Robotically (as used herein, the terms “robot” or “robotically” and the like include teleoperation or telerobotic aspects) controlled instruments are well known and often used in minimally invasive medical procedures.
Tendons 121 and 122, which may be stranded cables, rods, tubes, or similar structures, run from backend mechanism 130 through shaft 120 and attach to end effector 110. A typical surgical instrument would also include additional tendons (not shown) that connect backend mechanism 130 to other structural members of end effector 110 or of a wrist mechanism, so that backend mechanism 130 can manipulate the tendons to operate end effector 110 and/or the wrist mechanism when performing the desired procedure at the work site.
Slack in tendons 121 and 122 can cause malfunctions, for example, by permitting tendons 121 and 122 to derail from guides or pulleys (not shown) that route tendons 121 and 122 through instrument 100. Slack can also cause jumpy or unpredictable motion of the instrument. To avoid creating slack in tendon 121 or 122 when moving jaw 112, backend mechanism 130 operates to release a length of one tendon 121 or 122 while simultaneously reeling in an equal length of the other tendon 122 or 121. Tendons 121 and 122 can be attached to the same capstan 132 but wrapped in opposite directions to provide the desired movements of tendons 121 and 122 when a drive motor (not shown) turns capstan 132. In cases where an end effector has several degrees of freedom that are controlled by several tendons, for instance as described in patent U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,394,998 and 6,817,974, the backend mechanism can include mechanisms other than capstans to perform the function of releasing and reeling in related lengths of tendons in order to avoid slack in the tendons as distal joints are turned. It can be seen that tendons 121 and 122 can be two separate components, or they may be part of a closed loop component with a capstan actuator, such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,316,681 B2 (filed Oct. 4, 2005) entitled “Articulated Surgical Instrument For Performing Minimally Invasive Surgery With Enhanced Dexterity And Sensitivity” by Madhani et al., which is incorporated herein by reference.
Avoiding slack may also require tendons 121 and 122 to be pre-tensioned, particularly when end effector 110 may be used for pushing and pulling, clamping, gripping, or other actions that encounter resistance. In particular, backend mechanism 130 can apply tension to tendon 122 to cause jaw 112 to clamp down on material between jaws 112 and 114. Increasing tension in tendon 122 causes higher clamping force but also causes tendon 122 to stretch. To prevent the stretching of tendon 122 from causing a corresponding amount of slack in tendon 121, tendon 121 can be preloaded with a tension that stretches tendon 121. For example, assuming tendons 121 and 122 are identical, tendon 121 can be pre-loaded with a tension about equal to or greater than maximum clamping tension used in tendon 122. As a result, tendon 121 starts stretched by the preloaded tension, and when applying a clamping force, the stretching of tendon 122 reduces the tension in tendon 121, allowing tendon 121 to contract without becoming slack.
The tensions preloaded in tendons can increase the forces that a backend mechanism must apply to operate an instrument. In particular, tension increases friction where tendons may ride on guides or solid surfaces. Also, if shaft 120 is a flexible tube such as might be employed to follow a natural lumen in a patient's body, the preloaded tension causes friction where tendons 121 and 122 contact curved surfaces of shall 120. In all the above cases, increased friction quickly makes accurate control of the motion of end effector 110 difficult and can lead to, imprecise manipulation of, e.g., tissue, sutures, and needles during a surgical procedure. Further, preloading of the correct tension in tendons of a medical instrument can also increase the complexity of the manufacturing process of the medical instrument. Accordingly, medical instruments are desired that can avoid slack in drive tendons without requiring high preloaded tension.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a passive preload system, such as a spring based mechanism, is attached to a tendon that is wrapped around a capstan, so that the passive preload system can control the relaxed tension in the tendon. The capstan can be driven by a motor when the tendon is needed to pull on a structural member of the instrument. For example, when applying clamping pressure or moving the structural member against resistance, capstan friction can produce tensions in the tendon that are many times the passive preload tension. However, when the tendon is not needed to apply force to the member, the capstan can be effectively and quickly made free to spin by zeroing or releasing the torque applied to the capstan by a drive motor, so that the passive preload system controls tendon tension and can provide just enough tension to prevent derailment or other malfunctions of the tendon. It should be noted that when the capstan is freed, the tendon can easily slide on the capstan since the tendon is not permanently attached to the capstan. In other words, forces are exchanged between the capstan and the tendon solely through friction. The reduced tension in relaxed tendons can reduce tendon friction, particularly in instruments with bent or flexible shafts. Two modes of operation of an instrument using a tendon attached to a passive preload system includes a mode where a motor turns a capstan about which the tendon is wrapped and thereby pulls on the tendon, and a mode where the capstan is freed and the tendon tension matches a tension of the passive preload system. A system can quickly switch between these two modes of operation by controlling the torque output by a drive motor and thus has a large bandwidth torque control.
One specific embodiment of the invention is a surgical instrument. The surgical instrument includes a shaft, a member mounted at a distal end of the shaft, a mechanism attached to a proximal end of the shaft, and a tendon. The member can be a link, or a jaw of an end effector, or a group of links coupled together, and the member is mounted to permit movement of the member relative to the shaft. The mechanism includes a capstan and a passive preload system, such as a spring system. The capstan can normally be free to roll and has a coupling through which a motor can attach to and rotate the capstan. The tendon has a first end attached to the member, runs down the shaft, wraps around the capstan, and has a second end attached to the passive preload system, which controls relaxed tension in the tendon.
Another specific embodiment of the invention is a robotic surgical system. The robotic surgical system includes a motor and an instrument coupled to the motor by means of a docking port. The robotic surgical system can also include an articulated arm holding the motor pack and the docking port. The instrument generally includes a shaft a member mounted at a distal end of the shaft, a backend mechanism attached to a proximal end of the shaft, and a tendon. The member is mounted to permit movement of the member relative to the shaft. The backend mechanism includes a capstan and a passive preload system. The capstan is coupled to a drive motor in the docking port, so that the drive motor can rotate the capstan. The tendon has a first end attached to the member, runs down the shaft, wraps around the capstan, and has a second end attached to the passive preload system.
Yet another embodiment of the invention is a method for operating a surgical instrument containing a movable member, a first tendon attached for movement of the member in one direction, and a second tendon attached for movement of the member in another direction. The method includes: applying a torque to a first capstan about which a first tendon is wrapped; and at the same time, freeing from motor torques a second capstan about which the second tendon is wrapped so that a passive preload system attached to an end of the second tendon extending from the second capstan controls tension in the second tendon.
Use of the same reference symbols in different figures indicates similar or identical items.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a surgical instrument can avoid tendon slack and maintain a relatively low tension in a relaxed drive tendon by wrapping the tendon around a capstan that is allowed to rotate freely and attaching an end of the tendon to a passive preload system such as a spring system. When operating the surgical instrument, friction between the tendon and the capstan allows a drive motor that turns the capstan to reel in a length of the tendon, and capstan friction can apply a maximum tension to the tendon that depends exponentially on the total angle of wrap the tendon about the capstan. The force from the passive preload system, e.g., spring force from a spring, and the tension in a relaxed tendon can therefore be kept relatively low while still being able to produce the high tensions needed for clamping or other movement of the instrument against resistance. When the motor torque on the capstan is zeroed, the capstan can rotate freely, and the passive preload system can pull in the tendon and prevent the tendon from becoming slack. The low relaxed tensions can decrease the forces needed for manipulation of the instrument, and tendon friction, which can be particularly problematic in medical instruments with curved or flexible shafts, can be reduced.
Jaw 212 is connected to a first pair of tendons 221 and 222, and jaw 214 is connected to a second pair of tendons 223 and 224. Each pair of tendons 221 and 222 or 223 and 224 may be portions of a continuous tendon having a point that is attached to jaw 212 or 214, for example, by an adhesive or by a crimp residing in a notch in jaw 212 or 214. In a typical embodiment, additional tendons (not shown) would be connected in instrument 200 to a wrist mechanism or joints (not shown) that provide additional degrees of freedom for movement for positioning and orienting end effector 210.
Tendons 221, 222, 223, and 224 apply force and torques to jaws 212 and 214 when pulled by backend mechanism 230 and can have any structure suitable for that task. For example, tendons can be stranded cables, wires, rods, or tubes made of metal, a polymer, or other material. In an exemplary embodiment, tendons 221, 222, 223, and 224 include portions of stranded cable that are fused to tubes, with the stranded cable being used where significant bending or flexing of the tendons is expected, and the tubes being used elsewhere to reduce stretching of the tendons. In another embodiment, particularly useful when shaft 220 is flexible, tendons 221, 222, 223, and 224 can be made of a woven polymer material and run inside individual sheaths (not shown).
Shaft 220 is a hollow tube through which tendons 221, 222, 223, and 224 run. Shaft 220 may be rigid or flexible. For example, shaft 220 may be a rigid stainless steel tube if instrument 200 is intended to be inserted through a straight cannula during a medical procedure, but shaft 120 would need to be flexible if instrument 200 is intended to follow the variable path of natural lumens. In a typical configuration, shaft 220 may have a diameter of about 5 mm or 8 mm for use with some existing cannulae and may have a length on the order of several tens of centimeters. In case the shaft 220 is flexible, the tendons can run inside sheaths in a Bowden cable arrangement (i.e., like bicycle cables). As used herein, the term “flexible” includes continuously flexible components (such as a rubber tube, which bends at each point along its length) and constrained series of short, discrete links that allow the links to approximate the movement of a continuously flexible unit (such as a series “snake-like” vertebrae).
Backend mechanism 230 attaches to the proximal end of shaft 220 and acts as a transmission that converts the rotation of drive motors (e.g., drive motors 242 and 244 in
The ends of tendons 221, 222, 223, and 224 attach to passive preload systems, here implemented as linear coiled springs 235, 236, 237, and 238, which can be anchored to a case or chassis of backend mechanism 230. Springs 235, 236, 237, and 238 are biased, e.g., stretched, so that springs 235, 236, 237, and 238 apply a non-zero force to respective attached tendons 221, 222, 223, and 224 throughout the range of motion of surgical instrument 200. With this configuration, when capstans 231, 232, 233, and 234 are free to rotate, the corresponding spring 235, 236, 237, or 238 controls the tension in the associated tendon 231, 232, 233, or 234 and avoids slack by pulling in the required length of tendon 231, 232, 233, or 234. Tendons 221, 222, 223, and 224 do not require a preloaded tension that is higher that the maximum tensions used for operation of surgical instrument 200.
Each passive preload system more generally can be any structure or system that is able to apply a force to the free end of a tendon while allowing the tendon end to displace. The preload system is passive in that the system does not need to respond to a control or feedback system. Such systems can use linear coil springs as illustrated in
End effector 210 can be operated using drive motors which are under the active control of human input (e.g., master control input in a master-slave servo control system) and software executed in a robotically controlled system. In particular, four drive motors, which are provided in a docking port of a control system (not shown), can be respectively coupled to capstans 231, 232, 233, and 234 of
Backend mechanism 230 can be removably attached to a motor pack including motors 242 and 244 through a sterile barrier, such as a sterile sheet of plastic, and the instrument 200 can be designed to be disposable or reusable and sterilizable. When the instrument is detached from the motor pack, the passive preload systems (e.g., springs 235, 236, 237, and 238 in
One system for mechanically coupling a motor to a capstan uses a friction connection where a pinion of the motor fits tightly into a bore in the capstan and relies on friction between the pinion and bore. Generally, when the motor rotates the capstan, the tendon wrapped around the capstan will tighten, which can increase the frictional connection when the capstan is sufficiently elastic to shrink in radius in response to the squeezing force from the tendons.
Backdriving capabilities of an instrument can also create situations where the orientation of capstan 320 relative to shaft 312 may be unknown when shaft 312 is inserted into bore 322. Regardless of the relative orientation, with the mechanical coupling of
The drive motors coupled to backend mechanism 230 of
The control of jaws 212 and 214 and any joint in end effector 210 or shaft 220 can be effected in a closed loop by basing the motor control torques for that joint on measurement of the current position of the joint. Such measurements can, for example, be done by using a sensing technology such as the one described in U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. US 2007/0156019 A1 (filed Jul. 20, 2006), entitled “Robotic Surgery System Including Position Sensors Using Fiber Bragg Gratings” by Larkin et al., and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/164,829 (filed Jun. 30, 2008) entitled “Fiber optic shape sensor” by Prisco, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Controlled rotation of member 410 about pivot 412 relies on tendons 421 and 422 being attached to member 410 at moment arms such that pulling tendon 421 or 422 can cause rotation of member 410 about pivot 412 in a direction that is opposite to the rotation that pulling on tendon 423 can cause. Similarly, rotation of member 410 about pivot 414 relies on tendons 422 and 423 being attached to member 410 at moment arms such that pulling tendon 422 or 423 can cause rotation of member 410 about pivot 414 in a direction that is opposite to the rotation that pulling on tendon 421 can cause. The desired relative anchoring of tendons 421, 422, and 423 can be achieved, for example, by terminating tendons 421, 422, and 423 on rays that extend at a 120° angles relative to each other from a central longitudinal axis of member 410. In operation of instrument 400, passive preload systems 435, 436, and 437 and drive motors 441, 442, and 443 create tensions in tendons 421, 422, and 423, and a control system (not shown) can control drive motors 441, 442, and 443 to balance the torques about pivots 412 and 414 as needed to achieve the desired relative orientation of member 410 or overcome resistance to the movement or stationary position of member 410, Sensors (not shown; see e.g., element 250 in
The instruments described above employ passive preload systems to maintain a minimum relaxed tension in drive tendons. Passive preload systems as described above are readily implemented employing flexible members or springs, such as linear or rotational coil springs. Most common springs produce forces that are at least approximately described by Hooke's law over a range of forces and deflections. In particular, most springs apply a force that is proportional to the deflection of the spring from its equilibrium length. With Hooke's law springs, the tensions in relaxed tendons of an instrument of the types described above will depend on how far the springs are stretched, which in turn depends on the general configuration of the instrument, including the positions and orientations of the joints and effector in the instrument. This variation may not be significant if the range of motion of the tendons is small compared to the stretch already in the springs for biasing. However, simple Hooke's law springs will tend to create a minimal energy configuration for the instrument, and the instrument will tend to approach that configuration when all of the capstans are free to rotate. In practice, as mentioned above, this effect is small since the spring length change can be designed to be small compared to the spring bias. Further, spring systems that apply constant force can be used to avoid or reduce variations in the tensions in relaxed tendons.
Constant-force spring systems can also be produced or approximated using a spring obeying Hooke's law and one or more cams or variable radius pulleys.
The low tension maintained using techniques described above are particularly advantageous in surgical instruments having flexible shafts.
The above-described embodiments illustrate embodiments of surgical instruments having backend mechanisms in which capstans have rotation axes that are generally perpendicular to the direction of the instruments' shafts. However, many mechanical systems for routing and directing tendons are known and could be employed in a backend mechanism to alter configuration of the capstans.
Docking ports 820 generally include drive motors that provide mechanical power for operation of instruments 810 and systems for establishment of a sterile barrier between instrument 810 and the rest of robotically control system 800. Some suitable sterile barriers are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,368 (filed Nov. 21, 1997) entitled “Multi-Component Telepresence System And Method” by Cooper, which is incorporated herein by reference. Docking ports 820 may additionally include an electrical interface for communication with instruments 810, for example, to identify the type of instrument in the docking port and to access parameters of the instrument. The electrical interface may also convey measurements such as measurements of the position and orientation of effectors 812 or shaft 814. A computer system 850 can receive the measurements and execute software that controls drive motors in the docking ports 820 as needed to manipulate instruments 810 as directed by a surgeon or other medical personnel using system 800 to perform a surgical procedure.
Although the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, the description is only an example of the invention's application and should not be taken as a limitation. Various other adaptations and combinations of features of the embodiments disclosed are within the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/941,368 filed Sep. 28, 2020 entitled “PASSIVE PRELOAD AND CAPSTAN DRIVE FOR SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/026,673 filed Jul. 3, 2018 entitled “PASSIVE PRELOAD AND CAPSTAN DRIVE FOR SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS” (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,772,690), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/001,948 filed Jan. 20, 2016 entitled “PASSIVE PRELOAD AND CAPSTAN DRIVE FOR SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS” (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,022,194), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/286,644 filed Sep. 30, 2008 entitled “PASSIVE PRELOAD AND CAPSTAN DRIVE FOR SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS” (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,259,274), all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
793510 | Cramer et al. | Jun 1905 | A |
4117359 | Wehde | Sep 1978 | A |
4259876 | Belyanin et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4281447 | Miller et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4283165 | Vertut | Aug 1981 | A |
4696524 | Cloyd | Sep 1987 | A |
4899608 | Knappe et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5269031 | Alexander | Dec 1993 | A |
5373317 | Salvati et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5555897 | Lathrop, Jr. et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5624398 | Smith et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5674024 | Daumal et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5784542 | Ohm et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792135 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5824007 | Faraz et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6007550 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6102850 | Wang et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6139245 | Hofmeister | Oct 2000 | A |
6246200 | Blumenkranz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6331181 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6371952 | Madhani et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394998 | Wallace et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6459926 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491701 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6494662 | De Montalembert | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496099 | Wang et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6522906 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6800056 | Tartaglia et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6817974 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6974411 | Belson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984203 | Tartaglia et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994708 | Manzo | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6997079 | Nomura et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7048745 | Tierney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7118582 | Wang et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7261726 | Jinno et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7316681 | Madhani et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7331967 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7524320 | Tierney et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7666191 | Orban, III et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7699855 | Anderson | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7727244 | Orban, III et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7823330 | Ostrowski et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7886743 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901348 | Soper et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7930065 | Larkin et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7935130 | Williams | May 2011 | B2 |
7947050 | Lee et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7947051 | Lee et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7963913 | Devengenzo et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8142447 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8333755 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337397 | Prisco et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8348931 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8444631 | Yeung et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8479969 | Shelton, IV | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8506555 | Ruiz Morales | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8551115 | Steger et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8602031 | Reis et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8620473 | Diolaiti et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8644988 | Prisco et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8771270 | Burbank | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8800838 | Shelton, IV | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8801601 | Prisco et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8911471 | Spivey et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9028494 | Shelton, IV et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9043027 | Durant et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9078684 | Williams | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9121494 | Buchleitner et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9198714 | Worrell et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9204923 | Manzo et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9232979 | Parihar et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9259274 | Prisco | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9291793 | Cooper | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9339342 | Prisco et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9387048 | Donhowe et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9452276 | Duindam et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9524022 | Nakayama | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9533122 | Weitzner et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9687312 | Dachs, II et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9750578 | Alden et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9757149 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
10016244 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10022193 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10022194 | Prisco et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10130366 | Shelton, IV et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10219874 | Yu et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10238837 | Duindam et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10271911 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10420622 | Dachs et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10478163 | Prisco et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10543051 | Schena et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10595836 | Smaby et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10639119 | Dachs, II et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10772690 | Prisco | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10780573 | Vaders | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10820949 | Prisco et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10912616 | Dachs, II et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10932868 | Solomon et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10980556 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11090124 | Holop et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11547503 | Prisco | Jan 2023 | B2 |
20020087048 | Brock et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020096885 | Gomez et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111635 | Jensen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020153221 | Schnepf | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040035243 | Duval | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049205 | Lee | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050042943 | Mocivnik et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050089345 | Yasumoto et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050277875 | Selkee | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060084945 | Moll et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070043338 | Moll et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070137371 | Devengenzo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156122 | Cooper | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070232858 | MacNamara et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070287992 | Diolaiti et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004603 | Larkin et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046122 | Manzo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065102 | Cooper | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065105 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080087871 | Schena et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103491 | Omori et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080196533 | Bergamasco et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090000899 | Paterra et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090062813 | Prisco et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088774 | Swarup et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090227861 | Ganatra et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090324161 | Prisco | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011900 | Burbank et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100170519 | Romo et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100175701 | Reis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100318101 | Choi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331820 | Prisco et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015650 | Choi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110118754 | Dachs, II et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110160743 | Espinal | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110213383 | Lee et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110277775 | Holop et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282356 | Solomon et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282357 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282359 | Duval | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295269 | Swensgard et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110295270 | Giordano et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120021867 | Rosmarin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120111136 | Kawakami | May 2012 | A1 |
20120118917 | Naughton et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123441 | Au et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120239060 | Orban, III et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245596 | Meenink | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120289974 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130096385 | Fenech et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140005678 | Shelton, IV et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140005708 | Shelton, IV | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140100558 | Schmitz et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150008090 | Adamczak et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150150635 | Kilroy et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150157355 | Price et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160151115 | Karguth et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160184034 | Holop et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160184037 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160361049 | Dachs, II et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170000984 | Duindam et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170165017 | Chaplin et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20190223966 | Holop et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20200054310 | Prisco et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200352660 | Prisco | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210186544 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210282793 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1127332 | Jul 1996 | CN |
2573759 | Sep 2003 | CN |
2626684 | Jul 2004 | CN |
1650117 | Aug 2005 | CN |
1763638 | Apr 2006 | CN |
102014759 | Apr 2011 | CN |
0688538 | Dec 1995 | EP |
H06114000 | Apr 1994 | JP |
H10249777 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2002200091 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2003024336 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2004105451 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005288590 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006061364 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2007229906 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2008104854 | May 2008 | JP |
2010220955 | Oct 2010 | JP |
WO-9501757 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO-9729690 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-2005039835 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2007075864 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007136783 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2010039387 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-2011037394 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO-2015142290 | Sep 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Amended Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 123-1, Nov. 13, 2019, 31 pages. |
Amended Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 81, Aug. 29, 2019, 29 pages. |
Auris Health, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Jury Trial Demanded, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 52, Mar. 29, 2019, 8 pages. |
BOEHM D.H.,0et al., “Early Experience with Robotic Techmology for Coronary Artery Surgery,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1999, vol. 68 (4), pp. 1542-1546. |
Charles, Steve et al., “Dexterity-enhanced Telerobotic Microsurgery,” 1997, pp. 5-10, IEEE. |
Complaint for Patent Infringement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Aug. 31, 2018, 14 pages. |
Da Vinci by Intuitive, Enabling Surgical Care to get Patients Back to What Matters, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-1, Aug. 29, 2019, Retrieved from the internet: URL: [https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-and-services/da-vinci], pp. 202 pages. |
Das H., et al., “Evaluation of a Telerobotic System to Assist Surgeons to Microsurgery,” Computer Aided Surgery, 1999, vol. 4 (1). pp. 15-25. |
Decision of Final Rejection for Korean Application No. 10-2013-7032821, dated Jul. 3, 2019, 6 pages. |
Decision on Granting Institution of Inter Parties Review 35 U.S.C. 314, dated Mar. 4, 2020 for U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,701 B2, IPR2019-01532, Before Ulrike W. Jenks, Tina E. Hulse, and James A. Worth, Administrative Patent Judges., 18 pages. |
Declaration of Dr, William Cimino Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,701, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc v. Patent Owner. Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., IPR2019-01532, Aug. 28, 2019, 95 pages. |
Declaration of Kelly E. Farnan in Support of Auris Health, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 53, 2019, 3 pages. |
Declaration of Laura E. Miller in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Exihibit, Document 122, Nov. 13, 2019, 50 pages. |
Declaration of Shaelyn K. Dawson in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 119, 2019, 3 pages. |
Declaration of Shaelyn K. Dawson in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 127, 2019, 2 pages. |
Declaration of Taylor Patton in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Redacted—Public Version, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 30, Dec. 11, 2018, 15 pages. |
Declaration of Vera Ranieri in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28, Demand for Jury Trial, 2018, 4 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint for Patent Infringement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 12, Oct. 25, 2018, 12 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'S Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 118, Oct. 30, 2019, 18 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Demand for Jury Trial, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 126, Nov. 15, 2019, 13 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.s.c. § 1404(a), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 31, Nov. 18, 2018, 14 pages. |
Demand for Jury Trial Public Redacted Version, Declaration of Jamie L. Kringstein in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Renewed Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 215, Mar. 12, 2020, 5 pages. |
Desai M.M., et al., “Flexible Robotic Retrograde Renoscopy: Description of Novel Robotic device and Preliminary Laboratory Experience,” Urology, Jul. 2008, vol. 72 (1), pp. 42-46. |
DiMaio S., et al., “The da Vinci Surgical system,” Surgical Robotics : Sysytem Applications and Visions, Chap. 9, 2011, pp. 199-217. |
Exhibit 1, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 119-1, Aug. 9, 2019, 5 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Before Ulrike W. Jenks, Tina E. Hulse, and James A. Worth, Administrative Patent Judges, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc v. Patent Owner. Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., IPR2019-01173, Document 215-1, Entered: Dec. 16, 2019, 197 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Declaration, Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(D) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form 10-K, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Document 28-1, 2018, 12 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Fox Chase Cancer Center Among First in U.S. to Use Innovative Technology for Lung Cancer Diagnosis, Temple Health, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://www.foxchase.org/news/2018-08-15-Monarch-Robotic-Bronchoscopy), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-3, Aug. 15, 2018, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Morrison & Foerster, via Email, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Sep. 9, 2019, Document 127-1, 22 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action, Stryker Corporation, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Civil Action No. 18-1359-MN, Document 158-1, held on Jan. 27, 2020, 42 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, Amir Belson, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Civil Action No. 18-1359-MN, Document 188-1, held on Mar. 12, 2020, 9 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, Gunter D. Niemeyer, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Civil Action No. 18-1359-MN, Document 148-1, held on Jan. 29, 2020, 9 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, Hari Das Nayar, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Civil Action No. 18-1359-MN, Document 154-1, held on Jan. 29, 2020, 44 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, Joseph M. Tartaglia, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Civil Action No. 18-1359-MN, Document 149-1, held on Jan. 30, 2020, 9 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, Paul Schenker, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Civil Action No. 18-1359-MN, Document 155-1, held on Jan. 30, 2020, 44 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, Robert H. Sturges, Jr., Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Civil Action No. 18-1359-MN, Document 156-1, held on Jan. 28, 2020, 44 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, Steve Charles, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Civil Action No. 18-1359-MN, Document 157-1, held on Jan. 27, 2020, 44 pages. |
Exhibit 1, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, to Carolyn M. French, C/O Durie Tangri LLP, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 150-1, Dec. 23, 2019, 9 pages. |
Exhibit 1, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, to Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 104-1, Oct. 17, 2019, 28 pages. |
Exhibit 1, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, to Covidien Holding Inc., Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 96-1, Oct. 8, 2019, 9 pages. |
Exhibit 10, From: Dawson, Shaelyn K, Subject: Intuitive v. Auris: Summary of Sep. 26, 2019 meet-and-confer re: Intuitive's deficient production, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-10, 2019, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 11, U.S Food and Drug Administration, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-11, Auris Surgical Robotics, Inc, Mar. 22, 2018, 12 pages. |
Exhibit 12, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form D, Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-12, 2018, 7 pages,. |
Exhibit 2, Declaration, “Pairing Human Ingenuity with Technology, ” Intuitive, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-2, 2018, 13 pages. |
Exhibit 2, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, USPTO, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-2, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01173, Jun. 12, 2019, 85 Pages. |
Exhibit 2, UPMC Hamot First in U.S. to Use Innovative Robotic Technology to Detect Lung Cancer Earlier, UPMC Life Changing Medicine, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-4, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 3, Declaration, Contact Intuitive, Office locations and contact Information, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-3, 2018, 5 pages. |
Exhibit 3, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,800,056, USPTO, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-3, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01189, Jun. 13, 2019, 73 Pages. |
Exhibit 4, “da Vinci Robotic Surgery, ” Christiana Care Health System, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-4, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 4, Letter, Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions, ClinicalTrials.gov, Document 23-6, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03727425), Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-6, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03727425, 2018, 9 pages. |
Exhibit 4, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,200, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01448, Document 119-4, Aug. 5, 2019, 86 pages. |
Exhibit 5, “Auris Health, Ethicon's Neuwave Ink Robot-assisted Bronchoscope Ablation Dev Deal, ”May 16, 2018, by Fink Densford, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://https://www.massdevice.com/auris-health-ethicons-neuwave-ink-robot-assisted-bronchoscope-ablation-dev-deal/), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-7, 2018, Massdevice Medical Network, 12 pages. |
Exhibit 5, Declaration, “Beebe Healthcare Introduces the da Vinci® Xi™ Robotic Surgical System, ” Submitted by Rachel on Jun. 8, 2018, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-5, 4 Pages. |
Exhibit 5, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01496, Document 119-5, Aug. 15, 2019, 72 pages. |
Exhibit 6, Declaration, “Fox Chase Cancer Center Among First in U.S. to Use Innovative Technology for Lung Cancer Diagnosis, ” Philadelphia International Medicine® News Bureau, Fox Chase Cancer Center Temple Health, for Immediate Release, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-6, Aug. 23, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 6, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, Before The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01533, Document 119-6, Aug. 29, 2019, 84 pages. |
Exhibit 7, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,701, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01532, Document 119-7, Aug. 29, 2019, 79 Pages. |
Exhibit 7, “UPMC Hamot First in U.S. to Use Innovative Robotic Technology to Detect Lung Cancer Earlier, ” UPMC Life Changing Medicine, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-7, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 8, Careers Audacious goals. Audacious challenges, Auris, Retrieved from the Internet: (URL:http://https://www.aurishealth.com/jobs?gh_jid=1256912), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-8, 2018, 8 pages. |
Exhibit 8, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,522,906, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, IPR2019-01547, Document 119-8, Aug. 30, 2019, 82 pages. |
Exhibit 9, “Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions,” ClinicalTrials.gov, U.S National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03727425, Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-9, 2018, 8 pages. |
Exhibit 9, Trial Statistics, USPTO, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-9, 2019, 12 pages. |
Exhibit A, Letter, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. v. Auris Health, Inc., Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Doc 53-1, 2019, 86 pages. |
Exhibit B, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Defendant Auris Health, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Document 23-2, Dec. 3, 2018, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 14836283.3, dated Sep. 4, 2017, 11 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 14836336.9, dated Jun. 16, 2017, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 14836512.5, dated Aug. 3, 2017, 13 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 14836696.6, dated Jun. 16, 2017, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 14836832.7, dated Jun. 9, 2017, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP14836874.9, dated Mar. 17, 2017, 10 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP18184785.6, dated Nov. 23, 2018, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP19195298.5 dated Nov. 12, 2019, 10 pages. |
Final Action mailed Apr. 8, 2019 for Korean Application No. 10-2013-7032821 filed May 10, 2012, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US14/050838, dated Nov. 25, 2014, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US14/50957, dated Nov. 21, 2014, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US14/51001, dated Nov. 20, 2014, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US14/51074, dated Nov. 20, 2014, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/037269, dated Sep. 19, 2012, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/051033, dated Nov. 19, 2014, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/051050, dated Nov. 25, 2014, 14 pages. |
Joint Appendix to Claim Construction Brief, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114, Oct. 29, 2019, 4 pages. |
Joint Claim Construction Brief, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 113, Oct. 29, 2019, 103 pages. |
Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 76, Aug. 2, 2019, 31 pages. |
Koolwal A.B., “An Image-based Localization Algorithm for Catheter Navigation in the Left Atrium,” Experimental Robotics: The Eleventh International Symposium, 2009, pp. 251-260. |
Le Roux, P.D., et al., “Robot-assisted Microsurgery: A Feasibility Study in the Rat,” Neurosurgery, Mar. 2001, vol. 48 (3), pp. 584-589. |
Markman Hearing, Before: The Honorable Maryellen Noreika, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Defendant: Auris Health, Inc., held on Nov. 20, 2019, pp. 1-162. |
Markman Hearing, Before: The Honorable Maryellen Noreika, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Defendant: Auris Health, Inc., held on Nov. 20, 2019, pp. 1-139. |
Memorandum Opinion, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), May 31, 2019, 13 pages. |
Memorandum Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), 2019, 16 pages. |
Mendivil A., et al., “Emergence of Robotic Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology American Perspective,” Gynecologic Oncology, Aug. 2009, vol. 114, pp. S24-S31. |
Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 117, Oct. 30, 2019, 2 pages. |
Notice of Dismissal of Amendment for Korean Application No. 10-2013-7032821, dated Jul. 3, 2019, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,836, dated Feb. 25, 2019, 4 pages. |
Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2018 for Korean Application No. 10-2013-7032821 filed May 10, 2012, 16 pages. |
Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2017 for Japanese Application No. 2016177316 filed Sep. 12, 2016, 7 pages. |
Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2014 for Japanese Application No. 20140021913 filed Feb. 7, 2008, 10 pages. |
Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2016 for Chinese Application No. 201510185999.6 filed Sep. 2, 2009, 24 pages. |
Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2015 for Japanese Application No. 20140021913 filed Feb. 7, 2008, 7 pages. |
Office Action dated May 19, 2020 for Japanese Application No. 20190032482 filed Feb. 26, 2019, 8 pages. |
Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2019 for Korean Application No. 10-2019-7025657 filed on May 10, 2012, 19 pages. |
Partial Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP14836283.3, dated May 17, 2017, 12 pages. |
Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices of U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, Before The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, IPR2019-01533, Sep. 12, 2019, 7 pages. |
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,701, Review No. IPR2019-01532 dated Dec. 10, 2019, 20 pages. |
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, Review No. IPR2019-01533 dated Dec. 10, 2019, 27 pages. |
PCT/US09/55727 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 3, 2010, 9 pages. |
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,701, review No. IPR2019-01532 dated Dec. 5, 2019, pp. 1-4. |
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,701, review No. IPR2019-01532 dated Dec. 9, 2019, pp. 1-4. |
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, review No. IPR2019-01533 dated Dec. 5, 2019, pp. 1-4. |
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, review No. IPR2019-01533 dated Dec. 9, 2019, pp. 1-4. |
Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 26, Dec. 11, 2018, 23 pages. |
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 121, Nov. 13, 2019, 21 pages. |
Prosecution History for U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447 dated Jan. 30, 2019, 1871 pages. |
PTAB Teleconference for review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 6, 2019, Petitioner Auris Health, Inc, pp. 1-33. |
Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark, To: Mail Stop 8, Director of USPTO, Alexandria, VA, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 3, 2018, 2 pages. |
Sackier J.M., et al., “Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery, From Concept to Development,” Surgical Endoscopy, Springer-Verlag, 1994, vol. 8 (8), pp. 63-66. |
Saraf S., “Robotic Assisted Microsurgery (RAMS): Application in Plastic Surgery”, Medical robotics, Ch.3, 2008, pp. 363-376. |
Schenker P.S., et al., “A New Robotic for High Dexterity Microsurgery,” Conference of Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine, 1995, pp. 116-122. |
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, The Homourable Maryellen Noreika, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., et al. v. Auris Health, Inc., Document 123, by CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Nov. 13, 2019, 1 page. |
Solomon S.B., et al., “Three-dimensional CT-guided Bronchoscopy with a Real-time Electromagnetic Position Sensor a Comparison of two image registration methods,” Chest, Dec. 2000, vol. 118 (6), pp. 1783-1787. |
Stipulation Regarding Prior art, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, CA No. 18-1359-MN, Mar. 4, 2020, 4 pages. |
Stipulation Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Mar. 20, 2020, 2 pages. |
Sturges R.H. Jr., et al., “A Voice-Actuated, Tendon-Controlled Device for Endoscopy”, 1996, pp. 603-617. |
Sturges, Robert H. et al., “A Flexible, Tendon-Controlled Device for Endoscopy,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1993, vol. 12(2), pp. 121-131. |
Tarn T.J., et al., “Coordinated control of Two Robot Arms,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1986, pp. 1193-1202. |
Taylor, Russell H. et al., “A Telerobotic Assistant for Laparoscopic Surgery,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, May/Jun., 1995, pp. 279-288, vol. 14, Issue 3, IEEE. |
Transcript Teleconference, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Document 58, 2019, 11 pages. |
Transcript, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-(MN), Document 83, 9 pages. |
Uchiyama, M., et al., “Hybrid Position/Force Control for Coordination of a Two-art Robot,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1987, pp. 1242-1247. |
Vertut, J, and Coiffet, P., “Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development,” English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. |
Weller S., “He Helped Pioneer Robotic Surgery. Now He Wants to Reinvent Lung Cancer Care,” JNJ.com, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-2, Apr. 2019, 155 pages. |
Zhou H.X., et al., “Clinical Characteristics of Remote Zeus Robot Assisted Laparascopic Cholecystectomy: A Report of 40 Cases,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, Apr. 2006, vol. 12 (16), pp. 2606-2609. |
Office Action for JP Application No. 2020-17637, dated Oct. 5, 2021, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230000574 A1 | Jan 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16941368 | Jul 2020 | US |
Child | 17852033 | US | |
Parent | 16026673 | Jul 2018 | US |
Child | 16941368 | US | |
Parent | 15001948 | Jan 2016 | US |
Child | 16026673 | US | |
Parent | 12286644 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 15001948 | US |