1. Field of Invention
This invention is in the field of sample probing (including electrical) using scanning probe and nanoprobing systems.
2. Related Art
Nanoprobing (using scanning or point probing) is a very broad field of analytical science covering various types of electrical, mechanical, compositional and chemical physical characterization of nano-size objects. Nanoelectronic devices and their components are examples of such objects. Electrical probing of single transistors, memory bitcell and critical parts of integrated circuits (IC) is used widely to test performance of newly designed IC and to correct potential problems of the specific IC design or/and overall technology.
To test the elements of an IC, the nanoprobes are made to physically contact the surface of the IC and to scan the surface of the IC. The scanning can be used to generate topography image, capacitance image (dC/dV), etc. To generate those images, every pixel of the image is generated as the probe scan the surface at the same speed and with the same force applied to the probe. However, there are circumstances wherein certain areas of the scanning are not of interest for the particular test, in which case there's no need for slow, high-resolution scanning. In other cases, certain areas of the region of interest (ROI) may constitute a softer or more sensitive layer, such that less force should be applied. In yet other cases the probes should simply contact certain elements without the need for scanning, e.g., to read electrical signals in a point probing mode. Thus, there's a need for improved nanoprobing device and method for operating the nanoprobes, such that the above cases are taken into consideration.
The following summary of the disclosure is included in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects and features of the invention. This summary is not an extensive overview of the invention and as such it is not intended to particularly identify key or critical elements of the invention or to delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented below.
Various disclosed embodiments utilize systems and methods wherein the probe scanning speed and force are variable during the scanning of the sample. When the probes are scanning areas that are of no interest, the speed can be increased until a new area of interest is reached, wherein the speed is decreased. Similarly, when the probe is scanning a sensitive area, or area of no interest, the force can be reduced, to prevent damage to the sensitive area and to reduce wear of the probes. For example, when the probes are scanning over an interlayer dielectric, the force should be reduced (to cause less sample damage and less probe-tip wear) and the speed should be increased (to provide higher throughput, even at reduced resolution), since the dielectric area is of no interest for the electrical testing).
In other embodiments, the probes are used to collect electrical data and, therefore, need not scan the sample, but rather contact specific points on the device. In such cases, the probes' positions are registered to the sample outside of the area of interest. Then, the probes are moved blindly above the sample, i.e., without physical contact with the sample, to the ROI using a priori knowledge of the circuit layout (e.g., from CAD file). When the probes are in the proper position above the specific points, the probes are moved down so as to “land” on the appropriate points.
According to disclosed embodiments, an adaptive (i.e., variable) mode of probe motion is executed during sample probing. The adaptive mode operates the probes to test the sample using a combination of any of the following modes of motion: hopping, contact scanning, non-contact scanning, taping, scanning with variable feedback type, scanning at different speeds, scanning at different force, scanning at different amplitude of oscillation, etc. The specific mode of motion is selected according to the local properties of the sample, which may be known a priory (for example from CAD information) or/and assessed in real time (for example from robust high signal-to-noise ratio electrical or mechanical probe signal).
The embodiments are beneficial as data quality improvement achieved using an optimized probe-sample interaction adjusted for and dependent on (1) local properties of the sample and also (2) type of measurement to be done at the particular location. The embodiments are also beneficial for preserving of the sample and probe(s) for repeatable and precise measurements on the stable sample-probe system, by avoiding unnecessary wear of the probe tips.
Other aspects and features of the invention would be apparent from the detailed description, which is made with reference to the following drawings. It should be mentioned that the detailed description and the drawings provide various non-limiting examples of various embodiments of the invention, which is defined by the appended claims.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, exemplify the embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain and illustrate principles of the invention. The drawings are intended to illustrate major features of the exemplary embodiments in a diagrammatic manner. The drawings are not intended to depict every feature of actual embodiments nor relative dimensions of the depicted elements, and are not drawn to scale.
Various embodiments will be described below to achieve the benefits of the invention. Some of the benefits include the following.
(1) Scanning a sample with physical contact of the probe tip can damage the sample. For certain locations or parts of the sample, physical contact with prescribed force or pressure is required in order to obtain the needed data. However, there are cases where some parts of the sample are not that critical for the tests. In such cases, disclosed embodiments avoid damage caused by contact mode of scanning.
(2) The prober throughput and data quality can be optimized using high-speed low-pressure or non-contact motion over areas of no-interest, and slow increased-pressure contact motion (optimized) or even a full stop at sites of interest (for the period of time needed to achieve desired quality of data).
(3) The probe tip lifetime can be improved by avoiding high pressure and/or contact with the sample when not needed. The probe tip can be made to “fly” over areas of no-interest at safe height above the sample's surface.
