This invention relates to thermal and electrical burn-in of electronic devices. More particularly the present invention relates to wafer level burn-in systems applicable to components of the semiconductor industry through use of two electrical contacts in contact with opposite sides of a wafer. The present invention is also related to wafer level burn-in of vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELs).
Solid-state semiconductor devices are found in most electronic components today. For example, semiconductor lasers are important devices in applications such as optoelectronic communication systems and high-speed printing systems. There continues to be increased interest in vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELs) although edge emitting lasers are currently used in the vast majority of applications. A reason for the interest in VCSELs is that edge-emitting lasers produce a beam with a large angular divergence, making efficient collection of the emitted beam more difficult. Furthermore, edge emitting lasers cannot be tested until the wafer is cleaved into individual devices, the edges of which form the mirror facets of each device. On the other hand, not only does the beam of a VCSEL have a small angular divergence, a VCSEL emits light normal to the surface of the wafer. In addition, since VCSELs incorporate the mirrors monolithically in their design, they allow for on-wafer testing and the fabrication of one-dimensional or two-dimensional laser arrays. It is common for more than 60,000 semiconductor laser components to be fabricated on a single wafer.
VCSELs are typically made by growing several layers of reflective material on a substrate material. VCSELs include a first mirrored stack, formed on the substrate by semiconductor manufacturing techniques, an active region, formed on top of the first mirrored stack, and a second mirrored stack, formed on top of the active region. By providing a first contact on top of the second mirrored stack, and a second contact on the backside of the substrate, a current is forced through the active region, thus driving the VCSEL. VCSELs can be fabricated/grown with combinations of gallium, arsinide, nitrogen, aluminum, antimony, phosphorous and/or indium placed within or about a typical GaAs substrate.
Historically, the manufacturing of semiconductors has been a very elaborate and expensive multi-step process. Component burn-in generally refers to the process of thermally and/or electrically testing newly fabricated semiconductor components. Burn-in allows for the individual identification of faulty components coming for a lot or batch. Currently, components are burned-in at the “package level”, which means that the individually-packaged devices are typically tested after being derived from a wafer. Each component is tested and placed in sockets to be burned-in either as a packaged unit or to be tested as bare die (before packaging). Either die or package level burn-in can be costly for manufacturers because it is labor intensive. Each component has to be tested, requiring plenary human intervention.
Although wafer level burn-in (WLBI) methods and systems are currently being explored by the semiconductor industry, proposed systems and methods generally require that a plurality of electrical probes contact a plurality of electrical contacts on a wafer. Such systems can be complex and require extra care with regard to probe and contact alignment. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,339,329 issued to Nakata et al., entitled “Method of testing electrical characteristics of multiple semiconductor integrated circuits simultaneously”, is typical of the technological direction being taken in the industry for WLBI. The Nakata et al. patent teaches simultaneous testing of a plurality of semiconductor integrated circuit elements by bringing a plurality of probe terminals into contact with a plurality of testing electrodes associated respectively with a plurality of semiconductor integrated circuit elements on a wafer and applying a voltage to each of the testing electrodes from the common voltage supply line via a plurality of positive temperature coefficient elements.
The semiconductor fabrication industry needs methods and systems for reducing the costs and associated labor currently required to carry out device burn-in. Further, the semiconductor industry needs a wafer level burn-in (WLBI) method and systems that can be used in the manufacturing and test of semiconductor components having front and back contacts, such as VCSELs, diodes, LEDs, and other semiconductor devices. The present inventors have recognized that it would be advantageous to remedy current burn-in procedures by providing methods and systems of accomplishing wafer level burn-in of components. Accordingly, the present invention is described and presented as a novel method and means to address the shortcomings currently found in the art.
The following summary of the invention is provided to facilitate an understanding of some of the innovative features unique to the present invention and is not intended to be a full description. A full appreciation of the various aspects of the invention can be gained by taking the entire specification, claims, drawings, and abstract as a whole. Additional objects and advantages of the current invention will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the specification.
It is a feature of the present invention to provide systems for conducting wafer level burn-in of semiconductor devices.
In accordance with addressing the limitations of the prior art, presented are systems for burning-in electronics components at the wafer level, or wafer level burn-in (WLBI).
It is a feature of the present invention to provide a WLBI system including top and bottom contact plates for making electrical contact with a semiconductor wafer having front and back contacts.
It is another feature of the present invention to provide a WLBI system including a heat exchanger for assisting in the regulation of wafer temperature during burn-in procedures.
It is another feature of the present invention to optionally provide a graphite foil for facilitating contact between contact plates and/or wafer contacts.
It is another feature of the present invention to provide an electrical power regulator for providing current and voltage through components on a wafer undergoing a burn-in procedure.
It is another feature of the present invention to provide monitoring and automated adjustment apparatuses necessary for maintaining current and temperature level requirements during wafer level burn-in.
It is another feature of the present invention to provide a wafer level burn-in system including wafer support hardware for providing mechanical retention of a wafer undergoing burn-in procedures.
It is yet another feature of the present invention to provide a wafer support that provides controlled mechanical clamping force, electrical contact and temperature interface to a wafer undergoing burn-in procedures.
It is another feature of the present invention to describe methods of achieving wafer level burn-in for semiconductor devices wherein a wafer containing semiconductor devices is fabricated, undergoes wafer level burn-in, individual devices are derived from the wafer after burn-in, and operational devices are made available for use (shipment).
Wafer level burn-in reduces the need for package level burn-in and reduces component production costs. A WLBI system having distinct contact plates serving as electrodes for the application of electrical bias on each surface/side of a wafer having back and front electrical contacts for semiconductor devices borne by the wafer is described. Furthermore, a pliable conductive layer, such as a graphite, felt material that can appear disk-like in form, is described for simultaneously supplying pins on the device side and/or substrate side of a wafer with electrical contact. The pliable conductive layer can allow for an effective series resistance, R, in each of the devices borne by the wafer, thus helping maintain voltage bias level consistent. The pliable conductive layer also prevents damage to the wafer when pressure is applied by chamber contacts onto the wafer during burn-in operations, because the pliable conductive layer can deform to absorb contact surfaces of the pins on the device side of a wafer. A cooling system is also described for enabling the application of a uniform temperature to a wafer undergoing burn-in.
The accompanying figures, in which like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally-similar elements throughout the separate views and which are incorporated in and from part of the specification, further illustrate the present invention and, together with the detailed description of the invention, serve to explain the principles of the present invention.
The novel features of the present invention will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon examination of the following detailed description of the invention or can be learned by practice of the present invention. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description of the invention and the specific examples presented, while indicating certain embodiments of the present invention, are provided for illustration purposes only because various changes and modifications within the scope of the invention will become apparent to those of skill in the art from the detailed description of the invention and claims that follow.
The present invention replaces component, or device level, burn-in with new methods and systems that achieve burn-in results at much lower cost. This disclosure of the present invention teaches how to burn-in many wafer-based components simultaneously while the components are integrally part of the wafer, rather than using current processes known in the art that generally require the handling of one die/component at a time. Prior methods are generally more labor intensive. Furthermore, the present invention substantially reduces scrap devices resulting from post wafer burn-in operation.
Referring to
Referring to
It should be appreciated that variations on the upper surface (or device side) of the wafer 100 may develop during creation/processing of a wafer, or variations can also be formed on the surface of the upper contact plate 210, that may not allow for electrical potential to be applied to all devices on the wafer. In order to ensure that all devices are provided with electrical potential from the upper contact plate 210, a conductive and pliable layer 220 can be optionally introduced between the upper contact plate 210 and the wafer 100 via common contact 110. The pliable layer 220 can also reduce mechanical pressure on the device side of the wafer 100. Also, pliable layer 220 can be optionally introduced between the lower contact plate 215 and the wafer 100 via common contact 105, preventing excessive mechanical pressure on the wafer 100. The upper contact plate 210 can be controlled by a controller 230. The controller can allow the surface of upper contact plate 210 to be optimally oriented against the surface of the device contacts 110, or the pliable, conductive material 220 when used. The controller can provide for X-Y-Z orientation of the upper plate 210.
During the burn-in process, thermal energy 240 can be provided through the upper contact plate 210 directly to all device contacts 110 formed on the surface of the wafer 100. If an optional pliable layer 220 is used, thermal energy must also be sufficient to pass through it to the wafer 100. In order to maintain a constant burn-in temperature at the wafer during processing, a heat exchanger 225 can be used. The heat exchanger 225 can provide cooling action through the lower contact plate 215 to the wafer 100. The heat exchanger 225 may include heat sink material, liquid cooling, air cooling and other heat transfer methods known in the art to regulate a constant temperature at the wafer 100.
Referring to
Referring to
When used, the pliable layer 220 should operate as an intermediate contact material that is electrically conductive, thermally conductive, and mechanically compressible. The pliable layer 220 should add sufficient electrical resistance to the burn-in circuit to minimize current flow variation die-to-die across the wafer 100. The pliable layer 220 must also be thermally conductive to transfer heat flow to/from the semiconductor wafer. The pliable layer 220 must be mechanically compressible to ensure uniform contact across non-uniform wafer and electrode surfaces and to prevent damage to the semiconductor wafer surfaces (upper and/or lower). Some materials that can be used include, but are not limited to, z-axis elastomers, conductive elastomers, conductive rubber, metal films, metal-impregnated polymer films, graphite discs, and sacrificial patterned metal. For example, a graphite foil disc referred to by Toyo Tanso USA of Troutdale, Oreg., the manufacturer and distributor, as PERMA FOIL can be cut from high purity graphite sheets. PERMA FOIL properties include:
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
A method for carrying out WLBI in accordance with the present invention will now be described. It should be understood that variations in steps, time periods, electrical/thermal quantities and other parameters are possible given different semiconductor wafers. Use of a VCSEL in the following example, or exact methods, steps, time periods and electrical/thermal quantities, should not be construed as a limitation to method and systems of the present invention.
Referring to
Once the burn-in process is initiated, a record of burn-in start information and settings may be recorded at step 930 on a burn-in log/form. The wafer burn-in current and temperatures are monitored at step 935 during the burn-in process for each wafer, which may take several hours or days depending on the devices or application.
After the burn-in process time period is completed, the bias current being supplied to the wafer is ramped down and eventually turned off at step 940, and the heater is turned off at step 940. A record of the burn-in stop time and other observable information may be recorded at step 945 on the information log. The wafer is generally allowed to cool down at step 950 to less than 30° C. After the cool-down period, the heat exchanger (cooling apparatus which may include a fan powered by a power supply) is turned off at step 955 (and any other equipment should be turned off for safety and electrostatic discharge reasons). The contact plates are then opened at step 960. The wafer and pliable disc material are then removed at step 965. The wafer is then cleaned at step 970 to remove graphite (or other pliable layer 220) particles, and the wafer is returned to the process lot at step 975. Another VCSEL wafer can then be loaded into the system from the lot or, if the lot is completed, the lot can be forward to the next operation (e.g., verification testing or device assembly).
It should be commonly known that semiconductor wafers must be handled with electro-static discharge (ESD) considerations in mind. Appropriate cleanliness and non-static equipment, procedures and material should be used at all times when handling semiconductor wafers and devices.
Reference in the above process has been made to “ramp up/down of bias current” and mechanical pressure during closure of contact plates. More detailed information of the present WLBI processing methods will now be provided in light of these important processing considerations.
During initial cleaning of a wafer prior to burn-in, lint-free paper can be placed on the work surface. A lint-free tissue wet with acetone can be used to wipe the conductive graphite disc (pliable layer 220) to remove particles. Both sides of a wafer can be sprayed with an air-dusting product to gently remove loose particles. A lint-free tissue wet with acetone can also be used to wipe the top and bottom contact plates of the burn-in system to remove particles, particularly any remaining graphite or other particles that may remain from previous wafer burn-in. The contact plates and wafer area of the system can also be sprayed with an air dust product.
The lot number and wafer number for a new wafer requiring wafer level burn-in are observed and then recorded on a log sheet. An example of a log sheet is shown in
The wafer and pliable layer 220 (i.e., conductive disk material), if used, are then loaded into the system as shown in
The contact plates are then closed onto the wafer and disk. A, system may be equipped with manual or automated contact closing apparatus. Described herein is a process for closing an automated system. In preparing to close the automated contact closing apparatus, the upper contact plate air cylinder air pressure gauge can be set to 10:*5 psi. A “Down” button associated with the contact plate is then initialized to close contact plate. The wafer and/or graphic disk are then monitored during contact plate closure to assure that they do not experience movement/sliding. An operator may be required to open the plate and repeat steps if necessitated by movement.
An operator should wait about one minute after contact plate closure for the system and wafer to stabilize, then pressure, which can be generated by an air cylinder, will be increased while monitoring the air pressure gauge consistent with the following sequence:
Next in the process can be to ramp up the bias current across the electrical contacts. First, an operator should short the voltage sensor/voltmeter leads together (to protect against supply currents surges during power up). The operator will turn on a 500 Amp power supply. Nominal settings at startup can be an open circuit voltage less than 3.0V and short circuit current to 0 Amps. The power supply should read approximately 0V for voltage output and approximately 0 Amps for current output with the voltage sense leads shorted. The power supply bias current can first be set to 10 Amps. The operator can then remove the voltage sense voltmeter lead short. The supply output voltage should now increase to 1–2 volts. The operator can manually ramp up the bias current slowly (using the current setting knob typically found in electrical power supply equipment) with the following schedule:
For 120 Amp wafers:
For 170 Amp wafers:
For 480 Amp wafers:
It is important to ramp the bias current slowly to avoid excessive temperature transients, which can shock and break the wafer. These current ramp rates will limit thermal transients to less than 5° C./minute. Refer to Table 1 for the burn-in current generally used for different wafer types.
Next, the operator should check the wafer substrate temperature on thermocouple readout. Wafer temperature used for a VCSEL wafer, for example, should be increased steadily from 25° C. toward the 125° C. burn-in temperature. The heat exchanger should then be activated. If the heat exchanger is a heat sink in combination with a cooling fan, then the cooling fan power switch should be powered on (if not already operational) and the temperature of thermal monitoring should be set to control the cooling fan in accordance with device specification such as shown in Table 1 (e.g., either 85° C. or 125° C.). A fan with an automatic operation can now cycle on/off to cool the wafer when the substrate temperature exceeds the set control temperature.
The wafer/wafer substrate temperature can be checked using a thermocouple readout. The wafer's temperature may increase steadily toward the specified burn-in temperature at a less than 5° C./minute rate. For 120 Amp and 170 Amp wafer types, the operator should turn on the top plate heater power when the wafer substrate temperature exceeds 50° C. 480 Amp wafer types do not generally require top plate heat to reach burn-in temperature. The wafer burn-in for a VCSEL wafer can be considered “started” when the wafer substrate temperature reaches 100° C. for 125° C. burn-in condition wafer types and 60° C. for 85° C. burn-in condition wafer types. A record of the start time and other information can be recorded in proper spaces of the burn-in log shown in
The operator should monitor the wafer carefully during burn-in startup until wafer substrate temperature stabilizes at specified burn-in temperature (e.g., 85 or 125:t5° C. for VCSEL) and check the wafer substrate temperature periodically during the entire burn-in (e.g., 20 hours for VCSEL wafers). The cooling fan should cycle on/off with temperature ranging :t5° C. The 120 and 170 Amp wafers will seldom cycle on the fan. The 480 Amp wafers will cycle the fan on/off in approximately 2 minute intervals. Power supply current should also be monitored periodically during the burn-in to verify the nominal bias current is maintained. Clamp (contact) pressure should also be checked periodically to verify the appropriate setting (e.g., VCSEL at 50:*5 psi) is also maintained in order to ensure that adequate thermal and electrical contact is being maintained on the wafer. The top contact plate heater can also be periodically monitored to verify the appropriate temperature reading is maintained. If wafer substrate temperature exceeds the maximum allowable (e.g., 1 35° C. for VCSEL), immediate corrective action should be taken by setting the cooling fan to the “ON” position or, if required, decrease/turn off power supply bias current.
At completion of the burn-in period, the current will be ramped down and the heater turned off. For VCSELS, the operator will carefully ramp down the power supply bias current (to avoid temperature transients that can shock and break the wafer) and turn off top plate heater as follows:
120 Amp wafers:
170 Amp wafers:
480 Amp wafers:
To open up the contact plate, the contact plate clamp air pressure gauge setting should be reduced from 50 psi to 10 psi with the following sequence:
The contact method described herein is for electronic devices with front and back contacts. This includes, for example, VCSEL type lasers, other lasers, LEDs, semiconductor diodes, plus other types of electronic devices. The contact method preferably comprises two distinct electrodes, one on each side of the wafer for application of bias. Use of a pliable layer 220 can enable contact over the full wafer surface and all devices across it.
The pliable layer 220 described herein as pliable and/or graphite material formed as a disk to correspond to the size and shape of the wafer may be added to one, both, or neither side of wafer, between the electrode (contact plate) and the wafer. As described in some detail with regard to the illustration of
The present WLBI system can include equipment apparatus and design currently available in the electronic, electrical, mechanical, measurement and control arts. These include, but are not limited to:
The following description will now focus on VCSEL wafer burn-in considerations, but the principles can apply to other semiconductor wafers. The VCSEL wafer product is generally a 3-inch diameter round (with 2.9 inch diameter flat) gallium arsenide (GaAs) semiconductor wafer, typically 0.008–0.014 inches thick. The wafer has been processed with metallization patterns on the top side and full surface metallization on the bottom side. The wafer level burn-in process is a powered burn-in, supplying 20 mA dc typically, with 5–20 mA dc for some products, current limited, with approximately 2 volts to each device on the wafer, at 125° C. typically, with 85–150° C. for some products, controlled +/−5 C, for 20 hours typically in an air ambient atmosphere. Each wafer (depending on device type) will have 24K–58K devices, for a total burn-in power supply current requirement of 120–1,200 Amps, with supply voltage capable of ranging 0–5 volts.
Typical VCSEL wafer power dissipation will range from 200 watts to 2,000 watts, depending on device count/wafer and bias current/device. The burn-in system of the present invention provides metal electrodes, which clamp at controlled pressure (adjustable 10–100 psi force, controllable to +/−5 psi) to the two sides of the wafer, opening up for loading/unloading. A graphite foil (i.e., pliable layer 220) nearly matching the shape of the VCSEL wafer surface, and currently known to be about 0.015 inches thick, can be inserted on the patterned topside of the VCSEL wafer to provide a cushioning layer that is electrically and thermally conductive. Significant heat will be generated by the combination of the graphite foil and the wafer during burn-in, which must be thermally managed by the burn-in system to maintain the targeted wafer bottom side temperature. Air and/or liquid cooling are useful to manage the thermal load.
The present inventors have developed a wafer level burn-in system which is air cooled and maintains 125° C. wafer temperature for up to 1,200 watts, with control for up to 1,400 watts at 140° C. wafer temperature. The target performance for maximum power dissipation is to maintain a 125° C. wafer temperature at 1,600 watts power dissipation. The WLBI system utilizes an air cylinder clamp to apply up to 700 pounds of force on the wafer. A thermocouple provides wafer substrate temperature to a control box, which turns the cooling fan on/off to maintain the target temperature +/−5° C. in the center of the bottom contact plate. The temperature profile across the bottom copper plate drops approximately 10° C. at edge from center reading. The heat path is generally downward through the bottom copper contact plate into a large copper heat sink with cooling fins through which air is forced. A propeller fan with 600 cfm capacity is utilized. An auxiliary heater is connected to the top contact plate to inject heat for low current wafer products.
The system used to accomplish VCSEL wafer burn-in should uniformly apply a pressure contact to the wafer that is adjustable to a target of 10–100 psi on 3 inch diameter wafer. This corresponds to 70–700 total pounds clamp force on 3 inch diameter wafer. The pressure should be controlled to +/−5 psi. An adjustable 120–1,200 Amps of dc current at 0–5 volt range during 20 hour burn-in is applied to the wafer and the devices formed on the wafer. Control of the voltage should be to within +/−1%.
Up to 2,000 watts of heat should be dissipated to control wafer temperature to a target in 85–150° C. range to +/−5° C. temperature tolerance over, for example, a 3 inch diameter wafer during the 20 hour burn-in. The contact pressure, bias current/voltage, and wafer temperature heating/cooling should be ramped up/down during burn-in startup/completion in a controlled and adjustable manner. Contact pressure, bias current, bias voltage across wafer contact plates, and wafer (bottom contact plate) temperature during burn-in and the ramp-up and ramp-down should be monitored and data logged.
Material types selected for the machine parts of the WLBI system can include aluminum and copper as well as other material types. Support machined parts are preferably aluminum and all high-current path material is preferably copper with gold/nickel plated contacts to block copper migration into the gallium arsenide VCSEL wafer and to prevent copper oxidation and parasitic resistance/heat generation.
The top/bottom contact plates (210 and 215) should preferably self level to approximately 0.003 inches. The graphite disk (pliable layer 220) can compress to about 0.003 inches to compensate for some wafer/plate parallelism variations. The system should be able to operate continuously during a 20 hour burn-in for VCSELs. The system's use can be assumed to be over a six-day per week operation with four hours load/unload time.
VCSEL wafers should preferably be burned-in with controlled pressure contact, controlled bias current, and controlled temperature, for a controlled time period, without wafer breakage. Ramp-up and ramp-down processes should be controllable. The contact plate areas should preferably be flat, smooth, and clean to prevent irregular surfaces that can cause wafer breakage. A PC-based logging system with sensor instruments can be used to automate monitoring and to supply periodic readings. A PC-based system can monitor contact pressure, bias current, contact plate bias voltage, bottom contact plate temperature, top contact plate temperature, and log data each minute during ramp-up and ramp-down, then every 5 minutes during the 20 hour burn-in period. A data log for each system/wafer burn-in lot can be supplied in a data file that can be uploaded to a network server location.
For monitoring, a power supply can be calibrated and can supply signal on bias current. A voltmeter can measure contact plate bias voltage. Thermocouples can be inserted into upper/lower contact plates to measure temperature.
An over-temperature alarm should trigger shutdown of the bias power supply, which will remove the heat generation source. If loss of system air pressure should occur, the wafer contact force will be lost, which should trigger a system alarm. An uninterruptible power supply (UPS) should be used to support auxiliary 110 VAC control electronics to protect the system in case of loss of 110 VAC power. If loss of three-phase power should occur, a system alarm should trigger so that remedial measures can be taken to save the wafer and system.
Software used within a PC-controlled and automated data logging system can control and monitor several WLBI systems simultaneously; preferably, data log file output that can be uploaded to a network server location and viewed with Microsoft® compatible software (e.g., Excel, etc). A network interface such as Ethernet can provide the necessary network linkage and instrumentation control remotely.
Each WLBI system should preferably use three-phase 208V AC 20 Amps for the power supply and single phase 110 VAC 20 Amps for control box electronics.
The system should provide electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection connections for operators during wafer handling. Wafer contact plates will be connected electrically to power supply terminals to prevent ESD.
The present burn-in process has already been shown in tests to “stabilize” VCSEL performance by operating a wafer-based device at elevated temperature and dc current for a fixed time. Component burn-in has been successfully tested at a temperature of 125° C., current of 20 mA, and a duration of 20 hours. The wafer-based test components were verified to be “stabilized” after individual components were built after being removed from the burned-in wafer, and changes in optical power output for each device was tracked during a 14 hour “operational” burn-in.
During testing, the WLBI system was required to work with “die shrink” wafers which would have 50K die/wafer, drawing 1,000 Amps/wafer at 20 mA/die, at 1.6V forward voltage drop for 1,600 watts total power dissipation. This wafer VF×IF power dissipation was to be the heat generator to drive the wafer to 125° C. The system then had to remove the heat in a controlled manner to maintain 125° C. The present invention has been shown to be operational at a full 1,000 Amps capability, with up to 2,100 watts dissipation capability. Testing of WLBI on full wafers to verify proper delta PO (optical power output) stabilization determined several interesting effects. Proton and oxide VCSELs behaved differently, leading to increased understanding of the manner in which the current flowed through the wafers. WLBI was demonstrated to roughly approximate the stabilization achieved by the component burn-in process. With the teaching of the present invention, WLBI is achievable for an 870 Amp array VCSEL product and can be adapted for use with other semiconductor products (e.g., LEDs) having electrical contact points at front, back or other surfaces of the wafer.
Several heat exchanger designs can be utilized to provide for thermal management of wafers being burned-in with the present invention. These diverse thermal management options will now be discussed.
Using copper heat conductor 1325 as the heat conductor with, for example, a 3.17 inch diameter, the boiling water level will need to be 2.0 inches below the surface of the chuck 1310 for a heat load of 1,000 W; for 2,000 W the boiling water level will need to be 1.0 inch below the surface of the chuck 1310. Lower thermal conductivity materials can be used if the boiling water surface is much closer to the top of the chuck 1310.
The copper heat conductor 1325 must extend into the boiling water at all times. A heat conductor/chuck cylinder that is about 8.04 cm (3.17 inches) diameter and about 10 cm (4.0 inches) high may be optimum. The heat conductor 1325 and chuck face can both be 8.04 cm (3.17 inches) in diameter.
The embodiment and examples set forth herein are presented to best explain the present invention and its practical application and to thereby enable those skilled in the art to make and utilize the invention. Those skilled in the art, however, will recognize that the foregoing description and examples have been presented for the purpose of illustration and example only. Other variations and modifications of the present invention will be apparent to those of skill in the art, and it is the intent of the appended claims that such variations and modifications be covered. The description as set forth is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the scope of the invention. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching without departing from the scope of the following claims. It is contemplated that the use of the present invention can involve components having different characteristics. It is intended that the scope of the present invention be defined by the claims appended hereto, giving full cognizance to equivalents in all respects.
The present application is a 371 of PCT/US02/25664 filed on Aug. 12, 2002. This invention claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application, Ser. No. 60/311,916, entitled “METHODS OF AND SYSTEMS FOR WAFER LEVEL BURN-IN OF ELECTRONIC DEVICES”, filed Aug. 13, 2001.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US02/25664 | 8/12/2002 | WO | 00 | 2/12/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/017335 | 2/27/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4276098 | Nelson et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4860079 | Turner | Aug 1989 | A |
5513200 | Paoli | Apr 1996 | A |
5570032 | Atkins et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5929651 | Leas et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6184053 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204074 | Fiore et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222206 | Chirovsky et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229329 | Nakata et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6340302 | Ladd | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351134 | Leas et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6549026 | DiBattista et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6623997 | Chang et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6771086 | Lutz et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6842029 | Howland | Jan 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4223658 | Jan 1993 | DE |
0841572 | May 1998 | EP |
05029418 | May 1993 | JP |
10178074 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2000111576 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001050983 | Feb 2001 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050024076 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60311916 | Aug 2001 | US |