1. Field of the Invention
The inventions relate to coatings for exposure apparatus, a lithographic apparatus, a device manufacturing method, and a device manufactured thereby.
2. Description of the Related Art
A lithographic apparatus is a machine that applies a desired pattern onto a target portion of a substrate. Lithographic apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs). In that circumstance, a patterning device, such as a mask, may be used to generate a circuit pattern corresponding to an individual layer of the IC, and this pattern can be imaged onto a target portion (e.g. including part of one or several dies) on a substrate (e.g. a silicon wafer) that has a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist). In general, a single substrate will contain a network of adjacent target portions that are successively exposed. Known lithographic apparatus include steppers, in which each target portion is irradiated by exposing an entire pattern onto the target portion in one go, and scanners, in which each target portion is irradiated by scanning the pattern through the radiation beam in a given direction (the “scanning” direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate parallel or anti-parallel to this direction.
Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of lithographic apparatus in the manufacture of ICs, it should be understood that the lithographic apparatus described herein may have other applications, such as the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, liquid-crystal displays (LCDs) and other flat panel displays, thin-film magnetic heads, etc. It should be appreciated that, in the context of such alternative applications, any use of the terms “wafer” or “die” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general terms “substrate” or “target portion”, respectively. The substrate referred to herein may be processed, before or after exposure, in for example a track (a tool that typically applies a layer of resist to a substrate and develops the exposed resist) or a metrology or inspection tool. Where applicable, the disclosure herein may be applied to such and other substrate processing tools. Further, the substrate may be processed more than once, for example in order to create a multi-layer IC, so that the term substrate used herein may also refer to a substrate that already contains multiple processed layers.
The terms “radiation” and “beam” used herein encompass all types of electromagnetic radiation, including ultraviolet (UV) radiation (e.g. having a wavelength of 365, 355, 248, 193, 157 or 126 nm) and extreme ultra-violet (EUV) radiation (e.g. having a wavelength in the range of 5-20 nm), as well as particle beams, such as ion beams or electron beams.
The term “patterning device” used herein should be broadly interpreted as referring to a device that can be used to impart a radiation beam with a pattern in its cross-section such as to create a pattern in a target portion of the substrate. It should be noted that the pattern imparted to the radiation beam may not exactly correspond to the desired pattern in the target portion of the substrate. Generally, the pattern imparted to the radiation beam will correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion, such as an integrated circuit.
Patterning devices may be transmissive or reflective. Examples of patterning devices include masks, programmable mirror arrays, and programmable LCD panels. Masks are well known in lithography, and include mask types such as binary, alternating phase-shift, and attenuated phase-shift, as well as various hybrid mask types. An example of a programmable mirror array employs a matrix arrangement of small mirrors, each of which can be individually tilted so as to reflect an incoming radiation beam in different directions; in this manner, the reflected beam is patterned.
The support supports, e.g. bears the weight of, the patterning device. It holds the patterning device in a way depending on the orientation of the patterning device, the design of the lithographic apparatus, and other conditions, such as for example whether or not the patterning device is held in a vacuum environment. The support can use mechanical clamping, vacuum, or other clamping techniques, for example electrostatic clamping under vacuum conditions. The support may be a frame or a table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required and which may ensure that the patterning device is at a desired position, for example with respect to the projection system. Any use of the terms “reticle” or “mask” herein may be considered synonymous with the more general term “patterning device”.
The term “projection system” used herein should be broadly interpreted as encompassing various types of projection system, including refractive optical systems, reflective optical systems, and catadioptric optical systems, as appropriate for example for the exposure radiation being used, or for other factors such as the use of an immersion fluid or the use of a vacuum. Any use of the term “lens” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general term “projection system”.
The illumination system may also encompass various types of optical components, including refractive, reflective, and catadioptric optical components for directing, shaping, or controlling the radiation beam of radiation, and such components may also be referred to below, collectively or singularly, as a “lens”.
The lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two (dual stage) or more substrate tables (and/or two or more mask tables). In such “multiple stage” machines the additional tables may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables while one or more other tables are being used for exposure.
The lithographic apparatus may also be of a type wherein the substrate is immersed in a liquid having a relatively high refractive index, e.g. water, so as to fill a space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate. Immersion liquids may also be applied to other spaces in the lithographic apparatus, for example, between the mask and the first element of the projection system. Immersion lithography is mentioned in, for example, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0119954 A1 and WO 2004/093610.
Use of a liquid, however, may result in stains on, for example, the projection system, the substrate holder, or other parts in the vicinity of the liquid or possible vapors emanating from the liquid. For example, stains may be left on sensors, for example transmission image sensors (TIS) that may be present on the substrate holder, which could lead to inaccuracies in, e.g., aligning a wafer with a mask and/or to a decreased lifetime of these sensors. An aspect of the present invention is to reduce or eliminate the risk of staining on the various parts of the exposure apparatus by the immersion liquid.
Other problems that may arise in exposure apparatus in general is the deposition of contaminants on various parts of the apparatus, for example sensors. Such contaminants may originate from, e.g., outgassing by the photoresist that may be present on the substrate or from components present in the ambient air (including components formed in the ambient air under the influence of the radiation generated by the exposure apparatus). Outgassing may be of particular concern in extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography. EUV lithography is mentioned in, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,724,462. The EUV radiation may assist in cracking hydrocarbons that enter the atmosphere as a result of the outgassing, which in turn may lead to undesirable deposition of carbon on nearby surfaces.
Deposition of contaminants may, depending on the location of the deposition, lead to concerns relating to, e.g., the lifetime of various apparatus parts, alignment, leveling, sensor grating deterioration, and/or radiation blocking. An aspect of the present invention is to reduce or eliminate the deposition of contaminants on the various parts of the exposure apparatus.
The present invention provides coatings for use in an exposure apparatus, for example for coating a sensor on a substrate table. The coating may have a contact angle with water of less than 10°. The coating may have photocatalytic activity, for example a coating including a semiconductor photocatalyst. The coating may include a semiconductor. The coating may also include a metal oxide.
The invention further provides sensors including a protective coating, for example the above-noted coatings.
The present invention also provides lithography apparatuses and lithography methods.
Additional aspects and features of the present invention are set forth in this specification.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts, and in which:
As here depicted, the apparatus is of a transmissive type (e.g. employing a transmissive mask). Alternatively, the apparatus may be of a reflective type (e.g. employing a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above).
The illuminator IL receives radiation from a radiation source SO. The source and the lithographic apparatus may be separate entities, for example when the source is an excimer laser. In such cases, the source is not considered to form part of the lithographic apparatus and the radiation is passed from the source SO to the illuminator IL with the aid of a beam delivery system BD including for example suitable directing mirrors and/or a beam expander. In other cases the source may be integral part of the apparatus, for example when the source is a mercury lamp. The source SO and the illuminator IL, together with the beam delivery system BD, if required, may be referred to as a radiation system.
The illuminator IL may include an adjusting device AM configured to adjust the angular intensity distribution of the beam. Generally, at least the outer and/or inner radial extent (commonly referred to as σ-outer and σ-inner, respectively) of the intensity distribution in a pupil plane of the illuminator can be adjusted. In addition, the illuminator IL generally includes various other components, such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO. The illuminator provides a conditioned beam of radiation PB having a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross-section. In an embodiment, the radiation has a wavelength of at least 5 nm, e.g. at least 100 nm, at least 125 nm, at least 150 nm, at least 190 nm, or at least 220 nm. In an embodiment, the radiation has a wavelength of at most 400 nm, e.g. at most 365 nm, at most 300 nm, at most 260 nm, at most 200 nm, at most 150 nm, at most 100 nm, at most 50 nm, or at most 20 nm.
The radiation beam PB is incident on the mask MA, which is held on the mask table MT. Having traversed the mask MA, the radiation beam PB passes through the projection system PL, which projects the beam onto a target portion C of the substrate W. With the aid of the second positioning device PW and a measurement device (position sensor) IF (e.g. an interferometric or capacitive device and/or encoder), the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g. so as to position different target portions C in the path of the beam PB. Similarly, the first positioning device PM and another position sensor (which is not explicitly depicted in
The depicted apparatus can be used in the following preferred modes:
1. In step mode, the mask table MT and the substrate table WT are kept essentially stationary, while an entire pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C at once (i.e. a single static exposure). The substrate table WT is then shifted in the X and/or Y direction so that a different target portion C can be exposed. In step mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the size of the target portion C imaged in a single static exposure.
2. In scan mode, the mask table MT and the substrate table WT are scanned synchronously while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C (i.e. a single dynamic exposure). The velocity and direction of the substrate table WT relative to the mask table MT is determined by the (de-)magnification and image reversal characteristics of the projection system PL. In scan mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the width in the non-scanning direction of the target portion in a single dynamic exposure, whereas the length of the scanning motion determines the height in the scanning direction of the target portion.
3. In another mode, the mask table MT is kept essentially stationary holding a programmable patterning device, and the substrate table WT is moved or scanned while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C. In this mode, generally a pulsed radiation source is employed and the programmable patterning device is updated as required after each movement of the substrate table WT or in between successive radiation pulses during a scan. This mode of operation can be readily applied to maskless lithography that utilizes programmable patterning device, such as a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above.
Combinations and/or variations on the above described modes of use or entirely different modes of use may also be employed.
As noted earlier, use of a liquid, such as in immersion lithography, may result in stains on parts in an exposure apparatus, for example on sensors, e.g. transmission image sensors. Other problems that may arise in exposure apparatus in general is the deposition of contaminants from the ambient atmosphere on various parts of the apparatus.
In an embodiment, the present invention provides coatings for parts of an exposure apparatus, for example parts of the projection system or parts of the substrate table. In an embodiment, the coatings are used on one or more parts that are exposed to radiation during operation of the apparatus. In an embodiment, the present coatings are used for sensors, for example aberration sensors, radiation dose sensors, transmission image sensors, and/or reflective image sensors. In an embodiment, for example when the coating is used in an immersion lithography apparatus, the coating is exposed to a liquid, e.g. an aqueous liquid, for example water, during operation of the apparatus.
In an embodiment, the present coating includes one or more photocatalysts, for example titanium dioxide and/or zinc oxide. In an embodiment, the photocatalytic coating assists in breaking up contaminants that are deposited on the coating. In an embodiment, the coating includes, relative to the total weight of the coating, at least 25 wt % of one or more photocatalysts, for example at least 50 wt %, at least 75 wt %, at least 90 wt %, or at least 95 wt %. In an embodiment, the coating includes one or more photocatalysts, e.g. TiO2.
In an embodiment, the present coating is hydrophilic and has a water contact angle of less than 15°, for example less than 10°, less than 8°, less than 6°, less than 3°, or about 0°. Water contact angles may be determined with a FTA 200 Dynamic Contact Angle Analyser (available from Camtel LTD, Elsworth, Cambridgeshire, UK) at room temperature. Hydrophilic coatings may avoid staining of the coated parts by an aqueous liquid in, for example, immersion lithography. The hydrophilic coating may prevent the formation of droplets and thereby prevent contaminants that may be present in the liquid from flowing to and concentrating around the perimeter of a droplet. The hydrophilicity of the coating may be photoinduced hydrophilicity (e.g. as a result of being or having been exposed to UV radiation) and may have a water contact angle of, for example, greater than 15° (e.g. greater than 20°) prior to invoking the photoinduced hydrophilicity. In an embodiment, the photoinduced hydrophilicity may be reversible (e.g., the coating may return to its comparatively hydrophobic state after not having received radiation for a certain period of time). In an embodiment, the hydrophilic coating is a titanium dioxide coating.
In an embodiment, the coating includes one or more metal oxides, for example titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, and/or zirconium dioxide. In an embodiment, the coating includes, relative to the total weight of the coating, at least 25 wt % of one or more metal oxides, for example at least 50 wt %, at least 75 wt %, at least 90 wt %, or at least 95 wt %. In an embodiment, the coating consists essentially of one or more metal oxides, for example TiO2, SrTiO3, Fe2O3, ZnO, ZrO2, WO3, or mixtures thereof.
In an embodiment, the present coating includes one or more semiconductors, for example TiO2, SrTiO3, Fe2O3, WO3, CdS, or mixtures thereof. In an embodiment, the coating includes, relative to the total weight of the coating, at least 25 wt % of one or more semiconductors, for example at least 50 wt %, at least 75 wt %, at least 90 wt %, or at least 95 wt %. In an embodiment, the coating includes one or more semiconductors. In an embodiment, the semiconductors are semiconductor photocatalysts.
The coating may be provided on a substrate by any suitable method or process. In an embodiment, the coating is applied by reactive magnetron sputtering. In another embodiment, the coating is applied by spin coating or dip coating. In an embodiment, the substrate is a glass substrate (e.g. a glass substrate that is partly coated with a metal, e.g. chromium) or a metal halide (e.g., CaF2) substrate.
The coating may have any suitable thickness. In an embodiment, the thickness of the coating is at least 1 nm, for example at least 3 nm, at least 7 nm, at least 15 nm, at least 30 nm, at least 50 nm, at least 75 nm, at least 100 nm, at least 150 nm, or at least 250 nm. In an embodiment, the thickness of the coating is less than 10 μm, for example less than 7 μm, less than 4 μm, less than 2 μm, less than 1 μm, less than 750 nm, less than 500 nm, or less than 350 nm.
Having described specific embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood that many modifications thereof will readily appear or may be suggested to those skilled in the art, and it is intended therefore that this invention is defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/033,485, filed Jan. 12, 2005, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,450,217 on Nov. 1, 2008, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4346164 | Tabarelli et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4480910 | Takanashi et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4509852 | Tabarelli et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4540277 | Mayer et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
5144363 | Wittekoek et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5481362 | Van Den Brink et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5527562 | Balaba et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528118 | Lee | Jun 1996 | A |
5610683 | Takahashi | Mar 1997 | A |
5623853 | Novak et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5715039 | Fukuda et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5808715 | Tsai et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825043 | Suwa | Oct 1998 | A |
5874820 | Lee | Feb 1999 | A |
6268904 | Mori et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6297876 | Bornebroek | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307620 | Takabayashi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6383629 | Tsai et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6480260 | Donders et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496257 | Taniguchi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6674510 | Jasper et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6710849 | Kwan et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717651 | Kato et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6724462 | Singh et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6741331 | Boonman et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6778257 | Bleeker et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6884984 | Ye et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7105419 | Hiramatsu et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7199858 | Lof et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7221431 | Ohsaki | May 2007 | B2 |
7259828 | Tolsma et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7405805 | Uitterdijk et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7450217 | Boogaard et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460206 | Weissenrieder et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7466392 | Nagasaka et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7515246 | Nagasaka et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7835087 | Hosoe et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20020026878 | Kwan et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030066975 | Okada | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040025733 | Kurt et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040119954 | Kawashima et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136494 | Lof et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160582 | Lof et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165159 | Lof et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040207824 | Lof et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050024609 | De Smit et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050025108 | Dillinger et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060028626 | Chang et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060028628 | Lin et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060077367 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060119809 | Verhagen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132731 | Jansen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060170891 | Nishinaga et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070258072 | Nagasaka et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080038458 | Gemici et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080073602 | Jacobs et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080252865 | Nagasaka et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090225286 | Nagasaka et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
221563 | Apr 1985 | DE |
224448 | Jul 1985 | DE |
0 467 445 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 906 590 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1 420 300 | May 2004 | EP |
A 57-117238 | Jul 1982 | JP |
A 58-202448 | Nov 1983 | JP |
A 59-019912 | Feb 1984 | JP |
A 62-065326 | Mar 1987 | JP |
A 62-183522 | Aug 1987 | JP |
A 63-157419 | Jun 1988 | JP |
A 04-65603 | Mar 1992 | JP |
A 04-305915 | Oct 1992 | JP |
A 04-305917 | Oct 1992 | JP |
A 05-62877 | Mar 1993 | JP |
A 06-53120 | Feb 1994 | JP |
A 06-124873 | May 1994 | JP |
A 06-188169 | Jul 1994 | JP |
A 07-176468 | Jul 1995 | JP |
A 07-220990 | Aug 1995 | JP |
A 08-37149 | Feb 1996 | JP |
A 08-166475 | Jun 1996 | JP |
A 08-316125 | Nov 1996 | JP |
A 08-330224 | Dec 1996 | JP |
A 10-163099 | Jun 1998 | JP |
A 10-214783 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-256116 | Sep 1998 | JP |
A 10-303114 | Nov 1998 | JP |
A 10-340846 | Dec 1998 | JP |
A 11-16816 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11-111587 | Apr 1999 | JP |
A 11-135400 | May 1999 | JP |
A 11-176727 | Jul 1999 | JP |
A 2000-058436 | Feb 2000 | JP |
A 2000-505958 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-311933 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-109103 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-196303 | Jul 2001 | JP |
A 2002-14005 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-075839 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-158168 | May 2002 | JP |
2004-122056 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-188314 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-207711 | Jul 2004 | JP |
A 2005-072404 | Mar 2005 | JP |
A 2005-079222 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-175324 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006-165502 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006-196898 | Jul 2006 | JP |
WO 0135168 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 2004019128 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004051717 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053956 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2005031799 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093130 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093160 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004105107 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005064405 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 9949504 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005124833 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Preliminary Amendment filed in U.S. Appl. No. 11/822,964, dated Jul. 11, 2007. |
Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/822,964, dated Dec. 5, 2007. |
Information Disclosure Statement filed in U.S. Appl. No. 11/822,964, dated Jul. 11, 2007. |
Lev Davydov, “Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Contaminants: Novel Catalysts and Processes,” p. 211-236, ( 2001). |
“Photocatalytics”, Photo-Catalytic Materials. (1999-2004). |
S. Takeda, et al. “Photocatalytic TiO2 Thin Film Deposited onto Glass by DC Magnetron Sputtering,” p. 707-721. |
T. Watanabe et al. “Recent Issues on Photoactive TiO2 and Advanced Applications for Glass Coatings,” p. 697-706. |
P.Zeman, et al. “Effect of total and oxygen partial pressures on structure of photocatalytic TiO2 films sputtered on unheated substrate,” Surface and Coatings Technology, Elsevier, p. 93-99, (2002). |
Ikuo Okada, et al. “Mask Contamination Induced by X-Ray Exposure,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 37 (No. 12B), p. 6808-6812, (Dec. 1998). |
Andrew Mills, et al. “A web-based overview of semiconductor photochemistry-based current commerical applications,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 152, p. 233-247, (2002). |
R. Fretwell, et al. “An active, robust and transparent nanocrystalline anatase TiO2 thin film—preparation, characterisation and the kinetics of photodegradation of model pollutants,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, p. 229-240, (2001). |
Satoshi Takeda, et al. “Photocatalytic TiO2 thin film deposited onto glass by DC magnetron sputtering,” Thin Solid Films 392, p. 338-344, (2001). |
Toshihiro Minabe, et al. “TiO2-mediated photodegradation of liquid and solid organic compounds,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, p. 53-62, (2000). |
Andrew Mills, et al. “Thick titanium dioxide films for semiconductor photocatalysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, p. 185-194, (2003). |
Andrew Mills, et al. “An overview of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, p. 1-35, (1997). |
Makiko Yamagishi, et al. “Thin film TiO2 photocatalyst deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering,” Thin Solid Films 442, p. 227-231, (2003). |
Y. Paz, et al. “Photooxidative self-cleaning transparent titanium dioxide films on glass,” J. Mater. Res., vol. 10 ( No. 11), p. 2842-2848, (Nov. 1995). |
B.R. Weinberger, et al. “Titanium dioxide photocatalysts produced by reactive magnetron sputtering,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 66 ( No. 18), p. 2409-2411, (May 1, 1995). |
English Translation of Notice of Reasons for Rejection as issued for Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-003343, dated Jan. 7, 2010. |
English translation of Official Action issued on Feb. 17, 2009 in Japanese Application No. 2006-003343. |
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-003343, mailed on Nov. 17, 2011. |
S. Permpoon et al., “Natural and persistent superhydrophilicity of SiO2/TiO2 and TiO2/SiO2 bi-layer films”, Thin Solid Films 516 (2008) pp. 957-966. |
V. Pore et al., “Atomic Layer Depositioon of Photocatalytic TiO2 Thin Films From Titanium Tetramethoxide and Water”, Chemical Vapor Deposition, vol. 10, No. 3, (2004) pp. 143-147. |
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-188713, mailed on Jan. 24, 2012. |
Japanese Office Action mailed Sep. 7, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-161717. |
Japanese Office Action mailed May 27, 2013 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-188713. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090027642 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11033485 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 12232967 | US |