Patent Grant
10876119
The invention pertains to the field of RNA interference (RNAi). The invention more specifically relates to nucleic acid molecules with improved in vivo delivery properties without the use of a delivering agent and their use in efficient gene silencing.
Complementary oligonucleotide sequences are promising therapeutic agents and useful research tools in elucidating gene functions. However, prior art oligonucleotide molecules suffer from several problems that may impede their clinical development, and frequently make it difficult to achieve intended efficient inhibition of gene expression (including protein synthesis) using such compositions in vivo.
A major problem has been the delivery of these compounds to cells and tissues. Conventional double-stranded RNAi compounds, 19-29 bases long, form a highly negatively-charged rigid helix of approximately 1.5 by 10-15 nm in size. This rod type molecule cannot get through the cell-membrane and as a result has very limited efficacy both in vitro and in vivo. As a result, all conventional RNAi compounds require some kind of a delivery vehicle to promote their tissue distribution and cellular uptake. This is considered to be a major limitation of the RNAi technology.
There have been previous attempts to apply chemical modifications to oligonucleotides to improve their cellular uptake properties. One such modification was the attachment of a cholesterol molecule to the oligonucleotide. A first report on this approach was by Letsinger et al., in 1989. Subsequently, ISIS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Carlsbad, Calif.) reported on more advanced techniques in attaching the cholesterol molecule to the oligonucleotide (Manoharan, 1992).
With the discovery of siRNAs in the late nineties, similar types of modifications were attempted on these molecules to enhance their delivery profiles. Cholesterol molecules conjugated to slightly modified (Soutschek, 2004) and heavily modified (Wolfrum, 2007) siRNAs appeared in the literature. Yamada et al., 2008 also reported on the use of advanced linker chemistries which further improved cholesterol mediated uptake of siRNAs. In spite of all this effort, the uptake of these types of compounds appears to be inhibited in the presence of biological fluids resulting in highly limited efficacy in gene silencing in vivo, limiting the applicability of these compounds in a clinical setting.
Therefore, it would be of great benefit to improve upon the prior art oligonucleotides by designing oligonucleotides that have improved delivery properties in vivo and are clinically meaningful.
Described herein are asymmetric chemically modified nucleic acid molecules with minimal double stranded regions, and the use of such molecules in gene expression modulation. RNAi molecules associated with the invention contain single stranded regions and double stranded regions, and can contain a variety of chemical modifications within both the single stranded and double stranded regions of the molecule. Additionally, the RNAi molecules can be attached to a hydrophobic conjugate such as a conventional and advanced sterol-type molecule. This new class of RNAi molecules has superior efficacy both in vitro and in vivo than previously described RNAi molecules.
Aspects of the invention relate to an isolated nucleic acid molecule having a guide strand of 18-23 nucleotides in length that has complementarity to a miRNA sequence and a passenger strand of 8-16 nucleotides in length. The guide strand and the passenger strand form the nucleic acid molecule such that the nucleic acid has a double stranded region and a single stranded region, wherein the single stranded region is the 3′ end of the guide strand and is 2-13 nucleotides in length and comprises at least two phosphorothioate modifications. At least 50% of the pyrimidines in the nucleic acid molecule are modified.
In some embodiments the nucleotide in position one of the guide strand has a 2′-O-methyl modification. For example, the nucleotide in position one of the guide strand may be a 5P-2′O-methyl U.
In other embodiments, at least 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98% or 99% of the pyrimidines in the nucleic acid molecule are modified. 100% of the pyrimidines in the nucleic acid molecule are modified in other embodiments. The modified pyrimidines may be, for instance, 2′fluoro or 2′O methyl modified.
In some embodiments at least one U or C includes a hydrophobic modification. In other embodiments a plurality of U's and/or C's include a hydrophobic modification. The hydrophobic modification may be, for instance, a methyl or ethyl hydrophobic base modification.
The guide strand may include a number of phosphate backbone modifications, such as phosphorothioate modifications. The guide strand contains 6-8 phosphorothioate modifications in some embodiments. In other embodiments the 3′ terminal 10 nucleotides of the guide strand include at least eight phosphorothioate modifications. In yet other embodiments the guide strand includes 4-14 phosphate modifications. These modifications may be on the single stranded region, the double stranded region or both.
The nucleic acid molecule includes a single stranded and a double stranded region. The single stranded region of the guide strand, in some embodiments, is 6 nucleotides long. In other embodiments the single stranded region of the guide strand is 8 nucleotides long. The double stranded region may be 12-14 or 13 nucleotides long in other embodiments.
Optionally, the double stranded nucleic acid molecule has one end that is blunt or includes a one nucleotide overhang.
The passenger strand is linked at the 3′ end to a lipophilic group according to some embodiments. The lipophilic group may be a sterol, such as cholesterol.
The isolated double stranded nucleic acid molecule in some embodiments is an miRNA mimic. The miRNA sequence to which the guide strand is complementary in the miRNA mimic is a miRNA recognition element. In some embodiments the miRNA mimic is a mimic of an miRNA selected from the group consisting of miR21, miR 139, miR 7, miR29, miR 122, miR 302-367 cluster, miR 221, miR-96, miR 126, miR 225 and miR 206.
In other embodiments the isolated double stranded nucleic acid molecule is an miRNA inhibitor. The miRNA sequence to which the guide strand is complementary in the miRNA inhibitor is an antisense strand of a mature miRNA. In some embodiments the guide strand is at least 50% chemically modified. In other embodiments the mature miRNA is miR 17-92.
According to aspects of the invention, a method for modulating miRNA-mediated gene expression in a mammalian cell is provided. The method involves contacting the mammalian cell with an isolated double stranded nucleic acid molecule described herein in an effective amount to modulate miRNA-mediated gene expression. In some embodiments miRNA-mediated gene expression in the mammalian cell is reduced. In other embodiments miRNA-mediated gene expression in the mammalian cell is increased. The mammalian cell may contacted with the isolated nucleic acid in vivo, ex vivo, or in vitro.
The invention also involves in other aspects a method for modulating miRNA-mediated gene expression in a stem cell. The method involves contacting the stem cell with an isolated double stranded nucleic acid molecule described herein in an effective amount to modulate miRNA-mediated gene expression in the stem cell. The methods are useful for example in promoting or inhibiting stem cell differentiation, tissue remodeling, organ preservation etc.
Each of the limitations of the invention can encompass various embodiments of the invention. It is, therefore, anticipated that each of the limitations of the invention involving any one element or combinations of elements can be included in each aspect of the invention. This invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways.
The accompanying drawings are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the drawings, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various figures is represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every drawing. In the drawings:
Aspects of the invention relate to methods and compositions involved in gene silencing. The invention is based at least in part on the surprising discovery that asymmetric nucleic acid molecules with a double stranded region of a minimal length such as 8-14 nucleotides, are effective in silencing gene expression. Molecules with such a short double stranded region have not previously been demonstrated to be effective in mediating RNA interference. It had previously been assumed that that there must be a double stranded region of 19 nucleotides or greater. The molecules described herein are optimized through chemical modification, and in some instances through attachment of hydrophobic conjugates.
The invention is based at least in part on another surprising discovery that asymmetric nucleic acid molecules with reduced double stranded regions are much more effectively taken up by cells compared to conventional siRNAs. These molecules are highly efficient in silencing of target gene expression and offer significant advantages over previously described RNAi molecules including high activity in the presence of serum, efficient self delivery, compatibility with a wide variety of linkers, and reduced presence or complete absence of chemical modifications that are associated with toxicity.
In contrast to single-stranded polynucleotides, duplex polynucleotides have been difficult to deliver to a cell as they have rigid structures and a large number of negative charges which makes membrane transfer difficult. Unexpectedly, it was found that the polynucleotides of the present invention, although partially double-stranded, are recognized in vivo as single-stranded and, as such, are capable of efficiently being delivered across cell membranes. As a result the polynucleotides of the invention are capable in many instances of self delivery. Thus, the polynucleotides of the invention may be formulated in a manner similar to conventional RNAi agents or they may be delivered to the cell or subject alone (or with non-delivery type carriers) and allowed to self deliver. In one embodiment of the present invention, self delivering asymmetric double-stranded RNA molecules are provided in which one portion of the molecule resembles a conventional RNA duplex and a second portion of the molecule is single stranded.
The polynucleotides of the invention are referred to herein as isolated double stranded or duplex nucleic acids, oligonucleotides or polynucleotides, nano molecules, nano RNA, sd-rxRNAnano, sd-rxRNA or RNA molecules of the invention.
The oligonucleotides of the invention in some aspects have a combination of asymmetric structures including a double stranded region and a single stranded region of 5 nucleotides or longer, specific chemical modification patterns and are conjugated to lipophilic or hydrophobic molecules. This new class of RNAi like compounds have superior efficacy in vitro and in vivo. Based on the data described herein it is believed that the reduction in the size of the rigid duplex region in combination with phosphorothioate modifications applied to a single stranded region are new and important for achieving the observed superior efficacy. Thus, the RNA molecules described herein are different in both structure and composition as well as in vitro and in vivo activity.
In a preferred embodiment the RNAi compounds of the invention comprise an asymmetric compound comprising a duplex region (required for efficient RISC entry of 10-15 bases long) and single stranded region of 4-12 nucleotides long; with a 13 nucleotide duplex. A 6 nucleotide single stranded region is preferred in some embodiments. The single stranded region of the new RNAi compounds also comprises 2-12 phosphorothioate internucleotide linkages (referred to as phosphorothioate modifications). 6-8 phosphorothioate internucleotide linkages are preferred in some embodiments. Additionally, the RNAi compounds of the invention also include a unique chemical modification pattern, which provides stability and is compatible with RISC entry. The combination of these elements has resulted in unexpected properties which are highly useful for delivery of RNAi reagents in vitro and in vivo.
The chemically modification pattern, which provides stability and is compatible with RISC entry includes modifications to the sense, or passenger, strand as well as the antisense, or guide, strand. For instance the passenger strand can be modified with any chemical entities which confirm stability and do not interfere with activity. Such modifications include 2′ ribo modifications (O-methyl, 2′ F, 2 deoxy and others) and backbone modification like phosphorothioate modifications. A preferred chemical modification pattern in the passenger strand includes O-methyl modification of C and U nucleotides within the passenger strand or alternatively the passenger strand may be completely O-methyl modified.
The guide strand, for example, may also be modified by any chemical modification which confirms stability without interfering with RISC entry. A preferred chemical modification pattern in the guide strand includes the majority of C and U nucleotides being 2′F modified and the 5′end being phosphorylated. Another preferred chemical modification pattern in the guide strand includes 2′Omethyl modification of position 1 and C/U in positions 11-18 and 5′end chemical phosphorylation. Yet another preferred chemical modification pattern in the guide strand includes 2′Omethyl modification of position 1 and C/U in positions 11-18 and 5′ end chemical phosphorylation and 2′F modification of C/U in positions 2-10.
It was surprisingly discovered according to the invention that the above-described chemical modification patterns of the oligonucleotides of the invention are well tolerated and actually improved efficacy of asymmetric RNAi compounds. See, for instance,
It was also demonstrated experimentally herein that the combination of modifications to RNAi when used together in a polynucleotide results in the achievement of optimal efficacy in passive uptake of the RNAi. Elimination of any of the described components (Guide strand stabilization, phosphorothioate stretch, sense strand stabilization and hydrophobic conjugate) or increase in size results in sub-optimal efficacy and in some instances complete lost of efficacy. The combination of elements results in development of compound, which is fully active following passive delivery to cells such as HeLa cells. (
The data shown in
The data in the Examples presented below demonstrates high efficacy of the oligonucleotides of the invention both in vitro in variety of cell types (supporting data) and in vivo upon local and systemic administration. For instance, the data compares the ability of several competitive RNAi molecules having different chemistries to silence a gene. Comparison of sd-rxRNA (oligonucleotides of the invention) with RNAs described in Soucheck et al. and Wolfrum at al., as applied to the same targeting region, demonstrated that only sd-rxRNA chemistry showed a significant functionality in passive uptake. The composition of the invention achieved EC50 values of 10-50 pM. This level of efficacy is un-attainable with conventional chemistries like those described in Sauthceck at al and Accell. Similar comparisons were made in other systems, such as in vitro (RPE cell line), in vivo upon local administration (wounded skin) and systemic (50 mg/kg) as well as other genes (
Significant amounts of data also demonstrate the in vivo efficacy of the compounds of the invention. For instance
The sd-rxRNA can be further improved in some instances by improving the hydrophobicity of compounds using of novel types of chemistries. For example one chemistry is related to use of hydrophobic base modifications. Any base in any position might be modified, as long as modification results in an increase of the partition coefficient of the base. The preferred locations for modification chemistries are positions 4 and 5 of the pyrimidines. Preferably the base modification is a methyl or ethyl modification. The major advantage of these positions is (a) ease of synthesis and (b) lack of interference with base-pairing and A form helix formation, which are essential for RISC complex loading and target recognition. Examples of these chemistries is shown in
This invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having,” “containing,” “involving,” and variations thereof herein, is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items.
Thus, aspects of the invention relate to isolated double stranded nucleic acid molecules comprising a guide (antisense) strand and a passenger (sense) strand. As used herein, the term “double-stranded” refers to one or more nucleic acid molecules in which at least a portion of the nucleomonomers are complementary and hydrogen bond to form a double-stranded region. In some embodiments, the length of the guide strand ranges from 16-29 nucleotides long. In certain embodiments, the guide strand is 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, or 29 nucleotides long. The guide strand has complementarity to a target gene. Complementarity between the guide strand and the target gene may exist over any portion of the guide strand. Complementarity as used herein may be perfect complementarity or less than perfect complementarity as long as the guide strand is sufficiently complementary to the target that it mediates RNAi. In some embodiments complementarity refers to less than 25%, 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, or 1% mismatch between the guide strand and the target. Perfect complementarity refers to 100% complementarity. Thus the invention has the advantage of being able to tolerate sequence variations that might be expected due to genetic mutation, strain polymorphism, or evolutionary divergence. For example, siRNA sequences with insertions, deletions, and single point mutations relative to the target sequence have also been found to be effective for inhibition. Moreover, not all positions of a siRNA contribute equally to target recognition. Mismatches in the center of the siRNA are most critical and essentially abolish target RNA cleavage. Mismatches upstream of the center or upstream of the cleavage site referencing the antisense strand are tolerated but significantly reduce target RNA cleavage. Mismatches downstream of the center or cleavage site referencing the antisense strand, preferably located near the 3′ end of the antisense strand, e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 nucleotides from the 3′ end of the antisense strand, are tolerated and reduce target RNA cleavage only slightly.
While not wishing to be bound by any particular theory, in some embodiments, the guide strand is at least 16 nucleotides in length and anchors the Argonaute protein in RISC. In some embodiments, when the guide strand loads into RISC it has a defined seed region and target mRNA cleavage takes place across from position 10-11 of the guide strand. In some embodiments, the 5′ end of the guide strand is or is able to be phosphorylated. The nucleic acid molecules described herein may be referred to as minimum trigger RNA.
In some embodiments, the length of the passenger strand ranges from 8-14 nucleotides long. In certain embodiments, the passenger strand is 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 or 14 nucleotides long. The passenger strand has complementarity to the guide strand. Complementarity between the passenger strand and the guide strand can exist over any portion of the passenger or guide strand. In some embodiments, there is 100% complementarity between the guide and passenger strands within the double stranded region of the molecule.
Aspects of the invention relate to double stranded nucleic acid molecules with minimal double stranded regions. In some embodiments the region of the molecule that is double stranded ranges from 8-14 nucleotides long. In certain embodiments, the region of the molecule that is double stranded is 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 or 14 nucleotides long. In certain embodiments the double stranded region is 13 nucleotides long. There can be 100% complementarity between the guide and passenger strands, or there may be one or more mismatches between the guide and passenger strands. In some embodiments, on one end of the double stranded molecule, the molecule is either blunt-ended or has a one-nucleotide overhang. The single stranded region of the molecule is in some embodiments between 4-12 nucleotides long. For example the single stranded region can be 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12 nucleotides long. However, in certain embodiments, the single stranded region can also be less than 4 or greater than 12 nucleotides long. In certain embodiments, the single stranded region is 6 nucleotides long.
RNAi constructs associated with the invention can have a thermodynamic stability (ΔG) of less than −13 kkal/mol. In some embodiments, the thermodynamic stability (ΔG) is less than −20 kkal/mol. In some embodiments there is a loss of efficacy when (ΔG) goes below −21 kkal/mol. In some embodiments a (ΔG) value higher than −13 kkal/mol is compatible with aspects of the invention. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, in some embodiments a molecule with a relatively higher (ΔG) value may become active at a relatively higher concentration, while a molecule with a relatively lower (ΔG) value may become active at a relatively lower concentration. In some embodiments, the (ΔG) value may be higher than −9 kkcal/mol. The gene silencing effects mediated by the RNAi constructs associated with the invention, containing minimal double stranded regions, are unexpected because molecules of almost identical design but lower thermodynamic stability have been demonstrated to be inactive (Rana et al 2004).
Without wishing to be bound by any theory, results described herein suggest that a stretch of 8-10 bp of dsRNA or dsDNA will be structurally recognized by protein components of RISC or co-factors of RISC. Additionally, there is a free energy requirement for the triggering compound that it may be either sensed by the protein components and/or stable enough to interact with such components so that it may be loaded into the Argonaute protein. If optimal thermodynamics are present and there is a double stranded portion that is preferably at least 8 nucleotides then the duplex will be recognized and loaded into the RNAi machinery.
In some embodiments, thermodynamic stability is increased through the use of LNA bases. In some embodiments, additional chemical modifications are introduced. Several non-limiting examples of chemical modifications include: 5′ Phosphate, 2′-O-methyl, 2′-O-ethyl, 2′-fluoro, ribothymidine, C-5 propynyl-dC (pdC) and C-5 propynyl-dU (pdU); C-5 propynyl-C (pC) and C-5 propynyl-U (pU); 5-methyl C, 5-methyl U, 5-methyl dC, 5-methyl dU methoxy, (2,6-diaminopurine), 5′-Dimethoxytrityl-N4-ethyl-2′-deoxyCytidine and MGB (minor groove binder). It should be appreciated that more than one chemical modification can be combined within the same molecule.
Molecules associated with the invention are optimized for increased potency and/or reduced toxicity. For example, nucleotide length of the guide and/or passenger strand, and/or the number of phosphorothioate modifications in the guide and/or passenger strand, can in some aspects influence potency of the RNA molecule, while replacing 2′-fluoro (2′F) modifications with 2′-O-methyl (2′OMe) modifications can in some aspects influence toxicity of the molecule. Specifically, reduction in 2′F content of a molecule is predicted to reduce toxicity of the molecule. The Examples section presents molecules in which 2′F modifications have been eliminated, offering an advantage over previously described RNAi compounds due to a predicted reduction in toxicity. Furthermore, the number of phosphorothioate modifications in an RNA molecule can influence the uptake of the molecule into a cell, for example the efficiency of passive uptake of the molecule into a cell. Preferred embodiments of molecules described herein have no 2′F modification and yet are characterized by equal efficacy in cellular uptake and tissue penetration. Such molecules represent a significant improvement over prior art, such as molecules described by Accell and Wolfrum, which are heavily modified with extensive use of 2′F.
In some embodiments, a guide strand is approximately 18-19 nucleotides in length and has approximately 2-14 phosphate modifications. For example, a guide strand can contain 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 or more than 14 nucleotides that are phosphate-modified. The guide strand may contain one or more modifications that confer increased stability without interfering with RISC entry. The phosphate modified nucleotides, such as phosphorothioate modified nucleotides, can be at the 3′ end, 5′ end or spread throughout the guide strand. In some embodiments, the 3′ terminal 10 nucleotides of the guide strand contains 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 phosphorothioate modified nucleotides. The guide strand can also contain 2′F and/or 2′OMe modifications, which can be located throughout the molecule. In some embodiments, the nucleotide in position one of the guide strand (the nucleotide in the most 5′ position of the guide strand) is 2′OMe modified and/or phosphorylated. C and U nucleotides within the guide strand can be 2′F modified. For example, C and U nucleotides in positions 2-10 of a 19 nt guide strand (or corresponding positions in a guide strand of a different length) can be 2′F modified. C and U nucleotides within the guide strand can also be 2′OMe modified. For example, C and U nucleotides in positions 11-18 of a 19 nt guide strand (or corresponding positions in a guide strand of a different length) can be 2′OMe modified. In some embodiments, the nucleotide at the most 3′ end of the guide strand is unmodified. In certain embodiments, the majority of Cs and Us within the guide strand are 2′F modified and the 5′ end of the guide strand is phosphorylated. In other embodiments, position 1 and the Cs or Us in positions 11-18 are 2′OMe modified and the 5′ end of the guide strand is phosphorylated. In other embodiments, position 1 and the Cs or Us in positions 11-18 are 2′OMe modified, the 5′ end of the guide strand is phosphorylated, and the Cs or Us in position 2-10 are 2′F modified.
In some aspects, an optimal passenger strand is approximately 11-14 nucleotides in length. The passenger strand may contain modifications that confer increased stability. One or more nucleotides in the passenger strand can be 2′OMe modified. In some embodiments, one or more of the C and/or U nucleotides in the passenger strand is 2′OMe modified, or all of the C and U nucleotides in the passenger strand are 2′OMe modified. In certain embodiments, all of the nucleotides in the passenger strand are 2′OMe modified. One or more of the nucleotides on the passenger strand can also be phosphate-modified such as phosphorothioate modified. The passenger strand can also contain 2′ ribo, 2′F and 2 deoxy modifications or any combination of the above. As demonstrated in the Examples, chemical modification patterns on both the guide and passenger strand are well tolerated and a combination of chemical modifications is shown herein to lead to increased efficacy and self-delivery of RNA molecules.
Aspects of the invention relate to RNAi constructs that have extended single-stranded regions relative to double stranded regions, as compared to molecules that have been used previously for RNAi. The single stranded region of the molecules may be modified to promote cellular uptake or gene silencing. In some embodiments, phosphorothioate modification of the single stranded region influences cellular uptake and/or gene silencing. The region of the guide strand that is phosphorothioate modified can include nucleotides within both the single stranded and double stranded regions of the molecule. In some embodiments, the single stranded region includes 2-12 phosphorothioate modifications. For example, the single stranded region can include 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12 phosphorothioate modifications. In some instances, the single stranded region contains 6-8 phosphorothioate modifications.
Molecules associated with the invention are also optimized for cellular uptake. In RNA molecules described herein, the guide and/or passenger strands can be attached to a conjugate. In certain embodiments the conjugate is hydrophobic. The hydrophobic conjugate can be a small molecule with a partition coefficient that is higher than 10. The conjugate can be a sterol-type molecule such as cholesterol, or a molecule with an increased length polycarbon chain attached to C17, and the presence of a conjugate can influence the ability of an RNA molecule to be taken into a cell with or without a lipid transfection reagent. The conjugate can be attached to the passenger or guide strand through a hydrophobic linker. In some embodiments, a hydrophobic linker is 5-12C in length, and/or is hydroxypyrrolidine-based. In some embodiments, a hydrophobic conjugate is attached to the passenger strand and the CU residues of either the passenger and/or guide strand are modified. In some embodiments, at least 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90% or 95% of the CU residues on the passenger strand and/or the guide strand are modified. In some aspects, molecules associated with the invention are self-delivering (sd). As used herein, “self-delivery” refers to the ability of a molecule to be delivered into a cell without the need for an additional delivery vehicle such as a transfection reagent.
Aspects of the invention relate to selecting molecules for use in RNAi. Based on the data described herein, molecules that have a double stranded region of 8-14 nucleotides can be selected for use in RNAi. In some embodiments, molecules are selected based on their thermodynamic stability (ΔG). In some embodiments, molecules will be selected that have a (ΔG) of less than −13 kkal/mol. For example, the (ΔG) value may be −13, −14, −15, −16, −17, −18, −19, −21, −22 or less than −22 kkal/mol. In other embodiments, the (ΔG) value may be higher than −13 kkal/mol. For example, the (ΔG) value may be −12, ×11, ×10, ×9, ×8, ×7 or more than −7 kkal/mol. It should be appreciated that ΔG can be calculated using any method known in the art. In some embodiments ΔG is calculated using Mfold, available through the Mfold internet site (mfold.bioinfo.rpi.edu/cgi-bin/rna-forml.cgi). Methods for calculating ΔG are described in, and are incorporated by reference from, the following references: Zuker, M. (2003) Nucleic Acids Res., 31(13):3406-15; Mathews, D. H., Sabina, J., Zuker, M. and Turner, D. H. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 288:911-940; Mathews, D. H., Disney, M. D., Childs, J. L., Schroeder, S. J., Zuker, M., and Turner, D. H. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101:7287-7292; Duan, S., Mathews, D. H., and Turner, D. H. (2006) Biochemistry 45:9819-9832; Wuchty, S., Fontana, W., Hofacker, I. L., and Schuster, P. (1999) Biopolymers 49:145-165.
Aspects of the invention relate to using nucleic acid molecules described herein, with minimal double stranded regions and/or with a (4G) of less than −13 kkal/mol, for gene silencing. RNAi molecules can be administered in vivo or in vitro, and gene silencing effects can be achieved in vivo or in vitro.
In certain embodiments, the polynucleotide contains 5′- and/or 3′-end overhangs. The number and/or sequence of nucleotides overhang on one end of the polynucleotide may be the same or different from the other end of the polynucleotide. In certain embodiments, one or more of the overhang nucleotides may contain chemical modification(s), such as phosphorothioate or 2′-OMe modification.
In certain embodiments, the polynucleotide is unmodified. In other embodiments, at least one nucleotide is modified. In further embodiments, the modification includes a 2′-H or 2′-modified ribose sugar at the 2nd nucleotide from the 5′-end of the guide sequence. The “2nd nucleotide” is defined as the second nucleotide from the 5′-end of the polynucleotide.
As used herein, “2′-modified ribose sugar” includes those ribose sugars that do not have a 2′-OH group. “2′-modified ribose sugar” does not include 2′-deoxyribose (found in unmodified canonical DNA nucleotides). For example, the 2′-modified ribose sugar may be 2′-0-alkyl nucleotides, 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro nucleotides, 2′-deoxy nucleotides, or combination thereof.
In certain embodiments, the 2′-modified nucleotides are pyrimidine nucleotides (e.g., C/U). Examples of 2′-O-alkyl nucleotides include 2′-O-methyl nucleotides, or 2′-O-allyl nucleotides.
In certain embodiments, the miniRNA polynucleotide of the invention with the above-referenced 5′-end modification exhibits significantly (e.g., at least about 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90% or more) less “off-target” gene silencing when compared to similar constructs without the specified 5′-end modification, thus greatly improving the overall specificity of the RNAi reagent or therapeutics.
As used herein, “off-target” gene silencing refers to unintended gene silencing due to, for example, spurious sequence homology between the antisense (guide) sequence and the unintended target mRNA sequence.
According to this aspect of the invention, certain guide strand modifications further increase nuclease stability, and/or lower interferon induction, without significantly decreasing RNAi activity (or no decrease in RNAi activity at all).
In some embodiments, the 5′-stem sequence may comprise a 2′-modified ribose sugar, such as 2′-O-methyl modified nucleotide, at the 2nd nucleotide on the 5′-end of the polynucleotide and, in some embodiments, no other modified nucleotides. The hairpin structure having such modification may have enhanced target specificity or reduced off-target silencing compared to a similar construct without the 2′-O-methyl modification at said position.
Certain combinations of specific 5′-stem sequence and 3′-stem sequence modifications may result in further unexpected advantages, as partly manifested by enhanced ability to inhibit target gene expression, enhanced serum stability, and/or increased target specificity, etc.
In certain embodiments, the guide strand comprises a 2′-O-methyl modified nucleotide at the 2nd nucleotide on the 5′-end of the guide strand and no other modified nucleotides.
In other aspects, the miniRNA structures of the present invention mediates sequence-dependent gene silencing by a microRNA mechanism. As used herein, the term “microRNA” (“miRNA”), also referred to in the art as “small temporal RNAs” (“stRNAs”), refers to a small (10-50 nucleotide) RNA which are genetically encoded (e.g., by viral, mammalian, or plant genomes) and are capable of directing or mediating RNA silencing. An “miRNA disorder” shall refer to a disease or disorder characterized by an aberrant expression or activity of an miRNA.
miRNAs are important modulators of cellular homeostasis and differention. Reduced levels of miRNA expreression or excessive expression of miRNA have been shown to be involved in many diseases. microRNAs are involved in down-regulating target genes in critical pathways, such as development and cancer, in mice, worms and mammals. In particular significant reduction of different miRNA expression is related to tumor development and progression. Gene silencing through a microRNA mechanism is achieved by specific yet, in some cases, imperfect base-pairing of the miRNA and its target messenger RNA (mRNA). Various mechanisms may be used in microRNA-mediated down-regulation of target mRNA expression.
miRNAs are noncoding RNAs of approximately 22 nucleotides which can regulate gene expression at the post transcriptional or translational level during plant and animal development. One common feature of miRNAs is that they are all excised from an approximately 70 nucleotide precursor RNA stem-loop termed pre-miRNA, probably by Dicer, an RNase III-type enzyme, or a homolog thereof. Naturally-occurring miRNAs are expressed by endogenous genes in vivo and are processed from a hairpin or stem-loop precursor (pre-miRNA or pri-miRNAs) by Dicer or other RNAses. miRNAs can exist transiently in vivo as a double-stranded duplex but only one strand is taken up by the RISC complex to direct gene silencing.
In some embodiments a version of sd-rxRNA compounds, which are effective in cellular uptake and modulating miRNA activity are described. Essentially the compounds are similar to RISC entering version but large strand chemical modification patterns are optimized in the way to block cleavage and act as an effective inhibitor of the RISC action. For example, the compound might be completely or mostly O-methyl modified with the PS content described previously. For these types of compounds the 5′ phosphorylation is not necessary. The presence of double stranded region is preferred as it is promotes cellular uptake and efficient RISC loading.
Finding a way to modulate miRNA expression is an important unresolved problem in miRNA based drug development. The invention describes novel miRNA modulating compounds (miRNA mimics and miRNA inhibitors). The miRNA modulating compounds of the invention have the same basic structural properties described herein for self delivering RNA. Exemplary, non-limiting, sequences of the miRNA modulating compounds of the invention are shown in Tables 4-5.
In general, the miRNA modulating compounds have two strands, a guide (or antisense) strand that is 18-23 bases long and a passenger (or sense) strand that is 8-16 bases long. The size difference of the two strands results in a double stranded and a single strand region of the molecule. In some embodiments the single stranded region is substantially modified, for example, with phosphorothioates. The presence of this phosphorothioated region is believed to be important for improved PK/PD, tissue distribution and cellular uptake properties of these molecules.
In some instances it is preferred that the first position of the guide strand has a 2′O-methyl modification such as a 5P-2 o-methyl U. The presence of this modification in the guide strand further promotes the association with and loading into RISC complex.
Preferably both strands of the miRNA modulators are extensively modified, as described herein. For instance many of the pyrimidines are preferably 2′ modified. These modifications contribute to the stability of the molecule.
Additionally the overall hydrophobicity of the miRNA modulating compounds of the invention is increased to enhance cellular entry. This may be accomplished through the presence of some hydrophobic modification in the bases. For instance, position 5 or 4 of uridines and cytidine may include hydrophobic base modifications. These modifications increase and promote RISC association, stability, specificity and cellular entry. An example of a preferred hydrophobic base modification is methyl or ethyl. The presence of these type of modifications appear to not interfere with RISC entry of the miRNA modulating compounds and actually seem to promotes RISC entry.
In addition to hydrophobic base modification, other hydrophobic moieties may be linked to the molecule. A preferred location for linkage of hydrophobic moieties is the 3′ end position of the passenger strand.
The compounds of the invention having these structural properties are excellent modulators of miRNA expression in vivo. Administration of these compounds is expected to mimic natural miRNA expression in a targeted cells or inhibit undesirable miRNA, depending on the specificity of the guide strand. These compounds are useful in modulating miRNA level and activity in many tissues, such as brain, spinal cord, tumors, liver, lung, kidney skin, heart, vasculature, and spleen. Additionally these compounds may be used ex vivo and in primary, dentritic or stem cells to modulate cellular properties prior to introduction or reintroduction of the cells into a subject. For instance they may be used in dendritic cells or primary tumors to help with a cancer vaccine development. The compounds may be used in stem cells or tissues or organs ex vivo or in vitro to promote or stop stem cells differentiation, tissue remodeling, organ preservation and many other applications.
The miRNA modulating compounds of the invention are miRNA mimics or miRNA inhibitors. An miRNA mimic as used herein refers to a double stranded nucleic acid having a guide strand that has a nucleic acid sequence that is similar, or in some cases identical, to a guide strand of a naturally occurring mature miRNA. Naturally occurring miRNA are processed from long nucleic acids having secondary structural properties (referred to as pri-miRNA and pre-miRNA) to produce naturally occurring mature miRNA. The mature miRNA is a double stranded molecule of about 22 nucleotides in length having a guide strand that binds to an miRNA recognition element (MRE) in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of a target mRNA (in a RISC complex) and suppresses its translation or initiates degradation of the mRNA.
The miRNA mimic of the invention includes a guide strand that is identical to or similar to the sequence of a guide strand of a naturally occurring mature miRNA. Identical to the sequence, as used herein refers to the same nucleic acid bases in the nucleotide as are found in the mature miRNA. Similar to the sequence, in this context, refers to a nucleic acid molecule having a sequence which is less than identical but at least 75% homologous to the mature miRNA. In some instances “similar to the sequence” refers to a sequence which is less than identical but at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% homologous to the mature miRNA. In some cases the sequence of the miRNA mimic may include the same bases, but the base of the mimic may be modified, i.e. hydrophobically modified. In other cases the mimic may include one or more different bases or nucleotides than the naturally occurring mature miRNA.
The guide strand of the miRNA mimic is complementary to a miRNA recognition element (MRE). “Complementary to a miRNA recognition element” as used herein refers to base complementarity between at least 6 or 7 nucleotides of the miRNA mimic guide strand (preferably the 5′ end of the guide strand) and the MRE. The region of complementarity is referred to as the seed region. In some embodiments the seed region or region of complementarity is 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 or 13 nucleotides in length. The complementarity of the seed region may be perfect (100%) or may be less i.e. greater than 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%, but preferably is 100%. The complementarity between the entire miRNA and the MRE may be greater than 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%.
The miRNA mimics of the invention are useful for mimicking the activity of any naturally occurring miRNA. Non-limiting examples include: miR21, miR 139, miR 7, miR29, miR 122, miR 302-367 cluster, miR 221, miR-96, miR 126, miR 225 and miR 206.
An miRNA inhibitor as used herein refers to a double stranded nucleic acid having a guide strand that has a nucleic acid sequence that is complementary to a guide strand or antisense strand of a naturally occurring mature miRNA. “Complementary to an antisense strand of a naturally occurring mature miRNA” as used herein refers to base complementarity between the guide strand of the inhibitor and the antisense strand of the naturally occurring mature miRNA. In some embodiments the complementarity may be perfect (100%) or may be less than perfect i.e. greater than 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% complementarity. The guide strand of the miRNA inhibitor is extensively chemically modified (i.e. with O-methyls or other modification), to prevent its entry into RISC. The association of the miRNA inhibitor guide strand with the naturally occurring (or miRNA mimic guide strand) miRNA loaded RISC is enhanced by the chemical modifications and sequence complementarily, such that it competes for binding with the naturally occurring mRNA.
The structure and function of miRNAs has been the subject of extensive research and several miRNAs have been sequenced and investigated regarding their function in human disease. Some non-limiting examples of known human miRNAs, the expression of which can be modulated with agents and methods provided herein are let-7, let-7a-1, let-7a-2, let-7a-3, let-7b, let-7c, let-7d, let-7e, let-7f-1, let-7f-2, let-7g, let-7i, mir-1, mir-10, mir-100, mir-101, mir-101-1, mir-101-2, mir-103, mir-103-1, mir-103-2, mir-105, mir-105-1, mir-105-2, mir-106a, mir-106b, mir-107, mir-10a, mir-10b, mir-1-1, mir-1-2, mir-124, mir-124-1, mir-124-2, mir-124-3, mir-125, mir-125a, mir-125b-1, mir-125b-2, mir-128, mir-128a, mir-128b, mir-129, mir-129-1, mir-129-2, mir-130, mir-130a, mir-130b, mir-132, mir-132, mir-133, mir-133a-1, mir-133a-2, mir-133b, mir-135, mir-135a-1, mir-135a-2, mir-135b, mir-138, mir-138-1, mir-138-2, mir-141, mir-146, mir-146a, mir-146b, mir-147, mir-147a, mir-147b, mir-148, mir-148a, mir-148b, mir-15, mir-151, mir-152, mir-153, mir-153-1, mir-153-2, mir-154, mir-154, mir-15a, mir-15b, mir-16-1, mir-16-2, mir-17, mir-181, mir-181a-1, mir-181a-2, mir-181b-1, mir-181b-2, mir-181c, mir-181d, mir-188, mir-188, mir-18a, mir-18b, mir-19, mir-190, mir-190, mir-190b, mir-192, mir-192, mir-193, mir-193a, mir-193b, mir-194, mir-194-1, mir-194-2, mir-195, mir-196, mir-196a-1, mir-196a-2, mir-196b, mir-199, mir-199a-1, mir-199a-2, mir-199b, mir-19a, mir-19b-1, mir-19b-2, mir-200a, mir-200b, mir-200c, mir-204, mir-204, mir-206, mir-208, mir-208, mir-208b, mir-20a, mir-20b, mir-211, mir-212, mir-215, mir-216, mir-216a, mir-216b, mir-218, mir-218-1, mir-218-2, mir-219, mir-219-1, mir-219-2, mir-220, mir-220, mir-220b, mir-221, mir-221, mir-222, mir-23, mir-23a, mir-23b, mir-24, mir-24-1, mir-24-2, mir-25, mir-25, mir-26, mir-26a-1, mir-26a-2, mir-26b, mir-27, mir-27a, mir-27b, mir-28, mir-28, mir-29, mir-290, mir-29a, mir-29b-1, mir-29b-2, mir-29c, mir-30, mir-300, mir-301a, mir-301b, mir-302, mir-302a, mir-302b, mir-302c, mir-302d, mir-30a, mir-30b, mir-30c-1, mir-30c-2, mir-30d, mir-30e, mir-323, mir-329, mir-329-1, mir-329-2, mir-33, mir-33a, mir-33b, mir-34, mir-34a, mir-34b, mir-34c, mir-365, mir-365-1, mir-365-2, mir-368, mir-369, mir-371, mir-372, mir-374, mir-374a, mir-374b, mir-376a-1, mir-376a-2, mir-376b, mir-376c, mir-377, mir-379, mir-379, mir-380, mir-381, mir-382, mir-409, mir-410, mir-411, mir-421, mir-429, mir-449, mir-449a, mir-449b, mir-450, mir-450a-1, mir-450a-2, mir-450b, mir-453, mir-487a, mir-487b, mir-494, mir-495, mir-496, mir-500, mir-500, mir-501, mir-502, mir-506, mir-506, mir-507, mir-508, mir-509, mir-509-1, mir-509-2, mir-509-3, mir-510, mir-511, mir-511-1, mir-511-2, mir-512, mir-512-1, mir-512-2, mir-513, mir-513-1, mir-513-2, mir-514-1, mir-514-2, mir-514-3, mir-515, mir-515-1, mir-515-2, mir-516a-1, mir-516a-2, mir-516b-1, mir-516b-2, mir-517a, mir-517b, mir-517c, mir-518a-1, mir-518a-2, mir-518b, mir-518c, mir-518d, mir-518e, mir-518f, mir-519a-1, mir-519a-2, mir-519b, mir-519c, mir-519d, mir-519e, mir-520a, mir-520b, mir-520c, mir-520d, mir-520e, mir-520f, mir-520g, mir-520h, mir-521-1, mir-521-2, mir-522, mir-523, mir-524, mir-525, mir-526a-1, mir-526a-2, mir-526b, mir-527, mir-532, mir-539, mir-543, mir-545, mir-548, mir-548a-1, mir-548a-2, mir-548a-3, mir-548b, mir-548c, mir-548d-1, mir-548d-2, mir-550, mir-550-1, mir-550-2, mir-551, mir-551a, mir-551b, mir-570, mir-579, mir-603, mir-655, mir-656, mir-660, mir-7, mir-7-1, mir-7-2, mir-7-3, mir-758, mir-8, mir-891, mir-891a, mir-891b, mir-892, mir-892a, mir-892b, mir-9, mir-9-1, mir-9-2, mir-92a-1, mir-92a-2, mir-92b, mir-93, mir-9-3, mir-941, mir-941-1, mir-941-2, mir-941-3, mir-941-4, mir-95, mir-95, mir-98, mir-99, mir-99a, mir-99b. Sequence, structural information, and functions of these and other miRNAs are well known to those of skill in the art and are described, for example, in the miRBase database, Release 16, September 2010, accessible at www.mirbase.org, and described in more detail in “miRBase: tools for microRNA genomics” by Griffiths-Jones S, Saini H K, van Dongen S, Enright A J, Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 36:D154-D158; “miRBase: microRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature” by Griffiths-Jones S, Grocock R J, van Dongen S, Bateman A, Enright A J, Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 34:D140-D144; and “The miRNA Registry” by Griffiths-Jones S, Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 32:D109-D111. The entire contents of miRBase, Release 16, September 2010, and the three references provided immediately above are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference for disclosure of miRNA sequences, structure, and function.
In some embodiments, the miRNA that is modulated using an agent or method provided herein is an miRNA that is implicated or known to be involved in the pathogenesis or the progression of a human disease, for example, in a cancer or neoplastic disease. MiRNAs implicated or known to be involved in the pathogenesis or the progression of a human disease are well known to those of skill in the art and include, but are not limited to the miRNAs described in the Human MiRNA & Disease Database (HMDD), Release January 2011, accessible at 202.38.126.151/hmdd/mirna/md/, and described in more detail in Lu M, Zhang Q, Deng M, Miao J, Guo Y, et al. (2008) An Analysis of Human MicroRNA and Disease Associations. PLoS ONE 3(10): e3420; the mir2disease base, Release March 2011, accessible at www.mir2disease.org, and described in more detail in Jiang Q., Wang Y., Hao Y., Juan L., Teng M., Zhang X., Li M., Wang G., Liu Y., (2009) miR2Disease: a manually curated database for microRNA deregulation in human disease. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D98-104; the entire contents of each database and reference are incorporated herein by reference.
In some embodiments, an miRNA modulating agent or method is provided that targets a particular miRNA or a particular miRNA cluster. For example, in some embodiments, the target miRNA is mir139 (e.g., miRBase accession: MI0000261). Mir139 has been described to act as a tumor suppressor and aberrant expression of mir139 has been reported to be associated with leukemia, for example, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and with certain carcinomas, for example, adenocarcinoma, epithelial ovarian carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, and non-small cell lung carcinoma. In some embodiments, a miRNA modulating agent or method provided herein is useful for the alleviation of a disease or condition associated with aberrant mir139.
In some embodiments, the target miRNA is let-7 (e.g., miRBase accession: MI0000060-MI0000068). Let-7 has been reported to act as a tumor suppressor and aberrant expression of let-7 has been reported to be associated with tumorigenesis and tumor progression. In some embodiments, a let-7 mimic as provided herein is introduced into a neoplastic cell or tissue, for example, into a tumor cell or tumor tissue to alleviate tumor growth and/or any associated disease or condition. In some embodiments, introduction of a let-7 mimic into a tumor results in tumor regression.
In some embodiments, the target miRNA is mir-29 (e.g., miRBase accession: MI0000087, MI0000105, MI0000107). Aberrant expression of mir-29 has been reported to be associated with abnormal cell or tissue proliferation. For example, lack of miR-29a and/or miR-29b is implicated in progression of HCV infection, fibrosis or neuron remodeling and degeneration during Alzeheimer's disease. In some embodiments, introduction of a mir-29 mimic into an affected cell or tissue of a diseased subject is of therapeutic benefit in neurological disorders, liver and pulmonary fibrosis, HCV or other liver infection, cardiac hypertension and other indications with a reported involvement of mir-29. In some embodiments, introduction of a mir-29 mimic, as provided herein, for example, of a mir-29b mimic, can result in PDPN downregulation, which is involved in glioblastoma progression. In some embodiments, introduction of a mir-29 mimic as provided herein into a glioblastoma cell or tissue, for example, brain tissue of a glioblastoma patient, results in arrest or delay of tumor progression, tumor regression, or an alleviation of the disease state.
In some embodiments, the target miRNA is mir-133 (e.g., miRBase accession: MI0000450, MI0000451, MI0000822). Aberrant expression of miR-133 has been reported to be associated with CTGF downregulation as well as downregulation of molecular signaling pathways implicated in fibrosis. In some embodiments, a mir-133 mimic provided herein is used as an anti-fibrotic agent.
In some embodiments, the target miRNA is a miRNA of the mir-302-367 cluster, comprising mir-302a-mir302d and mir-367 (e.g., miRBase accession: MI0000738, MI0000772, MI0000773, MI0000775). Aberrant expression of the miRNA 302-367 cluster has been reported to be associated with inhibition of HDac2-regulated reprogramming of somatic cells into pluripotent stem cells. In some embodiments, introduction of a mimic of a miRNA in the miRNA 302-367 cluster into somatic stem cells supports or enhances the reprogramming of the somatic cells into pluripotent stem cells, which can be used for regenerative medicine approaches, and organ and tissue development.
In some embodiments, the target miRNA is mir-221 (e.g., miRBase accession: MI0000298). Mir-221 has been reported to act as a tumor suppressor, and aberrant expression of mir-221 has been reported to be associated with glioblastoma progression. In some embodiments, introduction, e.g., by direct ingection or intrabrain infusion of a mir-221 mimic provided herein is used to treat or alleviate a symptom observed in glioblastoma patients.
In some embodiments, the target miRNA is mir-96 (e.g., miRBase accession: MI0000098). Mir-96 has been reported to be involved in hair growth regulation and aberrant expression of mir-96 has been reported to be associated with alopecia, for example, or chemotherapy-induced alopecia. In some embodiments, a mir-96 mimic as provided herein is used to treat alopecia.
In some embodiments, the target miRNA is mir-126, mir-335, or mir-206 (e.g., miRBase accession: MI0000471, MI0000816, MI0000490). These miRNAs are potent suppressors of tumor metastasis formation or maturation. For example, mir-126 has been reported to suppress endothelium cellular recruitment and, thus, metastasis maturation. In some embodiment, introduction of a mir-126, mir-335, or mir-206 mimic as provided herein into a primary tumor, or systemic administration to a subject having a tumor results in a partial or complete inhibition of metastasis formation.
In some embodiments, the target miRNA is a miRNA of the mir-17-92 cluster, comprising mir-17, mir-18a, mir-19a, mir-20a, mir-19b-1, and mir-92a-1 (e.g., miRBase accession: MI0000071, MI0000072, MI0000073, MI0000076, MI0000074, MI0000093). The mir-17-92 cluster has been reported to act as an oncogene and overexpression of the cluster, or of any member of the cluster has been reported to be associated with tumorigenesis. In some embodiments, a miRNA inhibitory agent targeting the mir-17-92 cluster as provided herein is administered to a tumor cell or tissue, or systemically, to a patient diagnosed with or suspected to have a tumor. Another pathway that uses small RNAs as sequence-specific regulators is the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway, which is an evolutionarily conserved response to the presence of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in the cell. The dsRNAs are cleaved into −20-base pair (bp) duplexes of small-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) by Dicer. These small RNAs get assembled into multiprotein effector complexes called RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISCs). The siRNAs then guide the cleavage of target mRNAs with perfect complementarity.
Some aspects of biogenesis, protein complexes, and function are shared between the siRNA pathway and the miRNA pathway. The subject single-stranded polynucleotides may mimic the dsRNA in the siRNA mechanism, or the microRNA in the miRNA mechanism.
In certain embodiments, the modified RNAi constructs may have improved stability in serum and/or cerebral spinal fluid compared to an unmodified RNAi constructs having the same sequence.
In certain embodiments, the structure of the RNAi construct does not induce interferon response in primary cells, such as mammalian primary cells, including primary cells from human, mouse and other rodents, and other non-human mammals. In certain embodiments, the RNAi construct may also be used to inhibit expression of a target gene in an invertebrate organism.
To further increase the stability of the subject constructs in vivo, the 3′-end of the hairpin structure may be blocked by protective group(s). For example, protective groups such as inverted nucleotides, inverted abasic moieties, or amino-end modified nucleotides may be used. Inverted nucleotides may comprise an inverted deoxynucleotide. Inverted abasic moieties may comprise an inverted deoxyabasic moiety, such as a 3′, 3′-linked or 5′, 5′-linked deoxyabasic moiety.
The RNAi constructs of the invention are capable of inhibiting the synthesis of any target protein encoded by target gene(s). The invention includes methods to inhibit expression of a target gene either in a cell in vitro, or in vivo. As such, the RNAi constructs of the invention are useful for treating a patient with a disease characterized by the overexpression of a target gene.
The target gene can be endogenous or exogenous (e.g., introduced into a cell by a virus or using recombinant DNA technology) to a cell. Such methods may include introduction of RNA into a cell in an amount sufficient to inhibit expression of the target gene. By way of example, such an RNA molecule may have a guide strand that is complementary to the nucleotide sequence of the target gene, such that the composition inhibits expression of the target gene.
The invention also relates to vectors expressing the nucleic acids of the invention, and cells comprising such vectors or the nucleic acids. The cell may be a mammalian cell in vivo or in culture, such as a human cell.
The invention further relates to compositions comprising the subject RNAi constructs, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent.
Another aspect of the invention provides a method for inhibiting the expression of a target gene in a mammalian cell, comprising contacting the mammalian cell with any of the subject RNAi constructs.
The method may be carried out in vitro, ex vivo, or in vivo, in, for example, mammalian cells in culture, such as a human cell in culture.
The target cells (e.g., mammalian cell) may be contacted in the presence of a delivery reagent, such as a lipid (e.g., a cationic lipid) or a liposome.
Another aspect of the invention provides a method for inhibiting the expression of a target gene in a mammalian cell, comprising contacting the mammalian cell with a vector expressing the subject RNAi constructs.
In one aspect of the invention, a longer duplex polynucleotide is provided, including a first polynucleotide that ranges in size from about 16 to about 30 nucleotides; a second polynucleotide that ranges in size from about 26 to about 46 nucleotides, wherein the first polynucleotide (the antisense strand) is complementary to both the second polynucleotide (the sense strand) and a target gene, and wherein both polynucleotides form a duplex and wherein the first polynucleotide contains a single stranded region longer than 6 bases in length and is modified with alternative chemical modification pattern, and/or includes a conjugate moiety that facilitates cellular delivery. In this embodiment, between about 40% to about 90% of the nucleotides of the passenger strand between about 40% to about 90% of the nucleotides of the guide strand, and between about 40% to about 90% of the nucleotides of the single stranded region of the first polynucleotide are chemically modified nucleotides.
In an embodiment, the chemically modified nucleotide in the polynucleotide duplex may be any chemically modified nucleotide known in the art, such as those discussed in detail above. In a particular embodiment, the chemically modified nucleotide is selected from the group consisting of 2′ F modified nucleotides, 2′-O-methyl modified and 2′deoxy nucleotides. In another particular embodiment, the chemically modified nucleotides results from “hydrophobic modifications” of the nucleotide base. In another particular embodiment, the chemically modified nucleotides are phosphorothioates. In an additional particular embodiment, chemically modified nucleotides are combination of phosphorothioates, 2′-O-methyl, 2′deoxy, hydrophobic modifications and phosphorothioates. As these groups of modifications refer to modification of the ribose ring, back bone and nucleotide, it is feasible that some modified nucleotides will carry a combination of all three modification types.
In another embodiment, the chemical modification is not the same across the various regions of the duplex. In a particular embodiment, the first polynucleotide (the passenger strand), has a large number of diverse chemical modifications in various positions. For this polynucleotide up to 90% of nucleotides might be chemically modified and/or have mismatches introduced.
In another embodiment, chemical modifications of the first or second polynucleotide include, but not limited to, 5′ position modification of Uridine and Cytosine (4-pyridyl, 2-pyridyl, indolyl, phenyl (C6H5OH); tryptophanyl (C8H6N)CH2CH(NH2)CO), isobutyl, butyl, aminobenzyl; phenyl; naphthyl, etc), where the chemical modification might alter base pairing capabilities of a nucleotide. For the guide strand an important feature of this aspect of the invention is the position of the chemical modification relative to the 5′ end of the antisense and sequence. For example, chemical phosphorylation of the 5′ end of the guide strand is usually beneficial for efficacy. 0-methyl modifications in the seed region of the sense strand (position 2-7 relative to the 5′ end) are not generally well tolerated, whereas 2′F and deoxy are well tolerated. The mid part of the guide strand and the 3′ end of the guide strand are more permissive in a type of chemical modifications applied. Deoxy modifications are not tolerated at the 3′ end of the guide strand.
A unique feature of this aspect of the invention involves the use of hydrophobic modification on the bases. In one embodiment, the hydrophobic modifications are preferably positioned near the 5′ end of the guide strand, in other embodiments, they localized in the middle of the guides strand, in other embodiment they localized at the 3′ end of the guide strand and yet in another embodiment they are distributed thought the whole length of the polynucleotide. The same type of patterns is applicable to the passenger strand of the duplex.
The other part of the molecule is a single stranded region. The single stranded region is expected to range from 7 to 40 nucleotides.
In one embodiment, the single stranded region of the first polynucleotide contains modifications selected from the group consisting of between 40% and 90% hydrophobic base modifications, between 40%-90% phosphorothioates, between 40%-90% modification of the ribose moiety, and any combination of the preceding.
Efficiency of guide strand (first polynucleotide) loading into the RISC complex might be altered for heavily modified polynucleotides, so in one embodiment, the duplex polynucleotide includes a mismatch between nucleotide 9, 11, 12, 13, or 14 on the guide strand (first polynucleotide) and the opposite nucleotide on the sense strand (second polynucleotide) to promote efficient guide strand loading.
More detailed aspects of the invention are described in the sections below.
Duplex Characteristics
Double-stranded oligonucleotides of the invention may be formed by two separate complementary nucleic acid strands. Duplex formation can occur either inside or outside the cell containing the target gene.
As used herein, the term “duplex” includes the region of the double-stranded nucleic acid molecule(s) that is (are) hydrogen bonded to a complementary sequence. Double-stranded oligonucleotides of the invention may comprise a nucleotide sequence that is sense to a target gene and a complementary sequence that is antisense to the target gene. The sense and antisense nucleotide sequences correspond to the target gene sequence, e.g., are identical or are sufficiently identical to effect target gene inhibition (e.g., are about at least about 98% identical, 96% identical, 94%, 90% identical, 85% identical, or 80% identical) to the target gene sequence.
In certain embodiments, the double-stranded oligonucleotide of the invention is double-stranded over its entire length, i.e., with no overhanging single-stranded sequence at either end of the molecule, i.e., is blunt-ended. In other embodiments, the individual nucleic acid molecules can be of different lengths. In other words, a double-stranded oligonucleotide of the invention is not double-stranded over its entire length. For instance, when two separate nucleic acid molecules are used, one of the molecules, e.g., the first molecule comprising an antisense sequence, can be longer than the second molecule hybridizing thereto (leaving a portion of the molecule single-stranded). Likewise, when a single nucleic acid molecule is used a portion of the molecule at either end can remain single-stranded.
In one embodiment, a double-stranded oligonucleotide of the invention contains mismatches and/or loops or bulges, but is double-stranded over at least about 70% of the length of the oligonucleotide. In another embodiment, a double-stranded oligonucleotide of the invention is double-stranded over at least about 80% of the length of the oligonucleotide. In another embodiment, a double-stranded oligonucleotide of the invention is double-stranded over at least about 90%-95% of the length of the oligonucleotide. In another embodiment, a double-stranded oligonucleotide of the invention is double-stranded over at least about 96%-98% of the length of the oligonucleotide. In certain embodiments, the double-stranded oligonucleotide of the invention contains at least or up to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, or 15 mismatches.
Modifications
The nucleotides of the invention may be modified at various locations, including the sugar moiety, the phosphodiester linkage, and/or the base.
Sugar moieties include natural, unmodified sugars, e.g., monosaccharide (such as pentose, e.g., ribose, deoxyribose), modified sugars and sugar analogs. In general, possible modifications of nucleomonomers, particularly of a sugar moiety, include, for example, replacement of one or more of the hydroxyl groups with a halogen, a heteroatom, an aliphatic group, or the functionalization of the hydroxyl group as an ether, an amine, a thiol, or the like.
One particularly useful group of modified nucleomonomers are 2′-O-methyl nucleotides. Such 2′-O-methyl nucleotides may be referred to as “methylated,” and the corresponding nucleotides may be made from unmethylated nucleotides followed by alkylation or directly from methylated nucleotide reagents. Modified nucleomonomers may be used in combination with unmodified nucleomonomers. For example, an oligonucleotide of the invention may contain both methylated and unmethylated nucleomonomers.
Some exemplary modified nucleomonomers include sugar- or backbone-modified ribonucleotides. Modified ribonucleotides may contain a non-naturally occurring base (instead of a naturally occurring base), such as uridines or cytidines modified at the 5′-position, e.g., 5′-(2-amino)propyl uridine and 5′-bromo uridine; adenosines and guanosines modified at the 8-position, e.g., 8-bromo guanosine; deaza nucleotides, e.g., 7-deaza-adenosine; and N-alkylated nucleotides, e.g., N6-methyl adenosine. Also, sugar-modified ribonucleotides may have the 2′-OH group replaced by a H, alxoxy (or OR), R or alkyl, halogen, SH, SR, amino (such as NH2, NHR, NR2,), or CN group, wherein R is lower alkyl, alkenyl, or alkynyl.
Modified ribonucleotides may also have the phosphodiester group connecting to adjacent ribonucleotides replaced by a modified group, e.g., of phosphorothioate group. More generally, the various nucleotide modifications may be combined.
Although the antisense (guide) strand may be substantially identical to at least a portion of the target gene (or genes), at least with respect to the base pairing properties, the sequence need not be perfectly identical to be useful, e.g., to inhibit expression of a target gene's phenotype. Generally, higher homology can be used to compensate for the use of a shorter antisense gene. In some cases, the antisense strand generally will be substantially identical (although in antisense orientation) to the target gene.
The use of 2′-O-methyl modified RNA may also be beneficial in circumstances in which it is desirable to minimize cellular stress responses. RNA having 2′-O-methyl nucleomonomers may not be recognized by cellular machinery that is thought to recognize unmodified RNA. The use of 2′-O-methylated or partially 2′-O-methylated RNA may avoid the interferon response to double-stranded nucleic acids, while maintaining target RNA inhibition. This may be useful, for example, for avoiding the interferon or other cellular stress responses, both in short RNAi (e.g., siRNA) sequences that induce the interferon response, and in longer RNAi sequences that may induce the interferon response.
Overall, modified sugars may include D-ribose, 2′-O-alkyl (including 2′-O-methyl and 2′-O-ethyl), i.e., 2′-alkoxy, 2′-amino, 2′-S-alkyl, 2′-halo (including 2′-fluoro), 2′-methoxyethoxy, 2′-allyloxy (—OCH2CH═CH2), 2′-propargyl, 2′-propyl, ethynyl, ethenyl, propenyl, and cyano and the like. In one embodiment, the sugar moiety can be a hexose and incorporated into an oligonucleotide as described (Augustyns, K., et al., Nucl. Acids. Res. 18:4711 (1992)). Exemplary nucleomonomers can be found, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,849,902, incorporated by reference herein.
The term “alkyl” includes saturated aliphatic groups, including straight-chain alkyl groups (e.g., methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, hexyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyl, decyl, etc.), branched-chain alkyl groups (isopropyl, tert-butyl, isobutyl, etc.), cycloalkyl (alicyclic) groups (cyclopropyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, cycloheptyl, cyclooctyl), alkyl substituted cycloalkyl groups, and cycloalkyl substituted alkyl groups. In certain embodiments, a straight chain or branched chain alkyl has 6 or fewer carbon atoms in its backbone (e.g., C1-C6 for straight chain, C3-C6 for branched chain), and more preferably 4 or fewer. Likewise, preferred cycloalkyls have from 3-8 carbon atoms in their ring structure, and more preferably have 5 or 6 carbons in the ring structure. The term C1-C6 includes alkyl groups containing 1 to 6 carbon atoms.
Moreover, unless otherwise specified, the term alkyl includes both “unsubstituted alkyls” and “substituted alkyls,” the latter of which refers to alkyl moieties having independently selected substituents replacing a hydrogen on one or more carbons of the hydrocarbon backbone. Such substituents can include, for example, alkenyl, alkynyl, halogen, hydroxyl, alkylcarbonyloxy, arylcarbonyloxy, alkoxycarbonyloxy, aryloxycarbonyloxy, carboxylate, alkyl carbonyl, arylcarbonyl, alkoxycarbonyl, aminocarbonyl, alkylaminocarbonyl, dialkylaminocarbonyl, alkylthiocarbonyl, alkoxyl, phosphate, phosphonato, phosphinato, cyano, amino (including alkyl amino, dialkylamino, arylamino, diarylamino, and alkylarylamino), acylamino (including alkylcarbonylamino, arylcarbonylamino, carbamoyl and ureido), amidino, imino, sulfhydryl, alkylthio, arylthio, thiocarboxylate, sulfates, alkylsulfinyl, sulfonato, sulfamoyl, sulfonamido, nitro, trifluoromethyl, cyano, azido, heterocyclyl, alkylaryl, or an aromatic or heteroaromatic moiety. Cycloalkyls can be further substituted, e.g., with the substituents described above. An “alkylaryl” or an “arylalkyl” moiety is an alkyl substituted with an aryl (e.g., phenylmethyl (benzyl)). The term “alkyl” also includes the side chains of natural and unnatural amino acids. The term “n-alkyl” means a straight chain (i.e., unbranched) unsubstituted alkyl group.
The term “alkenyl” includes unsaturated aliphatic groups analogous in length and possible substitution to the alkyls described above, but that contain at least one double bond. For example, the term “alkenyl” includes straight-chain alkenyl groups (e.g., ethylenyl, propenyl, butenyl, pentenyl, hexenyl, heptenyl, octenyl, nonenyl, decenyl, etc.), branched-chain alkenyl groups, cycloalkenyl (alicyclic) groups (cyclopropenyl, cyclopentenyl, cyclohexenyl, cycloheptenyl, cyclooctenyl), alkyl or alkenyl substituted cycloalkenyl groups, and cycloalkyl or cycloalkenyl substituted alkenyl groups. In certain embodiments, a straight chain or branched chain alkenyl group has 6 or fewer carbon atoms in its backbone (e.g., C2-C6 for straight chain, C3-C6 for branched chain). Likewise, cycloalkenyl groups may have from 3-8 carbon atoms in their ring structure, and more preferably have 5 or 6 carbons in the ring structure. The term C2-C6 includes alkenyl groups containing 2 to 6 carbon atoms.
Moreover, unless otherwise specified, the term alkenyl includes both “unsubstituted alkenyls” and “substituted alkenyls,” the latter of which refers to alkenyl moieties having independently selected substituents replacing a hydrogen on one or more carbons of the hydrocarbon backbone. Such substituents can include, for example, alkyl groups, alkynyl groups, halogens, hydroxyl, alkylcarbonyloxy, arylcarbonyloxy, alkoxycarbonyloxy, aryloxycarbonyloxy, carboxylate, alkylcarbonyl, arylcarbonyl, alkoxycarbonyl, aminocarbonyl, alkylaminocarbonyl, dialkylaminocarbonyl, alkylthiocarbonyl, alkoxyl, phosphate, phosphonato, phosphinato, cyano, amino (including alkyl amino, dialkylamino, arylamino, diarylamino, and alkylarylamino), acylamino (including alkylcarbonylamino, arylcarbonylamino, carbamoyl and ureido), amidino, imino, sulfhydryl, alkylthio, arylthio, thiocarboxylate, sulfates, alkylsulfinyl, sulfonato, sulfamoyl, sulfonamido, nitro, trifluoromethyl, cyano, azido, heterocyclyl, alkylaryl, or an aromatic or heteroaromatic moiety.
The term “alkynyl” includes unsaturated aliphatic groups analogous in length and possible substitution to the alkyls described above, but which contain at least one triple bond. For example, the term “alkynyl” includes straight-chain alkynyl groups (e.g., ethynyl, propynyl, butynyl, pentynyl, hexynyl, heptynyl, octynyl, nonynyl, decynyl, etc.), branched-chain alkynyl groups, and cycloalkyl or cycloalkenyl substituted alkynyl groups. In certain embodiments, a straight chain or branched chain alkynyl group has 6 or fewer carbon atoms in its backbone (e.g., C2-C6 for straight chain, C3-C6 for branched chain). The term C2-C6 includes alkynyl groups containing 2 to 6 carbon atoms.
Moreover, unless otherwise specified, the term alkynyl includes both “unsubstituted alkynyls” and “substituted alkynyls,” the latter of which refers to alkynyl moieties having independently selected substituents replacing a hydrogen on one or more carbons of the hydrocarbon backbone. Such substituents can include, for example, alkyl groups, alkynyl groups, halogens, hydroxyl, alkylcarbonyloxy, arylcarbonyloxy, alkoxycarbonyloxy, aryloxycarbonyloxy, carboxylate, alkylcarbonyl, arylcarbonyl, alkoxycarbonyl, aminocarbonyl, alkylaminocarbonyl, dialkylaminocarbonyl, alkylthiocarbonyl, alkoxyl, phosphate, phosphonato, phosphinato, cyano, amino (including alkyl amino, dialkylamino, arylamino, diarylamino, and alkylarylamino), acylamino (including alkylcarbonylamino, arylcarbonylamino, carbamoyl and ureido), amidino, imino, sulfhydryl, alkylthio, arylthio, thiocarboxylate, sulfates, alkylsulfinyl, sulfonato, sulfamoyl, sulfonamido, nitro, trifluoromethyl, cyano, azido, heterocyclyl, alkylaryl, or an aromatic or heteroaromatic moiety.
Unless the number of carbons is otherwise specified, “lower alkyl” as used herein means an alkyl group, as defined above, but having from one to five carbon atoms in its backbone structure. “Lower alkenyl” and “lower alkynyl” have chain lengths of, for example, 2-5 carbon atoms.
The term “alkoxy” includes substituted and unsubstituted alkyl, alkenyl, and alkynyl groups covalently linked to an oxygen atom. Examples of alkoxy groups include methoxy, ethoxy, isopropyloxy, propoxy, butoxy, and pentoxy groups. Examples of substituted alkoxy groups include halogenated alkoxy groups. The alkoxy groups can be substituted with independently selected groups such as alkenyl, alkynyl, halogen, hydroxyl, alkylcarbonyloxy, arylcarbonyloxy, alkoxycarbonyloxy, aryloxycarbonyloxy, carboxylate, alkylcarbonyl, arylcarbonyl, alkoxycarbonyl, aminocarbonyl, alkylaminocarbonyl, dialkylaminocarbonyl, alkylthiocarbonyl, alkoxyl, phosphate, phosphonato, phosphinato, cyano, amino (including alkyl amino, dialkylamino, arylamino, diarylamino, and alkylarylamino), acylamino (including alkylcarbonylamino, arylcarbonylamino, carbamoyl and ureido), amidino, imino, sulffiydryl, alkylthio, arylthio, thiocarboxylate, sulfates, alkylsulfmyl, sulfonato, sulfamoyl, sulfonamido, nitro, trifluoromethyl, cyano, azido, heterocyclyl, alkylaryl, or an aromatic or heteroaromatic moieties. Examples of halogen substituted alkoxy groups include, but are not limited to, fluoromethoxy, difluoromethoxy, trifluoromethoxy, chloromethoxy, dichloromethoxy, trichloromethoxy, etc.
The term “heteroatom” includes atoms of any element other than carbon or hydrogen. Preferred heteroatoms are nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur and phosphorus.
The term “hydroxy” or “hydroxyl” includes groups with an —OH or —O− (with an appropriate counterion).
The term “halogen” includes fluorine, bromine, chlorine, iodine, etc. The term “perhalogenated” generally refers to a moiety wherein all hydrogens are replaced by halogen atoms.
The term “substituted” includes independently selected substituents which can be placed on the moiety and which allow the molecule to perform its intended function. Examples of sub stituents include alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, aryl, (CR′R″)0-3NR′R″, (CR′R″)0-3CN, NO2, halogen, (CR′R″)0-3C(halogen)3, (CR′R″)0-3CH(halogen)2, (CR′R″)0-3CH2(halogen), (CR′R″)0-3CONR′R″, (CR′R″)0-3S(O)1-2NR′R″, (CR′R″)0-3CHO, (CR′R″)0-3O(CR′R″)0-3H, (CR′R″)0-3S(O)0-2R′, (CR′R″)0-3O(CR′R″)0-3H, (CR′R″)0-3COR′, (CR′R″)0-3CO2R′, or (CR′R″)0-3OR′ groups; wherein each R′ and R″ are each independently hydrogen, a C1-C5 alkyl, C2-C5 alkenyl, C2-C5 alkynyl, or aryl group, or R′ and R″ taken together are a benzylidene group or a —(CH2)2O(CH2)2— group.
The term “amine” or “amino” includes compounds or moieties in which a nitrogen atom is covalently bonded to at least one carbon or heteroatom. The term “alkyl amino” includes groups and compounds wherein the nitrogen is bound to at least one additional alkyl group. The term “dialkyl amino” includes groups wherein the nitrogen atom is bound to at least two additional alkyl groups.
The term “ether” includes compounds or moieties which contain an oxygen bonded to two different carbon atoms or heteroatoms. For example, the term includes “alkoxyalkyl,” which refers to an alkyl, alkenyl, or alkynyl group covalently bonded to an oxygen atom which is covalently bonded to another alkyl group.
The term “base” includes the known purine and pyrimidine heterocyclic bases, deazapurines, and analogs (including heterocyclic substituted analogs, e.g., aminoethyoxy phenoxazine), derivatives (e.g., 1-alkyl-, 1-alkenyl-, heteroaromatic- and 1-alkynyl derivatives) and tautomers thereof. Examples of purines include adenine, guanine, inosine, diaminopurine, and xanthine and analogs (e.g., 8-oxo-N6-methyladenine or 7-diazaxanthine) and derivatives thereof. Pyrimidines include, for example, thymine, uracil, and cytosine, and their analogs (e.g., 5-methylcytosine, 5-methyluracil, 5-(1-propynyl)uracil, 5-(1-propynyl)cytosine and 4,4-ethanocytosine). Other examples of suitable bases include non-purinyl and non-pyrimidinyl bases such as 2-aminopyridine and triazines.
In a preferred embodiment, the nucleomonomers of an oligonucleotide of the invention are RNA nucleotides. In another preferred embodiment, the nucleomonomers of an oligonucleotide of the invention are modified RNA nucleotides. Thus, the oligunucleotides contain modified RNA nucleotides.
The term “nucleoside” includes bases which are covalently attached to a sugar moiety, preferably ribose or deoxyribose. Examples of preferred nucleosides include ribonucleosides and deoxyribonucleosides. Nucleosides also include bases linked to amino acids or amino acid analogs which may comprise free carboxyl groups, free amino groups, or protecting groups. Suitable protecting groups are well known in the art (see P. G. M. Wuts and T. W. Greene, “Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis”, 2nd Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1999).
The term “nucleotide” includes nucleosides which further comprise a phosphate group or a phosphate analog.
As used herein, the term “linkage” includes a naturally occurring, unmodified phosphodiester moiety (—O—(PO2−)—O—) that covalently couples adjacent nucleomonomers. As used herein, the term “substitute linkage” includes any analog or derivative of the native phosphodiester group that covalently couples adjacent nucleomonomers. Substitute linkages include phosphodiester analogs, e.g., phosphorothioate, phosphorodithioate, and P-ethyoxyphosphodiester, P-ethoxyphosphodiester, P-alkyloxyphosphotriester, methylphosphonate, and nonphosphorus containing linkages, e.g., acetals and amides. Such substitute linkages are known in the art (e.g., Bjergarde et al. 1991. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:5843; Caruthers et al. 1991. Nucleosides Nucleotides. 10:47). In certain embodiments, non-hydrolizable linkages are preferred, such as phosphorothiate linkages.
In certain embodiments, oligonucleotides of the invention comprise hydrophobically modified nucleotides or “hydrophobic modifications.” As used herein “hydrophobic modifications” refers to bases that are modified such that (1) overall hydrophobicity of the base is significantly increased, and/or (2) the base is still capable of forming close to regular Watson-Crick interaction. Several non-limiting examples of base modifications include 5-position uridine and cytidine modifications such as methyl, ethyl, phenyl, 4-pyridyl, 2-pyridyl, indolyl, and isobutyl, phenyl (C6H5OH); tryptophanyl (C8H6N)CH2CH(NH2)CO), butyl, aminobenzyl; and naphthyl.
In certain embodiments, oligonucleotides of the invention comprise 3′ and 5′ termini (except for circular oligonucleotides). In one embodiment, the 3′ and 5′ termini of an oligonucleotide can be substantially protected from nucleases e.g., by modifying the 3′ or 5′ linkages (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,849,902 and WO 98/13526). For example, oligonucleotides can be made resistant by the inclusion of a “blocking group.” The term “blocking group” as used herein refers to substituents (e.g., other than OH groups) that can be attached to oligonucleotides or nucleomonomers, either as protecting groups or coupling groups for synthesis (e.g., FITC, propyl (CH2—CH2—CH3), glycol (—O—CH2—CH2—O—) phosphate (PO32−), hydrogen phosphonate, or phosphoramidite). “Blocking groups” also include “end blocking groups” or “exonuclease blocking groups” which protect the 5′ and 3′ termini of the oligonucleotide, including modified nucleotides and non-nucleotide exonuclease resistant structures.
Exemplary end-blocking groups include cap structures (e.g., a 7-methylguanosine cap), inverted nucleomonomers, e.g., with 3′-3′ or 5′-5′ end inversions (see, e.g., Ortiagao et al. 1992. Antisense Res. Dev. 2:129), methylphosphonate, phosphoramidite, non-nucleotide groups (e.g., non-nucleotide linkers, amino linkers, conjugates) and the like. The 3′ terminal nucleomonomer can comprise a modified sugar moiety. The 3′ terminal nucleomonomer comprises a 3′-O that can optionally be substituted by a blocking group that prevents 3′-exonuclease degradation of the oligonucleotide. For example, the 3′-hydroxyl can be esterified to a nucleotide through a 3′→3′ internucleotide linkage. For example, the alkyloxy radical can be methoxy, ethoxy, or isopropoxy, and preferably, ethoxy. Optionally, the 3′→3′ linked nucleotide at the 3′ terminus can be linked by a substitute linkage. To reduce nuclease degradation, the 5′ most 3′→5′ linkage can be a modified linkage, e.g., a phosphorothioate or a P-alkyloxyphosphotriester linkage. Preferably, the two 5′ most 3′→5′ linkages are modified linkages. Optionally, the 5′ terminal hydroxy moiety can be esterified with a phosphorus containing moiety, e.g., phosphate, phosphorothioate, or P-ethoxyphosphate.
Another type of conjugates that can be attached to the end (3′ or 5′ end), the loop region, or any other parts of the miniRNA might include a sterol, sterol type molecule, peptide, small molecule, protein, etc. In some embodiments, a miniRNA may contain more than one conjugates (same or different chemical nature). In some embodiments, the conjugate is cholesterol.
Another way to increase target gene specificity, or to reduce off-target silencing effect, is to introduce a 2′-modification (such as the 2′-O methyl modification) at a position corresponding to the second 5′-end nucleotide of the guide sequence. This allows the positioning of this 2′-modification in the Dicer-resistant hairpin structure, thus enabling one to design better RNAi constructs with less or no off-target silencing.
In one embodiment, a hairpin polynucleotide of the invention can comprise one nucleic acid portion which is DNA and one nucleic acid portion which is RNA. Antisense (guide) sequences of the invention can be “chimeric oligonucleotides” which comprise an RNA-like and a DNA-like region.
The language “RNase H activating region” includes a region of an oligonucleotide, e.g., a chimeric oligonucleotide, that is capable of recruiting RNase H to cleave the target RNA strand to which the oligonucleotide binds. Typically, the RNase activating region contains a minimal core (of at least about 3-5, typically between about 3-12, more typically, between about 5-12, and more preferably between about 5-10 contiguous nucleomonomers) of DNA or DNA-like nucleomonomers. (See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,849,902). Preferably, the RNase H activating region comprises about nine contiguous deoxyribose containing nucleomonomers.
The language “non-activating region” includes a region of an antisense sequence, e.g., a chimeric oligonucleotide, that does not recruit or activate RNase H. Preferably, a non-activating region does not comprise phosphorothioate DNA. The oligonucleotides of the invention comprise at least one non-activating region. In one embodiment, the non-activating region can be stabilized against nucleases or can provide specificity for the target by being complementary to the target and forming hydrogen bonds with the target nucleic acid molecule, which is to be bound by the oligonucleotide.
In one embodiment, at least a portion of the contiguous polynucleotides are linked by a substitute linkage, e.g., a phosphorothioate linkage.
In certain embodiments, most or all of the nucleotides beyond the guide sequence (2′-modified or not) are linked by phosphorothioate linkages. Such constructs tend to have improved pharmacokinetics due to their higher affinity for serum proteins. The phosphorothioate linkages in the non-guide sequence portion of the polynucleotide generally do not interfere with guide strand activity, once the latter is loaded into RISC.
Antisense (guide) sequences of the present invention may include “morpholino oligonucleotides.” Morpholino oligonucleotides are non-ionic and function by an RNase H-independent mechanism. Each of the 4 genetic bases (Adenine, Cytosine, Guanine, and Thymine/Uracil) of the morpholino oligonucleotides is linked to a 6-membered morpholine ring. Morpholino oligonucleotides are made by joining the 4 different subunit types by, e.g., non-ionic phosphorodiamidate inter-subunit linkages. Morpholino oligonucleotides have many advantages including: complete resistance to nucleases (Antisense & Nucl. Acid Drug Dev. 1996. 6:267); predictable targeting (Biochemica Biophysica Acta. 1999. 1489:141); reliable activity in cells (Antisense & Nucl. Acid Drug Dev. 1997. 7:63); excellent sequence specificity (Antisense & Nucl. Acid Drug Dev. 1997. 7:151); minimal non-antisense activity (Biochemica Biophysica Acta. 1999. 1489:141); and simple osmotic or scrape delivery (Antisense & Nucl. Acid Drug Dev. 1997. 7:291). Morpholino oligonucleotides are also preferred because of their non-toxicity at high doses. A discussion of the preparation of morpholino oligonucleotides can be found in Antisense & Nucl. Acid Drug Dev. 1997. 7:187.
The chemical modifications described herein are believed, based on the data described herein, to promote single stranded polynucleotide loading into the RISC. Single stranded polynucleotides have been shown to be active in loading into RISC and inducing gene silencing. However, the level of activity for single stranded polynucleotides appears to be 2 to 4 orders of magnitude lower when compared to a duplex polynucleotide.
The present invention provides a description of the chemical modification patterns, which may (a) significantly increase stability of the single stranded polynucleotide (b) promote efficient loading of the polynucleotide into the RISC complex and (c) improve uptake of the single stranded nucleotide by the cell.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides a description of the chemical modifications patterns, which improve functionality of RISC inhibiting polynucleotides. Single stranded polynucleotides have been shown to inhibit activity of a preloaded RISC complex through the substrate competition mechanism. For these types of molecules, conventionally called antagomers, the activity usually requires high concentration and in vivo delivery is not very effective. The present invention provides a description of the chemical modification patterns, which may (a) significantly increase stability of the single stranded polynucleotide (b) promote efficient recognition of the polynucleotide by the RISC as a substrate and/or (c) improve uptake of the single stranded nucleotide by the cell.
The modifications provided by the present invention are applicable to all polynucleotides. This includes single stranded RISC entering polynucleotides, single stranded RISC inhibiting polynucleotides, conventional duplexed polynucleotides of variable length (15-40 bp),asymmetric duplexed polynucleotides, and the like. Polynucleotides may be modified with wide variety of chemical modification patterns, including 5′ end, ribose, backbone and hydrophobic nucleoside modifications.
Synthesis
Oligonucleotides of the invention can be synthesized by any method known in the art, e.g., using enzymatic synthesis and/or chemical synthesis. The oligonucleotides can be synthesized in vitro (e.g., using enzymatic synthesis and chemical synthesis) or in vivo (using recombinant DNA technology well known in the art).
In a preferred embodiment, chemical synthesis is used for modified polynucleotides. Chemical synthesis of linear oligonucleotides is well known in the art and can be achieved by solution or solid phase techniques. Preferably, synthesis is by solid phase methods. Oligonucleotides can be made by any of several different synthetic procedures including the phosphoramidite, phosphite triester, H-phosphonate, and phosphotriester methods, typically by automated synthesis methods.
Oligonucleotide synthesis protocols are well known in the art and can be found, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,830,653; WO 98/13526; Stec et al. 1984. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106:6077; Stec et al. 1985. J. Org. Chem. 50:3908; Stec et al. J. Chromatog. 1985. 326:263; LaPlanche et al. 1986. Nucl. Acid. Res. 1986. 14:9081; Fasman G. D., 1989. Practical Handbook of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 1989. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.; Lamone. 1993. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 21:1; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,013,830; 5,214,135; 5,525,719; Kawasaki et al. 1993. J. Med. Chem. 36:831; WO 92/03568; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,276,019; and 5,264,423.
The synthesis method selected can depend on the length of the desired oligonucleotide and such choice is within the skill of the ordinary artisan. For example, the phosphoramidite and phosphite triester method can produce oligonucleotides having 175 or more nucleotides, while the H-phosphonate method works well for oligonucleotides of less than 100 nucleotides. If modified bases are incorporated into the oligonucleotide, and particularly if modified phosphodiester linkages are used, then the synthetic procedures are altered as needed according to known procedures. In this regard, Uhlmann et al. (1990, Chemical Reviews 90:543-584) provide references and outline procedures for making oligonucleotides with modified bases and modified phosphodiester linkages. Other exemplary methods for making oligonucleotides are taught in Sonveaux. 1994. “Protecting Groups in Oligonucleotide Synthesis”; Agrawal. Methods in Molecular Biology 26:1. Exemplary synthesis methods are also taught in “Oligonucleotide Synthesis—A Practical Approach” (Gait, M. J. IRL Press at Oxford University Press. 1984). Moreover, linear oligonucleotides of defined sequence, including some sequences with modified nucleotides, are readily available from several commercial sources.
The oligonucleotides may be purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, or by any of a number of chromatographic methods, including gel chromatography and high pressure liquid chromatography. To confirm a nucleotide sequence, especially unmodified nucleotide sequences, oligonucleotides may be subjected to DNA sequencing by any of the known procedures, including Maxam and Gilbert sequencing, Sanger sequencing, capillary electrophoresis sequencing, the wandering spot sequencing procedure or by using selective chemical degradation of oligonucleotides bound to Hybond paper. Sequences of short oligonucleotides can also be analyzed by laser desorption mass spectroscopy or by fast atom bombardment (McNeal, et al., 1982, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104:976; Viari, et al., 1987, Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom. 14:83; Grotjahn et al., 1982, Nuc. Acid Res. 10:4671). Sequencing methods are also available for RNA oligonucleotides.
The quality of oligonucleotides synthesized can be verified by testing the oligonucleotide by capillary electrophoresis and denaturing strong anion HPLC (SAX-HPLC) using, e.g., the method of Bergot and Egan. 1992. J. Chrom. 599:35.
Other exemplary synthesis techniques are well known in the art (see, e.g., Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, Second Edition (1989); DNA Cloning, Volumes I and II (DN Glover Ed. 1985); Oligonucleotide Synthesis (M J Gait Ed, 1984; Nucleic Acid Hybridisation (B D Hames and S J Higgins eds. 1984); A Practical Guide to Molecular Cloning (1984); or the series, Methods in Enzymology (Academic Press, Inc.)).
In certain embodiments, the subject RNAi constructs or at least portions thereof are transcribed from expression vectors encoding the subject constructs. Any art recognized vectors may be use for this purpose. The transcribed RNAi constructs may be isolated and purified, before desired modifications (such as replacing an unmodified sense strand with a modified one, etc.) are carried out.
Delivery/Carrier
Uptake of Oligonucleotides by Cells
Oligonucleotides and oligonucleotide compositions are contacted with (i.e., brought into contact with, also referred to herein as administered or delivered to) and taken up by one or more cells or a cell lysate. The term “cells” includes prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, preferably vertebrate cells, and, more preferably, mammalian cells. In a preferred embodiment, the oligonucleotide compositions of the invention are contacted with human cells.
Oligonucleotide compositions of the invention can be contacted with cells in vitro, e.g., in a test tube or culture dish, (and may or may not be introduced into a subject) or in vivo, e.g., in a subject such as a mammalian subject. Oligonucleotides are taken up by cells at a slow rate by endocytosis, but endocytosed oligonucleotides are generally sequestered and not available, e.g., for hybridization to a target nucleic acid molecule. In one embodiment, cellular uptake can be facilitated by electroporation or calcium phosphate precipitation. However, these procedures are only useful for in vitro or ex vivo embodiments, are not convenient and, in some cases, are associated with cell toxicity.
In another embodiment, delivery of oligonucleotides into cells can be enhanced by suitable art recognized methods including calcium phosphate, DMSO, glycerol or dextran, electroporation, or by transfection, e.g., using cationic, anionic, or neutral lipid compositions or liposomes using methods known in the art (see e.g., WO 90/14074; WO 91/16024; WO 91/17424; U.S. Pat. No. 4,897,355; Bergan et al. 1993. Nucleic Acids Research. 21:3567). Enhanced delivery of oligonucleotides can also be mediated by the use of vectors (See e.g., Shi, Y. 2003. Trends Genet 2003 Jan. 19:9; Reichhart J M et al. Genesis. 2002. 34(1-2):1604, Yu et al. 2002. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 99:6047; Sui et al. 2002. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 99:5515) viruses, polyamine or polycation conjugates using compounds such as polylysine, protamine, or Ni, N12-bis (ethyl) spermine (see, e.g., Bartzatt, R. et al. 1989. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 11:133; Wagner E. et al. 1992. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88:4255).
In certain embodiments, the miniRNA of the invention may be delivered by using various beta-glucan containing particles, such as those described in US 2005/0281781 A1, WO 2006/007372, and WO 2007/050643 (all incorporated herein by reference). In certain embodiments, the beta-glucan particle is derived from yeast. In certain embodiments, the payload trapping molecule is a polymer, such as those with a molecular weight of at least about 1000 Da, 10,000 Da, 50,000 Da, 100 kDa, 500 kDa, etc. Preferred polymers include (without limitation) cationic polymers, chitosans, or PEI (polyethylenimine), etc.
Such beta-glucan based delivery system may be formulated for oral delivery, where the orally delivered beta-glucan/miniRNA constructs may be engulfed by macrophages or other related phagocytic cells, which may in turn release the miniRNA constructs in selected in vivo sites. Alternatively or in addition, the miniRNA may changes the expression of certain macrophage target genes.
The optimal protocol for uptake of oligonucleotides will depend upon a number of factors, the most crucial being the type of cells that are being used. Other factors that are important in uptake include, but are not limited to, the nature and concentration of the oligonucleotide, the confluence of the cells, the type of culture the cells are in (e.g., a suspension culture or plated) and the type of media in which the cells are grown.
Encapsulating Agents
Encapsulating agents entrap oligonucleotides within vesicles. In another embodiment of the invention, an oligonucleotide may be associated with a carrier or vehicle, e.g., liposomes or micelles, although other carriers could be used, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art. Liposomes are vesicles made of a lipid bilayer having a structure similar to biological membranes. Such carriers are used to facilitate the cellular uptake or targeting of the oligonucleotide, or improve the oligonucleotide's pharmacokinetic or toxicologic properties.
For example, the oligonucleotides of the present invention may also be administered encapsulated in liposomes, pharmaceutical compositions wherein the active ingredient is contained either dispersed or variously present in corpuscles consisting of aqueous concentric layers adherent to lipidic layers. The oligonucleotides, depending upon solubility, may be present both in the aqueous layer and in the lipidic layer, or in what is generally termed a liposomic suspension. The hydrophobic layer, generally but not exclusively, comprises phopholipids such as lecithin and sphingomyelin, steroids such as cholesterol, more or less ionic surfactants such as diacetylphosphate, stearylamine, or phosphatidic acid, or other materials of a hydrophobic nature. The diameters of the liposomes generally range from about 15 nm to about 5 microns.
A “hydrophobic modified polynucleotide” as used herein is a polynucleotide of the invention(i.e. sd-rxRNA) that has at least one modification that renders the polynucleotide more hydrophobic than the polynucleotide was prior to modification. The modification may be achieved by attaching (covalently or non-covalently) a hydrophobic molecule to the polynucleotide. In some instances the hydrophobic molecule is or includes a lipophilic group.
The term “lipophilic group” means a group that has a higher affinity for lipids than its affinity for water. Examples of lipophilic groups include, but are not limited to, cholesterol, a cholesteryl or modified cholesteryl residue, adamantine, dihydrotesterone, long chain alkyl, long chain alkenyl, long chain alkynyl, olely-lithocholic, cholenic, oleoyl-cholenic, palmityl, heptadecyl, myrisityl, bile acids, cholic acid or taurocholic acid, deoxycholate, oleyl litocholic acid, oleoyl cholenic acid, glycolipids, phospholipids, sphingolipids, isoprenoids, such as steroids, vitamins, such as vitamin E, fatty acids either saturated or unsaturated, fatty acid esters, such as triglycerides, pyrenes, porphyrines, Texaphyrine, adamantane, acridines, biotin, coumarin, fluorescein, rhodamine, Texas-Red, digoxygenin, dimethoxytrityl, t-butyldimethylsilyl, t-butyldiphenylsilyl, cyanine dyes (e.g. Cy3 or Cy5), Hoechst 33258 dye, psoralen, or ibuprofen. The cholesterol moiety may be reduced (e.g. as in cholestan) or may be substituted (e.g. by halogen). A combination of different lipophilic groups in one molecule is also possible.
The hydrophobic molecule may be attached at various positions of the polynucleotide. As described above, the hydrophobic molecule may be linked to the terminal residue of the polynucleotide such as the 3′ of 5′-end of the polynucleotide. Alternatively, it may be linked to an internal nucleotide or a nucleotide on a branch of the polynucleotide. The hydrophobic molecule may be attached, for instance to a 2′-position of the nucleotide. The hydrophobic molecule may also be linked to the heterocyclic base, the sugar or the backbone of a nucleotide of the polynucleotide.
The hydrophobic molecule may be connected to the polynucleotide by a linker moiety. Optionally the linker moiety is a non-nucleotidic linker moiety. Non-nucleotidic linkers are e.g. abasic residues (dSpacer), oligoethyleneglycol, such as triethyleneglycol (spacer 9) or hexaethylenegylcol (spacer 18), or alkane-diol, such as butanediol. The spacer units are preferably linked by phosphodiester or phosphorothioate bonds. The linker units may appear just once in the molecule or may be incorporated several times, e.g. via phosphodiester, phosphorothioate, methylphosphonate, or amide linkages.
Typical conjugation protocols involve the synthesis of polynucleotides bearing an aminolinker at one or more positions of the sequence, however, a linker is not required. The amino group is then reacted with the molecule being conjugated using appropriate coupling or activating reagents. The conjugation reaction may be performed either with the polynucleotide still bound to a solid support or following cleavage of the polynucleotide in solution phase. Purification of the modified polynucleotide by HPLC typically results in a pure material.
In some embodiments the hydrophobic molecule is a sterol type conjugate, a PhytoSterol conjugate, cholesterol conjugate, sterol type conjugate with altered side chain length, fatty acid conjugate, any other hydrophobic group conjugate, and/or hydrophobic modifications of the internal nucleoside, which provide sufficient hydrophobicity to be incorporated into micelles.
For purposes of the present invention, the term “sterols”, refers or steroid alcohols are a subgroup of steroids with a hydroxyl group at the 3-position of the A-ring. They are amphipathic lipids synthesized from acetyl-coenzyme A via the HMG-CoA reductase pathway. The overall molecule is quite flat. The hydroxyl group on the A ring is polar. The rest of the aliphatic chain is non-polar. Usually sterols are considered to have an 8 carbon chain at position 17.
For purposes of the present invention, the term “sterol type molecules”, refers to steroid alcohols, which are similar in structure to sterols. The main difference is the structure of the ring and number of carbons in a position 21 attached side chain.
For purposes of the present invention, the term “PhytoSterols” (also called plant sterols) are a group of steroid alcohols, phytochemicals naturally occurring in plants. There are more then 200 different known PhytoSterols
For purposes of the present invention, the term “Sterol side chain” refers to a chemical composition of a side chain attached at the position 17 of sterol-type molecule. In a standard definition sterols are limited to a 4 ring structure carrying a 8 carbon chain at position 17. In this invention, the sterol type molecules with side chain longer and shorter than conventional are described. The side chain may branched or contain double back bones.
Thus, sterols useful in the invention, for example, include cholesterols, as well as unique sterols in which position 17 has attached side chain of 2-7 or longer then 9 carbons. In a particular embodiment, the length of the polycarbon tail is varied between 5 and 9 carbons.
Alternatively the polynucleotide may be bound to a protein, peptide or positively charged chemical that functions as the hydrophobic molecule. The proteins may be selected from the group consisting of protamine, dsRNA binding domain, and arginine rich peptides. Exemplary positively charged chemicals include spermine, spermidine, cadaverine, and putrescine.
In another embodiment hydrophobic molecule conjugates may demonstrate even higher efficacy when it is combined with optimal chemical modification patterns of the polynucleotide (as described herein in detail), containing but not limited to hydrophobic modifications, phosphorothioate modifications, and 2′ ribo modifications.
In another embodiment the sterol type molecule may be a naturally occurring PhytoSterols such as those shown in
Targeting Agents
The delivery of oligonucleotides can also be improved by targeting the oligonucleotides to a cellular receptor. The targeting moieties can be conjugated to the oligonucleotides or attached to a carrier group (i.e., poly(L-lysine) or liposomes) linked to the oligonucleotides. This method is well suited to cells that display specific receptor-mediated endocytosis.
For instance, oligonucleotide conjugates to 6-phosphomannosylated proteins are internalized 20-fold more efficiently by cells expressing mannose 6-phosphate specific receptors than free oligonucleotides. The oligonucleotides may also be coupled to a ligand for a cellular receptor using a biodegradable linker. In another example, the delivery construct is mannosylated streptavidin which forms a tight complex with biotinylated oligonucleotides. Mannosylated streptavidin was found to increase 20-fold the internalization of biotinylated oligonucleotides. (Vlassov et al. 1994. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1197:95-108).
In addition specific ligands can be conjugated to the polylysine component of polylysine-based delivery systems. For example, transferrin-polylysine, adenovirus-polylysine, and influenza virus hemagglutinin HA-2 N-terminal fusogenic peptides-polylysine conjugates greatly enhance receptor-mediated DNA delivery in eucaryotic cells. Mannosylated glycoprotein conjugated to poly(L-lysine) in aveolar macrophages has been employed to enhance the cellular uptake of oligonucleotides. Liang et al. 1999. Pharmazie 54:559-566.
Because malignant cells have an increased need for essential nutrients such as folic acid and transferrin, these nutrients can be used to target oligonucleotides to cancerous cells. For example, when folic acid is linked to poly(L-lysine) enhanced oligonucleotide uptake is seen in promyelocytic leukaemia (HL-60) cells and human melanoma (M-14) cells. Ginobbi et al. 1997. Anticancer Res. 17:29. In another example, liposomes coated with maleylated bovine serum albumin, folic acid, or ferric protoporphyrin IX, show enhanced cellular uptake of oligonucleotides in murine macrophages, KB cells, and 2.2.15 human hepatoma cells. Liang et al. 1999. Pharmazie 54:559-566.
Liposomes naturally accumulate in the liver, spleen, and reticuloendothelial system (so-called, passive targeting). By coupling liposomes to various ligands such as antibodies are protein A, they can be actively targeted to specific cell populations. For example, protein A-bearing liposomes may be pretreated with H-2K specific antibodies which are targeted to the mouse major histocompatibility complex-encoded H-2K protein expressed on L cells. (Vlassov et al. 1994. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1197:95-108).
Other in vitro and/or in vivo delivery of RNAi reagents are known in the art, and can be used to deliver the subject RNAi constructs. See, for example, U.S. patent application publications 20080152661, 20080112916, 20080107694, 20080038296, 20070231392, 20060240093, 20060178327, 20060008910, 20050265957, 20050064595, 20050042227, 20050037496, 20050026286, 20040162235, 20040072785, 20040063654, 20030157030, WO 2008/036825, WO04/065601, and AU2004206255B2, just to name a few (all incorporated by reference).
