Double planar gated SOI MOSFET structure

Abstract
A double gated silicon-on-insulator (SOI) MOSFET is fabricated by using a mandrel shallow trench isolation formation process, followed by a damascene gate. The double gated MOSFET features narrow diffusion lines defined sublithographically or lithographically and shrunk, damascene process defined by an STI-like mandrel process. The double gated SOI MOSFET increases current drive per layout width and provides low out conductance.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention generally relates to double-gated Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors (MOSFETs) that provide increased current drive per layout width and low output conductance.




2. Background Description




Field Effect Transistor (FET) structures may include a single gate (a single channel) or a pair of gates (a pair of channels), with double-gate versions providing the advantage of having an increased current carrying capacity. A number of horizontal double-gate FET structures, and particularly SOI double-gate FET structures, have been proposed. These structures typically require a bottom gate formed beneath the thin silicon body in addition to a conventional top gate. The fabrication of such structures is difficult because the top and bottom gates must be aligned to a tolerance beyond the accuracy of state of the art lithographical equipment and methods, and because self-aligning techniques are frustrated by the layers between the top and bottom gates.




In “


Self


-


Aligned


(


Top and Bottom


)


Double


-


Gate MOSFET With a


25


nm Thick Silicon Channel


”, by Hon Sum Philip et al., IEDM 97-427, IEEE 1997, a double-gated MOSFET is considered the most promising candidate for a Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) scaled to the ultimate limit of 20-30 nm gate length. Rigorous Monte Carlo device simulations and analytical calculations predicted continual improvement in device performance down to 20-30 nm gate length, provided the silicon channel thickness can be reduced to 10-25 nm and the gate oxide thickness is reduced to 2-3 nm. However, the alignment of the top and the bottom is crucial to high performance because a mis-alignment will cause extra gate to source/drain overlap capacitance as well as loss of current drive.




In the double-gated MOSFET field, vertical structures such as the surrounding gate or pillar transistor and DELTA device require a lithographic and pattern transfer capability at least four times more stringent than the minimum gate length in order to control the required silicon channel thickness. On the other hand, the planar structures, which have been the norm of the Integrated Circuit (IC) industry to date are easier to manufacture than vertical structures. However, the double-gate MOSFET with a planar structure either does not have perfectly aligned gates, or did not have a source/drain fan-out structure that is self-aligned to the gates.




The following patents pertain to FETs, and particularly to the double-gated FETs.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,327, by Chu et al. and entitled “Vertical Double-Gate Field Effect Transistor” describes a vertical double-gate field effect transistor, which includes an epitaxial channel layer and a drain layer arranged in a stack on a bulk or SOI substrate. The gate oxide is thermally grown on the sides of the stack using differential oxidation rates to minimize input capacitance problems. The gate wraps around one end of the stack, while contacts are formed on a second end. An etch-stop layer embedded in the second end of the stack enables contact to be made directly to the channel layer.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,773,331 by Solomon et al. and entitled “Method for Making Single and Double Gate Field Effect Transistors With Sidewall Source-Drain Contacts” describes a method for making single-gate and double-gate field effect transistors having a sidewall drain contact. The channel of the FETs is raised with respect to the support structure underneath and the source and drain regions form an integral part of the channel.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,757,038 by Tiwari et al. and entitled “Self-Aligned Dual Gate MOSFET with an Ultranarrow Channels” is directed to a self-aligned dual gate FET with an ultra thin channel of substantially uniform width formed by a self-aligned process. Selective etching or controlled oxidation is utilized between different materials to form a vertical channel extending between source and drain regions, having a thickness in the range from 2.5 nm to 100 nm.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,580,802 to Mayer et. al. and entitled “Silicon-on-Insulator Gate-All-Around MOSFET Fabrication Methods” describes an SOI gate-all-around (GAA) MOSFET which includes a source, channel and drain surrounded by a top gate, the latter of which also has application for other buried structures and is formed on a bottom gate dielectric which is formed on source, channel and drain semiconductor layers of an SOI wafer.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,308,999 to Gotou and entitled “MOS FET Having a Thin Film SOI Structure” describes a MOS FET having a thin film SOI structure in which the breakdown voltage of an MIS (Metal Insulator Semiconductor) FET having an SOI structure is improved by forming the gate electrode on the top surface and two side surfaces of a channel region of the SOI layer and by partially extending the gate electrode toward the inside under the bottom of the channel region such that the gate electrode is not completely connected.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,689,127 to Chu et al. and entitled “Vertical Double-Gate Field Effect Transistor” describes a vertical double-gate FET that includes a source layer, an epitaxial channel layer and a drain layer arranged in a stack on a bulk or SOI substrate. The gate oxide is thermally grown on the sides of the stack using differential oxidation rates to minimize input capacitance problems. The gate wraps around one end of the stack, while contacts are formed on a second end. An etch-stop layer embedded in the second end of the stack enables contact to be made directly to the channel layer.




The key difficulties in fabricating double-gated FETs are achieving silicidation of thin diffusions or polysilicon with acceptable contact resistance, enabling fabrication of the wraparound gate without misalignment of the two gates, and fabrication of the narrow diffusions (ideally, 2-4 times smaller than the gate length).




The lithographically defined gate is by far the simplest, but suffers from a number of disadvantages. First, definition of the gate may leave poly spacers on the side of the diffusions or may drive a required slope on the side of the diffusion, thereby resulting in a poorer quality and/or more poorly controlled device. Second, the slope of the poly inherently leads to difficulty in forming silicided gates, leading to slower device performance. Finally, the poly step height poses a difficult problem for lithographic definition, as we expect steps on the order of 100 nm-200 nm in a 50 nm design rule technology.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a self-aligned dual-gated SOI MOSFET.




According to the invention, there is provided a dual-gated MOSFET comprising a substrate, and source and drain regions in the substrate each having a top, bottom and at least two side diffusion surfaces. The source and drain regions are separated by a channel region having a top, bottom and side channel surfaces that are substantially coplanar with corresponding ones of the diffusion surfaces, and a gate adjacent the top and the side channel surfaces which is electrically insulated from the top and side channel surfaces. The gate has a planar top surface with a contact pad for receiving a gate control voltage for controlling the MOSFET











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

is a representational cross section of cut A—A shown in

FIG. 6



b,


showing the formation of silicon lines;





FIG. 2

shows the substrate of

FIG. 1

after shallow trench isolation (STI) fill and polish;





FIG. 3A

is a representational cross section of cut A—A shown in

FIG. 6B

, after a polysilicon conductor (PC) resist mask is applied and etching;





FIG. 3B

is a representational cross section of cut B—B shown in

FIG. 6B

, after a PC resist mask is applied;





FIG. 4A

shows the substrate of

FIG. 3A

after gate dielectric growth or deposition, and gate conductor deposition;

FIG. 4B

shows the substrate of

FIG. 3B

after removal of the PC resist mask;





FIG. 5A

shows removal of STI and isolation implants in the substrate of

FIG. 4A

;





FIG. 5B

shows extension implants in the substrate of

FIG. 4B

;





FIG. 6A

shows the completed device of

FIG. 5A

before contacts;





FIG. 6B

shows a top view of the completed device;





FIG. 7

shows a perspective view of one of the SOI lines shown in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 8

shows a perspective view of one of the SOI lines shown in

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 9

cut C—C shows a representational perspective of one of the silicon lines shown in

FIG. 3A

;





FIG. 9

cut D—D shows a partial representational perspective of one of the silicon lines shown in

FIG. 3B

;





FIG. 10

cut E—E shows a partial representational cut of one of the silicon lines shown in

FIG. 4A

;





FIG. 10

cut F—F shows a partial representational cut of one of the silicon lines shown in

FIG. 4B

;





FIG. 11A

cut G—G shows a partial representational perspective of one of the silicon lines shown in

FIG. 5A

;





FIG. 11A

cut H—H shows a partial representational cut of one of the silicon lines shown in

FIG. 5B

;





FIG. 11B

cut J—J shows a representational embodiment of

FIG. 6B

cut A—A;





FIG. 11B

cut J—J shows a representational embodiment of

FIG. 6B

cut B—B;





FIG. 12

is a cross-sectional view of a second embodiment that corresponds to

FIG. 4A

;





FIG. 13A

is a cross-sectional view of the second embodiment that corresponds to

FIG. 6A







FIG. 13B

is cross-sectional view of the second embodiment that corresponds to

FIG. 6B

; and





FIG. 14

is a cross-sectional view of a third embodiment that corresponds to FIG.


4


B.





FIG. 15

shows a third embodiment of the substrate of

FIG. 1

after shallow trench isolation (STI) fill and polish;





FIG. 16

is a representational cross section of cut B—B shown in

FIG. 6B

, after a PC resist mask is applied;





FIG. 17A

shows the substrate after gate dielectric growth or deposition, and gate conductor deposition;





FIG. 17B

shows

FIG. 16

after removal of the PC resist mask;





FIG. 18A

shows

FIG. 17B

after PC resist mask is applied;





FIG. 18B

shows

FIG. 17B

after polishing;





FIG. 19

shows the fabrication of a fifth embodiment.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION




Referring now to

FIG. 1

, there is shown a patterned SOI substrate


100


having a bulk substrate


102


, a buried oxide (BOX) layer


104


, and narrow silicon lines


106


,


108


and


110


. In a preferred embodiment, the width of the silicon lines


106


,


108


and


110


is approximately 5 to 50 nanometers (nm), which is typically one fourth of the device length. Pad oxide


112


,


114


and


116


is grown using standard oxidation techniques and would typically be in the range of 3 to 14 nm, with 8 nm being preferred. Pad films


118


,


120


and


122


are placed upon pad oxide


112


,


114


, and


116


, respectively. Pad films


118


,


120


and


122


are typically in the range of 30 to 120 nm, with 80 nm being preferred. It is preferred that nitride films be utilized, although other materials may also be used. Pad films


118


,


120


and


122


define the etch areas for shallow trench isolation (STI) formation. In a preferred embodiment, thin diffusions in the range of 5 to 50 nm, with 10 nm preferred, can be formed above the thin silicon regions


108


that can be formed above BOX layer


104


using lithographic techniques and subtractive etching, and techniques such as sidewall image transfer, hybrid resist, thinning techniques using isotropic etching, or oxidation/removal steps to generate the narrow images.

FIG. 7

shows a partial perspective view of silicon line


108


shown in

FIG. 1

, where silicon line


108


is formed on BOX layer


104


.




Then, in

FIG. 2

, a standard STI fill


124


is provided, which is preferably a silicon dioxide layer of approximately 300 to 500 nm thick. However, other suitable materials known to those skilled in the art may also be used as a sacrificial film. It is preferred that the STI surface be polished.

FIG. 8

is a perspective view of silicon line


108


shown in

FIG. 2

, where STI


124


is filled around the silicon line


108


.





FIG. 3A

is a representational cross-sectional cut along line A—A of FIG.


6


B.

FIG. 3A

is representational because polysilicon conductor (PC) resist


126


and STI fill


124


are present during fabrication in

FIG. 3A

, but are not present in corresponding region


141


of FIG.


6


B. After placing the PC resist mask


126


on a selected regions of STI fill


124


, STI fill


124


is selectively etched relative to pad films


118


,


120


and


122


and down to the BOX layer


104


. It is preferred, but not required, that the etch also be selective relative to the BOX layer


104


. Pad films


118


,


120


and


122


are then removed selectively to the STI fill layer


124


and BOX layer


104


. The

FIGS. 3A

,


4


A and


5


A show that some of the pad layers


118


,


120


,


122


could be left, if desired, to allow a thin gate dielectric only on the sidewalls of the silicon lines


106


,


108


and


110


, respectively. It is preferred that there be approximately a 10:1 selectivity in each etch, which can be accomplished with known state of the art etches. If desired, well implants may optionally be introduced at this point. These implants would be done using highly angled implants, preferably in the range of 10 to 45 degrees, with each implant rotated at approximately 90 degrees relative to each other in order to fully dope the sidewalls of the diffusion. In order to avoid doping the surface layer of the diffusions more heavily than the sides, the implantation could be done before removing the pad films


118


,


120


and


122


in the exposed areas of PC resist


126


.

FIG. 9

cut C—C shows a representational perspective of silicon line


108


without pad film


120


thereon, as shown in FIG.


3


A.





FIG. 3B

is a representational cross-sectional view along line B—B shown in FIG.


6


B.

FIG. 3B

is representational because PC resist mask


126


and STI fill


124


are present during fabrication in

FIG. 3B

, but are not shown in the region between the source/drain


134


and gate


128


in FIG.


6


B.

FIG. 3B

thus shows the selective placement of PC mask


126


during fabrication. This can be accomplished using standard pattern lithography techniques using a PC mask preferably composed of either photoresist or a hardmask.

FIG. 9

cut D—D shows a partial representational perspective of silicon line


108


shown in FIG.


3


B.





FIG. 4A

shows the substrate of

FIG. 3A

after gate dielectric growth [e.g., SiO


2


], and gate conductor deposition. It should be understood that nitrided oxides, nitride/oxide composites, metal oxides (e.g., Al


2


O


3


, ZrSiO


4


, TiO


2


, Ta


2


O


5


, ZrO


2


, etc.), perovskites (e.g., (Ba, Sr)TiO


3


, La


2


O


3


) and combinations of the above can also be used as the dielectric. Gate dielectric growth on each line


106


,


108


and


110


could be standard furnace or single-wafer chamber oxidations in accordance with conventional methods. If desired, nitriding species (e.g., N


2


O, NO or N


2


implantation) can be introduced prior to, during, or subsequent to oxidation. Gate dielectric deposition on each line


108


,


110


can be can be accomplished, for example, through chemical vapor deposition (CVD) or other techniques known to those skilled in the art.




After etching, the gate


128


is deposited. Gate conductor deposition could be accomplished using conventional CVD or directional sputtering techniques. It should be understood that gate conductors other than polysilicon can also be used. For example, a SiGe mixture, refractory metals (e.g., W), metals (e.g., Ir, Al, Ru, Pt), and TiN can be used. In general, any material that can be polished and that has a high conductivity and reasonable workfunction can be used in place of polysilicon. After deposition, the gate


128


is polished in accordance with conventional techniques.

FIG. 10

cut E—E is a representational cut of silicon line


108


and gate


128


shown in FIG.


4


A.





FIG. 4B

shows

FIG. 3B

after removal of the PC resist mask


126


. The STI surface


121


is cleaned in accordance with conventional techniques.

FIG. 10

cut F—F shows a partial representational cut of silicon line


108


shown in FIG.


4


B.





FIGS. 5A and 5B

show extension implants to form the MOSFET device of

FIG. 4A

after removal of STI fill


124


. Implantations are done at a large angle, preferably in the range of 7 to 45 degrees, relative to a vector perpendicular to the wafer surface. Four implants, each rotated at approximately 90 degrees relative to each other about the wafer surface normal vector in order to fully dope the sidewalls of the diffusions uniformly. The pad oxide layer


112


,


114


and


116


on top of the diffusions may be utilized to avoid doping the surface of the diffusions too strongly. In this case, the pad films


118


,


120


and


122


would be removed after the implantation, but before the final implantations are done, which would follow the spacer


146


deposition.

FIG. 11A

cut G—G shows a perspective view of silicon line


108


shown in

FIG. 5A

, and

FIG. 11A

cut H—H shows a perspective view of silicon line


108


shown in FIG.


5


B.





FIG. 6A

shows the device of

FIG. 5A

after formation of silicide layer


144


in accordance with conventional steps. Also in accordance with conventional steps, after the gate


128


is formed, spacers


146


are formed and the diffusions are annealed, and a layer of highly conformal dielectric fill


148


is deposited, and then polished to the top of the gate conductor. It is preferred that dielectric fill


148


is a nitride layer followed by a doped glass. Because of the high aspect ratios, fill properties suggest a rapid-thermal CVD or a self-sputtering deposition using a high-density plasma-enhanced CVD technique. Typically, the dielectric glass includes phosphorus and/or boron, but it can also be undoped.





FIG. 6B

shows a top view of the completed device. The source and drain region is formed by implantation. Contacts


138


,


140


,


142


are added and back end of line (BEOL) processing is done in accordance with conventional steps.

FIG. 11B

cut I—I shows a representational embodiment of

FIG. 6B

cut A—A, and

FIG. 11B

cut J—J shows a representational embodiment of

FIG. 6B

cut B—B.

FIGS. 11A and 11B

are shown as before spacers


146


and dielectric deposition as shown in FIG.


6


A.




A second embodiment is shown in

FIGS. 12

,


13


A and


13


B. In

FIG. 12

, a dielectric pad films


118


,


120


and


122


electrically separate the gate


130


into two electrically isolated portions


135


,


137


. As shown in

FIG. 13B

, each portion


135


,


137


has a planar top surface and a contact


142




a,




142




b,




142




c


on its respective planar top surface. The gate


128


is independently controlled on each side of the diffusion. However, a linear strap of metal, or a patterned layer to link the layers with a silicide can also be utilized. Note that in

FIG. 13B

the fingered devices become larger because etch stretch of polysilicon would have to be individually contacted unless additional masking layers are used to strap them together.




In the second embodiment, the processing steps are identical to those described up to and including FIG.


2


. However, in

FIG. 12

, as opposed to

FIG. 3A

, pad films


118


,


120


,


122


are not etched. In this embodiment, it is preferred that the pad films be 80-150 nm.





FIG. 13A

, corresponding to

FIG. 6A

, shows the substrate of

FIG. 6A

after gate conductor deposition. Gate dielectric growth, deposition and gate conductor deposition can be implemented in accordance with the conventional techniques discussed in connection with FIG.


4


A. As in the case of

FIG. 6A

, spacers


146


are formed and the diffusions are annealed, and a layer of highly conformal dielectric fill


148


is deposited, and then polished to the top of the gate conductor.




Processing continues as in the case of the first embodiment, except that pad films


118


,


120


and


122


are removed after the PC polishing step, whereas in the previous embodiment these films are removed as part of the etching process the forms the trough defining the gate regions. The pad films


118


,


120




122


could alternatively be removed after the extension implantation shown in

FIGS. 5A and 5B

. As is the case with

FIG. 6A

, areas between adjacent gates


128


are filled by spacer


146


and dielectric layer


148


, as shown in FIG.


13


A.





FIG. 14

corresponds to

FIG. 4B

, and shows a third embodiment. In this embodiment, polishing would not be done until etching down to pad films


118


,


120


and


122


. The preferred thickness of the silicon lines


106


,


108


and


110


is approximately 200 nm. Pad oxide


112


,


114


and


116


is grown to a thickness of approximately 5 nm, and the deposited pad nitride is approximately 30 nm.




STI fill


124


is then provided. It is preferred that STI fill


124


is approximately 570 nm, which is approximately 2.5 times the surface topography of the combined thicknesses of the pad oxide, the deposited pad nitride and the silicon lines.




As shown in

FIG. 15

, the STI


124


is polished back to approximately 200 nm above the pads


118


,


120


and


122


. The PC resist


126


is applied, and the STI


124


is then etched to the nitride pads


118


,


120


and


122


and the BOX


104


. Nitride pads


118


,


120


and


122


are then etched to the pad oxide


112


,


114


and


116


, which is a short etch since the nitride pads


118


,


120


and


122


are thin. These steps result in

FIGS. 3A and 16

.




The pad oxide


112


,


114


and


116


is then removed, preferably with a wet etch. Since the required pad oxide is thin due the thinner nitride used, undercut is minimal. Vapor HF/NH


3


can also be used to further minimize undercut and control line width better. Standard well implants can be done at this point or, alternatively, before the thin pad oxide


112


,


114


, and


116


is grown. Note that when the pad oxide layer


112


,


114


,


116


is removed in the case where the STI layer


124


is also oxide, the gate


128


linewidth will increase due to lateral etching during the pad oxide removal. In

FIG. 9

, for example, as the pad oxide


112


,


114


,


116


is removed, the gate region (cut C—C) will increase in width. The total width will be the original cut plus twice the pad oxide removal. It is preferred that the thinnest gate length (width of cut C—C), so any increase is undesirable.




Gate oxide


130


is grown, and gate


128


is deposited and polished back to the STI fill


124


, as shown in

FIGS. 17A and 17B

. Finally, processing continues as shown in

FIGS. 5 and 6

, and described above to form extension, source and drain implants, spacers and contacts. The pad oxide


118


,


120


,


122


is dry etched to remove the oxide above the active area to nitride


112


,


114


,


115


, respectively. The nitride


112


,


114


,


116


is wet etched to remove residual nitride. Finally, extension, and source and drain implants are followed by regular processing for MEOL.




With this fabrication method, there is less damage to active area since the nitride


112


,


114


,


116


is thinner, which means less reactive ion etching of the nitride. Also, oxide etching has a nitride stop layer. Finally, the pad oxide


112


,


114


,


116


can be thin due to the thinner nitride


118


,


120


,


122


which means there will be less undercut when removing the pad oxide


112


,


114


,


116


, which will produce bad polysilicon profile. Also polysilicon line width control will also be improved.




A fourth embodiment planarizes the gate conductor film before etching rather than polishing it after a trough is formed in a different material. Silicon line formation


106


,


108


,


110


is identical to the previous three embodiments and is shown in FIG.


1


.




After the silicon lines


106


,


108


,


110


are formed, sacrificial oxidations may be performed to improve the surface quality of the silicon sidewall. Then the gate dielectric


130


is grown or deposited, and the gate


128


is deposited. In this case, the gate


128


material is required to be a film that can be etched selectively to the pad films


11




8


,


120


,


122


, the BOX


104


, and the gate dielectric film


130


. Polysilicon is one example, and other suitable materials can also be used. This gate


128


material is deposited to a thickness sufficient to completely cover the regions between the silicon islands to a height well above the pad films


118


,


120


,


122


. The gate conductor film is then polished. For the case where the gate conductors are connected together, the polish would stop above the layer of the pad films


118


,


120


,


122


with the height above the pad films determined by the resistive path between the gates (see FIGS.


6


A and


6


B). In the case where the gate conductors are independently addressed, the polish would proceed until the pad films


118


,


120


,


122


are reached, as shown in

FIGS. 13A and 13B

. The latter case is shown in

FIGS. 18A and 18B

after polishing the gate


124


.




After defining the PC mask


126


, the gate


128


is etched selectively to the gate dielectric, BOX films and the dielectric


130


on the silicon line. If the dielectric on top of the silicon line


106


,


108


,


110


is the gate dielectric, then stopping the etch without penetrating the gate dielectric will be quite challenging. After this etch process, the structure will be similar to that depicted in

FIGS. 5A and 5B

, except that in


18


B the gate conductor does not extend over the silicon diffusions, and the extension implants described earlier can proceed, ultimately forming the device depicted in


13


A and


13


B. Obviously, if desired, the structures depicted in


6


A and


6


B could also be formed.




The fifth embodiment continues from the previous embodiments, but the fourth embodiment will be used as the base. After the gate


128


is formed as above by deposition, polishing and etching, the device implants are completed, spacers


146


are formed and the diffusions are annealed, a layer of highly conformal dielectric fill


148


is deposited, and then polished to the top of the gate conductor. Note that in this case it is preferable to deposit a polish-stop layer


150


(typically a dielectric such as silicon nitride) as a cap on top of the original dummy gate conductor


152


after it has been polished but before it has been etched. Fabrication of this structure is shown in cross section in FIG.


19


.




This dummy gate cap layer


150


and the dummy gate conductor


152


are then removed, a gate dielectric deposited and a second gate conductor deposited. This approach is advantageous if either the gate conductor or gate dielectric cannot withstand the high temperature steps required in forming the diffusions. This approach allows these films to be optimized independent of their stability under high temperature treatment. After the final gate is formed, a dielectric film is deposited, contacts are etched and filled with a conductive layer. After these steps are completed, the structure will approximate

FIGS. 13A and B

or

FIGS. 6A and B

.




While the invention has been described in terms of its preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A FET comprising:a substrate; a source region and a drain region in the substrate, each of said source region and said drain region having a top, bottom, and at least two side diffusion surfaces, the source and drain regions separated by a channel region having a top, bottom and side channel surfaces substantially coplanar with corresponding ones of the diffusion surfaces; a gate adjacent the top and the side channel surfaces and electrically insulated from the top and side channel surfaces; and a dielectric material in the gate for electrically separating the gate into two electrically isolated portions, each having a substantially coplanar top surface.
  • 2. The FET as recited in claim 1 wherein the source and drain have a contact for receiving a control voltage for controlling the FET.
  • 3. The FET as recited in claim 1, wherein the gate is substantially centered between and substantially parallel to said source region and said drain region.
  • 4. The FET as recited in claim 1, further comprising a silicide layer that contacts a top surface of said gate.
  • 5. The FET as recited in claim 1, further comprising a dielectric layer that contacts a first side end and a second side end of said gate.
  • 6. The FET as recited in claim 1, further comprising a dielectric that contacts side surfaces of the channels.
  • 7. The FET as recited in claim 1, where the gate is comprised of polysilicon.
US Referenced Citations (13)
Number Name Date Kind
4996574 Shirasaki Feb 1991 A
5273921 Neudeck et al. Dec 1993 A
5308999 Gotou May 1994 A
5316957 Spratt et al. May 1994 A
5447875 Moslehi Sep 1995 A
5580802 Mayer et al. Dec 1996 A
5689127 Chu et al. Nov 1997 A
5757038 Tiwari et al. May 1998 A
5773331 Solomon et al. Jun 1998 A
5780327 Chu et al. Jul 1998 A
6171937 Lustig Jan 2001 B1
6242783 Ohmi et al. Jun 2001 B1
6307237 Erstad Oct 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
2 013 977 Aug 1979 EP
10-303412 Nov 1998 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
Hon-Sum Wong et al; Self-Aligned (Top & Bottom) Double-Gate MOSFET with a 25 nm Thick Silicon Channel; IEDM 97-427; pp. 16.6.1-16.6.4.
D. Hisamoto et al.; A fully Depleted Lean-Channel Transistor (DELTA); IEDM 89-833; pp. 34.5.1-34.5.3.
J. P. Colinge et al.; Silicon-On-Insulator “Gate-All-Around Device”; IEDM 90-597; pp. 25.4.1-25.4.4.
J.P. Denton et al.; Fully Depleted Dual-Gated Thin-Film SOI P-Mosfet's Fabricated in SOI Islands with an Isolated Buried Polysilicon Backgate; IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 17, No. 11, Nov. 1996, pp. 509-511.
D. Hisamoto et al.; A Folded-Channel MOSFET for Deep-Sub-Tenth Micron Era; 1994 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers.
M. Horiuchi et al; High-Current, Small Parasitic Capacitance MOS FET on a Poly-Si Interlayered (PSI) SOI Wafer; 1995 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers; pp. 33-34.
B. Majkusiak; Semiconductor Thickness Effects in the Double-Gate SOI MOSFET; IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 5, May 1998.
H. Liu; Thin Silicide Development for Fully-Depleted SOI CMOS Technology; IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 5, May 1998.
H. Takato et al.; High Performance CMOS Surrounding Gate Transistor (SGT) for Ultra High Density LSIs; IEDM 88-222.