(4) When high-integrity electrical data needs to be collected from the sample, the data quality can be improved by placing the probe in complete stop and full contact during data acquisition.
The above benefits are achieved by the following embodiments.
According to another example, the changes of scanning speed and force of probe-sample interaction is triggered by CAD information from a CAD file 140 (
According to one embodiment, the probe to sample registration is conducted outside of the area of interest. The probe can be registered to the sample using imaging, e.g., scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging. The sample may also be registered to a CAD pattern, if it is to be used for hopping/scanning modes. Once the probes are registered to SEM image and CAD pattern, “blind moves” to the points of interest followed by data acquisition could be made. The blind moves can be assisted using the CAD data for navigation, similar to a GPS (global position system). Depending on the amount of probe vs. stage drift, periodic probe to sample re-registration and correction may be needed.
Although electrical nanoprobing was provided as an example of adaptive probing, the same approach can be used for other types of probing. According to one example, tip-enhanced optical circuit analysis (TE OCA) can be done using so-called backside approach. With this approach Si wafer is thinned to about 100 nm thickness. IC tester is connected to the IC from the front side in a normal manner. Standard IC tests are conducted on the thinned chip. Electro-optical emission from operating FET p/n junctions is usually detected using high-resolution high numerical aperture optics (www.dcg.systems.com). In this example nanoprober tip is brought to the ROI from the back side of the wafer.
The metal probe is acting as an antenna which amplifies electro-magnetic (EM) field in the probe apex proximity (the effect is similar to the tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy or TERS). As a result, at any moment of time low-resolution optics (placed at the back side of the wafer) collects photons mostly from the probe apex proximity (where EM field is amplified). Once collected signal is synchronized with the probe position, the high-resolution map of electro-optical emission is constructed.
According to another embodiment of this example nanoprober tip is moving parallel to the backside of the wafer with variable speed and at variable distance between the sample surface and the probe. Such adoptive (speed and distance) probe motion will improve throughput, signal-to-noise and lateral resolution of the TE OCA method.
In another example the front side TE optical spectroscopy (Raman or fluorescence) can be used for high resolution and throughput defect analysis. A large laser spot is used to irradiate sample. The probe is scanned over ROI with low (nanometer) scale topography. Low resolution optics is used for collection of scattered (Raman or/and fluorescence) photon. The method spatial resolution is defined by the size of the probe apex and not by the resolution of photon collection optics. Throughput of the method is usually very low since long per pixel time is used to collect sufficient number of scattered photons. If one tries to collect spectral map of the scattered photons the data collection time becomes almost impractical. Adoptive scanning helps to reduce the data acquisition time. Tip is scanned at high speed collecting monochrome signal with relatively poor signal-to-noise. Once suspicious (monochrome) signal is detected at certain locations the probe stops at the spot and tool collects high signal-to-noise spectral data.
This is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/314,013, filed on Jun. 24, 2014, which claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/838,744 filed on Jun. 24, 2013, and the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3258326 | Rabussier | Jun 1966 | A |
3752008 | Danek | Aug 1973 | A |
4101072 | Weaver et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4142793 | Schilling | Mar 1979 | A |
4736401 | Donges et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4798989 | Miyazaki et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4874945 | Dhi | Oct 1989 | A |
4902892 | Okayama et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5081353 | Yamada et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5229606 | Elings et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239313 | Marko et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5253085 | Maruo et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5256876 | Hazaki et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5267471 | Abraham et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5312510 | Poultney | May 1994 | A |
5373372 | Loewen | Dec 1994 | A |
5455420 | Ho et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5479024 | Hillner | Dec 1995 | A |
5510615 | Ho et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5710052 | Alvis et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713667 | Alvis et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5763879 | Zimmer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5866806 | Samsavar et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5899703 | Kalter et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905577 | Wilsher et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907096 | Chen | May 1999 | A |
6075234 | Patterson | Jun 2000 | A |
6287880 | Erickson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
RE37404 | Harp et al. | Oct 2001 | E |
