The present invention relates to an ion milling device.
An ion milling device is a device which cuts the cross section and surface of a sample by utilizing a sputtering phenomenon in which an ion beam having a uniform energy and direction is accelerated to irradiate the sample and the sample atoms are blown off from the sample surface. The ion milling device is used in a wide range of fields as a sample pretreatment device of, for example, a scanning electron microscope (SEM). As described in PTL 1, there are generally a plane milling method and a cross-section milling method. The former planar milling method is a method of directly irradiating a sample surface with an ion beam to cut the sample and has a feature that a wide range of the sample can be cut as described in PTL 2. On the other hand, in the latter cross-section milling, in order to prevent sample damage other than the processing target position due to ion beam scattering during sample processing, a shielding plate can be disposed on the upper surface of the sample other than the processing target position and the cross section of the sample protruding from an end surface of the shielding plate by several μm to 200 μm can be processed smoothly along the end surface of the shielding plate. In this case, the phenomenon that the molecules of the sputtered sample are reattached to a processed surface of the sample occurs, and when sputtered particles adhere to an observation and analysis target part, it becomes an adverse effect of observation when the processed surface is observed with an SEM or the like. Here, as a countermeasure for reducing the phenomenon that sputtered particles are reattached to the processed surface, there is a method of providing a contamination trap using a cooling mechanism disclosed in PTL 3.
PTL 1: JP-A-2013-201028
PTL 2: JP-A-1991-36285
PTL 3: JP-A-2016-173874
In cross-section milling, there is a problem that fine particles derived from a sample and sputtered by ion beam irradiation reattach to the ion milling surface and this makes it difficult to observe the ion milling surface with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) or the like. The technique using the contamination trap disclosed in PTL 3 is not an effective method in a case of processing that does not require sample cooling.
An object of the invention is to provide a technique for reducing a phenomenon in which fine particles derived from a sample and bounced off by ion beam irradiation are reattached to an ion milling surface.
In an ion milling device of the invention, an ion source which emits an ion beam, a chamber, a sample table on which a sample is placed in the chamber, a shielding plate placed on the sample, and a magnet disposed in the chamber are provided, and therefore the problem described above is solved.
According to the invention, the phenomenon that fine particles derived from a sample and bounced off by ion beam irradiation reattach to an ion milling surface can be reduced, so that a sample processed to have a favorable ion milling surface can be observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) or the like.
The sample 107 is fixed on a sample table 106 arranged in the vacuum chamber 104. Further, a sample stage 109 can be pulled out of the vacuum chamber 104 when the inside of the vacuum chamber 104 is opened to the atmosphere. The sample table 106 on which the sample 107 is fixed can be fixed on the sample table 109. A portion protruding from the shielding plate 108 of the sample 107 can be processed by fixing the shielding plate 108 on the sample 107 and being irradiated with the ion beam 102 emitted from the ion source 101.
In
The permanent magnet 201a is detachable from the sample table 106 and it can be used by fixing the sample 107 to the upper surface of the magnet holding plate 202 with the permanent magnet 201a removed. Alternatively, it can be used by removing the permanent magnet 201a and the magnet pressing plate 202 and directly fixing the sample 107 to the upper surface of the sample table 106. Further, the permanent magnet may be mounted on a holder so that it can be detached.
In particular, when a sample end surface 208 protrudes from the sample table 106 by several millimeters and is fixed to the sample table 106, the permanent magnet 201a is preferably fixed close to a sample table end surface 209 of the sample table 106. However, it is not always necessary to bring the permanent magnet 201a close to the sample table end surface 209 of the sample table 106 depending on the processing conditions such as the size and shape of the sample and the acceleration voltage.
On a lateral side of the sample 107, a permanent magnet 201b fixed to a magnet support portion 203 is disposed. The arrangement position of the permanent magnet 201b can be adjusted by a control unit 207 via the magnet support portion 203 according to the irradiation position of the ion beam 102, the intensity of the ion beam 102, the size of the sample 107, and the processing position. By adjusting the position of the magnet support portion 203, processing according to the sample can be performed without the ion beam 102 hitting the permanent magnet 201b. The shape of the permanent magnet 201b is not particularly specified in shape, such as a cylinder, or a cube or size, but it is desirable to use one having a maximum magnetic force of about 300 gauss to 400 gauss. However, it is also possible to use a permanent magnet with a maximum magnetic force outside the range of 300 gauss to 400 gauss depending on the material, size or processing position of the sample.
The ion beam 102 irradiated from the ion source 101 spreads at a constant angle from an ion beam center 204, so that the ion density at the center of the ion beam becomes higher. When the ion beam 102 is incident on the sample 107 protruding from the shielding plate 108, sample fine particles 205 of the sample sputtered out from the sample surface jump out. Here,
When the sample fine particle 205 of the sample sputtered from the sample is particularly a magnetic material, the sample fine particles 205 of the sample sputtered from the sample 107 are attracted to the magnetic force of the permanent magnet 201a arranged on the upper portion of the sample table 106, and thus the phenomenon that the sample fine particles 205 of the sample sputtered from the sample are reattached to the processed surface of the sample 107 can be reduced.
In addition, the permanent magnet 201b fixed to the magnet support portion 203 is arranged on the lateral side of the sample processing surface. Therefore, similar to the effect of the permanent magnet 201a, the sample fine particle 205 of the sample sputtered from the sample 107 is attracted to the permanent magnet 201b, and thus the phenomenon that the sample fine particles 205 of the sample sputtered from the sample 107 are reattached to the sample processing surface can be reduced.
Furthermore, not only on the sample processing surface, but also on samples where there are voids, cracks, plating defects, foreign matter, or a space derived from a laminated structure, the sample fine particles 205 of the sample sputtered from the sample 107 can be reattached to the space. However, by either one of the permanent magnet 201a and the permanent magnet 201b or a combination of both, it is possible to reduce the phenomenon that the sputtered sample fine particles 205 of the sample are reattached to the space of the sample 107. Therefore, the sample 107 is moved to the scanning electron microscope (SEM) while being placed on the sample table 106 and the processed surface of the sample 107 can be clearly observed using the scanning electron microscope (SEM) or the like. Further, since there is a concern about the influence on an electron beam due to the magnetic force of the permanent magnet 201a during the SEM observation, the influence on the electron beam is reduced by removing the permanent magnet 201a, thereby enabling effective SEM observation.
However, it is also possible to use a permanent magnet with a maximum magnetic force outside the range of 300 gauss to 400 gauss depending on the material, size, or processing position of the sample. It is possible to mount the permanent magnet 201a of which the size is also changed according to the material, size, or processing position of the sample. Further, the permanent magnet 201a is fixed inside the magnet holding plate 202 by making it in contact with the magnet holding plate 202 and the magnet holder 301. However, in the cavity inside the magnet holding plate 202, the fixing position of the permanent magnet 201a can be freely changed.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2017/033428 | 9/15/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/053871 | 3/21/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4959543 | McIver, Jr. | Sep 1990 | A |
5977553 | Oh et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6259174 | Ono | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6437864 | Watanabe | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6730916 | Tsuji | May 2004 | B1 |
8803513 | Hosek | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20150008121 | Kamino et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3-36285 | Feb 1991 | JP |
10-269984 | Oct 1998 | JP |
2009-74933 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2010-169459 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2013-201028 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2016-173874 | Sep 2016 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report (PCT/ISA/210) issued in PCT Application No. PCT/JP2017/033428 dated Nov. 21, 2017 with English translation (two (2) pages). |
Japanese-language Written Opinion (PCT/ISA/237) issued in PCT Application No. PCT/JP2017/033428 dated Nov. 21, 2017 (five (5) pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200357602 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |