This application is based on and claims priority of Japanese Patent Applications No. 2005-100458 filed on Mar. 31, 2005 and No. 2005-279561 filed on Sep. 27, 2005, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
A) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a semiconductor device manufacture method, and more particularly to a semiconductor manufacture method by which a workpiece is processed by electron beam exposure.
B) Description of the Related Art
In manufacturing a semiconductor integrated circuit device, lithography is used to form a resist pattern by coating a resist layer on a workpiece layer and exposing and developing it. A precision of lithography is an important factor governing a precision, integration degree and the like of a semiconductor integrated circuit device.
Electron beam (EB) exposure has a high resolution and is suitable for micro processing in forming a pattern. EB exposure can draw a very thin pattern in a unit area of generally several μm, e.g., 4 μm at a maximum. EB exposure allows correction of alignment in a very fine unit.
If EB exposure is performed in a chip unit, as shown in
In detecting the position of an alignment mark of EB exposure alignment by detecting electrons reflected from the alignment mark, JP-A-HEI-9-36019 Publication proposes a method for raising an alignment mark detection precision by providing a plurality of detectors for reflected electrons and amplifiers and setting an amplification factor of each amplifier to make constant an output intensity.
In order to detect the position of an alignment mark at high precision and at high speed, JP-A-HEI-8-17696 proposes that electron beam scanning for detecting an alignment mark made of a step is performed by first scanning which scans a width larger than the width of the mark and second scanning which scans only the edges of the mark.
Detectors for reflected electrons and amplifiers are used for detecting reflected electrons. It cannot be said that a reflected electron signal is sufficiently strong. If noises are superposed upon the detectors, amplifiers and the like, a signal waveform is deformed, allowing an erroneous detection possibility.
If an erroneous detection occurs, an alignment precision will be lowered unless subsequent processes are corrected.
An object of the present invention is to improve provision of alignment mark detection in electron beam exposure.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a semiconductor device manufacture method comprising the steps of: (a) forming a semiconductor device structure in a chip and alignment marks, respectively in a semiconductor wafer; (b) forming a workpiece layer above the semiconductor wafer; (c) exposing the alignment marks; (d) coating an electron beam resist film on the workpiece layer; (e) scanning the alignment marks with an electron beam to obtain plural position information on the alignment marks and obtaining differences between the plural position information; (f) removing abnormal values of position information in accordance with the difference between the plural position information; and (g) performing an electron beam exposure in accordance with plural position information of the alignment marks with the abnormal value being removed.
If noises are superposed upon detectors, amplifiers and the like, there is a possibility of erroneous detection. By utilizing a difference between plural position information, it becomes possible to remove abnormal values of the position information. It is possible to prevent a local position misalignment due to an alignment mark detection error. Local position displacement can be avoided. It is possible to improve an exposure position precision and further improve a pattern position precision.
A position detection time can be shortened, contributing to reducing the number of manufacturing processes.
Semiconductor integrated circuit devices can be made fine and highly reliable, and yield and reliability can be improved. By positively using the function of an electron beam exposure method, a micro pattern can be formed at high precision and a position alignment precision can be improved among others. It is possible to contribute to improvement of yield and reliability of semiconductor integrated circuit devices.
A general detection method for an alignment signal in an EB exposure process analyzes an reflected electron signal obtained by scanning an alignment mark with an electron beam, the alignment mark being made of a step in a layer formed before a workpiece layer is formed.
As shown in
The column 20 is coupled to an exposure chamber 30 and irradiates an electron beam to a wafer placed on an XY stage 23 in the chamber 30. The chamber 30 is mounted on a vibration proof device 24. A detector 25 for detecting electrons reflected from the wafer is disposed in the chamber 30 and supplies a detected signal to a mark detection unit 26. An output signal of the mark detection unit 26 is analyzed at an A/D conversion—waveform analysis unit 27, and the analysis results in the form of digital signal are supplied to the digital control unit DCTL and control WS 1.
The control WS 11 and digital control unit DCTL control, via the electro-optics unit 18, a transport control unit 31 and a stage control unit 32, deflection of an electron beam in the column and the position of the XY stage 23 in the chamber 30. External apparatuses 12 such as a display, a hard disk and a memory may be connected to the control WS 11.
In an alignment operation, a mark scan signal is output from the pattern generation/correction circuit 14, converted into an analog signal, amplified by DAC/AMP 16, and applied to a deflector. Reflected electrons generated during beam scanning are captured by the detector 25, and amplified by the mark detector 26. Position coordinates of the reflected electrons are calculated by the A/D conversion—waveform analysis unit 27 and transmitted to the digital control unit DCTL. In accordance with the coordinate values obtained in this manner, the control unit DCTL determines an exposure position and performs pattern exposure.
