Light emitting diodes (LEDs) are an important class of solid-state devices that convert electric energy to light. Improvements in these devices have resulted in their use in light fixtures designed to replace conventional incandescent and fluorescent light sources. The LEDs have significantly longer lifetimes and, in some cases, significantly higher efficiency for converting electric energy to light.
The cost and conversion efficiency of LEDs are important factors in determining the rate at which this new technology will replace conventional light sources and be utilized in high power applications. Many high power applications require multiple LEDs to achieve the needed power levels, since individual LEDs are limited to a few watts. In addition, LEDs generate light in relatively narrow spectral bands. Hence, in applications requiring a light source of a particular color, the light from a number of LEDs with spectral emission in different optical bands is combined or a portion of the light from the LED is converted to light of a different color using a phosphor. Thus, the cost of many light sources based on LEDs is many times the cost of the individual LEDs. To reduce the cost of such light sources, the amount of light generated per LED must be increased without substantially increasing the cost of each LED and without substantially lowering the conversion efficiency of the individual LEDs.
The conversion efficiency of individual LEDs is an important factor in addressing the cost of high power LED light sources. The conversion efficiency of an LED is defined to be the electrical power dissipated per unit of light that is emitted by the LED. Electrical power that is not converted to light in the LED is converted to heat that raises the temperature of the LED. Heat dissipation places a limit on the power level at which an LED operates. In addition, the LEDs must be mounted on structures that provide heat dissipation, which, in turn, further increases the cost of the light sources. Hence, if the conversion efficiency of an LED can be increased, the maximum amount of light that can be provided by a single LED can also be increased, and hence, the number of LEDs needed for a given light source can be reduced. In addition, the cost of operation of the LED is also inversely proportional to the conversion efficiency. Hence, there has been a great deal of work directed to improving the conversion efficiency of LEDs.
For the purposes of this discussion, an LED can be viewed as having three layers, the active layer sandwiched between a p-doped layer and an n-doped layer. These layers are typically deposited on a substrate such as sapphire. It should be noted that each of these layers typically includes a number of sub-layers. The overall conversion efficiency of an LED depends on the efficiency with which electricity is converted to light in the active layer. Light is generated when holes from the p-doped layer combine with electrons from the n-doped layer in the active layer.
The amount of light that is generated by an LED of a particular size can, in principle, be increased by increasing the current passing through the device, since more holes and electrons will be injected per unit area into the active layer. However, at high current densities, the efficiency with which holes combine with electrons to produce light decreases.
That is, the fractions of holes recombine without producing light increases. Hence, as the current is increased through the device, the efficiency decreases and the problems associated with high operating temperatures increase.
The present invention includes a light emitting device and method for making the same. The light-emitting device includes an active layer sandwiched between a p-type semiconductor layer and an n-type semiconductor layer. The active layer emits light when holes from the p-type semiconductor layer combine with electrons from the n-type semiconductor layer therein. The active layer includes a number of sub-layers and has a plurality of pits in which the side surfaces of a plurality of the sub-layers are in contact with the p-type semiconductor material such that holes from the p-type semiconductor material are injected into those sub-layers through the exposed side surfaces without passing through another sub-layer.
In one aspect of the invention, each sub-layer includes a substantially planar surface that is in contact with the substantially planar surface of another of the sub-layers and a plurality of side surfaces, each side surface is bounded by a wall of one of the pits. Each sub-layer is characterized by a first hole current that enters that sub-layer through the substantially planar surface and a second hole current that enters that sub-layer through the side surfaces of the sub-layer, the second hole current is greater than 10 percent of the first hole current for at least one of the sub-layers.
In another aspect of the invention, the first and second semiconductor layers comprise GaN family materials and the pits are located at dislocations in the n-type semiconductor layer.
A light emitting device according to the present invention can be fabricated by growing an epitaxial n-type semiconductor layer on a substrate and growing an active layer that includes a plurality of sub-layers on the n-type semiconductor layer under growth conditions that cause pits to form in the active layer, a plurality of the sub-layers having sidewalls that are bounded by the pits. The portion of the active layer in the pits is etched to expose the sidewalls of the sub-layers in the pits. A p-type semiconductor layer is grown epitaxially over the active layer such that the p-type semiconductor layer extends into the pits and contacts the sidewalls of the sub-layers.
In one aspect of the invention, a plurality of the sub-layers are grown and then the sidewalls of the pits are etched to expose the sidewalls of the sub-layers. In another aspect of the invention, the sidewalls of the pits are etched after each sub-layer is grown to expose the sidewalls of the sub-layers that have been deposited at that point in the processing.
In yet another aspect of the invention, etching the active layer to expose the sidewalls includes changing a gas composition in an epitaxial growth chamber in which the device is fabricated to an atmosphere that etches facets of the active layer exposed in the pits faster than facets of the active layer that are not exposed in the pits. In the case of GaN-based devices, an atmosphere that includes NH3 and/or H2 can be used at an elevated temperature to perform the etching without removing the partially fabricated device from the epitaxial growth chamber.
The manner in which the present invention provides its advantages can be more easily understood with reference to
The active layer is typically constructed from a number of sub-layers. Each sub-layer typically includes a bather layer and a quantum well layer. Holes and electrons combine within the quantum well layer to generate light. Holes can also be lost within the quantum well layer in a manner that does not generate light. Such non-productive recombination events reduce the overall efficiency of the device. The fraction of the holes that are lost by non light-producing events depends on the density of holes within the quantum well layer, higher densities leading to a greater fraction of non-productive events. Holes that do not recombine in a particular sub-layer of the active layer enter the next lowest layer where the process is repeated. At low current densities, most of the holes eventually recombine in light producing events. At high current densities, most of the holes recombine in the first quantum well layer in non-productive processes, and hence, there are very few holes available for recombination in light-producing processes in the lower sub-layers of the active layer.
The present invention is based on the observation that the problems in the prior art system arise from attempting to inject all of the holes into the sub-layers of the active layers through the topmost sub-layer. The present invention overcomes this problem by providing a layered structure that allows holes to be injected in the lower sub-layers of the active layer without requiring that the holes pass through the top sub-layer. This approach lowers the density of holes in all of the sub-layers while maintaining the total number of holes that are available for light-producing recombination events in the active layer.
Refer now to
Consider layer 34b. In a prior art device, the only holes that entered the layer analogous to layer 34b were holes that entered layer 34a and did not combine in layer 34a. In LED 30, the holes that enter layer 34b are the holes that passed through layer 34a and the holes that entered layer 34b through the sidewalls of layer 34b that are exposed in the pits. Since LED 30 is powered from a constant current source, the total number of holes that are injected per unit time is substantially the same as the number of holes injected into a prior art device. Hence, the number of holes that enter layer 34a through the top surface thereof is reduced by the number of holes that enter the various sub-layers through the sidewalls of those sub-layers. If the density of pits is sufficiently high, the density of holes in sub-layer 34a is substantially reduced, and the density of holes in the underlying sub-layers is substantially increased while maintaining the same hole current through the LED as that utilized in the prior art configuration. As a result, the overall efficiency of LED 30 is substantially increased relative to prior art devices at those current densities that lead to non-productive hole recombination events.
In one aspect of the present invention, the pits in the active layer are formed with the aid of the dislocations that arise from the difference in lattice constant between the materials from which the LED is constructed and the underlying substrate. For example, GaN-based LEDs that are fabricated on sapphire substrates include vertically propagating dislocations that result from the difference in lattice constant between the GaN-based materials and the sapphire substrate. Refer now to
Refer now to
Refer now to
In one aspect of the present invention, all of the sub-layers of the active layer are grown and then the material on facet 74 is removed by selectively etching the active layer using an etchant that attacks material on facet 74 faster than material on facet 75. This leaves the side walls of the sub-layers exposed as shown in
For example, the etching operation can be accomplished in the same growth chamber by introducing H2 into the growth chamber after the growth of the sub-layers has been completed. The growth conditions can be set to enhance etching of the desired facets by utilizing a growth temperature that is greater than or equal to 850° C. using an ambient containing NH3 and H2. In the absence of any group III materials, this ambient will etch the facets at a much higher rate than the c-plane material. Over time, the pits will open up due to the difference in etch rate between the facets and the c-plane material, and hence, expose the sidewalls of the sub-layers.
The material can also be etched chemically using a solution that preferentially etches the crystal facet relative to the c-plane face. For chemical etching, molten KOH can be used to etch the facets. Also, hot solutions of H2SO4:H3PO4 can be used to etch the material at temperatures greater than 250° C. This method requires the removal of the wafer from the growth chamber, and hence, is not preferred.
In the above examples, all of the sub-layers of the active layer are grown and then the sidewalls of the pits are selectively etched either in situ or by removing the wafer from the epitaxial growth chamber and utilizing a chemical etch. However, methods in which the sidewalls in the pits are selectively etched at the end of each deposition of each sub-layer can also be utilized. In such methods, the gaseous etch described above is utilized in situ after the deposition of each sub-layer.
Refer now to
The chamber is then switched back to the epitaxial growth mode and a second active layer, sub-layer 88, is deposited under the same growth conditions that were used to deposit sub-layer 84 as shown in
While the resulting structure is substantially the same as that obtained by utilizing the in situ stack etching procedure, the control of the etching at the individual sub-layer depositions is easier to control. For example, if the entire stack is etched at once, the last sub-layer will be significantly reduced in thickness in the planar regions between the pits. Hence, the last sub-layer thickness must be thicker to compensate for the loss in material. Thus the last sub-layer is different from the other sub-layers. If the sub-layers are etched one at a time, then all of the sub-layers will be identical.
The present invention provides its advantages by injecting a significant fraction of the holes into the active layer through the sidewalls of the sub-layers of the active region. The fraction of the hole current that is injected into the active region through the sidewalls depends on the density of pits that are introduced into the active layer. If the density of pits is too small, most of the hole current will enter the active layer through the top surface of the uppermost sub-layer of the active layer. Hence, the density of pits must be sufficient to assure that a significant fraction of the hole current enters through the sidewalls of the sub-layers that are exposed in the pits.
However, there is an upper limit on the density of pits that can be advantageously utilized. It should be noted that light is, at best, generated with reduced intensity in the pits, since a significant fraction of the active layer in the pits has been removed.
Accordingly, the density of pits is preferably adjusted to a level that allows at least 10 percent of the hole current to be injected into the sidewalls of the active layer sub-layers while maintaining the light output above that obtained without the sidewall injection scheme of the present invention. In practice, a pit density in the range of 107 to 1010 pits per cm2 is sufficient.
The density of pits in LEDs that utilize dislocations in the LED layers can be controlled by choosing the substrate on which the layers are deposited and by varying the growth conditions during the deposition of the n-type layers and any buffer layers on which these layers are deposited. The density of dislocations can be increased by choosing a substrate having a greater mismatch lattice constant with that of the n-type layers and/or by adjusting the growth conditions of the buffer layers that are deposited on the substrate prior to depositing the n-cladding layer. In addition to the sapphire substrates discussed above, SiC, AlN, and Silicon substrates could be utilized to provide different degrees of mismatch.
As noted above, one or more buffer layers of material are typically deposited on the substrate under conditions that reduce the number of dislocations that propagate into the n-cladding layer. Altering the growth conditions of the buffer layer and other layers deposited on the buffer layer also alters the density of dislocations. Growth parameters such as the V/III ratio, temperature, and growth rate all have significant effects on the dislocation density if they are changed in the early layers of the structure. Normally, these parameters are chosen to reduce the density of dislocations; however, the present invention can utilize these parameters to increase the level of dislocations.
The above-described embodiments utilize the GaN family of materials. For the purposes of this discussion, the GaN family of materials is defined to be all alloy compositions of GaN, InN and AlN. However, embodiments that utilize other material systems and substrates can also be constructed according to the teachings of the present invention.
The above-described embodiments are described in terms of “top” and “bottom” surfaces of the various layers. In general, the layers are grown from the bottom surface to the top surface to simplify the discussion. However, it is to be understood that these are merely convenient labels and are not to be taken as requiring any particular orientation with respect to the Earth.
The above-described embodiments of the present invention have been provided to illustrate various aspects of the invention. However, it is to be understood that different aspects of the present invention that are shown in different specific embodiments can be combined to provide other embodiments of the present invention. In addition, various modifications to the present invention will become apparent from the foregoing description and accompanying drawings. Accordingly, the present invention is to be limited solely by the scope of the following claims.
This application is a Divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/626,474, filed on Nov. 25, 2009, the contents of which are all herein incorporated by this reference in their entireties. All publications, patents, patent applications, databases and other references cited in this application, all related applications referenced herein, and all references cited therein, are incorporated by reference in their entirety as if restated here in full and as if each individual publication, patent, patent application, database or other reference were specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5306662 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5408120 | Manabe et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5468678 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5563422 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5578839 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5734182 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5747832 | Nakamura et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753939 | Sassa et al. | May 1998 | A |
5777350 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5959307 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959401 | Asami et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6005258 | Manabe et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6040588 | Koide et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
RE36747 | Manabe et al. | Jun 2000 | E |
6215133 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6265726 | Manabe et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6326236 | Koide et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329667 | Ota et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6420733 | Koide et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6541293 | Koide et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6610995 | Nakamura et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6657236 | Thibeault et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6800500 | Coman et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6838693 | Kozaki | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849881 | Harle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6891197 | Bhat et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6906352 | Edmond et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916676 | Sano et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6951695 | Xu et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6977395 | Yamada et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7026653 | Sun | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7106090 | Harle et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115908 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7138286 | Manabe et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7193246 | Tanizawa et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7262436 | Kondoh et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7312474 | Emerson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7335920 | Denbaars et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7345297 | Yamazoe et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7348602 | Tanizawa | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7402838 | Tanizawa et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7442966 | Bader et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446345 | Emerson et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7491565 | Coman et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7547908 | Grillot et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7611917 | Emerson et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7635875 | Niki et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7709851 | Bader et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7737459 | Edmond et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7754514 | Yajima et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7791061 | Edmond et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7791101 | Bergmann et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7795623 | Emerson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7910945 | Donofrio et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7939844 | Hahn et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7947994 | Tanizawa et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8021904 | Chitnis | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8030665 | Nagahama et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20030001161 | Ota et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20060246612 | Emerson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070057249 | Kim et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090191658 | Kim et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2626431 | May 1994 | JP |
2681733 | May 1994 | JP |
2917742 | Jun 1994 | JP |
2827794 | Aug 1994 | JP |
2778405 | Sep 1994 | JP |
2803741 | Sep 1994 | JP |
2785254 | Jan 1995 | JP |
2735057 | Mar 1996 | JP |
2956489 | Mar 1996 | JP |
2666237 | Dec 1996 | JP |
2890396 | Dec 1996 | JP |
3250438 | Dec 1996 | JP |
3135041 | Jun 1997 | JP |
3209096 | Dec 1997 | JP |
3506874 | Jan 1998 | JP |
3654738 | Feb 1998 | JP |
3795624 | Feb 1998 | JP |
3304787 | May 1998 | JP |
3344257 | Aug 1998 | JP |
3223832 | Sep 1998 | JP |
3374737 | Dec 1998 | JP |
3314666 | Mar 1999 | JP |
4118370 | Jul 1999 | JP |
4118371 | Jul 1999 | JP |
3548442 | Aug 1999 | JP |
3622562 | Nov 1999 | JP |
3424629 | Aug 2000 | JP |
4860024 | Aug 2000 | JP |
3063756 | Sep 2000 | JP |
4629178 | Sep 2000 | JP |
3063757 | Oct 2000 | JP |
3511970 | Oct 2000 | JP |
3551101 | May 2001 | JP |
3427265 | Jun 2001 | JP |
3646649 | Oct 2001 | JP |
3780887 | May 2002 | JP |
3890930 | May 2002 | JP |
3786114 | Apr 2004 | JP |
4904261 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2007-214548 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2008-218746 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2008-277714 | Nov 2008 | JP |
10-2006-0027133 | Mar 2006 | KR |
Entry |
---|
International Seach Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2010/051205, Apr. 29, 2011. |
Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2010/051205, Dated May 30, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130316483 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12626474 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 13959297 | US |