The present disclosure relates to microelectromechanical (“MEMS”) force sensing dies, MEMS switches, and related methods of manufacture. The MEMS force sensing dies and/or MEMS switches can be used for converting force into a digital output code.
Current technology MEMS force dies are based on linking the applied force to a sensing diaphragm having strain gauges located on a surface of two or more stacked silicon or glass die. Wire bond pads are positioned around the sensing diaphragm and the resulting structure is packaged, which makes the device relatively large compared to more modern chip-scale packaged sensors and electronics. In addition, current MEMS force dies produce an analog output that must often be routed through an often noisy electrical environment before it is converted to a digital signal.
Current electromechanical switches consist primarily of conductive dome structures that deform to complete an electrical circuit. These switches are limited in their durability as the conductive material, often metal, wears over time. These switches are also incapable of being configured for multiple levels of actuation, which is becoming more desirable as software applications are growing in complexity and require more versatility from the user interfaces designed to control them.
Accordingly, there is a need in the pertinent art for a small, low-cost, digital force sensor.
A MEMS force sensor including a plurality of sensing elements and digital circuitry positioned on a surface of the force sensor die is described herein. Each sensing element can include a flexure and a sensing element (e.g., piezoresistive strain gauge). In one implementation, four sensing elements can be employed, although additional or fewer sensing elements can also be used. The inclusion of MEMS in a standard complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (“CMOS”) process allows the sensor to convert its analog output into digital codes and transmit them without loss of signal integrity due to electrical noise.
The MEMS force sensors described herein can be manufactured by bonding a cap wafer to a base wafer (e.g., a force sensor die) that has both the sensing element(s) (e.g., piezoresistive strain gauge(s)) and CMOS power, processing, and communication circuitry. Sensing elements can be formed by etching flexures on the top side of the base wafer. The bond between the base and cap wafers can include a gap produced by protrusions sculptured either on the top of the base wafer and/or on the bottom of the cap wafer. The gap can be designed to limit the displacement of the cap wafer in order to provide force overload protection for the MEMS force sensors. The protrusions and outer wall of the base wafer deflect with applied force, straining the sensing element(s) and producing an analog output signal. The analog output signal can be digitized and stored in on-chip registers of the CMOS circuitry until requested by a host device.
A wafer level MEMS mechanical switch including a base and a cap is also described herein. The mechanical switch employs at least one sensing element. The at least one sensing element is electrically connected to integrated CMOS circuitry on the same substrate. The CMOS circuitry can amplify, digitize, and calibrate force values, which are compared to programmable force thresholds to modulate digital outputs.
A MEMS switch including a plurality of sensing elements positioned on the surface of the switch die is also described herein. In one implementation, four sensing elements can be employed, although additional or fewer sensing elements may also be used. The sensing elements can have their analog outputs digitized and compared against multiple programmed force levels, outputting a digital code to indicate the current state of the switch.
The MEMS switch can be made compact as to only require a small number of input/output (“I/O”) terminals. The outputs of the device can be configured to indicate 2N input force levels, where N is the number of output terminals, which can be programmed by the user. In addition, the device's response can optionally be filtered such that only dynamic forces are measured. The resulting device is a fully-configurable, multi-level, dynamic digital switch.
An example MEMS force sensor is described herein. The MEMS force sensor can include a sensor die configured to receive an applied force. The sensor die has a top surface and a bottom surface opposite thereto. The MEMS force sensor can also include a sensing element and digital circuitry arranged on the bottom surface of the sensor die. The sensing element can be configured to convert a strain on the bottom surface of the sensor die to an analog electrical signal that is proportional to the strain. Additionally, the digital circuitry can be configured to convert the analog electrical signal to a digital electrical output signal.
Additionally, the sensing element can be a piezoresistive, piezoelectric, or capacitive transducer.
Alternatively or additionally, the MEMS force sensor can further include a plurality of electrical terminals arranged on the bottom surface of the sensor die. The digital electrical output signal produced by the digital circuitry can be routed to the electrical terminals. For example, the electrical terminals can be solder bumps or copper pillars.
Alternatively or additionally, the MEMS force sensor can further include a cap attached to the sensor die. The cap can be bonded to the sensor die at a surface defined by an outer wall of the sensor die. In addition, a sealed cavity can be formed between the cap and the sensor die.
Alternatively or additionally, the sensor die can include a flexure formed therein. The flexure can convert the applied force into the strain on the bottom surface of the sensor die. Optionally, the flexure can be formed in the sensor die by etching. The sensing element is arranged on the flexure.
Alternatively or additionally, a gap can be arranged between the sensor die and the cap. The gap can be configured to narrow with application of the applied force such that the flexure is unable to deform beyond its breaking point.
Alternatively or additionally, the digital circuitry can be further configured to provide a digital output code based on a plurality of predetermined force thresholds.
An example method for manufacturing a MEMS force sensor is described herein. The method can include forming at least one sensing element on a surface of a force sensor die, and forming complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (“CMOS”) circuitry on the surface of the force sensor die. The at least one sensing element can be configured with a characteristic that is compatible with a downstream CMOS process.
Alternatively or additionally, the at least one sensing element can be formed before forming the CMOS circuitry.
Alternatively or additionally, the characteristic can be a thermal anneal profile of the at least one sensing element.
Alternatively or additionally, the method can further include etching an opposite surface of the force sensor die to form an overload gap, etching the opposite surface of the force sensor die to form a trench, and bonding of a cap wafer to the opposite surface of the force sensor die to seal a cavity between the cap wafer and the force sensor die. The cavity can be defined by the trench.
Alternatively or additionally, the method can further include forming of a plurality of electrical terminals on the opposite surface of the force sensor die.
Alternatively or additionally, the force sensor die can be made of p-type or n-type silicon.
Alternatively or additionally, the at least one sensing element can be formed using an implant or deposition process.
Alternatively or additionally, the CMOS circuitry can be configured to amplify and digitize an analog electrical output signal produced by the at least one sensing element.
Alternatively or additionally, the trench can be configured to increase strain on the at least one sensing element when a force is applied to the MEMS force sensor.
Alternatively or additionally, a depth of the overload gap can be configured to provide overload protection for the MEMS force sensor.
Alternatively or additionally, the electrical terminals can be solder bumps or copper pillars.
An example MEMS switch is also described herein. The MEMS switch can include a sensor die configured to receive an applied force. The sensor die has a top surface and a bottom surface opposite thereto. The MEMS switch can also include a sensing element and digital circuitry arranged on the bottom surface of the sensor die. The sensing element can be configured to convert a strain on the bottom surface of the sensor die to an analog electrical signal that is proportional to the strain. Additionally, the digital circuitry can be configured to convert the analog electrical signal to a digital signal, and provide a digital output code based on a plurality of predetermined force thresholds.
Alternatively or additionally, the digital circuitry can be further configured to compare the digital signal to the predetermined force thresholds. Optionally, the predetermined force thresholds are relative to a baseline. Alternatively or additionally, the digital circuitry can be further configured to update the baseline at a predetermined frequency. For example, the baseline can be updated by comparing the digital signal to an auto-calibration threshold.
Other systems, methods, features and/or advantages will be or may become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and/or advantages be included within this description and be protected by the accompanying claims.
The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale relative to each other. Like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views. These and other features of will become more apparent in the detailed description in which reference is made to the appended drawings.
The present disclosure can be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description, examples, drawings, and their previous and following description. However, before the present devices, systems, and/or methods are disclosed and described, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to the specific devices, systems, and/or methods disclosed unless otherwise specified, and, as such, can, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular aspects only and is not intended to be limiting.
The following description is provided as an enabling teaching. To this end, those skilled in the relevant art will recognize and appreciate that many changes can be made, while still obtaining beneficial results. It will also be apparent that some of the desired benefits can be obtained by selecting some of the features without utilizing other features. Accordingly, those who work in the art will recognize that many modifications and adaptations may be possible and can even be desirable in certain circumstances, and are contemplated by this disclosure. Thus, the following description is provided as illustrative of the principles and not in limitation thereof.
As used throughout, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a MEMS force sensor” can include two or more such MEMS force sensors unless the context indicates otherwise.
The term “comprising” and variations thereof as used herein is used synonymously with the term “including” and variations thereof and are open, non-limiting terms.
Ranges can be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another aspect includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another aspect. It will be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges are significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint.
As used herein, the terms “optional” or “optionally” mean that the subsequently described event or circumstance may or may not occur, and that the description includes instances where said event or circumstance occurs and instances where it does not.
A MEMS force sensor 10 for measuring a force applied to at least a portion thereof is described herein. In one aspect, as depicted in
The cap 12 can optionally be made of glass (e.g., borosilicate glass) or silicon. The base 11 can optionally be made of silicon. Optionally, the base 11 (and its components such as, for example, the boss, the outer wall, the flexure(s), etc.) is a single continuous piece of material, i.e., the base 11 is monolithic. It should be understood that this disclosure contemplates that the cap 12 and/or the base 11 can be made from materials other than those provided as examples. This disclosure contemplates that the cap 12 and the base 11 can be bonded using techniques known in the art including, but not limited to, silicon fusion bonding, anodic bonding, glass frit, thermo-compression, and eutectic bonding.
The internal surfaces between the base 11 and the cap 12 form a sealed cavity 14. The sealed cavity 14 can be formed by etching a trench (e.g., as described below with regard to
The base 11 has a top surface 18a and a bottom surface 18b. The top and bottom surfaces 18a, 18b are arranged opposite to each other. The trench that defines the outer wall 13 and flexure 16 is etched from the top surface 18a of the base 11. A contact surface 15 is arranged along a surface of the cap 12 (e.g., along the top surface thereof) for receiving an applied force “F.” The force “F” is transmitted from the cap 12 through the outer wall 13 to at least one flexure 16. The MEMS force sensor 10 can include an air gap 17 (also sometimes referred to as a “gap” or “overload gap”) between a portion of the base 11 and cap 12. The air gap 17 can be within the sealed cavity 14. For example, the air gap 17 can be formed by removing material from the base 11 (e.g., the shallow etching process described herein). Alternatively, the air gap 17 can be formed by etching a portion of the cap 12. Alternatively, the air gap 17 can be formed by etching a portion of the base 11 and a portion of the cap 12. The size (e.g., thickness or depth) of the air gap 17 can be determined by the maximum deflection of the at least one flexure 16, such that the air gap 17 between the base 11 and the cap 12 will close and mechanically stop further deflection before the at least one flexure 16 is broken. The air gap 17 provides an overload stop by limiting the amount by which the at least one flexure 16 can deflect such that the flexure does not mechanically fail due to the application of excessive force. Example MEMS force sensors designed to provide overload protection are described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,487,388, issued Nov. 8, 2016 and entitled “Ruggedized MEMS Force Die;” U.S. Pat. No. 9,493,342, issued Nov. 15, 2016 and entitled “Wafer Level MEMS Force Dies;” U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2016/0332866 to Brosh et al., filed Jan. 13, 2015 and entitled “Miniaturized and ruggedized wafer level mems force sensors;” and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2016/0363490 to Campbell et al., filed Jun. 10, 2016 and entitled “Ruggedized wafer level mems force sensor with a tolerance trench,” the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Referring now to
It is further contemplated that the analog electrical signals produced by the at least one sensing element 22 in a Wheatstone bridge configuration can optionally be processed by digital circuitry that resides on the same surface as the at least one sensing element 22. In one implementation, the digital circuitry is CMOS circuitry 23. The CMOS circuitry 23 can therefore be disposed on the bottom surface 18b of the base 11 as shown in
The process of forming the at least one sensing element 22 and the CMOS circuitry 23 on the same surface (e.g., the bottom surface 18b) of the base 11 can be generalized as a three-stage process. The first stage is the creation of the at least one sensing element 22 by way of either diffusion, deposition, or implant patterned with a lithographic exposure process. The second stage is the creation of the CMOS circuitry 23 through standard CMOS process procedures. And the third stage is the creation of base 11 elements, which includes the outer wall 13, sealed cavity 14, at least one flexure 16, and air gap 17. It is contemplated that these stages can be performed in any order that the manufacturing processes allow.
The first stage includes the steps to form the at least one sensing element (e.g., sensing element 22 shown in
In an alternative aspect, the sensing element can be implemented as either an n-type or p-type poly-silicon implant 302 as shown in
The second stage includes the lithographic, implant, anneal, deposition, and etching processes to form the digital circuitry (e.g., CMOS circuitry 23 as shown in
As described above, the sensing element and digital circuitry (e.g., sensing element 22 and CMOS circuitry 23 shown in
The third stage includes the MEMS micro-machining steps that are performed on the p-type silicon wafer 101. It should be understood that the p-type silicon wafer 101 of
A MEMS switch device is also described herein. Referring now to
As described above, the MEMS switch device 50 can optionally include a plurality of sensing elements 62 configured as a Wheatstone bridge. The analog electrical signals produced by the sensing elements 62 in a Wheatstone bridge configuration can optionally be processed by complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) circuitry (e.g., digital circuitry 63) that resides on the bottom surface 58b of the base 51. In other words, both the sensing elements 62 and the CMOS circuitry can be arranged on the same surface of the base. As described above, the CMOS circuitry can include a differential amplifier or buffer, an analog-to-digital converter, a clock generator, non-volatile memory, and/or one or more digital outputs. The one or more digital outputs can be configured to change state when one or more force thresholds are reached. In this way, the MEMS switch device 50 can be used as a single-level or multi-level binary switch. For instance, in one aspect with two digital outputs, three force levels (e.g., predetermined force thresholds) can be programmed above the nominal zero-force, enabling a three-level switch.
Additionally, the CMOS circuitry can optionally include programmable memory to store trimming values that can be set during a factory calibration. The trimming values can be used to ensure that the MEMS switch device 50 provides accurate force level detection within a specified margin of error. Furthermore, the programmable memory can optionally store a device ID for traceability. This disclosure contemplates that the CMOS circuitry can include circuits other than those provided as examples. For example, this disclosure contemplates CMOS circuitry optionally including components to improve accuracy, such as an internal voltage regulator or a temperature sensor.
In one aspect, it may be desirable to maintain consistent force level transitions independent of any offset or static force applied to the MEMS switch device 50. In this aspect, the MEMS switch device 50 can be configured to compare a dynamic force to the programmed force thresholds, filtering any low frequency response caused by various conditions including mechanical preload and temperature variation. This can be achieved by performing a low-frequency baseline operation that compares the current force input to an auto-calibration threshold.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a 35 USC 371 national phase application of PCT/US2018/017564 filed on Feb. 9, 2018, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No. 62/456,699, filed on Feb. 9, 2017, and entitled “INTEGRATED DIGITAL FORCE SENSOR,” and U.S. provisional patent application No. 62/469,094, filed on Mar. 9, 2017, and entitled “SOLID STATE MECHANICAL SWITCH,” the disclosures of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2018/017564 | 2/9/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/148503 | 8/16/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4594639 | Kuisma | Jun 1986 | A |
4658651 | Le | Apr 1987 | A |
4814856 | Kurtz et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4849730 | Izumi et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4914624 | Dunthorn | Apr 1990 | A |
4918262 | Flowers et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4933660 | Wynne | Jun 1990 | A |
4983786 | Stevens | Jan 1991 | A |
5095401 | Zavracky et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5159159 | Asher | Oct 1992 | A |
5166612 | Murdock | Nov 1992 | A |
5237879 | Speeter | Aug 1993 | A |
5320705 | Fujii et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5333505 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343220 | Veasy et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5349746 | Gruenwald et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351550 | Maurer | Oct 1994 | A |
5483994 | Maurer | Jan 1996 | A |
5510812 | O'Mara et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5541372 | Baller et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5543591 | Gillespie et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5565657 | Merz | Oct 1996 | A |
5600074 | Marek et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5673066 | Toda et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5773728 | Tsukada et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5889236 | Gillespie et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5921896 | Boland | Jul 1999 | A |
5969591 | Fung | Oct 1999 | A |
6012336 | Eaton et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028271 | Gillespie et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6159166 | Chesney et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6243075 | Fishkin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6348663 | Schoos et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351205 | Armstrong | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360598 | Calame et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6437682 | Vance | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6555235 | Aufderheide et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556189 | Takahata et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6569108 | Sarvazyan et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6610936 | Gillespie et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6620115 | Sarvazyan et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629343 | Chesney et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6668230 | Mansky et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6720712 | Scott et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6788297 | Itoh et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801191 | Mukai et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809280 | Divigalpitiya et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812621 | Scott | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822640 | Derocher | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6868731 | Gatesman | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6879318 | Chan et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888537 | Benson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6915702 | Omura et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6931938 | Knirck et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6995752 | Lu | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7138984 | Miles | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7173607 | Matsumoto et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190350 | Roberts | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7215329 | Yoshikawa et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7218313 | Marcus et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224257 | Morikawa | May 2007 | B2 |
7245293 | Hoshino et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7273979 | Christensen | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7280097 | Chen et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7318349 | Vaganov et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324094 | Moilanen et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324095 | Sharma | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7336260 | Martin et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337085 | Soss | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7345680 | David | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7367232 | Vaganov | May 2008 | B2 |
7406661 | Väänänen et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7425749 | Hartzell et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426873 | Kholwadwala et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7449758 | Axelrod et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460109 | Satai et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476952 | Vaganov et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7508040 | Nikkei et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7554167 | Vaganov | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7607111 | Vaananen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7620521 | Breed et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7629969 | Kent | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7649522 | Chen et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7663612 | Bladt | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7685538 | Fleck et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7698084 | Soss | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7701445 | Inokawa et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7746327 | Miyakoshi | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7791151 | Vaganov et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7819998 | David | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7825911 | Sano et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7829960 | Takizawa | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7903090 | Soss et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7921725 | Silverbrook et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7952566 | Poupyrev et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7973772 | Gettemy et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7973778 | Chen | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8004052 | Vaganov | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8004501 | Harrison | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8013843 | Pryor | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8026906 | Mölne et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8044929 | Baldo et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8068100 | Pryor | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072437 | Miller et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8072440 | Pryor | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8096188 | Wilner | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8113065 | Ohsato et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8120586 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8120588 | Klinghult | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8130207 | Nurmi et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8134535 | Choi et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8139038 | Chueh et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8144133 | Wang et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8149211 | Hayakawa et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8154528 | Chen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8159473 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8164573 | DaCosta et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8183077 | Vaganov et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8184093 | Tsuiki | May 2012 | B2 |
8188985 | Hillis et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8199116 | Jeon et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8212790 | Rimas-Ribikauskas et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8237537 | Kurtz et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8243035 | Abe et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8250921 | Nasiri et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8253699 | Son | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260337 | Periyalwar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8269731 | Molne | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8289288 | Whytock et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289290 | Klinghult | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8297127 | Wade et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8319739 | Chu et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8325143 | Destura et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8350345 | Vaganov | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8363020 | Li et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8363022 | The et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8378798 | Bells et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8378991 | Jeon et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8384677 | Mak-Fan et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8387464 | McNeil et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8405631 | Chu et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8405632 | Chu et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8421609 | Kim et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8427441 | Paleczny et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8436806 | Almalki et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8436827 | Zhai et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8451245 | Heubel et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8456440 | Abe et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8466889 | Tong et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8477115 | Rekimoto | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8482372 | Kurtz et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8493189 | Suzuki | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8497757 | Kurtz et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8516906 | Umetsu et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8931347 | Donzier et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8973446 | Fukuzawa | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8984951 | Landmann et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9032818 | Campbell | May 2015 | B2 |
9097600 | Khandani | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9487388 | Brosh | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9493342 | Brosh | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9709509 | Yang | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9772245 | Besling et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
10962427 | Youssefi et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20010009112 | Delaye | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20030067448 | Park | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030128181 | Poole | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030189552 | Chuang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040012572 | Sowden et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040140966 | Marggraff et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050083310 | Safai et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050190152 | Vaganov | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060028441 | Armstrong | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060244733 | Geaghan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272413 | Vaganov et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060284856 | Soss | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070035525 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070046649 | Reiner | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070046 | Sheynblat et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070053 | Lapstun et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070097095 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103449 | Laitinen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103452 | Wakai et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115265 | Rainisto | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132717 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137901 | Chen | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139391 | Bischoff | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152959 | Peters | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156723 | Vaananen | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070182864 | Stoneham et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070229478 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070235231 | Loomis et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245836 | Vaganov | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070262965 | Hirai et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277616 | Nikkel et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070298883 | Feldman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001923 | Hall et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080007532 | Chen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010616 | Algreatly | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024454 | Everest | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030482 | Elwell et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080036743 | Westerman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080083962 | Vaganov | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080088600 | Prest et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080088602 | Hotelling | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080094367 | Van De Ven et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080105057 | Wade | May 2008 | A1 |
20080105470 | Van De Ven et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080106523 | Conrad | May 2008 | A1 |
20080174852 | Hirai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180402 | Yoo et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180405 | Han et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180406 | Han et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080202249 | Yokura et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204427 | Heesemans et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080211766 | Westerman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238446 | DeNatale et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080238884 | Harish | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259046 | Carsanaro | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080284742 | Prest et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080303799 | Schwesig et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090027352 | Abele | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027353 | Im et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090046110 | Sadler et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090102805 | Meijer et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090140985 | Liu | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090184921 | Scott et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090184936 | Algreatly | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090213066 | Hardacker et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090237275 | Vagnov | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237374 | Li et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090242282 | Kim et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090243817 | Son | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090243998 | Wang | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090256807 | Nurmi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090256817 | Perlin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282930 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303400 | Hou et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090309852 | Lin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090314551 | Nakajima | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100013785 | Murai et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100020030 | Kim et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100020039 | Ricks et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100039396 | Ho et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100053087 | Dai et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100053116 | Daverman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100066686 | Joguet et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100066697 | Jacomet et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079391 | Joung | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100079395 | Kim et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100079398 | Shen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097347 | Lin | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100102403 | Celik-Butler et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100117978 | Shirado | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123671 | Lee | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123686 | Klinghult et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127140 | Smith | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128002 | Stacy et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100153891 | Vaananen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164959 | Brown et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100220065 | Ma | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100271325 | Conte et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100289807 | Yu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295807 | Xie et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100308844 | Day et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100309714 | Meade | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315373 | Steinhauser et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321310 | Kim et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321319 | Hefti | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100323467 | Vaganov et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328229 | Weber et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328230 | Faubert et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001723 | Fan | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110006980 | Taniguchi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110007008 | Algreatly | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012848 | Li et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018820 | Huitema et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110032211 | Christoffersen | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110039602 | McNamara et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110050628 | Homma et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110050630 | Ikeda | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110057899 | Sleeman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063248 | Yoon | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110113881 | Suzuki | May 2011 | A1 |
20110128250 | Murphy et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110141052 | Bernstein et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110141053 | Bulea et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110187674 | Baker et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209555 | Ahles et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110227836 | Li et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242014 | Tsai et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267181 | Kildal | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110267294 | Kildal | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273396 | Chung | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291951 | Tong | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298705 | Vaganov | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110308324 | Gamage et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120032907 | Koizumi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120032915 | Wittorf | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120038579 | Sasaki | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044169 | Enami | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044172 | Ohki et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120050159 | Yu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120050208 | Dietz | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056837 | Park et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120060605 | Wu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120061823 | Wu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062603 | Mizunuma et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120068946 | Tang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120068969 | Bogana et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081327 | Heubel et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120086659 | Perlin et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092250 | Hadas et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092279 | Martin | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092294 | Ganapathi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092299 | Harada et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092324 | Buchan et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120105358 | Momeyer et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120105367 | Son et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113061 | Ikeda | May 2012 | A1 |
20120127088 | Pance et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120127107 | Miyashita et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120139864 | Sleeman et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120144921 | Bradley et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120146945 | Miyazawa et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120146946 | Wang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120147052 | Homma et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154315 | Aono | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154316 | Kono | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154317 | Aono | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154318 | Aono | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154328 | Kono | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154329 | Shinozaki | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154330 | Shimizu | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120162122 | Geaghan | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120169609 | Britton | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120169617 | Mënpää | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120169635 | Liu | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120169636 | Liu | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188181 | Ha et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120194460 | Kuwabara et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120194466 | Posamentier | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120200526 | Lackey | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204653 | August et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120205165 | Strittmatter et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218212 | Yu et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120234112 | Umetsu et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120256237 | Lakamraju et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120286379 | Inoue | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120319987 | Woo | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120327025 | Huska et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130008263 | Kabasawa et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038541 | Bakker | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130093685 | Kalu et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130096849 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130140944 | Chen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130187201 | Elian | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130239700 | Benfield et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130255393 | Fukuzawa et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130341741 | Brosh | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130341742 | Brosh | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140007705 | Campbell et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028575 | Parivar et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140055407 | Lee et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140090488 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140283604 | Najafi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140367811 | Nakagawa et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150110295 | Jenkner | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150241465 | Konishi | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160069927 | Hamamura | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160245667 | Najafi et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160332866 | Brosh et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160363490 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170103246 | Pi et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170234744 | Tung et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20190383675 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200149983 | Tsai | May 2020 | A1 |
20200234023 | Tsai et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101341459 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101458134 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101801837 | Aug 2010 | CN |
201653605 | Nov 2010 | CN |
101929898 | Dec 2010 | CN |
102062662 | May 2011 | CN |
102998037 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103308239 | Sep 2013 | CN |
102853950 | Mar 2015 | CN |
104535229 | Apr 2015 | CN |
104581605 | Apr 2015 | CN |
104919293 | Sep 2015 | CN |
105934661 | Sep 2016 | CN |
102010012441 | Sep 2011 | DE |
2004-156937 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2010147268 | Jul 2010 | JP |
9310430 | May 1993 | WO |
2004113859 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2007139695 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2011065250 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2013067548 | May 2013 | WO |
2015106246 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2019023552 | Jan 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT/US2018/017564, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 15, 2018, 11 pages. |
Mei, T., et al., “Design and Fabrication of an Integrated Three-Dimensional Tactile Sensor for Space Robotic Applications,” Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, MEMS '99, Twelfth IEEE International Conference, Orlando Florida, Jan. 21, 1999, pp. 112-117. |
Nesterov, V., et al., “Modelling and investigation of the silicon twin design 3D micro probe,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 15, 2005, pp. 514-520. |
Extended European Supplementary Search Report issued in EP 18751209.0, dated Oct. 22, 2020 (7 pages). |
Office Action issued for Chinese Application No. 201880023913.1, dated Dec. 25, 2020 (with English-language translation). |
Office Action issued for Chinese Application No. 201880023913.1, dated Sep. 10, 2021 (with English-language translation). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190383676 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62456699 | Feb 2017 | US | |
62469094 | Mar 2017 | US |