An alignment mark on a wafer uses generally a step in an oxide film, silicon body or the like. A necessary step amount is 0.3 μm or deeper at a minimum. However, depending upon process restrictions, there is a case in which a necessary step amount cannot be obtained, a signal intensity becomes insufficient, and an S/N ratio lowers. There is another case in which even if a mark step amount is sufficient, erroneous detection occurs because of noises on DAC/AMP 16 and the detector 25. In such cases, mark coordinate values are read incorrectly and a local position displacement occurs. A countermeasure against position displacement is difficult because it is not possible to judge which mark coordinate values are correct, from only the position information obtained through position detection.
In semiconductor integrated circuit device manufacture, as the pattern rule becomes very fine, a pattern precision, particularly an alignment precision, becomes a big issue and is a main factor of hindering micro patterning and high reliability of a semiconductor integrated circuit device. Under such circumstances, if the alignment precision is lowered, manufacture yield and reliability are degraded. There is a case wherein local erroneous detection of an alignment signal is hard to be removed because of the influence of fine noises or the like. In the semiconductor integrated circuit device manufacture, deterioration of a position precision, particularly a partial position precision in a wafer, adversely affects the manufacture yield and reliability.
In order to elucidate the circumstances of position precision deterioration, the present inventor analyzed a detection signal of reflected electrons output from the detector 25.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As the alignment mark is detected, opposite edges of the groove 2 are detected. The position of the mark is obtained as an average of positions of opposite ends of the groove. The width of the groove was designed, for example, to be 2 μm. If abnormal values are detected because of noises, it is considered that the width of the mark takes also an abnormal value. The mark width can be detected easily by detecting the mark.
The present inventor proposes a method of removing abnormal values from detection signals of the detector 25 and correcting detection values at high precision and with a simple procedure if noise elimination is difficult, to improve productivity of the semiconductor integrated circuit device manufacture using EB exposure.
The present inventor has also found that information on mark widths obtained from position detection information is effective for removing abnormal values and the abnormal values can be removed very efficiently by positively utilizing the information on mark widths.
Prior to exposure of a product, marks are detected at several points of a wafer, and the width of each mark is obtained. A reference size is decided on the basis of these widths. When each chip is actually aligned, data remote from the reference size is not used or the marks are detected again not to adopt abnormal value data. In this manner, position misalignment is avoided. For example, an average is basically used as the reference value.
In removing abnormal values, it is important to correctly determine the mark width reference value in order to obtain high precision. It is effective that the mark structure is designed so that the mark widths can be determined correctly. If a rounding corner poses a problem, a mark shape long in one direction may be adopted and the central portion not influenced by the corner is monitored.
With reference to
As shown in
For example, the mark width is set at a designed value of 2 μm. Let's suppose that the width data of W1x=2.16, W2x=2.15, W3x=2.14, W4x=2.15, and W5x=2.15 are obtained as the finished groove width. In this case, Wxref is 2.15 μm are obtained as the finished grove width. Similarly, Wyref is determined as 2.15 μm. Considering a process variation and an allowable position detection variation, the allowable range R is set for example, to 0.10 μm and values in the range of 2.05 to 2.25 μm are allowed.
Focus adjustment is required also for EB exposure. Prior to the first position alignment of exposure, an alignment mark is scanned with an electron beam and a reflected electron signal is monitored. For example, by changing the focus of an objective lens, the focus condition is selected which presents a maximum peak intensity of a differential waveform. In this manner, an optimum focus can be determined. In this process, the mark widths can be sampled, and preliminary sampling and mark width measurement can be shared in common.
In some cases, the widths of marks formed in a layer under a workpiece layer have some distributions in a wafer in-plane due to distributions of etching and CMP of semiconductor processes, etc.
If the distribution has a predetermined tendency, abnormal values can be detected at higher precision by using the mark width reference value represented as a function of position. Many distribution tendencies have distributions having concentrical widths relative to the wafer center as shown in
In the case of the distribution of mark widths in a wafer in-plane due to some issues in processes of forming marks in a layer under a workpiece layer, it is effective to change the reference value in the wafer by using a flat plane, a curved plane or the like including a polynomial on the basis of sampled results, to remove abnormal values at high precision.
If the distribution changes in a parabolic shape, it is effective that this distribution is expressed by a quadratic function such as W=ar2+br+c (r is a distance from the center, r2=X2+Y2). In the example shown in
The function of a mark width relative to a mark position is not limited to this equation. The in-plane distribution can be approximated by linear equations including polynomial, quadratic equations different from the above-described quadratic equation, cubic or higher order equations, depending upon distributions.
In EB exposure, the position of each alignment mark is detected generally in the unit of group including the unit of chip, the unit of chip column and the like, and exposure is performed after alignment. In such a case, after the positions of alignment marks in a group are detected, the reference width, for example, an average width, is calculated, and remote abnormal values are removed or widths are measured again not to adopt abnormal value data. In this manner, position misalignment can be avoided.
Alignment mark detection, alignment and exposure are repeated in the group unit including the unit of chip, the unit of chip column and the like. In this case, mark widths W1, W2, W3, W4 of each chip or mark widths W1(i), W2(i), W3(i), W4(i) of each group once obtained are used to determine the reference mark width of, for example, Wref=AVERAGE (W1, W2, W3, W4) or Wref=AVERAGE Σ(W1(i), W2(i), W3(i), W4(i)). The allowable range R of ΔW=|W−Wref| is set and abnormal values in excess of the allowable range are removed and not referred to. Other points are similar to the first embodiment. Similar to the first embodiment, erroneous detection can be avoided.
This embodiment does not require a preliminary process and can be used even if a local variation in mark widths in a wafer in-plane is very large. However, there is a demerit that if the reference width is determined in the chip unit, an abnormal value removal precision cannot be made too high because the number of reference points used to obtain the average is small. If a high precision abnormal value removal is necessary, it is preferable that a group is constituted of several chips to increase the number of reference points used to obtain the reference width, and then alignment mark detection, alignment and exposure are performed.
It is also possible that the same value is used as the mark widths at a position detection point along X- and Y-directions. If the X- and Y-direction detected widths measured at each position detection point are in excess of a predetermined difference value, these values are removed or widths are measured again not to adopt abnormal value data. In this manner, position misalignment can be avoided. Even if the distribution of mark sizes in the wafer in-plane in the mark forming layer is large, the influence of the distribution is small and the embodiment is particularly effective for such a case.
As shown in
The pair of X- and Y-direction marks are disposed in an area considered having the same process condition, and the X- and Y-direction marks are scanned alternately. An abnormal value is judged from a difference Δ=Wx−Wy between the X-direction mark width Wx and the Y-direction mark width Wy.
For example, a design value of the mark width is set to 2 μm and an allowable difference is set to 0.10 μm. If the mark width detection results of marks 1, 2, . . . are Wx1=2.10 μm, Wy1=2.11 μm, Wx2=2.40 μm, Wy2=2.10 μm, . . . , an XY difference of the second mark is in excess of the allowable difference. It is judged that there is an erroneous detection, and these values are removed from the position detection information. For example, if the width measured again is Wx2=2.10 μm, this mark width is adopted as the position detection information. With this process, large position misalignment can be avoided. An alignment mark may have a square shape, and a difference between X- and Y-direction widths of the mark is obtained.
A width is obtained as a first order difference between positions. A difference between X- and Y-direction widths is a second order difference of positions. The second order difference is not limited to a difference between widths along different directions, but other differences may be used.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
By using an area separation resist pattern, n-type impurity ions, e.g., P ions, are implanted into the p-type well PW to dope the impurities in the gate electrode G and form extension regions EX of source/drain on both sides of the gate electrode. For the n-type well NW, p-type impurity ions, e.g., B ions, are implanted. An insulating film such as a silicon oxide film is deposited and reactive ion etching (RIE) is performed to form side wall insulating films SW on the side walls of the gate electrode G. Then, n-type impurity ions are implanted into the p-type well PW and p-type impurity ions are implanted into the n-type well NW, to form high concentration source/drain regions S/D. After a MOS transistor structure is formed in this manner, an interlayer insulating film 7 of phosphosilicate glass (PSG) or the like is deposited by CVD. The surface of the interlayer insulating film is planarized by CMP. This state corresponds to that shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Thereafter, as shown in
Thereafter, multi-layer wirings are formed by usual processes. Alignment marks for the multi-layer wiring forming process may be steps of alignment marks formed in the substrate and exposed again or alignment marks formed at the same time when a new wiring is formed.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The present invention has been described in connection with the preferred embodiments. The invention is not limited only to the above embodiments. For example, the gate electrode may be made of polycide, metal or the like. The conductive plug may be made of silicon, TiN or the like in addition to tungsten. The MOS transistor may have pocket regions of an opposite conductivity type surrounding the extension regions of the source/drain. An EB resist film may have a multi-layer structure in addition to a single layer structure. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that other various modifications, improvements, combinations, and the like can be made.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2005-100458 | Mar 2005 | JP | national |
2005-279561 | Sep 2005 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4413186 | Uema | Nov 1983 | A |
4566796 | Leebrick | Jan 1986 | A |
4770533 | Suwa | Sep 1988 | A |
5004925 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5091285 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5301124 | Chan et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5412210 | Todokoro et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418613 | Matsutani | May 1995 | A |
5972772 | Sasaki et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6285455 | Shiraishi | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6399953 | Kitamura | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6440816 | Farrow et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
7235455 | Maruyama | Jun 2007 | B2 |
20010003655 | Tokunaga | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010006216 | Koike | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010042068 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020142235 | Hamanaka et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040047938 | Kosuga et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059540 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040135226 | Yoshimura et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040198017 | Chang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040198018 | Fukuda | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040264759 | Hattori et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050117154 | McArthur et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060085161 | Smeets et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070002298 | Visser | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
H05-190435 | Jul 1993 | JP |
H07-302741 | Nov 1995 | JP |
8-17696 | Jan 1996 | JP |
H08-111363 | Apr 1996 | JP |
9-36019 | Feb 1997 | JP |
H10-079339 | Mar 1998 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060223200 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |