This relates generally to the field of memory applications and voltage devices, including but not limited to dual threshold voltage devices.
The field of memory applications is becoming more challenging as the performance requirements for memory-based devices increase. Because of the many useful properties of dual threshold voltage devices (e.g., adjustability, density, and drivability), memory systems comprising dual threshold voltage devices have superior performance over conventional memory systems.
Analog compensation techniques could be utilized to compensate for different bit error rates and temperature dependency. However, analog compensation techniques are very complex and consume good portions of both silicon area and power. Moreover, the analog circuits themselves are susceptible to both temperature and supply voltage.
There is a need for systems and/or devices with more efficient, accurate, and effective methods for operating memory systems. Such systems, devices, and methods optionally complement or replace conventional systems, devices, and methods for fabricating and/or operating memory systems.
The present disclosure describes various implementations of dual threshold (e.g., dual gate) voltage devices and systems. As discussed in greater detail below, dual threshold voltage devices are able to store multiple bits in a compact layout. Thus, memory arrays can be produced using the dual threshold voltage devices as memory cells. In addition, dual threshold voltage devices can be implemented as current and/or voltage selectors for other circuit components, such as magnetic memory devices. Some magnetic memory devices require inputs with multiple voltage levels in order to effectively read and write from the devices. The dual threshold voltage devices are optionally used (e.g., in place of larger, more complex analog circuitry) to modulate a voltage or current source so as to provide the required voltage/current levels. Moreover, the input voltage requirements of some magnetic memory devices vary with the temperature of the magnetic memory devices. To achieve a desirable bit error rate (BER) across multiple temperatures, without excessive power consumption, a dual-threshold voltage is used in some implementations to regulate the input voltage/current for the magnetic memory device based on temperature.
There are significant advantages to using dual threshold voltage devices rather than conventional analog circuits. For example, in order to tune currents which are supplied to a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) device (e.g., a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction (pMTJ) device) through access transistor, either a complex analog current supplying block has to be designed or many analog voltages have to be generated and feed into the access transistor. Single analog voltage generation needs a significant size block. In order to achieve various BER or operation at various temperatures, many of the analog voltages are needed. Therefore, a significant portion of silicon area is dedicated to those analog circuits.
Using trimmable voltage threshold (Vth) devices as a selector device for the pMTJ is beneficial over analog circuitry in terms of both power and silicon area. The selector device itself is optionally individually adjusted to the coupled pMTJ and offers a very wide range of tenability in terms of current modulation.
In one aspect, some implementations include a memory device having: (1) a first charge storage device having a first gate with a corresponding first threshold voltage, the first charge storage device configured to store charge corresponding to one or more first bits; and (2) a second charge storage device having a second gate with a corresponding second threshold voltage, distinct from the first threshold voltage, the second charge storage device configured to store charge corresponding to one or more second bits; where the second charge storage device is coupled in parallel with the first charge storage device.
In some implementations, the first charge storage device is configured to: (1) store charge corresponding to a first bit of the one or more first bits on a drain-side of the first gate; and (2) store charge corresponding to a second bit of the one or more first bits on a source-side of the first gate.
In some implementations, each charge storage device is configured to selectively store multiple amounts of charge (e.g., using floating gate or charge trap technology), each amount corresponding to a distinct logic state. For example, each charge storage device is configured to store four different amounts of electrons, corresponding to 00, 01, 10, and 11 states. In this example, the memory device states correspond to 8 bits of data.
In another aspect, some implementations include a memory device having: (1) a magnetic memory component; (2) a current selector component coupled to the magnetic memory component, the current selector component including: (a) a first transistor having a first gate with a corresponding first threshold voltage; and (b) a second transistor having a second gate with a corresponding second threshold voltage, distinct from the first threshold voltage; where the second transistor is coupled in parallel with the first transistor.
In some implementations, the current selector component is configured to selectively supply a plurality of currents to the magnetic memory component. In some implementations, the memory device includes control circuitry configured to select a particular current of the plurality of currents based on a temperature of the magnetic memory component.
Thus, devices and systems are provided with methods operating memory systems, thereby increasing the effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction with such systems and devices.
For a better understanding of the various described implementations, reference should be made to the Description of Implementations below, in conjunction with the following drawings in which like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the figures.
Like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
Reference will now be made in detail to implementations, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various described implementations. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the various described implementations may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, circuits, and networks have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the implementations.
As described in greater detail below, dual threshold voltage devices have many useful properties. First, dual threshold voltage devices are able to store multiple bits (e.g., 2 bits or 4 bits per cell) in a compact layout. Second, dual threshold voltage devices can be implemented as current and/or voltage selectors for magnetic memory devices. For example, to achieve a desirable bit error rate (BER) across multiple temperatures, without excessive power consumption, a dual-threshold voltage is used in some implementations to regulate the input voltage/current for the magnetic memory device based on temperature.
In some implementations, the core is vertical and cylindrical in shape. In some implementations, the plurality of layers annularly surrounds the vertical cylindrical core and the core surrounded by the plurality of layers creates a cylindrical pillar (e.g., device 100 is shaped as a cylindrical pillar). For example, the cylindrical pillar includes the core 102, the first layer 104, the second layer 106, the third layer 108, and the fourth layer 110. Further, in this example, the cylindrical pillar includes the first input terminal 112, the second input terminal 114 and the drain terminal 116. In some implementations, the core is composed of a tantalum alloy (e.g., TaN). In some implementations, the device further comprises a cylindrical drain contact 104 that is coupled to the common source 118.
In some implementations, the core 102 is composed of a conductive material, the first layer 104 is a first dielectric layer that surrounds the core 102, the second layer 106 surrounds the first dielectric layer 104, the third layer 108 is a third dielectric layer that surrounds the second layer 106 and the fourth layer 110 is composed of a conductive material and surrounds the third dielectric layer 108. For example, the fourth layer may be the outermost layer. In some implementations, the fourth layer 110 is composed of a polycide. In some implementations, the first input terminal 112 and the second input terminal 114 are at distinct positions along the perimeter of the device (e.g., as shown in
MRAM stores data through magnetic storage elements. These elements typically include two ferromagnetic films or layers that can hold a magnetic field and are separated by a non-magnetic material. In general, one of the layers has its magnetization pinned (e.g., a “reference layer”), meaning that this layer requires a large magnetic field or spin-polarized current to change the orientation of its magnetization. The second layer is typically referred to as the storage, or free, layer and its magnetization direction can be changed by a smaller magnetic field or spin-polarized current relative to the reference layer.
Due to the spin-polarized electron tunneling effect, the electrical resistance of the cell changes due to the orientation of the magnetization of the two layers. A memory cell's resistance will be different for the parallel and anti-parallel states and thus the cell's resistance can be used to distinguish between a “1” and a “0”. One important feature of MRAIVI devices is that they are non-volatile memory devices, since they maintain the information even when the power is off. In particular, the layers can be sub-micron in lateral size and the magnetization direction can still be stable over time and with respect to thermal fluctuations.
In accordance with some implementations, the MTJ 220 is composed of a first ferromagnetic layer (a reference layer), a second ferromagnetic layer (a storage layer), and a non-magnetic layer (a spacer layer). The reference layer is also sometimes referred to as a pinned or fixed layer. The storage layer is also sometimes referred to as a free layer. The spacer layer is also sometimes referred to as a barrier layer. In some implementations, the spacer layer comprises an electrically-conductive material such as a metal. In some implementations, the spacer layer comprises an electrically-insulating material such as magnesium oxide (MgO).
In some implementations, the MTJ 220 is a perpendicular (or out-of-plane) MTJ. In this instance, the magnetic moments of the reference layer and the storage layer, and correspondingly their magnetization direction, are oriented perpendicular and out-of-plane to the ferromagnetic films of the reference layer and the storage layer.
For an MRAM device with the MTJ structure 220, the resistance states of the MRAM devices are different when the magnetization directions of the reference layer and the storage layer are aligned in a parallel (low resistance state) configuration or in an anti-parallel (high resistance state) configuration. Thus, by changing the magnetization direction of the storage layer relative to that of the reference layer, the resistance states of the MTJ structure 220 can be varied between low resistance to high resistance, enabling digital signals corresponding to bits of “0” and “1” to be stored and read. Conventionally, the parallel configuration (low resistance state) corresponds to a bit “0,” whereas the anti-parallel configuration (high resistance state) corresponds to a bit “1”.
During a read/write operation, a voltage is applied between the bit line 206 and the source line 208 (e.g., corresponding to a “0” or “1” value), and the word lines coupled to the gates of the transistors 202 and 204 enable current to flow between the bit line to the source line. In a write operation, the current is sufficient to change a magnetization of the storage layer and thus, depending on the direction of electron flow, bits of “0” and “1” are written into the MTJ 220. In a read operation, the current is insufficient to change the magnetization of the storage layer. Instead, a resistance across the MTJ 220 is determined. e.g., with a low resistance corresponding to a logical “0” and a high resistance corresponding to a logical “1.”
In some implementations, the voltage applied across the MTJ 220 is adjusted based on a state of the device 200. For example, if both transistors 202 and 204 are enabled (e.g., a voltage is applied to the gate of each transistor) then a larger voltage is provided to the MTJ 220 than if only one of the transistors 202 and 204 is enabled. In some implementations, the device 200 supplies distinct currents to the MTJ based on which of the transistors 202 and 204 is enabled, e.g., if both transistors are enabled a larger current is supplied than if only one of the transistors 202 and 204 is enabled.
In accordance with some implementations, the device 221 comprises device 100, where the first input terminal 112 corresponds to the gate of the transistor 222 and the second input terminal 114 corresponds to the gate of the transistor 224. In some implementations, the device 221 is coupled to a bitline 206, e.g., the drains of the transistors 222 and 224 are coupled to the bitline 206. In some implementations, the device 221 is coupled to a source line 208, e.g., the sources of the transistors 222 and 224 are coupled to the source line 208.
In Equation 1 above, μn to is the mobility of n-channel MOSFET, W is the width of MOSFET, L is the length of MOSFET, Cox is the gate capacitance of MOSFET, VGS is the voltage across gate and source terminal, VTO is the threshold voltage of MOSFET, and ID (sat) is the current between source and drain terminals.
In accordance with some implementations, each memory cell (e.g., each dual threshold device) stores four or more bits. In some implementations, parallel writing is performed in a row-wise manner. In some implementations, each bitline (e.g., the bitline 512) is configured to supply a plurality of currents to the coupled memory cells. In the example of
Although the wordlines, bitlines, and source lines described above in reference to
In light of these principles, we now turn to certain implementations.
In accordance with some implementations, a memory device (e.g., the device 221,
In some implementations: (1) the first charge storage device comprises a transistor; and (2) the first gate comprises a floating gate configured to store the charge corresponding to the one or more first bits. In some implementations, both storage devices have floating gates.
In some implementations: (1) the first charge storage device comprises a transistor; and (2) the first gate comprises a nitride trap configured to store the charge corresponding to the one or more first bits. In some implementations, both storage devices have nitride traps. In some implementations, charge traps other than nitride are provided, such as silicon nanocrystal or metallic nanocrystal (e.g. Co, Ni) embedded in insulating silicon oxide, Ti0.2Al0.8Ox, and the like.
In some implementations, the first charge storage device is configured to: (1) store charge corresponding to a first bit of the one or more first bits on a drain-side of the first gate (e.g., as illustrated in
In some implementations, a channel of the first charge storage device is electrically-insulated from a channel of the second charge storage device. For example, the channel of the first device is separated from a channel of the second device by a common drain layer (e.g., as shown in
In some implementations, a channel doping of the first charge storage device is distinct from a channel doping of the second charge storage device. In some implementations, the distinct dopings yield the differing threshold voltages of the first and second charge storage devices.
In some implementations, a work function of the first charge storage device is distinct from a work function of the second charge storage device. The work function for a charge storage device is the energy required to take an outer most valence electron from element atom. The work function generally depends on microcrystalline structure (e.g., direction, strain, etc.) of metal, grain boundary structure, and/or electronic band structure of the element. By having various gate electrodes with different work functions, different voltage thresholds are achieved. In some implementations and instances, the voltage threshold of a charge storage device is linearly proportional to the work function of its gate electrode.
In some implementations: (1) the memory device further includes a bitline (e.g., the bitline 206,
In some implementations: (1) the memory device further includes a source line(e.g., the source line 208,
In some implementations: (1) the memory device further includes a first wordline (e.g., wordline 504,
In accordance with some implementations, a memory device includes: (1) a magnetic memory component (e.g., the MTJ 230,
In some implementations: (1) the memory device further includes a source line (e.g., the source line 208,
In some implementations: (1) the memory device further includes a first wordline and a second wordline; and (2) the first gate is coupled to the first wordline and the second gate is couple to the second wordline.
In some implementations, the current selector component is configured to selectively supply a plurality of currents to the magnetic memory component (e.g., determined by which gates are activated). For example, the current selector component is configured to supply the currents shown in
In some implementations, the memory device further includes control circuitry (e.g., the control circuitry 250 and/or the control circuitry 252,
In some implementations, the memory device further includes control circuitry (e.g., the control circuitry 250 and/or the control circuitry 252,
In some implementations, the first transistor includes a charge storage layer (e.g., the charge layer 210,
In some implementations, the memory device further includes control circuitry (e.g., the control circuitry 250 and/or the control circuitry 252,
In some implementations, the memory device further includes control circuitry (e.g., the control circuitry 250 and/or the control circuitry 252,
Although some of various drawings illustrate a number of logical stages in a particular order, stages that are not order dependent may be reordered and other stages may be combined or broken out. While some reordering or other groupings are specifically mentioned, others will be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art, so the ordering and groupings presented herein are not an exhaustive list of alternatives. Moreover, it should be recognized that the stages could be implemented in hardware, firmware, software or any combination thereof.
It will also be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. are, in some instances, used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, a first device could be termed a second device, and, similarly, a second device could be termed a first device, without departing from the scope of the various described implementations. The first device and the second device are both electronic devices, but they are not the same device unless it is explicitly stated otherwise.
The terminology used in the description of the various described implementations herein is for the purpose of describing particular implementations only and is not intended to be limiting. As used in the description of the various described implementations and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will also be understood that the term “and/or” as used herein refers to and encompasses any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. It will be further understood that the terms “includes,” “including,” “comprises,” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
As used herein, the term “if” is, optionally, construed to mean “when” or “upon” or “in response to determining” or “in response to detecting” or “in accordance with a determination that,” depending on the context. Similarly, the phrase “if it is determined” or “if [a stated condition or event] is detected” is, optionally, construed to mean “upon determining” or “in response to determining” or “upon detecting [the stated condition or event]” or “in response to detecting [the stated condition or event]” or “in accordance with a determination that [a stated condition or event] is detected,” depending on the context.
The foregoing description, for purpose of explanation, has been described with reference to specific implementations. However, the illustrative discussions above are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the scope of the claims to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The implementations were chosen in order to best explain the principles underlying the claims and their practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best use the implementations with various modifications as are suited to the particular uses contemplated.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 15/865,125, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,319,424, entitled “Adjustable Current Selectors,” filed Jan. 8, 2018, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. This application is related to U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 15/865,135, entitled “Dual Threshold Voltage Devices,” filed Jan. 8, 2018; U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 15/865,138, entitled “Dual Threshold Voltage Devices with Stacked Gates,” filed Jan. 8, 2018; U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 15/865,140, entitled “Methods of Fabricating Dual Threshold Voltage Devices,” filed Jan. 8, 2018; U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 15/865,132, entitled “Methods of Fabricating Dual Threshold Voltage Devices with Stacked Gates,” filed Jan. 8, 2018; U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 15/865,123, entitled “Methods of Fabricating Contacts for Cylindrical Devices,” filed Jan. 8, 2018; and U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 15/865,144, entitled “Dual Gate Memory Devices,” filed Jan. 8, 2018, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4910709 | Dhong et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5308782 | Mazure et al. | May 1994 | A |
5656842 | Iwamatsu et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5717373 | Vachris | Feb 1998 | A |
6621730 | Lage | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6909631 | Durlam | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7067866 | Shi | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7166881 | Lin | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7224601 | Panchula | May 2007 | B2 |
7248498 | Nazarian | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7577019 | Hung | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7800938 | Rivkin | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7826260 | Zhu | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7872905 | Florez Marino | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7936597 | Clinton et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8008706 | Choi et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8077509 | Yanagi | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8107280 | Yoon et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8179711 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8194361 | Kudo | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8199553 | Chen | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8203389 | Zhou | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8345474 | Oh et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8353568 | Lee | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8416539 | Carey | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8421440 | Oksanen | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8508973 | Jin | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8587993 | Lee | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8625337 | Wu | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8633720 | Tudosa | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8724380 | Zhou | May 2014 | B1 |
8817546 | Wang | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8971119 | Avila | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9110746 | Zhu | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9142277 | Kim et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9166147 | Carman | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9166150 | Doyle et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9208878 | Iyer et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9230571 | Chen | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9236416 | Shukh | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9240799 | Wang | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9337415 | Oh et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9362336 | Lu | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9443905 | Bandic et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9444036 | Franca-Neto et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9460769 | Nozaki | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9461094 | Li | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9490421 | Apalkov et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9502133 | Ueda et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9503097 | Lee | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9525126 | Lin | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9543505 | Park | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9564493 | Colinge et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9595917 | Kan | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9608043 | Shimabukuro et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9634237 | Lee | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9637272 | Albaum | May 2017 | B2 |
9660183 | Wang | May 2017 | B2 |
9678178 | Bai | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9734882 | Toh et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9741926 | Pinarbasi et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9766705 | Chan | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9773913 | Balakrishnan et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9799383 | Hosotani | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9824933 | Pawlak | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9852800 | Lang et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9881970 | Chung | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9887237 | Sakai | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10109367 | Raberg | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10192787 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10192788 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10192984 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10199083 | Bozdag et al. | Feb 2019 | B1 |
10236047 | Ryan et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10255962 | El Baraji et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10326073 | Tzoufras et al. | Jun 2019 | B1 |
20030183889 | Kajiyama | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040026307 | Tamura | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047204 | Hung | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050026307 | Osipov et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050073878 | Lin et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050177652 | Cumpson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050184348 | Youn et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050232006 | Iwata | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060022239 | Mouli | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060152969 | Trouilloud | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070146008 | Tak et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070201265 | Ranjan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210338 | Orlowski | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090032849 | Higashino | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100003767 | Cho | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100052029 | Huang | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100102290 | Lu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100187601 | Masuoka et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100200900 | Iwayama | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110062515 | Masuoka et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110089496 | Masuoka et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110303985 | Masuoka et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120155164 | Shukh | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120217468 | Tekleab et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120313742 | Kurs et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130200467 | Edge et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130258763 | Ranjan et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140008606 | Hussain et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140050019 | Lee et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140103470 | Shukh | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140119107 | Cha | May 2014 | A1 |
20140151830 | Apalkov et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140151831 | Chen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140170821 | Nyhus et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175577 | Apalkov et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140218122 | Locatelli et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140264513 | De Brosse et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264552 | Prabhakar et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150014748 | Zaitsu et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150021675 | Min | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150063019 | Dieny | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150138873 | Lu et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150179266 | Park | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150279904 | Pinarbasi et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160079361 | Ching et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160225818 | Toh et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160240533 | Oxland | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160240542 | Kwon | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160315249 | Kardasz et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160372656 | Pinarbasi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170005106 | Zhang | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170178705 | Buhrman et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170317070 | Salcedo et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180075895 | Kishi et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180096896 | Zhu | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180211994 | Kim et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180269210 | Tezuka et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180308534 | Gaudin et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190036013 | Mo et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190096957 | Uchida et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190207094 | Gajek et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190207102 | Gajek et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190214431 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190273202 | Nikitin et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190296223 | Araki | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190311956 | Sharma et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Chen et al., “Processor Caches Built Using Multi-Level Spin-Transfer Torque RAM Cells,” 6/11 ©2011 IEEE, 6 pgs. |
Zhang et al., “MLC STT-RAM Design Considering Probabilistic and Asymmetric MTJ Switching,” 3/13 © 2013 IEEE, 4 pgs. |
Tzoufras, Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,157, 14 pgs. |
Bozdag, Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,259, 15pgs. |
Bozdag, Final Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,259, 14 pgs. |
Bozdag, Notice of allowance dated Feb. 13, 2019, U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,259, 9 pgs. |
Bozdag, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,256, dated Jan. 22, 2019, 12 pgs. |
Bozdag, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,256, dated Apr. 24, 2019, 9 pgs. |
Bozdag, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,250, dated Feb. 1, 2019, 12 pgs. |
Bozdag, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,250, dated Apr. 25, 2019, 9 pgs. |
Beleggia et al., “Phase Diagram for Magnetic Nano-Rings, May 27, 2005, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials,” 16 pgs. |
Tzoufras, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/858,808, dated Feb. 1, 2019, 9 pgs. |
Tzoufras, Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 15/858,808, 8 pgs. |
Kim, Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,125, 10 pgs. |
Kim, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 25, 2019, U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,125, 5 pgs. |
Kim, Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,144, 9 pgs. |
Sharma, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 13, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,138, 17 pgs. |
Sharma, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 25, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,140, 10pgs. |
Sharma, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 26, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,132, 11 pgs. |
Sharma, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 24, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,123, 11 pgs. |
Bhatti et al., “Spintronics based random access memory: a review,” Materials Today, vol. 20, No. 9, 530-548, Nov. 2017, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.007, 19 pgs. |
Chen et al., “On-Chip Caches Built on Multilevel Spin-Transfer Torque RAM Cells and Its Optimizations,” ACMJournal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems, vol. 9, No. 2, Article 16, May 2013, 22 pgs. |
Chen et al., “Processor Caches Built Using Multi-Level Spin-Transfer Torque RAM Cells,” Jun. 2011 © 2011 IEEE, 6 pgs. |
Dyakonov, M. I., “Spin Hall Effect,” arXiv:1210.3200v1 (2010), from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1210/1210.3200.pdf, 12 pgs. |
Eitan et al., “NROM: A Novel Localized Trapping, 2-Bit Nonvolatile Memory Cell,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 11, Nov. 2000, 3 pgs. |
Fernandez-Pacheco et al., “Three-dimensional nanomagnetism,” Nat. Comm. 8, 15756 ( 2017). |
Jiang et al., “Constructing Large and Fast Multi-Level Cell STT-RAM based Cache for Embedded Processors,” DAC 20125, Jun. 3-7, 2012, San Francisco, California, 6 pgs. |
Laczkowski et al., “Large enhancement of the spin Hall effect in Au by side-jump scattering on Ta impurities,” Phys. Rev. B 96, 140405(R) (2017). |
Lavrijsen et al., “Magnetic ratchet for three-dimensional spintronic memory and logic,” Nature 493, pp. 647-650 (2013). |
Lavrijsen et al., “Multi-bit operations in vertical spintronic shift registers,” Nanotechnology 25, 105201 (2014). |
Lavrijsen et al., “Tuning the interlayer exchange coupling between single perpendicularly magnetized CoFeB layers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 052411 (2012). |
Lee et al., “Domain Imaging During Soliton Propagation in a 3D Magentic Ratchet,” Spin 3(4), 1340013 (2013). |
Lee et al., “Soliton propagation in micron-sized magnetic ratchet elements,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 232404 (2014). |
Li Gao, “Spin Polarized Current Phenomena in Magnetic Tunnel Junctions,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Sep. 2009, 126 pgs. |
Li et al., A New Self-reference Sensing Scheme for TLC MRAM, Sep. 2015 © 2015 IEEE, 4 pgs. |
Mansell et al., “A magnetic shift register with out-of-plane magnetized layers,” Nanotechnology 28, 385201 (2017). |
Mansell et al., “A robust soliton ratchet using combined antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic interlayer couplings,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 092404 (2015). |
Parkin, “Systematic Variation of the Strength and Oscillation Period of Indirect Magnetic Exchange Coupling through the 3d, 4d, and Sd Transition Metals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 67(25), pp. 3598-3601 (1991). |
Petit et al., “Systematic layer-by-layer characterization of multilayers for three-dimensional data storage and logic,” Nanotechnology 27, 155203 (2016). |
Sbiaa et al., “Materials with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy for magnetic random access memory,” Phys. Status Solidi RRL 5, No. 12, 413-419 (2011) / DOI: 10.1002/pssr.201105420, 7 pgs. |
Van den Brink et al., “Spin-Hall-assisted magnetic random access memory,” Applied Physics Letters, 104, 012403 (2014), 4 pgs. |
Vincent et al., “Spin-Transfer Torque Magnetic Memory as a Stochastic Memristive Synapse for Neuromorphic Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 9, No. 2, Apr. 2015, 9 pgs. |
Wang et al., “Spintronic materials and devices based on antiferromagnetic metals,” Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, Oct. 23, 2016, 27 (2017) 208-216, 9 pgs. |
Yuen et al., “A 2-Bit MONOS Nonvolatile Memory Cell Based on Asymmetric Double Gate MOSFET Structure,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 24, No. 8, Aug. 2003, 3 pgs. |
Zhang et al., “MLC STT-RAM Design Considering Probabilistic and Asymmetric MTJ Switching,” Mar. 2013 © 2013 IEEE, 4 pgs. |
Zhang et al., Multi-level Cell STT-RAM: Is it Realistic or Just a Dream?, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, Nov. 5-8, 2012, San Jose, California, 8 pgs. |
Gajek, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/858,765, dated Jan. 21, 2020, 7 pgs. |
Sharma, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,135, dated May 9, 2019, 8 pgs. |
Sharma, Final Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,135, dated Sep. 18, 2019, 11 pgs. |
Sharma, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,135, dated Jan. 30, 2020, 8 pgs. |
Sharma, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/261,414, dated Oct. 4, 2019, 9 pgs. |
Gajek, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/103,835, dated Oct. 10, 2019, 15 pgs. |
Gajek, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/103,835, dated Jan. 13, 2020, 9 pgs. |
Gajek, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/103,835, dated Feb. 14, 2020, 10 pgs. |
Gajek, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/857,574, dated Jun. 6, 2019, 14 pgs. |
Sharma, Notice of Allowance U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,140, dated Nov. 15, 2018, 2 pgs. |
Kim, Notice of Allowance U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,144, dated Aug. 15, 2019, 7 pgs. |
Kim, Notice of Allowance U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,125, dated Feb. 25, 2019, 2 pgs. |
Sharma, Notice of Allowance U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,138, dated Dec. 10, 2018, 2 pgs. |
Sharma, Notice of Allowance U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,132, dated Oct. 17, 2018, 2 pgs. |
Sharma, Notice of Allowance U.S. Appl. No. 15/865,135, dated Apr. 20, 2020, 8 pgs. |
Sharm, Notice of Allowance U.S. Appl. No. 16/261,414, dated May 6, 2020, 9 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190287596 A1 | Sep 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15865125 | Jan 2018 | US |
Child | 16434724 | US |