6399400 | Osann, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6520005 | McWaid et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6643012 | Shen | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6880389 | Hare et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891170 | Yu et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6951130 | Hare et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6953927 | Quake | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6955078 | Mancevski et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967335 | Dyer et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7057409 | Wills | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7178387 | Kley | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7196454 | Baur et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7220973 | Yu et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7227140 | Skidmore et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7285778 | Baur et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7319336 | Baur et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7446550 | McDowell | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7493794 | Mancevski et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7513142 | Rice et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7562564 | Baba et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7675300 | Baur et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7716970 | Watanabe et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8484755 | Leach et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8536526 | Bell et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
9057740 | Ukraintsev et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
20020178800 | Hasegawa et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040133300 | Tsuboi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040207424 | Hollman | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050184028 | Baur et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193576 | Hollman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060261827 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060284083 | Kurenuma et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070179731 | Suri et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070187623 | Skidmore et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080065341 | Ishikawa et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078506 | Verbeck et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080078745 | Cordell et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080150559 | Nayak et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080180118 | Itou et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20100205697 | Iyoki et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110035848 | Perkins et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110221461 | Kanev et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120090056 | Hirooka et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20150377921 | Ukraintsev et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150377958 | Ukraintsev et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102014118657 | Jun 2015 | DE |
112014002974 | Jun 2016 | DE |
2003-156326 | May 2003 | JP |
2005-233700 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2008-089542 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2015-129749 | Jul 2015 | JP |
2016530499 | Sep 2016 | JP |
200831853 | Aug 2008 | TW |
201102658 | Jan 2011 | TW |
201113528 | Apr 2011 | TW |
201532102 | Aug 2015 | TW |
201600861 | Jan 2016 | TW |
201611074 | Mar 2016 | TW |
WO 2014210083 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2015200719 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2015200724 | Dec 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees in International Application No. PCT/US2014/043975, dated Mar. 6, 2015. |
Kane, T., Microelectron. Div., IBM Syst. Technol. Group, Hopewell Junction, NY, USA, “In Fab 300 mm Wafer Level Atomic Force Probe Characterization,” Proc. Of the International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, pp. 71-76 (Nov. 2012). |
Kane, T., Microelectron. Div., IBM Syst. Technol. Group, Hopewell Junction, NY, USA “300mm wafer Atomic force probe characterization methodology,” International Symposium on the Components, Circuits, Devices & Systems I, Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits, 2010 17th IEEE, Jul. 5-9, 2010, Singapore, IEEE, pp. 1-3. |
Kuhn, K. et al., Intel's 45nm CMOS Technology: “Managing Process Variation in Intel's 45nm CMOS Technology,” Intel Technology Journal, vol. 12, Issue 2, Jun. 17, 2008, pp. 92-110. |
Ukraintsev, V. et al., “Distributed force probe bending model of critical dimension atomic force microscopy bias,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, vol. 12, Issue 2, Apr.-Jun. 2013, pp. 23009-1 through 23009-15. |
Vickers, J.S., Rubix, “A Hybrid Between Ruby, LVi, & LVx the performance of Ruby with the simplicity of LVx,” DCG Systems, Inc., Technology Summit 2013, 18 pages. |
International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/043975, dated May 19, 2015. |
Kleindiek Nanotechnik, ProbeWorkstation found online at http://www.nanotechnik.com/probeworkstation.html, website accessed Jun. 22, 2015, 3 pages. |
Merlin Series: From Imaging to Your Complete Lab: Analytical Power for the Sub-Nanometer World, Interactive PDF, Release 1.0, ZEISS White Paper, downloaded from http://www.zeiss.com/microscopy/en_us/products/scanning-electron-microscopes/merlin-materials.html#downloads, on Jun. 22, 2015, 20 pages. |
Nanonics Imaging Ltd., 3TB4000 Combined AFM FIB and AFM SEM found online at http://www.nanonics.co.il/ products/nsom-spm-systems/combined-afm-fib-and-afm-sem.html?gclid=CJq59Lmrr4CFWVp7AodeiMAYw, website accessed Jun. 22, 2015, 3 pages. |
Park XE-3DM, Automated Industrial AFM for High-Resolution 3D Metrology Overview, found online at http://www. parkafm.condindex.php/products/industrial-afm/park-xe-3dm/overview, website accessed Jun. 22, 2015, 3 pages. |
Zeiss: Merlin Analytical Power for the sub-nanometer world: Introduction, found online at http://www.zeiss.com/ microscopy/en us/products/scanning-electron-microscopes/merlin-materials.html#introduction, website accessed Jun. 22, 2015, 2 pages. |
Zeiss: Merlin Analytical Power for the sub-nanometer world: Downloads, found online at http://www.zeiss.com/ microscopy/en_us/products/scanning-electron-microscopes/merlin-materials.html#downloads, website accessed Jun. 22, 2015, 2 pages. |
Advic, A. et al., “Fabrication of cone-shaped boron doped diamond and gold nanoelectrodes for AFM-SECM,” Nanotechnology, Mar. 3, 2011, vol. 22, 145306, pp. 1-6. |
Altmann, F. et al., “Evaluation of combined EBIC/FIB methods for solar cell activation,” Fraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials Halle, Drei-Lander FIB Workshop, Jun. 28-29, 2010, Vienna, 23 pages. |
Dickson, K. et al., “Electron Beam Absorbed Current as a Means of Locating Metal Defectivity on 45nm SOI Technology,” ISTFA 2010, Proceedings from the 36th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Nov. 14-18, 2010, Addison, TX, pp. 413-422. |
Eifert, A. et al., “Atomic force microscopy probes with integrated boron doped diamond electrodes: Fabrication and application,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 25, 2012, pp. 30-34. |
Erington, K. et al., “Advanced Backside Defect Isloation Techniques Using Electron Beam Absombed Current to Locate Metal Defectivity on Bulk and SOI Technology,” ISTFA 2011, Proceedings from the 37th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Nov. 13-17, 2011, San Jose, CA, pp. 275-286. |
Gatan: An Introduction to EBIC: Whitepaper, Available online at http://info.gatan.com/acton/attachment/11413/ f-02a3/1/-/-/-/-/App%20Note%20Intro%20to%20EBIC%20FL2.pdf, accessed on Jun. 29, 2015, 6 pages. |
Gatan: Smart EBIC: Product Datasheet, Available online at http://www.gatan.com/products/sem-imaging—ispectroscopy/smartebic-system, accessed on Jun. 29, 2015, 4 pages. |
Ippolito, S. et al., “Active Electrostatic Force Microscopy,” Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA), 2015 22nd IEEE International Symposium, Taiwan, Jun. 29, 2015, Session 17-1, 3 pages. |
Ippolito, S. et al., “Emerging Techniques in Atomic Force Microscopy: Diamond Milling and Electrostatic Force Microscopy,” EDFAAO, Electronic Device Failure Analysis, vol. 17, Issue 3, 2015, pp. 4-10. |
Kane, T. et al., “Wafer Level Atomic Force Probing,” Proceedings from the 36th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Nov. 14-18, 2010, Addison, Texas, ISTFA 2010, pp. 317-319. |
Larre, P. et al., “Precise Localization of 28nm via chain resistive defect using EBAC and nanoprobing,” ISTFA 2012, Proceedings from the 38th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Nov. 11-15, 2012, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 67-70. |
Lin, W.P. et al., “Physical Failure Analysis Cases by Electron Beam Absorbed Current & Electron Beam Induced Current Detection on Nano-Probing SEM System,” Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA), 2010 17th IEEE International Symposium, Jul. 5-9, 2010, 4 pages. |
Nagatani, G. et al., “Fault Isolation of Sub-surface Leakage Defects Using Electron Beam Induced Current Characterization in Next-Generation Flash Memory Technology Development,” ISTFA 2010, Proceedings from the 36th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Nov. 14-18, 2010, Addison, TX, pp. 62-65. |
Quah, Act. et al., “Failure Analysis Methodology on Resistive Open Defects,” ISTFA 2014, Proceedings from the 40th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Nov. 9-13, 2014, Houston, TX, ASM International, pp. 354-358. |
Smirnov, W. et al., “Diamond-Modified AFM Probes: From Diamond Nanowires to Atomic Force Microscopy-Integrated Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes,” Anal. Chem., vol. 83, pp. 4936-4941 (2011). |
Strizich, M., “Electron Beam Induced Current Isolation Techniques,” Available online at http://www.analyticalsol.com/ files/TechnicalArticles/EBIC_article.pdf, accessed Jun. 29, 2015, 3 pages. |
Strizich, M., “Voltage Contrast and EBIC Failure Isolation Techniques,” EDFAAO, Electronic Device Failure Analysis, vol. 9, Issue 1, 2007, pp. 20-23. |
Yaliang, C. et al., “Absorbed-Specimen Current Imaging Implementation and Characterization in Nano-Prober for Resistive Interconnects Isolation in 45-nm Silicon-on-Insulator Microprocessors,” Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits, 2010 17th IEEE International Symposium on Jul. 5-9, 2010, 5 pages. |
Ippoloto, S., et al., “Diamond Milling with an Atomic Force Microscope,” Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits, 2015 IEEE 22nd International Symposium, on Jun. 29, 2015-Jul. 2, 2015, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/108,286 dated Feb. 11, 2015. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for PCT/U52015/037824 dated Sep. 8, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/U52015/037824 dated Dec. 4, 2015. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for PCT/U52015/037829 dated Sep. 8, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/037829 dated Dec. 7, 2015. |
Examination Report for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 103143626 dated Mar. 22, 2016. |
Examination Report for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 104120476 dated Aug. 15, 2016. |
Notice of Reasons of Refusal from Japanese Application No. 2016-523868, dated Oct. 17, 2017, 7 pages (with English translation). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170082685 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61838744 | Jun 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14314013 | Jun 2014 | US |
Child | 15368516 | US |