown in
As shown in
In practice, it is preferred to apply the dielectric layer across the bottom portion of the piezoelectric stack as shown in
Referring to
One will appreciate that a thin Cr, or Ti/W layer, of a few 100 Angstroms thick can be conventionally used as an adhesion layer, or that Nichrome is used as a diffusion barrier, when depositing a Au electrode. Conventionally, the thickness of these additional layers is very thin relative to the Au layer, and, in the case of alloying the metals by co-deposition, the amount of the alloy is not significant to impact the signal electrode patterning techniques described below. It is contemplated that all combinations of metal alloying is included when describing the patterning of the signal electrode.
Prior to depositing the signal electrode, a laser can be used to ensure that the desired portion of the bottom portion of the piezoelectric layer is fully exposed with no residual dielectric layer covering the piezoelectric in the active area. Further, the laser can pattern the dielectric layer that overlies the first kerf slots to form elevated ridges. One will appreciate that the formed ridges above the first kerfs slots, in the active area, will help reduce the thickness of the applied resist above the first kerf slots and allow the resist to pool above the piezoelectric. This aids in providing for clean kerf patterning of the signal electrode.
In another aspect, the laser can be used to form a shallow trench or sunken path that extends from each active element of the array to its designated copper trace on the flex circuit leadframe. The trenches in the dielectric from the active element to the flex circuit allow for resist to pool therein, which helps protect the Au during the patterning of the signal electrode. In yet another aspect, the laser can be used in this step to remove the dielectric material above the copper traces of the respective flex circuits and cleanly expose the copper traces.
Optionally, the laser can be used to create a “rough” textured surface on the portions of the array transducer that will be covered by the signal electrode. The textured surface can help to promote metal adhesion of the signal electrode to the surface, as described herein.
For an exemplary 256 element transducer array, the signal electrode layer forms a signal electrode pattern that is made of 256 isolated signal electrodes. In one aspect, each isolated signal electrode can have, in the active area of the stack, including the sloped transition to the dielectric layer, a minimum electrode gap, that is approximately as wide as the width of the first kerf slots between neighboring array elements. This electrode gap can extend from one side of the dielectric gap to the other and is preferably positioned substantially directly over the first kerf slots. Optionally, no electrode gap is required above the sub diced kerfs, i.e., the second kerf slots, because the sub diced piezoelectric bars are electrically shorted together as described above. In another aspect, on top of the dielectric layer, each isolated signal electrode can be terminated on the dielectric layer by removing the gold in between the two electrode gaps adjacent to each array element. As shown in
In one embodiment, after the conventional deposition of an Au layer to the prepared portions of the transducer, a multi-step laser ablation and etching process is used to create the intricate signal electrode pattern. In one exemplary aspect, the gold layer can be applied using conventional sputtering techniques. In a first step, a resist layer is applied to achieve a substantially even coat over the deposited gold layer. The stack may be tipped or rocked to help ensure that the resist coat is substantially even. In this aspect, it is contemplated that the resist will be allowed to dry at substantially room temperature. Elevated temperatures, below the soft baking temperature of the resist are also permitted provided that the temperature does not exceed the thermal budget or limits imposed by the materials and construct of the stack (for example and without limitation 50° C.). In a subsequent step, a laser, such as a laser using a low fluence of, for example, about 0.3 J/cm2, can photoablate the resist over only the full signal electrode pattern, such as for example the full 256 array element signal electrode pattern. In a subsequent step, the signal electrode pattern is conventionally etched to thin the applied gold layer. Without limitation, this etching step can be exemplarily accomplished by warming the etching materials to 32° C. and etching for 3 minutes.
Subsequently, the laser can be applied substantially over the first kerf slots to help remove the majority of any residual metals that remain above the first kerf slots. Further, in this step, it is contemplated that a portion of the fill material therein the first kerf slot adjacent to the bottom surface of the piezoelectric layer will be removed. As one will appreciate, this removal of the fill material will create shallow trenches in the fill material within the first kerf slots that extend below the plane of the bottom surface of the piezoelectric layer. In one aspect, it is contemplated that the laser will use a medium fluence, i.e., about and between 0.3-0.8 J/cm2, for this ablation step.
In a further aspect, it is contemplated that a general laser pass over the flex circuit and other potentially exposed areas at a low fluence level, i.e., about and between 0.3 and 0.4 J/cm2, can be accomplished after each laser ablation step. This low fluence pass of the laser can help ensure that any residual, undesired post etched sputtered gold has been removed.
In an optional additional step, the laser can be additionally be applied at a high fluence for a minimal number of pulses over the first kerf slots and over the termination pattern to remove any burs that may have persisted at this stage of the signal electrode formation process. As one will appreciate, any sunken feature that had previously been formed can aid in protecting the deposited signal electrodes from the plasma plume created during the elevated fluence laser ablation process.
As one will appreciate, after the processing described above, each signal electrode is operatively mounted to the transducer and is electrically coupled to both an individual circuit of the flex circuit and an individual array element. Optionally, the signal electrodes are tested for shorts so that any short can be identified and targeted rework can be accomplished to rectify the identified shorts.
Optionally, an additional etching step can be performed to debur the signal electrode pattern. Without limitation, this etching step can be accomplished by warming the etching materials to 32° C. and etching for 1 minute. This step can aid in removing any final residuals that could risk causing shorts when the backing layer is applied. Finally, the resist is cleaned from the transducer/support member/flex circuit assembly, i.e., the array assembly, and the signal electrodes are again tested for shorts so that any short can be identified and targeted rework can be accomplished to rectify the identified shorts.
As shown in
In an additional step and referring to
As discussed above, depending on the desired frequency of operation for a transducer, the distance between adjacent transducer elements in an ultrasonic transducer array can be required to be smaller than the minimum distance at which manufacturers can create traces in a printed flex circuit. One solution to this problem is to use two printed flex circuits to connect to opposite sides of the transducer elements as discussed above. In this case, one printed flex circuit has traces that connect to even numbered transducer elements while the other printed flex circuit has traces that connect to odd numbered transducer elements. In this manner, the traces of each printed flex circuit board only need to connect to every other transducer element, thereby allowing them to be placed farther apart on the printed flex circuit. While this method works well for some embodiments, there are transducer arrays where the pitch of the transducer elements is still too fine to connect every other transducer element to a trace on a printed flex circuit.
To address this problem, one embodiment of the disclosed technology connects the transducer elements to traces in a multi-layer printed flex circuit. This is particularly useful for embodiments of the technology that are designed to be formed into probes that enter a subject's body.
In one embodiment, adjacent transducer elements in the transducer array are separated by a distance that is smaller than a minimum distance at which traces can be printed on a single layer of a printed flex circuit. In some embodiments, the traces of the printed flex circuits have to turn approximately 90 degrees between the points where they are electrically connected to a transducer element in order to extend along the length of the printed flex circuit. If an ultrasound transducer has 512 active transducer elements, then each printed flex circuit 1240, 1260 has to route 256 individual traces down its length. Because the size of the flex circuit is directly proportional to the number of conductive traces it carries, an increase in the width of the flex circuit causes a corresponding increase in the size of a probe that houses the flex circuits.
To address one or more of these problems, one embodiment of the disclosed technology uses multi-layer printed flex circuits to connect to the transducer elements. For example, if two-layer printed flex circuits are used, then each layer only needs to have traces that are spaced apart by the distance between 3 adjacent transducer elements (or 5 adjacent transducer elements if a two-layer printed flex circuit connects to only even or odd transducer elements). If three-layer printed flex circuits are used, the traces on any one layer need only be as close as the distance between 4 adjacent transducer elements (or 7 adjacent transducer elements if a printed flex circuit connects to only even or odd transducer elements). Similarly, if a four-layer printed flex circuit is used, then the traces on each layer of the printed flex circuit need only be as close as the distance between 5 adjacent transducer elements (or 9 adjacent transducer elements if the printed flex circuit connects to only even or odd transducer elements).
By allowing the traces to be spaced farther apart on the printed flex circuits, it is easier to manufacture and route the traces on the printed flex circuits. The traces of the different layers of the printed flex circuits can then be interleaved and aligned at the point where they connect to the transducer elements such that they have the correct pitch to connect to the transducer elements. However, within any single layer of the multi-layer printed flex circuit, the trace pitch can be greater than the transducer element pitch because adjacent traces within the single layer do not need to connect to adjacent transducer elements. Rather the traces may be separated by a distance that is proportional to the number of layers in the multi-layer printed circuit. In addition, the conductive traces of one layer are offset from the conductive traces of adjacent layers. This improves electrical isolation of the traces, thereby improving trace impedance and reducing signal cross-talk between traces. The printed flex circuit may also include one or more ground plane layers (not shown) between the signal trace layers to further reduce cross-talk.
By using multi-layer printed flex circuits, the size of the flex circuit within the probe is reduced by a factor equal to the number of layers in the multi-layer printed flex circuit. For example, if a four layer printed flex circuit is used, then the flex circuit width can be ¼ as wide as if a single layer printed flex circuit were used. This reduction in flex circuit width allows probes to be made thinner for improved patient comfort.
In one embodiment, the printed flex circuits may be manufactured with a lithography process to create the traces in each layer. The trace and ground plane layers are then interleaved, aligned and bonded together to form a multi-layer printed flex circuit.
In the example shown, the first active transducer element in the array is connected to a trace in the third layer 1246 of a multi-layer printed flex circuit on one side of the transducer array. The next active transducer element connects to a trace in the fourth layer 1248 in the multi-layer printed flex circuit on the same side of the transducer array. The next active transducer element connects to a trace in the first layer 1242 and the next active transducer element connects to a trace in the second layer 1244. In one embodiment, the pattern then repeats with the next active transducer element connecting to a trace on the third layer 1246 etc.
By using a four-layer printed flex circuit, the traces on any given layer need do not need to be spaced any closer than the distance between nine adjacent transducer elements (assuming the multi-layer printed flex circuit only connects to odd or even transducer elements). The traces on the various layers of the multi-layer printed flex circuit are interleaved and aligned such that they align with the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th etc. active transducer elements etc. Although not shown in
In one embodiment, the traces from the various layers of the printed flex circuit are electrically coupled to a transducer element using the techniques described above. That is, the traces of the multi-layer flex circuit are placed in a frame and aligned with the transducer elements of the array. The flex circuit is then bonded at an angle to the ultrasonic transducer using a particulate (e.g. silica) filled epoxy. The epoxy is machined or molded such that there are no abrupt transitions formed between the transducer elements 1220 and the printed flex circuit.
A low fluence laser then cuts smooth trenches in the epoxy that extend down through the epoxy layer to the ultrasonic transducer elements and up the side of the multi-layer printed flex circuit. In the spot where the trench is positioned over the correct layer in the multi-layer flex circuit, the laser burns down though the epoxy to expose a portion of the conductive trace in that layer.
The trenches on the printed flex circuit and transducer elements are then sputtered covered with a very thin layer of conductive metal (e.g. gold or gold with a chromium adhesion layer). The conductive metal is then covered with a resist that is allowed to dry. A low fluence laser is then used to remove the dried resist in areas where the gold or other conductive metal is undesired (e.g. between the traces on the printed flex circuit and in the kerf regions between the transducer elements.
The exposed conductive metal is then mostly removed with a wet etch processes. Any remaining metal is then cleaned up and removed with one or more passes with a laser. Finally, the remaining resist that covers the areas where the conductive metal is desired is removed by dissolving it with a suitable solvent thereby leaving only a number of conductive metal lines that connect an ultrasound transducer element to a trace on a layer of the multi-layer printed flex circuit.
A silica filled epoxy 1270 is coated over the flex circuit to bond it to the ultrasound transducer and the frame 1300 as well as to add strength. A laser is then used to cut trenches 1272, 1274, 1276, 1278 into the epoxy 1270 to expose a portion of the copper (or other conductive metal) traces in the flex circuit 1240. Once the trenches are cut, they are coated with conductive metal film to electrically couple the traces to a corresponding transducer element as described above.
It is not required that two multi-layer printed flex circuits be used to connect to an ultrasound transducer array. Depending on the pitch of the transducer elements and the ability of the printed flex circuit fabricator to route traces in the flex circuit, a single multi-layer flex circuit can be used.
In order to reduce cross-talk between the leads that couple the transducer elements to the traces in the printed flex circuits, it may be desirable to reduce the width of the connections that connect the transducer elements to the traces in the flex circuit. As shown in
It is also not required that the traces in the printed flex circuits run in a direction that is generally parallel to the length of the ultrasonic transducer.
Throughout this application, various publications are referenced. The disclosures of these publications in their entireties are hereby incorporated by reference. Unless otherwise expressly stated, it is in no way intended that any method set forth herein be construed as requiring that its steps be performed in a specific order. Accordingly, where a method claim does not actually recite an order to be followed by its steps or it is not otherwise specifically stated in the claims or descriptions that the steps are to be limited to a specific order, it is no way intended that an order be inferred, in any respect. This holds for any possible non-express basis for interpretation, including: matters of logic with respect to arrangement of steps or operational flow; plain meaning derived from grammatical organization or punctuation; and the number or type of embodiments described in the specification.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present disclosed technology without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosed technology. Other embodiments of the disclosed technology will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosed technology disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the disclosed technology being indicated by the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/923,383 filed Oct. 26, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/657,783 filed Oct. 22, 2012, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/562,998 filed Sep. 18, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/192,661 and 61/192,690, both filed on Sep. 18, 2008 and all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2205169 | Hallman | Jun 1940 | A |
| 3922572 | Cook et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
| 4217684 | Brisken et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4360007 | Levy et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4385255 | Yamaguchi et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4543829 | Lerch | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4617707 | Mohaupt et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4684436 | Burns et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4749896 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4802099 | Logue | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4809184 | O'Donnell et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4841977 | Griffith et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4945155 | Fagerburg et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5014710 | Maslak et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5045746 | Wersing et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5091893 | Smith et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5123415 | Daigle | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5160870 | Carson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5186177 | O'Donnell et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5203335 | Noujaim et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5311095 | Smith et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5318033 | Savord | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5322974 | Walston | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5325860 | Seward et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5329496 | Smith | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5329498 | Greenstein | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5345426 | Lipschutz | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5345940 | Seward et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5360007 | Shinomura et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5368037 | Eberle et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5369624 | Fukukita et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5371717 | Bolorforosh | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5388079 | Kim et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5390674 | Robinson et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5392259 | Bolorforosh | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5406163 | Carson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5410516 | Uhlendorf et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5415175 | Hanafy et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5434827 | Bolorforosh | Jul 1995 | A |
| RE35011 | Wersing et al. | Aug 1995 | E |
| 5438554 | Seyed-Bolorforosh et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5438998 | Hanafy | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5445155 | Sieben | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5453575 | O'Donnell et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5456259 | Barlow et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5460181 | Seyed-Bolorforosh | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5465725 | Seyed-Bolorforosh | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5505088 | Chandraratna et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5522391 | Beaudin et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5544655 | Daigle | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5548564 | Smith | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5553035 | Seyed-Bolorforosh et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5573001 | Petrofsky et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5577506 | Dias | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5582177 | Hanafy et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5603327 | Eberle et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5629865 | Roth | May 1997 | A |
| 5653236 | Miller | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5655276 | Pattanayak et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5667373 | Wright et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5704105 | Venkataramani et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5704361 | Seward et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5706819 | Hwang et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5713363 | Seward et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5743855 | Hanafy et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5744898 | Smith et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5774960 | De Fraguier et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5779644 | Eberle et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5792058 | Lee et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5795297 | Daigle | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797847 | Miller et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5834880 | Venkataramani et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841075 | Hanson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5844139 | Miller et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5855049 | Corbett et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5857974 | Eberle et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5865749 | Doten et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5879303 | Averkiou et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5895855 | Ishikawa et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897501 | Wildes et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5905692 | Dolazza et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5906580 | Kline-Schoder et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5938612 | Kline-Schoder et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5938615 | Eberle et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940123 | Daigle et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5970025 | Cole et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5976090 | Hanafy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5977691 | Stephens et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6001062 | Masters | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6029116 | Wright et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6034922 | Uhlendorf et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039693 | Seward et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6049958 | Eberle et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6050945 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6063034 | Doten et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6064628 | Uhlendorf et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6073045 | Dyson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6083164 | Oppelt et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6099475 | Seward et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110116 | Wright et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6123673 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6128958 | Cain | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6129672 | Seward et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6129677 | Sohma et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6135971 | Hutchinson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6183578 | Ritter et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193662 | Hwang | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6221017 | Uhlendorf et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6235024 | Tu | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236144 | Millar et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6238481 | Yamashita et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6251073 | Imran et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6262749 | Finger | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6278224 | Sawada et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6283920 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6306096 | Seward et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6315725 | Masters | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322505 | Hossack et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6350238 | Olstad et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6363033 | Cole et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6403396 | Gudesen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6417857 | Finger et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6437487 | Mohr, III et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6443899 | Uhlendorf et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6457365 | Stephens et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6492762 | Pant et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6497664 | Randall et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6530887 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6541896 | Piel, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6544180 | Doten et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6547731 | Coleman et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6558323 | Wakabayashi et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6558326 | Pelissier | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6608371 | Kurashima et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6612989 | Brock-Fisher | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6618916 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6626838 | Doten et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6635019 | Davidsen | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6641540 | Fleischman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6650264 | Chan et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6656124 | Flesch et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6664717 | Mohr, III et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6673018 | Friedman | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6676606 | Simpson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6679845 | Ritter et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6685644 | Seo et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6685657 | Jones | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6695783 | Henderson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6705992 | Gatzke | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6740037 | Schoenfeld | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6759791 | Hatangadi et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6761688 | Mohr, III et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6761697 | Rubinstenn et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6780157 | Stephens et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6784600 | Klee et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6787974 | Fjield et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6806623 | Petersen et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6821253 | Wakabayashi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6822189 | Hong et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6822374 | Smith et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6822376 | Baumgartner | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6837855 | Puech | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6851392 | Zan et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6873090 | Shiraishi et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6875178 | Phelps et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6891311 | Phelps et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6894426 | Shimizu | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6899682 | Eberle et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6919668 | Nagahara et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6929608 | Hutchinson et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6949071 | Saied et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6962567 | Eberle et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6974417 | Lockwood et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6994674 | Sheljaskow et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7017245 | Baumgartner et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7052460 | Liu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7052462 | Fukuda et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7087970 | Nakamura | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7091125 | Werner et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7134198 | Nakatani et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7139676 | Barford | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7148607 | Sato | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7148608 | Baumgartner et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7156812 | Seward et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7156938 | Baumgartner et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7208717 | Partain et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7229292 | Haider et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7230368 | Lukacs et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7255678 | Mehi et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7316059 | Sato | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7391872 | Pompei | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7424771 | Shiraishi et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7454820 | Nakamura | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7459836 | Scott | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7622848 | Lee et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 8077451 | Tang | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8316518 | Lukacs | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8410666 | Shikata et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 9173047 | Lukacs et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9184369 | Chaggares et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9555443 | Chaggares et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9935254 | Lukacs | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 20010007940 | Tu et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010041842 | Eberle et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020000763 | Jones | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020050169 | Ritter et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020058873 | Seward et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077551 | Fleischman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020129477 | Bureau et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020130590 | Shiraishi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020157472 | Stephens et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020173720 | Seo et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009873 | Hatangadi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030015037 | Stephens et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030025442 | Takeuchi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036702 | Davidsen | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030067249 | Lockwood et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030073906 | Flesch et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030127949 | Nagahara et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030147227 | Egitto et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030173870 | Simon Hsu | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187356 | Wakabayashi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030189391 | Shimizu | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030205947 | Klee et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040000841 | Phelps et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040002656 | Sheljaskow et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040011134 | Sato | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040040740 | Nakatani et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040051446 | Werner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054289 | Eberle et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068191 | Seward et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040071320 | Pfister | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040082858 | Fukuda et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040085858 | Khuri-Yakub et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111026 | Schoenfeld | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122319 | Mehi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040176784 | Okada | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236219 | Liu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254471 | Hadjicostis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050039323 | Sheljaskow | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050046030 | Nakamura | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050099096 | Baumgartner et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050099097 | Baumgartner et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113699 | Haugen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050124894 | Puech | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050126490 | Hsieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050156490 | Shiraishi et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197543 | Zan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197574 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203402 | Angelsen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050225210 | Englund et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240102 | Rachlin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251043 | Saied et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251232 | Hartley et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272183 | Lukacs et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060004289 | Tian et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060058681 | Eberle et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078501 | Goertz et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230605 | Schlote-Holubek et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241446 | White et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241461 | White et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070001259 | Palanduz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016071 | Eberle et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070059247 | Lindner et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078347 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070182287 | Lukacs et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070200460 | Scott | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070205697 | Chaggares et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070205698 | Chaggares et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070222339 | Lukacs et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070239001 | Mehi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080015438 | Mehi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080018205 | Rhim et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080037808 | Sawada et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195003 | Sliwa et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080315331 | Wodnicki | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090240152 | Angelsen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090298299 | Cain et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20110144494 | Mehi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20130140955 | Chaggares | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130188446 | Kubota | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130207519 | Chaggares et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130258803 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1234960 | Nov 1999 | CN |
| 1294755 | May 2001 | CN |
| 1495930 | May 2004 | CN |
| 1803223 | Jul 2006 | CN |
| 101442941 | May 2009 | CN |
| 4142372 | Jun 1993 | DE |
| 4226865 | Mar 1994 | DE |
| 10336101 | Apr 2004 | DE |
| 0227 926 | Jul 1987 | EP |
| 0467690 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 0627635 | Dec 1994 | EP |
| 0629992 | Dec 1994 | EP |
| 0629994 | Dec 1994 | EP |
| 0779108 | Jun 1997 | EP |
| 1227525 | Jul 2002 | EP |
| 1318551 | Jun 2003 | EP |
| 1382301 | Jan 2004 | EP |
| 2828056 | Jan 2003 | FR |
| 55014044 | Jan 1980 | JP |
| 5501444 | Apr 1980 | JP |
| 56070000 | Jun 1981 | JP |
| 57147397 | Sep 1982 | JP |
| S58-54939 | Apr 1983 | JP |
| 58054939 | Dec 1983 | JP |
| S6093899 | May 1985 | JP |
| 01069094 | Mar 1989 | JP |
| 03270599 | Dec 1991 | JP |
| 06225391 | Aug 1994 | JP |
| 08083789 | Mar 1996 | JP |
| 10112899 | Apr 1998 | JP |
| 2001069594 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2002177271 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2004080193 | Mar 2004 | JP |
| 2006211058 | Aug 2006 | JP |
| 2006228871 | Aug 2006 | JP |
| 2007534277 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2008011494 | Jan 2008 | JP |
| 2009528783 | Aug 2009 | JP |
| 2009528784 | Aug 2009 | JP |
| 9717018 | May 1997 | WO |
