This invention relates to the field of semiconductor fabrication, and more particularly to semiconductor device separation.
Sapphire wafers are an important semiconductor substrate. They are especially important for the development of gallium nitride based materials technology, which is used in blue spectrum light emitting diodes (LEDs). The production of high brightness LEDs in the blue spectrum is a relatively recent optoelectronics technology. The demand for nitride based LEDs, such as bright blue, bright green and other color LEDs, currently exceeds the industry's capability to supply them. Sapphire based device separation, however, remains a significant obstacle to efficient fabrication. Current separation techniques waste valuable wafer surface area, involve costly consumables, and have long process times.
Semiconductor fabrication processes involve fabricating several thousand individual devices, or dies, on one wafer. After processing and testing, the wafer may be thinned and the dies must be separated from the wafer. Separation has been traditionally accomplished using either a dicing saw or a scribe-and-break process, both of which rely on diamond chips to cut the material. These two processes have been very effective on silicon and III-V substrates, because the material is much softer than diamond. However, sapphire's crystal structure, crystal orientation, inherent hardness, and material strength inhibit these methods from working well.
Specifically, the diamond's edge dulls quickly when applied to sapphire. To compensate, dicing saw blades designed to cut sapphire contain diamonds in a resin matrix. The dicing blades wear quickly to constantly expose new, sharp diamonds. Although processing times and the number of blades is dependent on die size, studies have shown that completely dicing a 17 mil thick sapphire substrate into 16 mil×16 mil die would require up to four blades and over 2 hours of process time and the maximum yield would be 25%. A 4 mil thick sapphire substrate completely shatters during dicing. These low yields make it difficult to meet commercial demand. The yields are low because the minimum blade thickness is 8 mil. This results in a kerf width of >0.010″. Thinner blades, however, produce poor quality cuts. A significant amount of available device surface area is therefore wasted during wafer sawing.
The scribe-and-break separation process also relies on a sharp diamond edge or facet. The scribe tip has a diamond head which is quickly dulled by the sapphire. This requires frequent and costly tip replacement Due to these factors, a sapphire dicing process will produce too low a yield. Moreover, both the sawing and diamond scribing process become very complex due to diamond wear.
Another method for device separation is discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,151,389 and 5,214,261, both of which are issued to Zapella. These references discuss a method for dicing semiconductor substrates using an excimer laser beam. This method uses a laser beam that is oriented out of normal with respect to the substrate to ensure non-tapered cuts. A drawback of this method is that the substrate and the laser beams must be maintained within the critical out of normal ranges. A further drawback is that a polyimide coating is used to prevent “dust” from settling onto the surface. The removal of this coating via chemical peeling introduces the possibility of contamination.
The present invention is a method for efficient and inexpensive separation of semiconductor wafers by laser ablation. The method uses a laser to ablate material from the substrate, resulting in a separated wafer. Laser separation is advantageous because it permits processing of any sapphire based product, such as blue LEDs, inexpensively and quickly. Importantly, the separation methods are applicable to gallium arsenide (GaAs) and to other semiconductors with the same potential benefits of high throughputs, narrow kerfs and no cutting tips to wear.
In an exemplary embodiment, the method of the present invention separates semiconductor wafers into a plurality of devices via laser ablation. A laser light emission is generated and sent through optical elements and masks to obtain a patterned laser projection. The patterned laser projection is then directed toward a given surface of a semiconductor wafer such that the patterned laser projection is substantially perpendicular to the given surface. The patterned laser projection is applied for a specified time at a specified power to obtain at least a partial cut through the semiconductor wafer. If the wafers are not fully cut using the laser, a mechanical method is then applied to complete the separation and create the die.
Advantageously, the pattern of the laser projection can be selected in view of the type of semiconductor wafer. For example, the patterned laser projection of the present invention can be one long, narrow line that cuts several millimeters with one pulse or several smaller lines that cut several rows simultaneously with one pulse. Moreover, a protective layer is applied to the cutting surface to prevent cutting process effluent from contaminating the devices.
The method of the present invention results in a kerf in the order of 10 μm wide if cut from a front surface and less than 10 μm if cut from a back or substrate surface. Consequently, the present invention reduces wastage of wafer space and permits more devices to be placed on the wafer. The above factors make the present invention an efficient, low maintenance and high production method for separating semiconductor wafers. Such a method is a significant step toward meeting the demand for sapphire based devices.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be obtained from consideration of the following description in conjunction with the drawings in which:
The following description is presented to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
For purposes of clarity, a top-level functional overview of the present invention is presented, followed by an exemplary embodiment of a laser-based semiconductor separation system incorporating the methodology of the present invention. A more detailed explanation of the methodology is then presented.
In general, the method of the present invention separates a semiconductor wafer into several thousand devices or die by laser ablation. Semiconductor wafers are initially pre-processed to create multiple devices, such as blue LEDs, on the wafers. The wafers are then mounted with tape coated with a generally high level adhesive. The mounted wafer is then placed on a vacuum chuck (which is itself positioned on a computer controlled positioning table) to hold it in place during the cutting process. The cutting surface is then covered with a protective layer to prevent contamination from the effluent resulting from the actual cutting process. A laser light emission is generated and passed through optical elements and masks to create a pattern, such as a line or multiple lines. The patterned laser projection is directed at the wafer at a substantially normal angle and applied to the wafer until at least a partial cut is achieved through it. A mechanical separation process completes the separation when only a partial cut is achieved by the patterned laser projection. The die are then transferred to a grip ring for further processing.
Referring to
As shown in more detail in
Referring also to
Given the above laser-based semiconductor separation system, a more detailed explanation of the method of the present invention is presented. This explanation is given with respect to
Although the following description primarily refers to cutting gallium nitride (GaN) on C-plane sapphire, these are only illustrative materials. The epitaxial growth material can be, for example, any semiconductor material such as any of the III-V materials listed in the periodic chart of elements. The substrate material can be, for example, any of the III-V materials, refractory ceramics and any orientations of any of the listed substrate materials.
Referring now to
The bow in the wafer is flattened by a process termed wafer mounting. The wafer mounting process is also required to keep the 11000 individual devices in order. In an exemplary embodiment, wafer 300 is mounted on 0.003″ to 0.005″ thick tape 330 coated with a generally high tack adhesive. The mounting process is outlined below:
Because mounting tape 330 is used, the parameters of the patterned laser projection are set in one embodiment of the method to achieve only a partial cut through the device. A mechanical breaking process is used to complete the separation. If a full or total cut through the wafer is desired, another, layer must adhered on to the bottom of the mounting tape. This layer, for example, could be an epoxy or double sided tape.
Prior to the wafer mounting process, however, the user must decide which surface of the wafer to cut on. Whether to cut on the front surface or the back may depend upon the cut width or kerf that is produced for the particular type of wafer being cut. To minimize wafer wastage, the kerf value should be on the order of 10 μm wide. For example, front and back surface cuts should have kerf values of less than 100 μm. For the illustrative GaN/sapphire structure, the kerf value is 20 μm when cutting from the front surface and less than 10 μm when cutting from the back surface. However, there are additional considerations that must be accounted for before deciding on which surface to cut on.
Referring to Table 1, although cutting from the back surface results in a low kerf value, the resulting device edges are rough. This may decrease the performance of the device. With regard to blue LEDs, this means that the light output may be decreased. In contrast, the device edges are cleaner when cutting from the front surface. Consequently, this can increase the light output for the blue LEDs.
Once the cutting surface has been selected, a protective layer must be placed on it. Studies have shown that the cutting process coats the wafer's surface with effluent, which is unacceptable. Generally, the wafer's surface is protected with either photoresist or polyimide during a laser separation process, and the coating is removed with a solvent after the process. This is not possible in the present case because the solvent may damage mounting tape 330. The contamination problem is overcome by covering the cutting surface with a generally lower tack mounting tape 345. This provides excellent protection from effluent. Two pieces of tape were used for each wafer-one for X direction cutting and one for Y direction cutting.
Once the wafer is mounted and taped, it is placed on positioning table 150. Laser 110, for example, a KrF laser operating at 248 nm or a Nd:YAG operating at 1064 nm, is activated to generate laser light emission operable to cut the semiconductor wafer. The laser light emissions are fed through projection delivery system 130 to produce a pattern. The patterned light projection is then directed toward a selected cutting surface of the wafer so that it is substantially normal to the cutting surface. For example, the incidence angle should have a magnitude of less than 4°.
The parameters of the laser, such as cutting speed, laser power, laser pulse rate, number of cuts, cut depth, etc., are set to achieve the required cut without inducing cracking and chipping. Studies using several types of laser sources have indicated that multiple shallow cuts, for example, cut depths of one mil to three mils for a 13 mil thick wafer, are required to separate sapphire based substrates without cracking. In contrast, deep cuts, for example, a 6 mil deep cut, caused cracks in the wafer. Studies have also shown that cut depths of 45 μm leave very little effluent on the surface. As stated above, this is a very important consideration in terms of contamination of the separated devices. In addition, the parameters are also set to achieve the desired partial or full cut through the wafer.
Referring now to
Referring now to
After cutting, the wax paper is removed and the cut quality is inspected. The next steps depend on the wafer's orientation during cutting. If the wafer was mounted with the GaN surface on the mounting tape and cut from the back surface, the individual die must be remounted on tape with the GaN surface facing up. That is done using the following process:
If the wafer was cut from the GaN surface and the mounting tape was not damaged, then the wafer and the tape on which it was cut is transferred to a grip ring. If the mounting tape was damaged, then two tape transfers are necessary. The first would place the die, GaN surface down, on a medium tack tape, and the second would place the die, GaN surface up, on a high tack tape.
In accordance with the present invention, there has been described a method for separating a semiconductor wafer using a patterned laser projection. The patterned laser is incident substantially normal to a cutting surface of the wafer. The parameters of the laser system are set to maximize throughput without inducing damage to the wafer. The wafer itself is protected from cutting process effluent by the placement of a generally low tack adhesive tape on the cutting surface.
Numerous modifications and alternative embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the foregoing description. Accordingly, this description is to be construed as illustrative only and is for the purpose of teaching those skilled in the art the best mode of carrying out the invention. Details of the structure may be varied substantially without departing from the spirit of the invention and the exclusive use of all modifications which come within the scope of the appended claim is reserved.
This application is a continuation of the application Ser. No. 09/178,287, now Pat. No. 6,413,839, filed on Oct. 23, 1998, entitled “SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE SEPARATION USING A PATTERNED LASER PROJECTION”, herein incorporated by reference. This application is also related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/114,275, entitled “SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE SEPARATION USING A PATTERNED LASER PROJECTION,” filed on Apr. 2, 2002 co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/146,267, entitled “SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE SEPARATION USING A PATTERNED LASER PROJECTION,” filed on May 15, 2002 and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/137,904, entitled “SEMICONDUCTOR WAFER PROTECTION AND CLEANING FOR DEVICE SEPARATION USING LASER ABLATION,” filed on May 2, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3629545 | Graham et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3699644 | Cocca | Oct 1972 | A |
3824678 | Harris et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3970819 | Gates et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4046985 | Gates | Sep 1977 | A |
4224101 | Tijburg et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4543464 | Takeuchi | Sep 1985 | A |
4729971 | Coleman | Mar 1988 | A |
4851371 | Fisher et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4865686 | Sinohara | Sep 1989 | A |
4964212 | Deroux-Dauphin et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4992393 | Kosaka et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5075201 | Koh | Dec 1991 | A |
5151389 | Zappella | Sep 1992 | A |
5185295 | Goto et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5214261 | Zappella | May 1993 | A |
5385633 | Russell et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5543365 | Wills et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552345 | Schrantz et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5631190 | Negley | May 1997 | A |
5641416 | Chadha | Jun 1997 | A |
5864171 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5872046 | Kaeriyama et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5912477 | Negley | Jun 1999 | A |
5922224 | Broekroelofs | Jul 1999 | A |
5932118 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5976691 | Noguchi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6117347 | Ishida | Sep 2000 | A |
6140151 | Akram | Oct 2000 | A |
6225194 | Noguchi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
61219535 | Sep 1986 | JP |
63174793 | Jul 1988 | JP |
63183885 | Jul 1988 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020177288 A1 | Nov 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09178287 | Oct 1998 | US |
Child | 10114099 | US |