Administration
The optimal course of administration or delivery of the oligonucleotides may vary depending upon the desired result and/or on the subject to be treated. As used herein “administration” refers to contacting cells with oligonucleotides and can be performed in vitro or in vivo. The dosage of oligonucleotides may be adjusted to optimally reduce expression of a protein translated from a target nucleic acid molecule, e.g., as measured by a readout of RNA stability or by a therapeutic response, without undue experimentation.
For example, expression of the protein encoded by the nucleic acid target can be measured to determine whether or not the dosage regimen needs to be adjusted accordingly. In addition, an increase or decrease in RNA or protein levels in a cell or produced by a cell can be measured using any art recognized technique. By determining whether transcription has been decreased, the effectiveness of the oligonucleotide in inducing the cleavage of a target RNA can be determined.
Any of the above-described oligonucleotide compositions can be used alone or in conjunction with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. As used herein, “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” includes appropriate solvents, dispersion media, coatings, antibacterial and antifungal agents, isotonic and absorption delaying agents, and the like. The use of such media and agents for pharmaceutical active substances is well known in the art. Except insofar as any conventional media or agent is incompatible with the active ingredient, it can be used in the therapeutic compositions. Supplementary active ingredients can also be incorporated into the compositions.
Oligonucleotides may be incorporated into liposomes or liposomes modified with polyethylene glycol or admixed with cationic lipids for parenteral administration. Incorporation of additional substances into the liposome, for example, antibodies reactive against membrane proteins found on specific target cells, can help target the oligonucleotides to specific cell types.
Moreover, the present invention provides for administering the subject oligonucleotides with an osmotic pump providing continuous infusion of such oligonucleotides, for example, as described in Rataiczak et al. (1992 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:11823-11827). Such osmotic pumps are commercially available, e.g., from Alzet Inc. (Palo Alto, Calif.). Topical administration and parenteral administration in a cationic lipid carrier are preferred.
With respect to in vivo applications, the formulations of the present invention can be administered to a patient in a variety of forms adapted to the chosen route of administration, e.g., parenterally, orally, or intraperitoneally. Parenteral administration, which is preferred, includes administration by the following routes: intravenous; intramuscular; interstitially; intraarterially; subcutaneous; intra ocular; intrasynovial; trans epithelial, including transdermal; pulmonary via inhalation; ophthalmic; sublingual and buccal; topically, including ophthalmic; dermal; ocular; rectal; and nasal inhalation via insufflation.
Pharmaceutical preparations for parenteral administration include aqueous solutions of the active compounds in water-soluble or water-dispersible form. In addition, suspensions of the active compounds as appropriate oily injection suspensions may be administered. Suitable lipophilic solvents or vehicles include fatty oils, for example, sesame oil, or synthetic fatty acid esters, for example, ethyl oleate or triglycerides. Aqueous injection suspensions may contain substances which increase the viscosity of the suspension include, for example, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, sorbitol, or dextran, optionally, the suspension may also contain stabilizers. The oligonucleotides of the invention can be formulated in liquid solutions, preferably in physiologically compatible buffers such as Hank's solution or Ringer's solution. In addition, the oligonucleotides may be formulated in solid form and redissolved or suspended immediately prior to use. Lyophilized forms are also included in the invention.
Pharmaceutical preparations for topical administration include transdermal patches, ointments, lotions, creams, gels, drops, sprays, suppositories, liquids and powders. In addition, conventional pharmaceutical carriers, aqueous, powder or oily bases, or thickeners may be used in pharmaceutical preparations for topical administration.
Pharmaceutical preparations for oral administration include powders or granules, suspensions or solutions in water or non-aqueous media, capsules, sachets or tablets. In addition, thickeners, flavoring agents, diluents, emulsifiers, dispersing aids, or binders may be used in pharmaceutical preparations for oral administration.
For transmucosal or transdermal administration, penetrants appropriate to the barrier to be permeated are used in the formulation. Such penetrants are known in the art, and include, for example, for transmucosal administration bile salts and fusidic acid derivatives, and detergents. Transmucosal administration may be through nasal sprays or using suppositories. For oral administration, the oligonucleotides are formulated into conventional oral administration forms such as capsules, tablets, and tonics. For topical administration, the oligonucleotides of the invention are formulated into ointments, salves, gels, or creams as known in the art.
Drug delivery vehicles can be chosen e.g., for in vitro, for systemic, or for topical administration. These vehicles can be designed to serve as a slow release reservoir or to deliver their contents directly to the target cell. An advantage of using some direct delivery drug vehicles is that multiple molecules are delivered per uptake. Such vehicles have been shown to increase the circulation half-life of drugs that would otherwise be rapidly cleared from the blood stream. Some examples of such specialized drug delivery vehicles which fall into this category are liposomes, hydrogels, cyclodextrins, biodegradable nanocapsules, and bioadhesive microspheres.
The described oligonucleotides may be administered systemically to a subject. Systemic absorption refers to the entry of drugs into the blood stream followed by distribution throughout the entire body. Administration routes which lead to systemic absorption include: intravenous, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, and intranasal. Each of these administration routes delivers the oligonucleotide to accessible diseased cells. Following subcutaneous administration, the therapeutic agent drains into local lymph nodes and proceeds through the lymphatic network into the circulation. The rate of entry into the circulation has been shown to be a function of molecular weight or size. The use of a liposome or other drug carrier localizes the oligonucleotide at the lymph node. The oligonucleotide can be modified to diffuse into the cell, or the liposome can directly participate in the delivery of either the unmodified or modified oligonucleotide into the cell.
The chosen method of delivery will result in entry into cells. Preferred delivery methods include liposomes (10-400 nm), hydrogels, controlled-release polymers, and other pharmaceutically applicable vehicles, and microinjection or electroporation (for ex vivo treatments).
The pharmaceutical preparations of the present invention may be prepared and formulated as emulsions. Emulsions are usually heterogeneous systems of one liquid dispersed in another in the form of droplets usually exceeding 0.1 μm in diameter. The emulsions of the present invention may contain excipients such as emulsifiers, stabilizers, dyes, fats, oils, waxes, fatty acids, fatty alcohols, fatty esters, humectants, hydrophilic colloids, preservatives, and anti-oxidants may also be present in emulsions as needed. These excipients may be present as a solution in either the aqueous phase, oily phase or itself as a separate phase.
Examples of naturally occurring emulsifiers that may be used in emulsion formulations of the present invention include lanolin, beeswax, phosphatides, lecithin and acacia. Finely divided solids have also been used as good emulsifiers especially in combination with surfactants and in viscous preparations. Examples of finely divided solids that may be used as emulsifiers include polar inorganic solids, such as heavy metal hydroxides, nonswelling clays such as bentonite, attapulgite, hectorite, kaolin, montrnorillonite, colloidal aluminum silicate and colloidal magnesium aluminum silicate, pigments and nonpolar solids such as carbon or glyceryl tristearate.
Examples of preservatives that may be included in the emulsion formulations include methyl paraben, propyl paraben, quaternary ammonium salts, benzalkonium chloride, esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid, and boric acid. Examples of antioxidants that may be included in the emulsion formulations include free radical scavengers such as tocopherols, alkyl gallates, butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, or reducing agents such as ascorbic acid and sodium metabisulfite, and antioxidant synergists such as citric acid, tartaric acid, and lecithin.
In one embodiment, the compositions of oligonucleotides are formulated as microemulsions. A microemulsion is a system of water, oil and amphiphile which is a single optically isotropic and thermodynamically stable liquid solution. Typically microemulsions are prepared by first dispersing an oil in an aqueous surfactant solution and then adding a sufficient amount of a 4th component, generally an intermediate chain-length alcohol to form a transparent system.
Surfactants that may be used in the preparation of microemulsions include, but are not limited to, ionic surfactants, non-ionic surfactants, Brij 96, polyoxyethylene oleyl ethers, polyglycerol fatty acid esters, tetraglycerol monolaurate (ML310), tetraglycerol monooleate (MO310), hexaglycerol monooleate (PO310), hexaglycerol pentaoleate (PO500), decaglycerol monocaprate (MCA750), decaglycerol monooleate (MO750), decaglycerol sequioleate (S0750), decaglycerol decaoleate (DA0750), alone or in combination with cosurfactants. The cosurfactant, usually a short-chain alcohol such as ethanol, 1-propanol, and 1-butanol, serves to increase the interfacial fluidity by penetrating into the surfactant film and consequently creating a disordered film because of the void space generated among surfactant molecules.
Microemulsions may, however, be prepared without the use of cosurfactants and alcohol-free self-emulsifying microemulsion systems are known in the art. The aqueous phase may typically be, but is not limited to, water, an aqueous solution of the drug, glycerol, PEG300, PEG400, polyglycerols, propylene glycols, and derivatives of ethylene glycol. The oil phase may include, but is not limited to, materials such as Captex 300, Captex 355, Capmul MCM, fatty acid esters, medium chain (C8-C12) mono, di, and tri-glycerides, polyoxyethylated glyceryl fatty acid esters, fatty alcohols, polyglycolized glycerides, saturated polyglycolized C8-C10 glycerides, vegetable oils and silicone oil.
Microemulsions are particularly of interest from the standpoint of drug solubilization and the enhanced absorption of drugs. Lipid based microemulsions (both oil/water and water/oil) have been proposed to enhance the oral bioavailability of drugs.
Microemulsions offer improved drug solubilization, protection of drug from enzymatic hydrolysis, possible enhancement of drug absorption due to surfactant-induced alterations in membrane fluidity and permeability, ease of preparation, ease of oral administration over solid dosage forms, improved clinical potency, and decreased toxicity (Constantinides et al., Pharmaceutical Research, 1994, 11:1385; Ho et al., J. Pharm. Sci., 1996, 85:138-143). Microemulsions have also been effective in the transdermal delivery of active components in both cosmetic and pharmaceutical applications. It is expected that the microemulsion compositions and formulations of the present invention will facilitate the increased systemic absorption of oligonucleotides from the gastrointestinal tract, as well as improve the local cellular uptake of oligonucleotides within the gastrointestinal tract, vagina, buccal cavity and other areas of administration.
In an embodiment, the present invention employs various penetration enhancers to affect the efficient delivery of nucleic acids, particularly oligonucleotides, to the skin of animals. Even non-lipophilic drugs may cross cell membranes if the membrane to be crossed is treated with a penetration enhancer. In addition to increasing the diffusion of non-lipophilic drugs across cell membranes, penetration enhancers also act to enhance the permeability of lipophilic drugs.
Five categories of penetration enhancers that may be used in the present invention include: surfactants, fatty acids, bile salts, chelating agents, and non-chelating non-surfactants. Other agents may be utilized to enhance the penetration of the administered oligonucleotides include: glycols such as ethylene glycol and propylene glycol, pyrrols such as 2-15 pyrrol, azones, and terpenes such as limonene, and menthone.
The oligonucleotides, especially in lipid formulations, can also be administered by coating a medical device, for example, a catheter, such as an angioplasty balloon catheter, with a cationic lipid formulation. Coating may be achieved, for example, by dipping the medical device into a lipid formulation or a mixture of a lipid formulation and a suitable solvent, for example, an aqueous-based buffer, an aqueous solvent, ethanol, methylene chloride, chloroform and the like. An amount of the formulation will naturally adhere to the surface of the device which is subsequently administered to a patient, as appropriate. Alternatively, a lyophilized mixture of a lipid formulation may be specifically bound to the surface of the device. Such binding techniques are described, for example, in K. Ishihara et al., Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 27, pp. 1309-1314 (1993), the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The useful dosage to be administered and the particular mode of administration will vary depending upon such factors as the cell type, or for in vivo use, the age, weight and the particular animal and region thereof to be treated, the particular oligonucleotide and delivery method used, the therapeutic or diagnostic use contemplated, and the form of the formulation, for example, suspension, emulsion, micelle or liposome, as will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Typically, dosage is administered at lower levels and increased until the desired effect is achieved. When lipids are used to deliver the oligonucleotides, the amount of lipid compound that is administered can vary and generally depends upon the amount of oligonucleotide agent being administered. For example, the weight ratio of lipid compound to oligonucleotide agent is preferably from about 1:1 to about 15:1, with a weight ratio of about 5:1 to about 10:1 being more preferred. Generally, the amount of cationic lipid compound which is administered will vary from between about 0.1 milligram (mg) to about 1 gram (g). By way of general guidance, typically between about 0.1 mg and about 10 mg of the particular oligonucleotide agent, and about 1 mg to about 100 mg of the lipid compositions, each per kilogram of patient body weight, is administered, although higher and lower amounts can be used.
The agents of the invention are administered to subjects or contacted with cells in a biologically compatible form suitable for pharmaceutical administration. By “biologically compatible form suitable for administration” is meant that the oligonucleotide is administered in a form in which any toxic effects are outweighed by the therapeutic effects of the oligonucleotide. In one embodiment, oligonucleotides can be administered to subjects. Examples of subjects include mammals, e.g., humans and other primates; cows, pigs, horses, and farming (agricultural) animals; dogs, cats, and other domesticated pets; mice, rats, and transgenic non-human animals.
Administration of an active amount of an oligonucleotide of the present invention is defined as an amount effective, at dosages and for periods of time necessary to achieve the desired result. For example, an active amount of an oligonucleotide may vary according to factors such as the type of cell, the oligonucleotide used, and for in vivo uses the disease state, age, sex, and weight of the individual, and the ability of the oligonucleotide to elicit a desired response in the individual. Establishment of therapeutic levels of oligonucleotides within the cell is dependent upon the rates of uptake and efflux or degradation. Decreasing the degree of degradation prolongs the intracellular half-life of the oligonucleotide. Thus, chemically-modified oligonucleotides, e.g., with modification of the phosphate backbone, may require different dosing.
The exact dosage of an oligonucleotide and number of doses administered will depend upon the data generated experimentally and in clinical trials. Several factors such as the desired effect, the delivery vehicle, disease indication, and the route of administration, will affect the dosage. Dosages can be readily determined by one of ordinary skill in the art and formulated into the subject pharmaceutical compositions. Preferably, the duration of treatment will extend at least through the course of the disease symptoms.
Dosage regim may be adjusted to provide the optimum therapeutic response. For example, the oligonucleotide may be repeatedly administered, e.g., several doses may be administered daily or the dose may be proportionally reduced as indicated by the exigencies of the therapeutic situation. One of ordinary skill in the art will readily be able to determine appropriate doses and schedules of administration of the subject oligonucleotides, whether the oligonucleotides are to be administered to cells or to subjects.
Physical methods of introducing nucleic acids include injection of a solution containing the nucleic acid, bombardment by particles covered by the nucleic acid, soaking the cell or organism in a solution of the nucleic acid, or electroporation of cell membranes in the presence of the nucleic acid. A viral construct packaged into a viral particle would accomplish both efficient introduction of an expression construct into the cell and transcription of nucleic acid encoded by the expression construct. Other methods known in the art for introducing nucleic acids to cells may be used, such as lipid-mediated carrier transport, chemical-mediated transport, such as calcium phosphate, and the like. Thus the nucleic acid may be introduced along with components that perform one or more of the following activities: enhance nucleic acid uptake by the cell, inhibit annealing of single strands, stabilize the single strands, or other-wise increase inhibition of the target gene.
Nucleic acid may be directly introduced into the cell (i.e., intracellularly); or introduced extracellularly into a cavity, interstitial space, into the circulation of an organism, introduced orally or by inhalation, or may be introduced by bathing a cell or organism in a solution containing the nucleic acid. Vascular or extravascular circulation, the blood or lymph system, and the cerebrospinal fluid are sites where the nucleic acid may be introduced.
The cell with the target gene may be derived from or contained in any organism. The organism may a plant, animal, protozoan, bacterium, virus, or fungus. The plant may be a monocot, dicot or gymnosperm; the animal may be a vertebrate or invertebrate. Preferred microbes are those used in agriculture or by industry, and those that are pathogenic for plants or animals.
Alternatively, vectors, e.g., transgenes encoding a siRNA of the invention can be engineered into a host cell or transgenic animal using art recognized techniques.
Another use for the nucleic acids of the present invention (or vectors or transgenes encoding same) is a functional analysis to be carried out in eukaryotic cells, or eukaryotic non-human organisms, preferably mammalian cells or organisms and most preferably human cells, e.g. cell lines such as HeLa or 293 or rodents, e.g. rats and mice. By administering a suitable nucleic acid of the invention which is sufficiently complementary to a target mRNA sequence to direct target-specific RNA interference, a specific knockout or knockdown phenotype can be obtained in a target cell, e.g. in cell culture or in a target organism.
Thus, a further subject matter of the invention is a eukaryotic cell or a eukaryotic non-human organism exhibiting a target gene-specific knockout or knockdown phenotype comprising a fully or at least partially deficient expression of at least one endogenous target gene wherein said cell or organism is transfected with at least one vector comprising DNA encoding an RNAi agent capable of inhibiting the expression of the target gene. It should be noted that the present invention allows a target-specific knockout or knockdown of several different endogenous genes due to the specificity of the RNAi agent.
Gene-specific knockout or knockdown phenotypes of cells or non-human organisms, particularly of human cells or non-human mammals may be used in analytic to procedures, e.g. in the functional and/or phenotypical analysis of complex physiological processes such as analysis of gene expression profiles and/or proteomes. Preferably the analysis is carried out by high throughput methods using oligonucleotide based chips.
Therapeutic Use
By inhibiting the expression of a gene, the oligonucleotide compositions of the present invention can be used to treat any disease involving the expression of a protein. Examples of diseases that can be treated by oligonucleotide compositions, just to illustrate, include: cancer, retinopathies, autoimmune diseases, inflammatory diseases (i.e., ICAM-1 related disorders, Psoriasis, Ulcerative Colitus, Crohn's disease), viral diseases (i.e., HIV, Hepatitis C), miRNA disorders, and cardiovascular diseases.
In one embodiment, in vitro treatment of cells with oligonucleotides can be used for ex vivo therapy of cells removed from a subject (e.g., for treatment of leukemia or viral infection) or for treatment of cells which did not originate in the subject, but are to be administered to the subject (e.g., to eliminate transplantation antigen expression on cells to be transplanted into a subject). In addition, in vitro treatment of cells can be used in non-therapeutic settings, e.g., to evaluate gene function, to study gene regulation and protein synthesis or to evaluate improvements made to oligonucleotides designed to modulate gene expression or protein synthesis. In vivo treatment of cells can be useful in certain clinical settings where it is desirable to inhibit the expression of a protein. There are numerous medical conditions for which antisense therapy is reported to be suitable (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,830,653) as well as respiratory syncytial virus infection (WO 95/22,553) influenza virus (WO 94/23,028), and malignancies (WO 94/08,003). Other examples of clinical uses of antisense sequences are reviewed, e.g., in Glaser. 1996. Genetic Engineering News 16:1. Exemplary targets for cleavage by oligonucleotides include, e.g., protein kinase Ca, ICAM-1, c-raf kinase, p53, c-myb, and the bcr/abl fusion gene found in chronic myelogenous leukemia.
The subject nucleic acids can be used in RNAi-based therapy in any animal having RNAi pathway, such as human, non-human primate, non-human mammal, non-human vertebrates, rodents (mice, rats, hamsters, rabbits, etc.), domestic livestock animals, pets (cats, dogs, etc.), Xenopus, fish, insects (Drosophila, etc.), and worms (C. elegans), etc.
The invention provides methods for inhibiting or preventing in a subject, a disease or condition associated with an aberrant or unwanted target gene expression or activity, by administering to the subject a nucleic acid of the invention. If appropriate, subjects are first treated with a priming agent so as to be more responsive to the subsequent RNAi therapy. Subjects at risk for a disease which is caused or contributed to by aberrant or unwanted target gene expression or activity can be identified by, for example, any or a combination of diagnostic or prognostic assays known in the art. Administration of a prophylactic agent can occur prior to the manifestation of symptoms characteristic of the target gene aberrancy, such that a disease or disorder is prevented or, alternatively, delayed in its progression. Depending on the type of target gene aberrancy, for example, a target gene, target gene agonist or target gene antagonist agent can be used for treating the subject.
In another aspect, the invention pertains to methods of modulating target gene expression, protein expression or activity for therapeutic purposes. Accordingly, in an exemplary embodiment, the methods of the invention involve contacting a cell capable of expressing target gene with a nucleic acid of the invention that is specific for the target gene or protein (e.g., is specific for the mRNA encoded by said gene or specifying the amino acid sequence of said protein) such that expression or one or more of the activities of target protein is modulated. These methods can be performed in vitro (e.g., by culturing the cell with the agent), in vivo (e.g., by administering the agent to a subject), or ex vivo. The subjects may be first treated with a priming agent so as to be more responsive to the subsequent RNAi therapy if desired. As such, the present invention provides methods of treating a subject afflicted with a disease or disorder characterized by aberrant or unwanted expression or activity of a target gene polypeptide or nucleic acid molecule. Inhibition of target gene activity is desirable in situations in which target gene is abnormally unregulated and/or in which decreased target gene activity is likely to have a beneficial effect.
Thus the therapeutic agents of the invention can be administered to subjects to treat (prophylactically or therapeutically) disorders associated with aberrant or unwanted target gene activity. In conjunction with such treatment, pharmacogenomics (i.e., the study of the relationship between an individual's genotype and that individual's response to a foreign compound or drug) may be considered. Differences in metabolism of therapeutics can lead to severe toxicity or therapeutic failure by altering the relation between dose and blood concentration of the pharmacologically active drug. Thus, a physician or clinician may consider applying knowledge obtained in relevant pharmacogenomics studies in determining whether to administer a therapeutic agent as well as tailoring the dosage and/or therapeutic regimen of treatment with a therapeutic agent. Pharmacogenomics deals with clinically significant hereditary variations in the response to drugs due to altered drug disposition and abnormal action in affected persons.
For the purposes of the invention, ranges may be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. It will be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges are significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint.
Moreover, for the purposes of the present invention, the term “a” or “an” entity refers to one or more of that entity; for example, “a protein” or “a nucleic acid molecule” refers to one or more of those compounds or at least one compound. As such, the terms “a” (or “an”), “one or more” and “at least one” can be used interchangeably herein. It is also to be noted that the terms “comprising”, “including”, and “having” can be used interchangeably. Furthermore, a compound “selected from the group consisting of” refers to one or more of the compounds in the list that follows, including mixtures (i.e., combinations) of two or more of the compounds. According to the present invention, an isolated, or biologically pure, protein or nucleic acid molecule is a compound that has been removed from its natural milieu. As such, “isolated” and “biologically pure” do not necessarily reflect the extent to which the compound has been purified. An isolated compound of the present invention can be obtained from its natural source, can be produced using molecular biology techniques or can be produced by chemical synthesis.
The present invention is further illustrated by the following Examples, which in no way should be construed as further limiting. The entire contents of all of the references (including literature references, issued patents, published patent applications, and co-pending patent applications) cited throughout this application are hereby expressly incorporated by reference.
Transfection of Minimum Length Trigger (mlt) RNA
mltRNA constructs were chemically synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, Iowa) and transfected into HEK293 cells (ATCC, Manassas, Va.) using the Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) reagent according to manufacturer's instructions. In brief, RNA was diluted to a 12× concentration and then combined with a 12× concentration of Lipofectamine RNAiMAX to complex. The RNA and transfection reagent were allowed to complex at room temperature for 20 minutes and make a 6× concentration. While complexing, HEK293 cells were washed, trypsinized and counted. The cells were diluted to a concentration recommended by the manufacturer and previously described conditions which was at 1×105cells/ml. When RNA had completed complexing with the RNAiMAX transfection reagent, 20 ul of the complexes were added to the appropriate well of the 96-well plate in triplicate. Cells were added to each well (100 ul volume) to make the final cell count per well at 1×104 cells/well. The volume of cells diluted the 6× concentration of complex to 1× which was equal to a concentration noted (between 10-0.05 nM). Cells were incubated for 24 or 48 hours under normal growth conditions.
After 24 or 48 hour incubation cells were lysed and gene silencing activity was measured using the QuantiGene assay (Panomics, Freemont, Calif.) which employs bDNA hybridization technology. The assay was carried out according to manufacturer's instructions.
ΔG Calculation
ΔG was calculated using Mfold, available through the Mfold internet site (mfold.bioinfarpi.edu/cgi-bin/rna-forml.cgi). Methods for calculating ΔG are described in, and are incorporated by reference from, the following references: Zuker, M. (2003) Nucleic Acids Res., 31(13):3406-15; Mathews, D. H., Sabina, J., Zuker, M. and Turner, D. H. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 288:911-940; Mathews, D. H., Disney, M. D., Childs, J. L., Schroeder, S. J., Zuker, M., and Turner, D. H. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101:7287-7292; Duan, S., Mathews, D. H., and Turner, D. H. (2006) Biochemistry 45:9819-9832; Wuchty, S., Fontana, W., Hofacker, I. L., and Schuster, P. (1999) Biopolymers 49:145-165.
Asymmetric double stranded RNAi molecules, with minimal double stranded regions, were developed herein and are highly effective at gene silencing. These molecules can contain a variety of chemical modifications on the sense and/or anti-sense strands, and can be conjugated to sterol-like compounds such as cholesterol.
Chemical modifications of polynucleotides, such as the guide strand in a duplex molecule, can facilitate RISC entry.
The RNA molecules described herein were subject to a variety of chemical modifications on the sense and antisense strands, and the effects of such modifications were observed. RNAi molecules were synthesized and optimized through testing of a variety of modifications. In first generation optimization, the sense (passenger) and anti-sense (guide) strands of the sd-rxRNAnano molecules were modified for example through incorporation of C and U 2′OMe modifications, 2′F modifications, phosphorothioate modifications, phosphorylation, and conjugation of cholesterol. Molecules were tested for inhibition of MAP4K4 expression in cells including HeLa, primary mouse hepatocytes and primary human hepatocytes through both lipid-mediated and passive uptake transfection.
Optimization of the length of the oligonucleotide was also investigated.
The importance of phosphorothioate content of the RNA molecule for unassisted delivery was also investigated.
A summary of 1st generation sd-rxRNA molecules is presented in
Modifications to the sense strand were also developed and tested, as depicted in
Based on the above-described optimization experiments, 2nd generation RNA molecules were developed. As shown in
Linker chemistry was also tested in conjunction with the RNA molecules associated with the invention. As depicted in
Stability of the chemically modified sd-rxRNA molecules described herein in human serum is shown in
Based on the analysis of 2nd generation RNA molecules associated with the invention, a screen was performed to identify functional molecules for targeting the SPP1/PPIB gene. As revealed in
The effect of 5-Methly C modifications was also examined.
The addition of hydrophobic conjugates to the sd-rxRNA molecules was also explored (
A screen was conducted to identify compounds that could effectively silence expression of SPP1 (Osteopontin). Compounds targeting SPP1 were added to A549 cells (using passive transfection), and the level of SPP1 expression was evaluated at 48 hours. Several novel compounds effective in SPP1 silencing were identified. Compounds that were effective in silencing of SPP1 included 14116, 14121, 14131, 14134, 14139, 14149, and 14152 (
A similar screen was conducted to identify compounds that could effectively silence expression of CTGF (
Methods
sd-rxRNAnano constructs were chemically synthesized (Dharmacon, Lafayette, Colo.) and transfected into HEK293 cells (ATCC, Manassas, Va.) using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, RNA was diluted to a 12× concentration in Opti-MEM®1 Reduced Serum Media (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) and then combined with a 12× concentration of Lipofectamine RNAiMAX. The RNA and transfection reagent were allowed to complex at room temperature for 20 minutes and make a 6× concentration. While complexing, HEK293 cells were washed, trypsinized and counted. The cells were diluted to a concentration recommended by the manufacturer and previously described of 1×105 cells/ml. When RNA had completed complexing with the RNAiMAX transfection reagent, 20 ul of the complexes were added to the appropriate well of the 96-well plate in triplicate. Cells were added to each well (100 ul volume) to make the final cell count per well 1×104 cells/well. The volume of cells diluted the 6× concentration of complex to 1× (between 10-0.05 nM). Cells were incubated for 24 or 48 hours under normal growth conditions. After 24 or 48 hour incubation, cells were lysed and gene silencing activity was measured using the QuantiGene assay (Panomics, Freemont, Calif.) which employs bDNA hybridization technology. The assay was carried out according to manufacturer's instructions.
Passive Uptake Transfection
Sd-rXRNAnano constructs were chemically synthesized (Dharmacon, Lafayette, Colo.). 24 hours prior to transfection, HeLa cells (ATCC, Manassas, Va.) were plated at 1×104 cells/well in a 96 well plate under normal growth conditions (DMEM, 10% FBS and 1% Penicillin and Streptomycin). Prior to transfection of HeLa cells, Sd-rXRNAnano were diluted to a final concentration of 0.01 uM to 1 uM in Accell siRNA Delivery Media (Dharmacon, Lafayette, Colo.). Normal growth media was aspirated off cells and 100 uL of Accell Delivery media containing the appropriate concentration of sd-rxRNAnano was applied to the cells. 48 hours post transfection, delivery media was aspirated off the cells and normal growth media was applied to cells for an additional 24 hours.
After 48 or 72 hour incubation, cells were lysed and gene silencing activity was measured using the QuantiGene assay (Panomics, Freemont, Calif.) according to manufacturer's instructions.
Having thus described several aspects of at least one embodiment of this invention, it is to be appreciated various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description and drawings are by way of example only.
Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
All references, including patent documents, disclosed herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. This application incorporates by reference the entire contents, including all the drawings and all parts of the specification.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/069,780, entitled “Reduced Size Self-delivering RNAi Compounds”, filed Mar. 23, 2011, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120, as a Continuation in Part, of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/120,342 entitled “Reduced Size Self-delivering RNAi Compounds,” filed on Mar. 22, 2011, which is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of international application PCT/US2009/005247, filed Sep. 22, 2009, which was published under PCT Article 21(20) in English, and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. provisional application serial number U.S. 61/192,954, entitled “Chemically Modified Polyucleotides and Methods of Using the Same,” filed on Sep. 22, 2008, U.S. 61/149,946, entitled “Minimum Length Triggers of RNA Interference,” filed on Feb. 4, 2009, and U.S. 61/224,031, entitled “Minimum Length Triggers of RNA Interference,” filed on Jul. 8, 2009, the disclosure of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3687808 | Merigan et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 4201860 | Naito et al. | May 1980 | A |
| 4235871 | Papahadjopoulos et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4415732 | Caruthers et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4426330 | Sears | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4501728 | Geho et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4737323 | Martin et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4837028 | Allen | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4897355 | Eppstein et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4904582 | Tullis | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4958013 | Letsinger | Sep 1990 | A |
| 5023243 | Tullis | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5112963 | Pieles et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5149782 | Chang et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5151510 | Stec et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5177198 | Spielvogel et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5185444 | Summerton et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5188897 | Suhadolnik et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5264423 | Cohen et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264562 | Matteucci | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5391723 | Priest | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5405939 | Suhadolnik et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5414077 | Lin et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5416203 | Letsinger | May 1995 | A |
| 5417978 | Tari et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5432272 | Benner | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5453496 | Caruthers et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5459255 | Cook et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5466786 | Buhr et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470967 | Huie et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5486603 | Buhr | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5489677 | Sanghvi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5495009 | Matteucci et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5512667 | Reed et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5514786 | Cook et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5525465 | Haralambidis et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5532130 | Alul | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5534259 | Zalipsky et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5556948 | Tagawa et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5561225 | Maddry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5574142 | Meyer, Jr. et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578718 | Cook et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5580731 | Chang et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5580972 | Tu et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5587469 | Cook et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591721 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5591722 | Montgomery et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5591843 | Eaton | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5594121 | Froehler et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596086 | Matteucci et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596091 | Switzer | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5599797 | Cook et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5602240 | De Mesmaeker et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607923 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5614617 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5614621 | Ravikumar et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5623070 | Cook et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625050 | Beaton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5633360 | Bischofberger et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5643889 | Suhadolnik et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5646126 | Cheng et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5646265 | McGee | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658731 | Sproat et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5661134 | Cook et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5663312 | Chaturvedula | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5670633 | Cook et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5674683 | Kool | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681940 | Wang et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681941 | Cook et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5684143 | Gryaznov et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5688941 | Cook et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5700785 | Suhadolnik et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5700920 | Altmann et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5736392 | Hawley-Nelson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5750666 | Caruthers et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5767099 | Harris et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770713 | Imbach et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5777153 | Lin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5780053 | Ashley et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5789416 | Lum et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5792847 | Buhr et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5808023 | Sanghvi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5817781 | Swaminathan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5830430 | Unger et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5830653 | Froehler et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5851548 | Dattagupta et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5855910 | Ashley et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5856455 | Cook | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5914396 | Cook et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5945521 | Just et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5948767 | Scheule et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5969116 | Martin | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5976567 | Wheeler et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5981501 | Wheeler et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5986083 | Dwyer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6001841 | Cook et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005096 | Matteucci et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6015886 | Dale et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6020475 | Capaldi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6020483 | Beckvermit et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028183 | Lin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6033910 | Monia et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6043352 | Manoharan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6051699 | Ravikumar | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6096875 | Khan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6107094 | Crooke | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6111085 | Cook et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6121437 | Guzaev et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6153737 | Manoharan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6172208 | Cook | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6207819 | Manoharan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6248878 | Matulic-Adamic et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6271358 | Manoharan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6326358 | Manoharan | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6331617 | Weeks et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6335434 | Guzaev et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6335437 | Manoharan | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6344436 | Smith et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6355787 | Beckvermit et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6358931 | Cook et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6395474 | Buchardt et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6395492 | Manoharan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6399754 | Cook | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6410702 | Swaminathan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6420549 | Cook et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6432963 | Hisamichi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6440943 | Cook et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6444806 | Veerapanani et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6455586 | Kaplan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6465628 | Ravikumar et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6476205 | Buhr et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6506559 | Fire et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6528631 | Cook et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6531584 | Cook et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6559279 | Manoharan et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6656730 | Manoharan | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6673611 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6683167 | Metelev et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6815432 | Wheeler et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6849726 | Usman et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6858225 | Semple et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 7041824 | Bordon-Pallier et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7056704 | Tuschl et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7078196 | Tuschl et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7132530 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7205297 | Beauchamp et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7432250 | Crooke | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7538095 | Fire et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7560438 | Fire et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7595387 | Leake et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7622455 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7622633 | Fire et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7629321 | Crooke | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7695902 | Crooke | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7745608 | Manoharan et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7750144 | Zamore et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7786290 | Woppmann et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7829693 | Kreutzer et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7902163 | Bennett et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8110674 | Manoharan et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8263569 | Baulcombe et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8383600 | Czech et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8664189 | Khvorova et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8796443 | Khvorova et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8815818 | Samarsky et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 9074211 | Woolf et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9080171 | Khvorova et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9095504 | Libertine et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9175289 | Khvorova et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9222092 | Giese et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9303259 | Khvorova et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9340786 | Khvorova et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9493774 | Kamens | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9745574 | Woolf et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9938530 | Khvorova et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9963702 | Khvorova et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10041073 | Khvorova et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10131904 | Pavco et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10138485 | Khvorova et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10167471 | Kamens et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10184124 | Libertine et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10240149 | Khvorova et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10300027 | Levis et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10633654 | Pavco et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10662430 | Libertine et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 20020132788 | Lewis et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147332 | Kaneko et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020160393 | Symonds et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020162126 | Beach et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004325 | Cook et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030077829 | MacLachlan | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030108923 | Tuschl et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139585 | Uhlmann et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030157030 | Davis et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158403 | Manoharan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030166282 | Brown et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040009938 | Manoharan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040014957 | Eldrup et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040018999 | Beach et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054155 | Woolf et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040063654 | Davis et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040072785 | Wolff et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137471 | Vickers et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162235 | Trubetskoy et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167090 | Monahan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040171033 | Baker et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040180351 | Giese et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040191773 | Crooke | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040192629 | Xu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204377 | Rana | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229266 | Tuschl et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040241845 | Desgroseillers et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040248839 | Kowalik | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040259247 | Tuschl et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050020521 | Rana | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050026286 | Chi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050032733 | McSwiggen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050037496 | Rozema et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050042227 | Zankel et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050064595 | MacLachlan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080246 | Allerson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050107325 | Manoharan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050142535 | Damha et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181382 | Zamore et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239731 | McSwiggen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245474 | Baker et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246794 | Khvorova et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050255487 | Khvorova et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050281781 | Ostroff | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060008910 | MacLachlan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060009409 | Woolf | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069050 | Rana | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060127891 | McSwiggen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142228 | Ford et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178324 | Hadwiger et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178327 | Yeung | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060211766 | Kaplan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060240093 | MacLachlan et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070032441 | McSwiggen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070166734 | Bhat et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070173476 | Leake et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070231392 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080020990 | Yano et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080038296 | Brahmbhatt et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071068 | Oba et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080085869 | Yamada et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080107694 | Trogden et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080112916 | Wagner et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152661 | Rozema et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311040 | Berry et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090023216 | Woolf | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090131360 | Woolf et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090143326 | Obad et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090186802 | Alluis et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090208564 | Li et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090247608 | Manoharan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090298916 | Kauppinen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100069620 | Zon | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100081705 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100136695 | Woolf | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100286234 | Elmen et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110039914 | Pavco et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110237522 | Khvorova et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110237648 | Khvorova et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110251258 | Samarsky et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110268761 | Levis et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110288147 | Brown et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110294869 | Petersen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120016005 | Samarsky et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120040459 | Khvorova et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120059046 | Woolf et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120065243 | Woolf et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120094374 | Bentwich et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20130131141 | Khvorova et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131142 | Libertine et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130197055 | Kamens et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20140113950 | Khvorova et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20150057362 | Levis et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20160115482 | Libertine et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160115484 | Woolf et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160130578 | Khvorova et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160244765 | Khvorova et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160304873 | Wolfson et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160304875 | Cauwenbergh et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160319278 | Khvorova et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160355808 | Khvorova et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160355826 | Khvorova et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170009239 | Khvorova et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170051288 | Byrne et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170051290 | Byrne et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170067056 | Khvorova et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170137823 | Kamens et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20180030451 | Cauwenbergh | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180155718 | Woolf et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180195066 | Byrne et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180195072 | Cardia et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180263925 | Cauwenbergh et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180327748 | Khvorova et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180371464 | Khvorova et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190029974 | Cauwenbergh et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190048341 | Cardia et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190169608 | Pavco et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190211337 | Khvorova et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190218557 | Kamens et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190233826 | Libertine et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20200002701 | Khvorova et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200085764 | Maxwell et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200101028 | Levis et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200215113 | Eliseev | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2004206255 | Aug 2004 | AU |
| 1 568 373 | Jan 2005 | CN |
| 0 552 766 | Jul 1993 | EP |
| 1 214 945 | Jun 2002 | EP |
| 1 144 623 | Mar 2003 | EP |
| 1 352 061 | Oct 2003 | EP |
| 0 928 290 | Mar 2005 | EP |
| 1 407 044 | Sep 2007 | EP |
| 1 605 978 | Sep 2010 | EP |
| 4 095 895 | Sep 2004 | JP |
| 2007-525169 | Sep 2007 | JP |
| 2007-531520 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2009-519033 | May 2009 | JP |
| WO 9014074 | Nov 1990 | WO |
| WO 9116024 | Oct 1991 | WO |
| WO 9117424 | Nov 1991 | WO |
| WO 9203464 | Mar 1992 | WO |
| WO 9423028 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| WO 9511910 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO 9523162 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| WO 9640964 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| WO 9913915 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO 03012052 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003064626 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004042027 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004065600 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004065601 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004090105 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005019430 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005078096 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005079533 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005097992 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006007372 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006019430 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006039656 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006065601 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006113679 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006128141 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007030167 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007044362 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007050643 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007069068 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007089607 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008036825 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008109353 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009005813 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009020344 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009029688 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009029690 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009044392 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009078685 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010006237 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010011346 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010027830 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010042281 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011109698 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Cardia et al., Self-Delivering RNAi Compounds. Drug Delivery Technology. Sep. 2010;10(7):1-4. |
| Hudziak et al., Resistance of morpholino phosphorodiamidate oligomers to enzymatic degradation. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 1996 Winter;6(4):267-72. |
| Rose et al., Functional polarity is introduced by Dicer processing of short substrate RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 26, 2005;33(13):4140-56. Print 2005. |
| Shoeman et al., Fluorescence microscopic comparison of the binding of phosphodiester and phosphorothioate (antisense) oligodeoxyribonucleotides to subcellular structures, including intermediate filaments, the endoplasmic reticulum, and the nuclear interior. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. Aug. 1997;7(4):291-308. |
| Stein et al., A specificity comparison of four antisense types: morpholino, 2′-O-methyl RNA, DNA, and phosphorothioate DNA. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. Jun. 1997;7(3):151-7. |
| Summerton et al., Morpholino and phosphorothioate antisense oligomers compared in cell-free and in-cell systems. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. Apr. 1997;7(2):63-70. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,424, filed Oct. 5, 2018, Pavco et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/191,396, filed Nov. 14, 2018, Kamens et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/159,590, filed Oct. 12, 2018, Khvorova et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/270,524, filed Feb. 7, 2019, Khvorova et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/206,064, filed Nov. 30, 2018, Libertine et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/769,555, filed Apr. 19, 2018, Cardia et al. |
| PCT/US2009/005247, Jan. 29, 2010, Invitation to Pay Additional fees. |
| PCT/US2009/005247, Apr. 16, 2010, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
| PCT/US2009/005247, Mar. 31, 2011, International Preliminary Report on Patentability. |
| Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for Application No. PCT/US2009/005247 dated Jan. 29, 2019. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/005247 dated Apr. 16, 2010. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2009/005247 dated Mar. 31, 2011. |
| [No Author Listed] Red Chip Small-Cap Investor Conference. RXI Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq RXII). Jun. 16, 2009 Presentation. 22 pages. |
| [No Author Listed] Rxi Pharmaceutical Corporation. Ex 99.1. OTC: RXII. Mar. 2013. 38 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], RXi Pharmaceuticals Presents Self-Delivering RNAi Data at Scar Club Meeting in France. Drugs.com. Mar. 26, 2010. http://www.drugs.com/clinical_trials/rxi-pharmaceuticals-presents-self-delivering-rnai-data-scar-club-meeting-france-9093.html [last accessed Aug. 19, 2014]. |
| Alahari et al., Inhibition of expression of the multidrug resistance-associated P-glycoprotein of by phosphorothioate and 5′ cholesterol-conjugated phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotides. Mol Pharmacol. Oct. 1996;50(4):808-19. |
| Aleckovic et al., RNAi at Oxford. J RNAi Gene Silencing. May 27, 2008;4(1):266-8. |
| Aouadi et al., Orally delivered siRNA targeting macrophage Map4k4 suppresses systemic inflammation. Nature. Apr. 30, 2009;458(7242):1180-4. doi: 10.1038/nature07774. |
| Augustyns et al., Incorporation of hexose nucleoside analogues into oligonucleotides: synthesis, base-pairing properties and enzymatic stability. Nucleic Acids Res. Sep. 25, 1992;20(18):4711-6. |
| Baigude et al., Design and creation of new nanomaterials for therapeutic RNAi. ACS Chem Biol. Apr. 24, 2007;2(4):237-41. |
| Bergan et al., Electroporation enhances c-myc antisense oligodeoxynucleotide efficacy. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 25, 1993;21(15):3567-73. |
| Bjergarde et al., Solid phase synthesis of oligodeoxyribonucleoside phosphorodithioates from thiophosphoramidites. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 11, 1991;19(21):5843-50. |
| Bongartz et al., Improved biological activity of antisense oligonucleotides conjugated to a fusogenic peptide. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 11, 1994;22(22):4681-8. |
| Boutorin et al., Synthesis of alkylating oligonucleotide derivatives containing cholesterol or phenazinium residues at their 3′-terminus and their interaction with DNA within mammalian cells. FEBS Lett. Aug. 28, 1989;254(1-2):129-32. |
| Braasch et al., RNA Interference in Mammalian Cells by Chemically-Modified RNA. Biochem. 2003;42(26):7967-75. |
| Brown et al., Light at the end of the tunnel. J RNAi Gene Silencing. Jul. 28, 2006;2(2):175-7. |
| Cardia et al., Novel self-delivering RNAi compounds with enhanced cellular uptake and distribution properties. Keystone RNAi Silencing Conference. Jan. 14-19, 2010. Poster. 1 Page. |
| Chen et al., Functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes enables efficient intracellular delivery of siRNA targeting MDM2 to inhibit breast cancer cells growth. Biomed Pharmacother. Jul. 2012;66(5):334-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2011.12.005. Epub Feb. 17, 2012. |
| Chen et al., Nanoparticles modified with tumor-targeting scFv deliver siRNA and miRNA for cancer therapy. Mol Ther. Sep. 2010;18(9):1650-6. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.136. Epub Jul. 6, 2010. |
| Chiang et al., Antisense oligonucleotides inhibit intercellular adhesion molecule 1 expression by two distinct mechanisms. J Biol Chem. Sep. 25, 1991;266(27):18162-71. |
| Chiu et al., siRNA function in RNAi: a chemical modification analysis. RNA. Sep. 2003;9(9):1034-48. |
| Choung et al. Chemical modification of siRNAs to improve serum stability without loss of efficacy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Apr. 14, 2006;342(3):919-27. |
| Chu et al., Potent RNAi by short RNA triggers. RNA. 2008;14:1714-9. |
| Cload et al., Polyether tethered oligonucleotide probes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1991;113 (16): 6324-6326. |
| Collins et al., A small interfering RNA screen for modulators of tumor cell motility identifies MAP4K4 as a promigratory kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar. 7, 2006; 103(10): 3775-3780. |
| Constantinides et al., Formulation and intestinal absorption enhancement evaluation of water-in-oil microemulsions incorporating medium-chain glycerides. Pharm Res. Oct. 1994;11(10):1385-90. |
| Czauderna et al., Structural variations and stabilising modifications of synthetic siRNAs in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. Jun. 1, 2003;31(11):2705-16. |
| De Smidt et al., Association of antisense oligonucleotides with lipoproteins prolongs the plasma half-life and modifies the tissue distribution. Nucleic Acids Res. Sep. 11, 1991;19(17):4695-700. |
| Debart et al., Chemical modifications to improve the cellular uptake of oligonucleotides. Curr Top Med Chem. 2007;7(7):727-37. |
| Dykxhoorn et al., The silent treatment: siRNAs as small molecule drugs. Gene Ther. Mar. 2006;13(6):541-52. Review. |
| Elbashir et al., Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature. May 24, 2001;411(6836):494-8. |
| Elbashir et al., Functional anatomy of siRNAs for mediating efficient RNAi in Drosophila melanogaster embryo lysate. EMBO J. Dec. 3, 2001;20(23):6877-88. |
| Fabbri et al., MicroRNA-29 family reverts aberrant methylation in lung cancer by targeting DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct. 2, 2007;104(40):15805-10. Epub Sep. 21, 2007. |
| Fedorov et al., Off-target effects by siRNA can induce toxic phenotype. RNA. Jul. 2006;12(7):1188-96. Epub May 8, 2006. |
| Ferentz et al., Disulfide-crosslinked oligonucleotides. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1991;113 (10): 4000-4002. |
| Fisher et al., Intracellular disposition and metabolism of fluorescently-labeled unmodified and modified oligonucleotides microinjected into mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. Aug. 11, 1993;21(16):3857-65. |
| Ford, Using synthetic miRNA mimics for diverting cell fate: a possibility of miRNA-based therapeutics? Leuk Res. May 2006;30(5):511-3. Epub Oct. 20, 2005. |
| Griffiths-Jones et al., miRBase: microRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 1, 2006;34(Database issue):D140-4. |
| Griffiths-Jones et al., miRBase: tools for microRNA genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 2008;36(Database issue):D154-8. Epub Nov. 8, 2007. |
| Griffiths-Jones et al., The microRNA Registry. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 1, 2004;32(Database issue):D109-11. |
| Holmes et al., Syntheses and oligonucleotide incorporation of nucleoside analogues containing pendant imidazolyl or amino functionalities—the search for sequence-specific artificial ribonucleases. Eur J Org Chem. Apr. 13, 2005;5171-83. DOI; 10.1002/ejoc.20050413. |
| Hosono et at., Properties of base-pairing in the stem region of hairpin antisense oligonucleotides containing 2′-methoxynucleosides. Biochim Biophys Acta. Jun. 9, 1995;1244(2-3):339-44. |
| Jablonski et al., Preparation of oligodeoxynucleotide-alkaline phosphatase conjugates and their use as hybridization probes. Nucleic Acids Res. Aug. 11, 1986;14(15):6115-28. |
| Jackson et al., Position-specific chemical modification of siRNAs reduces “off-target” transcript silencing. RNA. Jul. 2006;12(7):1197-1205. Epub May 8, 2006. |
| Jiang et al., miR2Disease: a manually curated database for microRNA deregulation in human disease. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 2009;37(Database issue):D98-104. doi:10.1093/nar/gkn714. Epub Oct. 15, 2008. |
| Kamata et al., Amphiphilic peptides enhance the efficiency of liposome-mediated DNA transfection. Nucleic Acids Res. Feb. 11, 1994;22(3):536-7. |
| Kamens et al., Novel, chemically modified RNAi compounds with improved potency, stability and specificity. Keystone RNAi Silencing: Mechanism, Biology and Application Conference. Jan. 14-19, 2010. Poster. 1 Page. |
| Kim et al., Systemic and specific delivery of small interfering RNAs to the liver mediated by apolipoprotein A-I. Mol Ther. Jun. 2007;15(6):1145-52. Epub Apr. 17, 2007. |
| Kraynack et al., Small interfering RNAs containing full 2′-O-methylribonucleotide-modified sense strands display Argonaute2/eIF2C2-dependent activity. RNA. Jan. 2006;12(1):163-76. Epub Nov. 21, 2005. |
| Krutzfeldt et al., Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with ‘antagomirs’. Nature. Dec. 1, 2005;438(7068):685-9. Epub Oct. 30, 2005. |
| Kubo et al., Modified 27-nt dsRNAs with dramatically enhanced stability in serum and long-term RNAi activity. Oligonucleotides. 2007 Winter;17(4):445-64. |
| Layzer et al., In vivo activity of nuclease-resistant siRNAs. RNA. May 2004;10(5):766-71. |
| Lee et al., Contributions of 3′-overhang to the dissociation of small interfering RNAs from the PAZ domain: molecular dynamics simulation study. J Mol Graph Model. Mar. 2007;25(6):784-93. Epub Jul. 11, 2006. |
| Letsinger et al., Cholesteryl-conjugated oligonucleotides: synthesis, properties, and activity as inhibitors of replication of human immunodeficiency virus in cell culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 1989;86(17):6553-6. |
| Leuschner et al., Cleavage of the siRNA passenger strand during RISC assembly in human cells. EMBO Rep. Mar. 2006;7(3):314-20. Epub Jan. 20, 2006. |
| Lewis et al., A serum-resistant cytofectin for cellular delivery of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides and plasmid DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 16, 1996;93(8):3176-81. |
| Li et al., Surface-modified LPD nanoparticles for tumor targeting. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Oct. 2006;1082:1-8. |
| Lu et al., An analysis of human microRNA and disease associations. PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3420. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003420. Epub Oct. 15, 2008. |
| Ma et al., Design and synthesis of RNA miniduplexes via a synthetic linker approach. Biochemistry. Feb. 23, 1993;32(7):1751-8. |
| Ma et al., Design and synthesis of RNA miniduplexes via a synthetic linker approach. 2. Generation of covalently closed, double-stranded cyclic HIV-1 TAR RNA analogs with high Tat-binding affinity. Nucleic Acids Res. Jun. 11, 1993;21(11):2585-9. |
| Manoharan et al., Chemical modifications to improve uptake and bioavailability of antisense oligonucleotides. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Oct. 28, 1992;660:306-9. |
| Manoharan, Oligonucleotide conjugates as potential antisense drugs with improved uptake, biodistribution, targeted delivery, and mechanism of action. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. Apr. 2002;12(2):103-28. |
| Martins et al., Sterol side chain length and structure affect the clearance of chylomicron-like lipid emulsions in rats and mice. J Lipid Res. Feb. 1998;39(2):302-12. |
| Mathews et al., Incorporating chemical modification constraints into a dynamic programming algorithm for prediction of RNA secondary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 11, 2004;101(19):7287-92. Epub May 3, 2004. |
| Mescalchin et al., Cellular uptake and intracellular release are major obstacles to the therapeutic application of siRNA: novel options by phosphorothioate-stimulated delivery. Expert Opin Biol Ther. Oct. 2007;7(10):1531-8. Review. |
| Mori et al., Molecular mechanisms linking wound inflammation and fibrosis: knockdown of osteopontin leads to rapid repair and reduced scarring. J Exp Med. Jan. 21, 2008;205(1):43-51. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071412. Epub Jan. 7, 2008. Online Supplemental Material Included. 4 Pages. |
| Murphy et al., A combinatorial approach to the discovery of efficient cationic peptoid reagents for gene delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 17, 1998;95(4):1517-22. |
| Oberhauser et al., Effective incorporation of 2′-O-methyl-oligoribonucleotides into liposomes and enhanced cell association through modification with thiocholesterol. Nucleic Acids Res. Feb. 11, 1992;20(3):533-8. |
| Ono et al., DNA triplex formation of oligonucleotide analogues consisting of linker groups and octamer segments that have opposite sugar-phosphate backbone polarities. Biochemistry. Oct. 15, 1991;30(41):9914-2. |
| Ortigão et al., Antisense effect of oligodeoxynucleotides with inverted terminal internucleotidic linkages: a minimal modification protecting against nucleolytic degradation. Antisense Res Dev. 1992 Summer;2(2):129-46. |
| Overhoff et al., Phosphorothioate-stimulated uptake of short interfering RNA by human cells. EMBO Rep. Dec. 2005;6(12):1176-81. |
| Parrish et al., Functional anatomy of a dsRNA trigger: differential requirement for the two trigger strands in RNA interference. Mol Cell. Nov. 2000;6(5):1077-87. |
| Pavco et al., Robust Intradermal efficacy with novel chemically modified self-delivering RNAi compounds. Keystone RNAi Silencing Conference: Mechanism, Biology and Application Conference. Jan. 14-19, 2010. Poster. 1 Page. |
| Rajeev et al., 2′-modified-2-thiothymidine oligonucleotides. Org Lett. Aug. 21, 2003;5(17):3005-8. |
| Rozners et al., Expanding functionality of RNA: synthesis and properties of RNA containing imidazole modified tandem G-U wobble base pairs. Chem Commun (Camb). Dec. 14, 2005;(46):5778-80. |
| Rump et al., Preparation of conjugates of oligodeoxynucleotides and lipid structures and their interaction with low-density lipoprotein. Bioconjug Chem. May-Jun. 1998;9(3):341-9. |
| Salomon et al., Modified dsRNAs that are not processed by Dicer maintain potency and are incorporated into the RISC. Nucleic Acids Res. Jun. 2010;38(11):3771-9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq055. Epub Feb. 18, 2010. |
| Sato et al., Tumor targeting and imaging of intraperitoneal tumors by use of antisense oligo-DNA complexed with dendrimers and/or avidin in mice. Clin Cancer Res. Nov. 2001;7(11):3606-12. |
| Seela et al., Oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing 1,3-propanediol as nucleoside substitute. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 10, 1987;15(7):3113-29. |
| Shen, Advances in the development of siRNA-based therapeutics for cancer. IDrugs. Aug. 2008;11(8):572-8. Review. |
| Shi, Mammalian RNAi for the masses. Trends Genet. Jan. 2003;19(1):9-12. |
| Snead et al., RNA interference trigger variants: getting the most out of RNA for RNA interference-based therapeutics. Nucleic Acid Ther. Jun. 2012;22(3):139-46. doi: 10.1089/nat.2012.0361. Review. |
| Soutschek et al., Therapeutic silencing of an endogenous gene by systemic administration of modified siRNAs. Nature. Nov. 11, 2004;432(7014):173-8. |
| Sui et al., A DNA vector-based RNAi technology to suppress gene expression in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 16, 2002;99(8):5515-20. |
| Sun et al., Asymmetric RNA duplexes mediate RNA interference in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol. Dec. 2008;26(12):1379-82. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1512. Epub Nov. 23, 2008. |
| Tang et al., An RNA interference-based screen identifies MAP4K4/NIK as a negative regulator of PPARgamma, adipogenesis, and insulin-responsive hexose transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 14, 2006;103(7):2087-92. Epub Feb. 3, 2006. |
| Tang et al., MicroRNAs are tightly associated with RNA-induced gene silencing complexes in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Jul. 18, 2008;372(1):24-9. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.04.137. Epub May 12, 2008. |
| Uhlmann et al., Antisense oligonucleotides: a new therapeutic principle. Chem Rev. 1990;90(4):543-84. |
| Vlassov et al., Transport of oligonucleotides across natural and model membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. Jun. 29, 1994;1197(2):95-108. |
| Wolfrum et al., Mechanisms and optimization of in vivo delivery of lipophilic siRNAs. Nat Biotechnol. Oct. 2007;25(10):1149-57. Epub Sep. 16, 2007. |
| Xue et al., Mesodermal patterning defect in mice lacking the Ste20 NCK interacting kinase (NIK). Development. May 2001;128(9):1559-72. |
| Yamada et al., Synthesis and properties of oligonucleotides having a chemically stable 2-(trimethylsilyl)benzoyl group. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser (Oxf). 2008;(52):301-2. doi: 10.1093/nass/nrn152. |
| Yu et al., RNA interference by expression of short-interfering RNAs and hairpin RNAs in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 30, 2002;99(9):6047-52. Epub Apr. 23, 2002. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/680,101, filed Nov. 11, 2019, Woolf et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/377,617, filed Apr. 8, 2019, Levis et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/606,669, filed Oct. 18, 2019, Maxwell et al. |
| Chernikov et al., Current Development of siRNA Bioconjugates: From Research to the Clinic. Front Pharmacol. Apr. 26, 2019;10:444. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00444. |
| Vickers et al., Efficient reduction of target RNAs by small interfering RNA and RNase H-dependent antisense agents. A comparative analysis. J Biol Chem. Feb. 28, 2003;278(9):7108-18. Epub Dec. 23, 2002. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190161757 A1 | May 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61224031 | Jul 2009 | US | |
| 61149946 | Feb 2009 | US | |
| 61192954 | Sep 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13069780 | Mar 2011 | US |
| Child | 16022652 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13120342 | US | |
| Child | 13069780 | US |