| 9934733 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| 9945582 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 0152437 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| 0243593 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 03040427 | May 2003 | WO |
| 2004007098 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| 2004099814 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| 1677706 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| 2005104210 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| 2007029028 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2007056104 | May 2007 | WO |
| 2007067282 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| 2007103143 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| 2007103144 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| 2008065976 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| 2010031192 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report, EP Patent Application 17190476.6, dated Mar. 1, 2018, 12 pages. |
| European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report, EP Patent Application 09813954.6, dated Sep. 2, 2015, 16 pages. |
| European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report, EP Patent Application 16185029.2, dated Feb. 3, 2017, 21 pages. |
| European Patent Office, Partial European Search Report, EP Patent Application 16185029.2, dated Nov. 25, 2016, 8 pages. |
| European Patent Office, Partial Supplementary European Search Report, EP Patent Application 09813954.6, dated Apr. 2, 2015, 6 pages. |
| Huemoeller et al. “Unveiling the Next Generation in Substrate Technology,” Feb. 21, 2007, 10 pages. <http://www.amkor.com/go/packaging/substrate-technology>. |
| Bridal et al., “Milestones on the Road to Higher Resolution, Quantitative, and Functional Ultrasonic Imaging,” Proceedings of the IEEE 91:1543-1561, 2003. |
| Brown et al., “A Digital Beamformer for High-Frequency Annular Arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 52:1262-1269, 2005. |
| Brown et al., “In Vivo Assessment of Postnatal Murine Ocular Development by Ultrasound Biomicroscopy,” Current Eye Research 30:45-51, 2005. |
| Brown et al., “Performance of a 50 MHz Annular Array Based Imaging System,” IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 760-763, 2004. |
| Brown et al., “Quantitation of Hemodynamic Function during Developmental Vascular Regression in the Mouse Eye,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 46:2231-2237, 2005. |
| Cannata et al., “Development of a High Frequency (35 MHz) Linear Ultrasonic Array Using 2-2 Composite Elements,” IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 894-897, 2004. |
| Ergun et al., “Broadband Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers Ranging From 10kHz to 60MHz for Imaging Arrays and More,” IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 1039-1043, 2002. |
| Farlow et al., “Micromachining of a Piezocomposite Transducer Using a Copper Vapor Laser,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control 48:639-640, 2001. |
| Goertz et al., “High Frequency Nonlinear B-Scan Imaging of Microbubble Contrast Agents,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control 52:65-79, 2005. |
| Guess et al., “Cross-talk Paths in Array Transducers,” IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 1279-1282, 1995. |
| Herman et al., “Advanced-laser Processing of Photonic and Microelectronic Components at Photonics Research Ontario,” SPIE Proc. 3618:240-250, 1999. |
| Hu et al., “An FPGA Based Digital High Frequency Beamformer for Arrays,” 8th Annual Fred S. Grodins Graduate Research Symposium, NIH Resource Center for Medical Ultrasound Transducer Technology, USC Los Angeles, CA, 84-85, 2004. |
| Hu et al., “FPGA Based Digital High Frequency Beamforrners for Arrays,” IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 1347-1350, 2004. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/CA2009/001363, dated Feb. 19, 2009, 9 pages. |
| Jensen et al., “A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 34:351-354, 1996. |
| Lerch et al., “Simulation of Piezoelectric Devices by Two-and Three-Dimensional Finite Elements,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 37:233-247, 1990. |
| Liu et al., “Interdigital Pair Bonding for High Frequency (20-50MHz) Ultrasonic Composite Transducers,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 48:299-306, 2001. |
| Lukacs et al., “Laser Micromachined High Frequency Ultrasonic Arrays,” IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 1209-1212, 1999. |
| Lukacs et al., “Single Element and Linear Array PZT Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Transducers,” IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 1709-1712, 1997. |
| Lukacs et al., “Single Element and Linear Array Transducer Design for Ultrasound Biomicroscopy,” SPIE 3341:272-282, 1998. |
| Lukacs, “Single Element and Linear Arrays High Frequency Ultrasonic Transducers Using PZT Sol Gel Composites,” Ph.D. Thesis, Queen's University, 1-165, 1999. |
| McKeighen et al., “Design Guidelines for Medical Ultrasonic Arrays,” SPIE 3341:2-18, 1998. |
| Michau et al., “Piezocomposite 30MHz Linear Array for Medical Imaging: Design Challenges and Performances Evaluation of a 128 Elements Array,” IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 898-901, 2004. |
| Oralkan et al., “Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers: Next-Generation Arrays for Acoustic Imaging?” IEEE Tranactions on. Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control 49:1596-1610, 2002. |
| Oralkan et al., “High-Frequency CMUT Arrays for High-Resolution Medical Imaging,” IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 399-402, 2004. |
| Powell et al., “Incremental ‘Model-Build-Test’ Validation Exercise for a 1-D biomedical Ultrasonic Imaging Array,” IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 1669-1674, 1997. |
| Qi et al., “Finite Element Study on 1-D Array Transducer Design,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 47:949-955, 2000. |
| Ritter et al., “A 30-MHz Piezo-Composite Ultrasound Array for Medical Imaging Applications,” IEEE Transactions Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. 49:217-230, 2002. |
| Roh et al., “Finite Element Analysis on Reduction of the Cross Talk in Ultrasonic Transducers,” Proceedings of SPIE 4693:214-221, 2002. |
| Sherrit et al., “Field Dependence of the Complex Piezoelectric, Dielectric, and Elastic Constants of Motorola PZT 3203 HD Ceramic,” SPIE 3040:99-109, 1997. |
| Snook et al., “Design of a 50 MHz Annular Array Using Fine-Grain Lead Titanate,” Proceedings of SPIE 4687:91-98, 2002. |
| Tutwiler et al., “Design of a Test System to Characterize Very High-Frequency Ultrasound Transducer Arrays,” SPIE 3664:182-193, 1999. |
| Villaneuva et al., “Microbubbles Targeted to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 Bind to Activation Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells,” Circulation 98:1-5, 1998. |
| Wang et al., “Passive Materials for High Frequency Ultrasound Transducers,” SPIE 3664:35-42, 1999. |
| Wu et al., “Design of an Analogy Beamformer for Very High-Frequency Ultrasound Transducer Arrays,” Proceedings of SPIE 3982:142-149, 2000. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170197232 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61192661 | Sep 2008 | US | |
| 61192690 | Sep 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14923383 | Oct 2015 | US |
| Child | 15418483 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13657783 | Oct 2012 | US |
| Child | 14923383 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12562998 | Sep 2009 | US |
| Child | 13657783 | US |
